Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 18, 2024 - The David Knight Show

03:00:50

The David Knight Show - 06/18/2024

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Night Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 18th of June.
	Year of our Lord, 2024.
	Well, today we're going to look at the radical MAGA people who are out for revenge.
	And they're taking this even to a new level.
	We have a congressional candidate in Florida, in the Tampa area, now calling for the end of habeas corpus.
	So they can lock people up.
	You know, take the person, do the due process later.
	Where do you get that idea from?
	I don't know. But then we're going to also take a look at Redfield, who is now making the talk show circuit going on with, of all people, Chris Cuomo.
	Talking about pushing bird flu again.
	Boy, this is just like 2020, isn't it?
	And we're kind of coming up in the third hour.
	We're going to have an interview with David Hughes, who's written a book talking about Wall Street and the crimes of the Nazis.
	Yeah, you know, it's kind of like Operation Paperclip.
	I call it Operation Ticker Tape.
	These people who are running the global governance are doing economic warfare and conquest against us.
	We'll be right back. Well, this appeared on my Twitter feed yesterday.
	I don't know why.
	It wasn't anybody that I follow.
	It wasn't any topic that I was interested in.
	Now, maybe it was promoted.
	I don't know. But this is a congressional candidate in Florida.
	James Judge is his name.
	And there was somebody who retweeted it for him and said, well, James Judge wants to suspend habeas corpus.
	So President Trump can imprison political enemies.
	That's what he wrote. And he says, unbelievably based.
	Well, it is unbelievable, but it is not based.
	And I replied and I said, you know, MAGA is being played yet again.
	Yet again.
	There's no talk of reform, only of revenge.
	You know, we've got a big problem with the legal system, don't we, when it can be used this way?
	What do you do to stop it? No talk, no discussion at all about that.
	None whatsoever. We have a political candidate who, as his lawyer Ty Cobb said, is incapable of acting except out of his own perceived interest and out of revenge.
	And boy, that all lines up with this, doesn't it?
	It's all right here.
	Yeah, there's no talk of reform, only of revenge.
	Said, meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
	What is the difference if Trump goes out and locks up his enemies?
	We're going to have a civil war over Trump.
	And they keep saying it.
	Bannon is saying it. They're all saying it.
	You know, he goes to this thing by Charlie Kirk and they're all out there.
	We're going to get revenge. We're going to lock these people up.
	And this congressional candidate even appeals to Lincoln over this.
	Yes, folks, your hero, Abraham Lincoln, suspended habeas corpus.
	He did a lot of things.
	He was, as Peter Hammond pointed out, as he observed from South Africa, he said, you know, Abraham Lincoln was a fascist.
	They even put the fascista symbols there in his temple.
	That's the way that the Park Service describes the Lincoln Monument, a temple to a political figure to be worshipped.
	And he's got the two big fascistas there that he's resting his hands on.
	And it was about consolidation of power.
	It was about that fourth turning, which was to create the nation-state And to go from an agrarian society to the Industrial Revolution, it was about all of those different things.
	Yes, slavery was a part of it here, but as I've pointed out many times, Italy had a civil war over the issues of the consolidation of the nation-state and the Industrial Revolution at exactly the same time, 1861-1865.
	Slavery was not a component in Italy, and it was not the prime—it was not the mover— Of what happened in America either.
	It provided a moral cover for the tyrants to say that they were getting rid of slavery.
	Important to keep in mind, we see Juneteenth coming up.
	And as a matter of fact, one of the things that strikes me about Juneteenth is that this is a celebration of people who finally found out they'd been free.
	I thought, you know, that's got really important.
	They had been freed, but they didn't know it.
	And I finally got the news then.
	That has important ramifications for all of us, in a sense.
	You know, folks, we're all free.
	We just don't understand it.
	You don't ever have to be captive to politics.
	You don't ever have to make your life dependent upon what happens in Washington or in the Oval Office.
	Yes, you should understand, because these people are dangerous.
	You should understand how they're going to come after you, so you can try to get out of their way, so you can try to avoid it, so you can try to counter it.
	But they are not the things that control your life, and if they are, You need to have a Juneteenth experience.
	You need to understand that you're free.
	If you know the truth, if you know God, the truth will set you free.
	God will set you free. Set you free from the concerns of this world.
	Not to say that we just walk away and live in a la-la land.
	No, we're still called to be engaged in an active way about what is happening here.
	Not to just check out and live in a monastery or an ivory tower or whatever.
	No, we're very much engaged.
	But this is not what controls our life.
	It isn't what gives us meaning to our life.
	People like Hillary Clinton look for meaning in their life based on politics, based on their career and their success.
	And of course, we can do the same thing with our jobs.
	Even if they aren't as high-profile or as high-paying as being an international criminal like Hillary Clinton.
	But we don't have to imprison ourselves.
	We don't have to be slaves to these things.
	And so we need to understand that.
	And we also need to understand, as I continue to say here, the establishment wants civil war.
	And these MAGA idiots will play along with it yet again.
	Habeas Corpus, by the way, was born out of Christian persecution.
	This guy spends a bit of time.
	I'm going to play it.
	I'm going to get to it in a second here.
	He talks about how he's got military experience.
	He became a Christian, I think, eight years ago or something, 2016.
	And he said it set his life, turned his life around and everything.
	It was fine. Okay. I would just say to him that what you need to do is imitate Christ, not Trump.
	Imitate Christ, not Trump.
	I need to spend a little bit more time in the Bible, perhaps, in your Christian walk, because then you'll understand the importance of these things.
	And maybe you want to, if you're going to run for Congress, I don't know, educate yourself a little bit about history, about politics.
	That could be useful. So here's his speech.
	Good evening. My name is James Judge, and I'm running for U.S. Congress in Florida's 15th Congressional District.
	I'm a Coast Guard veteran.
	I served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and I'm also a Tampa Bay Area native and small business center.
	As you may know, I'm a Christian.
	But prior to 2019, my life was headed in the wrong direction.
	That's when I decided to give my life to the Lord.
	Since then, God has mended my marriage and helped me in every aspect of my life.
	Let me say this about God.
	He is real, He created us, and He wants us to acknowledge Him.
	And He wants what's best for us.
	I bring up my faith because Biblical truth is what this nation was originally founded upon.
	But today, our government has rejected God.
	Instead, it funds abortion, DEI, LGBTQ, and transgender surgeries while replacing the Bible with porn in our schools.
	Our problem is not constitutional but cultural, and this didn't happen by accident.
	President Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Steve Bannon, Roger Stone, General Flynn, and more than 1,400 January Sixers have all been arrested and charged.
	This is no longer politics, this is war.
	In response to this threat, and President Trump's call this week for Congress to do something, I propose looking back to measures that President Lincoln and Congress took in 1862 to quell the rebellion.
	As they did, I'll put forth legislation on President Trump's first day in office to suspend the writ of habeas corpus.
	This will give President Trump the authority to arrest and imprison the treasonous officials and subversives who now occupy positions across our government.
	These people are scary.
	Stupid. Scary stupid.
	Well, he's right on the issues.
	And he's a thousand percent wrong on the solution.
	You don't suspend habeas corpus.
	Look, he wants to talk about the Christian foundations of our nation.
	Do you understand anything about that, James Judge?
	Do you understand where habeas corpus came from?
	Do you understand that habeas corpus came about because William Penn was told that he could not hold church services?
	Is there anything in our history that kind of rings a bell with that?
	I know history doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme, doesn't it?
	Well, you know, they had their own religion.
	They had a state religion.
	We have a state religion.
	We have a Pope, Fauci, you know, who's a high priest of this state religion.
	He told people that they couldn't meet, and if you did that in defiance, you got the same kind of treatment in most areas that William Penn got.
	First, they padlocked the church building, and then William Penn met with his church on the steps of that building.
	So then they arrested William Penn.
	And the trial, you had, Ed Bushnell was the foreman of that trial, and he and the co-foreman said, we don't like this law.
	We're not going to enforce it.
	That's the most important thing about juries.
	Nullification. They said, this is a bad law.
	We will not enforce it.
	Clearly, he violated the law.
	There was no question about that.
	The facts of the case were clear.
	You know, in every one of the trials that we've got, judges will tell the jury, you're not here to judge the law.
	You're here to judge the facts of the case.
	No, you're here to judge the government as well as this case.
	You're here to judge the law as well as the facts of the case.
	And we've had jury nullification.
	One of the reasons that alcohol prohibition stopped, because they could no longer enforce it.
	People said, I'm going to keep sending people to jail for drinking alcohol.
	And so they changed it.
	But it was really jury nullification that stopped that.
	But going back to William Penn, who later, Pennsylvania was named after him.
	In that trial, Edward Bushnell, the foreman, And the other guy said, not guilty.
	And the judge was so outraged that he threw the foreman and the co-foreman into jail because he had to let William Penn go.
	Habeas corpus was established because their lawyer came up to him and said, what law has the jury violated?
	Where does it say that the jury can't follow its conscience?
	Where does it say that the jury can't nullify a law?
	Oh, uh, uh, uh.
	You see, we need to lean into these things, like habeas corpus, rather than abandon them.
	You want to talk about how this is a nation founded on Christian principles, and you know nothing about the struggles that people went through that caused them to found this nation?
	Are you kidding me?
	The guy who put this out, and I retweeted that, and he comes by and goes, well, you sure have fallen off since you were at Infowars.
	And I said, I haven't changed at all.
	I haven't changed at all.
	And I said, you political newbies who know nothing disgust me.
	It absolutely disgusts me to see people calling for things like the removal of habeas corpus.
	It disgusts me to see people on the left or see people who support Israel calling for the removal of free speech.
	To protect us from hateful speech.
	We cannot remove these foundations.
	They are vital to our survival.
	These things are far more...
	Habeas corpus is far more important to us than Donald Trump.
	Far more important.
	And quite frankly, I would ask him, okay, you want a current day analogy to what happened to William Penn?
	Well, why aren't you concerned about Trump?
	Who, like the rulers in Britain at the time of William Penn, said, sorry, you can't meet in church.
	We're going to shut it down.
	We've got a different religion now.
	It's a religion based around worship of a virus.
	The virus. Save us from the virus.
	All hail the glorious virus.
	Bow and worship before it.
	Put on your garments of humiliation, the masks, and all the rest of this stuff.
	Stay apart from other people.
	Keep yourself holy, okay?
	What kind of superstitious nonsense did Donald Trump have us marching to four years ago, and you don't even remember it?
	You're not only ignorant, you people who support Trump, you're not only completely ignorant of history, you're completely ignorant of your own life and willfully ignorant.
	Disgust me. You disgust me.
	You're not part of what I'm talking about.
	You may get the right idea on these issues, but you have no idea.
	That's why these people are so dangerous.
	They look at the problems that are done by Biden.
	They say, well, therefore, we need to get rid of habeas corpus.
	Oh, therefore, we need to get rid of free speech.
	Let's see, what else can we throw out?
	Let's see, we could throw out the Second Amendment, take the guns and do the due process later.
	I know, I can fix that bump stock thing.
	I can do that myself, fortunately.
	Trump doesn't know, doesn't care about the Constitution.
	He doesn't know, doesn't care about history.
	He doesn't know, he doesn't care about the Lord Jesus Christ.
	And I'm sick of these phony Christians like Michael Flynn and the rest of them.
	James Judge may be a real Christian.
	I'm not saying he's phony.
	But I'm saying if you're going to lead ascended prayers, occultic prayers from theosophy in these pseudo-religious meetings, Now, I'm not going to give you any assurance that you're a Christian, and that includes Julie Green as well.
	Folks, we got to separate the wheat from the chaff here.
	We got to have a little bit of discernment here.
	It's just amazing to me.
	These people who want war, who want revenge, we cannot allow them to have political control.
	The people who are, quote, on your side, that are actually working for chaos, working for global governance.
	As I've said before, I'll say it again.
	A spy who will stab you in the back is far more dangerous than the regiments that are coming at you wearing their uniform, attacking you on the front.
	Remember the fifth column analogy?
	Yeah, we've got four columns attacking the city.
	But what's even better?
	We've got a fifth column of people inside the city who are on our side.
	And that's more powerful than those four columns on the outside.
	I said in 2020, I said what will happen is Biden, who will fly his flag and wear his uniform of Marxism, will galvanize people into resistance.
	Whereas Trump will gain their confidence and stab them in the back, as he did before.
	And you better understand, if you know anything about history, you know that the second term of these presidents is always the worst one.
	Always the worst one.
	It's like the Supreme Court justices.
	They might be conservative-leaning when they get appointed, but And then by the time they leave, they're just as liberal as any of the Democrat-appointed Supreme Court justices.
	But I want to play for you just a little bit of what he said there about end habeas corpus.
	I want to let this sink in. President Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Steve Bannon, Roger Stone, General Flynn, and more than 1,400 January Sixers have all been arrested and charged.
	This is no longer politics.
	This is war. In response to this threat and President Trump's call this week for Congress to do something, I propose looking back to measures that President Lincoln and Congress took in 1862 to quell the rebellion.
	As they did, I'll put forth legislation on President Trump's first day in office to suspend the writ of habeas corpus.
	This will give President Trump the authority to arrest and imprison the treasonous officials and subversives who now occupy positions across our government.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And he mentions, you know, Trump, Rudy, Bannon, Flynn, and the 1400 J6ers.
	Wait a minute. How did the 1400 J6ers get in trouble?
	Well, they followed Trump.
	They gave him money, $250 million he made more after the election with that grift than he had before.
	$250 million and they followed him to Washington because they thought there was something they could do to fix it.
	It was the wrong solution.
	It was bad leadership.
	And I don't think it was bad leadership and ignorance.
	I think it was a deliberate manipulation.
	Come with me. Follow me.
	Meet me over there at the Congress building.
	And he doesn't show up. He goes somewhere else.
	Same thing with Alex Jones.
	Come with me.
	January the 6th. There's no way that Biden is going to take office.
	We're going to make sure that one way or the other, we're going to get that guy out.
	And then when it hits the fan, he runs to the other side of town, hangs out at the Supreme Court building.
	He made a lot of money off of Stop the Steal as well.
	Now, Trump, as I pointed out, could have pardoned all these 1,400 J6ers who were there.
	He could have done a blanket pardon.
	It's been done. You don't have to wait until somebody is indicted or found guilty.
	But they don't even have to be indicted for you to pardon them.
	You can do it in advance.
	That was done by Gerald Ford for Richard Nixon.
	And it was done for an entire class of insurrectionists, as they would see them, by Andrew Johnson after the Civil War.
	You know, they wrote that Insurrection Act and not a single person.
	Was charged with insurrection?
	There were people in the Congress who wanted them punished.
	Andrew Johnson, who I'm not a big fan of at all, but Andrew Johnson did the right thing.
	He said, we've had enough killing.
	Let's not perpetuate this.
	I mean, if they'd started arresting people, that would have kicked off a long-lasting guerrilla war.
	There were still some people who were still ready to fight.
	And that would have kicked off a guerrilla war.
	And so he said, let's just, let's pardon everybody.
	Before you charge them with anything.
	Before they're found guilty.
	Yo, they got some people here who passed an insurrection act.
	I'm pardoning them all right now.
	Trump could have done that to his followers.
	Why didn't he? Is it because he's ignorant?
	Or is it because he's only capable of acting in his own perceived self-interest?
	I think that's what it was.
	These people must be opposed.
	They must be opposed.
	It doesn't do my program any good to attack these people, or Trump, but they must be opposed.
	Bannon is out there naming names.
	A list of people that he wants prosecuted in a second term.
	He wants war.
	He wants revenge.
	He doesn't have any ideas for reform.
	He has no proposals for legal changes.
	He's not talking about any new checks or balances or even setting it up so that we enforce the checks and balances that are there right now.
	No. I'm going to use this system and I'm going to be a bigger monster than they are.
	Right? What do I say?
	Whenever you've got a war, you be careful that you don't become the monster that you fight.
	Well, they have become the monsters that they fight.
	And he's not proposing anything of any value that will make any changes.
	He's not proposing any restrictions on the police and surveillance state that have oppressed our people.
	Not these politicians.
	I don't care about them.
	Trump and Biden and the rest of these people belong in jail for what they did in 2020.
	And on. But, you know, these types of things that they're so concerned about, oh, Mar-a-Lago.
	I mean, you know, Trump has got his own private army of people to protect him.
	There could have been a crossfire and they could have shot at each other.
	Who cares? We don't have a private army to protect ourselves.
	And if somebody breaks into your house in the middle of the night and you grab your firearm to protect yourself because you don't know what it is, they'll kill you.
	It's happened over and over again.
	Or they'll just shoot into the house.
	Maybe the wrong house.
	That's happened over and over again as well.
	And kill somebody in the wrong house.
	Or maybe they'll shoot flashbang grenades through the window into a baby's crib and burn the baby.
	That's our SWAT teams.
	That's our military people.
	You want to talk about Mar-a-Lago?
	Come on, get real.
	This privileged world that Trump lives in disgusts me.
	His gilded life.
	His ostentatious display.
	You know, I thought it was interesting when they're talking about the movie, The Apprentice.
	They said, you know, we did the sets and the clothing.
	We had to make it look expensive yet tasteless.
	Gauche and gaudy.
	Now, that pretty much describes Trump.
	Trump has said he will seek retribution for what he calls his persecution.
	Bannon is scheduled to report to prison on July 1st after being convicted of contempt of Congress.
	Well, he did the crime.
	And I understand that that crime is, and I've said that, I said, well, why aren't they even prosecuting Hunter?
	Because Hunter's contempt was even as big, if not more so, than Bannon's.
	Hunter held a press conference with the Capitol in the background on the day that he was supposed to be there.
	He said, I'm not going there. How much more contempt could he show?
	There wasn't any way that he could show more contempt to the Congress.
	And yet, Hunter is not being punished.
	But Biden is. And we have seen this type of thing before.
	We've seen how James Clapper, talking about something that affects you and I, about how they are spying on each and every American.
	And he lied about that under oath.
	That's called perjury.
	And for five years, not a single congressperson, nobody in the Senate, nobody in the House, nobody suggested that And also Trump's Department of Justice.
	Nobody came after Clapper for perjury on something that was very substantive.
	I mean, this January the 6th stuff doesn't matter, that Bannon did that.
	And it was a stupid thing that Bannon did.
	Bannon was, he was just, you know, it was braggadocio, right?
	Bravado. Oh, I'm not going to go in there.
	It's like... If you don't want to go to jail, you go in there and you plead the Fifth Amendment a hundred times or however many times they ask you a question.
	After a while, they get tired of asking you the question because they know the answer is I refuse to answer on the grounds that it may incriminate me.
	And you're done. This is what I'm saying.
	You can talk about the unfair prosecution between Bannon and Hunter.
	And that is an issue.
	But you can also talk about how stupid Bannon was for putting his neck in the noose.
	All he had to do was show up and plead the fifth to every question.
	You're going to follow somebody that stupid?
	If stupidity is a crime, he'd be doing a life sentence.
	And the same with Trump.
	These people are not capable of leading anything.
	They can't even manage their own life.
	How could you be that stupid?
	How could you be that stupid? I even said that.
	I said that when they had Alex Jones.
	They were on the same committee.
	Everybody said, oh, it's a perjury trap.
	I said, it's not a perjury trap.
	I said, you just go there and you plead the fifth.
	And that's what Alex did.
	You don't have to be a genius to do this.
	Anyway, so we're coming.
	He says, this is Steve Bannon now.
	Okay, you're going to follow this guy.
	Who decided that he was too big of a man, too important to go in and testify and take the fifth.
	He's going to hold a press conference and brag about how he's going to defy the January 6th committee.
	And then they throw him in jail.
	The same idiot.
	Idiot is out there saying, well, we're going to come after Lisa Monaco, Merrick Garland, senior members of the Department of Justice prosecuting Trump, Jack Smith.
	This is not about vengeance.
	This is not about retribution, he says.
	We're going to hold you accountable. It is about vengeance.
	It is about retribution.
	It's a stupid way of going about it, even if that's what your motivation is.
	If you want vengeance and you want retribution, maybe you could find somebody that was smarter than Steve Bannon who's going to be going to jail because of his own bravado and ignorance.
	You know, these people say, well, this is not revenge, this is not retribution.
	These are the same people who worship Trump as an idol and say, it's not idolatry.
	Yes, it is. Yes, it is.
	You can lie to yourself as much as you want, but I can see your idol worship and I can see your desire for revenge and retribution.
	You're only fooling yourself.
	You're not fooling anybody else.
	Oh, but they've always got the disclaimer.
	Oh, I know. It's not what you think it is.
	It always reminds me of a movie, Working Girl.
	And the girl comes in and finds her husband or boyfriend.
	I don't even remember. It has been so long since I've seen it.
	Finds him in bed with another girl.
	And the guy jumps up and he says, It's not what you think!
	Yeah, it's not what you think.
	It's not revenge and retribution.
	It's not idolatry of Trump.
	It's not any of that stuff.
	Like, oh, okay.
	It's not what you think.
	Yeah, so, again, these people, 1400 January the Sixers, it doesn't excuse what Biden is doing one way or the other, right?
	It's criminal what Biden is doing.
	And there needs to be some reforms to make sure that's not going to happen again.
	However, Trump is culpable in this as well.
	If he wasn't focused only on his perceived self-interests, he could have saved these people.
	But it's not about you.
	It's about him.
	He's not between you and them.
	You're between them and him.
	And when these people who are pushing you into a civil war, they're going to push you in front of themselves.
	And so Bannon was there at the Charlie Kirk display, the event, and he was saying, winning in November is just the first step.
	Jamie Raskin is going to try to steal the election.
	They're already going to say, President Trump's an insurrectionist, and we will never certify an election of an insurrectionist.
	Starting at high noon on the 20th of January, when Trump takes his hand off the King James Bible, we're going to have an exorcism, he said.
	Taking his hand off the King James Bible.
	I know it's a King James translation, but he's not going to use the Trump Bible to get sworn in on?
	I mean, it's got all these secular documents that he's stuck in there.
	It reminded me very much, remember when I had the interview with Peter Hammond, and he was talking about that Marxist politician who took the place of, I don't know if he was the first guy to take office after Nelson Mandela, but he's, Cyril Ramaphosa has been head of the Marxist ANC for a very long time,
	and he was literally shoved out the door When the group of 30,000 people, brought together by Peter Hammond, went to the parliament to protest the fact that they were legalizing abortion, legalizing pornography, legalizing one sexual immorality after the other, he was afraid of them.
	He thought they were going to get violent, and so he was afraid to go outside, and they shoved him out the door.
	And as he comes out...
	Peter was there at the front, and he said he had a friend who had a Bible that was engraved with his name and everything, and he got it in America, and it was a treasured possession of his, and he had it in his hand, and Cyril Ramaphosa said, let me hold that Bible.
	He grabs it, and he holds it up.
	I'm a Christian! We had that interview.
	I said, I know an American politician like that as well.
	Well, you know, and people fell for it.
	Those Christians over there fell for it.
	Oh, yeah, look, Cyril Ramaphosa, he's got a Bible.
	A few years later, he was out there leading his group of Marxist thugs in chants to say, kill the boar, kill the white man.
	You need to have a little bit of discernment.
	These people's discernment is skin deep.
	It's absolutely amazing.
	Do not obey.
	It says, left-right paradigm is dangerous.
	So look at 1980. January the 6th was a trap for patriots.
	I said it. That's why I got fired.
	I said it's a trap.
	It's a grift. And Alex had been out grifting that whole weekend.
	And I said, and it's over. You know, that Monday, he was out grifting on the weekend.
	And that Monday, they had the different electors and all the different states had already turned in their votes.
	I said, it's done. They never came up with any alternate slates of electors.
	This is what they could have done, but they didn't do any of that.
	And so it's done.
	And so at this point, it's just a grift.
	Anyway, DGA, David, nobody's going to jail.
	The chance of the deep state being arrested or held accountable has the same chance that Hillary had of getting locked up in 2017.
	Yeah, that's right. AP Rumble seat, they're all related in the same club, so what makes anyone assume they'd lock each other up?
	It's the people that they would turn on.
	Yeah, please use logic.
	Yes. Yeah, it is.
	I do think, I will be surprised.
	If they put Trump in jail.
	Because I think it's one thing.
	They've crossed one Rubicon, set up another precedent in the way that they have come after Trump with so many different trials.
	And obviously kangaroo courts and things like that.
	But I think it's one thing to attack him publicly, to air his dirty laundry about the porn star hooker that he slept with, to have her testify about intimate details, to smear him that way, smearing him with the truth.
	I mean... When Satan talks about us, he tells the truth.
	When he talks about Christ, he lies, you know?
	But he told the truth about what was going on with Trump there.
	It's one thing to sully his reputation to get this conviction, which I think will be overturned, so they can label him as a felon.
	And it's another thing to put him in jail, because these people don't want to have that done to them.
	They'll take the chance that somebody could go through a show trial process like that and really talk about who they are.
	But I will be surprised if the Bannon people really want to go all that way and put him in jail.
	If they do, it'll be because Biden is so out of it.
	That he doesn't know or care, and it'd be somebody else that's doing it.
	They just want to get him. A Grammy for God says, police and soldiers will follow orders.
	That's right. Octo Spook says, January 6th was our unofficial representatives taking their grievances to Congress.
	They arrested them and punished them for speaking with a voice of we the people.
	That's right. And as a result, Trump should have preemptively pardoned them.
	I said that from the very beginning.
	I said everything they did, we have a right to redress our grievances peacefully.
	Now, if there's somebody who broke windows or somebody who fought with cops, and again, you know, you can look at this and say, well, were they fighting to protect themselves?
	Did the police fire first or whatever?
	But you can have that kind of discussion in a trial.
	But to lock up people, Like Sam Montoya at InfoWars, the only one at InfoWars who did any reporting that day.
	The rest of the people were out there as rebel rousers and following Alex around.
	But Sam went in and actually took pictures of what was going on as a reporter.
	He was the only one who got in trouble.
	Isn't that interesting? He didn't do anything wrong.
	He was exercising both the right to redress grievance.
	They said, well, you were there as a reporter, free press, okay?
	So that's it. End of story.
	No, no, no. You were there as a reporter, but you're not a reporter.
	You were there because, and you said, he said something about, yay, Trump, or something like that.
	Okay? Okay, well, that's also covered under free speech.
	So what's your problem?
	Why are you coming after Sam?
	Then Alex wanted distance himself from Sam. So he fired Sam Rather than defending him. See Alex doesn't defend free speech. He didn't defend himself. He didn't defend Sam What Alex did was he refused to comply?
	with the Discovery process so he got convicted He said well, I gave him everything they wanted. No, you didn't you got caught red-handed in a Perry Mason moment.
	That's the way Alex characterized at a Perry Mason moment when some of the information that he had and was withholding and wouldn't turn over Was actually accidentally sent by his lawyer to the other side Bye.
	He made a decision from early on that he was going to sock away the money and he didn't want to comply with any of that stuff because he didn't want it discovered where his money was or how much money he was getting.
	So he wasn't going to comply with it.
	David Strauss. The removal of habeas corpus won't affect any of Trump's enemies, but it will be used to destroy our rulers' enemies, us.
	That's exactly right.
	That's why we can't allow them to touch this stuff.
	It's why it has to be opposed.
	It's why, even if you've got a guy, he may be a sincere Christian.
	He may be sincerely opposed to all these things that I'm opposed to.
	But if he thinks for a minute...
	That he, that habeas corpus should be suspended?
	He's my enemy. This guy is just absolutely amazing.
	And Grammy for God.
	Trump made $200 million in three days after the verdict.
	He's laughing all the way to the bank.
	Actually, he's $400 million. So, yeah, it's absolutely insane.
	We're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back The common man Bye!
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hire.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com Michelle Obama, thank you very much for the tip.
	I really do appreciate that. And folks, we survive on tips and voluntary donations, and so I really do appreciate that.
	Thank you. Let's talk a little bit about the pandemic.
	We have maybe a new danger that's going to be pushed out to us.
	CDC says new salmonella outbreak has been traced to bearded dragons.
	Well, we should kill them all, I think.
	That's... Isn't that the approach that they take with all this stuff?
	You got salmonella.
	We've traced it to bearded dragons.
	Kill them all! And what did they use?
	Did they use some PCR tests?
	Is that what they used? No, what they're going to do, the PCR tests now of cows and of beef and of dairy to see if they can find salmonella in that.
	Because they found it in bearded dragons, of course.
	This is the kind of logic that we get from the CDC. And the bearded dragons, I mean, they even sound evil.
	You know, just kill them all.
	No, they're going to come after the cows for the salmonella.
	And when you look at it, four people have been hospitalized with salmonella from these bearded dragons.
	Now, that's worse, far worse than bird flu.
	You know, we've got some people who got pink eye.
	They didn't have flu.
	They didn't have a fever. They didn't have respiratory issues.
	They didn't go to the hospital.
	But hey, we've got nothing but constant hammering and propaganda from the mainstream media.
	And even from people like Breitbart and Epoch Times and other people like that.
	Constantly talking about bird flu.
	And how bird flu is all over.
	Not the birds this year.
	Right? This year it's all the cows.
	Why? Well, because...
	C40, the Bloomberg Sadiq Khan scam, where they said, we want to make sure that nobody has meat or dairy.
	We don't want you to have more than three items of clothing that you can buy a year.
	You'll have one flight of 900 miles or less every three years.
	Those people, those people are using this bird flu excuse.
	Come on. Salmonella and bearded dragons makes more sense than any of this stuff.
	My son says, first the bats, now the bearded dragons.
	Evil critters are rising up.
	That's definitely the end of the world right here.
	I mean, we're under attack from bats and bearded dragons and everything else.
	Eye of Newt, that'll be the next thing.
	What are they going to find? Maybe they find conjunctivitis in Eye of Newt, I guess.
	These pharmakia, the sorcerers out there.
	Yeah, it's not...
	Bird flu is not flu.
	It was pink eye. It was pink eye.
	It's just a little bit of hygiene that these people who were working on the farm didn't exercise proper hygiene.
	One of the key things in medical science, most important discovery, is to wash your hands.
	And that would stop the...
	Well, there you go.
	CDC says disease is everywhere.
	Be afraid. Be very afraid.
	Especially those bearded dragons.
	Former CDC Director Redfield, who ran this scam under Trump.
	He's something of a bearded dragon himself, actually.
	Bearded and evil.
	He says, it's just a matter of time until we have a bird flu pandemic.
	You know, because...
	It's just a matter of time. They're going through this incrementally.
	As Fauci said, you do it with disruption.
	You do it from the inside.
	And you do it iteratively.
	And so, yeah, it's just a matter of how long it's going to take them to incrementally ramp this thing up.
	And at one point, they're going to go full eyes and full lockdown.
	Just like they did before.
	Going to go from bat soup to this.
	He says, it's not a question of if.
	It's more of a question of when.
	When will they lock us up like they did before?
	Will we lock or lock us down, I should say?
	We should be locking them up before they lock us down.
	But we don't care about that, do we?
	No, no, no. We don't care at all what Trump did to us in 2020.
	But these people are trying to lock him up.
	Well, Trump locked us down.
	He did that to the best of his ability.
	He paid people.
	Unbelievable sums of money.
	Trillions of dollars.
	He sent the government into debt, and of course they've been spending money at that pace ever since.
	But he ramped it up.
	Yeah, trillions of dollars to do his lockdown in 2020.
	And so Redfield, his CDC guy, says, oh, it's just when bird flu enters humans...
	It's going to have significant mortality.
	He says probably somewhere between 25 to 50% mortality.
	This guy is a big conspiracy theorist.
	Where did he get this stuff?
	He's just making it up.
	These are made-up numbers.
	He has absolutely no idea.
	Oh, bird flu. Bird flu has been around for a very long time, you know.
	Just like coronavirus was.
	Oh, but now this is going to be novel.
	This is going to be a novel bird flu.
	And when it comes around, 20 to 50% mortality rate.
	What was the mortality rate for coronavirus?
	Well, coronavirus, the mortality rate was really what they were doing to people in the hospitals.
	It had the same mortality rate as the flu.
	Like 0.1% case mortality rate.
	They were telling everybody it was going to be 3%.
	Now he's out there saying bird flu is going to be 25% to 50%.
	This guy is shameless.
	Trump's CDC director is absolutely shameless.
	And you notice that he's going on with Chris Cuomo, who lied to you throughout all this stuff.
	He lied about how he was injured with a vaccine.
	He lied about how he didn't tell anybody he was treating himself with ivermectin.
	At the same time, he was mocking anybody else who would use ivermectin.
	He was using it himself. Chris Cuomo, Andrew Cuomo, Redfield, the whole lot of them.
	It doesn't matter whether they call themselves D or R's.
	Just lying criminals.
	Don't listen to any of these people.
	How many times? I mean, you know, to talk to the conservatives, you know, would they listen to Michael Cohen anymore?
	I mean, everybody was talking about Michael Cohen.
	He was a convicted liar.
	He was their chief witness in this case in New York.
	And then they put him on, and then the lawyer nails him down, catches him in lies, gets Cohen to admit that he lied about all this stuff while he's on the stand.
	And then admitted that he stole money as well.
	And he still follow these people?
	Yeah. People still following Chris Cuomo.
	Tucker Carlson and Robert Redfield and all these people.
	Alex Jones. Still following all these people.
	Never learned anything from it.
	So yeah, probably somewhere between 25 and 50%.
	Where did he get this? Did he get this?
	Did he ask chat GPT or something?
	I mean, this sounds like the kind of hallucinations that you get out of AI. Or maybe the kind of lies that you get out of big pharma.
	The largest American producer of fresh eggs, Cal Maine Foods, had to temporarily halt production at its Texas plant after detecting bird flu in chickens in April.
	And this is Breitbart pushing the fear, by the way.
	Oh, look, Robert Redfield.
	And we can trust him because, you know, he worked for Trump.
	Yeah, right.
	An estimated 1.6 million laying hens and 337,000 bullets at the Palmer County facility were destroyed.
	After being infected, the company said in a statement.
	They weren't infected.
	You had a couple of chickens that blew a PCR procedure, and they just killed them all.
	Again, the reasonable thing would be to quarantine and watch them, but they're not going to do the reasonable thing because what they're trying to do is to create a panic-demic again.
	If you quarantined them and watched them, You know what you'd find?
	The PCR test is baloney.
	Pure Bolshevik.
	And so, that would be kind of the equivalent of what we were saying.
	If you quarantine and watch the chickens with the bird flu stuff, that would be kind of like what we said about the lockdown in 2020.
	Okay, so you've got people can't meet together.
	They've got to wear the little face rag, but you don't really even define what a mask is.
	It could be anything.
	Anything. Well, what if we let an elderly demographic, you know, like church.
	Churches, they have a very elderly demographic.
	Let's let them all meet together once a week in close contact with each other and sing and do stuff like that.
	And then let's watch them and see what happens.
	And of course, that did happen in some places, and nobody died.
	Nobody died there.
	And we would see the same thing if we quarantined these chickens where one of them had blown a PCR test positive, where they magnify this more even than the PCR tests of four years ago.
	They've now got a digital process, and it's far more inaccurate because it is far more magnified.
	And so, he goes on to say, once the virus gains the ability to attach to the human receptor, and then goes human to human, that's when you're going to have the panic-demic pandemic.
	And as I said, I think it's just a matter of time.
	Well, what we're really talking about here, not the virus, but once the propaganda, It gets the ability to be received by humans.
	And once it starts being passed human to human on social media, with a bunch of bots out there lying to you, and the mainstream media lying human to human, that's when you're going to have the panic-demic that he's talking about.
	And of course, you know, media, both mainstream media and alt media, like Breitbart that's pushing this stuff, they are the vectors for spreading the panic-demic.
	They are the vectors that spread fear.
	Former CDC director admits the truth.
	This is from Brownstone, talking about Robert Redfield.
	He admits a little bit of the truth, but he keeps lying about some other things as well.
	As Ian Miller said, unproven policies without any supporting evidence, even as Dr.
	Anthony Fauci now admits, were suddenly immutable truths that could not be questioned.
	Those who did raise legitimate questions about the efficacy of such policies were labeled grandma killers or anti-science freedom, D-U-M-B, lovers.
	I'll never forget Scott Adams.
	I said two weeks into it, You know, they told us two weeks to flatten the curve.
	Well, okay. Let my people go.
	Oh, no, no, no.
	And then Scott Adams, Dilbert guy, said, it's getting harder and harder to distinguish the freedom lovers from the sociopaths.
	And I replied to him, I said, it's harder and harder to tell the pragmatists from totalitarians.
	I should have just gone, I know he saw himself as a pragmatist, but I would have been more accurate to say it's harder to tell government sycophants like Scott Adams from totalitarians.
	Dr. Robert Redfield discussed our pandemic response in a recent interview with Chris Cuomo.
	When the blind lead the blind, or when the liars lie to the liars, is what that interview was about.
	He made some stunning admissions about how our COVID policies and mandates developed and were justified.
	In other words, he just made them up, just like he just made up this figure about 25 to 50 percent.
	Nobody calls him on that.
	Breitbart doesn't question that either, do they?
	Breitbart doesn't question that.
	He says, yeah, when it spreads to humans, you'll have 25-50% case mortality.
	How in the world could he possibly know that?
	Because that virus doesn't exist.
	Oh, wait a minute. Did coronavirus really exist either?
	Did COVID-1984, did that really exist?
	Or is that a figment of their imagination?
	Was everything that we're told about it just made up?
	Just made it up like the six-foot rule.
	Just made it up like the cloth masks.
	Don't wear a mask. Wear a mask.
	Wear two masks. Wear three masks.
	Simon says.
	Fauci says. Well, don't expect any apologies anytime soon, says Ian Miller.
	And he's right. They're not going to apologize for this stuff.
	And so, he's out there now.
	What is he selling now?
	He's selling the lab leak stuff.
	Why? Because now, you know, that's the one thing they've got that they can scare you with.
	That was what Alex and Mike Adams were scaring people about.
	The lab leak, you know, buy my stuff.
	This is real. There's a lab leak.
	It's real. No, it wasn't real.
	It wasn't real. But now he can push the fear.
	Just like the alternative media did in 2020 with the lab leak stuff.
	Redfield shared how the rollout of the COVID vaccine played out much differently than it should have while admitting that the vaccine mandates were a disastrous mistake.
	Because, again, that was not his doing.
	That was Biden's doing.
	I thought these vaccines should have been prioritized for nursing homes and Prioritized for assisted living, prioritized for the elderly over 60, 65, and yet that's not what happened, said Redfield.
	There was this, everybody has to get vaccinated.
	You see, he's still lying about everything.
	He still isn't going to tell you the truth about what these vaccines were.
	These vaccines were bioweapons.
	So I think the bioweapons should have been prioritized for nursing homes, the elderly, because, you know, we've got Social Security coming out.
	We can't afford to pay that. Let's kill these people.
	Cuomo wondered why the priorities changed.
	He said, well, was it because of Big Pharma?
	Homer Simpson. Goh.
	This guy, when's Cuomo going to change his name to Simpson?
	Redfield agreed. He said, yeah, I think it definitely was a huge influence by the pharmaceutical industry.
	Pfizer, Moderna, I think you did, you know, you pointed out that there was a big push.
	And Miller says, wait a second.
	Anybody who previously said that Pfizer and Moderna were using their power and their leverage to influence politicians, regulatory bodies like Redfield, advisory organizations, media, and the expert community, quote-unquote, to promote their vaccines, you were labeled a conspiracy theorist.
	But now Redfield can talk about a virus that hasn't happened yet.
	He doesn't claim to have tested any of this.
	But he's an expert.
	And we should believe him, that when this virus eventually comes into existence, as he's certain it will, it'll kill 25 to 50% of the people who get it, and Breitbart pushes that out without any pushback.
	They push his stuff out, because this guy is with Trump.
	The fifth column.
	The fifth column of news.
	Does your newspaper have five columns in it?
	Well, it does if you're getting information from Breitbart.
	It really does have a fifth column in there.
	And Infowars as well.
	It's got the Trump column that's down there.
	Whatever is in Trump's interest, they will try to shove that to you.
	Redfield also stated that he personally prefers to use the protein-based vaccines and not mRNA.
	He said, because we don't want to make the body a, quote, manufacturing plant, unquote, for the spike protein.
	He called it a manufacturing plant.
	Well, of course, that's what they called it from the very beginning.
	And that's why I had a problem with it from the very beginning.
	I was pushing back on this in the January and February time frame of 2020.
	I said, do you hear what they're talking about?
	The way they talk about this vaccine, that's why I called it the GCI, the genetic code injection from the very beginning.
	I said, they're going to push something in here, and they say, yeah, we don't have, and remember that little dog and pony show that Trump set up?
	He goes around, he brings in all these pharmaceutical executives to talk about their vaccine.
	How long is it going to take you?
	And he goes, they already know the order to ask these people.
	And so they say, oh, take us a year or two or whatever they said, right?
	Oh, that's too long. Next person.
	And they can do it in a little bit less time.
	Then he goes to the next person. And then they're faster, too.
	And finally, we get to the punchline.
	After he's deliberately arranged all these people by how long they're going to take to make a vaccine.
	Then they get to Fauci's pal, Monsef Slaoui.
	The two of them, co-conspirators in previous pandemics and vaccine scams.
	And he says, well, we're ready to go right now.
	We're going to not have to manufacture these things.
	Your body will manufacture it.
	And you go to the Moderna thing, and it talks about how they're going to reprogram your body to manufacture this stuff.
	And I said at that very time, I said, so what turns it off?
	What's the off switch?
	And that's the issue.
	And even Redfield talks about it.
	So he says the spike protein is immunotoxic.
	You get infected, it's immunotoxic.
	But when you give the vaccine, we make that spike protein.
	What have we been saying for the longest time?
	So you're going to make the toxic thing?
	As a matter of fact, you're not going to make the toxic thing.
	You're going to program somebody's body to make the toxic thing.
	I said, it's a bioweapon.
	The vaccine is how they describe a virus.
	The vaccine is how they describe cancer.
	Cancer takes over the healthy cells and it starts trying to create its own cell.
	You know, if you've got kidney cancer, you have these aberrant kidney cells that go around and they start trying to create a kidney.
	Instead, they make a tumor, right?
	And so, you know, they're injecting us with cancer?
	They're injecting us with a genetic code injection?
	When I give you an mRNA vaccine, says Redfield, I don't know how much spike protein you make because I give you mRNA and then your body goes and makes it.
	You may make it for a week.
	You may make it for a month.
	You may still be making it because there's no indication that it ever stops.
	It may not stop until it kills you.
	Just like cancer.
	I use the protein vaccine, says Redfield, so I know exactly how much spike protein you get, and your body is not becoming a spike protein manufacturing plant.
	You see we knew this all along All you have to do is pay attention to what they're saying.
	They were telling you all along They have to tell you It's like the deal they make with the devil. I'm serious He believed there was a concerted effort by the CDC under Rochelle Walensky Redfield did to release information to not release information that could make the vaccines look bad and
	He said, I mean, I was upset with CDC when I left because they stopped tracking people that were infected that were previously vaccinated.
	And Cuomo jumps in with a Homer Simpson impression and says, why would they do that?
	Well, I don't know.
	He says, you couldn't report that there were people vaccinated that got infected, he said.
	I think there was a decision not to do anything that made it look like the vaccine didn't work.
	You know, there was a decision to skip the testing that Redfield participated in, that Trump participated in.
	There was a decision, even when they had tests, to cover up the results.
	There was a decision to show that it wasn't stopping anything.
	People were still getting the flu.
	There was a decision not to talk about the adverse effects.
	A lot of decisions being made.
	I wonder who made those decisions.
	Oh, it wasn't Trump.
	It wasn't Redfield.
	It was the Biden people.
	Absolutely never should have mandated vaccines, period.
	He's a terrible decision. These vaccines do not prevent infection.
	Therefore, as we pointed out last week, and as the court pointed out last week, because they don't prevent anything, they are by definition not vaccines.
	They are a therapeutic.
	That was the way that they sold it.
	When it became obvious and they couldn't deny it anymore that it wasn't stopping anybody from getting infected, you had the CDC and everybody else, all these experts, started telling us, oh, yes, but if you get it, you won't have as bad a case.
	And so the judge says, well, if that's what you're telling people, then you're telling them that it's a therapeutic.
	Therefore, folks, you need to sue the pants off of these people.
	It wasn't a vaccine.
	It was a therapeutic.
	Game on. Game on.
	Go after them if you took this stuff.
	If you've got anybody in your family who took this stuff.
	He also defended natural immunity.
	Redfield said it was ignored and people were fired.
	He said the lockdowns were overreach, and yet he was a part of that during the lockdown.
	But what does he say? He shifts it to other people.
	I know nothing, right?
	Nuremberg. Redfield admitted that Fauci, Birx, and the president, which president would that be?
	Trump. And that Trump, Fauci, and Birx had a meeting to decide if lockdown should be continued.
	And he was against it.
	He was against closing schools.
	He said it wasn't science-based policy.
	It was emotionalism.
	And he said all of that, no doubt, was overreached by the government.
	A big mistake. And we paid a big price for it.
	No, you've got to waste scot-free, pal.
	You got away. Fauci got away.
	Birx got away. Trump got away.
	You guys all got away with your crime.
	And so, we're supposed to be concerned about the fact that Trump is now being targeted by Biden.
	Breitbart is very concerned about this.
	The Biden re-election team seeks the moral high ground.
	And they're going to target Trump in a $50 million advertising campaign.
	Do you remember $50 million?
	Do you remember when Trump gave five times that amount?
	$250 million to the Ad Council?
	And, yeah, what is it?
	What he meant to say is we were paid a big price for it.
	We didn't pay a big price, but we were paid a big price, says my son.
	Yeah, you're absolutely right. They were paid a big price to do all this stuff.
	And Trump paid a big price...
	To do the advertising with the Ad Council.
	All the smoky bear, only you can prevent forest fires.
	This is your brain on drugs and all the things that we remember.
	Just say no and all the rest of this stuff.
	They never had an Ad Council campaign that even came close to $250 million budget.
	Until Trump gave the Ad Council $250 million to scare you and to vaccinate you.
	And they're worried about the fact that now Biden is going to have a $50 million ad campaign against Trump.
	Well, you know, what goes around comes around, doesn't it?
	Isn't that a shame? Poor guy.
	He's going to get a dose of his own lies, I guess.
	And then the real-life PSYOP. How the U.S. military spread anti-vax conspiracy theories.
	This is Reason Magazine.
	Reason likes vaccines. They really do.
	They don't like people like me who tell you to stay away from all vaccines.
	You've been warned.
	You will regret it if you give it to your kids.
	Reason doesn't say that.
	A government agency was spreading dangerous rumors about a coronavirus vaccine playing on people's religious beliefs to sow chaos.
	Oh, which government agency was that?
	They said, was it Russia? Was it China?
	Was it Iran, maybe? Well, the culprit turned out to be somebody closer to home, the U.S. military.
	The U.S. military was telling people the truth, probably, about the Chinese vaccine, but making it about the Chinese-made vaccine.
	Don't get the Sinovacs.
	Get our Pfizer Vax, the Pentagon, brought to you by Pfizer.
	Yeah, they were pushing down the other guy's brand X so they could sell brand A and brand B from good old USA. Reason says both the Trump and Biden administrations signed off on a psychological operation aimed at discrediting Chinese-made vaccines.
	You see, this is all a psychological operation, and it all came from...
	The Pentagon and from the CIA. They were the ones who ran these germs games going back to 2001, dark winter, two months before 9-11.
	It's always been these people.
	But again, the military-industrial complex...
	Being captured by Big Pharma, that's not the takeaway that Reason came up with, with all this stuff.
	No, no. They don't see it as a public-private partnership between the Pentagon and the pharmaceutical companies, just as the Pentagon has announced, as I pointed out yesterday, a public-private partnership to feed lab meat to their soldiers.
	Because nobody wants to pay for this stuff, and nobody wants to eat it.
	So we're going to give it like swill to the swine that we put in uniform, right?
	Oh, we really thank you for your service, don't we?
	Here, have some of this lab meat.
	And we're going to force inject you, too.
	And the way they treat the people in the military, it's so disingenuous.
	Oh, yeah, I really love the military.
	Go off and die.
	You know, go, you heroes, go and die in a foreign land for which we've not had any consideration about this war.
	Consequences for you or for the nation?
	No, just go do it, you know.
	We'll give you a medal posthumously.
	And meanwhile, we're going to feed you some lab meat and inject you with some bioweapons.
	How about that? They love the military, don't they?
	Yeah. So Reason says, chaos like this is an opportunity, quote, to prevent enemies from opposing U.S. actions or to better position U.S. joint forces in the event of armed conflict, says the document.
	They put that out there. Talking about the PSYOP. An opportunity to prevent enemies from opposing U.S. actions or to better position U.S. joint forces in the event of armed conflict.
	That's the PSYOP thing.
	Well, let's just rewrite that a little bit.
	Seems to me like when we talk about actions, what they're really talking about here is their poison, is their products, is their vaccine.
	And when we're talking about joint forces...
	I think that's better understood as a public-private partnership between these bureaucrats in the Pentagon and the pharmaceutical companies, don't you?
	And when they talk about armed conflict, maybe what they're talking about is injections into your arms.
	So let's just repeat that with those substitutions.
	To prevent enemies from opposing U.S. products and vaccines, or to better position U.S. public-private partnerships, In the event of armed injections.
	They encouraged vaccine hesitancy for the Chinese vaccines, and they sowed doubt about medical authorities abroad as if foreigners' reactions to the pandemic would not have any effect on America.
	See, reason doesn't like that.
	If you tell these Chinese people to be skeptical of a rushed vaccine that was done by their government, That might have consequences here.
	People here might be suspicious about a new kind of vaccine that was rushed without any testing that was done by their government to push that on people.
	You know, this could blow back.
	We could have hesitancy to do that, says reason.
	Shame on them.
	Well, yeah, shame on them, but for all the other reasons.
	Conservative thinker, thank you for the tip.
	I appreciate that. I've been listening to you on iHeartRadio.
	He says there's a Publix commercial every five minutes.
	I hope you're getting some of that ad revenue.
	I have no idea.
	I don't know. The iHeart, they, you know, Rumble puts ads on.
	I don't know that I get any revenue from that.
	I can't tell that I do.
	And the ads on the audio are put on by Spreaker.
	And that Spreaker podcast that gets pushed out has ads in it.
	Now, they may be adding some other ads.
	I don't know.
	But iHeart is actually under Spreaker, so probably not.
	So maybe I am getting some money from that.
	The progress retort.
	Thank you for the tip. Much like your statements on AI being garbage in, garbage out, the average human brain is being inundated with information.
	Bad data and propaganda making up the majority, and people simply cannot process it.
	You're right. You're right.
	Chops 480. My stapler just tested positive for salmonella with a PCR. Yeah.
	What's my stapler? I like the office.
	Is it red? Yeah.
	Do not obey.
	It's a PCR fraud.
	Yeah. Rattus bro. I thought it was common knowledge that reptiles carry salmonella.
	Yeah. Isn't it? You know, they banned the little turtles that I used to play with when I was very, very young.
	You get pet turtles and you play with them.
	And it's like, oh, you can't sell those in pet stores anymore because they got salmonella.
	And it's like, I don't know.
	How did I survive?
	I don't know. We had no seatbelts.
	I played with turtles.
	Yeah. I was a free-range kid.
	I was outside, riding my bike, going all different kinds of places when I was five and six years old.
	I don't know how I survived. Do not obey.
	I was disgusted when seeing Trump acting as a pharmaceutical rep.
	As he was present. That's exactly what he did.
	He says, and I was...
	Oh, okay, that's there twice.
	Malika, Tom, this stuff sheds more than we're told.
	My roomie had the whole house sick after getting his booster a while back.
	You're right about that.
	I've heard firsthand reports about people...
	Who said they're around somebody who just got their shots, the two shots.
	And then, you know, female.
	And she said, and it's messed up my cycle and all this other kind of stuff.
	I really do believe that.
	I've had some anecdotal firsthand reports about that.
	RL56, Mr. Knight, I've lost 12 of my friends.
	I'm so sorry. In the last four years.
	Since the rollout of the unsafe and effective at killing vaccines.
	Denver Attaway.
	PCR cycle counts.
	The correlation of diagnoses with dates and shots were rolled out.
	Same for the boosters, etc.
	Yeah. Jason Barker.
	The jab was the disease.
	Yes. They stopped reporting numbers after the rollout.
	Yeah. And if the jabs were the disease, the entire discussion is a false dichotomy.
	Lab leak or natural?
	Both of these are false, which is ideal for the manipulators, for people to rattle around two hypotheticals.
	That's right, it is the hypothetical Hegelian.
	Both the thesis and the antithesis are all made up.
	And you can't talk about any third alternative.
	Absolutely cannot. Jason Barker, we definitely had something new going around.
	It could have been engineered or it could have been natural.
	The loss of taste and smell was something new.
	It very well could have been 5G related as well.
	We have too many variables introduced at one time, so it's hard to pin down.
	You're absolutely right.
	But again, when we look at this, it was my instinct all along that it was hospital protocols.
	And the more I see the data about that, that's what I believe was going on before the vaccines.
	And then with the vaccines, it was them directly.
	But before that, there were so many people killed.
	First of all, you get pneumonia, not going to get any treatment.
	I'm going to send you home. Come back when it's really bad.
	When it's really bad, we'll put you in invasive intubation, which was never done before.
	We've had pulmonologists who have said that's their specialty.
	We've never done that before. Why would we do that?
	And so they put you on that.
	Give you remdesivir and all these things, it'll kill you.
	And so it was neglect followed up by giving people leeches and mercury like they did George Washington to kill him.
	That's exactly what this was.
	And people are going to look back at this and say, wow.
	This is like we look back at George Washington when he...
	Rode around Mount Vernon, and he got a cold, got flu, starts to go into pneumonia.
	They call the doctors in, and they bring in leeches, and they nearly bled him, nearly bled him to death.
	They gave him a bunch of mercury and everything, and surprise, surprise, he died.
	It just goes to show you how dangerous flu is.
	And I'm not saying that it's not dangerous, but I'm saying that the doctors and their treatment is even more dangerous.
	We're going to take a quick break. We'll be right back.
	Music playing.
	No liveliness Nothing unkown
	Nothing unknown Nothing unknown
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	All right, let's talk about the pharmaceuticals and maybe some good news in this.
	Kansas is suing Pfizer.
	The state attorney general alleges that the company knew of serious adverse events.
	Yeah, they marketed the vaccine as safe.
	We all know this.
	the people who are going to do something about it. Well, here's Kansas Attorney General Chris Kobach and he may be doing something about it.
	He announced yesterday allegations and and the lawsuit against Pfizer for misleading Kansas residents about this and it has several different points here. Several allegations in the lawsuit.
	Number one, Pfizer misled the public that it had a safe and effective vaccine.
	Number two, Pfizer said its vaccine was safe, even though it knew that it was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis, pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths.
	They left out blood clots.
	Number three, Pfizer said its vaccine was effective, even though it knew that the vaccine waned over time, did not protect against any COVID-19 variants, hence the boosters and all this stuff.
	So it wasn't safe. It wasn't effective.
	That's fraud, right?
	Everybody knows that's fraud.
	Another aspect of fraud was to say that it would prevent transmission, which has been disproven as well, even though it knew that it had never studied whether or not it prevented transmission.
	Again, why are they allowed by these other state attorney generals to get away with this kind of fraud?
	Not safe, and they knew it.
	Not effective, they knew it.
	Not preventing transmission, and they knew it.
	But instead, what did they do?
	They worked to censor critics on social media.
	That's number five in the allegations here.
	Number six, Pfizer's misrepresentations of it being safe and affected resulted in a record company revenue of approximately $75 billion in just two years from that jab.
	Number seven, Pfizer's actions and statements violated previous consent judgments with the state of Kansas.
	Number eight, Pfizer's actions and statements violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act.
	And number nine, Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of And I would say also the risks, while concealing and suppressing the truth about the risks.
	Yeah, they suppressed the truth.
	Now, the good news, this may be good news, I don't know, it's still early, but the McCullough Foundation, Dr.
	Peter McCullough has got a research foundation, and there is a new preprint study that says that they may have found a way to turn off The mRNA replication.
	Remember, we were just talking about that.
	Talked about it now for over four years.
	I've been talking about that.
	What is the off switch for this?
	I mean, this is like the discussion from the very beginning.
	Logically, when they say, we're going to have this thing come in, it's going to reprogram your cells and make your cells replicate, not themselves, but to replicate this spike.
	And then that spike is going to hit another cell.
	So what stops this?
	And it's very much like the decision, if you're going to turn over the kill decision to autonomous killer robots, how do you get that back?
	And, of course, I've talked to people who advocate that, say, we've got to do that to keep up with the Chinese.
	Okay, well, how do you turn it off? Yeah, that really bothers us.
	We're really kind of worried about that.
	We don't really know. But you have to do that, right?
	You've got to give the kill decision over to the AI, and then how do you get control back?
	How do you stop this mRNA replication?
	Where's the off switch?
	Well, there isn't one.
	Well, maybe they have discovered one now.
	This is what they say in this preprint study.
	The Pfizer BioNTech and the Moderna biodistribution studies refute the assertion That nanolipid-bound mRNA remains in the deltoid muscle or the auxiliary lymph nodes.
	In other words, it doesn't stay where you shoot it, right?
	And we've known that as well.
	There was a study coming out of Japan.
	And then when you had doctors in Canada and the U.S. talk about that, I think the first one to talk about it was Dr.
	Makis in Canada. No, you talked about it.
	Oh, I'm going to take your license now because you talked about that.
	And what did they find?
	They found that it was distributed all over the body.
	They found that it passed over the blood-brain barrier.
	They found that the places where it accumulated the most were, of course, the spleen, which filters out things in your bloodstream.
	But next to that, it was reproductive organs, male and female, where it concentrated.
	So, in the conclusion, the study says the possibility of vaccine mRNA integration into the host genome and the prospect of unintended protein production due to read through and advocate for a mechanism to eliminate lingering synthetic mRNA.
	And to halt damaging spike protein production.
	The use of siRNA and ribotax to target and degrade vaccine mRNA are promising approaches to mitigate deleterious health effects.
	Although further investigation is warranted to address challenges, which include possible off-target issues and immune system activation.
	Well, as I've been saying all along, it's a genetic code injection.
	David Martin has been saying this as well.
	The heart and soul of this is simple.
	We now have data that has been clearly published in the last several days that shows that, as I've reported for several years now, mRNA, in fact, does get into the genome, does modify the genome, and in fact is not something that's just this innocent little, you know, shot that creates a spike protein and you kind of get your fever and you get your COVID symptoms and you get over it and somehow that's good for you.
	This is a genetic engineering and genetic modification, as stated by the companies, and it is, in fact, gene therapy designed to harm humanity and perpetually make humanity a slave to the ongoing gene-editing fantasies of psychopaths.
	Yeah, you know, psychopaths like...
	By Bill Gates and stuff.
	But I thought we were told that it was just sugar water.
	Very weak, attenuated, classic viruses.
	A very low amount of adjuvant.
	It was a classic virus.
	Classic vaccine. Sugar water.
	Can we take a little bit of an attenuated, microwaved or radiated COVID deal?
	Absolutely. That's why Trump is taking control of the process.
	Do it for Trump. Do it for Trump.
	He choked on those words as he was lying.
	Had to think about it there, didn't he?
	Yeah. Yes, genetic code injection.
	The longevity of this, he says, we might be able to do something about it.
	Here we explore the potential of small interfering RNA. That's what they mean by siRNA.
	And ribonuclease targeting chimeras.
	That's what they mean by ribotaxe.
	As promising solutions to target, inactivate and degrade residual and persistent vaccine mRNA, thereby potentially preventing uncontrolled spike protein production.
	In other words, unending.
	Unending. So he said, and to reduce toxicity.
	So hopefully they're on to something.
	We don't know. I mean, there are some things that people do to try to mitigate some of the stuff that is there, creating blood clots.
	Well, you know, get tested.
	You can take some of the things like natokinase or some other types of things that actually work against the blood clots.
	But, you know, as people want to talk about lab leaks, Neuralink, Elon Musk's company, you know, they're messing around with diseases as well with their lab monkeys, I guess.
	These are the people who are doing, you know, what we absolutely, we got to have these brain-computer interfaces.
	I mean, that's essential work.
	Is it? And so, because that is so essential, they got to get these monkeys and they're doing all kinds of stuff with it.
	I saw this headline, a fired Neuralink employee, Sue's, says that she was attacked by lab monkey carrying herpes.
	That just immediately made me think of the flying monkeys from Wizard of Oz.
	A former employee at Musk's brain-computer interface startup, Neuralink, is suing the company, alleging she was forced to work with lab monkeys.
	And some of them even had tails that carried herpes and even got scratched by one on her bare skin through a glove.
	She claims that she was fired after informing her supervisors that she was pregnant.
	All told, she is accusing the company of retaliation, of wrongful termination, and of gender discrimination.
	These are all accusations that have already been made against Musk's other companies, such as SpaceX.
	The lawsuit paints a troubling picture of what's going on behind closed doors at Neuralink.
	You see, these kinds of experiments, we have diseased animals and everything, they escape or they infect the lab workers that are there.
	And yet, you know, there's no lawsuits against these labs that everybody wants to focus on, redirect your attention to these labs.
	Nothing's being done to stop them.
	Of course, they're not going to stop this at Neuralink either.
	She claims she has scratched through the glove an animal that was infected with herpes B virus, never given adequate protective equipment.
	This is something that we saw with these labs 10 years ago in 2014.
	Long series of stories were done by a reporter at USA Today.
	According to the lawsuit, she was threatened with severe repercussions if she insisted on medical treatment again.
	And she was fired a day after informing her department that she was pregnant.
	She had been promoted just two months earlier.
	And you know, this is Elon Musk, the guy who's out there saying, we got to be worried about the people who want to have depopulation.
	And even, you know, quoted the Bible or something, be fruitful and multiply.
	And yet he fires people, his company fires people when they notify them that they're pregnant, I guess.
	The progress report.
	Thank you for the tip, John Cullen.
	I am John Cullen on X, and of course you put an underscore between those different words, I am John Cullen, is the only person other than you to go into depth on New York Navy Hospital.
	Check out his content on COVID. Also does a full breakdown on the Las Vegas shooting.
	Quality stuff. Good. All right. And so everybody take a look at that.
	Do not obey.
	So stay out of the government's business.
	They are working toward achieving their desired depopulation quota.
	They're working for their zero population.
	They're working for zero everything.
	They are nihilist.
	Handy. Good to see you, Handy.
	In 2020, we were told, and Handy works with EMS, in 2020, we were told to withhold respiratory care that may cause aerosols.
	They stopped us from transporting cardiac arrests unless we got a pulse on the scene.
	That is, by the way, that stopping aerosols, that was a justification for putting people who have respiratory illness on these ventilators.
	That was a justification for it.
	That's why, you know, pulmonologists said, we've never done this before.
	Oh, yeah, but we can't have any aerosols.
	So, you know, kill them.
	Smother them on the machine there.
	It's just insane what they did throughout these last few years.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	break we'll be right back.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	I'm going to be a little bit more dramatic than I usually am.
	www.circlelineartschool.com You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, I have to say, Ed Snowden sees AI just as I see it.
	He says that OpenAI just performed a, quote, calculated betrayal of the rights of every person on Earth.
	He said they've gone full mask off.
	Do not ever trust OpenAI or its products.
	You've been warned.
	Well, exactly. And why does he say that?
	What was it that they did that caused him to say that?
	Well, they hired a former director of the NSA, a also retired U.S. Army general, because it's all about, it's all militarized.
	Last week, ChatGPT creator OpenAI announced that it had appointed retired U.S. Army General and former NSA Administration Director Paul Nakasone, who also helmed the military's cybersecurity-focused Cyber Command Unit.
	They put him on their board.
	They said General Nakasone's, and I don't know if I'm pronouncing his last name correctly, that's my estimation of it, his unparalleled experience in areas like cybersecurity will help guide open AI in achieving its mission of ensuring artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity.
	I've been saying from the very beginning that open AI is nothing other than militarized surveillance.
	The NSA is nothing other than militarized surveillance, folks.
	And it makes perfectly good sense that OpenAI, which is militarized surveillance, would bring the guy in who ran militarized surveillance for the government.
	I've been saying that the only function of artificial intelligence, the only thing that it does well, and does it without errors, really, is the pattern matching to identify us.
	It is the perfect surveillance tool.
	It's like having a million Stasi eyes to watch you.
	And so Ed Snowden says they've gone full mask off.
	Full mask off. Well, you know, sometimes we can recognize the tyrants even when they're wearing a mask, can't we?
	As we saw in 2020.
	He said, there's only one reason for appointing an NSA director to your board.
	This is a willful, calculated betrayal of the rights of every person on earth, and you've been warned.
	And he's not the only person.
	Not the only person to say that.
	A Johns Hopkins University cryptography professor, Matthew Green.
	I mean, this is Johns Hopkins.
	These are the people. And, of course, it's not monolithic.
	If you work for Johns Hopkins, that doesn't mean that you're in on Dark Winter and all the rest of the stuff.
	John Hopkins was there with Fauci and the CIA and the military running every one of these germ games from Dark Winter in 2001 on.
	But, you know, there's different people in different places.
	He says, I do think the biggest application of AI is going to be mass population surveillance.
	I absolutely agree.
	I think that's what it was created for.
	I think it was created for that, and I think it was created for autonomous killer robots.
	And they don't care if the killer robots get it right or wrong.
	See, the point is, you want to depopulate the world.
	If you want to depopulate the world, there's nothing better than to have a war.
	Have a war by autonomous killer robots that don't really necessarily care about friendly fire or any of the rest of this stuff.
	He says, so bringing the former head, this is the guy, the cryptography professor, bringing the former head of the NSA into the open AI has some logic behind it because that's what this was developed for anyway.
	That's what DARPA was there pushing this stuff from the very beginning.
	The government with its brain project.
	I forget what the acronym was, but, you know, they put together some words.
	They spelled brain, and I forget what the B-R-A-I-N stood for.
	But, yeah, that's what this is always about.
	Companies are starting to find that the AI projects have had dismal financial results.
	Now, you know, Brian Shalhavi has said from the very beginning, he said, we've seen this now two times before.
	They get everybody all excited about artificial intelligence and it doesn't live up to the expectations and there's a tremendous amount of money put into it and then when people's expectations fail, it crashes.
	And you know, it doesn't have to be something that is ahead of its time.
	You just have to get people ahead.
	you have to get their expectations ahead of reality in order to have this fall.
	Just go back to the dot-com bust. That's something that is forever etched in my memory because of my experience with the dot-com stocks. I didn't even bet on any dot-com stocks.
	I was betting on the picks and the axes of the gold rush with dot-com.
	I was betting on the people that are making the switching circuitry.
	That was going to be necessary.
	They're going to have to rewire all of the internet.
	And look, all that stuff was real.
	And it eventually made a lot of money for people.
	People that made the switching stuff and everything else.
	But we had a panic that went through all of the tech stocks in 2020, spring of 2020.
	And so everybody, including Intel and everybody, it all went down.
	It doesn't mean that Intel was bad.
	It doesn't mean that it was real. It's just that there was a panic.
	And there was a panic because it got ahead of expectations.
	And, you know, when you build up a bubble, it's just looking for a pin to burst it.
	And so what this article is saying, prepare yourselves for the trough of disillusionment.
	Just like with the dot-com bust.
	When OpenAI first released ChatGPT to the public back in late 2022, many people in business were gripped with an intense case of fear of missing out, FOMO. And they started trying to stuff AI into practically everything, from consumer chatbots to facial recognition in stadiums.
	An AI company called Lucidworks has just released a new report on generative AI this week that revealed that many businesses are not seeing much in terms of financial return for adopting AI products.
	And if you look at the stock market, it's all based around NVIDIA and AI stocks.
	What is the play on AI? If there's some connection to AI, I'll buy the stock, that type of thing.
	But it's a very small number of stocks that That are connected in one way or the other with artificial intelligence.
	And if the psychology of the marketplace gets damaged about that, oh no, you mean AI is not real?
	Watch for a big stock market crash if that happens.
	They said in the report, unfortunately, financial benefits of implemented projects have been dismal.
	42% of companies have yet to see a significant benefit from their generative AI initiatives.
	Researchers at Lucidworks gathered survey responses from over 2,500 business heads in North America, Europe, Middle East, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region.
	They found that only 63% are planning spending increases in AI products this year.
	Well, you would say, well, that may be pretty good.
	63% are going to increase spending on AI. But last year, that was 93%.
	That was the mania, and now it's pulled back a little bit.
	Another telling data point.
	This year, 36% of companies are planning to keep their spending on AI products flat.
	Not going to increase it at all.
	There was only 6% of the people who were going to keep it flat last year.
	So if we track the buzz of AI to this thing called the Gartner hype cycle, it looks like we are about to crest...
	What he called the peak of inflated expectations.
	And then we will be plunging down any moment on a steep slope that he calls the trough of disillusionment.
	Well, we'll have to wait and see.
	I mean, it's going to be big if that were to happen.
	By the way, get that article ready with that picture that I was telling you about.
	McDonald's is a good example.
	They decided they were going to put AI... In their drive-thru.
	And they had some hilarious results from this.
	As you can imagine.
	So they're going to give up on their AI-powered drive-thru system.
	Following a string of hilarious yet infuriating failures, some unlucky customers ending up with over $250 worth of chicken McNuggets.
	Ha! Or extra unwanted packs of butter.
	I can only imagine how much extra butter they got with all this stuff.
	McDonald's is going to terminate the drive-thru AI test.
	This was a joint venture with IBM. And they are officially removing the tech from more than 100 restaurants.
	But they're not going to give up entirely on AI. I guess maybe they'll be able to use it for surveillance, for customer profiling, or something like that.
	See, here's the problem that McDonald's doesn't understand.
	This is set up for a militarized police state surveillance state.
	It's kind of like expecting that if you get that F-16, it's going to be great in the drive-thru.
	This is a weapon, folks.
	AI is a weapon.
	It's a weapon of the police state.
	Maybe they'll be able to use this police state weapon, you know, or the tanks or something like that.
	Maybe they'll find some use for some of these militarized weapons, but it is a militarized weapon.
	That's one of the reasons why it's not working, except in the applications where they want to use it as such.
	You know, if you've got one of these venues, like Madison Square Garden or something like that, you want to use it to identify people.
	Biometric identification, yeah, it's great for that, because that's what it was really designed for.
	So, this person says, still expect more AI to be baked into McDonald's operations in the future.
	The company signed a strategic partnership with Google to deploy generative AI tech in December.
	Thousands of stores are going to get both hardware and software upgrades sometime this year.
	McDonald's remained incredibly vague in its statement today.
	Talking about what they're going to use in the next phase of this, since it failed in the drive-thru.
	They are promising that they will have hotter and fresher plastic food.
	Oh, they just said food.
	I added the plastic. Hotter, fresher plastic food for customers by streamlining the operations using generative AI. Meanwhile, other chains like Carl's Jr.
	and Checkers have been caught outsourcing the task to workers in the Philippines after announcing that they had AI drive-thrus.
	Just like Amazon and their just-walk-out stores, they had hired 1,000 people in India to watch what people were doing and to, you know, write up the ticket, and they said it was being done by AI. Carl's Jr.
	and Checkers are saying, yeah, we got AI in our drive-thrus.
	You should come experience it.
	When they actually were hiring people at slave wages in the Philippines to do it.
	And then we get to this very interesting failure here.
	This is from a company called Stable Diffusion.
	And they have been producing some very interesting...
	Horrifically mangled human bodies when people want them to show people.
	AI generated mess of incoherent limbs.
	One person said, I haven't been able to generate a single decent image at all.
	Outside of their example prompts.
	So here's an example.
	Pull up that picture there.
	And this is the prompt for this.
	Just stare at this picture for a second here.
	The prompt for this was a woman laying on a beach.
	And so she's on grass, by the way.
	But her head, the bottom part of her head...
	It's upside down, and there's hair growing on the top part of her head, which is now the bottom part of her head.
	So she's got this hair like the top of your head, but it's growing out of underneath her chin because the head is upside down, and there's no top of the head.
	There's no eyes or anything.
	That's attached to a body, which then comes down to three odd legs.
	This resulted in whatever this mess of face-on-arm-on-hair-on-possible-tree-stop is.
	We don't know exactly what that was.
	Now, here's where it gets even more interesting.
	They were saying that this was caused because this company, again, the company's name was Stable Diffusion.
	Stable Diffusion. They said that AI is using pornography on the internet to come up with understanding of anatomy.
	Like a pubescent boy or something, right?
	So it's looking at not safe for work pictures.
	Stable diffusion said, we're not going to do that.
	We're not going to use pornography in our training process.
	And so, because of that...
	Maybe because of that. I don't know.
	Now they're starting to get that kind of stuff there.
	One person says, well, I guess they can now go bankrupt in a safe and ethical way.
	This is how sick this whole thing is.
	It truly is insane.
	We're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back and we're going to talk a little bit about a strange variation on Father's Day.
	For a very prominent trans person we'll be right back
	Music playing...
	you Making sense.
	It's common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Did you ever have to make up your mind?
	Pick up on one and leave the other behind.
	It's not all that easy, and not all that kind.
	Did you ever have to make up your mind?
	Yeah, Bruce Jinder's having problems making up his mind.
	This life.
	I guess not.
	I guess he doesn't have to finally decide.
	So many changes, you know.
	So many changes. As a matter of fact, Bruce Jinder, as I call him, He put out a tweet, he now calls himself Caitlin, but he put out a tweet saying that he was a proud father.
	And I think this is an interesting thing, because remember when they first started pushing the DEI in homosexual marriage, it was all about the gay gene.
	You can't fault people because they can't help it.
	You know, it's an immutable physical characteristic.
	It's not a choice, and now it's all a choice, isn't it?
	Can they make up their mind?
	Does the LGBT people, do they have to make up their mind?
	No, they don't. They can be all over the place.
	And so can Bruce.
	As LifeSite News said, with the redefinition of marriage in our dystopian reproductive industry, there are many children who are deliberately created motherless or fatherless.
	To insinuate that mothers or fathers are essential is now seen by many as an implicit rebuke of same-sex parents.
	Because it highlights what their children are being denied.
	And so, Bruce Jinder, calls himself Caitlyn Jenner, set off on a great journey for a great Father's Day weekend.
	Celebrate your dad's or father's father figures this weekend.
	He's a father figure.
	I guess he cuts a striking figure in a dress, doesn't he?
	This guy who is a Fox News contributor and a favorite of Sean Hannity.
	And so he hasn't had to decide, and neither has the LGBT lobby had to decide finally what they really are.
	Is it a choice?
	Is it immutable physical destiny?
	Well, we don't know.
	Meanwhile, the California Senate has approved a ban on school boards requiring schools to notify parents of a child's pronoun change.
	I wonder, Bruce, do parents have to notify children of their pronoun changes?
	Where does this start and where does it stop?
	But of course, if you're going to say that school districts The school district wants to require teachers to notify parents if their child asks to go by a new pronoun in school.
	No, you're not supposed to tell the parents.
	You're supposed to groom the children, and you're supposed to hide this from the parents.
	Do you get it? Do you get what this is?
	It's called pedophilia, right?
	These are not public schools.
	They are pedophile schools.
	As pedophiles, don't tell your parents, you know, let's do this thing or whatever, right?
	And it gets even worse.
	In Texas, you now have a doctor, an ethical doctor, who blew the whistle on a Texas hospital that was doing child mutilation, where it is not supposed to happen.
	They had purportedly discontinued their transgender program at Texas Children's Hospital.
	And so he blew the whistle on this.
	Dr. Ethan Heim, who identified himself earlier this year as the anonymous whistleblower who provided evidence of the ongoing sex change procedures for children as young as 11.
	He blew the whistle on this to Christopher Ruffo last year.
	Well, he just had U.S. Marshals from the Biden so-called Department of Justice show up at his home earlier this month.
	See, I'm very concerned about that.
	I'm not concerned about Trump, because as far as I'm concerned for what Trump did in 2020, he couldn't spend enough time in jail under the worst kind of circumstances.
	I think Biden deserves to belong there as well.
	But when you look at what Biden is doing, trying to use the FACE Act to lock people up for the rest of their life, When this person blows the whistle on the mutilation of children, and now he has U.S. Marshals, and he is facing four felony counts of alleged HIPAA violations.
	He could go to jail for 10 years.
	And that's what the Biden Department of so-called justice wants to do to him.
	The now-revealed multiple-count indictment alleges that Haim obtained protected individual health information for patients who are not under his care and did it without authorization.
	The four-count indictment alleges that he got the patients' names, their treatment codes, and the attending physician from Texas Children's Hospital's electronic system without authorization.
	He allegedly obtained this information under false pretenses and with intent to cause malicious harm to TCH. They were the ones doing the malicious harm to children who don't have the judgment to do this.
	May I play? And we all know this as parents.
	I played the clip where the guy said, well, okay, here's a stack of cash, $10,000.
	He puts it in front of a toddler, and then he says, or you can have a couple of Oreo cookies or whatever, right?
	Pushes them out there. Okay, so I'll take the cookies, right?
	Are you sure about that?
	Yes, I am. Okay, well, he's affirming the cookies there.
	Now, what we've affirmed is that children don't have the ability to make these kinds of decisions.
	They don't have the maturity to do it.
	The Navy SEAL, Kristen Beck, who was pushed by Navy doctors to transition.
	He was used as a poster child by Michael Flynn to celebrate Pride Month and DEI. Yeah, that conservative Michael Flynn who's going to fix our country.
	Yeah, right. And Chris Beck, who was dressed up as a woman and everything and had an operation.
	Called himself Kristen Beck for a while.
	He said, if they were able to do that to me, a mature man, a Navy SEAL, imagine what they can do to children.
	He said, we've got to stop this.
	Well, Haim was a resident at Baylor College of Medicine.
	He had previous rotations at TCH as part of his residency.
	And in April of 2023, he allegedly requested to reactivate his login access at TCH to access pediatric patients that were not under his care.
	He's a surgeon. He must have gotten wind of the fact that some of the surgeons were doing this kind of stuff.
	The indictment from the Biden so-called Department of Justice alleges that he obtained unauthorized access to personal information of pediatric patients under false pretenses and later disclosed it to a media contact.
	If convicted, he faces up to 10 years in federal prison and a $250,000 maximum possible fine.
	And, of course, he'll probably end his career as well if that doesn't do it.
	I mean, these guys, he's in residency.
	Or else he just started his practice.
	These people come out of medical school with tremendous bills.
	And then they're going to give him a big fine, put him in jail.
	It's absolutely outrageous.
	Because the crime, whenever you are, you know, if he violated HIPAA to find somebody that was acting as a pedophile, would that be justified?
	Of course it would. Is this every bit as bad?
	Yes, of course it is.
	They will be sterilized.
	They will be in all kinds of health issues the rest of their life.
	And this is done to a child?
	And the Biden administration is going to put a whistleblowing surgeon in prison for this?
	The evil is just unbelievable, isn't it?
	He has already maintained that no medical privacy laws were broken.
	When he provided evidence of this to Rufo, he said, It is my responsibility as a doctor, as a physician, to expose this to the public.
	If I don't, then this abuse can continue.
	I knew that future generations, like my children, will Would never be able to forgive me if they knew that I had the chance to do something and I decided to stay silent.
	This is a good guy.
	This is the kind of people that we need.
	The kind of people that the Biden regime wants to lock up.
	The kind of people that...
	They will lock up for life, you know, these people at the abortion clinics.
	You know, they're in their late 80s and they're going to give them a five-year jail sentence.
	It's a death sentence. And even as the judge was sentencing one of the elderly women in a wheelchair, she said, no, you stay alive.
	You're all about life, pro-life, aren't you?
	Just mocking her, this judge.
	We need to have some serious reform.
	We don't need to have a civil war, but we need to have some serious reform.
	It requires average, everyday doctors, he said, to stand up and to speak out against things like this.
	He's 33 years old.
	So, again, the intimidation that the Biden regime is doing to people is far worse than anything he did to Trump.
	Far worse. And yet, Outside of LifeSite News, not much news about this anywhere.
	But boy, if Trump stubs his toe, it's news everywhere.
	Just echoes for days every little thing that happens to him.
	This is an intimidation tactic, of course.
	All this politicized Justice Department of the Biden administration is all intimidation.
	It is to enforce silence.
	On people who would otherwise speak out against these favored policies of the Biden regime, just as they did about people who spoke out about the vaccines and other things like that.
	This is not the first time we've seen the Justice Department behave this way, wielding executive power to intimidate both political opponents and cultural enemies, said the National Review, because they don't talk about what happened during the pandemic or with the vaccine and things like that as well.
	We've seen this with pro-life Americans, with traditionalist Catholics, even with vaccine skeptics, I said.
	And it looks like they're trying to bully their enemies into a kind of going along.
	Does it look like that?
	Yes, because it is.
	We've just lost our minds when it comes to criminal prosecution.
	Health care defense attorney Ron Chapman told Fox News 95% of cases do not go to trial because prosecutors can find fuzzy statutes to get such high maximums or even mandatory minimums at play.
	This forces innocent people to plead guilty and that's what we're dealing with.
	We're all dealing with tons of innocent people who may not be innocent of all the crimes, but they are innocent of the ones that were overcharged against them.
	This has been the case for a very long time.
	And we don't have trial by jury anymore because they intimidate people.
	People don't even want to have a jury trial.
	And one of the reasons why they don't want to have a jury trial is because the juries aren't going to do jury nullification.
	And so he said they've got a staggering 99.6% success rate.
	Once they get you something that they didn't like, like the FACE Act or something like that, then they will add all kinds of additional things or they will overcharge you to the extent that people are afraid to challenge this.
	This guy, Haim, sounds like he's got a conscience.
	It sounds like he is ready to fight.
	I hope he does fight. And I just got to say that even though lawyers typically will not argue during nullification, I think, you know, it's been said, somebody who represents themselves in a court has a fool for a lawyer and for a client.
	But I think when it's a serious charge like this, I really do agree with what New Jersey Weedman did.
	I interviewed him almost a decade ago.
	And he used jury nullification.
	He was not a seller of marijuana, but he was a very heavy user.
	Like Rastafarian dreadlocks and all this other kind of stuff.
	And while I was interviewing him, he actually lit up a joint while I was interviewing him.
	But he knew that in New Jersey, it was in the Constitution, that juries have a right and a duty to judge the law as well as the facts of the case.
	And he put that up for the jury.
	And to argue during nullification.
	And the first judge said, take that down, I'm going to send you to jail for contempt.
	But he got the majority of that, and yet it wasn't unanimous.
	So the prosecutor came after him a second time.
	Second time, the judge was not hostile to him showing a part of the state constitution, and he kept that up full time, and he got a unanimous vote that he was not guilty so they could not try him again.
	I think people need to keep that in consideration.
	We're going to go to our interview now.
	This is David Hughes talking about Wall Street and the crimes of the Nazis.
	You know, this kind of global governance that we have is actually coming to us by economic conquest.
	So here's the pre-recorded interview we had.
	So says the author of this new book here, Wall Street, the Nazis and the Crimes of the Deep State.
	This is written by David Hughes, and David Hughes' introduction is a senior lecturer of international relations at the University of Lincoln in the UK.
	He has received his undergraduate and master's degree from Oxford University, holds doctorates in German studies from Duke University in international relations from Oxford Brookes University.
	Most importantly, I think, for our audience here is that his research focuses on psychological warfare, 9-11, COVID-19, the deep state, technocracy, global class relations, and the resurgent totalitarianism.
	I think his background is very relevant to the times that we live in.
	I've been talking about Gesundheit Führers and medical martial law for the last four years.
	So it's great to have you join us.
	Thank you for joining us, David Hughes.
	Thank you. It's a pleasure to be with you.
	Thank you. And again, when I look at all this and the financing of the Nazis, the very first thing that comes to my mind is the Bush family, their connections to Brown Brothers Herrmann and the financing of the Nazis in the early...
	I haven't seen your book, so I'm just kind of going to throw some things out there and see where your position is on this and what your take is on this.
	Right. Well, I mean, there are so many of these families, not just the Harrimans and the Bushes, but the Duponts and the Rockefellers and others.
	In terms of the Harriman-Bush connection, it runs quite deep.
	So, for example, they were involved in something called the Hamburg-America line.
	Which was owned by W. Averill Harriman.
	And this was an initiative which was intended to provide free passage to Germany, Nazi Germany, for US journalists that were willing to write favourably about Hitler's rise to power.
	And in return, they'd bring fascist sympathisers in the other direction.
	So that's kind of how it got started.
	The president of the Harriman& Co company was George Herbert Walker.
	His son-in-law was Prescott Bush, who of course was the father and grandfather of two future US presidents.
	They were members, Bush and Roland Harriman were both members of the Skull and Bones Secret Society, which probably tells you a lot.
	They were also directors of the Union Banking Corporation, which had connections through a Dutch bank to the Nazi industrialist Fritz Thyssen, who financed Hitler up until 1938.
	Both the Union Banking Corporation and the Hamburg-America line were seized by the US government in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act.
	And one final connection for now that I'll point out is their involvement with what was called the Silesian American Corporation, which was also seized in 1942 under that act.
	But this was a company which had extensive dealings in the region where the Auschwitz concentration camp was.
	It wasn't originally an extermination camp.
	It was set up primarily as a profit centre for Wall Street, to quote John Loftus.
	It goes even deeper than that, but as an introduction to the Bush and Harriman connection, straight away your viewers and listeners will see that there's quite a lot in there.
	Oh, absolutely. And of course, you know, the financing is everything, isn't it?
	Especially as I look at this, you know, I mean, the Nazis were all defeated and they're all gone, right?
	I mean, you don't have to worry about any of that stuff.
	If they were going to enforce trading with the enemies, I guess probably most of these politicians would be put...
	Put it in jail now today, but they all seem to be trading with the enemy.
	When you look at the amount of money that is given in our elections, it's absolutely amazing to see how it has gone up exponentially.
	And so that tells us, as H.L. Meekin said, that an election is an advanced auction of stolen goods.
	But it's something far more than that, I think.
	It seems to me when I look at it, and I'd like to get your take on it, We're good to go.
	At least for the time being, they focused on doing that by pulling economic strings.
	And that's what really piqued my interest in your book in terms of talking about Wall Street because I see Wall Street as being kind of the central bank for these different corporations where they can operate almost endlessly with access to money. How do you see Do you see the connections any connections with Bilderberg and with?
	World Economic Forum and that kind of approach. What do you think about that? I certainly do I I think it's chapter four or chapter five of the book deals with Failures of denazification and the continuing involvement at very high levels of society of former Nazis.
	So you might have expected after 1945 that high-ranking Nazis would not be able to get such positions.
	Unfortunately, we see them resuming life within a matter of years or even months in some cases.
	In West Germany, for example, as...
	Leading industrialists, we see them on the international stage, assuming roles in NATO, the EU, of course, the Bilderberg Group, as you mentioned.
	In terms of the World Economic Forum, set up by Klaus Schwab in 1971, Schwab's father, Eugen Schwab, was a leading industrialist in Nazi Germany, and he was given special permission by Hitler to use slave labour.
	So these are the kinds of figures that we're dealing with.
	There is a direct lineage here that can be traced, and therefore it's quite troubling that somebody like Schwab has the kind of influence that he has today.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, so many people now are familiar with Operation Paperclip where we had, you know, scientists who had been involved in Torturing and killing humans. Hey, if they've got some useful knowledge, let's put them in charge of our Biowarfare program or if they've been launching v2 rockets at the UK. Let's put them in charge of our rocket program here But maybe this is kind of maybe instead of Operation Paperclip.
	Maybe we should call it Operation ticker tape We give them their financing.
	You know, this is the Nazi pot of gold, I guess, that everybody's wondering.
	Where did they put all their gold? I guess maybe Wall Street?
	I don't know. Yeah, well, I mean, the question of Nazi gold is another very, very interesting one, and I get into that also in the book.
	For example, the role of the Vatican in helping to launder some of that.
	The Bank for International Settlements is particularly significant, and what a remarkable entity this is.
	While these nations were at war, During World War II, the Bank for International Settlements, which was led by an American at the time, had senior British financiers on the board, but predominantly the board members were Nazis.
	It just continued business seamlessly throughout the war.
	Now, those Nazi board members of the Bank for International Settlements were directly involved with, for example, the looting of gold from the mouths of Jews.
	You know, the sources of the gold that the Nazis got were really very, very dark.
	And the Bank for International Settlements had a key role in helping to move that gold.
	And again, this was all done with the knowledge and the consent of leading Anglo-American financiers who also sat on the board.
	Yeah, truly is amazing.
	Of course, I guess, you know, as they say, all wars are bankers' wars.
	Yeah. And some of these guys, even though they set us up at war with each other, they're at peace with each other, competing, I guess, for money, but not in terms of killing each other like they have us engaged in that.
	As you look at this, what other constructs?
	You mentioned many of the other families.
	Of course, everybody's familiar with the Rockefellers and many others.
	Are there some other names in there that people would be less familiar with?
	Well, I mean, I think the most significant names are the ones that people would be familiar with.
	So Ford, for example, in producing vehicles not only for the US Army, but also for the Wehrmacht, playing both sides essentially, purely for profit, no national allegiance whatsoever.
	Or if you take the Rockefeller Standard Oil Company, producing tetraethyl lead, without which the planes of the Luftwaffe could not have flown.
	Or the role of the Rockefeller Chase Bank in helping to provide finance to the Nazi operations, particularly in France.
	The role of General Motors and the DuPont family.
	Who not only sponsored kind of fascist thug organizations at home to attack workers and workers' plants to stop them from organizing, but again were deeply involved with the financing of Hitler and the Nazis.
	And when you look back at this history, what's so shocking about it is that Hitler couldn't have come to power without this money.
	The Nazi war machine could not have been Built back up again in the 1930s without the kind of support that was being provided by these leading industrialists and financiers in the United States, also with support from Britain.
	And it would not have been possible to go to war and prolong the war in the way that it was.
	So when you really understand your history, you see that it's anything but a simple kind of us versus them, kind of Anglo-American goodies versus Nazi baddies. It's anything but that. What you actually see from a class perspective is that you have a transnational ruling class here, which is actually very keen to promote totalitarianism.
	It wasn't just Nazi Germany. The Soviet Union was also being financed by Wall Street, for example, in terms of the electrification. And even at home in the United States, we mustn't forget the business plot, so-called of 1933, which was again funded and organized by leading industrialists and financiers with a view to instituting fascism in the United States.
	And it was only because of General Smedley Butler, the intended leader of that plot, that that actually failed.
	So when we go back some nine decades, we can see very clearly that we're dealing with a ruling class which has long favoured totalitarianism as a most efficient and brutal way of crushing working class resistance.
	And just as these initiatives were being promoted in the 1930s in response to a major crisis of capitalism following the Wall Street crash, so today, I argue in the book, since 2020, we are witnessing an attempt to create a global form of totalitarianism, different in form because it's bio-digital, it's technocratic now, but the logic is essentially the same
	and it's not accidental.
	It's all being done by design.
	So the book essentially charts the continuities between 1930s Nazi Germany and the political economy of the West since 2020 and points in the latter chapters to where that might lead.
	If this attempted global technocratic coup is not put down.
	Yes, yes. It truly is amazing.
	Yeah, I seem to have heard somewhere that the love of money is the root of all evil.
	That certainly seems to be exhibited here.
	And it's the same multinational corporations that you mentioned that were involved on both sides of World War II. They are now even more powerful, more in control, and we have the new rise of the technocrats I think it's interesting, you know, when we talk about fascism, people have different definitions of what they think that means.
	And, you know, when you look at, I know George Gilder has talked about the technocrats in Silicon Valley and everything, he calls them neo-Marxists.
	And the reason he says that is because they're focusing on, as part of this enslavement, you know, using universal basic income and taking everything from us, as they are fond of saying.
	And Bloomberg, when he was running for president, said, we just, we're going to, the smart ones of us, we've had the agricultural society, we moved to the industrial revolution.
	Now the smart ones of us are taking everybody's jobs.
	We just need to figure out how we're going to keep them from coming after us in guillotines.
	That's what he said. And so they're looking at universal basic income.
	What Gilder said was, he said, you know, Marx looked at this and the Industrial Revolution and thought, we have infinite capacity for manufacturing material goods.
	We just need to redistribute it.
	Gilder says these guys, these neo-Marxists, believe that with their new technologies of genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotech, that they have infinite capability.
	They aren't so necessarily interested in redistributing it.
	They want to keep it all, but...
	They want to redistribute enough of it to pacify us.
	So how do you see this?
	People argue Marxism.
	People argue fascism.
	Seems to be elements of both of those involved.
	How would you define fascism?
	Well, the standard definition of fascism has to do with the merger of corporations and the state, which we are seeing very much in evidence.
	There are debates about how useful a term it still is today, so there's a British author, very good, I'd recommend him, Simon Elmer, who has written books about resurgent fascism since 2020. He thinks it's just as useful today as a term as it was 90, 100 years ago.
	I've avoided using that term in my own work just because I don't want to conflate the two because the previous version was very much bound up with a kind of form of ultra-nationalism, often forms of racism and xenophobia and so on, and the kind of totalitarianism that we're witnessing today on a global scale is somewhat different to that, so I prefer to go with the term global technocracy because I think it's more accurate.
	Now, just to come back to so-called neo-Marxism, I personally would object in the strongest possible terms to that terminology, simply because, I mean, it drives me up the wall when people refer to the World Economic Forum, for example, as a Marxist or a neo-Marxist organisation.
	It couldn't be further from being that.
	Marxism is about the emancipation of the working class.
	Its entire ethos is oriented towards the working class and promoting the interests of the working class against capitalist oppression by the ruling class.
	The World Economic Forum is the exact opposite.
	It's a mechanism for advancing the interests of transnational capitalism against the working class.
	So I think that Marxism is one of the most important but most misunderstood terms, ideologies, concepts, whatever you want to call it, in the present era.
	It's essential to have a sound understanding of classical Marxism.
	And I think that almost nobody does in today's era.
	Firstly because, I mean, the Cold War and hostility to Marxism on ideological grounds, but also five decades of neoliberalism has been extremely hostile to Marxist thinking.
	And what we find now is that when the term Marxism is used...
	It's used in a grossly inaccurate way, and it's often used as a term of abuse.
	So, for example, conservative commentators like to talk about cultural Marxism as though there's anything about that that Marx or Engels would ever have recognised, or the kind of myths that Marxism automatically leads to Stalinism.
	Yeah, I mean, without wanting to ramble, I do think it's essential to understand Marxism in order to be able to get a handle on what I call the global class war, which was...
	Initiated in an undeclared fashion in 2020.
	And it's important to understand that there are so many misreadings and misunderstandings of Marxism out there that I hope that your viewers and listeners won't be taken in by the kind of very cheap use of terms like neo-Marxism.
	Well, I agree. The labels are very confusing.
	We think of the Chinese Communist Party, and yet I look at them, and they look to me to be fascist, because there is that merger of business and government.
	You have to be a member of the government in order to own the business.
	But what I see, mainly, is the rhetoric.
	It seems to me like...
	Like, you know, the rhetoric of Marxism and the Brotherhood and everything, as we've seen in the past over and over again, these Marxist intentions, okay, have turned into totalitarianism.
	So I think the most accurate way to speak of all this stuff is as totalitarianism, which is what you talk about.
	And I think that the fact that they seek to own everything, you know, we've seen that under Stalinism as well, as we had Solzhenitsyn talk about how difficult, you know, was it if they if they employ you, if they own your home and that type of thing, if they disagree with you, you're cancelled, you're out on the street. And so we see those elements of it. I think that's what brings in people talking about, you know, I guess I would say functional communism, where
	they own everything and they own you and they can punish you and shut you down.
	And it's but both of these approaches, it seems to me, run towards a totalitarian society where everything is controlled by a handful of people and they are ruthless in terms of removing people's freedom to do anything and everything.
	I think that is really the common ground is totalitarianism, which is the way you frame it, I believe.
	It is. And again, there are many parallels here with what took place in Nazi Germany.
	The promotion of big business and kind of large industry.
	An attack on the lower, on the working classes and on the middle classes.
	All of this was witnessed in Nazi Germany.
	And we saw it again quite strongly in 2020.
	The biggest businesses were allowed to stay open.
	Many small and medium enterprises were left to go to the wall.
	As Trump said, you're non-essential.
	I said, what's worse, being deplorable or being non-essential?
	I can't tell the difference, really.
	I think that's exactly what that term was intended to do.
	So what we saw was a reported global wealth transfer of an estimated $3.3 trillion from the middle class and the working class.
	To the upper class. And so these mega corporations like Amazon and Google and so on became even richer than they already were and everybody else has been left to struggle.
	And of course with the inflation that we've seen in the last couple of years as well, it's got even harder for the ordinary man and woman to survive day to day.
	So this is...
	Most certainly a class war that is taking place here.
	And these kinds of economic mechanisms are being used to punish ordinary people, but also to make sure that they are weakened and in a position where they will struggle to resist this drive towards totalitarianism, which, as you rightly say, amounts to total social control.
	And in the case of China, which you mentioned, Ian Davis describes China as the world's first technate, i.e.
	the first concrete example of a state which actually manifests technocracy as a political regime.
	So when we're thinking about the social credit scoring and the surveillance and all of the rest of it, the awful kind of Shanghai lockdowns of the drones ominously going past windows, beaming out, control your soul's desire for freedom, really dystopian stuff.
	But it's a reality and it seems to me now that the aim is to expand that technocratic model which has been instituted in China Across the West now.
	I agree. So this is all about the controlled demolition of liberal democracy and the institution of a novel global form of totalitarianism, which is technocracy.
	Yes. And I've said for the longest time that China was the beta test site for the technocracy.
	They rolled out their traffic light system and everything in just a couple of years before we got it rolled out everywhere.
	And let me ask you about that.
	One of the things I've said over and over again about this is the fact that if you look at every single country during the 2020 pandemic stuff, the lockdown, if you look at every single country, it doesn't matter what political party, what politician, it doesn't matter what their stated philosophy is.
	They could be a hard left, hard right.
	They could be a libertarian philosophy.
	It doesn't really matter. They all did the same thing in lockstep.
	Is that not a tell?
	Do we already have global governance, even though they haven't set up a castle somewhere yet?
	Well, it's emerging, isn't it?
	I mean, there's a difference between global governance and global government or world government, and that's ultimately what they're pushing towards because it's hierarchical, it's centralised, and it can work in that manner.
	Sorry, what was the first part of the question?
	There was something I wanted to say there.
	I was just talking about how all of the different politicians were kind of in lockstep with each other.
	Thank you. Yeah, that's right. Regardless of country or philosophy or party or whatever.
	Yeah, and that's a really important consideration.
	That is a big tell, as you say.
	And the title of my book, Wall Street, the Nazis and the Crimes of the Deep State, The deep state is a really fundamental concept here, and I think and I argue that this is an actually existing entity that you can trace all the way back to the late 1940s at least, and maybe earlier in terms of the Office of Strategic Services in the World War II era.
	The forerunner of the CIA. The forerunner of the CIA. And what you find in that late 1940s period are a soup of alphabet agencies all coming together.
	For example, with the formation of NATO, it was only revealed decades later, in 1990, I think?
	And these armies were then used to, in the case of Italy, commit false flag terrorism in the 1970s and 1980s, which was a model which was subsequently expanded through the post-911 global terror wars.
	So the more of this evidence that comes to light, the more it seems to me that there has in fact been a hidden power structure.
	That there is in fact an apparatus which is operating at a higher level than democracy behind the scenes.
	And the way it works is essentially through veto power.
	So normal political life and democracy is allowed to continue for as long as it's convenient.
	But every now and again there are these key moments where this transnational deep state intervenes because it wants to change things.
	So 9-11 is a classic instance of that.
	And the whole paradigm of rule changes thereafter with the war on terror.
	The Covid lockdowns were another classic example of that as we move into the biosecurity paradigm.
	And what was so interesting to me about those lockdowns, from a UK perspective, is who authorised them or who declared them, who decreed them?
	Because all of our senior politicians and scientists and so on, right up until the day of the lockdown, were saying that they were not in favour of such a thing.
	And then all of a sudden, bam!
	There it was! And that to me looks like a classic instance of one of these kind of veto moments where somebody has told, even the British Prime Minister, this is what you're going to do now, and you have to go along with this.
	So... I think I'm going to go.
	I agree.
	Absolutely. And over the politicians that are going to be able to choose from Tweedledee or Tweedledum, they've got control over them as well.
	It's absolutely amazing to see this.
	If it wasn't so evil, you could admire the genius of this and the long-term strategy of it.
	But I see, you know, you talk about 9-11, you talk about COVID. I see COVID as being the other shoe to drop from 9-11 because it was two months before 9-11 that they had the first one of these germ game simulations, Dark Winter.
	One week later, Anthrax.
	And then they put out the model legislation to get around our 10th Amendment.
	And then when Trump did the executive work, and then they practiced it.
	Another 20 years of germ game stuff.
	Fauci there at the beginning. CIA right there.
	Wolsey was playing the role of president and all this kind of stuff, former CIA. And then this whole thing rolls out.
	Fauci is a part of that.
	And it doesn't matter.
	You can have the guy that is billed as Mr.
	Anti-Globalist, but he runs.
	They get him to run the whole thing for them.
	It's absolutely amazing to watch this all play out.
	It is. And in my previous book titled COVID-19 Psychological Operations and the War for Technocracy, I actually get into, for example, Operation Dark Winter there that you cite from June 2001 and some of the other pandemic preparedness planning exercises.
	and the case that I make in that book is actually the preparations for 2020 as a psychological operation, a form of psychological warfare, date back at least two decades and possibly longer and we also see around that time the first big push towards bio-nanotechnology from around the year 2000 and there seems to be quite strong evidence now that we are
	in fact entering into what back then in 2000 they called the IT bio-nano era and in various military intelligence documents that I analyse they were projecting two decades ago, dates including 2020, 2025 and 2030.
	So there appears to have been an enormous amount of planning behind the scene.
	As I argue in that book, the level of complexity and sheer malice, in fact, behind the psychological operation in 2020 It must have taken many years to have put it together.
	Nothing was accidental.
	All of it was deliberate, and it was a war against humanity.
	Oh, yeah. Fauci famously said in October of 2019, somebody asked him, The Milken Institute.
	How do we get everybody in the world to take an untested vaccine?
	He says, well, we do it with disruption.
	We do it from the inside and we do it iteratively.
	And we've seen this roll out.
	And that was, I think, another tell.
	The fact that they would, you know, roll this thing out and everybody would be doing the same thing.
	But they would say, well, this is emergency.
	But in two months, we're going to do the next step.
	it was the US or if it was France or if it was Canada, they did the next step a couple months down the road.
	I've got to get you on to talk about the psychological operations of COVID-19 and talk about that book as well.
	But let's not get too far off of the Nazis.
	When you look at...
	Again, the global governance, the economic aspect of it.
	Where would you say, how far along are we now?
	You mentioned the date 2025.
	I've long talked about the importance of 2030 to them.
	They started talking about Smart Cities 2030 and all the rest of this stuff back, I think, in 2015.
	Prior to that, we had, you know, Agenda 21 and things like that.
	But it seems like that's a real target date for them.
	What do you hear about 2025?
	Firstly, it featured in, for example, a NASA document from 2001, which seems to be seminal in terms of laying out some of the agendas that we're facing today.
	Also, if you remember back in 2020, I think it was March or April 2020, the World Bank issued major funding for a COVID-related project whose termination date was 2025.
	So there are two things kind of right off the bat there that you can connect there.
	In terms of 2030, I personally think there's a kind of, somewhat of a spell-casting going on there.
	Almost, you know, if you encamp these dates enough and enough and enough, it kind of starts to lead people to believe that they have the power to do this.
	But you already mentioned Agenda 21.
	That's, 21 has been and gone by now, so they like putting these dates out there, but I don't think that we should imagine that they necessarily hold the kind of power that I'm sure our would-be overlords would like to have.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about our would-be overlords and, you know, it's, as you point out, it's the technocracy.
	And they have the same kind of absolute disregard for everybody else.
	I mean, it is, you know, when we look at the Nazis, they were the master race and everything.
	I guess the master race today are the billionaires, and everybody else really matters.
	I've talked to people in the past about artificial intelligence.
	Hugo de Garis wrote a book called Artillac War, and his idea was that artificial intelligence was going to become self-aware, that Terminator scenario, which he thought was a possibility.
	I've never really bought into that, but I did agree with his take of the technocratic elite and their contempt for the rest of us, and his idea that as we awakened to what their real plans were for us, that there'd be a new world.
	there'd be a massive pushback and he believed that they would use their amazing technology to for the small elite to go to war with the rest of us is that something that you see on the horizon? Yeah and I think it's happening already.
	Yeah, I think, again, it's possible to join all of those dots.
	So, with two co-authors, Daniel Brody and Lissa Johnson, I've just published a four-part series on transhumanism in Propaganda in Focus, so you can find that by going to propagandainfocus.com.
	And we're very interested in transhumanism because it seems to us that when you read the relevant military intelligence documents over a long period of time, that transhumanism has kind of been sold to us as something...
	A bit kind of sci-fi, a bit out there, a bit kooky, a bit geeky, something that we maybe shouldn't take too seriously, you know, the kind of futurist aspirations of Ray Kurzweil and the singularity and all of this kind of thing.
	And I think you're right.
	I think a lot of it is nonsense.
	However... Coming back to the very kind of predatory and psychopathic and extremely nasty dimension to this predator class that we are dealing with here, what we argue in the series is that that kind of Innocent image, if you like, of transhumanism.
	They often talk in terms of human augmentation.
	The very term augmentation is positive.
	It's supposedly about making us better.
	They sell it in terms of being able to help with disabilities and so on, or perhaps helping to cure diseases like cancer or Parkinson's or Alzheimer's.
	Actually, when you look closely at the military intelligence literature, what this looks like very much to us is a pretext for merging human beings and technology in a way that is not in fact designed to promote the cause of human freedom or human health, as potentially some of these technologies could be.
	But actually, it looks more about a means of enslavement, potentially.
	And again, in the previous book, I get into some of this.
	So when you are talking about, let's take Charles Lieber and his syringe-injectable neural nets that he successfully injected via a syringe into a mouse in 2019, the year before COVID, So we know that such technologies are a reality.
	It doesn't require a wild leap of the imagination to think that they could inject via a syringe nanotechnologies which can cross the blood-brain barrier, self-assemble, create neural nets, create other things within the body that can be used to surveil or control a person from the inside out.
	Klaus Schwab openly talks about being able to, or at least the desire, or the technological project to be able to read people's brains directly.
	James Giordano, the neuroscience advisor to the Pentagon, he talked openly in I think 2017, 2018.
	He said that the brain will be the battlescape of the 21st century.
	So this is a senior military figure saying this.
	So once we understand that it's a global class war that we're in, that humanity has been framed as the enemy, and that the primary site of the battle...
	Will be the brain and neurotechnology.
	Then when you start piecing all of this together, it looks like a project for global totalitarian control, which is beyond the wildest dreams of Hitler or Stalin, and which, if implemented, could potentially be irreversible.
	So it's truly frightening what we're facing here.
	Yeah. I say all the time, our big mistake is, as normal people, we, as George Bush would say, misunderstand the evil of these serial killers and mass murderers.
	And we also do the same with their technology.
	We just can't imagine how advanced their technology is and how evil their intentions.
	And I think that's the key thing.
	We can get a glimpse of it occasionally as we see Yuval Harari talking at the World Economic Forum.
	I mean, his contempt for mankind is you cut it with a knife.
	I mean, it's just amazing how thick it is.
	Absolutely despise humanity, and once in a while they start monologuing like a supervillain in a superhero movie about what they want to do.
	It's absolutely insane what they want to do.
	And I think back, you know, in terms of This kind of, these comic book villains, you know, the origins of a lot of what was done with Red Skull and with Captain America and stuff.
	It goes back to actually something that's part of Operation Paperclip, where the Germans said they were trying to revive people that had frozen as they were shot down over the English Channel.
	Sometimes you get there and it'd be just a little bit too late.
	They could have saved them, maybe if we can revive them.
	So they started experimenting on humans and killing humans and seeing if they could bring them back in certain ways.
	They had a little bit of success after about 10 or 20 minutes or something like that.
	So that was one of the key things that the allies wanted.
	And so when you look at this, we're supposed to be the fair haired good guys and yet Operation Paperclip, one of the really, I guess, how people found out about it because this was leaked by a good guy in the US Army.
	And he said, do you realize what was going on with this stuff?
	And we're giving these guys a pass because we want their technology.
	So immediately at that point in time, there was a mindset, even within the American government, that not just the Nazis, but within the American government, that they wanted to use that kind of technology to be able to reanimate dead bodies and things like that.
	There's been this undercurrent of evil on both sides throughout this whole thing.
	What do you think, as you look at this going ahead, I mean, what is our best defense against this war against the brain, war against the mind?
	Is it information?
	Is that why they're so interested in shutting everything down?
	What do we do? I personally think that it has to start with the role of conscience.
	I'm glad that you bring evil up openly.
	It's a category which was widely disregarded, I think, in the 20th century.
	But this is, in fact, what we're dealing with.
	This is, as much as anything else, it's a war between good and evil.
	It's a war between these vicious psychopaths and the rest of humanity.
	They're not like us.
	They don't think like us.
	They appear not to have a conscience.
	I mean just in terms of the kind of medical experimentation, I get into some of that in the book and I won't kind of go into the gruesome details here but I mean it's just beyond belief what the Nazis were doing in terms of experimenting on people medically and I find it really deeply troubling in that regard that what appears to have taken place since 2021 is a worldwide
	experiment on a reported 5.55 billion people who took these shots because there was never any adequate data after only a few months.
	I've shown in one of my papers that these shots, they all contain a whole host of undisclosed ingredients.
	This is based on the studies of 26 different research teams that did microscopic and spectroscopic analysis of their contents.
	I mean, this is really frightening stuff.
	This could be attempted and could be, in fact, carried out, and of course it has been, and all of the harms are now becoming self-evident.
	So, you know, what do we do when faced with that kind of evil?
	It has to start with the role of conscience.
	And this is a war against all of us, and we are all undeclared participants in this war.
	Solzhenitsyn, he mentioned earlier here, he had the famous line about the line between good and evil runs through every human heart.
	And because what is taking place here is fundamentally evil.
	It involves the inversion of morality on so many levels.
	It's so dark that many people can't face it, in fact.
	But given that that's fundamentally what it is, each of us has to start with our own conscience and what we, deep down, know to be right and wrong.
	And even many people who went along with these highly deceptive narratives in 2020, 2021, and beyond, They must, deep down, know that there's something really, really badly wrong at this stage.
	And when we look into ourselves, it then becomes incumbent on all of us to ask, well, what is it that we can do?
	And each of us has our own different skill set, our own gifts, our own ways of being able to influence things for the better.
	So I don't have a magic bullet to say, well, here's the solution to the emerging global totalitarianism.
	But I do think that if all of us are honest enough and have the kind of moral courage to do what's right, that this could be ended pretty quickly.
	I mean, just in terms of the numbers, we have a numerically tiny transnational ruling class.
	When you look at statistically how the wealth is distributed across the world, 10% owns and controls 76% of the world's wealth.
	And it increases exponentially as you approach the richest 1%, 0.1%, 0.01%, and so on.
	The curve goes higher and higher and higher.
	So, yes, of course, they own the means of production.
	They have all of that on their sides.
	They've weaponized it all against us.
	But on the other hand, they're seeking to control a reported 8 billion people.
	In the world now, we have the numbers on our side.
	So, in a sense, it's about awareness as well, spreading information as best we can.
	And it just takes a critical mass of people to say no.
	No to the central bank digital currencies.
	No to the technocracy.
	No to the ubiquitous surveillance companies.
	No to the smart technologies which are being used to enslavers.
	No to experimental products being deployed against us without adequate safety data.
	If enough people can see what's happening and have the backbone to stand up to it, these agendas cannot be enforced.
	So much of it relies on the psychological warfare and keeping people in a deceived state, a fearful state.
	Once people start to come out of that, it could be game over.
	Yeah, I agree. I think that's one of the reasons why they're so hell-bent on depopulation.
	You have to look at this and it's like, well, do they just hate people?
	No, they're concerned because there's 8 billion people and there's maybe just a couple of dozen of them or whatever at the very top.
	They're very concerned about that.
	And so they've got to put the odds in their favor.
	So they've been about depopulation and population reduction for a very long time.
	And when you talk about the conscience, isn't it interesting that the conscience was really the thing that was under most direct attack Here in the United States, because of the First Amendment and the free exercise of religion and that type of thing...
	That would give people a pass against any of these mandates in most scenarios.
	So they had to attack your conscience.
	They had to coerce you, attack your conscience, come up with different mechanisms, have a little question-answer period where they're going to say, but you do this.
	You violated your conscience over here.
	So now you've got to violate it over here, that type of thing.
	And so people had objections about the development of these vaccines that had religious conscientious objections to that and to other things.
	They were concerned perhaps that this might be training for the, you know, moving the Overton window to the mark of the beast or anything like that.
	They had to attack the conscience.
	They had to attack religious liberty.
	Because that's the thing that gives people the backbone and the courage to stand up against this kind of stuff.
	If you think that this life is not all that there is, then you're going to stand up for the principles that are eternal.
	And I think that's why they made that such a line of attack during the COVID coercion.
	100%, and I've got a section in the book called Hijacking Conscience, and I draw parallels between exactly the kind of thing that you're describing there.
	You're right, anybody who stood up and resisted was perversely branded as, oh, well, you're harming and endangering others, and you're morally objectionable, you're irresponsible, and so on, when actually... What many people were trying to do was actually trying to stand up for basic principles of human freedom, liberal values, human dignity, etc.
	But they were branded as the bad ones.
	It's all inverted. Now, in the book, I draw parallels between that kind of thing and what took place, guess what, in Nazi Germany.
	Citing, for example, a book written in 2003 by Claudia Koons called The Nazi Conscience.
	Great book, because what it argues is that the image of Germans as kind of blind order followers is very much a cliché.
	And what actually took place over the course of many years in Nazi Germany, through methods of propaganda, indoctrination, cultural discrimination, passage of various laws and so on, is that over the course of several years, Germans actually came to believe that Deep down.
	But yes, it was okay to discriminate in these ways and to hold views about a superior Aryan race and other inferior groups in society who were worthy of punishment and so on.
	Once you've conditioned the population in that way, then you can get to some of the worst horrors that we saw at the end of the Third Reich, when these processes, unfortunately, led to the Holocaust, they led to genocide, and various other horrors, the medical experimentation and so on.
	These completely unconscionable acts Which history has damned?
	All of this was made possible by hijacking conscience in the early period.
	So I draw attention to this in the book because in chapter 7, the title of that chapter is called Where It Leads.
	And having...
	We've identified a couple of dozen, at least, parallels between the political economy of 1930s Germany and the political economy of the West since 2020, and having argued that this is all non-accidental, it's all by design, it's all being driven by the same ruling class whose operations I trace from decade to decade in the intervening chapters, when I get to the end of the book, I'm saying, well, where will this go if this is not stopped?
	And again, the writing is on the wall in many ways.
	The Nazis, for example, promoted euthanasia, and it's known how euthanasia was the thin edge of the wedge, Kind of first, the kind of life-not-worthy-of-life concept, and then, you know, killing off disabled children.
	Eventually, you end up with genocide.
	And so it's deeply troubling today when we look at Canada and the so-called MAID program, another inversion of morality.
	You know, MAID sounds kind and caring and so on.
	But, you know, we're talking about killing, essentially.
	Yeah. And in this country, the Midaslam scandal, another form of euthanasia, and Matt Hancock is a central figure, our former health secretary in this country.
	Today, he's still pushing for assisted dying and so on.
	So some people might think that this sounds innocent or maybe even good for people who are really, really suffering and want an end to life.
	But the problem is when you put it in this broader historical context and trajectory, you can see it's part of a much darker totalitarian agenda.
	And we know from history where this leads.
	And armed with that knowledge, we really have to stop this.
	Yes, yes.
	And just as a reminder to the American audience about Madazolam, is it Madazolam or Madazolam anyway, but Matt Hancock, very cynical, as we saw his emails, laughing at these arbitrary rules that he was going to be imposing upon other people, violating them himself, and then getting, what was it, three or five times the amount of Madazolam that they had had
	This is something that suppresses breathing, killed a lot of people, these medical protocols that were put through, just as we did.
	And I think they used it here as well when they put people on the invasive ventilators.
	Most of them died.
	And so this is a mass culling that we saw running through 2020.
	And so I look at this and I just shake my head that the two people who had involvement in all of this are now our two candidates for the presidency.
	It's just unbelievable to me.
	But the...
	And when you were talking about that and creating different classes of people, my mind always goes back to New Zealand's Fuhrer.
	I called her Jab Sinda because she was pushing the vaccine.
	Sounds like you're creating two classes of people.
	Yep, yep, that's what it is.
	And she was just, she loved that.
	I mean, she was in her glory.
	Dan Andrews in Australia, Dictator Dan.
	And the two of them have been elevated by the globalist elite and given awards and given new positions and all that.
	That tells you everything.
	Some of the worst dictators are the most rewarded.
	That is a very frightening scenario.
	And it shows this kind of Nazi fascism, totalitarianism, probably the best.
	We just need to start talking about totalitarianism.
	It's just amazing to see this kind of stuff played out at this time.
	During that, it was exactly what the Nazis did, what she was doing.
	Two classes of people.
	We're going to punish you.
	We're going to force you to do this.
	You're not going to have anything.
	We're going to take everything away from you.
	It's just amazing how much that was like what we had seen.
	And now everybody's at the stage where, well, I don't know where the six-foot rule came from.
	I don't know where this mask...
	It's like Nuremberg all over again, except that nobody is going to jail and nobody is going to be executed.
	They all get the Operation Paperclip treatment.
	Yeah, I mean, even Nuremberg 1.0 was largely victor's justice.
	I mean, no American, no Brit was charged.
	I mean, you know, some of the senior figures that I've mentioned were directly responsible for the rise of the Nazis in the World War II, not even mentioned at Nuremberg.
	So when people call for Nuremberg 2.0, I'm somewhat sceptical of that, I have to say.
	Yeah, that would be the same type of thing where we let the real perpetrators go off of the people who are funding it get off with a pass.
	It truly is amazing.
	A very important book, and I'm very interested in reading it.
	And again, this is David Hughes, and the book is...
	Let me read the title here so I get it right.
	Go ahead and pull up the cover of the book there.
	It is Wall Street, the Nazis, and the Crimes of the Deep State.
	And it is deep.
	It is broad. It has been there.
	Where's the best place? We've got a screenshot here, a brief screenshot of Amazon.
	Where's the best place for people to get this?
	Do you sell it directly?
	Do you have a website where you sell this?
	Or do people just go to Amazon or wherever they buy books?
	It's published with Skyhorse, so American readers can go directly to the Skyhorse website and order it there.
	In the United States, it's available both as an e-book and as a hard copy edition.
	Some of my readers have sent me photos of their hard copy.
	Here in the UK, it's not yet available, and I myself don't own a hard copy yet.
	It's out in July in this country.
	The easiest place, not that I ever would recommend it, is of course Amazon.
	Yeah, because then you're feeding the very people we've been talking about.
	I know. It's so difficult, isn't it?
	It's so difficult. Skyhorsepublishing.com is a place where you can go.
	You can order it direct, and you don't have to feed the beast that we're talking about.
	It's so good talking to you, David.
	Thank you very much. Thank you for the book, Wall Street, the Nazis, and the Crimes of the Deep State.
	Very important for people to understand the big picture.
	And you, you know, paint that big picture very thoroughly, I believe.
	It seems like, I haven't seen the book, but it certainly, as you're talking about the different chapters and the different aspects, you get the big picture.
	You certainly do understand it and understand what we're up against.
	And folks, we're in the fight of our life.
	Because they want to kill us. That's very much the intention, is to provide that bigger picture.
	And also in my previous book, you know, the two kind of work together.
	So if anybody wants to find out more about my work, Substack's the best place to go, dhughes.substack.com.
	Good, good. Yeah, I want to talk to you about, we'll have to get another interview and talk to you about that other book as well.
	Thank you so much, David Hughes.
	Wall Street, the Nazis, the Crimes of the Deep State.
	Thank you. You're very welcome.
	Thanks for having me on.
	Thank you.
	The David Night Show is a critical thinking super spreader.
	If you've been exposed to logic by listening to The David Knight Show, please do your part and try not to spread it.
	Financial support or simply telling others about the show causes this dangerous information to spread farther.
	People have to trust me.
	I mean, trust the science.
	Wear your mask.
	Take your vaccine.
	Don't ask questions.
	Using free speech to free minds.

▲