White House OFFICIALLY Accuses Fauci Of COVID Crimes!
The Trump White House re-launched the govenrment’s official COVID-19 website on Friday. The revamped site blames the origins of the coronavirus on a lab leak in China while criticizing former President Joe Biden, former top U.S. health official Anthony Fauci and the World Health Organization. The website is also critical of steps like social distancing, mask mandates and lockdowns. Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss how not even this level of government sanctioned critique of the nation’s COVID policy will be sufficient to shake some hopeless deadenders in the media and comedy community who refuse to engage in even the most cursory reexamination of their mistaken views over the pandemic. Plus segments on British political commentator Douglas Murray’s savage takedown of… British political commentator Douglas Murray, Trump’s all-out assault on academic freedom and Chinese commentators’ better understanding of the United States than Americans’. Also featuring Stef Zamorano!
We're going to be in Bakersfield, San Jose, California, Buffalo, New York, Toledo, Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa, Glasgow, Manchester, Belfast, Dublin, Liverpool, Birmingham, and London.
Go to jimmydoor.com for a link for tickets.
Establishment media sucks.
All gaslighting, so good luck.
Bullshit we can't afford.
Fomenting this.
Watch and see as the jack off.
The median speeds and jumps the medium.
And hits them head on.
It's the Chimitor Show.
you you Donald Trump, if you see this right here, that's called covid.gov.
You just revamped the website.
Donald Trump's White House just revamped the, and they got all kinds of stuff.
They got all kinds of stuff.
And so I'm going to show you.
By the way, that this is a thing that you're showing me.
I did not know about this.
This is real.
And I tweeted out, I said the White House just updated COVID.gov, and it accuses Fauci of lying and covering up the origin of COVID-19 virus, making up anti-science policies like social distancing, lockdowns, and masks.
And of course, people doing their own research knew all of this four years ago, which is why we were censored, smeared, and slandered.
The completely corrupt corporate media was also responsible and on the forefront of lying, pushing fake science, and slandering the doctor, scientists, and journalists who were telling the truth and exposing the lies.
The thing that still blows my mind the most, and this really does, is that the people who do independent news shows, many of whom I know personally, completely went along with the lies,
defended Big Pharma and the government's lies, and cowardly refused to use their own critical thinking skills and still are gutless cowards, afraid to cover the biggest story of their lives.
I know these people personally.
And they call themselves truth tellers.
And they call themselves rebels.
And people who push back against the powerful.
And they went along with fascism at the blink of an eye.
And they still, still won't talk about it.
Yeah, well these people are programmed to think fascism is not what it is.
So that's how you get that.
They don't have principles.
They have the flavor that they got programmed into.
They just got afraid.
They just got afraid.
They got afraid of being ostracized.
And so they cowered.
They still do it.
And they still won't look into it.
Hey, if you do an independent news show and you still wear a mask.
Your independent news show is worth shit.
And you're worth shit.
So I told you my friend that was visiting this comic was there.
And he goes, yes, if I believe in God.
And I said, yes.
I didn't say what I believe in in any way.
He goes, oh, you think there's a man in the sky?
He really steel manned my argument for me.
And then he thinks that Epstein killed himself and there was no lab leak.
Ha!
Wow.
So I go on to say they, the people in independent news, they push the lies, the slander of people like Joe Rogan, Dr. Robert Malone, RFK Jr., and me with zeal and zero shame.
And they will never atone or apologize.
I, for one, will never forget.
will continue to call for accountability and prosecutions and i hope you do too so let's look into um so here's this is the new website the true origins of covet 19 this is what it says if you go to covid.gov and then it has right down there it says the origin and then it has the virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature
Data shows that all COVID-19 cases stem from a single introduction into humans.
This runs contrary to previous pandemics where there were multiple spillover events.
Wuhan is home to China, China's foremost SARS research lab, which has a history of conducting gain-of-function research, gene-altering, and organism supercharging at inadequate biosafety levels.
that's
what it now says at covid.org covet.gov now just because wuhan is the home of china's sars research lab that doesn't mean that the bioweapon was created in china that's racist right probably in raleigh it's probably it's probably palestinians who did it right they created oh it was probably the salamicists so here i'm gonna break it down for you there's a little bit and it also goes on to say the wuhan institute
of virology researchers were sick with COVID-like symptoms in the fall of 2019, which was months before COVID-19 was discovered at the wet market.
The wet market.
Yeah, those markets were totally dry by the time this all came out.
By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of natural origin, it would have already surfaced.
But it hasn't.
So here they have this whole list of things.
I'm going to go through them for you.
Proximal origin publication.
The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 publication that was in Nature magazine or Nature's website.
And it was, Matt Orfala got a hold of the emails that showed that it was all rigged.
That the scientists who first were sent there to discover where the virus came from, they all said it came from a lab.
And then Fauci said, hey, I'm going to give you eight or nine million dollars in research funds.
And they all flipped.
And they were like, oh, no, no, no.
It came from a wet market.
By the way, that article, still not retracted by Nature magazine.
Still up.
And it's called the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2, which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab league theory, was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated in nature.
So they're saying Dr. Fauci pushed the lie.
They're saying this now at COVID.gov.
The gain of function research, a lab-related incident involving gain of function research, is the most likely the origin of COVID-19.
Current government mechanisms for overseeing this dangerous gain of function research are incomplete, severely convoluted, and lack global applicability.
Do you remember when Dr. Fauci said to Rand Paul when he was tested, this is not gain of function, and you don't know what you're talking about?
Well, that was Dr. Fauci lying to Congress, but he now has a blanket pardon.
So he can't be prosecuted for that.
I, for one, am hurt that someone that looks that much like Pinocchio would turn out to be a liar.
And still, still people with YouTube shows who call themselves anti-establishment, independent media truth tellers won't talk about this.
They're not going to talk about it because they're coward gutless and they throw away their critical thinking skills on purpose.
Well, a lot of them are on SSRIs that are made by these fine pharma companies that help you not feel the evil you do in this world.
They went from being the people who are supposed to be poking holes in the status goal and pointing out where big pharma and the government are criminally lying to you to repeating the criminal lies and slandering anybody who looked into it.
I was, I personally was on the receiving end of that from people who have shows still on YouTube.
Like the Young Turks, for instance.
I'll just name one, the Young Turks.
People with MSNBC contracts.
Of course, what are you going to get except big pharma propaganda?
Echo Health Alliance, Inc.
I can't believe people, after people, after they were lied to repeatedly about everything from Russia Gate to COVID to mass to the Wuhan virus to lockdowns to the vaccines to the Ukraine war to Joe Biden not being demented, they still go back to those same news organizations that lied about all those things and they still go back to them for their news and information.
Who am I supposed to go to?
Putin?
Right?
So Echo Health, under the leadership of Dr. Peter Dasik, used the United States taxpayer dollars to facilitate dangerous gain of function research in Wuhan, China.
After the select subcommittee released evidence of Echo Health violating the terms of its NIH grant, the United States Department of Health and Human Services, which is what RFK is in charge of now, back then, they commenced official department proceedings and suspended all funding to Echo Health.
But new evidence also shows that the Department of Justice has opened an investigation into Echo Health's pandemic era activities.
Well, that's good.
The NIH failures.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, friend of the show, is now he's in charge.
A guy who got COVID right, a guy who was an author of the great Barrington Declaration, which said you shouldn't do lockdowns.
You should only vaccinate the vulnerable.
And he was slandered.
He was immediately slandered by the Atlantic and all the mainstream news media.
Now he's the head of the NIH.
The Atlantic, the reliable jobs publication, friend of UAI.
NIH's procedures for funding and overseeing potentially dangerous research are deficient, unreliable, and pose a serious threat to both public health and national security.
Further, the NIH fostered an environment that promoted evading federal record-keeping laws, as seen through the actions of Dr. David Morins and the FOIA, the FOIA lady, Marge Moore.
So that was Fauci's number one assistant.
And that was another lady at the NIH who was called the FOIA lady, Marge Moore, who showed people how to evade federal FOIA requests.
That nickname's great.
It sounds like you'd see her at like Foxwoods Casino, the FOIA lady.
The FOIA lady.
And here we see Anthony Fauci checking his breath before he drops to his knees to give Satan a blowjob and thanks for a pardon.
This is all up at COVID.gov now.
This, this is up too.
It says a full and unconditional pardon for any offenses against the United States, which may have committed or taken pardon from January 1st, 2014.
That's what the pardon of Anthony Fauci says.
Now the Trump administration has put this up with this picture at legal argil bargle, Jimmy.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So the Department of HHS Health and Human Services obstruction.
Again, now RFK is in charge of this agency.
The Biden administration's HHS engaged in a multi-year campaign of delay, confusion, and non-responsiveness in an attempt to obstruct the select committee subcommittee's investigation and hide evidence that could incriminate or embarrass senior public health officials.
It appears that HHS even intentionally under-resourced its component that responds to legislative oversight requests.
So again, all the people who are screaming about Joe Rogan and Jimmy Dore and Dr. Robert Malone and anybody else who was actually telling the truth, they're not going to Be screaming about that they were lied to by their government about it.
They're not going to be screaming that they were lied to by big pharma.
They're not going to be screaming that they were lied to by corporate media.
They're just going to try to ignore it.
Because to be mad about it is fascism, Jimmy.
Echo Health Alliance, Echo Health Alliance obstruction.
Echo Health President Dr. Peter Dazik obstructed the select subcommittee's investigation by providing publicly available information, instructing his staff to reduce the scope and pace of production and doctoring, doctoring documents before releasing them to the public.
Further, Dr. Deswick provided false statements to Congress.
But those people who hate me hate Joe Rogan are never going to be upset at this, at the people in actual power who lied to them about everything that had to do with COVID.
They lied about the virus, that they funded the creation of it.
They created the virus.
Joe Rogan didn't create it.
Fauci, the people who they worship created the virus that led to lockdowns, which had no science behind them, that led to mask mandates, which had no science behind them, which led to vaccine mandates, which also had anti-science behind them.
New York obstruction.
Now, this gets really, this is all up at COVID.gov.
New York's executive chamber, held presently by Governor Kathy Hokle, redacted documents, offered numerous illegitimate privilege claims, and withheld thousands of documents without an apparent legal basis to obstruct the select subcommittee's investigation into former Governor Cuomo's pandemic era failures.
He's running for mayor.
He's running for office again.
And he's running for mayor.
He's got the experience, Jimmy.
The World Health Organization, the WHO's response to the COVID-19 pandemic was an abject failure because it caved to pressure from the Chinese Communist Party and placed China's political interests ahead of its international duties.
Further, the WHO's newest effort to solve the problems exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic via the pandemic treaty may harm the United States.
You think that's one of the things that wasn't the CCP?
Not Bill Gates.
I think it was Bill Gates.
It's the CCP.
Yeah.
Thank God Trump, one of the first things he did was withdraw the United States from the WHO.
That is good.
That is good.
Social.
I hate that they go because I'm sure the CCP is part of it, but Fauci's part of it.
A bunch of people that aren't Chinese are part of this.
Bill Gates.
They're in league with it.
That's right.
So quit trying to blame China.
Shot him out.
Yeah.
So social distancing.
The six feet apart social distancing recommendation, which shut down schools and small businesses across the country was arbitrary.
And it wasn't based on science.
During closed-door testimony, Dr. Fauci testified that the guidance just sort of appeared.
I showed you that video.
Just sort of appeared.
Wasn't based on science.
Mask mandates.
There was no conclusive evidence that masks effectively protected Americans from COVID-19.
In fact, all the evidence went the other way.
Public health officials flip-flopped on the efficiency of masks without providing American scientific data, causing a massive uptick in public distrust.
Oh, I thought Putin did that.
Lockdowns, prolonged lockdowns caused immeasurable harm to not only the American economy, but also to the mental and physical health of Americans, which with a particularly negative effect on younger citizens.
Rather than prioritizing the protection of most vulnerable populations, federal and state government policies forced millions of Americans to forego crucial elements of healthy and financially sound life.
Oh, like when they put sand in skate parks and they were arresting people surfing.
Yeah.
That's a great podcast topic for the next Gavin Newsom show.
Yeah, yeah.
Hey, it's Governor Newsom.
Hey.
But hey, hey.
Hey.
Yeah.
The Newsome Shake I do.
The Newsome Shimmy.
Hey, you're just not looking at the upsides of lockdowns, Kurt.
Now millions of people think they are master chefs and can do their own plumbing.
That would have never happened.
That would have never happened if they were allowed to go outdoors.
There's a lot more lockpicking lawyers than there were before.
That's true.
That's true.
The New York pandemic failures.
Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's March 25th order, which forced nursing homes to accept COVID-19 positive patients, was medical malpractice.
Evidence shows that Mr. Cuomo and his administration worked to cover up the tragic aftermath of their policy decisions in an apparent effort to shield themselves from accountability.
You remember they gave Andrew Hollywood gave Andrew Cuomo an Emmy for his performance during COVID?
I guess because he was acting because he was lying and he was doing he was doing the, but then they took it away, not because he was lying and he was wrong about COVID and he did a policy that killed people, but because he got caught doing grab ass.
Same way they did Dr. Cosby.
Here it is.
Here's how it appears on the website.
They have this picture of Andrew Cuomo with a mask in his hand.
Evidence suggests Mr. Cuomo knowingly and willingly made false statements to the select subcommittee on numerous occasions about material aspects of New York's COVID-19 nursing home disaster and the ensuing cover-up.
The select subcommittee referred Mr. Cuomo to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution.
That never happened.
Well, now let's see what Pam Bondi is going to do.
I mean, this is a cool website, but I love how so far everything's on the verge of something big happening.
But nothing's going to happen yet.
But I got high hopes.
And this is the final slide, the COVID-19 misinformation.
Public health officials often misled the American people through conflicting messaging, knee-jerk reactions, and lack of transparency.
Most egregiously, the federal government demonized alternative treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, steroids, and disfavored narratives such as the lab leak theory in a shameful effort to coerce and control the American people's health decisions.
When those efforts failed, the Biden administration resorted to outright censorship, coercing and colluding with the world's largest social media companies to censor all COVID-19-related dissent.
And again, all the people I know in independent news are too big of gutless cowards to actually even talk about it, to actually even talk about it.
Pretend it didn't happen.
And they pretended it wasn't happening while it was happening.
Well, Kim Iverson did, and she got fired off the hill.
Right.
So there was Joe Rogan.
There was this show and Kim Iverson.
Can you name it?
Russell Brand said it.
Who?
Russell Brand.
Oh, and Russell Brand.
That's right.
Russell Brand.
And look what happened to Russell Brand.
Can you think of another show that bothered to cover this stuff?
I can't.
I can't think of another show.
And this all comes from the House Oversight Report from December 4th, 2024.
And that's now when you go to COVID.gov, that's what you see, what I just showed you.
So good on Trump for doing that.
I know.
It's very strange to see a thing I like after a thing I don't like so quickly.
Yep, isn't it?
So it's a mixed bag with the Trump administration.
Mixed bag.
Oh, redacted said.
Redacted said it.
We're at.
Oh, redacted?
Okay.
Redacted.
Oh, Tucker Carlson, but he didn't.
He was still on Fox.
So he was the one guy in the corporate media telling the truth.
So good on redacted, good on Tucker Carlson.
Oh, you know what?
I know Max Blumenthal also.
Yeah.
Okay, Max Blumenthal.
They put up a good Buchaley report on Grey Zone yesterday.
It's very good.
Oh, really?
Oh, yeah.
You know how it seemed pretty cool at first?
It might not be that cool.
turns out he's not as cool as you think.
Yeah.
It's not a good sign.
And what Bukali would tell you is like, well, we went from the most dangerous country in the world to the safest.
Yeah, but at what price?
I get it.
You're down to Firefest in a minute, buddy, because there's such a crypto country that I think the money that he, you know, you know, they promised the money is going to roll in.
I think the money might be because they're spare Guantanamo now.
And I think that's my guess from what I watch in Max's thing.
I haven't finished it, but I'll bet you whatever bonus they're getting for taking prisoners to America, he's going to need that to prop up whatever the hell he's doing with his, you know?
And meanwhile, Malay just pumped and dumped a crypto coin to everybody.
People in America.
He just hawked to in America, by the way.
People invested in his dumb coin.
That's the Argentinian president.
Yeah, he's a Chabad convert.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydoorcomedy.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
So our friend Turncoat Don did one of these great video.
Remember, so Douglas Murray and Dave Smith had their famous debate.
It was a non-debate.
Douglas Murray wanted to debate about debating.
And someone tried to make, someone, well, anyway, let me just show it to you.
So of course there's a video out there because Douglas Murray's whole thing was to obfuscate and talk in circles and use circular logic and try to talk and try to talk about credentialism, meaning you don't have a right to make these arguments.
Instead of engaging in the arguments, he did everything except engage in the argument.
And so, of course, there's a video out there of him making fun of himself for what he did on Joe Rogan with Dave Smith.
Of course, there's a previous version of himself arguing against the exact thing he did during that debate.
So let's, and Turncoke Dodd put it together.
Have you seen this yet, Kurt?
Let's watch.
No, no, no, no.
This is Douglas Murray versus Douglas Murray violence.
Have you been to the crossing point?
When were you last there at all?
You've never been.
You've never been.
That's my favorite.
It's got to be one of my favorite quotes of this year for sure.
You've never been.
Like this fake, this faux outrage.
You've never been.
Are you inviting me?
No, I've never been dogwalked by the IDF, by the Israeli army through an occupation zone.
No, I've never been dogwalked.
No, they didn't offer me a Hasbara trip so I could be a propagandist for them.
Well, how else would I go there to see the checkpoints?
Right?
Would they just let you wander over and check them out?
You know, they're just, you know, they slaughtered over 200 journalists who went there.
Also, I don't want to be killed by the IDF.
Yes.
In an accident?
Here we go.
Ready?
Talking about an issue in a region you haven't even had the courtesy to visit whilst developing all of these views about it.
If the words were violent.
I really resent that form of argumentation.
I really resent it.
I have the Right to talk about whatever the hell I want, and no one's going to stop me or try to intimidate me.
Seriously, is that a reasonable form of argument?
You haven't been through everything I've been through in my life, therefore you can't comment.
No.
In that case, nobody can talk about anything.
We might as well pack up, go home, and isolate ourselves.
In terms of wanting to listen to another person who has experienced something, yes.
Yes.
But not endlessly.
Not endlessly.
I mean, there are some people who've written about the, I mean, there are people who've written about the Holocaust who didn't experience the Holocaust and have written about it better than people who did.
The almost aggressive tone in which this is now leveled, I don't like the sound of.
Nobody's experience is completely understandable by another human being.
Nobody's.
This idea that the lived experience has to triumph over everything else is not always correct.
Lived experience over the data is a very bad direction of travel, which we've been imbibing for some time now.
Because we all have lived experience.
We all have personal experience.
But if we claim that, as it were, I cannot understand you and you cannot understand me because I have lived.
Well, this is an impossible game.
Because if we can never understand each other, because you have had your experience and I have had mine, then where exactly do we go?
I think personal experience, lived experience is very important.
But we also have to be able to get beyond that to say, okay, but what is the data?
What are the facts?
What are the provable discussions that we can have here?
So of the great job by Turncoat Don.
Of course, there's a video out there of him and several videos of him completely contradicting his stupid line of arguing or debating.
You've never been.
I thought you'd have the courtesy to visit the current.
My money had the courtesy to visit and build a goddamn checkpoint.
Is that not enough courtesy?
How about that?
They took my tax powers and did it.
Yeah.
The courtesy.
I got a courtesy that I'm going to pay for this no matter whether I like it or not, right?
Dickhead.
The courtesy.
Lived experience.
Here's why I realize.
One, the stupid term woke right.
I know what the woke right is.
It's Zionists.
That's what the woke right is.
All those little tricks of wokery are old Zionist tricks.
Yes.
All of them.
So what the woke right is.
So how the woke left calls everything racism.
The woke right, Zionists call everything anti-Semitism.
I don't think that's what James Lindsay was trying to say when he called Dave Smith woke right.
I think he did not understand what he was saying, but now I understand what he's saying.
And it's Zionists.
That's very obvious.
Yeah.
Also, lived experience.
You mean experience?
Yeah, that's just experience.
What are you talking about?
My lived experience.
What kind of experience could you have?
Oh, when I was dead for a while, I had that experience.
Yeah, life in and of itself is experience.
So the reason they're calling it lived experience is because it's personal experience.
But personal experience doesn't carry the weight of a brand new phrase that came out of action.
Yeah, that's just called redundancy over and over.
It's an insult to anybody who's intelligent at all.
But guess what?
Most people are in a daze and they just say the duck.
Everybody forgets the definition of words because the herd has my lived experience.
One of the most cringe phrases to come out of the human race in the last couple of years.
My lived experience.
My experience.
How about your just your experience?
It's been my experience.
Has it been your lived experience?
Well, I didn't live.
I didn't live.
This morning I pooped the shit.
Oh, really?
Did you live it?
Yeah.
Were you living?
And then I don't know how to say it, but I want to try and be redundant.
Let's watch it again.
Have you been to the crossing point?
When were you last there at all?
You've never been.
Talking about an issue in a region you haven't even had the courtesy to visit whilst developing all of these views about it.
How discourteous of you, Dave.
That is so rude.
Is that what you call dollars of expensive trip courtesies?
It costs me too many courtesies to make the trip because I have to pay taxes to support building your apartheid state.
I really resent that form of argumentation.
Sure.
I really resent it.
Really?
I have the right to talk about whatever the hell I want.
And no one's going to stop me or try to intimidate me.
Seriously, is that a reasonable form of argument?
You haven't been through everything I've been through in my life, therefore you can't comment.
No.
In that case, nobody can talk about anything.
We might as well pack up, go home, and isolate ourselves.
In terms of wanting to listen to another person who has experienced something, yes.
Yes.
But not endlessly.
Not endlessly.
I mean, there are some people who've written about the, I mean, there are people who've written about the Holocaust who didn't experience the Holocaust and have written about it better than people who did.
The almost aggressive tone in which this is now leveled, I don't like the sound of.
Nobody's experience is completely understandable by another human being.
Nobody's.
This idea that the lived experience has to triumph over everything else is not always correct.
Lived experience over the data is a very bad direction of travel, which we've been imbibing for some time now.
Because we all have lived experience.
We all have personal experience.
But if we claim that, as it were, I cannot understand you and you cannot understand me because I have lived.
Well, this is an impossible game.
Because if we can never understand each other, because you have had your experience and I have had mine, then where exactly do we go?
I think personal experience, lived experience is very important.
But we also have to be able to get beyond that to say, okay, but what is the data?
What are the facts?
What are the provable discussions that we can have here?
*laughter*
All right.
Dave was out with Piers Morgan yesterday, and they had another guy with another British accent do the same stuff.
Try to tell Dave he doesn't know about Wool Research 101.
I'll give you a class on it.
Like, oh, my God.
Anyway.
Oh, my God.
Don't, Dave, don't take that class.
It's going to be with his dick.
All right, Obrisa.
That's great that Dave's doing it.
It only elevates his visibility for people that otherwise aren't aware of him.
Because Dave does stand up.
So, because Dave is used to having to speak to people so they can understand it and not just bloviating into the camera, which all these people is what they're used to doing is like dazzling you with their accent and that kind of horseshit.
It's amazing watching him talk to these people and how poorly they do.
Yeah.
Yeah.
He totally can like debate them so quickly.
And it's like he doesn't stumble.
He has the facts.
He's all ready to go.
And they don't.
Hey, it's hard to know what's misinformation.
Is it?
Because I notice here's a little trick I like to use.
If you ask a direct question and they don't answer it, then they're probably lying to you.
Right.
So the Trump administration sent a letter to Harvard about their policy changes that Trump is demanding they make in order to continue to receive federal funding.
First of all, I don't understand why Harvard needs federal funding at all.
I would say just stop.
Why not just cut the federal funding?
They have a $50 billion endowment.
They don't need the tuition from their students.
They don't need federal money.
But this is Trump trying to control them, right?
Here we go.
So Trump's administration's threat letter to Harvard demands a comprehensive audit of anti-Semitism, followed by a demand for the abolition of DEI, including speech control policies.
Wow.
As if there's no conceivable contradiction there.
So they're policing your speech.
And then they want you to, but they want you to not police other speech.
Just police the speech that Israel wants.
So they're getting rid of the DEI speech policing and they're replacing it with the Israel police speeching.
Which admittedly is less politically correct.
It's a lot more racist, put it that way.
This is a continuation of that lady that kind of looked like Mayor Chocolate Rain of L.A. She was the head of Harvard, the first black woman, and she was a plagiarist.
You remember this story?
Yes.
And they were asking her, is genocide wrong?
And she couldn't just go, yes, genocide is wrong.
That's what this is.
So this is where, this is part of the letter.
Reforming programs with egregious records of anti-Semitism or other bias.
By August 2025, the university shall commission an external party which shall satisfy the federal government as to its competence and good faith to audit those programs and departments that most fuel anti-Semitic harassment or reflect ideological capture.
So this is thought policing.
This is just, remember how everybody hated the hate speech laws?
This is Trump's hate speech laws.
It sounds like it's not even for America.
It's for another country, which are full of, which is just a terrorist country, Israel, which has led us into every war that Trump claims he hated.
The Iraq war, the Libyan war, the Syrian war, Lebanon, the genocide in Gaza, Yemen bombing, the Sudan, Somalia, all at the behest of Israel.
So this is worse than hate speech laws.
Well, it's the new hate speech laws.
And Trump is doing it.
The era of free speech never got here.
It never got here.
Are you sure you're not just doing the anti-Israel grift?
That's a real phrase.
I know.
Yeah.
You know how all the money's in anti-Israel stuff.
Just ask those people.
So here it is.
They want to have a, they want the university to set up an external committee to monitor your speech, not only your speech, but if you have a, if you reflect ideological capture.
This is thought police stuff.
And then at the bottom, it says discontinuation of DEI.
The university must immediately shutter all diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, offices, committees, positions, and initiatives under whatever name and stop all DEI-based policies, including DEI-based disciplinary or speech control policies.
So they're against a certain kind of speech control policies while they're instituting a way worse speech control policy because this speech control policy covers me because I'm going to tell you the truth about Israel.
I'm going to tell you the truth that they're committing ethnic cleansing and they're targeting children on purpose.
They're committing murder and genocide and siege warfare.
Well, you know, Jimmy, you know why the significance of Harvard is?
Because these are the rich kids that pull the levers of power.
Hopefully, once they get put through this and they come out, people like you won't be allowed to exist because they'll be running the Justice Department, right?
Yes.
And so all the assholes, all the liberal progressive assholes who were forced monitoring speech under DEI, because I've seen everybody, I've seen everybody from every lefty to every, even comedians advocating for hate speech laws.
Well, now it's being used on you.
Now it's being used on you when you want to criticize the United States government and Israel and their policies of genocide.
Now it's being used.
So do you see why it's important that you have to stand up for the speech you hate?
So the stupid fucking progressive asshole liberals who wanted hate speech laws to censor people.
Well, if you're not for the speech you hate, you're not for free speech.
And now, that same ideology is being used against you when you want to criticize Israel.
Do you not see that?
Do you not see how the stupid let this is this is uh this is just woke.
This is just Israeli wokeness.
Are you talking to the big head girl from the Puerto Rico from Snow White that said Free Palestine and everybody hates her?
So Wesley and Princeton and now Harvard are refusing to capitulate to Trump really makes Columbia look quite bad.
A disturbing, so I guess I guess they're not going along with it.
So Trump's going to pull their federal funding.
And I say, good.
Those places don't need federal funding.
Did the doge find that?
You know, what should be happening at Columbia is that the faculty should be walking out over what?
Over academic freedom, over free speech.
They should be, and so should the students, but they're not.
They're knuckling under at Columbia.
Isn't that amazing?
But they're standing up at Wesleyan, Princeton, and now Harvard.
So the U.S. Department of Education, along with the Departments of Health and Human Services and the General Services Administration, sent a letter to Harvard University demanding extensive policy changes to maintain nearly $9 billion in federal funding.
The demands included eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, banning masks at protests.
What are the feds going to do now?
Because they all wear masks at protests.
Ensuring viewpoint diversity in hiring and admissions and reporting foreign students who violate conduct rules to federal authorities.
So they want you to snitch on your neighbor.
This is Nazi shit.
Not when we do it.
Not when we do it.
The letter accused Harvard of failing to address anti-Semitism and promote.
You know what?
You know what fuels anti-Semitism?
This.
Trump trying to make it illegal to criticize Israel.
That's what fuels anti-Semitism.
That's what makes people go, hey, I wonder if there's a cabal of Jews who are, I wonder if they're actually pulling the levers of power and controlling things.
That's what spurs all that.
You'd think a smarty pan school like Harvard would teach the basic fact that Arabs are also Semites.
So it's kind of absurd to do that exclusively for Jews when you say anti-Semitism.
And by the way, the Jews aren't Semites.
Most of the people in Israel aren't Semites.
That's why every prime minister of Israel changed their name to sound more like they're from the region.
They're all from DNA test unless a court okays it in Israel because they don't want people to know that they're not Semites.
This sounds very trans.
And Trump is threatening to freeze $2.2 billion in grants and $60 million in contracts if it's unmet.
The letter also required audits of academic programs, particularly those suspected of fueling anti-Semitism and reform to governance and disciplinary processes.
Harvard's refusal marked a shift from other universities like Columbia, which complied with similar demands to avoid the funding cuts.
The conflict reflects broader tensions between the Trump administration and elite universities over issues like anti-Semitism, free speech, and DEI initiatives.
So Trump's getting rid of one set of hate speech rules and he's implementing them with a much more insidious set of hate speech rules.
The effect is a chill on academic freedom, debate, discussion, all that stuff that who's the guy from the Daily Wire?
Ben Shapuro said that you're a snowflake.
You're a snowflake if you can't handle robust debate.
Facts don't care about your feelings.
Facts don't care about your feelings.
Higher Ed War heats up as Trump threatens Harvard's tax-exempt status.
President Trump threatened on social media to revoke the tax-exempt status of Harvard University.
Perhaps Harvard should lose its tax-exempt status and be taxed as a political entity if it keeps pushing political, ideological, and terrorist-inspired supporting sickness, Trump said in a true social post.
By the way, it should.
They should.
Tax them.
They make billions of people.
Tax them.
Look how much money they make.
Tax them.
They're not a church.
His comments marked the latest volley in a battle between the Trump administration and the wealthiest college in the world.
A battle that heated up last Friday when the administration sent Harvard a list of demands it said must be met or risk losing $9 billion.
They have a $50 billion endowment.
They don't need your money.
Yeah.
Harvard's president yesterday rejected the administration's demands, saying they were illegal and an intolerable attempt to dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.
I have to admit, I side with Harvard on this, even though I don't think they should be getting federal money in the first place.
The administration responded within hours, freezing more than $2.2 billion in grants and multi-year contracts to Harvard, much of it intended for research on a wide range of subjects.
Many higher education leaders welcomed Harvard's stance, saying the school was uniquely positioned to take the lead.
Harvard really had no choice given the extent the demands the Trump administration made on it, said Michael Dorff, a law professor at Cornell.
Ted Mitchell, the president of the American Council of Education, an organization that represents 1,600 colleges and universities, said that by taking the lead, Harvard paved the way for other institutions to oppose the administration's demand.
Finally, finally, somebody standing up to Trump's woke policies of policing speech.
Because that's what this is.
So the thing you thought you voted for in Trump, you're getting the exact opposite.
It's just a different version of it.
If Harvard hadn't stood up, it would have sent a chill across higher education that would have really hampered the ability of other institutions to define for themselves where that red line is.
The administration maintains that it attacks on Harvard and dozens of other universities Are an attempt to root out anti-Semitism on campus?
No, it's an attempt to root out academic freedom and free speech.
That's what it is.
And so, this isn't just about foreigners anymore.
It's about anybody, anywhere, at any of these universities.
In March, the government announced that 60 universities were under investigation by the U.S. Education Department for allegedly failing to protect Jewish students.
From what?
Hearing about DNA test results?
Yeah.
The disruption of learning that has plagued campuses in recent years is unacceptable.
Said the administration's joint task force to combat anti-Semitism said in a statement yesterday.
It is time for elite universities to take the problem seriously and commit to meaningful change if they wish to continue.
If there's any ethnic group that needs more power and protection, it's the one that doesn't live here and lives in Israel.
People not even from here.
President Trump has also repeatedly said that he wants to curb what he views as a far-left bias in academia.
So now we want to have a far Israel-right bias.
It's the exact same.
It's just meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
It's going to be a real morning in America.
We're going to choke off the money to schools that aid the Marxist.
Oh, Jesus Christ.
Dear God.
No, you're going to choke the money off from people who are allowed to criticize Israel and Zionism.
The days of subsidizing communists.
So it's all the buzzwords, Marxist, communists, all the bug words.
But what Trump is doing, Trump is doing his version of Marxist communism, Nazism.
That's what this is.
By the way, they try to tell you all those things are different, but it's like they really are all forms of the same thing.
And they put it in these stupid terms so they can keep you in your sheep pen forever of left and right.
That's right.
While the loss of grants and I just showed you how it's this bipartisan.
Barack Obama wanted to make sure that the government could oppress you and stifle your speech and throw you in jail indefinitely.
And so does Trump.
You know who doesn't?
The Supreme Court, which is a right-wing Republican, conservative Supreme Court.
So thank God for the Supreme Court.
While the loss of grants and contracts for researchers in wide ranges of fields is alarming, many college leaders have said that they were deeply worried that the administration might move beyond that, notably by threatening their tax-exempt status.
Well, fuck them.
I really don't care about that.
Benefit on your own.
Have some decency here.
We don't need it.
We make so much money.
We don't need that.
Yeah, how about that?
Trump's comments today confirm those fears.
The catalog of horrors is a thick one, Mitchell said.
There are plenty of things that the administration can seek to do that would throw institutions off kilter, and tax-exempt status is certainly one of them.
Oh, yeah, okay.
I'm sure Harvard, their free market.
Couldn't care less.
Already legal challenges have begun, including a lawsuit filed late last week by the Harvard faculty, along with the American Association of University Professors, challenging the administration's demands for changes in order to maintain funding levels.
Among those demands are that Harvard eliminate DEI programs, screen international students who are supportive of terrorism or anti-Semitism.
So that's just, we don't like you.
Right.
And ensure viewpoint diversity in its hiring.
So diverse except for that one thing.
Except for that one thing.
Fine.
So.
Why not let the free market decide what they teach and take away all that shit?
Take it all away from them.
And the free market can decide if Harvard is worth it.
I'll bet it won't decide that.
I'll bet it will not decide that unless you literally rig the game to make it like that.
So Power of the People tweeted this out.
Chinese people have a better grasp of what's going on in America than most Americans.
So what happened in America is that American corporations, people with all the money who actually run the government, deinvested in the United States, took all our manufacturing jobs and shipped them to poor people in China and then re-imported those products back at a cheaper rate so they could make money.
So the corporations made the money.
The American corporations made the money.
And what did they do with that money?
They bought themselves 450-foot yachts and their own jets.
And this guy's going to tell you all about it.
Let's watch.
They rob you blind and you stank them for it.
That's a tragedy.
That's a scam.
That's why I'm saying this right now.
Americans, you don't need a tariff.
You need a revolution.
You don't need a tariff.
You need a revolution.
And when a Chinese guy tells you that you need a revolution, you probably actually do because these guys are willing to stand in front of a tank.
Okay, here we go.
Well, that case, you'll come and oligarchs won't ship your job to China.
Not for diplomacy, not for peace, but to explore cheap labors.
So I've heard people say, oh, the problem with manufacturing in America is that we just got automation and robots.
That's a part of it.
The bigger part, the bigger part is that American corporations shipped, they took your jobs, turned them into crappy jobs, shipped them overseas to China, poor people in more desperate situations, and then imported the stuff back into the United States.
That's what happened.
And that's just what he's talking about.
Okay, here, here we go.
China doesn't even do those jobs anymore.
They sent them to Vietnam.
You know that?
No, I didn't know that.
Phone making and the suicide building.
Really?
That has been years.
Here we go.
Watch.
In the process, they hollow out your middle class.
That's right.
They crashed our working class.
To be proud.
Well, they sold your future for profit.
And yes, China made money, but we used it to build roads, lift millions out of profit.
Farm healthcare, raise living standard.
We reinvested in our people.
So when we shipped our jobs to China, the money that China made from us shipping our jobs there and all the stuff they made, they invested actually in their country.
They got people out of poverty.
He spoke and said we lifted people out of property, which is what some people would counter at him.
Okay, here we go.
My family also benefited from it.
What did your oligarchs do?
They bought yachts, private jets, missions with golf course rightways.
They manipulate the market, torch tax, and pour billions into endless wars.
That's right.
And you, you got stagnated wages.
Yep.
Crippling health cap costs.
Yep.
Cheap dopamine.
That.
And flag to wave poverty made in China.
Well, they pick your pocket.
He said they give you American flags to wave that are probably made in China.
Probably right.
And they pick your pocket.
I mean, they make 40 years.
Both China and the United States benefit from the trade, the manufacturing, but only one of us use that wealth to build.
That's right.
So the United States and China both benefited from this trade, but only one country actually invested that wealth in their own country to build.
This isn't China's fault.
This is yours.
You let this happen.
You let oligarchs fit your lies.
Well, they made you fat, poor, and addicted.
Now they blame China for mass dynamite.
I don't think so.
I don't think you need another tariff.
You need to wake up.
You need to take your country back.
I think you need a revolution.
In fairness, one of the ways they screwed up was not doing a tariff.
That's one of the initial ways.
Like they said unfair trade themselves, you know?
So here's this guy, Jack Ma.
So he's like the Jeff Bezos of Asia.
He created that.
He's disappeared for two months because he ran his mouth.
He ran his mouth.
And Jack Ma, so he created Alibaba, which is the Amazon of Asia.
And he sees it clear as day.
For three decades, the United States corporations raked in obscene amount of cash.
It was so big it was outstripping China's top four banks, all by shipping manufacturing overseas.
Where'd all that loot vanish to?
Well, straight into war chests and Wall Street's greedy paws.
Tanks got funded.
Traders got fat.
But bridges and roads?
No.
Not a dime.
Pure plunder.
No progress.
So let's listen to Jack Ma.
Let's listen to what he says.
We just want to contribute IP.
We just want to have technology.
So he's saying that's what the United States said.
We just want to control the technology and the IP.
Great strategy.
Past 30 years, IBM, Cisco, Microsoft, they made tons of money.
The money, the profit they made are much more than the four largest banks in China.
So the American corporations made tons of cash.
Made way more money than all the banks in China.
Where'd all that money go?
where'd it go there you go past the 30 years the american had 13 wars spending 14.2 trillion dollars the money going there What if they spent a part of their money on building up the infrastructure, helping the white colors and blue colors?
No matter how strategy good it is, you're supposed to spend money on your own people.
And the other money, which I'm curious about, is that when I was young, I heard America is about Ford, Ford, and Boeing, those big manufacturing companies.
Last 10, 20 years, I heard about is Silicon Valley and Wall Street.
That's it.
The money go to the Wall Street.
And what happened?
Year 2008.
The financial crisis wiped out $19.2 trillion USA alone.
They wiped all the white colors and destroyed 34 million jobs globally.
So what if the money, it's not a Wall Street, but what if the money spent on the Middle East, Middle West of the United States, developing the industry there, that could be changed a lot.
So it's not the other countries steal jobs from you guys.
It is your strategy.
So this was America's strategy.
China didn't steal our jobs.
This was American corporations' big idea.
It wasn't China's idea that America would take our manufacturing and send it to them.
That was our idea.
Why?
Because it would increase corporate profits because they could make their products cheaper.
And then the corporations could get richer and then they could buy jets and they could buy yachts and they could buy golf courses.
But they didn't invest any of that money back in the Midwest.
They put all that money into that stuff or they put it into bombs for the Middle East.
He said we did, what did we do?
11 wars at $15 trillion?
13.
13 wars?
Yeah.
I had lost count.
I didn't realize we were already up to 13.
So I'm just saying Jack Ma doesn't obviously understand American exceptionalism, which means the rest of the world can have nice things except for America.
Yeah, well, he was cool with all that until he said something about they should get rid of all the regulations on him and then they took him to a camp and now he talks sense.
So I just want to show you this.
These are all the United States military bases.
These are not United States manufacturing companies.
These are not United States manufacturing factories.
These are not factories.
These are united.
This is what we make.
We make bombs and we make military installments.
And this is every dot on there is a United States military base.
Just look at all the ones we just have in Africa alone, which is why we killed Gaddafi.
We killed Gaddafi because he was going to unite Africa.
But we can't have that happen because we need to take their, we need to steal their natural resources, their cobalt and things like that, and exploit their labor, which is why we killed Gaddafi.
Because he was going to unite Africa as one, just like the European Union is.
