Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 20, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:01:35

The David Knight Show - 06/20/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	At the clock strikes 13, it's Thursday the 20th of June, Year of Our Lord 2024.
	Well, today we're going to begin with Fauci's rehabilitation tour again.
	He's going other places and talking about how many people died because they didn't follow his advice to get vaccinated.
	Well, we're going to show you some clips of some of the people.
	Who succumbed to the coercion.
	And we're going to talk about how Scientific American has now trained its sites on homeschooling.
	And they want, this is something new that we've done.
	So even though they admit homeschooling is working better, they want federal oversight.
	Why would that be? And we have the Ten Commandments coming up in Louisiana, mandated for that.
	Is that a good thing? Is that a bad thing?
	What is it? What should be the involvement of government and education?
	And of course, we're going to take a look at some of these Stonehenge idiots that are coming up to the big...
	We have two religions in conflict.
	This is not like Islam and Christianity.
	This is paganism and the green agenda.
	We'll be right back.
	There are a lot of families now that are demanding that the government come after Boeing for the biggest fine possible against a corporation, $24 billion.
	I didn't know that there was a maximum fine that you could add to a company.
	I don't know why they would clip it at $24 billion.
	I guess that lets Pfizer and these other people get away scot-free, really.
	But they said this is the deadliest corporate crime in US history.
	Is it? We've had, what, two crashes?
	I'm not minimizing it.
	I'm just saying, in terms of the way Fauci presents the vaccine, I've said this many times, Fauci would have said, it's rare, right?
	We got 8,200 flights here, and only two of them crashed.
	Yeah, okay, killed everybody on board.
	You know, you got 500 or 600 people.
	So what, he would say, right?
	So what? They really don't care.
	We've got far more than 500 or 600 people who have died from these Trump shots.
	Nothing is being done about it.
	It's amazing how captive the government is in so many different agencies.
	You've got the FAA out there, which is doing what you would expect in a sense.
	I mean, they haven't really taken action.
	They grounded the planes and they stopped it.
	And Boeing has continued to have problems.
	And yet... They have taken some action, unlike the FDA, because the vaccine industry has got ties to not just the FDA. They don't just own the FDA. They own the CDC. They own the NIH, all of HHS, pretty much.
	It's just amazing to see how the government has covered up for this stuff.
	And it's amazing to see that not only have they covered up for it, But the Republicans in Congress have not even reduced the budget of these criminal bureaucracies that don't have any constitutional authority to even exist.
	Families that lost loved ones on the two Boeing 737 MAX crashes.
	Again, two out of 8,200 flights.
	I mean, you know, far more rare than the vaccine industries.
	That that's that are there.
	They've asked the Justice Department to find the company a maximum of $24 billion.
	I find it strange that they are not suing for compensation.
	Personally, I think that they could probably hurt Boeing far more if they went after individual lawsuits.
	I mean, look at the lawsuits against Glyphosate, Monsanto, which were bought by Bayer.
	If you look at those lawsuits, I think that comes to a lot more.
	This is just a criminal fine.
	They said the appropriate action now is an aggressive criminal prosecution.
	Yes, that would be the appropriate action for the vaccines, wouldn't it?
	Because time is of the essence to avoid any statute of limitations from running out.
	The department should begin these prosecutions promptly.
	Now... These are things that happened, these two crashes.
	One of them happened in 2018, the other one in 2019.
	So we're talking about something that only precedes the kill shots from Trump by two or three years.
	So are we starting to reach a statute of limitations for this stuff?
	You know, James Clapper never had to answer for perjury that he committed in Congress.
	Yeah, he testified in Congress.
	He didn't stand him up.
	Bannon is going to jail, perhaps for four months.
	Frankly, I don't care.
	He deserves it.
	It was done out of his arrogance, out of his self-promotion, and all he had to do was show up and take the fifth.
	But he's too arrogant to do that.
	But it is unequal justice.
	They didn't do it to Hunter Biden.
	Hunter Biden did the same thing.
	Hunter Biden held a press conference.
	No charges against him.
	No jail time for him either.
	So there's both of these aspects involved in that.
	But still, when you look at the FDA, comparing it to the FAA, and don't forget the connections not just between the NIH and the CDC and HHS, But it's also the Department of Defense heavily involved in all of this MRNA stuff because this was democide.
	You know, these people are at war with us, not just with Ukraine.
	They're at war with us.
	But as we look at Boeing, this company has had one failure after the other.
	Not only are they constantly having problems with their planes, but the Starliner, you know, when you look at this stuff, and many times that was delayed over and over and over again.
	As a matter of fact, it was delayed for years, and then as they got to the point of launching, oh, it's got a leak, let's delay it another couple of weeks or whatever.
	Finally, they launched it, and I looked at this and I thought, man, these people, these two astronauts who are going up on this thing, This is like a suicide mission.
	Well, they launched it, and as they launched it, more leaks developed.
	They've made it up to the International Space Station, and now even more leaks have developed.
	They have been delaying and delaying and delaying, returning.
	After years of delays and technical problems, Boeing's Starliner finally made it to the International Space Station.
	NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sonny Williams on board last week, but when it'll exactly be able to undock and bring the two back to Earth remains to be seen.
	Teams have discovered an astonishing five different helium leaks so far.
	They said it represents another thorn in the spacecraft's already cursed development.
	Cursed development, anyway.
	It's going to be at least another week, they're saying.
	This is...
	They just keep pushing it out.
	I thought it was kind of funny on Futurism, they...
	I talked about, well, how did we get here?
	And they said, well, here's the whole story.
	Spelled at H-O-L-E. Last month, officials discovered the first helium leak, which was later underplayed by officials and determined not to be severe enough to delay the journey to the ISS. But on its way up, the capsule sprang even more helium leaks, even docking procedures didn't initially go as planned, with Boeing calling off its first attempt Due to a reaction control thrusters malfunction.
	So, you know, still a lot that's not known.
	But are they going to make it back?
	Well, we don't know. But the failures of Boeing are well reported.
	But, you know, the pharmaceutical industry, Pfizer and Moderna, is anybody getting kicked off of social media?
	Are they getting punished for speaking out against Boeing?
	No. But the far worse jabs you are.
	Because, you see, the jabs are not simply sloppy work like the Boeing stuff.
	It is deliberate.
	You know, you don't have people who are deliberately engineering these leaks on the space station or deliberately messing up the planes to make them crash.
	But I believe that these vaccine things, it was not negligence.
	It was criminal intent.
	It was malice.
	And the malice has spread throughout all of our institutions.
	Well, you talk about Gramsci and these Marxists who said we've got to have this long march through the institution.
	They certainly did it with the pharmaceutical stuff, didn't they?
	They marched through every institution.
	Censorship and the rest of this stuff.
	And so now you've got Fauci, as I pointed out.
	Yes, he went on Stephen Colbert.
	What a disgusting display of that court jester trying to, you know, help Fauci.
	And again, Fauci admitting to the crimes, but he would exaggerate them and laugh about them.
	Oh, yeah, they say I got a billion dollars.
	Well, actually, you got 710 million.
	Somebody did. Royalties.
	You're not telling people who got those royalties.
	And you made more money, about twice as much money, as your salary is supposed to be legally capped at.
	And all of your supervisors, a chain of people above you, all had their salaries capped to that of the vice president, but you made more money than the president.
	It's just amazing to see all this stuff.
	And it continued on Morning Joe.
	As one of the clowns there was talking to, helping to try to rehabilitate this unrepentant, bold-faced liar, Fauci, said, we now head into a moment where, because of divisiveness, this has all become a political issue.
	You have not just Donald Trump, but other Republicans saying, no, no, don't take these vaccines.
	Has that changed? Has Trump changed like Alex Jones?
	Last I saw, you know, he went from promoting them, the proud father of the vaccine, to just finally shutting up.
	As people kept telling him, you know, this is going to destroy you.
	You better stop talking about this.
	But he was just so proud of his accomplishment.
	He couldn't stop talking about it.
	So maybe he stopped talking about it, but I haven't seen any pictures of him boosting or telling people not to take the vaccine.
	Maybe I missed that.
	Anyway, what Fauci said was, it's astonishing to me that so many people, by political ideology, will make a decision that will actually endanger their lives.
	Yeah, you know who did that?
	The Democrats. You know who did that?
	The people who followed Trump. We're good to go.
	Is that you have people like the Morning Joe mainstream media.
	That you have people like Fauci who would make a decision to endanger other people's lives for his political power.
	Isn't that amazing? You stop and think about the wrath that this guy has stored up on his head.
	All the lives that he has destroyed.
	Whether he's killed people or injured them.
	It truly is amazing that he would kill and maim millions of people and have absolutely no remorse.
	And that Trump would aid him in this.
	And that Biden would aid him in this.
	And that Trump and Biden are the two selections that they have given people to vote for.
	And that the people would...
	Many of them, left and right now, would go to a civil war to support one or the other of these mass murderers against the other one.
	You know, if Stalin and Hitler were on the ballot, I wouldn't care to vote, and I don't care to vote for these guys.
	They've killed their own people.
	They've killed people around the world.
	There's absolutely no way that I would ever support Benedict Donald or Joe Biden after what they have done to people.
	Daily Skeptic says, be quiet, don't mention the vaccine.
	They're looking at it in their country, in the UK. They've got an election coming up.
	And it's something that nobody wants to talk about, just like the Republican congressmen and senators don't want to talk about the vaccines or lockdowns.
	They don't want to do anything about it.
	If the Democrats talk about it, they brag about it.
	Oh, we should have done more of it.
	They said, here's a daily skeptic, Dr.
	David Livermore, says none of our political parties care to talk about lockdowns.
	This is in the U.K., Same thing applies in the United States.
	None of them remind us how fervently they supported masks or social distancing or the rule of six.
	I like that. That's the term that they use in the UK, the rule of six.
	It harkens back to me, to the prisoner.
	You are number six.
	I'm not a number. I'm a free man, you know?
	It's like six for two when he ran.
	So the rule of six for two people, you gotta stay apart.
	That was one of the episodes when he ran for number two in the village.
	Because we're not told who number one is until the very end.
	The Tories don't wish to remember how stringently they enforced futile strictures.
	Labor and the Scottish National Party don't care to recall how they demanded greater restrictions.
	That's our Democrats.
	You could be fined 6,400 pounds for persistently not wearing a mask on a train.
	Or 10,000 pounds for a birthday party.
	Do you remember? Oh yes, I do remember reporting that.
	And of course we had Matt Hancock who was putting together this nonsense garbage and talking about how people who came back into the country had to be quarantined for a certain amount of time.
	And we got the texts eventually where he was laughing with his other co-tyrants about, imagine what these people are going through.
	Imagine the looks on their faces and so forth.
	Laughing and mocking the victims of his tyranny while he was having an adulterous affair in violation of his own rules.
	What hypocrites, liars, cynical criminals these people are.
	It's becoming hard to find anyone who still thinks that lockdowns were wise.
	Except for Donald Trump.
	Because his only criticism of Fauci is that Fauci didn't do it soon enough or do enough in terms of lockdowns.
	I did better than Fauci on that.
	You notice that, right?
	He's afraid to criticize, even criticize Fauci.
	But he'll do that one thing.
	Talk about how. He was stricter than Fauci.
	Because Trump is a Democrat.
	It's the Democrats who say we should have done more.
	The Republicans are just kind of...
	I hope nobody remembers that I did this stuff.
	I hope nobody remembers that I just quietly sat there while other people did it.
	But the Democrats and Trump brag about it.
	I did more even than Fauci wanted when it came to lockdowns.
	The impact... On educations, on mental health, on livelihoods, on the work ethic, on health care.
	What has happened with inflation that has impoverished us and driven interest rates higher?
	Taxpayers on the hook for the tab of the stimulus and the corrupt PPP, where they told us it was raining.
	They were really PPPing down our back.
	Yeah, the raised taxes will be there to cover the debt interest, not better public services.
	And it'll be there to cover war and all the rest of this stuff.
	Now comes the general election in the UK, and this is going to happen sooner than ours.
	But no candidate in Britain hails the vaccines or the rollouts.
	You know, it's interesting. Not even Biden is bragging about the vaccines.
	Trump has stopped bragging about it.
	Biden's not bragging about it.
	Not bragging about the lockdowns and the vaccines.
	Isn't that interesting? They know what they did.
	They're running from their record, hoping that they can be silent and escape the reckoning.
	So you'd think it'd highlight what three years ago was hailed as a world-beating success.
	And then, again, Trump bragged about it for another three years.
	And then we recently had Robert Redfield, who was Trump's CDC guy, as I reported yesterday.
	He said, when you give an mRNA vaccine, I don't know how much spike protein you make because I give you mRNA and then your body goes and makes it.
	You may make it for a week. You may make it for a month.
	You may make it for years. You may never stop making it, which is what I said from the very beginning when they described how this stupid thing was designed to work.
	I said, where's the off switch?
	Dr. Peter McCullough has got a study.
	He thinks they may have found something that will switch it off, but it's not being switched off.
	Do you think Robert Redfield knew this?
	This guy who is a virologist?
	This guy who's a head of the CDC? I knew it.
	He knew it. And now he's talking about what?
	A criminal. We'll talk about his crimes and his background when we get to the pandemic stuff.
	And who he's making money with by pushing this bird flu stuff.
	Just another Fauci. Just another Fauci working for Trump.
	So, I knew this stuff even before they created it.
	As soon as they were describing the mechanism of what they were going to do, it was like, well, how did they ever stop this thing?
	It made absolutely no sense.
	So, as Fauci has Morning Joe and Stephen Colbert and all these people running cover for him now, Let's understand that Fauci's crimes go way back before this.
	They go way back to 1986.
	Because it was Fauci who gave the vaccine companies legal immunity to do this.
	Look at this.
	This child.
	Nothing but bones.
	Tube up the child's nose.
	Can't do anything but just shakes.
	The person who put this up, Jessica Rojas, says this is vaccine injury.
	Don't look away. Don't pretend it doesn't exist.
	Don't claim that it is one in a million.
	Don't say that it's for the greater good.
	Imagine if that was your baby.
	Yeah, just like these people. Does it make them feel any better that their relative is one of only 500 people who died?
	They were only on one of two planes that crashed when 8,198 other planes did not crash.
	Does that make them feel any better?
	This all started for this young child.
	I'll play that again while I describe this here.
	This all started shortly after his one-year-old vaccines.
	He started to seize. His seizures were intractable.
	He did not respond to any medication.
	He was on 11 different medications initially.
	And his seizures were continuous.
	They never stopped. The specialists believe that the epileptic encephalopathy played a part in his severe brain atrophy.
	Nothing else to explain what has been found so far.
	His brain has shrunk significantly.
	Some parts of his cerebellum responsible for movement and coordination are completely gone.
	The parts that are gone have been replaced with fluid. Now when you look at a child that is shaking like that with uncontrollable seizures, that was why you know I covered a couple of times.
	I had him on. David Simpson, who was a state representative in Texas.
	God bless him. He pushed back against this insane war on drugs.
	Which is a war on us.
	It's a war of drugs on us.
	It's a war of the CIA and the pharmaceutical industries and all these people who collaborated with the dark winter stuff.
	It's a war on us.
	And he said he had several children in his district.
	The parents came to him and said, we can't stop these tremors that our kids have unless we use, the only thing we found that works is medical marijuana.
	But they want to put us in jail.
	And David Simpson got that exemption.
	Even though medical marijuana is still not recognized in Texas.
	It is for that particular circumstance.
	That's a child who didn't get the medical marijuana.
	And it's been going on for years and it's destroyed his brain.
	So, these children can thank Fauci for this.
	Fauci for protecting the pharmaceutical companies.
	And that's a big part of what the war on drugs is really about.
	We have an attorney, Aaron Seary, who was put up by The New American.
	He says the recommended vaccine doses for infants have surged from three when Fauci took office.
	Guess what it is now? I reported the other day, 72.
	With all the boosters and everything they want with COVID and new vaccines that they've added to the schedule, it's up to 90.
	It went from three vaccines for infants to 90 in the 37 years that Fauci has been there at the NIAID. They are making billions of dollars every year on selling vaccines.
	That's not enough to cover the harms that are made by these products?
	Oh, well then that's very, very troubling.
	Think of every other product that can survive out there that can cause harm.
	Think about literally every other product that are far more dangerous.
	Nobody will come to you and say, hey, listen, chainsaws are safe, right?
	No, but they'll tell you vaccines are safe.
	But the vaccines need the immunity and the chainsaws don't?
	Do you see what I'm saying?
	It doesn't make any sense.
	For better or worse, we have a system in capitalism in which we define the benefits of society in dollars.
	That's the way we do it. And so if you are causing more harm in dollars than you are benefit in what you can sell, then your product's not deemed fit or make a better product, make a safer product.
	There's no reason that pharmaceutical companies can't be held to that same exact standard as every other product out there.
	Absolutely right. Comments here.
	Nancy Chambers, fines for big corporations are just considered as license fees to them.
	That's absolutely right. Hey, look at the big banks like HSBC or J.P. Morgan.
	How many times have they been given multi-billion dollar fines?
	They don't care. It's nothing. Look at how much money they already made.
	They don't care about that at all.
	It's not a deterrent to them whatsoever.
	It's not even a deterrent tens of billions of dollars in civil lawsuits.
	Those lawsuits had already been filed against Monsanto for glyphosate, for Roundup.
	And Bayer looked at it and said, oh, we'll buy you.
	You know, we'll buy that corporation.
	No problem. They didn't care.
	Ha ha ha. They just assumed all those lawsuits.
	We'll beat them in court or we'll pay them.
	It doesn't matter. We'll make even more money than that.
	Michelle Obama, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. And Giza Power Plant says, vaccine passports, never forget.
	That's right. Biden is not bragging about anything because he can't even form a sentence, says Chevkin 321.
	Well, there is...
	It's not just the childhood vaccines.
	Those are bad enough. And that's been going on for 37 years as Fauci's going around.
	Yeah, I was there for almost 40 years.
	Nobody asked him about the vaccines that are harming people and how they have legal immunity and how it's gone from 3 to 90 now.
	And then we get to the people who are injured by this latest one.
	The people who are injured by the Trump shot.
	Thank you for hearing my support testimony for HB390. I wish to have the Lord allow me to impact souls with my words.
	I was a father, a husband, a pharmacist.
	A healthy person prior to being coerced into receiving the COVID vaccine.
	I understood that attending my daughter's volleyball game would require the vaccine.
	As a doctor of pharmacy, I had negative opinions about COVID prevention.
	I would never have taken the vaccine voluntarily.
	Well, there you go.
	We didn't mandate anybody to do it.
	The cynical attitude of these people.
	We didn't mandate anybody.
	No, we coerced them. We twisted their arm.
	We created two classes of people, as Jabsinda in New Zealand said.
	Yeah, yeah, that's it.
	Yeah, yeah, that's what it is. Mike Yoha suffers from Guillain-Barre syndrome.
	And by the way, this is not just limited to the COVID-vax.
	This has been going on for a very long time, going back 50 years to that swine flu vaccine, Guillain-Barre.
	And it's been there in all these vaccines since.
	As my liberty was violated, he eventually gets his testimony goes on for five minutes.
	He said, The solution to this isn't going to come from these politicians,
	the Republicans who are hanging out in the shadows, not saying anything, hoping that this goes away, that people forget.
	It's not going to come from the Democrats who are proud of it and wish they could have done it even harder on us.
	Or other people who are, you know, now on the Republican side, like Alan Dershowitz, who have always been Democrats.
	Oh yeah, I would have the police come to your door and drag you out and stick the needle in your arm, and I'd defend that at the Supreme Court and I'd win, that type of person.
	We have to get rid of this radical Model State Health Emergency Powers Act.
	And Jay and Jessica here in Tennessee...
	I heard me talking about this. They contacted their representative and said, hey, you know, what information can we put together for some of this stuff?
	And let's come up with a sample of this.
	I went through and I think I'm going to, well, I know I'm going to put up something this weekend on Substack and give Tennessee as an example.
	The different things that I found, found some of the bills that they enacted in 2002 as this legislation was sent out.
	And it won't just be of interest to people in Tennessee.
	You need to, first of all, I'll put up a link to the actual model legislation that was put out at the end of 2001, two months after 9-11 and the anthrax attack, four months after the dark winter thing.
	I'll put up a link to that so that you can see it.
	But the way you can find this stuff is look for your state and look for this model, the State Health Emergency Powers Act.
	If you can't remember the order of those words, I never can remember which order they put them in.
	You know, just the search engines will find it if you put all those words in there.
	They'll put them in the proper order.
	And it'll direct you to state bills if you put in your state.
	And so you'll be able to find these things.
	Actually identify the bills and then start talking to some state legislators and say, this is what needs to be nullified.
	And in addition to removing this thing, pulling it out by the roots, going back to the roots of all of this.
	Because it was a radical change.
	And we've got to have a radical change.
	We've got to rip this out by the roots.
	And so, you know, take this to your state representatives.
	Take it to local communities.
	Especially if you live in a state where you have home rule.
	Where it's allowed for, where you don't have the state having preeminence, ultimate preeminence over the local ones.
	But if you can get some resolutions, anything that you can do at the local or state level to get rid of this stuff.
	And then also do something positive.
	Start to work with some state and local people to get a bill of rights.
	And we could go back to what Benjamin Rush wanted to put into the Constitution.
	He wanted to have something there to respect medical freedom and to push back against this medical community that would establish a monopoly.
	And so we need to do two things.
	We need to rip out this cancer that was put in there as part of the 9-11 false frag.
	You know, this COVID thing was the other shoe to drop from 9-11.
	I'm absolutely convinced of that.
	And so we need to rip that out, and we need to replace it with something positive.
	And we need some kind of a Bill of Rights.
	Here is Eric Clapton, who was injured.
	He took the first one, he had really bad symptoms, and he took the second one, and it was incredibly bad.
	He has been attacked by the media.
	You don't see him on with Stephen Colbert or the Morning Joe show to find out what happened to him.
	They pretend that he doesn't exist.
	They pretend that people I just showed you don't exist.
	The vaccine took my immune system and just shook it around again.
	And that's still going on.
	And then I read, you know, a lot of the evidence that I had been reading about with people that were having adverse reaction.
	That was on the list, was, you know, damage to the immune system.
	Do you feel like you were made aware of those risks beforehand?
	Oh, God, no. I lost the use of my hands for about three weeks.
	Eric Clapton. I thought I was in real trouble.
	And about that point, I was invited by Robin Minotti to talk about it.
	And it was easy to say yes, because I realized that I'm definitely, by then I realized I wasn't the only one that was suffering.
	And that's my experience from having had the second jab.
	But now I've stopped watching TV. One of the cartoons was a little drawing of a guy interviewing two Quakers and saying, how come none of your company has got COVID? And they said, well, we don't watch TV. So true, man. So much of the sickness is in our heads now.
	And I experience it.
	When you get caught in the trap, well, can you believe what your heart tells you is right?
	Or is it going against the narrative?
	Can I talk about how I feel to my family?
	Man, it's...
	It doesn't get riskier than that.
	When I made that little statement, I was pleased to see that it went around without too much flack.
	I did get some flack from the people I least wanted to get flack from that.
	My fear about vaccination is what will it do to my children?
	Part of the reason, maybe the biggest part of the reason why I'm talking here today with you, to talk to my daughters about they may not be able to have kids.
	They don't probably care. You know, at that point in time in your life, it's not an issue.
	Yeah, that's one of the risks I take by doing this, is that, you know, they're going to look at me like, why don't you just keep your...
	But the vaccine...
	Yeah. Oh, you get the idea.
	And then this was sent to me by a listener.
	He said, I got this article in the mail two days ago.
	At the same time, I was told about a family member.
	Strange timing sometimes.
	Here's the article. Younger adults confronting colorectal cancer surge.
	Yeah, we're seeing a massive increase in surges.
	And of course, I reported this.
	I remember reporting Dr.
	Ryan Cole, a pathologist, who in the spring of 2020 was saying, people that I've been looking at who've been vaccinated.
	He said, one of the things that I've seen There's a tremendous decrease in the number of killer T-cells, which is your body's defense against cancer.
	We all have cancer at one level or the other.
	If they want to get everybody in chemotherapy, all they have to do is just give us a PCR test for that.
	They'll find it. The difference is you don't get sick with something just because it's in your body because you have an immune system.
	If whatever it is overwhelms your immune system, then you show signs of sickness or illness.
	But what he was saying is we're going to have a tremendous number of cancer cases, and it'll go faster because of the loss of killer T-cells.
	And he said that in the spring of not 2020, in the spring of 2021.
	And so this listener says a family member, so he just got that, just got this article, received this, and he said, and then a family member at the same time was just diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer, out of the blue.
	Went to multiple hospitals the past few months and no results until she went to the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
	She was diligent in taking every COVID and maybe flu vaccine for the past few years.
	Her heart now shows 40% activity as well.
	No symptoms or history prior to the pandemic.
	Now been given weeks or months to live.
	Going back home soon to be put on hospice.
	That is what we're seeing everywhere.
	And yet, we have Fauci preening on all of these shows.
	And we have Biden and Trump attacking each other in this wrestling match to get everybody distracted from what was done to us four years ago by these two guys.
	It's absolutely amazing.
	I'll play one more for you.
	This is a young girl who died.
	Aubren Shea Grundy.
	This is her vaccine injury.
	Only one in their household got vaxxed.
	This 17-year-old girl got vaxxed so she could take a field trip from Michigan to New York with her school.
	She got vaxxed just before leaving.
	Came down very sick on the trip.
	Family drove from Michigan to New York.
	Got her into the hospital.
	She died about two weeks later.
	Absolutely amazing. Again, just as you saw from the pharmacist, he wanted to go to his daughter's volleyball game.
	She wanted to take the trip.
	And of course, Fauci would say, yeah, but none of these other kids died that were on this trip.
	So no problem, right?
	Not unless it's your child.
	And not unless it is unsafe, which is what this is.
	Well, in light of all that, I just can't express my contempt for people like Alex Jones telling people it was sugar water or people like Stephen Colbert.
	Yeah. Yeah, I hope you got all the money that you wanted, pal.
	I hope you got that. Well, Trump, says Fauci, got the hydroxychloroquine idea from Laura Ingraham on Fox News.
	No. No.
	She got it from Zelenko.
	Remember the doctor who was in an ultra-Orthodox community?
	He said, well, let me think about this.
	You know, hydroxychloroquine and zinc and everything.
	Hey, it works! And the community leaders came after him in that small, knit community.
	They even came after him.
	But he did it anyway, and he publicized it.
	And then we found ivermectin, which seemed to be even better.
	Trump discredited both of those by talking about it, and then, you know, as a clown, you know, oh, well, you know, we could inject sunlight, or we could take hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, you know, just laying it out there to be mocked by Fauci.
	And, of course, Fauci and the rest of them Punishing anybody who would fill a prescription for that.
	Any doctors who would prescribe it.
	Trump never stood in the gap for them.
	Never stood in the gap for freedom of choice.
	Don't talk to me about the fact that Trump wouldn't mandate this stuff.
	You know, it's...
	He had the mandate in for the military.
	And, you know, as Jason Barker pointed out, the order was there.
	It was going to happen as soon as they gave it the rubber stamp.
	And I said, they're going to rubber stamp it in September, because that's when school starts.
	That's when they're going to do it. But he had already signed that order himself, Trump had.
	But the idea that he would not support people's choice for these medicines, he could have actually even manufactured these things.
	But he didn't even protect the people who were trying to exercise their own free choice out of this.
	Fauci said, I felt very uncomfortable when Trump was saying it's going to disappear like magic.
	And yet, Fauci said COVID was going to disappear like magic if everybody took the shot.
	Remember that? Remember when he kept talking about the herd immunity and we've got to get up to a certain percentage?
	And then they got up to that percentage and he shut up.
	Stopped talking about that.
	And then everybody said, wait, everybody's still getting the same, you know, still getting cold and flu and still blowing positive PCR tests?
	He says, I wasn't happy about criticizing the president or disagreeing with the president.
	But then he did. And so the question is, why didn't Trump ever criticize Fauci?
	Why didn't he ever disagree with Fauci?
	Finally, Mike B. sent this.
	He says, in honor of Fauci's tour and his new book, you know, he wrote this new book, On Call, A Doctor's Journey in Public Service.
	He changed it.
	On The Take, A Con Man's Career in Pharmacide.
	That's exactly what this is all about.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and yesterday I played a new song that we had, and I said, can anybody identify where this is from?
	It's John Williams, of course.
	We had some audio problems with it.
	We removed that out of the full show, but nobody could hear the music.
	So we'll put that out there today and see if anybody recognizes where this music came from.
	Of course, you're going to recognize Yellowstone.
	We'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	¶¶
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Yes, I'm curious if anybody can recognize that.
	By the way, for all the copyright trolls out there trying to get the show taken down, that is my performance of it.
	So go pound sand.
	Anyway, this is a comment from A. Wootz.
	Thank you for the tip. It says, in an interview before his death on Infowars, Zelenko in correspondence with Trump said Trump made a political decision to go with a vaccine.
	Zelenko was disgusted.
	Yes. And Alex made a political decision to go with Trump.
	He made a financial decision to go with Trump.
	And I was disgusted as well.
	Anyway, let's talk about what's going on with the pandemic.
	German doctor has been sentenced to over two years in jail for issuing mask and COVID shot exemptions for actually practicing medicine.
	How in the world does a government bureaucracy get a chance to do that?
	Well, of course, in Germany, they don't care much for freedom.
	We got here in Tennessee a family of German Christian family of homeschoolers who escaped Germany, got political asylum here, but the Biden administration wanted to send them back.
	Because that's what Biden does.
	Biden is not so much focused on Trump and Biden and Bannon and all these other people, folks.
	He's focused on us.
	He's coming after the people with the FACE Act, like nobody else has done before, sending people to prison for the rest of their lives, elderly people who will die in prison.
	He's coming after now whistleblowers.
	It's not just the doctor that I talked about the other day who blew the whistle on a hospital that was committing fraud and violating Texas law and doing transgender mutilation of children.
	Now the feds, Biden's administration, the Biden administration, wants to...
	Give him 10 years in jail and $250,000 fine, I think it is, and now they've shown up at the door of a nurse.
	We're going to show that in a minute, and I'll give you the backstory of what happened with that nurse that caused her to do that.
	They're after everybody at the individual level.
	Doing raids on a homeschooling father who has a bunch of kids coming in with guns drawn.
	They didn't do that to Trump at Mar-a-Lago.
	Trump wasn't even there.
	All these people, all these conservative alternative media, all they care about is Trump.
	They don't care about you.
	And folks, Trump is not between you and these criminals known as the Biden regime, whoever is in charge.
	It certainly isn't that idiot who's up there.
	But whoever is in charge.
	You know, it's a cartel. It's a gang.
	Just like there's a Trump gang, there's a Biden gang.
	And they don't care at all about you.
	And I don't care about Bannon.
	Like I said before, if he wasn't such an arrogant grifter, he would have just shown up and said, you know, pleaded the fifth.
	But he had to be a big man.
	So now you're going to go to jail and have some time to think about it.
	And I really don't care.
	He's a shill. He's a crook.
	And he's just like Trump.
	He's just like Alex Jones.
	It's amazing. He's out there threatening people.
	You're going to pay. You want to fight?
	You got one, type of stuff.
	I mean, he's doing all of the lines of Alex Posovia.
	Somebody sent me a video of Alex and Posovia that was on Twitter.
	It's about a minute long. And...
	And Alex is there, and Posobiec beats him to doing his own lines.
	I mean, it's become a stereotype model.
	And so, you know, the whole thing is to go out there and to stir people up for a civil war, isn't it?
	And both sides, both of these gangs, the Trump gang and the Biden gang, both of them want a civil war.
	Are you stupid enough to follow these people?
	Come on. That's the reason to talk about this stuff.
	Don't follow them. But anyway, getting back to Germany.
	So Bannon's going to go to jail for four months for crimes that he did.
	Okay? That he didn't have to do it that way.
	Again, unequal prosecution.
	Justice is not blind as it should be.
	But still, he did it.
	But here's a doctor.
	Two years in jail.
	She's not going to be able to practice medicine.
	She's 67 now. They're going to block her from practicing medicine for three years.
	So probably she'll have forced retirement because the government controls the health care system there.
	She's going to be issued a $50,000 fine.
	Why? Because she gave people exemptions from the COVID jab.
	She practiced medicine.
	These other people are practicing tyranny.
	Dresden, Germany. A German doctor has been sentenced two years and eight months, almost three years, in jail for issuing mask and COVID shot exemptions.
	The 67-year-old doctor, three years, $50,000 fine.
	She wrote about 1,000 exemptions for this stuff.
	And she wrote exemptions also to exempt the patients from wearing the mask.
	As well as getting the experimental jabs.
	And she did that between 2021 and 2022.
	And so, the question is, isn't that interesting?
	You know, as I say all the time, I always point this out.
	Every country on Earth doing exactly the same thing at exactly the same time.
	And we had a pandemic declared everywhere at exactly the same time.
	Even though, in every country, there was exactly zero cases of people who had died from it.
	Oh, it wasn't political, was it?
	It wasn't a fraud, was it?
	Come on. How stupid are people.
	It's amazing. She issued fake certificates, they said.
	No, they're not fake. They're from a doctor who made an assessment.
	This is unhealthy for people to wear a mask.
	I would have done the same thing if I'd been a doctor.
	I know it's unhealthy to wear a mask.
	As a matter of fact, OSHA said, don't wear these things for more than 20 minutes.
	They would mandate these N95 masks where people are working in very dusty environments to protect them.
	Then they said every 20 minutes you've got to go take a break, take that thing off your face, get a new mask, breathe some fresh air.
	They wanted to put these masks on, and they did put masks on, kids, for all day.
	That's criminal. So...
	She identified herself as well as a member of the Reichberger movement, a group that is said to reject the modern German state and to have been part of the indigenous people of the Germanites.
	So, again, they're coming after her political affiliation.
	She doesn't like the immigrants, I guess.
	I don't know anything else about it except what they have in this LifeSite News article.
	But, you know, that was another reason that they leaned on her heavily.
	And listen to what the German judge said.
	The German judge completely disregarded overwhelming evidence that these experimental Trump shots have caused millions of deaths and serious injury, and refused to allow a former government minister's testimony apologizing for these deaths, refused to allow that in there.
	We've seen that over and over again, haven't we?
	And this is not just about Trump.
	This predated Trump.
	This is the Bundy trial.
	Stuff like that. They would ban any exculpatory evidence.
	And I've seen it with the Bundys.
	I've seen it with Ross Ulbricht.
	I've seen it with Marty Gottesfeld.
	Over and over again. Anytime it's a political thing, they want to shut down your speech.
	And they will shut down anything that allows you to make your case.
	So all evidence, widespread evidence that the masks don't work was hidden by that judge.
	The case of the doctor was treated like that of an exceptionally dangerous, violent criminal by German authorities.
	She has been held since February of last year.
	The first day of the trial took place eight months after her imprisonment.
	After she was arrested in February of 2023, a journalist compared the immense effort and resources that the German authorities put into her case to much worse violent criminals who often receive more lenient treatment,
	just like here. If the state, he said, almost regularly lets serious criminals go free because the justice system is overwhelmed and child molesters, for example, get off without prison sentences time and time again, while at the same time crimes with a political background are prosecuted excessively, then critical journalism must contrast this.
	We've got to talk about this.
	This is the real politicization and weaponization of the system.
	The politicians are not that important because they're not doing anything anyway.
	They're just a threat to the other guys who want to occupy the same seat.
	But these things are a real threat to all of us.
	They're letting violent criminals loose while they go after people at the grassroots level that oppose them at the school board, that oppose them at the abortion clinic.
	That opposed them on their mask and jab mandates.
	According to the state-funded news show, supporters of this doctor had to be escorted out of the courtroom when the judge read the verdict as they started complaining loudly and sang the German national anthem.
	In his explanation of the ruling, the judge claimed regarding COVID, he said, we had an epidemic that was comparable to cholera in the 19th century.
	Another journalist said, this judge, who sentenced a doctor to a long prison sentence, compared corona and his justification to the cholera epidemics of the 19th century.
	But in the cholera epidemics, every second infected person died.
	That didn't happen.
	So we didn't even have an epidemic, let alone a pandemic, that was in every country all at once.
	No, they shut it down. Never reached that level.
	With or without the jabs.
	The jabs was when the deaths really took off.
	It is completely insane how this justice system acts today.
	And that is the issue.
	Trump is not the issue.
	Trump was with them on all of this stuff.
	By the way, you know, when we talk about every other person who gets infected died, that's the nonsense that Trump's CDC director, Robert Redfield, is trying to sell.
	And we'll talk about his corrupt connections in just a moment here.
	We need COVID fine amnesty, says the ex-Justice Secretary in the UK. Why?
	Well, because they see that they're going to have probably the worst results for the Conservative Party that they have ever had.
	At least in the UK, they're going to punish them.
	Now, of course, they're going to jump out of the frying pan into the fire if Labor wins, because Labor wanted even more strict stuff.
	But, uh, the justice secretary who oversaw the courts during the pandemic has called for an amnesty for more than 29,000 people, given criminal convictions for breaking COVID rules.
	That's a good way to put it.
	Because it's not the law.
	It was COVID rules.
	And it wasn't COVID that was making the rules.
	It was these health bureaucrats, uh, He said, this is Sir Robert Buckland, he said, the 29,383 people fined by the courts should have their slates wiped clean rather than risk their career prospects being hampered by convictions that were handed out at an exceptional time.
	Well, I think they should accept those things as a badge of honor, but it's not just the fines that they were given.
	They're treated like felons.
	Magistrates find people for breaking the COVID restrictions resulting in criminal convictions that could bar them from working as teachers, social workers, or police officers.
	Police can pass on these details to potential employers if they are deemed relevant for criminal background checks for sensitive jobs where applicants have to deal with vulnerable people or with children.
	People are also required to declare any criminal convictions when applying for visas to visit countries like the U.S. or Canada, both of which reserve the right to permanently ban anyone who fails to reveal one of these.
	And so this is being treated like a felony.
	29,000 people.
	Do you think that's more important than Trump having his felony convictions for hush money to a hooker?
	Yeah, that was total nonsense.
	This is too, right?
	He didn't violate any laws except for God's law over and over again.
	But it's not anything that, you know, certainly the Manhattan DA is not out there claiming that he's enforcing God's law.
	It's anything but that.
	Nevertheless, okay, so they got criminal convictions on Trump in a kangaroo court for things that are not a crime.
	These people, 29,000 of them in Britain alone, got fined and they now have a criminal record that's going to block them from certain jobs, travel, other things like that.
	We focus everything on the politicians, the politicians who did nothing to defend the rule of law, the constitution, or our liberties.
	Now, let's talk about Robert Redfield again.
	Why has the former CDC director, Robert Redfield, Trump's CDC director, why is he pushing this bird flu?
	And why has he been pushing it for so many years, as a matter of fact?
	Well, you know, when you look at this stuff, I love this cartoon here.
	Bill Gates is a chicken, a rooster or something, in a hoodie holding a hypodermic needle.
	I think that's really, we need to, we need to view bird flu in light of this.
	It's coming from these types of people.
	And Brian Shalhavi at Health Impact News says, Says, this is just a summer rerun.
	We've seen this movie before.
	This is a story that was launched to the public multiple times since it first made its debut in theaters in 2006.
	This is almost 20 years he's been doing this stuff.
	He said it was a hoax back then, and while I had not yet started Health Impact News in 2006, I had a phone call with Dr.
	Sherry Tenpenny that year about a book that she had just published titled Foul, F-O-W-L. Bird Flu, It's Not What You Think.
	And then he said, I began selling it on my online store.
	The pandemic never came, but people made a lot of money off of it, and they went after small-scale poultry producers to protect the large commodity poultry operations from competition.
	Exactly what's happening now?
	They recycled the dreaded bird flu pandemic again in 2015 during the Obama administration and again, they began destroying poultry farms, especially in Iowa the state that produces the most eggs In 2015 in May the New York Post again, it's a summer thing Iowa governor Terry Branstad declared a state of emergency back in 2015 To give authorities the power to enforce preventative measures
	Kill the birds before they get the flu See? That's the solution.
	Yeah, we got this respiratory illness going around, so we're going to have to kill you first before you get it.
	Kill your animals first.
	Iowa, the top producing egg state in the U.S., is the third state to declare a state of emergency back in 2015 because of the viral outbreak.
	They exterminated up to 21 million chickens and turkeys nationwide.
	Isn't that interesting? This time, you haven't heard anything at all about turkeys.
	Isn't that interesting? This time, they started with a few chickens.
	Well, millions of chickens, but a couple of incidents of this.
	Each of those incidents had millions of chickens.
	But then they immediately went to the cows.
	But they're not talking about the pigs, and they're not talking about turkeys, and they're not examining eggs, and they're not examining chicken meat.
	They're examining and focusing on the cows, and we know exactly why.
	That's their agenda, to get rid of meat and dairy.
	And so, this was, and I don't have the guy, this was somebody that It was recommended to me by one of the listeners, and he had some, and I'll have to find this, and I'll mention it tomorrow.
	He had put up a couple of shots of going back to 2021.
	So we talked first of all, 2002, then 2015, then in 2021, look at this, the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, 2021 to 2022 data shows the largest avian flu epidemic in Europe ever.
	we're not involved in any of that.
	And they keep hyping this over and over again.
	In 2022, Redfield announced that there was a new pandemic coming, which had yet to happen.
	And he said this is going to be far worse than COVID. And now he's doing the same thing, announcing a new pandemic.
	This one's going to affect humans.
	You know, we skipped the turkeys this time, and it went straight for cows.
	Didn't do anything with pigs, but it's going to go to humans.
	He said, I did it last year in 2023.
	Every year they've been doing it now, more and more frequently.
	And now he's saying 25 to 50% mortality when it hits humans.
	And he's absolutely certain that it's going to hit humans.
	And so, Brian Shalhavi of Health Impact said, okay.
	So he said, I looked this up.
	I know this guy's making money from promoting this stuff.
	Where is he making his money?
	Who is paying him to push this fear?
	He did some research, and he said from 2020 through 2022, the last year they have records for, the 2023 records should be updated in a day now, you have Robert Redfield received $360,093.16 payments from one single company, Roche Diagnostics Corporation.
	Maybe we should pronounce that Roche.
	Bunch of roaches. That time frame, he says, is interesting because it peaks in 2022, the same year that Redfield began his bird flu fear-mongering campaign.
	Next, he said, we did a news search on Roche Diagnostics Corporation to see if they've been in the news lately for any new bird flu products.
	And bingo! He found it!
	Is it COVID? Is it the flu?
	Is it RSV? A Roche test could soon provide the answer in just 20 minutes.
	This is their press release.
	This past winter, hospitals and clinics across Indiana filled up a patient suffering from different respiratory illnesses that have much the same symptoms.
	COVID-19, flu, and RSV, and many more people suffered at home with fevers, sore throat, and stuffy noses.
	You take the most common disease, the common cold.
	And you make this the existential threat to life on Earth, just like they take CO2 that is breathed out by every animal and say, we've got to have zero cold, zero flu, zero CO2. Eh, it even rhymes.
	I guess we could do a number on that.
	Starting this summer, though, I said the press release...
	Health care providers will have a new rapid test to help quickly diagnose which of these three respiratory illnesses is ailing their patients.
	Now, Brian Shulhavi comments on it.
	He says, remember when the PCR tests were fast-tracked by the FDA in 2020 to be able to supposedly detect the coronavirus?
	And then they found out that by rigging these tests to always find COVID-19, that the flu viruses all but disappeared because one had to either diagnose someone with pneumonia-like symptoms with either COVID or the flu.
	Well, COVID was much more profitable as positive PCR tests unleashed billions in government kickbacks.
	And so what are they doing now?
	Well, now they've got a new test that's going to tell you all these different ones.
	And that's not the only place where Robert Redfield's got his dirty little hands in there making money to try to destroy our food supply and our rule of law, our liberty, our freedom to move around.
	What a despicable person.
	And to think about the fact that Trump never had a problem with him, never had a problem with Fauci.
	You think Trump's going to save you in another four years?
	He'll be worse in his second term.
	Redfield is a fraud.
	This was sent to me by Harry Hound.
	You can find him on Twitter.
	He was investigated for AIDS fraud back in the day.
	This is some research that was done by Thomas Paine, who has a podcast.
	Birx, Fauci, Redfield, you know, the three amigos, the usual suspects, you know, these three people who are running this whole scam for Trump, you know, they were involved in AIDS. And, of course, that's where the PCR test was.
	Initially was abused.
	And Fauci never answered for that.
	So they've got a long history of this kind of stuff.
	As Kit Knightley says to the Off Guardian, he said, bird flu is being brought to us by the evil twins of technocracy and transhumanism.
	And he says this, Kit says, don't let them kill all the cattle.
	Don't let them kill all the chickens.
	Don't let them kill or wound all the humans.
	When lockdowns are mandated, don't do it.
	When masks are mandated, don't wear them.
	When mRNA shots are mandated, don't take them.
	When they tell you to shut up, yell louder.
	When they tell you to social distance, move closer together.
	He says the wall-to-wall coverage of bird flu is getting wallier to wallier with each passing week.
	And he said in our last bird flu update, we pointed that the bird flu death supposedly in Mexico was very likely no such thing.
	And it was right out of the COVID playbook.
	This is why I got so upset.
	With Michael Snyder and Zero Hedge and Breitbart and all these supposedly conservative alternative...
	Oh, look! He just dropped dead!
	We just now had the first person drop dead!
	No, you didn't!
	You better pay attention to these people.
	Don't get railroaded by these alarmists on the right.
	Oh, you trust them because they support Trump?
	That's the first warning sign, okay?
	Since then, the head of Mexico's health ministry has criticized the WHO for calling it a bird flu death at all.
	Now, that I did not see. And yet, there's been crickets about all this stuff from mainstream media.
	They put it out there. Oh, yeah, he dropped dead.
	Says Breitbart and Zero Hedge and Michael Snyder and all the rest.
	This is World Net Daily, Infowars, New American.
	Oh, you better be. Maybe we should be concerned about bird flu now, they all say.
	No, no.
	Maybe you should be concerned about the fact they're not giving you the full report.
	Maybe you should be concerned about the fact that they are parroting this alarmism and these lies that are coming straight out of the CDC and the WHO. Maybe you should be concerned about that.
	You should be as skeptical of any of these people as you are of NPR, quite frankly.
	So, Redfield is putting this out.
	They're not talking about the bird flu fraud.
	Because Breitbart and Zero Hedge and WND and InfoWars and New American, they're all out there cheering Trump.
	And they're cheering everything about Trump.
	Oh, defend Trump.
	Defend Bannon. Defend all these people.
	And they don't say anything about the bird flu attack.
	They need to start defending us.
	But of course they won't.
	And Trump is not going to defend us either.
	So, when you look at what these people are doing, paying farmers, this is Kit Knightley, paying farmers to test their animals, that's the next thing that they're going to put out there.
	Recycling what they did with COVID, right?
	Do it with the hospitals.
	We'll pay you to do that.
	We're going to make it more profitable for you to kill your cattle than to continue raising them, milking them, and all the rest of this stuff.
	This is really about the war on food.
	And Politico quotes, federal rulemaking is delaying the rollout of compensation for farmers who have lost or had to kill cows because of the disease.
	In other words, pay them more, pay them sooner, and we've got to speed this up.
	That's what Politico is saying.
	This isn't going fast enough.
	Oh, this bird flu thing is going to get out there ahead of us with the cows.
	Again, I can't ask why this is focusing on the cows, and we all know that.
	He said this is just like the UK's environmental land management schemes or the US Conservation Reserve Program that we've talked about here, where you pay farmers not to farm, and then what happens is they come in and gain control of your property.
	And it's a very insidious process.
	Well, we're going to take a break before we do.
	Junk Silver. Beautiful track.
	Is it from the soundtrack of the movie?
	The Right Stuff? No, it's not.
	But thank you for the compliment.
	AP Rumble Seat.
	We've all had crazy conspiracy theorists for even questioning the Vax narrative, right?
	They kill, they maim, they gaslight.
	Yeah. Amerigun.
	We didn't make you take the jab.
	We only threatened your livelihood if you didn't get it.
	Yeah, it's a mafia aspect of this.
	Organized crime is what it is.
	Got a nice business there.
	It'd be a shame if anything would have happened to it, you know.
	I'm not saying that the virus is going to get you, but I will.
	That type of thing. Johnny Freedom.
	Biden forced the military to take them, but not the USPS. He needed the union support.
	That's a good point.
	That's a good point. Do not obey.
	He says, it's simply the Hegelian dialectic.
	Our reality is being manufactured by control-agarchs.
	Yep. Big industries, big government collusion to deceive the public while ultimately achieving their goal.
	Don't Frag Me Bro said it's super simple.
	When the government says you have to do something, say no.
	Do not comply. Yes.
	AP Rumble seat. That's what all this bird flu and fear-mongering is about.
	They're gearing up for round two of genocide and to come after the food.
	As I said before, you know, they've made it very clear whether you're talking about climate or you're talking about the pandemic or any of the rest of the stuff, the goal remains the same regardless of what MacGuffin they've got you chasing.
	Are you going after the Maltese Falcon?
	No. Or are you going after the plans for the nuclear bomb?
	It doesn't matter.
	They still want the same thing done.
	And so, what do they want done?
	They want to make sure that we own nothing, we go nowhere, we don't eat anything except what they synthesize and all the rest of the stuff, that they destroy all meat and dairy.
	We know where this is headed.
	And so, whether they're coming at us from a climate standpoint or whether they're coming at us from bird flu, It's totally bogus.
	The bird flu stuff is just as ridiculous as the CO2 fear pushing on everybody.
	And they want to be able to shut down and kill our food.
	And of the remaining food, they want it to be under control of just a few large companies who will comply with them.
	They will tag and track everything.
	And they will vaccinate the food and get the harmful stuff to us in the food.
	That's the plan. Has been from the beginning.
	Michelle Obama says COVID made everyone sick by telling them they were sick, regardless of the lack of symptoms.
	Yep. Nadlender, the Cleveland Clinic, killed my mother.
	Sorry. I'm sorry to hear that.
	I told her not to do it because of her cancer, but she was convinced by mainstream media that it was a miracle drug.
	She was 84. Yeah, this is a problem I have with a lot of these people like Franklin Graham, people like Al Mohler, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, out there parroting word for word the Yale psychological documents.
	This is a miracle from God.
	Thank God for the Trump shot.
	Go get your Trump shot.
	That's how you love your neighbor and all the rest of this stuff.
	Psalm 144. Thank you for the tip.
	Like I put in the chat yesterday, they're testing the cows because they can't get the swabs in the chicken's noses.
	Yeah. Bright fingers.
	What's the best way to avoid the masses stinging you up for your crime?
	War. Better yet, world war.
	Yeah. Octospook.
	Nothing our government is doing to benefit we the people.
	They are engaged in wholesale crimes and treason.
	A war on we the people.
	Yeah. Junior Barner, do you remember when Joe Biden came on one of his speeches and said it's going to be a dark winter?
	I do. I remember that.
	And I even said that.
	I said, you know, he's not all together there.
	And he comes back and he brings back little fragments of stuff.
	He was heavily involved in dark winter.
	And he was heavily involved in the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act as well.
	You know, that was 2001.
	Yeah. That was 23 years ago, and he still had a brain.
	He said it was going to be dark winter, as if that wasn't rubbing it in people's faces that know what's happening.
	Yeah, that, or, and, or, you know, he's just, you know, getting these flashbacks when his brain kicks in occasionally.
	Solicat, 1980. The barbarian at the gate or the infection at the gate, fear it and give up your rights, says the ruling class.
	OctoSpook, we're now under full attack by the very people we put into government to protect us from such attacks.
	The weaponized medical system is beyond treason.
	And so, again, let's start to focus on, in each individual state, Find the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act.
	How that was enacted, it'll be the early 2000s.
	In most cases, they did another take of it in 2005.
	Because remember, in 2005, under George W. Bush, you know, he had the 9-11.
	Then they put out that at the end of, the Model State Health Emergency Powers Act was put out at the end of 2001.
	Then in 2005, they got more busy on it.
	That's when they put in the PREP Act.
	To give legal immunity to these people, it's a different act.
	The PrEP Act is different than the 1986 childhood vaccine, you know, legal immunity for the vaccine companies.
	This was a legal immunity if they were told to do it because it's some kind of a bioweapon attack or something like that.
	And so in 2005, they also upped this Model State Health Emergency Powers Act stuff.
	So you probably see something 2002, 2005, maybe something after that as well.
	But you'll see that in each one of the states.
	That's got to be ripped out.
	We've got to come up with some kind of a Bill of Rights for medical stuff.
	And we need to enact that at the state level.
	You're not going to get it through in Washington.
	It doesn't matter if the Republicans win both houses of Congress and the White House.
	They're going to do nothing about this.
	They sat on their hands the whole time.
	They don't want to even talk about it in the middle of an election.
	Because their hands have blood on them.
	So they're not going to talk about that.
	So Michelle Obama, the billing department of our hospital is larger than the main campus.
	That's right. That's what it runs on.
	It runs on cash. Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	And we'll be right back.
	And we're going to talk about the attack on homeschooling.
	And also about what's going on with this Ten Commandments thing.
	And we'll be right back.
	♪♪
	Analyzing the globalist's next move.
	♪♪ Well, Scienterific American, that's what we used to jokingly call Scientific American, you know, be so impressed with their pseudo-intellectualism, fall at their feet.
	Scientific American magazine calls for federal homeschooling regulations.
	By the way, all you experts at Scientific American, I'm sure that you're so...
	You're so scientific in everything that you do.
	You like to see the data, right?
	You examine things.
	Well, get out your microscope and see if you can find the hidden decoder ring that's got the hidden message about where the federal government has any authority at all to have a say about anything in education.
	The entire Department of Education is and always has been unconstitutional.
	It is a usurpation of the federal government.
	To get into that. So where do they have any right to say anything about homeschooling?
	They don't even have a right to say anything about schooling.
	Again, how do they control it?
	Well, by regulations that are written by bureaucracy, by money that is put out by that bureaucracy.
	That's why they created the Department of Education.
	They don't have the authority to tell anybody what to do.
	So they bribe and blackmail them with money.
	And that's their only power.
	So how do we keep them from controlling us as homeschoolers?
	Well, we don't take their money for anything.
	You don't take the money. If you're a homeschooler, stay away from any government money, whether it is federal, state, or local.
	Don't take a dime from them, and they won't have any control over you.
	And folks, I have seen it when you start a letter-writing campaign.
	As I pointed out, 30 years ago, in North Carolina, when homeschooling was very small, and you had all of the big teachers' unions, there's two or three of them, but two really big ones, and North Carolina was completely Democrat and completely in the pocket of the teachers' unions.
	And they decided they were going to outlaw homeschooling.
	And we started a letter-writing campaign and stopped it.
	Because they just don't get that many letters.
	Most people, most of the time, these infringements on your life are done because nobody speaks up and says anything about it.
	Scientific American even suggesting that the parents of homeschool children undergo a background check.
	Well, none of this is new. We've seen this from these types of status before.
	What is different... Is the fact that they're calling for this to be done at the federal level, where there absolutely is really no ability to do that at all.
	How about a background check for people who are self-professed scientists and experts in education and the law?
	Like the people who wrote this article at Scientific American.
	Where are your credentials? Where's your experience?
	What do you know? You know nothing about any of this stuff.
	This opinion was put out in a newsletter.
	It cited the National Center for Education Statistics that showed that nearly 3% of American children, 1.5 million, were homeschooled in 2019.
	And this is before the big jump, right?
	The newsletter admits, listen to this, they admit that homeschooled children have excelled.
	And they go on to win national spelling bees, geography bees.
	They even pointed to a famed Hungarian mathematician, Paul Erdos, who was homeschooled by his mother.
	Don't stop there.
	Let's talk about the Wright brothers, who beat the guy who was the preeminent scientist of his day, Langley.
	He was the head of the Smithsonian Institute and he couldn't get his plane off the ground, but the Wright brothers who were homeschooled bicycle mechanics could.
	Why?
	Because they didn't just trust the science.
	You see Langley, some people had already created some lift tables and they got it wrong.
	Langley used their tables because, you know, this was done by well-respected and credentialed scientists who worked for the academy.
	I'm not going to question that.
	Well, the Wright brothers did their own stuff.
	They did their own research. They came up with their own lift tables.
	And they did what he couldn't do because he was mired in this mindset of academia and authority figures.
	Or you could talk about Jefferson.
	Or you could talk about virtually every American before the early 20th century was privately schooled, homeschooled, virtually everyone.
	And the literacy rate back in the 1770s was far greater than what it is today.
	So, in spite of the fact that they do a better job, we've still got to regulate them, says Scientific American.
	How do you get to that conclusion?
	I mean, don't they as scientists care about the efficacy of what it is that they are evaluating?
	They said most states don't require the same assessment of homeschool kids.
	Parents are not required to have an education themselves to direct instruction.
	By the way, they don't test teachers.
	And even though they test the students, when the students fail, nothing happens in the schools, does it?
	They said in the worst cases, homeschooling can hide abuse.
	But you know what? There's way more abuse cases of teachers sexually abusing kids.
	Way more.
	They can be hidden in the schools as well, can't it?
	Especially when it's strangers.
	Again, there is no perfect solution.
	You can have bad parents, but it's just like, you know, when we talked about the Boy Scouts and having them separated by sex and gender, that you would have Boy Scouts that are going on camping trips.
	You could still have a male who would sexually abuse these kids.
	It's just that because homosexuality was a smaller percentage, you're reducing your risk.
	And so then you would if it was, you know, men taking little girls camping in the woods.
	It's just you're trying to reduce that in the same way.
	In general, parents are going to know and love their children more than a stranger is.
	Therefore, they are going to be less likely to sexually abuse the child.
	You're just playing the odds. There's nothing that is guaranteed.
	There's no guaranteed outcome with this.
	In any way. I mean, you're not guaranteed that the kids are going to learn.
	You're not guaranteed that they're going to prosper morally or by any other metric.
	And you're not guaranteed that there's not going to be abuse, whether you're talking about a government school institution or you're talking about a family.
	You just go with the things that are odds on favors, and you go with freedom.
	And you support the family.
	So they say the newsletter then concludes that homeschooling should be subject to federal mandates.
	Homeschool instructors could be required to submit documents every year to their local school districts or to a state agency to show that their children are learning.
	Well, again, why don't you try that first with the government-run schools?
	When you can figure out how to do it there, then come in and tell us.
	We'll be very interested to know what you're doing that works.
	But what you're doing does not work.
	It does not work as well as homeschooling.
	Education is a basic right, said the editors.
	We need to make sure that kids have chances to investigate what makes them curious.
	You know, that's the biggest argument for homeschooling.
	Kids have a chance to investigate what they're interested in.
	Rather than having their time wasted in school, which is designed to stretch out the amount of time so that they're babysitting the kids for the parents who are working.
	They keep them in school far longer than they need to be.
	Everybody that knows that homeschool, they could stay ahead of what the government school curriculum was by homeschooling half a day.
	And then the kids have time to investigate what they're interested in.
	So they said homeschooling is largely rooted in combating toxic school environments.
	This is not the scientific American people.
	This is the people who understand what's going on.
	And also the lack of moral instruction.
	No, they're getting a lot of moral instruction.
	Just the wrong kind.
	80% of homeschoolers said they homeschool because they have a concern about the school environment.
	75% said they desire to provide moral instruction.
	Another 75% said they want to put an emphasis on family life together.
	And 59% said they had a desire to provide religious instruction.
	Do it because you want to spend time with your kids.
	Do it because you want to have a relationship with your kids.
	Do it because you want to take them with you to heaven.
	Now, none of those things are guaranteed if you do homeschooling.
	That's really between them and God.
	But you're more likely to have a relationship with your kids than if you ship them off somewhere else to spend most of the day with strangers.
	The U.S. Department of Education's National Assessment of Educational Progress Testing found that just 32% of fourth graders read at or above proficiency for their grade level in 2022.
	Oh, so maybe you do it because you want them to be able to read.
	How about that? When only one-third of these government school kids can read, don't talk to me about proficiency, oversight, and all the rest of this stuff.
	Heal yourself first.
	In 2023, the LA Unified School District, for example, hosted a rainbow club to teach kids as young as five years old about LGBT-related topics.
	We've all seen the stories, and I report on them many times, about the pornographic books, about the grooming, the sexual grooming, the mutilation of young children, and all the rest of this stuff.
	That's why people are escaping these.
	Another example, last year, John Glenn Elementary in Oklahoma School District hired a drag queen as the principal of the school.
	Oh, of course, you could always go to San Francisco, like I said yesterday.
	Mayoral race. Challenged the debate.
	Challenged the debater to name three drag queens.
	I love my son's first response was, Jager Hoover.
	One of the most famous drag queens ever.
	You know, then we could put in Bruce Jinder and Rachel Devine, Levine, whatever.
	Dick Devine is what I call them.
	Yeah, that kind of insanity.
	You know, when we talk about abuse...
	This began long before the masks, long before the social distancing, long before the pornography and the grooming and the peer pressure and all the rest of the stuff.
	When Karen was teaching in school back in the late 1970s, the kind of abuse that was happening there, and it was psychological abuse, it was an open classroom.
	She could hear what was happening in the next open stall.
	And there was a teacher there who had a little bit of a power trip.
	And there was one little kid that she would pick on.
	Just pick on him, you know, just like chickens do.
	You know, it's pecking order. And one day she had him standing in the trash can.
	Said, you're nothing but a piece of trash.
	Get in that trash can. And she reported that to the principal.
	The principal said, well, there's nothing we can do about it.
	She's tenured. We've got to get some more evidence about this.
	And then even on the parent-teacher's day, This little boy's dad came in.
	And again, Karen could hear this stuff going on because it's just a little panel between them.
	And she browbeat that father because the kid was like him, very timid.
	Yeah, this kind of psychological abuse that is there.
	When she was in graduate school, they had her read B.F. Skinner.
	That's how I became familiar with Skinner.
	I mean, they're showing them how to do it, how to control people.
	It was absolutely incredible.
	And so we made our mind up at that point in time.
	We had kids we were never, ever going to put them in a government school.
	She got out of it, never looked back.
	We're going to take a quick break, and Tony Arterman is waiting to join us.
	We'll be right back. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com TheDavidKnightShow.com Joining us now is Tony Arterman at Wise Wolf Gold.
	And, of course, Tony has set up davidknight.gold.
	We'll take you there.
	Let him know that you're coming through me.
	And he can help you buy gold or silver, large or small amounts.
	He can also help you to get...
	on a regular savings basis with his wolf pack you can pick a level each month that you would like to buy into and he can get you quantity discounts with the buying group larger purchasing quantity so get you some better prices because he's got a lot of people that are doing that so you can sign up that way and of course you can also do your gold and silver IRA and he can help you with that as well so joining Tony Arterman.
	It's good to have you on, Tony.
	Thanks for coming. It's good to see you, David.
	Thanks for having me back. You know, we were talking during the break, and I've seen a lot of talk lately about the end of the petrodollar.
	And you and I talked about this a couple of weeks ago when it was on a Sunday that And we talked about on the following Thursday the fact that Saudi Arabia announced that they were going to be Selling directly to China not going through the dollar they were going to just use their local currencies and that type of stuff And we said well, that's it. It's over and now a lot of people are talking about that. The date was June the 9th It was like 50 years almost to the day since they had their agreement the one thing that I wasn't sure of and I'm still not sure
	if it was actually like a Formal treaty or something or if it was just kind of a de facto agreement a handshake or something But it went on for 50 years and on the 50th anniversary they started selling with with China and They're also going to be a partner and this new CBDC that is set up on top of the Chinese yuan and that's being run through the Bank of International Settlements This is going to be huge.
	It is, and it's absolutely amazing that, I mean, we've been talking about it for a couple weeks now, and some of my listeners are probably tired of it, but I'm like, this is huge, and the mainstream media almost completely ignored it.
	On my show last week, I said, I found a lone article just kind of out there in the periphery that no one was talking about in the mainstream, you know, mentioning it, and like you said, it...
	It's hard to really drill down to see if there's a formal agreement.
	I know that we had a lot of communiques with the Saudis, and especially 1973 with the oil embargo and the rest.
	We went off the gold standard in 1971.
	They were looking to do this.
	In my research, I think that's Kissinger and Nixon and John Connolly, who was head of the Treasury when we went off the gold standard.
	I think they were looking to do something to peg the dollar to something.
	But it's interesting that we got 50 years down the road, And there's nothing.
	Our government completely ignores it.
	At least that's how I see it.
	I mean, there's not any talk of it.
	There's no press releases or anything.
	Now, if you look, and there was an article on Kitco, some of the stats that come out about the petrodollar are absolutely fascinating.
	Not just Saudi. But 80% of all the transactions that go on around the globe in crude, if you're buying crude oil, are denominated in dollars.
	So if one goes, I think it's a domino effect.
	And we talk about money velocity, and people are always asking, you know, why don't we have hyperinflation here?
	How is the dollar still going after all this abuse?
	Well, it's because it's used around the world.
	And I know this is...
	Again, people have normalcy bias and then there's the mainstream media who never talks about this.
	It's always the stock market.
	It's always Wall Street. It's very myopic.
	But really, the reason the dollar has survived as long as this is an experiment.
	Literally, going off the gold standard in 71, this is an experiment.
	The average lifespan of a fiat currency is 26 years.
	That's what history teaches us.
	So we've doubled that, but we're losing all of the things that prop up.
	David and I don't have a crystal ball.
	We don't know when this is going to drop as far as the strength of the dollar and the rest.
	But you can see the storm clouds on the horizon for the supremacy of the dollar.
	It's just not looking good, especially when our government doesn't have any plans to...
	They're not brokering any deals here in our favor.
	They're not even trying to make a mistake.
	So it is interesting to watch, David.
	And, you know, the point that you're making about how you just don't hear anything about it anywhere, even in most of the alternative media, that was the very first thing that Brian Shulhavi said.
	He said, look, even Zero Hedge is not talking about it.
	Zero Hedge, alternative media focused on financial stuff, they're not even talking about it.
	He said to find more of a discussion on this, you had to go to the Business Standard out of Bangladesh to get a discussion of this because nobody is covering it.
	Not even the alternative media. Everybody is so focused on the reality TV show of this presidential election and all the crimes against each other and people being jailed and everything.
	Nobody's talking about the financial...
	Foundation of this country being rocked, and it is a big rocking of the foundation of this country.
	With all of this debt, like I pointed out yesterday, $56 trillion is what the Office of Management and Budget estimates it's going to be within 10 years, and that's a very, very conservative estimate, because in that estimate, they're not imagining that the spending is going up, and they're not imagining that there's going to be tax cuts, and both of those things are going to be happening.
	We know that's going to happen, regardless of who becomes president.
	Well, we know one thing.
	This government and the central bank, when they have a problem, what do they do?
	They inflate their way out of it.
	That's what a fake currency does.
	The welfare or warfare state, they inflate their way out of a problem.
	So when they do that, folks, what happens to the purchasing power of your dollar?
	It continues to go down.
	And so I think when we look into the future, you know, you see, you know, the central banks around the world, which there's some stats coming out from the world gold council, that's putting out these surveys they're doing with central banks. If you, if you watch the mainstream media financial networks, they don't even talk about central banks buying gold.
	And they surveyed most of the central bank surveys that see that there's going to be a continuance of central bank gold demand, but 81% 81% of the central banks around the world surveyed said they see an increase in that. Now, why isn't that headline news?
	All these analysts across the board are talking about stocks, and they're wondering why gold is up.
	Well, it's not only gold is up, but it's breaking its all-time high.
	As a matter of fact, I'm checking spot prices this morning.
	Silver broke $30 again, which it should have done years ago, but it's at $30.60 a troy ounce, and gold's at $2,358.
	I mean, a year ago, David, we were talking, gold was at like $1,800.
	So, when we were doing our...
	The same time last year, talking, you know, we were in the 1800s, below 2000.
	So, you know, we are on our trajectory.
	And again, if you're watching this to see about investments, it's not that the dollar's going up, or that gold is going up.
	It's the dollar's losing purchasing power, and people are making bets around the world on where the dollar's headed.
	This is a...
	I think a very sophisticated game of chicken.
	The central bank here in the United States can't buy gold because it's at war with it.
	If you buy it, it's like you increase its power.
	So this is going to be...
	I don't think it's going to end well for the central banksters here.
	We've got a long way to go, but I think the groundwork is being laid for...
	It's not that BRICS, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and Saudi Arabia are going to supplant the dollar.
	They're going to have some BRICS currency that's going to supplant the supremacy of the dollar.
	It's that there's going to be a basket of all kinds of things.
	And I think gold will be at the top of that.
	All these countries trading in gold outside of the system...
	The weaponized dollar system that these countries want to move away from.
	So I think gold really is the world reserve currency at this point.
	It's just that the other countries moving away from the dollar system is going to, I think, ultimately crush the dollar's supremacy.
	Yeah, yeah. Yeah, you've talked many times about how, and if we look at it, some people are saying, well, this is 80 years of petrodollar.
	Well, it's not 80 years of petrodollar, but it's 80 years of the dollar as the world's reserve standard because we had Bretton Woods 1, which you've talked about many times right after World War II. That was propping up the dollar with gold.
	And then when that was exposed as an obvious fraud, you had Nixon and Kissinger say, well, we'll prop it up with energy because everything was running on oil.
	And this was in this article from Brian Shalhavi.
	I thought it was kind of interesting because he talked about the geopolitics and the maneuvering.
	Of Kissinger in this, and how his purpose really was to, you know, the OPEC embargo kicked off because we took the side of Israel in the Yom Kippur War, right?
	And yet, it didn't hurt America, it hurt Europe.
	Because America had a lot of domestic production, so they hurt worse than we were.
	We had gas lines and things like that.
	Everybody remembers that. Depending on whether your car tag was odd or even, you could get gas on an odd or even day, that type of deal.
	So there was a little bit of rationing.
	There was a big spike in the prices, but it really hurt Europe even worse than it did us, even though Europe was not the target directly of that OPEC embargo.
	But what his point was is that other people believe that what Kissinger was doing was kind of targeting to make Europe weaker and also targeting to break the influence of these European oil companies like BP or Shell or other ones like that.
	And to put the United States into that position.
	And when I saw that, they didn't make the analogy to what's going on in Europe right now with the natural gas pipelines from Russia.
	But that's many people have said that's maybe the underlying Issue with this Russian war a big part of it for the Biden cartel people, you know to break Europe again on that energy issue and so at the time they put this together They got all the United Arab Emirates and Qatar and Libya Iran Kuwait Iraq all these different ones They brought this and it wasn't just the Saudis They all were doing this and now as you pointed out before
	Iraq is saying well We're not even gonna allow the US dollar to be traded here I mean they're turning against the dollar with a vengeance because the way it has been weaponized against everybody amazing It reminds me when I look at Biden, that clip from Star Wars where Princess Leia says to Darth Vader, you know, the tighter you squeeze, the more this is going to come through your fingers or whatever, like, you know, like water or something.
	It's something to that effect. I'm paraphrasing it.
	But, you know, that's really what is happening.
	The tighter that Biden tries to squeeze everybody, the more this all slips through his fingers, it seems like.
	Well, it's true. And, you know, again, the calls are coming from inside the House.
	We know that the reach of the World Economic Forum, the globalist, really is the deep state here in the United States.
	That's why you talk about Kissinger setting up American influence.
	That's kind of bizarre now, if you think about it, because nobody here in this government is trying to set up American influence almost anywhere except for places like Taiwan, for example.
	What is that? It's schizophrenic.
	We ceded Taiwan to the Chinese in 1979 officially.
	We broke diplomatic relations with Taipei.
	That's an official document with Zygmunt Brzezinski and Jimmy Carter.
	Nixon and Kissinger gave Mao a verbal promise on Taiwan in 1972, saying it's a one-China policy.
	So we abandoned what we used to call Formosa during the Cold War.
	So it's interesting, you know, looking at the agreement that you talked about Kissinger setting up, you know, really our first relations with the House of Sod and American influence goes back to around the times of Bretton Woods and the United States and Franklin Roosevelt and saying, look, we'll give American protection for this, you know, Middle Eastern oil.
	So we've had that connection for decades and decades.
	But it's interesting now to watch it wane.
	You know, in the face of, like, losing the petrodollar, and you've got to think about, Kissinger wanted American influence there.
	What is the issue now that we want?
	It's complete chaos.
	It doesn't make any sense unless you're talking about taking America's influence and destroying it from the inside.
	That's the only thing I can think of.
	I mean, this is conspiratorial conjecture.
	Well, you know, Kissinger was also heavily involved and always there with Bilderberg Group.
	And he also opened up, he and Nixon opened up to China.
	And I think it was, he was trying to, you know, to have an American dominance was really kind of a stepping stone for these people to then be able to transfer it over to China.
	All they care about is being in charge.
	They have no loyalty to anyone or any nation, right?
	They just want to make sure that they're in charge.
	And so I think that their concern about making America great...
	It was just a transitional period so that they could get what they really wanted out of China.
	China is the perfect model for them.
	You know, it's a corrupt, authoritarian, totalitarian regime, slave labor and all the rest of this stuff, counterfeiting, piracy, all the rest of this.
	China is the perfect model for them.
	You know, when you're talking about, by the way, when you're talking about Taiwan, I think I got an insight into why this is starting to get so important to them.
	It's been said for quite some time that Taiwan is incredibly important in the semiconductor industry, especially in the high-end ships.
	Yesterday, as people were talking about NVIDIA and the fact that it's gone up since the first one on the stock market in 1999, it's gone up by 600,000%.
	That NVIDIA has only one manufacturing facility that makes all of their chips now that it is the world's most valuable company.
	And that one facility is in Taiwan.
	Yeah. So there you go.
	That's why they're going to protect Taiwan, I guess.
	Well, it's a huge pivot, you know, foreign policy-wise.
	You know, if you go back to the 1970s, we opened China.
	And again, you don't see these kind of moves anymore, which is very alarming.
	If you're paying attention to geopolitics, we're not making any moves on the grand chessboard except for things that really put us in...
	A fast track for kinetic warfare, which is why I'm alarmed by it.
	That's why we're talking about it.
	It makes no sense.
	And I think you're talking about some of the plants there in Taiwan.
	From what I've read, they've got plans to self-destruct.
	They can push a button and all of a sudden it destroys everything, if that's true.
	You know, is China going to make a move on that?
	I don't know. That makes me think.
	I don't know if you ever saw the Peter Sellers film The Party.
	He's an extra on a movie, and he's like taking his way.
	He leans, and they've got this one take where they're going to blow up everything.
	And before they get the camera rolling, he's an extra, and he just pushes the button by mistake and blows everything up.
	I hope that doesn't happen in Taiwan.
	Bring back Peter Sellers, take the whole thing out.
	You see, too, that the Chinese president has been talking about how the U.S. was trying to goad them into war.
	You see, that was a headline, I think, on RT a couple of days ago.
	So, you know, this is a really strange time, you know, whatever is happening with the global markets and everything else and where payment systems are going to be.
	I'm over here. I'm watching both the fronts of the currency war and Well, you know, as part of this article, to bring it up to the current time,
	we're talking about the fact that even though the Biden cartel has been unable to sign any deal with the Saudis and they're going with the Chinese on the financial stuff, their fallback position Was to try, and they still haven't secured even this, was to try to make sure that militarily we were still going, you know, that was one part of the petrodollar.
	We'll sell you all the advanced military equipment we've got, and your part of the deal is that you're going to make sure that the oil is sold in U.S. dollars.
	But now what they're saying is, well, let's still do this military deal.
	Don't have any Chinese bases there, and we'll give you access to all the military stuff, because that seems to be our only product anymore is war.
	And I don't know how that's going to continue to operate.
	I mean, we're at the point where this country has become so spoiled and soft with all this stuff.
	It's just like Boeing. I don't know how long we're going to be able to maintain it.
	Any technological dominance?
	And even if we have technological dominance in these things, is that going to be enough?
	I think that, as Gerald Slenty has always said, you know, when people lose everything, you know, they lose it.
	And when it gets really bad, the government takes us to war.
	Well, they've already declared that their intention, the technocrats' intention, is to take everything from us.
	So it's therefore their intention to take us to war as well.
	I think you're right.
	You know, the IMF has been warning that AI is going to, is creating massive inequality.
	It's going to create unsustainable inequality.
	It'll be the scapegoat, yeah.
	It'll be a scapegoat, but that's, I think they'll blame a lot of things on that.
	It was a tweet I saw on Gold Telegraph, and he said, actually, it's central banks that are creating inequality.
	And they do that. They do that, again, you know, getting back to your point.
	If you really want a thought experiment, what saves this system?
	What really props up continues to, this is in 80 years on after Bretton Woods, the end of World War II, America was 5% of the world's population, we're still about that, had 50% of the world's wealth, Europe was in ashes, Japan was in ashes, and we were rebuilding the world.
	The new economic world order came out of Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, and we've since broken those agreements.
	We created an experiment with our currency in 1971.
	You mentioned, we talked about the oil embargo in 73, and that's when the petrodollar started.
	That's also the, you know, you're right, David.
	It's not, it's not, these deals that were brokered, whether it's the SALT treaty with Nixon, the Strategic Armed Limitations Agreement, whether it was Reagan with Reykjavik or all this, You don't see these kind of deals made anymore, but it was really just, I think, in a continuation to prop up that system long enough.
	It's like they can build golden parachutes because 1973 is a very pivotal year.
	That's the beginning of the Trilateral Commission.
	And you know that the technocrats, you're exactly right.
	There was a pivot towards Asia.
	That's why China was built up.
	That's why we brought in NAFTA here in the United States, the North American Free Trade Agreement.
	Ross Perot said it was going to be a giant sucking sound.
	Never before in history have you seen, and I've got books on my shelf, I've been fascinated since I was a kid, but you know, Pat Buchanan wrote a book in 1997 called The Great Betrayal, and this was in 97, just watching that manufacturing disappear, watching these multinationals grow richer and richer as they moved away from the United States. That's why multinationals and corporations here don't fight for lower taxes, they don't fight for lower regulation, they don't care, because they can just move around and throw these workers into a Darwinian contest of
	survival of the fittest within places like China that you're right, it's the perfect model of authoritarianism, dystopian technology, you know, combined with the communist state to create this, you know, a top-down system that the technocrats love.
	And it's, you know, the globalists, whatever you want to call them, they're all melded together.
	So America was, like, put on this trajectory, put on this chopping block to siphon its wealth away.
	And so you wouldn't notice.
	So they give you all these products, and they do bread and circus.
	You know, you can put your money in the stock market or whatever.
	You know, generations before, that wasn't...
	Not a lot of people did that. If you were in stocks, it was kind of this...
	You know, it was a niche deal.
	That was a business for you.
	Now they've got people in all kinds of products.
	You know, 1974, David.
	The 401k was born.
	The IRA was born.
	They had to do all these things so you wouldn't quite notice the fact that you can't save your currency anymore.
	And they're building this massive debt bomb.
	You mentioned the congressional budget.
	$56 trillion.
	We're at 130% of debt to GDP right now.
	Yeah. And every 90 to 100 days we go a trillion dollars in debt.
	It took us 200 years to do that.
	So, getting back to all of this and what we were talking about, like these little warning bells going off, whether it's Taiwan, whether it's Ukraine, And again, the fact that nobody here in this, whoever's in charge, you call him Machiavellian Mike, he does look like a little skeeving little backstabber, doesn't he?
	Well, he acts like one.
	He has actually stabbed us in the back multiple times already.
	But he kind of looks like one, you know?
	He's got that look about him.
	And I just think, you know, there's nobody talking about Any kind of fiscal sanity.
	So we the people, if you're paying attention, try not to get so engrossed into the hype, whether it's Hunter Biden's conviction or Trump or what's happening with the election.
	I could care less about the election, honestly.
	I don't think any policy will change.
	I know that upsets people.
	I lose listeners. I don't see any way that any real policy changes.
	I mean, you have Trump talking about crypto...
	But let's not forget, I mean, under Biden, you had the Bitcoin ETFs.
	Biden doesn't rule that.
	Larry Fink from BlackRock does, folks.
	It doesn't matter what Trump wants on crypto.
	I'm sorry. I know a lot of my crypto friends, and I like crypto, and I love Bitcoin.
	But, you know, policy is dictated by the banking establishment.
	Policy is not dictated by the president.
	I mean, unless you actually had a real active president.
	But, I mean, come on.
	Who's really going to do that? It's just like saying, I'm going to get rid of the income tax and we'll do all the taxes of the border.
	You and I have talked about that.
	I think that would be superior to what we have.
	But there's no way that's going to happen because there's too much vested interest there.
	It'd be too disruptive.
	And, of course, it's just a campaign promise.
	And we've seen the record of how he handles his campaign promises.
	He's not any more interested in fulfilling his promises to us that he makes during the campaign than the promises that he made to his wives before he got Married to them.
	Let's talk about you mentioned IRA. I've got a question here.
	I've got a couple of questions for you.
	This is from Colton Kimberly.
	For Tony, a question. Can you explain a little bit about the gold IRA? My employer matches my contributions to my 401k, and Human Resources says I can't change to a gold IRA. Well, that's not really true, right? They may not make matching contributions into it, but if they put it into another IRA, he could always roll it over into a metals IRA, right?
	Absolutely. Like, if you've got an existing 401k, now because of your employer's procedures or whatever it might be with the company that they're with, the HR system, you may not be able to do much with the 401k that you've got now.
	You can ask your 401k manager if you can put it into gold stocks.
	I've seen that where you can at least get into the silver and gold mining stock arena with with your 401k But what you could do is go ahead and set up your gold and silver precious metals IRA now So it's ready to go and when you're ready to roll over like when you eventually you're gonna own that 401k I mean if you're gonna move jobs or whatever Under that print or you can withdraw from it now and put it into a gold and silver IRA without penalty Yeah, if you're vested in it, can you roll?
	I don't know. I'm not even counting.
	I don't know. But maybe if you were vested in your 401k, maybe at that point, then you can roll it over into another instrument, I guess.
	Yeah, so if you've got an existing 401k, you just set up a precious metals IRA, and then once you've got that, you can roll it over.
	You don't have to do it from, you know, if you've got the entire balance, you can take portions of it and move that over into a precious metals, physical precious metals IRA. And again, the reason you do that is from product to product, so you don't incur a tax penalty.
	It's just like moving an account balance, and it's all above board.
	you can we have a company called New Direction Trust that we work with and you definitely can get all your questions answered there.
	And I guess really the issue would be is can you you know 401k is different than an IRA if it's in an IRA of course you can roll it anywhere you want to do.
	I don't know if you can get it out of the 401k into some kind of an IRA if you're vested excuse me or if it has to stay there until you separate with them or something.
	So that would be the question, I think, the central question about it.
	Junior Barner says, Tony, I want to buy gold.
	Why don't you take money orders?
	I do. Oh, okay.
	Absolutely. Just mail them to me.
	I need to know who you are. Make sure I have a return address and your phone number.
	I'll take money orders. That's fine.
	Okay, good. Atomic Dog.
	Tony, do you see or know of a reason for the recent dip in silver prices that happened over the last month?
	Well, it's just gone back up again, right?
	Is that correct? It's up over $30.
	I think this is the highest it's been now.
	Again, we're matching where we were a couple, three weeks ago.
	It's just some profit taking.
	I mean, that's really what it boils down to.
	There was some large entities and some, well, there was some profit taking.
	And then a lot of people, they'll hold on to their silver for years if they have to.
	And silver has been so depressed for so long.
	David and I have talked about that with J.P. Morgan getting convicted of suppressing the silver.
	There are some large entities that have an active role in keeping the price of silver down so they can accumulate.
	So when it does break through, a lot of silver floods the market.
	But I would look to see...
	I would expect silver to continue doing what it's doing right now.
	I think there's just too many deficits, as we've talked about on this show many times.
	I think the deficit last year...
	million ounces that were missing.
	So like the above ground supply had to be eaten into just to fill orders for not only technology but medicine and monetary issues and all the rest of that, jewelry.
	So the deficit is expected to be something like that this year.
	So that cannot go on forever.
	I mean, there's hundreds of millions of ounces and deficits can't go on.
	And the demand only increases, whether you're talking about solar or monetary issues.
	Yeah, just two days ago, this headline on Kitco, can silver prices sustain slowing momentum in the green energy transition?
	And so, you know, that's the question.
	As you look at them being consumed in the, you know, the solar panels and things like that, if that slows a little bit, That might slow silver, but they're continuing to push that pretty hard.
	So between that and other electronic uses, I think that's going to continue to be a real push on the prices of silver.
	And then we have a couple of predictions from a couple of different banks.
	Wells Fargo is saying in terms of gold, gold price will churn for the next six months and then rally back to record highs.
	That's their take on it.
	And if you look at another bank, Saxo Bank is saying gold and silver are caught in a prolonged consolidation, but prices will head higher.
	and silver are caught in a prolonged consolidation, but prices will head higher.
	I think everybody understands what the fundamentals are.
	They understand what the fundamental problems are with the American dollar and what is going on in America.
	And I think that they're looking at gold and silver.
	That's why they're looking at it after the election, because there's going to be a lot of distraction and manipulation before the election.
	But I think it'll be after the election that you're going to continue to see this go.
	Yeah, I think the wheels are off as far as like cheap metals in our lifetime.
	And you may see maybe one more dip like we saw in the first quarter of 2020 with the lockdowns.
	But that's when silver went down to like $12, $13 an ounce and people were calling me trying to lock in trades and I couldn't lock it in.
	There was no silver to be had.
	I mean, when the prices go down like that, it's not real.
	The same thing with gold.
	With central banks buying, David, this $2,300 an ounce gold, I think we've reached resistance point.
	You're never going to see, I mean, unless there's just a massive depression or something, something crazy happens in the market.
	$2,000 an ounce, I mean, that's when, you know, I remember when I was hosting for you, filling in four years ago, August 6, 2020, gold broke its all-time high.
	I was live on air hosting your show in Austin.
	And I had Gerald Salente on that day, of all things, and just watching that happen, and then they went on for years with it dipping under $2,000, and then all of a sudden you see this year, this last eight months or so, and it's just all-time high after all-time high.
	I think we're in the age of gold.
	The dollar's waning.
	All the things that we've talked about, and again, you turn on the financial networks, they have no idea what's happening.
	What's the... Why is the demand of gold up?
	I mean, my friend Charlie Robinson, host of Macroaggression, sent me an article today of gold bar vending machines in, I think, South Korea.
	They have gold bar vending machines, and my brother sent me a video yesterday of an actual gold-back ATM that they're about to roll out, so they're going to put these in major retailers where you can buy gold-backs just with your credit card, and they're just going to dispense it out of the ATM. The demand is something I didn't think I'd see this soon.
	I thought it was going to be something I, you know, as I start to retire, you know, there would be this awareness.
	But it's happening a lot faster than I thought.
	And you're seeing regular people that have never thought about their currency before starting to pay attention.
	And if Americans are paying attention, that means that the rest of the world has been paying attention for years, you know?
	That's right. Yeah, when we look at this, you stop and think about it, going back to Bretton Woods too, right after World War II ended, this has been going on pretty much longer than anybody's living memory.
	You'd have to be way over 80.
	You're still a child when this thing was established.
	So we haven't really lived in a world or in an America where America did not have the dominance.
	And this is going to be a very different thing.
	I look at it and...
	It's going to be interesting times, you know?
	It's going to be an opportunity, plus it's going to be danger.
	It'll be an opportunity for us to get a little bit freer, I think, from a federal government, because that's been their superpower, to be able to bribe and blackmail people with that money.
	But it's also going to be a very challenging time for us economically.
	And one of the things in this article that Brian Shalhavi had, he had a report from a guy With the Atlantic and he said he actually went to Saudi Arabia and he talked to a lot of people there about America.
	Many of these people had been educated in the United States, spent a great deal of time there, maybe got a PhD or whatever.
	One guy that got a PhD in America, he said, America is just coming apart at the seams.
	And I hate to see it happen because I really love the country.
	But that's the view from the outside.
	And that really is the view from the inside if we pay attention.
	And so with that happening, and with the fact that it's not just the loss of the petrodollar, but it's this new thing that nobody has ever seen before.
	Nobody in living memory has ever, you know, seen a situation where America is not the reserve currency, and none of us have seen anything like what's coming with CBDC. That's why I lean toward gold and silver, because I want to have something that is outside of that control system.
	And I want to have something that's outside of this system that is going to rapidly collapse at some point.
	We don't know when it's going to happen, but it's inevitable that it's going to happen.
	These are two things that we've never lived through, and so we don't really know what's going to happen, but we've got a general idea that's going to be very difficult, especially if your only assets are dollar-valued, I think.
	That's right. Gold, silver, Bitcoin, if you're comfortable with that.
	But, you know, the thing is, is that it's going to happen.
	And the CBDC stuff, I think one of the most ominous things about it is that not only did Saudi Arabia leave the petrodollar, but they jumped in with the Chinese on a CBDC thing that is attached to the Bank of International Settlements.
	The worst case scenario.
	The central bank of central banks.
	That's where all the gold went in 1933, folks.
	These are old institutions.
	They've been planning this for as long as I can.
	I started researching. The first time I went on your show, we talked about the cover of the Economist magazine from 1989.
	It says, ready for world currency.
	They've been talking about this for years.
	Now they have the technology.
	They've got blockchain. Somebody asked me the other day, I said, They rejected the central bank digital currency.
	They loved Bitcoin.
	The banksters rolled out the CBDC. They rejected it.
	And what it does, I think a lot of the conversations that we're having now, I'm very optimistic.
	I think we have, and I'm glad we have the challenges that we do.
	I think God has us here for a reason, if I can...
	I think it's pure evil that we're up against.
	So know your enemy. But just be thankful that we have an opportunity to show an alternative.
	I think that's the best thing. The elites have no alternative.
	So if you're talking about central bank digital currency, we've been having this conversation about crypto and gold and silver for so many years now, and especially with the loss of everything with the trust in the dollar system, people are asking questions.
	This is good.
	People should ask questions.
	It should be a better conversation because when you ask those questions, you find out how fake the whole system is and how evil the central bank, it's evil.
	That's what it is.
	It's not economic, it's not political, it's pure satanic.
	That's what it is.
	They want to control everything you do.
	They want to shut down dissent.
	It's the end of politics.
	It's the end of history.
	But the good news is you see people decentralizing all over the world.
	How are people going to go from, I want to collect gold beans for my future and I can sell these on the exchange or I've got something liquid and I'm hedging against inflation and uncertainty to, oh yeah, I'll download this and this is my social credit score currency.
	I don't see that happening.
	It's going to be very difficult for them to sell this.
	They can force you. They can force you all they want.
	But I don't think that it's going to be something that is going to ultimately be a success in the way that they see it as long as we resist and build the parallel systems.
	You see the states here in this country start to build their own gold and silver vaults and exchange systems and make gold and silver legal tender.
	Places like Oklahoma have passed a massive deregulation on cryptocurrency, which I love to see, and that's real crypto.
	In some places, even looking at other states, We were talking about last week with Nebraska, that they've made it illegal.
	They're going to make it illegal for you to have a central bank digital currency.
	I love this. I love these headlines.
	And so the awareness is there.
	I'm not doom and gloom, but I am vigilant.
	I think that we've got to continue to fight and build better systems.
	Yeah, it's going to be very interesting times.
	It's going to be difficult times, and you need to make some kind of preparation.
	Lots of different things. Learn how to grow food.
	Learn skills. Get into something that is not under their control, whether it's gold, silver, bitcoin, anything like that.
	The more of these things we've got, the better.
	I mean, I don't want it to all be in just one thing, because they'll focus everything on that one thing.
	So as long as there's multiple things out there, that's fine.
	Whatever you're comfortable with.
	And again...
	One more comment. This is from Jason Barker.
	Gold and silver will never reach their true price until the ETF bubble is exposed.
	What do you think about that? Well, I think he's 100% accurate on that, and I think that will be sooner than later.
	And it's because, you know, I'll make this really short.
	What happened in the 1960s, if you look back on it, was glaringly obvious now, but I don't think people really saw what was happening for its true value.
	I see a lot of commentators starting to pick up on this, something I've been saying for years.
	We took the silver out of our coinage in 1965.
	And it was, I mean, pretty obvious.
	I mean, you can tell the difference in the coins.
	You know, so dimes, quarters, half dollars that used to be silver, they just became debased, you know, nickel and copper.
	So all that silver, you know, all that monetary wealth is just transferred out.
	And so other countries started to take notice.
	And we had, you know, the LBJ and the Great Society on the Mekong, guns and butter, all that.
	We were paying for that. Well, I think.
	It's like, we're going to pick it up with our Navy.
	And the rest of the world started to look around, and so Nixon closed the gold window in 1971.
	So this is very much akin to what I think will happen with these exchanges and ETFs and the rest.
	Is that you've had people investing for so long.
	When you cash out of GLD or any ETF that's gold-backed, they don't send you a gold coin.
	They send you fiat.
	So, you know, a lot of us have been saying...
	You can look up Stuart Engler's book that I've had him on my show called Rigged.
	It's about this.
	And there's a whole organization of people in finance and people in the gold industry that have been suing to get more of the records and show where the central banks are colluding with the bullion houses.
	Because I said earlier in the broadcast, the dollars at war with gold That's why all these central banks are buying gold, ladies and gents.
	But we're not.
	We're not buying gold.
	So China has a vested interest in buying gold because it drives the price of gold up.
	And when you drive the price of gold up, you expose what happened to the dollar.
	And now it goes close to $2,400 an ounce again.
	It's glaringly obvious that we've lost control of something.
	So to answer Jason's question...
	I think that this will happen, and it could be a gradual thing, or it could be a shock where somebody places an order and they can't fill it on the comic.
	So it's going to be something interesting to watch.
	Yeah, it is. It is.
	We are in interesting times.
	The old Chinese curse.
	May you live in interesting times.
	But we're not worried about that.
	We'll just do what we can.
	And you've got a program that follows immediately after this program, right?
	Yes. Yes, sir. Arterburn Radio Transmission.
	Once a week here on Rockfin.
	If you're watching on Rockfin on the American Plug channel, on my Twitter at TonyArterburn and FreeWorld.fm.
	We'll probably just continue this conversation.
	That's what I did last week.
	I've got some other articles to talk about.
	I always love seeing you, David. DavidKnight.gold.
	I don't want to keep you forever, but DavidKnight.gold.
	The Wolfpack, we've got some great deals going on now with the prices going up.
	Even when prices increase, David, I'll wait a couple of days on invoices so you can still get yesterday's prices.
	So you can go check out DavidKnight.gold and check out Wolfpack.
	We've got a lot of great deals going on there and promo code 1776 for constitutional free silver.
	Thank you, Tony. I really do appreciate what you've done to support the show.
	And it's always important, just as we're talking about with the ETFs, the paper gold, the paper silver, and so forth, it's important to have somebody that you can trust.
	And so I've known Tony for a long time, done business with him for a long time.
	Thank you so much for what you do, Tony.
	It's great to have that resource there.
	DavidKnight.gold will take you to Tony.
	And right after the show, don't miss his program.
	Like he said, he's going to continue this discussion.
	We're going to take a quick break, folks, and we'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Liberty. It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	I didn't see this before we went to break guard, but I'm sure Tony will hear it.
	Thank you for the tip. He says, gentlemen, I'll be headed to Porkfest tomorrow, and that's pork folks with a C, as in porcupine, as in piggy wiggly.
	So Porkfest is a porcupine fest.
	That's the symbol for the libertarian festival they got up there is a porcupine, as in just leave me alone, okay?
	I'm not threatening you, unless...
	And I think that's a much better symbol than the snake.
	You know, the don't tread on me. I like the porcupine thing.
	It doesn't seem to be as threatening as a snake to many of us.
	But it could definitely cause you some problems.
	Anyway, I'll be headed to Porkfest tomorrow to see the good freedom backers there.
	I hope that soon we can all get together, share some gold and silver and smiles.
	Okay, well, that's good. Yeah, I'd like to do that.
	Here's to your fantastic work.
	Thank you, Gard. Appreciate that.
	I don't have gold and silver smile, though.
	I don't have any gold teeth or silver, but I understand.
	Thank you. Neurodivergent.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	Writes, here's my monthly contribution to my favorite political orphan.
	Thank you. It takes integrity and courage, but more importantly, faith to say things that nobody on the left or right want to hear.
	God bless. Well, thank you. That's very kind.
	Very kind. Appreciate that.
	And Dougalug, thank you for the tip.
	Dustin Helm says, Rockfin is blocking my tips all week.
	Even updated my card.
	I'll try Subscribestar.
	Yeah, I'm not really sure what's going on with that, but...
	Sorry, I don't know.
	We have gotten tips from other people, I think.
	I'll look at that and see that there's nothing weird going on.
	But again, you know, we're required to use these secondary things.
	I'm kicked off of PayPal.
	I'm kicked off of Venmo. I'm kicked off of YouTube.
	So, you know, we have to deal with what we can deal with.
	And the secondary outlets there are not quite as...
	They don't work quite as well as the big guys, but the big guys won't work with us at all.
	So my son says we've gotten tips on Rockfin today, but Subscribestar is better anyway.
	And so we do appreciate that.
	Again, you can leave tips on Subscribestar.
	You don't have to subscribe.
	It's great if you do.
	We really do appreciate that.
	That kind of gives us a baseline there.
	We can see how things are shaping up for the month when people subscribe to that.
	Comments about homeschooling, because we're going to go back to that.
	Delaville says, my hairdresser homeschools because her son was bullied over and over, and the school principal did nothing.
	Exactly Karen's experience.
	And, of course, you know, we talk about all the grooming of kids.
	That's done in the name of saving them from bullying.
	Folks, we've all known that bullying was always there.
	Whenever you get a massive group of kids all the same age and you've got one adult, it's going to be inevitable that there's going to be bullying going on there.
	That's one of the reasons why I think homeschooling is superior to that.
	Freegan says, when my school's principal confessed to 25 years of molesting boys.
	Wow. The school board transferred him to a neighboring school.
	Wow. Well, of course, when they found out, it wasn't made public, but when they found out about Dennis Hastert sexually molesting the wrestling coach, sexually molesting people in his high school, the Republicans ran him for Congress.
	And then they made him Speaker of the House, longest-serving Speaker of the House, so, you know, there you go.
	Narraway Narragate Ministries.
	Who remembers kids driving to school with shotguns on the rack in the back?
	I do. And doing target shooting at school, learning firearms, and also going hunting after school.
	As a matter of fact, even RFK Jr.
	has talked about that.
	And said, you know, we need to think about this because he leads into, well, what has really changed?
	What has changed in our society?
	Besides the moral decay, we've also got all these SSRI drugs that are out there and other drugs that are pushed out there to alter children's moods.
	It is a brave new world.
	Brave new schools.
	Jeb Stewart. Jeb Stewart!
	Hey! Two years ago, I was telling people in my club that Newsom will be the Democrat candidate in 2024.
	My bet is he's going to step in as late as possible.
	Most of them scoffed and said, no chance.
	Well, we'll see what's going to happen.
	I mean... The Democrats are throwing Biden under the bus for things that they ignored in the past.
	I think that that certainly is a possibility, especially as he continues to drop in the polls, you know, not just as he's going up and down steps.
	He's dropping in real life as well.
	Let's get back to the schools here.
	And, of course, we were talking about the fact that Scientific American wants the feds to somehow regulate homeschooling, to burden us with things that really are problems with the government schools as much, if not more so. So, U.S. schools, going back to 1983, you may remember there was a famous federal study that was called A Nation at Risk.
	And that was about the failure of government schools at that point in time.
	And that was 40-some-odd years ago.
	This op-ed piece by Stephen Moore said, well, the real warning of a nation at risk was the fact that we were getting to mediocrity.
	And he said, well, achieving mediocrity would be a big improvement over where we are right now, and that's for sure.
	We've achieved idiocracy.
	That's what we've achieved here.
	60 years of failing because it doesn't just go back to that report.
	They did that report because the schools had already been failing for decades.
	I look at 60 years plus when I started school.
	And I watched the whole thing decline as I was there.
	Karen saw more of it as she got out and then went back as a teacher, but the decline has really accelerated.
	It's like a soapbox derby where you're going downhill, and it's getting faster and faster, isn't it?
	Math scores hit a 20-year low.
	ACT scores dropped to a 30-year low last year in dozens of schools throughout the country.
	Not one child is reading or practicing math at grade-level proficiency.
	Not one. And of course now we even have Bill Gates saying, forget about getting the right answer with math.
	That is the final straw, isn't it?
	If you're going to say that there is no absolute truth in math, There is a right answer.
	Only one right answer.
	And as they remove that, we understand exactly what Gates is trying to do in terms of trying to destroy education, rational thought, critical thinking.
	He wants to enslave people.
	And when you look at the fact that you've got schools all over the place where they've got a very tiny minority population, We're good to go.
	And we have to do much better than that.
	It isn't the amount of money that you spend on the kids.
	It isn't the amount of days that they spend in the classroom, the amount of hours per day they spend in the classroom.
	It's not really about any of these quantitative measures.
	It's really more about qualitative stuff.
	The study famously warned Nation at Risk that if an unfriendly power had attempted to impose on America this mediocre system, it would be seen as an act of war.
	Folks, it is an act of war.
	It's just not a foreign power that's doing it.
	It's domestic powers.
	It's these people like Bill Gates and others.
	This was designed and planned, and this isn't anything that even began 60 years ago.
	This goes back to the design and plan of people like Thomas Dewey and Horace Mann going back to the 1800s.
	There was an excellent interview that I did with Alex Newman where he talks about the history of that, if you want to know that.
	He's written a book on that.
	And it's a long-running plan, but it really didn't get up to steam in terms of everybody getting into a government school until the early 20th century.
	And really started to pick up steam in the middle of the 20th century.
	And now it is a juggernaut destroying this country.
	Deliberately dumbing us down, as Charlotte Isabe said.
	The parental choice movement is gaining steam, especially in red states.
	And I mention that because you've got to beware of the dollars.
	The dollars are a trap.
	And that's my concern about these voucher systems and about the...
	Charter school systems and everything.
	If they fund it, they control it.
	And you better be careful.
	And if you're a homeschooler, don't touch any of that money.
	Not from the state, not from the feds.
	You don't need it. You really don't.
	Plenty of free resources out there.
	Plenty of used resources that you can get.
	The teachers unions adamantly oppose anybody measuring their performance.
	They can grade the students, but nobody can grade them.
	Back in 1983, the warning that our schools had slipped into a cesspool of mediocrity.
	Forty years later, that would be an improvement.
	And even Scientific American is silent about what's going on with the teachers in the schools.
	They go on offense and attack the homeschools, but they don't want to talk about what is actually any alternative.
	Reforms are coming, but will they get here soon enough?
	That's the ending of the article.
	Well, I'll just say this.
	Don't wait for politicians.
	You don't need their permission.
	You don't need their handouts.
	You don't need their money. You need a conviction.
	We have to stop worrying about the cost of freedom.
	And we have to stop worrying about these fundamental things that our kids desperately need.
	We don't want to be bought by these people.
	According to an early 2000 survey, nearly two-thirds of parents chose homeschooling for religious reasons.
	I always go back to that story stole by a pastor that I heard talking.
	And he said he had his kids in kindergarten.
	And they had a parent visitation day, and they were talking about this activity that they were doing.
	He raised his hands. He said, so what's the purpose of this activity?
	And they just kind of stopped and said, well, I don't know.
	You don't have a purpose? Even, you know, whatever you're doing that is so elaborate and so proud of, I mean, you should have some kind of a purpose.
	You should think about that, right?
	What is the end goal?
	What are you trying to establish with your kids?
	I used to remember when the kids were young, we'd drive around and see all these people, and it was very fashionable at the time that they would, if your kid made the honor roll, they would give you a bumper sticker and it would say, I've got a kid on the honor roll at such and such a school, right? And I told Karen, I said, we need to get a bumper sticker that says, we had to have a name for our school, right?
	I said, we need to get one that says, I've got an honorable student at such and such academy, right?
	That's what we're trying to do.
	We weren't trying to produce honorable students.
	We're trying to produce honorable students.
	And so, you know, what is your goal?
	And so they looked at this and it was actually done by an organization that does classic homeschooling.
	And, of course, you know, they ran the study and they found that the Association of Classical Christian Schools, and that is a good way to go if you want to do that.
	I mean, you're still having somebody else teaching your kids, but they do very rigorous academics and things like that.
	And in some areas, they did better.
	In other areas, the homeschoolers did better.
	They said that an evaluation of homeschooling would require an analysis of the goals that the parents have set for themselves.
	Like, what is your goal?
	Right? Do you want your child to have a relationship with you?
	Do you want your child to understand right from wrong?
	Do you want them to have a relationship with God, these different types of things?
	What is it that you're trying to do?
	That's one of the reasons why we homeschooled instead of going for a more rigorous academic thing.
	They said the survey compared outcomes between graduates of the Association of Classical Christian Schools Religious homeschoolers, normal evangelical schools, Catholic schools, and public schools on a number of issues.
	When they talked to the respondents, they were between the ages of 24 and 42.
	So a lot of these students were there at the very early days of homeschooling.
	So they looked at several different things, their attitudes towards and their accomplishments in terms of higher education, religious commitment, marriage, other things like that.
	They said homeschoolers were the least likely to attend college.
	Only 45% of them did.
	Maybe it's because they've got a different set of values.
	My sons are not interested in going to college.
	I discouraged them from doing it, even though we went to college, because I thought it was overpriced, first of all.
	Secondly, I thought there was a lot of garbage that was there.
	They said nearly 45% of homeschoolers who attended college earned A's or mostly A's in college, ranking second to the classical Christian schools.
	In terms of religious commitment, homeschoolers most likely to seek to strengthen their relationship with God, that's 45% of them.
	They were second most likely to feel that they had much in life to be thankful for, uh... sixty five percent of them And that was also second behind the classical Christian schoolers.
	In terms of marriage, they were the most likely to think that living together is morally wrong, about 50%.
	Second, most likely to think that divorce is wrong, 31%.
	Isn't that interesting? Even amongst Christian homeschoolers, you've still got two-thirds of them think, well, divorce is no problem.
	You know, it's so different from what I grew up in.
	As I've talked about, you know, like Liz Taylor who had something like seven husbands, and she was just a pariah, you know, with my parents and their friends.
	You know, it's like, oh, that woman.
	But, you know, now everybody has accepted that because...
	It's been standardized by Hollywood.
	And these Christians celebrate Trump, who has dumped, not just divorced his wives, That has dumped on them, as he does every former employee when they leave him.
	70%, just under 70% said premarital sex is wrong.
	Homeschoolers are the group most likely to endorse the traditional male provider, female homemaker model of family life.
	So, again, think about what it is that you want from your kids and understand that nothing is 100%.
	As we're looking at this, whether you're talking about Religious commitment, or you're talking about Christian marriage, or other things like that.
	Nothing is 100%.
	Yeah, it's about 50-50, but it's still way higher than it is for kids that are going through public school.
	So, you do what you can, you understand that it truly is up to God.
	In terms of trust, and I thought this was interesting, through my access to the raw data as a writer, Homeschoolers scored the lowest on trust in terms of trusting neighbors, co-workers, the federal government, public schools, the mass media, scientists, atheists, or people in general.
	In other words, in God we trust, everybody else pays cash.
	They're the most likely to think the dominant US culture is hostile to their religious and moral values.
	They're also the group that is second most likely to be independent thinkers.
	So the classical Christian schoolers are slightly ahead.
	I think that is based.
	Again, you need to be skeptical.
	You need to say, show me.
	You don't need to be hostile to people.
	But you also, I think, need to be somewhat skeptical.
	We look at what happened with people as they trust politicians, as they trust scientists like Fauci and so forth.
	It's a very dangerous thing to hand out your trust when it hasn't been earned, I think.
	So... Bubbles8621, we have proud to be an LGBT parent bumper stickers now.
	That's, yeah, there you go.
	You put that, I guess, on your training mission of your car.
	Your transmission. Jason Barker, the best thing you can do for your kids is to start them off in life debt-free.
	College will do just the opposite.
	Exactly right. I mean, it's just ridiculous how much college tuition costs now.
	And folks, as we've always said...
	When the government subsidizes something, it gets more expensive.
	And as soon as they started heavily subsidizing this stuff, I watched in my lifetime from the time I was in college, I've just seen it go exponential in terms of curriculum.
	And it doesn't help for the government to come in and start giving people tuition subsidies.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to take a look at this Ten Commandments new law that has been put in Louisiana.
	The governor says he can't wait to be sued, and people are lining up to sue him.
	The usual suspects are lining up to do that.
	that we'll be right back.
	♪♪♪
	M. Seller says there's many different reasons why people we knew in our co-op homeschooled and different religions as well, and some weren't even Christians.
	Oh, absolutely. I knew a lot of secular libertarians who homeschooled because they were opposed to communism.
	And that was before the schools were pushing critical race theory and a bunch of other things that are really setting up that type of, you know, Marxism.
	But yeah, there's a lot of reasons and a lot of people, it's not just Christians.
	We focus on that because, from my perspective, I think it's important to not just be against something, but to be for something.
	And that really kind of brings us, I think, to this Ten Commandments thing.
	The new law requiring all Louisiana public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments.
	Well, I'm not against this at all, frankly.
	I'm in favor of people being exposed to stuff.
	Will it be effective? I don't know.
	Like I said before, look, if you're raised by your parents, Christian parents, in a homeschool, you've still got about a 50-50 chance.
	And we know a lot of kids who were raised by very Christian parents, and they're not following in their ways, at least not yet.
	The jury is still out.
	I'm always reminded of George Mueller, who I've talked about him many times.
	He had an orphanage that he set up, set it up on faith, and God always provided in amazing and miraculous ways.
	Well, if you want to see God working in somebody's life, just read his diary.
	It is amazing.
	But he had a long list of people that he prayed for to become Christians.
	And when he died, a lot of them were not Christians.
	But before they died, a lot of them became, the majority of them did become Christians.
	And so we never know about our kids.
	You know, we have promises, train up a child in the way they should go.
	And when they're old, they will not depart from it.
	So we don't really know what is going to happen to these kids.
	And, you know, there's not any guarantee.
	You know, God doesn't have grandchildren.
	He just has children.
	So there has to be that relationship between them and with God.
	And so when you look at something like the Ten Commandments, you know, we have so many things that the moral foundation of our country is gone.
	And there were a lot of things that were part of that foundation.
	Besides the Ten Commandments.
	The Ten Commandments is an important thing for people to understand.
	The idea that there is a moral code, the idea that there is a God that is going to hold us to that, that is essential for a nation to have a moral foundation.
	But I think, you know, when you look at it in terms of the kids...
	And this is one of the reasons, again, why we did Christian homeschooling.
	I think it's important for kids to see not only the law, not only to see the standard of morality there, but they also have to see the grace of God.
	I think it's just as important.
	The law is a teacher. The law is going to show them what is right and wrong.
	Seeing right and wrong, you understand that, yeah, you can't keep it.
	And you've already failed to keep it.
	And so then what happens?
	If you just leave the Ten Commandments there and you don't show them the cross, Seems to me like that's not going to be exactly what we need.
	We do need to have some kind of a moral restriction there, but some kind of a moral code for kids to live by and understand.
	And that, I guess, is what the school is trying to do.
	Here's the bottom line.
	All education is going to be religious, whether you like it or not.
	That was something that R.L. Dabney wrote about right after the Civil War.
	And at that point in time, there was no public education in the South.
	There really wasn't any public education outside of Massachusetts.
	And he believed that the public education in Massachusetts was somewhat responsible for the Civil War, the attitude that we're going to tell you what to do, we know better than you, that type of thing.
	But either way, he made a very compelling case that there is no such thing as a secular education.
	Secular humanism can be your religion.
	Transgenderism can be your religion or whatever.
	The LGBT stuff. You can make a religion out of Marxism.
	You can worship the state. You can worship politicians of every stripe.
	The heart is an idol factory.
	And so the question is, which religion is going to be taught?
	There will be a religion, there will be a worldview that will be taught.
	So which one is it going to be?
	And I think that's really at the center of what this fight is going to be.
	And he argued that the state should have absolutely no connection to religion whatsoever.
	Because in whatever way it's going to get involved in teaching values, even if it's the values that you agree with, it's going to be...
	We're establishing a religion and it's going to be pushing that religion and who knows what that religion is going to be.
	The majority of people may push out your religion and your kids are then going to be taught this other religion, whether it is humanism or maybe it's Islam or whatever, who knows what that's going to be.
	And so that's really kind of where I come down on this.
	Now, in terms of putting up the poster, they're going to, I think, try to get around the establishment of religion aspect by talking about its historical significance.
	Ten Commandments, they said, it'll have four-paragraph context added to the Ten Commandments in the poster.
	It'll say they were a prominent part of American public education for almost three centuries, and Well, again, public education was rare to non-existent most of the last three centuries.
	It's only really been about a century that it's been a part of that.
	And even when you look back in the 1920s, very small, locally controlled schools, very different from what we have right now.
	centrally controlled federal schools telling people there's no right answer to math even Not long after the governor signed the bill into law They had civil rights groups and organizations met at Our Lady of Fatima Catholic School in Lafayette Saying they want to keep religion out of government. They promised to file a lawsuit challenging it as usual suspects the ACLU the Freedom From Religion Foundation That's what it says
	uh... in the constitution The Constitution says freedom of religion, free exercise of religion.
	Americans United for Separation of Church and State, all of them are going to be suing this, so the governor's not going to have to wait long.
	Again, I think that there's no such thing as a value-free education.
	There's no such thing as an education that does not have a worldview attached to it.
	And I don't want the government, especially this government that we've got right now, really pushing any of that.
	Republicans hold every statewide elected position in Louisiana.
	And, you know, when I look at it, it's like, so what are the Republicans going to teach?
	Are they going to teach some MAGA religion?
	We got people like General Flynn and Julie Green out there mixing Christianity with theosophy and New Age paganism.
	Is that what we want?
	I mean, that's the MAGA religion that's out there.
	You really want that? I don't, again, I don't support government schools at all.
	I want to see government get out of the school business.
	There will be no free freedom, free exercise of religion, no real free thought or real freedom of free exercise of religion unless we get the government out of education.
	Because education, especially the way that it's being practiced right now, is indoctrination.
	And, you know, it's this tug of war going back and forth.
	It's just like this tug of war. We want all this power in the White House.
	And so we get this tug of war, this pulling us into a civil war as to whether or not it's going to be one of these two Hegelian puppets sitting there.
	And it is a false dichotomy that is being offered to us in the schools as well.
	It's not real religion.
	It is very, very shallow what they're going to be teaching kids.
	It's not going to be of any use to them whatsoever.
	I don't want the schools to even exist.
	I certainly don't want to fight over who's going to control these schools that shouldn't exist in the first place.
	And when we talk about the Establishment Clause, understand that the First Amendment says Congress shall not establish a religion.
	I was not talking about what the states do.
	The states can do that.
	They have the constitutional ability to do that.
	I don't think it's a wise decision, but you had for over 40 years, Connecticut and Massachusetts continued to have an official state-established religion After the Constitution was signed, that established religion that they wanted prohibited was an established federal religion because all these different states at the time had their own established state religions.
	And they all got rid of them, but even 40 years later, you still had an established religion in Massachusetts.
	So, the real equation for Bill Gates here is that religion plus politics equals politics.
	If you mix it with religion, you're going to simply get politics.
	And so, again, take control of your kids' education.
	Think about what kind of person you want them to be and educate toward that.
	Focus the curriculum that you give to them.
	You don't have to be dominated by the curriculum, even if they've got inspectors and people who test.
	You don't have to worry about that.
	Because if they've got a curriculum, and they've got standardized testing, and even if they were to force that on you as a homeschooler, guess what?
	Their kids and their schools can't pass their tests.
	So you don't have to pass it.
	If you get a thick skin, tell your kids, well, okay, this test doesn't mean anything.
	We haven't talked to it. We don't agree with what they're asking.
	If you get an F on it, if you get a zero, it doesn't matter.
	You just got to give them the test and put it in.
	That's an important life lesson to say that your life is not going to be defined by these government bureaucrats To think independently to think critically about what is really going on here. Does this test matter?
	No, put your name on it mark some stuff by rent and send it in who cares It's like you know, that's I think that's one of the most important lessons that you can The real purpose of a test...
	It's to find out, for the person who's being tested, it's to find out what they know, right?
	That person needs to understand where they are.
	And so there's values and tests.
	I'm just saying that if you've got a government that does what Scientific American wants to do, which is to evaluate you and so forth, don't worry about what they think.
	Because they're not teaching any of that stuff to their kids that are in their institutions.
	So they really can't hold you to that standard.
	M Sellers. Our kids trust no one.
	LOL. That's good.
	That's really good.
	We don't want to raise babes in the woods who are going to be sadder but wiser because they've got to take advantage of.
	Let other people earn their trust.
	Instead of just giving it away for free.
	AP Rumble seat.
	It should be up to parents to religiously and morally instruct.
	Once you put that into legislation, you're opening up a Pandora's box for corruption, tyranny, and abuse.
	Yeah. Syrian girl.
	The government is not going to show these captive children the cross, so we have to start somewhere.
	At least the Ten Commandments might ground them against relativism.
	Yeah, it is a foundation, but again...
	Here's the danger of the Ten Commandments.
	The danger is where people think something's being done, right?
	The danger is to lull parents and to think, oh, that's good.
	Here in Louisiana, we got the Ten Commandments in every classroom.
	Well, you know, that's such a low beginning standard.
	You know, I've seen Ray Comfort do this.
	He engages people in California, and he tries to get them to understand where they stand before God, you know, that all of us have sin.
	So he'll begin with the Ten Commandments, and he'll use that.
	But he goes directly to the cross.
	What do you do with that sin?
	What do you do with the fact that, you know, you've already blown your shot with God?
	You want a second shot? Well, here's how you get the second shot, that type of thing.
	I think there's a lot of value to that, but again, it's just like everything else that the government schools do.
	There's really not much value to it, if any.
	Canadians have gathered to protest LGBT pride in schools.
	They have a One Nation Under God rally.
	Why am I talking about this?
	We know that parents are upset about what's going on and for good reason.
	Why am I talking about this one?
	Well, I think what's important about this story, you know, talking about Ten Commandments, they want to have ten genders or more.
	It would be an improvement to have the Ten Commandments instead of the ten genders that are out there.
	But this is being organized.
	The main organizer in all this is a pro-family Muslim activist.
	Kamal al-Sheikh is the organizer of the Million Person March for Children on September 20th of last year.
	He's currently advocating for June to be dedicated to protecting children and not pushing LGBT ideology.
	So instead of having it be a Pride Month, have a month where you celebrate children.
	My child, June, is what he says.
	And so we look at this, you know, as this is a guy who's a Muslim, and I think this is an important thing for us to understand that we can have co-belligerence with us, people who are on our side in this culture war, in this religious war against us and against our kids.
	We can have people whose religion we don't agree with, who can be co-belligerents on the politics side of this.
	And we all agree that kids should not be gaslighted, groomed, mutilated, and things like that.
	Yeah.
	And if there's a guy out there who's a Muslim or whatever, some other religion that I don't agree with, you know, if we can fight against that being done to kids, I think that's a good thing.
	Maybe not much else that we would agree on, but if we can agree on that and bring together numbers to stop it, I think that's an important thing.
	That's why I think it's important to understand that.
	But he says, ladies and gentlemen, what is My Child June?
	Well, for years now, we are...
	Canadians, and we don't want to offend, we're not violent.
	We're a peaceful country. Now, this is the thing that I think has been taken for granted.
	But do not take our kindness for weakness.
	You have to have resolve.
	Another person there, Dr.
	Ann Gillies, said the pride flag, I want to tell you, is a desecration to our national identity.
	And it is, you know, we have to understand the shifting foundations...
	And, like I said, they're trying to reform the public schools.
	I'm not really interested in reform of the public school.
	I want to shut them down.
	But, you know, if we can, reform would be better than doing nothing at all if we can't get it shut down.
	Public schools in June celebrated Pride Month.
	Many Canadian families kept their kids out of school from May 31st to June 4th.
	Instead, they participated in pray-ins at Catholic school boards and bishops' offices.
	They said with school boards and mainstream media not reporting the absences, they said that in 31 French schools in the Ottawa area, They had a 70% average absence rate observed.
	So people are boycotting it.
	And that's a start. You know, you get them to walk out in one week, and then after a while you get them to walk out forever.
	And if we get enough people out of the system long enough, then what we do is we start building an interest in defunding that system.
	Nobody wants to pay for a system that teaches things that we abhor, right?
	That was the central thing with Thomas Jefferson and his move for religious liberty.
	He said, I think it's wrong to make people contribute to a system that teaches stuff that people abhor.
	And I think that is really what has happened in In general to everything in our schools.
	And eight of the ten Canadian provinces have had walkout campaigns.
	So it's starting to move through Canada as well.
	Then this from the Free Thought Project.
	Why do modern humans feel so empty and what can we do about it?
	This is a very long article, but they don't have any solutions quite frankly Because they don't even talk about God they do talk about our isolation from each other and how everybody is Isolated we were losing the family connection. We're losing the community connection But nowhere does it mention the fact that we've lost our connection to God And I guess you know when we look at this and as I point
	out everybody's caught up in these amazing technological Advancements, but what does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose their own soul?
	Right? These are just, we look at the technology.
	I like technology. I got into engineering because I liked technology.
	But at some point you realize that it's kind of like the little busy boxes that you give your toddlers, you know, to move things around.
	They're not really accomplishing anything, and it can distract you from living your life.
	It can distract you from engaging with other people.
	And so, going to finish this out, there was an interesting article from the Mises Institute.
	The problem with Juneteenth.
	And I said this earlier in the week.
	I said, I think Juneteenth is a metaphor.
	A metaphor for political freedom.
	I think it's a metaphor for true freedom.
	It's not being used that way in many cases.
	That's what this article from Conor A'Keefe at the Mises Institute was saying.
	I mentioned, I actually had a lady write me.
	I said, I don't know what this is about that Biden is doing.
	Because they went, a couple of weeks ago, they had some Juneteenth event.
	And I said, I guess this is about freedom thing or something like that.
	But I said that.
	I know what Juneteenth is about.
	I just didn't know why Biden...
	I don't think Biden knew why he was there either.
	I didn't know why Biden and his wife and Lala Harris and her husband, I didn't know why they were there.
	I was laughing about the way that Biden was not...
	Well, so Stephanie wasn't dancing.
	It's not very much like the way I was.
	But the... I said, you know, why are they there?
	It's not for a couple of weeks yet, you know?
	So they had these early Juneteenth things, but I know what Juneteenth was about.
	And I think the key takeaway from Juneteenth, a couple of them, one of them is for people to understand that they need to know their rights.
	You know, here are people who continued on as slaves for a period of time because they didn't know, you know, for a couple of months.
	They didn't know that the war had ended.
	They didn't know that they were free.
	And so we need to understand what our rights are.
	And one of the things that he says in here is that the progressives like to push positive rights And what that means, it sounds good, right?
	No, we talk about negative rights.
	That means a negative right means that I'm going to impose a negation on the government trampling on my God-given rights.
	Whereas the progressives, and they like to label it as positive because they control the terminology.
	They say, well, you've got a right to food, you've got a right to housing, you've got a right to college education, all these other things.
	No, you don't. You don't have any of those rights.
	You have a right to be left alone.
	And that's what the Bill of Rights was about.
	Obama understood that.
	Obama criticized that. I mean, I don't like the Bill of Rights.
	It's all negative.
	It's all telling the government you can't do this and you can't do that to me.
	Well, if the government is going to hand you stuff, they've just handed you slavery again.
	That's what he's talking about.
	And he also says, you know, we need to think about the abolition of slavery as being one of the greatest achievements of our civilization's history.
	Because throughout history, every civilization has had slavery.
	We're the civilization that ended it.
	And one way or the other, it was and how it could have been done better.
	That's why I always like to talk about how it was done better.
	Thanks to the efforts of a committed Christian, William Wilberforce, who spent his entire life fighting against the established slavery.
	And of course, with the British Empire, it was far wealthier, more powerful than the American industry.
	And it was slavery was embedded in everything that they did.
	And so he went into this, he opposed this entrenched industry.
	Think about it like the pharmaceutical industry.
	It had its tentacles in everything.
	And he opposed it and made it his life work, and he got that ended.
	And I think that's an inspiration for all of us, and it's also an inspiration for us to know where we are free, to know what our rights are.
	You know, as Jesus said, you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.
	And that is true in every aspect of our life.
	We need to understand what these rights are.
	We need to understand that they are prohibition, that we have God-given rights, and we have the government there to protect those rights, to keep the government at bay.
	And that's a difficult thing.
	And the founders were aware of that.
	They said, well, since we're not angels, we need to have government, or the government's going to be run by men.
	You know, what do we do? That's the tension.
	And that's why it requires our attention to all of that.
	And Juneteenth, I think, is a good example of that.
	But of course, it's been taken over by a lot of the Marxists.
	And so, like everything else, we need to fight for that narrative, even for Juneteenth, to make it about freedom.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲