All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 6, 2020 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
01:29:31
Dr Corsi NEWS 11-06-20: Trump Wins Exposing the Coup
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
♪♪ ♪♪
♪♪ ♪♪
So, Dr. Corsi, do you think that pause in the ballot counting Tuesday night
and then the barrels and buckets and rolling carts of ballots
coming in at exactly 4 a.m.
in places like Detroit and Philadelphia was just a coincidence?
You mean the Democratic clown show going on in these states?
That's it. That's what I thought you meant.
Today is November 6th, 2020, three days after the election.
And I'm here with Jerome Corsi with my producer, Craig.
Now, I want everybody to understand Trump is going to win.
And we're going to continue explaining why.
We have a podcast, too, today.
We've got this one. And then at one o'clock, we're going to do an interview I held with Dr.
Carla Dean Graves, a former secretary of state for the state of Kansas, who was in charge of elections, and a very good friend and author and columnist who is an analyst.
And we pretty much explained how Trump has got to fight back and is starting to fight back.
Remember, I've known Trump for a long time.
Not well. I mean, Donald Trump and I are not buddies.
We don't have dinner together.
He doesn't call me on the phone.
He's only spoken to me on the phone a couple of times.
That was during the birth certificate crisis when he was supporting it and he had questions.
I was leading some of the reporting on that.
At any rate, yesterday we covered some constitutional points, and I'm not going to go over them because they take time, but go back and listen to the Daily Decode podcast we did on November 5th, yesterday.
And the two points I made, and these I want to frame to start, is that the Constitution gives Trump some tools here that can be used ultimately.
Number one, The Electoral College has to meet on December 14th.
That's by statute, federal statute, which means that the states have to report their results by December 12th.
Now, the one big contest we had about elections that went to the Supreme Court was the Bush, George W. Bush versus Al Gore Florida recount that occurred in the year 2000.
Now, that was a hotly contested.
We were doing hanging chads.
Anyone who lived through it as an adult and remembers it, it was a nightmare because you, for 37 days, I believe, were in the courts arguing who won the Florida election, which was pivotal in determining the outcome of the presidential election.
And Al Gore, of course, was vice president under Bill Clinton for eight years, and this was his chance to be president.
George W. Bush's father had been president, George H. W. Bush, and George W. Bush wanted to repeat the feat to be a father-son team in the presidency.
Now, the court ended the Florida recount, because the Democrats had planned to recount, recount, recount, recount, until they could throw the election into the House of Representatives.
Because there would be no winner for the Electoral College to pick on the date that year, mid-December, when the Electoral College by statute, federal statute, had to meet.
So the court said, we've had enough of these recounts.
It ended them.
Because I said the Florida made no provision to get these recounts done to report on time,
the Florida electors in order to do their voting in the Electoral College,
and the court wasn't going to put up with it.
Now, the way the Electoral College works, most people don't understand,
but it is the states who pick the electors.
Now, the state legislatures in particular, the state legislatures are very important here.
Now, the state legislatures in Wisconsin, in Michigan, Pennsylvania are all controlled by Republicans.
Republicans control the state legislatures.
Now, when it comes time to selecting the electors, what has been the tradition is that whoever wins the popular vote in the state Gets the electors.
In fact, when you vote, you're really not voting for the candidate, you're voting for the electors who have been picked by the state to do the voting in the Electoral College for that candidate, should that candidate win the popular vote in the state.
But the Constitution gives the state legislatures the full power, and the Supreme Court decision in Bush v.
Gore affirmed this, What the court said is a plenary power, which means full, without any qualification.
The state can choose the electors any way the state wants.
So the state can say, we see fraud in the vote counting, and even though Biden was declared the winner in this contest, we are appointing a slate for Donald Bush, And they're going to vote Bush because we are not going to let this state have a fraudulent result entered into the Electoral College.
And that can be done in all the states right now where the Democrats are trying to flip this election by fraud to Biden.
Okay, now that's number one.
That's a last recourse.
The states are going to have to have the gumption.
There's other words for it, but they're going to have to have the courage To do their job and to protect the Constitution.
Secondly, everybody's saying, well, if this goes to the House of Representatives, which is the last recourse, if they don't have 271 votes, someone, 270 votes, it's 270, not 71, 270.
I keep thinking 271 because 70 is the point and I think they need one more.
They really just need 270 electoral votes.
And that's a majority.
If neither candidate or no candidate has the needed electoral votes, the House of Representatives decides the election.
This is the way early in the...
After the ratification of the Constitution, you didn't have parties.
Whoever ran it was number one was president.
Whoever was number two was vice president.
It was very contentious.
In the era of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, Hamilton was a federalist.
Thomas Jefferson was for what we would call today states' rights, wanted limited government.
Thomas Jefferson did not want the power of the federal government.
He feared government power, I think correctly.
Alexander Hamilton, of course, that's why they did this big Broadway play, The Democrats for Hamilton, because he wanted to give state power.
That's what they want is power.
At any rate, In the Electoral College, you've got to understand that the state legislatures are the boss, and they are controlled in these key states by Republicans, controlled state legislators.
If the election goes to the House, Nancy Pelosi is saying, well, you know, we have the majority of seats, so we'll win.
No, I'm sorry, Nancy Pelosi, that's not how it's done.
The Constitution specifies that each state in the vote for president in the House of Representatives gets one delegate, one vote.
It's very much like the Electoral College.
California has, what, 44 million people?
And Wyoming's got way under that.
Wyoming has one vote in the House of Representatives for president.
California has one vote.
That's so that the smaller states don't get wiped out.
Otherwise, if it was just by population or popular vote, basically New York City and Los Angeles would settle a lot of every presidential election.
And that's not what the founders wanted.
They wanted the states to have a say.
So the truth is that in the House of Representatives, the GOP controls the delegates.
There are 26 states with Republican delegates.
There are majorities in their House of Representatives, and there are, I guess, what, 24 for the Democrats?
23 and a half. There's one state that's split.
That's right. There's one state that is split.
Maine, I think? Yeah.
Yeah, Maine. But when you get to the current House coming in, it's the same.
The GOP retained control, probably expanded control, of the number of state delegates.
It's still not completely settled yet.
So if it did go to the House, the GOP has the votes there, too, to say Donald Trump is president.
And there's nothing anybody can do about it.
Now, that's, again, going to take the courage of the GOP. And many people are raising questions about the Republican establishment, I think, I think correctly, because really, Donald Trump is not a GOP candidate.
He never has been.
The country is now divided We're good to go.
Because his base is not the GOP. Mitt Romney hates him.
Mitt Romney's establishment.
He's one of the oligarchs, one of the privileged few who use Washington to get rich and for power.
They don't really care about anybody but themselves.
Unfortunately, I think Lindsey Graham falls in the same category.
At any rate, Donald Trump has the tools in the Constitution To overturn a fraudulent vote in any given state by appealing to the state legislature.
There's one more point that I want to make.
And that is, according to the Constitution, the state legislatures set the rules for voting.
Now, in Pennsylvania, the governor said, well, COVID, we better let them vote extra times.
And John Roberts, this four-to-four opinion, which was really not definitive.
John Roberts kind of punted.
But it's open. And now with Amy Coney Barrett there, it's going to be revisited, I believe.
But the governor does not have the authority to extend voting or to extend vote counting in Pennsylvania.
Only the legislature can change that.
Pennsylvania is holding aside all the votes that are being approved after the election day ended, including postmark.
Philadelphia isn't checking the postmarks very much because they don't care.
They've got the votes, they're counting them.
But they're keeping them aside because they know they are going to likely be thrown out by the Supreme Court.
And if the state of Pennsylvania or these other states are decided the night of the election, Donald Trump clearly wins.
He'll have Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia.
He'll have North Carolina.
And I believe he's going to get Arizona, even with the current counting going on, because it seems to be Arizona is at least trying to do an honest job.
Okay, so yesterday, I'm making the point that just don't despair.
Don't think the narrative of the mainstream media, and it's really the corporate entities that own these various media outlets.
Even Fox, now controlled by the Murdoch Suns, is going left.
You know, when you take a look at the major networks, a few corporations own the vast majority of the media in this country.
You've got the New York Times, which is owned by this guy named something out of their slim down in Mexico.
Carlos Slim, a big criminal down in Mexico.
Now I'll probably get sued for saying he's a criminal, but he's one of the Mexico oligarchs who in Mexico people get enormously wealthy or they're enormously poor.
Because Mexico has been a socialist state, and that's what happens in socialist states.
The socialist state is not about redistributing income to the people.
It's about redistributing income to the oligarchs who control it.
And everybody else is a peasant.
Everybody else is a slave.
Expected to bow and kneel.
And the Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos.
And again, these are people who are controlling the agenda for the global New World Order.
Going back, this communism and Nazism goes way back into the 1920s and 1930s.
1917 was the Russian Revolution, and it was played out in the streets of Germany in the Weimar Republic after World War I, because Germany lost the war.
And felt aggrieved that the Kaiser and the others who were running the corporation sold Germany out.
Hitler blamed the Jews, typically.
But the point is, the bankers, Jews are bankers, it was all money.
Okay, well, any of this blaming the Jews is just completely nonsense.
As far as I'm concerned, it's complete trash.
You know, scapegoating, and that's what they call it in psychology and in social science.
But the point is, Nazis were national socialists.
They were on the left. Now, the difference between Nazis and communists were the Nazis.
Hitler had a welfare state.
He was a socialist. He had paid for by the government vacations for people.
He had universal health care.
First one, I think, ever to do it.
And he also wanted the multinational corporations to rule the world.
And in that, he was helped by Wall Street.
In particular, Prescott Bush, the grandfather, the progenitor, the father of George H.W. Bush, worked on Wall Street with Averill Harriman and brothers, that whole firm, and they financed Hitler in the 1930s out of Wall Street.
The Dulles brothers were involved in that.
Alan Dulles became head of the CIA when John Kennedy was assassinated.
He was fired just before that.
In my book, Who Really Killed Kennedy?
I say that Dulles was one of the ringleaders in the plot to assassinate Kennedy.
Allendahl spent World War II in Bern, Switzerland, and he helped Bormann, who was Hitler's secretary, move money out of Germany that the Nazis had stolen from the Jews in the concentration camp and every place else.
Largely put a lot of it in the stock market.
The US. Part of the boom after World War II. Because the Nazis, smart Nazis knew by 1943 they were going to lose.
So they started getting money out of there.
And Dulles, Alan Dulles was the bag man.
John Foster Dulles became Secretary of State under Eisenhower.
And these people wanted to put together U.S. Steel and Krupp in Germany and create a multinational corporation.
They were going to rule the world.
It was going to be an EU. If Hitler had what Merkel had, a united Europe with Germany leading it, and Merkel as head of Germany leading the EU, Hitler would have settled for that.
But he had to go after the communists because the communists wanted...
Government ownership of private property.
No private property. The government was just going to steal it all.
And they've been fighting about this on the left for eons.
And right now, the current Democrats are really not specifically as much communists as they are Nazis.
Okay, now, again, Joel Goldberg wrote a brilliant book called Liberal Fascism.
A few years ago, maybe as many as 10 or 15 years ago, which explains that Nazism, fascism, which began and rose in Italy under Mussolini, is really left.
Mussolini was a leftist.
Came into Rome with the brown shirts, organized workers and peasants.
He was a labor guy.
He was a labor union guy every bit as much as the Democrats traditionally have been.
Okay, so Donald Trump's base is against all this.
He opposes the New World Order Nazis.
He opposes the Communist AOC and the others, including Kamala Harris or Kamala or however she pronounces her name, opposes her too.
And by the way, Silicon Valley is just an extension of multinational corporate structures, which are now trying to censor and control social media the same way the New York Times has controlled media the same way that we have controlled media in the Washington Post.
Now, Trump opposes all this.
So they are desperate to get Trump.
Now, I want you to go back and review yesterday so you really understand how the Electoral College works and how the voting in the House works, because Trump has got aces in the hole there, and he will understand how to play them, largely because I made sure that all these videos of what I'm doing are shared with Trump's team, and Trump's lawyers are on top of it.
Okay, today I'm going to do more social science and politics to explain how Trump beats this.
Now, Trump is a unique human being.
As I said, I've known him for a long time.
And I always say he always looks like he's going to lose, just like he does today, until just before he wins.
I've seen him do it over and over and over again.
The Commodore Hotel, the first big property he bought, the hotel that's now the Hyatt In New York City, what's left of New York City, over Grand Central Station, what's left of Grand Central Station.
And the banks were going to not give him more money.
Basically, Trump went in and said, you know, I own the banks.
I'll default on you guys unless you give me more money.
And besides, he knew that the New York Central...
The railroad owned the property, Commodore Hotel and Grand Central Station.
And they had a railroad yard on the west side of Manhattan at this time.
This is when John Lindsay was mayor.
This goes back, I believe, into the 80s.
At any rate, Trump got 70s.
That's right, John Lindsay was 70s.
That was before the default of New York.
That's another great era that Democrats architected.
At any rate, Trump got the rail yard rights as part of the Commodore Hotel purchase from the Penn Central Railroad.
And Lindsey wanted those at land for the Javits Center, where he was going to build a convention center.
And Trump held the land because he held the option to buy it.
And Trump threw that into the Commodore Hotel deal, and he won.
His father even thought he was going to lose.
And at that time, my remark about Trump was one I probably can't say on the air,
but it had to do with God endowing him with what he needed to beat any battle.
That's about all I'm gonna say about that off air.
I can explain it to Craig, but don't need to go into it right now on air.
But it does have to do with having exactly what he needs in order to win these, because when it gets down to it,
Donald Trump resolves, he's just not gonna lose.
When he says, we're gonna win, we're gonna win, We're going to keep winning.
He means it.
And he does not intend to lose.
Now, I want to start today, and we may go a little bit long today, but I want you, Craig, let's queue up this press conference.
Trump came out yesterday, and he did an impromptu press conference.
Now, it lasts for about 12 minutes, so it starts here on this one by, I think, 31 minutes.
07, he's walking into the room.
32 seconds, 32 minutes and seven seconds into this, Trump is starting.
Let's play two minutes on that and come back, and I'm going to mute myself here, okay?
Okay, thank you. Thank you very much.
Thank you. I'd like to provide the American people with an update on our efforts to protect the integrity of our very important 2020 election.
If you count the legal votes, I easily win.
If you count the illegal votes, they can try to steal the election from us.
If you count the votes that came in late, We're looking at them very strongly, but a lot of votes came in late.
I've already decisively won many critical states, including massive victories in Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Ohio.
To name just a few, we won these and many other victories despite historic election interference from big media, big money, and big tech.
As everybody saw, we won by historic numbers.
And the pollsters got it knowingly wrong.
They got it knowingly wrong.
We had polls that were so ridiculous, and everybody knew it at the time.
There was no blue wave that they predicted.
They thought there was going to be a big blue wave.
That was false.
It was done for suppression reasons.
But instead, there was a big red wave.
And it's been properly acknowledged, actually, by the media.
I think very impressed, but that was after the fact.
That doesn't do us any good.
We kept the Senate despite having twice as many seats to defend as Democrats.
And in a really much more competitive states, we did a fantastic job with the Senate.
I think we're very proud of what's happened there.
We had many more seats to defend.
They spent almost $200 million on Senate races in South Carolina and Kentucky alone, two races.
Hundreds of millions of dollars overall against us.
At the national level, our opponents' major donors were Wall Street bankers and special interests.
Our major donors were police officers, farmers, everyday citizens.
Yet for the first time ever, we lost zero races in the House.
Well, Dr. Corsi, I've gone on about two minutes and 20 seconds.
Okay, now, what you've heard Trump say here, and this is very important.
First of all, look at how he comes out.
He's kind of, he's solemn.
He's composed.
He's speaking softly.
He is making his points precisely.
Inside, he's raging.
And he would love to really let that out.
But he's not going to do that.
He's going to keep that energy in.
Now, he framed it by saying, first of all, what's at stake here is the integrity of voting, the integrity of the election.
That's very important, because that's ultimately a constitutional point.
The Constitution requires that the state legislatures maintain the integrity of voting.
That's had a lot of consequences in constitutional history.
I'm a political science by training, political scientist.
My Harvard PhD, 1972, was from the political science department, not the Kennedy School, at Harvard.
And I did a lot of work in the law school.
My doctoral dissertation was on a First Amendment topic, prior restraint and prior punishment and political dissent.
Could you put somebody in jail before they spoke because you thought what they were going to do would be so dangerous that it shouldn't be done?
There's very few examples of that, the court said.
You know, maybe publishing the position of troops during a war, that would be forbidden.
But saying the war was not a war we should be fighting, that would be allowed.
And I did a lot of work on that.
One of my thesis advisors was in the law school.
I had two thesis advisors.
One was Michael Walzer, who was very much of a leftist socialist revolutionary.
And I was not.
And the other was Arthur Sutherland Jr., who was the historian of the Harvard Law School.
I was his last graduate student.
We held my exam, my thesis defense.
And the thing was, when I went to Harvard, I was explaining to you that I did not get a law degree
because I got accepted into the graduate school at Harvard in the Department of Political Science,
and they offered to pay everything.
A National Science Foundation grant, they had one a year they could give, and I got it.
I had written three books under my own name as an undergraduate, and the professors at Harvard knew who I was.
So they gave me this and they paid me $1,000 a month to live.
And the law school was going to cost me a lot of money.
I didn't come from a rich family.
I had to work my way through college.
Paid for it myself.
And went to college at Case Western Reserve in Cleveland where I grew up.
Couldn't afford to go to a college out of state and live and pay the tuition and room and board and everything else in a dormitory.
So at any rate... At the law school, I did my dissertation with a constitutional law topic.
Did we cover that, Craig, or should I repeat that?
Was that stable when I gave that?
I... Don't know.
Don't remember. Sorry. Okay, so my doctoral dissertation was on the prior restraint, prior punishment, and political dissent.
It was at the time of the Pentagon Papers.
This was in 1972.
And what I was saying, it was about could you stop somebody from speaking or writing before they do it because it's going to be so dangerous you don't want it said.
And there are very few exceptions on that where it's true, like if you're going to publish location of troops in a war, which would be a material benefit to the enemy.
But if you wanted to give a speech and say the war shouldn't be fought, well, you have a right to do that, as long as it wasn't causing an insurrection.
And then it had to be likely it could lead to an insurrection.
Just give a speech and nobody's listening to you.
Nobody cares. And that was a very famous decision that was written by Justice Brandeis.
It was called Whitney v.
U.S. I studied that case a lot.
One of my advisors was Michael Waltzer, political science department.
He was a revolutionary leftist.
And I was not.
And the other advisor was Arthur Sutherland Jr.
in the law school. He was a law school historian.
I was his last graduate student.
He held my doctoral defense in his living room in his home in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
He let us know he had cancer and he was going to die.
And he had clerked with Oliver Wendell Holmes.
It's how far he went back.
And he was a brilliant, brilliant man.
Michael Walzer's a brilliant man, too.
I had great education at Harvard and took advantage of it.
At any rate, So I know constitutional law as a political scientist.
I'm not a lawyer. I don't pretend to practice law.
And yet I'm a political scientist, so I'm going to explain to you today.
Yesterday was all about the Constitution, how it works.
And today I'm saying when Donald Trump's coming out in this press conference and he's saying it's about voter integrity, that's what this is about, he has signaled he's going to the Supreme Court.
Because the constitutional issue here is The Constitution gives the state legislatures the right to settle all rules about elections, but their responsibility is to make sure that every voter gets an opportunity to vote equally.
And that's led to some legislation, the Equal Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act, Supreme Court decisions, etc.
And that's an important point.
That's where he's staking this battle.
So this battle is about the Constitution and voting integrity.
Okay, now, secondly, Donald Trump said, if we count the legal votes, I win.
Well, and remember, I made the point, if we count the votes in Pennsylvania on election night, and the governor changed the rules to count for three or four more days, when that really comes before the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court's going to have to say, the governor doesn't make the rules.
And so all the votes that were counted in Pennsylvania since election night don't count, and Trump will win Pennsylvania.
Probably be the same in Wisconsin, same in Georgia, same in North Carolina.
Arizona. Arizona, you had election officials making the rules.
You had governors making the rules.
Well, the Constitution does not give them that authority for good reason, because the founders knew if you let politicians do this, they would be doing exactly what the Democrats are doing today.
They'd set the rules to win the votes and disregard everybody who didn't vote the way they wanted them to vote.
That's not what the Constitution says.
Now, Donald Trump has also then set down some markers.
He's saying, we're going to contest the illegal votes and we're going to fight it hard.
Now, Craig, can you play the next two minutes of that press conference?
I was talking to Kevin McCarthy today.
He said he couldn't believe it.
Zero races. Very unusual thing.
Zero. And actually won many new seats with, I think, many more on the way.
This was also the year of the Republican woman.
More Republican women were elected to Congress than ever before.
That's a great achievement.
I won the largest share of non-white voters of any Republican in 60 years, including historic numbers of Latino, African American, Asian American, and Native American voters.
The largest ever in our history.
We grew our party by 4 million voters, the greatest turnout.
In Republican Party history.
Democrats are the party of the big donors, the big media, the big tech, it seems.
And Republicans have become the party of the American worker, and that's what's happened.
And we're also, I believe, the party of inclusion.
As everyone now recognizes, media polling was election interference, in the truest sense of that word, by powerful special interests.
These really phony polls, I have to call them phony polls, fake polls, were designed to keep our voters at home, create the illusion of momentum for Mr.
Biden and diminish Republicans' ability to raise funds.
They were what's called suppression polls.
Everyone knows that now.
And it's never been used to the extent that it's been used on this last election.
To highlight just a few examples, the day before election, Quinnipiac, which was wrong on every occasion that I know of, had Joe Biden up by five points in Florida, and they were off by 8.4 points, and I won Florida easily.
So, Dr. Corsi, you've gotten to the point where he's talking about how he won Florida easily, even though the polls were putting him in the opposite side.
Yeah, now Donald Trump's saying, now he's making another point.
He's saying, essentially, that the fraud included the corporate entities controlling the media, the mainstream media and the broadcasters parroting what they've been told to say.
Allowed to be leftists, encouraged to be leftists.
The polls, which are largely paid for by the media, and remember, it's now come out that even one of the Fox decision desks Also was in the company that did the polls.
And he's a never-Trumper.
And he's a never-Trumper.
And what they were doing is they were making decisions on election night to affirm what their polling said, that Biden wins.
So they were jumping states like Arizona and other states.
They were doing everything they could to call everything for Biden.
The illusion was being created that was going to be massive turnout and Biden was going to win.
What Trump just said also, from a political science point of view, is he said, we won women.
We won Hispanics.
We won blacks.
We won gays.
We won across the board.
This is not the Republican Party anymore.
He said, my coalition is now reforming what we call the Republican Party, which means he's going to be happy to throw out the Romneys.
Don't need them anymore.
Might as well just join the Democrats.
And he's not going to trust the state establishments.
He's going to say, okay, which of these states are with me and which of these states are not with me?
And he's the president.
Okay, and he's going to continue being the president.
And he knows it. Now he's setting the ground here by saying that we won all these things.
It's impossible that the numbers turned out the way they did with this after-the-fact mail-in voting.
Okay, now that's the point I really want to drive home today.
There's a couple points I want to drive home.
Trump wins on this, and the coup d'etat, which began the moment he came down the escalator in 2015 to say he wanted to be president, These forces, the bureaucracy, the hard left, the moguls that own the media because they want to have one world government, multinational corporations.
They want that narrative.
They want enslaved people. Nazism is socialism just as much as communism is on the left.
And they want government power.
Okay, now, all of this is architecting toward a An analysis of who these people are that voted in the mail.
Okay, now, the instances of fraud here are massive.
I'm just going to recount a couple, just go down a quick list.
So you can, you know, I've been sent some very nice emails from people who have done a lot of this work.
It's been very helpful.
But I'm going to try to find it here.
Okay. I mean, I'm just going to read the first few of these.
Which all have references.
Postal worker, U.S. postal worker at the Canadian border had stolen ballots in his car trunk.
What's that all about? Philadelphia, total votes counted goes from 94% of the vote to 90.
It's called cheating, so they can keep counting.
Watcher in Michigan kicked out of the Detroit Hall, but not before they obtained evidence of potential fraud.
All the voter birthdays that they were looking at were January 1, 1900.
These people are all dead.
Michigan voters born 100 years ago.
More than 100 years ago.
Well, I guess 1900 would have been 120 years.
Poll worker filling out ballots in Philly.
Director of Election Day Operations posts video of Philly post office continuing to collect ballots after Election Day.
Vote counter caught filling in ballots.
Nevada Republican Party.
Our lawyers just sent a criminal referral to Attorney General Barr regarding at least 3,062 instances of voter fraud.
We expect that number to grow substantially.
At least 3,000 unauthorized votes were found in Clark County, Nevada, by a law firm representing the Trump campaign and comparing the election roll with the national change of address file.
Dead people found on voter rolls in 40 states one month before the election.
Judicial Watch finds 1.8 million ghost voters that don't exist in 29 states.
Dead people in Michigan found voting via absentee ballots.
That's quite a feat for the afterlife of their voting.
Michigan U.S. Post Office whistleblower details hand-stamping late backdating ballots so that they could be counted to make them appear as if they had been in before the election day or on election day.
Memory sticks to program ballots Voting machines were stolen from the Philadelphia election warehouse.
That's interesting and used probably to create votes.
Stolen ballots found, quote, under a rock in West Valley Field in Phoenix.
The United States Post Office disregards order to sweep facilities with police to find unprocessed ballots after the U.S. Postal Service confirms 300,000 ballots unaccounted for nationwide.
It goes on. I mean, the list is three times that long of all the irregularities and frauds and wrong addresses, ballots sent to the wrong places, duplicate ballots, people voting twice.
Okay, so the mail-in voting is inherently subject of manipulation, and we don't have to.
Nancy Pelosi said Joe Biden will be elected president regardless what the vote is on Election Day.
In other words, the vote on Election Day didn't matter because they were going to rig it for Biden to win afterwards.
Okay, now, the same point on what Biden said.
He said, we've got the most massive voting fraud scheme in operation ever designed.
Well, that's probably a memory slipper.
He probably didn't know what he was saying, but it was the truth.
Now, the legal argument that the Democrats are relying on is a fairly sophisticated one, and that is a mail-in ballot, if you've seen them or used one, it comes to you in an envelope.
You open up the envelope, and it's got a couple parts to it.
One, it's got a mail-in envelope you're supposed to sign.
That's supposed to be checked against your signature on your voter registration card to make sure it's the same person.
It's the only way they can check it.
It's not very reliable.
Especially if it's not looked at.
Then you put the ballot inside and you seal it and you put it in the post office.
Okay, now, when the postal workers open that, they separate your vote from the envelope.
The envelope is put aside and the vote is thrown into the pool.
Now, if that vote were found subsequently to be fraudulent, you don't know which vote to get to take out of the pool because they're all mixed together in this big spaghetti mix.
You know, vegetable soup, you can't just take the carrots out and eat them separately.
Carrots are now cooked into the stew, as well as being there, or you can't eat them separately.
But the point is, it's all in the pot.
You don't know which ones were fraudulent and which ones were not.
If you remove a vote, the arguments could be made by the lawyers.
Well, you don't know that was the vote that person voted.
Even if you know that's fraudulent, you can't associate it with the vote that's in the pool.
Is that clear, Craig?
Yeah, absolutely. Okay, now the way you defeat this is not precisely the way a lawyer thinks, not to start.
You have to do now like a social scientist does.
And part of my experience, again, is I've run randomized field experiments, massive ones, in New Mexico when I was younger at universities.
Those are advanced skills in research methodology and statistics.
I taught statistics in a university, although I never took a course in statistics.
Didn't need to. It's a waste of time.
I taught it. Okay, now, here's what you're not bragging.
I'm just trying to get you to understand that I have background for making the arguments I'm about to make.
And when you listen to what I'm saying, you're going to find that it's correct.
Now, there's been several different ways you start.
Now, first of all, Most of the cases are that on election night, on Tuesday night, we all went to bed thinking Trump had won.
And in the middle of the night, big dumps of ballots.
You know, 50,000 ballots show up and they are 90-some percent for Biden.
After they paused the counting.
After they paused the counting.
These pauses of counting say, okay, now how many do we need to create?
Okay, because they fell short.
Of invalid votes, fraudulent votes.
Trump's actual in-person voting was so strong, they didn't create enough fraudulent votes to begin with.
But that's why they created this extra time to count votes, because you could stop votes counting and say, let's go get 50,000 more ballots.
Run in the back room and get them for us.
And they wheelbarrow them out, middle of the night, and they're all for Biden.
Now, statistically, the probabilistic chance that that is correct, that in any group of large ballots, that you would have 90% of them being for one candidate, is not only improbable, it's probably impossible.
Because if you take a look at what the voting mix was, or the votes that you know you got, And they're going to say, well, Democrats were afraid of COVID, and they wanted to stay home, so they favored the mail-in votes.
And Republicans were doing these big spreader rallies, and they didn't care, so they voted in person.
Remember, the whole thing is architected, so the narrative support, even the COVID shutdowns by the Democratic governors, are part of the voter fraud.
All this fits together, and you've got to see the puzzle all fitting together.
It's the same as I said, Russian collusion.
This is a book I wrote. Two books.
Coup d'etat, a hardcover book.
And in June, I wrote the e-book, The Plan to Remove Donald Trump from the Presidency.
And I predicted we would be at the last stage voter fraud.
And here it is as part of the coup.
Ukraine didn't work.
Senate trial to remove Donald Trump by impeachment didn't work.
The shutdown of the economy didn't destroy Trump.
He even got COVID. It was better in three days.
Nothing's beaten him. He always looks like he's going to lose until just before he wins.
It's going to happen again. Okay, now, when you look at all these votes coming in and you say, well, the votes that we have do not mirror those percentages.
And so, therefore, the argument's going to be made, well, the people who used the ballots were afraid of COVID. They were Democrats.
So that's why they are so biased in favor of Biden.
Okay, so now we say, well, let's take a look at those ballots, because bring me the envelopes that came in it.
Well, you know, we threw the envelopes away.
Or what do you mean you've only got half of the envelopes?
Okay, well, bring me what you got.
Now we start doing name checks against the registration.
And we find out that these ballots are largely fraudulent.
You can't even go to the people And say, I'd like you to give me a sample of your handwriting.
Now, we don't have all the time in the world to do this, because the Electoral College is going to meet on the 14th of December by federal statute.
And so we've only got six weeks for max, maybe five, for this drama to be played out.
But I guarantee you it will be played out all five weeks, and I'm going to explain to you now how.
So even before you get to make the argument, if you can say, well...
There were 50,000 votes cast at late in the day, and over 90% of them were for Biden.
So let's be conservative. Let's take 75% of 50,000, which is going to be somewhere like about 35,000 votes.
And we're just going to take those away from Biden.
We don't know which ones they were, but we know that these were 90% for Biden.
We can identify that 75% of them were fraudulent.
For sure, we think 90% of them were fraudulent.
And so, therefore, we're going to remove that from the total.
Now, I heard Geraldo Rivera on the TV today, who I basically, even though he's now living in Cleveland, Ohio, where I grew up, I still can't stand him.
Well, it's too bad because the court will never decide this way.
The court will decide this way because the court's responsibility is to maintain voter integrity.
I'm going to get to the court and its dynamics in a minute, but this is a constitutional question the court will have to take up.
Now, I wouldn't even start there.
I'd like to see the registration numbers, please.
You may have the registration.
Now, I'm going to cross-check that registration against other databases.
There is a national database of people who have moved.
I want to see how many people that you have registered in this state have moved.
Okay. How many people on election day were in the hospital in this state?
In any given day, somewhere between 5% and 10% or 15% of the population is in the hospital.
Think about it. If the hospitals fill up with patients, where do they come from?
Well, they come from the population, which is going to be registered voters.
So I want to know if the vote totals, if 87% of the people in Wisconsin voted, but 15% were in the hospital that day, I don't think 87% of the people actually voted.
Again, it's not the people who vote the count, it's the people who count or make up the votes, manufacture them.
And it's very easy.
You send out vote harvesting.
I send out Democrat operatives.
I pay them each $50,000.
I say, go to this nursing home, ask people if they've got a mail-in ballot.
Tell them you're there to help them fill it out.
Have them sign the outside envelope.
Ask them what they want.
You sit there and mark only Biden and Democrats.
If these people are mentally not all with it, thank them very much.
Say, see, I did exactly what you want to put it, because they're not going to read it.
They can't read it. They're confused by it.
It's called vote harvesting.
I want to see if these ballots and mail-in that came in late have the names of vote harvesting, or if the handwriting on the signatures looks like the same person signed them.
That's in addition to matching the signatures against the voter registration cards.
I'm going to go to other databases.
There's databases of the people who've moved out of the state.
Every year, between 10 and 15% of the population changes where they live.
And when people do that, they don't go to the voter registration and say, take me off the voter registration.
I've lived, I was born in Ohio, Lived there until I was 21.
I lived in Massachusetts when I went to Harvard.
I then moved to New Hampshire and lived there for a while.
My first job teaching.
I went to the University of New Mexico, lived there for a while, went to the University of Denver.
Registered in Colorado and voted.
When I started my banking career, I moved to Portland, Oregon.
Voted there. Then I moved back to New Jersey.
First I moved to actually to White Plains in New York.
And registered there to vote.
Then I came on to New Jersey where I live now.
I've lived here for over 30 years and vote here.
I never once got my name off the voter registrations.
I never once went in and thought to say, take me off.
I'm no longer living here.
Okay, you've also got other things.
You've got these voters.
I want to see their electric bills.
I want to see the gas bills.
I want to see the internet bills.
For these people. I want to see if they check to the same address or if these people are even in this state any longer.
In other words, I'm going to take these voter registrations and I'm going to show that with these high percentages voting, which is architected by the narrative, you know, Biden's going to win.
Look, he's ahead in all these states.
He wasn't. Donald Trump's pointing that out.
Donald Trump is on to these points and he's going to argue them.
Okay, now, so there is a lot of database analysis that can be done by a qualified social scientist who understands databases, where you can take a voter registration list and you can scrub it to say, these are the only people on that list.
Then you want to know how many people registered the last day?
You know, were they checked?
How did they get to validate where they lived?
Did they bring in an electric bill?
Did they bring in a mortgage payment?
Okay, and you'll find a lot of people just got to put their names on the voter registration and weren't checked because the Democrats wanted names.
They weren't intending that these people voted.
I want to check the mail-in votes against the in-person votes.
How many people voted twice?
How many people went to the polls and said, I want to vote in person?
So, well, you've already voted by mail.
So, no, I didn't. That happened too.
In other words, there's going to be massive discrepancies, which are indicative of voter fraud.
Okay, now, Craig, is that point clear?
Yes, sir. Okay, now, it was announced by the Department of Justice yesterday that the, we can find probably, you can probably search for it, Craig, and are we not roboting now?
No, you're fine. Okay.
Okay. So if you go, you'll find an article yesterday where the Department of Justice said that the Department of Justice has the authority to bring in armed federal agents to begin investigating for voter fraud.
Okay, now my next set of recommendations is this.
Donald Trump today has nothing to lose and everything to gain.
Because if he doesn't fight this, The Democrats are probably today or tomorrow going to say, well, Joe Biden has 270 electoral votes.
We're going to declare him the winner.
And all the mainstream media, all the corporate media, all the social media, and now Twitter censors Trump and other platforms censor Trump.
Okay, now, this is set so Donald Trump loses.
And say, there's nothing you can do about this.
Because we have the fraud so carefully architected, you can't get rid of the votes that we've thrown into the pool.
We open the ballots, they're in there, you can't take them out.
You don't know which ones they are.
I'm saying we don't have to know which ones they are.
I'll get to the court in a minute.
But what Donald Trump needs to do now is he needs to say, Attorney General Barr, what's your next job going to be?
And by the way, Christopher Wray, I'd like you to come over for a cup of coffee.
I got these 15 questions I'd like you to answer.
And by the way, bring your letter of resignation with you.
Fire them. Put in, I guess, Doug Collins.
Doug Collins lost his Senate race.
There's others around.
More Grinnells, more Radcliffe's.
Let's find them. Let's put Grinnell in as Attorney General.
Oh, he's LGBT. I don't care.
He's honest. And he's tough.
And he's in Nevada now, making the case of voter irregularities in Nevada.
And by the way, these are crimes.
Every one of these voter instances of irregularities is a federal crime.
These people can go away into prison for about 10 years or more.
As President Donald Trump's going to be saying, I'm going to get an attorney general, I am going to put these armed agents, I'm going to get cases going, and I'm going to file criminal cases.
Against these workers in the polls whom I'm finding are conducting irregularities.
And then I'm going to do a real law enforcement investigation.
Remember, I tell you that I had for years with the State Department and through a grant from the Agency for International Development, I had a top secret clearance.
I worked on terrorism, anti-terrorism.
And I look like gray hair.
I'm somewhat soft-spoken, but it comes to bad guys.
The psychiatrists were interviewing people in prison.
I could tell you where these people...
I told the government, you don't think like these people do.
Well, I can.
You know, once when I... I think my father first said, you know, son, you've got a criminal mentality.
And I said, well, yeah, dad, first of all, where do you think I got it?
And number two, I've just decided not to be a criminal.
So that's just a decision I made.
I'm not going to do that. Might be a brilliant one, might make a lot of money.
I'm just not going to do that. That's not why I'm here.
So I decided not to be a criminal, but I, okay, get a terrorist.
Better think like the terrorist.
You know, you beat them up and do all these things and waterboard them.
Some will break and they'll tell you lies.
That's not, I'd say to them, you know, tomorrow, I'm going to release you.
In fact, I'm going to bring you right back to your group.
And I'm going to publish stories about all the things you told us, how you ratted out.
Oh, I've got all the names, and now I'm going to kill all the people because of you.
So I'm going to hand you back to Osama bin Laden, and I'm going to hope you go back in there and kiss him on the lips, like Judas.
And they'll kill you faster than I would, And I won't have to be responsible for it.
Now, you got his attention.
Okay, so when we start bringing these criminals and criminal cases in the states, some of the postal workers are going to say, wait a minute, don't get me.
I'm going to tell you what happened. Some of the poll watchers are going to say, or the people counting ballots, I know I was wearing a Biden mask.
Let me tell you what happened. I don't want to go to federal prison.
I'll tell you what was the deal.
Okay, now we're going to crack it wide open.
And we're going to find out exactly what happened and who did it.
Now, when I had my talk with Abar, I'd say, this guy, I'm Dunham.
Tell me about him. Why hasn't he brought any cases?
Durham. Durham.
Okay, so I'd get Grinnell in there, so your first job is to fire Durham.
Second job is, I want Biden indicted.
I want a criminal investigation of Biden and his son.
I want you to announce it.
I want the people to know what this laptop was about, and if you indict Biden, the press will have to cover it.
So they're going to elect a criminal to be president.
That's what the Democrats want to do.
Okay, so now we've reframed the whole thing.
Now we've said the criminal, remember when I, look, I've been through a tough situation.
Mueller was going to put me in prison for 25 years the rest of my life.
I was going to die in prison. They said that if I didn't say that I had connections with Assange, which I did not have, give them to Stone, which I did not do.
If I didn't do that, they were going to charge me with obstruction of justice in a court in Washington, D.C. The jury would hate me.
I go to prison the rest of my life.
So I will not stand in front of a federal judge Put my hand on the Bible and swear a lie.
I'm not going to say I committed a crime and I didn't.
He said, you can put me in prison.
35 years, I don't care how long I live.
Okay, so maybe I'll start evangelizing the prison.
Put St. Paul in prison.
What did he do, Craig? Yeah, he evangelized.
And he wrote a book. Yeah.
Oh, I can write a book. I've written 25 of them since 2004.
And they'll be feeding me.
I'll have a place to sleep. I'll just write books.
And if they don't give me paper or let me do it, I'll write them in my head so when I have a chance, I'll say, here's the book.
It helps with a photographic or identic memory.
Okay, I'm not going to worry about that.
I'm not going to feel afraid.
Me feel afraid? They gave me the plea deal.
I was in New York City in the limousine going to NBC to give an interview.
And my lawyer called and said, just come home.
You won't go to prison. They're going to give you a plea deal.
But don't do the interview.
They don't want you doing the interview.
Mueller's people don't want you doing the interview.
Well, I said, okay.
I came back, didn't do the interview, got the plea deal.
When the plea deal, they wanted me to plead that I had lied to testimony they allowed me to amend because I forgot a few emails.
I said, I'm not doing this.
My wife woke up one morning.
We were going through all this.
It was in 2018.
And she just woke up and looked at me and said, first thing she said that morning, she said, I'd rather visit you in prison the rest of your life than have you not be the man I married.
Well, I said, okay, because you make this decision for the family.
I said, well, Monica, if you can say that, I'm telling these people to take a hike.
Now, I didn't say it quite that politely, because I did grow up in East Cleveland, and one of my faults, Craig will tell you, is I can swear with some of the best of them.
Right, Craig? Woo!
Yeah, I can. And the point is, I said, no, I'm not doing that.
And I went right back on the media.
I told everybody what they did.
I wrote a book, Silent No More.
You should read it. I exposed them all.
I said that Jeannie Rhee and Goldstein and my great friend Aaron Zielinski, these are the criminals, the prosecutors.
The one day I went to the grand jury, Jeannie Rhee wore a see-through blouse.
I said, what's this all about?
David Gray, my attorney, says she's trying to, you know, make you a little unstable or make you shook up.
I said, you know, well, I've seen all that equipment before.
I'm not particularly impressed.
I think it's disgraceful.
So it's not invoking my period interest.
I'm thinking, who is this slut?
And I'm reading her character and I'm saying, I can beat these people.
They want to mess with me, I'll mess with them.
I didn't come in there to mess with them.
I gave them my computers. I gave them everything.
They start messing with me over, you forgot this email, so you're lying.
Uh-uh, I wasn't lying. I forgot an email.
So they didn't scare me, but I'm about to scare them because I'm coming after them for suborning perjury.
And Donald Trump will do it in his second term.
All the Mueller prosecutors, they were the criminals.
And because I wouldn't break, Donald Trump knows this, That ended Mueller, because they didn't get the last piece of this Russian collusion with me connecting to Assange and then to Roger Stone.
That was their last piece.
But I said, uh-uh. You can scare me any way you want and try to.
It doesn't scare me. It makes me think you're a criminal.
And criminals don't scare me.
Because when you learn how to see criminals in a particular way, like I do, And again, this is probably why they wanted me to be a psychiatrist rather than, I didn't want to do that.
I didn't want to spend the rest of my life listening to other people's problems.
And I know I have a good idea what I'd be hearing.
I knew a lot of psychiatrists and I know what goes on, all the trash they have to listen to.
But when you look at criminals the way I do, they're like, they're silly.
Let me explain that to you.
Okay, I got a great idea.
We're going to have mail-in votes, and then we're going to know how many we need, just like we did with Al Franken.
We got Coleman beat because we produced all these votes, just like we did in Southern California.
We tried it out. We'll just produce the votes.
They won't be able to stop us.
They won't be able to say these aren't fraudulent.
We'll have them in the pool. They won't be able to take them out.
We'll flip an election.
And they did that, right, Craig?
Yeah, for six seats in Orange County.
Okay, now, with bank robbers, and this is part of, again, what I was architecting going back even into the 70s.
I remember the three books I wrote that got me into Harvard were all on the racial violence in the 60s.
I actually co-authored with a professor one of the task force reports of the Eisenhower Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence, In 1968, and that report was called Shootout in Cleveland, a gun battle between the black militants and the police.
So here's a bank robber, okay?
I always said terrorists and criminals are like bad playwrights.
They got a great first act.
But they don't know what the second act is.
They don't know how to write a conclusion to the play.
So your job is, as law enforcement or as a negotiator with the terrorists or bank robbers, you've got to write the second act for them and you've got to tell them how the play is going to end.
Okay, so, hey, let's go.
We've got guns. We're going to get in here.
We're going to scare all the people.
We're going to have them put their hands up. They're going to give us the money.
And then we're going to leave.
We'll have a getaway. We'll have a car.
And we'll get away and we'll have the money.
Yeah, well, that might have worked in the days of Bonnie and Clyde.
But today, you get exploding money, which means they give you the money.
You get out of the bank, it blows up, and you've got orange dye all over you, so a place can find you pretty easily.
That's only one of the things they do.
So there was this great movie, Dog Day Afternoon.
I don't know if you saw it.
I think Al Pacino was in that.
Yes. Yeah. So these bank robbers, I think he was playing the bank robber.
Yes. Yeah. With his brother, they needed the money for his sex change operation.
For his sex change operation.
This movie is so good.
I love this movie. I want to see it 25 times.
And so they, okay, well, they press the levers.
The police know. The police surround the place.
They got the SWAT teams. And they're in there.
They're getting ready to leave the bank with all the money.
And the phone rings.
And they pick up the phone.
What's the phone ringing? Pick up the phone.
And it's the police negotiator on the other side of the street.
He says, my name is so-and-so and I'm here to help you get out.
I'd like you to look outside the window and tell me what you see.
Because you're going to be seeing a lot of police, a lot of SWAT teams.
And what I want you to know, all those guns are pointed on you.
And I can probably hold them off for a while.
And so would you guys like some pizza?
How about those? You got any hostages?
Any women? We could let the women go.
You're a guy. You don't want to be terrorizing women.
Well, let's get some food for you.
Well, the reason you do that is because the adrenaline is pumping in these bank robbers.
You got to get them to think. Well, a good way to get them to think is to sit down and get something to eat.
Now their blood's going into their stomach and they have a chance to wear off the adrenaline and start thinking.
Next thing you say is, now I know you guys think you're going to get out of here and you're going to have all that money, but I got a little problem here and that is that these police are not going to let that happen.
So we're your best choice.
Let's talk about your alternatives.
Now, that may take a while to get them to make step-by-step decisions.
Okay, so from the point of view of what I'm looking at, these criminals were about as smart as, you know, a pack of hyenas.
They didn't think it all the way through.
Now, my job as negotiators is saying, okay, second act is everybody calms down, you get some food, we start talking.
Third act is, I'm going to let you walk out of here.
You won't be killed. I want you to come out with your hands up.
We'll treat you nicely. We'll put you in prison, but we'll treat you well.
Otherwise, you're dead. Take your choice.
A lot of people are going to die. We don't want those hostages dying.
You can release some of them, get a stepwise decision.
Okay, what I'm doing is I'm architecting it.
Now, Trump's got to start architecting.
And one way to do it is he's got to take control of the Justice Department.
And he's got to show that he's the president.
I'd also take Esper's resignation.
He's reputedly, he's written it.
He's Secretary of Defense.
And I get the military ready to support the National Guard, because if they go tear up cities again, if they think that's their next act, I'm going to meet with the National Guard and we're going to try to arrest as many as we can.
And I'm going to send out the police with the National Guard, with the military.
And we're going to start knocking on doors because we have all these people in the streets protesting in Portland on videotape.
And we've got face recognition.
We know who they are. We're knocking on their doors and we're going to arrest them.
We'll do that in the middle of the night.
Start tonight. We're not going to stop until we arrest them all.
That's going to change the whole dynamic.
People are going to say, what do you mean? I thought I was just protesting.
I'm just protesting. No, I'm sorry.
You were destroying property.
It was an insurrection. Now you're going to face treason charges.
We might hang you. Well, that's like a cry.
They're going to break down and start crying.
Going to beg to be let go.
We didn't really mean it. Yeah, well, you should have thought of that before.
Okay, so what the Democrats have tried to do is a dumb scheme.
Why? Because it's obvious.
They're like somebody acting like a demon running around in the streets naked.
You say, well, this guy's crazy and he's naked.
Let's get him under control and put him somewhere where we can take care of him or find out if he's completely nuts.
Because only a nuts person would walk around the streets acting like a demon naked.
Homeless. Psychological problems, most of them.
Okay, so... The whole scheme is harebrained, because it's not going to take people like me very long to prove to anybody else who's got any training in methodology and law and all these other issues that Trump is right.
And Trump knows it.
And he knows how to win here.
He's just in the first act.
Remember, this is only day three after the election.
Brace yourselves, because we've had chaos all year long.
It's not going to end right now.
It's going to keep going.
And the chaos is just going to be part of their whole thing, saying, we'll stop if you let Biden be president, if you let Biden be president.
By the way, I'm going to investigate Nancy Pelosi.
I want to know who on the Democratic Party approved this scheme.
I want to know who implemented it.
I want to know who funded it.
Where do these people get the money to do this?
Where do I get the money to do this?
Oh, you mean George Soros?
Where is he? I want to arrest him.
I'm going to have an indictment.
I'm going to have the banks, either I'm going to close down the banks or I'm going to start impounding his money.
Because without money, these people can't do anything.
And by the way, I'm going to get Section 230 repealed, and I'm going to charge Jack Dorsey and Zuckerberg with election fraud, because they were architecting the narrative that made this possible.
And they were trying to destroy the Constitution.
Well, I'm not putting up with that.
Those are crimes, and I'm going to have my new Justice Department under Grinnell, and Grinnell will be happy to do this, I guarantee you.
I've watched Grinnell. I've never met him.
But Grinnell will relish this.
And Radcliffe will be right there.
You can find out in the intelligence agencies who architected this, how this was designed.
Now, let's talk about the Supreme Court.
We're going to go a little bit longer, Craig, but it's on a roll, so I want to get all this out today.
It's very important. I want people not to despair.
I want people to know we're going to win.
Donald Trump will win this.
Now, it isn't going to be pretty.
It isn't going to be fun.
It's going to be scary. And that's what the other side wants you to feel.
When they're dealing with me, I'm saying, you know, you guys are pathetic.
Couldn't you have come up with a better scheme?
You just served me up one I can prove in 20 minutes is fraudulent.
And you won't be able to refute what I'm going to show you.
Not from statistical analysis, not from comparison of various databases, not from questioning people about whether they voted.
I'll send investigators in the nursing home, find out who did what.
And I'm going to want to know which reporters reported on it.
Because they were complicit in a criminal conspiracy to subvert the Constitution.
That's treason. I don't mind bringing treason charges.
It's okay with me. They committed it.
They're going to be indicted. Now, the Supreme Court is an interesting creature, and God plays a part in this at center stage.
That's partly why I didn't want to become a criminal.
Final court is when you die.
None of this is permanent.
Can't take any of this with you.
It can't even explain to me where it is.
This small little stupid planet with this race of people that has a tendency to act like baboons screeching in the streets and throwing feces at each other.
That's about as smart as the Democrats are right now.
Okay, now the Supreme Court.
Now, first of all, Mr.
Biden's got a problem. His problem is named Clarence Thomas.
Now, this book is called The Real Anita Hill.
It was written by David Brock.
Now, David Brock's a homosexual, and he used to be a conservative, but then he realized something or other.
I don't know what he realized.
I don't know what he was thinking, but he's running Media Matters now, and he's a complete lefty.
But what he was pointing out in this book was that in 1991, when Clarence Thomas came to be confirmed to the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas is black, and this woman, Anita Hill, was coming forward with charges that, as a judge, he had engaged in sexually abusive activity with her.
At that time, the Democrats had control of the Senate was when Bill Clinton was in 1991.
He was president. And Ted Kennedy from Massachusetts, another guy who I saw many times.
I watched him. I used to sit in the Senate gallery and study Ted Kennedy.
Did not like him.
His brothers would have been...
I can tell you stories about that too.
But Jack, Ted was a disgrace in the family.
And many things Ted did were disgraceful.
Including Chappaquiddick.
At any rate, Ted Kennedy decided he was going to hold the labor, he was going to be the chairman of the Labor Department, Labor Committee, because the Democrats had traditionally had their basis support from unions and workers.
Today they've just got it from communists and psychopaths.
And Biden, after Bork, Bork was the case where the Supreme Court has been moving left and And under Earl Warren, the Supreme Court made a lot of decisions like Brown v.
Board of Education in 1954, which advanced the civil rights agenda.
And the left began realizing they could use the court to enact laws to put into place their social agenda on these social justice themes.
And they also realized they could use sexual harassment charges and say that women must be listened to.
That started in 1991.
At any rate, Biden, Joe Biden, the same guy today running for president, was chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and he was in charge of the questioning of Clarence Thomas.
And Clarence Thomas is on the court right now, and Biden let that be a lynching.
This book details how they knew Anita Hill didn't have anything.
They didn't care. They advanced her arguments.
And finally, Clarence Thomas said, this is a judicial lynching.
And Thomas sat there and took it.
But he took a lot of abuse from Biden and the others.
And he's now on the court.
What do you think Clarence Thomas is going to think when Joe Biden comes before him with charges of vote fraud?
I've been waiting for this day for, what is it, 40 years, 30 years?
30 years, I guess it's 30 years.
And that's when the Senate, the Senate was very different in those times.
It was, it was passing.
You had some people like Metzenbaum from Ohio.
I remember all these guys used to sit and watch them in the Senate gallery.
Reading this book is like kind of going back to old times days because many of these senators are gone and dead.
The Senate isn't, it was the last breed of the old, truly political class.
These guys, especially with the Democrats were increasingly becoming criminals.
And using the Senate to make money.
At any rate, Clarence Thomas is going to love having this case before him.
Don't you think, Craig? Oh, absolutely.
I think he'll be back in that meeting room again.
And I remember him staring in the camera and tearing up just like Brett Kavanaugh and forcefully saying directly to it that statement about how this is a public lynching.
And when he did that, the tide turned.
I think Biden and the rest knew that they had overplayed their hand, that all of the lies that Anita Hill was saying, they had worked together, Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill at the EEOC. Clarence Thomas was the department head of that, and she made all these false claims.
And when he did that statement straight to the public, it was over, because they knew that it was the truth.
He was being lynched in a political sense.
And he had no fear.
Yes. He said to Biden, you're the criminal.
All you people, what you're doing to me is disgraceful.
You know this isn't true.
And you're trashing my reputation because I'm not the kind of black you want.
I'm conservative. You want a plantation black.
Well, it's not me.
And I'm not going to become one.
And I'm going to call all you people out.
That's what Clarence Thomas did.
And he was confirmed.
It's on the court right now.
Now, Justice Roberts, I get a lot of people complaining about Justice Roberts.
Yeah, Justice Roberts is completely no backbone.
They say, well, he's compromised.
They've got to be blackmailing him.
He has these two adopted kids.
They know he paid for the kids. You know he did this.
I heard a dozen theories as to why Roberts is leftist and weak-kneed.
Now, You know, for, I don't know what another person's thinking.
Bad mistake to tell you, I can tell you what you're thinking.
I can't. I can tell you what you do.
And I can infer what you might be thinking, but I don't know it.
I can't read your mind. I didn't take that course at Harvard.
I didn't take the mind reading course.
It was a bad mistake.
I could have used that course, but I didn't take it.
So, what I'm seeing here now is that God intervened.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg died.
Nobody expected her to die. She'd been hanging on from cancer for a long time.
Obama asked her to resign to the court so he could appoint somebody younger.
She said, no, I'm not going to do that.
She liked being on the court.
She was a communist, socialist, didn't care about God, wanted to kill children.
Feminist. But she's also very clever.
She would... Buddy up to everybody in the court that was conservative.
She would become John Roberts' best friend.
Whisper in his ear. Seduce him with her attention.
That's possible. I don't know that it happened.
I do know that she did become close to Roberts.
Now, Ruth Ginsburg not only died, she died with just the right amount of time For Trump to get a new person confirmed.
And he chose Amy Coney Barrett.
Now, I've never met her, but I've watched her and studied her.
Now, first of all, she's very smart.
And she's very well educated.
Everywhere she was, she got the top grades.
She didn't go to an Ivy League school.
That's probably to her credit. And she was at the top of all of her classes.
And brilliant in the law.
She understands the law.
She knew how to answer their questions.
And she went through all their little pitfalls and she made them look bad with their posters of these people who weren't going to get Obamacare.
All this Obamacare sob story.
Democrats love victims.
They're going to keep them victims because that gives them the power.
The congressmen and the senators who are Democrats, communists.
So she's extremely smart.
She's a strict constructionist.
She is going to understand that the primary responsibility of the court is what Trump said it was, namely to preserve voter integrity.
That's paramount.
Okay, now...
I'm going to have to end this in a few minutes here, Craig, or you won't have any chance to get this up.
You might just play the whole thing even with the glitch in it.
I don't know. No, I've already got a strategy.
Keep going. Well, when should we end?
Five minutes? Yes.
Does that give you enough time? Yes.
Okay. Because we like to pre-record these.
Okay, so where I'm going is that...
Amy Coney Barrett is going to come into John Roberts and say, you know, Mr.
Chief Justice, that little mealy-mouthed 4-4 decision.
Here's the deal, John Roberts.
We've never had a constitutional crisis like this before.
And it's on you, as well as every other member of this court.
Now, Sotomayor and Kagan are going to be communists.
They don't care about the Constitution. Ruth Bader Ginsburg was reading foreign laws.
To make constitutional decisions under U.S. law.
That wasn't her job. She took an oath to defend the Constitution.
She didn't care about the Constitution.
She wanted to get rid of it, just like Biden does, just like Kamala Harris does.
Kamala Harris with her little cartoons about redistribution of income and we'll have equal outcomes.
Are we all going to be happy at the end of the day?
No, we'll all be in prison. And Justice Barrett is going to say to Justice Roberts, I know you're Chief Justice, and I know I just got here.
As a junior member, I'm supposed to sit down and behave myself and raise my hand to speak.
He said, however, as I see it, I was sworn in by you to this court, and I have full authority, as does every other Associate Justice, and I intend to exercise it.
So I'm here to tell you that your job is to uphold the Constitution and not let this stupid voter fraud occur.
And if you allow the Democrats to win this election by stealing it, we will never have another election.
People won't trust it. The American people out there saying, not only no, they're saying hell no.
Now our side won't go riot in the streets, but they're thinking about it and they're making sure they got all the guns they need.
They bought them like crazy over the last few months.
Because they feel this is a desperate moment in the Constitution.
And it is.
But we now have five to four, even if Roberts goes south.
Now, Barrett might say something.
I'm not here to threaten you, Justice, but I'm going to tell you that when I write my opinion, if you've gone south and didn't preserve the integrity of the votes, I'm writing that.
I'm calling you out.
I'm saying you didn't do your job.
I'm saying you did not protect the Constitution.
You violated your oath.
So I get to write my opinion.
Even if I'm concurring, I can write a separate concurring opinion.
And Justice Roberts, don't even think twice that I know this was wrong and you can't sit here as the court and say you can't remedy it because you can't get the votes back.
We're going to say, if we end this on election day, when the state legislatures in these key states said it was going to end, we don't let all these extra votes come in, we stop the whole stupid scheme.
And President Trump has already got criminal cases going.
Are you going to ignore those criminal cases?
You reframe it.
And now we're coming after you.
Justice Roberts, he'll be coming after you too.
Again, I'm not threatening you.
You're an adult. You can make whatever decision you make.
You write your own opinion.
I don't. You write yours.
I write mine. But I'm telling you what I'm going to say.
Because I know what happened here, and it's wrong.
So Justice Barrett's going to say, I know what the American people are saying in Kansas and Missouri and the center of this country.
They're saying, this just ain't right.
Well, in our entire Constitution, our entire nation, Americans have from time to time risen up and said, this just ain't right.
Finally, we said it about slavery.
This just ain't right.
The Democrats want to have slavery.
I guess we're going to go to war. And they did.
It wasn't about war.
It was about states' rights. But by the end, when they started passing the 13th and 14th Amendments, it was about slavery.
And Abraham Lincoln said, as I wouldn't be a slave, I wouldn't be a slaveholder.
He got things down to Abraham Lincoln used to say he thought about ideas like a fireplace until the logs were cinders.
He got ideas down to cinders that he thought he understood them.
As I would not be a slave, I would not be a slaveholder.
That said it all. In other words, he was saying, this isn't just wrong, it's damn wrong.
I'm not going to put up with it.
Well, Justice Roberts is going to have to do that.
Or his legacy is going to be infamy.
And Amy Coney Barrett will have no trouble explaining that to him.
Now, she'll do it politely. She won't be threatening, but he'll know what she's saying, I can guarantee you.
Because she was careful in what she said, but I read her clearly.
This is a woman who does not like killing babies.
There's a woman who believes we have a right to believe in God.
There's a woman who's going to fight for those things.
And she doesn't care how many communists are on the court.
And it's going to take this to preserve our freedoms.
But just in 2016, the Democrats miscalculated.
They didn't understand who Donald Trump was.
Now you do. You saw Donald Trump.
He went to all these rallies.
He has enormous support.
He's telling me he's got supports from blacks.
He's got support from women.
He's got more women in Congress.
Didn't lose a single woman.
Didn't lose a single, I don't think, a single house race.
Say it's possible. The country was a red wave.
It wasn't a blue wave.
And I know I won.
Well, Donald Trump is going to win at the end of the day, too.
Craig, do you understand where I'm going with this?
Yes, absolutely. And the key here is fear not.
And you kind of went through that a couple times during this soliloquy.
But it is important.
And so fear not. And we have to push back against this darkness or the darkness will bulldoze us.
Dr. Corsi. Well, I apologize I didn't give you more time to talk today.
That's okay. Your audience probably appreciates it.
No, they enjoy your comments too.
But the point is that I had to get this out.
It's taken us longer. We're going to end this now so you can get it going on the live stream.
Any last comments, Craig?
No, just stay strong.
In the end, God always wins.
I know somebody that always ends his broadcast saying that.
Who would that be? In the end, God always wins.
And God will win here, too.
Pray. Be strong.
Support Donald Trump in doing his job.
He's resolved to do it, and you're going to watch your living.
In the middle of history, and this will be a chapter that will be written in the glory of the United States, not the infamy.
These little demons are going to be rounded up and cast back into hell where they belong.
Kagan, Sotomayor, the whole bunch of them.
AOC. The American people are about ready to hunt these people down like raccoons or rats.
They're not going to let a group of screaming baboons throwing feces at each other to determine the future of them, their children, and their grandchildren.
We haven't lost that much in America yet.
So God bless America.
God bless Donald Trump. In the end, God always wins.
Thank you for joining us. Jerome Corsi with my producer Craig.
Today is November 6th.
It's Friday. It's three days after the election, and we have only just begun to fight.
God bless. God bless.
▲
Export Selection