All Episodes
Dec. 7, 2020 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
01:08:04
Dr Corsi NEWS 12-07-20: Trump Will Win At SCOTUS
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
So, Dr. Corsi, Corsi v. Biden, that's got a nice ring to it.
Well, here we go.
You're right.
Today is Monday, December 7th, 2020.
And by the way, December 7th is Pearl Harbor Day.
It is.
And there are still some of those veterans alive, and thank you for your service.
God bless them.
And some who are buried in the Arizona beneath the waves in that memorial.
And I will write a book about how Franklin Roosevelt Planned, egged the Japanese on, knew it was happening, did nothing about it because he wanted to get out of the war.
This was his way to get America out of pacifism into the war.
And I will, before I die, do that.
And I'll do two more, two volumes on Kennedy.
Show people how we're living in these, where these events are architected by these deep states to get us into wars.
You got to think about World War I as a genocide, not a world war.
And I pretty much had it with these deep state people thinking that they can play psyops as they're trying to do right now to Donald Trump.
Another.
So today is really appropriate that I'm filing in the Supreme court.
Of course, CV Biden repaired the filing.
It's, uh, it will be filed in the Supreme court today.
And I don't know whether this will be the case, but, uh, it could well be.
I'm not a lawyer.
But I have, I think, some excellent arguments here and we'll write up an article later today.
We'll post it on the website so everybody can see it.
And by the end of the day, as we get it filed, I have a timestamp and all the rest.
Of course, E.V.
Biden will be part of the public record.
What do you think of that, Craig?
I think it's great, and yet last week you did a petition to the Supreme Court.
We know that petitions to the ultimate court, Lord's Court, often bear fruit, and I don't know if that petition you made last week had any bearing on what Alito came out with, demanding that the Pennsylvania people submit briefs to him by tomorrow about what happened in that state.
Well, I don't know they're related either, and you never will probably, but I think it moves things along.
What Justice Alito is signaling, really a couple of things.
Number one, December 8th tomorrow is the last date for the safe harbor law, or safe harbor regulations kick in.
That's when the states are supposed to have had all disputes About the election resolved for certification by saying the briefs can be in on the 8th, which means the case is still going to continue for a few more days.
At least this involves the Pennsylvania decision by the governor and by the state legislature.
To move in a direction where there.
Adding three more days to the voting.
Say, well, I know the election ends on November 3rd, but the governor of Pennsylvania, Democrat, Secretary of State, a Democrat said, we'll just have three more days.
And if the mail-in ballots come in and they're postmarked for three more days, I guess that'd be up to the postmarked on the 6th of November, we'll take them and count them.
Well, the problem is the state legislature did not pass a law to that effect.
And there are, under the Constitution, Article Two, there can be no regulation or rule imposed on how the state conducts presidential election that is not issued by the state statute.
So Judge Alito said, we're gonna let, you know, before the election, he gave an order, because he supervises the courts, federal courts, In the circuit that includes Pennsylvania and New Jersey, where I reside, and Judge Alito said we're just going to keep those ballots that came in after the 3rd of November aside.
We'll let you count them, but I want to know how many there are.
I want you to keep those ballots aside.
That's a strong indication he's going to say that those ballots don't count.
They have to be taken out, and that's the case probably Biden loses Pennsylvania.
Now, that's going to be the start of a domino effect, and Justice Alito is signaling.
Now, that came after I did my filing.
Now, there's a fallacy in logic, which is post hoc ergo propter hoc, which means after something, therefore you think it's because of it.
I don't know why Justice Alito made the decision he did to extend the time And I don't know that it's related to my filing, but they have a pretty good idea what's coming because my court case that I'm filing, Court C.B.
Biden, is based on taking my filing asking for pro-persuasponte action, which is, I initially asked the court to do something in the court's best judgment, but now I'm actually filing a case.
So now I've got another step.
Now they have to decide whether they're going to grant certiorari on the case I've filed.
And Justice Alito seems to say, you know, these dates are statutory dates.
Safe Harbor is set up by a statute.
It's a complication in dealing with this post-election period of time, is that we've got The constitution, which sets the basic parameters of how an election for president is to be done.
And ultimately any statutes that come have to be in conformity with the constitution.
Article two.
We also have, uh, two additional amendments, amendment number 12 and 20, which do affect how the presidential election cycle goes.
We've got a couple of laws that do that set dates and times and change some parameters around.
But the basic point is that the Safe Harbor, which set tomorrow, December 8th, as the deadline to finish all the disputes over the state elections, Justice Alito said, that's just a statute.
We don't have to, we can change that.
Given circumstances, I'm sorry, but we didn't meet the December 8th this year.
We're going longer.
Now that means that Alito is pretty well convinced there are irregularities here that are going to take more time to settle out.
And by the way, I'm not even sure today that the Electoral College is going to meet on the 14th, although I suspect they'll try to keep that schedule.
But I think the way the election is headed, the Supreme Court is going to probably take my case, certainly take one similar to it, And I believe the Supreme Court's going to say this entire election, the voting is so messed up that there's no way to fix it.
There's some crimes committed here, which we would like the Justice Department to investigate.
And by the way, I think that Barr and Wray and Durham might also be facing, I wonder what they're going to be doing in their next jobs.
What do you think, Craig?
Well, if President Trump remains president, which I believe he will, I think they'll all be looking for new jobs, starting with Barr, then Wray, then Durham, whatever he's been doing all this time, but maybe not.
You know, Durham is still a mystery to me, but it's perfectly obvious that Christopher Wray and William Barr need to go.
Well, I'm talking about when they begin their next careers, maybe this week.
Oh, I see!
That soon!
I think maybe this week would be good.
Okay.
Okay, now I think after what I'm going to tell you today, you're going to see why.
Okay, so that's the first news.
We are in fact going to now see Corsi Biden filed in the Supreme Court.
We're going to see if they give us a grant of certiorari or not.
Certiorari is the, let us be informed, let it be informed.
It's the ruling that the Supreme Court makes to either grant or deny certiorari, which means the case is either going to be heard or not heard at the Supreme Court.
That's the next thing we'll wait for after the filing today.
Now let's switch gears, Craig, because I want to make it clear that I'm 100% convinced that President Trump will win in the Supreme Court, and the Biden camp's headed to a big fall.
Now, I want to start out with this intelligence document that was filed.
Sidney Powell came up with this, and it comes from the 305th Military Intelligence Unit, which is the unit that General Flynn was involved with.
General Flynn, of course, now is out on, he's got a pardon.
Of course, Judge Sullivan still thinks he can sentence him for something or other.
I don't know what that is, but, you know, he still thinks it's the case.
And so let's go now to what the this intelligent, by the way, there's a lot of things bursting this morning.
I see already there's some articles out about whether the Pennsylvania is going to be overruled on this late voting.
I think there's no question to me that it will be and I think we'll find that out through the course of this week.
But the I want to go to this 305th.
Craig, what do you know about the 305th Military Intelligence Unit?
That's Swords to Satellites.
That's their moniker.
They're based in Huabachaca, Arizona.
That's Cochise County, where Cochise held off the American Army from 1861 to 1872.
And they are the cyber experts and attached to a military division that is solely responsible for cyber issues.
Sounds pretty serious to me.
What do you think they do in that unit, Craig?
I think they patrol what's going on, maybe they even have taps into what the NSA is able to gather and any other intelligence service in the world.
They're probably tapped into Mossad, who knows?
Well, Mossad's, you know, everybody talks about Mossad as if it's the end-all be-all.
It's good, but it's not the end-all be-all, I can assure you.
This unit's also called the Kraken, right?
That's what it's called.
When Sidney Powell said she was going to release the Kraken, I'm not entirely sure what she meant, because I didn't take the famous mind-reading course at Harvard, and it's very hard for me to tell you what somebody else is thinking.
In fact, I don't try.
But this unit is called the Kraken, and I think you were going to release the Kraken.
What we're about to tell you is, after we're finished today, The election 2020 is going to take on a totally different dimension, I promise you.
Craig, do you think that's correct?
I think so.
I think we're at a big turning point.
Okay, let's look at the declaration of somebody who redacted their name.
It's a statement, a declaration.
It's under oath.
Sidney Powell produced it in her filings in Michigan and Georgia.
This person says, I'm over the age of 21 and I'm under no legal disability, which would prevent me from giving this declaration.
I was, not currently, was electronic intelligence analyst under the 305th military intelligence with experience gathering SAM, service-to-air missile system electronic intelligence.
I don't think that would be too complicated.
Do you think so, Craig?
I don't know.
No.
Easy stuff.
I have extensive experience as a white hat hacker used by some of the top echelon specialists in the world.
I just probably do that as a hobby.
The methodology I have employed represent industry standard cyber operation toolkits for digital forensics and OSINT.
What do you think OSINT is?
That's, I know the INT is intelligence, the S is probably signals, I don't know the O. I think it's operational signals intelligence.
Okay.
Which are commonly used to certify connections between servers, network nodes, and other digital properties, and probe to network system Vulnerabilities.
Okay, so he knows how to look through the, how these, all these systems connect and all the like.
I'm a U.S.
citizen and resident blah blah blah location in the United States of America.
Okay, now Dominion and Edison research.
Dominion, of course, is the voting system that was used in, I believe, about 30 states.
It's the one that we've covered extensively by Russ Ramsland, the cyber security expert in Dallas who showed us how the system records votes in fractions, decimals, decimals are fractions, so that you can do weighting systems and you can change votes and you can make the outcome what you want it to be.
There's a whole other dimension of that issue.
Whereas the Dimension and Edison Research Systems exist in the Internet of Things, which makes the network connections between Dominion, Edison Research, and related network nodes available for scanning.
Okay, so the idea that Dominion is not on the internet is complete, I guess, normally, and horizontally, you'd say BS, right, Craig?
That's a good shot, yeah.
Yeah, it's on the internet.
Whereas Edison's research job primarily is to report the tabulation of the count of the ballot information as received from the tabulation software to provide Decision HQ for election results.
So Edison Research takes what the Dominion computer gives it, here's the results, and it puts them into Decision HQ, which then goes to the wire services and the news services to be reported to the public.
And Spiderfoot and RobTex are industry standard digital forensic tools for the evaluation, network security and infrastructure.
He often misses his, you know, I don't think, I don't think English is his first language.
I think his first language is computers because his sentence structure grammar is a little awkward, but his intelligence and regarding what we're about to discuss couldn't be better.
These tools were used to conduct public security scans of the aforementioned Dominion and Edison Research.
Okay, anybody know?
He's got the best tools in the world to detective how all this works.
A public network scan of dominionvoting.com on 2020-11-8, which is following the 11-3-2020
election, revealed the following relationships and revealed 13 unencrypted passwords for Dominion
employees and 75 hashed passwords available in TOR nodes.
I'm not sure what TOR is.
I didn't quite get that.
That's the protocol for downloading of documents.
Okay.
And then look at this network.
What does that tell you right off, Craig?
That's quite the spider web.
A lot of different people involved in accessing the Dominion computer.
Lots and lots of people on the internet.
I didn't think that was supposed to be possible.
They weren't even supposed to be on the internet, right?
It was a closed system.
It didn't go on the internet, so it was safe and secure.
What happened to the air gap?
Yeah, the air gap.
That air gap meant it couldn't connect.
It was a gap between this Dominion server and the internet.
That was the air gap.
So the one didn't go into the other.
Call that in Arizona, BS.
Now he goes in and the first thing he finds out is that one of these nodes, Dominion Voting, is in Belgrade.
That's in Yugoslavia, isn't it?
Serbia.
And he's got the name here of two Serbs.
Who are software developer at Dominion Voting Systems and senior full-stack web developer.
Of course, it's not on the internet, so I don't know why they need this guy.
Okay, now, Serbia is where another little conflict began a few years ago.
Do you remember that, Craig?
I think it was called World War I. That's right.
Sarajevo.
And Bill Clinton was kind of involved in this area of the world, wasn't he?
Yeah, I think we actually sent some war planes over there to deal with that issue during the Clinton administration.
But we were fighting on the side of the Muslims, weren't we?
Yeah, we were picking sides.
Sometimes we were on the wrong side.
Well, they kind of like Muslims in the Democratic Party.
Radical Muslim starting wars and terrorism.
I'm sure Iran has nothing to do with our election, does it, Craig?
The initial search of Edison Research on 2011-8 showed that Edison Research has an Iranian
server here.
I'm sure Iran has nothing to do with our election, does it, Craig?
Well, I'm sure that John Kerry would say that it doesn't.
Oh, you mean John Kerry and the swift boat fame?
Yeah, you know, the one whose daughter is married to the son of, or the best man at the wedding when his daughter got married, is the son of the person, I believe, that Kerry negotiated with at the table for the Iran deal.
This wouldn't be the same John Kerry that That Biden is planning to send back to the Middle East to reinstate the Iranian deal from Obama, would it be?
Yeah, I think they're probably loading the pallets of cash into another cargo plane, getting ready to go over and restart the Iran deal.
So they can develop a nuclear weapon and we can have a nuclear war by 2020?
2022, yeah.
Okay.
Got my ears mixed up.
Alright, so, as we continue down this page, so Iran is involved in the Dominion server, inputting the Iranian IP, The internet protocol, or the address, into RoboTax, this tool, confirms the direct connection into the Edison Research host from the perspective of the Iranian domain also.
This means that it's not possible that the connection was a unidirectional reference.
So, that means Iran could... In other words, it was going back and forth.
Iran could enter in and maybe manipulate the data.
That's what he said in computer speak.
A deep research of the ownership of the Edison Research, edisonresearch.com, shows a connection to BMA Capital Management, where share or fear, share or fear, share or fear, share or fear, share or, what do you think that means in relationship to Iran?
Every time I hear the word Iran, you know, I have to fight the fear.
So, CherylFear.com and BMACapital.com are both connected to EdisonResearch.com via a VPS, or virtual private server, as denoted by the VPS at the start of the internet name.
So, all these guys are on a virtual private server where they can't be detected through normal security.
Channels.
They're trying to hide their IPs.
But yet, it looks like the BMA Capital, the Shero Fear, the Iranian Node, all of these people are connected together.
And also, the next page, which is page 5, Dominion Voting is also dominionvotingsystems.com.
Of which there are also many examples, including access to the network from China.
Wow.
Well, you don't mean that China and Iran are both in the Dominion computer system counting the votes of our election, do you?
Well, I don't know.
And when they say China, I would think they mean Communist China.
I would guess.
And we just found the connection with Iran is two ways.
In other words, it's not just telling Iran about what they are.
It's Iran's also able to get in there and do things.
Let's find out about China.
So he's gone back to the Wayback Machine, and he's now tracking through all the connections China, this is one of the, it just turns out that the, and this is on page six of 17, which he's going to, the Whois server on, he's looking up Whois, which is a search to find out who owns a domain on GoDaddy.
I wonder if they watch any of those commercials with those hot babes.
DominionVotingSystems.com, It says here that the registered state was Hunan.
Is that in China?
That is in communist China.
I thought so too.
And the name of the server is ns1.dns.com.
That wouldn't happen to be in China too, would it?
Yeah.
And Dr. Corsi, I think there's a city in Hunan named Wuhan.
I was getting there.
Oh, sorry.
That's good.
I mean, I'm not dazed.
I'm glad you added it.
Look, this is who owns DominionVotingSystems.com, the communist Chinese.
These are the guys that we're happy to run our elections in 30 states.
Does this represent a national security interest, Craig?
I'm a little foggy on this.
Not if you ask Gina Haspel.
Our CIA has jurisdiction over this?
They probably do, but they probably don't think this is a big deal.
I think that's what John Brennan is telling his little puppet, Gina.
Don't worry about it.
I'm sure John Brennan, was he for torture questioning or was he against it?
No, you have to ask Gina.
She was in charge of that whole operation.
Well, as I remember it, he was Against it, and then he became CIA director, I think it was for it, and then he became against it.
Back and forth.
He seemed to be a little bit influenced by the politics.
And wasn't Dianne Feinstein, who was producing reports at this time, and the big documentary... Feinstein was the communist Chinese driver.
The communist Chinese driver, that one.
Saying that this torture, this, you know, using these waterboarding... Of course, the CIA was saying, hey, we saved American lives.
And they didn't want it done anymore.
You don't think there was a connection between John Brennan and the Communist Chinese, do you?
Well, I don't know, since he voted for Gus Hall in, what, 1976, the Communist candidate back then, and has since, I guess, converted to Islam.
I think he's conflicted, don't you?
Yep, it is.
Conflicted totally.
CIA's done nothing.
CIA's hiding this data.
I took a computer expert here in the Kraken.
This is the releasing of the Kraken.
Point number 11 on page 7.
BMA Capital is known as a company that provides Iran access to capital markets with direct links publicly discoverable on LinkedIn.
Found via Google on 11-19-20.
So he was searching this all on 11-19-20 right after the election.
He was figuring it out.
And then the next page, 8.
Mohammed.
Tal Ha, BMA Capital Management, he's the Money Manager, Fixed Income, BMA Capital Management, BMA Capital, Manager FMR at Pakiran, joint investment company, Pakistan.
Pakistan!
Holy moly, another mystery man from Pakistan!
Isn't that where Osama Bin Laden was found?
Uh, yeah, they found him there.
And that's also where we had those, uh, that Awan family that was taking care of all the Democrat computers, uh, in the Congress.
That was, uh, Debbie Wasserman Schultz and, um, and company.
Before she had to resign as head of the DNC after WikiLeaks dropped that dump showing how she and Hillary had conspired to make sure that Bernie Sanders would never win a primary.
Or enough primaries to get the nomination of the Democratic Party for president in 2016.
So he's a Pakistan money manager, Pakistan tied to Iran, BMA Capital involved in Dominion voting systems, all tied into the computer system that did our voting in 30 states.
Okay, now he goes back to this Robex and he texts, confirms that the Iranian address is tied To the server in the Netherlands, which correlates to known operational signal intelligence of Iranian use of the Netherlands as a remote server.
So, here you've got Iran operating out of the Netherlands in a remote server, in a way to disguise and mask their involvement in a variety of things, including, evidently, Dominion voting systems.
And then a search of the indivisible.org showed a subdomain which evidences the existence of scorecard software in use of the Indivisible, formerly Acorn, political group.
Now Indivisible was a group that Obama formed.
Obama formed this group I guess it was really between 2008 and 2012 as I remember.
ACORN was the group that Obama was really originally working with when he was a community organizer in Chicago.
And ACORN is also the first group that got James O'Keefe famous when he got one of his assistants to dress up as a
hooker and he was the pimp and they went into Acorn and wanted to know where they could get housing
to set up their porn little deal with hookers to do prostitution in the area. And Acorn said,
well, we can help you with that.
That's right up our alley. Okay, now scorecard is also ties into what
general McInerney has been talking about with this hammer network that Montgomery was talking
about in scorecard, which is another set of technologies, which will help you change results.
results.
Indivisible was famous.
So, as Acorn developed Indivisible, Indivisible put out A manual.
I wrote about it when I wrote about what went wrong in 2012 in the Romney election after I spent three weeks flying on Romney's airplane.
The end of the campaign is traveling press.
That was sure fun.
You have two or three hours of sleep at night whether you needed it or not.
And Indivisible was set up to teach people how to go to town hall meetings and wreck them by asking Very hard questions.
Remember those town hall meetings where the activists would show up and a congressman was trying to get voters and they would just trash the congressman and they had tactics to do it?
That was indivisible.
Now, what this means too is that this expert has just tied in Obama and his radical organizations for communist social change, Marxist tactics, out of ACORN, is tied in uh through the this iranian tie in the netherlands detected through um this indivisible.org scorecard a search of the indivisible organization showed a domain subdomain scorecard which evidences the use of scorecard software one part of the indivisible political group for obama
13.
Each of the tabulation software companies have their own central reporting affiliate.
Edison Research is an affiliate for Dominion.
Beanfield.com out of Canada shows the same connections via co-hosting sites including dvscorp.com.
He's showing this through the hosting.
So Dominion partner domain DVS Corp also includes an auto discovery feature where new in-network devices automatically connect to the system.
The following diagram shows something the related dv.sc OPR.com mappings which mimic the infrastructure for Dominion and are an obvious typo derivation of the name.
Typo dot derivations are commonly purchased to catch redirect traffic and sometimes used as honeypots.
The diagram shows the infrastructure spans many different servers as methodology.
Okay, and there they are.
And these connect to Iran and other places, including the following Chinese domain.
And there it is.
Okay.
Now the simple way of understanding this is that in this backend structure, it's not just the Chinese and the Iranians.
It's also the Obama organizations in divisible that are tied into the Connections in the computer system, which are dealing with Edison, where the data from Dominion is reported out to the networks, and the Iranians, Chinese, and possibly even Indivisible, have access to that data, possibly even to manipulate it.
Certainly, the Iran connection is a double-way connection.
Point 16, the Dominion voting systems sold a number of their patents to China, via HSBC Bank in Canada.
HSBC Bank is one of my favorites.
You know why, Craig?
Well, they've had a connection with doing a lot of nefarious acts, and I believe that, was it Comey or Mueller that was associated with HSBC?
What it was, was that on the board, Comey was on the board, I believe, of HSBC Bank when I caught them doing the illegal Money laundering they were doing.
That was when we had all of these pages that were coming out of the system from HSBC that were brought to me by... I want to remember this guy's name right now because he's very important.
That was out of Long Island, New York, was it?
Yeah, it was out of Long Island.
I just want to get the guy's name because he really deserves the credit for this.
And I hate not giving people credit.
Let me just find it.
Take me a second.
Probably just a coincidence that Comey was on that board.
Oh yeah, sure.
He was making sure that they followed all ethical policies.
Yeah, um... Okay, here we go.
Let's see.
I'm just trying to, they have a hard time, they don't, of course, oh here we go.
Whistleblower believes HSBC is still money laundering.
This is, this will have it right here.
Loretta Lynch was tied into this.
The whole group of them were all tied into this.
And, um, John Cruz, John Cruz, John Cruz wrote a book.
I want to give John Cruz full credit here because he really did a great job pulling this together.
And, uh, I want to do Amazon.
I want to tell you what the name of his book is.
I really do like giving everybody credit.
Okay, and... It's hard to find on these, you know.
Yeah, his book is called World Banking Fraud Using Your Identity.
Yeah, I've got it.
It's up on the screen right now.
Yeah, they, what they, in that scheme that they take your social security number, they use your identity, run millions of dollars through an account that's Really a bogus account.
It's set up for the money laundering, and then they close it after they put zero money coming in, zero money going out.
They close the account.
You don't ever know about it.
They run billions of dollars around the world doing this scheme.
And Comey was on the board.
I caught them.
Ultimately, they had to pay a $1.9 billion fine.
They had to pay a $1.9 billion fine.
Of course, they only got a wrist slap.
But that's- Yeah, compared to the trillions they probably moved through
there.
Trillions of dollars they moved through there.
Okay, now, so through HSBC, they moved these patents from the Dominion software to China.
China bought the patents.
And if you look down a little bit on page 13, a particular interest section of this document shows the nature of the patents had to do with authentication.
Okay, so you've got the patents, which is the, this is on page 13, and the patent is the ballot level security features for optical scanning machine, capable of ballot imaging processing, secure ballot printing, and ballot layout authentication and verification.
Now, this is the place where they scan the ballots, And I suspect can change the voting on the ballots.
So that however the system is adjusting the votes by switching votes, they can have ballots now that look like the original data that were really switched within the system.
So you've got what should be a paper trail, all electronic, and the paper trail you're going to have is of the switched ballots.
Okay, now Symantec, remember the Smartmatic, which says, oh, we're a different company.
We don't have anything to do with this.
They basically create the cloud in which this operates.
And the Cytel, S-C-Y-T-E-L, is the company that provides the security and electronic system.
And he documents that in the next page.
And then page 18 in the GitHub account for Cytel, CITL J seats have become some of the programming necessary to support a much broader set of election types, including a decorator process where the data is smoothed.
The following diagram shows that how it goes.
So this is on page 15 and you see that the votes come in and they're tallied But then they go through a filter and there's just these gears that says process.
I love this.
Just a little process.
Well, that's probably the process in which they apply their algorithms.
And as you'll note, input into the process is the seat allocation configuration.
And in the diagrams provided by Russ Ramsland, the intervention here at the process level is from NGP Van.
Which is the, again, a democratic computer system set up by Obama operatives that was the computer system Hillary Clinton used in her 2016 campaign.
And that filter includes parameters.
Okay.
Here's how you do voting data as a political scientist.
Let's take Detroit or take Boston.
Okay.
Now Boston, first of all, your primary, Factor in dealing with voting data is really kind of an economic measure of combining class and race.
It's illustrated by saying that, for instance, if you're a Black in Boston and you live in Roxbury, which is a largely Black segregated division of relatively poor Blacks, you're probably going to vote Democrat.
If you're Black And you live in Beacon Hill, which is one of the, that's where John Kerry lives, one of the hoity-toity oldest original colonial areas of Boston near the State Capitol, from where all the Boston elite come from.
If you're a black living there, you're probably at just a whole different echelon,
but still likely gonna be voting Democratic, but you're gonna be outweighed by a lot of others
who used to vote.
This is where all the top, top diplomats, the top people who've been in the FDR administration,
all these people were coming from, and the lodges, the cabots, the cabot lodges,
I mean, these were big names when I was growing up and around Boston.
I was born and raised in Cleveland, but my grandmother's sister from Ireland
lived in Framingham, and so we spent a lot of time out in Boston, and I got to know her as a kid,
and then as a graduate student at Harvard.
So you'd say, okay, so we want to profile the voting in Roxbury and South Side, which is like the white area that's always having fights with Roxbury.
And it's not an upper class, it's pretty much middle, lower middle class.
And they're going to vote, now they're going to vote for Trump.
You want to profile, if you say, well, to win Biden's got to get so much of this kind of numbers and percentage out of Roxbury.
If the numbers are low, that's bad for Biden.
If the percentages are high for Trump, that's bad for Biden.
So in this process, you're monitoring the voting coming out of Roxbury and you're changing it to be the way you want it to be.
Okay, and they've got tally features, which is looking at it.
So tally features, it's a running average.
In other words, you're constantly making these calculations.
And tie breakers, you're able to decide which way you want the vote to go.
And then the result decorators, isn't that a nice term?
Result decorators means after you switch the vote, you can go back and change the ballot to make it look the way you want it to be decorated.
and after you decorate, then you produce the result and that result chooses the candidates
in the seats. Isn't this nice, Craig? This is how the sausage is made and I'm not liking this sausage.
Right, because it's a complete way to calculate professionally, looking at models that are
sophisticated from political science and other data, statistically, who's winning, who's losing,
and to adjust the outcomes so Biden wins.
And then the results are printed out, you wouldn't know the difference.
And all of this goes back to tie-ins from Iran, China, Pakistan, Democrat party that used to be ACORN and all internet run and all such that it can be penetrated.
And then 19 unrelated but also a point of interest is CTCL or Center for Tech and Civic Life funded by Zuckerberg.
Within their github page One of the programmers holds a government position.
The BitCoop repo shows Tanderegg is one of the developers.
He works for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
And here's Tanderegg.
There's his picture or his, what do you call that?
His avatar.
And he works for the Consumer Protection Federal Bureau in Washington, D.C.
And it's seen in a document titled, this document AA, this is on page 16, AA20-304-A,
Iranian advanced persistent threat actor identified obtaining voter registration data
that was authored by the cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency
with a product on a specific date of October 30th, 2020.
CSA and the FBA reports that the Iranian APT teams were using Acutenix, a web scanning software
to find vulnerabilities within the election company websites
confirmed to be used by the Iranian APT teams to buy seized cloud storage that I personally captured
and reported to higher authorities.
These scanning behaviors show that foreign agents of aggressor nations had access to U.S.
voter lists and had done so recently.
That should be reassuring to everybody through this guy here, Tim Anderegg.
I wonder if he's Iranian.
No, he couldn't be.
And he couldn't be related to Zuckerberg, who happens to be Facebook social media, could he?
I think it's all one big happy family.
Page 21.
In my professional opinion, this affidavit presents unambiguous evidence that Dominion voter systems and Edison research have been accessible.
We're certainly compromised by rogue actors, including Iran and China.
By using servers and employees connected with rogue actors and hostile foreign influences, combined with numerous easily discoverable leaked credentials, these organizations neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data and intentionally provided infrastructure and provided
access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the
most recent one in 2020.
This represents a complete failure of their duty to protect basic cyber security. This is not a
technological issue, but rather a governance and basic security issue.
If it is not corrected, future elections in the United States and beyond will not be secure and citizens will not have confidence in the results.
And it's probably a national security attack, which means that we're at war with Iran and China.
Am I wrong in that conclusion?
No, I would believe that that all fits together.
Those dots are connected.
And he said, I've declared this under penalty of perjury, and it was executed November 23rd, 2020, 20 days after the election.
And I've included this in my filing, Corsi v. Biden of the Supreme Court.
I've alleged we have national security issues involved in this, and there's been foreign interference in the election.
And they have the capability of manipulating the results.
That's in my filing to the Supreme Court.
What do you think that means, Craig?
Well, I think that you've got the ability then to have it heard.
Well, not only that, the Supreme Court now knows that they've got issues with the CIA.
Why has the CIA been asleep in the switch?
President Trump knows he's got a national security threat, which is really equivalent to an act of war by China and Iran.
We've got certain laws now, including the Insurrection Act, that executive order that President Trump signed a couple years ago about foreign interference in U.S.
elections.
Do you think, Dr. Corsi, this could connect to the Wuhan Communist Chinese Party virus actually being an act of war?
I don't think we're going to get there.
We don't need to get to the virus.
That's another separate issue.
We've got enough right here to say if China and Iran were looking at the data in the Dominion system with the ability to manipulate it, and this was provided by Obama operatives and Zuckerberg, I would say Obama has more problems than just not being president anymore.
He may have committed treason here.
And Zuckerberg doesn't need to, again, doesn't need to worry about his holdings in his holdings in Facebook, because when he's facing a firing squad are getting charged with treason, it's not going to matter how much money he's got.
This is treasonous.
This is treason.
So the Democrats, to get Biden elected, committed treason.
That's what this document says.
And it's in my filing.
I put it before the Supreme Court today.
The justices will know what I'm talking about.
I didn't have to do more than reference this document, which I did, which makes this document part of the case.
The case is that it's a 14th Amendment case.
And now I'm even alleging that Iran and China and the Democrats and these operatives and Zuckerberg all interfered with my 14th Amendment rights for my vote to have equal, my vote didn't have an equal say in anything now.
Not when it's China and Zuckerberg and all these other people manipulating the data so that my vote couldn't possibly make any difference anywhere.
Even if it did get registered after the governor forced me to do it by mail-in, saying it was going to be probationary if I filed it here in the state of New Jersey in person, and then it was going to get double-checked to see if I had registered to vote, which was not done for the pile of mail-in ballots that they just ran through the copy machines and then ran through the voting systems multiple times after they brought them in in suitcases.
We don't have just a, we're not worried anymore about tabulating votes.
We're worried about who's going to go to the electric chair.
I think that sounds to me like these are major crimes and crimes of high crimes and misdemeanors on Obama's part.
I think he can still be impeached after he is no longer president and charged with treason.
I don't think we have to worry anymore about, you know, switching a few votes in Georgia.
It's way beyond that now.
And my filing with the Supreme Court puts that on the public record today.
I don't need anybody's permission to do it.
My voting rights as a citizen were violated under the 14th Amendment.
I'm not happy about it.
So I'm complaining to the Supreme Court.
I want it remedied.
They'll probably take the case.
What do you think, Craig?
I think you've got a really good chance.
But of course, AP will dispute that.
AP?
Associated Press.
I thought they were part of the conspiracy.
Weren't they important?
They sure are, and for everybody to keep pointing towards them on these Twitter feeds every time you post something that they don't like, they put under it AP Disputes.
You don't think they may... It gives them a rat's rear end about AP.
You don't think they may have criminal or possibly national security implications in their actions, including MSNBC and NBC and all the rest of them.
You don't think they've committed treason, do you?
Yeah, pretty much.
Well, they should be shut down and they're not news organizations.
Let's pull their licenses.
Okay.
Now this is the, this is game shifting information.
We're no longer playing.
We're no longer playing election.
We're no longer counting votes.
We're now worried about where we point the missiles and when we turn them on.
Donald Trump is elected president.
I think as of today, it's in the bag.
I don't see any way that Biden stands a chance once this information is made and once it's explained to the American people.
And I think the justices are on to it now.
Certainly as a result of my filing and this podcast and the other things we've done to communicate to the justices and the Supreme Court, they know they're facing treason and they know they got, in fact, as I said in my book, coup d'etat, this is a coup d'etat.
How are we doing on time, Craig?
Time-wise, on the recording, you're at 51 minutes.
There's one of the other articles I found here.
I gave it to you earlier today.
It's this Epoch Times article.
There's two more things I want to reference before we're done.
This Epoch Times article, if you'll put it up, is from Nevada.
This was found by True The Vote, which is Katherine Engelbrecht.
She's been a great patriot for a long time.
I've gotten, I've met her.
I've talked to her.
She's just a tremendous patriot.
She is working on this True to the Vote.
And she sent a letter to the Assistant Attorney General for National Security.
I wonder, do you think she sees the national security issue what we're about to discuss?
I think it's clear and evident.
Well, what she did was she was basically Sure.
True.
The vote requested Nevada voter files.
The secretary of state after the November 3rd election, the state responded with a voter file and an email, but the message was copied to vagas, but Pakistani based cab tech solutions limited.
And she said the fact this company was CC'd in Pakistan.
On an email containing access to Nevada voter registration database appears to be evidence of a breach within the Nevada Secretary of State's email system.
Obviously, the problem with such a breach may evidence include access to at least voter registration information of Nevada residents.
At worst, it could reveal a breach that gives a foreign power access not only to the state of Nevada's systems, but to the email systems of anyone within the state Anyone whom the state communicates with an email.
Okay, so there we go.
I mean, so now Nevada's election probably ought to be thrown out altogether after this becomes known.
And Craig, I want you to go to another, I'm going to have to find it here for just a second.
It'll take me a minute to think about.
I want to, one of the Obama articles that in when the Floyd George Floyd.
I mean, I don't mean to disrespect the guy, but this whole operation led to Obama coming in, and what Obama was doing was Obama was essentially It was essentially giving a speech by internet.
This is one of those remote speeches in which he was encouraging the Black Lives Matters to burn and engage in insurrection.
I want to try to find that.
It was so much going on last two days.
I've been kind of spinning around trying to keep up with it in my mind because there's just been so much information that's been developed.
But Let me see if I can find it here quickly.
But basically, all of this yesterday was developing with this article that I think I know where it is.
Hold on a second.
Literally, it has been dizzying how much there's been going on the last two days as this has been breaking.
Hold on.
I think this is the article right here.
Yeah, here's the article, Craig.
Let me give it to you so you can post it.
There you go, that article right there, CNN.
CNN reported this, and this was on June 3, 2020, a few months ago, when we had the death of George Floyd, which was a tragic death.
And Obama gave a speech Uh, and what he was saying was that the, um, that this killing of Floyd and the pandemic represent the epic changes.
And what he was saying is that, um, I have enough.
I, I know enough about history to say there's something different here.
Look at the protests in the sixties.
They were peaceful protests.
It's kind of about Martin Luther King.
He said today.
Basically, this represents something that we need to go into a whole nother gear of violence and intensity.
But hearing a lot of chatter, voting versus protest, politics, participation versus civil disobedience, and direct action, this is neither.
This is both.
And to bring about real change, we have to highlight a problem, make people in power uncomfortable, We have to translate that into practical solutions that can be implemented.
And he is not here for law and order.
He wants to defund the police.
And those who've been talking about protests, just remember this country was founded on protests called the American Revolution.
And every step of progress, every expansion of freedom has been won through efforts that made the status quo uncomfortable, like rioting.
I want to come directly to the young men and women of color.
This country has witnessed too much violence, too much death.
Some violence has not come from folks who are supposed to be serving and protecting you, the police.
I want you to know that your dreams matter.
And so he's talking about his, I look at the faces of my daughter.
Wasn't one of those daughters having sex with Hunter Biden?
Yeah, there's a video that shows that.
Was it Sasha or was it Malia?
I can't remember which.
Malia.
I look at my nephews and nieces.
I don't have to worry about them.
They're taking a jog or driving down the street.
So you've got the power to make things better.
I'm hopeful you'll also feel angry.
Okay?
So basically what Obama is saying here, and he's saying it pretty clearly, to bring about change we have to highlight a problem, but to make people in power uncomfortable, we also have to translate that into action, practical solution and laws that can be implemented, and essentially he's calling here for a violent revolution.
This is an insurrection he's calling for, he's saying it doesn't make any difference if you burn the place down, Because it's time for a revolution.
Now the fundamental transformation after 400 years of discrimination.
Now it's our turn.
This is Obama quoted again.
A lot of ways what's happened over the last several weeks is challenges and structural problems in the United States have been thrown into high relief.
Critical race theory.
They are outcomes not just of the immediate moments in time but of a long history of slavery and Jim Crow and redefining and institutionalizing racism.
I thought that we went away from that already.
And I hope we'll be able to seize this moment.
If that's not calling for a violent revolution, I don't know what is.
Okay, so now the warnings that have to go out to the President are a couple.
Number one, we covered the lawfare yesterday, earlier last week, I guess we did, of the lawfare saying that, this is a lawfare article, we'll find it for a minute.
And the lawfare article was lawfare, who will decide to investigate Trump?
And this makes it clear, the lawfare article, which is where the, you know, lawfare is like warfare, it's used by the left to destroy the constitution.
So this article makes it clear that, right here, that if the, following all of this, if, Biden is president.
They're going to put the Trump family in prison and it won't be Biden.
So we're going to be above politics, attorney general.
Well, I'm going to leave it to my operatives operatives.
So it comes down to the struck and page level.
Say nobody's above the law.
Okay.
Now, if Obama's willing to call for violence and violent revolution, I think that, um, president Trump and Donald Trump ought to be concerned that they're not going to be allowed to live because Machiavelli 101 coup d'etat.
Don't let the king live.
Depose the prince.
Kill the prince.
You can prison him, but then he's still thinking about it.
Machiavelli writes a whole chapter about whether it's better to imprison your enemies or kill them.
And he says in the Prince and the Discourse is that if they're still alive, they're still thinking of killing you.
If they're dead, they're not thinking about anything.
You don't have to worry about them.
Also, there's another corollary to all this, and that is that basically it looks to me like the Biden-Harris team has rigged an election in order to affect a coup that Obama is still directing in a violent way, and has the potential to end up in violence.
I want to do one more piece And it's going to bring me up against a hard break.
We're going to have to broadcast this a little bit late today.
You'll not be able to get it right at 11 o'clock.
I apologize for that, Craig.
We're pre-recording it today.
But Dershowitz made a statement yesterday in which Dershowitz was basically saying that he's changed his mind a little bit.
This was kind of a big surprise to me.
When Dershowitz comes on, and on Fox News, let me see if I can find it.
Dershowitz, Fox News, plus State Legislative... You had posted it.
Is it the one that you posted explains how the Supreme Court?
Yeah, that's it.
It's that one.
That's the one I want to go to right there.
Thanks.
Dershowitz explains, I'll give it to you, I've got it up now.
I've got the article.
If you want the one from Fox News, I've got it.
Put it up, put it up.
Okay, it's up.
This happened over the weekend where Dershowitz, you know, who is, I thought Dershowitz might be a good one to represent President Trump, and then it was clear that Dershowitz was siding with Larry Tribe and was going to be on the lawfare side.
He was going to try to get Trump, going to try to get Biden as president.
He favored Biden.
And that's a surprise because Dershowitz represented Trump in the Senate impeachment trial over Ukraine.
Now, this was a big article because the lawfare people have been saying, this is a little bit of a technical point, I'm going to go quick because I'm going to run up against a hard break myself.
The lawfare people have been saying that even though the Constitution under Article 2 says the state legislators Anytime they want, can take the power to pick the electors back and choose the Trump electors in a state where Biden won the popular vote.
And Larry Tribe has been saying, no, no, no, we gotta look at the timestamp.
Dershowitz was on this because if that law stays in place, a state law that the popular vote determines the electors, and that was not changed before the election, then the state Legislature has the power to take it back, but only for the next election.
Well, Dershowitz in this article says, well, maybe that's not quite right.
So maybe there's, we ought to look further.
Uh, in fact, in, um, in Georgia and some of these other states, there may actually be probable cause for investigating and looking further.
Giuliani has made serious accusations.
The question is, which institution is constitutionally designed to look into it?
Is it the state legislature or the courts?
Well, then he opined as he went through this, he's suggesting that maybe the state legislatures aren't the right place, but he does say, clearly state legislatures have the power before the voters vote to pick the electors.
The unanswered question is, do they have the powers, the legislatures, to pick electors after the vote, Dershowitz just said two things here.
has in some way been defrauded or wrong? That's a constitutional question. We don't know the answer.
The Supreme Court may get to decide it. The state legislature decides to determine who the electors
should be and changes the electors from Biden to Trump. Dershowitz just said two things here.
He said, number one, that this Constitution, as we've said, is clear.
The power of the state legislature is punnery.
They can take this power back anytime they want.
That's said in Bush v. Gore.
And Dershowitz has just affirmed they don't have to go with the Biden electors, even if that law in the state stays in place.
And by the way, the Supreme Court's going to be involved in this.
They're going to have to decide these issues.
So let's go to the Supreme Court.
Dershowitz just threw Larry Tribe and Lawfare under the bus.
So Dershowitz has come to know, for some reason or other, that the Larry Tribe is going to go down.
They're going to lose.
Biden's going to lose.
And he doesn't want to be caught on the losing side on this one, evidently, knowing that the Trump train is going to roll over all these people and the national security issue Going to war with a computer system that chose the voters, that chose who won and lost, depending on how Iran and China and the democratic operatives of Obama wanted it to be.
Craig, I think it's the biggest story I've ever seen in my life.
And I filed a case with the Supreme Court this morning, of course, E.B.
Biden.
Okay, now we're gonna run out of time quickly, and I've got about two minutes.
If you want to support what we're doing.
Go to donate on the Corsi Nation website.
We're gonna need resources to fight this battle.
It's just beginning.
The election battle has just begun.
Forget all the nonsense, forget everything you've been told.
Biden is not president-elect.
We've just started.
Now the fight gets serious.
The Supreme Court gets involved, and it's gonna go to Congress.
Congress is gonna pick the president.
Like I said in my book, Trump Wins.
I wrote this three or four weeks ago.
And now it's playing out.
And I think you should all, we've got a couple of books.
I'll sign coup d'etat and silent no more, which I think now are going to be historic books and get them to you for a hundred dollars.
We'll take another a hundred dollar deal.
We'll do my book, America for sale and the late great USA.
And that'll be a hundred dollars.
And there's other books to buy my eBooks and donations.
This would help us greatly.
We're going to continue doing this whether anybody donates or not.
It's not about money.
It's about saving the country for our children, our grandchildren, and future generations.
Saving our liberties from what is in fact a coup d'etat, an insurrection.
Obama's behind it.
I'm sure Hillary's in the background.
Dershowitz jumps ship over the weekend.
In the end, God always wins.
This is Jerome Corsi, and I'm signing off.
I've got to go quickly now.
We took a little bit longer today to get this all done.
It's, I think, been a historic broadcast.
Craig, any last words on this?
Fear not.
Stay strong.
Be united.
Keep praying.
Keep praying.
In the end, God always wins.
This is Jerome Corsi with my producer Craig.
Today is Pearl Harbor Day, December 7th, 2020.
We've exposed Franklin Roosevelt today.
And the killers of John Kennedy, and Obama, and the insurrectionists.
May they all go down.
We'll be back tomorrow.
God bless all.
Thank you for listening.
Export Selection