Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 6, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:02:21

The David Knight Show - 11/6/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 6th of November, year of our Lord, 2023.
	Today we're going to begin with the tax spend erase procedure.
	This is what is happening in America.
	We'll take a look at the new speaker.
	The good, bad, the ugly, and some, and I say mostly ugly stuff.
	A lot of ugly stuff being thrown at him by his opponents.
	Not because of war.
	And we're going to take a look at war.
	And we're going to take a look at...
	I'm going to try to explain in a little bit more explicit detail why we should follow a path of peace.
	If you call yourself a Christian, why you should follow a path of peace.
	This is very important.
	This is a trap.
	These people have poisoned their own people.
	State that again. Poisoning over and over again.
	Why would you follow these people who have engaged in democide for the last three years?
	Now you're going to walk off in a war following these people?
	Come on.
	We'll be right back.
	It truly is amazing.
	As we look at what is happening to our countries worldwide, And as I said, we look at Europe and the Europeans are saying, well, we're going to have to do something about this uncontrolled immigration.
	It's such an obvious problem that even Henry Kissinger, who is involved in creating this, tries to distance himself from it.
	Just as you will see, people who push the vaccine trying to distance themselves from that.
	I didn't order anybody to do anything, said Fauci.
	I didn't tell anybody to do anything, says Trump.
	But it was great. Greatest thing we've ever achieved is this poison.
	It's that kind of cognitive dissonance that's amazing.
	And we look at the border collapsing.
	We look at the fact that we now have barbarians inside the gate deliberately.
	When you look at what is coming up in the UK, You've got millions are going to protest November the 11th.
	That's Remembrance Day.
	Kind of like Memorial Day.
	But that's Remembrance Day in the UK. And they expect to have millions of pro-Palestinians demonstrating.
	Probably not peacefully. Mostly peaceful, right?
	Like the BLM stuff. And you see homelessness throughout the streets of London.
	Record high. You got people living in tents.
	As I said before, I've been there many times.
	I haven't been there for a couple of decades now.
	But over the period, last time we were there was in 2001.
	And never saw anything like that.
	Never saw these homeless encampments everywhere.
	You got the same type of thing that is happening in Italy, where you have this island of 6,000 people and you bring in 18.
	Well, you don't bring them in. Well, they did bring them in.
	But you stand down and you let 18,000 people just immigrate with no means of support, no place to live, no way to earn a living, except in crimes of predation and other things like that.
	And so this is what's happening everywhere.
	Why do you think they have, Mayor Sadiq Khan in London?
	It's because of immigration.
	When we were there 20 years ago, you know, it was...
	My experience with London, we went there in 1984.
	We got married. We had no money, but had some time.
	I didn't have to start a job for a couple of months.
	We basically just lived, could barely afford to eat, lost so much weight.
	It's amazing. We were literally starving.
	The dollar was extremely weak.
	Everything was extremely expensive.
	We had no money. But we just did everything we could for free.
	You know, we'd walk by bakeries and smell.
	And that was our meal.
	But we had a great time.
	And then we went back four years later.
	Things were very different. Both of us had been working for four years.
	And the dollar had just gone through the roof.
	And had gone from the weakest position against the pound, pretty much historically, to one of the strongest positions ever against the pound.
	And so we went back in 1984 and everything was pretty much the same except for our personal circumstances, but we were able to do different types of things.
	We took the kids in 2001, spring.
	It was a very different place.
	Very different. London was, it was the people that were there.
	And, you know, it was basically swamped with immigrants who elected city con.
	But more than that, it was crime-ridden.
	People were gruff and angry.
	It was like being in New York City, which always has been that way every time I've been there.
	You know, people were very helpful when we'd been there before, kind of like when we went to Hong Kong.
	People would see you reading a map in Hong Kong.
	They'd walk, can I help you find anything?
	It was almost like small-town kindness that you expect to see.
	And things have pretty much been that way in London.
	I remember when we went in 1980, we were looking at a map and some guy in a kilt walks up to us and wanted to help us.
	I said, sure, yeah, yeah.
	And he gives us directions with such a Scottish accent.
	I didn't understand a word he was saying.
	And he walked off and I looked at Karen and I said, did you get a word of that?
	No. I don't know what he was saying.
	But it changed a great deal.
	And... And now it is changing again, and this is by design.
	Over a 40-year period, we never saw homeless people there.
	And now they're there.
	And you understand, we are the colonizers.
	No, they are the colonizers.
	They are the colonizers, and they're being brought in for war.
	This is, quite frankly, what is happening.
	Happening across Europe.
	And you see this type of stuff, as I said before.
	I don't think... You know, when you see pictures of, you know, Jewish stars being put on, sorry, David being put on Jewish people's houses and Jewish people being attacked, I think if you get to, the media's not going to say it, but I think if you get down and investigate, my hunch is that you're going to see that this is the immigrants into Paris, the immigrants into the UK and other places like this that are doing this.
	And as we see that happening there, Our history is being erased.
	I showed the clips last week of Robert E. Lee and how they made a fetish of melting down the statue.
	We've got to cut off the head.
	Now we're going to show us slicing the face off.
	See this? Look at the face.
	See that there? And now we're going to melt him and we're going to show you the picture of his face being melted.
	That was a deliberate move.
	As Robert Bridge said, America, your history is being erased.
	Why, destroying the Robert E. Lee statue is an insult to the nation.
	The U.S. political left is no longer content with canceling thoughts and words, but has taken its Orwellian sword to the annals of history as well.
	What will become of a nation that seeks to eliminate all vestiges of its past?
	Those who control the past control the future.
	And they are racing the past now.
	Down the memory hole, or down the furnace.
	And along with it go all the principles and the laws and the traditions and the Magna Carta, Bill of Rights, the Constitution.
	All this is being erased.
	The statues are merely the final visual cue of what is happening.
	Elon Musk, when he saw the Washington Post and their fetishizing of this statue destruction, Elon Musk is right.
	The left claims of destroying a century-old Robert E. Lee statue by a great American artist represents healing.
	The truth is exactly the opposite of that.
	Charlie Kirk, who I don't normally agree with, but I did agree with him about this.
	He said, letting the South publicly honor its experience during the Civil War was a major part of the nation's post-war healing.
	Now, you have to understand, the North honored Robert E. Lee as well.
	Why? Why? Well, because when he saw that he could not win the war, and when he saw firsthand, because he was on the front lines, he and his generals, when he saw that bloodshed for that period of time and knew that it was not possible to win, he could have continued in a guerrilla war.
	As a matter of fact, Nathan Bedford Forrest never surrendered.
	He wanted to continue a guerrilla war.
	He helped to establish, well, he won't get into the Ku Klux Klan.
	He distanced himself from that.
	But he was there initially as a pushback against Reconstruction and other things like that.
	But there were a lot of people like him that wanted to continue a guerrilla war.
	Robert E. Lee said, no, part of a just war is the possibility of winning.
	And we're not going to continue this kind of bloodshed with this.
	And so he was honored for his military genius, for his character, but mostly by the North as well as the South because he brought an end to the killing that he could have continued.
	A very deliberate effort to mock and to taunt the political right, the Washington Post's video of the dismemberment of the Lee statue.
	Again, you know, putting it inside of an Indian shawl, and you saw the careful, it's like an unboxing or something, you know.
	It's really, they made a fetish out of this whole thing.
	But, you know, we can imagine what they're going to do with it, right?
	They said we're going to melt it down and we're going to make some other kind of statue.
	Well, again, you know, we look at this picture here.
	This is a statue that they have put in in Europe.
	And if you look at this idiotic stuff, this dumbed down stuff, look at that.
	That was $2 million they spent on that statue, that fountain statue.
	And somebody compared it. They said, look at the difference in a 1902 statue and a 2023 statue.
	Look at that. Now, you know, there's a lot of skill and art, whether or not you like the composition.
	I don't really particularly care for the Grecian competitions myself, but we want to talk about an idiocracy.
	And we'll look at what we have done.
	But again, this takedown of the Lee statue is ritualized, a ritual of domination.
	They bragged, well, they can't put Humpty Dumpty back together again.
	And there's this article from RT. It says, for all the talk of healing and of righting historical wrongs, All of this appears to be a deliberate provocation and a show of force directed at the American right.
	In August of 2017, Charlottesville turned into a pitched battle between, quote, white nationalist groups, unquote, and Antifa over the decision to remove the Lee statue.
	That decision was made by a city council earlier that year because the monument's presence was disrespected.
	So now they are disrespecting it by making a ritual of taking it apart.
	And you understand since Antifa is communist and always has been communist that this is what they do.
	Communists and Islam make it a ritual of domination when they take over a country to remove what was there before.
	Could this be an attempt to incite MAGA supporters to organize another tiki torch parade?
	Again, we have to be careful about how we respond.
	We don't want to fall into the traps that they lay for us.
	Like Charlottesville. Like January the 6th.
	So, what will the 6,000 pound statue be turned into?
	Will it be something like that nonsense there?
	Probably. Meanwhile, we have the antithesis of what Robert E. Lee was about, personified in Zelensky, who is now doing everything he can To try to get attention drawn back to himself so he can continue the war without any possibility of winning it.
	That's why I call him the antithesis of Robert E. Lee.
	As a matter of fact, his own aides are saying, can't win this war.
	His own aides are saying, the money is just going everywhere.
	Everything is being looted.
	Everything is being stolen. And he keeps demanding that he get more money.
	As a matter of fact, he thinks that he can get more attention to himself if he invites Donald Trump to come to Ukraine.
	Because, you know, that's where all the news media is.
	What can I do to get back in the spotlight now that the Israel and Hamas fighting has taken center stage and nobody's paying any attention to me?
	Well, I can get Donald Trump in because Donald Trump is the big show in town.
	Everybody will pay attention if I get Donald Trump.
	And so maybe he will do it, because that's what Trump is about.
	It's about attention. So he's dead set against a truce or a peace deal with Moscow, and so is President Biden.
	They had options to do that.
	As a matter of fact, Biden even more so than Zelensky early on.
	So... They're refusing to advance in suicidal ways in Ukraine.
	And a new Time magazine cover story starts talking about the changing attitudes of Americans to this war in Ukraine.
	A recent long article in Time magazine presents itself as a deep dive into the world of and the state of mind of Zelensky.
	In reality, it is a backhanded, withering attack.
	So even Time magazine has turned on him.
	We see a lonely leader who will not accept that he is losing and is ready to sacrifice evermore of his country and of his people for his obstinacy.
	That's why I say he is the antithesis of Robbery Lee.
	And yet we shower him with cash.
	He's been given every honor on earth by our contemporaries as they destroy honorable people of the past because they want to destroy the foundations of our country.
	That's not just a statue that's being taken down.
	And it's not just the Confederacy.
	It's everything. And it's all condemned.
	As colonizers. We'll talk about it later, but we've got Obama out there saying, well, you can't have free markets.
	Free markets are slavery.
	Free markets are colonizing and all the rest of the stuff.
	I understand why Obama doesn't like it.
	Centralized government, all-powerful centralized government has worked very well for him.
	Turn him into essentially a billionaire.
	I don't know his exact net worth, but it's got to be close to that.
	If not, he'll be zooming in on that before he's gone.
	This community organizer who never did anything.
	Biden is threatening to veto the GOP spending bill that would cut Amtrak funding to twice what it was before the pandemic.
	You see? This is, again, this is Reason Magazine.
	So they put the cuts in air quotes.
	Because it's not a cut. When we talk about the so-called cuts to the IRS, unfortunately, they're not cuts.
	The reductions in the planned increase, and you'll still wind up with an IRS that is five times bigger than it is today.
	But Mike Lee is talking about how he's cut it.
	This is the way this works, you see.
	The difference between, when it comes to the budget stuff, the difference between Biden and Mike Johnson, It's simply one of degrees.
	So, I don't know what Biden really wanted for Amtrak.
	He's not happy with a two-and-a-half-time increase.
	Under Republicans' draconian cuts, they'd receive over $5 billion next year, but historically they receive $2 billion in subsidies every year.
	So, two-and-a-half times bigger, but that's a cut.
	That's a cut to Biden.
	I don't know. Biden want to make it five times bigger, ten times bigger?
	I don't know. You're only going to double the size of the ANTRAC subsidy?
	Well, that's a draconian cut.
	This is the language of Washington.
	And, of course, reducing any taxes to us is an expenditure.
	Because they all believe that everything that you produce belongs to them.
	Because, you see, you are living on their plantation.
	That kind of a mindset tells you that they see us as their slaves.
	And so Johnson is slamming the FBI for targeting religious Americans, but will he cut their funding?
	No. No.
	What else can the House do?
	The House is where all funding originates.
	And so the purse strings are what they have to deal with.
	And if they're not willing to cut the funding of the FBI, or to defund it completely because it's an abomination, it's a bureaucracy, a federal bureaucracy, now of instigation.
	And if they won't cut it even a little bit, instead of defunding it completely, it's just talk.
	And so that's the other thing that the House does.
	It talks. And it approves money.
	And for all the talk that you see from Mike Johnson and from others that are there grandstanding, they don't do anything to rein it in if they don't pull in the purse strings.
	In an interview with the Daily Signal, Johnson specifically addressed the Justice Department's interest in pro-life Americans and people of faith in light of revelations that the FBI was investigating traditional Catholics, labeling them as potential domestic terrorists, but of course they did the same thing to People speaking up at school boards.
	Targeting pro-life activists such as Mark Hoke and the FACE Act, the weaponization of that FACE Act.
	I've made it very clear that in my view, the evidence shows that the FBI, for example, in the last couple of years has been weaponized, says Mike Johnson.
	Well, thank you for stating the obvious, as Jim Jordan does, as Trey Gowdy does, and then they hold hearings and then they do nothing about it because they keep funding these people.
	We're doing this. If you're serious about it, you've got to cut the funding.
	And it's not serious to just cut the planned increase.
	Well, you want to make it five times bigger?
	I want to make it two and a half times bigger.
	There you go. I'm a hero for that.
	Republicans are nothing but Democrats' light and have been all of my life.
	And as I've said, we've seen these things move.
	The Republicans are now the Democrats of my youth.
	And the Democrats are now the hardcore Marxists of my youth.
	That's the direction we've gone.
	So Mike Johnson says we've got evidence to show it.
	They have in some cases targeted people of faith.
	They've targeted conservative Catholics, concerned parents at school board meetings, and all the rest.
	The evidence is very clear that that has happened.
	Well, there's your axis of evil, Mike.
	And you're going to give money to the axis of evil.
	You're not going to do anything.
	We have met the enemy and they is us.
	I mean, United States.
	Government. But all this stuff that he just said, we've been talking about this for years.
	This is nothing new.
	And I suggest that there's not going to be anything new.
	I suggest that there's going to be posturing and there's going to be show trials and the rest of this stuff and no action will be taken.
	He said, we have to ensure that the FBI is a trusted institution.
	There you go. We've got to rehabilitate it somehow.
	It's not necessary.
	We didn't have it in the United States until J. Edgar Hoover.
	Not necessary.
	All law enforcement, you know, criminal actions like that are redone by the states.
	If they want to, they could be consulting detectives.
	You know, rename it.
	Take the, instead of J. Edgar Hoover, put Sherlock Holmes' name on the building.
	Take down that cross-dressing authoritarian Jagger Hoover's name.
	We owe it to the people to have an accountable federal agencies that work for them, he said.
	What a joke.
	What a joke. The FBI has never worked for Americans.
	And so, when we come back, we'll talk about...
	You know, the attacks on him.
	But we're going to get into a little bit more.
	I want to expand on peace after we talked to, you know, we had Gerald on.
	He's very upset, of course, rightfully so.
	It looks like he says, well, none of this stuff matters if we don't stop the war.
	And to some degree, I agree with him.
	But that is a path of hopelessness.
	Because that is a path that says that I don't have any control.
	Over what happens. Everything that I want is dependent on the politicians not doing this and not doing that.
	The politicians that I have zero control over.
	Folks, don't put yourself in that situation.
	That is a perspective, a worldview of despair.
	And that is not the worldview of Christians.
	We don't despair about that.
	And that's why I mentioned on Friday a quote from Martin Luther.
	Somebody said, now he's quoting Martin Luther King, a communist.
	It's like, look, whatever you think of Martin Luther King.
	He had some good quotes, but it certainly didn't match up with his life.
	But, no, the original Martin Luther, not Martin Luther King, is that if I knew the world was going to end tomorrow, I would still plant a tree today.
	Why? Why?
	Well, because we do what we're called to do.
	And we carry on with that.
	And we leave the future to God.
	It's in His hands.
	All the world is in God's hands.
	And our relationship is focused, our life is focused on our relationship with God.
	Not whether or not we can get the government to do what we think is necessary.
	That's hopeless. And it's hopeless to try, just as hopeless as it is to try to accumulate a lot of wealth in this life.
	That is a path of despair.
	And so we come back.
	We're going to talk about what is going on from a Christian perspective in these wars.
	I just have to say that I think it was interesting to see what they have attacked Johnson on.
	To say that he's living paycheck to paycheck.
	He doesn't have a bank account, they said.
	So what's going on? Is he lying to us about all this stuff?
	The Daily Beast published a report.
	It says, does the new Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, have a bank account?
	That was the title. He said he's never listed a bank account in his financial disclosure.
	In fact, in his newest disclosure, he doesn't list a single asset at all.
	How could this be? We're used to people who are politicians who go from being a community organizer to a billionaire.
	We see Nancy Pelosi.
	Beating the stock market with her picks and everything.
	These people insider trading and all the rest of this stuff.
	How could it be that he doesn't have money like this?
	And then they kept looking.
	Said we couldn't find any assets in the name of his wife.
	He doesn't put anything in the name of his children.
	And he doesn't appear to have any money stashed in investments.
	What's going on with this?
	Well... The Daily Beast hack, Roger Sullenberger, said, of course, it's unlikely that Johnson doesn't actually have a bank account.
	What's more likely is that he lives paycheck to paycheck, so much so that he doesn't have enough money in his bank account to trigger the checking account disclosure rules for members of Congress.
	How about that? And then they think that is a sign of failure.
	That he doesn't, you know, have $10 million in bribery like the Biden family or whatever.
	You know, it just shows how fallen our country is.
	That, you know, well, you haven't gotten rich off of the government.
	Think about the fact that some of the biggest tax cheats we've ever seen get away with it.
	Hunter and Joe Biden.
	And James Biden and the whole Biden crime family.
	They get away with all of this stuff at the same time that Biden is furious, furious that Mike Johnson is only going to grow the IRS by make it five times bigger than it is today.
	Joe Biden wants it seven times bigger.
	And he doesn't, he gets all the charges removed when he's caught not paying taxes on $10 million worth of income.
	And yet he wants to weaponize the IRS against us.
	He transfers all this stuff with aliases and his emails and all the rest of this, transfers this money around.
	And yet he wants anybody that transfers $600 or more, he wants that reported on all the little guys.
	That's what happens when you wind up with this kind of corruption.
	They can do anything that they want.
	And then the power that they desire means that they keep you from doing anything.
	Anything. So Chip Roy said, so to be accurate, he's like a lot of Americans right now.
	He's also navigating raising a large family.
	What a monster!
	Matt Gaetz says, the Daily Beast is furious that he isn't rich, corrupt, or rich from being corrupt.
	He doesn't have shady business deals.
	He doesn't trade stocks as a congressman.
	Let's cry about it, right?
	Well, yeah, he's in the same situation as most people are, trying to raise a family, living paycheck to paycheck.
	So why is he going to fund the IRS today?
	To get five times bigger.
	The IRS that Joe Biden wants to squeeze more money out of people without adding any new taxes or anything.
	Let's just do it in the name of compliance.
	And we're going to bully people with audits and the rest of this stuff.
	Prove that you don't have this tax income that we're imputing to you.
	You're guilty. Prove you're innocent to us.
	That's what Joe Biden wants to do.
	And it's what Mike Johnson wants to do as well.
	That's what they're talking about.
	They're not talking about coming up to your face and saying, we're going to raise a tax on this and raise a tax on that.
	No, we're just going to squeeze it out of everybody one at a time and tell you that it's for the really rich.
	Well, you don't need an army of 80,000 IRS agents for the really rich.
	They need it for everybody else, just living paycheck to paycheck.
	And then you look at Ukraine.
	All right, I'll give you your warrant.
	See, this is a problem I have with Mike Johnson.
	I understand where he's coming from on Israel.
	I know a lot of Christians who will put Israel first because of their religious beliefs.
	And I think that's mistaken.
	But I understood where he was coming from.
	What concerns me about his character is that as soon as he becomes Speaker of the House...
	He completely reverses himself on Ukraine.
	He was opposed to spending on Ukraine.
	He was opposed to Ukraine war, and he should have been.
	He was right about that. But as soon as he becomes speaker, he's no longer concerned about that.
	So we're going to take a quick break.
	I just want to get some of the comments.
	My son says, look at how incompetent Johnson is.
	People throw bribe money at politicians all the time, but he's still not rich yet.
	What a loser! Doesn't he know SBF? Doesn't he know Sam Bankman Fry?
	I mean, come on. Get in on some of that stuff.
	By the way, we'll talk about that.
	And I think that there's something else going on with that.
	And I'll tell you what my opinion that is.
	Comments about the war.
	Milutin Milankovic says, sorry if I massacred the pronunciation of your name.
	I think they want people in Ukraine so they can focus their military on the Greater Israel Project.
	USA doesn't have capacity for two fronts.
	Well, they're building a third one, too.
	They're quietly arming Taiwan to the teeth.
	And this is, you know, again, it may be a planned takedown of our country, but they want to have multiple, they'd like to have the Mideast in war, Europe in war, and the Pacific in war.
	Let's see, what do you call that?
	Oh yeah, it's a world war, isn't it?
	And they would like to have a civil war as well.
	They want a civil war within Europe, within the United States at the same time.
	That's why they brought the barbarians inside the gates.
	And continue to do so.
	Everybody knows what this policy is.
	Nobody will stop it. You got Maloney in Italy who runs on that basis.
	And what does she do? Nothing when she gets in.
	Just to remind you, Zelensky ran on a peace platform when he got elected in 2019 that already had five years of shelling of civilians by the Ukrainian government.
	You want to declare your independence from us?
	You want to be politically connected to Russia?
	Because culturally and religiously and all the rest of you, you're not going to do that.
	We'll destroy all these civilian cities for five years.
	And so everybody on both sides was sick of that war, and they elected Zelensky, who, like Maloney, had promised what they wanted.
	Just as people were sick of the open border, and they elected Trump.
	And all of these people then ignore what they ran on, and they do what the globalists tell them to do.
	North American House Hippo is a legal immigrant who did everything by the book to get here.
	Every one of these invaders is a slap in the face.
	That's absolutely right. And, you know, when we go back and we look, the early 20th century, everybody thought the Ellis Island experience.
	Well, the Ellis Island experience was that you didn't have a welfare magnet.
	There wasn't going to be any welfare for people.
	They came here for freedom, not for free stuff.
	You know, this is an invasion.
	It's an invasion of people who seek to loot our country and enticed to do so by Biden and all the rest of these people in their Cloward and Piven strategy.
	KWD 68, enact plans with the shield of political correctness and the media and the culture for culture, relentless destruction of our way of life.
	Yeah.
	And one person, no truth in them says you're not allowed to have beautiful art.
	Yeah, that's true.
	Roger Scruton talked about that.
	So what happened to beauty?
	You know, we look at architecture.
	At least people, even if you don't agree with some of their aesthetics, at least they put a lot of work into it.
	They don't do that anymore.
	It's just, you know, planar skyscrapers and things like that, but also the brutalist architecture, you know, the raw materials on the outside, the The university that I went to, the engineering departments and things, it looked like a concrete fortress and stuff.
	It was disgusting.
	But anyway, Yona says, Mike Johnson is funded generously by AIPAC. He'll be found out soon enough.
	You can count on politicians to disappoint you, David.
	Well, I know that.
	Watch this. I learned that lesson with Ronald Reagan, so that was a long time ago.
	Long time ago.
	My dad learned that lesson with Barry Goldwater.
	He got on board with Reagan, but he kind of kept his distance.
	But anyway, narrow way, narrow gate ministries on the statues.
	The overwhelming majority of the Confederate statues were paid for by the sons and daughters of the Confederacy, private organizations not paid with taxpayer dollars.
	Yeah, that's true.
	That's true.
	North American House IPO.
	Yeah, it's Nikki Haley who used the Confederate flag to boost her political career there.
	She made that heinous shooting.
	It was the guy's name. Was it Dylann Roof in South Carolina?
	So a white guy, hateful guy, who goes to a black church, and he's there, and he goes to a prayer meeting, and there's like 10 people or something in this small group.
	And he sits there in this Christian group, and they're praying, and then he pulls out a gun and kills people.
	And because they could find a picture of him with a Confederate flag in the back, And again, all these symbols have been adopted, co-opted by people who were hateful.
	Are we going to purge the cross?
	Well, quite frankly, they will do that.
	The Ku Klux Klan used the Confederate flag, but they also used the cross extensively.
	They don't have anything to do with Christianity.
	And quite frankly, people like Robert E. Lee would have had nothing to do with them.
	So, anyway. Mary Ellen Moore, all beauty is being destroyed.
	That's right, it's intentional. Robert Scruton talked about that extensively before he died.
	MJ, if they make public fountains ugly, no one will want to go there.
	It's like, why would I go out anyway?
	I mean, look at that statue.
	It's an eyesore. I'll just stay here and play on the internet.
	Narroway Narrowgate Ministries.
	The FBI has never been for the protection of the people.
	Just a tool of corruption of the bankers and the politicians to keep their interests protected.
	That's right. It originated with Palmer Raids.
	That was what brought Jager Hoover into power.
	The guy who was Attorney General at the time, Palmer...
	Was using those highly publicized raids.
	He thought it would be a stepping stone for him to run for president.
	The person who carried it out was J. Edgar Hoover.
	What were the Palmer raids? Well, the Palmer raids were raids against people who opposed Woodrow Wilson's World War I. And it was a fracturing of the liberty movement.
	Because you had a lot of business people who wanted a free market and those types of economic freedoms.
	But they were for the war.
	They could see that it was going to make them some money.
	And then you had other people who said, well, I don't, you know, I'm opposed to the war for, say, political reasons, not really religious reasons.
	And so it caused a fracturing of that.
	But now you see that the left is now pro-war, pro-censorship, all the rest.
	They've come around. And they're just communist authoritarians.
	It's not the kind of split that you used to have about 40-50 years ago.
	Where you have conservatives who, you know, be kind of pro-war, but free market and that type of thing.
	And then the left, which is moving towards communism by opposing that.
	But again, J. Edgar Hoover used that as a stepping stone to get the Federal Bureau of Investigation started because Woodrow Wilson would do anything to shut down the opposition.
	He threw movie directors in jail.
	Fine them and threw them in jail because they made, you know, this guy who made a movie about the American Revolution and the British were the bad guys in that.
	Spirit of 76.
	Gave him 10 years in jail and a massive fine that would have been millions of dollars today because he wouldn't censor and cut down that movie.
	And the Supreme Court upheld that.
	And so, you know, the same guy that gave us the income tax, the IRS and the Federal Reserve and World War I, Gave us the FBI and Jager Hoover and all the rest of these things as well.
	KWD-68. Johnson may be smart enough to have some precious metals and want the government to think that he's broke.
	That's true.
	So, yeah.
	So let's take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk a little bit about war.
	We'll be right back. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the classic hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	Let's talk about war.
	Not the one that everybody's focused on.
	But you know that other one that happened to us a couple of years ago, still happening to us?
	Israeli Ministry of Health.
	Data released in March of 2023.
	Talked about at the time. And nobody paid any attention to it.
	And so Steve Kirsch is bringing it up again.
	That's good. In March of 2023, MIT professor Retsif Levy disclosed a troubling figure produced by the Israeli Ministry of Health.
	Unassailable proof that the vaccines are killing people.
	Nobody cares. I played for you so many times.
	My first thing I played when I had the comment about this, I said, let's just understand.
	Netanyahu, I played you the clips of him multiple occasions, calling his masters in the World Economic Forum and reporting to his globalist masters.
	Yes, I'm taking care of it.
	I've spoken to Pfizer, what is it, you know, 21 times or whatever.
	And we're going to get the preliminary data using our people here.
	He used Israelis, he used the Jews as lab rats.
	And a bigger crime against the Jews than Joseph Mengele.
	Think about that.
	In terms of magnitude?
	Yeah, absolutely. In terms of cold-bloodedness?
	Absolutely. Yes, I am the protector of Israel.
	No, you're the injector of Israel.
	And so what Steve Kirsch says, well this is what we learned from the Israeli data.
	They used the people, the Jews, as lab rats.
	And so here's what the lab experiment produced from these Nazis.
	These literal Nazis.
	Number one, they're clearly killing people.
	Number two, the medical community and the health authorities are simply inept or corrupt.
	He said you can't have a nine-fold variation and not notice this.
	Your risk of death increases from the time you get the shot peaking at around three to four months after shot number two.
	And then for other doses, it just climbs.
	And then plateaus.
	The mortality risk curve is opposite in slope to what doctors expect.
	In other words, you're more likely to die later than sooner.
	This is exactly the opposite of what they talk about in terms of the vaccine health effects.
	Well, you know, some people are going to have immediate problems with this, but if you got past this, okay, well, that's not the case with this.
	You're actually likely to have this as a long-term thing.
	And that's why I said, from the very beginning, I said, we've never seen anything like this, of people dying right away.
	I said this back in January, early January.
	Yeah, before the January the 6th stuff and everything.
	I said, look at this.
	Trump's shot, his poison.
	We got more people dying of this than died in, you know, the last three, four years combined of theirs.
	Then it was like the last five years combined of theirs.
	The ten years, all 33 years eventually it became, right?
	It's like we've never seen anything like this before.
	The adverse effects typically take a long time.
	You can't really increase in all these childhood allergies, autism, increases in cancer, all these different things, and they have plausible deniability on that.
	But we're seeing people dropping dead with this, and it's only going to get worse.
	So doctors fail to associate this death with a vaccine injection.
	Your risk of death increases exponentially with each shot, as you pointed out.
	And this explains, he says, why the excess death rates keep going up worldwide, even though booster adoption is going down.
	The few people that are getting it, three, four, five, six times, they're dying.
	And so even though they're a smaller part of the population, it's a higher percentage of these people are dying.
	He says lot variation is real.
	I've talked about this so many times.
	He said some lots are killing 30 times more dose than others.
	He says this alone should kill the safe and effective narrative.
	Yeah, 33 times actually.
	It went from 3 to 100.
	In terms of the dosage.
	He said the healthy vaccine temporal effect is complete BS. If that even exists, he said it ought to be exponentially decaying effect like the charge curve of a capacitor gradually, you know, decaying exponentially.
	The lack of transparency.
	Here's the key thing. The lack of transparency of record level public health data allows them to keep killing people without getting caught.
	Nobody pushing the jabs.
	Think about this, okay?
	This is why it's great to have the tests and to have the measurements and to have the autopsies and to have the epidemiological studies and everything that we now see.
	But you could tell this from the very beginning.
	Why? Because of the cover-up.
	Why are they trying to hide?
	It was all there from the very beginning.
	That was the big tell at the very beginning.
	So we didn't have the data yet.
	I mean, we're starting to get data. We saw it in the VAERS report right away.
	A lot of people dropping dead.
	But the idea that nobody wants their data published, just like the climate MacGuffin, just like Michael Mann.
	Oh, yeah. We're going to use this, and we've already used it.
	I've published this. We've got public policy health based on this, but you can't see my data.
	No, no, no. You can't see it. Yeah, be proud.
	Let people see his data.
	Show us how clever he is.
	No, you fight that hard to cover up the data because you're lying.
	And they did this all the way through.
	Both the climate people and the pandemic people, always covering up their data.
	And so Steve Kerr says, look, Nobody pushing the jabs is calling for any data transparency of public health data.
	This is a huge red flag.
	This is a sign of a corrupt, out-of-control government.
	And no, you can't get a Freedom of Information Act request out of this.
	This has never been done anywhere, ever.
	Once this data is made public, it's all over.
	They're hiding that data, and so what is happening is you've got the epidemiologists, and you've got the physicians, and you've got the pathologists, and you've got the people doing the autopsies, and they're putting this data together, and these people are playing the game that they can dismiss all of this stuff by calling everybody conspiracy theorists, just like the JFK thing.
	We're not going to show you the data for 75 years.
	And if you don't agree with us on our official story, you're a conspiracy theorist.
	And you should not be taken seriously.
	Well, I'll tell you, the people who should not be taken seriously are the people who are hiding information from you.
	He says if the government wants to stop all the COVID vaccine misinformation instantly, the solution then would be for them to publicly show the data.
	To free it. So why aren't they doing that?
	Right? So he said all this stuff is misinformation?
	Then fine. End it. Yeah, show me your data.
	You say that all these people are climate deniers.
	You're denying this, and everything's like, okay, well, prove me wrong.
	Show me the data. No, no, you can't see my data.
	No, no. Prove me wrong that you're killing people with these Trump shots.
	Show me the data. No, no, not going to show you.
	But you're lying. You're the one who's lying, because you're not showing the data.
	Joe Biden, if they did this, Joe Biden would have to hold himself accountable for all the Americans killed under his leadership to push the jabs.
	Here's the problem. And here's why this isn't happening.
	If it was just Joe Biden, we could do something about it.
	But as I said before, this is like Murder on the Orient Express.
	Everybody jabbed us.
	Biden jabbed us. Trump jabbed us.
	The Democrats jabbed us.
	The Republicans jabbed us.
	Congress jabbed us. The Senate jabbed us.
	The governors jabbed us.
	The local public health officials jabbed us.
	The companies that you work for jabbed us.
	The hospitals are paid to jab us.
	And to force this on us.
	And to put out a hospital death protocol to create a narrative of a pandemic unlike any that anybody had ever seen before.
	They all have blood on their hands.
	And they're all conspiring to cover this up.
	That's why you don't see it.
	But you know that when they're hiding it, you know, that's a tell for us.
	He says, not a single pro-vaccine advocate is calling for data transparency of public health data.
	Why is that? Oh, it's safe.
	It's a fact, show me your data.
	No vaccine manufacturer is calling for it either.
	Instead, they all seem to want to have the data hidden for 75 years at a minimum.
	And that tells you everything you need to know, doesn't it?
	And when he's talking about that, he means it literally.
	Remember, we had the FDA and Pfizer fighting in court to keep that data secret.
	And the judge said, no, you've got to turn some of this stuff over.
	So they're slow walking that process.
	They actually argued in court, never show this information.
	And see, this is why, from the very beginning, we knew what was happening.
	If you understood the political and historical context leading up to this, you didn't need to get into the details of the mechanism of how it's killing people and giving people heart attacks and blood clots.
	That stuff came out.
	We didn't know what it was going to do to people, but we knew it was designed to kill.
	The mechanism is being discovered, has been discovered, has been documented.
	These people are hiding all the information.
	But we knew from the beginning, if you understood the context politically and historically, you knew exactly what they were doing.
	And if you'd seen the MacGuffin of climate stuff, you knew exactly what they were doing.
	It's all about depopulation.
	You know, the same way that if you look at the censorship stuff, all the stuff that's been revealed from the Twitter files, that's nice to have.
	It's nice to have the receipts.
	It's nice to have the documentation, all the rest of this.
	But we knew it already. We knew it.
	There wasn't any question about it.
	Not in my mind. And so, when you look at what is rolling out in terms of the war, first of all, understand who's going to lead you into this war.
	Understand, these are the same people who did everything they could to kill you and to destroy our society for the last three years.
	And that's the purpose of this war.
	Whatever else you may think this is about, that's the purpose of this war.
	And so you got massive protests at the White House by people, you know, again, as I said, in London, it's going to be millions of people.
	That's a large number of people in Washington.
	Of course, the plan is to send even more angry people into this country in order to promulgate a civil war.
	We have Representative Mast, a former IDF soldier, the guy who wore his uniform to Congress, Israeli Army uniform, and Brian Mast of Florida.
	And he said, I would encourage the other side to not so lightly throw around the idea of innocent Palestinian civilians, as is frequently said.
	I don't think we should so lightly throw around the term innocent Nazi civilians during World War II. In other words, there's not any innocent Palestinian civilians, and there weren't any innocent Germans.
	So I guess that's why we firebombed Dresden, right?
	As I said many times, Robert McNamara, when he was interviewed in the excellent documentary I'd recommend you see, Errol Morris, Fog of War.
	Errol Morris, shortly before Robert McNamara died, he got him to talk about Vietnam and about the fog of war.
	And in an effort, I think, to cover up his culpability for Vietnam, What he did was he started talking about the bombing of Dresden.
	He said, if we'd lost that war, we would have been tried as war criminals for what we did to Dresden.
	So that was much worse than what I did.
	You get it? That's what he was talking about.
	And yet, we do understand that that's an atrocity.
	Because we do understand there are innocent civilians.
	And we do understand there needs to be...
	We need to not escalate this.
	But this guy, Mast, who is the counterpart of Rashida Tlaib, as I said, the two of them just disgust me.
	Why doesn't she move back to her Palestinian family there?
	And why doesn't he move back to Israel?
	What are they doing in Congress?
	These people don't have any loyalty to the country that they supposedly represent.
	The neocon jihad against free speech goes full tilt.
	This is from Vaccine Impact.
	Quotes Nikki Haley, or Nuki Haley.
	Nuki Haley, there should be freedom of speech, but you don't get freedom of hate.
	The same thing that DeSantis does, right?
	Well, if I don't like your speech, I'm going to call it hate speech, and I'm going to put you in jail.
	Now, escalate this. And both Nuki and DeSantis are doing the same thing.
	Chase Broden, thank you very much for the tip.
	No sovereign but God, no king but Jesus.
	Absolutely true. Absolutely true.
	Thank you very much. And James, thank you very much for the tip.
	Those are on Rockfin.
	By the way, I think we set the gas gauge this morning to start a new month.
	But thank you so much to everybody who supported us last month.
	I know one of the things that's really encouraging about it is that I know that's from people's hearts.
	And so thank you very much for that.
	I really do understand that.
	SoloCat, 1980. Worldwide population collapse already started with a clot shot, both in deaths and sterilization.
	Yeah. North American House Hippo.
	When I was in the hospital earlier this year after a heart attack, one of the technicians doing my EKG told me, yes, she's seen many young people, even children.
	Yeah, it's a thing now, you know, if you want to participate in sports now for the first time.
	Children have to get an EKG, but don't worry, it'd be normalized just like autism was.
	Never heard of autism until a few decades ago, you know, around the turn of the century.
	Actually, it was, I guess, the mid-2000s.
	We knew a family who had a kid, age of ours, who had autism.
	I'd never heard of it at that point in time.
	Brian Deb McCartney, our country, just had a vaccine day.
	To a county, I should say.
	Had a vaccine day to get both your flu shot and COVID-19.
	Anybody under age six months was eligible.
	Six months and older was eligible.
	No matter which COVID-19 shots you had.
	They said it didn't matter.
	That's right, because it doesn't matter. COVID stuff doesn't matter.
	This is to kill you, sterilize you.
	So when we look at this, are we going to be drawn into this war?
	Ben Shapiro says, well, if you work in the media and you're uncritically and reflexively parroting the genocidal, Jew-hating, terrorist, liars, Hamas, you should be fired.
	And yet, this is a guy who reflexively parroted all the pharmaceutical lies.
	And he did it over and over again.
	And yet, now, this year, he said that he was lied to.
	We were lied to by the scientists.
	We were lied to by Pfizer.
	We were lied to by the government. We were lied to by the Biden administration.
	We were lied to. I don't like being lied to.
	I don't know about you. And it makes me not believe these people.
	Now, as I've spoken out before, I got vaxxed twice.
	We're having double vaxxed. My wife being a doctor and seeing vulnerable patients is triple vaxxed.
	But knowing now what I know then...
	Knowing then, what I know now, rather, would I have actually gotten back based on the information that my actual chances of death from COVID were exorbitantly low and I wouldn't be preventing my parents from getting it?
	That was really what I was concerned about.
	We were bubbled with my parents. Would I have gotten it?
	I don't know. I really don't know.
	I think maybe not. Because again, my personal risk when it comes to the vaccine was extremely low when it came to COVID. I'm a young, healthy male with no pre-existing conditions.
	Yeah. How about that?
	So, yeah. He was lied to.
	He was lied to. Except he also lied to us.
	Because if you look at what he was telling us at that time, he was...
	Demanding that we get the Trump shot.
	And he essentially made a hero out of Louis Farrakhan, who was telling people the truth.
	Louis Farrakhan was saying the same stuff I was at the time.
	So he picks Louis Farrakhan because he thinks that he can, you know, put a face out there that people won't listen to.
	And listen to the way that he attacked him over the...
	This is Ben Shapiro then.
	And we have seen a tremendous amount of vaccine hesitancy, unfortunately, in the black and Hispanic community.
	If they come up with a vaccine, be careful.
	Don't let them vaccinate you with their history of treachery.
	Through vaccines.
	Okay, Black America, only 67% of Black Americans say they definitely will get the vaccine or probably get the vaccine.
	So the Black community has tremendous vaccine hesitancy.
	Okay, that is a real problem.
	They are making money now, plotting to give 7,500,000,000 people a vaccination.
	Yes, that's right. Dr.
	Fauci... Bill Gates and Melinda?
	You want to depopulate there?
	What the hell gives you that right?
	The people who should be ripped up and down right now are people like Louis Farrakhan, who's literally going out there and telling his millions of followers that the COVID vaccine is a vial of death.
	Have you seen any media coverage of this?
	If a major conservative figure who had met with a bunch of members of Congress were out there literally telling people that the COVID vaccine was a vial of death, you know that would be at the front of every single newspaper, right?
	Conservatives deny vaccine efficacy.
	And yet here was Louis Farrakhan doing just that.
	Democratic members of Congress have met with this guy.
	They continue to meet with this guy.
	Have you seen a headline about this?
	Here's Louis Farrakhan, who has many, many followers, talking about how the COVID vaccine is a vial of death.
	Some of these so-called vaccines.
	It's the nanoparticles that men like Dr.
	Fauci have proprietary knowledge of that allows them to get a patent for their vial of death.
	I mean, how is that not the headline?
	Right? I mean, seriously, that should be the headline.
	You want to talk about overcoming COVID? We should be talking about vaccine hesitancy.
	Yeah. Why are you hesitating?
	This has not been tested.
	It's novel. It's genetic code injection.
	It's got lipid nanoparticles in it.
	We just rushed this thing through without...
	No, no, no. What's the matter with you?
	And, of course, we had Mark Levin doing the same thing.
	What's the matter with you? Why are you hesitant about all this stuff?
	You know, I thought it was kind of interesting.
	Recently, I saw on social media, I don't know when this happened.
	This is a playback.
	This is Ben Shapiro talking to Joe Rogan.
	And Joe Rogan asks him, you know, what do you think about Jesus?
	Well, of course, he's Jewish. He doesn't believe that Jesus is the Son of God or anything like that.
	He doesn't believe the miracles. But then Joe Rogan asks him about the miracles in the Torah.
	Ask him if he believes any of that.
	Listen to this. We don't believe in the divinity of Christ.
	There you can make an argument that the Gospels which were written...
	He was just a prophet. No, no, no.
	We don't even believe he was a prophet. What do you think he was?
	What do I think he was historically?
	I think he was a Jew who tried to lead a revolt against the Romans and got killed for his trouble.
	Just like a lot of other Jews at that time who were crucified for trying to lead revolts against the Romans and got killed for their trouble.
	So he became legend in story, and it became a bigger and bigger deal as time went on?
	Yeah, he had a group of followers, and then that gradually grew.
	Do you think he was resurrected?
	No, that's not a Jewish belief.
	Okay, I just want to check. Yeah, no.
	We're not into the miracle stories.
	Do you not have any miracles?
	No, not by Jesus.
	There are ones in the Old Testament.
	Yeah, you've got Moses splitting the sea and all that.
	What do you think happened there? What do I think happened there?
	Yeah. Well, I'll go with Maimonidean explanation.
	I mean, it says in the Bible there was a strong east wind.
	So there's a naturalistic explanation for a physical phenomenon.
	Okay. So there's an actual physical phenomenon.
	So it wasn't a miracle then.
	It was just providential that they happened to be there at the time that a wind blew the Red Sea apart.
	Well, here's the thing, Ben.
	You know, it reminds me so much of the Christian prosperity gospel, people.
	All they see, God, is a magic genie that they can rub the lamp and get anything that they want.
	You know, private jets, fortunes like Jim Copeland and other people, Joel Osteen.
	You know, give your money to me and God will bless you.
	You know, that type of thing.
	And, you know, if you don't believe the Torah, you don't believe even the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, you don't believe the miracles in it, then, but you want the promise.
	You say, well, yeah, but God gave this land to Abraham.
	Well, you don't get to pick and choose.
	You either take it or you don't take it.
	And so, if God didn't park the Red Sea, then He didn't give the land to Israel.
	You can't have it both ways, Ben.
	You have it both ways when it comes to the vaccine, don't you?
	You have it both ways when it comes to the land.
	But you're no different from the prosperity gospel hucksters in Christianity.
	You know, it's all about what you can get from God, and no responsibility about any of that whatsoever.
	Look, I mention this because...
	We have to understand that as Christians, we don't look at what is going to be the outcome of this stuff as defining our life.
	And so we don't despair.
	We understand that we're citizens of another kingdom.
	If my kingdom were of this earth, then my servants would fight.
	And so, quite frankly, I'm an American.
	I love America. But I have higher loyalties.
	You know, just like these people who go to Congress and say, well, I'm a Palestinian.
	Here's my Palestinian flag.
	Or a guy who goes there wearing his Israeli uniform.
	They're Americans, but their real heart and their real loyalty is to another land.
	And so is mine. And so is yours if you're a Christian.
	You understand that you're a pilgrim and a traveler in this world, and you are not going to go out there and kill to get what you want, and you're not going to follow other people.
	Who order you to kill? Especially when those other people have been killing people around you for the last three years.
	Why would you follow people like this?
	I simply can't understand it.
	And yet, you know, when we look at this, so many times this is all about vendettas and vengeance, right?
	And the violence is a cycle of vengeance.
	And this is why I don't show the pictures that I could show about what is happening.
	In these places.
	Because that's just going to get your bloodlust up.
	And yet, when you look at how this is moving forward, the same dynamic is there in our own election, isn't it?
	You know, Trump is out there talking about how he is going to...
	He's going to take revenge on these people.
	Once he gets control of the Department of Justice, he's going to get his vengeance.
	It isn't that he's necessarily going to get it off of our backs, but he's going to get even with those people who have been weaponizing it against him.
	You know, that's the case.
	You know, Ty Cobb, his lawyer, said he's a deeply wounded narcissist, incapable of acting except out of his own perceived self-interest or out of revenge, and he's openly plotting and threatening his revenge.
	And so when you look at the fact that he's being elevated up as a victim, and of course, the Democrats are more than happy to make him a victim because they believe they can beat him in the general election by hook or by crook.
	And regardless of who wins, if Trump wins, he's going to start a civil war against his enemies.
	And if he loses, He's going to try to get MAGA to enlarge everything in the Civil War for him as well.
	And do we understand how he is lying to us as well?
	You don't want to follow Biden into a war?
	You would follow Trump into a war?
	Here's Trump. Going back to, I think it was 2008.
	Yeah. At that time, he was talking about Hillary Clinton and the aftermath of her failed run against Obama for the presidency.
	Listen to what he had to say about his good friend, Hillary Clinton.
	Well, I think her history is far from being over.
	I'd like to answer that question in another 15 years from now.
	I think she's going to go down, at a minimum, as a great senator.
	I think she is a great wife.
	What does it mean? To a president.
	And I think Bill Clinton was a great president.
	You know, you look at the country then.
	The economy was doing great.
	Look at what happened during the Clinton years.
	I mean, we had no war.
	The economy was doing great.
	Everybody was happy. A lot of people hated him because they were jealous as hell.
	You know, people get jealous and they hate you.
	People don't like him because they're jealous of him.
	But Bill Clinton was a great president.
	I mean, I hope we can be so lucky in terms of the economy and in terms of other aspects.
	I mean, we weren't in wars with two...
	I'm not blaming Afghanistan, by the way, is probably a place that we should be.
	Iraq, we shouldn't be.
	Bill Clinton was a great president.
	Hillary Clinton is a great woman and a good woman.
	You said of Hillary Clinton that she was, quote, pretty badly abused during her presidential campaign.
	Why did you say that? I thought that they roughed her up pretty good.
	I think she's a wonderful woman.
	I think that she's a little bit misunderstood.
	You know, Hillary's a very smart woman, very tough woman.
	That's fine. She's also a very nice person.
	And I know Hillary and I know her husband very well.
	They're fine people.
	I thought... We party with him on the plane.
	...political battle. I thought she was roughed up.
	I thought she...
	And I'm not knocking the other side.
	You know, you want to win a battle, so if it gets a little bit nasty, it is politics, and politics is a tough game.
	But I thought she was perhaps unnecessarily roughed up.
	She took some pretty hard hits.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	He hasn't changed a bit, folks.
	It's all simply about him.
	And, you know, we got people trying to get us involved in a world war.
	With Russia, with China, and in the Middle East, an oil war that is there.
	But then, you know, Trump is there for the civil war aspect.
	The open border immigration in both the U.S. and E.U. is there for civil wars.
	And then if people get angry enough, you may have the civil war over the coming election.
	When we come back, we're going to take a look at Glenn Beck's He's now begging to be made an Israeli citizen.
	and begging Netanyahu.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	The End Making sense.
	common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news, APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSRadio.com.
	As on the comments, Michael DeSilvio says he campaigned on locking Billery up.
	Yeah, that's right. Didn't he also govern and campaign as the anti-globalist?
	And yet he showed us who he is with, didn't he, in 2020?
	If you paid attention to what he actually did, instead of to his lying lips, we know whose side he's on.
	He's never changed.
	A New York Democrat, gun control by executive order.
	He brought that in. He established that as a president.
	Got to get the shots.
	They got to get the shots. You know, there is a meme that was put under that video on social media.
	A meme of him saying, you know, Republicans are the dumbest people.
	If I ran for president, I'd run as a Republican.
	Well, that's been disproven even by his enemies.
	That meme is not true.
	So, you know, don't go that far because that discredits it.
	His words are enough.
	His words tell you where he's coming from.
	Jim Z7, Shapiro called for public mandates for vaccination.
	That's right. So look at 1980.
	Ben Shilpiro has not repented for pushing the vaccine.
	That's right. You hear that? I was lied to.
	I was lied to. Well, Ben, if you didn't know you're being lied to, if you didn't have the discernment, as I said before, you didn't need to have these tests.
	If you had a political and historical context, you would have known what was going on.
	But you either didn't know, or you were bamboozled.
	In either case, why are people listening to him?
	I don't understand. He either didn't have the discernment.
	He didn't have the political and historical context to understand what's going on.
	There's no excuse for that. That's his job.
	You had one job, Ben.
	Let's take a look at politics and history and figure out what these people are about.
	You failed. And you don't apologize for any of it.
	Oh, I was deceived.
	Okay. Were you? I'm still not even convinced about that.
	Um, Luton Milankovic says, um, Did you hear that France wants to have a $75,000 fine and two years of imprisonment for criticism of Israel?
	Doesn't surprise me. Look at what DeSantis did.
	Essentially the same thing. He had some very hateful people down there, you know, name-calling and doing some other stuff with flyers and things like that in Florida.
	And so he wanted to make that a punishable by imprisonment felony.
	And then DeSantis went to Israel.
	Why is it a felony in Florida and in France to criticize a foreign government?
	You know, Israel, as I showed you that clip on Friday, you know, you got the Israeli cop, Israeli soldiers, and you had some anti-war Orthodox Jews protesting.
	Everybody there is Jewish.
	And the Orthodox Jews got beaten in a very cowardly way, too.
	The big guy. The big guy who was the cop.
	You know, walks like he's going to walk past him.
	And then at the last minute, he throws his arm there and pulls the guy backwards while he trips him with his foot.
	Could have busted the guy's head.
	Maybe he did on the concrete.
	I've got to be very serious. You see these people getting sucker punched in New York.
	Some of them have fallen and cracked their skull.
	Some of them have died from that.
	That was a cowardly act.
	So who was the anti-Semite there?
	You had all Jews.
	And some of them were complaining about the conduct of the Israeli government.
	Political Israel is not Israel.
	Not the same thing.
	But Glenn Beck...
	Wants citizenship in political Israel.
	Yeah, play that video that I just talked about.
	We've still got that. Look at this.
	Watch that. Watch this move.
	Coward. Coward.
	He's many times the size of that guy, but he doesn't attack him front on.
	And then he comes after this guy.
	There's a camera behind him.
	Throwing this guy around. Now watch this.
	Throws him in here. Starts punching him.
	Then he sees...
	He's much bigger than this guy.
	He's all suited up with his body armor.
	And then he sees there's a camera in there.
	That's the one thing he's afraid of, is the camera.
	Because the camera tells the truth about who these guys are.
	And so Glenn Beck wants to be a part of that.
	That's what he identifies with.
	Glenn Beck, a Mormon. But he's not talking about changing his religion.
	He's talking about becoming an Israeli citizen.
	So in that case, Glenn, roll up your sleeve.
	So that Netanyahu can inject you like he did the other Jews.
	So he can be his lab rat.
	He says, I don't know, Glenn Beck, I don't know why I was born, but there's something about the state of Israel that connects deeply to me.
	He said to his listeners, to have the privilege to stand with the Jew is a tremendous honor spiritually.
	So I want to read a letter that I wrote that I'm sending to the state of Israel.
	And again, he wants to be a political Jew.
	He's not converting to Judaism from Mormonism.
	And a lot of people confuse Judaism with Zionism.
	Not the same thing at all.
	And so, again, I played that clip.
	Shapiro doesn't believe what Moses said about the miracles, but he believes what Moses said about the land being his.
	He can't have it both ways.
	So Beck acknowledged that he has no connection to Judaism or to Israel.
	But he says, Well, again, I don't know. You know, when I look at it, I've had...
	He doesn't want to participate in the Jewish religion.
	But, of course, the Jews haven't really participated in the Jewish religion since the temple was destroyed in 70 A.D., We went to Passover a few years ago with some Messianic Jews who invited us.
	And they talked about it in terms of what the Seder is like and the different symbols of it and that type of thing.
	And of course, there is no lamb.
	There's no lamb in the Passover meal.
	That was a central thing.
	Because they've passed over the lamb that God has provided.
	And they haven't done that.
	What do they do with their sins?
	What do any of us do with our sins?
	We've got all these different religions that talk about, well, I can earn my way to heaven.
	That's what Glenn Beck has been involved in.
	Here's the things that you have to do to earn your way to heaven.
	You know, you can take a prayer and you can stick it in a wheel and just keep spinning it over and over again, and it'll eventually be heard, that type of thing.
	Because they don't believe the Bible.
	And, you know, it is amazing to see that.
	But again, he's not going to become political Israel.
	Even the people who want to rebuild a temple, who want to start sacrifices and that type of thing, political Israel will do the same thing to them that they did to the Orthodox Jews.
	Every year, you've got somebody who shows up and, I'm going to do a sacrifice.
	Where the temple was, and they get hammered by the political Israelis.
	So, Glenn Beck says, 10 years ago I took my children to Israel for the first time, but we first visited Auschwitz in Poland.
	I told them, you can't understand Israel without the Bible or Auschwitz.
	You know, I wonder if you can understand Israel without looking and taking your kids to a Pfizer plant.
	Can you really understand Benjamin Netanyahu?
	If you don't take your kids to a Pfizer plant, do you think in the future the Pfizer plants will become a memorial to one of the greatest death shots we've ever had?
	Well, time will tell, won't it?
	I think these Pfizer factories need to be preserved like the Auschwitz camps were.
	Global depopulation and global democide for everybody.
	Not just one group of people.
	Equal opportunity. Equal opportunity.
	Everybody gets a shot at all of this.
	And you know, I talked about Ben Shapiro.
	Mark Levin is another one.
	I saw that about Ben Shapiro.
	I thought, you know, what is Mark Levin's take on religion?
	Does he just completely dismiss the Old Testament as well as the New Testament, like Ben Shapiro?
	And I came across, and I was looking for that, I came across this article from June of 2022.
	This guy, it's wayoflife.org, but I thought it had interesting comments about Mark Levin.
	And again, Mark Levin has been kind of, I can't, he doesn't publicly speak about what he believes.
	But this guy says, well, I listened to Mark Levin's radio broadcast last week, and I was reminded of two things.
	First, Levin is one of the most knowledgeable, clever, sincere, and passionate personalities in America's conservative political movement.
	I completely disagree with that assessment.
	I think just like Ben Shapiro, he's either totally lacking in discernment, political and historical context, or he's a shill.
	Lying to you. Lying because, you know, in January, again, in January, oh, you know, you got to take credit for this shot, Mr.
	Trump. Biden is taking credit for it.
	It's your shot. You did a great job.
	You got this out. You need to take credit for it.
	And I, you know, went all after Mark Levin on Parler when they brought it back.
	And I just was ratioed there by the Trump lovers and the Levin lovers.
	And it's like, I'm done with this platform.
	I don't even have... I just don't care about social media.
	And, you know, because it was absolutely reprehensible.
	We had people who were dropping dead from the vaccine.
	He's telling Trump to take credit for this.
	Because it was all about politics.
	It was all about sucking up to Trump.
	That's what it was about. But the guy said, the other thing about it is that I realized that other than sharing a love for America...
	Levin and I have radically different worldviews.
	I'm not criticizing him. I'm thankful for the good that he's done for America, he says.
	Well, I don't see that, quite frankly.
	Even on America, we have different ideas.
	Levin's book, The Liberty Amendments, he supports changing the Constitution with a constitutional convention.
	He thinks that the people who have taken an oath to the Constitution to obey it and who violate that oath on a regular basis...
	Those people are going to write us a new constitution and it'll be better.
	Yeah, right. Again, I don't think he's that naive.
	Are you that naive? Do you really believe that a constitutional convention would fix things?
	We could balance our budget? Yeah, right.
	Right. There isn't any piece of paper that is self-enforcing.
	And you could put an amendment in there and say, well, how's the First Amendment working for us?
	How's the Second one? How's the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, the Sixth Amendment?
	How's all this stuff about trial by jury and due process and all?
	How's that working for us?
	Anyway, this guy says, well, first of all, we have a different God.
	And we need to understand that.
	We do have a different God.
	You know, Allah, just as Allah is a different God.
	Allah is not just another name for God, which is what they tell kids in school.
	He says we have a different gospel.
	And our gospel is spiritual, not political, you see.
	I'm not giving you any good news about politics.
	Because, folks, there isn't any good news in politics.
	I sometimes give you the good news about the fact that there is something much better than this world that's on its way.
	And there's a way, it's just, it's there asking, it's just, it's to be had.
	All you have to do is ask for it.
	And he says, we have a different authority.
	We have a different citizenship, as he said.
	My citizenship is in heaven, he said.
	Not in Israel. You know, Glenn Beck wants to be an Israeli citizen, an American citizen.
	My citizenship is in heaven.
	That's where I want my citizenship.
	And it's a lot easier to get.
	He said we see different fundamentals that are at work.
	We have a different goal in life.
	He says my goal is to please God who saved me by his amazing grace and to fulfill his calling for my life.
	He said we fight different battles and we use different weapons.
	Our warfare is not carnal, but it is mighty.
	And what do we do with that?
	We pull down strongholds.
	We pull down philosophies.
	We pull down people's ideas that they're going to exalt themselves above Christ.
	That's what we pull down. We have a different spirit.
	He says, because of my faith in Jesus Christ and his infallible word, I have the spirit of faith and trust and patience and hope, not a spirit of frustration and anger and fighting and bitterness and disappointment, and that's what you see everywhere else in the world, but especially right there with Israel and Mosque and the Palestinians, that's what you see.
	Spirit of frustration, anger, fighting, bitterness, disappointment.
	We don't have to feel that way.
	And we don't have to get drawn into that.
	That's a very unchristian thing, to get drawn into that.
	And he says, I see that our fundamental problem with America is spiritual and not political.
	Founders of this country understood that liberty was a gift from God.
	It wasn't something that they saw themselves having achieved in their own strength.
	They saw it as a gift from God.
	He says it cannot be resolved by political warriors and politicians and judges of any stripe.
	And you know what? It can't be resolved by wars either.
	And as we look at how people are warring, just take a look at this.
	This is from WND, David Gornoski.
	He says, in the midst of the catastrophes of Hamas' terrorist attacks and Israel's reciprocal strikes on Gaza, it's easy to feel the social pull of conformity to one side or the other.
	Yeah. Which one are you...
	You know, you look at the... That's why.
	I'm not going to show pictures of atrocities, of deaths, and, you know...
	Bombs that have gone astray or bombs that have been targeting civilians, whatever your interpretation of that, in the fog of war is.
	Because all that does is polarize us.
	All that does is build up a bloodlust.
	That is not what we as Christians need to be doing.
	And that's not just my job.
	That's your job as well.
	Each and every one of us needs to be tamping this thing down rather than escalating it and lighting a fire on it.
	You know, you go back to Psalm 37.
	Do not fret. Do not fret.
	Three times it says in Psalm 37, do not fret.
	What does that mean? You know, I looked that up.
	I thought that's kind of interesting. The only time it's ever used in the Bible.
	A great source for stuff like this is Blue Letter Bible, by the way.
	You can click on a word, and it'll show you how many times it's used.
	It'll show you, you know, the Old Testament, Hebrew, New Testament, and Greek.
	It'll show you how many times it's used.
	And it'll give you an idea of the definition, but then it'll also show you the different context.
	Well, you know, that word fret is only used in Psalm 37.
	And it's used three times.
	But it's a Hebrew word that is like kindling a fire.
	And isn't that the way that it is in our life?
	We fret about something.
	And we sit there and we just, it's like we've got this little fire and we just keep pouring stuff on it.
	And it gets bigger and bigger and bigger.
	And if we keep doing that, if we keep fretting about what is going on in this war, we're going to burn all of our houses down.
	And so we don't fret about that.
	We transcend it.
	So he says, it's easy to feel the social pull of conformity to one side or the other.
	Such polarity is tempting to assuage inflamed emotions and confusion in the fog of war.
	There's also a magnetic pull for those who wish to signal solidarity with one of the many identity group parallels being painted by propagandists on both sides of this fight.
	And that's why Glenn Beck has now succumbed to this.
	Again, these people, I just can't believe.
	Well, I know why people like Glenn Beck, Joe Rogan, and Alex Jones are promoted.
	I understand what's going on with that.
	I just can't understand why people keep following them when they see this stuff happen.
	Anyway, those who profess to imitate Jesus, regardless of their doctrinal particularities, are obligated to, by definition, to make peace between warring brothers.
	You hear that? If you identify as a Christian in any way, you are supposed to make peace.
	That means that Christians in America cannot justify the killing of a single innocent life.
	We're completely opposite from Nuki Haley and Lindsey Graham.
	There's no such thing as innocent civilians, says Mast, and so forth.
	And we don't care how many civilians we can.
	No, no, no, no, no. We're completely opposite of that.
	We can't justify that and call it collateral damage.
	That's Pentagonese.
	The Pentagon always coming up with these labels to justify their heinous crimes.
	Collateral damage.
	Yeah, it's not collateral.
	Collateral is something that you show the bank to get a loan, right?
	It's like property.
	So, you know, killing civilians is killing the property of that other government, you know, because we're all just slaves to our government.
	That's the Pentagon perspective, right?
	So, we are all a slave to the Pentagon.
	We have to give them money, and we get sent off to fight their wars and all the rest of this stuff.
	And, you know, if somebody kills a bunch of American civilians, oh, you just damaged my collateral.
	You know, it's like damaging your car or something.
	No, we're not collateral to the Pentagon.
	And these other people are not collateral to their government either.
	Although they're used like that.
	Meanwhile, you got the people like Obama out there saying, well, you know, you don't want to have free markets because, you know, that's just a form of slavery.
	They think of us as their chattel property.
	Chattel property.
	Endless blood feuds, whether motivated by ethnicity, land, ideology, or religious zeal, have no place in the Christian life.
	Jesus said, God desires mercy, not sacrifice.
	And remember what Samuel told Saul.
	God desires obedience and not sacrifice.
	It's better to obey than to sacrifice, right?
	No matter how much you've got there.
	Swept up in a notion of algorithmically mediated anger, many Christians contradict Christ by insisting that their side...
	Must seek mercy via sacrificial violence.
	Scott Horton recently highlighted Israel's finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich's comments.
	He said, the more moderate Palestinian authority is a liability.
	Hamas is an asset.
	On the international playing field in this game of delegitimization, in other words, they're playing 4D chess.
	And we would rather have somebody who's really radical.
	We've been told, and I read some of these comments, and said, well, they wanted to put Hamas in because they saw them as a more moderate alternative to the Palestinian Authority.
	That's not true. That was widely reported, and I read that to you before.
	So let's correct that. Because Israel's finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, Said that they wanted Hamas because they were more radical.
	They wanted Hamas because it would help to delegitimize their opponents.
	See, they're playing chess, 4D chess, and they're playing you for pawns if you buy into this on one side or the other.
	Rather than choosing a side or arming or manipulating both sides, as our government always does, we arm both sides, we manipulate both sides, Americans have done this for far too long.
	Christians have to take a leadership position.
	Don't underestimate what you can do.
	Let me tell you, you may have nothing in this world except your relationship with Christ and your ability to pray.
	And I tell you what, not having anything sometimes makes people real prayer warriors.
	And you've got more power than Joe Biden.
	A lot more power.
	So you better start using it.
	Christians have to take a leadership position, which their role model calls them to do.
	And they have to demand a cessation of all killing and retributive violence.
	Christians must not be ashamed of the gospel and its penetrating solidarity with all of its victims of war.
	Perpetrators of terrorism must be brought to justice.
	But serious Christians cannot make excuses for violent overreach that kills innocent lives.
	This is what I've been trying to show by example.
	I played a long testimony, like five minutes last week, of a guy who was part of Hezbollah, a terrorist.
	And he became a convert to Christianity.
	What happened to his life after that?
	Well, he began an outreach to Jewish people, the people that he wanted to kill.
	He began an outreach to them.
	He's at peace with them. They're not at peace with him.
	I can imagine that if he's got some kind of a Christian ministry, especially being a former Hezbollah guy, they're not going to trust that he's converted.
	They're not going to believe that sincere.
	And because of his background, and because of what he is trying to do, he's going to be severely persecuted.
	But that is what we're called to do.
	And it is possible to do that.
	Because Christ gives us that ability.
	Old media, social media, political operatives are scrambling to shape myths.
	And so are people like Glenn Beck.
	You know, I realize that Glenn Beck was a controlled opposition with the Bundy Ranch thing.
	There was a lot of people that were there that were Mormons because there was a big population in that area.
	A lot of people come from Utah and the Bundys were Mormon and everything.
	But Glenn Beck...
	Called up Cliven Bundy and said, are you a sovereign citizen?
	And of course, that is a loaded term.
	You know, they weaponize these terms, calling people domestic terrorists.
	That's essentially calling them a domestic.
	Are you a domestic terrorist, Cliven?
	Because that's what the term sovereign citizen has been labeled and marketed to law enforcement everywhere as.
	And he didn't know what that meant.
	Well, I don't know. I guess we're sovereign with the Constitution.
	And he was setting him up.
	You know, you have somebody like Glenn Beck.
	They hang out there.
	They portray themselves as something that they're not.
	They get the confidence. They gain the confidence of people, as he did during the Tea Party.
	And just like General Flynn, Glenn Beck was leading these quasi-religious revivals at the time.
	Nobody asked him about his religion.
	He comes in, he wears this cloak of religiosity.
	Nobody asked him about his religion.
	And he becomes this Elmer Gantry figure.
	But again, they all just want to justify their power grabs and their vengeance and the name of victimhood.
	And that's exactly what Trump is doing, right?
	Trump is doing a power grab, portraying himself as a victim so that he can get vengeance on these people.
	That's it. That's it.
	You know, it was about him taking the golden ring and His pride and his ego.
	But now it's about vengeance.
	And they're more than willing to oblige him and give him victim status.
	And if we go down that path, like I said, Trump is going to be the divider for a civil war with us.
	And so, you know, go back and just take a look at what he did for the January the 6th people.
	Did he do anything for them? No.
	Completely betrayed them.
	And he showed whose side he was on.
	So, when you look at what is happening, as people are being, you know, collateral damage, as they say.
	You've got civilians who are being killed.
	The Red Cross is trying to do its work.
	And yet, Israel's current foreign minister, Eli Cohen, is criticizing the Red Cross.
	He says that the focus is unbalanced, and this is what he has to say.
	He said the Red Cross has no right to exist.
	No right to exist.
	Now Israel's got a right to exist, but the Red Cross has no right to exist.
	They have no right to exist if it does not succeed in visiting the hostages being held captive by Hamas.
	The Red Cross must act decisively and with a clear voice and utilize all leverage it has to push for a visit to the hostages as soon as possible.
	The Red Cross's reputation is at stake, he says, if it cannot secure a visit to those being held captive by Hamas.
	Well, the Red Cross responded and they said, Well, when the bombs are continuing to fall, it is impossible for our teams to do their jobs.
	For us, it is a priority to get access to and to visit all of the hostages.
	The amount of suffering that they endure is also unimaginable.
	And we've been constantly calling on the Hamas authorities to give us access so that we can provide medicine, so we can give news to the families of the hostages.
	We cannot do that unless we're given the needed humanitarian space and the access to be able to do our job.
	We cannot force our way through bombs.
	We just need all the parties to show goodwill and also to respect our obligation under the international humanitarian law.
	These are people who have been, again, it originally began as a Christian ministry back in the 1800s.
	And the guy who started was Swiss.
	The Swiss flag is a white cross on a red background, and he just inverted the colors.
	But it was there.
	It was a Christian symbol.
	And they have tried to accommodate the prejudice and the hatred coming from both the Arabs and the Jews by changing it to a Red Crescent so they could help people in Muslim areas.
	And they changed it to a Red Star of David so they'd be allowed to help people in Israel.
	And now this guy's saying, well, I don't care about anything except the hostages, and you better find out where they are.
	And I don't care, you're going to do it even while we're bombing the civilian areas.
	Nowhere else in the world, and you can see this with a red cross, nowhere else in the world, Is the cross as despised as it is by the Arabs and the Jews?
	And you can see it just in the story of the Red Cross.
	And here he is demanding that they do more.
	And then the collateral damage, so to speak, just continues.
	Israel's blowing up the university in Gaza with bombs and at the same time hitting an ambulance.
	Near the Gaza hospital, they had an evacuation group the other day, and you had a back and forth with Wolf Blitzer.
	So now people are calling Wolf Blitzer because he questioned.
	He said, so you couldn't identify where this guy was?
	You just went ahead and hit the convoy?
	Yeah, yeah, we did it. And so he shouldn't have said that, many say.
	And he should not have called him out on that.
	And so this just keeps happening, and it's going to continue to happen.
	That's why we have to push for peace, but it's going to get bigger than that area.
	We're going to continue to stoke that little fire until it is a worldwide fire, if we don't start going the other way.
	And that's what Christians are called to do.
	So the Hezbollah chief is now saying the U.S. is directly responsible for the Gaza atrocities and will soon pay a heavy price.
	You know, we probably have been...
	Helping both sides of this probably is right.
	Probably were responsible for the atrocities to some degree with Israelis.
	Standing down, looking the other way.
	We're looking the other way with the Hamas leadership living in luxury in Qatar, aren't we?
	Oh, we can't do anything about it.
	You know, there are allies, but they won't listen to us.
	Well, how do you define an ally when they won't listen to us?
	And of course, the solution is to push everybody out of Gaza.
	And where are they to go?
	Well, we're supposed to lean on Egypt to get them to take them.
	But if Egypt doesn't want them, Israel has also said in that piece that Europe needs to take them.
	The U.S. needs to take them.
	They don't want the Palestinians, but they're going to tell us that we are obliged to take them.
	Why is it that the Muslim countries don't want the Palestinians?
	Well, in the past, they have accepted them.
	Places like Jordan and Lebanon.
	How did that work out for them?
	Well, the Palestinians organized themselves into armies inside those countries and created this civil war, which is exactly why our borders are open in the U.S. and Europe already.
	And they just want to accelerate this.
	That is a globalist agenda, but it's also the agenda of the Israeli government.
	Do you see a connection here with the pandemic?
	These people are all doing the same thing.
	All of our leaders are doing the same thing.
	All of our leaders are working against their own people.
	Europe, US, worldwide we saw in 2022.
	And so again, you know, people are calling for The British to activate the military because there's going to be millions of people protesting through the middle of London on the Day of Remembrance on November 11th.
	He says, you've got to do something about this.
	Well, they're not interested in it.
	Doing anything about it.
	So, we're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Angry Tiger, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, that's right, David.
	As Christians, we should not support unjust wars.
	It's antithetical to be a Christian and support these wars, period.
	I agree. He says, I'll never forget when I was working for the Ron Paul campaign, Glenn Beck called us terrorists.
	Yeah, yeah. And then what happened, Angry Tiger, after that 2008 election?
	Well, they started sending out things to people.
	Talk about Glenn Beck.
	You had Homeland Security send out a notice saying, if you see somebody with a Ron Paul bumper sticker, Or a Chuck Baldwin, because Chuck Baldwin was a candidate for the Constitution Party.
	You see them with a Chuck Baldwin bumper sticker or Ron Paul bumper sticker.
	These people are probably sovereign citizens.
	And that was a Fusion Center report.
	Bulletin. Bolo.
	Be on the lookout for people with a bumper sticker for Ron Paul.
	Now, Glenn Beck knew that stuff, right?
	Glenn Beck was calling people terrorists, and then, guess what?
	Lo and behold, the government that he shills for and pretends that he is, oh, I'm conservative.
	You know, I want these people to pull this back.
	No, that government then makes that policy, states it.
	After Glenn Beck runs that out.
	Audi, modern retro radio.
	The only sovereign citizens are the cops and the politicians.
	Yeah, I don't think they see themselves as sovereign, but maybe not as citizens.
	I don't know. They're above us.
	We're the slaves.
	MJ, companies are now letting people go who became disabled as a result of the mandate.
	Sick leave and disability payments are going through the roof.
	Yeah, isn't that amazing?
	Yeah, a lot of people took that to keep their job.
	And then they became disabled or died because of it.
	Bob of Atlantis, the love of money is the root of all vaccine injury.
	Yeah, you're absolutely right about that.
	Yeah. North American Nippo.
	During the brief period when it was legal in Florida in 2021, a manager asked my vaccination status and I told him I identify as fully vaccinated.
	There you go. There you go.
	It doesn't matter the reality.
	It's just what you think of yourself.
	I think of myself as fully vaccinated because I don't need it.
	Don't need it at all.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	Elvis. Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the oldies channel at APSradio.com.
	Thank you to APS Radio for carrying the program there as well.
	Daily Mock News said, I had a friend who grew up in Egypt, and he said this to me once.
	He says, if you think the American government is so bad, just think how bad the rest of them are.
	I know. That's why we see ourselves as travelers and pilgrims in this world.
	Let's talk a little bit about money and about Sam Bankman Fried.
	He's totally fried now.
	Convicted of seven charges, and he hasn't even had a trial yet on some of these SEC charges.
	Found guilty of seven felonies.
	He's facing 110 years in prison if they give him the maximum sentence.
	So we'll see what happens. But the way it's being portrayed in the media is what I want to talk about here.
	Vox says that his trial pulled back the curtain on crypto.
	That's what they would like you to believe.
	And, of course, we'll take a look at what this is about.
	But maybe the lesson is that it pulled back the curtain on the politicians.
	Because maybe the politicians used him for their purposes.
	Maybe the politicians are using Bitcoin for their purposes.
	But certainly they used him.
	They got him to fund elections and fund them and give them massive amounts of money.
	Then they pulled the plug on him.
	And I think that what happened with Sam Bankman, Fried, and with his company FTX, I think that that is kind of a metaphor for what they want to do to crypto in general.
	I think they want to use it and then pull the plug on it at the same time.
	Something that we've seen them do over and over again.
	George H.W. Bush, CIA guy.
	They would use people like Manuel Noriega in Panama.
	And then when they're done with him, then they basically use him for the next agenda that they have.
	And they make a sacrificial offering of this person.
	There's no loyalty with these people, as Henry Kissinger said once.
	He said, we have no permanent allies.
	We have permanent interests.
	And that's the way the government is.
	After a few hours of deliberation, a New York jury on Thursday convicted Sam Bankman Freid of fraud and conspiracy.
	And he stands accused of stealing as much as $10 billion with a B from customers.
	He gained international prominence.
	As a crypto genius.
	I don't think so, if you listen to this guy.
	He founded it in 2019.
	How could anybody that is supposedly a genius be this clueless?
	He was out there just monologuing about everything that had happened.
	He took the stand. He was a total wreck.
	And all of his public statements were supposed to believe that this guy is some kind of genius.
	He was set up.
	He was set up.
	And then they set him up.
	He was a...
	His whole thing was a political scam.
	Profit and money laundering they're accusing him of, but it was really, he was set up to money launder for them, and now they're taking him down.
	At its height, FTX was valued at more than $32 billion, and he was supposedly worth about $26 billion.
	It fell to shambles all of a sudden in late 2022 when it became public that FTX had used the deposits of his customers as a de facto piggy bank.
	Nobody knew. These politicians were taking money from him and clearing the way for him.
	They didn't know that. No, they knew it.
	And they set him up. Now, Sam Bankman Fried and his crypto empire used dark money to influence U.S. elections.
	This is from The Federalist. I would say that the real story here A more accurate headline would be how the Empire used him to influence U.S. elections and then threw him away.
	And again, I'm not excusing anything that he did.
	I'm just pointing out he's another Manuel Noriega.
	Some deposits, now we look at the banks, may be temporarily delayed.
	And this was something that happened on Friday after this show.
	And you had all the biggest banks.
	You had Chase. You had Bank of America.
	As a matter of fact, if you look at this article here, it's got all the different logos of them here.
	AT&T, ADP that a lot of people use for biggest payroll processor.
	Instagram, Wells Fargo, Truist, which was BB&T and Sun Bank, I think, merged a few years ago.
	Yeah, it's just one merger after the other.
	A couple of about, you know, probably less than half a dozen big banks now ruling the world.
	Bank of America started experiencing problems around eight o'clock in the morning.
	And then on a Friday, once people are supposed to be getting payroll from ADP and other things like that, you may have experienced this directly.
	So this may not be news to you, but a lot of people who did not experience it directly didn't know what was going on.
	But Bank of America put up on their web page, some deposits may be temporarily delayed.
	Some deposits from the 3rd of November may be temporarily delayed due to an issue impacting multiple financial institutions.
	Your accounts remain secure.
	Your balance will be updated as soon as the deposit is received.
	You do not need to take any action.
	And so we see a lot of people tweeting out, Zero Hedge and others are saying, well, blockchain fixes this.
	No, no.
	Fed now fixes this.
	That's what this is about, don't you think?
	Why is it that all of these, is this a problem solution thing that's out there?
	Well, don't worry about this.
	You know, this system that we got now just doesn't work anymore.
	We're going to have to go with a new system, FedNow, for the wholesale level.
	And then that will run us into FedCoin.
	That's what I think is behind all this stuff.
	Problem, solution.
	All of a sudden, how could it be this widespread?
	And then we have not just the failure to be able to process deposits and payments and all the rest of this stuff.
	We also had, over the weekend, another big bank fail.
	Citizens Bank, the fifth U.S. bank to fail in 2023.
	The FDIC took control of it.
	And again, you know, this is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is going to take control of it, pay off the people who had deposits.
	And the other ones, they even went beyond what the FDIC was supposed to provide because we had a lot of people in California that were too big to fail.
	But, so, you know, some people on animal farm, some of the animals on animal farm are more equal than others.
	But in addition to that, okay, so we've got...
	A lot of the biggest banks, and again, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Chase, and Wells Fargo, these are the people who are out there working with FedNow.
	And then there's a lot of others that were involved besides that.
	You know, the biggest banks are there, and somehow the system just isn't working.
	Then we find that another bank has gone belly up.
	And now a rash of articles about why banks are suddenly closing down customers' accounts.
	Add this to the troubled financial system.
	Bank customers get a letter in the mail saying their institution is closing all of their checking and savings accounts.
	Their debit and their credit cards are being shuttered, too.
	The explanation, if there is one, if there is one, if there is an explanation, it just happens.
	I don't know why this is happening.
	There's no explanation for it whatsoever.
	Yeah, there's no explanation when PayPal did that to me.
	PayPal and Venmo did that to me in May of 2021.
	No explanation coming about that, but I knew what it was about.
	We have seen the same thing done to Nigel Farage.
	We've now, because of investigation, they've seen the emails saying, yeah, that'll take care of him.
	You know, they were lying to the public about what was happening there, but confessing it in their text messages and emails exactly what they were doing.
	And now the New York Times is telling us, well, there may not be any explanation.
	Just stuff like this just happens.
	They just close down your customer accounts.
	And so this whole article, It's to try to give cover to these banks who are now closing people's accounts down, and we know why they're doing it.
	We've even had some of these same firms that were saying, oh, we can't process any payments today.
	I don't know what's going on. Had some of the same ones, Bank of America, And J.P. Morgan were leaning on the people who do QuickBooks, Intuit.
	They told them, we're going to debank you.
	We're going to debank you if you don't stop doing business with gun retailers and gun wholesalers.
	And so they're weaponizing the financial system.
	And it's been that way for a while.
	And, you know, and I know what this is like.
	I've fought with these people, tried to get an answer.
	I don't have the kind of profile that Nigel Farage did to be able to get some emails from the internal to see who told me to shut it down.
	But I spent a couple of hours on the phone with somebody and said, this is really unusual.
	I've never seen this before. And, you know, he, well, let me go see if I can find out what's going on.
	He goes away and he comes back.
	We do this several times and finally goes, the only thing I can find just says, shut this account down right now.
	No reason given. So there's something behind that somewhere, but he can't penetrate that veil of secrecy to find out what's going on.
	But now we've seen it happening a lot.
	We know what it is about.
	Maybe the customers don't see the letter.
	Or maybe they never get one at all, says the New York Times.
	Instead, they discover that their accounts no longer work while they're at the grocery store, the rental car counter, or an ATM. As a matter of fact, I still can't use PayPal.
	I can't use it even to pay somebody.
	Or use a credit card to it.
	When they call their bank, frantic representatives at first show concern.
	Oh, I'm so sorry. We'll do whatever we can to fix this.
	Yeah, I know the drill.
	These situations are what banks refer to as exiting or de-risking.
	This isn't your standard boot for people who have bounced too many checks.
	Instead, a vast security apparatus has kicked into gear, starting with regulators in Washington and trickling down to bank security managers and branch staff eyeballing customers.
	Eventually, when they do it enough to some of these people, what we will find is the same thing we found with the censorship.
	That it all began with the government.
	That it began with Trump's Department of Justice.
	And it continued and escalated with Biden's.
	And it will continue and escalate even if Trump gets in a second time.
	Because they're not concerned about us.
	It's about them personally.
	And so, eventually, it's going to come out.
	We're going to see the same type of stuff that we see with Nigel Farage.
	The same types of things that have now been shown in the Twitter files that, you know, they were getting orders from Homeland Security.
	Shut down this person.
	Shut down that person. Shut down categories of people.
	That's what we're going to find out.
	We knew it then. Before we saw the stuff, I don't need to see the details.
	I don't need to see the emails.
	I know what this is about, just like I knew what the censorship was about.
	We want to build long-term relationships with our clients, they said, which is why the accounts are closed only after appropriate review and consideration of the facts, said a spokesperson for JPMorgan Chase.
	And then they said, you know, we have 80 million, biggest bank, 80 million retail customers, and we have 6 million small businesses.
	And I'm sure they've got a very personal relationship with all 80 million people and 6 million businesses, don't you think?
	You're just a number to these people.
	They just continue to throw out this complete BS about all of this stuff.
	And so, one of the things that gives people an insight is the fact that they're punishing mom-and-pop stores who deal in cash.
	And we saw that Trump put a high priority on shutting down the mom-and-pop stores.
	They were non-essential.
	The big box Wall Street companies were essential.
	They had to stay open. The small guys needed to be closed.
	And this is what is happening with this, as even the New York Times says.
	Well, they're looking for unusual cash deposits.
	Or maybe... Just usual cash deposits.
	Because a big part of why they're debanking people is debanking small businesses who put cash in.
	And they want to make that criminal.
	Biden has made that pretty clear.
	$600 or more?
	You file a report.
	It used to be $10,000.
	And so the same guy who can weasel around and Get paid off in bribes at $10 million or more?
	He wants to know if you've got $600 there.
	And he's going to send his army.
	So what are they going to do about it?
	Well, you know, that generated a lot of reports.
	You're going to need an army of IRS officers to go through that kind of stuff.
	Maybe you're going to need like 80,000 more people out there.
	And that's exactly what they're going to do.
	They're going to harass us.
	They're going to debank us.
	They're going to confiscate everything from us so that we own nothing and we'll be happier.
	That's what this is about.
	And shame on these Republicans for growing it by a factor of five instead of a factor of seven.
	Brian Delaney has owned several New York City bars over the decades.
	He and his business partner and general manager have a long-standing system for handling cash.
	It goes to the bank on Fridays and it goes on Mondays.
	Well, they don't like that.
	You know, that looks like structuring to them.
	You're structuring these deposits?
	Well, we're going to, you know, shut you down.
	We're going to shut down everybody that deals with cash.
	Because if you can't use your cash at businesses...
	Well, then, that's one way to push us into a cashless society, isn't it?
	Well, this is just a start for gold, says one report, Kitco News.
	And, again, it really is about your security.
	It's not, I think, even at this point in time.
	When you look at inflation, you also look at how markets are manipulated and that type of thing.
	But we know how they're going to manipulate the financial.
	We know how they're going to manipulate the entire financial system.
	And how they're going to try to close everything down.
	Again, one way to protect yourself is with gold or silver.
	And we're going to talk more about that on the other side.
	But davidknight.gold will take you to Tony Arderman and his Wise Wolf business, Wise Wolf Gold and Silver.
	And we appreciate Tony's support of this program.
	But you need to do something.
	To get out of this system. And so we're going to talk when we come back.
	We'll talk about gold and silver.
	There's a great report that's been put out by Catherine Austin Fitz about prepping.
	There's a lot of things you need to prep for.
	There was recently an article I just saw about Pemmican.
	First time I ever saw anything about Pemmican was Civil Defense Manuals.
	CivilDefenseManual.com. Jack Lawson's thing.
	He talks about making Pemmican.
	And it's a A tried and true method stays food that preserves for a very long time and So people are starting to look at what they need to do to prep for their food, prep for self-defense, prep to create a community, but especially to prep to make sure that you have the ability to keep some of the stuff that they're going to try to take away from you.
	If you've got everything in their financial system, everything online, it's very easy for them to shut that down.
	And so in every program that goes out, I direct people at davidknight.gold and I say, money is It is what you hold.
	And the one thing that you hold physically, that yes, they can come in and they can take it from you at the point of a gun.
	But other than that, and they can do that with anything, frankly.
	But other than that, that is the most secure thing that you can have in order to prep for what they're planning.
	You need to know what they're planning and the direction that they're coming.
	But I can tell you that as far as CBDC goes, there is no difference between Trump or Biden.
	It was Jared Kushner was pushing it off and along with Steve Mnuchin during the Trump administration.
	They thought it was great. They were activating that.
	Biden then takes it to the next step.
	He does an executive order in March of last year.
	Gave them six months to come back, and he gave everybody marching orders of figure out how you're going to completely redesign the financial system.
	That's one of them.
	That's four of them. Then figure out how we're going to implement this.
	Then there was law enforcement and how they're going to force people to use their CBDC. And then the fourth one was climate stuff.
	And so we're going to talk about the climate stuff when we come back as well.
	Risha M, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. Tom McDawg, when debanking became a thing five or six years ago, Congress should have acted immediately.
	Yep. They should have done that about the credit card interest rates too, don't you think?
	I wonder who owns Congress.
	It's joint ownership.
	Pharmaceutical companies, banks, the military, industrial corporations.
	Yeah, they're owned by a lot of people.
	I've said many times that I would love to see these guys be required by law to wear their sponsors like some kind of a NASCAR driver.
	Just put the corporate logos all over the place, you know, when they speak.
	Anyway, Atomic Dog says, but instead there were a couple of hearings and it went off the radar.
	Mm-hmm. Yeah. Now look at where we are.
	One simple law that states citizens have a right to obtain financial services without prejudice would have sufficed.
	But they don't do that, do they?
	And they don't even as they come out and say, well, you know, the FBI, they're targeting religious people.
	I don't like that, says Mike Johnson.
	Will he cut a penny from the FBI? Well, I'd be willing to bet you that he won't.
	I'll bet you that he doesn't.
	I bet you that he never talks about cutting their budget.
	Jason Barker. Hey, Jason, how you doing?
	He says, I've always said that FTX was used to demonize crypto.
	Exactly right. Exactly right.
	And it was done on purpose to push CBD instead of any other option.
	Remember, it was his exchange that was corrupt, not the assets that he pretended to have in it.
	Oh, yeah. Yeah.
	So I guess, you know, whenever you've got Nancy Pelosi corruptly trading stocks, I guess we should shut down the entire stock exchange, right?
	Well, maybe we should.
	That's a lot less on its system than Bitcoin.
	coin.
	That's for sure.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	If you like the Eagles, the cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	Well, Michael Bloomberg has got an idea of getting rid of all coal everywhere.
	All coal everywhere. And I've said this from the very beginning.
	I said, you know, you go back and look at the 1970s.
	They told us where the CIA said peak oil.
	We had the OPEC oil embargo.
	You had Time and Newsweek saying we're going to be out of oil just within the next decade.
	You know, that was the late 70s.
	And they were saying by the mid-1980s, we're going to be out of coal.
	We're going to be out of natural gas.
	But when they talked about coal, they said, well, we got 666 years of it, but it's just too dirty.
	We can't use it. It's like, well, you can scrub it, you can clean it, just like you can anything.
	You can clean the exhaust out of a car, as we've seen.
	You can clean it out of a diesel engine, anything like that.
	It's more expensive, but hey, you know, if we got 666 years, 666, what an interesting number, then maybe we can just clean this up and use it.
	But no, it's got to go.
	Says Michael Bloomberg. And so this article from Real Clear Wire is headlined, Richmond North of Richmond?
	Well, that sounds like Michael Bloomberg, doesn't it?
	These rich men north of Richmond, they just want to have total control, said Anthony Oliver.
	They want to know what you think, want to know what you do.
	They don't think you know, but I know that you do.
	And so Bloomberg has just announced an initiative.
	He's going to spend $500 million to close all remaining U.S. coal-fired plants.
	And we've had a lot of them closed.
	I remember over a decade ago when I went to Austin, they were closing them there.
	And, you know, putting out wind farms and things like that.
	And we saw what happened with that.
	Why would someone commit such resources against an industry that's provided affordable, reliable energy for decades?
	A half a billion dollars to shut them all down.
	And again, what does that tell you?
	That he is going to spend a half a billion dollars.
	This is a guy who wants to get a return on his investment that's going to be pretty big.
	So what do you think he's going to get in return?
	How many billions do you think he's going to get in return?
	Well, buy some politicians.
	They're the best return on investment that you can get.
	He's invested in natural gas.
	He's invested in so-called renewable energy, solar, wind.
	And media outlets like Bloomberg Green promotes a green-focused narrative.
	It seems like Bloomberg might view environmentalism not just as a cause, but as a business venture.
	So he's going to invest $500 million to take down...
	Industries that are competing with the things that he's invested in.
	Switching from coal to alternatives like wind and solar, experts argue, would necessitate a significant expansion of the current grid system because you've got to get the power lines out to where the wind farms are and where the solar farms are.
	Texas spent billions of dollars to run those lines out there, and then we saw what happened when we had a freeze.
	With a surge of electric vehicles, some project that the U.S. grid may need to double in capacity, potentially costing up to $2 trillion by 2050.
	That is an absurd understatement of the problem.
	It's going to have to do more than double.
	It's not just electric vehicles, everything, of course.
	You know, all your appliances, everything must be electric, must be under central control, must be these...
	Wind farms, solar farms that people like Bloomberg have gotten in on the ground floor with to make them more money.
	Despite these concerns, Bloomberg remains resolute.
	He said, today marks a new chapter in the Beyond Carbon campaign.
	Notice that these guys can't even come up with any original names.
	We got Beyond Meat, Beyond Carbon.
	Well, these people are beyond belief, aren't they?
	And they're going to try to take this thing out to infinity and beyond.
	What is beyond infinity?
	I don't know. Ask him.
	So he said, we're going to shut down every last U.S. coal plant.
	That's right. We're going to burn down our infrastructure.
	Remember, Michael Bloomberg, when he was running for president...
	He said, you know, those stupid farmers, we can get rid of them, we don't need them.
	Everybody said, wait a minute, farmers are really intelligent, they've got to wear a lot of hats and all the rest of it.
	That was not what he was talking about.
	He was talking about the agrarian revolution, and then we went into the industrial revolution, and he said, and now we're at a point in time, this fourth industrial revolution, he said, where, you know, what Klaus Schwab and all these guys have agreed on.
	We're now at a point in time where those of us who are smart, that's what he said, that's what Bloomberg said, the smart ones of us are looking at how we're going to take their jobs.
	And to keep them from coming after us with guillotines, we're going to have to give them universal basic income.
	And so that's what they're lining up to do.
	And we see this being put out in San Francisco as well.
	They're program after program doing these trials.
	And let me tell you, the income is very, very basic.
	It's subsistence level.
	But they're hoping that they can give you enough distractions with computers and with games and virtual reality that you'll take the money and live in your little cave until you die and never come after them.
	And so there'll be those people who will take the SOMA and do the sex and they get the Brave New World treatment.
	But if you don't, If you look at this and say something's wrong with this, then you get the 1984 treatment.
	You get the boot stomping on your face forever.
	The war on meat.
	A study suggests that a cigarette-style warning label could be used to cut down meat.
	And I think that'll be very effective, quite frankly.
	I look at this, how this cigarette smoking thing started in my generation, how they put these labels on.
	You know, I went from a situation where...
	You had the Marlboro Man and you had, you know, cigarettes were advertised extensively when I was growing up.
	And then they change and they start warning everybody about it and putting warning labels on the tobacco and everybody just laughing at that.
	You know, the smokers didn't care.
	But the generation coming up, they were able to indoctrinate them through the institutions that we call schools.
	They're not there to educate.
	They're there to indoctrinate.
	So they're able to educate the kids and say, and I don't think tobacco is good for you.
	Certainly not the way they present it.
	You know, I think that what you have in cigarettes and things like that today is adulterated with so many chemicals.
	It's a very different thing than what people were smoking, what Sir Walter Raleigh was smoking.
	You're smoking a lot of chemicals, menthols and filters and asbestos and all the rest of this stuff that's in there.
	But it's a very different thing.
	But nevertheless, I mean, I'm not defending tobacco use.
	I'm just defending I'm attacking their propaganda.
	And I think this will be very effective for new generations.
	And it's been so effective in terms of getting people to not smoke by this constant PR propaganda campaign.
	And again, there can be white propaganda and there can be black propaganda.
	White propaganda is when you just tell one side of the story, and it's true what you're saying.
	It's kind of narrow, but it's true.
	Black propaganda is when you've got this heavy narrative that you're feeding people, and it's a lie.
	So the stuff that they're saying about tobacco is generally true, about it not being healthy, certainly not in the corporate form that we get now.
	But it's been very effective.
	And I think that they can run a propaganda campaign on meat because we see that now the new generation is not really smoking a great deal.
	And you see places like New Zealand and others Are jumping in.
	New Zealand was the first place to do it, but there's been others now that have jumped in on it.
	They've said, well, anybody who's born after a certain date now, we're not going to let them ever smoke tobacco.
	Ever. Lifetime ban.
	And I think that's what they're going to do with meat.
	I think that's what they're looking at. A heavy propaganda campaign, warning labels, demonizing meat as being unhealthy for you and evil and going to kill the planet and everybody on it.
	And then eventually what they'll do is just come out with prohibition for the remaining people who are diehards and say, I want to do it anyway.
	Well, you can't. And the vast majority of people, this is what democracy is like, right?
	Yeah, that's why we don't want a democracy.
	We want to have a republic where you have a rule of law.
	And as this is all happening, you know, as they come after the food, they come after the energy, well, you can just starve yourself to death, right?
	Just like Soylent Green.
	If anything could get me to smoke, says my son, it would be the government outlawing it.
	That's my son. I guess he's literally talking about the seatbelt stuff.
	That's right. They got me to not wear my seatbelt when they made it a rule that I had to.
	Because some things are more important, right?
	Some things are more important on a principle.
	But, you know, when you look at just starving yourself to death, right?
	You go back to Soylent Green.
	I thought it was kind of interesting. I went back and Looked at that again, and you know, that was all.
	They were telling everybody, well, you know, it's cannibalism or it's starvation.
	Take your pick. Which is it going to be?
	And the places where they would go to be, quote-unquote, euthanized, they call them thanatariums, right?
	Thanos. And that's, of course, part of the root of euthanize.
	Yeah. Death. Thanos.
	The god of death that they had.
	And euthanasia is a good death.
	Well, they had a thanatarium.
	They didn't have a lisp.
	They were actually talking about it.
	They weren't trying to say sanitarium.
	Thanatarium. It was thanos, the rule of death.
	And so, as we look at the food, we're looking at assisted suicide.
	You know, these people who have been injecting us with poison, As Catherine Austin Fitz calls it, the great poisoning.
	That's a good way to put it.
	You know, the great reset began with the great poisoning.
	So they've been poisonous with all this stuff and telling us that we should not have food, should not have energy, go nowhere, and all the rest of this stuff.
	Well, they are moving on with the democide program in terms of normalizing assisted suicide.
	This is from Live Action News.
	In the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare, once staunchly dedicated to preserving life, the healthcare profession is now increasingly preoccupied with hastening death.
	Well, they were paid to do it during the great poisoning.
	They were given a death protocol.
	To run through in the hospitals.
	They're rewarded by government to do that.
	And they're going to be rewarded by government to kill people as well.
	The Medical Assistance in Dying.
	Also called MAID. That's their M-A-I-D. That's their acronym.
	National Review highlighted in a September article, they said healthcare has been pushed out in favor of what can only be described as death care.
	What they don't see is that that happened with Trump in 2020.
	Currently, Canadian law prohibits assisted dying if a patient verbally, physically or through gestures shows signs of refusing or resisting it.
	However, a significant turning point came during the panel discussion where the participants explored ways to bypass this rule.
	Even going so far as to discuss, listen to this, sedating patients to obtain their consent.
	Yeah, didn't Bill Cosby do that?
	Didn't he sedate women in order to get their consent to sex?
	No, it was still rape.
	And if you do that to patients, it's still murder.
	It's just amazing.
	The levels of prevarication that these people go through.
	Matthew Ronson says, smoke them if you've got them.
	Smoke them while you've got them if you take them away.
	But yeah, sedating patients so you can get their consent.
	This is so typical of leftists, right?
	People who are advocates or plants and animals.
	I know that this is what the plants would want.
	I can read their mind.
	Many view this moment as a milestone, signifying the introduction of death care within the Canadian health care landscape.
	Because that is not something that happened recently.
	That discussion about, well, if anybody gives us any kind of verbal or nonverbal or gesture or anything like that that they don't want to be killed, okay, we can't do it.
	So let's sedate them so we can have their consent.
	And that was a discussion that happened in 2021.
	Death care now has gained momentum not only in Canada, but also in Belgium, Australia, France, Spain, the Netherlands, and several U.S. states.
	For instance, in Belgium, when a 36-year-old woman with terminal cancer survived a failed lethal injection, we're not talking about the Trump shots here.
	This is like executing a prisoner.
	This is euthanasia, they call it.
	The attending physician, after she survived the lethal injection, the attending physician resorted to suffocating her with a pillow.
	In another case, in the Netherlands, I guess this is very much like comfort care, right?
	They give you a lethal injection, you survive, so let's kill them, you know, just like a failed abortion.
	Another one, a physician's use of sedation to influence a patient's consent to euthanasia.
	Led to the first ever criminal trial of a euthanasia doctor.
	However, he was acquitted.
	Acquitted. And that was in the Netherlands, of course, where they're embarking on a campaign of starvation to people.
	So, in Canada...
	One out of every 25 deaths in Canada last year was due to euthanasia.
	And that's not even counting the effects of the jabs.
	I mean, this is like direct killing.
	It's not a delayed effect or sudden death, heart attack.
	No, directly killing.
	Now, one out of every 25 deaths was murder under the so-called medical assistance in dying, MAID. And that's 4%, 4.1% of all deaths, one out of every 25.
	Since it was legalized in 2016, there have been 45,000 deaths that way.
	Soylent green type deaths.
	And the number of those cases grew by 31% from 2021 to 2022.
	It's growing by leaps and bounds.
	More males than females.
	51% male, 48% female were executed by their doctors.
	The number of maid providers in Canada is growing.
	During 2022, there was 1,837.
	That was a 19% increase.
	95% of the killers are physicians.
	However, the number of nurses is growing.
	Nurse practitioners performed 9% of the procedures, the murders, up from 8.4% in 2021 and up from 7% in 2019.
	As it becomes socially normalized, that's what this is about, doctors are doing them more frequently.
	Wesley J. Smith, who is a bioethics commentator, said in a National Review column, he said, If the same percentage of people were killed by doctors in the USA as are in Canada, that would amount to 140,000 homicides annually.
	That's about as many people as live in cities like Waco, Texas, or Fullerton, California.
	Well, when you look at it, of course, they don't like to talk about the leading causes of death.
	They typically will omit death by hospital, but that has been one of the leading causes of death, even before the death protocols of Trump, and even before the jabs.
	And so why should we be surprised by any of this?
	And you need to understand what the root of all of this is, really.
	You know, starvation, the zero energy policies, and all the rest of the stuff.
	And Elon Musk called it out.
	He said environmentalists have become a death cult.
	And he's absolutely right about that.
	It is a religion of depopulation.
	It has been from the very beginning, even before the beginning of the environmentalist movement.
	It was all about Paul Ehrlich and his population bomb and the rest of the stuff.
	Again, I remember when that happened in high school.
	I remember the people who bought into it.
	Hook, line, and sinker.
	My best friend did. And, you know, believed in...
	Too many people are all going to die.
	All that stuff. And then it morphed into this environmentalism.
	I find it interesting that Musk has become the richest man in the world over environmentalism.
	And yet he's calling it out now.
	And I'm going to tell you what is behind all that.
	But first, what did he say?
	He pointed out that while there were explicit extinctionists at the fringes of the environmental movement, he said, however, the sentiment behind the death cult has pervaded it as a whole.
	It always has from the very beginning.
	He says, I'm pro-environment.
	But if you take environmentalism to its extreme, you start to view humanity as a plague on the surface of the earth, like a mold or something.
	I've talked about this many times as well.
	Someday I'm going to find the tape that I made when I took the kids to the Children's Museum in London.
	This loop. The Gaia theory.
	Gaia, the Greek goddess representing Mother Earth.
	And how Earth was this sentient being.
	And human beings are a virus.
	And so we have to be eliminated.
	And that's what he's saying. Well, he takes humanity into something like a mold.
	Actually, they call it a virus.
	That's what they call it. I've been calling it for a while.
	The environmental movement, he says, and I'm an environmentalist, has gone too far.
	They've gone way too far.
	If you start thinking that humans are bad, the natural conclusion is then that humans should die off.
	Well, they've been saying it explicitly for decades.
	Before he got rich, they were saying that.
	Again, going back to the 1960s, before he was born.
	While a controversial figure for some, His credentials on environmentalism are pretty strong.
	He has, after all, risked his personal fortune to build a globally successful manufacturer of electric cars, says Daily Skeptic.
	That's not at all. He's not an altruistic billionaire for the common man.
	People need to stop sucking up to these billionaires.
	I understand why they do. You know, I mean, they can make things happen to you, for sure.
	But that's simply not true.
	He's not risking anything.
	He's not risking his personal fortune by attacking the environmentalists.
	He made his personal fortune.
	He became the richest man on earth by going to all of these Hail Hydra meetings and going to all of these people who are the political leaders in our countries and telling them, I can make this thing happen for you.
	I know you've got an agenda. I'm going to make it happen for you.
	So why is he telling us this now?
	He tweeted out, he said, these extremists, activists, one of them said, Corona is the cure, humans are the disease, back in 2020.
	Again, that's the Gaia theory for decades.
	The mainstream political thrust towards net zero is already heavily anti-human in terms of its impact, if not in its intent, but they explicitly state it.
	Believe them when they tell you that they want to kill us.
	Don't try to explain it away.
	And then he goes on as he's talking to Joe Rogan.
	He says, well, if artificial intelligence gets programmed by the extinctionists, its utility function will be the extinction of humanity.
	Well, guess what? They are.
	You know, Biden, with his executive order that he just came out with, artificial intelligence, is to make sure that he and the U.S. government are telling these people how to program and how to bias artificial intelligence and for the uses that they want to put it to.
	And, of course, Biden is an extinctionist.
	And everybody in his administration are pushing that agenda.
	You know, there was just an article last week that I didn't get to, overcharged, overcharged, quote-unquote, kind of a pun, saying that a major study shows that the cost of, quote-unquote, fueling your electric vehicle is equivalent to paying $17.33 a gallon for your fuel.
	Now, regardless of where that is, if you take a look at what these people are pushing in terms of the panic, fear, and the absurd disinformation, take a look at some of these pictures.
	This is CNN. Haunting underwater photos.
	That portray climate change in a new way.
	I first looked at this and I thought, well, that's pretty lifelike pictures of people underwater.
	This is a woman and she's sitting on a bed, doesn't have a mattress.
	And there's a guy who's in an inclined position with his head in her lap.
	And they're just staring ahead like, I don't know what's going on.
	And they're underwater. Underwater.
	Well, what is this about?
	This is a little artwork project that, as CNN describes it, you see a 15-year-old sitting in a rickety chair, her hands clasped at her lap, her white skirt billowing ever so slightly in what, at first glance, you might assume is the wind, but it's actually underwater.
	A stunning portrait.
	Here's another one. Here's a couple of guys on seesaw, teetering.
	And, of course, one of them is on the seesaw backwards.
	This whole thing is just... Beyond lunacy.
	And of course, this is to warn us that we are all on the brink of losing our homes, our lands, our livelihood due to climate change.
	Nothing could be further from the truth.
	No, we're on the brink of losing our homes, our lands, our livelihood due to them using climate change to take it all away from us with their 2030 agenda.
	Here's another one here. They have these people...
	A shallow area here, and they had these people in street clothes go down and hold their breath and pose for these pictures.
	Here's a bunch of people in scuba suits taking pictures of these people who come down, hold their breath, and freeze in a pose.
	What a bunch of ludicrous idiocy.
	Total idiocy. You know, there was a story last week.
	It came out of Brazil.
	The Amazon. And they said, look at this.
	We found some carvings that were done by humans.
	And they have been hidden all of these years.
	How far back do they go?
	Well, they said this was the indigenous people that were there before the Europeans came.
	So we're talking about something that's thousands of years old.
	And they said, well, this is climate change, isn't it?
	Do you think that's climate change?
	I look at it and I say, well, wait a minute.
	What they're saying is that the water level that we have today is the same as the water level was thousands of years ago.
	You've got some of these rocks and they've got carvings on them and they've got very primitive faces.
	But, you know, not nearly as primitive as this garbage artwork that they're putting out there now.
	No. This is being put out by indigenous Europeans now, and that reverted to lunacy.
	But, you know, they've got carvings of faces, very, very crude, you know, like smiley faces type of things.
	But they did that before there were any Europeans, before there was any Industrial Revolution, before any of that stuff.
	And now the water level is the same as the water level was then.
	It isn't like we are on some kind of a progressive path.
	It's that these things go in cycles, isn't it?
	We saw the same thing. I remember a few years ago, they like to talk about how Venice is sinking.
	They used to talk about that. Well, now they don't talk about Venice sinking.
	They talk about the sea level is rising in Venice.
	Is it? Well, then why are other places not flooding like that?
	And so they would highlight this flood and look at how bad it is.
	But then, of course, the water's receded and they don't say anything about that.
	And then, in just a few short months after they had been telling everybody, look, Venice is proof that we're all going to be underwater, just like they were showing you in these pictures.
	We're all going to be underwater. Venice is sinking.
	Everything else is not sinking.
	It's not sinking anymore.
	The sea level is rising.
	Even though you don't see it where you are, it's rising.
	In just a few months, they were talking about a drought in Venice.
	And they had a drought, and the gondolas were sitting on dry land.
	I guess they should have called Ben Shapiro, and he could have told them it's a wind blowing through there.
	But, I mean, it's just like they do with cold or hot weather.
	They will completely, both sides will interpret their opinion based on, you know, whatever the changing weather is.
	But that's not what this is about at all.
	We're going to take a break, but before we do, comments about euthanasia.
	Now, Fregan says, MAID is the third biggest death in Canada, cause of death in Canada last year.
	But it's not been launched yet, he says.
	But next year, it will explode into unbelievable death.
	It opens up in March. Oh, okay.
	So, even though it hasn't launched yet, one out of 25 deaths is euthanasia already.
	And then they're going to have a program for that.
	North American house hippo.
	My mom was deprived of food and water before she passed away back in July.
	Thankfully, it took less than three days.
	The nurses left juice and jello by her bed.
	The problem is that she was sedated.
	I'm glad it was quick.
	More or less, I couldn't do anything because my brother and uncle had power of attorney.
	You know, we saw this with Terry Chavo and the Bush brothers.
	And yet, they're doing that on a massive scale now, aren't they?
	Mishigus, don't maids clean up trash?
	Nice play on words, Canada.
	Yeah, yeah. Yeah, you know, when they did that to Terry Chavo, Jeb Bush was governor and George Bush was president.
	I said, well, that puts to rest all this talk about them being Christians, doesn't it?
	Distorted Perception says, Canada's making it for mental illness and drug addiction now, too.
	It's pretty sick, to be honest.
	Strange they make life so bad and hopeless, and the solution is not help, but it's death.
	Wayne McRoy, ATR, I find it ironic that these idiots at the WEF are obsessed with stakeholders, but they don't want anybody holding stakes.
	Well, if we start holding those stakes, S-T-A-K-E, for these vampires, then they've got a real problem, don't they?
	And Jim Z's seven, the evolutionists should love climate change, a chance to evolve back to tadpoles.
	Yeah, exactly. Except we're having spermageddon at the same time.
	We'll be right back. You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	Looking for better information?
	APSRadioNews.com features articles and commentary, along with audio from all the top news from around the world.
	APSRadioNews.com Well, Wayne McRoy says, if you eat ze bugs, it will make the weather betterer.
	My TV told me so.
	Yeah. Well, the future doesn't necessarily have to be cashless.
	And we may have artificial intelligence to thank for that because they now have an artist who has done some covers of songs using Johnny Cash's voice.
	Listen to this. It truly is amazing.
	This is an AI Johnny Cash doing a cover of a Taylor Swift song, which only underscores...
	Just how bad her song is, in my opinion.
	But see what you think. Here's Johnny Cash from Beyond the Grave doing Taylor Swift.
	Hello, I'm not Johnny Cash.
	So it's gonna be forever Or it's gonna go down in flames You can tell me when it's over If the high was worth the pain Got a long list of ex-lovers They'll tell you I'm insane Cause you know I love the players And you love the game Cause we're young and we're reckless We'll take this way too far It'll leave you breathless
	Or with a nasty scar Got a long list of ex-lovers They'll tell you I'm insane But I've got a blank space baby And I'll write your name Yeah, yeah, yeah. The song is called Blank Space.
	And I think it refers to the area between Taylor Swift's eyes, I think.
	That's the blank space there.
	Those lyrics!
	So, I'm not a Taylor Swift fan.
	I see her everywhere.
	Can't see any news sites without something about Taylor Swift.
	It doesn't matter if it's mainstream or it's alternative media.
	They've all got something about Taylor Swift.
	I'm supposed to care. But I've never heard any of her music.
	And so I saw that and I pulled up the song to hear the original.
	And what I thought was really funny was that The original of her singing is so auto-tuned, she sounds like she was AI-generated.
	Not the Johnny Cash that was AI-generated.
	How's that? We've really turned reality inside out and upside down.
	She is so auto-tuned.
	She sounds less real than an AI Johnny Cash.
	So again, we don't have to...
	This is one good thing, I guess, about artificial intelligence.
	We don't have to have a Johnny Cash-less future.
	Hello, I'm not Johnny Cash.
	This is done by a Dallas musician.
	Dustin Ballard. He also did, and I'll spare you listening to the lyrics of Barbie Girl, or The Spice Girls' Wannabe, or Miley Cyrus' Party in the USA, or Greta Gerwig's, well, that's her film, Barbie film.
	Again, I just kind of walked away from the music and the movie scene.
	Strangely, Ballard deleted the Barbie Girl mashup from his TikTok and YouTube accounts, but not before it was grabbed by a lot of other people, including even Fox News and the Daily Mail, published these and gave him laudatory reviews of how We could have Johnny Cash singing this epic Pop-Tart trash.
	Ballard, who has also done a bunch of really hilarious, often amazing, ruined songs, quote-unquote, that's what he calls them, will be doing a few live shows in the Dallas area at the end of the year, in the beginning of 2024.
	It'll be awesome to watch videos of the events and see how his skills translate live.
	Well, yeah, it will be interesting to see that.
	And as I pointed out before, you know, with Michael Bloomberg, His coal goal is to end all coal.
	And this is done in terms of pushing people into universal basic income.
	Listener Sam sent this to me.
	He says... This program is going to be in San Francisco, Ventura counties.
	He says, in a state with $40 billion budget deficit and rising.
	He said, I moved here 40 years ago from Dallas to chase the California dream like millions before me.
	He says, alas, the promised land is no more.
	And as California goes, so goes the nation.
	May God help us, he says.
	And so this is $5 million.
	It's going to be distributed to 300 people in two cities.
	Sounds like a lot of money, but when you break it down, it's not all that much.
	It is $1,200 per month for a duration of 18 months in one city.
	That's in San Francisco and in Ventura County.
	$1,000 a month for a year and a half.
	This is not going to change anybody's lives, except to the extent that it makes them more dependent.
	what they really ought to call UBI is PET, PET, because that's what they want to make of you.
	They want to hand feed you into dependency on them.
	That's what the welfare system has always been about.
	And that's why I was absolutely disgusted to see that Charles Murray, who wrote an excellent book talking about how welfare programs, the great society and things like that, It actually harmed the people that it was supposed to help.
	You would think, well, you give people a helping hand, they're suffering, they need some money, and so forth.
	Here's a handout. Well, what that does to you is the same thing that it does to a pet.
	Makes them dependent on you for food.
	And anybody that has a pet knows how that works.
	You know, they get used to A certain amount, a certain time, all this kind of stuff, and they get all over you if you don't give them their food right at that point in time.
	But it is a way of pacifying people.
	And Charles Murray, who wrote Losing Ground in the 1980s, is now an advocate of doing that to everybody.
	Because that's what it really is.
	It's not universal basic income.
	It's universal welfare for everybody.
	Universal dependency for everybody.
	Meanwhile, Obama is warning about the dangers of a market-based system that he says is compatible with slavery.
	See, it's exactly the opposite.
	Universal basic income and the welfare state, but the journalizing it to everybody, the universal welfare state, that is a form of slavery.
	This truly is Orwellian, to say that a free market is slavery, but that coercion is choice.
	That's what he's telling everybody.
	He says, just because an economic system generated wealth and innovation doesn't mean that it guarantees a good society.
	No, what it means is that it's a good economic system.
	If you've got an economic system that generates wealth and innovation, it does what it's supposed to do, and that's what free markets do.
	That's not necessarily what capitalism does, because I look at what people describe as capitalism, and that typically is now crony capitalism.
	It's not a free market anymore.
	They did their best to destroy the free market when they came after the mom-and-pop small people on Main Street America.
	The free market is not things like the big companies and Wall Street.
	That's not the free market. That's controlled.
	That is a government-public-private partnership to rip everybody else off.
	And as an example of it, just take a look at the way that they cram the, I like to call it D-I-E, because it's going to kill everybody.
	But they're DEI programs.
	They're diversity, equity, and inclusivity.
	They cram that down people's throats.
	You have Coca-Cola, NASCAR, and all these different...
	They are just shoving it in the face of people who don't want to see it because they don't care what their customers want.
	They want to please the government that's going to give them a public-private franchise to, you know, kind of a monopoly on these types of things.
	So they don't care what the customers want.
	A free market only works when you have to compete against other people and provide things that people really want to have.
	But if you get big enough and you are partnered up with the government, you can dictate to people and then you can just shove this stuff in their face.
	And you don't care whether they buy your Bud Light or go to your NASCAR thing or go to your NFL game.
	You're going to shove that agenda down people's throats.
	That's what this is truly about.
	And so it's not a free market system.
	But Obama says, you know, an economic system, even though it generates wealth and innovation and everything, doesn't guarantee a good society.
	No, what guarantees a good society is morals and religion and that type of thing.
	But his religion is communism.
	And you notice how subtly he twists this.
	Well, it's an economic system that provides prosperity, but it's not good.
	No, it works as an economic system they can't avoid.
	Talking about how it works as an economic system.
	But, of course, his religious views that he wants to foist upon you of communism.
	What did that result in?
	Well, that resulted in starvation.
	That resulted in authoritarian, totalitarian societies.
	It resulted in mass purges of death, like Mao's Great Leap Forward and Stalin's purges and that type of thing.
	He says...
	Market-based systems have been compatible with slavery, caste systems, colonization, war, exploitation, corruption, fraud, autocracy, and the poisoning of our natural environment.
	I kind of get the idea that Obama doesn't like a free market.
	And of course, having government dictate things to people has worked out really well for him in his personal life.
	A centralized authoritarian dictatorship has made him a billionaire because people would come to him for permission to do this or that or to live their life or to have their business.
	That's the way he wants it.
	So you don't think that Marxism has resulted in slavery?
	You don't think that Marxism has had a caste system?
	For some animals on animal farm are more equal than other animals.
	You don't think that communism has resulted in war and exploitation and corruption and fraud and autocracy?
	Boy, what projection from Obama.
	And what a heap of lies.
	So, some of the other things that Elon Musk had to say, he's talking about his AI chatbot.
	He calls it grok.
	And he says he's going to offer it at $16 a month on X. But only a limited number of users in the U.S. right now.
	I guess he's just trying it out right now.
	He says it will also answer spicy questions that are rejected by most other AI systems.
	Grok is designed to answer questions with a bit of wit and has a rebellious streak.
	So please don't use it if you hate humor.
	Well, do I really need answers from Grok?
	Seriously, do I really need to go to his artificial intelligence to get answers for things?
	Yeah, meet your new AI god.
	Meet your new AI authority.
	Oh, and this one's got a sense of humor.
	A spoonful of sugar to help the authoritarianism and the propaganda go down, right?
	Maybe he should just call it Deep Thought to put it in real perspective and add a bit of humor to it.
	You know, just like you had Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy had Deep Thought.
	Maybe that's what he needs to reference.
	But look, if you want to know where Elon Musk is, Elon Musk is a transhumanist.
	And if you understand what that is about, then you'll understand Elon Musk in a nutshell.
	This is a good article in American Thinker, Transhumanism and the Human Condition.
	It says, humanity tends to assume control in two senses of the phrase.
	First, we think that we can and should control the course of our own lives and determine our ultimate destiny.
	We assume control by taking command.
	Secondly, we think we can overcome any problem and continue to make progress through our individual or collective wisdom.
	In this second sense, we assume that control is possible.
	And this is what technocracy is about.
	Science and technology as a means of becoming gods and controlling other people.
	It's what it's always been about. You go back to the 1930s and you look at what H.G. Wells was selling people, you know, the book and the movie, Things to Come or the Shape of Things to Come.
	And you see that you have these elitists, you know, they have a war, very much like what they're trying to do now.
	And everybody's killing everybody else.
	And these guys come in and they transcend all of it.
	And they have technology to whip everybody under control and say, we're not going to have nations anymore, we're going to have a global government, and we're in control of all this, and we're going to restrict what you have to do.
	And this has been the type of thing sold to us throughout science fiction so many times.
	You know, whether it is some, typically it's sold as some benevolent aliens coming here or something like that.
	But it's all about assuming control.
	And when you go back and you look at the 1930s, technocracy was coming out at that time.
	Transhumanism was a term that was coined by Aldous Huxley's brother, Julian Huxley.
	Aldous Huxley, who did Brave New World, among other things.
	And then when you look at what H.G. Wells is pushing in the shape of things to come, around that time, Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua Haldane, tried to get rid of the Canadian form of government, an institute of technocracy.
	They brought up charges, criminal charges against him.
	He was able to beat those criminal charges, and they beat it out of Canada and went to South Africa.
	But as I said many times, Elon Musk is essentially a technocrat.
	And everything that he sees, he's a technocrat.
	Assuming control, well, it's foundational in transhumanism.
	The Transhumanist Declaration outlines seven core beliefs of the movement, two of which relate to the issue of control and immortality.
	Technology, they say, holds the key to exercising greater control by allowing humans to, quote, extend their mental and physical, including reproductive capacities.
	And so they say that there's a lot of challenges associated with the human condition that will be overcome by redesigning humanity.
	These challenges include the inevitability of aging, limitations on human and artificial intellect, Unchosen psychology, suffering, and our confinement to the planet Earth.
	Doesn't that have Musk in a nutshell?
	Limitations on our intellect, our human intellect, and how we've got to merge with the machines, how we're going to get off of planet Earth and go everywhere.
	I mean, this is his, you know, he is a transhumanist.
	You need to understand that's where he's coming from.
	And that it all makes sense.
	Don't think of him as some benevolent billionaire.
	I don't think there are any benevolent billionaires because I think typically billionaires love money.
	And that's the root of all evil.
	So don't look for benefactors as billionaires, whether you're talking about Trump or Musk.
	Redesigning the human condition so that humans can minimize, if not eliminate, all the effects of human sin and break free from God's good, though broken, creation.
	The transhumanist presents our humanity and the world as obstacles to be overcome.
	Transhumanists believe they have the intelligence to remake humanity.
	They believe that there's an inherent contradiction.
	They believe that, but it's an inherent contradiction in their philosophy.
	It assumes that finite beings can, through their own creations, transcend their being finite and fragile.
	Now, they don't say that in this article, but I think that's one of the reasons why AI is so important to them.
	Because for the longest time, these people have seen AI as a new god.
	Kind of like what Mark Twain said.
	He said, you know, God created man in his own image, and then man returned the favor.
	Well, this is quite literally true with what these people think they're doing with artificial intelligence.
	Hugo de Garis, that I've interviewed many times, he thinks that they are creating some godlike intelligence, super being.
	And so that's how they get around this idea that they, as finite beings, can create this.
	But it is all that.
	They will live forever.
	They will transcend. They'll become godlike and all the rest of this stuff.
	It is a lie that goes back to the Garden of Eden.
	Artificial intelligence oligarchs are planning to team up with China so that they can break capitalism.
	You see how this all fits together?
	Go back and we take out that horrible capitalism.
	It's one of the reasons why George Gilder So these guys in Silicon Valley are neo-Marxists.
	Just like Karl Marx, who believed that the Industrial Revolution had taken care of all material shortages, and the only thing that we needed was politicians to allocate an infinite supply of material goods, which was all false, right? These people in Silicon Valley believe that with the Internet and with artificial intelligence and with genetics, robotics, AI, nanotech, all the rest of the stuff, they have infinite capacity.
	And all they have to do is figure out how to allocate this.
	But of course, they will be the ones who are allocating everything.
	And we already know how that looks.
	We own nothing.
	And the stakeholders, quote-unquote stakeholders, own everything.
	And they're just like the communists.
	Everybody is equally poor except for the leaders who own and control everything.
	Thinking people should ditch the left-right rhetoric...
	And they should look beyond their noses to see that these technocrats are playing both sides against the middle.
	And that's how you understand where Musk is.
	He's playing both sides against the middle.
	Well, he's now out there for free speech, and he's now suddenly talking like he's a conservative and talking about how, you know, these environmentalists want to reduce the population.
	Well, of course, as a transhumanist, he wants to increase the population.
	He wants to go to the stars, as Alex Jones always says, right?
	It was amazing to see Alex Jones and what a sycophantic worship he had always of Elon Musk.
	Because, again, both of them buy into this New Age religion and this New Age philosophy.
	We're going to go to the stars.
	We're going to take everything over. You know, the only thing that was a question was how much of this was genuine worship of Musk and how much of it was, well, this is a rich guy that's moving into Texas.
	I need to make friends with him.
	Until Musk gave him the big heave-ho out of Twitter and said, forget about it.
	But that's what these people are about.
	Musk is not on our side.
	He's playing both sides against the middle.
	That's why he can say very liberal things and other stuff.
	And then you see him go around and notice how he bows and scrapes to every leader everywhere to get what he wants.
	And what he wants is to be the world's richest man.
	That's why I'm a marked guy on Twitter.
	Thanks for listening.
	Thanks for listening.
	The Common Man .
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.

▲