All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 5, 2020 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
01:13:15
Dr Corsi NEWS 11-05-20: Trump is On Track to Win Re-election
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thanks for watching!
So, Dr.
Corsi, we had a little bit of a technical hiccup on starting the broadcast, but we're live right now.
Okay, well, this is Dr.
Jerome Corsi, and today is November 5th, 2020, two days after the election.
And I'm here with my producer, Craig.
So we pre-recorded the show this morning.
I've had a very busy day today.
And it turned out the first 10 minutes had no audio to it.
The rest is good. It's an important broadcast, I believe, because we're covering in here a couple of really key subjects.
I'm explaining how the...
The basic point is that Trump is going to win.
I think it's kind of locked and secure that he's going to win.
So I want everybody to kind of relax.
The first point that we're going to make is that the voter fraud is obvious.
The Democrats have just...
Made up these ballots in the middle of the night and delivered them.
There's so many videos of the Democrats not letting Republican poll watchers in to monitor the vote counts.
There's abundant evidence of fraud.
And that's got to be pursued in the state courts.
The president has assembled an outstanding team, Rudy Giuliani, who's been just stalwart.
In defending the president through the Russia collusion, hoax, Mueller.
Rudy's done a magnificent job.
And Sidney Powell, who is the attorney for General Flynn, has joined the team.
And they're both outstanding.
This is a great team. They're going to win.
But I make a couple of points.
I go through the... Remember, I'm a political scientist by training.
My PhD in Harvard many years ago, 1972, was in political science.
And I, my doctoral dissertation was a constitutional law theme on the First Amendment, prior restraint and prior punishment of political speech.
It was at the time of the Pentagon Papers, and this was a major issue at the time.
It still is today.
But I took a lot of, I audited a lot of courses in law school and did a lot of my work for my dissertation in the law school.
I had been accepted to the law school at the same time I got accepted to the political science department in 19...
1968, a long time ago.
And the political science department offered to pay everything.
It was going to cost me nothing, and they were going to pay me $1,000 a month.
The law school I was going to have to pay for, and they didn't have a combined program at the time.
So I went to the political science department.
But Paul Freund, who was one of the renowned...
Constitutional law scholars at the Harvard Law School.
I audited many courses with him and spoke with him many times at his office.
He's a brilliant man. John Kennedy asked him to be on the Supreme Court when he was president.
And Freund said, no, he'd prefer to teach at the Harvard Law School.
And Kennedy said, well, I've just given you the chance to make law and you want to teach law.
Kennedy didn't understand it.
And one of my two advisors was Arthur Sutherland Jr., who was the historian of the Harvard Law School.
He had clerked with Oliver Wendell Holmes.
And so I did a lot of work in the law school, the Harvard, and my dissertation was on that topic.
Now I'm covering today two important things.
One is that the way the Constitution is written, it's important to know that All these contests of the state fraud have got to be conducted before the 14th of December, because that's when the Electoral College meets.
And so there's a time frame.
Part of the Bush v.
Gore decision in 2000, the Florida recount was The court ended the recount because the Democrats wanted to keep recounting and recounting and recounting and throw the election past the Electoral College meeting when the Electoral College couldn't decide the election.
And they wanted to go to the House of Representatives.
Now, I'm making several points that are very important.
Number one, according to the Constitution, and this is affirmed in the Bush v.
Gore decision, According to the Constitution, the state legislators pick the electors.
Now, by tradition, they've allowed the popular vote to select the electors.
In other words, when you vote, you're not voting necessarily for President Trump or Biden.
You're voting for the electors who have been picked to represent that candidate in the Electoral College.
Remember, the Electoral College is what decides the votes because each state is counted in the Electoral College so that California and New York don't just decide everything by the popular vote since they've got the most people.
And according to the Constitution, the state legislatures are not bound to pick the legislators by whoever wins the popular vote.
They can pick it however they want.
They can say, there's electoral fraud here, and we know it as state legislatures.
And by the way, the state legislatures in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania are all controlled by the GOP. So remember, the states have been very strongly for the GOP. And so they can pick Trump legislators, even if...
Even if the popular vote in the state stays for Biden in Wisconsin and Michigan.
I don't think it will, but it could.
At any rate, that's one of the safeguards, is that we could have the state legislators pick the electors, even in states where Trump lost, saying it was because of electoral fraud, and they're going to pick a Trump slate of electors.
And Bush v.
Gore, the Supreme Court decision in 2008, It has language in it that says the state legislatures have plenary authority.
They can take back any law that was made saying that the electors have to be selected by the popular vote of the state for president and make the decision any way they want.
That's how the Constitution is written.
Secondly, if it does go to the House, and Nancy Pelosi's, you know, he's got her strategies where, you know, we do voting fraud, we have chaos in the streets, then we throw the election to the House.
The House has a majority of Democratic members, even in the new House coming in.
And so, therefore, we'll pick the president, we'll pick Biden.
Well, that's not how it goes, Nancy Pelosi.
The Constitution, again, says that in the House of Representatives, when the voting is for the president, Because no one has 271 electoral votes in the Electoral College to be president, the House then has one vote for each state delegation.
Okay, so California may have 44 million people, but it's got one vote.
Okay, now, that means that 26 of the state delegations are GOP. And even in the incoming Congress, the GOP holds a majority of the state delegations, even though it does not hold a majority of the House members.
And it's the delegations that vote.
So if Nancy Pelosi puts it on the floor and the Republicans stick together, the House of Representatives elects Donald Trump.
And these are important to remember because this is how the Constitution works.
Now, we started the The whole broadcast today by going to play some of the video from Rudy Giuliani.
And Rudy Giuliani was in Philadelphia yesterday, landing with the team.
And I want you to get a sense of just how strongly the president's going to fight.
I saw Bannon on television today with Maria Bartiromo.
And Steve Bannon was on fire.
He was saying to President Trump, he's got to be strong.
We've got to go firmly at this.
Trump won by a landslide.
I think it's going to be close to 360 electoral votes when all the dust settles.
But first, we're going to do the state fraud challenges, and that's what the team is in the field doing.
They're going to launch a challenge today.
They sent Richard Grinnell, former director of national intelligence, to Nevada to demand a recount because he's got proof.
10,000 of the people who voted in Nevada no longer live in the state.
And the Republicans are on top of this.
They've won everything.
Donald Trump has gone through all these crises since he came down the escalator to announce his candidacy in 2015, and he's beat every one of them.
So as you listen to this, remember, I've always said Donald Trump always looks like he's going to lose until just before he wins.
Right now, you've got the mainstream media and social media playing this narrative about how Biden's got 264 electoral votes.
That means he's going to be president.
No, it does not. We actually have just begun the last phase of the coup d'etat, which is voter fraud and the attempt to steal the election.
And this broadcast does, I think, a very good job of going through the points I'm making.
It's important that you understand these because from here on the contest is legal and it's constitutional and Donald Trump wins.
I see no way that he loses.
Craig, is that a good summary to get it going?
Okay, so keep going and we'll be putting this on our social media later today.
And God bless all of you.
In the end, God always wins.
God's going to win here again.
Craig, take it away. Thank you.
Second.
For some reason I can't get that audio to click.
Give me one second. It's supposed to be allowed by law to observe the counting of the ballots.
Now observe means to any intelligent person being able to look at it.
The way it's interpreted by the Democrat crooked machine of Philadelphia is that the observers can be 20 or 30 feet away, never able to see the ballot itself, never able to see if it was properly postmarked, properly addressed, properly signed on the outside.
All the things that often lead to disqualification of ballots or make it very easy to dump 50,000 totally fraudulent ballots because they're not observed.
This went on for 20 hours.
While all of you thought there was some kind of legitimate count going on here in Philadelphia, it was totally illegitimate.
So we went back to court and we went before a Democrat judge.
No need to tell you what the result in Philadelphia is if you're before a Democrat judge.
Obviously a political hack who doesn't know the meaning of the word observe.
Observe means to be able to look.
Not a single Republican has been able to look at any one of these mail ballots.
They could be from Mars, as far as we're concerned, or they could be from the Democratic National Committee.
Joe Biden could have voted 50 times, as far as we know, or 5,000 times.
The ballots could be from Camden.
Philadelphia, unfortunately, and I say this about my own city, has a reputation for voter fraud.
You have a reputation for dead people voting, and we're going to go look at just how many dead people voted here.
I didn't think we'd have to do that, but we will.
And you have a reputation for people being bussed in from Camden voting here.
Okay, so I've played the first two minutes, and he's kind of, Rudy Giuliani has outlined the problem and the plan of attack.
Dr. Corsi. Yeah, in fact, what you see here from Giuliani's statement, I've got my own going here.
I'll have to find it and silence it.
Hold on. What you see is, if you listen to Giuliani, and we don't need to play the full, we've got too much to cover this morning.
If you play the full thing, you'll hear him go and continue to say, not only do we need to get a Court decision here with a court that's not a Democratic judge that says, Biden won, so don't bother me with this nonsense.
But he's got legitimate points.
You can't just make up ballots in the middle of the night and bring them in in a wheelbarrow and say, oh, we found new ballots.
There's going to be cases of throwing away Republican ballots.
There's going to be cases of not filling out the ballots properly.
There's going to be cases where people aren't registered or voted twice, or they moved out of the state or are deceased.
All of those are going to get challenged.
So Michigan, which miraculously somehow produces just a number of, you know, tens of thousands of ballots in the middle of the night, just what's needed to flip the state, or Wisconsin, these are almost certainly fraudulent.
And I can't imagine the courts aren't going to throw them out.
Craig? Right.
Now, Dr. Corsi, then, the way this will work is they have to file their suits in the local jurisdiction first, and they have to work their way up through the system.
How quickly do you think it'll go from the local jurisdictions to the place where we know at least we can get a little justice, which will be the federal Supreme Court?
Well, it's going to have to go to the Supreme Court, ultimately, I think.
Now, I want to discuss a couple of issues on the Supreme Court.
Do you know how long this will take, Dr.
Hussey? Well, that's where I'm headed.
Okay. Okay, so look.
First of all, the Electoral College...
I want to go to the Gore...
The decision with the Al Gore and Bush and the Supreme Court decision.
Here it is, Craig. I'm going to give you the...
The citation for it, and you can bring it up.
It's... Bush v.
Gore. Yeah, I've got it right here.
There you go. It's in Justia.
You can bring it up. Now, the first issue is this, that what the court decided in this case on Bush v.
Gore, which was decided in 2000 with the Florida recount, is that there are time issues here.
Okay, because the electors and the Electoral College has to meet by about mid-December.
Now, what the U.S. law, 3 U.S.C. Section 5, requires that any controversy or contest that is designed to lead to a conclusive selection of electors has to be completed by December 12th.
Okay, that date is here.
So that's it. By December 12th, the states have to be able to choose their electors.
Okay, and I think the Electoral College this year meets on December 15th.
I believe that's it.
I'd have to go check that exactly, but it's going to meet right in the middle of December.
So what the issue was in Bush v.
Gore was you had this recount going on and on and on and on.
And what the Democrats were also planning to do that year was throw the election into the House.
Because if the electors don't have a clear 271-vote majority for either candidate, the election is thrown into the House of Representatives.
And the House gets to decide it.
Now, we'll come to that in a minute.
But the point I'm coming to here is that there are time limits.
And so in Bush v.
Gore, one of the reasons the court ended the recount was because there is no date here in this case, they say, there is no recount procedure in place under the state court's order.
That comports with the minimal constitutional standards.
So in other words, if you're going to do recounts, the recounts have to all be done by December 12th.
So we've got a time clock here.
And, you know, if it goes too long, it'll go into the House of Representatives if these challenges are still being waged.
Okay, now, Craig, is that clear?
Yes. Okay, now there's another part of this Also, this decision, and this is a technical point, too, but it's very important in sorting this all out.
If you'll just search, Craig, in the decision I gave you for the word plenary, P-L-E-N-A-R-Y, full, you'll find it.
And what the court decided here, this again is the An 1892 case, which was McPherson v.
Blacker, the state's legislative power to select the manner for appointing the electors is plenary.
It may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself, which indeed was the manner used by state legislatures in several states for many years after the framing of our Constitution.
I'm just reading right out of the opinion, the majority opinion of the court.
History has now favored the voter, and in each of the several states, the citizens themselves vote for presidential electors.
When the state legislature vests the right to vote for president in its people, the right to vote as the legislature has prescribed is fundamental.
And one source of its fundamental nature lies in the equal weight accorded to each vote and the equal dignity owed to each voter.
Okay, now that's really a primary principle of the court was, you know, the all votes are equal and the voters' rights are predominant.
And so therefore, if the voters choose the electors, in fact, when you vote, you're voting for the electoral slate behind the candidate.
You're not necessarily voting for the candidate directly.
And most people don't recognize that, but that's in fact the way it works.
But what the Supreme Court said here in Bush v.
Gore 2000 case, the state, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article 2, can take back the power to appoint electors.
Okay, and they're quoting, there is no doubt of the right of the legislature to resume the power at any time, for it can neither be taken away nor abdicated.
Okay, so now this year, what could happen is that the state legislature, if it's controlled by the Republicans, and for instance, in Wisconsin and Michigan it is, I think also in Pennsylvania, We have to go down through the whole list of states.
The state legislature, controlled by the Republicans in both House and Senate.
Remember, the GOP has done very well, and these majorities are maintained in the currently new coming-in state legislatures.
Republicans did not lose control of these houses or Senates in the states.
The state legislator could say, I know that the election is being called for Biden.
But we're not going to elect a Biden slate because we think that there's massive fraud.
And so therefore, we are choosing the electors in the state legislature, not taking into account the vote in the state, the popular vote in the state.
And we're going to create a slate of Trump electors who are going to be sent to the electoral college.
You don't actually travel the electoral college.
They meet in the state legislature, the electors, and they cast their votes In the state legislature, and then they're totaled in Washington.
But the point is, the states that are in contest are controlled by the GOP and the legislatures, and the legislatures have the power and the ability to take back the choice of electors from the voters To themselves and to appoint a slate of Trump electors if they, in fact, decide that there is voter fraud, there's just not enough time to get it resolved.
Now, I think that's an important point, Craig.
Now, it would be very controversial if they did so, but they have the authority to do so.
Craig? Right.
And so, Dr. Corsi, then, let's say that that is what pans out in a few of these states, that they have to resort to that nuclear option, I will call it.
And so, if that happens, then, what is the recourse of the lawfare specialists like Lawrence Tribe and Norm Eisen to fight back against that and try to overturn what is being done?
Well, again, I think the way the Constitution reads, this power, as they say, is plenary.
It's full. The state legislatures by the Constitution, Article 2, are empowered to pick the electors.
And even if they designate by state law that they're going to delegate that authority to the voters, so that whoever wins the presidential popular vote in that state gets to their slate of electors to go to the To vote in the Electoral College, the state can take that power back and say, we're not going to do it this way this year.
Okay? Because the state has to formally create by December 12th Who the legislators have chosen to be the electors who are going to vote in the 15th, I believe it is, in December.
This whole thing has to be wrapped up by then, according to the constitutional requirements and statutory requirements around these dates.
Now, Nancy Pelosi has recently said that she would like to see the Election thrown into the House of Representatives, where the Democrats control today a majority, and the House ultimately, as we pointed out, in case no one gets 271 electoral votes, the House makes the decision who's going to be president.
Now, again, there's constitutional issues.
Of course, Nancy Pelosi knows that the Democrats are in the majority right now.
She's the majority. She's the House Speaker.
And the problem is that the Constitution, because they're trying to weigh in presidential voting, that small states are equal to big states, which is why the Electoral College exists at all, because we only had a popular vote.
You could basically take the votes in Los Angeles or California and New York, and that would just about decide the election.
Maybe that plus New Jersey plus one other.
And since they're solidly Democratic, the Democrats know they'd win all the time.
They would like that. When the House votes, the Constitution requires they vote by delegation.
In other words, each state gets a single vote.
Okay, one vote. Now, California, which has a population of 40 million people, and Wyoming with a population of 600,000 people.
And Craig, here I'll give you the article which states all this out, so you can post it up and take a look at it.
But this is a article written from the constitutional perspective.
And there I've given it to you now.
The article is How Congress Could Decide the 2020 Election.
So California with 40 million population and Wyoming with 600,000, California gets one vote as a delegation in the House, and Wyoming gets one vote as a delegation.
The GOP controls delegations from 26 states, exactly the number required to reach a majority under the rules of the House presidential selection.
But it's not the current House that would decide to contest a 2020 election.
It's the newly elected House that would choose the president.
And I believe the GOP still has control of the state delegations within the House of Representatives.
I must check that right now and see.
Craig, do you want to comment on this?
Yeah, so let me roll back.
I don't want to destroy your train of thought here, but just for my edification, and maybe others in the audience are thinking on the same way, this is like step 3, 4, 5 or something.
So the first step is to try to ensure that the voting was legitimate.
And so there's being action taken at the state level in order to disqualify votes that should not have been Submitted either duplications or a variety of other anomalies.
That's step one, correct?
That's correct. I mean, the first steps are if that fails.
Yeah, I mean, well, there's a couple ways to play this.
First of all, if in fact, and I believe it's the case that the Republicans still have the edge in the Electoral College delegations and Basically, this would mean that the GOP controls the voting in the House of Representatives because it's one delegate, one vote per each state, single vote.
California with 53 House members, Texas with 36, they have one vote.
And a majority of the U.S. House of Delegations, 26, must vote for a candidate.
And the GOP I believe, holds 26 of the 50 delegations.
The Democrats hold 23 and one is split.
Okay, I guess that's Pennsylvania, nine seats each.
So it looks like it would be, you know, if the, first of all, if the court challenges take a long time and the Supreme Court doesn't come in and make a decision, Like they did in Gore, Bush v.
Gore, 2000, to say, this has got to stop.
And at that point, Bush was ahead in the recount, and Bush was the one who had won the most recently completed recount.
They were doing recount, and they were doing another recount, and they were going to keep doing recounts until it was forced into the House of Representatives.
That was the plan from the Democrats in 2000.
I think there's no need to be fearful that it could quickly go to the House of Representatives, because again, it's likely that the GOP would hold together and Trump would be elected president out of the House.
I think I still prefer to do the route of the court challenges.
Because the core challenges can say, you know, we've got to go in and throw these votes out that are obviously fraudulent.
I don't see how the Democrats are going to win to keep fraudulent votes on the books.
And when they did not allow there to be poll watchers from the GOP who were given equal and full access to watch the counting going on and challenge votes.
The bias in the state procedures for counting votes is going to be apparent and not sustainable.
So I think the legal arguments favor the GOP to win in the courts.
And if it goes to the Supreme Court, I think things like these blocks of voters that were 99% or 90-whatever percent For Biden are just going to get thrown out.
And if they lose those big blocks of votes, the states will conclude where they were on election night, which is that Trump will win Wisconsin, he'll win Michigan, he'll win Pennsylvania, he'll win Georgia, North Carolina, and very possibly Nevada, Ohio, Arizona.
It's going to go on. I mean, and I don't think there's going to be the potential For them getting away with voting fraud.
So I think the first path, which has started today, and today is the 5th of November, so they've got really a little more than a month to conclude this vote challenge.
So if it goes to the Supreme Court, A, the sooner it goes to the Supreme Court, the better.
And B, the Supreme Court will have to go into an expedited mode of hearing the case in order to reach a decision.
And the court will be cognizant of the need to come to that decision by the 12th of December.
But there's a couple of backups.
A couple of backups are, number one, that the state legislature in these states where the vote is being flipped to Biden by the Democrats, the legislatures are controlled by Republicans, and the legislatures can take back the right to appoint the electors and can appoint a Trump slate of electors.
Because they know the voting fraud was obvious.
Okay, so that's one recourse.
The second recourse is if it does get thrown into the House of Representatives, right now the way it is stacked in the delegations, Pelosi loses.
The Democrats lose.
And so therefore, Trump is elected that way.
These are all different paths to get Trump elected.
I think they're all certain paths to succeed.
And it's why when the people are confused, they're saying, well, doesn't Biden have these electors?
Doesn't he already have 264?
He only needs six more or seven more and he's president?
No, because if a state is judged to have gone to Biden fraudulently, those electors will be taken away from Biden and will be given to Trump.
And Trump will clearly have what I said to begin with.
I thought Trump, if the vote counting were fair, and it's not, Trump would have 360 electors.
Craig? Right, and so I can put away my go-bag.
You're saying, fear not. I was on my way to Costa Rica.
I had my plane ticket, so I'll call up the airline and cancel that.
Thank you for the clarification, and all we need to do is look at the legal process and what the Constitution states, not what you're hearing on CNN and what Nancy with her gavel wants to proclaim.
Well... What we have here is really you have to understand how the Constitution works.
And these provisions are not going to be changed.
These would take an amendment to the Constitution to change these provisions.
The Supreme Court will adhere to these provisions.
I can't even imagine that Kagan or the leftists that Trump put on the court Have any way to say that the Constitution doesn't apply?
I mean, they may try that, but it's bizarre.
You mean Obama, Sotomayor?
Sotomayor and Kagan.
Okay, so these are the constitutional issues I wanted to get straight.
And to say that now that Giuliani is bringing these challenges, I think, in fact, we're on the track for Trump to solidly win.
Now, Craig, is that all clear to you?
It is now, and I appreciate it.
I knew a couple pieces of that, but my fear was that they were going to come up with a way to try to run out the clock and to have then the riots in the streets.
That's what I'm still concerned about now, is every step of the way, as action is taken in order to ensure that the election is fair, they are going to launch these thugs in the street and keep burning places down.
Well, I think there's going to be violence.
I think it's around the corner.
We saw already the breaking out of violence in Portland, Oregon.
The National Guard is there, which is different.
And I think you're going to see the National Guard in many of these states I also think Trump is now...
I heard Bannon with Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business this morning, and Bannon was very, very strong.
He said, now it's time for Trump to be forceful, be strong, take the role of the presidency and use it.
He said he should be firing Ray.
He should be firing Fauci.
Well, also, if it comes down to it, Trump should be ready to use the Insurrection Act.
And if he has to fire Esper, do it.
If he has to fire Milley, Esper's Department of Defense, the Secretary of Defense, and Milley's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs.
If he has to fire them both, fire them both.
And invoke the Insurrection Act and call out the military.
Get rid of Barr. Get rid of Barr.
Now it's time for Trump to take decisive action.
And Dr. Corsi, in all of those situations, he can then put in a temporary replacement that would be in place for up to six months.
Could have an acting Department of Defense director.
Just like Grinnell was the acting director of national intelligence until you had...
John Ratcliffe come in as the permanent, you know, for now, Director of National Intelligence.
Now, the next point I want to make is that, so I think the violence, if it occurs now, is going to be handled very differently by Donald Trump.
And I think as Trump begins to understand how these different paths work, and he's got a top legal team.
Giuliani is on the team.
Giuliani has been outstanding through all of this.
And Sidney Powell, I have the utmost respect for.
She's the attorney for General Flynn.
She's done a remarkable job.
She's even gotten General Flynn's case dismissed by the Department of Justice, even though he twice pled guilty.
She was able to show it was under duress and under a really suborning perjury actions by the special counselor, which I also, my case, I think, proves that I think these special counselors ultimately should be charged with crimes, prosecutors.
Now, Dr. Corsi, what role is Sidney Powell going to play?
She's going to be one of the team that's going to go into these legal challenges in the states and ultimately take the cases to the state courts.
Got it. Okay. And so he's assembled a team of lawyers and that team has met.
Now they've deployed a strategy.
And they're going to the various states.
Grinnell is going to Nevada, and he's going to begin a challenge on 10,000 votes were from people in Nevada who he can prove no longer live in the state.
So they were fraudulent votes.
That's 10,000.
That should be enough to flip that state back to Trump or get it to decide for Trump.
You're going to have the same thing going on with the ballots that are challenged as fraudulent because they came in at the end of the night.
You know, they were obviously 90% of the ballots in any group can't be all for Biden.
And they come in in the middle of the night.
I mean, the next point I want to make...
Is that one of the things that has happened here is that, just like all the others, the Russian collusion, the Ukrainian collusion, the Senate trial, this trial, that trial, what we're finding is that it boomeranged on the Democrats.
The rioting in the streets was supposed to be about racial justice.
In fact, it was Maoist revolutionary violence that people see that.
The support for Black Lives Matter has plummeted.
And people understand these are just the democratic mobs, just like the communist mobs and the Nazi mobs in the Weimar Republic in Germany in the 1920s and 30s fighting each other in the streets to create chaos.
Like the Maidan Rebellion in Ukraine that was architected by Soros and the State Department to overthrow the government in Ukraine in 2014.
The violence was one of the playbook, which is a playbook in which the Democrats did voter fraud.
That's their first plan. Second plan is chaos in the streets.
Third plan is throw it to the House.
Okay, but I'm just showing that the House is not going to necessarily vote for Biden.
Well, Dr. Corsi, you were able to show everybody in previous broadcasts exactly what you're talking about with the Black Lives Matter and the communist thrust behind that by your interviews with, two interviews with Trevor Loudon and your interviews with Stephen Coughlin.
So this goes back months.
You were way ahead of the curve on this.
Thank you. And also take a look at the e-book that we've got.
We've got two e-books on this website that are free.
The one on hydroxychloroquine and the one on the rioting.
Take a look. I've also got one of my e-books is about how the little red book of Democrat socialist lies, how they were really espousing Marxism from the very beginning, and the plan to remove Donald Trump from the presidency.
That coup is continuing.
In fact, in that book, which I wrote in June, I said the last act would be voter fraud, and it is.
Now, I want to go to this in conservative treehouse, because what this shows is, in fact, here...
Hold on a second, I'll give you the article, Greg, so you can put it up there.
What this shows is that not only is the voter fraud now clear, but the bias of the news media is clear.
The Democrats are obviously engaging in voter fraud.
I mean, they're not even hiding it anymore.
They're throwing poll workers, the GOP poll watchers, out of the...
They're not allowing them to be in.
They got videos of saying, everybody out of this room that's GOP. Well, you can't do that.
And they're putting a board so you can't see in the windows.
You can't do that.
That's inherently fraudulent.
Okay? Open elections, the principle of the Supreme Court, which is, you know, everybody gets one vote, and the legitimate votes have to be counted.
Just because it's voted doesn't mean it's a legitimate vote.
Just because it's included in the total today doesn't mean it's going to stay in the total.
And by the way, these are crimes that were committed.
This isn't just, you know, fooling around and, you know, ha, ha, ha, look at how we can punk the system.
No, these are federal crimes.
Just like the rioting in the streets are federal crimes and people can go to prison for a long time.
Poll watchers who are wearing masks that say Biden-Harris.
No, you can't do that. You can't have videos we've got of polling precincts while the voting was going on with Biden workers in there working the crowd.
No, you can't do that. With the GOP poll watchers in precincts to observe the voting being not permitted to enter the polling district.
They can't go into the precinct to watch the voting.
You can't do that.
Now, Fox News, this Guy Benson, who is a Fox News contributor, in an email that he wrote, really, Fox is in full damage control.
Fox is completely, even Trump is complaining about Fox.
It's unwatchable. It's just completely gone left.
I've had all the Donna Brazile and Juan Williams I care to see the rest of my lifetime.
I'm tired of them. I'm done with them.
Donna Brazile ought to be in prison for the way they did campaign finance fraud on the Victory Fund with Hillary Clinton.
I've written about that extensively.
Back in 2016. 2016.
Okay, now what this shows is that the...
Devin, this Darren Shaw, whom he mentions in the Fox decision team, is actually a part of the polling team that was hired by Fox.
So you've got a conflict here, and it's obvious, again, that they're using the same person to predict the elections and then report the results of the election.
Well, a person performing both tasks, predicting and reporting, is going to have a self-interest in affirming their predictions.
That's how they're paid.
So if you wonder why these manipulative Fox News operations during election night were so fundamentally flawed, this is what's being written by Sundance here in Conservative Treehouse.
Or you wonder why Fox News would have a vested interest in affirming their predictions before the actual outcomes are even clear.
Here's the answer.
And Darren Shaw is the establishment, quote, Republican pollster behind Shaw and Associates.
They pointed out issues with Shaw in the past as they've deconstructed his outcomes.
And here's, you know, Shaw with the, you see the strings on the marionettes.
Well, you're seeing the strings everywhere.
You're seeing how completely wrong the polls were and how the pollsters were paid by the networks to give them the data that would validate their pro-Biden narrative.
So the pollsters gave them what they wanted.
The campaign had pollsters that were more accurate.
The internal polls for Trump were much more accurate.
And in fact, that's one of the reasons why Trump knows that these elections that are being flipped are being flipped with fraudulent votes.
Okay, now, we're seeing also the states like DeSantis in Florida, which had more votes coming in total, than you had in Wisconsin or Michigan got all the votes counted on election night.
The Republican governors tended to get a good job done and do it the right way with unbiased vote counting where both Democrat and Republican poll watchers were allowed to observe the voting and challenge votes.
And it got done on election night.
Okay, so I think there's abundant evidence here of the, and it's obvious once you know how to look for it, once you see it, of the fraud that went on on election night.
This is democratic lawfare, and the Democrats have been engineering to steal this election, and that's now out in the open.
It's like, you know, everybody sees the emperor has no clothes on.
Little kid was right, saying he's naked.
Well, now everybody sees it.
Naked, out there, standing there in obvious voter fraud.
Craig, is Arthur there?
Let's bring Arthur in. Yep, Arthur.
And as he's coming in, though, when you say that everybody can see it, here's the problem.
We still have the social media and mainstream media shield for the Democrats.
And if you've been, if these people, and unfortunately I've got a couple in my own family that live on CNN and MSNBC, they do not know anything of what you just described.
Well, they're about to find out, aren't they?
And the fact is that Donald Trump is going to have to, in his second term, let's say deconstruct or reimagine, that's a word, let's reimagine Jack Dorsey.
I want to reimagine him in prison.
That's what I was going to say.
You took the words right out of my mouth.
Okay, and I want to reimagine him broke after all the blizzard of lawsuits that he's going to get hit with.
Arthur, how are you?
Good morning, gentlemen. I'm fine.
How are you all doing? Well, I think this validates, you know, we've been praying so hard and we've had, Arthur has created for us the ThePrayerfulPatriot.com, which is our affiliate companion prayer site.
And Arthur's crafted a number of prayers that this voting fraud be exposed.
And I think, Arthur, those prayers are being answered.
What do you think? Oh, absolutely.
This is why we're seeing what we're seeing.
This is all as a result of putting these prayers out for the last, oh, months.
You know, expose the fraud.
And now it's in such a way that everybody is seeing it.
And I believe all of this is, you know, a lesson.
As I was listening to your analysis, which is...
Absolutely splendid.
You know, there's some components in there that they don't teach you, you know, in middle school or even high school about the election process regarding state selection of electors.
You know, so we're putting all of this actually into the prayer and we develop another prayer that's out on the prayerful patriot to correct the election results, you know, using these concepts that you're talking about.
Well, I think this is critical because, in a sense, it's an act of God.
A couple things.
Number one, that Ruth Bader Ginsburg died with enough time for Trump to get Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court, and she's going to be a strict constructionist.
I think even influencing John Roberts, who we're all beginning to develop questions about, As if he's, Ruth Bader Ginsburg may be still whispering in his ear.
And the point is that he's voted with the left, but even the Supreme Court has given until Thursday for Pennsylvania To explain why they are allowing continued voting and votes to be tabulated that don't even have a postmark for three days and some states are going to do it for nine days.
By the way, that's another point of challenge.
The point of challenge is that many of these state legislatures or state election officials change the rules They modified how the election was going to be conducted in the last hours to allow all these loopholes for these mail-in votes to come in.
The whole thing was scammed from the beginning.
Craig? Dr.
Corsi, you said Thursday. Thursday as in today.
Today. That's right. Today.
They have to explain. That's right.
It's today. Now, John Roberts was there, too, saying, you better explain this to us.
Now, the Supreme Court doesn't ask you to explain something to them unless they're pretty upset about it.
And the point is that since the legislatures also under the Constitution control the state elections, it does not give them the authority to create fraudulent procedures.
They can create procedures as long as the procedures all have a fair and meritorious intent.
But if they are intended to allow fraud, the state itself has committed fraud, and the rules that the state legislature set up will not be adhered to by the Supreme Court.
They will be outlawed, which means the voting may have to end on election night.
It would even raise some questions about whether these middle-of-the-night ballots delivered surreptitiously could be delivered.
But again, the point I'm trying to make here is that the other act of God I see is that the Democrats have gone so insane, so determined to steal the election, that they're like a thief who live-streams the fact that they're conducting a theft.
They put their own theft on live-stream camera.
It's one of those dumbest criminals you've ever seen.
Well, they're called Democrats.
The Democrats are protesting in the streets.
They don't understand they're being videotaped.
They don't understand there's face recognition technology.
They're going to be hunted down. That Zoom call with the people shut down D.C. and the federal workers admitting what they do behind the scenes and doxing themselves with their real names?
They are so proud of how they're committing crimes that they're videotaping their crimes.
I mean, well, thank God that that's how crazy they are.
I mean, you know, God must be laughing away at all this, thinking this is insanity that is going on.
How possibly...
Could these fools be bragging about crimes that they're committing and stealing elections and causing chaos, or taking the bureaucracy to only resist Trump, and they really are there to oppose Trump until they get rid of him?
I mean, these people are out there saying these things.
This woman who was shut down and she did two hours explaining how she was going to shut down D.C., and they publish a map showing the sites they're going to attack.
I mean, thank you very much.
The shopping list for your weapons?
Yeah. Talk about telegraphing your punch.
Yeah. I mean, that's the insanity of all this, but it's there.
But I think it's important.
I think all this is important because it's giving us a test as a nation as to whether or not we're going to fight for this Constitution.
I see divine hand in all of this.
And I believe that it's time for us to rise up and take dominion over this.
And it's up to us to blow the whistle on that play and throw the flag down and say, nah, this is wrong.
This is absolutely wrong.
God sees all this, always has, always will.
And nothing will change that.
It's the problem is, is we need to see it.
We need to correct it, given what we know and what we're supposed to do.
So all these guys prosecuting all this stuff need to step up.
So now everybody's involved, lawyers, judges, state legislators, you know, everybody, the Electoral College, you and me and everybody, you know, saving this nation if we want it.
We're all being tested, I believe.
Well, they should have, you know, I've said from the beginning that the Democrats, the communists who control the Democratic Party, made their move too soon.
They should have waited until people like me were dead.
I mean, I'm a political scientist.
I'm a political scientist by training a PhD at Harvard.
So I've had it since 1972, and I didn't get it by accident.
Okay, so, you know, reading the Constitution, I sat, I did a constitutional law doctoral dissertation.
One of my advisors was the historian of the Harvard Law School.
And I attended a lot of classes at the Harvard Law School auditing them, including by Professor Freund, who was one of the most renowned constitutional scholars, period.
He was offered to go to the Supreme Court by John Kennedy.
He said he'd rather stay at Harvard and continue teaching.
Well, John Kennedy didn't quite understand that, but he acknowledged that that was his choice, Freud's choice.
I spent a lot of time with Freud in his office talking to him.
Okay, so he drilled into you the need to understand how the Constitution is written and why it's written that way.
What's the history behind it?
You know, how in fact that our early, the first draft of the Constitution initially, when it was ratified, you did not have parties.
You had number one who won the popular vote was going to be president, number two was going to be vice president.
But that began, and then all these elections were getting thrown into the House of Representatives.
Because you didn't have clear electoral college majorities.
It was a nightmare.
And they changed it to have the president and vice president be the same party, which is the way we do it today.
That's not the original one.
And the original one architected the House of Representatives to be the last resort to elect the president if no one had 271 electoral votes, because they knew that that was happening.
It was going to happen. You know, he had these very, very rancorous Jefferson and Hamilton.
It was one of the core bases of their argument.
And by the way, in case anybody doubts it, I've been reading, again, Rob Chernow's book.
Just to make sure I went back and understood what happened back then.
And make sure this is his book on Hamilton.
And it discusses a great length of fights between Jefferson and Hamilton.
Hamilton was a Federalist, and Jefferson was not a Federalist.
He wanted... States rights.
States rights. He wanted basically to keep the government small.
Hamilton wanted, you know, national banks and all these state judges permanently, all these things that would, you know, entrench the federal government.
That was Hamilton's mindset.
It's why the Democrats made a play out of this book.
Because they worship Hamilton.
Okay? And, you know, so they jump the gun here because, you know, PhDs like myself know what the rules are and can find them out and can study them and understand them, and we can explain them to people, and we're going to do that. I'm doing it right now.
And by the way, we'll share all this, make sure that Giuliani and Sidney Powell know all of these intricacies.
I'm sure they do. I'm probably not going to teach Sidney Powell anything about constitutional law or Giuliani.
I don't think they need me to instruct them.
They've got some of the best in the country, but I'll make sure they're aware of this.
And as such, I think they will be finding it.
It'll be reaffirming their strategy.
Donald Trump It's right now sitting in the catbird seat because the Democrats are out and about like they were in the streets.
They're doing it in the election. They're just creating chaos.
There's one cartoon I remember when the Russian collusion was going on when I was under the gun with Mueller.
It's a dog sitting in the middle of the room.
The husband and wife come home with the kids and the entire house is in disarray.
He's got bird feathers coming out of his mouth and the cat is terrified.
The dog says, the Russians did it.
I remember that one. The Russians did it.
Well, that's how patently absurd this is.
Well, the people voted.
Let all the votes count.
Give me a break.
Let all the dead people's votes count.
I'll see.
I gotta tell you, I saw this meme, which I think is appropriate to what you're saying, and it shows a woman kneeling in prayer, actually looking at a grave, and the thing says, Mom, please don't decide to vote Democrat this election.
Well, other ones that they're doing, other memes with Tombstone saying, I voted Democrat, you know.
It's like a joke, you know, but there's crimes committed.
Now you've got James O'Keefe out there with videos, his current video.
What is he showing in his current video?
Well, how long have we gone on today, Craig?
We are at 58 minutes, but he's got that video out there by that Raquel Rodriguez from the other day where she blatantly says, I got paid $55,000 to deliver 5,000 votes.
She should be going to prison.
He's got a new one. He just put one out yesterday.
Yeah, I saw it, and I didn't watch it, though.
Well, we're going to do it now, and so I'm going to give it to you here.
While you're talking about that, Dr.
Corsi, I do want to make some comments.
I mean, it's very important that we also get God's all-seeing eye of God exposing what's going on in the postal service, because they've been used as a manipulative tool all the way along.
I mean, we're seeing evidence coming out of postal workers.
Doing the same kind of thing.
It's as if they've been in the pocket of the Democrats for years.
Well, they have been. These prayers are all focused to go after these.
I'm going to end with two videos.
These are both important.
This video, Craig, I've got it now on YouTube.
As much as I can't stand YouTube anymore, they're still demonetizing me.
Stealing money from us.
There's the video. It runs two minutes.
Let me know when you've got it up.
You're talking about James O'Keefe about the Michigan whistleblower?
Yeah, the Traverse City Post Office, the Barlow branch where he's got a whistleblower.
I've got it, and I've got it up on the screen right now.
It plays for two minutes.
I'm going to mute my screen here.
Why don't you play the full two minutes and 19 seconds?
Hang on one second. I want to get it situated just a little better in the screen.
Okay, no problem. Here we go.
Okay, good. Wait a second.
No sound. Hang on. Go back.
Tell us where you work.
I work in the Traverse City Post Office, more specifically the Barlow branch.
Your boss told you and your colleagues something that shocked you this morning.
What was it? We were issued a directive this morning to collect any ballots we find in mailboxes, collection boxes, just outgoing mail in general.
Separate them at the end of the day so that they could hand stamp them with the previous day's date.
Today is November 4th, for clarification.
Who is your boss, and what is his title?
Jonathan would be a direct supervisor, yes.
As of right now, he is the opening supervisor for the Barlow Branch Post Office.
So I, and this is anecdotal, a carrier down in another office said they watched the Postmaster doing it.
If it were just a typical day, It would be clerks doing it up at the distribution center.
So 8 p.m. Election Day, November 3rd.
The Court of Appeals ruled ballots have to be received by that time.
And what were you told?
To separate them today so they could mark them with yesterday's date and send them through the express system to wherever they needed to go.
This appears to be an attempt to circumvent Michigan law and allow late votes.
And you said there was a hamper where letter carriers were supposed to leave their ballots.
Where are the ballots now?
They were putting them into express bags.
To go to the distribution center.
In regards to a hamper, there was a standard hamper that All Letter Mail was supposed to go to and they had a tub next to it that we were supposed to put any ballots collected today into.
What made you come forward?
That's sketchy. I don't like sketchy.
It screams corruption. Also knowing the post office's leanings politically, it didn't seem quite right.
What is your message to other postal workers who see things like this?
Report it. How are we supposed to have any integrity in this country if we are just going to let things slide based on a scaling issue?
Are you afraid of retaliation against you?
I've had whistleblower policies backfire on me in the past, so yes.
We'll have to reach out to Jonathan Clark for comment.
Is this Jonathan? Hey, I'm a reporter with Project Veritas, James O'Keefe here, and I have information that you guys have been stamping ballots with the previous date, November 3rd.
He just hung up.
He just hung up the phone on me.
Wow, smoking gun.
And then they get a hold of him on the phone and the guy hangs up.
There it is. Guilty as charged.
Right this moment, there is a mad rush in America.
Apple, Amazon, Facebook, dozens more.
Hang on one second. Another video launched on me while I was trying to close the window.
You have to repeat that statement.
I'm sorry. This video is going to be played in court.
The James O'Keefe video.
The judge is going to see it.
If there's a jury, the jury will see it.
And it's going to be apparent that this is fraudulent.
Fraudulent practices being carried out by state employees.
Now, this supervisor's got a problem.
He committed a crime.
That's a crime. It's not just a trick to win an election.
No, it's a crime.
It's a federal crime. Go to prison, I don't know how many years, but a bunch.
And he should. Now, I want to end this with one other video that I found to be extremely important.
Let me get it here for a second.
Take me just a second to find it.
Yeah, okay. It's this video right here, Craig.
This is on the gnews.org.
These are the Chinese that are exposing the Hunter Biden laptop and the fraud.
And this is what you're seeing here in this video.
And it's got subtitles.
The guy is speaking in Chinese.
But he's revealing that what's behind this, in fact, what controls the Democratic Party these days, what controls Biden, the money, and the Communist Party, In China, and that we are really at war with them, both because they launched this bioweapon and because what he's saying is they've funded the Democratic Party.
Where did the Democratic Party get all this money to try to steal elections, all the money they need for all the shenanigans they're doing in the streets?
How are they paying for all these riots?
The money is going to be the source of everything when it's finally analyzed.
And Craig, do you have that video up and ready to go?
Justice must win.
Yeah, it's the American election will end in an absurd manner.
Right, under the caption on the video, it says, Justice must win.
Is that the correct one? Trump with his fist raised?
No. I'm going to give it to you again.
Okay. Hold on.
It's important we get this, so we'll take a minute to get it.
The heading on the article is, the American election will end in an absurd manner.
It will be beyond your imagination.
I just don't see what you're saying.
That's okay. I think you've got the right one.
I'll mute myself. It's got a guy in these aviator glasses, and he's got a bookshelf behind him with little knickknacks on it.
Let me launch it and see what happens.
And it says all things have been proved the threat that the Communist Party is posing.
Yes. Okay. Yeah, it was a thumbnail on top of it that was different than what you were seeing.
I'm ready to go. Okay, let's go.
play it. Here it goes.
So now the President has to understand that there are many people who can't say it.
You must be open.
So now you have to go to the election, and you have to go to the right place, and you have to go to the right place.
This time to開戰, it will be with you, and it will be with you before.
The result of the president of the United States will be滑稽, but you don't have to think about it.
The CCP's attack is a war that has never happened before.
It is a combination of a super-limited war, a political war, a war of execution, and a war of fire.
And this is the first time that the war has been four-dimensionalized.
Four-dimensionalization.
Everyone is more professional than me, so I won't say it.
The first time.
The first time.
It was said in the book.
It happened before.
Wow.
And so, yeah, Dr. Corsi, back at the beginning, when the Wuhan virus, the communist Chinese Wuhan virus was launched
at us, you had said that that was an act of war, but that Pompeo
can't say that, because if he says that, then we actually have to get into
a war footing immediately.
immediately.
Yeah, I was aware of that problem and knew that Trump was being very cautious in what he was going to say and what he wasn't going to say.
But the point is that I think when we finally get down to the who paid for all of this, we're going to have another bioweapon, this unrestricted political warfare.
At all means, anything they can do, create chaos in the United States.
And the Democrats are willing accomplices because the Democrats want to take down and destroy the United States every bit as much As the communist Chinese do.
And they're happy to be paid.
You've got this little oligarchical privilege class in D.C. that Mitt Romney and others are members of where they think they're beyond being touched by law enforcement and they can make all the money in criminal ways that they want and keep it.
Okay, this is going to come to an end.
This election is by no means done.
It's only this is when it starts.
And we've had chaos all year long.
We've had chaos the entire presidency of Donald Trump.
So it's going to end this first term in chaos.
Don't expect it to be any different.
It's going to be a crazy ride between now and the middle of December when the Electoral College meets.
But it's all going to fall Trump's way.
I've always said Trump always looks like he's going to lose until just before he wins.
This is going to be another case of that.
Right now, the average person thinks he's going to lose.
But he's not. He's, in fact, in the catbird seat.
He's positioned to win.
He's got all the arguments that favor him.
And the Democrats have made themselves obvious in their criminality.
They're going to go to prison.
And this entire Democratic Party may be a criminal organization before it's done.
I would be encouraged in Donald Trump to pursue that line of thinking and to get somebody running the Department of Justice like Grinnell who could clean it up or close it down.
Okay, Craig, any concluding comments?
And then we'll come to you, Arthur.
Craig? Yeah, and it takes these whistleblowers like this brave soul in the post office to come out and to shine the light on the darkness.
These are the people that make a difference.
And we're starting to see them now.
And even though he knows, he's obviously been a whistleblower before.
I've been a whistleblower. I know what happens to whistleblowers.
Trust me. But he knows that the issues at hand here are bigger than his career or his job at the post office.
We need to fear not.
And we need to gather together, and more whistleblowers need to come out, because it's obvious what's going on, and many people have witnessed it.
It's time to speak up.
Arthur? Yeah, and what we're seeing here is...
Yeah, yeah, it's there.
Go out to the prayerfulpatriot.com.
There's a brand new prayer out there to correct the election results and stop the fraud.
You'll see it. It's got a meme of a woman holding a box of emergency Democrat votes.
And this particular prayer is absolutely necessary because these whistleblowers and people need God's support through our prayers.
They will get God's support to help and assist them to take the stands that they need.
So everything that Dr.
Corsi has laid out today has been embedded in this prayer and this petition.
So as Dr. Corsi was talking about it, the prayer has been updated.
And so everything that's there, including the overshadowing of state legislators, Or in the selection of their electoral college participants.
All of that is in this prayer and this petition.
And it's up to us to throw that flag down and say, fail, go back to God with this and be a part and active participant in asking for divine justice to be made manifest.
And by doing this, you're actually helping to balance Inactions that we have taken in the past where we've allowed this to occur, and that's part of the act of repentance.
So please go ahead and visit this.
This prayer is hot, off the press, and it's very directed into these things that Dr.
Corsi's brought up today. Okay, we've run out of time.
The hydroxychloroquine is a big issue right now in the telemed program in Corsi Nation.
I think there could be a new virus coming in from Europe in a few weeks.
Europe is going through another lockdown.
I haven't seen the genome of the virus yet, but I'm very anxious to see whether it's COVID-20, as I predicted there would be.
And go to the Swiss America, the gold and silver.
With the amount of money we're spending and how we're gonna continue spending, making up this money, one of the big issues in 2021 is gonna be how we get back onto a gold standard.
And I think it's gonna be imperative.
So wrapping up today is November 5th, Thursday, 2020, two days after the election.
This is when the election really begins now, today.
And now the legal team is in the field for Donald Trump.
We're beginning to understand the issues.
They're being presented to the court.
The court is going to respond.
And as we discussed, all these other mechanisms work as well, including the House voting, which I don't think we have to be afraid about.
At any rate... In the end, God always wins, and God will win here, too.
And thank you for joining us.
We'll be back tomorrow.
This is Dr. Jerome Corsi with my producer, Craig, and with Arthur, who runs our affiliate, thepairfulpatriot.com.
Be sure to put the in that, thepairfulpatriot.com.
God bless. Thank you for joining us.
Always victory, everyone.
God bless. Fear not.
▲
Export Selection