Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 29, 2024 - The David Knight Show

02:51:22

The David Knight Show -10/29/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	President Trump.
	He set precedents for this pandemic stuff.
	He set precedents for gun control by executive order.
	This guy says, people were coerced and bullied into taking an emergency use authorized unapproved medical product.
	It's wonderful.
	It's the best thing.
	I'm the father of the vaccine.
	It saves so many lives.
	That had yet to reach safety testing.
	Because, you know, that's how he got it out fast.
	And he bragged that he pushed the FDA faster than even the FDA wanted to go.
	And they don't really care anymore about testing or about product contents.
	They don't care about any of that.
	Consistent with 20 years of compliance conditioning, many complied.
	But many resisted, too.
	More and more, people are awakening to the realization that they were duped.
	They took more rights from us and exacted more authoritarian control over us.
	They sneered in our faces when they were caught in their hypocrisy.
	And that's true of Trump.
	It's true of Biden.
	It's true of Lala.
	She laughs in our face.
	Caught in her hypocrisy.
	Now, in New Zealand, we have new freedom of information data.
	Shows a 188% rise in the deaths of children after the rollout of the vaccine.
	Three-month mortality risk among the 12 to 19 age group.
	Following the mRNA vaccination.
	And an 83% rise in the 20 to 30 age group.
	Now what should we say about politicians who kill children?
	What should we say about that?
	It is an abomination what is happening in Gaza.
	Isn't this an abomination as well?
	If they do it for their political purposes, if they do it for the UN, if they do it for the WHO and Davos agendas, isn't it an abomination as well?
	How is it that Christians just ignore all of this stuff?
	And you've got pastors lecturing the same pastors, many of them, who told you you needed to get the jab to love your neighbor.
	As a matter of fact, you go back and you look at Curtis Chang, who was getting paid a lot of money four years ago.
	He's going on CNN saying, it's absolute fraud to say that you've got any religious objections against this stuff.
	He says, there's nothing in the Bible about not taking a vaccine.
	I know you see the logical flaw in that, right?
	There's nothing in the Bible about killing somebody with a handgun either, is there?
	You know, Jesus doesn't talk about abortion.
	He does talk about murder in general, right?
	That's the principle there.
	But he doesn't talk about abortion.
	He doesn't even imagine the kinds of ways that they kill people today at that point in time.
	So you don't have to address every particular way of killing people.
	Every particular heinous example of killing babies and then reusing their body parts.
	Yeah, that wasn't a thing back then.
	But, you know, the principles are pretty clear, aren't they?
	And yet you've got Curtis Chang and a lot of pastors saying that, well, it's not clear.
	And it's these same people out there telling you, you've got to vote for Trump.
	You've got to vote, and you can't vote for law, so you've got to vote for Trump.
	They're not telling people, like, you vote for Dr.
	Shiva.
	Yeah.
	I don't even know what his position is.
	Look, when I look at Dr.
	Shiva, I haven't talked to him a great deal about issues.
	Maybe we'll talk a little bit about that today.
	But his key issue, and I haven't really been concerned about that.
	I haven't really been concerned about his eligibility to run this debate about what natural citizen means in the Constitution.
	Now, the reason I like what Dr.
	Shiva is doing It's because what Dr.
	Shiva is doing is trying to take this mania about electoral politics, presidential politics, and he's trying to challenge that, to get people to take that and then turn people into, look, here's how you do things for your life.
	Here's how you improve your health without these people, right?
	Here's how you start to organize on a community level so that you can actually have an effect at local politics.
	And so what he's doing is he's using the presidential non-election.
	As I said, you know, to paraphrase Carlin, it's an election.
	And you ain't voting.
	It's already been determined by the people who are selecting these candidates.
	But, you know, everybody wants to be involved in this, so he's taking that energy and he's channeling it and diverting it to useful purposes.
	That's the purpose of his campaign.
	That's why I haven't pressed him on any issues about what he thinks about anything.
	I think that is the key issue.
	And that's exactly what I agree with.
	I think people need to...
	This whole thing is a distraction.
	It's an illusion.
	It's a Sisyphus task.
	All this stuff.
	The most important election of our lifetime and all the rest of this nonsense.
	Getting back to this, though.
	You know, should we vote for people who killed children?
	Who killed our own children?
	New Zealand lists the number of people in 2021 and 2022 who died within 93 days of receiving a Pfizer mRNA Trump shot.
	You know, he gave the companies $11 billion, Trump did.
	And then he delivered it for them.
	And then Biden mandated it for them.
	So they said out of 12 million doses that they put in, that's a lot because, you know, there's only about five and a half million people in this country.
	It's about the population of Tennessee.
	So a lot of people got multiple shots.
	They said there were 67 deaths within 93 days of children between the ages of 12 and 19.
	Is that enough?
	Do you need to know any more?
	I talked about vaccines in the 1970s.
	We had three or four deaths.
	Nine states banned the vaccine.
	Why didn't that happen this time?
	There's absolutely no question.
	About thousands, tens of thousands of deaths, and then they hid most of them.
	I believe that it's tens of millions based on things like this that we have seen.
	But then there were, between the ages of 20 and 30, 166 deaths within 93 days of COVID-19.
	And when you take a look at this, again, you can start looking at 237 deaths.
	People who died.
	They're saying, well, the excess deaths, they said, of what would normally happen is 110.
	110.
	So, 40 teenagers and 70 young people in their 20s.
	Is that enough for us to say, we're not going to do this again and we're not going to reward these politicians?
	But no.
	And I think that understates it, because usually young people's deaths are based on activities, you know, car driving, drowning, things like that.
	And they weren't doing anything.
	Well, before we take a break, and we're going to take an early break here, this was sent to me by Harry Hound.
	And he sent a post on XML. By Mike Adams, Health Ranger.
	He says, is this the guy you work with?
	He's a moron.
	This is a comment.
	Why did he say that?
	Well, here's what Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, Natural News, this is what he has to say.
	As you may know, I have serious disagreement with Trump over his inability to denounce Israel's genocide, and also, he still hasn't said the COVID jabs are harming and killing people.
	Nevertheless, I do hope to see him win November the 5th.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	So, you know, this doesn't do it for him.
	This doesn't do it for him.
	That doesn't do it for him either, right?
	So he says, largely because we will get to witness tens of millions of deranged leftists lose their minds and explode into unprecedented levels of insanity and derision.
	And of course, Mike Adams and Infowars will be able to monetize that.
	You know, the only thing that's important to them is that we have this conflict.
	We've got to have this tribalism.
	We've got to have people on both sides losing their minds so they can have some sensational stuff to talk about.
	Talk about civil war.
	Maybe we can foment another January the 6th like he did.
	And, you know, let's just get this stuff together.
	Let's raise some money.
	All that matters to them is owning the libs.
	That's all that matters.
	They don't care about people dying.
	And since I've left there, I've had people at Infowars mock me.
	When I talked about Trump killing people with a vaccine.
	That's all that matters to them is money.
	So, the comments that they put up.
	Oh, you're just a little baby whiner because you care about the execution of tens of millions of people with Trump's depopulation shot.
	This is really about just owning the left, right?
	So, Mike Adams says it's going to be millions of deranged leftists losing their minds.
	It's going to be great.
	So many people will turn to his website, Natural News, and watch all this stuff.
	He says, it'll be an event to be recorded for all of history, as it'll teach humanity critical lessons about the dangers of media-run PSYOP operations.
	Ooh!
	Well, you want to talk about media-run PSYOP operations?
	Talk about Warp Speed.
	Talk about the MAGA media.
	Talk about Infowars and Natural News running a PSYOP operation, telling people after all these years and all the flu shot things, look at the CDC says this.
	CDC says more people are dying of COVID than of anything else.
	Mike Adams putting that up.
	He says, TDS, you know, Trump derangement syndrome.
	TDS is media instilled.
	Yes, it is.
	And so is the other TDS. Not just Trump derangement of the left, but Trump delusion from the right.
	Both of those TDSs.
	Media installed.
	You have witnessed a mass brainwashing operation scientifically rooted in information-based alterations of human neurology weaponized to achieve a political outcome, he says.
	That's right.
	I was right there when they were doing it.
	On the other side.
	And it was also weaponized to achieve a financial outcome.
	Well, Harry Hound says this guy is an idiot.
	No, he's not.
	Mike Adams is not an idiot.
	Alex Jones is not an idiot.
	They're very smart.
	They're very rich.
	They live by lies.
	They make their living by lying.
	And they will sell you to the devil.
	It's amazing to watch people still tuning into them and still getting angry with me because I try to warn people about what they do.
	We'll take a quick break.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, this is from yesterday.
	We missed this at the end of the show.
	This is a tip from Sabogus.
	Thank you very much.
	Appreciate that.
	It says, I really appreciate the logically rigorous open-mindedness you've demonstrated with regards to the virus contagion paradigm these last few years.
	All of us who've awakened to the lie of contagious illness know that it's a painful process.
	It is alienating to demand truth in a world of lies.
	It's very hard.
	But once you're awake to the truth, it's even harder to go back to sheep.
	Back to sleep.
	But back to sheep is what it is.
	Yeah, it's taken me a while.
	I've seen this for a while.
	And I gotta say, you know, it's...
	When you go back and you look at, again, that common cold house, those are one of the key things for me.
	But there's just so much stuff there.
	You know, the fact that for 45 years, the British tried to, and the UK, they tried to see how the common cold was transmitted.
	And they never could.
	And so when you look at the idea of virus and most contagion that's there, again, it is a paradigm that's been deeply ingrained in all of us.
	And I like to point out to people that even if you stay within that paradigm of contagion, none of this stuff made any sense.
	Even within their paradigm, which I don't believe anymore, even when it's logically inconsistent, Don't you hate that when you go to Hollywood and they've got like a superhero movie and there's these logically inconsistent things in that?
	And that's what this is.
	It's like a movie where they've created this sci-fi world or something and it's not consistent.
	It doesn't make any sense.
	It's bad writing, really, is what it is.
	So we've had a lot of bad scripting from these people.
	Michelle Obama says the vax of the past few years will decimate for generations to come.
	Yeah, it will.
	As a matter of fact, I didn't get into it yet, but that was the point of one article they were talking about then that said, you know, we need to come to terms with this and understand just how cancer has elevated and is elevating and the role that these vaccines have played in that.
	And so we need to start talking about that and many other things, you know.
	Instead, they'll just normalize it.
	Myocarditis, pericarditis that have never been around before.
	Now, we have to have children who participate in sports.
	They have to be tested with an electrocardiogram before they can participate.
	That's...
	Well, nothing to see here.
	I mean, sure.
	Yeah, we've never done that before.
	Let's just start doing it.
	I don't know why this is happening.
	Maybe it's the COVID thing.
	No.
	No, no.
	The sickness that you spread around was actually the Trump shot.
	That's the real bioweapon.
	Didn't come from China.
	Didn't come from Wuhan.
	Didn't come from Fauci.
	It came from Trump and Fauci and Biden and all the rest of these people.
	And if they're not going to address that, things are only going to continue to get worse.
	And one of the things that they have found...
	But ivermectin helps to counteract some of these things.
	And I would still suggest B17. And you can get that at rncstores.com.
	B17, you can get that either in a pill form or you can get it in the apricot seeds, you know, the raw stuff.
	I would look for natural things like that.
	But what they found was that if they use ivermectin, Like chemotherapy, it had as good or better results than the chemotherapy did.
	And without all the horrendous side effects that are there.
	But they're not going to face up to that.
	They're going to continue to lie to people.
	And, you know, nobody, if we're going to have this literal cancer, and we're going to have a cancer of authoritarianism and health.
	Don't you remember when everybody's so upset about Hillary Care and government-run health care and how we were going to have death panels?
	And we didn't care when there were death panels that were out there saying, you've got to get this or you're not going to get any health care.
	We're going to kick you out of the hospital if you don't get this shot, that type of thing.
	Or when Trump paid the hospitals to throw people out unless they could find a respiratory illness and claim that it was COVID. And then put him on a ventilator and kill him with rindexivir?
	I mean, that's 100% on Trump.
	100% on him.
	He didn't coerce it.
	He bribed hospitals to do it.
	So, completely different, right?
	Little Ford Schoolhouse.
	Personally, I'm seeing a lot of people getting accelerated forms of cancer and heart issues.
	Yeah.
	People in our church that were vaxxed.
	It's so sad.
	And it's so sad to see so many people who had no discernment.
	And unfortunately, a lot of Christian leaders who knew better.
	Who knew better.
	Matthew Ronson.
	He wants the demicidal Don to win just for the spectacle.
	Mike Adams, that's right.
	Yeah, wouldn't this be great?
	I just want to see these other people so miserable.
	And then I can write articles about him endlessly.
	Oh, collect the liberals' tears in a bottle.
	That was the big thing.
	And it's like, what's the matter with you guys?
	You exist solely to antagonize people.
	Maybe they genuinely like Trump because that seems to be what his purpose is.
	His purpose is to be the Mason-Dixon line of a civil war.
	No matter the death and the misery that Trump inflicted on them, they just want to win for the spectacle.
	Mike Scam Adams should not be more callously shallow and ghoulish.
	Hey, Adams, TDS cuts both ways.
	You're part of those allegedly on the right cheering it on.
	That's absolutely right.
	Michelle Obama, thank you for the tip.
	He says, peace be with you and your beautiful family and crew.
	Thank you so much.
	I appreciate that.
	Well, let's take a look at the aftermath of the election because, again, we know it's going to be whatever happens.
	There's going to be outrage, wanting to fight, tears, lawsuits, lawsuits, a lot of this stuff.
	And so this is coming from Vox.
	A new Supreme Court case could change the result of the presidential election.
	Republicans asked the Supreme Court to disenfranchise thousands of Pennsylvania voters.
	Now that's not what is happening at all.
	That's their subtitle.
	That's not at all what they're talking about.
	The issue here, well the immediate issue in this particular case, They had some vote-by-mail ballots that were done improperly.
	And so they threw them out.
	And rendering their votes void.
	And so the Democrats want these people to be able to vote again.
	You know, vote early, vote often.
	That's been the motto of the Democrats for a long time.
	Certainly in North Carolina, we had the longest voting period there anywhere.
	You know, vote early, vote often.
	And as I pointed out, since they don't require ID, my brother-in-law, Keith, a friend of his, and I tried to get, I said, let me talk to him, let me talk to him.
	He wouldn't come on.
	He goes to vote on election day, and he gives him a name and an address, and they said, no, you've already voted.
	No, I haven't.
	Yes, and this other person in true addresses, well, that's my mother.
	She's been dead for years.
	Well, you've already both voted.
	So, when we look at the vote-by-mail stuff, so what happened in this particular case?
	They sent in mail ballots, and there was something about the way they were done.
	They threw them out.
	But I don't know.
	Maybe they've got some way.
	I've not looked at the vote-by-mail stuff.
	They've got some way they can identify these people, and they want to let them vote again.
	Because every state is different, how they've got these things set up.
	So presumably, they can identify these people.
	They can tell them, hey, you can go vote again.
	Republicans are saying, no, they've already voted.
	And so it's become a court case.
	But the principle on which this turns, regardless of that, is really about what they call the supremacy of the state legislature in this.
	And the independent state legislature doctrine, the ISLD. And that is based on the Constitution, which Fox doesn't like.
	The Constitution says that the legislature shall set the means and qualifications for voting and that type of thing.
	And that's why I said when they had the contesting of the election in 2020, I said what needed to be done.
	They weren't getting anywhere in the courts, obviously.
	Most of the courts said, I'm not even going to listen.
	I don't want to get involved in this.
	I'm not my jurisdiction, or you don't have standing.
	They just refused to even look at it.
	So I said, so take it to the legislatures.
	And I said that on December the 14th.
	I said, today's the day that the electors have sent in their vote totals.
	And so I said, it's over.
	I said, what could have been done is that they could have made the case to the state legislatures.
	There was four that were razor-thin margin that were run by Republicans.
	And so you could have made that case to the Republicans.
	And if you've got a case, certainly we think the Republicans would do something about it.
	And in two of those states, they had a Republican governor.
	And so I said, if you want to make the case to them, you know, the law, the Constitution, Supreme Law, says that the legislature will determine the manner in which this is done and so forth.
	So I said, you know, it would be a fight, but if you had two different sets of electors sent on January the 6th, One of them from the State Board of Elections, another one from the state legislature.
	Well, then, you know, they would have had something that they could work with.
	And if they wanted to go with that, you could say, well, I don't know what to do.
	I've got two different ones, so I'm not going to certify the election.
	Then there would have been a lawsuit.
	Then it would have gone to the Supreme Court.
	And the Supreme Court would have then decided between the state legislature and the governor in terms of this.
	And I think they would have had the upper hand of this.
	So what Vox is saying is state Supreme Courts are supposed to be the final word on all questions of state law, but not with the election, folks.
	The election is federal.
	This is about a federal election, as state Supreme Courts can have the final word on state elections, certainly.
	But when it comes to federal elections, there are some qualifications, general qualifications, like for a president or age qualifications and things like that, that are federal.
	But the rest of the manner in which this happens is up to the state legislatures, according to the Constitution.
	But they go on to say the ultimate authority on the question in this case and the Supreme Court needs to butt out.
	Because the state Supreme Court has made a decision.
	Nevertheless, they said the GOP argues that the high court needs to get involved because of something known as the Independent State Legislature Doctrine, ISLD. A chaotic legal theory.
	It's not chaotic.
	It's just boxes that are going to go down the drain soon.
	But the Supreme Court has rejected many times over in the last century.
	In its strongest form, ISLD claims that each state's legislative branch has executive as exclusive authority to determine how federal elections are conducted in that state.
	That's what the Constitution says, actually.
	Yeah.
	That a state governor cannot veto laws governing federal elections, even if the state constitution typically allows the governor to veto bills passed by the legislature.
	It means that the states cannot alter their election laws through ballot initiatives or referendum.
	It means that state courts cannot enforce state constitutional provisions that protect the right to vote.
	And it even calls into question court decisions interrupting state election laws.
	Well, that's what the constitution says.
	And that's why I say it's such a powerful thing if they wanted to make that argument in 2020, but they chose not to.
	Because it was just about raising money for Trump and Alex.
	And Ginzer, this particular case, the Republican Party doesn't go to any of those extremes.
	The state Supreme Court robbed the state legislature of its supposedly exclusive authority to write election laws, they said.
	But then they talk about whether or not this is going to come back up again.
	And this is a key issue, and that's one of the reasons why they're talking about this, is because if they have litigation, then this is going to come back into play.
	And so they were wringing their hands about how dangerous this is.
	They said, on the one hand, in this particular case, Pennsylvania law states that a provisional ballot shall not be counted if the same voter's mail-in ballot is timely received by county board of elections.
	So that statutory language is certainly helpful to the Republican Party's position in this case.
	On the other hand, the state Supreme Court previously held that ballots cast without a secrecy envelope are void.
	As the same court explains in its Ginzer opinion, something that is void must be given no legal effect.
	So, under this reading of the Pennsylvania law, a milled ballot that is submitted without a secrecy envelope must be treated as if it didn't exist, and it cannot prevent the same voter from casting a provisional ballot.
	Well, again, they can decide how they want to slice that.
	But it's the independent state legislature doctrine that is important.
	It was important in 2020, and it's likely going to be important when we come up to 2024.
	And I believe that there will be a challenge regardless of who is selected by the elites.
	The other side is going to challenge it.
	Trump advisors, by the way, are proposing that a private agency and not the FBI issue security clearances to appointees.
	A group of at least six advisors to Trump are reportedly circulating a memo that proposes the GOP presidential nominee, if elected, be allowed to issue security clearances to his appointees without the normal FBI background check process.
	Deep distrust of the FBI. Finally, What does it take to wake up these people?
	It took them coming after Trump in a partisan criminal way.
	The FBI has been criminal since its inception.
	The FBI was criminal before its inception.
	Before they created a federal bureaucracy to investigate.
	It began with J. Edgar Hoover and the Palmer raids and the run-up to our involvement in World War I, which we should never have been involved in.
	And so then Attorney General Palmer, who wanted to build his political reputation and run for president, got Jager Hoover, this eager beaver, to go out and do a bunch of raids of anti-war people.
	And Jager Hoover, master propagandist that he was, used that to build his reputation, not Palmer's.
	So he usurped this over Palmer.
	Palmer didn't get anything except the blame.
	But Jager Hoover...
	Use that to leverage in the FBI. And he was a master propagandist.
	He got involved in entertainment and creating a legend about the FBI and all the rest of this stuff.
	TV shows that were there in the 70s.
	Efren Zimblis Jr., he was the one that was really helping to produce all that stuff.
	But as Truman said, the FBI is trending towards the Gestapo in the 1950s.
	And, sorry, 40s.
	Actually, 40s.
	Yeah.
	Trending towards the Gestapo.
	He's got dossiers on everybody.
	Nixon said the same thing.
	I mean, both parties, everybody understands what the FBI was about.
	Except conservatives.
	They were completely taken by that propaganda law and order, you know.
	So, whether or not Trump is going to win.
	This is sent to me by a listener.
	It says, Kalshi legal betting proves that Trump wins in a landslide.
	Now, they seem to be quite excited about this.
	They've got uppercase, Trump wins in a landslide.
	Legal betting on the presidential election shows Trump winning by over 20 points, according to the founder, who was just on CNBC money section, stated that anyone with a 24-point lead has proven to win the election in a landslide.
	In addition, his calculations also use advanced AI algorithms that mathematically prove the winner.
	I wouldn't take a proof from AI about anything.
	I wouldn't take a proof from AI that the sky is blue or that it's filled with CO2. And when it comes to the betting markets, I just talked about it last week.
	I said, and it was not this one.
	It was another one.
	I forget the name of it.
	But it was widely reported in the MAGA media.
	I said, look at this.
	You know, after Lala had this interview with Brett Baer, Trump goes straight up and she goes straight down.
	Well, there were four big purchases of the betting stuff by four big individuals that rigged those odds.
	And as one person who was investigating it said, I think those are made by the same person.
	But it was just four people placing a bet.
	Those things are very easily manipulated.
	Now, I think that Trump is going to win in a week.
	But I think it's more reliable to look at, as I said yesterday, what are the CEOs doing?
	What are the Democrat mainstream media outlets like the Washington Post and the LA Times?
	What are they doing?
	And then take a look at what Michelle is doing.
	Michelle Obama.
	And I think that Lala's got a lot of people in the Democrat Party that don't like her.
	That got pushed out and edged out.
	A lot of people that don't want to see her there in four years, they want that to be open so that they can have their shot.
	People like Michelle Obama, people like Gavin Newsom, they have to pretend that they're very supportive.
	They have to pretend that But this speech by Michelle Obama struck me very much like the Shakespeare speech in Julius Caesar, where Mark Anthony says, all these things, he's backing into accusations against Brutus.
	And yet, Brutus is an honorable man.
	Everything he is telling you is that Brutus is not an honorable man.
	Now, with that in mind, listen to Michelle Obama laying out all of the faults But whether it's online or in the media or in our social circles, there are folks who say they're not sure about Kamala.
	They accuse her of not providing enough policy detail.
	Some wonder, do we really know her?
	Is she too aggressive?
	Is she not aggressive enough?
	There are folks sowing seeds of doubt about whether she's who she appears to be.
	I would never succeed the doubt.
	Don't get me wrong.
	Voters have every right to ask hard questions of any candidate seeking office.
	But can someone tell me why we are once again holding Kamala to a higher standard than her opponent?
	Yeah.
	Must be racism and sexism.
	That's what it is.
	It's racism and sexism, isn't it?
	Oh, that's one way to come out and favor somebody while you're stabbing them in the back, isn't it?
	Well, yesterday I talked about Thomas Massey endorsing Donald Trump for president, and I didn't say why.
	And I wanted to just revisit that briefly.
	Mitch McConnell, you know, is a senator.
	He's not running again.
	That's an open seat on the Republican side.
	I wonder, can Mitch McConnell try to appease Trump and MAGA? You know, if he doesn't toady up to Trump, And Trump opposes him.
	He could not possibly...
	He could win in his district where people know him.
	And he has.
	Even though Trump tried to primary him out in 2020 because he stood against this irresponsible $3.5 trillion welfare program that was moving the Overton window towards universal basic income when he locked everybody down and said, here's a stimulus check and here's extended unemployment benefits and all the rest of the stuff.
	He stood against that.
	And he said, no, you're all going to come back.
	I'm going to require that we have a vote in person.
	What?
	We're all going to die!
	You know, that type of thing.
	And Trump was furious.
	He said, we're going to primary him out.
	Well, he wasn't able to.
	Not out of his district.
	But he could certainly keep Massey from winning Mitch McConnell's Senate seat.
	And so I think he did that for those particular reasons.
	And he really poured on the flattery.
	That's what's very disappointing about this.
	He poured on the flattery.
	He said, we support Trump for his commitment to promoting family values and protecting our children's well-being, especially when it comes to curriculums and schools.
	Is that the job of president?
	Curriculum in schools?
	Shouldn't we support for president somebody who says that the government has no role in education, should have no role in education?
	Certainly under the Constitution.
	And does Trump really promote family values?
	The family values of Epstein?
	The family values of the Trump family, where you have Melania out there promoting her pornography, promoting abortion, where she has held parties and been honored.
	By LGBT groups.
	Where Trump has promoted cross-dressing transgender people to participate in his lecherous beauty contests.
	Where he has, first of all, trashed heterosexual marriage, and then promoted homosexual marriage.
	Is that family values?
	Seriously?
	So, if you think that you're going to switch horses...
	And that you are going to...
	Well, I know, but I need to do what I... The end justifies the means.
	I will support Trump so that I can get elected senator.
	If you think that's going to work, Thomas Massey, just take a look at the comments on Breitbart.
	And let me give you an example of this.
	There wasn't a single positive comment on this article.
	First one.
	This should have been done a while ago.
	Next one.
	This is so odd.
	We're supposed to be comforted or impressed that an elected Republican finally came to this deep insight about Trump.
	Give me a break.
	Way to stick your neck out, Tom.
	What was your original endorsement date?
	November the 6th?
	It's about time, Thomas, you had a little butthurt.
	Glad you're over it now.
	You know, because he opposed the lockdown and the trillions of wasted money.
	And more importantly, setting a precedent to take everything away from you and put you on universal basic income.
	He opposed that.
	So, shame on him.
	Shame on him.
	From these people, the typical Breitbart Kool-Aid cult.
	You can't appease the MAGA cult.
	They have TDS. Trump delusion syndrome.
	Don't kid yourself.
	He's saying the right words, but in his heart, he's a traitor to all of us.
	The group think cult.
	That's right, folks.
	It is Kool-Aid time.
	Drink the Kool-Aid.
	Inject the Kool-Aid.
	These people, you can show them what Trump did.
	They know what Trump did.
	You can show them what Alex Jones did.
	And they will attack you.
	Not Alex Jones.
	Not Trump.
	It is amazing.
	It is amazing.
	So, this article on Free Thought Project looks at the foreign policy issues.
	Because it's from anti-war.
	And it said, Trump and Harris and the lesser of two evils.
	While Americans argue over the superficial differences between Trump and Lala, the reality that comes November, no matter which one is selected to take up the Oval Office, the reality is that the imperial status quo remains the same.
	The American empire will remain the American empire.
	And we will not have peace.
	A distressing number of my relatives, friends, and acquaintances have found themselves reduced to making a choice between the lesser of two evils in most elections.
	He says, However, Trump largely gained that reputation because he criticized the Third World nation-building crusades with George W. Bush, Barack Obama, the 2016 election.
	You know, one of the things that he said, which got a lot of people happy, he said, you know, we were lied to about the Iraq War.
	Then what did he do as president?
	As I've said over and over again, he put Gina Haspel, the CIA person, who orchestrated those lies, orchestrated the torture, Then took the stuff, covered up the torture, deleted the videotapes.
	John Kiriakou, who exposed the CIA, goes to prison.
	She goes to the Trump White House as the head of the CIA. First is number two, who was running everything under Pompeo, and then he made her the head of the CIA. The person who lied us into the, produced the lies that were used to sell us into the Iraq War.
	See?
	And so, but because he said, well, we were lied into the Iraq War, Most of the MAGA people aren't going to connect the dots to Gina Haspel and CIA. So, he said, that's the image that he has.
	And the image is that he didn't get us involved in any new wars.
	Well, that's not true either.
	We're in Syria.
	He said, we've got to go to Syria to collect the oil.
	And that's what we're doing.
	We're stealing oil.
	Every once in a while, he said, look at this, those dastardly Iranians, or somebody, Shot missiles at our troops in Syria.
	What are our troops doing in Syria?
	Well, they're stealing oil.
	And he shot missiles into Syria based on these false flag things that were put out.
	And came so close to a full-on war, but they pulled back and just decided to just steal the oil.
	And then when you talk about what is happening in Ukraine, he says, Moreover, despite the campaign of the Democrat Party and its allies in news media to paint Trump as Putin's puppet, U.S. policy towards Russia became more confrontational rather than less.
	During Trump's presidency.
	Even when you look at his talking about, you know, we're putting all this money into NATO, and I think if the Europeans don't add more weapons and spending and all the rest of this stuff, maybe we're just going to pull back.
	Well, we never did pull back.
	But by doing those threats, he got Europe to start building up an arms thing because they were going to go to war with Russia.
	Again, he was laying the foundation for that.
	He was working with the globalist organization and their plans to escalate a war.
	And he's just goading the Europeans to add more weapons.
	And the MAGA cult and the conservatives think, oh, he's trying to pull away from NATO.
	No, he could have easily pulled away from NATO if he wanted to.
	He could get out of the UN if he wanted to, but instead he enforces a UN agenda through the pandemic.
	He says, however, voters who hope that Harris might pursue a more competent, less reckless foreign policy may be even more delusional than advocates who back Trump.
	Harris' speech at the DNC, where she accepted her coronation, does not encourage hope for a more prudent foreign policy.
	She denounced Trump for even being willing to talk to Putin.
	Or to North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un.
	Or any other autocrats.
	And yet, even during the worst days of the Cold War, U.S. leaders were willing to negotiate with Soviet officials.
	And several dangerous crises today, including tensions on the Korean Peninsula, are certainly going to worsen if Harris is serious about this.
	Forget that red phone.
	We don't need the red phone.
	We don't need to talk to these people on the other side at all.
	Let's just escalate, escalate.
	It truly is brinksmanship.
	And they want a war.
	And so there's no good choice there.
	But the moral issues are even more so.
	And yet, what do they focus on?
	Here's this article from Breitbart.
	And they're trolling Tim Waltz.
	Because he was a football coach.
	And he plays a game of Madden football.
	You know, video game of Madden.
	With AOC. To show that they're normal.
	See, this is the whole thing, like all the McDonald's stuff and everything.
	These people have to pretend that they're one of us.
	I don't really care if they're one of us.
	I want them to be like one of the founders.
	I want them to be a leader, not a follower, okay?
	I want them to lead.
	Get out front with some principles and lead.
	You know, like Thomas Jefferson.
	Does Thomas Jefferson know anything about football?
	No, he wouldn't care.
	Why do we care about this?
	And so they troll him, and it's really ridiculous.
	It's ridiculous, first of all, that Waltz and AOC would be doing this, just like it's ridiculous about the McDonald's stuff between Lala and Trump.
	And then, but of course, that was huge, huge for Trump.
	Because that's what this so-called election is about.
	It's about building a consensus.
	Because your vote's not going to make any difference.
	So the game was live-streamed on Occasional Cortex's Twitch site.
	And so as they're doing this, the comment is put up.
	AOC can run a mean pick six, and I can call an audible on a play.
	And that was coming from Tim Walsh's thing.
	Well, I won't get into the details of this.
	I don't know what a mean pick six is, and I really don't care.
	And, you know, but they're saying, well, anybody that knows football knows this, blah, blah, blah, you know.
	And then this footnote.
	It's important to note that Waltz didn't actually verbalize the comment about AOC running a pick six in the live stream.
	The error is on whoever writes the governor's social media post.
	However, it's still really a bad look.
	And we can own those lefties, can't we?
	Just like Mike Adams.
	It's just insane.
	Karen and Keith had a friend from high school who came down to see them.
	And...
	It was at the time I was, you know, I think we were doing, I think we were doing, we had just done, I think, the commercial about sales tax in our kitchen that we're running on cable TV. And so we're talking about founders.
	I just mentioned in passing.
	I wasn't, you know, standing on a pedestal preaching about Thomas Jefferson and giving quotes from him.
	I just said, yeah, just like Jefferson.
	He says, Jefferson, he's such an idiot.
	Because all those people from then, they wouldn't even know how to drive a car.
	So what?
	So what?
	They wouldn't know the first thing about football, let alone a video game.
	What's up with those people?
	Did they ever run the french fry machine at McDonald's?
	They're complete idiots.
	We don't need leaders like that.
	You know what I mean?
	Guard Goldsmith.
	Good to see you, Guard.
	And thank you for doing such a great job on the show on Friday.
	I appreciate that.
	He says, Adam's rationale seems to reflect a nearly sociopathic narcissism.
	Mm-hmm.
	He cites terrible war crimes, genocide by IDF that Trump backs and cites the jabs and then says he wants the guy to win so he can have a laugh.
	That's exactly right.
	He's not a moron.
	He's kind of sick.
	And he lives by the lies.
	He just wants chaos.
	That's what I'm saying.
	You got people on both the MAGA media as well as mainstream media, and they're trying to push us into a civil war.
	And as we look at economic conditions coming up, you know, it's very easy, as Gerald Slenty always says, when everybody loses everything, they lose it.
	I remember when I was looking at asymmetric warfare, and we were looking at these asymmetric warfare training centers, and so I looked at a lot of stuff from the brass on YouTube, and you'd find these really dry presentations.
	I mean, they were hard to get through.
	This was actually back before they had the ability on YouTube to listen to stuff at like two times speed or something even.
	It was hard to get through.
	And they only had like a dozen or a couple dozen people had watched it.
	But what they were talking about was what motivated the people that they were fighting in asymmetric warfare.
	You know, they can easily go in and reduce the military, conventional military, to rubble.
	But then they wanted to occupy the country and do nation rebuilding.
	And so they said, so what we're finding in this asymmetric warfare that happens when we've got all the weapons, but, you know, we still can't get them under control.
	So what we're finding is that the leaders are not really motivated by religion initially.
	What they're motivated by, he said, these are typically, the leaders of this are typically in their 30s.
	They typically come from upper middle class or wealthy families.
	They've got a good education.
	Maybe they were educated in engineering in the United States or something.
	And we come in and occupy their country, and they are driven to oppose us because they see that they've got no future and no control over their future.
	That's how it starts.
	And then once they get in the war, then they turn to religion.
	It's not initially motivated by religion.
	And so, when you start taking everything away from everybody, that's the path to having a civil war.
	And our government knows that.
	And that's why they're doing it.
	Real Jason Barker.
	Thank you for the tip, Jason.
	Good to see you.
	And Knights of the Storm.
	Thank you very much.
	It says, Bless Karen for holding down the fort.
	She's an angel.
	She certainly is.
	And she writes there, Thank you, Jason.
	She definitely is an angel.
	Don't frag me, bro.
	Trump is the one that issued the emergency orders providing the legal provocation for political parasites to enforce lockdown orders and mask mandates.
	Trump is the one that funded the death jab and remdesivir and the ventilators.
	And as Jason Parker, at nights in the storm, had pointed out, he was in the military.
	He said Trump had already set that order in place so that it would be mandated for the military once it got its emergency use authorization.
	Hmm.
	And so, that was in the cards.
	And we already knew that the Republicans were pushing everything by incentivizing it, right?
	You know, Biden used blackmail.
	Well, you do it now, I'm going to take your money away.
	They said, do it and we'll give you more money.
	That was the approach of the Republicans and Trump.
	He says, yeah, the military is Operation War Speed.
	Trump is the one that gave fake Dr.
	Fauci the podium, the ear of the masses.
	Trump pushes the death jab, kisses the rear end of the big pharma at rallies.
	Yeah.
	A Syrian girl, thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	Trump should be nervous about all the polls stating that he'll win in a landslide.
	Didn't they all say that Hillary would win in a landslide in 2016?
	That's right.
	And we're going to talk about that coming up.
	We're going to take a break and we're going to come back and talk a little bit more about it.
	I think there's great hope on the Lala side now since the Madison Square rally.
	Lala's big hope Is this comedian, fittingly enough, who made these stupid, unfunny, vicious remarks about Puerto Rico being an island of garbage and many other things that he said.
	And on the basis of that guy, they really are trying to pull out a last-minute Hail Mary.
	Who knows?
	Who knows what's going to happen?
	And as I've said, you know, we can kind of look at this and determine that whoever they feel will do the most damage to us is going to be the one that they pick.
	Brandon Bennett, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	Thank you.
	And he said, God bless.
	Mana Hector says, agreed, David, all indications that Trump is to be selected.
	What if they pull the rug underneath and Lala wins?
	What does the 2nd January the 6th look like?
	Oh, if then that's another part of it.
	See, they could also be doing this to build up expectations of a Trump victory, so they could pull the rug out from under them, as you said.
	That would really get everybody wired to go, wouldn't it?
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to have a little bit of fun.
	I think you're going to enjoy this next segment.
	I know I am.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about technology.
	Jeff Bezos has made a lot of people.
	He's lost, accordingly, 200,000 people have canceled their subscription to the Washington Post.
	He doesn't care.
	He didn't buy the Washington Post to make money.
	He bought it for political influence, and that's how he's using it.
	The same thing with Elon Musk.
	He didn't buy Twitter for any reason other than political influence.
	And also so that he could feed your brain into his artificial intelligence and other things like that.
	That's what they use, big data.
	TikTok does that.
	That's one of the key things of social media.
	Facebook, TikTok, Twitter, all that is that they want to get real human interactions, real human speech to feed into artificial intelligence, which cannibalizes that and imitates that and tries to appear to be human.
	Well, Bezos, after he's done that, he's had a lot of people have resigned.
	Several people have resigned.
	Several editors have resigned.
	People are canceling the subscription.
	And you've got other people who are very angry writers.
	And one of them put out a post on Twitter.
	And this is a New Yorker journalist, Sarah Larson, recounted her own story about Jeff Bezos.
	So they're all attacking him personally about this.
	She said, once again, I'm reflecting on the time I interviewed a powerful guy who knows Jeff Bezos and who offhandedly told me, quote, Jeff has personal reasons for wanting to get to Mars.
	I'm not comfortable sharing what they are.
	What is going on with that?
	It's Musk who's always talking about colonizing Mars.
	Bezos has been a lot more about the space colonies.
	He has distanced himself, this article says, from Martian colonizing ambitions while his rival Musk goes all in on it.
	Years after stepping down as CEO of Amazon to spend more time with his space launch company, Blue Origin, Bezos told podcaster Lex Friedman he thinks humans will likely be living inside massive cylindrical space stations.
	See, this has been his passion.
	Like I've said before, he's a couple years younger than me, and He's got an engineering degree, like I do, and it was something that was being talked about quite a lot.
	You know, the space program, allegedly going to the moon, had not been that, you know, just been a few years, and it was kind of like, okay, well, now what do we do for an encore?
	And at the time, you know, we thought that was real.
	But, you know, everybody was kind of waiting, okay, what's the next step?
	What's the next step?
	And a guy named Gerard K. O'Neill did a book.
	I read it, and I thought it was very inspiring, very interesting, that we're going to create these space stations and set them up.
	His idea was to set them up in the Lagrange libration points, these gravitationally neutral points on either side of the moon, so they just stay up there in this kidney-shaped orbit forever.
	It neutralizes the gravitational forces.
	They don't fall down towards the moon or towards the Earth.
	And then they would go to the moon, and they could mine whatever they wanted to for manufacturing, and they could shoot it up to these Lagrange libration points using maglev, you know, to catapult it up.
	They would collect it up there.
	And in space, you could do very efficient manufacturing because you could get extreme temperatures just by painting things white or black.
	And that's what you need to make things work in terms of energy.
	You need those extremes in temperature.
	And so...
	It was very interesting, and it was also interesting in the way that he designed the space stations.
	And probably the best depiction of it we've seen is from Elysium.
	This is the trailer for the beginning of it.
	Here they show the messy, disgusting Earth and what it's turned into, the cities.
	And then they turn to space, and it says, Earth.
	Earth's wealthiest inhabitants fled the planet to preserve their way of life, right?
	Their wealth, whatever.
	And there's your thing.
	Now, that's not out in a Lagrange libration point, but this is just a large toroid-shaped thing.
	And this is what was depicted in Elysium.
	But it is the work, really, of Gerard K. O'Neill.
	And you remember that.
	This is very detailed.
	Large cities in space that the elites live in.
	And Jeff Bezos has talked about how that was something that really inspired him.
	And that's what he wanted to do.
	He had no interest in running an online retail store.
	He always wanted to go to space and to do this.
	And that's why he's focused on this.
	And he told Lex Friedman in December, he said, I would love to see a trillion humans living in the solar system.
	If we had a trillion humans, we would have at any given time a thousand Mozarts and a thousand Einsteins.
	The only way to get to that vision is with the great space stations, he said.
	The planetary surfaces are just way too small.
	And so then that brings us to the Mozarts that are out there, the great Mozarts.
	And how are we going to get more of them?
	Well, this is a robot playing cello with a live orchestra.
	And it was actually programmed by a researcher and a composer, Frederick Grand, who played a piece by a Swedish composer alongside the Malmo Symphony Orchestra.
	And as it's reported, they say the final bow, or the final bow, whichever way you want it.
	For perhaps the first time ever, a robot played a cello live on stage as the symphony orchestra was live on stage.
	stage.
	Here's what it sounds like.
	It sounds like a Suzuki violinist playing for the first time.
	I can imagine that the engineer out there said, That's my George!
	It's just like the scene out of Music Man.
	It sounds so horrible, and yet they love it!
	Yeah, isn't this great?
	Yeah, this is...
	Well, you know, you can make those motions across the thing, but...
	It's something else completely to have a real cellist.
	Here's an example contrasting Yo-Yo Ma, excellent cellist to say the least, and he plays a little bit of the Bach piece that's so famous, and then they have somebody playing samples on a keyboard.
	Now listen to the difference of that.
	This is the real cellist, obviously.
	Leaves a little bit of something to be desired.
	laughter Yeah, so he needs to work on the timing of that a little bit, as well as the articulations sound very dead, don't they?
	Right?
	Because it's always the same type of thing.
	There's not any nuance to that either.
	I mean, it's a little bit better than the robot dragging the bow across the thing, right?
	Yeah.
	But, you know, that's typically what I do for the music, is that type of thing.
	And it's very difficult to make it sound realistic.
	Very difficult.
	First you have to play it, and then you have to reprogram it with different articulations.
	Just to give you an example, here is Vienna Symphonic Library.
	And he's been doing this since the 90s.
	This is one of the first ones, and it is probably one of the premier ones.
	It's a very expensive library.
	I don't have this library.
	But what he does is he's there in the recording studio where they record the instruments.
	And they do that even if they just have one player or just one section.
	They get the entire recording studio so that it sounds like the room.
	And so he's there, and he's recorded this musician, and he's actually playing what he's recorded her doing on the keyboard, and then having her play something.
	And then he plays it back, and then they play a duet.
	And so you can kind of see how this is a bit better than the other one because it is a better quality library, but you still see the limitations of this.
	That's really sweet, no?
	Now, if you're listening to that, it doesn't sound that different, does it?
	Because he's recording her.
	Good morning.
	We have a very very unique situation here.
	Usually I was sitting upstairs in the control room just telling you what you have to do.
	Now I have to perform with you and it's just a kind of proof of concept how close we can get with our sampled version to your wonderful live performing.
	We start with the detaché articulation.
	You remember we did He chooses the articulation and how loud it's going to be.
	It's just one articulation.
	There's so much more life.
	The second variation where we have a more pronounced attack.
	and Mercato decks, just listen to the example.
	Okay.
	Same thing.
	played differently with a different articulation.
	Kind of small duet.
	It's fun, isn't it? - It's very interesting, really.
	I can perform violin as well.
	I've never done anything like this.
	Me too, me too.
	Yeah, well, you're not going to be a real string instrument.
	This is...
	When you listen to that, it's so fluid and it is so expressive.
	And that's the thing that is so difficult about all of this stuff.
	And again, you get a taste of what that's like.
	And I thought it's interesting for people to see that, especially because I'd have people, one day somebody asked me, what keyboard do you use?
	And I said, well, it's just a MIDI keyboard.
	Nothing special.
	And I thought about it afterwards, and I thought, oh, because there's a lot of keyboards that people use in live performances that have the instrument samples built into them.
	And this was something that actually started back in the 1970s, when I had synthesizers and stuff like that.
	The first time they started using, grabbing sound samples and mapping them onto keys, I think was Stevie Wonder's Songs in the Key of Life.
	And he had a lot of things like, you know, birds singing and things like that.
	And then they really caught on with it.
	But then it became really difficult to try to make these things alive.
	As you heard, he's playing one set of articulations with her, another set of articulations, but to mix this stuff up in real time.
	And to make it more realistic, more human, that's the difficult thing.
	I've got, this is from a listener of ours who has set up a substack.
	And I wanted to pass this on to you because I think it's going to be excellent.
	It's called the AI Wrap.
	And this is done by Noel Vega.
	And his very first article...
	De-industrialization of the mind.
	The effects of AI on a productive mind.
	And I thought that fit in really well with what we see with the music that is happening there.
	He says, With a fresh, unique perspective, including an exploration of its more pernicious effects.
	Something I feel strongly about.
	And I know it won't win any popularity contests with the elites or with the algorithms, but the site is vrap.ai.
	And he is going to be there.
	He's also, I think he's setting this up on...
	No, I think you still need to go to therap.ai.
	And here's what he had to say.
	It's just a couple of paragraphs.
	It's a short article, but it's very smart, the perspective on it.
	He says, when I think of deindustrialization, I think of small American factory towns.
	Once bustling hubs that supported local families, communities, businesses, all contributing to the nation's economic output.
	The demand for products they once manufactured never ceased.
	Steel from rust, belt cities, and textiles in the Carolinas remain as vital as ever, but no, these productive roles were outsourced to cheap labor in foreign lands, leaving generational devastation in their wake.
	This sharp industrial decline of the 1970s coincided with the dawn of a new form of decline, thinking.
	Math problems, once the domain of productive thought, were quickly jettisoned to their own form of outsourcing, the pocket calculator.
	Arguably the first digital assistant, it ushered in the de-industrialization of the mind.
	As we clamored for these convenient co-pilots, from calculators to computers to cell phones to chat apps, we inevitably surrendered our cognitive sovereignty.
	And along the way, our minds became as depleted as those of a barren factory wasteland, themselves symbols of a lost national sovereignty, until both became virtually indistinguishable.
	Thank you.
	At least during the halcyon days of the early pocket calculator, we could argue that the innovation sparked a kind of creative destruction, but no longer.
	If we imagine our minds as enclosed systems, much like how physicists define and enclose their systems, Then all we can claim now is destruction.
	Because AI, especially generative AI, doesn't create within the mind.
	It, too, is outsourced labor.
	Manufacturing content somewhere else.
	Yeah, when we look at music, for example, right?
	You've got sites now.
	The next stage is not just, you know, canning the performances.
	And again, you know, most people when they say, I like to play music, they immediately assume that you're just playing it by hitting the play button somewhere, right?
	Rather than learning an instrument.
	And of course...
	Going back to Jefferson, what he would do is he would sit on a long trip.
	Instead of putting on iPods, he would sit on the saddle and he would play his violin as the horse walked along on his long trip from Williamsburg to Monticello or something, right?
	So everybody played an instrument.
	Maybe not that well, but they still enjoyed it.
	But not anymore.
	And now the next step of all this is generative AI. Sites like, I think one of them is called Sura.
	I don't know if that's movies or music.
	But basically, you just describe something that you want in terms of a genre.
	You might describe a particular beat, some instruments or something like that.
	You just give it some text description of what you want.
	And, you know, presto, it comes out.
	But it comes out.
	It's very commercialized music.
	It's a big it's going to put the sites that that do B-roll and and write royalty free music and stuff.
	I was going to put them out of business, but it's not really music, right?
	It is designed as a mass consumption product for an increasingly illiterate world.
	Because people don't appreciate it because they haven't learned how to play it.
	And that's increasingly the case.
	And so you get the auto-tuned Taylor Swift and Beyonce and all the rest of this stuff because it becomes about appearances.
	It becomes about how they dress and how they dance and it's not about their music and it's all...
	And so we have something that opens the door to this type of thing.
	And so...
	When you look at the things that we have lost, I'm also reminded what Noel is talking about this.
	Just take a look at, as people become more and more dependent on map apps, they lose their ability to read a map.
	Or you have a situation like the London taxi drivers.
	And they had to do extensive training to memorize all of these fragmented streets.
	Many times the street, even though it seems like it's a continuous path, they would continue to change names every few blocks and everything.
	So they had to memorize this complicated map of London.
	And they found that taxi drivers had a part of their brain that was significantly more developed than the average people.
	And yet, that is starting to atrophy, those types of things.
	And so, I think Noelle is right.
	It really is a de-industrialization of the mind.
	It has a numbing effect on us as we turn more and more stuff over to AI.
	What is left for us to do?
	What do we take pride in?
	What do we get a sense of accomplishment out of?
	If we just push a button and we get the thing.
	Nothing has any value anymore.
	So Michelle Obama says, Native Instruments has an incredible sound sample and modulated everything suite.
	Yes, they do.
	And I've got some of their stuff as well.
	My keyboard is actually a Native Instruments keyboard that was set up to work with their libraries.
	Charles Trudell, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, the only news that's worth paying for that's not the good news comes from the David Knight Show.
	Well, that's very kind.
	Thank you.
	He says, Thank you for sharing your gifts of discernment, intelligence, integrity, and kindness with all of us.
	What a blessing you and your family are to all of us.
	Well, that's really good.
	You are a blessing to us.
	But thank you so much.
	He says, Praying for the physical and spiritual health of you and your family, David, let us rejoice and be glad in this day.
	That's right.
	Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof, but we also look at the blessings of each and every day and the fact that we do have another day.
	We're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	The inflationist narrative is crumbling.
	The U.S. 10-year government bond yields reached a low of 3.6% in September, but have rapidly creeped up to 4.2%, erasing the rate cut impact.
	You see, we've seen home mortgage rates rise and all the rest.
	Why is that happening?
	Well, the primary cause, says Daniel Lacalle, Zero Hedge, primary cause is the out-of-control public spending and the lack of confidence among bond investors and the government's ability to manage its public finances.
	So, we're going to see all kinds of weird, unexpected results.
	The Fed not being able to manipulate, they're getting to the point where they're blowing up their ability to do that.
	And yet again, just as we saw in foreign policy, this is another key area where we're not really going to see much of a difference between Lala and Trump, because both of them are just going around handing out favors.
	Now, it may make a difference to you if you're the group that's going to be favored by one of them.
	But the bottom line is, is that they're going to still hand out money to their favored friends and they will tax their enemies.
	That's what modern monetary theory, MMT, I call it magic money tree.
	That's what that's really about.
	We just spend.
	We don't have to worry about the deficit.
	Unless we get inflation.
	And if we get inflation, what we'll do is we'll raise taxes on our enemies.
	But we hand out unlimited amounts of money to our friends.
	And so that just, you know, depends on, you know, whether they like you or not.
	Or whether you buy favors from them in advance.
	You know, because an election is an advance auction of stolen goods.
	So, if they're not going to do anything about spending...
	We're going to have inflation.
	The U.S. government is obsessed with doping GDP with government spending and bloating job figures by hiring people to work in the government.
	That's where most of the jobs they said were created were created.
	There were government jobs.
	This is the road to ruin or stagflation.
	Or as Gerald Salenti says, dragflation.
	He's been saying this for a very long time.
	We're not going to just have the stagflation of the 70s.
	It's not going to just, you know, be kind of flat.
	It's going to go down.
	And he's been saying that for a long time, just as he said that this is going to be the year for gold.
	By the way, if you want to subscribe to Trends Journal, you can save 10% if you use the code NIGHT. Great publication, as he points out every time.
	He says it's...
	Less than half the price of an entire week cost half the price of one day of the Wall Street Journal.
	And so he has seen a lot of this stuff coming.
	The handwriting has been on the wall ever since we had the lockdown, what it was going to do to commercial real estate.
	And of course, the knock-on effect of that is going to be with the banks.
	But we also see this kind of financial chaos.
	There is not even any acknowledgement of this problem from either party, especially the two people at the top.
	The U.S. debt has exploded by more than $850 billion in just three months, but the government has accelerated the insane borrowing.
	Almost half of that figure was an increase in borrowing in the past three weeks.
	The Congressional Budget Office forecasts an unsustainable $16 trillion in new debt over the next 10 years.
	Which will result in ongoing inflation from unchecked public spending and currency printing.
	No wonder then that investors don't believe the Fed and they continue to demand higher yields for U.S. Treasury securities.
	You see, in the marketplace, they can put it out there at a price and if nobody's buying it, they have to bump it up.
	So there's something of a market mechanism there in the interest rates for these U.S. Treasuries.
	That's why when they cut the interest rate, the things still started going up.
	They started going up for home mortgages as well.
	Tax cuts are not inflationary.
	It's not spending.
	They like to talk about tax cuts as being spending, but it's not spending.
	Very different.
	Tax cuts are not inflationary.
	It is the same quantity of money, only difference is in whose pockets it is.
	Is it in the pockets of those who earn it?
	Rising expenditure is inflationary.
	Because it is literally printing currency that is diminishing demand relative to issuance.
	The government has surpassed the economic, fiscal, and inflationary limits of currency printing.
	Their strategy is clear.
	They want to ban any alternative to a declining value currency, the dollar.
	They want to ban it, right?
	So, again, that's the totalitarian response.
	I'm going to ban anything other than my injection or my remdesivir or my ventilators.
	I'm going to ban anything other than the electric car that charges off of the grid.
	Anything else is going to be banned.
	So the bond market sees this.
	Jack Lawson has an excellent article on Civil Defense Manual.
	He's got an excellent article about inflation.
	I've had him on in the past, and he lived in Zimbabwe for a while.
	He had a trillion-dollar Zimbabwean dollar bill.
	And the title of this article, and you can find it at CivilDefenseManual.com, the $1.2 trillion lunch for three.
	Ha ha ha ha ha!
	No such thing as a free lunch, is there?
	Especially with hyperinflation.
	And so he talks about his life in Africa.
	It's an excellent article.
	It's too long for me to cover here, but I think you'd really enjoy it if you went to civildefensemanual.com.
	He talks about, he says, to understand Africa, you've got to live in Africa.
	And he says some very interesting things about life there in Africa.
	And then he talks about what happened with the Marxists coming in and the civil wars that happened there that he was involved in.
	And communism and what communism did to the economy.
	You know, I thought it was kind of interesting when I went back, there was talk that instead of Tim Walz, the Democrat governor in Pennsylvania, Josh Shapiro was going to be picked.
	So they were the last two.
	So I did some research on Josh Shapiro at the time.
	I was absolutely amazed to see that, you know, just like Tim Walz, he was somebody who loved communism so much they just couldn't stay away from the communist country.
	Instead of it being China or in the case of de Blasio, Cuba, or in the case of Bernie Sanders, Russia, Josh Shapiro wanted to go to Zimbabwe after the communists took over.
	And he went there to teach, of all things, economics.
	In a country, as he was there, that was going into hyperinflation.
	This is what you wind up with on the Democrat side.
	A guy who is an economics professor in a Marxist country at the epicenter of the legendary hyperinflation.
	Yeah, he was the other pick for Lala Harris.
	But you went with the other communists, you know, the Chinese communists, Tim Walz.
	And so, a very interesting article again on CivilDefenseManual.com.
	Go there and take a look at what he's got.
	When we talk about preparing, that's something that you really need to think about.
	What do you do to prepare, you know, to secure your neighborhood with other people?
	What are the ins and outs of trying to do that with other people without getting them to call the FBI on you?
	You know, what do you need to know to defend yourself?
	How do you need to prepare in terms of food and energy, especially water?
	And he's got a free chapter there on water.
	And this chapter is an amazing read that you'll see there at CivilDefenseManual.com.
	Well, BRICS is meeting now.
	A lot of people are talking about the declaration.
	They're in Kazan in Russia.
	That's where they're having their meeting.
	And they have put out a manifesto.
	The Declaration is a voluminous document containing 134 paragraphs, some of which are quite long, says Zero Hedge.
	Other people's take on it is, well, it looks like they're headed for a new world order out of all this.
	This person was not condemning this.
	This was sent to me by Mark and...
	This person thought it was great.
	This is very good news.
	Let us celebrate together by reading Brick's Kazan Declaration.
	Please, I beg you, read this declaration and share it with all of your friends.
	This declaration is not just a massive victory for Brick's.
	It is a victory for all decent, freedom-loving people on earth.
	Here's a few highlights from it.
	See if you think this is a victory for freedom.
	BRICS supports global governance and the central role of the UN in the international system.
	Those are quotes.
	We reaffirm our commitment to multilateralism and upholding international law and the purposes and principles of the UN as indispensable.
	And in accordance with that, they like the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
	We stress the universal and inclusive nature of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its Sustainable Development goals.
	And they also support the reduction and removal of greenhouse gases to combat climate change.
	They support public-private partnerships, that kind of crony capitalism, the creation of carbon markets.
	They support the World Health Organization and its, quote, central coordinating role, unquote, in strengthening the international pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response system.
	They support the development of safe and effective vaccines.
	They support digital transformation using 5G and other emerging technologies.
	And I would look at all this stuff and I would think that this was sarcasm to say that this is great, except it seems to be this person seems to really buy into all of this.
	The world is at a crossroads.
	There's two distinct visions for the future of humankind.
	You must choose one and then argue with strangers on the internet who are inadequately enthusiastic about your choice, which is perhaps the most meaningful and consequential choice you will ever make.
	Your choice will literally change the trajectory of human history.
	So please choose wisely.
	Let's be more specific.
	In sharp contrast to the G20, which includes the U.S. and many other unipolar, satanic West nations, And so forth and so on.
	They're about saving the world.
	I mean, I think this person is literally serious about this stuff.
	And just as a reminder, you know, we talk about this all the time.
	Putin's not a good guy.
	He wants a central bank digital currency, just like the Chinese.
	You know, they did their social credit stuff first.
	You know, these are not good guys.
	And it's very much like the competition we have between Republicans and Democrats in this country.
	You better choose one.
	This is very important.
	Look at this.
	These people have got this all together.
	And so you can have one group that openly promotes this, another group that doesn't, but does it anyway.
	So, gold is going to continue to rise higher on geopolitical risks.
	HSBC thinks that there will be weaker demand in the second half of 2025.
	Do they think that there's not going to be any inflation?
	That we're going to somehow solve all of that in the second half of 2025?
	Well, I don't think so.
	I don't think there's going to be any less geopolitical risks in the second half of 2025 in terms of wars and things like that.
	I think, if anything, it's going to accelerate.
	But, you know, things have paused after this record run-up.
	It paused at about 2750, I think is about where it is this week, which is astounding.
	Because these same banks were predicting a while back that it wasn't going to reach 2700 until January or February next year.
	And it ran up even before the election.
	Gold investors so are buying the dip.
	It's not really that much of a dip.
	It was kind of a pause.
	I mean, it went up to like 2770 or 80, and then it fell back down 2750.
	Not much of a dip.
	There is price pressure, they said, on gold, silver, as people are starting to take profit out of it.
	That's why it pauses with that.
	But nothing fundamentally has changed.
	As Peter Schiff says, gold is exposing a phony economy.
	Record-setting week for gold last week and a stellar week for silver.
	Gold got up to nearly $2,800, silver up to $3,500, and silver is holding its gains above $32.
	Politicians love inflation, but the metal markets know that America's economic trajectory is unsustainable.
	The long-term interest rates are rising, even though interest rates were cut by the Federal Reserve, as I began before.
	Because nobody believes that inflation is under control.
	That's especially true of the people who are investing in this, and true of the central banks who are accumulating gold.
	Long-term rates and gold prices are rising in tandem, which is the opposite of what people expect.
	And Tony Arterman's been talking about this for a long time.
	He said they keep...
	You know, playing these, you know, the Federal Reserve is at war with gold, but what they're doing is not working, right?
	They're not able to drive gold down, just like they've not been able to drive interest rates down.
	Why?
	Suspending.
	They believe higher interest rates are bearish for gold, but gold keeps going up anyway.
	The mainstream financial media didn't expect this.
	They thought when the Fed cut short-term rates, long-term rates would follow.
	Instead, they're going in the opposite direction.
	So why is this?
	He says the dollar is condemned to a future of continuous devaluation, and gold is the best hedge against dedollarization.
	We still have a weak economy.
	That's not why rates are rising.
	Rates are rising for the same reason that the gold price is rising.
	It's because the Fed rate cuts are a mistake.
	The inflation genie is not back in the bottle.
	And so he says, you know, look, Peter Schiff says it's like goals moves in the pre-2008 era.
	He said they didn't care about gold when it was $495 an ounce.
	And now that it is $27.50 an ounce, they still don't care about it because they have no idea what that means.
	Or if they do, they certainly don't want their audience to find out.
	But when the Fed showed its hand and announced a quantitative easing, gold took off.
	Initially, people, not just me, there was a chorus of people saying, this is terrible.
	There's going to be massive inflation, and you've got to buy gold.
	It reminds us that inflation was an intentional policy choice that benefits the political class.
	Of course, they believe they can run the debt up.
	And then they can monetize it with inflation.
	You know, we're going to stack up this big debt and we'll pay you back with a lot of cheap dollars that we just conjure out of nowhere.
	But, again, if you want to get real, if you want to get outside of this insanity, go to davidknight.gold.
	Tony has set that up to take you to Wise Wolf Gold.
	You can get gold or silver.
	Just go to davidknight.gold, and Tony's got something that's very unique, and that's Wolf Pack, where you can gradually begin to accumulate gold on a...
	Set amount each month, and that helps to average the price out.
	But it's also a savings program.
	Saving your money into something that is going to be a kind of wealth insurance.
	And it's not just the inflation this time around.
	We're also looking at the intentional destruction of the financial system.
	Not just by bricks.
	But the announced intention by the Biden administration and by the people who are going to remain in Washington running this regardless of what happens, their intention is to destroy the financial system that is existing now, the dollar system.
	So if you don't want to get caught up in all that, if you don't want to get Caught up in the surveillance, they start to make a move outside of that system.
	And you can do that if you go to davidknight.gold, which will take you to Tony Ardeman.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Conservative.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He says, Bannon just got out of jail today, and he's got 93,000 people watching him on Rumble.
	Maybe a few months in the slammer could help your show.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	It just goes back to, I think he's a very dangerous person, quite frankly.
	He's a fraud.
	If you go back and look at We Build the Wall stuff, he's a fraud.
	He's another grifter, but he's also a very dangerous person throwing out this kind of rhetoric.
	He's another one of these bomb throwers who wants to start another January the 6th type of thing.
	I have no respect for Steve Bannon whatsoever.
	I look at Steve Bannon, though, like so many of these people, I guess the age-old question that's always asked in the Psalms, why do the wicked prosper?
	You know, I mean, it is.
	And it's just the world system that we live in.
	If you want to serve Satan, you will prosper.
	You want to lie?
	You can read it.
	Look, we all know what people want.
	It's just, are you willing to sell yourself for that, right?
	It's a form of prostitution.
	It really is.
	Abortion doctors, by the way, at the Harris rally, freeze up during a medical emergency.
	You know, you see these types of things that happens with Trump things all the time.
	You get a big crowd of people.
	People are standing for a very long time.
	Somebody passes out or whatever.
	Well, he had a group of abortion doctors on Friday at a La La rally, froze when an audience member reportedly suffered a medical emergency.
	Dr. Richard Todd Ivey, an abortionist who has been killing babies for 25 years, was addressing the crowd.
	He was pushing claims about, quote, women becoming severely ill and dying, unquote, due to lack of abortion, even though all states permit abortion to be performed if it is necessary to save the mother's life.
	As he was speaking, a member of the audience shouted for a medic.
	All the doctors on stage looked around, but nobody made a move to respond to the emergency.
	These are the kind of people that have been bred out of a desire for money now.
	And, you know, it's about the money.
	I'm giving people shots, and I'm prescribing toxic antibiotics to harm people, like the phloxans.
	I'm doing that, you know, to make money.
	I'm, you know, help somebody?
	I don't know about that.
	So, Dr.
	Ivey tried to proceed with his speech, but was eventually forced to acknowledge it, and he said, well, I think somebody needs some medical assistance over here.
	People talked about it, and they said, well, here is the LaLa campaign in a nutshell.
	She brought up all these doctors to say how much they love and support abortion.
	Somebody in the crowd has a medical emergency and calls for a medic, and they do nothing.
	With all of them.
	That was Joey Manarino commenting on Twitter.
	Another person said, so if you're wondering what it's like to go to Planned Parenthood looking for help from quote-unquote doctors, it looks a lot like this.
	And so as she pointed out in her debate, you know, this is all about Making decisions about your own body, and yet, at the same time, as I've said over and over again, it's not your body.
	This is the only choice they want you to have.
	She still is forcing her staff all have to get a COVID shot.
	She doesn't care about the medical choices or the medical safety of her staff.
	No, you want to work for her, you get the shot.
	And she also is saying that there's going to be no religious exemptions for abortions.
	In a recent interview with NBC's Hallie Jackson, she was asked what concessions would be on the table.
	Religious exemptions, for example, would that be something that you would consider?
	Why are we talking about that?
	I mean, we're not talking about a religious exemption for the woman who's having the abortion.
	This would be religious exemptions for the people who are having to pay for the abortion.
	Transpayers, Christian companies, you know, like the Little Sisters of whatever, you know, there's a Catholic group of nuns who are forced to buy abortion care on so many different levels.
	That's absurd.
	But, you know, they had to go to court to fight that.
	She doesn't want to have those kinds of religious exemptions.
	And that would include a doctor or nurse who does not want to participate in an abortion.
	You would not have that either.
	So much for your choice, right?
	So much for your choice not to opt into that.
	So doctors and staff will be forced to perform abortions, no religious freedom, but a mandate to murder and to pay for murder.
	Harris is saying out loud what the Democrat Party truly believes.
	And she says, I don't think we should be making concessions when we're talking about a fundamental freedom to make decisions about your own body.
	Well, it's not your body.
	It's somebody else.
	Again, the DNA is unique.
	50% of the time, the sex is different.
	The gender is, you know, sex and gender, same thing.
	And it's not your body.
	So, the idea that this is a fundamental right, as this writer here with American Reformer says, well, rights...
	Come with moral claims.
	The idea that this is something that is good.
	Well, bottom line is, rights, we understand, come from God.
	Privileges are granted by government.
	And so, he says, you know, when you look at this, this kind of discussion has been going back and forth for a while.
	There was a 2007 article, Harvard Law, should religious groups be exempt from civil rights laws?
	And of course, what she was anticipating was this clash between Between people who are caught up with sexual disillusions and so forth, the LGBT stuff.
	Do we have to use their pronouns, for example?
	Right?
	That type of thing.
	That kind of clash.
	And I've always said that this is not about tolerating anything.
	It's about celebrating it.
	Of course, we could see that with the redefinition of homosexual marriage.
	It's not enough that we're going to let people, you know, there was no demand to punish people who were doing this or to lock them up.
	But their demand was that we had to celebrate what they were doing.
	And you have to celebrate their pronouns now, and on and on.
	It's never about tolerance.
	These people are incredibly intolerant.
	And it's about pushing their values on other people and demanding that you fall in line to whatever they do.
	But she anticipated this for quite some time.
	And she said, we're going to have to balance these things.
	Well, there doesn't have to be a balance.
	But in the mind of the left, everybody has to do everything the same.
	And so we've got to decide what we're all going to do.
	We're all going to think alike.
	We're going to walk alike, talk alike.
	Sometimes, you know, like the Patty Duke show.
	Christopher Caldwell wrote a 2019 book, The Age of Enlightenment.
	And he said, you know, when you look at these cases like Lawrence and Obergefell, he goes, what has happened is that the Supreme Court, by going its own way, has created a de facto second constitution.
	We have the written constitution, de jure constitution, de jure or whatever.
	The de facto constitution is what they have set up.
	And he says it's essentially created two classes of citizens, two allegiances, two concepts of justice, two entirely different policy prescriptions.
	And they are not going to allow people to make their own decisions.
	Going back to the Harvard professor, she said she framed her discussion.
	She said it's a historic American conflict between freedom and equality.
	You know, the French Revolution talked about liberty and equality.
	And it's like, well, what's the difference between those?
	Well, liberty or freedom, that's the freedom of opportunity.
	And so, you know, when you're talking about that, it's the opportunity.
	When they talk about equality, they're talking about results.
	Because the French Revolution was fundamentally socialist, communist in its principles.
	And so they're talking about inequality of results.
	They're not talking about inequality of opportunity.
	These are completely different things, and people need to come to grips with the reality of all this.
	But again, when we're talking about what they call reproductive rights, we need to just start calling them sexual rights, because these people are sex workers.
	And what they are doing is a backup plan.
	It's their insurance policy.
	You know, all this stuff about, you know, get your laws off of my body.
	Well, you know, what about the pandemic?
	No, no.
	What about working for Lala?
	No, you'll have no choice about that.
	You have got to get over this idea that your body belongs to yourself, right?
	Even when they say, well, you can choose what to do with your children, but if you have children, you've got to get over the idea that they belong to you, said Melissa Harris-Perry years ago for MSNBC. And so that's what they're saying.
	You know, you have children, you don't have any choice about what you do with them.
	And so when we look at where the church is today, why we're in this muddle, because we don't have any clear foundation.
	We don't have any clear moral principles.
	Everything is up for grabs.
	Just take a look at this as we're coming up a couple of days from Halloween.
	You've got this Southern Baptist megachurch out of Florida.
	And I want you to see what they're doing here.
	They're all about entertainment.
	You know, the entire church...
	It has become a children's church.
	We used to kind of joke about the fact that children's church was not really productive.
	It's something just to occupy the kids, so they're not in your way, right?
	And, you know, they do a bunch of nonsense that's there.
	And now you've got, I guess, the people who have grown up in children's church, if they haven't walked away from the nonsense, they want children's church for adults.
	That's what this is.
	This church by the Glades, the guy's name is David Hughes that runs it.
	As this person points out in Dissenter, they said it's nothing short of a circus.
	They're just putting on a show.
	That's all it is.
	It's amateur theatrics.
	It's not about God.
	It's about them.
	It's about their performance.
	They want to be on stage.
	They want to be seen.
	They have in the past, he said, blasted secular rave music by DJ John Summit, who promotes drug use as worship.
	Yeah, the real pharmakia, the sorcery type of stuff.
	Then there was a Sunday that they went full Disney week.
	With a rendition of The Little Mermaid, another where they sang Beyoncé's Freedom in honor of Martin Luther King Jr.
	They've worshipped to the Addams Family theme.
	They've covered Lady Gaga's Shallow that was sung from the rafters in a circus-like display.
	K.C. Musgraves' What a World, and even pumped the nihilistic garbage anthem, Only Happy When It Raines.
	And so he says that Charles Spurgeon hit the nail on the head when he warned that the church would one day be full of clowns entertaining goats rather than shepherds feeding sheep.
	This pastor was actually invited to speak at the Southern Baptist Convention in 2020.
	Didn't do it because of the pandemic and the fear.
	From the Southern Baptist Convention.
	This weekend, this is why they've got mummies, zombies, and dead bodies.
	He says it's almost as though they were performing a parody of their own audience.
	Keep on running till I'm one step ahead.
	I love you so.
	That's what you say.
	That's what you say.
	Baby, baby, please don't go away.
	Don't go away.
	And I pray.
	I never say.
	To every mummy that I see here, this is what I'll say.
	Yeah, run as fast as you can in that church.
	Yeah, isn't that great? isn't that great?
	Yeah.
	You wonder why the church is not having any influence on anybody.
	Well, we have the German homeschooling family that sought asylum in the United States.
	I mean, they're having to fight all the time to stay.
	The Biden administration is trying to deport them.
	It's actually the Obama administration let them come in.
	Boy, they are after them.
	There's absolutely no limit to the number of people they want to bring in who cannot support themselves, who are not here as a family, but young, single males.
	And they will give them welfare and all the rest of the stuff.
	But you bring in one family of white Europeans, Christians especially.
	Oh, they gotta go.
	Send them back to wherever they came from.
	These people are true refugees.
	And so, this Christian family, they're right here in Tennessee.
	They're not too far from us.
	They're in eastern Tennessee.
	Christian family that fled Germany seeking freedom to homeschool their children.
	They ran, ran, ran away.
	Has permission to stay in the United States now for one more year, said their lawyer.
	The Biden administration told the family, the Ramekes, I guess, that they would soon have to return to Germany, according to the Homeschool Legal Defense Association.
	They have lived in the United States for 15 years and supported themselves.
	The family's legal status remained unchanged.
	They're under government supervision, but they're not allowed to permanently reside in the United States.
	And the Biden administration, this is one family that the Biden administration wants to send back.
	Because they're German Christian homeschoolers.
	Can't have that.
	Why can't they homeschool their children in Germany?
	Well, the country does not permit parents to homeschool their children, according to Homeschool Nonprofit.
	German parents cannot obtain the right either by citing religious or pedagogical convictions, the way they teach.
	The organization said some parents have managed to homeschool their children in Germany, but have not done so without legal difficulties, said the agency.
	The family believes that they are responsible to God for their children's education.
	According to the organization, they decided in 2006 to home-educate their children in Germany due to growing concern over the content of the German public school curriculum, particularly its anti-Christian and sexual elements.
	They went to the United States in 2008.
	And applied for asylum.
	And so, you know, we've seen stories in the past.
	I remember one family.
	The husband was German.
	The wife was from another country.
	I forget where it was.
	And they went to homeschool.
	The German government was giving them a hard time.
	So they said, all right, we're just going to leave.
	They arrested them at the airport.
	Took their children away.
	It's amazing.
	Yeah, but of course, when you look at it, Strong collectivist, you know, takes a village type of attitude like Hillary Clinton there in Germany, right?
	The whole idea of kindergarten came from Germany.
	We're going to grow the kids in a garden.
	We're going to have the government do it.
	Well, in all of this, let's take a look at what is happening with the Trump administration.
	You know, Trump says we've got to fix education.
	And so Alex Newman, who is very good on educational issues, he says...
	Mississippi schools superintendent, and this is all Republican government in Mississippi, but they put in a guy who has long experience in the public schools, and he says, if we're going to give money to private schools, to charter schools, to home schools, Control must follow any of these school choice issues.
	Private schools that accept tax funding or vouchers must follow the same standards as government schools.
	Warren Mississippi Superintendent of Education Lance Evans.
	This statement adds urgency to growing concerns over how government funding may corrupt private education homeschooling.
	Alex Newman understands.
	And see, this is a key thing.
	All the people who are apologists for Trump don't understand how he ran this by using money and financial incentives.
	And you've got to be very careful because Trump is talking about doing this with education as well.
	Many parents are very naive about this, just like MAGA isn't deniable about the lockdowns and all the rest of the stuff.
	But...
	He said Mississippi's Constitution specifically prohibits public funding for private education.
	That's good.
	You don't want to take the money, ever, because money is going to have very dangerous controls and strings attached to it.
	The new state superintendent, a longtime public educator, was very vocal in expressing the view that government control must follow tax funding.
	Quote, I do believe that if one single dollar...
	...of public money goes into a private school, then every single child in that school has to be subjected to the same assessment of every single student in public school.
	And this is a principle on which Hillsdale College has refused to accept anybody who has a government scholarship.
	Because it's that one government scholarship and they will impose all of these regulations on us.
	Evans...
	Warned that private schools, this is the school superintendent, the state superintendent, Lance Evans.
	He warned private schools taking government funds would have to follow non-discrimination policies and hiring and admissions and state testing requirements and government-issued standards like Common Core.
	They will control you.
	They will control the curriculum.
	He framed his views as being in line with those of the entire education bureaucracy.
	He said, this is not just the opinion of Lance Evans.
	That is the opinion of any superintendent that you talk to.
	Any principal, he said.
	And he was confirmed by Republicans in this Republican state.
	Meanwhile, says Alex Newman, GOP presidential contender Trump has become more vocal in promoting school choice at the federal level where the U.S. Constitution's 10th Amendment prohibits any federal role.
	What Trump should be talking about is getting the government out of education.
	Now, he does, as mentioned, as every Republican candidate has mentioned since Jimmy Carter created the Department of Education in 1980, as the election was going, Reagan said, I'm going to shut it down.
	He didn't shut it down.
	And every Republican candidate has promised to do that, but has never done that.
	And so what Trump is saying is that families would be able to use federal education dollars to pay for alternatives to traditional government schools.
	It's a trap, folks.
	It's a trap.
	On the campaign trail, Trump articulated his support for a national scheme.
	He said, we want federal education dollars to follow the student rather than propping up a bloated and radical bureaucracy in Washington, D.C. Well, if you print the money in Washington, D.C., and you send it out as block grants, that is going to promote the radical bureaucracy that is there.
	Trump has called for abolishing the Department of Education, but that's meaningless.
	If you're going to send the money out, you're going to control people with that.
	In Arizona, Democrat Governor Katie Hobbs and Democrat leaders in the legislature are pushing for government control of private schools and homeschool families, taking government money.
	The controls include testing standards, data collection, non-discrimination policies.
	This is where they put in all the gender garbage and everything in the name of protecting people from being bullied and so forth.
	All the sex garbage that's in public schools.
	That's where that's all going to be.
	And as he pointed out, in 2022, he quotes his own article, Alex Newman.
	He said, the UN... Through UNESCO, publicly called for imposing government control on quote, non-state education providers.
	Any private schools, any homeschooling, you want to put that under government control, says the UN. How did they propose to do that?
	By using public money as bait.
	The UN agency, UNESCO, suggested that all education should be brought under government oversight through vouchers.
	This is another example of how conservatives and Christians who hate this agenda want to let Trump enact another UN agenda, just as he did with the With the pandemic, he enacted a UN agenda.
	And so, where does this all lead?
	Well, we know where it all leads.
	We are going to see this bait-and-switch, and of course, it'll just be $40.
	It'll be fine.
	You know, Trump is just trying to give us money.
	It's that deep state that's now trying to take that money that Trump gave people and to use it to control us.
	Yeah, that's the way it'll be spun.
	And who knows?
	You know, he might, if he's there for four years or whatever, he might put that out there.
	Maybe it stays for four years because that's when it's really effective.
	That's when they really get the hook into you, right?
	Then they reel you in after that.
	Trump understands that.
	His voters don't.
	He understands it.
	Obama understands it.
	Both of them have talked about that in terms of, are we going to have boys in the girls' bathrooms and so forth?
	And they talked about how, well, if you don't do what I want you to do, either put the boys in the girls' bathrooms and showers, or you take the boys out of the girls' bathrooms and showers.
	So, one of them says, I will cut your funding if you don't do what I say.
	The funding is how you control it.
	So, as I was saying yesterday, there's a lot of these polls show that Christians want their pastors to get involved about current issues.
	But they also don't want them endorsing somebody, yoking themselves to somebody.
	This isn't about politics.
	Past polls show how percentages, 35% of Christians attending church at least monthly, believe that it is appropriate to endorse a political candidate during church services.
	Very low percentage.
	They want to know what the principles are in terms of issues and other things that we face, but they don't want them attached to a particular individual.
	Churches with 500 or more members in attendance were the ones that were most likely to report their pastors rarely address any issues.
	Well, they don't want to offend anybody.
	They want a big church.
	Which means that they're there to please men, not to please God.
	A megachurch, really big, but it gets big because its first thing is to entertain people and not to give offense.
	And so we have that kind of situation.
	The truth is compromise.
	So as we talk about this endorsement, this partisan endorsement, and not talking about the real issues, Charlie Kirk is calling on American pastors.
	He says, you need to preach against the Democrat Party.
	And he wants Christians to put pressure on the pastors who refuse to do this.
	What is Charlie Kirk doing?
	Well, he's out there trying to divide churches for his own petty party ambitions.
	It's absolutely amazing to look at this stuff and the hypocrisy of these people.
	This is a guy, and I've shown you the clip in the past, when he was going around and talking about the culture war.
	And he had people challenging him because he was endorsing and putting up on stage a guy who was a homosexual.
	And they said, how does this help us with the culture war?
	How does this help us with Christian values?
	Now, Charlie has gone even further into wrapping himself in God talk.
	In Jesus' talk.
	And yet what he's calling for is dividing churches over partisan stuff.
	Democrats, oh, they're satanic.
	Of course, Republicans are not satanic, are they?
	Really?
	Well, I think they are as well.
	That's why you need to talk about the principles.
	Not everybody in both of these parties is satanic, but some of them are, and some of these principles that they're putting out there are.
	That's what the people want, have talked about.
	He says, my biggest concern of this election is the faithful.
	It's the pastors who are not engaging right now with this election, says Charlie Kirk.
	He says, You can talk about the different issues, but we start making it about the party.
	Then we have a big problem.
	It is about nothing other than dividing the people.
	And I think that is one of the key things that is coming up in this election.
	I think we got, do we have Dr.
	Shiva ready?
	Okay, good.
	Okay.
	I didn't see the message there.
	So we got Dr.
	Shiva ready.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we're going to get him on.
	And a quick couple of comments.
	Andy says, this is exactly why I left the first church I attended.
	The movies was my first Sunday there.
	After I began reading the Bible, I realized there was no Jesus there.
	And Audi, Modern Retro Radio says, I can assure you, Christian music industry is just as pro-devil as pop rock and hip-hop.
	I agree.
	If you know their name, they're in the game.
	That's pretty true.
	That's true of so many things.
	That's true of politics as well.
	So we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to be right back with Dr.
	Shiva Ayyadurai.
	We're just a week away from the election, so we're going to talk to him and find out in this last week what's up with that.
	We want to find out where he's on the ballot.
	I had a listener tell me that they saw that his name is on the ballot in Iowa, so we're going to talk about that, how you can write him in, and all the other issues with that.
	that so we'll be right back .
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, welcome back, folks.
	And joining us now is Dr. Shepard.
	Shiva Ayyadurai, and he, again, we're about a week away, and I really, as I said earlier in the program, I really like what he is doing, because he is taking this thing that everybody is manic about, and he's using it to transcend this petty, partisan contest to get people to look at meaningful things that they can do in their life and other places.
	So, the website, if I'm going by memory, is it Shiva4President, the number 4 for president?
	Is that correct?
	Yeah, David, that's the site for coming to the campaign.
	Yes.
	But the other site that we invite people to get educated is shattertheswarm.com.
	Yes.
	the swarm.com, which is a site that really educates people out of few control to many.
	And then our larger movement, you know, is truth, freedom, health.com.
	Jiva for president.com is our campaign website.
	Shatter the swarm is an educational website where in 15 minutes we explain to people this entire system dynamics of power, profit, control, and that leads them to the larger global movement for truth, freedom, health.com.
	So those are the three sites.
	It's a very methodical approach that we have to educate people.
	And I like what you're doing.
	I think the best way that we can use this is to channel people into something that is above all of this.
	Let's talk just briefly.
	Since we're a week away from the election, as I said, I've got a listener who just checked their ballot in Iowa and saw that you're on the ballot there.
	Talk about where you're on the ballot.
	Talk about what it takes to write you in and, you know, which states you have qualified for being tallied in terms of a write-in.
	First of all, David, to everyone listening, in the United States, we have something called the Electoral College.
	And in every state, you have defined electors, and the number of electors vary.
	And those electors have to go get signatures to get you on the ballot, even listed, your name, or even as a write-in.
	It's very difficult to even be a write-in for a presidential campaign, so your votes are counted.
	So, in California, to be listed, we had to get like 300,000 signatures, right?
	There's no way we could have done that.
	But we did get ourselves the ability to be a write-in candidate, which in itself is quite extraordinary.
	You have to get 108 electors, David.
	Wow.
	Which we just finished, okay?
	So, in every state in the United States, except for New Mexico, Nevada, Hawaii, and Alaska...
	At minimum, people can write in Dr.
	Shiva, Dr.
	Shiva, S-H-I-V-A. By law, the Supreme Court has ruled it is the intent of the voters.
	You can write in Shiva or Dr.
	Shiva.
	There's not any other Shivas running for president.
	Right.
	But they don't have to use your last name, I do.
	No, they don't have to.
	Shiva is easy to remember.
	Yeah, Dr.
	Shiva or Shiva.
	All right.
	Right, because that is the intent of the voter.
	Every write-in vote gets kicked out of the machine, David, and it gets hand-counted.
	So that's an advantage that we have.
	Um, so that's a good thing, right?
	It gets hand counted.
	In 13 states, we actually, um, got signatures to be listed on the ballot.
	So our names are supposed to appear on the ballot.
	Among them was Washington, Iowa, Idaho, Minnesota, Massachusetts, Kentucky, um, uh, missing a few here.
	Uh, uh, I think I said Minnesota, right?
	Um, um, Tennessee, Nebraska, and a few others.
	There's about 13 of them.
	In those states, six of them took us off the ballot illegally, unconstitutionally, which are in litigation right now.
	So in those states, you can write us in.
	But in Washington State, you'll see our name.
	If you're in Massachusetts, you see our name, and you just circle in our name.
	That's easy.
	But in every state except those four states which don't allow write-ins, you can write in Dr.
	Shiva.
	So it's been a pretty extraordinary effort, David, with less than $100,000 that we created a national organization.
	We got on all of these ballots with electors, with leaders in 46 states.
	And we're listed in, at minimum, seven to eight states, you know?
	And in the other four, we're doing litigation.
	One of them is going all the way up to the United States Supreme Court.
	The other is going to the appellate courts.
	And we are challenging the entire process of ballot access, end to end.
	And we just had a major win in Tennessee.
	Even the judge split the baby in half.
	The opposition said, oh, this case should be thrown out because, you know, the election is only four days away.
	The case is moot.
	We printed the ballots.
	We argued that using a very, very important 1969 ruling, and the judge gave us that win.
	even though he dismissed it, which we're going to go up to the appellate court, he said this case is not moot because the constitutionality of ballot access can never be moot because the timelines are so short.
	This is a huge win.
	We've set a big precedent here saying that because from the time they try to throw you off the ballot illegally to the time you can file a lawsuit is only like 30 days.
	So the Supreme Court in a very important case called Ogilvy v. something else ruled that ballot access issues are never moot.
	Anderson v.
	Calibris was one of them, John Anderson, where it got adjudicated three years later.
	So we're going to continue all these lawsuits long after the election fighting for everyday people that we all have equal right access to the ballots.
	This is a big win.
	Kennedy only did one state and then he ran away.
	He pocketed his 20 million and ran away.
	Okay.
	That's amazing.
	That is very, very key, what you're doing in terms of fighting for ballot access as a principle.
	I said this with all of the back and forth about what happened in 2020.
	I said, you understand that the election is rigged from ballot access.
	And I said, if you want to have honest elections, you've got to start with ballot access.
	And then the second thing that you've got to do is have debate access.
	If somebody makes it on the ballot, they need to be on the debate.
	But, you know, then you can talk about all the rest of the stuff.
	Then you can talk about the machines and the computers and the paper ballots and how it's counted and all the rest of the stuff.
	But you've got to get it right at the very beginning with ballot access.
	And that's why what you're doing is really key.
	That ballot access fight, that's been one of the key means of controlling our election and shutting it down, keeping people then out of the debate so that no serious issues are discussed.
	Those things are key.
	Yeah, David, if you look at my credentials, which I have to promote because of all the shadow banning, right?
	And the influencers out there are all opportunists, right?
	But if you look at my credentials, educationally, you know, business-wise, creating and fighting.
	standing up for the right things at the right time, since the time I was 17 years old, It's an A++ record.
	Everyone knows in 2020, I was the first one to call out the pandemic.
	I was the first one to run the Fire Fauci campaign.
	I was the first one to give people solutions on how to boost the immune system.
	I was the first one who exposed the machines and how the machines work in bare view.
	I was the one in my federal lawsuit, I exposed the fact that the government has a backdoor portal to Twitter.
	All of these other people, Trump was promoting lockdowns.
	Kennedy is promoting lockdowns.
	Jill Stein, as I called her, was promoting lockdowns and is also a Zionist.
	And people think she's not a Zionist.
	She was the one who threw Cynthia McKinney.
	And all you Green Party people, listen very carefully.
	The Green Party is a nouveau democratic party because now you have a unit party And the establishment always has to have two heads, David.
	They have to have the obvious establishment, and then they have to have the not-so-obvious establishment.
	So real revolutionaries, real change agents like myself, don't fill off a vacuum.
	They can't have that.
	So now that everyone is aware Trump and Harris or Democrats or Republicans are one, they have to create another scam opposing force.
	It was Booby Kennedy, but we exposed the hell out of him, and he ran back to Trump.
	So now they created Joe Stein.
	And Jill Stein promotes the carbon tax scam.
	The entire Green Party is based on putting people on a new plantation.
	Yes.
	And the Democratic Party elites are the ones who are behind the Green Party.
	But it was Jill Stein who acts like she's for the Palestinian people.
	But she's the one who threw out Cynthia McKinney, who is a black woman congressperson in Congress, who, by the way, has endorsed our campaign and she said she'll be my secretary of state.
	But Cynthia McKinney is the one who exposed AIPAC and she was thrown out of Congress.
	She was the VP candidate with Jesse Ventura in the Green Party.
	When she came out and she said that perhaps 9-11 was done by Israel and Mossad, Jill Stein called her anti-Semitic and made sure she was banned from the Green Party.
	Jill Stein is a liberal Zionist.
	She just says just enough to fill in that vacuum.
	So the real discussion about Zionism doesn't take place, which is Zionism has occupied the United States of America.
	Zionism has taken over the Christian movement by equating, as though saying that if you're a Christian Zionist, that means Christian.
	I believe Jesus would have whipped all these Zionists.
	Okay?
	Christian Zionism is an oxymoron.
	It's like saying you're Christian devil.
	Christian Satanism, right?
	That's how bad it is.
	So...
	The reason I bring that up, David, we talked about ballot access.
	That's the front part of where the election fraud begins.
	The next part is, okay, you get on the ballot.
	Now they have to restrict you from getting visibility, which is the debates.
	Well, obviously the big guys are not going to keep me on, but even there's a new alternative debate organization called Free and Fair Elections.
	I fulfilled all the criteria to be on the debate stage.
	not want me on the debate stage with Joe Stein and their libertarian guy, Oliver, who is polling at 0% here in Massachusetts.
	I'm at 1-1.5%.
	It's small, but I'm higher percentage polling, independent polling, and they don't want to put me on the debate stage.
	So even these alternative polls Quote, unquote, fake anti-establishment organizations which are coming against the Uniparty are being created by the Uniparty to sucker people back so they don't build a bottoms-up movement.
	And that's what you and I have talked about, David.
	Our campaign recognizes that people need to save themselves.
	That's our slogan.
	And let me just jump in before we get into that.
	You know, when we talk about the debates, I was contacted by the people running the free and fair election debate before it happened to get it promoted.
	And I looked to see who was on it.
	Well, that's not free.
	They don't have Shiva on there.
	There's other people that were running for president that they didn't have on there either.
	And so, you know, it's like, I just, it really is a stickling point with me because I've been involved in third party politics.
	I know how difficult it is to get on the ballot.
	And then they use the ballot as a determination as to who's going to get to get into the debates.
	And, of course, they also throw in their polls.
	But then they can play all kinds of games with polls.
	And when we saw this and when I was working with the libertarians in North Carolina years ago, what they would do is they would say, well, this is a private organization.
	And that particular time, it was a North Carolina Broadcasters Association or something like that that was running.
	It was the media that was running the debate.
	And they said, so since this is not being run by the government, we can exclude whoever we want.
	Now, what did that turn into?
	We saw, well, it's corporations, and corporations can censor anybody that they want to off of social media.
	It's the same template that they then later superimposed on social media.
	Well, these are private companies.
	They can do whatever they want.
	They're private companies who are working with the government with those particular parties.
	They can outsource the censorship to private.
	They're laundering the censorship.
	That's right.
	In many ways, it's worse than it was before.
	Because at least before, we had some ability for jurisprudence to go after the government.
	That's right.
	Now, when they outsource it to private companies, we don't have that.
	That's right.
	And that's what Missouri versus Biden, we should talk about it after your break, is so critical because Missouri versus Biden was a really bad lawsuit done by a bunch of morons who purposely concealed the lawsuit win I got in Massachusetts.
	It was a conspiracy, it was a badly written lawsuit to create the conditions at the presidential level that So therefore, justifying that government can in fact censor us using laundering censorship.
	And the people who did that lawsuit acted like they were heroes, but they intentionally concealed by lawsuit.
	Amy Coney Barrett said there is no direct connection showing that government censored you.
	is that lawsuit.
	They left it out.
	It was almost like these lawyers were colluding with the establishment to take it to the Supreme Court and fail purposely, David.
	Now it has made it very, very difficult for us to prove That government is the one who censored you.
	It's a horrible lawsuit done by a bunch of morons who intentionally left out my lawsuit, which had the evidence.
	And I'm litigating that separately.
	But the bottom line is this, getting back to how the establishment works.
	They know that a bottoms-up movement is going to come.
	With leaders like me, bottoms-up.
	So they have to create fake leaders top-down.
	One of the members of the Green Party called me up and he said, do you know Jill Stein?
	We were all sitting there.
	Suddenly, seven people walk in the room and they anointed her to be the party head.
	Just anointed her.
	So, backroom is how all these people work.
	They never, ever want to have front-on, on-the-front transparent debates.
	I mean, I have more followers than Chase Oliver, like 10 times more, polling at a higher rate than him.
	And he's promoted as a libertarian head when he was promoting the mask mandates.
	He's promoting the lockdowns, all of this.
	So the establishment knows there's going to be a bottoms-up movement, David.
	Yeah, that's right.
	So they know people have figured out Trump and Harris, that people are not only waking up but getting out of bed.
	They don't want them to come to our movement.
	So they're creating these fictitious anti-establishment, aka Jill Stein, aka Libertarian Party.
	These people have sold out people, and they're like the next wave.
	They're like the next Bernie Sanders.
	The Libertarian Party lost me in 2020 when the candidate there had absolutely nothing to say.
	I mean, it was about the lockdowns and all the rest of the stuff.
	Who was that?
	That was Joe Jorgensen.
	And I knew Joe Jorgensen from 20 years earlier when she was running as VP for Harry Browne.
	I couldn't believe that they would take a powder and just not do anything when that lockdown was happening.
	That was the most insane thing I've ever seen.
	It's like, what is this about?
	You know, what are you guys doing?
	Is this so that you can get your name on TV or something?
	What game are you playing with this?
	And, you know, when we look at the Green Party, as you pointed out before, I've always called them The watermelons.
	Because they've got a thin veneer of green and inside they're all red.
	Not meaning that they're supporting MAGA, but meaning that they're Marxist.
	All their policies are communist about centralized control, about taking us into slavery.
	It is absolutely a communist agenda, but then they put that thin veneer of green on it.
	Yeah, we should talk about that, David.
	You know, I just had a discussion with a friend of mine.
	He's an electrician, works very hard.
	And we're talking about this entire notion of state capitalism versus real capitalism and socialism.
	Okay?
	It's a very, very important discussion to have.
	So, he was saying, you know, Amazon trucks on Sunday were delivering stuff to his home using UPS. Okay?
	United Postal Service.
	Okay, which is a postal service that all of us contribute to our tax dollars.
	Okay?
	So, what is...
	And then we had that discussion, so if you can keep that over here.
	And then we're talking about Starlink.
	Starlink just got $2 billion Pentagon grant to build surveillance systems for us.
	For the government.
	So...
	And then you look at something like DHL and FedEx, privatization of the Postal Service.
	I've spoken about this for many, many years, since 1997.
	It gets back to this core thing.
	The government over here has to live up to the Bill of Rights.
	And if the government censors you, if the government surveils you, you know, the wireless, the warrantless wiretapping they did under the Bush administration, we have the right to sue the government.
	But if the government brings in a private party, gives them the contract to do mail, DHL, FedEx, to do satellites, to push their goods out, Amazon, guess what?
	We as citizens cannot sue.
	They've created a buffer to the government.
	Private companies have First Amendment rights.
	And this is the fascism that's taking place.
	This is state capitalism.
	Yeah, it is fascism.
	And what they're doing is they're outsourcing the tyranny.
	So when people use the word communism to describe, if the definition of communism is the government and private companies have become one, that's what China is.
	China is all the leaders of the private companies and the government are in the party.
	So at least in China, you know they're fascists and they're state capitalism, which is the right term.
	It is nowhere near, if you read what Marx talked about, or the tenets of true socialism, and we should talk about that.
	But they conflate that on purpose.
	Now, in the United States, we actually have state capitalism, but it's presented to us as democracy.
	And the more we outsource, the more the government outsources stuff to private companies and keeps this illusion, we actually have Chinese-like state capitalism.
	But at least in China, they know they're living under fascist state capitalism.
	In the United States, people think Elon Musk is some private entrepreneur.
	No, he's a government agent.
	He's a Mossad agent.
	That's right.
	Yeah, it's a public-private partnership.
	Whenever they talk about that, what you're talking about is a merger between the government and the state.
	You're talking about crony capitalism, and you're talking about corruption, and of course the Chinese do it, and as you point out, they're open about it, but here there's this subtle secrecy where they pretend that that's not really happening.
	And if you look at every company Elon Musk has, all of them explosively grew at the behest of government.
	That's right.
	And so Twitter is like this would lock a stock barrel with government, right?
	Section 230 immunity.
	Without Section 230 immunity, Twitter would not be considered a platform.
	It would be considered a publisher.
	Their valuation drops by a factor of 10.
	So that's number one.
	So Twitter's value, why he was able to leverage Twitter to make his other wealth or use it to buy, all comes from the behest of government.
	SpaceX, $7 to $10 billion.
	Subsidies.
	He didn't create any of these rockets.
	SpaceX is essentially ex-NASA engineers, ex-government engineers, working in a private company under the illusion of privacy.
	A private company.
	But now they're building a surveillance system around the Earth.
	And then you're going to pay for it.
	So...
	And keep going on, right?
	Same with the Postal Service.
	Amazon is using the Postal Service and making billions.
	So I would argue true quote-unquote socialism.
	True socialism.
	If you wanted to talk about that, where we the working people own this infrastructure again.
	Because we paid for all this infrastructure.
	Now, the founders, when they created the Postal Service, knew there were certain infrastructure that is like air, like water.
	You know, we breathe it.
	So the Postal Service was a very interesting phenomenon, David.
	It was the bulwark to ensure the First Amendment took place.
	Yeah, the Second Amendment is important.
	But materially, the Postal Service was created to make sure that I could send you a letter, you could send me a letter, David.
	then no one would interfere if Free speech equal free reach.
	So the Postal Service, in their framework, also had their own independent police force.
	A lot of people don't know this.
	Separate from your state police, your local police, there is a postal police force.
	And that police force makes sure that postal employees, if they open a letter, 22-year sentence in prison.
	So you see, if I send you a letter and you believe it was open, we can sue the government and we can get restitution.
	Now, take that over to the world of email.
	If I send you an email on Gmail and Gmail opens it, you have no right at all.
	All of this communications infrastructure got outsourced electronically and even DHL and FedEx through this infrastructure.
	This is very, very important for people to understand.
	And I'm the only candidate who talks about this because I understand systems and I value these rights.
	And that even goes back to, you know, we talk about the FISA court and all the rest of the stuff.
	That goes back to that because from its very inception, you had the CIA and the NSA were spying on Americans.
	And so the church committee hearing looked at this and said, well, you know, this shouldn't be allowed.
	But the Supreme Court had said, well...
	If it's AT&T, this government-created monopoly, essentially, if AT&T has your information, they're a private company, and they own that information, and so they can turn that over to the government if the government wants.
	And so we see that now propagating through where Bank of America...
	If they want to turn over everybody that had a transaction in Washington, D.C. around January the 6th, they can do that because that's their data.
	And so they have established, and this goes back now for about 60, 70 years, the idea that private companies own information about you, and they can buy and sell you, and they can turn you into the government.
	The government is just a customer.
	That's right.
	So this is what's happened.
	We have created a very sophisticated form of state capitalism.
	Yeah.
	Fascism.
	Under the illusion of the Bill of Rights.
	So they've created this buffer.
	The government has created now a buffer so we can't go after them and make them accountable to the Bill of Rights, etc.
	This is what's dangerous, Dave, that's occurred.
	So When you play this out, this has become the modus operandi for everything.
	So how do we win at this?
	What is the solution?
	So what those in power have also done, they have conflated the words movements, working people's movements, with I think?
	Oh, they weaponize them.
	Yeah, they weaponize these terms.
	Even like they stole the term liberal.
	You know, there used to be people about freedom and everything.
	So the left wing takes these very important terms about workers' movements, and they take over them.
	The right wing uses them to brand it as quote-unquote communist fascism.
	And if you really play this out...
	Many of these important infrastructures that we have, like the Postal Service, should be public utilities for the public.
	Maybe you give a couple of choices.
	You can use the Postal Service, or you can use FedEx or DHL. You can use Gmail, or you can use a government version.
	Now, not the government version, but the postal version, the people's version.
	Why would that be different?
	Because if the government opened your email, you can sue them.
	You can't sue if Gmail opens your email.
	You don't have any restitution at all.
	And the infrastructure that the founders created was a decentralized infrastructure when they created the Postal Service.
	So many years ago, David, I said that we should use mesh networks to have the people's network.
	Right now, when you talked about FISA, four major telco companies own all the communications.
	When warrantless wiretapping took place, government was wiretapping US citizens without any warrants.
	And then when they got caught in class action lawsuits, the Congress retroactively immunized them.
	You see?
	They passed a bill.
	So this is the way that this is going on.
	You have private companies, government, aka Congress, and they're always protecting this government.
	Say capitalism.
	That's what we have.
	So to me, this is why it becomes preeminent we build a bottoms-up movement.
	So in my view, David, the telecommunication workers at AT&T and Verizon and all these people actually do the work.
	That infrastructure at a certain point should be seized as a property of we, the people.
	We're the ones who paid for that.
	And the working people, not nationalization, that's state capitalism, but we working people say, you know what, this is my property.
	Get rid of all these executives.
	Because when you look at the cost of telecommunications, it should be like pennies by now.
	We have made, technology has made things actually very cheap.
	When you look at food, communications, the cost should be going down.
	But because of the nature of monopoly Crony capitalism They actually create artificial Supply issues So they can keep the cost high So this is very important We can literally have quote unquote heaven on earth Today we have more than enough food We have more than enough communication We've created infinite capacity in some ways But because of the nature Of monopoly capitalism literally have quote unquote heaven on earth today.
	We have more than enough food.
	We have more than enough community.
	I mean, we've created infinite capacity in some ways, but because of the nature of monopoly capitalism, imperialism, state capitalism, fascism, they actually create artificial supply issues so they can keep the cost high.
	And this is what's important to understand.
	So my view, we must build a bottoms up movement and we, the people must take back this infrastructure, which is our infrastructure.
	We paid for Starlink.
	We paid for this infrastructure, not the corporations, This is, in many ways, it's like the air, the water.
	This is public property.
	Yeah, you can have your private versions.
	Great.
	But you better have a public version so we can hold government accountable.
	Yes.
	So this is where the libertarian philosophy sort of falls apart, because they don't forget.
	They forget that the government and the private companies have become one.
	I remember when Gary Johnson was talking about it, and it was one of these bakery cases in Colorado.
	And you got the guy who's now won multiple times at the Supreme Court, and they came in and said, well, we want you to make a custom cake for us that is antithetical to your religious beliefs.
	And presumably, if he had made that cake, they would have taken his face and stuck it.
	Because that's what they were really trying to do.
	And I remember Gary Johnson saying, well, libertarian approach is that, yeah, certainly, you know, we don't want the phone company telling people that we don't like your sexual practices or your religious beliefs or whatever, so we're going to cut off your phone service.
	And said, well, no, actually, you know, he's not, this guy's not, he's not a public monopoly that's there.
	He's not part of the infrastructure.
	There's other backwards.
	And I said, the libertarian position on this ought to be that it would be abhorrent to have the phone company listening to your phone conversations and say, I don't like what you're saying, and then cut off your service.
	I said, that's what we're looking at everywhere.
	You know, when all this was happening with him, we also had the social media stuff was rolling out and all the first cancellations were happening.
	It's like, why isn't the Libertarian Party aware of this?
	They really have lost their way in terms of focusing on the Constitution and liberty.
	Well, I remember Gary Johnson, his running mate was Bill Weld, drunken Bill Weld, who was a governor in Massachusetts, who was as elite as you can get.
	He was on Fairwater Street in Cambridge, right?
	Yeah.
	They wanted to have two ex-governors, so it was very impressive, right?
	And they really didn't care what these guys believed.
	And they were neither one of them about liberty at all.
	So, David, I think the other thing I wanted to speak to is, you know, our campaign now, if you go to our social media, you know, you'll see the infinite amount of shadow banning that's going on.
	But separate from that, we're going direct to people.
	We probably put out close to 10 to 20 million of these cards you may have seen on our website.
	I don't know if you've seen those, David.
	I don't know if I could share here, but if you go to our website, shiverforpresent.com, they're little cards.
	And the card says, Save Yourself.
	And on the back of the card, it has cost of living going up a curve and lifespan going down.
	Two inverse curves.
	And then it tells people go to shattertheswarm.com.
	So you can understand how we got here.
	That since 1970 until now, regardless of who you voted for, cost of living has gone up and lifespan is now going down.
	So the goal is to educate people that...
	The quality of our leaders, the quality of the society that we get, is a direct reflection of the decisions we make and our consciousness.
	And we have immense power to do this.
	So this is why I think these free and fair elections Pro-establishment people don't want guys like me on the debate stage.
	They do not want that because we're going to talk about this fundamental issue of breaking from all of this, giving the individual infinite...
	Power, in a sense, collectively and individually to build these bottoms-up movements.
	So if you go to our screen right now, our ads, David, are individual or our leaders talking about, hey, there's a video.
	And these are just people just making the ads.
	The guy's out there putting Blacktop down, Matt Stoneman, and he's saying, hey, this is why I'm going to vote for Dr.
	Shiva.
	Okay?
	An electrician, a plumber, a school teacher.
	Those are our multi, quote-unquote, multi-million dollar ads.
	We actually have real people, David, making our videos and putting them out there, handing out cards.
	And the future is not going to be online for true opposition forces.
	The future is offline.
	I agree.
	Because they have consolidated power.
	So whenever people ask me about Bitcoin, David, oh my god, Bitcoin's decentralized.
	No, it isn't.
	The infrastructure is all owned by four major telco companies.
	You need massive data centers.
	Yes, conceptually a blockchain makes sense, but all the in-between infrastructure was owned by them.
	I absolutely agree.
	Yeah, you're absolutely right.
	Yeah.
	And you know, it is so funny because all these other campaigns, they do produce multi-million dollar ads and they hire actors to act like they're everyday people, but you've got everyday people just doing this on their own and putting it up.
	Talk a little bit about the swarm.
	And of course you have shattertheswarm.com where people can get the full spiel about it.
	But just give people kind of an overview of why you call it the swarm rather than the deep state or something like that.
	Yeah, David, you know, what I want to really, I mean, everyone should go to shattertheswarm.com, watch it with your family.
	I'm not cursing in there.
	I'm pretty, you know, in my suit and tie, and I'm the MIT professor in that model, okay?
	So you'll enjoy it, okay?
	It's a very, very Disney G-rated version, but it's very educational.
	But the swarm, the reason I call it the swarm is it's more about the concept of it's dispersed.
	The control is dispersed.
	When you use deep state or you use the swamp, it gives the, or the Rothschilds, right?
	Or you use XYZ, right?
	Yeah.
	Or the masons.
	It gives a location, like it's a particular group only, and it's localized to some geography or some particular group.
	And therefore, it sets into people's mind.
	If we get rid of that group, it's over.
	The reality is a swarm, it comes from system science, is much more dispersed.
	They're everywhere.
	And if you ever see starlings on a twilight flying, these birds that fly, they look like they're seemingly going in different directions.
	They may even compete.
	But overall, they move together.
	They're a swarm, like a school of fish.
	You see that go together.
	So those in power are like that.
	That's a much more accurate description.
	They may have a Kamala Harris and a Trump, right?
	Acting like they're against each other.
	But overall, when it comes to the real questions of human existence, Zionism, right?
	They will come together.
	When it comes to the issues of manipulating 8 billion of us, they will come together.
	If there was a war where they're both killing each other, but they see us rising up, they'll get together and suppress us, and that happened during the Franco-Prussian War.
	The French people were rising up, the French and the Germans got together, and they went back and beat up their own people and then went back to fighting.
	So, we want to give this clarity to people that it's a multi-racial aristocracy dispersed.
	All over the world.
	And they have a control system for their survival.
	Their goal is to maximize power, profit, control.
	And we saw that in 2020.
	You know, everybody's like, you know, so who's directing all this?
	Is it Klaus Schwab?
	Is it Tedros?
	Well, they were all doing the same thing.
	You know, they're moving like a bunch of starlings.
	They were all doing exactly the same thing at the same time, you know?
	And when I look at it, the way I think about it is autonomous killer robots and how they're talking about using them in a swarm.
	That swarm technology, David.
	Yeah, that's right.
	So they have a telepathy.
	The work of E.L. Wilson talked about how, you know, ants work together.
	They look like they're doing random stuff, but they're actually communicating with 25 different chemical signals.
	The swarm has its own telepathic communication.
	They know who are their enemies, and then they have frenemies.
	Among them, okay, Trump and Harris may be local enemies.
	After, you know, January 6th, they're all together again, right?
	That's right.
	And then they go on, but during a period of time between around, you know, January, every four years to October, they play out this WWE wrestling to entertain people.
	And that entertainment model comes from the Edward Bernays School of Advertising, which is we want to do soundbites to make the average electorate consumers of information available.
	And to be entertained.
	They do not want us to be participants.
	They do not want us to jump in the arena.
	So what is our movement, David?
	We're completely changing there.
	We're saying, you've got to save yourself.
	Once you understand the swarm dynamics, the only way out of it is you.
	So, I did an interview with some guy two days ago, and he was asking me just idiotic questions.
	Oh, what do you think about Trump?
	What do you think about Kamala?
	I said, look at all the questions you're asking.
	They have nothing to do with you.
	You're not asking anything about what am I going to do.
	And so, these people overlord over us.
	And this is, so the swarm, when you go to shatter the swarm, I explain all of this.
	Just a little marker and a chalkboard so everyone can follow it, end to end, and you can rewind it and watch it.
	And then I explain that the swarm goal is to always make you think they're going to take care of things for you.
	Yes.
	Outsource your future to them.
	Outsource your truth to them.
	Outsource your freedom to them.
	Outsource your health to them.
	That you don't have to take any personal responsibility.
	Oh, Boogie Kennedy is going to make America healthy again.
	Really?
	I mean, this is a guy who said, I believe in full vaccination of all Americans.
	This is a guy who looks awful when you really look at him.
	Has no sense of anything having to do with integrity.
	He openly tells you personal integrity and public integrity are two different things.
	Hopefully he tells you that.
	He says the Palestinians are the most pampered people on the planet.
	So, to the extent he talks about saving children by not putting food coloring here, he's absolutely fine bombing them over here.
	And they have these contradictions.
	I just covered yesterday a guy that was on social media, and he was talking about how his son who died as an infant, sudden infant death syndrome from vaccines, and he said, I was really in denial about it, but you know, now I trust RFK Jr., and he's explained it to me, and I trust that I'm voting for Trump because I know he's going to put RFK Jr.
	in there, and he's going to fix it, and it's like, wow, this guy died.
	He doesn't know what happened four years ago when Trump got in, and he doesn't know what Bobby Kennedy has been doing with all this stuff.
	It's absolutely insane.
	As we not know, Boobie fucking Kennedy promoted.
	Sorry about that.
	I believe that.
	Boobie fucking Kennedy.
	I mean, I really despise these people.
	They're devils.
	Pure devils.
	promoted, promoted lockdowns in March of 2020.
	He said it would save the climate.
	So you have to go back and you have to look at what did these so-called leaders do when it mattered.
	And compare them to what I did, David, or what you did.
	People have to really give credit to us.
	And that's what our movement is trying to do.
	We're trying to put a mirror up to the average citizen and say, why don't you start respecting you?
	This is you.
	It's amazingly delusional and Orwellian that they can hold these mutual.
	They hate the vaccine, but they love the father of the vaccine and the guy who bragged about it.
	And you look at Kennedy and how he's talking about he wants to lock up people who are climate deniers.
	And then he doesn't ever really pull that back.
	Instead, he says, well, that wasn't what...
	Well, it was what he was saying.
	He tells you another lie.
	What I want to know, Shiva, is when you're going to do a shift at McDonald's.
	I mean...
	That could really turn this around for you, right?
	Yeah.
	I mean, that's the thing, David.
	They have to go to extremes.
	I mean, how much did he spend?
	He must have spent at least $2 to $3 million on the staging of that, the security, organizing that, right?
	Yeah.
	Well, I mean, or Kamala Harris, right?
	Either one of them.
	I mean, you look at my journey, David, or your journey.
	I grew up in New Jersey.
	I think I've been working since I was 12 years old.
	Some job.
	14 full-time.
	I've never stopped working.
	I work, you know, delivering donuts door to door, right?
	I work doing landscaping as a child, because my parents didn't have money.
	So I've worked all my life, but Trump has to act.
	worker that's right and then you're saying oh my god he's one of us yeah and this is a delusion that our movement is exposing we're putting a mirror up to people's face and saying why do you respect these people why do you have a low value of yourself when you get up in the morning and you take care of your family You have maybe $400 in your bank account.
	Why are you writing even $10 to these people?
	That's right.
	So our movement in many ways, David, is about people having dignity for themselves.
	Yes.
	And that's what I like.
	That's what I like about that.
	Because I look at it, and as you point out, we're outsourcing our lives to these people.
	We're putting all of our hopes on these people.
	Well, if only Trump gets in, then he'll put in RFK Jr., and then they'll fix things so that doesn't happen again like it happened to my son.
	All of these different things, and yet, you know, they won't take control of their life, and it is something that they've been trained to do.
	You know, you look at the predictive programming of movies, and I've talked about this before, how the CIA actually had a site where they said, hey, we've got great ideas for scripts.
	You know, if you're a writer, give it to—and they did.
	They had great ideas because it's the kind of stuff they're going to pull off.
	But then what happens is we've always got one individual— Who is a savior.
	And he's going to save everybody.
	That was the most predictive programming of all of these things because in every one of these nightmare scenarios that they're now trying to run on us, in every one of them, you had a one-man, a lone hero who's going to save us.
	Well, of course, that's going to have to be somebody who's really rich and powerful like Trump.
	So they fall for that.
	Or like Elon Musk, they fall for that.
	Hook, line, and sinker.
	And that's really, I think, when you look at this delusion, I like what you're doing because you're pivoting people to taking measures that they can do themselves and to empower themselves and not to make themselves dependent on these distant billionaires who don't care about it.
	I played a clip the other day of...
	Of Michael Keaton, the actor.
	And of course, he was partisan in it, you know, saying, ah, Trump, he doesn't like you and all that.
	But none of them do.
	I mean, what he was saying was essentially true if you apply it to all of them.
	So they don't care anything about you.
	They're running their own life.
	And he was right about that.
	So that's what I like about what you're doing.
	You're using this mind control that we call a presidential election.
	And you're getting people's attention and saying, now you can do things on your own.
	And I think that's really important.
	Well, David, we have five people that I've educated, and they've taken it to file their own federal lawsuits.
	Here we have a guy who does alarm systems control.
	Young kid, 27 years old.
	In Tennessee, when they took us off the ballot...
	He filed a lawsuit.
	He argued with a federal judge, and he's going to take it to the appellate court.
	A 70-plus-year-old woman, Rose C.S., who is a schoolteacher, she's doing that in New Jersey, independently.
	We have a medical doctor in Utah doing that.
	We have a pizza store owner, Frank Marshall, in Wisconsin, who's doing that.
	So Trump tried to take us off the ballot in Wisconsin.
	And Kamala Harris took us off the ballot in New Jersey.
	But these are extraordinary people who come through, they've understood, shattered the swarm.
	They've gone through training.
	They've collected signatures.
	They've mobilized people.
	And now they're learning how to file lawsuits without any lawyers, David.
	We didn't spend any money on any of this.
	That's great.
	Meanwhile, Boobie Kennedy goes and raises $22 million.
	Trump and Kamala Harris are raising, what, $15 billion?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	The amount of money we're talking about is circulating money among the swarm, among themselves.
	It's a racket.
	And this money is a wealth transfer from ordinary people who they hit with emails all day.
	But the savior mentality, David, I've talked about this from the context of Joseph Campbell's work.
	And this is where the real brainwashing goes.
	When you look at all ancient cultures, and it may even be in our deep psyche, spiritual psyche, of the hero's journey.
	Yeah.
	Right?
	Joseph Campbell identified that in all great stories that there was always this concept of a hero's journey.
	Where someone, and it's really the journey of our own soul.
	It's not someone else, but they have stolen even the hero's journey.
	But the soul goes through this maturation process where you come into this world.
	You're presented with an opportunity to do something heroic.
	Initially you don't want to do it.
	Then some great teacher comes.
	Brings you to the point of wanting to go through life's tribulations.
	You go through that process.
	You then maybe suffer.
	You don't achieve your goals.
	And then you come out of that through a resurrection process, and you do something noble for humanity.
	This is a journey.
	Now, the story of Christ is a penultimate example of that, right?
	But the goal was, each one of us was supposed to be our own heroes, in a sense, going through that journey.
	And it may be deeply in us that we're supposed to do that.
	But they even outsource that hero's journey back to them.
	So when Hollywood created the movies, we're being entertained.
	We're not doing the hero's journey ourselves.
	And so this is the deep manipulation that's taking place.
	They took Campbell's analysis.
	They took this deep, deep rooted concept in our own soul's journey.
	And they have outsourced that.
	So they're almost stealing your soul and outsourcing it, and you get to watch not you having to do the work, but others having to do the work.
	So you vicariously live through them, and they create a fake hero like Elon Musk.
	I mean, this guy is a disgusting human being.
	Or a fake hero like Boobie Kennedy, who tells you personal integrity is not...
	That you can divorce him.
	So he can have 38 relationships with philander with women, his wife hangs herself, and he can justify it.
	So this is what's going on, David.
	They're taking this very powerful Yeah.
	Exactly.
	Exactly.
	We're pretty upfront about that, where they want to go with the technocracy.
	And we got a real taste of that during the lockdown.
	No, you just stay where you are.
	And of course, you can communicate with other people if you want to through your Zoom or whatever.
	But that is it.
	They want to atomize us.
	They want to remove us from the real world, from real life.
	They will provide a reality for us, whether it's movies or whether it's games or some kind of virtual reality.
	They will provide the reality so that they can control everything that we do.
	Absolutely.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, but I think this essence, David, of you not having...
	So one is they don't want you to take care of your health.
	They don't want you to take care of your physical, mental health.
	They don't want you to get educated.
	But the deepest issues, they don't want you to go through your own journey at a spiritual level, to understand your connection with your Creator, to understand that you must go through this process.
	We're almost out of time, and I want to get some comments here for you.
	Judy Wrinkle says, I'm writing Dr.
	Shiva in on my ballot.
	I did in the New Hampshire primary as well.
	S.A. Miller123 says, I'm in Iowa.
	Dr.
	Shiva has my attention.
	I vowed not to vote, but he may just change my mind.
	Jason Barker, I would take Shiva over our two current choices.
	I can't vote this time around.
	Audi Modern Retro Radio says, finally, somebody is exposing that Elon Musk...
	Is not the self-made mogul.
	Musk is a government mascot.
	We always talk about him as the king of crony capitalism.
	About a decade ago, the LA Times called him the king of crony capitalism.
	Exactly.
	He's just like Zuckerberg.
	I agree.
	DGA, David, can you ask Dr.
	Shiva how it's legal for Trump to take money from Elon Musk After Musk has taken over $5 billion from China.
	Isn't that a threat to national security?
	And of course, that's part of the corruption that we have these political action committees where you've got one donor, right?
	Yeah.
	So that is amazing to see that.
	But to every one of your viewers listening, David, and everyone out there, understand that there is a growing group of people who are very intelligent.
	And they come from all different backgrounds, David.
	If you look at the quality of people that, and every Thursdays at 11 a.m. and 8 p.m., everyone's invited.
	It's a long day because we have people from Europe and Asia and people from the United States.
	You go to vasheva.com slash orientation.
	Sign up.
	Because it's an opportunity for you not to feel alone.
	Because what happens, David, is as people raise their consciousness, they feel there's no one else around them.
	And the consciousness raising here is to understand that there's no one coming to save us.
	That's right.
	We have to take personal responsibility.
	That's right.
	And we can move 3-5% of the people vibrating at that consciousness state, but it's over.
	It's like we don't need weapons at that point.
	That's right.
	And we saw that in the lockdown.
	Everybody thought, well, I'm the only one that realizes that this is a fraud.
	No, it wasn't.
	They worked that very hard to keep people isolated.
	So that's very important.
	And again, maybe the best site to go to is to shattertheswarm.com or via...
	Yeah, so for the campaign, go to shibaforpresident.com.
	You can get our cards, hand them out, to get a real understanding where you want to start and really solve this for yourself.
	Go to shattertheform.com.
	If you really want to solve this problem, if you want to be on the path, So you don't feel deluded and, you know, nihilistic.
	Shadow the Swarm gives you what the problem is.
	Then you've created a course, David, where people can actually get off the plantation.
	Okay?
	And then people can connect with these global communities and then really become what we call a Truth, Freedom, and Health Warrior Scholar.
	They understand the physics, and then we get people on the ground talking to their neighbors.
	That's what this is about.
	No one is coming to save us.
	Save yourself.
	Well, Dr.
	Shiva's on the ballot and all but, you can write him in, at the very least, in all but four states.
	Some of the states you'll see him on the ballot.
	And, of course, this is not going to be over with the election.
	That's not the beginning and ending of life.
	It's going to continue to go on.
	And so you can go to shivaforpresident.com, VA Shiva, or you can go to Shatter the Swarm.
	We'll put all those in the link for the interview for you.
	Thank you so much for joining us and thank you for what you do.
	Thanks very much, David.
	Best to you and your family.
	Thank you.
	Have a good one.
	Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?

▲