Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 28, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:30

The David Knight Show -10/28/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Free Minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 28th of October, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	44.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at the Joe Rogan-Donald Trump interview.
	Three hours of mostly chill talk that I think was intended, certainly happened, as an antidote to Hillary Clinton talking about a Nazi rally in Madison Square Garden.
	And we're going to take a look at the total collapse of the Lala campaign.
	Don't pay any attention to the polls.
	Take a look at what the CEOs are doing.
	And I think it's looking like a CEO landslide.
	But then, of course, there's always the question of whether or not they're building expectations for a civil war.
	We'll also take a look at Tucker telling us that we need Don as Daddy and Charlie Kirk telling people they need to pressure their pastors to endorse Donald Trump.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, I want to begin the program by thanking Guard Goldsmith, doing an excellent job on Friday as usual.
	This guest, Eric Peters, and another guest.
	And it is always great to be able to have somebody that can step in and give us a break.
	And we really did need a break.
	So it's much appreciated.
	And of course, for the audience, we don't skip a beat.
	We got Gard here.
	So thank you, Gard, for doing that.
	Well, let's take a look at what Joe Rogan and Trump did.
	They talked for three hours.
	And I like this headline.
	This is from New York Magazine.
	They talked for three hours and they didn't mention Jeffrey Epstein once.
	Not once.
	There's so much to talk about.
	You can do a three-hour program just on recollections of Donald Trump with his many adventures with Jeffrey Epstein.
	And of course, you know, there's big questions about Operation Warp Speed.
	You know, Fauci was not also, was not mentioned, not once.
	Not once.
	Even though they talked about really bad advisors.
	Well, I don't know if Fauci was a bad advisor.
	I mean, he gave him a medal on his last day.
	But that's the standard line that's been fed by the MAGA media.
	I guess we'd call them the MAGA stream press, right?
	They've had, well, you know, it's not Trump's fault.
	He's just, you know, bad advisors.
	He didn't know when he picked John Bolton what John Bolton was.
	He's the only person in the world that doesn't know what John Bolton was.
	John Bolton was spouting off at the UN for the longest time.
	Has Donald Trump never paid attention to politics?
	Of course he's paid attention to politics.
	But we'll get to that.
	First thing, though, is Jeffrey Epstein.
	Two hours and 40 minutes into Rogan's interview with Trump.
	This is by Matt Stieb at New York Magazine.
	Two hours and 40 minutes into it, Rogan finally asked about...
	At least one of his most frequent obsessions.
	One of the things I wanted to talk to you about was the JFK files.
	They pressed Trump for a reason why he didn't fully release the classified files.
	Trump said, well, there are some people still alive who are affected.
	To which Rogan suggested that these people were implicated then.
	Implicated in a plot.
	Oh, well.
	To kill candy, he said, well, if these are living people, Trump said, you generally don't want to do it.
	So I guess that's one of the reasons why we didn't ask too many questions, or Joe Rogan didn't ask too many questions about the attempted Trump assassination, but they did briefly talk about the bullet scar.
	He was a nice guy.
	Once they shot you, I was like, he's got to come in here.
	It's all about timing.
	It's all about the timing.
	It's about ratings.
	Do you even have a scar on your ear?
	You got anything on there?
	I do.
	What did we say?
	So, right over here.
	That's a tiny little mark.
	It zipped right there.
	It healed up pretty fucking good.
	Well, it's pretty good, yeah.
	It's not like some of the wrestlers, some of the UFC fighters.
	No, you didn't get cauliflower.
	No, no.
	It was sort of like a top shot.
	The point of the bullet was a little of the ass, but you see, the thing's taken off a little bit, but it makes me a tougher guy.
	You know, the fighters...
	Yeah, it makes him a tougher guy, you know.
	Was that a Freudian slip when he talked about professional wrestling?
	The squib or what?
	Oh, where'd that come from?
	And then somebody put this out.
	It said, the moment Joe realized the assassination was staged.
	Look, it was not a lone shooter or a patsy or whatever.
	Whoever, it's either an assassination attempt that he miraculously survived.
	Or it was a false flag that they sacrificed people in the audience for.
	It's easy for me to believe either one of those.
	But I don't know.
	When we start talking about bullet scar, you know the initials for bullet scar?
	What is that?
	BS. BS. The bullet scar is BS. It appears that Rogan himself took the same Protect the Living approach on Friday to Trump's benefit regarding another one of his obsessions, because Rogan has talked incessantly about Jeffrey Epstein, and he didn't mention that.
	In a 2020 interview, for example, all the times that Joe Rogan has talked about, or key times he talked about Epstein, For example, in a 2020 interview with a former CIA agent, Rogan proposed that Epstein didn't kill himself and was discussed at length the theory that he was an Israeli intelligence asset tasked with getting leverage over the world's rich and powerful.
	Is that a theory?
	Is that a theory?
	I don't think it's a theory.
	It is a conspiracy, not a theory.
	In 2022, he said Alex Jones had told him years before about an island where they take influential people and they have sex with underage people.
	Where did Alex find out about that?
	And if you knew about that, why did he support Trump?
	Okay, well, in 2023, Rogan speculated that Epstein's painting of Bill Clinton in a dress in his Upper East Side mansion was a reminder of his leverage over the former president.
	In August, Rogan was not afraid to ask billionaire and former FBI informant Peter Thiel About his scheduled meetings with Epstein in 2014.
	Six years after, he says, six years after Epstein was sent to prison for sex crime.
	He wasn't sent to prison.
	He had the sweetheart deal from the guy that, Alex Acosta, the guy that Trump put in as labor secretary.
	And his lawyers defending Epstein again were Ken Starr and Alan Dershowitz.
	I mean, you can't...
	Every time I look at that, you know, it's like, you see Ken Starr defending Jeffrey Epstein, and you understand why he didn't come after Bill Clinton.
	Completely, this guy who, to the public, Ken Starr presented this persona of, you know, this straight-as-an-arrow Christian guy.
	He later became president at Baylor.
	And, of course, he was involved in covering up a sexual scandal there.
	Three giant sexual scandals that Ken Starr was at the epicenter of covering up this conservative Christian lawyer.
	Look at what they do.
	Not at their labels and not how the media portrays them.
	But they arranged a sweetheart deal in terms of prison.
	Yeah, he would go there to sleep at night and he was free to do whatever he wanted to during the day.
	As I said before, this is like saying that Otis from the Andy Griffith show was always locked up in jail.
	I mean, you know, Otis let himself in.
	This is the Otis sentence that they put together for Epstein.
	And, of course, this guy that Trump puts in as labor secretary, Didn't really have any qualifications.
	I mean, he'd just been like a local prosecutor or something.
	Then he gets put in his...
	It's great to know things, know the right people, but it's more important to know things about the right people.
	And I'm sure that he probably came across some documents involving Trump and that trial of Jeffrey Epstein.
	Anyway, after all that had happened, six years after that had happened...
	Peter Thiel meets with him.
	And so Rogan asked Thiel about it and says there naturally Thiel disagreed with Rogan's thoughts on Epstein.
	He said, well, I think he's got dirt on the world's most powerful people.
	You know, people like you.
	He didn't make it that pointed, but that's what he was implying.
	Oh, no, that's not the case at all.
	But on Friday, he didn't even ask Trump about Epstein, not even once.
	Not even once.
	You see, this is why they've got people like Joe Rogan.
	This is why they pay Joe Rogan $25 million on Spotify, and why Spotify won't even allow my podcast to be broadcast there.
	The only place where it's shut down, they're controlled.
	They're there to control what you know, what you see.
	And he does a great job of it.
	He's all over the place with all this stuff, and he loves to get into sensational things.
	But he's not going to tell you anything that's true.
	He's not going to go anywhere that's going to make the powerful uncomfortable.
	He's not going to expose any real agendas.
	Yeah, everybody can talk about Jeffrey Epstein's sex poison sound.
	Oh, look at this.
	I'm really uncovering the dirt.
	That's nothing.
	That's nothing if you don't want to ask Trump about it when he's there.
	You see, it's a limited hangout.
	We'll talk all the time about Jeffrey Epstein, but when it comes to Trump and the fact that these guys were best friends for a couple of decades, and their friendship, I mean, they're partying together all the time in New York and in Florida.
	Their friendship broke up over their competition in terms of wanting a particular property in West Palm Beach.
	These two spoiled billionaires.
	And so, other than that, I mean, you know, he introduced Trump to Melania.
	She was one of his girls.
	I mean, you could take a look at the pictures of the four of them.
	Look at that look that Melania is giving Epstein with Ghislaine Maxwell on the other side.
	There was much that Rogan could have asked about, such as Trump's long friendship with Epstein in the 1990s.
	He didn't ask about flying on Epstein's infamous plane.
	He didn't ask Trump about the unsubstantiated claims from Epstein's alleged victims that Trump had sex with him.
	He did not ask about the new allegation this week from model Stacey Williams, who claimed that Trump groped her in Trump Tower in 1993, as Epstein watched.
	And of course, it's come out, and she's a Democrat operative.
	And of course, we know the political timing of this, trying to put this out as an October surprise, right?
	But does that change the credibility of this at all?
	Yeah, that's what they, you know, we've got some dirt here on him and we're going to release it right before.
	Well, because you released it right before the election.
	That doesn't count.
	I don't believe it.
	Oh, it's believable.
	Like I said, just take a look at the picture of the foursome of Trump, Melania, Epstein, and Ghislaine.
	It's believable.
	It's believable.
	Um, He didn't ask, Rogan didn't ask Trump about his comment in 2002 that Epstein likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.
	Trump instead discussed how he was impressed with the Lincoln bedroom in the White House.
	Yeah, this long thing about Lincoln and the Civil War.
	Lincoln was really tall, but my son, Barron, is three inches taller than him, you know.
	He was 6'6", but, you know, Barron is already 6'9".
	Yeah, that kind of stuff.
	It was a very chill, personable, you look at it, you look at the clips, and it's like this ordinary conversation.
	Very comfortable.
	I know Trump was at ease, knowing he's not going to be challenged on anything.
	And so, it was a perfect antidote to all of the Hillary Clinton hysteria.
	About Madison Avenue, Madison Square Garden.
	That's like Hitler!
	It's crazy.
	And it was FDR, her hero, had a rally, Madison Square Garden, 1936, three days before the election.
	Does that make him a Nazi?
	And then three years before that...
	A lot of Jews had an anti-Hitler rally in Madison Square Garden.
	They're desperate.
	And that's why I'm saying we're going to talk a little bit about how the Democrats are in disarray.
	And it's collapsed.
	And we'll talk about what's going to happen before you start applauding.
	Okay.
	Anyway...
	They talked about Lincoln in the Lincoln bedroom, and he talked about how the word tariff is more beautiful than love.
	That must be what Epstein was talking to people about.
	Terrorists.
	Yeah.
	Rogan teed up Trump to bash Harris on her policies in the 2020 Democrat primary.
	And they both discussed their thoughts on wind turbines.
	I thought this was really the best quote of the entire interview.
	At least of what I've seen of it.
	I didn't watch all three hours of it, but I've seen excerpts.
	I read the transcript.
	Well, I didn't read the transcript, but I searched for keywords.
	Most of them came back empty.
	You're not going to find much if you look for keywords that affect us in terms of what they talked about.
	But they did talk about windmills and the wind turbines.
	And this is the best quote, I think.
	He called them bird cemeteries.
	That's not that good.
	But I like what he said, how the vibrations drive the whales crazy.
	He goes, I want to be a whale psychiatrist, said Trump.
	He just can't make up his mind.
	Does he want to do fries at McDonald's, or does he want to be a whale psychologist?
	Psychiatrist.
	Yeah, just got to get him on that couch.
	Trump claimed that Google CEO Sundar Pichai told him that his stunt appearance working at McDonald's was, quote, one of the biggest things we have ever had on Google.
	And I'm sure that it was.
	I'm sure that it was.
	As a matter of fact, you know, while we're talking about history, I guess, what other president...
	Has had dozens of appointees openly oppose them and campaign against them.
	Yeah, he talked about his advisors, his bad advisors.
	Here's what Trump said about his advisors.
	This has been the standard talking point, as I said, at the top of the show.
	This has been the talking point to excuse everything that Trump did.
	There was an outright betrayal of not only his voter base, but the Constitution.
	We just got really bad advisors.
	The biggest mistake I made was I picked some people.
	I picked some great people, you know, but you don't think about that.
	I picked some people that I shouldn't have picked.
	I picked a few people that I shouldn't have picked.
	Neocons?
	Yeah, neocons, or bad people, or disloyal people, or...
	People that were just...
	Disloyal, see.
	You got bad advice.
	Yeah, I mean, look, I mean, you're reading about them a little bit today.
	A guy like Kelly who was a bully, a bully but a weak person, you know.
	You know more about bullies than anybody probably around because you deal in a certain sport where the bullies are exposed very quickly.
	But you know...
	Heels and heroes, you know, professional wrestling.
	Bolton was an idiot, but he was great for me because I'd go in with a guy like a John Bolton.
	You know John Bolton?
	A friend of mine called...
	Called me up.
	I was picking Bolton.
	He's a very smart guy.
	His name is Phil Ruffin.
	He's a very rich guy from Las Vegas.
	He's a great card player.
	He doesn't play cards, but he's a great player.
	He's just a natural.
	He's got poker sense, right?
	He's great, but he doesn't play.
	And Phil Ruffin is a very, very wise kind of a guy.
	And one of the richest people around.
	And has had great success and understands people.
	So...
	It was in that I was picking Bolton, or I picked Bolton.
	He called up.
	He said, don't pick him.
	He's a bad guy.
	Now, he wasn't in politics at all.
	He's in various businesses.
	Yeah, everybody knew about Bolton Trump, including you.
	He's a bad guy.
	It always works out bad with that guy.
	I said, I wish you'd told me this two weeks ago.
	I already hired him.
	He's here.
	There's nothing I can do about it.
	But he was good in a certain way.
	He's a nut job.
	And every time I had to deal with a country, when they saw this whack job standing behind me, they said, oh, man, Trump's going to go to war with us.
	He was with Bush when they went stupidly into the Middle East.
	They should have never done it.
	On the advice of your CIA director.
	So I always got more publicity than other people.
	And it wasn't like I was trying.
	In fact, I don't know exactly why.
	Maybe you can tell me why.
	Oh, I can definitely tell you.
	You said a lot of wild shit.
	Maybe.
	Yeah, well, you know, he was at the UN, and he used it as a bully pulpit.
	And everybody, even a card player, a wonderful poker player that doesn't play cards, like Phil Ruffin...
	I have no idea who this guy is, but he's a great card player, but he just, I'm sorry, I would like to play you, but I'm just too good.
	I would take all of your money, so I don't want to do that.
	Anyway, everybody knows, including card players in Las Vegas, but Trump didn't know.
	What does that tell us about Trump?
	He's a liar.
	And so it reminds me, you know, because again, John Bolton made a name for himself being crazy at the UN. I remember interviewing Roger Stone one time when he was in the studio.
	And we were talking about something that I don't even remember what we were talking about.
	But at the end of it, we had not talked about Nikki Haley.
	And I asked Roger, I said, why did Trump put Nikki Haley in?
	She's one of the worst people with an R behind her name.
	And he said, well, he just did it to get her out of the way.
	Out of the way.
	He put her at the UN. That's a bully pulpit.
	That's where John Bolton made a name for himself.
	And so, you know, everybody knows the adage, personnel is policy.
	And he wants to criticize, Trump wants to criticize John Bolton because, you know, John Bolton is this crazy guy that got us into this war for no reason.
	You know who the really crazy person was that got us into that war for no reason?
	Gina Haspel.
	Who presented the lies about weapons of mass destruction that she obtained through torture.
	Then she covered up the torture.
	And then when John Kiriakou, the whistleblower, blew the whistle on, he goes to jail.
	But she gets promoted.
	The person who produced the lies.
	It was promoted by Trump, the head of the CIA. She was head of the CIA the entire four years he was there for all practical purposes.
	First couple of years, Pompeo was there.
	And then they moved him to the State Department.
	She was number two, then number one.
	She was running the place.
	The person who lied us into the Iraq War.
	You see, this is how this stuff works, folks.
	You want to get all tied up in a knot about the election?
	Do you realize what professional wrestling this whole thing is?
	And this is why I tell you, focus on real things.
	Focus on your life.
	And focus on things that are local, even.
	If you want to get involved in politics, then get involved in politics locally.
	I had a listener said, I heard you're talking about getting involved in politics.
	I went to a meeting, and it was the biggest waste of time I've ever had.
	Nobody wanted to, well, yeah.
	Many times that's the case.
	It's largely the case.
	And you're probably going to have to work outside the political party that is in power, even if it's the Republican Party.
	You're going to have to work outside of them to get things done.
	And you're going to have to, I think, organize around a single issue at a time.
	And you need to push those forward.
	So, you know, pay attention.
	You know, try to minimize the damage.
	We're talking about not having two good choices.
	Well, that's many times the way that it is.
	And not having a good choice between two people.
	That's frequently the way that it is in the elections.
	And so, the earlier you get involved in the primaries, the better.
	And you might wind up with a good candidate.
	Otherwise, it is trying to do damage control.
	Of the lesser of two evils.
	And that really makes a difference at the local level.
	It doesn't make a difference at the national level.
	I'm going to tell you why coming up.
	Because everybody's like, oh, look, now we're reading all the tea leaves and reading all the polls.
	And there's another way to see that the establishment, I think, has selected Trump as we're now a week and a day away from the election.
	But I know what that is like.
	I mean, I've talked about the meeting that I went to where we used to live in North Carolina.
	It's on the outskirts of Chapel Hill, North Carolina, where the University of North Carolina is.
	They had a lot of people there who rigged the system.
	They rigged the county government because they got in, and the first thing they did very cleverly, They got rid of people selecting county commissioners by geographical area.
	And they just did it by popular vote.
	This is why you see the Democrats always talking about popular vote.
	It's a trap, folks.
	Because I've seen how this works even on the local level.
	These people went in.
	They spilled into this county from Chapel Hill.
	And a lot of people, very wealthy, worked for the university, worked for the state, moved in there.
	And the rest of the county, most of the county was rural farmers.
	Many of them, their families had been there for a century, century and a half.
	And so these people didn't like that, and they didn't want any more development, but they didn't like farms either because, you know, they're environmentalists.
	And so they decided that they were going to take over the county government.
	And the way that they did it was to change the rules so that rather than voting in different regions, which had given conservatives control of the county government for a long time, they made an election at large.
	And once that happened, they took control of They put all kinds of regulations on the farmers, and the poor farmers couldn't even sell their farms because then they put regulations on them selling the farms because they didn't want any more development.
	It was hideous what they did to them.
	And that was a real learning experience for me.
	And that's why I understand the wisdom of the founders in terms of setting up the electoral college.
	That's one aspect of it.
	The other aspect of it is we have to remember, even though that has largely been erased, The purpose and the origin of the federal government, the federal government was a creature of sovereign states.
	And it had only been delegated certain limited powers, specifically as the 9th and 10th Amendment say.
	And the Civil War changed all of that.
	It became this consolidated, centralized monster controlling everything.
	That was the point of the Civil War, quite frankly.
	That was the point of the Civil War in Italy, the point of that fourth turning, the centralization of power, along with the Industrial Revolution.
	But when you look at the Electoral College, it was there to make sure that states had power.
	Just like the appointment of senators was there to make sure that the states retained that power.
	And when you move that away and you go to a Democrat mob, that's the way you destroy the republic.
	And that's the way you bring more and more power into the central government.
	And yet, people don't understand that.
	And I'm just waiting for the only reason that the Republicans have not embraced this It's because they see that as advantageous to them.
	But the Republicans, both the political leaders and the grassroots MAGA people, want everything in Washington.
	They think that there's going to be a savior coming into Washington in the name of Trump, and they want everything fixed in Washington.
	I mean everything.
	They want the president to fix everything.
	They are going to be so disappointed.
	I'm going to be so vindicated in the next four years.
	So, a good example of this kind of blindness is Jay Baracaya.
	This is one of the guys who did the Great Barrington Resolution, right?
	And he says the most devastating report so far.
	It says the White House, or rather, the House report, not the White House, but the Congressional House.
	The House report on HHS COVID propaganda is devastating.
	The Biden administration spent almost a billion dollars to push falsehoods about COVID vaccines, boosters, and masks on the American people.
	If a pharma company had run the campaign, it would have been fined out of existence.
	Wait a minute!
	Does Jay not understand?
	That Trump put a pharma company CEO, one of the biggest pharma companies, and the most politically active pharma company, Eli Lilly.
	That Trump put the Eli Lilly CEO in as head of HHS. Does Jay want to ignore the fact that the Ad Council alone...
	Under Trump had a budget of $250 million, more than they've ever spent on any ad campaign to hector us about anything else, you know.
	Only you can prevent forest fires.
	No, that's nothing compared to this.
	This is your brain on drugs.
	Or just pick any of these inane, idiotic, nagging commercials that you've seen for the longest time about the Ad Council.
	Now, this is far bigger than any of that stuff.
	And the fact that, okay, this is $1 billion?
	$1 billion?
	That's all?
	Does Jay want to talk about the fact that Trump gave the pharmaceutical companies as part of Operation Warp Speed?
	$11 billion?
	No, Jay Batacaya will not talk about Trump anywhere in this article.
	It's all about Biden.
	The MAGA media and its partisan reporting is why we will never have any accounting to these people for the crimes that they've done.
	Instead, he focuses simply on what Biden did.
	And look, it's another example of professional wrestling.
	Heels, heroes, whatever.
	Trump started this stuff?
	Again, massive propaganda campaigns.
	Jay doesn't remember what was happening in 2020?
	Seriously?
	And then you have this tag team thing, and they put Biden in to continue it.
	Now they're going to tag team Trump to come back.
	Left, right, left, right, marching towards agenda 2030.
	The propaganda campaign extended beyond vaccine uptake.
	It included exaggerating mask efficacy, pushing for social distancing and school closures.
	Jay, that happened in 2020.
	All the stuff about masks and social distancing and school closures.
	Wow, that's amazing.
	It's amazing to see this all just ignored.
	So Trump and Rogan...
	Talk a little bit about the corrupt media.
	They talk about vaccines.
	They talk about gender transitions for kids and all the rest of this stuff.
	And we're going to talk about that, but we're going to take a quick break here.
	Let me get some of your comments here, too.
	Spromford, Trump mentioned his uncle in the government, but failed to mention his uncle was a man who headed the team to Nikola Tesla's papers after his death.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Yeah, I mean, it takes to almost...
	Kind of plays this disarming country bumpkin type of thing, except he's a New York City urban bumpkin.
	I don't know anything about John Bolton.
	Yeah, right.
	Well, shame on you if you don't know the people that you got.
	You didn't vet this guy at all?
	But you got some friend in Vegas who calls you up and lets you know about it?
	Blotin says, Trump just says what his supporters want to hear.
	Hopium, yeah.
	Right, Overture, this show is more and more like The View than covering news.
	And I think he's not talking about our show, but Joe Rogan.
	And I think that's right.
	That's what it is.
	I mean, it's set up to entertain people.
	It's set up to be sensational.
	And, you know, it is kind of interesting that You've seen this type of thing, all the late night comedy shows that are uniformly radical left.
	And, you know, they've taken over from Jay Leno and Johnny Carson, who would skewer both sides, you know.
	And then, you know, you had David Letterman, who became rabidly partisan, and all of them after him have been that way.
	And so now, you know, it's this thing about comedians doing political commentaries.
	It's all over the place.
	But, you know, the right has got their equivalent as well, people who are just entertainers.
	As a matter of fact, they've got people who are just entertainers that they make president, even.
	That's how bad it gets.
	Dougalug, thank you for the tip.
	Jeremiah 16.5, the Lord says, I will condemn those who turn away from me and put their trust in human beings, but I will bless the person who puts his trust in me.
	And we're going to talk about that coming up.
	We're going to talk about what people really want.
	You know, this interesting poll that came out of Lifeway, which is, I don't know what they're doing now.
	They used to have bookstores all over the place, Christian bookstores.
	And back in the 90s, you know, they had all kinds of music and books, self-help, a lot of Christian self-help books, which I'm not a big fan of.
	But they didn't have a lot of Bible commentaries, and I'm a big fan of that.
	I like to read books.
	A lot of different commentaries and make up my mind, just like I like to listen to a lot of different news and make up my mind.
	And, you know, I used to go to Lifeway quite a bit.
	They've closed all their brick-and-mortar stores.
	I guess they're still online.
	They're somehow associated with Southern Baptists, so maybe they're getting a subsidy or something.
	I don't know how they're still in business, but they did an interesting poll.
	About politics and Christians and what Christians want from their Christian leaders and everything.
	We'll talk about that coming up.
	OctoSpook.
	It's 4D poker.
	Normal people just can't understand.
	That's right.
	That's 4D poker.
	They can't even explain it to us.
	We just...
	DG8, thank you for the tip, says, David, notice nobody questions Trump or Harris about these vaccines, lockdowns, or mandates.
	Is freedom important anymore?
	No, it's not.
	And, you know, the two of them are adamantly opposed to free speech.
	They only support speech from people that they agree with.
	And if not, Lala wants to shut down Twitter.
	He's abused his privileges.
	Take that away from him.
	And then Trump, when he gets bad interviews or he has CBS edits the interview to favor Lala, he wants to take their license.
	He said this about so many different media places.
	They don't support the Constitution whatsoever.
	They're just alike.
	Also, it writes, Joe Rogan gave Trump softball questions.
	Nothing about the clot shot or banned ivermectin and still promoting the Operation Warp Speed criminal shot.
	Hiring Pompeo, Gina Haspel, Wilbur Ross, Azar, Barr, all of them.
	Yeah, Barr.
	He didn't ask him, that reminds me, he didn't ask him either about Julian Assange.
	Didn't ask him about Ed Snowden.
	And so we're going to take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Okay, so as LifeSiteNews said, again, he talks about gender transition a little bit for children in a three-hour interview, vaccines and corrupt media.
	But as I pointed out, and it's a good summary, I would say no major missteps, nor did he or Rogan tread any new ground.
	The two held a relaxed conversation.
	Where Trump addressed the same issues that he's talked about over the past several years.
	And that's really true.
	And he didn't challenge him even as much as Candace Owens, who challenged him and then backed off on the vaccine.
	He starts with his canned response.
	Well, it's going to be like 1918 flu.
	I saved millions of lives and all the rest of this stuff.
	So this is the interchange, all of it, because it's pretty short.
	About what happened with the vaccines and in general, pharmaceutical companies, because that's the way Trump spun it.
	And Rogan let him move it over to pharmaceutical companies in general.
	So Rogan says, well, some pharmaceutical drugs that have been prescribed have negative effects that these people have been profiting off of.
	And you've got a guy like RFK Jr.
	who spends an enormous amount of time highlighting those things.
	You could say how they'd be very reluctant to have you support him.
	Trump says, I would say that'd be an understatement.
	Yeah, so what do you do to stop that from getting in the way?
	Now, why doesn't Rogan say, because you abandoned RFK Jr., you used him to bid up your price, and got millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical companies during the transition period.
	They laundered it through the...
	Through the ceremony thing that they do there, right?
	The inauguration ceremony.
	He's got a fund for that, so they contributed millions of dollars to the inauguration fund.
	And then they wound up having an Eli Lilly CEO put in as head of HHS for the full four years.
	And he used RFK Jr.'s vaccine skepticism to get votes.
	And then he brought, in the transition period, he brought RFK Jr.
	to Trump Tower and used him to leverage up big contributions from pharmaceutical companies that were afraid of what he might do.
	So, is that all he's going to do this time?
	Use it to get votes.
	Then use it to leverage up contributions.
	And then, you know, manufacture a little spat with RFK Jr.
	and kick him out on the street like he's done so many other advisors.
	Well, I really thought he was good, but then I found out what this guy's like.
	He's horrible.
	RFK Jr., he's got to go.
	Once he gets the money.
	That's what he did the first time around.
	So, yeah, what do you do to stop that from getting in the way, he says.
	What do you do so that, tell us what you're going to do so that you don't do this to RFK Jr.
	again?
	No, he didn't say that.
	Trump says, well, look, they've come up with some amazing things.
	Pharmaceutical companies, it's like a moonshot.
	It really is.
	It is very much like a moonshot.
	In the literal sense that it's absolute, total fraud.
	I just, as an aside, I just saw this one.
	All these different companies that are competing for lunar rovers, right?
	These are some pretty sophisticated vehicles.
	Not like that little buggy that you see that we had.
	They're not making stuff out of tinfoil anymore.
	Talk about tinfoil conspiracies.
	How about the actual stuff that we're supposed to believe that they launched up there?
	I'm telling you, you know, I talked to a guy, we had a guy on, who was on the front row during the Apollo missions there at Houston.
	And I asked him, is it real?
	And he's in his 80s.
	And it was just a little while before he died.
	He's at his end of life, so he's going to tell you the truth.
	And he goes, well, you know, I'm not really sure.
	Because a lot of times I thought it was fake.
	Then there's some other things that happened that seemed very real.
	But my biggest question he said was, why did they not only destroy all the engines, but destroy all the plans?
	And why is it that we now got this big lunar module that Elon Musk is doing, and it's much bigger, throwing rocks for miles and everything?
	Why didn't that ever happen before?
	I don't know.
	Anyway, so they've come up with some amazing things.
	Pharmaceutical companies have, says Trump.
	I mean, I don't know how you feel.
	I know you're against certain vaccines.
	But like the polio vaccine, people had polio.
	And there it was like a disaster.
	And they came up, Dr.
	Salk, and he came up with a vaccine.
	And there's no polio now.
	Very interesting.
	And there hasn't been polio.
	But now in the Gaza Strip, can you believe it?
	Have you heard that?
	There's been a big strain of polio coming out in the Gaza Strip.
	Yeah, I can't believe that.
	And Joe Rogan didn't believe it either.
	Joe Rogan immediately called him out and he goes, well, that's vaccine-derived, isn't it?
	That's exactly what it is.
	And so, again, the vaccine is the issue.
	Yeah, he doesn't want to talk about SV-40.
	He doesn't want to talk about the videos that we have where they're laughing about SV-40.
	Yeah.
	Cancer-inducing contaminant they put in it?
	And how they're going to ship that out to the Russians?
	You don't want to talk about any of that stuff.
	Why is it?
	Come on, Joe.
	That's some good stuff there.
	You would talk about it with anybody else, wouldn't you?
	You're not going to talk about it with Trump, though.
	So, Rogan says, well, is it a vaccine-derived polio?
	Because, you know, there's a strain of polio that comes directly from the vaccine, because unfortunately, sometimes we vaccinate people for polio.
	Trump says, oh, I see.
	I mean, well, all I can do is I sit down and I listen to him, and I'll give it a total.
	I would love him to be right, because if he's right, it's a lot less expensive, generally.
	I'll give it a total.
	Okay?
	So, yeah, he would love for us to not have to send, I don't know, $11 billion to big pharmaceutical companies, all these conservatives who are upset, and rightfully so, about all the money being sent to Ukraine.
	They didn't care about what was given to the pharmaceutical companies.
	And that's not counting the marketing either.
	You know, it's just like when you make a movie like any other movie they made.
	The pandemic movie was a movie.
	And, you know, just like any other movie, you spend even more money marketing it than you do on the actual product.
	Rogan says, well, there's two things that people point to when they point to the dangers of the pharmaceutical drug industry.
	One thing is when pharmaceutical drugs were allowed to advertise on TV. We're only one of two countries in the world that allow pharmaceutical drugs to advertise on TV. The other one is New Zealand, but they're more restrictive than we are.
	Trump says, those ads, those ads, when you hear like, you know, take a certain drug and then you hear all the consequences and it causes cancer and baldness.
	Joe Rogan laughs and he says, well, yeah, we don't like baldness.
	Make sure you call him Joe Rogaine.
	That's my new name for him, Joe Rogaine.
	So Joe Rogaine says, yeah, we don't like baldness.
	Trump says suicidal ideation.
	Yeah, that's a baldness can drive you to that, right?
	They said that in eyesight, and you can lose your vision.
	Yeah, maybe he should take a look at the side effects of remdesivir that he pushed so hard that he financed.
	How about the side effects of the ventilators, Trump?
	Peter Navarro, like I said, you know, keep him in jail for what he did with the ventilators.
	You got Peter Navarro and you got Trump out there.
	Leaning on people to create ventilators and pulmonologists are saying, what are they doing?
	Well, they're not doctors, but they pretend that they are.
	Right?
	And this is what happens when public health takes over your health.
	Just like when public education takes over your kids.
	So, again, it's not...
	How do you take this stuff?
	They start rattling off all the side effects.
	It's not to sell you the drugs.
	It's to buy the media.
	That's what it's for.
	And the media is bought and sold, including Spotify, where Joe Rogan is.
	He can criticize pharmaceutical companies, but he's not going to criticize them much.
	I've been kicked off one place after the other.
	After being there six years when I ran a headline last December on a Spreaker talking about the mass murder of these Trump shots.
	And that was in my headline.
	And I was immediately taken down.
	Well, we got a complaint, they said.
	And then, as I've said before, it took me a couple of days.
	I didn't realize it was on a Friday.
	I didn't realize it until the following Monday.
	So the podcast just disappeared for three days.
	And then, when I brought it back, they did not push it out to the other places.
	And so for almost a month, it disappeared.
	And so they have their ways.
	They have their ways.
	Vimeo.
	Took me down off of Roku just recently.
	Why?
	Pharmaceutical.
	They said it.
	Pharmaceutical.
	That's the first time.
	Usually they don't give you any reason at all.
	It's the first time I got a reason stated.
	I didn't have to guess.
	It's not hard to guess.
	But Vimeo was about criticizing the pharmaceutical companies.
	Because they buy everybody.
	They buy the big media companies.
	They buy cable.
	They buy broadcast.
	They buy social media.
	They buy everybody.
	They buy politicians like Trump.
	So he says, so I guess, and you know, I just actually, I asked one of these guys.
	He says, Trump says, well, look at these commercials.
	I would never take it.
	I mean, the cost is things that are so bad.
	And they go through a whole list.
	It's not about that at all.
	It's about owning the media and owning the politicians.
	So anyway, Rogan says, well, I know that you're aware of Callie and Casey Means, right?
	Yes, well, one of the things that they pointed out, and this is very important for people to understand, is that what a lot of these drugs do is that they act to somehow or another mitigate the effects of poor metabolic health.
	And so they pivot over to that.
	And that's it.
	Then they start talking about, well, we need to have healthy food and everything.
	Well, you know, there's an agency.
	Let's see, what are the initials of it?
	FDA. I think it stands for Food and Drugs.
	Or maybe it's just free to do anything.
	That's under HHS. That's under the presidency.
	And he didn't do anything about that.
	And they're not really too worried about healthy food.
	They're not worried about...
	And actually, as they start talking about health, He says, well, I think it's mainly genetics and stuff like that.
	So, well, you know, they're all into genetic foods, genetically modified organisms to eat, and all the rest of this stuff.
	That's what the FDA is into.
	You want to talk about genetics?
	Talk about those kinds of genetics.
	Talk about stopping that.
	No.
	Not going to talk about that.
	Anyway, you know, when we look at what is happening today, It is absolutely, totally fraudulent.
	And nothing of any substance.
	Never talked about with this stuff.
	Again, he asks about the vaccines, but he doesn't press them on it.
	And he allows them to pivot.
	And actually, he helps them to...
	He doesn't even allow Trump to pivot.
	He does the pivoting for Trump.
	You talk about somebody throwing softballs.
	What he did with Trump...
	On the vaccines is as reprehensible as the so-called interview that Lala Harris had with her VP at her side because she was so insecure.
	And the nervous Nellie who was interviewing her said, well, you know, what about this policy?
	Was it because of this or because and gave her a long laundry list of multiple choice excuses?
	And Lala wasn't even smart enough to hang on to one of those.
	Anyway, Rogan reminded Trump that the U.S. is one of only two countries that allows pharmaceutical drugs to be advertised on TV. But again, they're not going to do anything about it.
	He says, if we can send $175 billion to Ukraine, we can do something to fix a lot of the health problems the U.S. has.
	This is the equivalent of, if we can put a man on the moon, we can do X, right?
	This has become the refrain, and I am sick and tired of it.
	Stop sending $175 billion to Ukraine.
	And everybody's phony...
	As the moonshot stuff.
	Look, you think that money is really going into warfighting?
	A lot of it is, but for the most part, they're sending weapons because, you know, you've got to buy the products of the military-industrial complexes here.
	That's their payoff, right?
	But then there's a lot of non-military aid.
	What do you think is happening in that non-military aid?
	Well, I think it's going into foreign bank accounts, foreign villas and stuff for people like Zelensky and his ilk.
	And these guys have been caught openly parading this stuff.
	The $175 billion that we sent to Ukraine, some of it military, but most of it is going in the pockets of these politicians, and it's every bit as phony as the moonshot.
	So, again, when you look at this, they summarize what I just read to you.
	They're saying Trump agreed that many of these things have side effects to them, these certain drugs, and he would never take some of them, right?
	It's just as astonished as everybody is when they look at these ads.
	I don't know what kind of an idiot you'd have to be to ask your doctor for any of these things after, you know, you've got these nice pictures of people running in slow motion through the fields while they're talking about all the life-threatening, life-destroying side effects of these things, including usually exacerbating the condition that you're taking it for.
	So, who in their right mind would do that?
	But, you know, that was the same type of attitude.
	I don't know why they would, you know, who would ever take any of this stuff?
	But, hey, I'm going to let them advertise and tell you this stuff, and I'm going to let them buy the media.
	I'm not going to do anything to stop that.
	Laura Loomer, when she was pressed on the vaccine thing, well, I knew better than to take it.
	And if you took it, it's on you.
	It is an entire network.
	Of evil, demonic pharmakia people who are just waiting to catch you off guard about something.
	Just like they did my son.
	And it is not your fault if somebody poisons you with a sneak attack, frankly.
	This is much worse.
	Much worse than saying, well, you know...
	Those people shouldn't have gone jogging in Central Park.
	They should have known better than to do that.
	It's her fault.
	No, it's the fault of the people who raped her.
	And it's the fault of the pharmaceutical companies and the politicians who helped them to rape you.
	It'd be bad enough if they stole the money from us.
	But demons as they are, they're not satisfied unless they harm people as well.
	Right?
	That's the difference between these guys and highway robbers.
	Highway robbers just take your money.
	These guys will take your money and leave you crippled or dead.
	Rogan further commented on the political realignment taking place under Trump.
	He said, the rebels are now the Republicans.
	And he added, and then the liberals are now pro-silencing criticism.
	Again, ignoring that Trump says he wants to take the license of one TV network after the other.
	What license would that be?
	That's what the FCC is for.
	Is it for political purposes and political censorship?
	Should the FCC allocate frequencies, or should the FCC allocate the political spectrum for him?
	So, again, the remainder of the interview was spent talking about JFK files, a question about extraterrestrials, the war in Ukraine, Trump said, as he has said before, that his CIA director at the time, Mike Pompeo, as well as other good people, had asked him not to release all the JFK files.
	Mike Pompeo?
	A good person?
	See, what Trump means by somebody being a good person, you know, it's one of the attributes, I think it's the number two, but it's really the number one in his mind.
	Loyalty.
	Not to the Constitution.
	Not to the American people.
	Loyalty to him.
	Because Trump was not loyal to his voters.
	He was not loyal to America.
	He enacted the Davos-UN agenda just like all the other politicians in every other country when he was in charge.
	He's also not loyal to the Constitution or to his wives.
	So, it's interesting to see.
	Again, it was a chill conversation.
	And for most people, what they're going to come away from that is that, well, Trump is not a deranged monster.
	But you have some of the people who are conservatives who try to make it about issues.
	Donald Trump's economic rebuilding plan.
	Here's my 10 takeaways from the interview.
	Well, we're going to talk about that.
	But this person says, well, his focus is on reshoring American jobs.
	You know, it's just a question.
	If you're going to say that you can't...
	You know, John Deere is going to open up a factory in Mexico.
	And I'm not saying I support this, but...
	Trump's solution is, well, okay, if you do that, I'm going to tear a few to death.
	You're not going to be able to sell anything in America.
	So you're going to have to bring that factory back to the United States.
	And this is going to be used in some of these cases...
	It'll probably be used to argue for, well, okay, then we need to have more people brought in.
	And Trump has already said, well, I'll give him a green card.
	Just get a junior college degree and I'll give you a green card.
	These issues, they never focus on the real issue.
	The real issue is the welfare state.
	Trump will talk about different forms of taxation, changing forms of taxation.
	He'll talk about the income tax, he'll talk about the tariff, and we'll talk about that coming up.
	He'll never talk about cutting back the welfare state.
	Never.
	Never.
	He wants to hand out more stuff, just like Lala does.
	It's just he wants to hand it out to other special interest groups.
	She wants reparations for black people.
	Trump wants no taxes for cops and firefighters.
	No income taxes for cops and firefighters.
	So, you know, it's just about them identifying a demographic and then giving them what they want.
	In the same way that the MAGA media does.
	They identify a demographic and they say, we're going to feed them what they want to hear about Trump or whatever.
	Or we'll feed them what they want to hear about Lala and the Democrats.
	That's what CNN and the others do.
	So...
	Trump emphasized the importance of supporting a range of industries, including steel, automotive, and tech.
	And yet, the reality is, that has to be about energy.
	Trump has talked about energy.
	But what Trump has not talked about is the Paris Climate Accord.
	In the interview, you know, he and Rogan were talking in general terms about, well, you know, China's pretty much given a pass.
	How is that?
	What is the mechanism for that?
	It's the Paris Climate Accord that he pretended was a legitimate document.
	It was not legitimate from the very beginning.
	He didn't have to wait four years to try to get out of it.
	That four-year clause was put in there to stop an American president from getting out of it or to give an American president an excuse not to get out of it, which is what happened with Trump.
	And if he's going to pretend, as he did in his first term, that the Paris Climate Accord was legitimately entered into, even though the Senate did not vote on it, if he's going to pretend that it's legitimate, he won't get out of it in the second term either.
	He won't.
	He'll leave it in for the entire four times.
	Trump's plan aims to create an economic environment that prioritizes innovation while protecting American jobs.
	Folks, this is just boilerplate BS. Boilerplate BS. And then, this is my take out of this, listening to Joe Rogan.
	This is what Trump is really saying.
	He's going to support American-owned businesses.
	Yeah, he will.
	But it'll be the essential ones, you know, from Wall Street.
	It won't be your business.
	He shut those down.
	You were not essential in 2020.
	And you're not going to be essential later on either.
	So we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about the tax situation.
	And some of the numbers involved and some of the exemptions involved because every week there are new favors being handed out.
	Tax exemptions being handed out, you know, the special interest group here, another special interest group over there, demographic group over here.
	He's doing the same thing that Lala is doing with reparations.
	Meanwhile, nobody talks about this army of IRS agents marching towards you.
	They gave $80 billion to an agency that had a total budget of $13 billion before that.
	That was a bipartisan thing.
	And the IRS marches on while these guys are distracting you by rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
	Brian and Depp McCartney, RFK, is far too connected and savvy to fall for Trump kicking him out the door now.
	He knows corruption tactics to the core.
	He's going nowhere but the White House.
	Yeah, well, we'll see what happens with it.
	I know that's his long-term strategy.
	He's a lot more articulate than Trump is.
	As a matter of fact, we're talking about vaccines coming up.
	There's a guy...
	Who talked about how his child died of SIDS and said, I forget, seven or eight years old he would be today.
	And he said what woke him up to all this was RFK Jr.
	And look, he's done some good work.
	And I'm not going to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
	Some of the things that he said about vaccines and things like that are legit.
	Character-wise, I don't trust him.
	Just look at his background.
	He's another Epstein type of character.
	And when you look at his war policies, his alliances, he talks about peace, but he wants to side with Israel on these unending wars, and on and on.
	Free speech issue, he's not been honest about that.
	Do not obey, says, people don't make good decisions in times of struggle.
	Poisoned minds and bodies are very vulnerable.
	Who should I listen to?
	Let's go with Trump.
	Who else is there?
	That's a big con job.
	Yeah, it is.
	And I think that, you know, people in desperation, and you're seeing this happen right now, you know.
	This is one of the reasons why Lala is collapsing in public opinion polls.
	But it isn't even about that.
	And I'll talk about why I think that this is, you know, they've decided that they're going to install Trump coming up.
	It has nothing to do with voting.
	To paraphrase George Carlin, Yeah, the ballot box is a big club there that you don't have any say-so in.
	It really is.
	It's not just that you're not in the club, but you are not in this election, quite frankly.
	Audi, Modern Retro Radio, good to see you.
	The millions of migrants are being recruited for police and military as we speak, hence the recent DOD directive authorizing the military to use deadly force on Americans.
	Absolutely true.
	Absolutely true.
	Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that.
	So the term fascism has been thrown over around quite a lot lately.
	We lived in a fascist-ish country my whole life, kind of giving the meaning of the term, government agencies regulating industry.
	And economically, you have the veneer of private ownership and Hitler...
	Distinguished himself from Stalin by saying Stalin's taken over ownership of the places, but I'm going to let the people who built the companies run them, but they will run them for my pleasure doing the things that I tell them to do, and then I will take them at the last step.
	That's where I will take them after they have served me for what I want to do.
	So, you know, when we look at it, fascism is really, economically speaking, fascism Is a merger of corporations and the state.
	Common cause.
	And that's what we really do have.
	It's what China really has as well.
	They'll put a lot of veneers on different things.
	And now we're going really to technocracy.
	For people to talk about fascism and communism, there's elements of all these involved in technocracy.
	What people need to talk about.
	It's liberty versus authoritarianism.
	Liberty versus totalitarianism.
	Because you can get to totalitarianism with different arguments.
	The technocrats have their set of arguments.
	The communists have theirs.
	The fascists have theirs.
	Typically the fascists are about a particular nation, whereas the communists are about all nations and a world of government, that type of thing.
	But they always get back to the point where they are...
	Spying on you, reading your mail, trying to read your mind, trying to control everything that you do, and trying to get you to say that 2 plus 2 equals 5.
	So all of them go to authoritarianism and eventually to totalitarianism.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	break.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to the David Knight show.
	Well, let's talk about the tax issue that they talked about.
	And at one point.
	Joe Rogan says, did you just float out the idea of getting rid of the income taxes and replacing it with tariffs?
	Were you serious about that?
	Trump says, sure, why not?
	Yeah, why not?
	Let's do that today.
	Let's see what happens.
	Did you just float out the idea of getting rid of income taxes and replacing it with tariffs?
	Well, okay.
	Are we serious about that?
	Yeah, sure.
	But why not?
	Because we...
	Ready?
	Our country was the richest relatively in the 1880s and 1890s.
	A president who was assassinated named McKinley.
	He was the tariff king.
	He spoke beautifully of tariffs.
	His language was really beautiful.
	We will not allow...
	The enemy to come in and take our jobs and take our factories and take our workers and take our families unless they pay a big price.
	And the big price is tariffs.
	And he'd speak like that, but he was right.
	And then around in the early 1900s, they switched over stupidly to, frankly, an income tax.
	And you know why?
	Because countries were putting a lot of pressure on America.
	We don't want to pay tariffs.
	Please don't.
	You know, believe me, they control our politicians.
	Yeah, we noticed.
	We noticed that you went to Davos and then enacted all this 2020 stuff a couple weeks later.
	Well, look, when you had the consolidation of the nation state, and when you had the Industrial Revolution, The initial instinct of the companies, again, that was a kind of fascism, right?
	It was a form of government to benefit these captains of industry.
	And that was the purpose of the Civil War, as I've said many times, 1861 to 1865.
	And it happened at exactly the same time period in Italy.
	And the product of both of those was to shift the power from multiple centers of power, an agrarian society, to a consolidated nation state, an industrialized society.
	And after a few decades, these companies began looking for bigger markets than just internally.
	And so they wanted to compete internationally.
	And it was the multinational corporate desire that got the bankers and the rest of them to shut down the tariffs at the border and start to tax people internally because they wanted the markets.
	But David Stockman said, OK, so this is Trump's 19th century solution to fiscal disaster.
	He said in the last weeks of the campaign, Trump is slicing and dicing the federal income tax nearly as fast as he served up fries at McDonald's drive-thru window last weekend.
	So far, he has proposed to extend the lower rates, family tax credits, investment incentives of the 2017 Tax Act after they expire in 2025, and also to exempt tips, Social Security benefits, and overtime wages from the federal income tax. and overtime wages from the federal income tax.
	He also has proposed to exempt firefighters, police officers, military personnel, and veterans from the federal income tax as well.
	Those items alone would generate a revenue loss of $9 trillion over the next decade, the first ones.
	The second group was exempting firefighters, police officers, military.
	That's even more.
	He says, we estimate that those would add another $2.5 trillion.
	Over 10 years.
	He says that as it happens, there's 370,000 firemen, 708,000 policemen, 2.8 million uniformed military personnel, and 18 million veterans in the U.S., These 22 million citizens have an average income of $82,000, which translates to about $60,000 each of adjusted gross income.
	At an average income tax rate of 14.7%, these exclusions would generate $250 billion per year of reduced income tax payments.
	And I think it's kind of interesting, you know, when we look at police officers making a big appeal to police officers in this.
	And, you know, he has in his stats here 2.8 million uniformed military personnel.
	I don't know where he gets that number.
	Most of the places that I looked at when they talk about the number of uniformed military personnel, China is number one.
	And I say this in multiple lists.
	China is number one at 2 million.
	India at 1.4 million.
	U.S. at 1.38 million.
	So his number is quite a bit higher.
	It's almost twice as high.
	Then Russia at 1.3 million, number four.
	So China, number one.
	India, number two.
	U.S., number three.
	Russia, number four.
	North Korea, number five, at 1.28 million.
	Ukraine at 900,000.
	And then we drop down to 650,000 for Pakistan and 600,000 for Iran.
	We have a standing army of 708,000 policemen.
	And that's what it is.
	It's a standing army.
	If you look at it.
	So, you know, the question is, do we need that many police officers?
	I honestly don't think that we do.
	And when you look at what Trump was saying in terms of the interview as they started to talk about police, he said, well, I go to a lot of policemen's funerals.
	And he said...
	There's one police officer who was just killed in Long Island.
	They pull somebody over, and he and his partner get out, and the guy that's in the car, they pull over, just starts shooting at him.
	And kills the one guy, wounds the other.
	I presume that the other partner put that guy down.
	But he says it's so dangerous.
	People don't realize the car.
	Dark windows, you pull over.
	He's a gentleman.
	He's a gentleman.
	He's a gentleman pulling over.
	It's like, doesn't it make you feel safe to see a police car in your rear window tailgating you?
	You know that they're just running your tags.
	They're looking for everything that they can to pull you over, harass, and to fine you.
	Yeah, it makes me feel safe.
	It always does.
	I always say to Karen, oh, we've got a police officer following us now.
	Aren't you feeling safe?
	Um...
	And then, but then this is the most amazing thing.
	He says, even if they were allowed to pull their gun out, which they're not, you know, they can't, you know, they can't pull their gun out.
	So in other words, they can't initiate pulling somebody over for a minor violation to steal from them.
	And they can't pull you over to steal from you and then pull their gun out and approach you with a drawn gun.
	What kind of a country do we live in where that's not allowed by the police to do that?
	And this is the way that Trump is pandering.
	He said, but even if they did that, they still wouldn't have time.
	And so, again, this is where this kind of attitude really came from the Obama administration, the shoot-first idea for police officers.
	That, along with the fact that they've hired a lot of people, especially women, who are physically not capable of doing anything.
	And so their only option is to shoot somebody.
	Shoot him with a gun, shoot him with a taser, whatever.
	They can't actually physically handle any of this stuff.
	And so he continues to go on.
	He says, you know, you're not allowed to have your gun out, by the way.
	Yeah, they have very strict rules about that.
	You ever wonder why they got rules like that, Trump?
	I mean, is he?
	Where's he been?
	He never heard of John Bolton.
	He also, I guess, never heard of this DEI hire Somalian that they had in Minneapolis.
	Who shows up and shoots a woman dead.
	I forget the guy's name.
	But he gets pulled over by the police.
	And the police officer says, do you have a gun?
	He says, not on me.
	I have one in the car.
	I've got a permit for it.
	And he goes, I see your permit.
	He goes, pull out his permit.
	And the cop shoots him dead.
	And his girlfriend or wife is sitting right next to him.
	So, I don't know.
	You know, I guess maybe we should have more shoot first and ask questions later.
	Just like we can take the gun and do the due process later, too.
	Trump has got some unbelievably authoritarian urges.
	And I can understand the people who are politically opposed to him concerned about that.
	So anyway, in terms of talking about the taxes and everything, you know, were you serious about that?
	Yeah, why not?
	And so you heard what he had to say about that.
	And so the purpose of that really was for the multinational corporations.
	That's why they wanted to have the taxes at the border.
	But anyway, he crunches the numbers here, David Stockman, because he was head of the Office of Management and Budget under Ronald Reagan.
	And he kind of lost his partisan credentials there because he was concerned about the budget deficits under Reagan.
	And so, you know, he's going to be pulling his hair out now.
	I had him on last December, just before his book came out, Trump's War on Capitalism.
	And he's right.
	He says, and all Trump has tossed out promises to cut income taxes by $11.5 trillion over the next 10-year budget window.
	So he says, so where does that come from?
	He says when you look at it as a revenue loss, as a percentage of baseline, he's going to lose 34% of the revenue handing out these favors if he actually does them.
	And he says, and then again, Trump may have something virtually epic in mind.
	He could scrap the income tax entirely in favor of taxing consumption via levies on imported goods and merchandise.
	Well, I would just say, though, that if he's serious about that, Why doesn't he talk about the IRS? Why doesn't he talk about ending the income tax?
	Instead, what he's talking about is, I'm going to cut a tax break for this group or that group.
	I mean, waitresses and cops, you don't pay taxes.
	But then let's soak everybody at the border.
	He's not talking about replacing the income tax or the consumption.
	He's talking about adding higher tariffs.
	It's like when these people talk about, well, let's change everything over to a flat tax or a fair tax or a national sales tax.
	The real issue is, are we going to get that plus the income tax?
	And I would suggest to you folks that they are never, ever going to give up the income tax.
	It has always been there, not for fiscal reasons, but it has been there as a weapon against people.
	And that's why they're hiring all these agents.
	They're going to use it as a weapon against the middle class.
	They've used it as a weapon against their political enemies from the very beginning.
	He goes on to say, Trump did, in the old days when we were smart, when we were a smart country, in the 1890s and all, this is when the country was relatively the richest it ever was.
	It had tariffs, and it didn't have an income tax.
	Well, David Stockman says the New York Times is deeply alarmed at this.
	They said, the former president has repeatedly praised a period in American history when there was no income tax and the country relied on tariffs to fund the government.
	Well, they don't like that at all.
	Why are they such big fans of the income tax?
	Actually, however, says David Stockman, the 19th century America was even smarter than Trump realizes.
	Because their entire federal spending amounted to only 3.5% of GDP. See, that's the smart thing.
	It isn't about...
	These people are not going to talk about stopping the spending.
	It's like talking about the border.
	Don't tell me how you're going to create a police state at the border.
	Don't tell me how you're going to require all of us to get permission from the government to have a job with mandated eVerify.
	Don't tell me about how I've got to have face scans everywhere.
	Stop the welfare spending.
	It's just that simple.
	Stop the magnet pulling people across.
	As long as you've got this massive welfare magnet, as long as you're offering the same or, in many, many cases, superior benefits to people who are not American citizens, superior benefits than you give to American citizens, as long as you've got that big welfare magnet out there, don't talk about militarizing the border.
	That's the issue.
	The issue is the welfare magnet.
	And the issue with this is not how we collect the taxes.
	The issue is the money that we spend.
	It's just that simple.
	That's not an oversimplification.
	David Stockman says in the 1890s that he's talking about, when America was prosperous, the federal government only spent 3.5%.
	And you could go back, as I've talked about many times, the second inaugurational address of Thomas Jefferson, where he said, by eliminating useless offices, we have been able to eliminate all internal taxes.
	That's what the income tax is.
	The internal revenue service.
	The internal taxes.
	He said, by eliminating these useless offices...
	We've been able to eliminate all internal taxes.
	So he says, what farmer, what laborer, what mechanic knows the tax man?
	In other words, none of them have any dealing with the tax man.
	And it was because they could make America, the American government, small enough to fit into the Constitution.
	Small enough to be paid for by tariffs.
	Tariffs that were not oppressive.
	Because, you know, that was...
	That was decades before you had the nullification crisis that came up in the 1830s.
	Nullification crisis came up because you had, you know, they wanted to raise tariffs to a significant level.
	They had no internal taxes, and the tariffs at the border were not significant.
	And when they said we're going to make them significant, well, that's when South Carolina and a lot of other places, these agrarian places that survived, their primary product was And so they said, like cotton, and so they said, well, that's going to destroy our economy.
	We're not going to allow that.
	They call it the tariffs of abomination.
	And they had the nullification crisis.
	And the only reason that they didn't have the Civil War then was because the timing wasn't right.
	They needed to wait another 30 years.
	Because that's, you know, we are on this cycle.
	And people, you know, and I say that, you know, it wasn't like some magical thing.
	It's just that people's attitudes at that point in time, they were not that fed up with institutions yet.
	They still believed that they could make compromises and adjustments and that the institutions could be made to work.
	In another 30 years, they no longer believed that.
	Which is where we are right now.
	Forget about the polls and all the rest of the stuff.
	I mean, the overriding factors that we could see coming from a long time.
	Anyway, he says, David Stockman says, because back then, America only had 3.5% of gross GDP was spent by the government because America was still a peaceful republic.
	And it had no welfare state.
	And it didn't have a standing army.
	He says, the so-called revenue tariffs of the 18th century did not meet the income needs of the federal government to the point of actually balancing the budget year after year between 1870 and 1900.
	Indeed, the actual annual surpluses were large enough to pay down most of the Civil War debt to boot.
	You know, that warfare state.
	Yeah, they did have a warfare state.
	Here domestically.
	But they were able to pay that down because they're ongoing.
	They had no welfare state, and they were not involved as an empire power trying in every country of the world, starting or jumping into wars.
	Trump has stepped up to the plate, says David Stockman, when it comes to a 21st century version of the revenue tariff.
	He has pledged to impose a 20% universal tariff on all imports from all countries with a specific 60% rate for Chinese imports.
	Based on current U.S. import levels of $3.5 trillion per year from worldwide sources and $450 billion from China, Trump's tariffs would generate about $900 billion of receipts per annum.
	His claims that these giant tariffs will be paid for by Chinamen, Mexicans, and European socialists is just more of his standard baloney.
	Tariffs are paid for by consumers, just like the minimum wage, right?
	Prices go up, or number of people working goes down.
	But he says, but that's actually the hidden virtue of the tariff man's favorite word.
	The truth is, Government should be paid for via taxation on current citizens.
	He says, so if we're going to have big government at 25% of gross domestic product rather than the 3.5% of GDP that was being spent when Trump says we were so rich, that's really the issue.
	And he said, and the problem is that Trump is a big government man, if ever there was one.
	And so, he says, if you're going to have a big government, then that burden needs to be put on consumption, not on production, not on income, not on investment, he says.
	I favor, if we were going to do, pick a tax that we're going to do, sales tax, but anything that you do with this level of spending is going to be oppressive.
	The issue is really spending.
	And yet when you look at this, both Trump and Lala, they are trying to buy their way into office by handing out favors to special interest groups.
	So, he says the math works out such that the proposed Trumpian revenue tariffs would generate about $9 trillion over the next decade, or nearly 80% of the $11.5 trillion revenue lost from drastically shrinking the income tax coverage and collection rate.
	He said to be sure the proper redirection of federal tax policy would be a national sales tax or a VAT levy.
	Which could be applied to both goods and services and to domestically produced output as well as to imports.
	He says a 15% levy on all personal consumption expenditure.
	And as I've said before, everybody knows that a VAT is going to raise them more money and it's going to do so with less resistance because it's a hidden tax.
	It's hidden at every stage of production.
	But...
	We need to start looking at how we're going to cut the government's spending.
	And yet, everybody's got a long wish list of things that they want to do.
	And everything that Trump says he wants to do, just like Lala, everything both of them propose is about handing out money to people.
	Because they know that they can just keep kicking the can down the road.
	And they can have the Federal Reserve just keep conjuring up cash.
	And that's the way that he ran the pandemic.
	That is their power base.
	It is that this ability to conjure up money out of thin air is the basis of the American empire abroad.
	And it is the basis of American despotism at home.
	The bribery, the blackmail that they do with money, it extends to everything.
	And I'm still absolutely amazed that so many people can't see that.
	They can't see it.
	They don't hold Trump responsible, first of all, even though he was over the deep swamp.
	Oh, he just didn't know what he was doing.
	He had bad advisors and all the rest of the stuff.
	Well, so be it.
	He's still responsible.
	The buck stops with him.
	But the buck began with him.
	He financed all this stuff with imaginary fiat cash.
	So again, you know, as we're looking at his proposal, folks, just to underscore, he's not talking about getting rid of the income tax.
	He's talking about adding massive tariffs so that he can give to pay for 80% of the tax favors that he's going to give to specific demographic groups that will vote for him.
	Do you see how we're at the end stages of a corrupt democracy?
	Because both of them are doing it.
	I mean, Lala does it as well.
	So Trump, he says, has promised to turn Elon Musk loose on a crusade against government waste and inefficiency.
	And we say more power to him.
	If anyone has the courage and the smarts to take on the swamp, surely Musk is at the top of the list.
	Really?
	This guy is the king of crony capitalism.
	So, yeah, he knows where the inefficiencies are, and he's there to exploit them to the max for his own personal benefit.
	Radice Bro, thank you for the tip.
	Says, why do welfare queens and military need more benefits?
	The government is broke, and this is a volunteer army, and all benefits, military people, are just grown children with credit cards.
	I think that we need to...
	The whole point...
	That begs all this stuff is that it is all focused on the American empire and the fact that we have unending wars everywhere that are not in our interest.
	They cost us not only treasure but blood.
	And I don't want to send back.
	I mean, we're making disabled veterans in our global empire.
	And I have a lot of sympathy for people, even if they've been deceived.
	Because in a sense, a lot of them are patriotically trying to do the right thing.
	But just as we see people who are sick and scared, and they go to the doctor, and the doctor poisons them with things that the doctor knows is poison.
	You know, these people, as Kissinger has said in the military, he said, yeah, they're just animals, you know, they use them.
	They have utter contempt.
	For the soldiers who go.
	And, you know, you can say it's idealism.
	You can say it's naivete.
	But that doesn't excuse the abuse.
	And so, you know, I just...
	The real issue...
	The real issue, just like when we talk about fiscal stuff, the real issue is the spending.
	It's not about the taxes.
	And the real issue is not about military veterans' benefits, but it's about the size of the military and what they're doing to the military, how they're using and abusing the military.
	It doesn't make us safer either.
	These wars abroad impoverish us, and they create enemies.
	And we've got enemies everywhere now.
	Just look at what's going on with bricks.
	Look at what's going on throughout the Middle East.
	Just everywhere we go, we manufacture enemies with our foreign policy and our standing army.
	And a standing army will be the destruction, one way or the other, of a society.
	Whether they bring them, and the mercenaries, as Audi was saying earlier, Bring in people from foreign countries and so forth.
	They've already used the vaccine to kick out people who are Christians, who supported the Constitution and the principles of the Constitution.
	So it was a purge.
	They're also purging people out with their insane DEI and gender issues and things like that.
	But people are not even going to be a big part, as a bigger part, I think, of what they're planning on with the future.
	They're planning on an artilect war against us.
	They're planning on leveraging their technology and having autonomous killer robots.
	Yes, you still have soldiers out there, and soldiers, the veterans, are going to be our lifeline against something like that.
	But soldiers and hackers.
	That's going to be the future.
	Future war.
	Dusty Milton.
	He says, well, eliminate income tax, all right.
	We'll phase it out over 60 years.
	Yeah.
	Another administration can just repeat it later.
	M Sellers.
	Morning, David and friends.
	Good to see you.
	Good to see you.
	Good to see her.
	Over the weekend, my husband and I went to dinner with friends.
	Out of six adults, no one knew who they were voting for.
	They may not know exactly why, but no one likes Trump anymore.
	You know, that's an interesting thing.
	I didn't have this.
	I saw that article, but I didn't pull it out.
	They went down, and it was one of the major news networks, and they went down issue by issue.
	We look to see which issues are important for Republicans and which issues are important for Democrats.
	And then, you know, by gender, you know, men and women, you know, what do they think is important and who are they voting for?
	And they would come up, you know, Trump is a plus six on this issue and Lala is a plus eight on that issue and so forth.
	But the thing that I thought was interesting was...
	That, you know, when they look at this and they cross it up that way, the one thing that stuck out was every demographic didn't like Trump.
	I mean, he was a negative with everybody on every demographic, personally.
	Everybody hated him.
	That's why I said, if it had been anybody other than Trump, if it had been DeSantis, let this even be a close issue, assuming that it was an election, which I think is an assumption that I don't really buy anymore.
	I'm so cynical about politics.
	And it's amazing to me to see all the people who have argued and fought over the last four years about corruption of the ballot box.
	And by the way, I had absolutely no sympathy for that stuff because I was saying that summer, if you're going to have a vote by mail election, forget about it.
	They're going to stuff the balance like you've never seen before.
	It's a whole new level of corruption, a whole new way to corrupt things.
	I mean, you know, go back to the 1960 election, where it's JFK running against Nixon.
	And the tide was turned in Chicago with people riding around with the voting machines in the back of their cars and the trunk and all this other kind of stuff.
	You know, that kind of corruption.
	Old school corruption.
	And of course, you could always stuff ballot boxes.
	But the computers added a whole new level of ability to manipulate.
	And so did...
	The vote by mail.
	And that was done under Trump.
	So, you know, but these people who all believe for the last four years, this whole thing was rigged.
	Now they got their marching orders and now they're true believers again.
	Right?
	It is kind of this Orwellian double think.
	They can hold these mutually exclusive ideas at the same time.
	Yes, it was stolen.
	And yes, let's go vote again.
	Conservative, thank you for the tip.
	Thank you very much.
	Taxes should be paid exclusively by voters.
	Now, that's a good point.
	I remember when we went to take the kids frequently up when we lived in North Carolina up to Colonial Williamsburg.
	And I just liked the historical things.
	And there were places where you could...
	I'd watch them doing trades, you know, where they're making lumber, they're building bricks, or they're building buildings, or they're making rifles or whatever.
	You know, you could see these people who are the craftsmen about that.
	But then they would also have people who would hang around and talk about politics.
	And as I've said before, I would engage them, you know.
	So what was it fought over?
	Then would you say, taxation without representation?
	I would shout out, taxation is theft.
	No, that wasn't it.
	And I said, that is it.
	It is theft, you know, but...
	We'd have fun with that.
	We'd have fun with the Jefferson reenactor, who's now gotten older, and he's now not at Colonial Williamsburg, that same guy.
	He was very good.
	I liked him.
	But he is now at Monticello as an older, retired Jefferson.
	So, good for him.
	But I haven't been to Monticello for a very long time.
	We used to go frequently to Williamsburg, and When they were talking about people who are allowed to vote, you know, they love to play this DEI thing.
	Okay, so, you know, how many of you here are Christians?
	And how many, you know, raise your hands if, everybody put up your hand.
	Now, drop your hand if you're not a Christian.
	Drop your hand if you're not a male.
	Drop your hand if you're not a property owner.
	And of course, the reality is, is that if a woman was head of household and she was a property owner, she could vote.
	And what that was really about, like you said, was the taxpayers having a say.
	And only the taxpayers having a say.
	Because if you own property, You're paying tax.
	And so if you limited it to property owners, then you limited it to people who are directly paying the taxes.
	But everybody pays taxes, in a sense, indirectly, but the welfare state is the issue.
	The welfare state is the issue.
	And I do believe that if you are a ward of the state, while you are a ward of the state, you should not be allowed to vote.
	Marky Mark in New Jersey.
	As long as women vote, we'll have socialist policies.
	They're more collectivist in nature.
	States that allowed women to vote before the 19th Amendment saw increases in government spending.
	Well, that's why we talk about the nanny state.
	Men just naturally are less inclined towards safety and security than women are.
	And that's the way they erode our liberty, and that's the way they erode our freedom of choice.
	It's ironic to see them talk about choice when the only choice that they have is the choice to kill your child.
	That is the only choice.
	No other choice is allowed about how you want to educate or how you want to medicate or not medicate your child.
	No, they will make all those choices for you.
	But if you want to kill your child, yeah, we're there for you to do that.
	that.
	We'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Well, welcome back.
	Let's talk a little bit about the Trump triumphant and Lala collapsing here.
	And a good example of this, I talked about one, LA Times was the first one to do it.
	Talked about it last week, Thursday.
	And then after that, the Washington Post refused to endorse Lala.
	And this has been a real shaking at both of these biased institutions.
	And so you've got subscribers who are canceling.
	You've got staff who are resigning.
	Editors are resigning from both of these.
	And I said last week when it happened, I talked about the guy who owns the LA Times.
	And he's another tech guy, but he's also biotech.
	So that's where he made his fortune.
	And just like Bezos, he bought the L.A. Times.
	Actually, Bezos bought the Washington Post in 2013 for $250 million.
	And I remember talking about it at the time.
	I said, this is chump change.
	Just normalize it to his income that he was making at the time on stock dividends and things like that.
	And I said, so, you know, would you buy, if you were somebody, a large corporation, we all know that large corporations thrive because of the money that's in Washington.
	You know, we could call it Washington, D.C. In some cases, call it District of Criminals.
	But, you know, it is also the District of Cash.
	If you want to get rich, the best way that you can get rich is to get government subsidies.
	That's why Elon Musk is the richest man in the world.
	And so, you know, you get government contracts and things like that.
	You want to buy influence with them.
	And so, Bezos was playing the long game.
	You know, he knew that he was going to be in contracts, negotiations, like the Jedi contract that was written by Mattis, specifically for Amazon.
	But then because of political maneuvering in Washington, and everybody said it, you know, and you had Mad Dog Mattis in the Trump administration who was sending his...
	His highest ranking assistant, I forget her name, but she was making regular trips out to Seattle to meet with them.
	And so they were selling this Jedi database thing.
	There's going to be, you know, combined database for all these different aspects of the military.
	And, you know, because for security standpoint, you want to centralize everything to one point so that the...
	The enemy can take it down all at once.
	I mean, the last thing that you want to do is centralize everything if you've got cyber attacks.
	But that's what they were going to do.
	And again, it was set up specifically for Jeff Bezos, but he lost out on the influence game.
	And it was Microsoft that wound up getting it.
	And that was one of the reasons why he bought the Washington Post, I sincerely believe, because he wanted to be able to influence them.
	You know, when you talk about delivering packages by drone, Amazon was one of the first ones talking about it.
	As soon as they started talking about it, they said, well, you know, that can only be done by just a limited number of people.
	It's going to have to be the really big and responsible corporate citizens, you know, like Amazon.
	Other people, mom and pops, you know, we're not going to let them deliver stuff by drone.
	So they immediately started talking about that.
	Just like you see Sam Altman going to Congress and saying, well, we got AI and it's really powerful.
	It's very dangerous.
	And so only people like me should be allowed to do that.
	Me and maybe one or two others and let us compete with each other.
	But you got to shut this down for everybody else.
	It's just too dangerous.
	And we could give examples of that on and on about what's going on.
	But Bezos wanted to buy influence in Washington.
	The Washington Post is a very important way to do that.
	And they've been heavily involved in taking down politicians like Nixon and things like that in the past.
	So there's a very powerful weapon that could be used against his enemies.
	And he was able to buy for just $250 million.
	Now, this guy in L.A., Patrick Soon-Shiong, bought the L.A. Times for five years later for twice the price, $500 million.
	But it was a bargain for both of them, because it is a lot of leverage for them to have.
	Elon Musk spent, what, 40, 44, I don't know how many billions of dollars to buy Twitter, which...
	Is a lot more money, but it's also a lot more influence.
	And it's not only the ability to influence, but it also gives him access to all the data of what everybody's doing.
	It lets him tap into what people are thinking and tap public opinion.
	As well as being able to feed artificial intelligence.
	So he gets all those different things.
	It's an opportunity for him to measure the zeitgeist like no political pollster can.
	It also gives him raw human meat to feed into his AI stuff.
	And it lets him know which way he needs to go to be more popular.
	And so, all these things are political moves by these people.
	And so, when you see them pulling back, these guys are highly political.
	And when you see unusual moves, like the LA Times and the Washington Post saying, we don't want to endorse Lala Harris, that is significant.
	And that says that they know something is on.
	And the decision in all these cases was made by the owner.
	It was made by Bezos, and it was made by this Sun Xiong guy for the LA Times, against what the staff wanted to do.
	Staff are true believers in the Democrat Party.
	I mean, they are hardcore propagandists.
	And so one of the things we can see from this, besides the politics, is they make no bones about their bias and their prejudice.
	And I've said for the longest time that when people talk about being objective in news, there's no such things.
	Everybody has got a bias in what they report.
	And if they tell you that they're objective, they are either lying to you knowingly, or they're so stupid they don't see their own bias.
	And so we can see the bias in this, but we can also see how everything is moving rapidly towards Trump in this final week.
	The Post's publisher, Will Lewis, framed the decision as a return to the paper's roots as an independent voice, though the editorial board says that it had already drafted an endorsement of Lala that was allegedly blocked by owner Jeff Bezos.
	Now, this is a claim that Lewis denies, but they are still saying...
	So, I guess if he can deny it, but if the editorial staff is one by one all leaving...
	That's probably what really happened.
	The Post's editor-at-large, Robert Kagan, and opinion columnist Michelle Norris publicly resigned in response to the non-endorsement.
	A wave of subscription cancellations then followed.
	And so think about this.
	You know, that they're so outraged that a paper would take a neutral position.
	There's absolutely no way these people are objective about anything, right?
	These are fighting words if you're going to be neutral.
	Well, again, if you're going to offer yourself out there as objective, that's exactly what that would entail.
	So they're flying their flag and showing their colors here.
	Several board members openly disputed this, asserting that they'd prepared an endorsement for Harris and the LA Times that was ultimately blocked by the owner.
	The fallout was swift, with multiple staffers issuing their resignation and readers declaring that they would cancel their subscriptions, prompting the union that represents many LA Times employees to issue a statement urging them not to do so.
	The LA Times had endorsed a presidential candidate each cycle since 2004, while the post-presidential endorsements date back to 1988.
	And actually, somebody went back and looked at a century of endorsements.
	And going back to FDR, they've only endorsed two Republicans, and that was Eisenhower and Dewey.
	So, for 60 plus years, they haven't really endorsed anything other than a Democrat.
	By the way, Robert Kagan, the editor-at-large that resigned from the Washington Post, is the husband of Victoria Newland.
	I was not aware of that.
	They changed the names to keep you from understanding that.
	Newland, the former senior State Department official who was directly involved in the 2014 U.S.-backed coup in Ukraine that kicked the whole thing off.
	Kagan went from being a foreign policy advisor to Republican presidential candidate John McCain in 2008 to joining the Democrats in 2016 and endorsing Hillary Clinton.
	Always a warmonger.
	Just like his wife, Victoria Newland.
	And a warmonger that worked for John McCain.
	2008.
	I tell you, it is...
	LA Times editor quits...
	After the owner struck down their endorsement, said we are living in dangerous times again.
	I think it's good that people can see how opinionated, how partisan, how non-objective these papers that are worshipped as the standards are.
	Coalition for Content, Providence, and Authentication to label people like me, your band person, and we're not even going to let you create audio, video, text, anything.
	And you're not going to be able to upload it either, right?
	That's where it's going with Microsoft and DARPA. And so how do they label us?
	Well, you know, first of all, if you...
	If you point out the truth about pharmaceutical companies, but also they use the press like the BBC or the LA Times, the Washington Post, the New York Times, this completely partisan big government people are the ones that are out there defining the standard of truth.
	What a joke they are.
	And so the LA Times editor, Mariel Garza, said, I'm resigning because I want to make it clear that I'm not okay with us being silent.
	In dangerous times, honest people need to stand up.
	This is how I am standing up.
	Well, I think we see how they've been lying to us for a long time about their objectivity, don't we?
	As well as everything else that they say.
	Garza alleged that the LA Times owner Sun Xiong's decision not to endorse Harris amounted to greater political interference than if he had just allowed the editorial board to throw its support behind her.
	That's insane.
	But look, Bezos and this guy, Are looking at this knowing that Trump is going to be installed.
	And it's the same reason that you've got these other big tech executives, because that's where their money, they made their money as big tech executives.
	You've got all these big tech executives now coming around and kissing Trump's ring because they think he's going to win.
	Two more LA Times editors quit after her because of the non-endorsement.
	Meanwhile, you got John Fetterman, the Democrat senator, says Trump's support in Pennsylvania is astonishing.
	He says you can see the intensity.
	So, he said, anybody who spends time driving around, you can see the intensity.
	It's astonishing.
	I was doing an event in Indiana County.
	Very, very red, he said, and I just hate to see that.
	I mean, red is communist.
	Let's not let them label us.
	Anyway, and there was a super, it just confuses people, right?
	There was a superstore of Trump stuff and it was 100 feet long.
	We should see what Tennessee looks like.
	Multiples of these things.
	There were dozens of t-shirts and hats and bumper stickers and all kinds of, I mean, it's like, where does all this come from?
	Said Fetterman.
	It's kind of the thing that has taken over its life of its own, and it's like something very special exists there.
	And that doesn't mean that I admire it.
	It's just that it's real, he said.
	And then Musk is joining him, said Fetterman.
	I mean, to a lot of people, that's Tony Stark.
	That's the world's richest guy.
	And he obviously, and undeniably, is a brilliant guy.
	And he's saying, hey, that's my guy for president.
	He said that's going to really matter.
	Fetterman said he was alarmed when Musk began showing up on the campaign trail for Trump.
	He says he's a bigger star than Trump in some sense.
	He says endorsements are not really meaningful.
	I agree.
	Often.
	He says, but this one is, I think.
	And that has me concerned, says Democrat Fetterman, in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.
	Chris Christie no longer confident that Harris will win the election.
	He goes on The View and says she's had a bad 10 days.
	Well, she's had a bad political career, quite frankly, and people are starting to see what that's about.
	And they're starting to see that there's nobody home upstairs either.
	They thought they could pull this off by waiting to the last minute.
	But she's such a dead fish that she's already starting to stink.
	And then this, I was very disappointed in Thomas Massey.
	He offers his full endorsement to Trump, but just shows how everybody is realizing that this thing is over, right?
	And I don't think, again, that they're basing it on polls.
	I'm not basing my estimation that it's over on polls.
	I'm basing it on the actions of CEOs and of editors of Democrat papers and all the rest of this stuff.
	But Thomas Massey, who was four years ago, if you remember, he opposed Trump's unconstitutional Budget-busting, $3.5 trillion bill.
	And he demanded that people come back and be counted if they're going to vote for that nonsense.
	Trump was so angry, he said, we're going to primary him out.
	Well, he didn't.
	And AIPAC was unable to primary out Thomas Massey.
	But Massey is concerned.
	Trump has made a point.
	I mean, he's gotten rid of a lot of congressmen.
	The people who had, as a matter of fact, the guy who was head of the Freedom Caucus, he endorsed DeSantis.
	And then later, DeSantis dropped out.
	He didn't even wait until this point where Massey is.
	At that point, I think his name was good.
	I can't remember his name for sure.
	But I know he was head of the Freedom Caucus.
	And so he said, so now that DeSantis is out, I'm endorsing Trump.
	Well, that wasn't good enough.
	Trump wanted him out.
	This is a guy who, if you're conservative, you would agree with him on issues.
	Not Trump.
	Trump's a New York Democrat.
	But anyway, Massey says, Trump will put Americans first by securing our liberties at home and preventing needless wars abroad.
	I wonder what liberties Trump's going to secure.
	They're going to do the due process first now?
	I don't know.
	Second Amendment?
	First Amendment?
	Is Trump for those things?
	That's the thing that's such a fraud about Musk.
	You sign this petition saying you support the First and Second Amendment.
	Well, if you sign that and you really mean it, you don't have a candidate in this election.
	Neither Lala nor Trump supports the First Amendment or the Second Amendment.
	That was not an endorsement of Trump, although he was implying that it was.
	So, Massey says Trump will put Americans first by securing our liberties at home and preventing needless wars abroad.
	He will make America great again by empowering small farmers and taking on special interests that have corrupted our healthcare system.
	What a fantasy.
	What makes you think that he's going to do any of this if he even promised any of this stuff?
	What makes you think that, based on his first term?
	He is even committed to freeing Ross Ulbricht, who wrongfully was sentenced.
	And of course, Trump decided not to pardon Ross for four years.
	But he did pardon Jared's criminal Jewish pals that were buddies with his family.
	Some of the biggest white-collar criminals ever.
	And he let Ross rot in jail.
	Julian Assange as well.
	Other things like that.
	So maybe he will.
	Who knows, right?
	Massey had previously backed DeSantis, and he said he wasn't afraid of backlash and going against the former president.
	He also went so far earlier this year as to bash Trump for his ridiculous bullying tactics towards other politicians.
	Now maybe he's afraid that Trump is the selection.
	And as Trump is becoming more of a bully, maybe Massey is afraid of that.
	Who knows what his justification is for.
	Very disappointed in him, frankly.
	So, I said to you from the very beginning, and I said this for quite some time.
	I said it before the 2020 election.
	I said they'll pick the guy who will do the most damage.
	And Trump kicked off all these things, and then Biden nearly passed the baton over to Biden, and Biden continued those things and escalated them, and now they're going to kick it back over to Trump.
	What do you think is going to happen now?
	I think Trump is the more dangerous of the group because he won't be opposed.
	I said that in 2020, and I say it again now.
	Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is freaking out because of the collapse.
	In desperation, she and Matt Drudge were putting out this nonsense about Madison Square Garden, and it is utter nonsense.
	Look at the headline of the Drudge Report, and I think this was on Friday.
	Because the Madison Square Garden thing was yesterday.
	And they show this.
	The picture there is of a Nazi rally in 1939 in Madison Square Garden.
	Clinton says Trump will reenact the Nazi rally.
	This is the top of the Drudge Report.
	And then they got a video.
	I had linked to a video of it.
	And I looked at that.
	And after it had been up for a while, and it still only had a couple hundred views.
	Not even the Democrats who read Drudge believe that.
	And they've been up for quite a while.
	I don't know if those a couple hundred views were from the Drudge Report, if they were up from the years that it was up there.
	But they're absolutely desperate, deranged Democrats.
	So, Nazis held a rally there in 1939.
	So holding a rally there makes you a fascist, as I said earlier in the show.
	You had FDR holding a rally there in 1936, three days before the election.
	Three years before FDR held a rally there, and six years before the Nazis held a rally there, you had Jews hold a rally there against the Nazis in 1933.
	But, you know, it is the standard thing to everybody.
	If you don't like somebody, call them Hitler.
	I'm sure they're going to pull this one up again.
	When you ride alone, you ride with Hitler.
	And they've got a guy in a car who's driving, and they've drawn in the ghost of Hitler sitting in the passenger seat.
	Join a car-sharing club today.
	You know, shaming people about using gasoline.
	Well, when are they going to start using that again?
	You know, if you have a car, if you have an internal combustion engine, you are alone riding with Hitler when you're doing that.
	So, actually, even worse than that, you know, you're destroying the world if you ride in an internal combustion engine, you know.
	Hillary's statement appeared to build on recent comments made by James Carville.
	This guy is getting desperate.
	You know, again, the guy who said, this economy is stupid.
	Well, on that issue, she's underwater by about 10 points.
	So I don't know.
	He's going to have some explaining to do.
	He's either got to go back and change that, although he was right about it.
	But he's really getting desperate because he knows.
	I mean, he's an old guy now, and he's gotten even more feisty and combatant, I think, in his old age.
	Get off the lawn, you know, type of thing.
	But he's got to be worried if it's about the economy, stupid.
	Breitbart News reported October 15th that according to Carville's new conspiracy theory, he said Trump is signaling to Nazis by hosting a campaign rally at New York City's Madison Square Garden.
	Yeah.
	And so she picked it up.
	Hillary Clinton picked up on that as well.
	But the real reality is that she's not getting these key endorsements.
	And that's what really shows that her campaign is in freefall.
	That's what I believe.
	That's what the New York Post said.
	But folks, it's not about the voters.
	They said for the longest time, it's not about who votes, but it's who counts the votes and that type of thing.
	And to paraphrase George Carlin, you know, they've got an election and you ain't in it.
	You're not.
	You know, you couldn't even try to make a reasonable case that you're in this election unless you lived in one of the seven toss-up states.
	But I would make the case that you don't have a say-so there either.
	Let's talk about who does.
	The big tech CEOs are calling up Trump now and seeking to rekindle their relationship.
	Whoever it is that has decided to select him, the word is out.
	Musk, the king of crony capitalism, was also the first one to jump on board here.
	He's better at this stuff than any of these guys.
	That's how he became the world's richest man.
	He can read what's happening in government and the tea leaves better than any of these guys.
	And so now you've got Trump and Tim Apple talking on the phone.
	You know, Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple that Trump called Tim Apple.
	They chatted last week about the iPhone maker's ongoing legal issues in Europe.
	The former president divulged in an interview on Thursday later in the day, Trump told a Vegas audience that the head of Google, CEO Sundar Pichai, called to marvel over the Republican nominee's campaign stop where he was doing french fries at McDonald's.
	And he repeated that with Joe Rogan, or I should say Rogaine, I guess, in that interview.
	He said, this is one of the hottest things.
	We've never seen anything like it, Trump says Sundar Pichai told him.
	And then you've got the current CEO of Amazon, Andy Jassy, also recently reached out to check in with the former president.
	Two sources familiar with the phone call, told CNN. This is a CNN article, by the way.
	And then Mark Zuckerberg called him up this summer after the first failed assassination attempt on Trump.
	Zuckerberg and Musk picked up on it sooner.
	They realized, well, this is something that's going to make him very popular with the masses.
	And that doesn't mean, though, that the masses are going to be electing him.
	It's very similar to what Wilbur Ross, who was an agent of the Rothschild Bank, saw when he went to see Trump when Trump's casinos were going bankrupt.
	And he saw all the crowd around Trump.
	And he called up the Rothschild people and said, you know, we can use this guy.
	That's what this is about, folks.
	It's not about the actual voting.
	It's about the mass following that he has.
	And they can use this guy.
	And they can use this guy to get behind you and stab you in the back.
	That's how they can use this guy.
	I think he's more valuable to them.
	And I think these CEOs are picking up on that.
	So, just like the Rothschilds did when they bought him.
	Oh, the casinos.
	There are some that seem to be waking up to the fact that, hey, this guy might get selected again.
	I don't want to have him and his administration going after us, said a person close to Trump told CNN. They're bragging about this.
	They're bragging about the threats and the intimidation.
	You're either loyal to me or I'm going to come after you.
	See, this is, and this is, again, just like Biden.
	Everybody talks about how Biden has gone into lawfare against Trump, and it is despicable what the Biden administration has done to their political enemies.
	But Trump has made it clear that he plans on doing that.
	Now, is it an empty threat like it was about locking Hillary up?
	I don't think so after they came against him.
	So, what he's saying out loud, I think they hear.
	And I think they're taking it seriously, said a person close to Trump, told CNN. So, I guess, you know, we'll kind of get an idea as to which way things are going.
	We look and see how long after Trump becomes president again before he goes to Davos.
	Trump's conversation with the CEO of Amazon, Jassy, which has not been previously reported, comes after...
	Bezos shuts down the endorsement of Lala for the Washington Post.
	Again, as I said before, the purpose of buying the Washington Post was political influence.
	You see, in the 21st century American empire, it's not so important to sell things as it is to buy influence in Washington.
	Washington, D.C., the district of cash.
	So much...
	Confetti money there that, you know, you can't go wrong if you've got friends there that can give you contracts.
	Trump also spoke Friday with executives at Bezos' space exploration company, Blue Origin.
	Trump has clearly enjoyed his warming with the tech titans.
	He has flaunted his private conversations with them in many interviews.
	And again, the technocrats also believe that they have, with Trump, they have an ally with J.D. Vance.
	J.D. Vance While he was at Yale, he gets within the orbit of Peter Thiel and all the venture capitalists out there.
	He is a big tech boy.
	Whoever is sworn in next year will immediately face decisions over whether to continue Biden's crackdown on big tech.
	Biden's Department of Justice has sued Apple.
	They've gone after Google as well.
	And so, even from that standpoint, you would expect that these people would support Trump.
	But I think The fact that they waited until now, and they haven't publicly endorsed him, but the fact that they're calling him up on the phone and that type of thing, is waiting for them to read the tea leaves.
	And I think that these people certainly can read the tea leaves.
	And I would also say, in terms of big tech people, because Biden has gone after crypto as well, he's made a lot of enemies with them on that.
	And when I say Biden...
	I mean, whoever it is that's running the show there, right?
	It's not Biden.
	It's not Lala.
	They're just, you know, empty suits out front.
	They're the facade.
	And so from that standpoint, it doesn't really matter if they've got, you know, Biden or if they've got people that are making that, you know, wearing a Biden mask or none of that stuff matters.
	I mean, the reality is, is that whether or not it is Biden there, whether or not it is Lala there, the people running this thing is the Biden collective.
	And the same thing is going to be true of Trump.
	You know, Trump talks about himself in the third person.
	Well, they didn't like Trump, but now they're liking Trump.
	And if you stop and think about the fact that Trump is not really a single point of making decisions, but he's there as kind of the, you know, the avatar of Of, you know, the right-wing CIA. You know, the right-wing CIA is the right-wing of the intelligence community.
	The military intelligence has always, from the very beginning, people like Steve Pichinik and others have always pushed Trump.
	And you've got the CIA is a bunch of left-wing Ivy Leaguers, but the military-industrial complex, the intelligence community is not monolithic, and they're fighting each other.
	And neither one of them cares a whit about URI.
	They don't care anything about America.
	They've got their own geopolitical games.
	They've got their own power games that they're playing.
	And these are the people who are calling the shots.
	These suits like Trump and Biden and Harris are just that.
	They're just puppets that they put up in front of people.
	Trump refused to say if he would follow through on Biden's efforts to break up Google.
	However, he said he was not a fan of the company, and he said, they treat me badly.
	He previously said that he would request that Google be prosecuted, quote, at maximum levels, unquote, if he were to win re-election.
	And he claimed, this is CNN, without evidence, unquote, that Google broke the law and only displayed bad stories about Trump and good stories about him.
	Well, again, breaking the law, that would be...
	Making a donation, in a sense, I guess you could say.
	And I don't think that you, I don't think that you, everybody knows that Google is doing that.
	That's not a question.
	The question is whether or not, CNN pretends, well, I think that Google is being fair-handed.
	Of course they're not.
	They're not at all.
	They're highly, highly partisan and opinionated.
	The only question would be whether or not their actions constitute a violation of federal election laws.
	Not a question to their bias.
	However, Trump's tune on Google changed an interview on Thursday.
	He said, if you look at Google lately, I think you're going to see they've become much more inclined toward Trump.
	There again, see the royal we?
	He said, they're starting to like Trump because they're starting to get it.
	Again, the Trump collective, I guess.
	Or you talk about the royal we, you know, like Queen Elizabeth.
	We are not amused!
	Who's the we?
	Let me tell you, all of those companies will be set free, he said, if you have the right president.
	All of those companies will be in good shape.
	Don't worry about that.
	They just need to kiss the ring.
	And the congressmen, like Thomas Massey, need to kiss the ring.
	And the media needs to kiss the ring.
	Yeah, it's going to be the best of times, the worst of times, I can tell you.
	Anyway, Democrat groups are so desperate that they're going for the pornography vote.
	I'm serious, they're now going to make, after making abortion...
	And gender gaslighting and mutilation of children issue.
	Now they're going after the porn users.
	What would you expect from a party that has a sex worker as its candidate?
	In a 30-second ad called, quote, Republicans rubbing you the wrong way, unquote, Now, they came up with that.
	A lot of double entendre there with that.
	A young woman is shown watching porn before an actor playing a...
	I'm sorry, I said young woman?
	I said a young man.
	Anyway, an actor playing a Republican congressman takes away his phone.
	The guy says, how'd you get in here?
	Well, I am your Republican congressman.
	Now that we're in charge, we're banning porn nationwide.
	The guy says, get out of my bedroom, you creep.
	He says, well, I won the last election, so it's my decision, and I'm just going to watch and make sure that you don't finish illegally.
	This is how desperate they are.
	The Democrat Party is just demonic at this point.
	All they sell is debauchery.
	No political party.
	It's seriously likely to ban porn at the federal level, says The Hill.
	And they're right.
	And even if they were to ban it, it wouldn't work.
	How did that drug prohibition work?
	How did that alcohol prohibition work?
	How does any of this prohibition work, especially on moral issues, right?
	I mean, you can prohibit murder, but you're still going to have people committing murder.
	But when it is something that is a moral issue, it's very easy to just buy off the politicians and the policemen and get them to look the other way because they're looking at this and they're saying, well, people are making that decision on their own and even calling it a victimless crime.
	A number of states have, however, taken action in recent years to tighten access to pornography, including at least 19 states that require age verification to access online porn.
	And again, when we look at the Unintended consequences of prohibition, or maybe they are intended consequences, this is a backdoor to digital ID. And it doesn't support that.
	Look, the police are never going to be able to change morality, right?
	I've had for many, many years interviewed people with a group of former District attorneys, prosecutors, cops, and so forth, who were opposed to drug prohibition because they said, this is a problem, but it's not a problem that's going to be solved by law enforcement.
	You see, the problem is that Americans increasingly are like the proverbial person who's got one tool.
	The only tool they got is a hammer.
	And so to them, everything looks like a nail.
	They go around hammering stuff and breaking things.
	And that's where America is right now.
	Liberals as well as conservatives think that their only tool is government.
	And they think the government's only got one tool itself, and that is to prohibit things that they don't like.
	So they want to get the right person in, and they want that person to prohibit stuff that they don't like.
	But when we look at the Democrat Party here, again, just to underscore that it is the party of perversion and debauchery, we've got Monica Lewinsky suggesting that Democrats can ease their election anxiety with books about sex, with coloring books, and with books about abortion.
	Monica Lewinsky, offering 25 ways to calm down before the election, to relieve stress by reading literature on feminism and abortion.
	I don't know, that raises my stress level somehow.
	I don't know.
	And through having sex, a suggestion seen as tone-deaf, given her own past.
	In a recent piece in Vanity Fair, her closing recommendation, a suggestion to use sex as a distraction.
	Was she the one that suggested that to Bill Clinton?
	Ha ha ha ha!
	Vanity Fair, of all things.
	I mean, we're back to Pilgrim's Progress, I guess, in the real sense.
	She also lists costume planning.
	There you go.
	That helps you to get rid of your stress.
	Netflix.
	Dancing.
	Shaking your booty.
	Activism.
	And reading.
	And her recommended books focused on feminism and abortion, which she describes as one of the most vital issues on the ballot this year.
	Well, of course it's vital.
	For the party of sex workers like Monica Lewinsky and Lala Harris.
	That's what they are.
	They're sex workers.
	As a matter of fact, she has advocated for sex worker-led funding to support advocacy, community care, and the rights and safety of sex workers.
	You know, Lala goes on a sex podcast.
	And that's what these people are.
	They're prostitutes.
	That's why abortion is so important to them.
	It's their insurance policy.
	She concludes her list with a provocative suggestion.
	She says, and if all else fails, there is always sex.
	So I guess if your career's not going too well for you...
	You can get appointed as a district attorney or an intern or whatever.
	There's always sex for these sex workers.
	As Breitbart says, ironically, former President Bill Clinton said that his high-profile affair with Lewinsky was one of the things that he did during his presidency to, quote, manage my anxieties.
	Well, there you go.
	I don't know who came up with that idea, him or her.
	I thought he was also managing his anxieties by bombing other countries.
	Managing his anxiety when people noticed what he was doing to manage his anxiety.
	And to keep people from noticing that he got caught in adultery.
	So, you know, just go bomb in other countries.
	Hillary Clinton has a husband who is banging Lewinsky and bombing other countries, and she calls us deplorable.
	Will Democrats accept the results of the 2024 presidential election?
	You can also ask the question, will MAGA? This one, though, of course, is being written by American Greatness, and so they want to pretend that, of course, they will abide by it.
	I don't know that they will or not.
	But it is a question that's certainly left or right.
	Everybody has, up to this point, up to just the last few days, Everybody was being fed narratives, and you look at the headlines and stuff on Drudge, and he's a good barometer of what the left-stream media is about.
	And as I've said all along, you've got these dueling polls.
	And, of course, you can make a poll say anything that you want.
	You can write the poll in a way that you can get the answer that you want.
	And then, of course, you can always go back and say, well, look, you know, my candidate, they say, well, Lala's ahead two points in the national polls that we've done and so forth.
	But that doesn't matter.
	It's done on a state-by-state level.
	So the right will come back and say, yeah, but we're ahead in these battleground states and so forth.
	They're both of them are feeding a narrative and have been for quite some time that it is not possible for their candidate to lose.
	And so that's the thing that's really changed in the last few days.
	The left is not really pushing that narrative anymore.
	Now they're getting really scared and desperate.
	And, you know, things like 1939, Madison Square Garden, you're doing that again.
	You're a Nazi.
	And you can see the anger when you look at McDonald's, where Trump worked.
	They're having to hire private security because there's been so many threats from people on the left.
	And then you look at another thing, which I think is also a bit of irony.
	The fact that there's been a little mini-pandemic happening Claimed by, I don't know, was it the FDA or USDA about E. coli on McDonald's to punish them?
	And isn't that kind of ironic since they took that page right out of Trump's fake pandemic playbook?
	That's one thing that the press won't tell you.
	The right-wing press will tell you, well, you know, this is made, and I think it probably is.
	I think the coincidence is just too much of a coincidence.
	And have you seen any reports about people being hospitalized with any of this stuff?
	No, no.
	I've just seen the regulatory say, oh, we found E. coli there.
	Let's put a black mark on McDonald's.
	Let's hurt them on the stock market.
	Because they realize just how damaging this PR stunt by Trump was.
	And that's all it was, was a PR stunt.
	I mean, this is reality TV stuff.
	You know, he's doing this, and Musk is saying, I'll give you a million dollars, you know, and all this.
	A million dollars a day to the MAGA people.
	It's all just a big reality TV show.
	That's all that this is.
	But the true issue is what you see these people doing, the powerful movers and shakers, the big CEOs of Apple and Google, and the owners of these big leftist papers that are there.
	But I think it is ironic that they would go out and use this fake pandemic garbage like Trump used against all of us.
	Roughly a quarter of Americans believe that a post-election civil war is likely.
	And of course, why wouldn't they?
	Because it's being sold to them very, very heavily.
	Again, by both sides.
	Especially Infowars.
	Every day.
	You know, this type of thing.
	Civil War Alert!
	RFK Jr.
	exposes a Democrat Party deep state plan to trigger civil unrest and martial law during a contested 2024 election.
	Understanding the enemy game plan is critical to stopping the globalist plot to trick Americans into killing each other during a stage race war.
	Tune into this.
	It's just that kind of stuff.
	That kind of sensationalism.
	Really doesn't, you know, it shows you who he works for.
	It's just amazing to see that kind of, that's agitprop.
	Agitation and propaganda to help people, help to push people into this.
	RT says a significant number of Americans fear the upcoming election could lead to political violence.
	Why?
	Because they've been told that.
	Both sides.
	Both sides.
	And the candidates are pretty much doing that as well.
	You've got the Biden administration, Lala, saying, well, you know, I think we just signed this thing saying we don't care about the Posse Comitatus Act anymore.
	We can use the military as law enforcement.
	And they can use lethal force against that.
	That's coming from Biden and Lala.
	And Trump, rather than pointing that out and saying, see?
	See what those people are about?
	Instead, Trump doubles down and says, yeah, I'm going to use it against the enemies within as well.
	He's also pushing that narrative as well.
	So, both the candidates and their surrogate sycophant media are selling this stuff.
	6% of people said a second civil war is, quote, very likely.
	21% said somewhat likely.
	Roughly equal proportions of both Trump and Harris supporters thought the civil war was at least somewhat likely.
	And this is a survey that was conducted between October 18th and 21st.
	So just last week.
	So we're going to take a quick break here.
	So I got a troll here saying, David, you're still trashing Trump?
	Does the same thing?
	That's why Alex Jones had to fire you.
	Is that why he fired me?
	I heard so many...
	I said at the time, you know, first he was...
	Well, he had somebody else fire me.
	He didn't tell me to my face.
	He had somebody else fire me.
	But we know what it was about.
	It was because you're absolutely right.
	I am dead set against that mass murder.
	Shame on you, whoever you are, and shut this guy off.
	Whoever this guy is, and they keep coming back...
	You are supporting mass murder.
	It doesn't matter to you at all.
	And I am absolutely never going to support somebody that did what Trump did.
	He violated the Constitution.
	He began that stuff in 2019 with take the gun and do the due process later.
	Fortunately, it's something I can do on my own, he said.
	Yeah, really?
	And he continued through the vaccines.
	He continued with the elections.
	And he continued with the grifting and the stealing.
	And he took more money from his people after the election than he did before.
	And he kept it.
	And Alex did too.
	And Alex, after having a record year, and all that stuff came out in his trial, had a record year in the spring.
	And he...
	He said that he told people when he fired me, while other people were firing me, he was telling everybody, I had to get rid of David and Travis because they just couldn't afford them.
	Well, nobody was believing that.
	So he started coming up with other things.
	And when I began my program that following Monday, that was a Thursday, I said, he's got more reasons that he fired me than Hillary Clinton has about Benghazi.
	And all of them equally unbelievable.
	I tell you, one thing that he said, only one thing he said that I believe, and we know what it was about.
	He didn't want to draw attention to the fact that I was telling people that January the 6th was a grift because he was still doing it.
	That was December the 17th.
	And he continued to run that grift through January the 6th, making money.
	And, of course, you know, he has also doesn't want people to pay attention to what a sycophant he has become, partisan sycophant to Trump.
	But the one thing that he said that I believe, at one point in time, he told somebody, he said, well, I had this restless night, and God told me to fire David.
	Now that I believe, because it's been the biggest blessing in my life to be out of that place.
	It was a constant grief to me to see the lies from my co-workers deceiving people, sending them to their death, telling them that it was just sugar water, and they knew better.
	He knew better.
	He'd spent years telling people about vaccines and about the adjuvants, and then he just excuses it.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	you you Making sense.
	Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about pharmaceuticals and pandemic because we have a update.
	This is from James Roguski.
	James Roguski, if you remember, he has been on the World Health Organization's pandemic agreement more than anybody else.
	He broke this, had deep research about this, and they're coming again.
	They're never going to stop.
	You thought this was over?
	No, they're coming at it again.
	The World Health Organization is working to finalize another pandemic agreement by November the 11th.
	They say it's the same thing.
	They just keep heading.
	So when it shuts down, they can't get the votes.
	They go away.
	They come back.
	They tweak it.
	They come back.
	They want to do it by November the 11th in hopes of adopting it in a special session of the World Health Assembly in December.
	And so...
	James put this up on his Substack.
	He's got a James Roguski.
	You can find him on Substack.
	His last name is R-O-G-U-S-K-I. He says two steps here.
	He says, number one, he's got a link to read the latest available version of the pandemic agreement and to understand what it's really about.
	Number two, collect your thoughts, write them down, and record a video expressing your own opinion about the proposed pandemic agreement.
	He said, I strongly encourage you to display your courage and to take the time to record your own video, post it online on the video platform of your choice, and then share the link to your video in the comment section below.
	And so that is a very important thing that you can do, is to put that out.
	Just to sound the alarm, you'll get a lot of people pointing out that this is a betrayal that is there.
	Keith Oberman, meanwhile, is not really concerned about any of this stuff.
	He's just upset about Elon Musk, right?
	Just like this Trump troll, right?
	They don't care about people being killed.
	They don't care about this massive fraud that locked us down everywhere.
	They don't care about any of that stuff.
	It's just about getting their way politically.
	And that's the way Keith Olbermann is, just like that Trump troll, like so many of them.
	Says, you need to arrest Elon Musk immediately and lock him away in a military facility.
	But not Fauci, right?
	And again, you know, when Joe Rogan is talking to Trump, About vaccines or whatever.
	He doesn't mention Jeffrey Epstein.
	He doesn't mention Fauci.
	And doesn't even point out when Trump starts talking about his bad advisors who lied him into all.
	And this, again, has become the standard excuse offered by the MAGA cult.
	Oh, he just had a lot of bad advisors.
	Well, don't you think Fauci's a bad advisor?
	And why is it that Trump gave him a medal on his last day, Trump's last day in office, he gave Fauci a medal for Operation Warp Speed.
	And Trump continued...
	To repeat all the lies of Fauci until just a few months ago, even after he started running for president, he was still pushing that stuff.
	And if you push him...
	As we've seen some interviewers, he falls back into his Fauci talking points again.
	I mentioned this earlier in the show.
	This one guy, his name is Jonathan Bowen.
	He said, my son, John Charles Bowen, suffered a sudden infant death syndrome event in 2017.
	He would be seven years old today.
	Since his death, I've been in mourning.
	I've racked my brain over and over again in an attempt to understand the reason or the reasons behind his death.
	I initially blamed the presentation, I'm sorry, the pressurization of air cabins within commercial flights.
	And yes, I think that could have contributed to his death.
	He had just flown from Cleveland, Ohio, and all that.
	But now he thinks that it is all the vaccines that he took.
	And as I said earlier, he says, my opinion has changed because my opinion of RFK Jr.
	has changed.
	And he goes through this and he says, well, if Donald wins, we may get RFK Jr.
	in Don's administration.
	I want JFK Jr.
	to get some answers from the CDC. Well, good luck with all of that.
	Again, even when people understand the issue, they don't understand the solution.
	And they don't understand just how deep the lies are.
	And this is why I say, we all knew this at InfoWars.
	We all knew this was fraud.
	And they lied about it.
	And as this article at Expose News in the UK says, they lied about the flu for 50 years.
	50 years of data shows that the flu cases are rare.
	That 97.5% of symptoms are not caused by influenza and that there have been no deaths.
	We get bacterial pneumonia and things like that.
	But flu and the things that they vaccinate you for, and this is how I knew from the beginning.
	Because I had seen it was the same game that they ran every year.
	And the same game that we would all at InfoWars talk about.
	And Mike Adams too.
	And yet Mike Adams jumped on board with this thing and said, look, CDC says that COVID is the number one cause of death.
	And he's putting up charts from the CDC. Pushing CDC propaganda after he had for years...
	Looked at the flu shot and pointed out.
	And we know exactly what this is.
	Again, in October now, we know.
	Didn't know this at the time, but in October of 2019, Fauci goes to the Milken Institute.
	I've played the clip for you many, many times.
	They said, how do you get everybody to take an untested flu shot worldwide?
	Well, you do it with disruption.
	And you do it from the inside, and you do it iteratively, right?
	It also helps have people like Alex Jones and Mike Adams, who can monetize it.
	Who can monetize the fear and the panic.
	So, again, going back to this, 50 years worth of data.
	It's reviewed by a man named Dr.
	Tom Jefferson.
	Hey, there we go.
	I guess he's sworn eternal enmity to these mass murderers in the altar of pharmakia.
	He explained why flu cases are rare, why complications from flu are very rare, why there have been no deaths from influenza.
	And so he said he's published this series of articles on his Substack page.
	His Substack page is Trust the Evidence, but I think you'll be able to remember Thomas Jefferson, Tom Jefferson.
	He's published a series of articles.
	He calls it the Dot Series, as in Connecting the Dots.
	The Dot Series started as a project to publish downloads of work that Dr.
	Jefferson and his colleagues on influenza vaccines did.
	And he got a lot of feedback on it.
	Consequently, the series morphed into summarizing the backstory of four Cochrane reviews which show poor performance of influenza vaccines.
	In 2008 and 2009, Dr.
	Jefferson and his colleagues conducted reviews on the evidence of the World Health Organization and the CDC and how the all-powerful had used their flu vaccine recommendations.
	It is the review of this evidence that has become the focus of the DOTS series.
	In his second article, he called it Connecting More Dots.
	Trust the Evidence Substack noted, quote, U.S. investigators at the Informed Consent Action Network, that's ICON, that's the Big Trees organization, recently published private email correspondence, which lays bare the extent of the deception.
	And emails have been made available, and there's a link to them in this article as well as in his articles.
	The emails show that you can't trust even very big and famous institutions as they are part of the pandemic industry.
	You mean like Johns Hopkins that was a part of Dark Winter and every one of these germ games on?
	Yeah, yeah.
	But this is not a new story, and we'll show why this had to become clear to us as early as 2008, says Dr.
	Jefferson.
	The following is a third part, revealing the evidence used to recommend annual flu vaccinations.
	Dr.
	Jefferson begins his article by saying, I beg all of you who were or who will be offered a flu vaccination to consider the content of this post when deciding whether or not to accept it.
	By the way, before COVID, flu was the vaccine that more people had more adverse reactions to than anything else.
	And of course, it was absolute nonsense, even within, again, their paradigm.
	And I, you know, don't, well, let me just finish it.
	One last quote here.
	Influenza, he says, is rare.
	Population interventions such as inactivated vaccines do not stand a chance against a relatively rare moving target like influenza.
	This completely demolishes the 1918 narrative and all the rest of this stuff, and there's been other things that demolished that narrative.
	One of the key things of Drs.
	Bailey, Sam and her husband, they pointed out something that I was not aware of before I interviewed them, before I read her book for the interview, and that is the fact that the UK had for 45 years a house that They pay people a good bit of money to take a two-week vacation there because they're trying to determine how cold the cold is passed on to somebody.
	Cold virus, they say.
	Well, is it a virus?
	Is it contagious?
	They were unable, even though they were taking mucus and putting it in the mouth and nose of other people, they were not able to transfer the cold to those other people in 45 years.
	After 45 years, they shut it down.
	And so it calls into question this whole idea of contagion.
	It calls into question this whole idea of viruses.
	And so I don't buy that.
	But even if you bought into that paradigm, if you look at what they were doing on an annual basis with the flu vaccine, What did they do?
	Well, you know, they had to manufacture this stuff.
	They put it in eggs and stuff like that.
	So they would say, well, this is what we think it is.
	And so we're going to manufacture this.
	We think that this year this is going to be a strain of virus that we're going to have.
	And so we're going to manufacture this in advance.
	And have all these things ready.
	And that's what we're going to inject you for what we think will be the flu strain this year.
	And so you need to get another injection this year.
	Because every year, it's going to change.
	Every year, we're going to have a variant, right?
	Well, that was the lie that they told everybody.
	The reality with all this virus stuff is that they never isolate anything.
	So what were they even doing?
	The whole thing was a, should we call it a shell game, since they were using eggs?
	That's what it was.
	The whole thing is a bunch of nonsense.
	And here's another angle, another data point, to show the fraud of the pharmaceutical companies.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we will be right back.
	ORCHESTRA
	PLAYS ORCHESTRA
	PLAYS ORCHESTRA
	PLAYS You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	I want to thank Atomic Dog.
	Thank you for the message that's helped David Knight destroy MAGA trolls by liking the video, sharing on social media, and subscribing.
	It helps, and it really does help.
	And it's something that doesn't cost anything, so we really would appreciate that.
	Let's talk a little bit about the Christian side of this political election here.
	We've got Harris heckled yet again.
	At a Pennsylvania church.
	She was heckled at another church that she went to.
	I think it was in Georgia, I think.
	Now at a Pennsylvania church.
	And she says that voting for her fulfills God's expectation for us to help him.
	I do believe Paul's message holds great urgency.
	As a nation, we face real challenges.
	We carry real...
	we carry yeah the band comes to the rescue again yeah Oh, she loves free speech, doesn't she?
	She loves dissent.
	It's so important.
	and helps her to sharpen her image.
	Every voice is in court.
	She doesn't know what to say.
	Can't handle it, can you?
	Yeah.
	They're trying to drown it out with a band there.
	And they're doing a pretty good job.
	She's just standing there.
	She doesn't know what to say.
	She's clapping.
	I love the dissent, doesn't she?
	Well, it's kind of like, you know, when somebody asks one of these politicians a difficult question, it's like, I'm so glad you asked that.
	They're not glad that you asked that.
	That just is one of the standard approaches to it.
	She was interrupted by Heckler while speaking.
	But what she was saying was truly amazing, frankly.
	Christian Compassion in West Philadelphia, referencing the biblical story of Paul when someone began shouting.
	Oh, I'm sure she wasn't talking about Romans 1 because Paul wrote Romans 1 to talk about the Democrat Party.
	He's definitely talking about depravity.
	God gave them over to that depravity, the Democrats.
	Somebody began shouting.
	She stopped speaking, clapped.
	The church band sounded the music, drowned out the heckler, who was not captured on the event cameras.
	That's why we fight for democracy.
	I'm so glad you had it.
	Every voice is important.
	Clapping your hands, every voice is important.
	But here's what she had to say.
	She said, in just nine days, we have the power to decide the fate of our nation for generations to come.
	You see, this is one of the most important elections ever.
	When everybody tells you that every election, they're lying to you.
	But listen to what she says.
	I'm reminded God expects us to help Him.
	We've got work to do.
	What God is that that she's talking about?
	That's not the God that I say.
	God that I know is not helpless.
	He is the defender of widows.
	He's a father to the fatherless, but he's not helpless.
	It is in and within our power to fulfill the promise of America, she said.
	An opportunity for every child.
	Every child?
	Including the ones that you insist on ripping apart?
	Is that right?
	Every child?
	The power to do justice, love, mercy, and walk humbly with our God power.
	That's it.
	To walk humbly with our God power, the black church understood and has used for generations.
	Their God power?
	I don't know who her God is.
	Who is her Lord?
	Ha!
	She said, you know, hey, if you say Jesus is Lord, you're at the wrong rally.
	And I think maybe if you say Jesus is Lord, you're at the wrong place.
	But if we go back to 2008, 16 years ago, when she was San Francisco District Attorney, a job that she got by being a sex worker for Willie Brown.
	This is an article from that point in time.
	You know, it's kind of interesting when you go back and you look at these archives.
	That's why they want to get rid of the Internet Archive.
	The government is coming after them, denial of services, and I don't think it's a bunch of hackers.
	I think it's the government's doing it.
	They really want to flush things down the memory hole.
	But this article, I am praying at the temple every day for Obama, quote unquote, 2008.
	San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Devi Harris, a Barack Obama campaign insider, who also serves on Influential Policymaking Committee of the Democrat National Committee, and was one of the headliners of the only Indian American event at and was one of the headliners of the only Indian American event at the DNC said her grandmother in Chennai, which is in India.
	Is her grandmother in India voting in this?
	Her grandmother in Chennai, India, It says, you let them know, I'm going to the temple every day, and I'm praying for Barack Obama.
	My grandmother and our family members, not only in India, but in this country, are all very excited about the future of our country.
	See, she was all Indian 16 years ago.
	She was the only Indian American at the event, at the DNC. She's talking about her relatives in India.
	Now she's invented herself, reinvented herself, As a black Christian that doesn't think that Jesus is Lord.
	Barack was recently in San Francisco, she said, at an Indian-American reception we hosted for him, and he proudly declared to the crowd his status as a Desi.
	A Desi.
	I don't know what a Desi is, but I think, Lucy, you got some splainer to do, you know?
	What?
	She was Indian, and now she's black.
	So he says he's a Desi, and he talked about the need to have an administration in Washington, D.C., in the White House, that understands the plight of immigrants.
	Now, of course, a Desi is...
	Referring to people who are Indian.
	The people in the culture of India.
	So he's saying, Ich bin ein Desi.
	To paraphrase JFK, right?
	Who said, I am a jelly donut.
	I'm ein Berliner, you know.
	Ich bin ein Berliner.
	Instead of ich aus Berlin.
	I'm not from Berlin.
	I am a Berliner, a jelly donut.
	Anyway, I think Indian Americans can be very proud of our support of Obama and electing the next president of the United States, who again, by his own admission, is a Desi.
	And that's what she was selling herself as.
	She was a Desi.
	Now she is a black Christian using the God power, she said.
	The God power that's out there.
	Well, the Drudge had this article from Rolling Stone.
	The Christians were preaching the case for Kamala.
	They said, Trump undermines the work of Jesus.
	And I agree.
	And so does she.
	Isn't it amazing how both sides...
	We'll undermine the work of Jesus.
	The small crowd, says Rolling Stone, on the lawn, tittered knowingly.
	There was a bus emblazoned with faith, hope, and love.
	A phrase that any good Christian would know is from 1 Corinthians 13.13.
	And then they say, well, that's 1 Corinthians, not 1 Corinthians.
	And you know, one of the interesting things, I remember when that happened, and it was Ted Cruz who was trolling Trump about it.
	And I said, you know...
	If he wants to show what a good Christian he is, maybe instead of taunting Trump because of this shibboleth, which is what it was.
	I don't like the way you pronounce that.
	You say 1 Corinthians instead of 1 Corinthians, so you're obviously fraud.
	And of course, Trump really was a fraud.
	But at the time, it's like, well, if you're a Christian, why don't you reach out to him?
	Right?
	On some other basis, instead of taunting him about that.
	But subsequently, I've got an audio recording of the British actor David Suchet reading the Bible.
	He's got an excellent voice.
	I really enjoy listening to it.
	I've got several of them that are really good.
	I mean, you've got...
	Alexander Scorby, the King James Version, masterpiece.
	And then you've got another one by Mike Kellogg.
	He's got a really nice voice.
	There's three of them I like, and they're different translations.
	Of course, Alexander Scorby does the King James Version, masterpiece.
	David Suchet, NIV. The other one was NLT, Mike Kellogg.
	But that's a good version to listen to because if you're just listening and you're not reading and you're not studying, it's a good version.
	If you hear something different, time to go back and Look that up.
	Say, why is that different from what I remember?
	I've got all these Bible verses memorized in King James Version.
	When I hear something that's different, I like to go back and say, why did they use that word?
	Sometimes that gets you into a word study, opens up things quite a bit.
	That's the key thing.
	I had somebody on a Thursday show ask me about books to read, Christian books and everything.
	And it's like, look, you know, my point was, and everybody started saying, well, okay, I don't like this author, I don't like that.
	That's fine.
	You don't have to.
	You might be able to get something from some of these people.
	Like I mentioned C.S. Lewis.
	I think C.S. Lewis has a lot to say to people.
	about grief and things like that I think are very useful.
	But anything that you get from any of these Christian writers, hold it very loosely and check it against the Bible.
	But focus primarily on the Bible.
	That's what's going to really give you the growth and the foundation and the rest of that stuff is going to come from that.
	So these other things that are kind of peripheral, you can learn something from them, but hold them loosely on that.
	But again, the reason I brought all that up, got onto that sidetrack thing, David Suchet, a British actor, I thought it was very interesting.
	When he goes through, he doesn't say 1 Corinthians or 1 Kings or 2 Kings.
	He always says 1 Corinthians, 1 King, 2 Kings, 3 Kings, 4 Kings.
	Actually, there was 4 Kings.
	Anyway, that's another story.
	But they change it to Chronicles.
	But the point is that different people say it different ways.
	What difference does it make?
	And they trolled him.
	And here is Rolling Stone.
	Still wanting to troll him for saying 1 Corinthians.
	Yes, he had never cracked a Bible open, and we all understand that.
	And we understand that he's as fake about all this stuff as Lala is.
	But meanwhile, they go back and they talk about this wonderful movement of lefties for Lala, lefty Christians.
	So they show up and they've got a rainbow-colored, love thy neighbor, no exceptions signage.
	Isn't that wonderful?
	Well, I think, you know, just like when we're talking about the vaccines, you know, and Al Mohler's out there saying, love your neighbor, get that vaccine.
	Well, I think loving your neighbor is also telling them the truth about the vaccine.
	And I think loving your neighbor is also telling them the truth about sin, about the consequences of sin, here and now in your life, and the consequences of sin eternally.
	And if you don't tell them that, you're not loving your neighbor.
	A lot of times, neighbors don't want to hear that kind of stuff.
	They get very angry about that.
	But it's an act of love.
	And so, when we look at this, what's the matter with Trump's pastors that they won't tell him the truth?
	That they won't love him enough to tell him where he stands before God?
	To tell him that he needs forgiveness, and he doesn't think he needs it.
	Jesus said, the sick don't need a physician.
	If you think you're just fine.
	Because you've got it all together and you follow, you know, like Michael Bloomberg says, well, if there's a heaven, he said, I'm going straight in because I've given so much money to good causes.
	Okay, well, that kind of a person you can't reach.
	But you still need to tell him.
	But Trump's pastors won't tell him.
	They'll stand there and they'll pray over him, that he be king, that he have political power, but they won't pray for his soul.
	Or they will stand there and have their picture taken holding up a camera while they're praying on him so they can put that on.
	What kind of a pastor is that?
	Jesus said, don't be like the Pharisees who pray publicly so that everybody can see and hear them doing it.
	Well, what did he say about the pastors who were praying over Trump and putting it out on social media with selfies?
	So anyway, Rolling Stone goes on and says, a lot of people in this country have been told over and over again that if you're truly a Christian, you can only vote for a Republican.
	And I think that is wrong as well.
	Right?
	We're here to remind you that has never been true, and it's not true today, and it's not going to be true tomorrow.
	And I'd say that I would never vote for a Democrat who supports these things, the gender gaslighting and mutilation and other things like that, and war.
	But I also don't support presidents who support war and who have murdered people with vaccines by the millions.
	I don't vote for evil people, period.
	Padgett and Vote Common Good are part of a growing movement of evangelical Christians, so professing, so labeled by themselves, committed to spreading the good news of that exact message.
	What message?
	The message that we're here to remind you, that as a Christian, you can vote for a Democrat.
	That's their message.
	That's the good news of their message, says Rolling Stone.
	That's not the good news.
	You know, the good news, the gospel, right?
	They said, the Christian Democrats of America bills itself as being sick of sitting by quietly while Jesus' message of good news is hijacked by the religious right to serve a hateful political agenda.
	Well, you know, if you're going to hate the sin, love the sinner, that means you've got to warn the sinner.
	You've got to warn Trump.
	You've got to warn voila.
	You've got to warn these Democrats who are embracing this perversity, what God condemns.
	And so that's loving them.
	And the good news is that when you tell them where they stand honestly before God and the rebellion to God...
	That you can also tell them about the grace and forgiveness of what Christ has done for them.
	That's the good news.
	The good news doesn't have anything to do with politics.
	And that's why you see this happening in Rolling Stone for the left, but I see it for the right as well.
	Right?
	The good news is that if you want grace, if you want forgiveness, which Trump and Lala don't want, they want power.
	They want money.
	So if you want grace and if you want forgiveness...
	It's there.
	It's there for free.
	Evangelicals for Harris know that it's not one that the bulk of conservative Christians will be able to hear.
	But in the context of this election, they're not trying to save the conservative church from itself.
	They're trying to elect Kamala.
	Well, the conservative church needs to be saved.
	Why wouldn't they give them the good news?
	Now, their God is only politics.
	And it isn't God power.
	It's that power is God to them.
	Well, I kind of gave you the right words in the wrong order.
	It's not God power that you got.
	It's the fact that power is God to them.
	Now, this I thought was interesting.
	Do Christians want their pastors addressing current issues?
	New numbers unveil a fascinating reality.
	When it comes to social and political issues, it seems that congregants want their faith leaders to give them advice and help them to understand cultural phenomena.
	But I guess the question is, how, right?
	What perspective should they come in with?
	What worldview should they use as Christian leaders?
	You think it might be a Christian worldview?
	You think it might be based on the Bible?
	Four in five U.S. Protestant churchgoers, 80% of them, believe a pastor must address current issues to be doing their job.
	Otherwise, you're completely disconnected, right?
	In the same way that James says, well, if somebody is hungry and doesn't have any clothing or whatever, you say, well, be filled and go on your way, and you say, bless you, and you go on, you haven't done anything.
	These are people who are being lied to, murdered, sent to war, crippled.
	By these vaccines and by everything else that the government is doing, and you're not going to tell them?
	And they're in the middle of a spiritual battle, and most of these pastors don't even understand where the battlefield is.
	The battlefield is not between Republican and Democrat.
	Those are just different tactics in the spiritual battle.
	The kingdom of God is within you.
	It's not in Washington, D.C., Only 16% disagree that the vast majority of them want pastors to jump in.
	91%!
	So they have total trust in the pastor of their church, which likely speaks to the reason they want to hear a preacher discuss current issues.
	This isn't about politics, though, as past polls show how percentages, 35% of Christians attending church at least monthly, believing it is appropriate to endorse political candidates during church services.
	Well, again, they want information about what they see around them.
	How are we to interact with this?
	What does this mean?
	How do we raise our children?
	How do we live our life?
	What is right?
	What is wrong?
	What is right and wrong in the culture that we live in?
	They don't want you to yoke yourself to a politician that is a known liar, grifter, and corrupt.
	That's not what they want.
	They, you know, you look at these people that are reprobates, they don't want that.
	So he said, as American culture increasingly includes fewer overtly Christian elements and more non-Christian ideas, churchgoers are hungry to know what the Bible says about life's issues.
	It's about the principles.
	It's not about the end justifies the means.
	I want Trump elected and everything's just going to be fine, and I don't really care what we have to do about it.
	So we'll talk more about this tomorrow.
	Thank you for listening.
	The David Knight Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲