Jimmy Dore Show - 20210923_TJDS_20210921_Podcast

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 23, 2021 - Jimmy Dore Show

01:07:31

20210923_TJDS_20210921_Podcast

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hey, this is Jimmy.
	Who's this?
	Hey, Jimmy Dorr.
	This is Matthew McConaughey.
	Hi, Matthew.
	Hi, Matthew.
	Good to hear from you.
	I don't believe we have spoken in a while, Matthew McConaughey.
	No, we have not.
	It's been too long, partner.
	Too long.
	Well, better late than never.
	I had been expecting a call from you since you announced you were thinking about getting into politics.
	And Texas politics at that.
	Brother, I'm probably plumb out of my mind to even think about it.
	But I've always been a damn the torpedoes kind of a dude.
	Right, right.
	But seriously, Jimmy, the reason I haven't called yet is that, at least as far as politics goes, you and I aren't exactly cut from the same cloth.
	You're a far left dude, and that's cool.
	But if I run for governor, I want to be everybody's governor.
	I may not even run for either party.
	I want to unite this state by representing all Texans.
	Maybe abortion can be legal and illegal at the same time.
	I don't know.
	I'm not a lawyer.
	I see.
	Okay, I see.
	But something told me you just wouldn't be down with that approach.
	You're right.
	I wouldn't.
	I know, I know.
	You got to get up all you got to get all worked up about every little thing.
	I know how it goes.
	So why are you calling me now then?
	Well, something has come along that I actually think you and I can agree about.
	What's that?
	Betto O. Rourke.
	What about him?
	This little motherfucker needs to go the fuck home and stay there and think about what the fuck he's done.
	Instead, he decides he's going to jump into my fucking race.
	I don't think so.
	Jesus.
	All right, go on.
	You see, Jimmy, I was leading in the polls, leading Greg Abbott, without even a formal announcement that I'm running.
	But now he jumps in.
	He's going to steal my thunder, steal votes from me, not Abbott.
	If I run Democrat, he's splitting the ticket.
	I'll beat him.
	But I don't want to run Democrat.
	And if not, we're looking down the barrel of a three-way race.
	He's going to Ross parole this motherfucker.
	That would be bad.
	Either way, he's going right for my voting block.
	Betto O'Rourke or Matthew McConaughey?
	What is a center left BLM sign in front of their mansion suburban Dallas housewife who is sexually bored of her husband to do?
	Good question.
	Beto.
	Stupid nickname.
	His name's fucking Robert.
	Jimmy.
	Jimmy, believe me, I love my Latino brothers and sisters like my own family.
	But I don't call myself fucking Mateo just to win him over.
	Man, he's really a thorn in your side, huh?
	Well, of course he fucking is.
	Running for governor.
	Does this motherfucker do anything other than run for shit and then lose?
	What does he do?
	What's his job?
	Posing for the cover of Texas Monthly?
	No idea, buddy.
	He challenges Ted Cruz and he loses.
	And he thinks, hey, maybe that qualifies me to be president.
	So then he gets his ass handed to him on national stage.
	Then he mopes around, says he needs to go find himself.
	Look, don't get me wrong.
	I myself have gone on many a journey of self-discovery.
	The difference is I don't bring a fucking camera crew along with me.
	Well, what are you going to do about it?
	Well, Jimmy, I'll be honest with you.
	What I'd like to do is drive a Lincoln Continental right up into that giant he-haw fucking mouth of his.
	But I got to be realistic.
	This is Texas politics.
	When you're matched up, you got to out-Texon the other guy.
	George W. Bush ran for Congress in 1978.
	No Texas accent.
	Politics indistinguishable from his opponent, who pointed out he was born in Texas, Bush wasn't.
	So Bush lost.
	When he resurfaces in 94 to run for governor, he sounds like fucking Yosemite Sam and he wins.
	That's the strategy.
	Is that true?
	You bet your ensilata combo played it is.
	I'm going to point out every goddamn non-Texan thing about this fucking weasel.
	First of all, he's from El Paso.
	That's barely in Texas.
	That's the fringe.
	He took time off to go find himself.
	Yeah, that's going to sit real well with a ranch hand, a shrimper, and an oil worker.
	Get the fuck out of here.
	He doesn't have no Texas accent.
	I'm going to play mine up so much, it's going to sound like the Alamo farting.
	I'm going to wear a cowboy hat, boots, carry a fucking gun, not believe in science.
	Downplay Thomas Jefferson's role in the founding.
	Wow, you sound committed.
	Yeah, I'm worked up.
	I'm pissed.
	And I'm high as shit.
	I'm going to think of shit so Texan no one's ever even fucking thought of it before.
	Well, please keep us posted on how it goes, all right?
	I will.
	I got it.
	A gun made of barbecue in space.
	Establishment media sucks.
	All gaslighting, so good luck.
	Bullshit we can't afford.
	He's fomenting this.
	Watch and see as he's jacked off.
	The median speeds and jumps the medium and hits them head on.
	It's the Chimitor Show.
	So Aaron, we're going to get to the story right now about the...
	Now, we're going to, this gets a little complicated, but trust me, we're going to clear it all up for you.
	That's why Aaron's here.
	And it's not, it actually isn't that hard to follow.
	So let's just start.
	Michael Sussman.
	Hillary, this is the guy.
	Now, he is a partner with Perkins Coy, who represents the DNC, right?
	That's the Democratic National Committee.
	Now, he's being accused of making false statements during meetings with the FBI general counsel, Jay Baker.
	And he's also in trouble.
	With Clinton lawyer charge, this is from Buzzsaw.
	He says, with Clinton lawyer charged, the RussiaGate scam is now indicted.
	In accusing Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman of lying to the FBI, Special Counsel John Durham offers new evidence of the fabrications behind the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory.
	Now, I've maintained at this story that this was complete fabrication.
	RussiaGate was made-up evidence-free conspiracy theory, and they still don't have evidence for it.
	Okay.
	Well, what they'll point to Twitter trolls as evidence that Russia overthrew our election.
	Here we go.
	Michael Sussman gave the FBI attorney Jim Baker documents and data purporting to show that computer servers associated with Trump and Alpha Bank were in regular contact.
	This was evidence, Sussman argued, of a possible covert back channel.
	Now, I know about the story because Jank Uger covered this ad nauseum, this story about how there was a ping going from that bank to Trump's servers.
	Turns out it wasn't Trump's servers, and that was a completely made-up story, but we're going to get to that.
	Sussman told Baker, the FBI guy, that he was not working for any client and was simply passing on information that had been provided to him by multiple, by multiple cyber experts.
	Multiple.
	Okay, according to the detailed indictment by special counsel Durham, Michael Sussman was in fact trying to plant a politically motivated scam.
	The purported covert Trump alpha channel has been cooked up by an unnamed tech executive positing positioning himself for a top cybersecurity job in the anticipated Hillary Clinton administration.
	Hmm.
	So this backfired on multiple levels.
	The spread to spread this media and intelligence, to spread this to the media and intelligence community.
	The executive and Sussman coordinated with Mark Elias.
	He's a colleague of Sussman's at Perkins Coy and the top lawyer for Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign.
	Hmm.
	And so, hang on one second.
	Go to Steph.
	All right.
	Hey, you know what?
	First off, I see Frank B. Frank.
	John Kerry has taken horse to Worma for years with no ill effects.
	I see, I see, because he looks like, okay.
	You did that.
	Frank B, you did it twice, dude.
	Very, okay.
	Hey, Medicare for All.
	Steph, I need a fancy Vagina Friday hat stat with a two days shipping.
	It arrives for my favorite event of the week.
	I live for a Fancy Vagina Friday's life.
	I love you all.
	Medicare for All.
	Now, I'm going with that mandate, by the way.
	Now, back to Jim Jam.
	So to spread this to the media and intelligence community, the executive and Sussman coordinated with Mark Elias, a colleague of Sussman's at Perkins Coy and the top lawyer for Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign.
	So you see what they're doing.
	They're cooking up a conspiracy theory and they're going to pitch it to the FBI, which is what they were doing.
	Michael Sussman and Mark Elias in turn coordinated with the private intelligence company Fusion GPS.
	Now, you remember, they were hired by the Clinton campaign also.
	So they're all working together.
	Okay.
	Elias had hired the firm on Hillary Clinton's behalf to produce the Steele dossier, the collection of fabricated reports by ex-British spy Christopher Steele, alleging a long-standing Trump-Russia conspiracy blackmail relationship.
	So you see how this is all working together.
	Okay.
	So this is slide 11.
	GPS Fusion then gave its marching orders to the Hillary-friendly journalist over at Slate.
	And they said, time to hurry.
	So they gave him this story and they said, time to hurry.
	Like, you better get this published, right?
	And the indictment then describes that in response, Foyer, who's the reporter at, is that how you pronounce his name?
	Foyer?
	How do you pronounce his name?
	Franklin Foyer.
	Foyer.
	Franklin Foyer.
	He then forwarded a draft of his article that he's going to use to smear Trump to Fusion GPS with the message, first 2,500 words.
	So do you see how they're all working?
	So this is amazing, right?
	And here's the article.
	So there's the article.
	Was a Trump server communicating with Russia?
	There it is.
	It says, this spring, a group of computer scientists set out to determine whether hackers were interfering with the Trump.
	They found something they weren't expecting.
	Yeah, made-up story.
	And so this is what Glenn Greenwald said.
	He says, just think about that.
	Foyer knew that it was the Hillary Clinton campaign planting the story, but did not bother to disclose that in his story.
	It was Hillary's own campaign and its operatives who concocted the story at the time she and Jake Sullivan pretended that it was Slate, which uncovered it.
	And here she is.
	So she did a series of tweets where she pretended like this was news to her.
	So there she is.
	Computer scientists have apparently uncovered a covert.
	So there's that.
	She goes, in response to our new report from Slate, so she's pretending that her and Sullivan learned about this from the story they planted.
	This could be the most direct link yet between Donald Trump and Moscow.
	Computer scientists have apparent, what?
	Computer scientists.
	The secret highline may be the key to unlocking the mystery of Trump.
	There was no secret.
	It's all made up.
	It's time for Trump to answer serious questions about his ties to Russia.
	So this was October 31st, right before the election.
	She's doing this.
	And Slate.
	And you remember right before the election this year, they were doing the exact opposite.
	They were censoring stories negative to one of the candidates.
	That would be Joe Biden.
	So this is amazing.
	Four things you need to know about the Trump.
	Donald Trump has a secret server.
	It was set up to communicate privately with Putin Thai Russian Bank called the Altra Bank, Alphra Bank.
	When a reporter asked about it, they shut it down.
	Once a week later, they created a new server with a different name for the same purpose.
	That was just, that was not Trump's server.
	That was a marketing company's server, and they marketed some stuff for Trump's hotels, plus a lot of other companies.
	It had nothing to do with Trump.
	And so this is what she's pushing.
	And both Hillary and Jake Sullivan were pretending that they had just learned about the shocking story from Slate when, in fact, it was Hillary's own lawyers planning it.
	In other words, it was Hillary and her team who had manufactured the hoax, then pretended they were just learning about it and believing it to be true because a media outlet to which they had fed the false story had just published it.
	And here's Hillary.
	I mean, here's that guy, Franklin Foyer, the journalist who took the story from the Hillary Clinton campaign and then printed it, knowing it was planted.
	He went on with Rachel Maddow.
	And you want to see what Rachel Maddow has to say?
	Here we go.
	Oh, wait, it happened.
	Why doesn't it play?
	Is it playing?
	Oh, hang on.
	Go over.
	Let me get the audio.
	Come to Steph.
	I don't know why.
	All right, here we go, ladies and gentlemen, at the top.
	I'm going to fix it.
	I'll tell you why.
	Jim's going to fix it right now, Bitches.
	I'll tell you why.
	All right.
	Hannah Sarah H. Frontline COVID Critical Care Alliance, Dr. Corey's group, is having weekly update webinar.
	Watch it TMRW on Odyssey, Uttar Pradesh, etc.
	Okay, you can come to back to Jimmy.
	You can come to me.
	So here is Rachel Maddow.
	She's in 2018, she is interviewing Dexter Filkins on his and Franklin Foyer's stories about secret Trump-Russian bank contacts, the DSC-funded scam that is now subject to federal indictments.
	So watch this.
	Here we go.
	We are blessed as a country to have journalists as talented as you and Franklin Ford writing.
	We are blessed.
	We are blessed to have journalists as talented as you and Franklin Foyer planting stories at the behest of the DNC and the Clinton campaign.
	We are blessed to have them.
	You want to hear it again?
	It's fun for me to listen.
	We are blessed as a country to have journalists as talented as you and Franklin Ford writing about this because, no, it's a difficult thing.
	And the storytelling ability around a story like this is very important because it's hard to get at the core of it unless you're great with words.
	So, Aaron, come in and just, but we're not halfway.
	We're only halfway through this story because there's way more to it.
	But could you, I know you got stuff you want to say about that.
	Well, look, let's consider what if Trump had done this to the Hillary Clinton campaign, gone to the FBI with a story that the Trump campaign was involved in fabricating to try to gin up an investigation and then also leaked that to the media and pretended as if it was some huge explosive story before the election.
	I mean, this would be a national scandal.
	This has come out now, and the reaction to it is it's been pretty mute.
	It hasn't gotten very much attention.
	And the reason why it hasn't gotten attention is because it's yet again more evidence that the multi-year Russia gate craze that we were subjected to was a scam.
	And such a scam that it required involved fabricating evidence and trying to get the FBI to investigate it and planting it in the media with credulous journalists who were actually in the case of Franklin Foyer emailing a Clinton campaign contractor, Fusion GPS, to get their approval or their input and actually taking direction from them when they said to him, as you quoted, time to get moving.
	And the indictment for the first time, this look, remember for two years we had so many indictments in the Mueller investigation and they were these long-winded things and like the Mueller team tried to make it look as if they were on the hunt of some, they were closing on a conspiracy.
	But of course, you would read the language carefully and there was nothing there.
	But they gave the media a narrative to make them think that there was something there, conspiracy.
	Now we get an indictment where we have concrete proof.
	The actual conspiracy, the only conspiracy, was the one that was involved with the Clinton campaign and its contractors and its subservient journalists to plant a fake Trump-Russia conspiracy theory.
	And what they did is it's pretty crazy.
	So basically, Sussman, Michael Sussman, this lawyer who's been indicted, he's working behind the scenes with a unnamed tech executive.
	We don't know who it is.
	There's speculation about who it is, but he hasn't been identified yet.
	And basically, they're working with the team to try to come up with this narrative that could somehow present a case where DNS traffic, like web traffic between a Trump server and this Alpha Bank server, a Trump marketing server, as you say, is possible proof of a secret covert channel.
	And the indictment itself quotes the actual people who were tasked to work on this because this tech executive got some people involved to help him out to fake this story.
	And one of them says that, look, let's be honest here, there's nothing here.
	And we're really going to look bad if people apply any skepticism to this.
	And the executive himself admits that this is a red herring, that really fake.
	And what's actually worse, it's not even that they try to make something out of something innocuous, like they took this Trump marketing server and tried to make that look as if that was Trump Tower communicating with Russia.
	This bank, Alpha Bank, they allege that actually some web traffic was concocted.
	It was faked, which is criminal.
	So it's not just this case where they found some web traffic between a Trump marketing server sending spam to people with an AlphaBank address.
	Alphabank alleges that actually some of this web traffic was faked, which means that someone was deliberately, criminally trying to create this connection between Trump and Russia, however thin it was.
	So nothing.
	So it just raises questions.
	So this, you know, this is one more window into what a scam Russia gate was.
	So what else was the result of a conspiracy like this?
	And I think there's a lot of windows to look at here.
	So what you're saying is that they invented some of that data that was coming from their server.
	So in order to plant this conspiracy, the Clinton people invented the data, didn't exist, just like CrowdStrike invented that Russia had hacked the DNC server without any evidence.
	So they just invented that.
	Because if they had evidence, they would have shared it with everyone.
	They didn't, which means there is no evidence, which means they made it up just like they made this up.
	So again, proving the theory at this show that how is it that a pothead comedian in his garage could get RussiaGate 1,000% right when everyone else for five years, a half a decade, was wrong and pushing an evidence-free conspiracy theory, which no one will ever have to pay a price for.
	And we're going to get to that.
	Let's keep going.
	So here's the question.
	Let me say quickly a couple of things.
	First of all, it's important you raise CrowdStrike because guess who is the Perkins-Coy Clinton attorney who hired CrowdStrike?
	Is it Elias?
	It's Michael Sussman.
	Oh, Sussman, okay.
	So the same guy who was working with this unnamed tech executive to fabricate a Trump-Russia tie is also the same guy who hired CrowdStrike, which generated the allegation that Russia had hacked the DNC.
	So what else do you need to know?
	Well, there's a lot.
	There's a lot more to say about it.
	But let me also say, too, what these guys were doing, you know, these journalists like Dexter Filkins and Franklin Foyer, who reported all this credulously, without skepticism.
	Even though, by the way, even before we knew all this, it was obvious that this was a scam, which I've written about before.
	And it was obvious because first of all, this theory is so ludicrous that like Trump and a Russian bank are using a server to secretly communicate.
	It's like, it was obviously absurd.
	But their cover story that they told Franklin Foyer and Dexter Filkins is hilarious.
	Both Filkins and Foyer repeated this without any skepticism.
	The researchers who they spoke to said that the reason they came across this traffic is because basically after Russia hacked the DNC, allegedly, they became concerned that Russia was then going to hack the Trump campaign as well.
	Because if the Russians were hacking Democrats, then they probably are going to hack Republicans as well.
	So what they told Foyer and Filkins, and which Foyer and Filkins repeated for their audience credulously, is that we were just trying To protect the Trump campaign.
	We were trying to protect the integrity of the election.
	That's the cover story that both the New Yorker and Slate printed.
	And now we learn in reality what was actually happening.
	These people were working on a Democratic party connected scam with the Clinton campaign to fabricate a Trump-Russia tie and lying to the media about that.
	They were just concerned citizens who came across some suspicious traffic.
	And I want to show you even more.
	So this is way after this.
	I'm pretty sure this was way after the story was already debunked.
	No?
	Well, it doesn't matter.
	This was October 2018 when Dexter Filkins of the New Yorker decided to recycle Franklin Foyer's story, which had come out two years before.
	Yeah, so it was already debunked, right?
	Yeah, but Russia Gate was so deranged and our media was so reckless that the New Yorker, like, you know, sort of like this highbrow magazine, elite journal of liberal opinion, decided to recycle this Trump-Russia bank story.
	And here it is.
	I mean, what more evidence do you need?
	I mean, what more evidence do you need?
	It's very, very obvious, and it's really Occam's razor here.
	The fact that we still have not been able to rule out the idea that this was a covert communication channel two years after the fact, the fact that no one has come forth with a plausible explanation for why this was happening, for why Alphabank was one of three organizations communicating with the Trump server in those months leading up to the election is just completely remarkable.
	And I think the fact that Frank's story got overlooked or criticized as much as it did.
	And the fact that now it's being revisited and you have the editor of the New York Times saying that there was a story there just shows the lack of imagination.
	It doesn't show the lack of imagination.
	It shows that they were actually imagining the whole story and it was completely made up.
	That's what that means.
	And two years later, she's still pushing a completely debunked story.
	And Chris Hayes is giving her a platform to do it without pushing back.
	And that's what you look like after you've sold every piece of your integrity.
	That's what you look like right there, what Chris Hayes looks like.
	That's the look you have on your face.
	Hey, what does a face look like with no integrity right there?
	And so she's, again, another operative.
	What's her name?
	Natasha Bertrand.
	And that's why I call them Jamie Bluenon, because whereas QAnon is on private internet forums and chat groups, Bluenon is on cable news every single night, spewing during stuff like this.
	And there's the guy right next to her, Franklin Foyer.
	That's the guy right.
	There's the guy who took the bogus story from the Klan campaign, published it.
	He knows it's a bogus story.
	So does he.
	And they're all sitting there lying.
	And you wonder why people don't trust the news.
	You wonder why people get their news from potheads on YouTube.
	You wonder why people do that?
	This is why.
	They're lying with straight.
	This is two years after that story was known to be untrue.
	There it is.
	And I just want to show you what WikiLeaks revealed.
	That the Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party has a long list of their toadies that work for them in establishment media, right?
	Exclusive new email leaks reveal Clinton campaign's cozy press relationship, off-the-record Manhattan cocktail parties, planting stories with friendly journalists, all of it laid bare.
	And it's by Glenn Greenwald.
	And I just want, here's how they place the story.
	As discussed on our call, we are all in agreement that the time is right.
	Time is right.
	Place a story with a friendly journalist in the coming days that positions us a little more transparently while achieving the above goals.
	Who should we have do it?
	We should have as a very, we have a hat, we have has a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year.
	We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed.
	While we should have a larger conversation in the near future about a broader strategy for re-engaging the beat press that covers Hillary, for this, we think we can achieve our objective and do the most shaping by going to Maggie.
	And I just want to show you, here's the list.
	Here's a list of the journalists that were working for them.
	Columnist Pundits, Kiki Finney from the lead this week's work just to start additional surrogates, Philippe Padette.
	Okay, so Dan Balls, Wolf Blitzer, Gloria Borger, Mika Brzezinski, David Brooks, Gail Collins, John Dickerson, E.J. Dion, Maureen Dow, Ronan Farrow, Howard Feynman, Ron Fournier, Mark Helperin, Chris Hayes, John Heilman, John Carl,
	John King, Mara Lyason, Rachel Maddow, Ruth Marcus, Chris Matthews, Dana Milbank, Andrea Mitchell, Nora O'Donnell, Robin Roberts, Eugene Robinson, Charlie Rose, April Ryan, George Snuffel Upigis, Robin Sproul, Karen Tomulti, and Jeff Zeleni.
	That's just a lit.
	That's just the list we got.
	That's just the ones we know of for sure, super sure.
	So according to, so I just want to go back to this.
	So just so you know, that's why no one trusts the media because they're liars and they're paid by the establishment to lie and that's what they do.
	All those people there are paid liars.
	Okay.
	According to Steele, it was Michael Sussman.
	So Steele, the guy who put together the dossier, the folk, the faith, he was paid over $100,000 to put together a bunch of garbage that were just made-up stories.
	It was Michael Sussman in July 2016 who first informed him about the Alpha Bank server story.
	So again, more proof that it was Sussman who made this off.
	Sussman efforts yielded purported DNS traffic between a Trump-adjacent marketing server and the Alpha Bank in Russia.
	Sussman concealed this plot from the FBI along with the fact that he was billing Hillary Clinton for his involvement.
	So this guy was completely, first of all, I know the FBI knew he was working for.
	So that's the thing that when I first read the story, I'm like, wait a minute, the FBI didn't know that that guy was working with the Clintons?
	Of course.
	Well, the meeting with the FBI, for example, where he tried to push the story or did push the story, he billed Clinton for that meeting, called it work and communications regarding a confidential project.
	Now realize what he's doing.
	Sussman, working for Hillary Clinton, is going to the FBI and pretending he's not working for Hillary Clinton, at the same time billing Hillary Clinton for that meeting.
	That's ballsy.
	And what that tells me is they're all working together.
	Hillary Clinton wasn't worried about the FBI finding that out.
	In fact, according to Durham, all or nearly all of Sussman's work pushing the Alpha Bank story was billed to the Clinton campaign.
	Hiding the money trail was established Russia Gate practice.
	His law firm, Perkins Coy, and the Clinton campaign concealed that they funded the Steele dossier until a subpoena.
	I remember when this happened, until a subpoena from the House Intelligence Committee forced them to admit the truth on October.
	They had denied it on the, they had denied it, denied it, denied it, that they had anything to do with the funding of the Steele dossier.
	And then they had to admit that they did.
	They paid Fusion GPS who got the thing for Steele to do it.
	The FBI also concealed Steele's Democratic funders from the FISA court when it used the dossier to so they use that.
	So Clinton funds, gives money to Steele to print a bullshit dossier about Trump.
	Then the FBI takes that dossier to the FISA court, doesn't tell the FISA court that this was funded by opposition research by the Clinton campaign.
	They conceal that.
	Why do they got to be liable?
	Because it's all made up.
	That's why.
	Along with the FBI, by the way, that's how they got the warrant to do a tap on Carter Page.
	And again, remember, you can do a two, there's a two-hop rule.
	So if they got a warrant for Carter Page's phone, they can also listen in on anybody he talks to and anybody that that person talks to.
	That's called the two-hop rule.
	Whoa, you think you live in a free society, huh?
	Along with the FBI lawyer, who previously pled guilty for lying to the FISA court to spy on ex-Trump campaign official Carter Page, it's clear that much of the criminality of the Russia gate was not from anybody in Trump-Russia collusion, but by those who fabricated.
	So again, it wasn't Trump and his campaign that is the criminals in this story.
	The criminals are the Clinton campaign and the FBI.
	What do you mean, the FBI?
	We'll get to that.
	The indictment of Hillary's lawyer in connection with propagating a fake Russia gate story that many corporate journalists spread sheds more bright light on the CD underbelly of the DNC media access.
	And we just showed you all those journalists who are on the payroll working for the DNC.
	And that's why they were almost all ignoring it, hoping that it goes away.
	The indictment approved by the Biden Department of Justice, not Trump's Department of Justice, the Biden Department of Justice and his attorney general explicitly states that the Trump Alphabank story is a sham.
	And yet most of the journalists who spread it, Natasha Bertrand, Franklin Foyer, Dexter Filkins, Chris Hayes, have barely acknowledged it, let alone grappled with it.
	This is the perfect microcosm of the Russiagate fraud that the country had endured for four years.
	Hoaxes were repeatedly cooked up by private intelligence operatives working for the DNC or anti-Trump factions within the CIA and the FBI, and then fed to friendly reporters who laundered the falsehoods by publishing whatever they were given without the slightest concern for whether they were true.
	It's just a small, this is from Isaac Shore over at the National Review.
	He says it's just a small sampling of the journalists who were swept up in just one botched story on the Trump-Russia relationship.
	But it's nevertheless frightening how easily a campaign's political and very well-placed personnel interests set wheels in motion at the FBI and in most major American newsrooms.
	Wheels that stayed in motion for the better part of half a decade.
	And this, let me, Glenn Greenwal tweeted this out.
	Everything you need to know about how the corporate media works in two screenshots you want to see.
	Rachel Maddow rooted for the Steele dossier to be true, and then it fell apart.
	And then she pushed every bullshit story possible.
	And then how did she get punished?
	She got a new contract for $30 million a year.
	Do you know how much money that is per day?
	It's $114,000 a day.
	I'm pretty sure.
	Check my math on that.
	It's almost $15,000 per hour.
	That's what Rachel Maddow makes.
	Almost $15,000 per hour.
	Okay.
	Now, how did she handle this revelation that this story she and her whole network has pushed is completely bogus?
	How did she handle it?
	Well, oh, by the way, before I get to that, I just want to show you that the FBI, the way they wrote the indictment, makes it seem like the FBI was a victim to Sussman and the Hillary Clinton campaign scam.
	Like they didn't know.
	Like I just said before, how did they not know who Sussman was and that he was working for the Clintons?
	Well, I'm going to say they did.
	And here's what Glenn Greenwald says.
	He says that claim that the FBI was the victim and they were duped, it falls short for this claim is dubious for two reasons.
	It is inconceivable that high-level FBI operatives like Baker would have been unaware that this Perkins Coy partner was deeply enmeshed with the Clinton campaign and DNC politics.
	And two, the FBI concluded very quickly that there was nothing to the story, yet never said anything, allowing hashtag resistance journalists to continue telling the public that this fraudulent story was true.
	Indeed, Sussman's own Twitter account reveals an obviously close relationship with that FBI official, James Baker, throughout the summer of 2016.
	But the FBI, still under the command of former director James Comey, chose to say nothing about its findings, which debunked the Trump Alpha Bank fraud.
	So they had already debunked it that the FBI kept it to themselves.
	And then they pretended like they were the dupes of this scam when, of course, they knew exactly who Sussman was.
	So Glenn goes on to say this in turn allowed the same army of liberal employees of media corporations that perpetrated most of the Russia gate frauds to continue to deceive the public into believing that it was true long after it was clear that it was fiction.
	And so that's the FBI's complicity in this.
	And now watch how Rachel Maddow, who just got a $30 million contract for reporting stuff like this with a straight face, how did she cover this story now that it's been confirmed?
	It's a garbage story.
	How did she, did she cover it as a garbage story?
	This is how she covered it.
	On Thursday, Maddow called one of the countless resistance prosecutors in the MSNBC's table, Bart McQuaid, to impugn the charges against Hillary.
	So they're trying to discredit this indictment.
	That's how MSNBC and Rachel Maddow is reporting.
	They're trying to discredit the indictment, which discredits the story.
	So the duo implied that the case was brought only to beat the expiring statute of limitations, insisted that the indictment should not have been brought because the lie was not material to the FBI's investigation.
	So it's okay to lie to the FBI as long as you don't think it's material.
	And it implied that it is merely an attempt to appease angry Trump supporters demanding indictments from Durham.
	It was left unexplained why Merrick Garland would go along with.
	So there's Rachel Maddow saying that, oh, they're just doing this to appease Trump voters and it's a garbage thing anyway.
	Well, Merrick Garland is, why would he go along with this?
	That's a Biden appointee.
	Why would he go along with it?
	They never talked about that.
	It never brought it up.
	And so here's my last slide, and we'll go back to Aaron.
	We have yet again convincing evidence of the axis of power.
	The DNC, their corporate media allies, and the security state services that again and again conspired with one another to disseminate false Russia gate stories to the public.
	That's how it works.
	DNC establishment figures, corporate media elites, and CIA and FBI and the NSA.
	So let me bring back in, were you surprised at it?
	First of all, Rachel Maddow, again, getting $15,000 an hour to lie to you, do a worse job than I am in my garage.
	What would you like to comment on the rest of that story?
	Go ahead.
	To me, it's a good illustration of how the news media is faker than Hollywood.
	In Hollywood, the highest paid actors, they have to have some talent, right?
	Like they have some ability at what they do.
	Whereas in news media, the worst journalists possible, the people who like push frauds and lie to their audience constantly, get paid $30 million a year.
	I mean, that was Rachel Maddow.
	That was the consequence of Rachel Maddow pushing the dumbest conspiracy theory of all time for four years.
	She had $30 million because it was good for MSNBC's ratings.
	And the rest of the hosts aren't really attracting anybody.
	So that's the talent that they had to go with.
	But yeah, it's like, you know, it just speaks to what a joke our media has become.
	And, you know, on that point, you see this indictment after four years where any single possible development in Russia gate, like a hearing or an indictment, whatever, that would like dominate the news cycle for 24 hours.
	It was like, you know, MSNBC was non-stop all over this.
	Now we get an indictment for someone involved in pushing a scam to in the service of the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory.
	And, you know, like we're covering it, but otherwise it's been mostly ignored.
	And people like Maddow and the New York Times have been doing their best to downplay it.
	Like Maddow did, her story came out, her segment came out the night before the indictment.
	So she wasn't covering the indictment.
	She was covering a leak from the Sussman camp about the indictment and totally spun it in there in the service of their narrative.
	This was just some trivial charge.
	So she didn't actually cover the details of the indictment that came out the next day, which showed that the Trump Alphabank story, which she had pushed and praised Dexter Filkins for, talking about how blessed we are as a country, how that was a result of a conspiracy, a fabrication.
	So she has not yet reported that on her show.
	And neither I think is anybody else in MSNBC because again, they're not there to report the news.
	They're there to push a narrative in the service of their partisan affiliation, which is the Democratic Party.
	And look, taking the big picture here, when you look at every single plank of Russia Gate, all of it directly comes from the Clinton campaign.
	All of it.
	So the first thing is collusion, right?
	Where does that come from?
	That started with the steel dossier, paid for by the Clinton campaign.
	Then there's this theory, and part of that too involves fabricating this Trump-Russia bank story, which again was paid for by the Clinton campaign, overseen by their lawyer, and he billed the Clinton campaign for it.
	Okay, so that's collusion.
	It comes from the Clinton campaign.
	Then you have this thing about social media, Russian social media bots, and this theory that that swung the election for Trump and that these Russian trolls waged this sophisticated brainwashing American operation that duped millions of Americans into not voting for Hillary Clinton.
	That also comes from the Clinton campaign.
	The Washington Post revealed this, that Facebook, when they initially looked at all these Russian social media ads, they concluded that this was just basically a commercial operation of people putting out these memes and ads to try to get traffic, to try to target certain audiences like evangelicals and African Americans, build a following which they could then leverage to sell ads to vendors.
	That's what Facebook initially concluded.
	But then veterans of the Obama and Clinton campaigns, they looked at this and they came up with theories that really this was part of an operation to swing the election.
	And Mark Warner, the head of the intelligence committee in the Senate, he personally flew out to Facebook's headquarters and shared with them this new theory.
	And not long after that, at a time when Facebook was facing heavy scrutiny from Congress and wanted to play ball, then Facebook came out with this new theory that really this was the Russian government trying to interfere in our election.
	And Facebook apologized and that was supposed to be this big scandal.
	And then we have the foundational claim, the thing that started it all, this allegation that Russia hacked the DNC, stole emails, and then gave them the WikiLeaks as part of this operation to install Trump.
	Well, where does that come from?
	Who generated that?
	That comes from a private company called CrowdStrike, who was hired by none other than Michael Sussman, the same guy who's now been indicted by John Durham for taking part in, for lying to the FBI about a fabricated scheme that he was pushing to tie Trump to Russia.
	So it raises new questions about, you know, just how far does this scam go?
	And all of us have been told for four years that if we question this allegation that Russia hacked the DNC, that, you know, that we're like committing sacrilege, you know, we've been attacked for it.
	As if we have to trust whatever the FBI and CIA tell us.
	But the fact that Sussman was involved in hiring them, the fact that Sussman hired them at the same time as his colleague at Perkins Coe hired Fusion GPS to concoct the steel dossier, and the fact that we haven't seen any of the evidence used to make this attribution to Russia,
	plus the fact, and we've talked about this before, that we learned three years after the fact that the CEO of CrowdStrike, Sean Henry, he admitted under oath that while in public his firm was accusing Russia of stealing emails from the DNC, that he told them under oath that actually they had no evidence of it.
	They had no evidence whatsoever.
	And the media, no mainstream liberal outlet has reported this damning admission.
	And he admitted that in pretty sure 2017.
	December 2017, that's right.
	Yes.
	So in 2017, the guy who said Russia did this said, we don't have any evidence that Russia did this.
	And no one reported that.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	So listen, Jimmy, so just to wrap it up, given the fact that Sussman, Clinton's lawyer, was involved in a scheme to try to plant fake stories in the media and the FBI tying Trump to Russia.
	You have to wonder if CrowdStrike was a part of that too.
	That basically, because what do these emails show?
	They were embarrassing for Hillary Clinton.
	They showed that she was telling the public one thing, telling Wall Street something else, that they were rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders.
	And so if you could tie all this to Russia, then you could distract the public from the content of these leaks and just taint it all really as the work of this evil foreign power that wants to destroy our country.
	And then if you could tie Trump to Russia, then you could basically distract the public from all this.
	So, you know, we don't know for sure what actually happened, but that is my speculation about what actually happened.
	Is that basically just as Fusion GPS was brought in to do a job tying Trump to Russia, so was CrowdStrike.
	And, you know, we're, you know, some of us are out there still trying to report the story and get more information because, for example, the public has never seen the reports that CrowdStrike wrote and that the FBI relied on.
	Remember, the FBI did not inspect the DNC server itself.
	It relied on CrowdStrike's forensics.
	So there's a lot that we don't know, but a lot that raises suspicions that the rest of the media just is not following because they were too busy parroting the Trump-Russia scam.
	I just want to play this one more time just as an indictment of not only MSNBC, but in the presses in general, the establishment press.
	And this is why you and I have a job.
	I mean, what more evidence do you need?
	It's very, very obvious.
	And it's really Occam's razor here.
	The fact that we still have not been able to rule out the idea that this was a covert communication channel two years after the fact, the fact that no one has come forth with a plausible explanation for why this was happening, for why Alphabank was one of three organizations communicating with the Trump server in those months leading up to the election is just completely remarkable.
	And I think the fact that Frank's story got overlooked or criticized as much as it did, and the fact that now it's being revisited and you have the editor of the New York Times saying that there, you know, was a story there just shows the lack of imagination.
	The irony of her word choice is just amazing.
	We lack imagination, not the people making up the story, this guy.
	Okay.
	And he's just sitting there.
	That's what a lying establishment piece of shit looks like when he puts on a suit coat and goes on MSNBC.
	That's the face he makes when he's lying, and he knows he's lying.
	And that's what it looks like.
	Isn't that nice to know?
	They look so nice and white.
	They look so white and truth-telling.
	Oh, boy.
	It's amazing.
	Hey, everybody, we just added stand-up dates in Florida and Arizona.
	And we are going to be at Harlow's.
	We just added a second show in Sacramento, California on October 3rd.
	Is it the 3rd?
	I think so.
	So go to jimmydoorcomme.com for the Florida tickets, the Tempe tickets, and the Sacramento, California.
	See you there.
	Hey, President Biden's on the phone.
	Hello.
	Stop it, man.
	Come on.
	It's me, Biden, President.
	I got a lot of work to do this week.
	Firstly, let me clear this up.
	The other day, I did not say vaccines protect against hurricanes.
	What I said was bactene protects against hurricanes.
	You understand?
	It's a big difference.
	Bacteen?
	It's got light of cane in it, you idiot.
	Sprays of bactin all over your damn house.
	It'll numb the outside of the structure so it can't feel pain while it's slammed and pounded by the force of God's almighty wrath.
	He'll thank me later.
	Secondly, this week I'm going to take a trip to my phone to talk to the kingdom of France.
	I'm literally going to call Prime Minister Enamel Macaroni.
	Have you heard of him?
	No, Joe, it's not Enamel Macaroni.
	It's Emmanuel McCrone.
	Fuck you, Emmanuel Lewis.
	McCrone.
	That's what I said, goddammit.
	Lenny Macaron.
	No, Joe.
	His name is Emmanuel McCrone, and he's the president, not prime minister.
	I'm president, Frat.
	And like me, Marconi can't do anything because the Republicans won't let him.
	I'm between a rock and a place that's like a rock, but called something different.
	A hard place?
	I was going to say my prize state, but that'll do.
	Joe, the richest 1% don't pay 40% of their taxes.
	You could change that.
	I've spoken to my speechwriters about that.
	They say it's unacceptable that the 1% don't pay 40% of their taxes.
	My plan fixes that.
	I'm lowering that amount to 39%.
	Come on, Joe.
	Your plan doesn't do anything.
	Poppycock.
	I'm the most progressive president in history of the fucking Milky Way galaxy.
	Yeah.
	And I'm sticking it to the man in the moon, man.
	Joe, right now, you could use your power to do all sorts of things that would actually help people.
	You know that, right?
	And I am.
	For instance, firstly, I've already expanded offshore drilling so Americans will have access to enough cash to escape the flooding.
	No.
	But I can't.
	Hey, hey, but I can't work miracles.
	What do you think I am, the Senate planetarian?
	Parliamentarian, Joe.
	Stuff is happening, man.
	We're big.
	Ha, ha, ha, ha.
	I We're building back better by completely forgetting about destroying Afghanistan.
	Jesus.
	Oh, God.
	And what happened to that family?
	Look, I swear I will hunt down any person involved in that heinous attack, and we will kill them.
	Jesus, Joe.
	Not the family, but they're killers.
	I think someone, something already happened to the family.
	I mean, we can't find them anywhere.
	He seemed to just disappear.
	And to me, that's a little suspicious as well.
	What I'm saying is nobody is above the law.
	If they're trying to get into our country legally, they'll have to go through the proper channels, just like anyone else who's not of Anglo-Saxon origin.
	No gutsies.
	Hey, didn't our military just admit that they killed that family?
	I know.
	And that is why I vowed that this U.S. retaliatory strike will not be the last.
	What does that mean?
	We're going to bomb that family a second time just to make sure they got the message.
	Because thanks to Google Earth, we not only have the technology to bomb any gravesite in the Mideast, but now we can get its latest estimate.
	Hey, man, I have to go.
	Either my eyes are getting all squinty or the sun is dying.
	And we're a Max.
	That's funny.
	We get this estimate.
	So Bill Gates is bad.
	He's not what he appears to be because he looks like a nerd, right?
	So that's like when they have Chris Hayes and Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, these white nerds.
	You don't think they'd lie to you?
	They're white and they're nerds.
	And Rachel Maddow's a homosexual.
	They don't lie.
	Nerds are big liars.
	Nerds are just as despicable as anybody.
	And want to prove it?
	So here is Judy Woodwolf.
	Judy Woodwolf is interviewing Bill Gates.
	Now, Bill Gates funds the News Hour.
	He funds their medical reporting.
	Could you look that up?
	I think they do.
	You don't have to stay there.
	We're going to look it up, and I'm going to double-check on that.
	I'm almost 1,000% sure that he funds the NewsHour's medical reporting.
	It was reported at that time that you had a number of meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, who, when you met him 10 years ago, he was convicted of soliciting prostitution from minors.
	What did you know about him when you were meeting with him, as you've said yourself, in the hopes of raising money?
	You know, I had dinners with him.
	You know, we were both hungry, and we happen to be, you know, just at the same restaurant.
	We've had dinners.
	Watch this.
	Regret doing that.
	I regret doing that.
	Relationships with people he said, you know, would give to global health, which is an interest I have.
	You know, not nearly enough philanthropy goes in that direction.
	You know, those meetings were a mistake.
	They didn't result in.
	So he was meeting with Jeffrey Epstein to get funding for his philanthropy.
	Son of a gun, the richest guy in the world needs someone else to get him money.
	Isn't that wild?
	Wow.
	It was either dinner with Jeffrey Epstein, I guess, or GoFundMe, huh?
	Bill?
	Is that where you're at?
	What he purported and I cut them off.
	You know, that goes back a long time ago now.
	There's, you know, so there's nothing new on that.
	It was reported that you continue to meet with him over several years and that, in other words, he just shakes his head.
	Yeah, you did.
	Your wife said so.
	And it was just the last time you met with her with Epstein that she went nuts.
	Number of meetings.
	What did you do when you found out about his background?
	Well, you know, I've said I regretted having those dinners.
	And there's nothing, absolutely nothing new on that.
	Is there a lesson?
	So he doesn't answer the question and she doesn't make him.
	Yeah, but you had many meetings with him after that.
	And what did you do when you found out about his past?
	He doesn't answer any of those questions.
	And she lets him right off the hook.
	Why?
	Because he funds their show.
	That's why.
	She's not a real journalist.
	That's why.
	For you, for anyone else looking at this.
	So listen to this question.
	This is the weirdest question, but it's a good question, but the weirdest answer.
	Watch this.
	So she's asking him, what have you learned from this?
	Right?
	Watch.
	Absolutely nothing new on that.
	Is there a lesson for you?
	What's the lesson?
	Anyone else looking at this?
	Well, he's dead.
	So, you know, in general, you always have to be careful.
	If you cross the CIA or the richest guy in the world, if you have secrets that could take us down, well, you're going to be dead.
	What the hell?
	Did you hear what he just said?
	She asked, what's the lesson?
	He's like, well, the lesson is Jeffrey Epstein's dead.
	That's anyone else looking at this.
	Well, he's dead.
	So in general, you always have to be careful.
	And, you know, I'm very proud of what we've done in philanthropy, very proud of the work of the foundation.
	You know, that's what I get up every day and focus on.
	Oh, really?
	First of all, keep that in mind.
	Every day he gets up and focuses on philanthropy.
	So he didn't answer any of her questions, and she didn't hold his feet to the fire at all.
	Why?
	Because they get their money from him.
	So here it is.
	So watch this.
	Were a mistake.
	They didn't result in what he purported and I cut them off.
	You know, that goes back a long time ago now.
	So there's nothing new on that.
	Bill Gates thinks about philanthropy every day.
	He gets up.
	Bill Gates says no to sharing vaccine formulas with Global Poor to end the pandemic.
	That's the guy who thinks every day he gets up.
	Does this guy look like he has nothing to hide?
	They didn't result in what he purported and I cut them off.
	You know, that goes back to- He's literally doing this.
	Isn't that what the creepy guy from The Simpsons always does, right?
	That guy.
	Hey, he's literally doing that.
	He looks like a cartoon after they get caught stealing.
	He really does.
	Were a mistake.
	They didn't result in what he purported.
	Bill, tell us the truth.
	Did you take the cookie from the cookie jar?
	Tell us the truth, Bill.
	Okay, so again, Mr. Philanthropy, you see what Mr. Philanthropy's doing, right?
	He's denying the vaccine to poor people.
	Hey, sorry, Jeffrey Epstein's not alive, but I got to make money somehow.
	I got to sell.
	I can't be giving away these vaccines.
	I need money.
	Jeffrey Epstein's dead, so I don't have any connections to money anymore because Jeffrey Epstein's dead.
	They pledged to donate right to their COVID vaccine, rights to their COVID vaccine.
	Then they sold them to Big Pharma.
	That's AstraZeneca.
	And why did they sell their rights to Big Pharma?
	They were going to give the COVID vaccine away for free over at the Oxford.
	But why did they?
	Well, Oxford University surprised and pleased advocates in April by promising to donate the rights of its coronavirus vaccine to any drug maker.
	A few weeks later, Oxford, urged on by the Bill Gates Foundation, reversed its course.
	It signed an exclusive vaccine deal with AstraZeneca that gave the pharmaceutical giant the sole rights and no guarantee of low prices.
	Boy, that Bill Gates, he just gets up and thinks about philanthropy every day.
	That's what he thinks about all day.
	You mean how you could screw the poor out of the vaccine and make money off it?
	Let's all remember that Bill Gates started a foundation to give all his money away because he couldn't spend it, yet has gotten richer running his foundation.
	This should make it abundantly clear that philanthropy is a scam.
	Bill Gates says no to sharing vaccine formulas with the global poor to end the pandemic.
	This should make it abundantly clear that billionaire philanthropy is a scam.
	And Bill Gates is a scammer, a monopolist, a liar, and probably a criminal.
	Because again, let's remember, was it friend Leibowitz who says you don't make $400 million, you steal $400 million?
	That guy's got over $50 billion.
	You think he made that money?
	Bill Gates could single-handedly end homelessness in America and still be one of the richest human beings on the planet.
	Keep that in mind.
	Bill Gates, former science advisor, shocked to be named backup executor of Epstein's will.
	Bill Gates, former science advisor, was the backup executor of Epstein's will.
	Come on.
	Boris Nikolik, a 49-year-old biotech venture capitalist, was named an executor of Jeffrey Epstein's will.
	The will was filed in the U.S. Virgin Islands, where Epstein owned two islands, Little St. James and Great St. James.
	Boris Nikolik was a former science advisor to Bill Gates, the Microsoft founder and philanthropist.
	The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation gave nearly $70 million to the parent organization of the dark money funder of multiple pro-Biden super PACs in 2020.
	It was the largest one-year commitment the foundation has made since 2014 and its second largest ever.
	The donations were given to Arabella Advisors' new venture fund, NVVF, a dark money group that funneled tens of millions to super PACs during the 2020 election cycle that backed Democratic candidates, including President Joe Biden.
	The most recent tax returns available show that the new venture fund raised $450 million from anonymous sources that year.
	There are no good billionaires.
	If there was a good billionaire, they wouldn't stay a billionaire.
	How about that?
	Here we go.
	Here's some more Bill Gates.
	Is there a lesson for you, for anyone else looking at this?
	I'm a billionaire.
	I don't need lessons.
	Okay?
	I give you lessons.
	That's the lesson.
	Really rich people do think they're going to figure out a way to live forever.
	That's the lesson.
	That's the lesson.
	What's the lesson you learned?
	Well, he's dead.
	So, you know, in general, you always have to be careful.
	I can't believe this.
	Anyway.
	There you go.
	There's your Bill Gates, ladies and gentlemen.
	There's the guy everybody thinks is Gandhi because he's a nerd and he wears a crew neck sweater over a button-down shirt and glasses.
	I'm pretty willing to believe that he is pretty evil.
	Why was he hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein even after he knew?
	Oh, he needed money.
	Bill Gates, the richest man in the world, needed money.
	He didn't need teenage girls to have sex with on an island.
	No.
	He needed money.
	I know that's not true.
	He didn't need money.
	So I wonder why he was really hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein.
	I wonder how many times he was on that jet, the Lolita Express.
	How many times?
	Google, see how many times that Jeffrey, that Bill Gates was on the Lolita Express.
	I'm going to wait.
	We'll wait.
	We will.
	The little holding music.
	Hey, Suri, how often was Bill Gates on the Lolita Express?
	17 times Okay, I'm checking it out.
	I'm going to go to the business.
	You say 17?
	I got 17 times, and that was from Reuters article in May 15th, 2020.
	Okay.
	Did you find anything else?
	No, no.
	I just, no, they don't give a number.
	Well, I have to say at the very end where he says, well, he's dead.
	And that should be a warning.
	I just got the feeling he was telling Judy that.
	You better quit asking questions.
	Yeah, he's dead.
	See what happens to people who know too much about the richest people in the world?
	Yeah, see what happens?
	Barack Obama's calling me.
	Hello.
	Hey, man, can I get some water?
	I want a glass of water.
	What?
	Settle down, Jimmy.
	I'm all right.
	I just got to get a glass of water right here.
	Don't worry, it'll be filtered.
	I'm going to talk about that in a second.
	First, I'm going to have some of that Martha's Vineyard water.
	And wear a mask.
	Are you wearing a mask?
	Are you kidding?
	I'm rich.
	But not for long.
	I mean, that was before I got that $32 million book deal.
	Right, right.
	And before Michelle got that $32 million book deal.
	Yeah, okay.
	And before we got that undisclosed sum deal with Netflix.
	Please stop.
	With an option to make our lives into a Broadway musical starring Moment Shant.
	Imagine, can I get some water for foreign with people wearing surreal masks and black legots against a dark background using balloons and tallow piper?
	We get it.
	What do you think's helping me build the damn library?
	Now give me your money, too.
	I got a whole section on pulling up your damn trousers that won't build itself.
	Hey, you know there's a lot more to that phone call, but we don't have time in today's podcast.
	How do you hear the entire phone call?
	You got to become a premium member.
	Go to JimmyDoorComedy.com, sign up.
	It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
	Today's show was written by Ron Placone, Mark Van Landowitz, Steph Zamarano, Jim Earl, Mike McRae, and Roger Rittenhouse.
	All the voices performed today by the one and the only of the inimitable, Mike McRae, who can be found at MikeMcRae.com.
	That's it for this week.
	you be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.
	Don't freak out.
	Do not, do not.
	Do not freak.
	Do not freak.
	Do not freak out.

▲