All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 4, 2020 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
01:02:58
Dr Corsi NEWS 11-04-20 Why DEMs Will Not Succeed in Stealing Election
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So Dr. Corsi, did Joe Biden win his race for Senate last night?
I think he even lost that.
Look, this is Dr.
Jerome Corsi, and I'm here with Craig, producer.
This is the day after the election.
This is November 4th, 2020.
It is a Wednesday.
And I guess we're into now the real contest, which is the legal contest.
It was amazing last night watching it, Craig.
I was on coast-to-coast AM last night, so I was up most of the night.
I did get a little bit of sleep.
But the point is that we're seeing the major issue in this campaign is the fraud.
The mail-in voting, which is tipping the balance, the early voting and the mail-in voting, tipping the balance for I think?
And what I've been writing and warning about is that this voter fraud is inherently subject to manipulation.
So my bottom line take on this is I think that Donald Trump will win.
I think if the voter fraud were eliminated, he won about 360 electoral votes.
I really believe that.
But the voter fraud is so intense, it produces several million votes.
And in states where the fraudulent factor on this could be as high as 50 or 60 percent, the votes cast were fraudulent.
Then you see the Democrats attempt to steal the election.
Democrats started this with the Al Franken contest.
Do you remember that, Craig? Yeah, Minnesota.
He was behind. Coleman had won.
And so, mysteriously, after election night, they found extra ballots just enough to drag Al Franken, creepy Al Franken, over the line.
And what they did in that election was the same as they're going to do today, is that they...
I'll prolong the period of time in which they could continue to count votes.
And in fact, find votes, which was the other part of what they did in that Al Franken election.
They said, oh, we found another batch here.
We didn't know we had this box of mail-in ballots or this box of absentee ballots.
And then they count them and they're all for Al Franken.
So when Donald Trump last night came out and made his speech, I think Donald Trump was really aware.
I saw anger and the determination to fight this.
Now, Donald Trump will win.
We'll win if he stays strong and he goes to the Supreme Court.
But it's going to have to be fighting.
And remember, I've always said, Craig, that Donald Trump always looks like he's going to lose until just before he wins.
And I think we're going to see that again, is that Donald Trump is always looking like he's on the ropes.
And then he gets this resolve, and he does win in the last-minute moves.
In a sense, he's outperformed the polls dramatically.
Polls, I think, have been one of the first casualties of this election.
Polls are just meaningless.
They were completely wrong, predicting that Biden had a double-digit lead.
Well, the in-person voting is very heavily in favor of Donald Trump.
If it had just been a normal election with in-person voting, Donald Trump would have easily won.
But when we factor in the mail-in votes...
We have the great potential for fraud.
Now, I think in terms of where God is on all this, I think, first of all, we are seeing that this is going to be a major battle.
And it's going to be a spiritual battle.
But I think, again, if we have the Democrats win, we will basically have lost the Constitution.
And That Ruth Ginsburg died, and we have Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court, is critical.
And I think I've said this even when she was going through the confirmation process, Craig, that she was pivotal to get on the court because now it puts a 6-3 balance in the court for constitutionalists.
And John Roberts doesn't have Ruth Bader Ginsburg to whisper in his ear anymore.
I think he's going to find himself in a very different environment.
What are your thoughts, Craig? I think it's 5-4.
I think that little weasel will continue to do it.
Whatever they've got hanging over his head, there's speculation about that he's been blackmailed just before he made his reverse ruling on Obamacare.
But we'll see. Maybe he'll bend with the wind.
Maybe they don't have as much leverage on him anymore.
We'll find out. Well, I think he can be influenced.
I don't know that he's being blackmailed.
Maybe. John Roberts, we're talking about the Supreme Court justice.
The top Supreme Court Justice.
Chief. Chief.
Chief Justice, that's right.
But the point is, forgive me, but I got about three hours sleep last night in the midst of everything.
At any rate... I think he's very influenced, and I think that Barrett is going to be strong.
I think she's new, and usually the new justices take their place and don't try to assert themselves, but I think this is an unusual time.
As I read her character, she's not one to sit back, and she's not going to recuse herself.
She has a legitimate right to vote on any case that comes up on the election, and she's going to do it.
And I think she'll stick to the Constitution.
Now, the Constitution gives the states the right to set the rules for voting.
But it doesn't give the right to set the rules fraudulently.
So a state that decides they're going to have mail-in voting...
And extend the time for voting by saying you can do it early, way early, you know, weeks ahead of time.
And many of the people who voted for Biden in the early period of time would not have voted for Biden after the Hunter Biden scandal came out.
So this early, early voting again eliminates the chance for October surprises, new information, the closing arguments in a campaign.
And you can't end the campaign by voting early before the campaign is over.
Campaign's got to go the full length of distance.
You can have a voting window of two or three days, maybe.
But the point is, even that's problematic.
Because the current voting is going to affect who comes to vote next.
I mean, really voting one day, getting it all done in one day, when nobody knows the results or has any idea, and in-person is the way to do it with voter IDs.
Now, in an electronic age, we may have to adapt that.
We may have to allow for electronic voting, but it can still have safeguards where we can validate that the person voting is the person registered to vote.
And again, these are the kind of safeguards we're going to have to put in place now that we see that the Democrats are going to cheat.
The Democrats are socialists.
They're no longer a middle party in the center of the political spectrum.
And the socialists will cheat, steal, be fraudulent, because power is all that matters.
We've seen this in every communist takeover in the world back to the Russian Revolution in 1917.
Craig? Right, absolutely.
And truth is what they say it is.
They have absolutely no qualms about staring in your face and telling you a bald-faced lie.
Just look at Shifty Schiff.
He's continuing to throw out his bald-faced lies, even to this day.
And so there was some movement in the House of Representatives.
Some seats switched over from Democrat to Republican.
But I think that Nancy's still going to have the gavel, and that's going to be an issue, correct?
Yeah, it's going to be correct, I think.
But again, I think Nancy Pelosi will – I think the Republicans will retain control of the Senate.
I think the Democrats are going to retain control of the House, but I don't think they're going to have as big a margin – And it may be that the Senate is the same margin.
It looks like maybe one seat's going to be lost, one seat picked up.
So it's going to be the same.
Now, historically, I want to go back historically and make a couple points here, Craig, before we look at the voter fraud.
And that is that Number one, I remember 1960.
And in 1960, I was about, let's see, 14 years old.
I remember watching it, though, very carefully and was watching elections since the time I was a child.
That election was not called until the morning.
John Kennedy went to bed and woke up in the morning.
They told him he had won in the early morning hours, and he won because of the largely voting fraud in Illinois.
Which came in and voted for Kennedy when Cook County, which is where Chicago is, held their votes back to see just how many they needed in order to carry the state for the Democrats.
Now, in 1960, Richard Nixon decided not to contest the election because Richard Nixon, to his credit, said this will set a very bad precedent.
If we start contesting elections, we're gonna go down a path where voting will lose its integrity.
People will lose their trust in elections.
Well, that's happened. Now, I think the turning point was 2000 when Al Gore refused to concede to George W. Bush and the key issue there was Florida.
And so we began the Florida recount Which was absolutely a mess.
I think it went on for 37 days.
And we were in the courts.
The courts had drama every day.
We were talking about hanging chads, which is the way the votes were, you know, how the votes were punched at that time.
What was a vote for Bush or what was not a vote for Bush.
And we got into all those looking at the ballots.
It was almost comical.
Finally, the Supreme Court said enough.
Because the Democrats were going to keep recounting until they got the result they wanted.
Even in 2000, the Democrats were headed in the socialist way.
Now, by today, with engineering the rules and keeping the lockdowns with the COVID-19, the Democrats have gotten into a position where they could say, well, we need to have mail-in voting because we don't want people going to the polls and getting COVID. And so therefore we have to provide a mail-in provision.
But as I'm saying, back to Al Franken, and when was that election, Craig?
Do you remember the, I can look it up here and find out when it was.
But again, it goes back to, you know, decades ago.
And let's just see if we can find the Al Franken win.
I'll do it. 2008.
2008. Okay, well, so 2000 and 2008.
By 2008, the Democrats had figured out how to do the voter fraud by manufacturing votes, vote harvesting.
Now come forward to 2020.
2020. And the Democrats started perfecting these techniques in Southern California, in Irvine and other places down in Southern California, where on the elections, what the Democrats have done is whoever wins election night, usually that's one part of California that's fairly conservative.
The Republicans may win, for instance, in the House.
But what happens is the election's not called that night because it's too close, and the Democrats contest the results and want recounts.
Then the process begins a vote harvesting, where votes are found.
They say, okay, now we know how the voting occurred, and we know that the GOP won by so many votes.
That means we have to create, as Democrats, this number of votes in order to flip the state, flip that election from the GOP that won on the balloting To the Democrat who's going to win once we create the votes we need in order to manufacture a win.
Craig? Yeah, and so on election night in 2018, Mimi Walters, who was the Republican in California 45, which is Orange County, one of the Orange County, the six districts that are here, and gee whiz, like you're saying, of the week or so later, Katie Porter, the Democrat, was declared the winner, and her five colleagues, the same thing with them, the Republican on...
On election night was ahead, and a week later, all six of them, all six Democrats, superseded their Republican opponent and were seated in the House.
Well, you know, that's...
Now, we're headed to the courts.
And Orange County, one last thing I wanted to say is Orange County is a Republican plus three area.
So there's no way that happened.
No, and again... By letting the Democrats get away with it in the Al Franken case, in the Southern California case, by not contesting it early on, by not taking this immediately into the Supreme Court, The Democrats incrementally get everybody to accept the mail-in cheating tactic.
Now, on the articles I wrote on the website, let's look at them for a minute, Craig.
I want to look at first, the first one I wrote, which was the second one that's up there, which I'll get you the title here in a second.
And the title of it is Hold on.
Scroll down the page and find it.
And let's see.
Do you remember what it was? I've got the two that make the most sense up on the screen right now.
First one, do the massive mail-in voter fraud.
That's the one I want to cover first.
Okay, it's up. Okay, good.
Now, what I'm saying here is that Basically, the mainstream media is saying that we had, I don't know what the final vote tally is, but 100 million people voting by election, when the election voting started in person.
Now, if we get 150 million people voting, we've got a 350 million population.
I'm very doubtful that those are all legitimate votes, because historically, In recent elections, the biggest turnout has been about 60% of eligible voters.
Now, as I point out here that the Go down a little bit.
Mail-in votes, how they set the stage.
The polls were setting the stage for the mail-in votes because goal number one was manufacture enough mail-in votes to say turnout is as high as 80%.
This way, when the Democrat socialist operatives create Well, the turnout is not going to be that high because, for instance, in 2004, The percentage of the voting age population that voted was since 2004, the last 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, the last four presidential elections,
the turnout has been between 50 and 57%.
Turnouts of more than 70% occurred in the United States only in the 1800s.
And population was much smaller at that time.
I think one of the biggest percentages was in 1908.
Turnout was 62%.
And that was when William Howard Taft, who had been handpicked by Theodore Roosevelt to succeed him, beat Williams Jennings Bryant, who was the preacher.
He ran three times as a Democrat and lost all three times.
He's the only, I think, real three-time loser in American presidential politics.
And he was, by the way, the figure in the Scopes Monkey Trial.
He was the one who was the Bible...
Preaching lawyer who was ridiculed in Inherit the Wind, which was a play written to really push the secular agenda that Bible pushers, Bible believers were essentially hicks backward, not advanced in thinking.
So the first goal, and they did this, we had the polls which were showing these extraordinary numbers that were going to be voting And that the vote was going to go for Biden.
Okay, so then that set the stage to do a lot of mail-in voting fraud.
Number two, when you show Biden winning by double digits, when these states that were ending, you know, the closed states, Wisconsin, Michigan, even Pennsylvania, where Trump at one point was almost 900,000 votes up, And Pennsylvania says, well, we're not going to count any more votes until Friday.
Because we're going to allow these extra three days for the people to send in their mail-in votes.
So they can be postmarked for the next three days.
Well, they'll just manufacture enough to flip Pennsylvania.
And it's going to be so transparent that I think it will get caught.
Okay, but the point is that in New Jersey, for instance, where I voted yesterday...
You couldn't vote in person if you wanted to.
I mean, you could go and force yourself to be there and say, I want to vote in person.
Well, first of all, you're not going to be counted on election night.
You're going to be considered a probationary vote.
In other words, they may say, well, you could have voted by mail, too, and we're going to have to check that out.
Okay, but the fact is these provisional ballots...
Are put aside.
So you were almost forced to vote by mail if you wanted your vote counted on election night.
But voting by mail, you had no idea at all whether the vote was ever going to get there.
Because you were putting these votes into these boxes that were around the state, and the boxes weren't guarded.
There was no way to know what was in those boxes or who was submitting ballots.
And the point is that the entire mail-in system is designed not just to be an alternative way to vote, but it's meant to be the safety valve for the Democrats to steal elections.
That's its real purpose.
And so it's inherently fraudulent.
And we'll get into that with the second article in a minute.
I want to explain to you why it's inherently fraudulent.
But the point is that this is, I think, a scandal.
An electronic age, if we want to have people vote from their computers, etc., we can design tests to do that.
I mean, you buy goods over the Internet, and you have to use your credit cards.
There's some fraud, but by and large, the credit card companies are on top of that and they prevent there from being fraud.
And there are recourses to check fraud and to identify it.
And mail-in ballots can be controlled in the same way, where they are in a computerized system where you've got IDs, you've got passwords, you're going to have to get in and legitimately vote yourself, and it can be registered and it can be appreciated.
Again, I think it should be on election day.
I don't think there should be these big windows of time in which things can fluctuate In terms of the political narrative, which means that ballots cast early or late, you know, again, early ballots may change.
People would say, I wish I could take that vote back.
Well, you can't. Craig?
Yeah, some states you can.
I think there's six or seven states in which you can say, I want to change my vote, and you can do that.
But like you're saying, Dr.
Corsi, with all of the technology, I mean, I've got an iPhone, and gee whiz, I get in and out of it with biometrics.
I just put my little thumb on it, and it pops up my little window, and off I go.
So why can't they take that kind of...
And then use it for the voting system.
So you have to put in your thumb, you know, and it's reading your fingerprint, which is unique.
And then that gives you access to the ballot and you do your vote.
And there's another process.
It's called DocuSign online.
If you're going to buy or sell a house, you can do it.
All of the Paperwork is required by the escrow.
You can do it online, and it's a secure system.
And again, it's verifying that it's you when you're submitting and receiving documents.
And so all of this technology is out there.
All they have to do is turn around and apply it to the election system.
Well, and again, in a technologically sophisticated age, the idea that we're just going to have these mail-in ballots the way they're done is completely ridiculous.
Now, the way, and the second article, let's go to the second article.
And I wanted to distinguish between absentee ballots and mail-in ballots.
Because absentee ballots have been around for years.
If you're going to be out of the state, you go into the election board and get an absentee ballot.
And again, you can be verified in that.
You can show identification. You can have your signature be matched with the signature in your registration, voter registration.
And you get a ballot, and you fill that ballot out, and when you send it in, again, it's verified by your signatures, if nothing else.
And so you've got some control that that's you voting.
But these mail-in ballots, when you send the mail-in ballots to all registered voters, including those who request absentee ballots, you almost inherently build in fraud, because first of all, People are going to vote, want to cheat, they'll vote in person, and they'll vote by their mail-in ballot, saying, go ahead and try and catch it.
Because again, when you're dealing with millions of votes, are you really going to cross-check every mail-in vote against who voted in person to see if it's a double vote?
And even if you did find it a double vote, since you're voting in person by a secret ballot, And that vote is cast.
Once it's cast, it's no longer associated with you.
So how do you know which vote to withdraw?
That's the problem here.
In fact, as we get into studying how these mail-in ballots are done, they're done by having an outside envelope where you sign your signature, and then you put the ballot in a pocket inside and you seal it.
Now, they're supposed to check that signature against your voter registration signature to see if they match.
But what the Democrats are saying is, well, our poll workers aren't handwriting experts, so they can't verify the signatures.
Again, if the signature is not validated, then you've invited people to simply write your name on a ballot and send it in.
Because if they can get that ballot past the initial tier of screeners who don't check the signature, the envelope is opened and your ballot is put in the pool.
Now, if that ballot is later challenged because the signature doesn't match, how do you know which vote to retrieve?
You don't. Right, Craig?
Right, absolutely. And Ilhan Omar in Mogadishu on the Mississippi, that's Minneapolis, Minnesota, has perfected this technique and she has been extorting and bribing the Somalis in that city to fork over their votes so that she could do this.
And if you go to Project Veritas, you can watch a video where there's an operative for Ilhan Omar driving around bragging in his car that's full with ballots doing exactly what you described.
Well, there's also a video that James O'Keefe has where one of the Democratic operatives is driving a car and saying they're going to make $5,000 or $10,000.
It's Raquel Rodriguez in Texas.
Getting paid $55,000 by a fake Republican who's getting her to harvest ballots for Biden and the Democrats.
And all she needs to do is get $5,000 and she earns her $55,000.
Okay, now the way they do this is they go to a nursing home.
And people are older, they're not really functioning mentally to the extent that they had been.
But of course, mental functioning is not a requirement for voting.
Simply being a citizen is the requirement for voting, and even that's ignored by the Democrats who want illegal aliens and prisoners and everybody else to vote.
The point is that you come into the nursing home as an operative and you say, oh, let me help you fill out your ballot.
You sign the outer envelope here and then tell me who you want to vote for.
And they listen to you and they start marking the ballot and they mark it all Democratic.
Now they're counting on that this person has been screened, that the person is not going to say, let me see what you did.
Because if they're going to let somebody else fill out the ballot for them, it's probably a pretty good indication that they're mentally not all there.
And if you can get 5,000 of those, you make $50,000, that's going to motivate a lot of people.
People are going to go out and do that.
So there's the outright buying of the vote.
Come to me, I'll give you $1,000.
We want your vote, which is what was going on in the Somalia community, where people would say, hey, this is an entrepreneurial opportunity.
I'll bring in votes for $1,000 apiece and I'll share that revenue.
It's like a bounty.
For votes that are being cast and paid for, which is inherently illegal.
Can't pay for votes.
And secondly, rewarding people to harvest votes because vote harvesting occurs in many different ways.
Vote harvesting occurs also when you can collect the mail-in votes and deliver them to the polls as a harvester, a collector.
Okay, I'll go around and collect them all and I'll bring them to you.
Well, okay, so I collect them and I change the votes.
I manage to either throw away the one you did or open it and see who you voted for and then create one with something that looks like your signature and vote Democratic.
Because again, remember, once these votes are through the first screen, nothing is going to, you can't retrieve them.
Because they're in the pool. Which vote is associated with the name that was fraudulent?
How do you know? The only way you know is when you take a look at how the mail-in votes are going, and you see that the mail-in votes are going very heavily Democratic.
Now, going back to the poll numbers, going back to the arguments where the Democrat states are saying we're worried about COVID, the analysis that...
Biden did, saying Donald Trump did not do a good job with COVID. We don't want the whole social distancing in his rallies.
This was all done to architect that Democratic voters were being more cautious about health and therefore were more prone to use mail-in balloting, voting.
And so therefore, that the mail-in votes go heavily Democratic doesn't mean they're fraudulent.
It means that Democrats were more worried about COVID. So again, just like the polls are used to architect a reality, psychologically, that looks like the Democrats are going to win, The same with COVID and saying Democrats are really concerned about health.
Trump is running these super spreader rallies.
So of course Trump's people are going to vote in person, and of course the Democrats are going to vote by mail, but it isn't fraudulent.
It's just the proclivity they have because Democrats are more careful about health.
Craig? Yeah, that's a good line, and they've thought this out very carefully, and once again, this is part of the bigger plan, and they don't do anything willy-nilly.
They've got it all scoped out, but again, it's up to us to pray our way through this, and for President Trump, To stay strong, as you're saying, Dr.
Corsi, and take this to the courts and to push back on some of this nonsense.
Otherwise, there could be a different colored flag flying over the White House in January.
It could probably be one that looks very similar to the Communist Chinese flag.
Well, in fact, all the things about Biden being compromised, that's the next issue I want to take up.
With the press and Twitter and all the social media, Now, they blocked out the story to a large extent, almost 100%, where you got your tweets removed, you got your tweets suppressed, the mainstream media did not cover the Biden story of Hunter Biden, and yet we have a justice department that held that laptop
from Hunter Biden since December 2019 and let Donald Trump go through a Senate impeachment
trial knowing that that laptop had exculpatory information on it for Donald Trump, which
showed that he was legitimately raising concerns about Joe Biden and Hunter Biden in
corruption in Ukraine and being bought by the communist Chinese with Hunter Biden, who is clearly this
crack addict and sex addict, even with underage girls in his own family, which is so shocking that
it couldn't be, you couldn't show the videos. But of course, that's another reason that they
are hidden because they're saying, oh, you don't want to show pornography.
It's okay to do pornography.
It's okay to engage in pedophilia.
The Democrats don't mind that, but don't mention it.
Don't say anything about it.
Don't make the public aware of it.
The average person is going to be shocked by what's on those computers.
And yet even today, I don't want to show them on Twitter because I feel like it's inappropriate to be showing pornography.
Craig? Right, and for those that would say, well, that's Hunter, what does that have to do with Joe?
Well, the issue is that Joe knows what Hunter's been doing, and Joe's the one that actually unleashed Hunter on the world to go hook up with these gangsters in other countries in order to be the bag man for all of these, the Biden crime family operations worldwide.
And so Joe's up to his neck in this, and he's still trying to hide from it.
And unfortunately, we have...
Christopher Wray, like you're saying, in the FBI, and he was compromised.
It came out, I don't know if this story's been verified, that he was an attorney for Hunter Biden before he became FBI director.
Yeah, I see Twitter over here blocking tweets.
This tweet is unavailable.
That tweet's unavailable.
So they're heavily into the censorship today.
Okay, let's say, okay, where do we go from here?
Now, in many countries with a parliamentary system, Israel, the United Kingdom, many different countries with parliamentary systems, there's no vote for a president.
You vote for the parliament.
And then whichever party in the parliament has the majority, members of parliament or the members of the Knesset, which is the Congress.
Parliament is a Congress.
It's a legislative body.
Whichever party has the majority gets to pick a prime minister, but the prime minister has to then pick a cabinet, and that cabinet has to be able to be affirmed by the parliament.
Okay, now, if the election is very close in the parliament, and there's only a few seats, for instance, in some of the Israeli elections, I think it was in 2009, as I recall, I was in Israel and it was Tippi Livni, member of parliament, actually won, her party won enough seats where she had the first chance to put a government together.
Benjamin Netanyahu of Likud did not get to put the government together except that
Livni couldn't put a government together. She couldn't get a coalition of the other parties
so that when she said, this is my cabinet, she had enough votes in the Knesset to affirm that
those choices of that cabinet making her prime minister.
She had a period of time to do that, and then it fell to Netanyahu who had the chance to form a
government. He formed the government, coalition government, and that's how he got to remain prime
minister. Now, you've got the same kind of a situation in Great Britain. So in other words,
there's an election and then there's a post-election period of time in which the results of the
election for the chief executive, as it it were, Prime Minister's not a chief executive.
Usually there's a king or a president.
In Israel, it's a president who's separately elected, but it's titular.
Just like the king and queen in Great Britain don't have a lot of power, they're titular.
But the point is that there's a post-election period of time In which the election itself is arbitrated, it's debated, disputed, etc.
And right now, with the GOP, who have an army of lawyers, and the Democrats have their army of lawyers, their lawyers are all going to be lawfare.
They're wanting to say, let's throw the election into the House of Representatives.
Which is the case if neither candidate gets the 271 votes needed for the Electoral College, the House of Representatives chooses the president, and the Democrats control the House, probably will still control the House after all this voting is sorted out.
So they could even put Barack Obama as the president or the head of the House, because the head of the House by the Constitution does not have to be a member of the House.
And Obama, under the 25th Amendment, I believe it is, only could have won two elections of his own, but could serve 10 years.
So he could be president for two more years, and we could have another election in two years.
That's one possible outcome.
But I think that what's going to happen now, and that's why I'm encouraging that Trump should just go immediately to the Supreme Court, Because if this drags out for 30 days or so, the more it drags out, the more votes the Democrats will find, the more they will validate.
Because every one of these states that's outstanding is a Democratic-controlled state.
Democratic governor in Pennsylvania, Democratic governors in Michigan and Wisconsin.
Democratic governors in every one of the contested states.
Now, Georgia, I think Georgia and North Carolina look most solidly like they're going to go for Trump.
But again, the Democrats are going to manufacture votes.
And many of the votes that have been counted in the mail-in votes, what happens if the mail-in vote is accepted and You're supposed to keep the outer envelope so you can validate that signature or it can be challenged.
What if they're lost?
What if there are fewer outer envelopes than mail-in votes counted?
Well, how do you find the mail-in votes that are fraudulent?
You can't. So the entire system is fraudulent by design.
And the Supreme Court's got to say the issue here is election integrity.
The states get to set the rules, but the states do not get to set the rules fraudulently.
And if a method of voting is inherently subject to fraud, as I'm maintaining mail-in voting is, it's going to have to be outlawed.
And the Supreme Court's going to have to say, we want to know that the vote being cast is by the eligible voter casting it.
We want to make sure that's the vote that's counted.
Democrats say, we want to count all the votes.
Well, we've just manufactured 100.
They've got to be counted. And that's just fraudulent.
And the Supreme Court, I think, is still, especially with Barrett on the Supreme Court, I wouldn't feel quite as sanguine about it if Ruth Bader Ginsburg were still alive.
And again, I think we're going to see acts of God, this thing being resolved.
Donald Trump last night, when he came out, was angry.
And he was determined.
And I've always said Donald Trump always looks like he's going to lose until just before he wins.
Every major contest of his life that I've watched, going back to the Commodore Hotel being bought by him, which was his first major purchase in New York City, now the Hyatt Hotel over Grand Central Station, Donald Trump looked like it wasn't going to work.
And then he figured out that if the banks had lended him the money, they would lend more.
Because he owned the banks. The banks were otherwise going to face a bankruptcy.
They didn't want it. Or default.
He also got the railroad yards.
Penn Central owned the Commodore Hotel.
They had railroad yards on the west side of New York that Mayor Lindsey wanted for the Javits Center.
Well, Trump went and got an option as part of the purchase of the Commodore Hotel on those railroad yards.
And because of that, the banks said this is worth financing.
In fact, the city did take up that option and use that land.
That's where today the Javits Center is built on the west side of New York, over by a part of New York that until recently was not major developed.
Now it's getting developed, the west side of New York, at least was under Donald Trump.
At any rate, what I'm saying is that Donald Trump has a history of being on the ropes and winning.
And I think this is another case, and I think it will take prayer, because I think it's going to take, again, divine intervention.
I think God, that's why I was so pleased to see this, the Jewish groups, for the first time in 2,000 years, the rabbis, deciding they were actually going to pray for a Donald Trump victory.
And with the amount of prayers going on around the world, I do think there's enough moral fiber yet left among human beings who have not completely gone secular, communist, radical Islam, etc., burning down churches, that God may yet allow us to repent for letting the country get here And may have Donald Trump win through the grace of God.
Otherwise, what we're headed for is communism.
The future is going to be very bleak.
Ultimately, I'd see the future as a nuclear war.
Donald Trump is trying to prevent that with peace in the Middle East, something else that didn't get reported.
And the reforms that are going to have to come out of this are massive.
The entire mainstream media, the entire social media, the bureaucracy is going to need to be moved out of Washington, D.C. They're planning.
They're globalist communists.
The globalists are essentially Nazis.
The Nazis were national socialists.
They were leftists. But they wanted multinational corporations to rule the world and a socialist government to put a safety net.
And the Communists wanted there to be no private property.
They were more extreme to the left.
And that was the fight between Stalin and Hitler.
And that was World War II. And again, we've not gotten rid of either one of them.
These two malware ideologies need to have a stake driven through their hearts.
And the only way that'll be done is if people return to God.
Craig? Well, and you see it in the streets that Black Lives Matter, the founders are all communists, avowed Marxists, trained Marxists.
They admit it to face a camera and say, that's what we are.
And if you see the BLM operatives, these white, I don't know what to call them, these kids
all dressed in black going through these neighborhoods in Portland, flashing lights up into the homes
of these people and saying, that's not your house, that's ours, get out of it.
That's exactly what this is all about.
It goes back to this anti-colonialism supposed nexus, the root of their belief system.
And it's all based on the lack of property being owned by individuals.
they want it all to be confiscated and divvied up the way they like it, and it's obvious in the streets.
You can see exactly where this is headed.
I want to cover, how are we doing on time here, Craig?
44 minutes. Okay, I want to end this and shift gears for a minute, because we've got to cover another topic.
We've got to cover COVID-19.
And here, I'm going to end this by saying that today we're now in the post-election fight.
And it will be fought in the courts.
It's going to be heavily contested.
The sooner it gets to the courts, the better.
The Democrats, given enough time, will flip all of these Democrat-controlled states that are in abeyance, even though Trump looks like he had 900,000 vote plurality in Pennsylvania.
They'll flip it to a Democrat win.
And I don't think the country is going to put up with this this time around, because I think the country, especially as we begin to educate the country of what the mail-in voting is all about, I think that people are going to realize how fraudulent this is and put an end to it.
And I think the courts will decide, especially with Ginsburg gone, again, that I see as an act of God, that she died with enough time for Donald Trump to put a new person on the Supreme Court.
He picked someone very strong, I believe.
We haven't seen how she votes yet.
But certainly from her past and her adherence to the Constitution, She's going to understand that while the states have the right to set the rules, they do not have the right to set the rules fraudulently.
And this mail-in balloting I think is going to have to be put to an end I think we're going to have to shift gears now and start thinking about voter IDs and electronic voting through computers that can be validated.
And you know who's voting and limit the time.
I really think the voting should be one day.
And you either vote that day or you don't vote.
And the votes have to be counted that day.
That's the only way we're going to prevent the opportunity for manipulation and fraud.
Because two days, the left, Satan will figure out how to make that into a fraud.
You can't give any wiggle room.
It has to be strict.
It has to be either you or nothing.
It has to be either correct or it has to be either sin or it's evil.
If it's evil, it's sin.
You can't have, well, there's this moral ground here where, you know, we've got to, you know, what you think is right, what I think is right.
No, you've got to go back to natural right.
And it's fundamentally that some things work.
You know, you can't put a hole in the bottom of a boat to look at the fish because you think that they're pretty.
Boat will sink. Okay, so natural law rules a lot of the physical world.
As Aristotle said, fire burns here in Greece the same as it does in Persia, who was their archenemy, because natural law applies.
And Aristotle extended that to moral.
You can't just say that, you know, the You can have any idea you want, any value you want.
Murder is as good as not murder.
You can justify it.
We'll get this wiggle room in here.
No. Moral rules are like physical rules.
Because human beings are set up to work a particular way.
And if they don't work that way, it's malware.
Just like malware in a computer, the thinking comes out wrong, confused, and you get social justice theory.
So we're going to have to go back and say, you know, that's what returning to God is.
It's returning to a moral standard.
It's returning to the way human beings were meant to function.
And when they don't, you get wars, you get confusion, you get poverty, disease, and all the things that we are going to be in for if these Satanists...
I agree with you 100%.
And bottom line is, we'll see how it pans out.
And Dr. Corsi, when Donald Trump went in front of the camera last night and talked about what was going on, and like you said, he had some, not anger, I wouldn't call it, but I'd say concern and he's resolute.
He did mention the Supreme Court.
And so I think he knows exactly that's where this has to go.
I think so, too. And Donald Trump's not one to mess around on these things.
He is not shy about taking a strong stand, especially when the chips are down.
You saw how he went and got the in-person voting.
Well, he's going to go after getting the Supreme Court the same way.
This is going to be decided in the Supreme Court.
And we're in the post-election period.
It's going to be agony.
But I think you see the stock market today going up because they know that the Democrats did not get control of the Senate.
So many of the things that want to be done, the communist left wants to do, they'll be blocked in the Senate, including tax increases.
But they're still going to cause chaos, and they'll set it up to try to flip the Senate in two years if they get away with this mail-in voting.
The mail-in voting must be stopped.
Okay, now, let's shift to COVID. Craig, I gave you an article there, and it's from The Economist.
Do you see it there in the messages?
Yeah, it's going to be up in a sec.
Okay, now, I'm going to COVID, shifting to COVID, because I've been saying, by the way, in my e-book, The Plan to Remove Donald Trump from the presidency, I predicted that There, that the last stage of all of this coup d'etat would be mail-in voting fraud, and that the election would have to be contested in the courts.
I still think Donald Trump got 360 electoral votes if the voting were legitimate, because a lot of these states that have gone, even Virginia, I think would have gone for Trump, except for the mail-in voting.
And the mail-in voting was calculated to flip these elections.
Okay, so that book is valid.
And what I'm saying in that book is that Donald Trump will pull it out because he moved the embassy to Jerusalem.
It's like Harry Truman.
Harry Truman looked like he was going to lose in 1948.
It is not going to be, it was not Dewey beats Truman, and it's not going to be Biden beats Trump.
He's not going to beat him, but it's going to be down to the wire in the court.
Okay, now, Craig, I also have a unique book on COVID-20.
And if you show the graphic detail here, what these charts are showing is they're saying this is a second wave of COVID-19 pandemic.
And they're putting the data up against the first wave to say that the second wave is going to be equally virulent because you're starting up the curve and the peaks look like they have some similarity except in Sweden, by the way, where the second peak is not taking hold and all the other countries that shut down and these countries are going back into lockdown.
Now, First of all, I've not seen the genome of this new virus to know whether it is COVID-20 or not, but I have a suspicion that it may be not just a return of COVID-19, but it may be the son of COVID-19, namely COVID-20.
And we're going to have to wait a bit of time to find that out.
But the point is, Europe is locking down again.
And the word I'm getting from the intelligence sources that I'm talking to Including Boris's group, we still remain in touch, is that this virus was released in...
It is a new virus.
It was released in Africa.
It's another Chinese virus.
And it's now in Europe.
And in about three to four weeks, it'll be here.
And again, with the democratic states, they'll immediately want to continue into lockdown to try to destroy the economies and get control of the population.
We can't take another lockdown.
Another lockdown in New York City, New York City will be gone.
Too many bankruptcies, too many failures, too many apartments in default, too many people leaving.
And we'll be into a mass migration with everybody moving to Florida.
It's just not going to be sustainable, another lockdown.
Now, I think the only way to prevent it Is the hydroxychloroquine and zinc and azithromycin.
And Craig, if you go to the Tel-MD program, and we are negotiating a big expansion of this program.
And I think we'll be able to announce it in the next few days.
But we're thinking about establishing a live streaming television channel.
And we're thinking about having this tele-MD program expand dramatically and be able to cover areas such as weight loss, birth control, other sexual issues and medications, the diabetes, With a pharmacy chain nationally that can provide generic drugs that you can have your doctor get you that will be delivered to your home.
Much cheaper prices.
We'll be announcing all this, I think, by sometime next week.
In the final stages of putting it together.
At any rate, the hydroxychloroquine and zinc we're offering through the TelMD program as well as the ability to get a test kit For the COVID-19, through a pharmacy, it'll have to be administered by medical personnel, but it will be a medical doctor, all according to the FDA rules.
And the test is a 15-minute blood serum test, and it has an emergency use authorization on it from the FDA. Now, what I'm finding, Craig, if we continue to look at what the doctors are doing, Dr.
Zelenko and others, is that now that the election is about to be behind us, the doctors are going to launch another major wave of trying to educate the public that hydroxychloroquine and zinc may be the best preventative and the best early treatment for COVID that we have.
And You know, what Zelenko is saying is that we have had really a crime against humanity with the extent to which Fauci and the other government bureaucracy, the medical bureaucracy, has been entrenched in demonizing hydroxychloroquine.
It is still available off-label to be prescribed legitimately, according to the FDA, for COVID-19.
It's just with many of the MDs and pharmacies being threatened with their licenses by states that want to shut this down.
In other words, I'm saying the left is happy to work with China to engineer this disease so more people die and get sick, get sick and die.
Craig? Right, and Dr.
Corsi, as you've been talking, I've gone from the CorsiNation.com website and shown people that page on the TeleMD program, and then I went to the Test Kit page, and now I'm on Dr.
Zelenko's Twitter feed.
And yes, he is pushing out.
He's becoming stronger in a lot of what he's pushing out through his tweets.
But we all have to continue to pray for Dr.
Zelenko as he continues to struggle with treatment for cancer and a bad heart.
But at this point in time, he's very vocal about the need for hydroxychloroquine and zinc.
He's pushing out not only tweets to the public, but tweets directly to President Trump.
And I think it's going to be heard.
And I think we're in for another period of chaos.
And I don't know that there is an alternative to it except to As I say, support Donald Trump and take strong action to beat back these essentially demons that are trying to ruin the country and are making a run at it right now with the mail-in votes and with COVID-19.
I think we're going to find that this is a period of challenge and test for the United States like we've never been through since the Civil War.
The United States has faced dark days before.
It was never certain that the revolution would succeed.
But yet in fighting these things, in fighting the demons we fought for all these 200 and some years, we've succeeded.
We've succeeded with prayer.
We've succeeded with people being resolved to bite the bullet and do the right thing.
And we're going to have to get to that resolve again.
Because on both the health front and on the political front, we are in a civil war.
It may not be one that's fought yet in the streets, but that's the last thing I want to mention is we did not get the streets torn up last night.
Because again, it was not a clear Donald Trump win, and the Democrats were holding off the demons in the street until they can be absolutely certain they have to unleash them.
That will be their final act, and Donald Trump has the National Guard positioned.
So this is not a time for those who are weak-kneed or are not ready for a good fight.
But, you know, I've got confidence that through human history, we've gone through dark periods.
World War II is a disaster, yet we got through it.
The next chapter will be nuclear war, and that's the one we're going to have to face next, because that's what's on the horizon.
Do we get through it or don't we get through it?
And this is warm-up for that test.
Craig? Right, absolutely.
And Emperor Xi, Xi Jinping, the leader of Communist China, he knows that he has a dilemma coming up very quickly as people start to starve next spring.
As the crops have failed and there's been a lot of natural disasters, God has unleashed his fury against Communist China this year.
And as his people start to starve and he had his plan to invade Taiwan in 2020, I think he's pushed it back to 2021 just because of how now the weather works as far as an invasion force.
But I think the next president of the United States is going to be faced with China, potentially communist China, going into Taiwan with force next year.
And if it's Joe Biden, he'll welcome that movement.
And if it's President Trump, I think he'll help Taiwan fight back.
Dr. Corsi, there have been two major protests.
Sales of American weaponry to Taiwan within the last week.
Billions of dollars, the two of them together, worth over $4 billion.
And all of that material is essential for Taiwan to protect itself.
But next year is going to be a doozy.
Well, I mean, I have no confidence that Joe Biden wouldn't just concede Taiwan.
I mean, he's been bought and sold, owned by the communist Chinese and his family has.
And it's astounding that a guy who's got The obvious signs of mental senior dementia, who is so compromised to the Communist Chinese, is yet being foisted upon us by the Democrats and trying to be put into the White House through mail fraud, mail and vote fraud.
I just don't think it's going to work.
I think they went too soon.
If they'd waited until more people had been indoctrinated by the universities, more true communists were around in the young, I think they would have pulled this off.
But I think yet there's enough people around my age and people around who still believe in God That are not going to let this happen.
So I think we are in for a massive fight.
But I think in the end, as I always say, in the end, God always wins.
God will win here, too, one way or the other.
But God is not allowing Satan to ultimately win.
If this entire experiment of Earth and human beings fails, God might end it.
But Satan won't win in the process.
Let's not have that be the outcome.
Let's fight as Dr.
Zelenko says, let's choose truth and let's choose life.
And let's reject this darkness.
Craig, how are we doing on time?
Hour and two minutes. Okay, so I think we'll wrap it up.
Any concluding comments?
Yeah, just this is light against dark.
This is good against evil.
There's no doubt about it.
All the forces that Satan can pull together have been unleashed and coming at us.
And it's time for us. Number one is take a breath.
Fear not. That's what it says in the Bible repeatedly.
When the people in the Bible are facing something that they're unclear about is to, first of all, don't fear it.
God's plan supersedes our plans, but we all need to stand together, stay strong, support the president, and help him and pray for him to stay strong, and let's fight back against this darkness.
Dr. Corson. I agree.
Amen. I agree with that entirely.
In the end, God always wins and God will win here too.
This is Dr. Jerome Corsi with my producer Craig.
Today is the day after election day, November 4th, Wednesday, 2020.
And we'll be back tomorrow.
Thank you. God bless you. Thank you for joining us.
▲
Export Selection