Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 19, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:42

The David Knight Show - 06/19/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Welcome to the World of Tanks.
	Thank you.
	lines.
	you You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 19th of June.
	Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at the shameless pandering by Stephen Colbert to Fauci.
	I guess they've got a new comedy routine.
	It's like Abbott and Costello, where...
	Colbert plays the comedian, and Fauci plays the straight guy.
	But we're going to take a look at the shameless shilling of that.
	We're going to take a look at the global pandemic of bird flu.
	We know what the goal is with this, but we have to keep track of this as it's rolling out.
	And we have Klaus Schwab.
	Bragging to the young economic, the Davos forum people, the young kids, that they're going to live for at least another 50 years, transfer their brains into computers and the rest of this.
	And we have today, joining us, Michael Cargill, who just had a victory in the Supreme Court over the bump stock.
	We'll be right back. Music Yeah, the shameless pandering is never going to stop.
	And it was kind of interesting how on this Stephen Colbert performance that the two of them were giving, how they touched on a lot of the sensitive points that were brought up in the other entertainment production that was done for your benefit in Congress.
	Of course, not as many people watched that little show trial.
	And nothing will come of it.
	He won't answer for anything.
	Put a spin on what was happening, beginning with this.
	Nice to see you again, Doctor.
	Good to be with you, Steve. Always a pleasure to have you on.
	I've got to say, you are a spry 83 years old.
	Have you...
	Have you thought about running for president?
	No. No?
	No interest? Yeah, why would he want to take it to motion?
	You served under six, seven presidents.
	Seven presidents. Okay.
	And ruled over the last two.
	...of science... It's dangerous, but it's not a new thing.
	Right. This has happened in the past.
	You've dealt with it in the past. Have you seen anything like the way it is now, though?
	Because certainly, just a few days ago, your testimony down in Washington, D.C., made headlines for the hostility that you received.
	Right. Is this your long-historic career and being involved with all these politicians...
	Did they put a mask on him and make him stay six feet apart from everybody?
	And disturbing. Back when I first became director of the Institute, which was, you know, I've been director, I had been director for almost 40 years.
	In the beginning, there was always politics.
	You know, there was people of different ideology.
	There was center, center left, center right.
	They disagreed.
	They, you know, sometimes would argue with each other.
	But at the end of the day, there was civility and respect for each other.
	What we're seeing now is what you had mentioned, Stephen.
	It's vitriol and pure hostility.
	So I would get questioned in a very strict, pushing way maybe back in other administrations.
	But at the end of the hearing, they would come over to you and say, you know, good job.
	You know, sorry that we had to be tough with our questionings.
	But, you know, we want to get to the right place.
	Now it's pure attack.
	Yeah, I wonder why.
	A reflection of the profound degree of divisiveness in the country, which is very destructive.
	Okay, well, you know, you're a doctor.
	Yeah, you're a doctor.
	Well, did you ever, before in all this time, did you ever decide that you're going to dictate to everybody what they can and cannot do?
	That you're going to be overruling what we wish to do with our bodies?
	What the doctor-patient relationship is?
	No, that never happened before.
	Why would he become president?
	I mean, he'd take a salary cut, right?
	He was making more money than the president, and nobody asked him about that in Congress either.
	You know, all the people above him.
	He was head of the NIAID, but that was under the NIH, Francis Collins, and that was under the HHS, which was under Trump, it was Alex Azar, now it's Javier Becerra.
	So all of those people that he was under had their salary capped at the level of the vice president, which is just over $200,000.
	He was the highest paid person.
	He got paid more than President Trump.
	He got paid more than President Biden.
	But his bosses and all of these people in the deep state are supposed to have their salary capped at the level of the vice president.
	How did that happen?
	Again, is he double dipping or something?
	Is he working for DARPA on the side?
	What's the deal with all that?
	And of course, that doesn't even count...
	The royalties that they kept quiet.
	So, politicized science.
	Don't question him, of course.
	We've heard this all along.
	How dare anybody question him?
	You know, before, it used to just be like one of these Looney Tunes things.
	You know, remember the one with the sheepdog?
	And the wolf. And it begins in the morning.
	They've got their cards and they punch in the time clock.
	You know, morning, Ralph. Morning, Wiley, whatever his name was.
	You know, and so they just both punch in.
	They do their job fighting each other and all the rest of the cartoon.
	And at the end, you know, they go out and they punch out and they shake hands.
	Yeah, you got Senator left.
	You got Senator right. Yeah.
	It was always so collegiate.
	You know, what happened with all of this stuff?
	No, you know, they had this hearing, and he got a tongue lashing, and so he goes on with Stephen Colbert so that Stephen Colbert can lick his wounds.
	That's basically what's happening here.
	Here, let me fix that for you.
	You want a Band-Aid? Let me pat you on the head, sing you a lullaby.
	But nothing was done by Congress, you see.
	This is what is really infuriating, that infuriates me more than this PR campaign that he's doing now, beginning with Stephen Colbert.
	Because what's the point of Congress?
	They do nothing.
	We have seen them kick everything over to the bureaucracy.
	And that's one of the reasons why we're going to have Mike Cargill on to talk about that.
	Now you've got even the president kicking stuff down to the bureaucracy here.
	You decide what you want to do in terms of regulating guns.
	We're not even going to ask Congress about this.
	They don't even pretend. That your elected congressional representatives are going to do anything.
	The president can just do it by executive order and use the bureaucracy to ban whatever they wish to ban, whether it's bump stocks or whether it is pistol braces or whether it is quote-unquote ghost guns or whatever the infringement of the day.
	They can do whatever they wish, and it's not just on guns that they're infringing us.
	You got the EPA out there deciding that they're going to shut down power plants, that they're going to shut down certain types of cars, that they're going to shut down appliances and so forth.
	We've got to stop this.
	And so I want to talk to Cargill, see what he thinks about this.
	He said, as a matter of fact, let me just play a little clip that he put up there as a teaser.
	I think it will be something that we're going to look at for decades to come.
	This is a very important case, I feel, that will be used as case law.
	Alright, that's Michael Cargill, Central Texas Gunworks.
	I had a chance to meet him in Austin.
	Great guy. He used to be interviewed quite a bit.
	But we're going to take a look at that.
	Is this going to be something that is going to be used to rein in the bureaucracy?
	It used to be a pet peeve of Rand Paul when he first began.
	Every year he would have the RAIN Act.
	How are we going to rein in this out-of-control bureaucracy?
	He doesn't seem to be interested in that anymore.
	He's got all that remdesivir stock.
	He's okay now, I guess.
	But, you know, what do we do about this?
	Why doesn't Congress even defund the gain-of-function stuff, right?
	They focused on that.
	Oh, this is evil. And you know why they're doing that?
	They're doing that so that you'll believe that there's a bird flu virus that is going to be a threat to you.
	So that you'll give them a pass or you'll be uncertain as to whether or not you ought to do all the ridiculous things that they made you do or made the public do in 2020.
	Well, I don't know. Maybe it is this time.
	Maybe it really is a gain-of-function thing this time.
	That's why they're pushing it, folks.
	They're pushing that so they can blame it on China.
	The Republicans are trying to blame it on Fauci and the Democrats.
	But the real importance of that gain-of-function stuff...
	It's to get you to believe in the next pandemic whenever they say it's going to be out there.
	We already got Trump's CDC Director Redfield saying, well, yeah, it's inevitable that it's going to come.
	And when it does come, it's going to kill 25 to 50 percent of all the people who get it.
	What an extraordinary lie that nobody else is calling him on.
	Where in the world is he making these numbers up?
	Did he talk to chat GPT or something?
	Where's this hallucinating lie coming from?
	There's no way that he can make a prediction like that.
	It's absolutely absurd.
	Bird flu has been around for decades.
	Decades. What makes him say that?
	What basis does he have?
	Nobody's going to ask him, why would you say that?
	They just go, oh, wow.
	Oh, and artificial intelligence is going to kill us all unless we give a monopoly to OpenAI and Microsoft.
	And bird flu is going to kill us all because, you know, they keep doing this gain of function, but we can't figure out how to turn off the funding in Congress.
	So they'll just have more hearings and more hearings and more hearings and more hearings.
	Well, I've heard all I need to hear from Congress.
	That's why I said, Washington, forget about Washington.
	Forget about the national elections.
	Focus on the local elections and state elections.
	Forget about Washington.
	It doesn't matter.
	If it's Republican or Democrat, it doesn't matter.
	The road to hell is paved with Hegelian two-steps.
	This one or that one.
	And so, they're not going to defund gain-of-function.
	They're not going to defund the NIAID. They're not going to defund the NIH. They're not going to defund HHS. And there's no constitutional authority for any of that.
	None whatsoever. But they're just going to keep it going.
	Why do we even need the FDA? Because the FDA is not doing anything.
	Like we reported in the fall of 2020, as soon as Children's Health Defense saw that they were going to be using polyethylene glycol to encapsulate this genetic code injection, they said, you know, that's going to cause anaphylactic shock.
	There's a lot of people, you inject them with PEG, they're going to have anaphylactic shock.
	We know that. And of course, it did happen.
	And so they contacted the FDA, and the FDA said, well, we don't care.
	Contact Pfizer. See what they say.
	See if they'll change it.
	They contacted Pfizer.
	Pfizer didn't do anything. So what's the purpose of the FDA? FDA is not regulating Pfizer.
	So what's the purpose?
	Pfizer does its own test to some degree, and even when they show that it's not safe and not effective, they proceed with it anyway.
	The FDA is there to give the illusion, the illusion of safety and efficacy.
	Just get rid of them.
	They're nothing but a front for the pharmaceutical companies.
	They've been regulatory capture.
	They're way beyond regulatory capture.
	Way beyond that.
	And then we've got a second clip from Fauci here.
	Well, you know, you're a doctor.
	If you were going to diagnose...
	America is a patient right now.
	Where were you, Colbert? How was your diagnosis?
	You diagnosed America four years ago.
	Give it to me straight, Doc. I think you need a surgeon, not an internist.
	Yeah. Well, he did his best to castrate us, didn't he?
	What about if you were a psychologist?
	It was all psychology.
	...schizophrenia in the country.
	I mean, it's just...
	Who created that?
	How far apart people can be that they seem to forget how much alike we are, but we're acting like we're so, so different.
	It looks like we're six feet apart wearing masks or something.
	Yeah. I don't know.
	You know what? How did that happen?
	Psychology. I said at the very beginning of this, when people started staying six feet away from everybody, and they were afraid to touch anything, and they're wearing masks, I said, we've got...
	America's become OCD. OCD because of this.
	Yeah, the whole thing was a PSYOP. Imagine that.
	Imagine that... You've become a caricature on the right.
	There's some really wild, fantastical conspiracies.
	It's preposterous, Chuck.
	Totally preposterous.
	I took it hard. Maybe too hard.
	I tried to kill myself.
	Yeah, I did kill myself.
	Look, I want to end with this.
	This is an email you sent on February 27th.
	You happened to send it to Morgan Fairchild.
	And she told me about Pathological Liars Anonymous.
	Oh, you'd be surprised how many famous people belong.
	In fact, at one of the meetings I met my wife, Morgan Fairchild.
	If you are trying to, you know, get at me as a public health official and a scientist, you're really attacking not only Dr.
	Anthony Fauci, you're attacking science.
	And then I got a job in journalism, running for the National Geographic.
	Yeah, I was making $20,000 a month.
	In fact, I won the Pulitzer Prize that year.
	Yeah, that's a ticket. Yeah, met the ticket, and that's exactly what Colbert's going to sell you next.
	Schizophrenia? Yeah, America's schizophrenic?
	I wonder how we got schizophrenic when we're told, don't wear the mask, wear the mask, wear two masks, wear three masks, put the masks on your kids, right?
	Yeah, he told us that as well.
	When the children go out into the community, you want them to continue to wear masks when they're interacting with groups from multiple households.
	When we talk about what you can do when you're vaccinated, you can certainly have members of a family if the adults are vaccinated and you're in the home with your child.
	You don't need to wear a mask and you can have physical contact.
	Who are you to tell us this?
	Oh, he's America's doctor.
	You want to talk about psychological damage?
	Talk about what you did to the kids.
	I've had child psychologists on multiple times over the last four years talking about the damage that has been done to these kids and how they're absolutely paranoid about everything.
	You want to talk about OCD? You want to talk about how that has affected them?
	And what they've done to them is far worse than the Cuban Missile Crisis.
	They did when I was a young kid.
	That was a temporary thing, and it was over.
	You know, it's kind of scary, but it was over.
	This thing went on and on and on and on.
	You want to condition somebody, you do it over a long period of time like that.
	And then finally we have this clip.
	The idea that your approval of a grant that went to a company that gave some of the money to the Wuhan lab created, used gain of function to change the nature of the virality of certain coronaviruses that became COVID-19, so you're to blame for COVID-19.
	Yes, and I also did it so I could make a billion dollars from the vaccines.
	Oh, right. Yeah, well, you know, actually, he kind of admits to it, right?
	Oh, yes, yes, he doesn't deny it.
	And yes, I made a billion dollars.
	Well, almost. Almost.
	We don't know exactly.
	You see, as I reported a few weeks ago, there was $710 million.
	That's almost a billion, right?
	70% of the way to a billion.
	$710 million in royalties paid to the NIH over these vaccines.
	Now, $690 million of that $710 million was kept hidden until just a couple of weeks ago.
	And they still are hiding who got what?
	Who got how much? So we don't know how much of that nearly a billion dollars Fauci got.
	But yeah, you know, they want to put the narrative out there that's gained a function.
	But of course, even though he and Francis Collins were funding it, funding it in defiance of Congress, who told him to stop it in 2014.
	But then, of course, Trump restarted it in 2017.
	But it was China, China that did it.
	So, again, nobody in America is to blame for this, including Fauci, I guess.
	But yeah, he says, yeah, I created it and I made a billion dollars.
	And he's kind of confessing to all of that stuff.
	But then we have the real issue is really about following the money, isn't it?
	And you know, we see these things being done to us through the uncontrolled bureaucracy.
	And realize that there are two ways, two primary ways that Washington rules us.
	One is by bribery and blackmail using Federal Reserve fiat currency.
	That's a biggie.
	And then the other one is with these unelected bureaucrats.
	We have regulation without representation.
	And nobody ever shuts these guys down.
	But again, the big issue is the funding.
	On day one I will sign a new executive order to cut federal funding for any school pushing critical race theory, transgender insanity, and other inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content onto the lives of our children.
	And I will not give one penny to any school that has a vaccine mandate or a mask mandate.
	And I will keep men out of women's sports.
	Thank you.
	Okay, well, you know, that is what I've been trying to explain to the market people for the longest time.
	That Trump actually was controlling everything.
	You see, the buck stops at the president's desk, just like Truman said, the responsibility, the executive order that he created.
	His executive order didn't create the pandemic.
	That was done by Alex Azar, the former CEO of Eli Lilly, who bought his way into office by bribing Trump in the transition period between the 2016 election and the swearing-in in 2017.
	Big pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer gave Trump millions.
	And he put in charge of HHS, Alex Azar.
	He was there for all four years.
	He was the one who declared the pandemic.
	And then Trump released the money.
	And I even explained it to people exactly where Trump began his explanation.
	Well, if they're doing this transgender stuff in the schools, I'm going to cut their funding.
	And that's how I tried to explain it to them.
	I said, you know that...
	If they don't do the transgender stuff, that Obama and Biden want to take away the money that they get from the Department of Education.
	And so I said, that's the way this works.
	If you like what they're doing, you give them money.
	If you don't like what they're doing, you pull it back.
	So you bribe them to do what you like, and then if they start to go the other direction, the carrot and stick thing here, is you pull the money back.
	It's bribery, and then it's blackmail.
	If you do that thing that I don't like, I'm going to pull your funding.
	And there's Trump explaining to the MAGA people how it works.
	Do you think that they can make the connection yet in their minds about what happened in 2020 even after he explains it to them?
	No, they can't. They will never admit that he's Benedict Donald.
	They will never connect the dots and say, wait a minute.
	If he kept Fauci in place, if he gave Fauci a medal on his last day in office, if he continued to fund all of this tyranny that was done by the Democrat and Republican governors, he didn't disapprove of any of it.
	He approved of all of it.
	And so, it's unfortunate that they can't see that.
	But that's the reality in front of us.
	That is really what is happening with these people.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	Before we do, I want to thank Mark Crawford.
	Thank you for the tip. I appreciate that.
	And Michelle Obama, thank you as well.
	And Carolus Rex, thank you for the tip.
	And we're going to talk a little bit about...
	Let me talk a little bit about...
	It's a short list.
	It doesn't take too long. This is people who have contributed on Zelle since I last mentioned it.
	Brian P., Jeffrey C., Raymond G., Stacy A., Susan L., Michael E., Michael P., and Lawrence C. Thank you all for that support.
	And... We have a couple of tips and questions from yesterday that we did not get to yet.
	So we're going to talk about those when we come back.
	A couple of comments.
	Octo Spook said, All proof and evidence demands the arrest, the prosecution, the imprisonment, and or execution of these criminals.
	Yet no arrests yet.
	And the reason is because they're all guilty.
	You see, we had both the Republican and the Democrat president.
	We had both the Republican and Democrat members of Congress and the Senate and all the rest of it.
	They were all involved in it. Nobody stopped it.
	Nobody pushed back against anything.
	And they're all complicit in it.
	Like I've explained before.
	It's like the Agatha Christie novel, Murder on the Orient Express.
	Except this is Murder on the Warp Speed Express.
	Gotta do it fast. And they all had a hand in it, just like the Agatha Christie novel.
	You find out at the end that all of the people who were on the train, all of the suspects did it, each one of them.
	Took a turn stabbing the victim.
	And each one of these Republican and Democrat presidents, Republican and Democrat congressmen, Republican and Democrat senators, each of them took a turn stabbing you.
	And that goes for the governors as well.
	And most of the state legislators.
	So, Brian and Deb McCartney, he is not a doctor.
	That's right. He plays one on TV. Where'd I hear that before?
	And a Syrian girl.
	Good morning, Deb, Octo, and Rockfin chat.
	And right, Fauci is no doctor.
	I don't know if he ever treated a patient for anything.
	And that's probably a good thing that they said.
	Good thing for the American public that he didn't treat anybody.
	Unfortunately, we all suffered from his malpractice.
	And we still don't have any answers from Congress as to who got that nearly a billion dollars.
	Yes, Fauci's right.
	A billion dollars!
	He exaggerates it to inoculate himself.
	From legal issues.
	He's all about that.
	That was the first thing he did in 1986 under Reagan.
	He made sure the pharmaceutical companies couldn't be sued for the harm that they did to children.
	It was all about childhood vaccination.
	You know, it's not just what happened to us during this medical martial law.
	But Fauci is the reason that autism went from unheard of to being commonplace everywhere.
	And it's going to continue to grow.
	That whole autism issue is because of Fauci and this childhood vaccine immunity law that he put in there.
	I saw a clip from somebody the other day, and they were talking about Rain Man, the movie Rain Man.
	It had been so long since I had seen that.
	They said, this is predictive programming.
	This is to introduce people to autism.
	I didn't remember that.
	The character that Dustin Hoffman played, remember?
	It's an older brother. His younger brother is Tom Cruise.
	And Rain Man, Raymond, is what he called him when he was very young.
	And they lost contact because they put him in a home or something.
	And then he established his contact.
	I'm just going by memory about a movie I haven't seen for 40 years.
	40 years. But anyway, in that movie, Dustin Hoffman plays this withdrawn idiot savant, very good at numbers and things like that.
	And it's about Tom Cruise making contact again with his brother that he hasn't seen since he was a child.
	Now they're both adults.
	And that was to introduce autism to everybody.
	And just a few years after you had Fauci push through this immunity for childhood vaccines, so now we have in America 72, I think, is the number of vaccines.
	If you take all of the shots that they want to do to your child, your child gets 72 shots.
	I don't think any other country even comes close.
	And so everything that Fauci has done has been a full-on war against us.
	It truly is amazing that he's being allowed to get away with us.
	And it shows you how they all collude with each other.
	All the media, all the people in Congress, everyone.
	Allowing him to escape scot-free to keep his pension more than anybody's ever had because he's been paid more than any other federal employee in history.
	Paid more than statutorily allowed.
	Paid more than the president himself, as I said before.
	We'll be right back. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for watching.
	Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, here at Laos, your annual Global Risk Report makes for a stunning and sobering read.
	For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate, it is disinformation and misinformation.
	followed closely by polarization within our societies.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You are listening to The David Knight Show.
	You have the chance to look forward to a career of 50 years.
	In my own opinion, yeah.
	Maybe, maybe more, you will get some injections and so on.
	And then, don't forget, your avatar will continue to live.
	And your brain will be replicated through artificial intelligence and algorithms.
	So we don't know.
	But at least 50 years.
	Yeah, you could be in there longer than Fauci was in.
	Fauci only got nearly 40 years.
	He's there forever. He's talking to the young Davos global leaders, right, of the World Economic Forum, the young global leaders.
	This was a private meeting.
	It just got leaked out.
	And so, of course, your brain...
	Your brain will do this, and so be ready.
	You'll be able to last for 50 years, transfer you into a computer, you know, just like...
	The Winter Soldier movie with Explained Operation Paperclip and they got the Klaus Schwab imitation, I guess, the guy was inside the computer.
	You'd be able to do all of that.
	Are you Avatar, right?
	You're going to be in virtual reality.
	These people are a piece of cake.
	Now, they're laughing about that, but Klaus has seriously talked about all of these things.
	So, through the use of technology and injections.
	Injections. Injections of what?
	Young blood? Well, what's he got?
	He doesn't fill in the specifics of that.
	You will continue to live, right?
	Where is their hope?
	What do they have their confident expectation in, right?
	Science. The God of science.
	Science will give them eternal life, will it?
	Yeah, you lean on science and you'll find that it's a cane that will break and pierce your hand.
	They're always changing it.
	Now, you know, when I think of hope, you know, of course, as that's described, you know, that's one of these words that has changed over the centuries in English.
	A better translation of that original word is confident expectation.
	Today, hope is kind of, well, I don't know.
	I don't think it's going to happen, but I hope so.
	I hope so. I really doubt it, though, but I hope so.
	I would like for that to happen, but I don't really think it's going to happen.
	No, that's not what hope means in the biblical text.
	Hope means a confident expectation.
	So, Klaus Schwab has hope in the conventional sense.
	Well, I'd like some of this to happen, but I don't know.
	Am I going to live in a machine?
	What? No, I have confident expectations.
	Why am I confident of it?
	Well, first of all, I know there's a God.
	And it's not Klaus Schwab.
	It's not Fauci.
	I know there's a God.
	I look at DNA. I look at the world around me.
	Only a fool will say that it's not created and designed.
	You don't look at a car and say, wow, I wonder how that just happened by chance.
	You ask if you like it or if you don't like it, who made that?
	Either way, if you like it or you don't like it, it's like, who made that?
	But you know that somebody made it, right?
	Every living thing is infinitely more complex than the most complex car.
	So only a fool would say that somebody has not made that.
	So who made it? Was it space aliens like Crick and Watson said when they discovered DNA? Who made us?
	And if they made us, have they talked to us?
	Should we set up listening posts like the search for extraterrestrial intelligence and see if we can determine some repeating pattern out there?
	To see if the spacemen who created us are trying to talk to us.
	Or maybe they already did.
	You already have this ancient book.
	That is filled with prophecies that were fulfilled.
	This ancient book that describes a world that was lost to civilization until they began archaeology in the 1800s.
	All archaeology at the beginning was biblical archaeology.
	Going through the Hebrew Testaments and looking to see these things that were described.
	And they would go different places and they would find them.
	And then, same thing with the New Testament.
	You know, they talked about Paul and Ephesus and the temple and all the rest of the stuff.
	That's how they found temples and things like that.
	They would look, well, okay, it says it's here.
	They'd find it. I remember taking my son who's doing the board here, Whistler, taking him to the British Museum.
	And because Travis was sick and Karen was with him.
	And, you know, we'd taken everybody to London.
	When they were about eight to nine years old.
	But she was in the sick room with him because he was really sick.
	It had a reaction to the vaccine.
	So we could travel.
	Anyway. What we saw there.
	We look at...
	Well, there's the thing they found about Sennacherib, talking about His invasion of Judea and different things like that.
	They made a big relief thing of it.
	Or looking at the little fragment of a gigantic column, just a little piece of the bottom, the base of the column, from the Temple of Diana in Ephesus.
	This stuff is rooted...
	In literal history.
	Literal history. And they found all kinds of archaeological things to support that.
	Or you could take a look at it just from your personal experiences.
	If you are convinced of that, you will have personal experiences.
	You will have answers to prayer.
	So we can look at that. I have confident expectation.
	Klaus has no confident expectation.
	He can tell himself fairy stories about how somehow he's going to be copied and put into a machine, even if that were true.
	What comfort does that give him?
	Are you flesh and blood?
	Are you just a memory?
	Are you a bunch of electrical signals?
	And can they send those electrical signals to a computer?
	Is that what you are?
	Or are you body, soul, spirit?
	Well, what are you? What are you?
	They can't even answer that question.
	These people know nothing.
	Because they don't know God.
	And so, you know, the interesting thing about it is we imitated what God had made in us.
	And computers. Tried to, and now they're trying to, but so far hasn't happened.
	They've come up with only frauds and imitations, which is what Satan does.
	Frauds and imitations of what God has done.
	So we have something that is an imitation of reasoning, but it's not thinking.
	It doesn't even understand your question.
	It's just matching patterns in different places.
	But it seems like it's reasoning.
	And then we have memory chips to store things, like we store things.
	And so these people who imitated the mind of man, tried to with the machine, they now believe that they want to become this idol that they set up to imitate the real thing of what we are.
	They still can't answer what we are, but they want you to believe, and they believe, that they're going to create a version, a mechanical version of us that they're going to somehow live in.
	It's really strange. It's really strange.
	You know, even if it was true, what would be the benefit of that?
	You would be replicated through artificial intelligence and algorithms.
	Okay, so what?
	You're going to be dead and gone, even if somebody imitates you.
	How is that any comfort to these people?
	You'll have the chance to look forward to a career of 50 years, maybe more.
	See, Heil. Your avatar will continue to live.
	So there's going to be a little imitation of you, different places.
	You're going to have an avatar that will continue to live.
	Your brain will be replicated through artificial intelligence and algorithms.
	You're going to lose Pascal's wager here, you know.
	You're betting it all on the wrong horse, pal.
	It's really sad.
	But, you know, how many people fall prey to that?
	And, of course, the World Economic Forum is really focused, like I began with that thing, they're focused on disinformation.
	They don't want you to hear anything except them.
	And because their lies are so easily debunked, they must silence everybody.
	But everybody can really understand what is going on if you give it half of a thought.
	So they put out a report just recently, the toolkit for digital safety design interventions and innovations.
	Notice I said interventions.
	Not inventions, but interventions.
	Blocking you. They have to block you for their safety, you see.
	It's not for your safety.
	National security, folks, is not for Americans.
	National security is for politicians and murderers like Fauci and the presidents and the congressmen.
	They've got their little holes in the ground they're going to go into.
	National security is not for us.
	It's for them. They have to keep things secret so they don't go to jail.
	That's what national security is about.
	That's why they classify everything and keep it secret.
	And that's what the World Economic Forum wants to do.
	They want to keep their plans secret.
	So the report expands the scope of what constitutes online harm.
	And to various categories.
	And listen to these categories. Threats to personal and community safety.
	Harm to health and well-being.
	Oh, well. Shouldn't we shut down Fauci?
	Yeah, maybe we should shut down Stephen Colbert as well.
	Hate and discrimination.
	Violation of dignity.
	Invasion of privacy.
	Deception and manipulation.
	You know, when I look at those six things, every single one of them was done during the pandemic.
	Did they threaten our personal and community safety?
	Yes.
	Did they harm our health and well-being?
	Yes.
	Did they violate our dignity?
	Yeah.
	Take a look at the masks.
	Did they invade our privacy?
	Yes.
	They kept records on us.
	They wanted us to take a vaccine passport.
	Deception and manipulation.
	Hate and discrimination.
	I remember the hatred of all the people who didn't follow their rules.
	As a guy said to the New Zealand Prime Minister, sounds like you're creating two classes of people vaccinated and unvaccinated.
	Yep, yep, that's what it is. Yep, yep, I'm so happy about that.
	Yeah, yeah. Yeah, you'll be vaccinated or you'll be nothing, right?
	Every single one of those things, they did.
	And you know, when we look at this, this article from Slay News says, well, you know, the problem is that they're conflating a lot of things that are real problems with things that are just what they would label as disinformation or malinformation.
	Right? In other words, just stuff they don't want you to hear.
	So what they're saying is, well, you know, things that are disagreements with them, they're putting in the same category as really harmful behavior.
	But when people do this, it's very different than when government does it.
	Those six things I just mentioned, threats to personal and community safety, harm to health and well-being, hate and discrimination, violation of dignity, invasion of privacy, deception, manipulation, if it's just you talking about any of that.
	What should we be concerned about?
	I can only see two of these that should be a concern.
	I would think that threats to personal community safety, I think that'd be something that law enforcement would get on.
	If somebody's saying, well, I'm going to shoot up this school or something like that, as this trainee did, you ought to act on that.
	I think if you're invading somebody's privacy, that would be something that somebody would sue you over.
	That would be even, I think, not necessarily a government function, but it would be something like a slander or something like that.
	But the rest of these things, in terms of speaking, to say that you're going to harm health and well-being of people, well, that's just because they don't like what you're saying about what your opinion is about health.
	The answer to that is to have a debate about what is health.
	Hate and discrimination. Same category.
	If we're going to lock people up and make a crime out of hate, there will be no free speech.
	Violation of dignity.
	Again, no comedy, no mockery of anybody, anything that could be, you know, we shut down any comments from anybody about anything.
	So, there's really only two concerns here.
	One of them, I think, should be handled in terms of private lawsuits.
	Only one of these things is really any business of government.
	This Slay News report says the problem is that there's real online harms.
	Online, there's not anything there that the government should get involved in except for threats of violence.
	The rest of the stuff should work itself out as a free speech issue.
	But they think that the problem is the government is conflating real problems.
	With things that are just disagreement.
	And I think there's only one real problem there.
	The authors of this report at the World Economic Forum's Slay News are deliberately putting misinformation, disinformation, so-called hate speech in the same category as abuse, harassment, doxing, and criminal acts of violence.
	Under this broad characterization of harms.
	Again, I would not include harassment and doxing in the same category as criminal acts of violence.
	These are things that somebody can sue over, but it's not something that the government should get involved in.
	Otherwise, they will destroy our free speech.
	That way they can treat anyone that they deem as a threat for speaking truth to power in the same manner as they would for people who commit the most egregious violent crimes known to humanity.
	Of course, the World Economic Forum has also called for 24-hour monitoring of everything that we're doing.
	And, of course, eating the bugs.
	Junk Silver says, Fauci has an infinite appetite for getting his behind kissed.
	Colbert is just the guy for the job.
	Yeah, as a matter of fact, I didn't play this before, but, you know, just to remind you what a virtue-signaling shill Stephen Colbert has been for all this stuff.
	Remember this?
	How much did they pay you for this?
	You get some of that ad council money from Trump?
	Colbert? Yeah! Yeah, yeah.
	How disgusting and pathetic that guy has become.
	You talk about how we've mixed everything up so that we can't have any more.
	It used to be that everybody in Washington was just palsy and all the rest of the stuff, but now they've gotten very edgy about all this stuff.
	Yeah, what has happened to comedy when you look at it?
	Yeah, it's become nothing but propaganda.
	And that kind of propaganda isn't funny.
	Especially, Stephen, when people have been killed and disabled by the millions.
	You pathetic shill.
	Junk, silver, mass genocide pays well, and it's steady work.
	Yeah, he's still on. Even as unfunny as...
	You know, when he didn't have a laugh track in an audience?
	You ever seen the stuff that he did?
	It gets you to realize just how unfunny Stephen Colbert is when he's performing without a laugh track.
	Marky Mark in New Jersey.
	Thank you for the tip. He says, children take more shots than I did in the U.S. Navy.
	Yeah. I took many shots in boot camp.
	Though young and healthy then, I felt off after some of them.
	I've seen pictures of people online.
	I mean, they've given people now, soldiers, military, shots in both arms.
	I've seen them passing out afterwards.
	It's just amazing.
	He said, this was 1980, before the vax makers were indemnified.
	I like speaking about immunity, you know?
	The only immunity in all this stuff is the legal immunity of these people who are poisoning us and giving kids autism.
	Junk Silver said, I'd need at least a 16 gigabyte flash drive to download my brain.
	Is that all? We need a lot more than that, probably.
	Junk Silver, you shall be like gods.
	Yeah, that's right. That's the oldest line.
	Right there in the Garden of Eden.
	Klaus, Satan, was telling them, you'll be like the gods and you'll live for the ever, you know, if you would just disobey God.
	You rebel against God.
	You're going to have eternal life, maybe in a place that you don't like.
	Here is a tip and a question from yesterday that I missed.
	Audi, Modern Retro Radio.
	Good to see you there. And thank you for the tip.
	Thank you very much. He said, Hi David, you may have already covered this, but the House of Representatives just passed automatically registering males between 18 to 26 years old for selective service, a draft, because recruitment is so low.
	That's Audi at Modern Retro Radio.
	I did cover it, and it is very concerning because it's not just because recruitment is low.
	It's also being done in the UK. Rishi Sunak.
	Who is circling the drain and coming up, holding another election, did this, floated this idea, immensely unpopular.
	Why would you do this when you're running for election?
	You know that's going to be unpopular.
	And, you know, pushing forced military service is also being talked about in Germany.
	What this tells us is that, A, you're right, people don't like being treated like guinea pigs.
	They don't like being poked and vaccinated.
	And the other thing, of course, that hasn't really happened yet, the Pentagon is partnering.
	They have a public-private partnership.
	I wonder how much these generals, who are nothing but bureaucrats, just like Fauci, I wonder how much these generals in the Pentagon, Are going to get a kickback from this synthetic meat.
	They can't sell this stuff to people.
	And so what they're going to do is partner with the military.
	And they're going to treat their soldiers and sailors.
	They're going to treat them like they were pigs.
	Feeding them this swill.
	This synthetic swill.
	The lack of respect.
	That's one of the reasons why people don't want to sign up for this stuff.
	But of course, they want everybody because they're worried they're not going to have enough people To fight the war that they're planning, the war that they're pushing, incrementally, from the inside, with disruption, and doing it iteratively, just like they did the war against us for the health emergency.
	Sabbath, 1974.
	Musk is also one of the World Economic Forum's young globalist assets.
	Controlled opposition details long since scrubbed from the net prior to him being portrayed as a social media freedom fighter for the masses.
	Well, he became the world's richest man by pushing the UN and the Davos climate nihilism.
	That's how he got to be so wealthy, by partnering with government, getting government subsidies to produce battery electric cars.
	That's where he made his fortune.
	And, of course, now what he's doing is he's also adding to his fortune by doing surveillance satellites and stuff like that for the military.
	Isn't it interesting? You know, we went to the moon.
	This line that you've heard so many times.
	They can put a man on the moon, but they can't even put up satellites anymore.
	I've got to go with independent contractors.
	Did they really put a man on the moon?
	Why has it been, what has it been, 60 years or something?
	Almost 55? Since they supposedly went to the moon and they can't seem to do it, and everybody else is starting to beat them to it, it looks like.
	Joseph Giuseppe, sorry, 228.
	I don't dislike technology, only the men who deify it.
	That's right. That's right.
	They have put their hope in.
	And I don't dislike science either.
	Look, a lot of the core scientists We're good to go.
	And so you look at people like Francis Bacon, people like Isaac Newton, people like Maxwell, did Maxwell's equations, James Clerk Maxwell, and so many others.
	They were trying to discover what God had created.
	They didn't believe that everything was just chance random processes.
	If that was the case, why study it?
	It makes no sense. And of course, now that they have pushed that for a very long time, they're even pushing the idea there's no right answer to math.
	You know, that's what Bill Gates is putting out there for people.
	He wants them ignorant and dumbed down so they don't challenge him.
	Grammy forgot. I remember having to write down name and address when eating in a restaurant during the pandemic.
	Yeah. My daughter went right along with it.
	Hmm. Yeah, I didn't get that far.
	In the restaurants around Austin, you had to wear a mask.
	I would have my argument with the person at the front desk and tell them to call the manager.
	Because I didn't bother to even go to the chains.
	I went to the places that were owned by somebody locally.
	I thought maybe they got sense.
	Maybe they would like to stay in business.
	And they would not. No, you got to do it.
	I said, you know, it's ridiculous.
	All these people sitting down here eating without a mask.
	You want me to put a mask on right now so I can walk five feet to a table and then I can sit there the whole time.
	I can even stand up and I can walk to the restroom and I don't have to put a mask on at that point.
	He goes, I said, you know, that's ridiculous.
	Yeah, I know, but you got to do it.
	I said, no, I don't. And I don't ever have to eat at this restaurant again.
	And I never will. I did that so many different times.
	I had to move to different states.
	I could go to a restaurant again.
	Actual science says, well, sir, my son here, is the opposite of their dogmatic worship of the official narrative and the silencing of any dissent.
	That's right. Because that's about authority.
	And when Francis Bacon gave us the scientific method, he said, in the past, what we've done is we've determined truth by what the academics say.
	What the people who have titles and authority say.
	No, we're going to determine what science is by measurement.
	See if we can repeat what you say.
	By observation, measurement, validation.
	That is what will be science.
	None of this stuff was tested.
	None of it was measured.
	None of it was validated. Where'd you get the six-foot rule?
	I don't know. I don't know where that came from.
	Where'd you get the idea about the mask?
	Well, I don't know. Well, there were experiments that were done.
	2002 in New South Wales and Australia.
	And they said, yeah, these N95 masks actually make things worse after 20 minutes because they get filled with spittle and as you talk, it pushes it out.
	Smaller particles that travel farther and stay airborne longer.
	It actually makes things worse.
	They said a lot of surgeons are not wearing masks even in operating theaters.
	Well, the experimental biosynthetic food...
	To replace natural food is happening now, says Exposé News.
	Last week, Australian Kate Mason gave a presentation to the 100-year Biodynamic Conference in Sydney.
	She flashed a document after a document on the screen detailing the involvement of national and international, of course, government and of corporate interests determined to alter the nature and the content of our food supply.
	And we are going to look at in detail of that right after we take this quick break.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Bye!
	Biosynthetic food products.
	Why don't we just call them frankenfoods?
	Of course, frankenfoods are different from frankfurters.
	By the way, you may want to figure out what's in the frankfurters as well.
	It was Bismarck who said of sausages, he said, making laws, the German politician Otto von Bismarck said that making laws is like a sausage.
	You really don't want to know what goes into it.
	Well, you better start paying attention.
	Because now they're going to make laws about how to make sausage.
	And they're going to be putting things into this sausage, these frankenfoods or these biosynthetic foods.
	They're going to be putting things in there you better pay attention to.
	They're being falsely promoted as more nutritious than organic food.
	None of this has been backed by any science.
	They just say so, right?
	Just like Redfield saying, yeah, we're going to create, gain a function, we're going to do this.
	Congress isn't going to stop them, right?
	So, again, absolutely amazing.
	If that were true, why wouldn't Congress stop it?
	They hold these hearings, they wring their hands about how horrible the gain-of-function is, and yet they won't stop funding it.
	They just can't help themselves.
	It's like they're addicted to power or something.
	And so, you know, they're going to be creating this stuff, and Redfield knows that it's going to already kill 25 to 50 percent of the people who get it.
	Just pulls these numbers out of the air.
	But they make these pronouncements.
	You know, the vaccines are safe and effective.
	The bird flu that's been around forever is going to kill 25 to 50 percent of people.
	None of this is backed by science.
	These are just pronouncements from people in authority.
	No biosynthetic foods have been proven to be healthy or safe.
	They don't test them anymore.
	It's just like the vaccines.
	It's just like everything else at the Food and Drug Administration.
	None of the synthetic foods, none of the GMO foods are tested.
	They don't test 5G for safety.
	They don't test any of this stuff.
	Although most, if not all, of these projects are doomed to fail and will ultimately disappear off the menu because people won't eat them.
	Take a look at what's happening to a lot of these synthetic foods out there, Impossible Burger and stuff like that.
	They're disappearing because nobody wants to eat it.
	Nevertheless... Tax money is still being diverted to pay these people to do this stuff.
	It's still very, very lucrative.
	Why? Because the government is paying them and they have no restraints on what the government can do.
	They're paying the big salaries, the biotech schemers.
	More importantly, the experimentation will leave a toxic legacy of persistent genetic pollution, which will continue to undermine plant health and human longevity through the generations.
	That's exactly right. That's from ExposéNews.com.
	Klaus Schwab is out there saying, if he gets the injections and some other things like that, if you eat this stuff, you might not make it.
	Milk and cheese that doesn't come from cows is one of the things that they're focusing on.
	And we know that's the case because they talk about it.
	No, you can't have any meat, dairy, products.
	No. Where are they going to get the milk and the cheese then?
	Because there's a lot of stuff included in dairy products, yogurt, all kinds of things.
	It's going to come from genetically modified yeast that have been engineered to excrete stuff that mimics milk.
	Oh, you don't want real milk.
	You want to eat the yeast poop, right?
	That's what we're talking about. You're going to get the yeast poop that is out there.
	Well, we've got Michael Cargill ready to join us.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll come back to this.
	There's more that I want to say about this attack on agriculture that bird flu is in reality.
	But we take a quick break and when we come back we're going to talk to the man who said no to the bump stock, took it all the way to the Supreme Court and won.
	That's a story that we should all pay attention to and we need to thank him for that as well.
	So we'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	♪♪
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Here we go.
	Yeah, the breaking news one.
	We're talking about that. So I've got a lot of questions for you.
	And Central Texas Gunworks, is that correct?
	Yes, sir. That's correct. Five years ago, why are you going down this road?
	No one cares about bump stocks.
	Let's go ahead and let them take the bump stock.
	But instead, I stood and fought.
	And because of this, the bump stop case is going to be the case that saves everything.
	It's going to stop the ATF coming after their brace, the triggers, all different parts and pieces that they're trying to ban.
	And I'm glad I stood up and fought.
	You know how much time we have? We have a case that is case law that we can move forward around this country and defend our Second Amendment rights.
	As always, More guns equals less crime.
	You go out there and you buy yourself a gun.
	Better yet, get yourself a bump stop.
	That's right, and support people like Michael Cargill.
	Michael, thank you for joining us.
	And your store is Central Texas Gunworks, if I recall correctly.
	Is that right? Yes, sir.
	That's correct. Right there in Austin.
	Central Texas Gun Works.
	Great. And I just want to thank you as we began.
	Thank you for doing this. You know, we get change when people like you refuse to take unconstitutional orders and just lay down.
	So I really do appreciate you doing that.
	But tell us, why the bump stock and why not some of the other regulation from the ATF? What was it about the bump stock to you that was different?
	Well, to me, because that was the one thing that the ATF used to take everything else.
	It was like the gateway to get into doing what they wanted to do.
	So they started with the bump stock after the Las Vegas shooting, and they took that framework and that little outline, and they used that and removed the word bump stock, and they inserted brace, they inserted triggers, FRTs, force reset triggers, and all the little parts and pieces they wanted to bend.
	And I actually, you know, I knew, I had something, you know, a feeling going on that something was going to happen.
	And when they first banned the bump stock, I sat back and I looked, you know, and I said, hold on, you know, we're talking about an agency within the federal government.
	We're not talking about Congress. We have a constitution in this country.
	It's not called the Bill of Needs.
	It's actually called the Bill of Rights.
	And we have rights that come with that.
	And so I looked at this and I said, hold on.
	We're allowing them to take the bump stock.
	And everyone was like, it's okay.
	Let's let them go ahead and take the bump stock because that, you know, we don't care about the bump stock.
	I say, well, you know what? I don't care about it either.
	It's not something that I, you know, ever used.
	It's not something that I really cared about.
	But it's the fact that if you allow them to take this one part or piece...
	You know, what happens when a Democrat steps into office, you know, like Biden or someone, and then boom, it just opens the gateway.
	And so I decided to, I started to, you know, just take a stand.
	I wanted to take a stand and say, you know what, that's not going to happen on my watch.
	I'm not going to allow it to happen.
	If I have to go in and do this by myself as the only plaintiff in this case, then that's exactly what I will do.
	Great. Yeah, thank you for doing that.
	We said, well, what happens when Biden gets in?
	When this was done, and of course, it was Trump's pet project as well.
	You know, he had the little thing there, and he says, oh, fortunately, the bump stock, I can do it by myself.
	You know, you guys in Congress, you decide which other things you want to do.
	You take the gun, do the due process later, all the rest of it.
	But I can do the bump stock myself.
	I was like, what is he talking about?
	You know, he's going to do gun control by executive order.
	And I said that.
	And I said, exactly what you said.
	What's Biden going to do? Well, we knew what Lala Harris wanted to do.
	She immediately said, when I become president, right after he said that, when I become president, I'm going to give a long list of gun control things that I want from Congress, and if they don't do it in 100 days, I'll do it by executive order.
	And so it really was a very dangerous precedent, and I was so disturbed to see that the NRA set it out.
	I guess they didn't want to go against Trump.
	I know the gun owners of America opposed it.
	Did the gun owners of America get involved with your lawsuit or any other gun organizations, or was it strictly you doing this with the legal firm that worked with you?
	Late on down the road, other organizations out there started their own lawsuit, but initially I reached out to everyone that I possibly could, and no one at the time wanted to join in and do this.
	So that's why I did it all by myself.
	And keep it in mind, you know, the ATF said 10 times on 10 different occasions that bump stocks were actually, you know, okay.
	And they fit it within the framework of what Congress had written.
	So they did not meet the definition of machine gun.
	So if he said this 10 times, and keep in mind this started on the Obama administration, bump stocks were legal.
	Trump, Bush administration, bump stocks were legal.
	You know, here we go into the Trump administration, and because of the shooting in Las Vegas, they wanted to please the left and satisfy the anti-gun community.
	They decided, okay, we'll just go ahead And I said, no, I'm not going to give them an inch.
	Because if you give them an inch, they're going to take a mile.
	And that's exactly what happened when Biden got into office.
	Yeah, oh, absolutely. Yeah, it's like, okay, well, I don't want to cut off my right arm, but how about my right pinky?
	Can I do that? And I don't have to worry about that.
	I thought it was kind of interesting, too, that I do it with a bump stock, because it's always a little bit of a bump, isn't it?
	You know, they just kind of bump you into this, and then all the precedents started kicking in line with Biden.
	So, you know, and I... I want to thank you, too, because, you know, this is not an easy thing for somebody to do that has a gun store, because we've seen what Biden has done in terms of weaponizing the ATF to take people's firearm licenses over minor violations that in the past they would have gotten just a, you know, a fine, even a minor fine.
	Instead, they say, well, we're taking the whole license because of that.
	And there's been a lot of report about that.
	There's been a lot of ATF agents who have blown the whistle on that, but that is the policy of the Biden administration.
	Have you had any kind of recrimination with this kind of stuff?
	Absolutely. And once we won the Fifth Circuit ruling in the en banc decision there, then I had ATF walk into my shop with three agents and they go through everything.
	And they spent like over a week, you know, combing through every piece of paper, you know, making sure we dotted every single I, we cross every single T, uh, they even, you know, took the extra two or three weeks after the inspection to then, you know, to make sure that, you know, everything was, everything was right with all of the permits and just every single thing, go through every single state agency, county agency, city government, federal government to make sure that, you know, everything was right. Uh, and, but that's, that's the price of doing business. That's the
	price of going up against the, you know, the federal government like that.
	You know, we're talking about the department of justice.
	We're talking about the Bureau of alcohol, tobacco, and firearms. You know, I don't know why they have the alcohol and tobacco in there because they only focus on the firearm, you know, but Hey, well, who knows? Maybe they'll bring back alcohol prohibition.
	You know, that'd be a nice little side business, side hustle for them, wouldn't it?
	But again, thank you for doing that.
	You knew that was going to happen.
	It wasn't a surprise to you, and you took that on.
	You took on that scrutiny, that harassment, that extra stuff that comes with it for all of that.
	So thank you again, and kudos to you.
	And was there any...
	We talked about other gun organizations.
	What about Congress? Is there any help, even any amicus briefs filed by anybody in Congress?
	Okay. There were several amicus briefs that were actually filed once we made it up to the Fifth Circuit and also to the Supreme Court.
	So a lot of different organizations came together then and, yes, absolutely started filing briefs for us, you know, in support.
	Different organizations started filing briefs in support.
	And also a group of governors filed the amicus brief as well.
	So we did get support, especially when we made it up to the Supreme Court.
	But initially, out the gate, it was very difficult because we went through the first court, the first federal court, which in that court session was actually held during COVID. So everything was shut down.
	We were the only proceeding that happened, you know, that year post-COVID. And so the judge in that ruling, you know, compared the bump stock to the function of how a shotgun works.
	He said, oh, okay, so the bump stock is kind of like a shotgun.
	You push what you left, you know, then you can fire it.
	I said, so you're trying to turn a shotgun into a machine gun?
	I sat back in my chair and crossed my hands and I said, we're going to lose this case here, which we did.
	It's a street sweeper now.
	Yeah. I have a clue.
	So the bump stock, if I'm correct, didn't it come in in 2018 or something like that?
	But then everything shuts down.
	Tell us a little bit about the process, because this has been a long-term process.
	When did it go?
	I think it was 2018.
	But when did you start your process, and what were some of the first things that you did?
	We started our process in 2019 when the ATF actually implemented the ban, the rule or whatever they want to call it, turning half a million Americans into felons overnight.
	So I walked into the ATF's office and I surrendered my bump stocks that I had because I explained to people, I'm no good to you if I'm in jail, I'm locked up.
	It makes it hard for me to defend myself.
	But if I go through the process, go ahead and surrender the bump stock, turn them into the ATM, and then within 30 minutes, we file the lawsuit in federal court against the government.
	And then that was 2019.
	Mm-hmm. And on the Fifth Circuit, those of you, you know, many people know the majority of the justices on that court are conservative justices.
	There are very few liberal justices that were appointed on that court.
	But we pulled three liberal judges.
	Okay? So, of course, we lost, you know, the three-judge panel in the Fifth Circuit.
	And then we appealed again, and luckily it was taken out by the entire Fifth Circuit, heard in en banc by the entire court there.
	And that's when we won that decision.
	They fully understood what we're talking about.
	We're talking about how machine gun, you know, the definition of machine gun and how a bump stock did not fit in that category.
	We're talking about the function of the trigger, the single function of a trigger, and how you pull, you know, that single function of the trigger, one round goes out, that is a semi-automatic.
	But if one single function of the trigger, I hold that trigger, more than one round goes out, that is an automatic.
	And they fully understood that, and so we won that case overwhelmingly in the Fifth Circuit, and then the federal government, the ATF, Department of Justice, decided to appeal the case to the United States Supreme Court, and the United States Supreme Court took it up in Satori, And so we had the hearing in the United States Supreme Court in February, on February 28th, and I'll never forget this because we said in this courtroom, we're talking an hour and a half going over the definition of a machine gun.
	And I just explained it to you within seconds.
	Yeah, exactly. For an hour and a half, we actually discussed the definition of what a machine gun is.
	And so, you know, we had that proceeding, went through that, and here we are, you know, from February down to June 14th, when the ruling came down on the Army's birthday, on Flag Day.
	Oh, yeah. We got the ruling.
	That's right. We got the ruling that the bump stocks are legal in this country and that the ATF and the agency within the federal government cannot create or write law that is reserved for Congress.
	And so that's two different aspects.
	Again, was that something that even came up in the lower courts, in the Austin court, and in the Fifth Circuit the first time or second time?
	It wasn't strictly ever about just the definition of a machine gun, but it was also about whether or not we're going to have regulation without representation, right?
	Yeah. That is correct.
	Through the entire process, we repeated the same thing over and over again.
	We talked about the definition of a machine gun, then we focused on an agency, the federal government, an entity within the government, not Congress, because we have a, like I said, we have a Bill of Rights, we have a Constitution that's laid out on how government should actually work.
	And so, agencies, you know, we're talking bureaucrats who were not elected into office, that were appointed to office, that are going to turn millions of Americans into felons overnight.
	And that's exactly what the ATF did.
	You know, this Brumstock case actually weaponized the ATF. You know, as soon as Biden stepped into office, it weaponized them to go after everything.
	They went after the brace, and you're talking millions of Americans who You know, lost their brace overnight, and then it turned into felons if they didn't surrender.
	People were literally running to the gun store trying to figure out what they can do.
	You know, do I take it apart?
	You know, can I separate it?
	Do I turn it into an SBR, get a tax stamp for it, you know, make it a short barrel rifle or whatever?
	They were frantic, you know, when that deadline hit for the brace.
	And I sat back and I said, just wait.
	The bump stock is going to save you.
	The bump stock is going to be your saving grace.
	And that's exactly what happened.
	And a lot of people don't realize, you know, they're still, even today, people are saying, the bump stock is not that important to me.
	It really is not.
	But it's not about the bump stock.
	It's about the entire concept.
	It's about the ATF use that paperwork, that framework, that outline to ban the bump stock.
	And he took that and he went after everything without anyone stopping them.
	I wish that somebody had challenged the 1934 Firearms Act or the 1968 Firearms Act to say it's not just the ATF or bureaucracy that can infringe on the Second Amendment.
	We don't want the elected representatives to do that either.
	If they don't like the Second Amendment, they can change the Second Amendment, but they can't infringe on it.
	But we have a long history now, nearly a century of legislative infringement on it, but it was a completely new ballgame.
	If the agency that was, if the ATF was going to start to just ban things at will, that was going to really change everything altogether.
	And, of course, it's interesting, too, that, you know, when you look at the NRA and they looked at the bump stock and said, well, you don't care about that.
	They didn't oppose it. Then Trump put in a pistol brace thing, and then they did oppose that, and then he did remove that before he left office, and then Biden immediately puts that back in and then starts doing everything else that he can think of.
	And that's the issue.
	You know, it's the principle that is involved.
	And so, as you were pointing out, this should affect a lot of other things.
	And, you know, I wonder, Michael, it really should affect things like the EPA trying to ban our appliances, you know?
	This is through regulation.
	You know, they're regulating appliances out of existence.
	This ought to affect more than gun parts.
	This ought to affect, if the Supreme Court is consistent with this, this ought to affect all kinds of regulation without representation.
	Absolutely. If we can stop the ATF, which we were able to do this with a slam dunk, we were able to stop them with the bump stock.
	And you're talking exactly what you just said, the EPA, OSHA, all the different little groups.
	You know, we're talking going back to COVID, shutting the country down, telling churches that they can't, you know, worship the Lord on Sunday, you know, and going through all these little different things that, you know, we went through in 2020.
	Man, I remember in 2020, when I had to put one of my dogs to sleep, and we walked into the veterinary office there, and the fact that, you know, they were so afraid of COVID, you know, the government caused such a fear that only one of us could go in and put the dog to sleep.
	Man, that was devastating to me, devastating to my family.
	The fact that, you know, and we're talking funerals, you know, family members that were having funerals in that time frame, you couldn't, you know, hug each other, you know, doing the service.
	Things like that. It was just insane the way this country, the way government treated its citizens.
	And you know what? That's why I did what I did because I said, you know what?
	I'm not going to be a slave to the government.
	The government's going to be a slave to me.
	I'm going to tell the government what to do.
	I'm not going to allow them to dictate to me what I should or what I can and cannot do.
	Good. Good for you. That's exactly what we need.
	More people like you. As a matter of fact, you know, when I was still in Austin, I remember you ran for city council.
	You had the right idea. You know, you're looking at local issues.
	I remember you talking about the fact, hey, our traffic problems are north and south.
	They're not even talking about that.
	They're talking about maybe doing something eventually that's gonna be East and West and it's not a very good solution, but it's not even a solution that's pointed at the problem.
	You were level-headed, you had the right idea, but unfortunately Austin is very left-wing.
	And so you didn't make it through that.
	But you know, when I look at this, Michael, when we look at the pistol brace, for example, here in Tennessee, they said, well, first of all, they pass a law, they said if it is something that is legal in Tennessee, then you're not going to enforce those federal prohibitions against it.
	And we're not going to have anybody in law enforcement help you.
	That's the non-commandeering thing.
	And then what they did was they made pistol braces legal.
	And so with those two pieces of things there, they talked to the state representatives and they said, don't worry about it.
	We've got it taken care of. You know, we've declared the pistol brace to be legal and we said that if anything is legal, the federal government in Tennessee, the federal government can't do anything about it.
	Is there anything like that happening in Texas at a state level to try to block or to nullify any federal overreach like this or like anything else that you're aware of?
	Yes, we do have some things similar in Texas that they do in Tennessee as well, and I'm grateful of that, of what we've done here at the Texas State Capitol.
	We're moving in the right direction in Texas, but we have some other things that we need to work on.
	There's some things I'm trying to work on at the Capitol here this next coming session.
	I'm talking with some of our elected officials right now because we were able to get a constitutional carry pass, but there's still some work that needs to be done with that.
	We were able to get a campus carry pass where you can carry a handgun concealed inside the building of a public college campus.
	There's still work left that needs to be done with that as well.
	And also, this past session, we were able to protect our schools a little more by having an armed person inside the school, every single school, not just a resource officer that's at the high school dealing with fights and things of that nature.
	We're talking about a person that's armed at the elementary school protecting the babies.
	And that's something that we were not focusing on at all in this country.
	But luckily, in Texas, we're actually focusing on the things that we need to focus on, unlike other states.
	That's good. Are they talking about letting teachers carry guns?
	Or is that something that's being talked about?
	Is that something they passed? What was the state of that?
	Yes, so in Texas we do have a school safety program and also a school marshal program where a teacher or several teachers or employees of schools can actually carry a firearm inside the building of a school to protect the kids as well.
	That's good. I think that's the most important thing.
	You know, we call people heroes if they run into a burning building or they run into a building where there's gunfire going on.
	But, you know, when you have a teacher that is there, the teacher that is armed and knows how to use it, if somebody comes in that classroom, it's not necessarily heroic to protect their own life.
	You know, that's a natural thing.
	And we've seen situations where you've got people who have been tasked with protecting the school, you know, like down in Parkland, where they don't do it.
	You know, they don't run in. It's a heroic thing to do, and not everybody's a hero.
	But pretty much everybody will protect their life, and a lot of people, if the situation is right there with them, they're threatening these children that they know, that they've had a relationship with, I think they'll do what they can to stop that.
	I think that's a much more effective thing.
	The person is not identified with the uniform, which takes away their effectiveness as well.
	So I think that's a very important thing to do.
	I got a comment here from Guard Goldsmith, and thank you for the tip, Guard.
	He says, well done, David and Mr.
	Cargill. It would have been great to see the SCOTUS tear down the 1934 Act itself, but this is a great pushback on the immediate practical level, and the principle is still being brought to light.
	That's from Guard Goldsmith.
	He also has a program, Liberty Conspiracy.
	Yeah, that is anything that we can do to pull back.
	We should be very grateful to you for doing that.
	There's a lot that remains to be done, of course, but anything that can be done is a victory.
	We should celebrate every step that we use to block their aggressions.
	Let me ask you this. You know, we've had, we have the, you know, as everybody does, that when a Democrat gets into office, gun sales go up.
	Did gun sales go up when Trump started talking about banning this and banning that and taking the gun and doing the due process later?
	Or did they just kind of stay level?
	Oh yeah, we talked about banning bump stocks.
	All the bump stocks were being sold around the country.
	That's why they're being recovered right now from those boating accidents that apparently happened.
	People are digging them out.
	They're coming out of the woodworks now.
	I'm seeing them pop up online for sale.
	So, absolutely.
	Whenever a leader in this country says they're going to ban something, a president says, hey, we're going to look into this or look into that, that product sells off the shelf every single time.
	Let's touch on the ammunition, because one of the things I think about when I look at a bump stock is like, what do these guys do that can shoot off this much ammunition?
	As expensive as ammunition is.
	And we saw during the beginning of the Obama administration, One of the things that feeds into ammunition is the ability for the companies that are manufacturing the ammunition to get spent brass from the military.
	And that's always been something that helps the price of it a little bit.
	And I remember in the Obama administration, they stopped it at Fort Drum and some other places.
	They even took the spent brass and crushed it into just scrap metal and then sold it to China.
	They could have made more money selling that spent brass into...
	You know, into American industry because it's already formed into shells and stuff.
	But what is going on with ammunition?
	Why is it so expensive?
	What do you think is happening with it?
	I think because exactly what you just said, you know, in cases like that.
	Also, I think we're, you know, sending ammunition over to different countries, Ukraine, to, you know, the different conflicts that we have around the world.
	And Unfortunately, that leaves us a little short, and then we're having to take up the cost of that by paying higher prices for ammunition.
	So that's why a lot of my customers are starting to do reloads.
	They're reloading their own ammunition, picking up brass at the range after they fire it and reloading that.
	And that's what we're going to have to get to.
	Because I got into this business of selling firearms because I said, I'm a little prepper.
	I said, I need to be prepared in case something does happen.
	And if COVID did not teach you anything, you know, to be prepared, let me tell you, you better wake up.
	Because I never thought in a million years that I would be in this country.
	A friend of mine called me around February, late February.
	In 2020, and he said, you know, Michael, they're getting ready to shut the country down.
	I'm like, what are you talking about?
	He said, everything is getting ready to shut down.
	In February, and I said, that's insane.
	That doesn't make sense to me. And I totally dismissed him.
	And then come March 13th, D-Day, exactly what happened.
	This entire country on 2020 shut down, and they're saying people have to stay in place and all that crazy mess.
	And I still, on March 14th, I still came into work.
	We still open these doors.
	I had the health department show up.
	I had the Austin Police Department show up.
	I had the fire marshal show up to try to shut me down.
	And I said, I'm not closing the doors.
	And by the way, I have more guns than you do.
	And I'd like you to leave.
	And so we did not close.
	We stayed open the entire time.
	And it takes that.
	It takes that drive, that tenacity to get things done.
	People don't realize the things that go on around different states in this country and what people are doing to stand up and to fight against that tyranny that's actually happening yeah so and they they very is very uh cold and calculating the way that they did it you know they would not do any articles about you uh but if somebody was in a jurisdiction where they they pressed it and they arrested the guy that's got the gym or whatever then it's like oh look at this could happen to you type of thing Or everybody that's shutting down and they talk to them about how,
	oh yeah, it's really going to, it may put me out of business, but I've got to shut down to be a good neighbor and all the rest of this nonsense.
	It was such one-sided propaganda.
	They showed no stories of anybody like you standing up to this.
	They didn't talk about anybody who refused to wear the mask.
	It was all about compliance, compliance, compliance.
	Censorship and then propaganda on both sides of this thing all the way through.
	Let me ask you this. Back on the bump stock thing, of course, we had Biden saying, well, we've got to pass this now through Congress, and Schumer introduced this, and we had Republicans who blocked it, even Republicans who didn't care about the bump stock before.
	They now care about it. Looks like that You're following this pretty closely.
	What is your assessment? Does it look like this is going to be blocked in this election year?
	Yes, I think we're going to do a good job of keeping them from doing anything in Congress, on the House and the Senate side.
	We need to make sure this election time, people get out there and go vote because the numbers matter.
	It matters how many Republicans, how many Democrats we have in office to actually shut a lot of these things down.
	We need to make sure that, well, I don't want to say Republicans and Democrats because there's Libertarians and That are out there that are doing a great job and growing as well.
	We need to make sure the people that are pro-Second Amendment are in office and they're actually listening to the people.
	We're saying, we're not going to let them take that inch at all because if we do, they're going to take the mile.
	So we have to get the people that we know that are going to stand on our side to make sure that we don't lose any of the rights that we hold dear and near to our heart.
	Yeah, that's right. I've got a comment here from Michael DeSilvio.
	He says, they taught schoolchildren to throw a can of soup at a gunman here in the town where he lives.
	I've seen that stuff, too.
	You're packing a can of soup there, right there.
	Concealed carry of some soup.
	I don't know. Right.
	I know. I know.
	Oh yeah, and they've come out with different little threats as well.
	I've received probably in a 24-hour period over 50 threats, but I'm thinking, wow, you're anti-gun and you're threatening me.
	With what? What are you going to do?
	So, of course, we're stepping up our security.
	We're doing the things that we need to do.
	We take all threats serious.
	But, you know, they're going to do that, and that's how the left is.
	You know, that's how the anti-gun community is.
	They're very violent, and so we're going to stand up against that and continue doing what I'm doing.
	I'm not going to stop what I'm doing.
	Continue forward. They're going to do this in Congress.
	We're going to fight them in Congress.
	You know, I will talk to all my elected officials in Texas, around Texas, let them know they were watching you.
	Make sure you don't, you know, don't...
	Don't betray us. So we will continue to do the things we need to do here.
	Yes. And just tell anybody who lives in the area, General Area in Texas, support somebody like Michael Cargill who supports your rights to own a gun.
	He got into this fight.
	Who was it with you that we had legal counsel?
	Who was it that was working with you?
	So in this case, it was NCLA, New Civil Liberties Alliance, a great organization.
	Thanks to them, they did exactly, you know, they fought this case exactly the way I wanted it fought.
	We picked the attorney to argue the case in the United States Supreme Court.
	Because that attorney, he actually argued a case in the Supreme Court for Trump as well.
	And so that's why we picked that attorney.
	And people were kind of hesitant, you know, once that hearing happened in February, like, man, we don't know if we're going to win this, you know, because the attorney, he didn't go after, you know, didn't respond to certain questions the way he should have.
	Well, you know what? The attorney did exactly what he was supposed to do.
	And this is how he explained it.
	He said, you know, there are some...
	Justices that are on the court, the United States Supreme Court, who are going to be in that no vote column.
	So if I focus on their questions in that no vote, I could take the chance of losing a yes vote.
	So instead of focusing on that person and losing my yes vote, I'm going to ignore them because they're already going to be a no vote regardless.
	I'm not going to change their mind.
	So him spending time in talking with Justice Continge Brown Jackson trying to change her mind, he's not going to change her mind.
	Because this justice said that she understood the bump stock to...
	Fire, you know, to be attached to a rifle and for a rifle to fire 800 rounds a second.
	She said 800 rounds a second.
	And it's like, I don't have an answer for that, you know?
	Yeah. It can't fire 800 rounds a second.
	And I say, just think about that concept.
	Second! Think about that for a second.
	Yeah, it's like the ghost gun or whatever they call it on these, you know, the special forces...
	I see 130 or something like that.
	Yeah. Pretty ridiculous.
	Not based in fact, but she was very...
	What was it? Sotomayor, though.
	Well, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and all the rest of this kind of stuff, and it's like, lady, you don't even know what a duck is.
	I mean... You don't know the difference between an automatic and a semi-automatic.
	But hey, if it works like that, it's like, well, the same thing could be true of the legislation.
	You know, if it looks like tyranny, if it looks like a power grab, if it looks like a violation of the Constitution, it is a violation of the Constitution.
	That's what you're here for, I guess.
	Absolutely. Even Senator Feinstein, the late Senator Feinstein, knew that this is something that had to go through Congress.
	She said it, and she warned them back when she was in office, when they were trying to do this back in 2019.
	She said, look, 2018, Congress has to do this.
	You can't allow the ATF to do this.
	But they did.
	No one called them on it, and Congress didn't do anything.
	Well, Trump was pushing it.
	He says, don't you worry about that.
	I can do that by myself, fortunately.
	So it's crazy.
	Just crazy. I mean, I just looked at that and was like, what is going on here?
	You're talking about somebody else that doesn't know anything about guns.
	That is Trump.
	But anyway, thank you so much for doing it again.
	The new Civil Liberties, was it Alliance?
	NCLA? That's correct.
	NCLA. And they sound like there's somebody who's been involved in some of these mask issues and things like that, too, maybe.
	So they focus on government issues and government overreach.
	They're not a gun organization at all.
	Matter of fact, I was the first Second Amendment case they've ever had.
	And so they actually called me up, and I was actually searching for them.
	Luckily, we met, and I said, hey, I need an attorney.
	They said, hey, we're looking for a client.
	I said, well, let's get married.
	So we did, and we took this case all the way to the Supreme Court.
	Well, if they're focusing on government overreach, that's a target-rich environment.
	They should have enough work to last all their lifetimes.
	Thank you for stepping in and taking care of that again.
	Central Texas Gunworks, they're in Austin.
	If you're in Texas, support Michael Cargill, because he supports your Second Amendment rights, and he has faced the scrutiny and probably will be facing a lot of other penalties, repercussions and recriminations for this type of stuff.
	So thank you for doing that, Michael.
	Great talking to you. Good to see you again.
	Thank you very much, sir, and thank you for having me.
	And like I always say, more guns equals less crime.
	Buy yourself a gun.
	That's a good way to look at it.
	Thank you so much, Michael.
	Appreciate it.
	Okay, folks, we're gonna take a real quick break and we will be right back.
	Thanks for joining us.
	Thank you.
	Liberty. It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, and let me catch up on some of these.
	Amos Poole, thank you very much.
	That's very generous. I appreciate that.
	Regarding all the bird flu BS, he says, Steve Kirsch and Dr.
	Kaufman had a debate about the existence of the COVID virus.
	Kirsch had his ass handed to him.
	He and other virus gatekeepers don't want this discussed.
	Thanks and best to you and your family.
	Well, I'll have to take a look at that.
	And, you know, I honestly have big questions about whether that virus exists.
	And even about virus theory in general, I see anything that can't be observed is a scientific model, an explanation to put something through.
	So I've had some people send me some stuff about contagion.
	About germs, this amazing stuff I didn't know about Louis Pasteur.
	That was in his diary. So, you know, I'm still looking at that, and I haven't taken a firm stance on that yet, but I'm really leaning towards the opinion that this is a model.
	As I've said before, we have different models of how subatomic particles interact with each other.
	We've had various atomic models.
	We've had the Bohr's atom.
	And even though you've got a model...
	That can be used to predict behavior.
	That doesn't necessarily mean that that model is completely, exactly what is happening there.
	It's just a model. And it may be useful to predict behavior.
	But it's not necessarily what is happening there.
	You know, we went from that.
	We've gone to quantum physics, which...
	Was it Feynman who said, if you think you understand quantum physics, you don't know anything about quantum physics.
	So, you know, we have these different models about things that cannot be directly observed.
	And the virus is one of those things.
	But especially when we look at this, that was the issue that I had.
	At the beginning of 2020, you know, as Michael Cargill was saying in February, somebody was saying, they're going to lock us down.
	And I knew that was going to happen.
	My question at that point, because I had been told it was Goat Degree who told me about a year and a half before that.
	So I'm getting a lot of chatter about Dark Winter II. And he says, you know what that means?
	He says, yeah, I know. I know what Dark Winter 1 was.
	I know, you know, two months before 9-11, that type of thing, and the basis for putting out the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act and so forth.
	So... I knew what they were going to do.
	I knew they were going to lock everybody down and push an untested vaccine.
	What I didn't know was that it was going to be mRNA.
	And what I didn't know was whether or not this was something that they had created or whether or not it was just going to be a PSYOP. Fortunately, it was a PSYOP, in my opinion, because it wasn't a pandemic.
	If you look at the numbers that were happening, we locked the world down because of a couple of people that they claim had died with it in China.
	So it was very bogus, and when I saw these people faking, locking down, when I saw what the Chinese Communist Party was doing, it's like, and everybody doing exactly the same thing at the same time.
	That was when I gained confidence that this is not the real deal.
	But we had people at Infowars and throughout alternative media that picked up this narrative like they had actually observed the virus.
	Well, it's got this little hook and it hooks into your body like this and like that.
	It's like, you don't know any of that stuff.
	You don't know any of that.
	You don't even know if this exists.
	It was the same type of thing we've been talking about with Redfield, saying, well, it's eventually going to happen, and it's eventually going to get to humans, and when it gets to humans, it's inevitable it's going to get to humans, and it's going to kill 25 to 50 percent of us.
	It's like, come on. You know, they start inflating this stuff like this, you know, it's a psyop rather than the real deal.
	And so I think that's very important for us to understand where they're coming from, what their motives are with this stuff.
	Stealth Patriot, thank you for the tip.
	The rights of school children could shoot an active shooter with assault silly string.
	There you go. Instead of throwing cans at them.
	I'm Marty. Thank you for the tip.
	And he says, push the needle.
	Yeah, the needle right now is at 49...
	Well, we got it at 50%.
	We're actually at 49%.
	So we're way behind.
	We really do appreciate that.
	Michelle Obama, thank you for the tip again.
	And OctoSpook writes, Trump is no friend of gun owners or patriots.
	He is a wolf in sheep's garb.
	I absolutely am convinced of that.
	And let me tell you...
	When you look at the second term of these people, it's just like what we see.
	It's the leftward drift of all these people, whether in Congress or they're in the Supreme Court or whether it's a second term.
	And Trump is already a child of New York Democrats.
	That's where he is coming from.
	All the talk that he has out there, that's just campaign rhetoric.
	What this guy is really about, he's comfortable with the Clintons, the Epsteins, he was pushing the transgender stuff in his beauty contests and all this stuff for a long time.
	And you've already seen him run as hard as he can from the pro-life issue.
	You're going to see that same type of stuff with gun owners as well.
	Don't frag me, bro.
	Says ammo is expensive because the biggest producer and consumer is the military, and the military is at war with us.
	That's right. And they're probably grabbing every bit of ammunition they can and sending it to Ukraine as well.
	In addition to all of the government-created inflation, I think that that is, you know...
	That is a big part of it.
	Stealth Patriot reloading is great, but the last time I checked, small rifle primer was hard to get.
	And getting real expensive, we were just talking about the other day.
	My son here...
	Yeah. No truth in them said 800 rounds a second.
	It's a lot of weight to carry around.
	That's right. Christian Constitutional Conservative Trump should have been brought up by David every time we heard the words bump stock and shutdowns.
	Yeah. Yeah, I did talk about it then.
	That's one of the problems with me and the other people at Infowars.
	Octospook. Legislating with executive orders is a crime.
	Plain and simple. Yeah.
	Dictator. Dictators.
	The word, the law is in my mouth.
	It's whatever I say.
	That's what an executive order is.
	The six-foot rule is from the CIA. It's a prison communication mitigation technique.
	Well, there you go. Yeah.
	I think it was also very useful for them, if you stop and think about it, if you put masks on your face, as long as you're six feet apart, they can identify you in other biometric markers besides just your face.
	DGA, David, you're exactly right.
	We don't have to do anything we know is wrong.
	The problem is people did it without thought, just blind compliance, and they're still doing it.
	On so many issues.
	B-slice, I lost clients over the mass.
	So glad I stood my ground.
	Me too. Good for you.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about the money issues here.
	The U.S. debt is on pace to top 56 trillion over the next 10 years.
	And again, it was Trump who took it up to that next level, you know.
	Hey, three and a half trillion dollars.
	Remember, Thomas Massey pushed back on it.
	Trump said we're going to primary him out.
	Fortunately, they didn't.
	The Congressional Budget Office is the one saying it's going to be $56 trillion, and they're counting on these tax cuts expiring.
	Even though Trump wants to extend them and deepen them, and even though Biden has all new spending plans for various things in the works, and whether you talk about lowering taxes or you talk about increasing spending, it's going to have the same effect on the deficit.
	So that is a very, very conservative estimate to get the U.S. debt to $56 trillion over the next 10 years.
	And... Have you heard Trump talk about cutting anything?
	Me neither. Have you heard the GOP Congress talking about cutting anything?
	No. We're going to keep funding the NIH, keep funding the CDC, keep funding the FDA. We're going to fund everything.
	No matter how many show trials they have, they keep funding everything.
	And, of course, one of the reasons why this happens is because everything is put into a giant omnibus bill.
	Several thousand pages, and you've got 24 hours or whatever to take a look at it.
	That was one of the key things that people, the Republicans in Congress, pushed about with Kevin McCarthy to get him to sign on to.
	That he was going to stop that.
	That he was going to stop shutting down any objections from the floor.
	Because, you know, you do everything in these select committees, and you create an omnibus bill, and it becomes this must-pass thing, and you only give people, you know, one or two days to look at this several thousand-page bill that is written in very technical, legal language.
	And so they pushed back against that, and of course, Machiavelli and Mike...
	Just got rid of all of that stuff.
	So you're not going to see anything from the GOP or Democrat Congress to talk about any spending cuts.
	You're not hearing anything like that from Trump.
	Nobody, when they're running for office, is making any promises about that.
	And of course, they're not going to do it when they get in office either.
	The interesting thing is that as we look at this massive debt that is happening everywhere, and it's not just the United States, it's in every country right now, 29% of central banks are planning to increase their gold reserve.
	That's the highest it's been since 2018, but they don't want you to get into gold, they want you to get into CBDC or something to that effect.
	And then I saw this article from Anti-War criticizing Biden for his Saudi obsession.
	Well, that's about the petrodollar.
	It really is. And it's a bit too late, quite frankly.
	I think in terms of...
	I don't know if there was an actual treaty or something, but whether there was a treaty or whether it was just an agreement...
	It is essentially ended, because now they are accepting multiple currencies.
	They're already doing it with several different countries, and now they've extended that.
	They've even made application to get into BRICS. They're no longer pricing oil strictly in dollars, and that was the petrodollar agreement that has ended.
	I don't know if Biden thinks that he's going to be able to get that toothpaste back into the tube or what.
	But as Andy Warb criticizes him for doing, he said, you know, look, the Saudis have got this Yemen war, a horrific regime in terms of civil liberties.
	The U.S. has spent the last three and a half years cultivating closer ties with the Saudis, while the Saudi government has done nothing to warrant a better relationship.
	Now President Biden is so desperate to get any foreign policy win, quote unquote, that he's proposing locking the U.S. into a formal alliance with one of the world's worst governments.
	The Saudis didn't need to win over Biden as he was too busy chasing after them like a drunken suitor.
	The administration hides behind great power competition.
	That's one of their excuses for cozying up to the crown prince.
	But Saudi ties with Russia and China have only become stronger during this period.
	And of course, again, BRICS is what they're moving toward.
	Biden is so preoccupied with not losing the Saudis to other major powers that, and again, it's the petrodollar.
	And again, he's already lost that.
	They're saying he's willing to offer them the moon in exchange for nothing.
	Well, we made that bargain a long time ago.
	But when you look at, again, the moves of the central banks in New Zealand, the New Zealand Central Bank, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, has opened a consultation on central bank digital currencies.
	They are in the second of four stages to implement CBDCs there.
	They consider that stage three will involve the development of prototypes and will be completed between 2028 and 2029.
	Just like Strauss and Howe said.
	And then around 2030, they would introduce digital cash into New Zealand.
	And so it looks, and this is the key thing here, it looks just like what everybody else is doing.
	Isn't that interesting? You know, we have these plans that are going around and everybody's doing exactly the same thing at exactly the same time.
	Somebody put up this meme about bird flu.
	And for my next trick, bird flu will magically appear in every country at exactly the same time.
	Yeah, that's exactly what we're looking at here.
	Isn't that suspicious? Isn't it suspicious that Trump did exactly what Trudeau and Macron and Bojo and everybody's doing the same thing at the same time throughout all this stuff?
	And then Biden, he just comes into place and he is in sync with him as well.
	And now they're all in sync about bird flu?
	Bird flu. Now it's a big issue to everybody.
	And it's happening everywhere, apparently.
	All at the same time. That's your clue that it's another clue that it is fake.
	So, global banking, finance, and technology, it mimics the language and the concerns on all of these issues.
	They're all saying exactly the same thing.
	It's a trap! The Admiral Akbar thing.
	Who knew? Who knew? Well, we all know.
	When they're all doing exactly the same thing at exactly the same time.
	New Zealand's central bank is somewhat unusual in that it has broader powers than most central banks.
	Following a major IMF review...
	The New Zealand Central Bank experienced its greatest transformation process in 40 years.
	So, from reading this, it looks like they have given their central bank powers that are distributed over a lot of different bureaucracies in our country.
	And yet, those bureaucracies don't seem to have any problem coordinating stuff.
	But it's all more and more centralized and more and more coordinated.
	When you look at how many different steps we are, Just remember that we are just one step away from putting in CBDC. They've already got FedNow, which is the wholesale version, and that is a way to draw these banks in.
	And the next step is Fedcoin.
	But of course, you'd have to be a conspiracy theorist to think that Fedcoin was actually going to be used.
	With all the time and the modeling and, you know, they put into this and the programming, oh, they don't really intend to actually use FedCoin, the CBDC. Well, of course they do.
	And so all of this stuff is going to flow back into the Bank of International Settlements.
	Not only are CBDCs programmable and combinable, but the long game involves a plan to interconnect everybody through the Bank of International Settlements.
	Just as we pointed out in that interview yesterday with David Hughes, he said, well, this Bank of International Settlements, it had a lot of connections with the Nazis, and of course the Nazis had a lot of connections with all these multinational corporations, supposedly American corporations and American banks, and then all of them put together this Bank of International Settlement.
	You want to talk about where the Nazis' wealth went, where their power went?
	And if you look at what is going on with the European Union, if you look at what is going on with the World Economic Forum, it's the same people and the same values and the same way that they run all this stuff.
	Yeah, it's Nazi finance, and this is the global ledger.
	It's going to be run out of that organization, the Bank of International Settlement.
	So... What can we do about it?
	Well, first of all, we try to prepare and work on this stuff from the ground up.
	And so, just remember, gold and silver are physical.
	Gold and silver are private.
	Gold and silver are real.
	That's something none of this other stuff is.
	And so again, davidnight.gold will take you to Tony Ardman, Wise Wolf Gold.
	You can get your gold and silver.
	You can even set up a savings program.
	He's set up something for people to be able to buy, determine what level you want to spend each month.
	And you can still get a bulk discount as part of that program.
	Each month, you can get gold and silver.
	You can get in at a $50 level.
	He's even got it for kids at $35.
	And it goes up to some pretty high levels.
	But, of course, you can also buy any quantity, small or large, directly from Tony of gold or silver.
	DavidKnight.Gold will take you to Tony's Wise Wolf Gold.
	And before we run out of time here, conservative thinker, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, go to thedavidknightshow.com, click on the link for Subscribestar.
	Keep the show going for just $5 a month.
	Thank you so much for getting me to say that and getting me to do a commercial.
	Thank you, conservative thinker.
	And so he says it's a 360 win.
	I really do appreciate that, and he's right.
	If you go there, that is a big part of our base.
	But again, so is Zell and Zell.
	You know, the tips that we have here, we have a P.O. box, if you would like to use that as well.
	But yeah, if just $5 a month, if the number of people who listen contributed $5 a month, we would be way, way, way beyond anything that we needed.
	But it's such a small group of people and people like Conservative Thinker and many others.
	I need to put some kind of a credit or something at the end of the show, because it's a few people that keep this show going and we cannot thank them enough.
	And we really do appreciate it. It's the same names I keep seeing for the most part.
	We did have somebody that was new on Zelle, but for the most part, it's the same people each and every time.
	And when I type in the names on the register there, it fills them in for me, because the computer program remembers your names and so do we.
	So I really do appreciate that.
	Fregan said, first we blow the money, then we get to find out how we blew it.
	Yeah, there's not going to be any fiscal considerations whatsoever about any of this stuff.
	Well, I think we're just about out of time.
	I haven't heard the bumper click, but I think we're...
	No, we're not. Oh, that's right, we've got another hour.
	Okay, well, I was about to sign off here, but...
	I'm looking at the minutes here, and I'm thinking, you know what got me confused was that Michael came on in the second hour.
	That's what confused me.
	Okay. I was like, what is happening here?
	We're going to take a quick break, and we've got a lot more to talk about.
	And I've got plenty of stuff left here to talk about.
	We're going to be right back.
	Welcome back.
	that I've missed Christmas is being overcome by a constant anxiety about being unstable the last three years I know well So always remember That any kind of certainty SAFE As, it's written right here It never comes
	You're listening to The David Knight Show!
	I'm David Knight, and I'm out!
	. .
	...
	you 나쁜 9ente 9 none
	9
	All right.
	I like that one.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	And we're back. And, of course, we've got our signals crossed a little bit.
	I was going to ask, before I play that, I was going to ask people to think about what soundtrack that's from.
	That's, of course, John Williams.
	You probably recognize the sound of John Williams.
	But what movie did that come from?
	Of course, the scenes of Yellowstone there.
	Anybody, I think they know...
	It's a comment there.
	Milk and cheese.
	That doesn't come from cows, as I said before, but it comes from excretion of yeast.
	That's what they want you eating.
	Perhaps worse than bugs.
	And, of course, 3D printed food.
	3D printers are getting much, much better.
	I guess now we can start printing food instead of plastic.
	Or maybe we just eat the plastic.
	How about that? That's probably what they want us to eat anyway.
	Fill you up, you know. You can make it and shape it to look like real food on your home kitchen printer using liquid colored ink goos.
	Made from repurposed old food, re-enlivened with biosynthetic additives, then delivered to your door by drones.
	How about that? Don't laugh.
	Crazy biotech scientists, admired by the government and the media, are busy making it already.
	And then you can cook it with lasers.
	This is like just the dumbest, nerdiest stuff.
	Except, of course, it's about making money.
	It's about controlling the population.
	And it's about reducing the population.
	A BBC article, Why 3D Printed Food is Set to Go Mainstream, describes it as even being healthier.
	Well, how do we know that? Oh, we know that it's going to be healthier.
	We know that the bird flu that Trump's CDC director is telling us now is going to kill 25 to 50% of the people.
	They don't know any such thing about any of this stuff.
	It's all made up. My son says, well, because what we needed for 3D printed food was to make something that looks like food.
	Yeah. Now, maybe we make it look like something completely different, because it is something completely different.
	All over the world, supermarket shelves are being filled with unhealthy food, but consumers are not being told about it.
	You know, how many times are you surprised to find out that there's some weird ingredient in your food?
	I remember when... You had one influencer look at the ingredient in a lot of the fast food breads and stuff, particularly at the time it was focused on Subway, and said, you know, this is stuff they make rubber mats out of.
	And of course, they use a lot of this stuff to assist in the manufacturing of the food.
	Make it go through the machines better, or to make it look, give it a certain look, a certain color, or to make it so that bugs won't eat it.
	You know, those bugs that you're supposed to eat, they won't even eat the food that they feed to you.
	So, you know, it's usually one of those three things.
	Getting it to go easily through the machine, getting it to look attractive to humans, and then putting preservatives in there so even bugs won't eat it.
	But when you look at the 3D food, I would imagine all those things are going to be at play.
	Don't you think they're going to have to put some really interesting chemicals in it to get it to go through that 3D printer?
	And of course, I already talked about how they want it to look like real stuff.
	So it's going to be a lot of different food dyes and other things like that.
	Well, it's your complacency.
	There's a lot of stuff that's already in our food that we don't know about.
	Look at glyphosate now.
	It's permeated throughout the food supply and many other things. You know the the the high fructose corn syrup that they've Substituted for sugar as unhealthy as the sugar is that is way more unhealthy than just regular sugar Novel synthetic foods are being described in glowing deceptive terms because it's simply
	And the government is a partner in it, in the same way that the Pentagon is going to be a public-private partnership to push this synthetic food on the poor people that have signed up for this stuff.
	And so Brownstone is talking about the government's involvement in all this.
	DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, they want to reset our food supply as well.
	Because you see, all of these technocracy and multinational corporations and the military-industrial complex and all these people, they're all on the same page.
	It's all about surveillance and control of us and population control in terms of reducing the numbers of us.
	DARPA has granted millions of dollars to researchers to turn military plastic waste into Into a bacterial protein powder that can be fed to humans.
	One word, plastic.
	One word, waste.
	Yeah, it never ends does it? Just as we see what Monsanto has been doing, Glyphosate that I've talked about many times.
	Oh, they got a new scam here. And just like the NIH, I'm sure that DARPA can get some royalties on some of this stuff.
	Just like they participated in the production of the mRNA things.
	Many Americans are not aware that there's already genetically modified animals in our food supply chain.
	Genetically modified pigs, genetically modified cows, genetically modified salmon have all been approved for sale in the U.S. by who?
	Well, by the FDA. Or by the USDA. These people don't care about anything.
	Just like they rubber stamp everything that the pharmaceutical industry does.
	They rubber stamp all the...
	The food products as well.
	If genetically engineered Franken-salmon sounds appetizing, you're sure to love Annika Bioscience's genetically engineered bacterial spores that contain DNA barcodes which are applied to produce.
	Now, this is the first time I've heard of this.
	DNA barcodes that they apply to produce because, you see, everything must be tracked And surveilled.
	And so they need to know what you're eating.
	And how will they do that?
	Well, they'll look at the waste in various cities.
	In Austin, for example, I think I covered it.
	They were going through the wastewater there and running it through their PCR test to see if they could find bird flu.
	Well, it's not just that.
	Whatever their agenda is, they want to know, are you eating lettuce?
	Which lettuce are you eating?
	What type of lettuce are you eating?
	And where did you buy it?
	These DNA barcodes will be embedded into produce.
	They cannot be removed by washing.
	They cannot be removed by boiling, by being fried, by being microwaved, or being steamed.
	And it'll make the food traceable from the field to your sewer, so that tests of your local sewerage will reveal what the local population is eating.
	Just the obsession that these people have with tracking and tracing everything is truly amazing, and you know how they're going to use it.
	They're going to use it against us.
	There is no labeling requirement either to notify you about which produce has been sprayed with these genetically modified spores.
	Given the USDA's obsession with food and tracking and surveillance, there's a very real possibility they'll try to mandate the use of such spores, just as they're currently mandating RFID chips on cattle for traceability.
	If you think that surveilling sewage sounds outlandish realize that it became common practice during code But of course like I said before Austin is already doing it to try to find bird flu Hey if we can find bird flu Maybe we can get some kind of a promotion through the public health bureaucracy because you know We found it for them and we contacted all the press and now we got more panic that we can push on people New York and London New York City have begun tracking what foods their
	residents buy of course They have committed to cutting how much meat can be served in hospitals and schools as part of a sweeping initiative To achieve a 33% reduction in carbon emissions from food by 2030 I think this was announced by Eric Adams, the new mayor of New York City, like a year ago.
	One of the first things that he did.
	The city states that most of these emissions are due to meat, poultry, dairy, eggs, and fish.
	Now, except for the fish.
	Think about the bird flu and how that fits in.
	They want to get rid, you know, it's in their crosshairs, to get rid of it for the climate MacGuffin, but now they can roll in a pandemic MacGuffin to get rid of four of those five things.
	Poultry and eggs, meat and dairy.
	So, again, I can see their DNA is showing, isn't it?
	The DNA of their schemes is pretty apparent for anybody to see.
	And, of course, this is not going to just be limited to New York and London.
	As I said when I pointed this out, again, about a year and a half ago, this is part of the C40 initiative.
	C40 initiative doesn't want anybody to have any meat or dairy.
	Gone. 100% gone.
	And they don't want you to own a car.
	They don't want you to have but three items of clothing once a year that you purchase.
	You have once every three years, you take a short trip of under 900 miles.
	All of these different things. It's a long list.
	And it's not just New York and London.
	It's now about 100 cities.
	It started out with 40 cities.
	And it began with Sadiq Khan and Bloomberg when he was mayor in New York City.
	But now it's expanded to a lot of American cities.
	Here's some of the American cities.
	Philadelphia. Austin, again.
	Chicago, Miami, Boston, L.A., Houston, Phoenix, Portland, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and Seattle.
	Now, I emphasize those two cities, Texas and, of course, Miami and Florida.
	These are Republican states.
	Again, that's no protection against this kind of stuff going through.
	And the mayor of Miami is very connected with technocracy.
	He wanted to, you know, have his salary in Bitcoin.
	He's pushing all this other stuff.
	And they're part of the C40 initiative.
	He's a globalist.
	Quite frankly, if he wasn't a globalist, he would be pushing to get out of the C40. Have you heard him say anything about that?
	No. He did run for president briefly.
	The World Economic Forum, affiliate funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, is working with these C40 cities.
	They've got a target, guess what, by 2030.
	Keep seeing that number over and over again.
	Their residents should have no meat, no dairy, no private cars.
	Like I said, all the rest of this stuff.
	Perhaps you'll be one of the lucky few who can still afford meat, dairy, fish, and fresh vegetables.
	Unfortunately, even those will be polluted if the technocrats get their way.
	Now, here's where the fight's going to be.
	You need to learn how to grow your own food, quite frankly, first of all.
	We'll probably lose this fight because of the political corruption in this country.
	All these people are on the take.
	They're all for sale.
	The media is for sale.
	Not just the mainstream media, but the alternative media is for sale.
	And so don't expect that you're going to win in those fights.
	Still have that fight. Still understand what the global agenda is, and you still need to have that fight.
	But again, focus on the local aspect and learn how to grow your own food.
	Where the fight will be, and you better make sure that you get this put in at the local level.
	Make sure that they can't shut down and take your chickens or take your produce or whatever.
	That's going to be a fight.
	They're going to try to do that just like they're trying to confiscate the guns all the time.
	That's going to be an ongoing fight.
	That's a fight we can win.
	And we can win that local level.
	And I'm confident that we can win that.
	And I'll tell you why.
	Because it was a few years ago I talked to somebody who had been a missionary in Romania.
	And one of the things that I thought was interesting about...
	Because Romania was a communist dictatorship...
	Very tightly controlled by Krzyzewski, and it was incredibly corrupt.
	But he said the people who really weathered it well were the people who were farmers, that were outside of the city.
	Now, they may not have been able to have clothes and things like that, but they had access to food, and the bureaucrats kind of looked the other way.
	And let them alone, because they were the ones who were growing all the food.
	The state industries couldn't feed people.
	And so people were surviving because of the independent farmers that were out there.
	And these bureaucrats knew it.
	They knew they were going to starve and everybody was going to starve if they put these farmers out of business.
	And of course, you know, they could get access to this food themselves, of course.
	You know, that was, they get first in line with that stuff.
	I'm just saying that when push comes to shove and we've got an underground economy and that type of thing, they are not going to cut their own throats in terms of shutting down productive food places.
	But we can start to do some things in terms of putting it into legislative protection and start building those things now.
	But even if... We wind up with incredibly corrupt, dictatorial, totalitarian government.
	Even a totalitarian government like the Romanian government would allow the local farmers to survive.
	We've just got to keep the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the FDA at bay for a few more years here with all of this.
	And they're moving pretty hard to try to take over things.
	When we look at this...
	This current fight to take over our food supply and to create the next pandemic again.
	The bird flu is right at the center.
	We now have a combined MacGuffin, a pandemic MacGuffin, and a climate MacGuffin, and that's what the bird flu is.
	But people understand this, and they're doing a lot of memes like this one, this dead fly, and the quote underneath it, it must have been the fly flu that took him out.
	Yeah, must have been.
	But you've got Thomas Massey, who is always on target with this stuff, pushing back against the surveillance that the USDA is pushing out there with their tags for cattle.
	He said the USDA is mandating the electronic ID tags in cattle without congressional authorization.
	This is the beginning of the end of independent cattlemen, but the Farm Bureau and Beef USA support it because they are the foxes that are watching the henhouse.
	He said, I tagged them.
	Let's see if they respond.
	Because he put their, you know, at Farm Bureau and at Beef USA. He knows.
	He knows exactly what's happening.
	And again, it is big agriculture and the groups that are associated with it that are going to push this type of thing.
	Regulation is typically pushed by the big corporations.
	You look at why we haven't had a lot of new car companies come out.
	And it's kind of interesting that Elon Musk was able to make his deals with the people in government to get that through, pushing their green agenda.
	But there's been a lot of other car companies that haven't been able to make it through.
	And typically they come up with three-wheeled vehicles.
	Because these safety regulations and emission regulations that have been put in there are highly supported by the big automobile companies.
	They're even supporting even more stringent regulations because that keeps competition out.
	Now the problem for them is that they can't compete with the Chinese on electric vehicles.
	Because the Chinese have got advantages in terms of material costs and energy costs and labor costs and all the rest of this stuff.
	And so you've had a lot of different three-wheel vehicles like the Aptera that was even going to be solar-powered, looked like a weird spaceship, the Elio, which looked like something straight out of Terry Gilliam's Brazil.
	They haven't been able to make it to market even as a three-wheeled vehicle.
	But these types of regulations, just as we see at the local level with restaurants, they would always be the established restaurants that would push the local government to put even more regulations on new restaurants to make sure they didn't have any competition.
	And so we see it with the restaurants, we see it with big business, with automobiles and other things like that.
	And that is what's going on here with this tag and trace stuff for the cattle.
	The big agricultural concerns want this.
	This is going to be an incredible burden for small and local cattle.
	And it will then give the USDA an excuse to shut down independent farms and individuals who have their own animals by saying that they are not tagged.
	And don't think for a moment that you will be saved if you don't market your stuff or send it across state lines.
	They got a Supreme Court decision during FDR's New Deal.
	You had a guy who was growing food and he didn't want to get involved in the federal programs and the price supports and things like that.
	And he fought him to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court made the wrong decision and said no, even if he's growing this stuff, and even if it's just for his own consumption, he's still affecting the overall market, and we're going to regulate it.
	They inverted the purpose of the Department of Commerce, which is supposed to be about freeing up trade.
	They used it to restrict trade.
	And so Thomas Massey was responding to another congressional representative, Harriet Hagman, who said EID ear tags are not about disease prevention.
	We already do that better than any other country in the world It's about government control and furthering the vertical integration of our food supply We're good to go.
	And they've got to be shut down over this stuff.
	And we can't depend on just having the court do it.
	It's got to be shut down at the state level.
	Congress is not going to do anything about this.
	Even though you've got Hagman and Massey who are pushing back on this, Mike Johnson is completely owned by the establishment, and he will shut down any attempt to defund any of this stuff.
	As a matter of fact, Thomas Massey even put this out.
	I love this. Come and tag it.
	It's just like the come and take it flag.
	There's a white flag with a silhouette, not of a cannon, not of the AR-15 that you frequently see, but of a cow.
	It says, come and tag it.
	That's a great meme to...
	To spread around. He also said the USDA overstepped its authority by promulgating a rule requiring the electronic tagging of cattle.
	Congress writes the laws, not bureaucrats, guided by corporate cronies.
	I will not comply.
	Well, good. I hope he'll do something about it.
	Again, he's already got a Supreme Court case now on his side, Thomas Massey does, in terms of pushing back against this bump stock.
	So, I don't know how he's going to try to oppose this, but Big Ag, as he points out, wants this.
	You know, another place where we see this is the Consumer Financial Protection Board that was created by Focahontas.
	Oh, that was going to help the consumers, right?
	No, what that did was that was used by her, because she's always been palsies with the biggest of banks.
	And so what they did was they created a whole bunch of regulations to make it impossible for small and medium-sized banks to participate in certain types of loan instruments.
	There's just too much paperwork for them to be able to do it and stay in business.
	The big guys could do it, but not the little guys.
	And so it hurt the small banks.
	It did exactly the opposite of protecting the consumers.
	It centralized the banking industry more.
	Well, we have, as one person said, bird flu outbreak at an Australian farm.
	Like I showed you the other day, we got bird flu happening magically in every country at exactly the same time.
	Here's what's happening in Australia.
	There are fears of an egg shortage in Melbourne this morning after a bird flu outbreak at a farm west of the city in Meredith.
	The farm has been placed in quarantine and 400,000 birds have been euthanised to prevent a wider outbreak.
	Also, a child in Victoria has become Australia's first confirmed human case of an emerging bird flu strain after returning from India in March.
	Okay, this kid came back from India.
	They've been traveling on a plane.
	Is that where they came in contact with the birds?
	Is it something they picked up in India?
	They don't tell you if it was a PCR test.
	Is it the old PCR test?
	How many cycles did they use on that?
	Or is it the new digital PCR, which is what we hear from somebody who sells those kits?
	Blew the whistle on that.
	So this is way more magnification.
	than they were doing with the analog or the quantitative PCR. Again, they just throw this stuff out there and you're supposed to believe it.
	It's inevitable that it's going to get to humans and it's going to kill 25-50% of the people even though what we've seen is some farm workers who got pink eye probably because they didn't wash their hands.
	But it's everywhere. The narrative is everywhere.
	And of course the only thing for it It's to kill birds.
	That's the only thing that'll do.
	Well, the new American says, is it time to take bird flu seriously?
	Well, yes, it is. You should take it seriously because this is a simultaneous attack on our liberty as a pandemic as well as our food supply.
	But that's not what they're talking about.
	And this is the thing that really disturbs me.
	It's like deja vu all over again.
	Four years ago, I watched the alternative press and the people that I worked with and for pushing this panic button over and over again.
	You know, buy my stuff.
	We're all going to die. It's coming.
	Gain of function. It's coming from China.
	China is going to buy a warfare against us and all the rest of this stuff.
	And they're doing it again.
	Listen to what they say.
	Americans have been right to dismiss reports as anything more than fear porn.
	So far, so good. Then they say, nevertheless, I really should be afraid because New American says so.
	Bird flu has already affected food production, and a former CDC director is warning that a human pandemic is inevitable thanks to the actions of humans, not the disease.
	You know, I've got to say, New American, you need to take down that interview you had with Michael Flynn that you've had up for over a month, and you need to stop pushing the fear.
	Come on! You know, I've talked to these people in the past.
	I don't understand what is happening to them.
	The bird flu has affected food production.
	No, the bird flu has not.
	The pandemic didn't lock us down.
	The pandemic didn't destroy Main Street.
	It was Trump's actions.
	And it's not the bird flu that is killing the birds.
	It's the government that's killing the birds.
	The birds are not even sick.
	They're being given this phony PCR test.
	Now, I'd like to see Stephen Colbert ask Fauci about that.
	You think he would? Dr.
	Fauci, the guy who developed this stuff called you an outright liar.
	He said you don't know anything about science, that you wouldn't debate him.
	Kerry Mullins. Mullins said this, and, you know, what do you say to that?
	So, yeah, the bird flu is not affecting food production.
	The government does.
	And it's ridiculous when you don't even have sick birds.
	To go in and kill hundreds of thousands, or in the case of the U.S., millions at a time.
	And then we've got it on the New American or any conservative press organization that puts any credibility into the CDC. Are you kidding me?
	I mean, come on. Are you going to quote a Marxist government as being authoritative?
	Of course, the new American never would.
	But the CDC? Oh, yes.
	We've got a CDC director.
	He's a former CDC director.
	He's a guy who worked for Trump, so I guess that means that he told us the truth.
	No, Robert Redfield lied to us then.
	He lied to us now. He's warning that it's inevitable.
	And he's warning that 25 to 50 percent of us are going to die.
	And thanks to the actions of humans, not the disease.
	So, is it the lab creation of it?
	Is it the fact that we're not social distancing or wearing masks?
	Because that was all the stuff that Robert Redfield was telling us.
	You know, you people out there who are not wearing the mask and not social distancing and all the rest, you're spreading this stuff.
	The disease isn't the point.
	Well, it wasn't any virus.
	The virus is the government.
	The pandemic was psychological.
	And these people are pushing this.
	Here we are four years later.
	Did New American not learn a thing about this?
	And I've seen this kind of stuff now from the New American.
	I've seen it from WND. I've seen it from Breitbart.
	It's not just InfoWars anymore.
	It's all of these people out there.
	What is going on?
	It's just pure Bolshevik.
	They're hallucinating like they're getting this stuff off of AI. Okay.
	Whistler says, be afraid.
	She got this from India.
	How many people in India are dying from bird flu?
	Exactly! You know, the COVID thing didn't affect Africa either, did it?
	And it didn't affect most of these nations until they started killing people with a vaccine.
	Psalm 144, thank you for the tip, says, Hey David, listening while gardening, these people are such control freaks and that's why we all have to disobey everything they say and do.
	Yes. Wish I could help you more, but waiting to start with a new company.
	Hope you can keep me in your prayers.
	God bless you and everyone else out there.
	Well, yes, and God bless you and your new venture.
	Thank you for the tip, and thank you, Michelle Obama, for another tip.
	I appreciate that. Thankfully, there's another hour.
	Yeah, I am so used to having guests in the third hour.
	That completely got me out of sync there.
	But yeah, I've got plenty to talk about here coming up.
	Jason Barker, good to see you, Jason.
	The Nights of the Storm and Foxhole Report says, don't forget about COVID and wild deer.
	They want to take away anything that is natural.
	I'm sure they'll ban hunting at some point as well, yeah.
	And he says, if you have a well-producing garden, it will be a gold mine.
	Already food is four times what it was a few years ago.
	Learning skills, folks.
	That's some of the best prepping that you can do.
	Yeah, you need to have some gold and silver and some things like that to maintain what you have, because otherwise this inflation is going to really eat it up.
	$56 trillion debt in a couple of years.
	The petrodollar is gone, and the implications of that disappearing have not percolated through our financial system and our economy yet, but they will.
	Government can't keep spending, you know, those two things.
	The removal of the petrodollar, which removed us from any fiscal responsibility and accountability, and now the removal of the incredible debt.
	So, you know, prep by learning some skills, especially food.
	And, you know, even more so than yourself.
	Everybody when you grow food you always wind up having more than you can eat right so It's not just gonna feed you, but it might provide you with income Jason says That's I already did that high boost as David talked about the water conservation going on in Id in Idaho yet. No I haven't talked about that I've seen that and I know there's a big fight there with the farmers Because they've decided they're just gonna cut off the water in that convenient and
	I'm sure that's not the big agricultural concerns that are being gored by that It's going to be the smaller farmers.
	I'll try to get to that. I don't have anything here today on that.
	I've seen some stories about it, but I'll take a look at that, and we will cover that, what is happening in Idaho.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	And we'll be right back.
	I'm going to be right back.
	You're listening to the David Knight show.
	By his law said eggs will cost ten a dozen soon.
	Yeah. It's interesting, though, you know, we saw this last year as they started culling chickens and things like that.
	But isn't it surprising that this year they went straight to the cows?
	Why the cows? Why not pigs?
	Why not chickens? Why don't you test the chickens with your PCR test?
	No, they're not doing that. They're going straight for the cattle.
	Because they had an agenda to tag them.
	And the USDA has done what they have done.
	And I don't know if they've gone further, as Thomas Massey was talking about it.
	But what they did was they said, if you're going to ship dairy cattle across state lines, you're going to have to be tagged.
	Where'd they get the authority to do that?
	And that's just the beginning of all of it.
	Well, let's take a look at what is happening in San Francisco.
	Because, you know, as crazy and insane as that place is, it always surprises us what they get into next.
	And so, right now, they've got an election going on.
	They've got the current mayor there, London Breed is her name.
	And I think that's London, I think was the first name.
	Anyway, she last name is Breed.
	I think it was London. Anyway, they had a debate between the candidates.
	And you won't believe what she challenged.
	They were able in this debate.
	They ask the candidates questions, and then they say, okay, each of you now can ask one question of one of the other candidates here on stage.
	And what did the current mayor of San Francisco ask?
	Well, she asked the guy that is closest to her level of support if he could name three drag queens.
	And so then the process starts.
	Can you name three drag queens that you know?
	And I thought, well, you know, we could use the Jeopardy thing, but I think it'd be even more appropriate if we were to use this.
	Can you name three drag queens to become mayor of San Francisco?
	And so we were talking about this, and it's like, oh, I think maybe we could.
	Let's see, we've got Bruce Jinder.
	What was one of the other ones?
	Was that? Oh, yeah, Jager Hoover.
	That was my favorite one. That's the one that Whistler came up with.
	We've got Jager Hoover, we've got Bruce Jinder, and then we could use Rachel Levine, or Dick Levine as I call him.
	There you go, there's your three drag queens.
	Now, they're not local, of course, and one of them is historical, or hysterical, depending on your perspective.
	Sugar Hoover. And this is the actual question.
	I'll play just a little bit of it for you so you see how this plays out in San Francisco.
	This is the important issue.
	Can you name some drag queens to become mayor of San Francisco?
	I'd like to ask Mark a question.
	You were at the...
	Harvey Milk, LGBT Democratic Club, and couldn't name any LGBT advisors to your campaign.
	You were at the debate last week and couldn't name any drag queens on your own.
	I was wondering if you could, this is an opportunity to redeem yourself, and if you could name three LGBTQ advisors for your campaign and three drag queens.
	In San Francisco.
	Now he gets up and he tries to virtue signal.
	Button the coat. We're not going to revise the drag queen question from last week.
	But what I will say is, I'm incredibly proud of the support that I have on our LGBTQ plus community here in the San Francisco community.
	Thanks. Yeah, they love me here.
	And he's got some LGBTQ people on his staff, he goes on to say.
	Unfortunately, he still can't name Jager Hoover.
	So, this is the Democrat Party from the local level to the presidential level.
	Biden and his intelligence community, the intelligence community folks, This is what's scary about the federal government, but of course it could be also encouraging to see just how out of touch these people are with reality.
	But he puts people like Sam Britton, who dresses up in his bondage clothes and has his friends on dog chains and stuff like that, and is stealing women's luggage.
	That's the guy that he puts in charge of nuclear waste.
	And then we have the people who are in charge of intelligence.
	And this is what they're doing for Pride Month.
	They are giving free trans flag manicures.
	Top intelligence agency in the U.S. is celebrating Pride Month by inviting agents to have the transgender flag painted on their nails.
	To participate in a Pride Ally Challenge.
	The Office of the Director of National Intelligence...
	A cabinet-level agency overseeing the rest of the intelligence community.
	I think this is where this Rick Grinnell guy, who has been Trump's DEI pick that he paraded around, and has been going everywhere telling LGBT people that they should be supporting Trump.
	Rick Grinnell, I think, was Trump's DEI pick to run the DNI. D and I run by DEI. My son says, that's how you know who the spies are.
	They're the ones with the tranny flags on their fingernails.
	That's right. So much for cloak and dagger, right?
	The cloak has come off.
	But they do have those dagger nails, and they're painted in tranny colors.
	For nail painting, we will have our pro team of FVEI. Why, rather?
	That's the five I's abbreviation.
	We'll have our pro team of five I artistes.
	They spell that with an E, an extra E in there.
	Who are ready to decorate you, ready for Pride Month, with the option of celebrating pride or trans flag colors.
	If you don't normally paint your nails, or you have never done so, all the better.
	We'll do everything for you, and you just might love it.
	What better way to show your allyship to the community?
	As a matter of fact, show that you are submissive to them.
	Worship them. It's not enough to tolerate.
	You must celebrate, and you must worship them.
	And, of course, it wasn't just Rick Grinnell that Trump had.
	He also had, in his administration, this isn't just Biden, right?
	In the Trump administration, you had, as national security advisor for 22 days, General Flynn, who, when he was appointed by Obama...
	To be the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, when he was in that position in the Obama administration, Flynn, as I've shown you the picture many times, he was pushing Pride Month, and he was pushing Chris Beck.
	Who was the SEAL, who was, you know, for a short period of time, became a woman, as he, in his imagination.
	But, you know, he's now pushed back against it, and said they pressured him into doing it.
	Said it's horrific if they can do that to an adult, to a Navy SEAL, what can they do to kids?
	And that's really the lesson of all this stuff.
	You know, we laugh about how absurd this is.
	We laugh about how these people are so obsessed with With their sexual obsession.
	How can they do their job?
	How can Sam Britton look at nuclear waste when he's scouting out all of the luggage to see if he can steal?
	Oh, I like that dress she's wearing.
	Maybe she's got some good stuff in her luggage.
	I mean, it's comical, but it's incredibly absurd and dangerous at the same time.
	I think it goes to show That, as I said before, national security is about their job security.
	It's about keeping them safe from criminal charges for all the crimes that they're doing with the CIA and the FBI and all the rest of this stuff.
	That's what national security is really about.
	Let's be honest, folks.
	It's not about protecting us.
	There's no difference in the fraud, really, between the CIA and the TSA. The TSA is going to protect us on the planes.
	Oh, really? Yes.
	They said in their own documents, you go back to, was it 2011, 2012, it showed up in a lawsuit.
	They accidentally published the unredacted document for a short period of time, and we saw that they said there are no threats.
	They said that at the same time they were threatening Texas with shutting down all planes going in and out of Texas if they didn't allow them to scan and put their hands on kids and women and adult men.
	Right? Had to do that.
	Why? Well, because they say so.
	Because they're going to shut you down otherwise.
	The TSA is theater.
	And it's not vital to our security.
	And neither is the CIA. Both of them are a threat to us.
	The CIA creating coups and wars that actually endanger us.
	They don't enhance our safety and security.
	They endanger it with all the wars and the assassinations that they do.
	And these are the people that are out there putting this stuff on their nails now?
	The elaborate array of pride celebrations, all of which will occur during work hours.
	They're not essential, are they?
	Yeah, Trump wants to tell us that Main Street small businesses are not essential.
	Let me tell you, the federal bureaucracy is not essential.
	The CIA, the FBI, the law enforcement people, they are not essential.
	And neither of these people are trying to steal everything from us.
	These people want to put tags on all of our cattle.
	These people who want to tell us what appliances we can have, what cars we can drive.
	None of them are essential.
	And they're not constitutional either.
	Mike Waltz, a Republican of Florida, member of the House Select Committee on Intelligence, a combat-decorated Army veteran who fought with the Green Berets, confirmed the authenticity of the document, With the intelligence community.
	So these are the people who are supposed to be keeping America safe.
	They keep us safe just like the TSA keeps us safe.
	The Nails and Crafts event was held with the Pride Employee Resource Group as well as with the 5i liaison offices.
	And they point out, well, you know, the 5i's.
	The U.S., the U.K., Canada, New Zealand, Australia.
	Five English-speaking countries.
	They said, well, maybe that means that they've also pulled in some foreign intelligence agents.
	Here's a shout-out to all you people in those other countries.
	You might want to check out the nails of people around there.
	They might be actually a spy.
	The same event also featured crochet lessons for the Five Eye people on how to crochet a pride flag.
	These are the people that we're supposed to believe are vital to our national security.
	That nail painting event, which took place on June 4th, came just ahead of a talk from guest speaker A.C. Doomleo, who was described as, quote, a transgender, non-binary, first-generation Filipinics, American activist and educator.
	He has a website called Call Me They.
	They call me they. AC will lead a discussion focused on transgender, non-binary, and gender-diverse identities and where we are today with trans rights and with ending discrimination.
	Yeah, I guess he calls himself AC because he's alternating sexuality.
	If only we had Trump, right?
	You know, actually, you know, Trump is no better.
	Trump is... Oh, by the way, AC, one of the things that he puts on his website...
	It's that he is dedicated to providing representation to queer and trans young people.
	Just like Sam Britton, the nuclear guy, who worked with the Trevor Project, he was going to mentor transgender youth.
	This guy wants to do something with transgender youth as well, and it's not mentoring.
	Look, these people hang out with these youth groups because they're groomers.
	But if only we had Trump.
	The real deal, right?
	He would save us from all this stuff.
	Well, we talked about Rick Grinnell.
	We talked about Mike Flynn.
	But Melania Trump will be hosting a second fundraiser for Log Cabin Republicans.
	She got a reward already when she held one of these recently at Mar-a-Lago.
	now they're going to do it at Trump Tower in New York on July 8th.
	She will be the headliner of the event.
	They gave her awards.
	And the last time when Trump was running in 2020, he had LGBT rainbow merchandise that he was selling on his website.
	And Rick Grinnell is, you know, his DEI pick is pushing this stuff everywhere.
	Psalm 144. Thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. And may God bless your new business.
	Guard Goldsmith. Good to see you there.
	London Breed. Yeah, that was her first name.
	I thought it was London. Was a woman who broke her own mask and social distancing mandates.
	To see Tony Tony Tone play a club music show.
	Very classy. Well, that's good, that guard.
	I didn't know that, but yeah.
	Maybe she ate French laundry, too, with Governor Nuisance.
	High Boost says, this is why I have chickens in a garden.
	I learned in 2020 to start prepping.
	Yes. Jason Barker.
	Storable food is only a stopgap.
	It'll run out at some point.
	You have to produce your own.
	That is the way to go.
	As a matter of fact... I don't know if somebody sent this to us.
	I think it was sent to us, but Thomas Massey has put up a video on YouTube.
	This guy's the real deal.
	You know, he's talking about what he's done on his farm and how, you know, you've got to be able to breed your own chickens and all the rest of the stuff so you're not dependent on people on the outside.
	So... The GOP has been taken over, folks.
	It's just another entertainment industry.
	We see this with the Disney franchises.
	Disney has bought out everybody.
	They got so much money. They bought out the Marvel franchise.
	They bought out Star Wars.
	And the GOP has been taken over just like these other entertainment franchises because the GOP is just an entertainment franchise, just like the Democrats.
	Star Wars, by the way, new Star Wars spinoff.
	They call it the Acolyte.
	It's pushing LGBT ideology, but even more so.
	And this new Star Wars thing that is being put out, I think it's being put out on streaming.
	I don't think it is. Yeah, Disney Plus.
	And it's been panned by the public.
	The public gives it 15%.
	And the critics on Rotten Tomato give it 68%.
	So there you go.
	That tells you everything. When you see that kind of a discrepancy there, you know that this is something that is highly politicized and for the left.
	When you see the critics all love it and the audience hates it, 15% of the audience liked it.
	85 didn't.
	So, one of the key aspects of this new acolyte, you have two lesbian witch mothers who conceive twins.
	They're going to use the occultic force, I guess.
	You know, Lucas is always playing around with Buddhism and things like that.
	And, of course, we see this a lot in science fiction, you know, the Dune.
	I remember reading Dune back when I was in college, and I thought the world that he imagined was kind of interesting in the first one.
	But it rapidly moved into this fake imitation of Christianity combined with a cultic witchcraft and all the rest of this stuff.
	And the second one, I lost interest immediately.
	But, you know, this also looks like it's derivative of Dune as well.
	You know, these witch mothers conceiving twins and all the rest of this stuff.
	As they promote it on the Disney website...
	They say, quote, the power to create life via the direct manipulation of the force.
	And remember, you know, I don't know, it's kind of halfway a joke, but maybe it's not a joke so much.
	You had a lot of people in the UK listed their religion.
	You know, they would send out these things and say, you know, what is your religion?
	Are you Christian? Are you Islamic?
	Are you atheist or whatever, Buddhist?
	They had a lot of people who listed Star Wars as their religion.
	Maybe if they were to do this again, maybe they could have public health as their religion.
	People like Fauci and others.
	The acolyte creator is a woman named Leslie Headland.
	Not headband, but Headland.
	She said, this is something like my parents would have allowed me to see when I was younger as a queer person that I would have been able to understand as a queer person.
	Headland insisted that had such a program existed in her youth, she would have had a completely different life.
	So just imagine this.
	Imagine an alternative universe where this woman never went into film and she never inflicted us.
	With the kind of garbage that's being put out by Kathleen Kennedy.
	That's something to think about right there.
	It's like if she would have had a completely different life, we might not have had to be vexed with the films that she's polluting our culture with.
	And so the real two lesbian witches that are...
	There is a reality to this.
	The lesbian witches that you see in the film...
	Maybe fictional. But there are two lesbian witches who put this thing together and gave birth to this series.
	They used the Star Wars force to do it.
	And that's Kathleen Kennedy and Headland.
	They are the two lesbian witches putting this thing together.
	Meanwhile, at the G7, we had Biden pushing abortion for all.
	And he was opposed this time.
	They got that through last time.
	But this time he was opposed by Italy's Prime Minister, Georgia Maloney.
	Last I saw, she was caving big time on protecting the border, protecting people from immigration.
	That was one of the big issues, as it is with most of these people.
	Most of the time, what they do, once they get into office, they just cave.
	But on this issue, she is hanging tough.
	Biden was bent on pushing his social agenda, stymied, though, by Maloney's actions, including her description of Biden's efforts to push these ideologies for political reasons as, quote, profoundly wrong.
	She said, I believe it is profoundly wrong in difficult times like these to campaign using a precious forum like the G7. Well, again, I'm against abortion.
	I'm also against these wars that they're pushing, though.
	You know, these are profoundly difficult times because it's okay to push the Ukraine war, but let's not push abortion.
	I don't...
	I'm again killing as...
	As you had Sergeant York say in the movie.
	The Bible's again killing, and I'm again killing, whether you're doing it with the Ukrainian war or with abortion.
	But of course, Biden is all about doing it everywhere.
	Such a commitment was in last year's statement that came out of the meetings in Japan.
	It affirmed a commitment to, quote, achieving comprehensive sexual and reproductive health and rights for all.
	Right?
	Right? Sell it to you over the counter, sell it to you via mail.
	No, you should have, if you cared about the health of the women, you would not allow them to have this abortion pill without having some medical exam first to see if the baby is too large or what their overall condition is.
	That statement, however, was dropped from this year's statement, mainly because of the opposition of Maloney.
	They mentioned only support for universal access to adequate, affordable, and quality health services.
	But in Poland, things have changed because Poland, which used to be a conservative, nationalistic government, has now been taken over by leftist liberals.
	Polish health minister there announced at a Monday press conference that a medical facility had been fined due to non-compliance with new abortion regulations implemented by the left liberal government.
	There will be no exceptions for doctors who say that they have a conscious objection to this.
	As a matter of fact, they hit this hospital with a massive fine, €125,000, which is about $134,000, and they could hit these hospitals They have a contract with the government, so they can hit them with as much as 2% of the contract's value,
	or they can just abruptly terminate the contract, which is exactly what Biden was doing during the so-called pandemic in CMS. I was like, okay, we bribed you to create this pandemic, to identify people as this, and we gave you all kinds of financial rewards, to identify people as being a COVID patient.
	Not only are we going to take all that away, but we're going to take away all of your Medicare and Medicaid business.
	You will be out of business.
	Same approach.
	It's always the money, folks.
	Somewhere I heard, follow the money.
	Follow the money, Jerry.
	Show me the money. Yeah, that's what it is.
	It's just like the Trump vibes or the Biden blackmail.
	That's what they're doing to take away doctors' conscientious objections to doing abortions.
	They said, you will do it.
	They were playing the thing where they said, well, we can't, I'm not going to be here, whatever they called them on that.
	Before we run out of time, thank you, Scott Helmer.
	Scott, I've got to get your, when you mentioned that song that you had, I'm going to get that and play it.
	I keep forgetting to do it. Thank you for the tip.
	He says, all government and authority is slavery.
	Everything else is just a symptom of that.
	Yeah. Guard Goldsmith.
	Wouldn't that trans guy better phrase it, call us they, not call me they?
	Who knows? We're beyond rules for anything, including language.
	Thank you, everyone, and thank you for the support.
	Have a good day. The Common Man They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening. Thank you for sharing.

▲