Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 30, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:02:30

The David Knight Show -10/30/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	it's Wednesday the 30th of October, year of our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at the smart village that is coming towards us.
	I think we need to start calling it smart villages instead of smart cities.
	After all, they're very small, and it's very much like the prisoner.
	And as we see this encircling us, we have an interesting project that is being put into Phoenix.
	And I saw that in eastern Tennessee, we're joining this massive network of surveillance that has been outsourced to a private company called Flock.
	And we're going to talk about what the Flock is happening here.
	We've got Big Brother everywhere.
	It's not just in any state.
	Tucker Carlson wants us worshipping Big Daddy as well.
	That's the difference, I guess, between the Republicans and Democrats.
	An anti-state versus Big Daddy.
	Big Daddy Don.
	Not Big Daddy Don Garlitz, the drag racer from Tampa.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, just before Halloween, just before Halloween, we have Towns setting age limits we have Towns setting age limits for trick-or-treating.
	And you know, when I saw this, I thought, we're so close to the election.
	Why don't we do the elections on October the 31st?
	It's a bit of, it is bewitching.
	It's a lot of magic smoke and mirrors.
	A lot of masquerading.
	And it's always the question with every election, is it going to be a trick or a treat?
	These politicians going door to door, handing stuff out, right?
	My son said, no, no point in doing that.
	It's always a trick with these people.
	They're always tricking us.
	Well, the other thing about this is that they don't want adults dressing in masks now.
	That's only during pandemics.
	And kids are encouraged, however, to pretend that they're whatever they want to be.
	You know, just like at school.
	You want to be a girl?
	You want to be a boy?
	I know, you know.
	And so this is the insanity that we live in.
	It's not just Halloween year-round.
	Halloween every day.
	Tricks, treats.
	And so two towns in New Jersey...
	Have set age restrictions, but it's not limited to them.
	By the way, there are no age restrictions on gender mutilations with these places either.
	You've got to be younger than a certain age in order to go trick-or-treating.
	But you can get your genitals mutilated at any age, and they can gaslight you at any age.
	And so I guess it's another difference for adults is that you have to be a certain age to vote, but not to pretend that you're another gender.
	Trick-or-treating is for kids, just like tricks, you know?
	Hey, stupid rabbit, tricks are for kids.
	Anyone over the age of 14 cannot go out trick-or-treating unless you're acting as a chaperone.
	And unfortunately, chaperones can't ask for any candy or treats.
	They have to wait until they get home to help their kids, quote-unquote, sort the candy, they say.
	And this is a quote from the website of this town in New Jersey.
	They actually said chaperones can go, but chaperones cannot touch the candy while they're out.
	Now, how are they going to enforce that?
	Well, I think your nanny government will have cops watching, don't you think?
	Certainly that's what we're going to talk about coming up here.
	The Flock cameras are everywhere.
	And the Flock cameras are not just about following cars.
	It's not just about automated license plate readers.
	The Flock cameras will create a profile of your car.
	And then identify it by the license plate.
	But it's more important that they have that profile.
	It's a private company.
	And they are very far along in a network environment.
	Of national espionage.
	And so, they brag about the fact, well, you know, once we found an 85-year-old man who had dementia, they can do all kinds of things with their flock cameras, and they put this in their national and international database.
	And so, don't eat that candy from your kids while you're out if you're a certain age or so, because, you know, that could, big brother's watching you, just like the prisoner's village.
	Maybe they will show up with guns drawn, even.
	As Trump said, it's a shame that when the cops pull you over for traffic violations to fine and harass you, it's amazing.
	These poor guys that go up to a car, they don't know what they're getting.
	Well, maybe just leave people alone.
	Most of the time they pull people over.
	It's not necessary.
	And they go up and he goes, they can't even pull their guns out on people.
	They can't approach with guns.
	And he mentioned that twice, Trump did.
	So I guess when Big Daddy Don is present, he's going to control everything from Washington.
	He's going to fix all the problems.
	And one of the problems is that the cops can't approach your car with guns drawn.
	So you better not panhandle any candy from your own children.
	Because, you know, children don't belong to you anyway.
	And neither does that candy.
	Says Melissa Harris Perry in MSNBC. So, Chesapeake, Virginia also has laws on the books limiting trick-or-treating for preteen, two preteen children.
	And they've had that there since 1970.
	But they said, well, you know, we haven't really enforced it over the last 54 years.
	Under the Chesapeake law, those who violate the age restriction law are subject to jail time.
	In 2019, however, they removed the potential jail time for violating the law.
	It's still against the law.
	They just won't send you to jail.
	I guess you get fined if you're out trick-or-treating, asking for stuff from people.
	Only politicians are allowed to do that, just like only politicians are allowed to put the road signs everywhere.
	A recent poll conducted by Farley Dickinson University asked 800 Americans if they thought there should be an age limit on trick-or-treating.
	Get ready for democracy, because if most of the people think that you shouldn't be able to do a particular activity, well, then you will not be allowed to do that activity.
	Let's put it up to a vote and see what you're allowed to do.
	Life in America.
	Around 25% of respondents said there should not be an age limit, while the remainder said that kids should stop trick-or-treating around ages 13 to 14.
	Maybe they should stop school, because, you know, by the time you get to 13 or 14, we've had this, it's long been a standard thing in many, many, many cultures, ancient cultures.
	You know, the Jewish culture has a bar mitzvah, 13 or 14, but, you know, even before then, and of course the Amish do that, you know, they get up, they go eight years to school, and then, okay, by now you know the basics of reading and writing, and now you're ready to do an apprenticeship, you're ready to get involved in the real world, you're ready to become a man or a woman, maybe there's something there.
	Isn't it interesting that people instinctively still come back to that age of 13 or 14?
	Okay, stop trick-or-treating.
	Stop being a child.
	Now you should be a man or a woman, right?
	So that was the dividing line for most of the people.
	Now the problem is that Lala and Trump are well beyond that age.
	Lala is 60.
	He's 78.
	And they're still trick-or-treating everywhere.
	As a matter of fact, they're still dressing up and pretending that they're McDonald's employees.
	I guess there's going to be a lot of people dressing up as McDonald's employees, inspired by the people that they love so much that are going to fix this country, depending on which political tribe you're in.
	Well, it takes a village, I guess, to decide whether or not we're allowed to trick-or-treat, and it takes a village to decide whether or not we have to wear a mask or whether or not we can't wear a mask.
	You must, or you're not allowed to, right?
	And so the interesting thing in this survey was the people who identified as LGBT, much more likely to say there should be no age limit on trick-or-treating because they're always dressing up in fantasy land.
	And, you know, the drag queens really do need to have that candy to keep their weight up.
	So it's always essential that they be morbidly obese as well as being a drag queen.
	So they get a pass.
	And I imagine if they're going along stealing candy from kids and bumping, grinding in front of them, that'll be just fine.
	You know, just like when they call the police about the pride marches.
	They said, I'd like to report a naked man in the street.
	I said, where is that?
	And she said, oh, that's where the pride parade is.
	Never mind.
	You know?
	I'd like to report a naked man stealing candy from kids.
	Well, he's LGBT. Yeah, okay, well, never mind.
	That's just trick-or-treat.
	And so...
	Smart cities.
	The ultimate.
	Trick or treat.
	$7 billion city within a city as planned for Phoenix.
	Plans are underway for a $7 billion development project billed as a city within a city.
	Halo Vista.
	Sounds kind of dystopian.
	Like a video game or something.
	Will surround a manufacturing complex developed by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company.
	Which is already under construction and being developed by a New York-based Mac real estate group in collaboration with McCourt Partners.
	All that is to let you know that this is for real.
	Not a conspiracy theory.
	Just a conspiracy.
	They have elected to spend $65 billion here, and that could go up to $120 billion.
	As historic as this is, this may be just the beginning.
	You know, this is something that we have seen over and over again.
	The Foxconn factories run by Taiwanese semiconductor companies.
	And, you know, in China, Taiwan, places, where they have people living in the corporate city.
	And they never get out.
	And we saw some evidence of this when we were in China 20 years ago.
	And the question is, In Phoenix, are they going to have suicide nets?
	Because they need that in these corporate factories.
	And I guess this is part of the, they see the handwriting on the wall.
	That if you want to manufacture stuff and sell stuff in the United States, you need to bring it onshore.
	Instead of offshoring things and outsourcing things, we're going to onshore them.
	We're going to insource them.
	We're going to bring them back.
	So, you want a factory?
	Got to put it in the U.S. So, if you want one of these oppressive semiconductor factories, well, you got to bring it here.
	This is techno-feudalism.
	That we're now bringing into the United States.
	And it also is part of a city within a city.
	It's not just a science park, and it's not just a manufacturing district.
	It's a community.
	It's a city within a city.
	You never have to leave.
	You don't need a car.
	You can walk everywhere that you want to go.
	You see, they're selling it as one thing.
	But if you've been paying attention to their smart city, I think we should call it the smart village agenda, you know what this is.
	8,960 residential units, as well as industrial, retail, and office spaces.
	Our vision is for the chip designers and engineering students, not just suppliers and manufacturers, to co-locate here, to create a value-added ecosystem beyond just what it takes to build chips.
	And that's how we're going to create more value in the Phoenix economy.
	And boy, they've got lots of money to shower on all of these local officials, town officials and anything, so they do whatever they want.
	You know, it just works somehow.
	I remember when we were in the video business, and we were competing against Blockbuster.
	And Blockbuster came in with lots of money like that.
	You know, I mean, they don't have as much money as this.
	They weren't spending $120 billion.
	But what they would do is they would go in, they would buy out parcels, and they would put them out in front of retailers who were in line in the retail shop.
	And basically, you know, they could take 20%, 30% of their business and put the mom and pop out of business because they had unlimited amount of money that they could raise on Wall Street.
	It's like having the Federal Reserve printing money for you.
	And so they would target one retailer at a time and build as close to them as they could.
	And then after they went out, then they would pick another retailer and do the same.
	It was very predatory.
	They never made any money, but after it was bought by Viacom, a parent company of Paramount as well, Paramount Studios, Sumner Redstone was the guy.
	Anyway, they did that.
	In the small town of Cary where we were, against one of the other small mom and pop stores.
	And they violated all of the signage regulations.
	There in Cary, they were very, very specific.
	About how big your signs could be, how bright you could be, and all the rest of the stuff.
	And they put this thing up and everybody was like, what's going on here?
	Looks like the mothership just landed.
	Which, frankly, I don't care about.
	But it's that they bent the rules for them.
	And so the newspaper got into it and said, what's going on here?
	We don't like the way this looks, you know?
	And so they asked the city and they said, well, yeah, it's clearly a violation of the code, as you pointed out.
	But we went back and we looked and there was somebody in the planning department that signed off on it.
	There's nothing we can do about it.
	Not going to enforce the rules for them.
	And so when these big companies come in with $60 billion, $120 billion, what do you think these town council people are going to do for them?
	Anything they want.
	It doesn't really matter.
	Apple has announced that it will buy semiconductors from these fabrication plants.
	The plants are anticipated to create 10,000 permanent jobs.
	Another 80,000 jobs are expected to be created in the surrounding development.
	TSMC's Phoenix Semiconductor Fabrication Campus is a tremendous economic driver with local, national, and global significance.
	And I think the significance is that of the smart village.
	If we look at what is happening in the Netherlands, for example, the Agenda 2030 15-minute cages is what they called it on Exposé News UK. How can we recognize the transformation of our cities into smart cities?
	In particular, how can we prevent it?
	Dutch activist Marce van den Berg discusses this in a recent interview.
	She said, smart cities, 15-minute cities, are sold to us as being green, as being healthy, convenient.
	It's just a city within a city.
	People should live in their own neighborhoods and be happy being in them where everything is in their own surroundings and you don't need to go out.
	They are made to be car-free zones.
	And if you need to go out of your neighborhood, then you can share a car with somebody else.
	And they even have places where you can rent cars.
	Or you can call up Tesla and have them send a robo-taxi to you if you want to go to another one of these smart cities.
	She said it's not only being planned, it's already being built in the Netherlands, implemented in small towns and municipalities all over Holland.
	In 2025, in three months...
	Amsterdam is going to be introducing zero carbon emission zones where diesel trucks and vans are not allowed to enter our cities.
	And everybody else, if they've got a car, they have to pay through the nose.
	This is something that's already being done in the UK, especially in London, and then in other towns like Oxford.
	Last year, a vehicle-free zone was trialed in Amsterdam, and for six weeks, the major road in Amsterdam was blocked by With physical barriers to stop vehicles from entering or leaving Amsterdam.
	Folks, we've got to stop these people.
	They literally are trying to put us in prisons.
	They have, long ago, decided that they don't want to build roads and they don't want to maintain roads, and now they're putting up road blocks.
	If we lose our mobility, we lose our freedom.
	It's just that simple.
	So I have Eric Peters on all the time.
	Those two things are linked together.
	Boy, these people hate it.
	I remember the CEO of, not Uber, but the other one, Lyft.
	CEO of Lyft.
	I remember covering extensively an op-ed piece that he put out where he was trained in college as an urban planner.
	These people are dangerous people.
	Really dangerous and delusional.
	And the bottom line of his piece was that cities are the greatest invention of man and cars are the worst invention.
	He got it exactly opposite.
	Cars are a great invention because they allow us to get out of the cities, but these urban planners call that urban sprawl.
	We call it survival.
	We call it room to breathe.
	Why is it that the suburbs became so popular?
	Places like New York City where everybody was packed into the city.
	I have Levittown, all these other developments that came out.
	People went for that immediately.
	Just a little bit more space.
	And I'm willing to drive.
	And I have the freedom to drive.
	And I can drive.
	And so you would have shops and things organically come up.
	But no, these people are going to deliberately block us into a prisoner-like village.
	She said a lot of people got really annoyed, but also really alarmed because ambulances were not able to pass through.
	And a lot of accidents happened, she said.
	The municipality of Amsterdam had to concede that their pilot project using physical barriers to make Amsterdam more green.
	So I'll say the climate MacGuffin has been at the center of this depopulation and enslavement and techno-feudalism all my life, pretty much.
	So, instead, the municipality decided to introduce intelligent entrance into Amsterdam.
	Cameras everywhere.
	Cameras.
	Intelligent entrance means installing license plate recognition cameras.
	Maybe they can get it from Flock.
	I hear they got a special for police departments.
	Special offer today.
	The federal government will give you a grant to pay for all this, and you know you want it because all the other police departments have it.
	I mean, you know, you're not a real police department if you don't have a FLOC system.
	On the 1st of January, 2025, coming up, just a couple of months, three months, 14 municipalities in Holland will introduce the zero carbon emission zones and people will get fined if they enter these zones with a diesel truck.
	And again, SEDAC Khan has been doing this for quite some time, part of the C40 agenda.
	But Bloomberg and now many other cities, it started out with just a couple of cities, New York and London.
	They renamed it when they got to C40.
	Now they've got over 100 large cities worldwide onto this globalist agenda.
	The same thing is going on in Germany with the cities.
	They're also introducing zero-emission zones, and they're doing the same thing in Belgium and France and Portugal and Spain.
	The financing is coming from the EU for all of these programs.
	They call it Horizon 2020 and the Green Deal.
	All the EU governments signed the Green Deal, so they are all applying for These policies.
	Now, just as we saw with the pandemic lockdown, Trump is in lockstep with that.
	Is this something that's being talked about?
	No.
	No, of course not.
	Just like what happened in 2020.
	It's not going to be talked about.
	Why?
	Because the Democrats and the Republicans are both in on it.
	Because Trump and Lala and Biden are all in on it.
	You see, the elephant in the room for the GOP is the vaccine.
	And the lockdowns.
	And the ventilators.
	And the remdesivir.
	And the masks.
	And the Fauci.
	And all the rest of this stuff.
	That's the elephant in the room that the GOP doesn't want to talk about.
	And neither do their cult.
	I'm at it with this MAGA mob.
	They can go jump off a cliff like the rest of the lemmings.
	And I know that was set up by Disney, but it's a great metaphor for MAGA people.
	As in Amsterdam...
	Oxford in the UK also previously piloted physical barriers to create a low-traffic neighborhood.
	London's Mayor Sadiq Khan has for years been attempting to implement his version of low-traffic networks that he calls ultra-low emission zones.
	That has also been met with resistance.
	The Isle of Man is planning to install automated license plate readers at its entry and exit points.
	At the same time that municipalities or local governments are installing cameras in Holland, they're removing parking spaces, she said.
	It is already difficult to find parking spaces, but by the end of 2025, 10,000 parking places will be removed, and new parking permits will no longer be issued.
	They don't build roads, they don't repair roads.
	As a matter of fact, instead of repairing the potholes, they build bumps.
	They call that road calming.
	Instead of building or widening the roads, maybe they can't widen the roads, but of course, every time you saw a science fiction projection of the future cities, they always had the cars vertically.
	If the city is going to grow vertically, the roads have to grow vertically.
	Or they can just lock us in, right?
	I mean, even Elon Musk got that right.
	He started talking about going down and boring holes.
	But you always see it as either elevated roadways or it's easier for them to do special effects than just having mini strata of flying cars, right?
	But everybody knows that if you build the buildings up, you're going to have to build your infrastructure up.
	Or you wind up with congestion that nobody can move.
	And I don't think that it's stupidity.
	I don't think it's corruption.
	I think that it's deliberate.
	It's a plan.
	And we can see it happening everywhere.
	And just because you're not in a city, just because you're not, you know, building, you know, 10,000 units and all this other kind of stuff, city within a city, don't think that isn't coming to you.
	It is all over.
	The surveillance network, a flock, is all over eastern Tennessee.
	Everywhere.
	Everywhere.
	All these small rural towns are getting it.
	And the government is paying for it, right?
	It's the usual model.
	You know, we want to help you with education.
	So we'll give you money, and then you put in Common Core, and then eventually, before you know it, they got drag queens dancing in front of your kids, right?
	This way it always works.
	Got boys in the girls' showers.
	Oh, we got trouble right here in River City.
	But we do have trouble.
	This is much worse than re-buckling your knickerbockers below the knee.
	The Dutch government is also building transformer houses.
	There are going to be 50,000 transformer houses.
	People don't like it.
	The electricity transformers are noisy.
	They emit electromagnetic fields because everything's going to be electrified.
	That's the other part of it.
	For control, of course, right?
	Electrifying everything allows them to have centralized control over energy, not just your movement.
	And, of course, the electric fields that are coming off of these big transformer houses are really nothing compared to the 5G and the 6G that's coming.
	Previously, all homes were powered by gas, and the Netherlands was significantly impacted by the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline.
	Would that be deliberate?
	Would that be part of the global agenda that Biden kicked in for them?
	You know, when you look at the immediate stuff, as bad as it was, you know, acts of war, wanton destruction, blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline that Biden did, the sanctions and all the rest of the stuff, which the sanctions then kicked off the death of the dollar as a reserve currency.
	But when he blew up these pipelines...
	What he's doing was blowing up Germany, the Netherlands, so dependent on gas.
	And he's trying to blow that up.
	So they have to have very expensive, very unreliable electricity.
	So even if they allow you to have it, you may not be able to afford it, even if it works.
	In Germany, we had big gas fields in the north of Holland, she said, and they said they were going to close them.
	And they have been closed, even though the pipeline had been blown up and caused a crisis in Germany and in Holland.
	They said, well, now we're going to not only, you know, after Biden blows up the Nord Stream pipelines, now we're also going to shut down our own pipelines.
	Sounds like a conspiracy, doesn't it?
	Yeah, because it is.
	Why would they do this when the gas supply was so obviously disrupted?
	Well, they want to make this transition, this energy transition toward electricity.
	Because Holland is a relatively small land area, the wind turbines, the large solar farms are all close to people's homes.
	All over Holland, data centers are being built, and they need lots of electricity.
	And so there's a mega data center for Google in the north of Holland.
	Google bought land to build their data center.
	There will be unlimited electricity for these people that the government is outsourcing the tyranny to.
	And that's what it is.
	They are outsourcing the Big Brother state.
	They're outsourcing the censorship.
	They're outsourcing the surveillance.
	They're outsourcing the AI propaganda to these people.
	The surveillance, propaganda, censorship, the SPC. It's about wrecking the economy, she said.
	That's what Agenda 2030 is about.
	It's about wrecking our economy because these transitions, like the digital transition, the energy transition, the smart cities, are not working out.
	It's meant to wreck us as part of the Agenda 2030, the great reset, the great taking.
	There's also a significant citizen movement to use cash, she said.
	We're telling everybody, don't buy your food and drink at a supermarket, only pay cash, and if you can't pay cash, leave.
	She said, say to the people, please, cash is a valuable way of paying, and you should allow it, or we won't come back.
	And I gotta tell you, small merchants would rather have that as well, because it's significant expense to them to go through Visa and MasterCard.
	It's really working out, she said, because a lot of places are letting people pay with cash more and more.
	She also recommends that people read Jacob Nordengard's book, Rockefeller, Controlling the Game, and another book that has been translated into English by somebody whose name I won't even attempt to pronounce.
	But the book is called Pandemic of Fear, A Step Toward a Totalitarian Society, and that's what it was.
	It was a pandemic of fear.
	And the only science was behavioral science.
	Well, as we go through this depopulation stuff, there's a Japanese village where they have so few people.
	They only got 60 villagers still living there.
	They're all elderly retired.
	They live in Ichinono.
	That's what we used to tell our kids.
	Itchy, no, no, no, no, no scratch that in public.
	Even if it itches.
	So, it is really kind of creepy Twilight Zone stuff because they feel lonely and these elderly people, again, only 60 of them living in this village, they're putting out puppets, puppets to take the place of the children that have gone.
	Look at this.
	I mean, is this like the Twilight Zone or something?
	This is the future they want for us.
	Fewer than 60 people live in the southern village of Ichinono, and most of them pass the retirement age as younger people have moved away for jobs or education.
	In an effort to heal the feelings of loneliness, the villagers have used old clothes, fabrics, and mannequins to stitch together a new population of puppets.
	You know, we do strange things rather than face reality, don't we?
	A mannequin girl wearing a beanie that can be seen waving gently on a wooden swing while her friend, a boy with a big smile, stands on a scooter ready to go.
	Another puppet girl in a red helmet is seen sitting on a bike nearby.
	So they continue.
	All these different pictures.
	Meanwhile, under leafless trees, two adult females and a mannequin of a girl put logs in a cart.
	Isn't that nice?
	We're probably outnumbered by puppets, said an 88-year-old widow who was there.
	Now, there are, however, some younger residents, a couple of them, 33 and 31-year-old, moved to that village from the city of Osaka during the lockdown because they had a flexible work schedule and they could work from home.
	They had a two-year-old son who That was the first baby born in 20 years.
	An itchy no-no.
	And his father said, just by being born here, our son benefits from the love, the support, and the hope of so many people, even though he has achieved absolutely nothing in his life yet.
	At two years old.
	Japan has the highest percentage of people aged 65 and over in the world.
	And the birth rate is incredibly low.
	They had a record low of 730 newborns in the entire nation of Japan.
	And an all-time high of 1.5 million deaths.
	More than 2.5 times as many deaths as births in that country.
	Japan is literally dying.
	So, when we come back, we've got a little bit more to talk about with surveillance.
	And we are also going to get into politics.
	And we have an interview that we recorded yesterday afternoon with G. Edward Griffin.
	And I think you're going to find it very, very interesting.
	We talked, of course, about the creature from Jekyll Island.
	But we talked about his background, which I thought was very interesting.
	He's had a very long and interesting life.
	And I especially wanted to get him on because I wanted to talk about his involvement in the book that he wrote called A World Without Cancer.
	His involvement in getting people laetrile, B17, amygdalin.
	Where did that come from?
	How did that come from?
	He was at the very epicenter of that back in the 1970s, and he wrote that book.
	And so that is, I think it's going to be a very interesting interview for you to see.
	I really was interested in what he had to say.
	We're going to take a quick break, but before we do, Marky Mark in New Jersey, thank you for the tip.
	He says, end the death tax.
	Urban sprawl goes away.
	Many children sell the family farm to developers when they can't pay the death taxes upon their parents' death.
	That's a big part of it.
	Absolutely is.
	Big part of small businesses as well.
	And that estate tax forces a liquidation.
	It's a horrible thing, quite frankly.
	A really horrible thing.
	And it's a kind of double taxation.
	But it especially hits the farmers, because they have now, they're continually going up on the valuation of the homes, and so they say, well, now this is what it's worth, and you're going to have to pay a percentage of that in taxes.
	One of the things you can do, just tell people, is you can set up a trust.
	If you put that farm in a trust and you make the children a trustee, that postpones it, kicks the can down the road quite a bit.
	We'll be right back.
	The Common Man.
	The Common Man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Well, I'm going to be here. I'm going to be here.
	a California couple is dropped by their home insurer over a satellite picture.
	This was sent to me by Sam.
	He said, the surveillance society and economy is growing by leaps and bounds, and this is only the beginning.
	And it truly is amazing.
	The company, the insurance company, Liberty Mutual, sent them a letter and said that the satellite photo shows moss on your roof.
	So what?
	But so they're going to completely drop their insurance because of that?
	And it wasn't moss.
	It was solar panels.
	Either that or they were growing moss in really sharp rectangular patterns, you know.
	The reason given was the condition of the property, they said.
	And they had to dig further to find out, well, what are you talking about?
	They claim that the roof had algae, mildew, mold, and or moss that negatively impacts its structural integrity.
	Well, how do you know?
	From a satellite picture?
	Liberty Mutual provided a satellite photo and their message to the Coleman's, the family there, and the couple was shocked to learn that the insurer of their 20 years appeared to confuse moss with solar panels on the roof.
	She said the three rectangular black spots on the roof were, in fact, solar panels.
	You know, we had experience with Liberty Mutual.
	We had...
	This was about 35 years ago.
	And we went up to Vermont, and it was snowing.
	We had an SUV, so we were able to get around okay.
	But, you know, we were parking a lot of this ski resort, and we weren't skiing.
	We were just looking around.
	You know, the kids were very young.
	And so we have the SUV, and everybody parks in weird ways and stuff.
	And so we, you know...
	A lot of snow and other things.
	And so that helped to obscure some of my visibility.
	And they were also parked in a weird way and very low car.
	And so I backed up and I hit their, because it was very low, I hit their light.
	It's like a Honda.
	It wasn't a new Honda.
	And broke the headlight on it.
	And so I was like, oh, great.
	So we spent about a half hour going through the resort trying to find who owned that car so we could pay for the headlight.
	And got that taken care of.
	And then when we got home, we got a bill.
	And it was like, I said, no, just pay.
	Just send me the bill.
	And we got home and it was $2,500.
	It's like, what are you talking about?
	I didn't take the whole front.
	A light was cracked.
	And that was it.
	It was cracked.
	It wasn't even shattered.
	And so I said, all right, that's fine.
	I'll just submit an insurance claim.
	I submitted an insurance claim to my insurer, Liberty Mutual.
	And they canceled my insurance and they put me in a high-risk pool.
	So, just so that you know, Liberty Mutual.
	There's my payback.
	After 35 years, I'm able to tell everybody the story of what they did to us.
	And it cost us so much money.
	It's amazing.
	But they said, we've been customers of Liberty Mutual for 20 years.
	This is a really bad way to be treated.
	I'm surprised that it lasted that long.
	Those relationships there.
	Liberty Mutual told CBS it doesn't talk about details of individual underwriting decisions.
	I feel they made a decision...
	Just to reduce their portfolio and offload our property as they were doing with thousands of other people in the state of California, she said.
	Or he said, the husband did.
	The Coleman's have since found another insurance company to cover them, but at a much higher cost.
	That's right.
	That's what Liberty Mutual does.
	The Coleman's said they hired a roofer to prove that their roof was sound, and yet Liberty Mutual still refused to reverse its decision.
	Yeah, the corporate partnership they have.
	Incredibly intimate details are being revealed of people.
	This is in Norfolk, Virginia.
	The 170 cameras that are being used for warrantless surveillance of the population.
	Now, these are the flock cameras that I was talking about.
	But this particular one is talking about Norfolk, Virginia.
	And there's a lot of articles that are suddenly popping up about this.
	And like I said, we saw this in our local area in East Tennessee.
	And Knoxville, a town called Morristown, another town called Jefferson City.
	They're putting these things up everywhere.
	And so in Norfolk, Virginia, they got a network of 170 cameras to do warrantless surveillance.
	But of course, just as I was talking about yesterday, Dr.
	Shiva, they outsource this stuff.
	Well, we're not the ones censoring you on social media.
	It's Twitter and Facebook who's doing it because we tell them to, right?
	So it's the government.
	We're not the ones who are surveilling you.
	No, it's the flock system.
	They just are turning it over to the police and anybody else that wants it.
	And creating a national and an international network of surveillance.
	The Institute for Justice...
	has a case charging that these actions violate the Fourth Amendment rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.
	The system allows the police to monitor the comings and the goings of all drivers in the city.
	The plaintiff said, I don't like the government following my every movement and treating me like a criminal suspect when they have no reason to believe that I've done anything wrong.
	Another person who's part of the lawsuit said, Which capture an image only when they sense speeding or somebody running a red light.
	Flock cameras capture images.
	Those are bad enough and banned in a lot of other areas.
	You can get the flock cameras banned in your area.
	And you should.
	For the same reason that a lot of places have banned speed cameras and red light cameras.
	It's predatory.
	It really is.
	So, flock cameras capture images of every car driving by, and it retains it for at least 30 days.
	AI then uses those images to create a vehicle fingerprint that enables any flock subscriber, any flock subscriber, not just the government, to both track where that vehicle has gone and identify what other vehicles have been seen nearby.
	As a matter of fact, they have another increase on it they call Raven.
	And Raven can identify a group of guys.
	They call it a convoy, right?
	And so that also, they use that to create a fingerprint.
	Norfolk has created a dragnet that allows the government to monitor everyone's day-to-day movements without a warrant or without probable cause.
	This type of mass surveillance is a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment.
	See, the problem is going to be that the government has outsourced its tyranny.
	And they're going to say, well, it's corporations.
	Corporations can do whatever they want.
	And if the corporation's got the data, the corporation can give the data to the police department, the FBI, anybody that they want, or to private individuals if they pay for it.
	And that legal precedent, which I think is outrageous and a lie, It goes back to the middle of the 20th century, where they were letting phone companies do PIN numbers and give a list to the government who's calling you and who you're calling.
	And of course, it goes back even before that.
	The Postal Service has always been a big part of that.
	They can do a mail cover on you.
	And as a matter of fact, when we moved, I was surprised That when we moved, and since we moved, they've continued to do it.
	I didn't ask them to do it, but they started sending me.
	I gave them my email address.
	I thought, well, maybe that'll help if there's any questions with stuff being forwarded.
	But they kept sending me pictures of every piece of mail that's coming.
	They take it and they send it to me.
	Well, they've been doing that for a long time with the government.
	A mail cover.
	And, you know, they're not allowed to open up the mail and read it, but they can look at everything on the outside and...
	Send that to the government.
	And just like, you know, like William Benny said when I talked to him, he said, oh, you know, when you have, what was the guy's name?
	Michael Hayden.
	What a snake that guy is.
	Michael Hayden says, we're not reading your emails, and we're not listening, and we're not reading your texts, and we're not listening to your phone conversations.
	We're just getting the metadata.
	And of course, with the metadata, they can construct all that stuff.
	And William Binney said, the metadata is far more damaging because the metadata is far more, they can do more in terms of processing it.
	Now that they go to AI and they have these massive data centers that use more electricity than a city does, well, they will start listening to your messages and reading your emails and all the rest of this stuff.
	But just the metadata, whether you're talking about computers and social media or you're talking about what's on the cover of the envelope, all the rest of this stuff, the government has been manic to try to get intelligence about it.
	As I said the other day, that's my opinion, why they did the income tax rather than a sales tax, a national sales tax, or a VAT where they could get a lot more money with a lot less friction with people.
	Don't have to report all this stuff.
	But those processes are anonymous.
	And the whole point of the IRS is to get information about you.
	That's why they're getting 80,000 more agents and spending $80 billion more to load it up with artificial intelligence.
	So this is the Institute for Justice, which is conservative.
	But you know, the ACLU is also against the FLOT cameras.
	And they have also put out a thing talking about how...
	So the Institute for Justice is suing in Norfolk.
	I don't think they're going to win this, unfortunately, because of where the courts are.
	And I think the courts are dead wrong on this stuff, but that's where they are.
	It's going to be federal grant money to pay for it.
	But then we say, well, you know, it's not Trump.
	It's the bad Democrat police, right?
	That's what you're going to hear from the MAGA people.
	It's not Trump sending them the money to create this massive surveillance network, right?
	Just like in 2020.
	That'll be what's happening in the future.
	When you complain about it, it's not Trump.
	Shut up.
	You're bad.
	I'm going to wish you into a cornfield.
	So this is the way they're going to run this out.
	Now, ACLU is not happy because they said, well, you know, this could be used to see if somebody's going to an abortion clinic.
	It's like, yeah, right.
	Or if it's an illegal immigrant or something, that's their concern.
	And they said, well, we got some talking points.
	You can send a letter to somebody or you can send them this article.
	Well, you got to say, if you live in Tennessee, don't send your representative an ACLU article and tell them to do something.
	That's going to be counterproductive because they are so partisan.
	But both people on the left and people on the right, and occasionally the ACLU does get something right, they're right to be concerned about this, even if they're concerned about it for the wrong reasons.
	Because of nonsense reasons, because we know where this leads.
	We know that this leads to total surveillance.
	We know that it leads to a police state, an Orwellian state, a prisoner village.
	That's where this all leads.
	And so their suggestion was to start to try to get people at the local level, again, it's all local, that's where these changes are going to have to happen, try to get people, if you can't stop it, At least try to get restrictions on it.
	So they can't keep the data for more than 30...
	They can't keep it for their 30 days or more.
	In New Hampshire, they have looked at this in one jurisdiction.
	They say, you've got to delete all this data within three hours.
	Now, we have a listener who has also...
	I did not know about this, so thank you for letting me know.
	This is somebody who knows about Flock.
	This is Coelimos...
	It says, check out the Flock opt-out policy.
	He said, Flock safety customers can opt out of being recorded by Flock cameras by registering their license plate with the safe list feature.
	You register your license plate number with the Flock safety system and opt to be excluded from captured footage.
	Once registered, your vehicle's footage will be marked as resident in the Flock safety database.
	This allows police to easily separate residents from non-residents when reviewing footage.
	So they must know you, LOL, and have identified you.
	That is another thing that you can do.
	So if you can get people together, maybe you can get some local city councilmen who are not going to be bribed or bamboozled into allowing these things to be set up.
	Always the police are pushing this stuff.
	And the federal government is funding it.
	So you can push back against this.
	I mean, think back about a decade ago, I think it was about 2013 or something, when Obama was pushing out all of these MRAPs and putting them in small areas.
	And people were saying, why are you doing this for?
	And, of course, as time went on, we saw these armored vehicles, they were not actually turning over ownership of them to the local police departments.
	What they were doing was turning over maintenance of them.
	They wanted to get rid of these things as far as maintenance goes.
	They wanted to have them distributed throughout the country, but they still wanted to retain ownership.
	The federal government wanted to retain ownership.
	They'd just send them out there and say, okay, now you do the maintenance.
	And one of the reasons why the federal government wanted to get rid of them was because the maintenance was so expensive.
	That's kind of like giving somebody a white elephant.
	That was where the expression came from in India.
	If the Raj wanted to punish you, He would give you a sacred white elephant, which you could not get rid of, and you could not kill, but you were required to feed it for the rest of your life.
	And that's what they were doing with these MRAPs.
	They were requiring people to maintain them for the rest of their life, just in case the federal government decided that they wanted to declare martial law and have these things already prepositioned and maintained for them.
	But a lot of communities, including some sheriffs, said, I'm not doing this.
	And they got rid of it after they had it there for a while.
	And so that's one thing we can do.
	Second thing is you get yourself out of the database like I just described.
	The other thing you can do is you can push for legislation at the local or the state level to say that you cannot retain this information for more than a couple of hours even.
	Why three hours even?
	Just say you can't retain it for more than three minutes.
	So it's a very dangerous system.
	Flock pulls its data into a centralized database.
	Police across the entire country can access over 1 billion monthly data points.
	Following someone's every move can tell you some incredibly intimate details about them, such as where they work, Who they associate with, whether or not they're religious and what religion, what hobbies they have, any medical conditions they may have.
	You see, this is why I said, and I've been talking about this since the 1990s, the geospatial intelligence is the fastest growing part of the intelligence community.
	That's where James Clapper Grew up in a career aspect.
	And geospatial intelligence allows them, just like a metadata on social media, allows them to make all these types of inferences about you.
	And they can actually, by collecting all this geospatial intelligence, they can also do the other kind of AI, which is anticipatory intelligence.
	They can anticipate where you're going to be, what you're going to be doing, because everybody's got a routine.
	And once you combine anticipatory intelligence with artificial intelligence, it's very, very dangerous.
	And this gives these people power that no tyrants have ever had before, and that's the way it needs to be opposed.
	I need to say that.
	We should not be giving our governments the kind of power that tyrants have never had before and always dreamed of having.
	We've got to stop that.
	That will not be on the ballot, by the way.
	You're going to have to put it on the ballot yourself.
	It's going to have to be local or state.
	It's not going to be the federal government.
	It's going to be continuing to pay people to do this.
	Abuse has already been documented.
	In Kansas, officials were caught using Flock to stalk their exes, including one police chief who used Flock 228 times over four months to track his ex-girlfriend and her new boyfriend's vehicles.
	In California, several police departments violated California law by sharing data from their license plate reader database and other departments across the country.
	And, as is the case with other databases, they can be susceptible to hacking.
	Hacking.
	But folks, where this is really headed, it's not some police chief who wants to track his ex-girlfriend.
	It's the kind of deranged control freaks that want to shut down all dissent and punish people who speak out against their lies and their propaganda and their narrative and don't toe the line.
	It's that kind of social credit punishment, that kind of social media punishment that we have seen.
	The kind of stuff that we see both Lala and Trump bragging about.
	They're going to censor and shut down their enemies.
	That's what we need to be concerned about.
	So we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	There are some people who talk and some people who don't.
	Which means that there are some people who leave this place And some who do not leave.
	You are obviously staying.
	Has it ever occurred to you that you're just as much a prisoner as I am?
	Oh, my dear chap, of course.
	I know too much.
	We're both lifers.
	I am definitely an optimist.
	That's why it doesn't matter who number one is.
	It doesn't matter which side runs the village.
	It's run by one side or the other.
	Oh, certainly.
	But both sides are becoming identical to what, in fact, has been created.
	An international community.
	A perfect blueprint for world order.
	When the sides facing each other suddenly realise that they're looking into a mirror, they will see that this is the pattern for the future.
	The whole Earth has the village.
	That is my hope.
	What's yours?
	I'd like to be the first man on the moon.
	laughter
	laughter
	Guard Goldsmith anticipated that.
	Another big prisoner fan.
	He says, I was watching an interesting clip of Patrick McGowan's daughter discussing the origins of the prisoner.
	He definitely put big pro-liberty and pro-Christian thought into the series.
	Yes, as a matter of fact, because he'd had Secret Agent Man, which was actually, in the UK, it was Danger Man.
	Very popular.
	And then they brought it to the US, Secret Agent, and they had the Johnny Rivers theme song that was very popular.
	And it got really big, and so he was their first choice for James Bond, but he, because of his Christian...
	He refused to do the character.
	He says, no, it's too sexual.
	You know, sexual overtones and things like that.
	So it's not appropriate for me.
	Turned it down.
	Man of principle.
	I love Ice Station Zebra.
	That's another one of mine.
	And the Scarecrow of Rodney Marsh.
	That's a Disney series that was done.
	It was interesting...
	We just went back and watched two of those three episodes.
	It was something that was on Disney's Wonderful World of Color.
	When Walt Disney was running it, he would do things that were about history.
	And I was going to pull out a clip of the press gang, which is in the very first one.
	You know, they're going to go around and kidnap people, you know, bludgeon them senseless and put them on a ship and make them the crew.
	That's what the British were doing all the time, a press gang.
	And that was part of the very first one.
	And I was going to put that in because in Ukraine, The goons there in Ukraine are doing essentially the same thing, except they're going to nightclubs instead of to churches.
	In the story that Disney had there, everybody in town was going to church on that Sunday morning, so that's where the press gang went to get the people, and they were warned in advance, and all the men ran out and went hiding.
	Now in Ukraine, they're going around to nightclubs to kidnap people and press them into service into this war that they have.
	Before we proceed, I just want to thank some of the people who have contributed to us on Cash App and on Zelle.
	I want to thank Randy on Cash App.
	Randy, Bobby, Jesse H., Brenda H., Timothy D., Jeffrey W., Down Home, David, Amy B., and George W. Thank you all so much for supporting this show.
	It is your support that keeps us going.
	And that is what our budget is.
	And on Zell, I want to thank Jeremy S., Michael P., Alexander W., Gretchen C., Lois I., J.H., Susan L., William W., Raymond G., Joseph R., Mitchell M., Ronald H., and Julie W., who is new.
	I've not seen a contribution before.
	So thank you so much, all of you, for your support.
	That is what, as I said, keeps us going, and I appreciate the kind and generous support that we get from all of you.
	Let's talk a little bit about politics, because, as I said, we got an interview with G. Edward Griffin, and it's a little bit longer than the usual interview, so we have to get to that before too much longer.
	But I got this yesterday, and I mentioned it a little bit with Dr. Shiva when he was on.
	This is from Eric.
	He said, I just checked my ballot in eastern Iowa, found that Dr. Shiva is on the ballot.
	And I just want to remind you that, as I asked him about that when Dr. Shiva...
	Shiva was on, there's only four states that don't allow a write-in candidate.
	So what he said was in 46 states, he's either on the ballot or you can write him in and he will be counted.
	And all you have to write in is Shiva.
	And they will count that.
	It gets kicked out of the system, and they manually count it.
	So there you go.
	There's something else.
	You can get a manual count of your vote just by writing in Dr.
	Hsu.
	And I thought it was interesting, as he pointed out...
	He didn't collect tens of millions of dollars like Bobby Kennedy and then drop out.
	He had a lot of grassroots help to help him get on in all these different states.
	And just like here in Tennessee, you got working people.
	As he gets kicked off, they pick it up and they do something about it.
	That's the key thing about this campaign.
	It's to get people to realize...
	That we have the ability to change our society.
	We don't have to passively sit here and watch what is happening in Washington.
	That's his theme.
	Save yourself.
	Do something about it.
	Don't just sit here and say, well, this is the most important thing of our lifetime, election, and if our guy doesn't win, everything is lost.
	Or girl, or whatever, right?
	That's what we see on both sides of this issue.
	And Eric also said...
	And I remember when you were at Infowars, you played the clip where Trump said he saved millions of lives, and he turned to the camera and said, I nearly fell out of my chair when I heard that.
	And I did.
	It was absolutely amazing.
	But you know what's even more amazing?
	It's how people make excuses for that now.
	This is from For Love of the Road, and...
	And I really do appreciate, Ryan, thank you so much for putting up the show on Telegram.
	And something that we just haven't been able to get it together, to put it up there.
	And he's done that.
	And even to the extent that he says, I got a comment there.
	And he couldn't answer it.
	So he forwarded on to us.
	He said, I got a comment about ranked choice voting.
	In the Telegram chat tonight, I can't remember the last time you talked about it, how long it's been.
	I tried searching the Telegram channel, but that feature isn't currently working.
	I looked up Prop 7 that this guy was asking about, and I don't understand why in Missouri they combined preventing illegals from voting with banning ranked choice voting altogether in a single amendment.
	Well, let me tell you why.
	The Republican Party and the Democrat Party.
	But, of course, this is being put together in the Republican area.
	And so whichever party is in power wants a two-party system.
	They don't want to have any other choices there.
	If you have a ranked choice voting system, that means that if there's independent or third-party candidates out there, what you do is you take all the different candidates and you put a ranking there.
	So, you know, you don't have to vote for the lesser of two evils, necessarily.
	So you can say, well, my first choice is, let's say, Dr. Shiva or whatever, right?
	Or some third party or some independent.
	You can put them as number one.
	Now, in the first round, they count all those votes and they throw out the person who had the least amount of votes.
	And if your number one choice was the person that gets thrown out that round, then they go to your second choice, and then they tabulate all of the votes again.
	And so forth.
	And so anybody who...
	And they take the one that was the lowest vote-getter and kick them out as well.
	Now, what's wrong with that?
	It is a more complicated system.
	It's got to be computerized somewhat.
	I mean, my only concern about it is that I like hand-counted ballots.
	But if we're going to have computer ballots, I think that hand-counted paper ballots are going to be the least vulnerable to being manipulated.
	If you're going to have computerized ballots, and if the counting is going to be honest, let's just imagine, for the sake of argument, let's just imagine nobody's hacking the computers and the counting is honest.
	In that kind of a situation, it opens up the ballot to other candidacies.
	And that really worries the Republicans and the Democrats.
	And so in Missouri, where they have Republicans, they put that there with an obvious issue that everybody disagrees with.
	We don't want to have people who are not citizens voting in an election.
	And so, yeah, certainly going to do that.
	And so at the same time, they shut down any possible challenge to their duopoly.
	They're very clever.
	Diabolically clever, aren't they?
	So the question was, long-time listener here from Missouri.
	I think I recall David has mentioned this broadcast before, arguments for why ranked choice voting isn't necessarily a bad thing, like all conservatives say it is.
	Am I misremembering this?
	In Missouri, we've got Proposition 7 on the ballot, which essentially asks us if we'd like to consider it in the future.
	I've read about ranked choice voting, and I don't understand why it's all that bad.
	But I value David's opinion because the topic's very confusing to me as far as why it's such a terrible idea, if it is.
	I'd love to be able to vote first choice for my real candidate.
	Can anyone elaborate pretty please?
	It seems like all left-wingers want it, and all hardcore right-wingers don't.
	But I don't know what to do.
	So, again, I think that you're going to see this.
	It depends on...
	It depends on where the majority is.
	I think it's about partisan loyalty.
	I don't think it's about a left or right thing.
	The only issue, like I said, I prefer paper ballot voting, but if you're going to have any other kind of voting, I think ranked choice is a good thing.
	David Icke, spot on.
	He said this about the election, and he also said this about journalists.
	He says, genuinely alternative journalists, quote-unquote alternative journalists, don't promote political candidates of whatever color.
	And I would say that's not just alternative.
	I would say genuine journalists, period.
	That's one of the reasons why mainstream media has lost its, people have lost their respect for it.
	And they should lose their respect for any alternative journalists who do this as well.
	They expose the untruths and the hidden agendas, is what alternative journalists should do, and let people make up their own conclusions about who to vote for.
	Tucker Carlson says that Trump has, quote, liberated us, unquote, from the obligation to tell lies.
	He says that's nonsense.
	You don't need anyone to liberate you to tell the truth.
	And you just do it.
	It's a choice to tell the truth.
	Or to lie for political advantage.
	And it always has been, says David Eich.
	And he's exactly right.
	You know what liberated Tucker Carlson from lying?
	That's when he got fired from Fox.
	When he was at Fox, they paid him to lie.
	And he lied up one side and down the other.
	He's got blood on his hands, just like Alex and Mike Adams do.
	He made $25 million.
	And, of course, two of them made millions of dollars lying to people.
	I'm always reminded of the game of scruples.
	We used to get together when we were in college and early married life, and we'd get together with people and play games and stuff, board games and stuff.
	And if you ever played scruples, it becomes pretty apparent that they keep asking you, in slightly different ways, the same fundamental questions and changing the dollar amounts.
	And I said, okay, would you do this for such and such amount?
	Okay, well, you do it for ten times that, a hundred times that.
	We do it for a million dollars, you know, that type of thing.
	And so you give an answer, and then the people around you who know you say, no, I know that you would do such and such for a certain amount of money or whatever.
	But we know what these people did.
	We know their scruples.
	We know that they lied to people during the pandemic.
	They said, it's 4D chest, don't worry about it, it's sugar water.
	Or they kept silent like Tucker Carlson did.
	Because, you know, for $25 million a year.
	Or they flat out lie and challenge people, as Tucker Carlson did, for decades about 9-11.
	And now that he's been liberated by being fired from Fox News, he'll say things like, well, you know, you're not allowed to ask that question in the media.
	I have questions about it, but he's got no answers.
	He's got no position.
	He won't take a stand on that.
	Don't trust this CIA spawn, this CIA shill, Tucker Carlson.
	David Icke goes on to say, what he misses is that his heroes, Tucker's heroes, are part of the system.
	And they're telling their target audience what they want to hear while heading in the same direction by a different route to the same end as the so-called opponents that they condemn.
	Which brings us to Tucker Carlson's rant about Big Daddy Don.
	If you allow your two-year-old to smear the contents of his diapers on the wall of your living room, and you do nothing about it, if you allow your 14-year-old to light a joint at the breakfast table, if you allow your hormone-addled 15-year-old daughter to, like, slam the door of her bedroom and give you the finger, you're going to get more of it.
	And those kids are going to wind up in rehab.
	It's not good for you, and it's not good for them.
	No.
	There has to be a point at which dad comes home.
	Boy, that's scary.
	Listen to those people.
	The MAGA cult.
	They're as dangerous as Antifa, folks.
	These people are deranged.
	They are delusional.
	And he's pissed.
	Yeah.
	Dad is pissed.
	Yeah, let's get rid of this.
	He's not vengeful.
	He loves his children.
	Disobedient as they may be, he loves them.
	Because they're his children.
	They live in his house.
	But he's very disappointed in their behavior.
	Trump doesn't love you.
	And he's going to have to let them know.
	The government doesn't love you.
	He's going to have to get to your room right now.
	And think about what you did.
	And when dad gets home, you know what he says?
	You've been a bad girl.
	You've been a bad little girl and you're getting a vigorous spanking right now.
	Now he's getting into Lolita.
	It's not gonna hurt me more than it hurts you.
	No, it's not.
	I'm not gonna lie.
	It's gonna hurt you a lot more than it hurts me.
	And you earned this.
	You're getting a vigorous spanking because you've been a bad girl.
	And it has to be this way.
	It has to be this way because it's true.
	And you're only gonna get better when you take responsibility for what you did.
	That's not said in the spirit of hate.
	It's not said in the spirit of...
	Vengeance or bigotry?
	Far from it.
	It's said in the spirit of justice, which is the purest and best thing there is.
	And without it, things fall apart.
	Well, nice performance, Tucker.
	And that's what it is, folks.
	It's a performance.
	You know, what he does, what Steve Bannon does, what Alex Jones does.
	It's a performance.
	These are performance artists.
	As Alex's lawyer said.
	In court, you know, he's under oath.
	He's like, yeah, he's a performance artist.
	Well, so is Tucker.
	Now, the problem is, it's a very dangerous idea that he's selling these people who are cheering it on.
	Ideas have consequences.
	And this is a stupid, dangerous, un-American, unconstitutional idea.
	The government is not your family.
	Big Daddy does not love you.
	Neither does the nanny state.
	Just amazing to see this.
	Now, the left is all upset about it because, you know, he's talking about a controlling patriarch.
	Now, if it was about a matriarch, that'd be okay, right?
	Because they love to have a government matriarchal society ruling you, right?
	But that's not the role of the president.
	Hey, Tucker, go back and dust off a copy of the Constitution.
	I know you probably didn't have it in your house because your dad was working for the CIA, Voice of America, Radio Free Europe.
	You guys don't like the Constitution, do you?
	But you should read it sometime, pal.
	You disgust me.
	He says, again, you know, he's talking about two-year-olds smearing feces all over the place and your teenage daughter lighting up a joint at the table.
	Well, I guess what he's trying to do is make, you know, references, oblique references, to the homeless smearing feces all over the place in San Francisco and they won't do anything about it.
	Or, you know, open drug use or whatever.
	But the presidency is not about local law enforcement.
	Absolutely.
	This should be done.
	And it should be done by local law enforcement.
	But that's a local issue.
	That isn't happening in places outside of San Francisco.
	Well, I mean, it is going to a lot of different liberal cities.
	But that is a local issue.
	And that's how you should address it.
	It is not something that needs to be done in Washington.
	And the other thing that Tucker Carlson is selling everybody, besides the fact that Donald Trump is benevolent, And that Big Brother government is benevolent.
	You know, we just need more benevolent police out there.
	You know, kicking people, spanking people, or whatever.
	But the real issue is that he's selling this idea to everybody that all of our problems need to be solved in Washington.
	And all of our problems need to be solved by the presidency.
	And this is what's wrong with our society.
	It used to only be the left that thought like that.
	But you know, the people who grew up in a CIA family, like Tucker Carlson did, I guess that they think that Big Brother's just fine.
	So the Democrats will give you the nanny state, and the Republicans will give you the Big Daddy Don state, right?
	The Big Daddy state.
	Either way, it's Big Brother.
	Are we children?
	Do we need the government as a parent?
	Is it trick-or-treat time yet?
	You know, this is ridiculous what we're seeing here.
	And this article said, this is where things come perilously close to the creepy borders where Humbert Humbert and fascist coded rhetoric mate talking about Lolita.
	When daddy gets home, you know what he says?
	You've been a bad girl and you're getting a vigorous spanking.
	And then the crowd starts chanting, daddy's home.
	Daddy Don.
	Yeah, the double-think, delusional MAGA mob.
	That's what we're looking at here.
	So, Brian Shulhavi says, Did you forget America?
	Is memory loss a COVID-19 vaccine side effect?
	Americans are going to vote for their favorite pro-COVID-19 vaccine candidate.
	There you go.
	Either one of them.
	And he's got Trump wearing a t-shirt.
	Says, I am the father of the vaccine.
	That's right.
	And again, he's got him in front of an Israeli fight because they're both going to support what is happening there in Gaza.
	The unending attacks against civilians.
	And as I said before...
	That is unjustified.
	If you deliberately target civilians, and I don't care that it was done in World War II, we went off the rails in World War II. Germans started attacking with a V-2 rocket, so we said, okay, we'll do that, we'll up the ante.
	And we did Hiroshima, Nagasaki, civilian populations, but before that we also did the firebombing in Dresden, which a lot of people said killed more people than the nuclear bombs in those two cities.
	And that Robert McNamara, in trying to excuse what he did with the Vietnam War, he said if we had lost World War II, we would have been tried as war criminals for what we did in Dresden with the firebombing.
	It's wrong.
	Wrong, folks.
	All Christians should reject the idea that we target civilian populations.
	All Christians should reject the idea that we do it relentlessly and endlessly.
	When we are not threatened, we try to end the war.
	And we try to limit wars to combatants.
	But because that's not always possible, we try to end them as soon as possible.
	We don't attack unless we were first attacked.
	So fine, you know, even if it was a staged stand-down with Pearl Harbor, even with that, you are still within your moral rights to shut it down, because, you know, just because you stand down, and just because they think that you might be a problem in the future, or because they don't like it, that doesn't authorize somebody using force.
	So when you look at what Hamas did, you look at what Pearl Harbor happened, the Japanese did, that was legitimate to respond with force.
	However, you want to try to end it I'm not changing from that position.
	I don't make exceptions to that position.
	I don't have an eschatology that trumps my moral positions on this.
	Because eschatology should never trump your clear moral definitions of what's there.
	Whatever you think, however you think the end of the world is going to happen because of your eschatology, that should never change the clear moral principles.
	You interpret the difficult passages in light of the things that are straightforward and simple.
	That's the first rule.
	So Brian Shalhavi says, well, it appears one topic that's off limits when discussing who the next president will be There's the idea of COVID vaccines.
	The reason, of course, is that Americans have no choice when it comes to the vaccines, among many other issues, as both candidates are solidly pro-vaccine and pro-COVID-19 vaccine.
	And he talks about the fact that I've mentioned for the last two days.
	On Monday and on Tuesday, I talked about this Joe Rogan interview.
	And I said, yeah, you know, he didn't even touch the COVID vaccine thing.
	You know, just let's move on.
	I mentioned it quickly, but he talks a lot about that normally, but he didn't want to bring that up with Trump.
	And he was even, I played for you yesterday, one of the people that works with him says, you know, you didn't really go into that vaccine thing.
	Yeah, I decided I didn't want to do that.
	Did they tell you that as a condition of the interview?
	Now, he's going to be interviewing J.D. Vance.
	And he says that he's offered an interview to Lala, but she's put a lot of conditions on it.
	You've got to come to me and things like that.
	And he says, well, I can't do that.
	But he says, I still hope she's going to do it, whatever, because it's an entertainment show.
	But the VAX is the elephant in the room, as I said before, for the GOP. And it is not just the elephant in the room for Trump.
	The vaccine is the elephant in the room for all the GOP politicians who passively sat there and did nothing about it.
	The lockdown, the vaccine, the pandemic is also the elephant in the room for all these people who are going to vote for them because they're engaging in a kind of Orwellian doublethink.
	Oh, I hate that vaccine, but don't talk about it.
	As a matter of fact, he saw this article questioning why Joe Rogaine wouldn't talk about the vaccine when he had Trump.
	He said, I saw that it was republished on Zero Hedge.
	He said, I know that Zero Hedge is very, very pro-Trump.
	So he said, I was interested to see what comments people left on the article.
	He said, one person commenting seems to sum up the rationale to not broach the topic of a COVID-19 vaccine issue with Trump.
	The person said...
	Talking about COVID is a vote loser.
	The purpose of interviews is not to set the record straight.
	It's to help win elections.
	We don't want to have the truth, right?
	Let's not have an interview so we can find out the truth.
	The purpose of the interview is to win an election.
	It's all about winning.
	Winning, winning, winning.
	I don't care what means I have to use so that I can win.
	And that was what disgusted me with Alex Jones and Infowars when I was there.
	Winning was everything!
	No, it's not.
	That's absolutely not.
	You're dead wrong about that.
	4-D chess, don't worry.
	I know that he told you he was going to do this.
	And I know it's a betrayal of his promises.
	And I know it's a betrayal of the Constitution.
	But hey, we've got to win.
	For what purpose?
	When you sell out like that, folks, and you see a politician who sells out like that, they make that little compromise.
	Well, I know this is the wrong thing to do.
	But if I don't do this, I won't be able to play the game.
	I'll lose.
	I'll be out of the game.
	I won't be able to do it.
	And so they do it.
	And then the next time when there is an issue that they need to take a stand on, it's so much easier to do the thing that's going to allow them to win that they know is wrong.
	Every time they make that compromise, it gets easier.
	And the only thing you can do is to not make that compromise.
	And if you've made it, you've got to stop it.
	But this is the attitude of the broadcasters, Mike Tucker, the rest of these people.
	The purpose of these interviews is just to win the elections.
	Not to tell the truth.
	Not to find out the truth.
	And so, as Brian Shohavi says, there you have it.
	The truth is irrelevant.
	But you see, at the same time this is happening, the GOP is absolutely furious that YouTube is directing people away from the full three-hour interview with Trump.
	And they're directing them.
	If you look for Rogan and Trump, what they say is on YouTube, they direct you to some things that are cut out where people have negative comments about it.
	And so they said, no, they're directing people away from the full interview.
	That's horrible.
	Is it?
	Is that censorship?
	Didn't Rogaine censor himself?
	Right?
	Joe, if you're going to engage in self-censorship, if you're going to be dishonest about this, if you're going to avoid certain topics, then why would it be strange for YouTube to set it up for their political purposes so that your interview is avoided by people?
	You see, Joe is not kicked off of YouTube.
	He's still there.
	Joe's not demonetized off of YouTube.
	He's still there.
	And what does that tell you about him?
	It's simply because Joe Rogaine censors himself.
	He knows what he can say, and he knows what he can't say.
	He knows what he can say to appease his masters at Spotify and YouTube and make millions and tens of millions of dollars just like Tucker.
	And he knows what he is allowed to say and not allowed to say to Trump.
	So that he appeases his audience and the thugs who don't want to know the truth, who don't want the truth to be said, who don't want to stop the COVID vaccines that are killing people, and they don't want to stop the principles and the precedents that were laid down by Trump.
	They're fine with all that as long as Trump goes back.
	That's all they care about.
	How insane is that?
	That is completely insane.
	Poor Trump.
	Poor Rogaine.
	Poor elephant in the room, because the elephant in the room can't get any of these MAGA tards to listen to him, no matter what happens.
	And so, it's all about, they're all butthurt about the fact that YouTube is censoring Rogaine, except Rogaine censors himself.
	Folks, it's just a pageant.
	It's just a show.
	It's just a performance.
	And it is all sound and fury, signifying nothing.
	Except that you see the effect that these people have.
	You see the effect that Tucker Carlson has when he gets these people cheering for big daddy government.
	That's scary stuff.
	Let's go to the article there.
	Show the picture of George W. Bush's daughter joining Harris on the campaign trail.
	Oh, it was so inspiring, she said, to be able to campaign with Lala.
	This just tells you about the unit party.
	Barbara Pierce Bush says, I'm hopeful that they'll move our country forward and protect women's rights.
	George W. Bush's daughter, Barbara Pierce Bush, 42, joined the Harris campaign last weekend in Pennsylvania to help knock on doors and campaign for the potential future president.
	Now, George Bush, George W., and his wife, I have not made an endorsement.
	They're setting this one out, unlike Cheney.
	And yet, you know, we've seen over and over again how George Bush is palling around with Bill Clinton, palling around with Obama, and all the rest of the stuff.
	And, you know, just like Trump always palled around with Clinton.
	Not Obama, but he paled around with Clinton all the time.
	The Clintons, he was partying with them, with Jeffrey Epstein and everything.
	And his daughter, Ivanka, was best friends with Hillary's daughter, Chelsea.
	They were best friends.
	They went to the same elitist, liberal, socialist schools together.
	And so the Bushes are really palling around with all the Democrats.
	You see, as I said before, I remember when we were in church and somebody got really upset with me because I said, I'm not voting for George Bush.
	And it's polar opposite.
	Oh, you can't be a Christian and not be pro-life.
	I said, no, I'm pro-life, but Harry Brown's going to stop the funding.
	Bush isn't going to do anything like that.
	And he's not going to end abortion either.
	So that's a non-starter right there.
	That's not a difference between them.
	And at that time, I didn't know what I told her about the Bush family and its long history with Planned Parenthood.
	It was George H.W. Bush's father, George W. Bush's grandfather, this daughter's great-grandfather, Who was on the very first fundraising letter that Planned Parenthood Margaret Sanger put out as they were doing their genocide campaign against black people.
	He was a treasurer.
	And his name is right there on the letterhead at the very top left.
	In 2010, Bush, who also has a twin sister, told People magazine she does not identify with either major political party.
	But in the past, Bush has supported causes that are sympathetic to many in the Democrat Party, such as abortion and same-sex marriage.
	It's great to have these wonderful Christian Republican politicians like George W. Bush and Mike Johnson, isn't it?
	Boy, they pull the wool over people's eyes.
	It's just amazing.
	Her mother, Laura Bush, similarly broke with the family's Republican roots in 2010 when she, too, came out in support of abortion and gay marriage.
	So there you go.
	The Bushes support abortion and gay marriage.
	The Trumps support abortion and gay marriage.
	As a matter of fact, Trump supported transgender and beauty contests, his own beauty contests, long before it even became an issue.
	And Melania supports pornography, her own pornography, right?
	As well as abortion.
	I'm proud to stand with Planned Parenthood, not only because women, regardless of where they are from, deserve to live dignified, healthy lives because it's really a good investment, she said.
	It's a good investment.
	It's a good investment to kill your baby because you'll have more money.
	And it'll be so much more healthy for you to kill your baby, except that it isn't.
	Remember, I talked about that, especially when you talk about the pill.
	It goes up like a factor of 50 times more emergency room visits, serious emergency room visits.
	And the people who had, they looked at emergency room visits of people who had had a pill abortion, people who had had a surgical abortion, Women who were not even pregnant, and mothers who delivered their children.
	And guess who had by far and away the smallest number by far and away?
	It was the mothers.
	The mothers who had the fewest emergency room visits.
	And the ones who had the most were the abortion, and way more than the surgical abortion was the pill.
	That these people are so concerned about the health of women that they'll allow them to take a dangerous abortion pill without even having a medical exam.
	That's how much they care about the lives of women.
	Matthew Ronson says, Trump claims he kept his promise to build a wall and his cult applauds him for lying to their faces.
	That's right.
	Yeah, that's really kind of an uncomfortable thing, I guess, you know, for Steve Bannon.
	Steve Bannon had to get pardoned by Trump Because the fraud that he committed, because he said, we build the wall.
	Trump wasn't doing it.
	So Bannon created, and everybody knew it, and Bannon and another guy, Brian Cothology, and actually three people were involved in it.
	Three people got convicted.
	Only Bannon got pardoned for that fraud.
	The other two went to jail.
	They raised millions of dollars from MAGA people who knew that Trump was not building the wall.
	They wanted the wall built, so they supported a private building of the wall.
	And yet now, they hold, this is very Orwellian, they hold this double thing.
	Oh yeah, Trump fixed the border somehow.
	I guess the wall just fell down as soon as Biden came in because it was just in their imagination.
	Blotin says, but the border crisis isn't Trump's fault, according to MAGA. That's right.
	Nothing is his fault.
	Well, when we come back, we're going to take a look at what is happening in France because we've got some people there have surrounded the Pfizer building there, and you're going to be interested to see what they are chanting.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	you Welcome back.
	I wonder if we could persuade David to do a live election night broadcast.
	She wants to do it.
	I don't know.
	I would much prefer his perspective to any other coverage that will be available.
	Maybe if we do a pledge drive, maybe if we fill the gas tank for November by the 5th.
	You do that, I'll definitely do it for you.
	By the way, we're at 78%.
	I don't think I mentioned that before.
	Yeah, I didn't.
	So, thank you very much, everybody, for that.
	I know we're getting close to the end here.
	And so, if you want to drop some pieces of candy in the bag, I'll make a shameless plea for that.
	But, yeah, thank you very much.
	We'll be moving the gas gauge.
	So, anyway, he says, maybe we could ask him to stay up late and have Gard do the show November the 6th.
	I've stayed up late.
	Whenever I do the late night show...
	With Clyde Lewis, I wind up, the show doesn't even start for us until after midnight, and so I wind up getting like two or three hours of sleep, and I'm kind of giddy the next day.
	I really don't know that there's going to be that much that's happening with it.
	I prefer, you know, the first time, the first presidential debate that Trump was in, we didn't have cable or anything.
	We don't get cable TV. And so Karen and I, just for fun, we went to a motel room and we watched the thing on cable and I did commentary.
	And I picked up, this is the days before I got shadow banned, I picked up like 20 or 30,000 people on Twitter and Alex noticed.
	And so from that point, he says, oh, let's do this live.
	We'll do this on the show.
	And that's when they started doing the debates live.
	But then he didn't like it.
	It was a strange thing.
	It's like, okay, you got to talk or they're going to put a strike against us.
	But don't talk too much.
	And it's like...
	Do it, don't do it, that type of thing.
	So anyway, it was...
	Debates I like to cover, but I haven't done that since then because I'm just disgusted with this whole thing.
	And, you know, election night is really going to be kind of a horse race type of thing.
	And nothing is going to be decided, I don't think.
	Unless they throw it all in.
	You know, you've got the people on the right are saying it's going to be a landslide.
	If it is a landslide and they throw everything in...
	Then that'll be one thing.
	But I think what they want is I think they want to drag this out.
	I think they want Conflict and challenges and hate from one side or the other.
	Maybe they can get it from both sides, attacking each other.
	So this is what is happening in France.
	And again, it disgusts me that we have all developed amnesia or double think when it comes to the vaccine here.
	These are people that have surrounded the Pfizer building in Paris.
	And I think you can understand what they're saying, even though they're speaking French.
	Assassin.
	Yeah, the big crowd there.
	And they're calling out Macron and Pfizer and anything, calling them assassins.
	I hardly endorse that message.
	They are mass murderers, folks.
	There's not really anything to laugh about.
	It's stupid that we're not doing that.
	It's stupid that we just look the other way.
	Especially when we paid, or I should say, Trump took $11 billion of debt and phony made-up cash and gave it to Pfizer to develop this poison and sent it worldwide.
	And he bragged about it just a couple of months ago.
	And all of his media people were saying, stop saying that, stop saying that, they're going to catch on.
	12 June, 1776.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	That's generous.
	It is well-deserved mind, spirit, candy in the bag.
	Thank you so much.
	I appreciate that.
	Well, a prominent UK surgeon, Dr.
	James Royal, warns of turbo cancer.
	Which is rapidly forming and spreading and mutating.
	Confirming the findings, Professor Angus Dalgleish and others, he said, many of my multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, specialist nurses, all acknowledged to me sudden change in patterns and dramatic increase in these incurable advanced cancers that we've observed in these past two years.
	Now, let me say this.
	I'm coming up in just a couple of minutes here with this interview that I had with J. Edward Griffin.
	One of the reasons I wanted to get him on was because of cancer, because of turbo cancer.
	And there are things that you can do.
	And people need to be aware of this.
	And he's got interesting stories about how they got on to B-17.
	And then, of course, it's a story that I think people are ready to hear now.
	Because we've all seen how criminal these assassins are.
	The assassins at Pfizer.
	The assassins at Eli Lilly.
	The assassins at Merck and Moderna and all the rest of the stuff.
	And the assassins and accomplices within the FDA. That ivermectin's for horses, y'all.
	You can't have that lying up one side and down the other to people.
	People are ready to...
	When this stuff came out 50 years ago, nobody wanted to give it a try.
	Because the establishment came in and said, well, no, I mean, you don't have authorization for that.
	We're going to take your license.
	And they did that with people.
	And now we've seen why they took people's licenses with all this stuff.
	And I think a lot of people have had their eyes open to this criminal enterprise we call medicine in the United States.
	And they're ready to try alternatives that do no harm, first of all.
	And that should be the very first thing.
	It does no harm to eat these seeds or take the B17.
	The close temporal association, in other words, a timing between the increased cancers and the rollout fulfills the gold standard Bradford Hill epidemiological criteria for causation.
	The tide is quietly turning with his colleagues and over 30 surgeons seeing the same thing.
	Folks, it's time for science to actually come back.
	It's time for integrity to return.
	And it was very sad to see this.
	It was an interview that, actually it wasn't an interview, it was a recording that a rancher put up.
	Talking about the mRNA that he was giving to his livestock.
	And so then Wall Street Apes put this up and wrapped it in a bunch of partisan BS about Trump.
	As if Trump had nothing to do with this stuff.
	And as if Trump is going to save us from all of this stuff.
	It's disgusting.
	You know, Wall Street Apes, look at this and it's like, why am I getting this?
	I don't subscribe to this guy.
	And he's always on my feed.
	He's got a half million followers.
	And I don't follow him.
	I'm not one of those half million to follow him, but whenever I go onto Twitter to post anything, he's there.
	Twitter likes this guy.
	And they like this guy because he said, for voters who forgot, Democrats are the party pushing mRNA vaccines on our livestock.
	Oh, give me a break.
	Did you forget the father of the vaccine?
	Did you forget the guy who is, you know...
	Got the lemonade stand?
	It just tells you that it's sugar water.
	He said they took 520...
	Now, this is what the rancher said.
	This is not what Wall Street apes said.
	Wall Street apes stole that.
	And so it's a video, but here's a transcription.
	They took 525 hogs, injected them with live mRNA vaccine, and in 21 days, these were the statistics.
	25 of them died.
	55 of them became so anorexic they were near death.
	20 of them suffered from lameness.
	12 of them suffered from loss of condition.
	And 25 more of them had near-death symptoms.
	This is what we heard in the nursing homes at the very beginning of all of this, when they injected elderly people.
	He said, so we have 70% of these animals that are either going to be okay to an extent, and then we got another 30% of them that either have died or have near-death symptoms.
	They did autopsies on the ones that had died, and they still found remnants of the vaccine inside of the meat of these animals.
	So, from a consumer standpoint, we have to worry about this being inside of our meat that we're putting inside of our body.
	And as a producer standpoint, we have to worry about the health of our animals.
	Killing these animals can destroy us.
	It can destroy our herd.
	It can destroy our business altogether.
	I'm interested to see what you all think this is about.
	So make sure you leave a comment and share it around.
	That's what the guy said.
	So Wall Street Apes grabs this, and he puts it up, and he says, well, if Democrats win, you can 100% count on them restarting all these insane climate change and vaccine initiatives.
	Hey, pal, they never stopped.
	What's your problem?
	They never stopped.
	Trump never stopped bragging about his sugar water that he's selling to these masked-up MAGA people.
	And so, you know, he says, so only Donald Trump and RFK Jr.
	will stop this.
	This is why RFK Jr.
	is there.
	RFK Jr.
	is there to help the MAGA cult with their double thinking.
	Right?
	Vaccine bad, Trump good.
	Repeat that.
	That's the MAGA mantra.
	Vaccine bad, Trump good.
	Vaccine bad, Trump good.
	See, we're done.
	Now you can go flip the lever for him.
	Well, we recorded this, as I said.
	This was yesterday.
	G. Edward Griffin.
	Oh, I got a tip and a comment, so let me reply to that first.
	Atomic Dog, thank you very much.
	He says, help David Knight spread the good news by liking the video, sharing on social media, and subscribing.
	It helps.
	Yes, thank you so much for that.
	And please do, folks.
	Please do.
	And Anagos Sonita, thank you very much for the tips.
	Just dropping off some candy.
	Thank you so much.
	Well, I'm going to play now the interview that I had with G. Edward Griffin yesterday.
	Again, we talk about his life, we talk about the Federal Reserve, and we talk about cancer in his book, A World Without Cancer.
	And that message is more important today than it ever was.
	Karen says, wait one moment.
	We got a very generous tip.
	Thank you very much, S.A. Miller.
	Thank you very much.
	David, since I don't participate in trick-or-treat, I'll put my savings on to you.
	Thank you so much.
	I appreciate that.
	Yeah, we don't either.
	We look at it as Reformation Day.
	That's why we're going to celebrate.
	Here's G. Edward Griffin.
	Joining us now is G. Edward Griffin, a real giant in the liberty movement.
	He's done so many monumental works.
	Of course, everybody knows Creature from Jekyll Island.
	But we want to also talk to him today about his book, A World Without Cancer.
	Because I think that's a message that people are ready to hear after what we've been through for the last four years.
	But we've now seen, I think, really a convergence in medical, financial, and political because it's all being swallowed up by the political stuff.
	But great to have Gio Griffin on.
	Thank you so much for joining us, sir.
	Well, it's my pleasure.
	Thanks for inviting me.
	And I want to talk also about the Red Pill Expo that's going to be coming up in just a couple of weeks as well, so give you a chance to talk about that and what's happening with that.
	But your work is very well known by a lot of people, and we're going to try to get into maybe, you know, the medical aspect of this is maybe not as well known as the Federal Reserve, but we do want to talk about the financial stuff.
	That's very important right now.
	But I think it'd be good for us to talk about your biography.
	How did you get into doing documentaries and books, especially in terms of going against the grain of conventional wisdom?
	Tell us a little bit about your background.
	Well, it's a long background, of course, considering my age and all that.
	And it's probably not very interesting.
	It's rather boring, actually.
	Yeah, you're correct.
	We've covered some ground and made some amazing touch points along the way, but I think it's only because we've been at it for so long.
	My life has been pretty much normal in the sense, by normal, I'm almost afraid or embarrassed to say normal because unfortunately what is normal out there in the world today is not particularly attractive.
	An abnormal world.
	A normal person in an abnormal world.
	Yeah.
	Well, I mean, it's not unusual, I guess I should say, in that I would start out in one direction and be confronted by some impossible barrier or setback or tragedy, and it would be life-changing for me and very uncomfortable, and it would be life-changing for me and very uncomfortable, very painful, very frightening.
	But in retrospect, as the time goes by, I'm going to go to my show.
	I'm going to go to my show.
	That was the best thing that ever happened to me because it forced me to do a right turn or change my direction substantially.
	And even though it was painful and I had to abandon my original plans and expectations, I found out that it was a better direction than the one I was on originally.
	And my life is full of that, and some of those tragedies along the way were very serious illnesses, too.
	I was still very young.
	I was in my early 30s, and I had a wife and a couple of kids to support, and I had a collapse, and I had two doctors tell me I had multiple sclerosis.
	I didn't really know for sure what that was.
	I knew it was bad, but when I looked it up in the In the encyclopedia, I decided, oh man, this is a bad way to go out the door.
	And I thought I was dying, of course, but it was a misdiagnosis.
	I had exhausted myself.
	I had a rather I thought I was carrying the world under my shoulders.
	I thought I had to save the world all by myself.
	And so I was not getting a lot of sleep.
	I was a young guy, of course.
	I was doing a lot of traveling, making presentations, training sessions, all that kind of thing.
	So I would go from one town to the next and drive a good portion of the day to get there.
	Get there and be taken out to dinner and then put on an evening presentation and then meet at somebody's house afterwards and What kind of presentations were you doing?
	Was this political?
	Well, these were recruiting meetings.
	At that time, I was a coordinator for the John Birch Society.
	I know that scares a lot of people.
	They think that's a wacko organization.
	No, not me.
	Well, good.
	Anyway, to me, they're very calm and very...
	Not wacko at all.
	Of course, they have some wackos in there, but the percentage of wackos in the British society I thought was smaller than the percentage outside of the British society.
	That's right.
	They're going to be everywhere, yeah.
	Yeah, that was the safest place to be.
	But anyway, that's what I was doing.
	And so I was drinking, you know, everybody would want to buy me some wine and we'd drink wine and talk about life and the world events and so forth.
	And then I get to bed late at night or early in the morning, get up in the morning and drive and do that over and over again.
	I came back and I was planting some trees in my front yard.
	And I just froze up.
	I became paralyzed.
	To make a long story short, I had just exhausted my physical strength.
	Malnutrition, toxic elements in my body, not enough sleep, and a bad mental attitude, always filled with anxiety and, you know, all the bad things.
	And I hadn't realized, I didn't think I had to worry about that because I was young, right?
	Young people don't get sick.
	So anyway, they diagnosed it as multiple sclerosis.
	It turned out not to be that.
	Once I got off of my routine and started to find out what this world was all about in terms of nutrition and rest and avoiding toxic things in your body and in your environment and so forth, I recovered rather rapidly.
	So in retrospect, it was very good because I learned how to How to live, and I probably wouldn't be alive today if I hadn't learned that lesson early in my life.
	At the same time, I was really pretty well stuck in bed, and I didn't know I could write.
	I had gone to school.
	I had learned about communications.
	I would stage plays.
	I was an actor, a little child actor.
	You can imagine anything worse than that.
	I did a lot of radio shows.
	Especially today.
	I can imagine it being a lot worse today.
	Well, I don't know.
	It was pretty bad.
	I was right in the middle of that.
	And, you know, I was in Detroit.
	And we did radio in those days.
	And, you know, a lot of shows came out of Detroit.
	The Ford Theater and...
	And the Hermit's Cave, and we had a Saturday show.
	It was the same as Let's Pretend.
	Anyway, I did a lot of radio stuff.
	And I went to school and took more of the same.
	Television was just coming online in those days.
	So I was taking courses in television and radio communications.
	Let me ask you a question real quick.
	Your radio, I guess that was live radio performance.
	Oh, yeah.
	That's really interesting stuff.
	I love listening to the live things like that.
	Yeah, I was.
	I worked my way through college as a radio announcer for WUOM, which was the university radio station at the University of Michigan in You know, and all of that.
	So I was into that.
	So when I got sick, I thought, well, I'm not going to be able to make a living.
	I couldn't get out of bed for the most part.
	I had to practically crawl from one room to the other.
	And so I got this call from a publisher and he said, Ed, I understand you've been giving speeches on the United Nations and they're very well received.
	Would you like to write a book for us on that topic?
	We want to publish a book and we think you could do it.
	And of course, at that time, I had never written anything.
	And that was not my...
	I did not identify as an author.
	I identified as a communicator on television or radio or something like that.
	And my dream was to go to Hollywood and become a great Hollywood producer in motion pictures.
	So when this guy called me and said, how would you like to write a book?
	That was the last thing I felt I was capable or interested in doing.
	But I thought instantly about, wow, he's offering me some money, and here I am in bed.
	I can't do anything else to support my family, and we're running out of money.
	And so I found myself saying, oh, yeah, no problem.
	Yeah, sure, I could do that.
	I'm in that kind of situation as well.
	You know, God puts us in a position where you got one way out, and that's it.
	One way out.
	Something that you would have chosen to do.
	Yeah.
	So I just use that as an example.
	So I took on the commitment, and I started to do my hard research.
	I had done a lot of it already, but I knew that in a book, you had to document everything.
	It wasn't just, you could say, well, I know this, and I know that.
	So I did research that lasted about probably two or three months of putting all the documents together.
	And then the day came when it was time to write.
	And it was kind of like looking at an old movie where everybody's seen those scenes where the author has to write something, and he's on a typewriter, and he types a few lines, and he pulls the paper out, crushes it, and throws it on the floor, and that's no good, and then this is no good.
	I went through that in spades.
	All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy, right?
	I was using a pencil.
	We didn't have computers in those days and I couldn't type.
	So I was writing things out and I would tear it up and throw it out.
	How come I can't write?
	I can't write!
	Give me a microphone!
	So then, there's a point, an end to this.
	So finally, I said, I'm just going to write, Mary Had a Little Lamb.
	I started to write things out, and first thing you know, I had this idea, I can't write this, because how do you approach a topic so huge?
	This is my book on the United Nations, my first book.
	It's called The Fearful Master, A Second Look at the United Nations.
	So I wrote down, how can you write about something like this?
	It's like a huge globe made of glass, so large that you couldn't grasp it in its entirety, and you couldn't hold it.
	How do you write a book?
	It's like having to move a mountain.
	How do you move a mountain?
	And then I found myself writing, well, you dig.
	And then, this is my first spade.
	And I looked at it and I said, well, that's kind of clever.
	And the first thing you know, I extended that.
	And the next few pages came pretty fast.
	And by the time I got to page seven, it was roaring along.
	I found out, I wound up, I looked at the wall and said, my gosh, I can write.
	And I'm having fun doing it.
	So I use that as an example.
	I wouldn't be here talking to you today if I hadn't had this illness.
	And that event that forced me to make a right turn in what I thought was my career path.
	And at that time, I didn't think I was going to live anyway.
	So it forced me to make a change that affected my whole life, I hope, for the better.
	That's a great story.
	We've had so many people, when they were faced with a decision, take the shot or lose your job.
	And I've talked to so many people who had that crisis.
	It's like, what do I do?
	I've trained all my life for this.
	I don't have any other alternative, but I'm not going to take that shot.
	And to a man that has been, or a woman, that has been every person I've talked to about that.
	It's been a wonderful turning point for them.
	And so I think your life lesson, as well as a lot of other people, that's a real important life lesson, I think.
	Well, there it is, and that's why I said, in a way, I'm very normal, because what I just said, although it's dramatic, for me it was dramatic, everybody goes through those crises, I think.
	Maybe they don't think about it as having made a big change, and I suppose not every change in the direction is that dramatic, but most of them, or many of them are, the important ones are.
	So, with that as a background, I started off in one direction.
	All of a sudden, I'm writing, and I decided I wanted to go off on my own.
	I decided I wanted to do...
	I wanted to reach out to a lot of people, and I wanted to use my skills that I had acquired in communications, so I decided to produce some very low-budget documentary films on important issues.
	The first attempt was to write something on a documentary film on money and inflation.
	And then, of course, that led me obliquely to the topic of the Federal Reserve System.
	And I'm off and running now.
	And I had no idea how much voltage was in the wire that I was about to grab hold of on that one.
	If I had even an inkling of how How deep that topic goes and how broad it is, how many things it covers, and how profoundly important it is to our lives, our liberty, our lifestyle, everything.
	I would never have tackled it because it was far beyond my reach.
	I'm the last person in the world to write about things like that.
	I'm a kid that was a child actor, you know?
	Well, that makes a question.
	How did you, you're working with the, before you started writing, and before you wrote that book on the UN, you were also lecturing about UN and other things like that.
	How did you get into working for the John Burt Society?
	Or how did you begin to be skeptical about what the UN's purposes and agenda were?
	Well, that's another story similar to the one I just mentioned.
	I was working for a large corporation.
	I was in the corporate world.
	I had found out the hard way that Hollywood wasn't waiting for me.
	I had gone there, and I wanted to make my splash.
	I wanted to get a job with some production company, and I was looking for the grand opening, and it wasn't happening.
	I looked around realistically, and I saw that all these young people there, the guys and gals, had talent superior to mine.
	Really.
	And they were busing tables and washing cars, waiting for the big chance in Hollywood.
	And then I began to get a sense of the corruption that is in Hollywood, and the lifestyle, and all of that.
	Evil things that were there that I didn't like at all.
	And it became clear that if you didn't tolerate those things, or if you didn't participate in those things, your chances of getting that big break were pretty small.
	So I quit all that, and I went to work for a large insurance company, and I got a job in an underwriting department, preparing group insurance plans for corporations and that kind of thing.
	So that's what I was doing when I decided to start speaking out on topics.
	And the reason I made that change is that I don't know who it was, but somebody handed me or sent me a little blue pamphlet called The Truth About the United Nations.
	I think that was the title.
	I thought the United Nations.
	Well, I'd gone to school.
	I've been to the university.
	I knew all about the United Nations.
	It was wonderful.
	It was our last best hope for peace, they told me.
	And I thought it was true.
	And so I was very much in favor of the UN and as a means of avoiding war.
	And about what year was that?
	That was 1960.
	Okay.
	Maybe 1959.
	Probably that pamphlet was in 1959.
	Anyway, so I read the pamphlet and I was incensed by it.
	I thought, well, this is ridiculous.
	I know better.
	But it's sort of, the things it said were hard for me to believe that these people were lying.
	That's how naive, you know, you come out of school, how naive can you be to think that your teachers would be lying or the people who would write books might even be lying.
	It's hard for us to believe that about other people.
	We want to believe the best of them and we want to think that they're like us, you know, and so we always overestimate their morals and we underestimate their technology, don't we?
	We certainly do, yeah.
	And of course, we're trained to do that.
	I went to the public school system, and that was, I found that later, one of its primary objectives is to create that attitude in the minds of the students.
	So they had succeeded, and I found it, I was very highly indignant over this pamphlet, written by a college professor, no less.
	You'd expect he would know better, right?
	Anyway, one day I went down to the library in downtown Los Angeles.
	It was only a few blocks from where our corporate office was, and I had some time in my hands that day, so I decided to just drop into the library.
	I never thought I'd go into a library again after I got out of school, because I thought that was where you punish people for doing bad things.
	But anyway, I went into the International Department, and I wanted to check out a few books on the topic of the United Nations, and in particular, these wars, these peacekeeping operations, as they called them, and to see if I could learn more about it and prove that this college professor was wrong.
	So I checked out a few books, and even though they were all written from the friendly perspective, they were all friends of the UN. Many of them were either employees or former employees, or they had positions, professional positions, which depended on their being friendly.
	Some of them were academics, and academics, I discovered, would never dare go against the UN. Anyway, so I read those books, and I recognized that they were biased.
	And so that was the beginning of it, reading their own works.
	And some of them were quite frank, by the way.
	I learned about the war in Katanga with Patrice Lumumba.
	The war on Katanga in Africa was really an eye-opener for me.
	In fact, that's how I opened my book on the United Nations, was with that section on what happened in Katanga.
	Basically, what happened is that there was a communist revolution, In the Congo, Katanga Province of the Congo, and the so-called colonial powers just left.
	There was betrayal, I think, at the highest levels in the government.
	I think it was Belgium, and they just withdrew their troops and all their law enforcement facilities and just gave the Congo over to the communist revolutionaries.
	And that was hard to believe, but there was an evidence.
	And so when the troops went out, there was mass slaughter going on.
	And it looked like it might be racial, but it was not.
	It was economic.
	It was getting the colonialists out, that was the word they used.
	The capitalists, get the capitalists out, and get the socialists in power again.
	So the Congo went into total chaos.
	Blood all over the place, and production stopped.
	The economy crashed.
	People were starving.
	People were...
	Robbing each other.
	It was total chaos.
	I fear we're, in America, going to get somewhat, like, see some of that ourselves when we make that step toward total collectivism or socialism.
	Anyway, that's what happened.
	And so the UN came along and said, well, look at this chaos.
	We've got to put an end to that.
	And everybody said, yes, yes, that's what you're for.
	And you're the peacekeepers, right?
	Yes.
	Okay, well, the peacekeepers went in and there were multiple provinces in the Congo and they were all in total...
	Blood-drenched chaos, except one.
	The one shining exception was Katanga.
	It was headed by Moishanbe.
	And Moishanbe had been to some universities in London and had come to America, and he understood the principles of free enterprise capitalism.
	And he was standing firm, and his province was like it had always been.
	And chaos was all around them.
	So where did the UN send the peacekeepers?
	There.
	They didn't send them any place else where the chaos was.
	They sent them where the chaos was not.
	And they literally overthrew the Katanga province and put it into chaos also.
	And when I saw that documented so clearly, and in many cases by the employees and officers of the UN itself, uh where they bragged about doing that in their own words and when I saw that that changed my life because it it it was a red pill you might say that I saw life the way it really was and in one book by the the uh I think it was an Irish general from Ireland um I can't think of his name anyway,
	but a big thick book on how wonderful he was in the Congo doing all these things on behalf of international cooperation and peace and so forth.
	And he time and again said, well, you know, when this issue came up, we lied in the press conferences, as all bureaucrats do.
	And he was sort of like, well, that's the way it is, folks.
	I'm glad you're reading my book.
	Now you know how it works.
	So I, Connor O'Brien, that was his name, General O'Brien.
	And I realized that these people actually boast about some of the crimes they commit.
	And that was my changing point right there.
	And so, my first interest was the United Nations, and I did some research on it.
	I took that pamphlet that I talked about a moment ago, and then my own independent research and added to it, and that's what became the basis for my book, The Fearful Master.
	That's great.
	Yeah, wonderful title as well.
	That comes from a quotation attributed to George Washington.
	I could never find an official source for it, but everybody seemed to agree that it came from him.
	And he said, government is not, let's see if I can get this straight, government is not wisdom, it is not benevolence, it is force.
	Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.
	That's great.
	Yeah, whoever wrote that.
	They had it.
	Yeah, they nailed it.
	So it's absolutely true.
	Now, you were with the John Birch Society.
	You were talking about how they like to portray Birchers as crazy.
	And I guess a big part of that, I think a big part of that war against the John Birch Society was coming from William F. Buckley.
	Talk a little bit about that.
	Was he the point man publicly, or was there other things that were happening?
	No, I don't think Buckley was a point man at all.
	That's an interesting observation.
	Buckley did come out publicly against the Birch Society.
	The militant left, left-wingers, attacked the Birch Society vehemently.
	They called it, you know, fascists, Nazis, extremists, anti-Semites, wackos, you know, any of those things.
	And they just kept repeating it and repeating it.
	And a lot of people believed it because they read about it in their newspaper.
	And, of course, it was none of those things, but that didn't make any difference.
	Perception is the important thing.
	But Buckley was not from the radical left.
	There were a few people like Buckley that also jumped on the bandwagon from what people considered to be the right wing.
	Of course, we could talk about the impropriety of thinking there's a difference between right and left later, but I learned that the hard way, too, that the right wing and the left wing are merely two Two wings on the same ugly bird called collectivism.
	That's right.
	Anyway, I hadn't learned that yet.
	So anyway, Buckley was one of those guys who was associated with the so-called right wing, but they believed pretty much the same thing, and they would attack any serious challenge to collectivism, which is what they believed in.
	Yeah, he's a big establishment.
	I remember I was thinking that I was trying to get polar opposites.
	I'd read National Review and I'd read The Nation when I was in college.
	I'd read these and kind of try to figure out what's going on.
	I didn't want to read Time and Newsweek, so I wanted to get these opposing views and everything.
	But then I eventually found out they were all so very much alike in many ways.
	I thought it was kind of extreme, but I wasn't, you know?
	Yeah, what's this opposing business business?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, people have to learn that lesson yet.
	They still think, especially as we're living right now through a period of great political intensity, they really think that the political parties are going to be their salvation.
	It's just a question, who are you going to vote for?
	And it is the most important election of our lifetime.
	You've had a lot of those most important elections of your lifetime, haven't you?
	You've probably heard that more than once.
	Every one of them.
	Last chance to do what's right.
	It's going to be the end of the world if we don't get this right.
	Yeah.
	We've heard that so many times.
	Well, so you start out with the UN and you're working with JBS. And how did you get over to the Federal Reserve?
	How did you move over to that?
	I decided I had to produce some little documentaries or documentary films, as we call them today.
	But back in those days...
	Unless you had big bucks, which we didn't, you used film strips, film strip projectors.
	And it was a projector where you roll a little roll of a 35 millimeter film with just still pictures on them.
	I think we had 98 pictures or so.
	And you click them one at a time and it projects up on the screen.
	You play the soundtrack like an LP recording on a phonograph machine.
	And when it's time to change the picture, there's a beep that comes onto the sound.
	The operator turns the picture and the narration continues.
	And then there's, it's like a PowerPoint presentation with the beeps.
	And so that's what we did in those days.
	And I did, oh, I don't know, nine or 10 of them.
	And I decided I wanted to do one on inflation.
	The money supply.
	I didn't know much about it, but I knew that there was something fishy going on, because everybody was accusing the other guy of being responsible for inflation.
	Everybody accused the farmers they were getting too much for their food.
	And the farmers said, no, we're starving.
	We have to eat our own food to just stay alive.
	We don't make any money.
	It's the distributors that take all the money and distributors.
	Not us, it's the truckers.
	And the truckers, oh no, it's not us.
	It's the grocery stores.
	And the grocery stores, oh, it's not us.
	It's the labor unions and so forth.
	And they're all, you know, everybody's pointing to somebody else as the cause.
	And they were all correct in a sense that it was not them, but they didn't know who it was.
	And there's that hidden element that nobody had looked at.
	And so I was curious about that.
	So I started to do research on inflation.
	And of course, that leads directly to the engine of inflation.
	And that's the Federal Reserve System, because that's the power that creates money out of out of debt and they can just create as much money as people are willing to borrow into existence and it's not their money they just create it out of nothing or worse than nothing on a debt so the money supply expands much faster than goods and services expand and therefore the relative prices for those goods and services in terms of
	the expanded source of the money goes up it's just a very simple formula A high school kid that knows anything about math can figure it out.
	But the American people still don't understand it, pretty much, because it's deliberately compounded and made to look very complicated.
	So I got into that, and I created a couple of banker boxes full of research on it.
	And I was ready to go.
	This topic is getting too big for me.
	And meanwhile, I had to get on and produce some faster film strips because I have to put groceries on the table, right?
	So I put the Kemp banker boxes in my closet for now.
	And then one day, I got a call from a little old lady in tennis shoes from Pasadena.
	You've heard about those ladies.
	This was the real one.
	And she was a widow, and she obviously had some money because she lived in a big house in Pasadena.
	And her husband had passed away, of course, and had this car in the garage.
	It was probably about 12, 15 years old, but I think it had like 800 miles on it.
	Well, that's a little side story, but she was a wonderful lady.
	And she had a monthly class that she was meeting in her home on taxes.
	And she'd heard that I was giving speeches and showing film strips and so forth.
	So she called me and asked me if I would give a speech to her group on the weekend on taxes.
	And I said, Well, I don't know much about taxes, except that they're too high.
	What else can you say that taxes are, but I have, I might be able to talk to your group about a hidden tax.
	Would that be of interest to you?
	And she said, a hidden tax?
	What is that?
	And in my supreme wisdom, I said, well, I guess you're just going to have to retain my services so I can tell you what it was.
	And she laughed.
	She said, you got me.
	She said, let's do it.
	So, all right, I committed to do a presentation on the Federal Reserve as the hidden tax.
	And that forced me to open up my banker boxes and go through this stuff again.
	And the second time through, I was amazed at what I picked up that I didn't catch the first time through.
	And I became electrified by how really important this was, how many areas in our lives had reached that I hadn't really focused on.
	So I got excited about it, and I spent some time putting together an outline.
	I gave the presentation, and it was very well received.
	I was happy to see.
	And some people approached me afterwards there, and they said, Ed, that was good.
	You ought to put that on the road.
	Well, you don't do that to a child actor.
	You say, oh, I'll put it on the road, which I did.
	I ramped it, got it all well organized, and I called it the Crash Course on Money.
	It was a one-day seminar.
	I thought, you know, I could probably sell tickets to this if I was smart enough, and so I tried that, and by golly, it worked.
	And I was selling tickets, and I put it on the road.
	I was going from town to town to town.
	This time, I'm not doing what I did in the old days.
	I was taking care of myself.
	And so we did that crash course on money.
	And then, I'm probably giving you more information than you want, but this is what happened.
	At the end of, I think it was probably about the 9th or 10th period, At the end of the meeting, I was approached by another little old lady, and she said, Mr.
	Griffin, and that was always a shock to me, because here she's an elderly lady, and I'm still in my 20s, late 20s or early 30s, and In my 30s, I guess.
	She's calling me Mr.
	Griffin.
	I've always got a kick out of that.
	She said, after what I've learned from you today, she said, I'm really concerned about what I should do with what limited resources I have.
	My husband passed away, and he left a small stipend in insurance, and we can get along.
	We have a small investment in a small apartment building, or two apartments, I think she said.
	But we're in debt.
	Should I get out of debt?
	Should I take what we have in assets and put it in gold and silver?
	Or what should I do with my assets?
	And it hit me at that moment what a fraud I was, because I did not know the answer to that question.
	I knew what the Federal Reserve was doing.
	I knew how they created money out of debt.
	I knew the impact it had on the purchasing power of money.
	I knew all those things, a lot of them, not all, but I was still learning still in those days.
	But to answer the question of what she should do to avoid the consequences of that, I had no idea.
	I was a fraud.
	And she was expecting me to know.
	So I stopped doing the webinar, the seminars, I should say.
	And I enrolled in the College for Financial Planning, which is a course done by A Chicago outfit, an educational group.
	It was like a CFP designation, and it normally takes a couple years to get it.
	So I enrolled in it, and it was all by correspondence.
	And then you have to go to a physical location and take the exam.
	That's an all-day exam, and so forth.
	So I did that, and I got my CFP designation as a financial advisor.
	Not because I wanted to do that, I just wanted to know how to answer this woman's question.
	How do you protect your assets under these conditions?
	So that's what I did, and then I came out of that with another realization, which I never would have had, had I not been taking that course, and that is that these people were teaching bunk.
	I was learning bunk.
	Now, they were teaching How to invest in markets that is in the best interest of the financial planners, not in the best interest of the investors.
	And that was really what it was all about.
	And of course, they always said it was for the group, for the best investment.
	I'll get this straight yet.
	It's always best for the investor himself, but it was always an investment that paid a commission to the person that recommended it or something like that.
	And none of it really took into account that the value of the money was constantly being depreciated.
	They didn't really understand inflation.
	Or they said, well, this has a better interest rate and therefore better to fight inflation.
	But they never talked about inflation itself and what the long-term consequences might be over 20 or 30 years for you who would have Do everything they recommend, but still in 20 or 30 years you have zero because the dollar is zero.
	Things like that.
	So that's when I decided, hey, Somebody ought to write a book on this.
	I looked around, and there were books on the topic, but they were all kind of written from the point of view of somebody who wanted to go into banking.
	If they wanted to be a banker, the book was there on the Federal Reserve, how to use the Federal Reserve, how it works, and the terminology.
	It was all good, but the books didn't help the average person at all understand the fraud that was built into the banking system.
	And not even the bankers.
	I had a friend of ours, and I would make remarks from time to time about the Federal Reserve.
	And we got together, and he had his brother, who was a branch manager at a bank.
	And he says, whatever his name was, I don't know, Fred or something.
	I met him once, and that was it.
	But he said, Fred, you know, Dave's got a lot of issues with the Federal Reserve.
	He said, tell him about the Federal Reserve.
	He goes, they just cash checks.
	They just process checks.
	That's your understanding of this.
	So, yeah, that was one of the most clueless people I've ever met.
	I mean, he wasn't even aware of the impact of, you know, setting interest rates even, for example, you know.
	None of it.
	Well, you see, you don't have to understand that to make a killing in the banking.
	That's right.
	All you have to do is just know how to cash checks and move the money around.
	That's right.
	And collect interest.
	That's it.
	Yeah, that's absolutely right.
	So that's how it all started.
	And so, as I said earlier, it's kind of a boring story, actually, because it's the same thing over and over again, that you'd stumble into things that you had no idea where you're headed.
	And if I had had any sense, literally any common sense, knowing what I know now, I would never have tackled it because it was so much over my understanding, over my head.
	I didn't know any of this.
	Well, It's a good thing I didn't know, because I've talked to bankers since then, and especially when I get into the topic of cancer and things like that.
	I have no medical background yet.
	I'm writing a book on cancer therapy and so forth.
	And I've had people tell me, like doctors in particular, say, Ed, you had an advantage that we didn't have.
	I said, what?
	What do you mean, an advantage?
	How could that be?
	You went to school.
	That's the advantage.
	We had to unlearn.
	All you had to do was learn.
	We had to unlearn first.
	Oh, yeah.
	Because when you go through the institutions and they teach you these things, you believe.
	You become a true believer.
	Trust these people.
	Before we leave the financial stuff, I mean, you know, we've got a lot of people looking at what is happening now.
	It looks like, you know, they've been kicking this can down the road for a long time.
	Looks like we're getting towards the end of the rope.
	They've openly talked about how they want to re-engineer the entire financial system.
	CBDC is on the horizon and all the rest of this stuff.
	What, in general, is your advice to people?
	I know you're not a financial advisor.
	You're not giving financial advice, but just in general, in terms of preparing for what is coming, what would you say to people?
	I guess it depends on to whom I'm talking because for many people if you tell them really what's happening it's so beyond their world of understanding that they can't they cannot believe it or if they believe it they don't understand it and so you're wasting your time you have to get depending who you're talking to but I guess my simplest way to explain it
	is to be totally honest, but to not be dramatic about it.
	So let's see if I can put that together.
	That's some pretty dramatic stuff.
	Yeah, not being too dramatic.
	What is happening, in my view, David, is that the old system of money is coming to an end.
	And that's an important fact to know, because up until now, All you had to know is, well, what has always worked?
	Like, should we invest in gold or silver or something?
	In coins?
	And there could be arguments pro and con, but the most overriding argument was, it's always worked.
	No matter when you look in history, no matter what the problem was, those that had gold and silver always came out on top.
	So, it's always worked that way is a really powerful item.
	But now, it isn't in my view, because the system itself is changing to the point where money will no longer even exist in the way that we think of it.
	Money, the essence of money, in order for it to have any use to us, is that we have to own it.
	It's got to be our money.
	It's not somebody else's money.
	Because if it's somebody else's money, they can just take it back, and we don't have it.
	And this is what's changing, is the fact that, and most people don't see this at all, and they think, well, no matter what they come up with, it'll be just like it always has been.
	No, no, because there's CBCDs, the Central Bank Digital Currencies, that all of the nations now are committed to adopting in the very near future, In the next decade for sure, possibly starting in the next year or two, that quality of private ownership is gone.
	Those tokens or whatever they call them, the digital currencies, they'll have different names, whatever the name is, they will be owned by the banks and they'll be allocated to you and me and everybody else to use As long as we have a good social credit, which means as long as we behave according to what they think we should behave.
	You and I are going to be pretty poor, aren't we?
	We're going to be out on the street, sitting on the curb with a tin cup, asking somebody to put a coin into the tin cup, but there'll be no coins.
	There are no coins anymore.
	They're just digital Impulses in a computer.
	So forget the cup.
	And people can understand that we're actually approaching a change in the entire system.
	So the rules of what you do are different now.
	I would say, normally, without this upcoming CBCDs, that we should have a nice stockpile in gold and silver.
	And I still say that, by the way.
	And I have, not as nice a stockpile as I would like, but I have some shekels put away in gold and silver.
	And in food and other physical tangibles, other assets that people will need and you can use as barter.
	But in terms of how you come out of it okay and still maintain your lifestyle, it's a different game.
	And the chances are we're not going to come out of it anywhere close to how we went into it.
	And we have to be prepared for that reality.
	Nobody wants to hear that.
	Yes.
	And I think what we're going to get is a heavy dose of reality.
	You know, it's going to be skills and it's going to be commodities and things like that that are going to be negotiable.
	And, you know, it's going to be, really, it is going to be a reset.
	And then the question is, how do we cope with that?
	I think...
	You know, in terms of people talking about a parallel society, Americans have not really had any experience like people in third world countries have in terms of operating black markets and things like that, but I guess we'll learn pretty quickly.
	Yeah.
	Yes, well, even the black market has a problem with it because in order for a black market to work, you have to have money that you own.
	You go into the black market and you have money that you can give to somebody who's going to give you something.
	Barter is the only thing left.
	And that only works in your local community among people you know and trust.
	So it doesn't allow you to put gas in your car.
	It doesn't allow you to pay your rent or to buy clothes in the big store, the big box stores or anything like that.
	If we don't turn this around and prevent it, We're going to be very much like little children who are completely dependent on the state for everything.
	And that includes food, shelter, health care, clothing, everything.
	And under those conditions, most people will buckle and they'll be like slaves in Egypt.
	That's right.
	The thing that concerns me Is that this is all based on surveillance.
	That is their overriding desire to know everything about us.
	And what concerns me about it is how apathetic so many people in our society are about privacy and about surveillance and about free speech.
	And you've got people across the political spectrum, all these people that are so eager about the...
	And you see both of these candidates talking about how they've got to shut people down that disagree with them.
	And because of that, people downstream from them are also buying into this kind of censorship stuff.
	And I think if we could develop and get back a respect for free speech and for privacy and things like that, that really has to be fundamental as a guard against some of this stuff, because that really is the essence of how their controls are going to run out against us.
	What do you think?
	Well, you're absolutely correct.
	And in other words, we have to be dealing with ideas.
	And ideas, that's the basis of our war.
	This is a war of ideas.
	I mean, yes, they have these powerful weapons that frighten us and can be used to eliminate us.
	And that's the ultimate weapon, of course.
	But in the meantime, they're conquering us not with weapons.
	They're conquering us with fear of weapons.
	And that fear of weapons makes us very compliant.
	And of course, if they didn't have the weapons, we wouldn't be afraid of them.
	That is true.
	But they could pretend like they have the weapons, and that's often what has happened in the past, as you probably know.
	In Russia, particularly, in the Soviet Union, they would parade these huge missiles in the street on trucks.
	You know, they were like 80 feet long, and these huge missiles, like...
	We send to the moon, or supposedly send to the moon.
	I don't know what to think about that one.
	But those weren't really missiles at all, I'm told, that they were just, you know, made of wood and painted up and so forth.
	But Americans, oh look, they got missiles too!
	And it was the fear of missiles, not the missiles themselves, that caused us to Not confront the Soviet Union and try and make friends with them and abandon our own interests and so forth.
	It's kind of a Temkin parade, right?
	Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	So anyway, this is new, and I guess that's my message, that the old answers to that question are not reliable anymore.
	That's right.
	But that still doesn't mean you shouldn't give them up.
	I mean, you shouldn't use them, I should say, because I think that Even though we don't have money, because we're not obedient enough, and they cut us down, and we did have coins, we could probably find somebody who would take silver coins, if they're a small denomination, and gold coins, in return for food, or something that they have a little surplus on in their homes.
	But this is not living, this is not surviving, this is slavery.
	And I think, though, if we fall back on the fact that what's going to get us through this, one way or the other, is going to be the ideas.
	It's going to be the principles on which we base our life.
	I think people who have a relationship with Christ are going to have a foundation that's going to carry them through this stuff.
	And it's going to be very difficult if you don't have something like that.
	You are going to, if you don't have any, the sand is going to be shifting.
	The earth is going to be quaking.
	And if there isn't some foundation that is rock solid in your life, and if they've got you afraid, they've got you.
	And that's what we saw four years ago.
	That was really panic and fear.
	But that brings me to the medical stuff, because I don't want to finish the interview without having you talk about the book, World Without Cancer.
	I think this is really a time for people's eyes to be open to this, because prior to what happened in 2020, a lot of people were taken in by the white coats.
	I remember Remember when they first started this thing, you had a public health person come out.
	I played that clip over and over again.
	Comes out to the podium, but before the person who's going to speak comes out of the podium, they had six people come out, three on each side, all of them in white coats.
	And they marched out in a line, and three of them stand on one side of the podium, and three of them said, look at this.
	They're just putting this in your face like we got white lab coats, we're medical, and we have authority.
	So listen to us.
	And I think people have seen that now as a fraud.
	And they have seen the self-interest in all of this stuff.
	So they're open to questioning the authorities on this.
	And I'm sure, you know, you must have quite a story behind A World Without Cancer.
	Because I know they came after Laetrile and B17, amygdalin, all that, in a very, very heavy way.
	I didn't realize that you had written this book until I interviewed John Richardson at rncstore.com.
	And when he was talking about the books that they have there and about your book especially, that's one of the main reasons I wanted to get you on because this is so key and it is a time that people are ripe to hear this message.
	Tell us a little bit about that, how you got into it.
	Well, there you go again.
	How did I get into it?
	Well, John Richardson Sr., Dr.
	Richardson, and I were very close friends.
	In fact, we had both worked together on projects in the Burt Society, and he put up some money to open up a little bookstore in the San Francisco area, and that's where I got involved because I was with the Burt Society in those days.
	But we soon developed a personal friendship that went well beyond that and it got to the point well after a while we want to get away from the routine the regular routine of our daily lives and we'd like to get away from town go out in the countryside and tell people we're going fishing or something like that but we just go out and and talk and do some hiking in the hills and one day We're out doing that, and Dr.
	John says to me, Ed, I need your help.
	He took his briefcase with him on that trip I thought was strange.
	He opened up his briefcase and pulled out some papers and fumbled through them.
	He says, I'm trying to write an article for the local newspaper or magazine, and I need your help writing.
	Could you help me?
	I said, well, sure, of course, that's what I do.
	You're the doctor.
	If I get sick, you help me.
	I'm the writer, and if you're silly enough to ask me, I'll help you with the writing.
	And so he said, well, I asked him, I said, what is it?
	He said, well, I'm in trouble with a local medical association.
	They're threatening to take away my license.
	I said, what did you do?
	You know, like the typical, what did you do wrong?
	Well, what I'm doing wrong is I'm saving lives.
	Oh, this was new.
	And now we've seen that story over and over again.
	People are ready to hear this and understand what's behind it.
	I said, what do you mean?
	So naturally, he told me this story.
	He said, I'm an eye, ear, nose, and throat specialist, as you know, but I've been getting people with cancer throughout their body.
	It's systemic, and they want me to treat them because they hear that I've got something that works.
	And I said, well, do you?
	He says, yeah, I do.
	Well, tell me about it.
	So that's how the whole thing started.
	He said, well, I found out there's a substance that's found in nature that I didn't believe in at first, but my office manager convinced me to look into it, so I did.
	This is a substance that occurs in nature, and...
	If you eat it, it turns out to be a natural control or prevention, a natural resistance against cancer.
	I said, how can that be?
	He said, well, I'm not sure how it can be, but I know that it works.
	So he told me the story of this amygdalin, or laetrile is the more popular name for it, that's found in some 1,200 edible plants, actually.
	But anyway, it's primarily found for commercial purposes in apricot seeds and peach seeds and...
	Any fruit in the rosacea family has this stuff called amygdala in it.
	It's bitter to the taste, and that's why most people in the Western world or in affluent societies don't like to eat foods that have this substance in it, because it's bitter.
	If you've ever bitten into an apple seed, you know what I'm talking about.
	That's the flavor.
	And he said that stuff in low quantities It looks like it's a natural control for cancer.
	He told me the story.
	This gets interesting in the details.
	He had a dog that had cancer, and he was about to put the dog down because he tried chemotherapy and everything else on the dog that the doctors do, and it wasn't working.
	In fact, the dog was getting sicker.
	And when he heard about it, he says, I decided to use this substance on the dog.
	And he said, blow me down.
	The dog got well real fast.
	I couldn't believe it.
	I'd never seen that happen before.
	And then the next part of the story is that he said his nurse came to him, his head nurse, whose husband had terminal cancer.
	And she said, Dr.
	John, you know, my husband is not going to last very much longer.
	And I saw what happened to the dog.
	Would you please do that for my husband?
	And he said, well, sure, I'd be glad to, but don't tell anybody because it's not approved, you know, for human use.
	And he tried it on her husband, and he got well.
	This is how it all started.
	And so John said, I started using it very, very cautiously and very low dosages and very suspiciously, making sure that I was not risking anybody's life, using it only on people who really had terminal cancer to start off with.
	And he said I was getting way, way better results than anybody I know.
	But the word got out.
	He said, I never advertised it, never talked much about it, because I knew what the establishment would say about it.
	It was quackery or something like that.
	But the word got out, because these patients that are Dancing out of the office when they came in on a gurney.
	They talk about it.
	And so patients started coming to his clinic.
	And it was no longer by this time an eye, ear, nose and throat clinic.
	It was a cancer clinic.
	And people were coming from all over the world.
	And I didn't know that at that time.
	So that's the story he told me.
	And he said, now the medical profession has found out about it.
	And they threatened me that if I don't stop this immediately, they're going to take my license.
	He said, I need to tell the story.
	Will you help me write it?
	I said, sure.
	That sounds interesting.
	I thought it would be it.
	Three-day project, you know, just to read about it a little bit and ask a few questions and then just write it up.
	But it turned out to be, I don't know, a three-year project.
	Yeah, something like that.
	And it changed my life.
	It just changed my life.
	I wouldn't be here today if I hadn't learned about that.
	Because it made me realize That almost everything that we think we know that is really important in our lives is a lie.
	When I realized that money was a lie, and now I found out that cancer treatments were a lie, what's more important than that?
	So that changed my life.
	In my own family, I've seen...
	We have some members of our family that are alive because of the treatments.
	So I wrote the book.
	It took me quite a while.
	I sat at the feet of listening to the great...
	The great scientists and doctors who really knew about this stuff.
	Dr.
	Richardson was very open about it.
	And, of course, I met the originator of this whole treatment, who was Dr.
	Ernst T. Krebs, Jr., who was the inventor of all that.
	Oh, not the inventor, but the discoverer of the chemical and pioneer in using it for cancer.
	And I sat in his office many, many an hour.
	He's a portly gentleman.
	He would sit back and he'd put his fingers together and say, well, let me think about that for a moment.
	And then he'd go off.
	How did he discover it?
	How did he discover it?
	Well, okay.
	His father was a doctor, an MD. He was not an MD doctor.
	He had his PhD degree from some smaller institution, which they liked to hold it against him because it wasn't from Harvard or something like that.
	He was a PhD, but his doctor was a pioneer in that.
	So his doctor and his father and he worked together on all kinds of herbal constructions.
	From nature, because they had already discovered in their minds that nature has the cure, not the test tube.
	So that's where they were experimenting, and they found that the use of laetrile, or the substance.
	Now there's this whole big story behind it, so that's what the book was about.
	I'll just give you one quick example.
	One of the clues to this was the fact that in the Midwest, It was quite common for farmers to see that their cows would develop cancers of the mouth and lips and so forth, and other parts of their bodies in the wintertime.
	But they would usually go away in the spring.
	And they thought, why was that?
	There must be something about the weather, you know?
	Well, Then they got to observing that it happened shortly after the green sprouts came up through the snow in the spring when the snow started to melt and the first green grasses started to come up through the snow and the cows would eat the green grasses and it turns out these broad leaf grasses are very rich sources of amygdalin.
	So that was the kind of clues that they had how they discovered this is by you know scientific method And so anyway, that's how it started.
	And so John asked me to help him write the article, and I did.
	And that led to the book.
	And then what happened?
	I bet they...
	That was a hornet's nest.
	When we look at what happened in the last few years, if anybody comes up with any treatment other than the one that they've decided they're going to sell you, they come after you in every way.
	We've seen that with ivermectin, HCQ, anything else that anybody comes up with.
	And so everybody, this has been on public display now, but you live this, I guess the book was written in 1970.
	You've done an update, I think in 2010 or something like that.
	But, you know, this is back in the 60s, I guess, where this was happening, when you were publishing it.
	So what happened after you published this?
	What was the Firestorm?
	Well, that's an interesting story.
	I published it and we sold it.
	I had a little publishing company by then, American Media, and we had a very brisk sale on it.
	And I went to a book convention in San Francisco shortly after the book was published.
	And that's where all the biggies came, you know, these big exhibits that Half a block wide.
	And let's see, which one was it?
	It was the little pocketbooks.
	Bantam, Bantam.
	Bantam was there.
	And I thought, well, maybe we could convince Bantam to reprint this and put it on the big market.
	So it just so happened on the morning of the first day, the president of Bantam was there on the floor when I was there.
	And I saw this cluster of people around him.
	So I thought, I'll get in line.
	So I did.
	And so I went up, shook his hand.
	I said, I'll make this short, Mr.
	Smith, or whatever his name was.
	I said, we have this book here on Laetrile and it's curing cancer.
	You probably have heard about it in the newspapers.
	There's a big controversy over it.
	And I'd like to give you a copy and see if it sounds like it's something that Bantam would like to run with.
	So he gave it to his assistant, who was standing next to him, and he said, yeah, we'll look at this.
	Well, they called me later in the afternoon, and they wanted to have dinner with me, and they wanted to talk to me about printing the book.
	So, to make a long story short, we did.
	We signed a contract.
	Wow!
	We got Bantam to publish our book.
	And they put it out.
	They made it, they had a special name for it.
	It was a special edition that they can produce a book in, I think it's 48 hours, something like that.
	Wow.
	And they just work around the clock.
	They have teams of people and they work 24 hours to get the thing out in 48 hours or something like that.
	And they did that with this book.
	And it went on the book stand and it was selling like hotcakes.
	And then all of a sudden, we got this message that it's out of print.
	Nobody can get the book out of print.
	And so we checked it out.
	Sure enough, it's out of print.
	How come it's out of print?
	And I called the publisher and said, well, there's no demand for it.
	There's no demand.
	The bookstores are clamoring for it.
	Well, our statistics show there's no demand for it.
	Well, we couldn't convince them otherwise.
	They just didn't want to reprint it.
	So it was clear that somebody on the board of directors at Bantam got the word, hey, you guys made a big mistake.
	You published the wrong book.
	And so we were clamped out.
	We had one printing, and that was it.
	It was glorious for a few weeks, but after that, it was deader than a doornail.
	Story of my life.
	You talk about the pharmaceutical companies, they come after you and they get you shut down.
	It is amazing, but again, people can find that at rncstore.com.
	I know that he sells it there.
	And very important for people to take control of their life, to question what they have been taught, and to think critically.
	And that really has been the story of your life, I think.
	Questioning what a lot of people just accept as fact.
	And you have done your research, and you gave people your opinion.
	And I think when their response is to just shut things down, that's something of an endorsement of your research, I think.
	with their own responses to censor you.
	Yeah, in sort of a backward way.
	That's a pretty good recommendation.
	I've been censored by the best.
	That's right.
	Well, tell us about the Red Pill University and the Red Expo, which is coming up November 16th through 17th, right?
	Tell us a little bit about it.
	Yes.
	That's a big flagship event.
	We started the Red Pill Expos in 2017, and they've been just roaring successes.
	We were very skeptical about it at first because, you know, the Red Pill meme, in case there's anybody listening that doesn't know what that means, it's based on a sci-fi movie.
	It's About 21 years ago now, called The Matrix.
	And the whole theme of the story was that humans were now living in a fantasy world.
	They were all wired up to machines, and they were dreaming about their lives.
	They weren't really living them.
	And they thought they were going to work every day.
	They thought they were raising a family, going on vacation, eating meals, and so forth.
	But it was all programmed into their minds.
	They were controlled by the matrix, that's what they called it.
	It was this computerized reality.
	And the only way to get out of that was to take the red pill.
	There was the blue pill, which you could take if you chose to, which would put you back into the illusion.
	But to get out of the illusion, you had to take the red pill.
	It turns out that many people chose the blue pill because it was more comfortable.
	They'd rather not know that they were wired up to a machine.
	They'd rather think they were living a normal life.
	It was more pleasant than knowing that you had to fight the matrix to exist.
	So it was kind of a good parallel to the reality.
	So we thought we would call this the Red Pill Expo and deal with topics like that, that we wanted to expose the reality.
	And that's underneath the illusions.
	And as I said a moment ago, it seems like the more important something is, the more likely it is that we are in illusions about it.
	Because it's to somebody's best interest to do that to us.
	They profit from our naivety and our false beliefs.
	Now, where can people go to get this?
	You've got red...
	Well, yeah.
	We have done physical events from the beginning, and they were very well attended and very successful.
	But this time around, we've decided to go 100% livestream, primarily so that we can cut expenses on the overall production and make the event absolutely free instead of having to charge tickets for it.
	Because we want, this is not about money, it's about getting the word out.
	So that's what we're doing this time, and it's working pretty well.
	We're very impressed by the response.
	But we want as many people, this is globally now, around the world, to sign up for it.
	And you can find all the information, who's going to be speaking, what the events are, what the topics are, and a lot of insights as to the themes and so forth on redpillexpo.org okay redpillexpo.org so sign up it's free and we do have an option for those that want to come in on a vip basis that gets some extra goodies if they want to do that like they can ask questions of the speakers and Oh, that's cool.
	We've got a raffle going on and all that kind of thing.
	That's great.
	It would be nice to be able to pay the bills, but we want this free, if necessary, to anybody that can't afford $10 or $20 or whatever it is as a donation.
	It's free.
	That's what our goal is, you see.
	Good.
	And one other question I've got about it.
	I see that you've got a new book coming up.
	It's called The Chasm, The Issue Behind All Issues.
	When is that coming up?
	Well, the latter part is a tough one.
	Yes, I do have a new book.
	It's been coming out ever since the day after 9-11, actually.
	Oh, okay.
	That's when I started to write it.
	The day after 9-11.
	You talk about a red pill.
	Oh yeah.
	But the whole purpose of the book is to provide historical support for the fact that our war today that we're in is a war of ideas.
	It's an ideological war.
	And it's not between the left and the right.
	It's not between the Republicans and the Democrats, or the Liberals and the Conservatives, or the Nazis, or the Communists, or the Socialists, or all of these labels that we've been given to worry about.
	It's not the Masons, it's not the Catholics, it's not the Jews, it's not the Black people, it's not the Christians, it's not the Muslims.
	All these divisions they want to get us focused on, you know, it's not about any of that.
	Those all little subsections play a part in it, but the overriding, controlling, dominating force behind it all is an idea, and it's a conflict of ideas, I should say, between something called collectivism and individualism.
	I found out in my research that those words were well known and used quite extensively a hundred years ago.
	You find them in the old books and in old newspapers too.
	But modern, no, it's all been scrubbed.
	And for good reason, because those two words, as strange as they are to the ears of most people today, are fully describing the conflict between Left and right and all these things we mentioned before.
	When you peel off the labels, you find it's collectivism versus individualism.
	And so what is that?
	How do you define that?
	And that's what this booklet is all about.
	I took all the issues in the big book that I'm working on, To illustrate support for these principles, I've taken just the principles themselves and put them into a 50-page document, and I'm giving them away free because I'm afraid I'm not going to live long enough to get this bloody book finished, although I'm making progress.
	I want to get these principles out now.
	So about 10 months ago, we made this little booklet here.
	This is 50 pages.
	Yeah, it's the chasm, collectivism versus individualism, and it's everything I have learned about those two topics, it's all there in type, and we got some good illustrations, you can see those in the back, that sort of illustrate the points that we're making.
	I think I have found very few, very few open-minded people, and that's hard to define, but very few people who I would have considered to be on the other side politically, From my position, that after reading this and going over these principles, doesn't come to the point where they say, hmm, hmm, I guess I've been an individualist all along and didn't know it.
	It's that simple.
	It's that clear.
	We get to thinking of, well, let me back up.
	The mantra of collectivism is this.
	The individual must be sacrificed.
	Fully stated it is, the group is more important than the individual, and the individual must be sacrificed if necessary for the greater good of the greater number.
	Boy, didn't we see that with public health and all the rest of the stuff?
	We see that with everything.
	Yeah, I know.
	We see that with everything.
	That's a good example because they don't care about individual health, right?
	No.
	We don't really care if you've had any issues with any of this.
	You're going to do it for the public health, for the public good.
	Everybody's going to have to do this.
	And I talk about that bureaucracy, the public education, and once they start talking about that, it is the collectivism that is there.
	You'll find this issue underneath all of them.
	That's why I say this is the issue behind all issues, literally.
	And look at Pearl Harbor, look at 9-11, look at COVID, look at everything.
	I don't care what it is, you'll find that collectivism is the answer, what makes all of that seem justified.
	Yes.
	Lenin put it this way.
	Vladimir Ilyich Lenin said, if you want to make an omelet, you have to crack some eggs.
	And now it can be said many different ways, but the greatest insults of history, the greatest outrages of history have been justified with this mantra.
	President Roosevelt and his team justified withholding information from American commanders on Pearl Harbor so that they were literally surprised by the Japanese attack, and they justified that, and they justified keeping the information unknown to the American people because it was a mark of statesmanship.
	It was a means of bringing about a greater good because it was necessary to convince the American people that we needed to get into World War II as quickly as possible so that we can sit at the peace table afterwards and when we do redivide the world and we'll make it a better world and we probably would save millions of American lives too because the Japanese surely would have come over and bombed our cities and so forth and you know the average American said oh oh Yeah,
	I guess the 4,000 sailors we killed deliberately in Pearl Harbor was worth it, because it's the greater good of the greater number, you know?
	Everything, everything that happens in this world that's horrible is justified by the perpetrators on the mantra of collectivism.
	And it's time to recognize that.
	It's time to break that hypnosis that that idea has over us.
	I learned that in school.
	They taught me that.
	The greater good for the greater number was the ideal political position.
	And most people still think it is.
	Yes.
	Oh, boy, we saw it in spades, didn't we?
	Absolutely amazing.
	Yeah, and I think you're spot on with that and so many other things.
	It's so interesting to talk to you.
	You've had so many important insights throughout your life, and your work has been very valuable to so many people.
	And I haven't read...
	The World Without Cancer, but that's my intention to read that.
	That's very, very important, especially when we look at the last four years, how the veil has been pulled back on what the pharmaceutical industry and what the government supposedly oversight people are doing for the greater good.
	You know, when people die miserably and it's like, well, it's rare.
	It doesn't matter, right?
	It's for the better good, for the greater good, the common good.
	So we're going to approve this drug that is out there.
	Yeah.
	Thank you so much for joining us.
	And again, it's redpilluniversity.org, but you have redexpo.org.
	Is that the one where people go for the Red Expo that's coming up?
	What is the website?
	It's redpillexpo.org.
	Redpillexpo.org.
	Okay.
	Yeah, redpillexpo.org.
	If you go there, you'll see who we have as the upcoming speakers.
	We still have three or four that we haven't put on the page yet.
	They're all dynamite.
	These people...
	All have a red pill to share with you, and they're all really, really important.
	And so it'll be two days.
	I mean, be prepared to be blown away by information like this.
	That's great.
	It'll change your life.
	That's great.
	Thank you so much for joining us, G. Edward Griffin.
	It's been a great pleasure talking to you.
	Thank you.
	Thank you, David.
	I really appreciate it, and it's good to see you again on the screen, and we'll be talking later.
	Thank you very much.
	Bye-bye.
	Well, what an inspiration G. Edward Griffin is.
	A real critical thinker.
	A visionary.
	A man with the courage to go wherever the truth leads him.
	And again, landmark books.
	The UN A Fearful Master, Creature from Jekyll Island, A World Without Cancer.
	And of course, the Red Pill Expo that is coming up.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day.
	Let me tell you.
	The David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah.
	Good job.
	And you want to know something else?

▲