Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 3, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:02:20

The David Knight Show - 11/3/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 3rd of November.
	Year of Our Lord, 2023.
	3.
	Well, today we're going to take a look at a lot of information that's been coming out now.
	It's really hard for them to tamp this down, even though they have complete censorship control and complete control of the narrative.
	The truth eventually comes up when a large percentage of the population knows somebody who has died.
	It's just like the Soviet Union.
	We've become more and more like the Soviet Union.
	And we'll talk about the developing budget battles, the conviction of Sam Bankman has now been fried, waiting to see how many years he gets in prison.
	But there's more to that than meets the eye, and we'll talk about that as well.
	well we'll be right back stay with us
	Well, I guess the thing that is...
	What was most surprising about Sam Bateman Fried...
	Was that he ever got this much money in the first place when you saw the guy talk?
	This is yet again proof of these people being made men.
	Take a look at the politicians.
	Take a look at the billionaires.
	You know, these are placeholders that are put there, and of course we know why he was there.
	A blithering idiot, patsy, criminally dishonest, of course, but also not too bright.
	If he was smart, he would have kept his mouth shut, but he was out there He's monologuing in public about everything.
	Took the stand and just, you know, it is...
	He thinks he's the smartest guy in the room, as most of these guys do.
	You look at him. You look at Zuckerberg.
	It's just amazing to see these guys.
	And, of course, he was chosen for money laundering.
	It wasn't his intelligence, but it was his dishonesty.
	And, unfortunately for him...
	There's no honor among thieves or politicians.
	I know I'm being redundant here.
	He was laundering money big time for all these politicians who then decided that they would use him as a poster child to attack cryptocurrencies.
	Because that's what this is ultimately about.
	They'd be happy to let him keep going on laundering money or even let him off, you know, to cover up what he did.
	But, yeah, they used him to launder the money for the politicians that now use this as a case to, for a stepping stone, using it as a stepping stone to their next agenda, which is to take out cryptocurrency so they can put in CBDC. Yeah, he's saying like a bird publicly long before any of this stuff, and it's just...
	You know, you have this kind of money these people have.
	It's really not an indication that you're smart, but it may be a clear indication that you're evil.
	As many people, the love of money is the root of all evil, and these guys love it to a great degree.
	So he's been found guilty on fraud and conspiracy charges.
	All of them, seven different charges.
	Also accused of violating campaign finance laws by using FTX customer funds to make billions in political donations through illegal straw donor schemes.
	And also bribing Chinese officials everywhere.
	He is...
	And so there's a second criminal trial that's going to begin against him in March.
	But since they found him guilty on all of these charges, he is looking at 110 years in prison, possibly, as a max sentence.
	And we'll wait and see whether or not that happens.
	But then when we look at the other...
	So much has come out about food additives.
	The FDA has had a slurry of PR stunts about food additives that have been around for years.
	Food additives that have been declared unsafe in many other countries.
	But now they're finally doing it with the FDA. Why now?
	Why now? And why are the mRNA, genetic code injections, why are they still safe?
	See, that's why they're doing this with these food additives.
	They greenlight every GMO, every genetically modified food without doing any testing.
	They're pushing bugs in your food.
	But now they're going to highlight this stuff, and there's going to be this big echo chamber in the mainstream media to convince people that the FDA is really doing its job.
	It's really looking out for food safety and the USDA as well.
	All this stuff. And so you have these highly publicized trivial moves for safety to con us as they green light every kind of poison injection and genetic modification and all the rest of this stuff.
	And so one of them is vegetable oil being put into drinks.
	BVO, a vegetable oil modified with bromine, authorized by the FDA for use in small amounts.
	In 1970, the FDA determined that BVO was no longer generally recognized as safe and began overseeing its use under our food additive regulations.
	And so 50 years they've been doing this, and now they've decided that they're going to virtue signal to everybody that we're going to just take it out completely.
	And they said the FDA said the ingredient bromine can irritate a person's skin and their mucous membranes.
	How does that compare to that vaccine they just rushed through?
	And keep telling people to take.
	This is trivial.
	Just beyond trivial.
	Long-term exposure can cause neurologic symptoms such as headache, memory loss, and impaired balance or coordination.
	Maybe they're confusing that with their mRNA injections, which, by the way, We keep finding out more stuff about them.
	We knew about the heart attacks and blood clots at the very beginning.
	And turbo cancer.
	Now the neurological conditions coming from the mRNA and everything.
	But, you know, don't drink that soda pop With the bromine vegetable oil in it.
	Whatever it is that they're processing this.
	It's derived from corn or soybean oil.
	But eat your bugs. Eat your GMO food.
	And take your FDA approved genetic code injection.
	And then the other thing thereafter is the trans fats.
	Which they've been talking about for quite some time.
	Partially hydrogenated oils.
	and they have linked them to heart disease and other health issues.
	You know, if they were smart, I guess they would kind of leave these things out there.
	And then as people are developing all these symptoms in much greater severity than these things are going to do, as people start to develop these same symptoms with their jabs, they could just blame it on this stuff.
	But it's important for them as we see them stand down, as we see the fact that it's been proven that the FDA, that Pfizer, adulterated this stuff.
	There's no question about it they even admit it, these vaccines.
	And so since it's adulterated, they need to pull it from the market, but they're not going to do that.
	So instead, what they do is they do some, you know, we're taking trans fats off and we're taking BVO out of the drinks and all the rest of it.
	Everybody report on that.
	Show that we're on the job. But we're going to leave all this other stuff.
	We don't care if they adulterated the vaccines.
	You take it. You should take it.
	You've got to take it right now.
	So, you know, nothing to worry about.
	Here's a... Maybe they should do a test and compare the damage.
	Since they're saying this could cause heart disease and other health issues, and maybe if they really want to see how dangerous it is, maybe they could inject...
	P.H.O., partially hydrogenated oil, into your bloodstream with a hypodermic needle like they do with the M.R.A. See what happens.
	I doubt that it would be as harmful as the Trump shots.
	But all this stuff is no longer safe.
	We're going to green light everything else, but we've got to move on the partially hydrogenated oils.
	And yet, as we look at this, there was a story out of Florida, a black bear on Halloween.
	Somebody left some food out.
	I didn't even know they had black bears in South Florida.
	I mean, we used to travel all the way from Tampa to come up to Gatlinburg to see the bears.
	I haven't seen a year and a half.
	I haven't seen any bears since I've been.
	I haven't seen bears for a long time.
	I've been coming here when we lived in North Carolina frequently.
	And I hear reports that they're around here somewhere occasionally see videos of them.
	But we used to come up here when I was a kid.
	They were all over the place because we were feeding them.
	I got an 8mm film of us feeding the bears through the cracks and cracking the window down a little bit and giving them crackers and things like that and having them slobber all over the window and everything, but they don't like that anymore.
	Everything is sealed up. But in Florida, they had a black bear, and some people were out trick-or-treating.
	Got a picture of the black bear.
	He found this candy on the table, and he's eating it all.
	Wrappers and everything.
	He's eating the wrappers, even.
	So here's the deal. You know, with all this partially hydrogenated oil and the titanium dioxide and the candy and the wrappers and everything else, Did he keel over and die like some people did with the Trump shots?
	No. Probably all this stuff they want to get you scared about.
	It's not good for you, that's for sure.
	I'm not saying it's good for you, but I'm just saying on a relative scale here.
	The stuff that they want to have you focused on, to see that they are doing their job, is not as harmful as the injections, even if you eat the wrappers and the boxes.
	It's probably not as harmful for this.
	So we had our animal test to verify that this stuff is safe.
	And then as we look at Beyond Meat, people are finally waking up to that as well, as if anybody ever really wanted it.
	Beyond Meat yesterday slashed its revenue forecast for the year.
	The second time in just a few months, they've kicked off $30 million, which is dropping it by about 10%.
	Maybe we should rename the company Beyond Hope, because they had a lot of hope that people were going to buy their meat facsimile stuff.
	And they said their global operations are also under review.
	They cut 19%.
	Of their global non-production workforce because nobody's eating their garbage.
	Even with today's dismal report, the company's shares unexpectedly jumped 9% in the early cash session.
	So, you know, your company is crashing and burning and nobody wants it.
	Except the stock market.
	This is why you need to stay away from the stock market.
	This thing is so detached from reality.
	And trying to figure out what was going on, on Zero Hedge, the writer said, well, maybe what this was was the cashing in of shorts that were there.
	So people had shorted the stock.
	So maybe they're just cashing that in.
	Well, there has to be a willing buyer to buy this stuff.
	And 10% of the people are buying it, even though...
	Nobody wants it. Maybe they figure it's going to be one of these mandated things with the climate, because we're all going to die if we don't get that.
	Oregon has just dropped all graduation standards in the name of equity.
	Yeah, idiocracy.
	But it is the deliberate dumbing down of people.
	And again, just like the FDA stuff, you really need to look at this removal of all graduation standards in Oregon as kind of a cover-up.
	They don't want any metrics.
	For the longest time when people said, well, you know, let's try to measure the schools and see if they're teaching Johnny to read and write, which, of course, was never the purpose of these schools in my lifetime.
	It wasn't to teach you to think critically.
	It wasn't even to give you facts.
	It was to indoctrinate you.
	And so they did not want the teachers were adamantly against that.
	That's not fair. What if I get a bunch of dumb kids and they do bad on their tests and, you know, then it's going to make me look bad.
	I don't want to be evaluated that way.
	And the schools said the same thing.
	You know, we have no control over these students, so don't evaluate us on this.
	We put this stuff out there. If they don't perform, they don't perform.
	It's not my fault. Not my job.
	So, yeah, they've been doing this for quite some time.
	And so, what they don't want you to see is just how bad the schools are, just how bad the students are, how illiterate, how innumerate they are.
	They can't do math, they can't read, think, any of this stuff.
	And they don't want you to see that.
	That's why they're removing the standards.
	It's not to help the students.
	It's not in the name of equity.
	It's a cover-up.
	Of what they're doing. And of course, you know, the schools are doing what they were designed to do, and that is to control people.
	And then we look at the markets and how they're being controlled.
	Amazon made a billion dollars through their secret price raising algorithm.
	That was kind of interesting. Nobody speculated as to why they called it Nessie.
	Is it something that's kind of hidden, like the Loch Ness Monster or something?
	You know, Nessie is what they used to call the Loch Ness Monster.
	So they had this program where, you know, if you own the market, it's very easy to manipulate it, right?
	And they have all the information that they, just like social media, just like Manipulating narratives about the vaccine and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's very easy to do that if you can see what everybody is saying, and you can, you know, put some stuff out there and test how they react to it.
	You've got feedback, and you've got complete omniscience about what everybody is doing there.
	Very easy to manipulate the market.
	Amazon used a series of illegal strategies to boost profits in its online retail empire, says the Federal Trade Commission, in a new court filing that came out yesterday.
	Amazon has a billion terms.
	Sorry, it does have a billion terms in its terms of service.
	It has a billion items.
	This is very small print on this article.
	And its online superstore, I created a, quote, secret algorithm, internally codenamed Project Nessie, to identify specific products for which it predicts other online stores will follow Amazon's price increases.
	Amazon used Project Nessie to extract more than a billion dollars from Americans' pocketbooks, Says the FTC, Federal Trade Commission.
	They paused the algorithm during their Prime Day sales event and during holiday shopping season when there was more media and customer attention to the online retailer.
	You know, a lot of people said, look at this.
	Here's a Prime Day special, right?
	And so here was a price like a couple months ago.
	And then just before the sale, they jacked the price up.
	And then for the Prime Day sale, they said, oh, now look, it's come back down to where it was a couple months ago, and it's like 30% off.
	Great, buy it now.
	After the Publix focus turned elsewhere...
	Amazon turned Project Nessie back on and ran it more widely to make up for the pause, says the lawsuit from the FTC. They called Nessie's algorithm a, quote, unfair method of competition because it manipulates the other online stores into raising prices, allowing Amazon to do the same.
	Amazon also requires sellers under the company's Prime feature to use its logistics and delivery system, even though many would prefer to use a cheaper service.
	Or one that would also service a customer from other platforms where they sell, said the FTC. And they have raised fees for sellers from 27% in 2014 to 39.5% in 2018.
	Because, you know, with great power comes great profitability.
	Wasn't that Spider-Man's uncle who said that or something?
	We'll be right back.
	The common man.
	music They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	All right, and MarkM228 says, the question is, who did SBF make angry?
	After all, he's a good Democrat who donated tens of millions to the party.
	Aren't those donations and the concomitant connections worth something?
	Yeah, I guess, you know, part of it is he was so incredibly stupid and flamboyant.
	That maybe they couldn't cover it up anymore.
	So they decided they'd use him as their patsy for cryptocurrency.
	I don't know. And again, their desire to attack cryptocurrency, their desire to put out central bank digital currency is just insatiable.
	And we're going to talk about that coming up.
	It is rolling out in a lot of different countries right now, simultaneously.
	And also, Sean E., thank you for the tip, and Angus Mustang, thank you both for the tip.
	That's on Rockfin?
	Okay. Yeah, we had a problem with Rumble yesterday.
	We lost... Contact with it.
	And so hopefully, that's happened a couple times the last couple weeks, but if something happens, we've got all of our shows at thedavidknightshow.com, all the places that you can find us.
	So I apologize that yesterday caused some people a lot of confusion.
	Dougalog also, thank you very much for the tip.
	He said, I ordered two DK t-shirts last night.
	Looking forward to brandishing them in public.
	Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	And thanks for reminding me as well.
	We've got a new design. And I'll show that again here.
	You can also see it on the website.
	And it is a...
	It is kind of a don't tread on me, but don't tread on mine.
	Kind of a different take on the snake.
	He's got a gun that he's got there.
	Revolver, and of course the MacGuffin shirt, which...
	Again, a conversation starter.
	Looks like a restaurant logo.
	I like it. I like the logo, but there we go.
	There we go. Hard to show this stuff.
	It's better to see it on the website.
	So thank you for reminding me, and thank you for buying the merchandise.
	Appreciate that, Doug. Again, for the tip.
	Let's take a look at, like I said before, you know, they can...
	When you look at how propaganda has gone, we've gone from print newspaper, which is very effective propaganda for the government for a long time, early 20th century.
	They could easily start wars with that.
	Then it got better with radio.
	Then it got even better with TV, you know, pictures and radio to push your agenda.
	But all those things were open-ended.
	And it was pretty hard for them to try to measure how well that was doing.
	And they were able to close the loop by creating social media.
	And I say they created social media and the internet because it was a JCR Licklider, who was a DARPA psychologist in the 1960s, proposed it.
	They just didn't have the technology for another 30 years.
	And once the technology started coming online, once the switching speed got there, you had the CIA was so excited about it, they went public with a venture capital firm so they could pour money into it.
	And you had one venture capital firm after the other.
	You look at the board of directors.
	It's all these people from CIA, NSA, the intelligence community.
	How do you think that these people were able to grow these companies and provide everything to you for free for the longest period of time?
	Well, you know, if you've got massive amounts of free money, that points in one direction, doesn't it?
	Washington, D.C., And so they got everybody to come in to their walled garden and then they've closed the walls.
	But they're able now to push out their propaganda and then see if people are buying it and do it very quickly.
	And then adjust their narrative and their propaganda.
	And to coordinate it with traditional media.
	But the problem is, is that, you know, when your friends and family are dropping dead next to you, sometimes you don't believe those lies.
	Even as pervasive as that technocracy has become.
	So there's a Rasmussen poll found that 24% of the people they polled, and this is a typical poll that do about 1,000 adults across the country.
	This is 1,110 adults, typically about 1,000 people.
	Rasmussen poll found that 24% knew somebody who was killed by the Jabs.
	They also said that 42% would join a lawsuit against Big Pharma if they weren't protected from lawsuit by the PREP Act.
	That's why I wanted to point out there's a couple of ways that you can penetrate that PREP Act protection.
	It was fraudulent.
	And the people with the former Feds group, I had them on and we talked about that.
	And that has been upheld.
	It's past the first hurdle or so with the judge.
	There's also adulteration that was knowingly put in there.
	And many other things.
	That's very easy to prove.
	And there are lawyers standing by.
	Imagine if we get a gigantic class action lawsuit going against the federal government, against Pfizer and the rest of them.
	Survey of over a thousand adults conducted late October found also that 47% of respondents know somebody who personally died from COVID-19 virus.
	24% said they died, knew somebody who died from side effects of the vaccine.
	Well, it was attributed to the virus.
	And I'm going to tell you, a lot of people say, no, no, no, it was something special and something unique.
	Well, there's a very long interview that just recently surfaced with somebody who was, for decades, worked for the CDC. Has about 150 published papers and a lot of experience.
	And he was talking to people inside the CDC. And a lot of these CDC employees look at this the same way I do.
	They don't believe it was anything special.
	They believe that what was special about all this stuff.
	It was the PCR tests, the isolation of people in hospitals, the unsafe, ineffective, and expensive treatments that were part of the protocol of death that was produced by Trump and directed by Fauci, that whole dystopian movie.
	So, again, you know, we'll get to that in a moment.
	Whether or not it was actually a virus that was unique, or whether or not it was the ventilators, remdesivir, the do not resuscitate orders, the isolation, and, you know, anybody with a respiratory disease, we're going to kill them with a ventilator.
	Curiously, the survey found almost no difference between Republicans and Democrats.
	Where they found a difference was between people who work for the government and who didn't.
	Isn't that interesting? And I don't know what to make about that.
	Government employees are twice as likely to know somebody who had died from this as private sector workers.
	Perhaps it was because this might have included government employees who were looking at the situation closely when the private sector wasn't.
	Anyway, in this article, kudos to LifeSiteNews.com.
	I never see this in conservative or alternative media.
	They never mention Trump's name.
	And they did say this was done under former President Donald Trump's Operation Warp Speed Initiative.
	That's right. Finally, he gets some credit as a producer.
	It's just like the movies.
	The producer provides the money.
	And it keeps this whole thing going.
	It's actually the director, like Fauci, or the movie director, We're good to go.
	And they're looking for a movie.
	And if you take it, people typically look at who the movie star is.
	Well, I like that movie that starred so-and-so.
	Wow, you got another movie with that actor or actress.
	Take a look at the director.
	If you liked that director's movie, and here's another, you liked both of these movies by this director, you're probably going to like the other stuff that he did as well.
	That's a reliable thing.
	And this is all directed by Fauci and the CIA. You like the movies that they give us?
	I sure don't.
	I don't like the CIA movies.
	They're really horrible.
	Coups, war, democide, genocide.
	That's the kind of stuff that the CIA produces.
	And they've got Fauci directing it this time around.
	Morning Consult's U.S. vaccine tracker, which stopped updating in January, consistently found those unwilling to take the shot, hovering in the 20% range since March of 2021.
	In May, however, looking at Pew Research, they saw 58%.
	The risks of side effects are medium or high, although 62% said they also thought that the benefits outweighed the risk.
	They still believe, so this is why it's important for them to push this narrative that this is some unique, novel, never-before-seen virus that was weaponized by the Chinese against us.
	That's how you get people to continue to inject this Trump-Fauci poison.
	That's the key. So, you know, whether or not this is anything more than a strain of flu, you know, safe, effective, and cheap treatment was withheld or prohibited while they pushed out dangerous, ineffective, and very, very, very expensive treatments that were required.
	Yeah. Pay no attention to any of that.
	I mean, again, sometimes people are just too close to see what's...
	Just pull back a little bit.
	Look at the history of these people.
	Look at, you know, what they're doing here.
	You got a couple of drugs that have been used for 50, 60 years.
	And all you're doing is saying, well, this is something that we've got a very long history of.
	Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't.
	No, you can't use that.
	You got to use my new, improved, untested stuff here.
	It's like, wait a minute. You got an agenda here?
	Yeah, because your stuff is real expensive and this other stuff is very, very cheap.
	And why are you prohibiting it? Steve Kerr said vaccine deaths are at least comparable to COVID deaths.
	No, there's excess deaths.
	And, you know, again, this is just part of what he has to say.
	He understands. But this quote that they pulled out is a little bit misleading, even for what he said in his publication.
	Now, since third quarter of 2021, that's when they saw the excess deaths go through the roof.
	Insurance companies and others admitted it.
	Then they created fantastic lies about it.
	Well, I know these are not COVID deaths that are skyrocketing.
	But I know that it must be COVID deaths.
	They all got it wrong. And so I'm going to ignore what they said about that, but I'm going to believe that excess deaths are skyrocketing, but I'm going to say, said the CEO of One America, the insurance company, but I'm going to say the increase in deaths that we haven't seen, you know, once every couple of hundred years you would see something like this.
	This is more than three standard deviations away from the mean.
	But I'm going to say it was all due to COVID. And since we know Because we've been told by Fauci and others that you're not going to die if you get the vaccine.
	This has to be unvaccinated people who are dying.
	Unvaccinated people dying from COVID. And so we're going to charge the unvaccinated people more for their insurance.
	That's what he said. COVID deaths were inflated by at least two times, he said, because the hospitals got paid when they reported a COVID death.
	Because the government was trying to encourage hospitals to kill people.
	So they labeled everything they could as a COVID death to maximize revenue.
	And they said to the relatives, well, this is a COVID death.
	If you agree to that, we will give you money for burial.
	So, incentivize killing them with the ventilators.
	And that's the Trump contribution there.
	The very sad reality is much worse than Rasmussen's poll indicates, said Kirsch, because around half of the respondents couldn't see a vaccine injury, even if it hit them in their own family, like it did the congressman, Sean Caston.
	whose 17-year-old daughter Gwen tragically died unexpectedly in a manner 100% consistent with a vaccine death.
	And, of course, when we're looking at all of this, their official definition of somebody who's vaccinated is two weeks after you've gotten your second injection.
	So that's not what these people were saying.
	These people said, I know somebody, and I think that they died from that.
	Well, it depends on how much they've been gaslighted.
	He says he thinks this is going to continue.
	Until at least 15% of Congress becomes visibly vaccine injured, or at least 60% of Americans have been injured by the COVID vaccine.
	I don't think that's, even if you hit those numbers, I don't think that it's going to change.
	I think the gaslighting is going to continue.
	Because this is part of their long-term depopulation agenda.
	There's a lot of money and political power involved in this.
	And on the behalf of the people, I'm just really surprised that 24% of the people can see this.
	Because for the most part, It is a slow-acting poison.
	And there's a lot of propaganda with that.
	It's difficult for people to see it.
	And when we go back and we look at the exponential rise in autism and all these other childhood diseases, that coincides very closely with To the exponential rise in the number of shots given to people at an earlier and earlier age to children.
	They tell us, oh no, there's no connection there.
	Oh, okay, well, I thought it might be something, but since you say so, I guess there's no connection there.
	That's the way this is going to play out.
	And it really doesn't matter. I mean, we can see this data in the European database.
	We can see it in different countries.
	We've got multiple databases here.
	As I point out, it's not just the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System VAERS here that the CDC runs.
	The military's got their own, and they got caught.
	And when they got caught and people said, look at how you've got all these different conditions have exploded.
	Compared to the previous five years, they say, oh, well, the previous five years are all wrong.
	This is right, but the previous five years are all wrong.
	They just go back and erase the past.
	Keep going with this.
	It's known. So 36,000 deaths reported in the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, VAERS. That is unprecedented.
	And, of course, that number is still underreported.
	And because they, not just by the mainstream media who chooses not to talk about it, But it's underreported because they're leaning on people very heavily to not report this.
	Just like they lean on you to not use any other alternative treatment.
	So the Pentagon, they had their defense medical epidemiology database, which, again, this is not self-reported.
	This is something that they closely monitor because they're concerned about the threat of biological and chemical warfare.
	So this is part of their readiness stuff.
	And if they got it wrong for five years, who got fired?
	What changed? Well, nothing.
	It's just lies. They saw hypertension go up by 2,100%.
	1,000% increase in neurological disorders.
	680% increase in multiple sclerosis.
	Guillain-Barre syndrome, 551% increase.
	Breast cancer, 487% increase.
	Female infertility, 472%.
	So this has all been known for a long time.
	And they continue to run with this.
	Because they use this all as lab rats.
	That's why I played that clip of Benjamin Netanyahu reporting back to his Hydra masters at Davos.
	Yes, I'm doing a very good job of using my people as lab rats.
	I called Pfizer 21 times a day.
	We get them going.
	I've called them 21 times and tell them how I'm doing everything for them.
	We will give them all the data and all my people.
	The protector of Israel.
	The injector of Israel.
	These people who will poison you, don't ever follow any of them, and that means everybody in our federal government.
	Don't follow any of them into any war.
	They hate you. They want to kill you.
	They did their best to poison you, to coerce you to take a poison.
	They hate us.
	They're murderers.
	Don't follow them into a war.
	And so when you look at part of this lab rat stuff, it's the nanotech is the key thing.
	It's really at the center of all this.
	We don't really know. It is difficult to see that.
	We can... We can try to observe effects from this with epidemiology, but this expose article says, at the heart, there's a shadowy realm of nanotech, and an alliance has emerged, and at the heart of this union, no pun intended, is the insidious presence of lipid nanoparticles, tiny carriers designed to transport genetic material deep into our cells.
	Think about that. Genetic modification, as well as nanotech in there.
	You know, we talk about the threats from the technocracy.
	The acronym is GRAIN. Genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, and nanotech.
	And that vaccine contained genetics and nanotech.
	And it's very hard for us to really understand what is in those shots of what they're doing, the nanotech that is there.
	So that's the key, is the fact that we can look at the massive increase, you know, ten times in one year.
	The number of these things go up by, you know, five to ten.
	All those different diseases I list out went up five to ten times more than they had the previous five years average.
	Five to ten times.
	And, of course, they want to pretend that there's absolutely nothing going on with all of that.
	Nothing to see there. And so...
	At the center of all this, and here's something else for your lawsuits, besides the other stuff, my son says, maybe government employees are more likely to know someone who died from the vaccine because they're more likely to be forced to take it.
	That's true. That's true.
	Yeah, all the federal employees were forced to take it.
	That's probably exactly what was happening.
	Damage says, I work for the government.
	I was mandated... I and others lawyered up and refused and we held out and we won.
	And I've seen that over and over again in a lot of different places.
	Good for you. Good for you.
	Good for you fighting it. And now for the people who are bullied into this, it's time for them to lawyer up and win too.
	And, you know, you kept your job.
	These people need to get even and bring some justice for everybody, the people who are injured with it.
	I agree. I think that's right.
	As my son said, I think it's because the widespread mandates for the government employees, that's why they were twice as likely to see it.
	John Henry, 3777, I saw a COVID vax commercial and they listed heart inflammation as a side effect.
	It truly is amazing, isn't it?
	When you look at these pharmaceutical commercials that they put out there.
	My wife and I were in the car the other day, and they were advertising some drug.
	We're listening to a Pandora.
	I don't pay for it, so they put ads in it.
	The same thing we try to do with a podcast.
	Somebody doesn't want to pay to subscribe, we put the ads in there and try to help pay for it.
	So they service ads, and there was an ad in there for some pharmaceutical product.
	And it was one horrific side effect after the other.
	And of course, usually, one of the side effects is exactly what you're taking it for, right?
	You're taking it, the cure condition A, and usually one of the side effects is a greater version of condition A. But then they add all kinds of horrific side effects in it.
	And they do that when you watch Fox News or CNN. They do that as some kid is running in slow motion through a field of high grass or something.
	The cognitive dissonance of that stuff is just amazing.
	And yet, it shows you the power of advertising.
	It shows you the power that Edward Bernays always knew.
	To lie people into war.
	And then he went after getting people involved in World War I for Woodrow Wilson.
	He goes to Madison Avenue to use his tactics on you.
	But here's the bait and switch of Pfizer.
	Here's another thing for you to sue them over if you got injured.
	So the bait is, and this is from Rebecca Barnett, the bait is the Pfizer's vaccine.
	It was manufactured by quote-unquote process one.
	It involved high-quality in vitro transcription of synthetic DNA to make the spike-producing mRNA.
	Process 1 doses were administered to almost all the participants in Pfizer's randomized controlled trial, the one they always like to talk about.
	And, of course, that in and of itself is, again, a big red flag.
	Because typically they would do it for 10 years.
	I've played the clip over and over again.
	If you listen to the show, you're familiar with it.
	The guy asks in October of 2019, just before this stuff rolled out, they had a Milken Institute thing, and the guy asked Fauci, yeah, it takes 10 years for us to approve these drugs.
	How do we get over that? And Fauci says, we do it with disruption from the inside, and we do it iteratively.
	And so, you know, the plan was to get rid of this long testing.
	And you do it over 10 years so that you can see these types of things with a small group of people who are volunteers.
	But no, they use this all as lab rats.
	And so, not only were the trials absurdly abbreviated and truncated, but they also switched the content after the trial.
	So they do their trial with process one.
	And then, to manufacture it, they changed to Process 2.
	That's what they call it in their papers.
	To mass manufacture billions of vaccines for the worldwide rollout, Process 2 involved growing DNA plasmids, not in a sterile environment and glass in vitro, but they did it.
	They grew these DNA plasmids in E. coli bacteria.
	From which the vaccine mRNA has been produced.
	Only 252 of the randomized controlled trial participants received this version of the vaccine before it was rolled out.
	And so, Rebecca Barnett says, researching this article, I came across a stunning statement from Vaccine and Public Health Policy Czar Dr.
	Paul Offit. This guy has been one of the biggest cheerleaders for years.
	You know, talked about his lies and his prevarications for a pharmaceutical company and his excuses for vaccines and his misinformation and misdirection about what's going on with autism and all the rest of these, the massive schedule of vaccines.
	You know, it's not even just, you know, one condition.
	It's a lot of different conditions.
	And it has to do with the frequency and the concentration of these vaccines in children at an early age.
	But Paul Offit, even Paul Offit, who said, yeah, I'm really not in favor of this warp speed thing because if this thing blows up publicly, as it's now doing, he says it's really going to damage the vaccine industry.
	He didn't care that people are going to get injured.
	He's just looking after the industry.
	Same way that Rand Paul said that.
	Dr. Fauci. Your vaccine is causing people to be vaccine hesitant.
	Well, Rand, you're a doctor.
	You ought to know that people should be hesitant to get vaccines even before this nonsense was rolled out.
	Anyway, Dr.
	Offit wrote a book about the Cutter incident.
	The Cutter polio vaccine inadvertently gave thousands of children polio, paralyzed hundreds, and killed 10 kids.
	Now, there's a lot of people who believe that's the case with the polio thing in general.
	You know, when Gates goes down with this polio vaccine, all of a sudden you get these people who have polio-like symptoms.
	But it's not polio because it couldn't be polio because we vaccinated them against polio.
	That kind of circular logic.
	But in this particular one, it was inescapable, what they were doing.
	Isn't it interesting that they always use polio to sell vaccines?
	When we look at thousands of kids getting polio, hundreds of them paralyzed, a dozen of them dying, and we've got other things that were harder to prove, but they laughed about it.
	SV40, Simeon virus 40.
	So that's going to give people cancer.
	We'll have to see what happens. Because not everybody is, some people are going to have very, very, very strong reactions to the lipid nanoparticles.
	But other people aren't.
	And some people, as we talk about alternative treatments, you know, some people will respond to ivermectin.
	Even the people who wrote books about it said, generally it works, but it may not work for everybody.
	So, you know, try hydroxychloroquine as well.
	We've got several different things that we can try here.
	Not every, people have a great, there's a great deal of individual variation in how people respond to these different things.
	And so, you know, when they knew about the SV40, the people were putting it together, and they actually got them on tape, laughing and talking about it.
	Oh, well, you know, what do we do with all these vaccines?
	Send them to Russia, and let's see what happens to their cancer rate.
	So they'd already injected a lot of people.
	And then we got SV40 back again, back again in these injections.
	How did that happen? We knew 60, 70 years ago that this was...
	Not something... They already had this in the vaccines.
	Why did they? Because the Trump shots were designed to kill us.
	They put everything they could in there.
	Yeah, let's throw in some genetic modification.
	Let's throw in some nanotech.
	Let's throw in some monkey cancer virus, SV40 and all the rest.
	Can you think of anything else that we can put in there?
	I mean, it was a literal witch's brew.
	You know, Eye of Newt.
	We got that in there too, baby.
	Who knows? Wing of Bat.
	The problem, said Dr.
	Offit, was not that the cutter lab did anything wrong.
	He said it was that in adapting it to a manufacturing process for a mass rollout of the vaccine, they didn't realize that the product would be marginally different and therefore dangerous.
	Marginally different and therefore dangerous.
	He said it shouldn't have been called the cutter incident.
	It should have been called the scale-up incident.
	Because that's really what the problem was.
	We had trouble scaling up that vaccine.
	And so when you look at this, you know, they run severely abbreviated tests for the mRNA with Pfizer, and then they change the process for their scale-up thing.
	And I'll just briefly say, you know, they have these three different things.
	First, they do animal testing.
	Then they have phase one, phase two, phase three.
	Phase one, you have a very, very small number of people, and you inject them, and you see, did they survive?
	Yes. Okay, then...
	Phase 2 and Phase 3.
	If it is a therapeutic that is meant to cure a disease or to treat a disease or something like that, to cure a disease, then what you do is you start with people who have that disease and you increase that to some volunteers who have that disease and you do a double-blind study to see if it helps them with that condition.
	And then if that works, then you repeat with a bigger group.
	That's phase three. For a vaccine, they say, well, it is not ethical to expose anybody to a disease.
	So we'll never do that.
	You had people who were raising their hands and volunteering and say, I'll be a volunteer to see if these COVID vaccines work.
	I'll take the COVID vaccine and you can expose me to COVID. No, no, no, no, no, no.
	We're not going to do that. Well, they say they don't do that because they say it would be unethical.
	I think that they don't do that because it would show their vaccines don't work.
	Especially when people are volunteering.
	I mean, we've got something that is an unprecedented...
	We've never reacted to any disease like we did.
	Everything is shut down.
	You know, we're going to starve ourselves to death.
	I'll volunteer. No, no, no, don't, don't, don't have them volunteer.
	That secret will go out, you know.
	And so that's the way they roll these things out.
	What they do is they don't expose people.
	They have a group, and they have one group that, again, double-blind study.
	One group gets a placebo. The other group gets the vaccine.
	They let them mix around in the general population for a number of years, and they compare to see how many, because, you know, it's like I'm just assuming that they were exposed to it because they're milling around for a number of years.
	I'm assuming that they were exposed to it, that both groups were exposed to this, And then they do it again with a larger group in phase 3.
	But they skipped all of that.
	Now we see neurological complications with the mRNA vaxxed.
	It's not just the clots.
	It's not just the heart attacks.
	It's not just the anaphylactic shock from the pegylated stuff, the lipid nanoparticles and things.
	And, of course, it's difficult to see the turbo cancer that's happening.
	But now we can see neurological complications.
	A new study showing this, that almost one out of three people who got the shots had some kind of neurological reaction.
	They had tremors, insomnia, muscle spasms, other things.
	Researchers said neurological complications have soared amongst the vaccinated.
	During an Italian population-based study, scientists aimed to evaluate the neurological complications after the first and or second dose of COVID-19 vaccines and factors potentially associated with these adverse effects.
	You see, this is not the kind of research that's going to be done in the United States because the FDA wants to cover for Pfizer and Moderna.
	We created this stuff, we funded it, we covered for it, and we're not going to do any research.
	If any research comes out, it's going to be from a foreign country that's going to do this.
	And so what they found in this Italian study, a staggering 31% of vaccinated individuals were suffering from neurological complaints.
	And they found that each of the different shots had different profiles of complications, they found in the study.
	They found that 40% of those who took the Moderna jabs reported suffering from sleepiness, with a condition usually lasting for a week.
	Now, I thought this was very interesting.
	Because, and I've talked about this many times, I used it as an example of why it's difficult to correlate these adverse effects to a particular vaccine.
	Pandemics, which they came out with, they rushed a so-called vaccine for the swine flu in 2009.
	Pandemics was put together, by the way, by Monsef Slaoui and Fauci.
	Slaoui and Fauci.
	They teamed up for this back in 2009, and then, of course, Fauci brings Slowy back.
	He's moved from, I think it was GSK that he was with, and he's moved now to, at that point in time, to Moderna.
	So he brings him in to be the chief of Operation Warp Speed.
	But when they put out Pandemrix, again, it wasn't the U.S. that found this.
	It was researchers in Scandinavian countries, and they saw that children who have a faster metabolism rate were developing narcolepsy and catalepsy.
	And that's what they're seeing with this Moderna jab.
	Listen to this. That's the most prominent, I think, 40%.
	In the Italian study, we're getting narcolepsy and having difficulty sleeping.
	One hypothesis of the mechanism is that the shots could make the selective immune-mediated destruction of orexin-producing neurons, which is T-cell-mediated neuronal damage, thus triggering narcolepsy.
	So the rest of that stuff, I don't even know what they're talking about.
	But they're saying it triggers narcolepsy, right?
	Interesting connection. That's what's interesting.
	They don't really know the mechanism.
	They're guessing at the mechanism. A lot of highly technical, you know, as far as I'm concerned, biological gibberish.
	But we can see that it triggers narcolepsy.
	That's the important thing coming out of this.
	Studies' authors are now urgently calling for future investigations into the possible neurological damage caused by the shots.
	It took a year for this to show up in children when they did it with pandemics.
	16% of those taking the Moderna shot suffered vertigo.
	15% reported numbness.
	With Pfizer, it was a different profile.
	With Pfizer, they found that people reported suffering from cognitive fog, with a condition usually reversing in a week.
	I can tell you that that's a very bad sign for people in terms of long-term stuff.
	It's okay, I got better. No, I've actually seen this in our family.
	Vaccine injured. Immediately having symptoms that then come back a few years later as rheumatoid arthritis.
	Same symptoms. And so that's a very concerning thing.
	So what can you do if you've been bullied into this besides suing them?
	Which you really should do.
	Everybody should sue that got shot.
	Sue the pants off of it.
	Sue everybody that you can.
	Lawyers are standing by.
	They really are. And I had somebody who asked me a question about it.
	I've got to go back and try to find the article...
	Where they're talking about a couple of different things of fraud, and they said, and I referenced it at the time, and I said, you know, there's a link in the article.
	I think it was one of the Steve Kirsch's articles.
	He said, here's a link. A lot of lawyers are ready to sue in various jurisdictions.
	But there are some things that you can do to try to mitigate this.
	And this is from Activist Post.
	One of the things they said was, you know, a lot of people got placebos.
	And by that, I think what they mean is how this dosage varied quite a bit by lot.
	And I think that was deliberate.
	And I've said in the past, it went from, the active ingredient went from 3 to 100 in terms of its constant.
	And I think it was micrograms.
	I've tried to go back and find that.
	I remember the fact that it went from 3 to 100, regardless of what the unit was.
	It's a 33-fold difference in dosage.
	Now, I don't think you'd do that in manufacturing.
	I don't think they're that sloppy in manufacturing.
	I think that was deliberate, because part of a test is to determine the safety of the dosage and the effectiveness of it.
	If you want to know safety and efficacy, that's totally dependent on the dose.
	Anything can be turned into a poison.
	And anything, if you give a small enough dose of it, it's not going to be effective.
	And then we found out, as Naomi Wolf looked at the data, that the ones who got the 100 micrograms, that's where all the deaths and injuries were occurring.
	And very consistent with that.
	And then the other ones, as they look at it, well, about a third of them got placebos maybe.
	No, I think they just got the low dosage that's there.
	And they didn't have any side effects.
	However, Dr.
	Peter McCullough, cardiologist, said he thought that people who had no pain at the beginning, once they got the COVID shots and had no symptoms, might be okay.
	However, Jonathan Otto's October 25th docuseries, Restoring Heart Health, Overcoming the Effects of Myocarditis and the Deadly Jab.
	Dr. McCullough said that he was shocked to discover that the hearts of everyone who got the COVID shots were damaged.
	He said, so no wonder people are developing effort intolerance and various cardiovascular syndromes, sudden cardiac death even in the absence of myocarditis.
	Dr. William Makis, who I've interviewed out of Canada, explained that sometimes the first symptom of subclinical myocarditis is sudden death.
	Dr. Pierre Corey said, And it's a book, Warren Ivermectin.
	Again, as I pointed out before, not everything works for everybody.
	He says it's important to have several options because no treatment is 100% effective for everybody.
	Even ivermectin, he said, was effective for only about 74% of the people.
	Now, I mentioned all of this.
	This is on Activist Post, but you can find this information in other places.
	So if you got COVID shots, what do you do now?
	Well, Dr. Makis, and he's got a substack.
	He says four different conditions have predominated with this.
	And he mentions that some things that you can do to try to mitigate those adverse effects.
	For example, cardiac arrest.
	He suggests taurine.
	Massive blood clots that the body can't break down.
	That's seen in about 10% of people.
	Cardiac arrests in 60% of the cases of death that they're looking at.
	He says that natto is good for that.
	Neurological injuries, NAC, turbo cancers, vitamin D. And pointing out, yet again, when you look at vitamin D3 and you take it with vitamin K, you need to get those two together.
	But that helps your body to assimilate.
	It keeps it from making deposits in your arteries itself.
	So you need to have that combination of D3 and K2. But 92% of the U.S. population has a deficiency of vitamin D. And I remember the very beginning of this because Alex sold a vitamin D. I looked to say, well, you know, what can I tell people about this?
	I found people who had been, you know, former, one of them was former, the other one was current, with the FDA and with the CDC. And both of them said, vitamin D is not going to cure any of this stuff, but it will help you to, it'll mitigate the severity of it, And it may help your immune system so that you don't have any symptoms with it.
	And so that was very clear.
	And I was on safe ground with that because that was coming from the so-called science experts.
	You know, they're the ones who are allowed to speak on this stuff and have an opinion.
	The rest of us need to keep quiet and not say anything.
	But again, there are some things that you can do.
	If you have been coerced into getting this.
	Rick Sanchez, New Mexico.
	Thank you very much for the tip. He says, keep in mind, developing a deadly respiratory virus that spreads human to human may be very difficult, if not impossible.
	However, a vaccine can be used to make the next virus worse.
	Yeah, that's right. Soundwave and Courtney says, my wife was forced to take one dose of Johnson& Johnson.
	She has prior neurological disorder.
	Lately, her side effects are getting worse.
	It's starting to freak me out.
	Well, again, you know, take a look at some of these supplements, and, you know, that's all I can tell you.
	I'm not a doctor, but it is just horrific, and you can...
	You can see this stuff happening if you know what these people have been doing for the last 20 years.
	You know they've been preparing and practicing this stuff.
	Tyrannosaurus Radio says, you're missing the point here, David.
	COVID was a precursor for the Mark of the Beast.
	No, I've talked about that. I haven't talked about it for a while.
	We talked about it when the mandates were out there.
	That just like the lockdowns were a precursor in training for universal basic income, this was a precursor in training for Mark of the Beast.
	You know, I played the other day, Curtis Chang, and he was with Robert Jeffress.
	And Curtis Chang was given a great deal of money by the Trump administration.
	Remember, they put out $250 million.
	They'd never had an advertising campaign that big, the Ad Council.
	And these are the people who do, you know, a mind is a terrible thing to waste, don't do drugs, and only you can prevent forest fires, and all of these things that we just saw these ads over and over again, they're burned into our memory.
	But they've never had that kind of money for a campaign like they did for COVID. And they would give it to people like Curtis Chain, Who said, well, you know, I've got a theological degree from Duke University, and so she would listen to me, and oh, by the way, here's a pastor of a megachurch, and we're telling you that this is not the mark of the beast, and this is safe, and it's a miracle, and it's this and that.
	They had a lot of people doing that, especially at, you know, universities and things.
	You had Al Mohler at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, you know, again, a university, he's going to buy into all this stuff.
	And repeating the talking points from Yale.
	But the Mark of the Beast thing, they pushed back hard on that.
	I said, you understand that this is exactly like it in principle.
	And they're training you for it, and that is the central thing.
	You know, they're still looking at the idea, and we'll talk about that coming up later today.
	Anyway, he says, God was preparing us using the pressure of a global effort to force submission, just as it will be very soon again.
	I agree. I think that's the silver lining in a lot of this stuff.
	A lot of people who, you know, when you look at Romans 13, well, you just do whatever the government tells you to do.
	Todd Friel's saying if they tell you to put pinwheels on your head, you put pinwheels on your head.
	It doesn't matter how dangerous the government, you obey the government in everything.
	Well, that's not true. That's not true.
	The government is a bad interpretation of Romans 13.
	I'm not going to go into why again.
	Talked about that in the past.
	But these people were telling you that all along.
	I said, you watch.
	When push comes to shove, they say, you do anything the government says except when it starts infringing on your religious liberties.
	I said, no, they'll cave on that too.
	And they did. They all shut down the churches.
	And now, a lot of them have learned the lesson.
	And as you pointed out, Tyrannosaurus Radio, they've learned that lesson.
	And fool me once, you're not going to fool me a second time with that.
	And a lot of people also saw what was going on in their students' classroom and on and on.
	And people have seen this and have been forewarned.
	And there's a lot of people now who have discernment about this.
	In the same way, you know, because we lived through it.
	I had seen the stuff about the germ games and I had seen the stuff about the annual flu shots and everything.
	So it was easy for me to see it, but it's going to be easy for everybody Who came through this thing and refused to do it and now look at what happened to the people who accepted the coercion.
	It's going to be easier for them to see it.
	So yes, God is always at work in mysterious ways.
	He plants his feet upon the storm and he rides upon the waves, as the poem goes.
	VAERS is not the only data source, as I pointed out.
	We see this everywhere. And so we're going to take a quick break.
	Before we do, one more comment here.
	DG8, the jab, the mask, the lockdowns, and the mandates were all a compliance test.
	Unfortunately, they were extremely pleased.
	Yes. And there are a lot of, on the flip side, there's a lot of people who failed that test.
	And a lot of people who are happy to go along and follow these mass murderers into a world war.
	That's the other side of this.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	The End Making sense.
	Common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Sometimes your day needs a little smoothing.
	Check out the Jazz Channel at APSRadio.com and the APS Radio app and leave the stress behind.
	Alright, before I move on to another topic, there is still more that I want to say about the pharmaceutical stuff.
	And as we're talking about, did people learn about the compliance?
	There's some hopeful signs of this and maybe some lessons for us coming out of Shanghai.
	But I didn't get to this yesterday.
	I do want to mention this.
	U.S. infant mortality rate rose 3% last year.
	The largest increase in two decades.
	As a matter of fact, for two decades, we've had a decline.
	And we had a 3% increase from 2021 to 2021.
	I wonder what could be behind that.
	What was it that happened in 2021?
	Not the pandemic. So, again, why is that happening now?
	And if we go back...
	Hang on a second. I lost my place here.
	If we...
	Yeah, here we are.
	This is what is at the center of it, of course.
	We can all see that this is designed to kill.
	A global rollout that was designed to kill.
	It is democide.
	It is depopulation. And as LifeSite News points out, they said, well, we got a Masonic leader who was at a Vatican environmental conference to promote depopulation in world government.
	Well, there's just so many things there.
	What do we focus on? Well, they focus a great deal on the fact that he was a Mason and, you know, antithetical to Catholic beliefs.
	But again, why is there a Vatican Environmental Conference in the first place?
	What business is it of him?
	And why do they have these people that are pushing depopulation always around the Pope?
	And why is he pushing the vaccine so much?
	If you go back... To his encyclical that he did in 2014-2015, where he does this big encyclical about the environment.
	And at that point in time, he brought in, as an advisor, John Schellenhuber, who was with the Potsdam Movement, and he's always been a rabid depopulationist.
	And he brought him in as his chief advisor for this environmental stuff.
	The climate MacGuffin is about killing people.
	It always has been.
	But they look at this, and what is more interesting, I think, to most of us than the fact that this guy is a mason is his connections to the Club of Rome.
	And you've heard people talk about that.
	It's one of the earlier institutions, globalist institutions, and one of the ones that's always pushed massive depopulation.
	He's saying this is the sixth forum that the Pope has run on this.
	And again, LifeSite News is a Catholic site, so they're paying very close attention to what the Pope does.
	The latest affair called Doubling the Commitment, It was a reference to Pope Francis' new exhortation, where he warned that the end is near, both for our suffering planet and, by extension, for us.
	Well, he's getting pretty old.
	The end of the world is right around the corner, and he will answer for this stuff.
	But he's saying, within 30 years, the world will be unlivable.
	As LifeSite News says, this Apocalypse Now message is, by now...
	Drearily familiar, yet another false prophecy, but I was still surprised by the Messianic zeal in which it's being proposed by leaders within the Catholic Church, says this Catholic writer.
	Take Bishop Domenico Pompili, who hosted the event.
	He opened the forum by emphasizing that simply transitioning to policies that protect the planet is not enough.
	He said, what we need is an ecological conversion.
	See, it is religious. This is a religion.
	And when they're selling this stuff, these carbon credits that they have out there, it's exactly like it's an indulgence, right?
	It's an indulgence.
	If I'm going to pollute, I need to pay Al Gore or Bill Gates or somebody for the sin of polluting.
	Like, well, that makes anything better.
	Who are they? Are they God to forgive me?
	You know, just like you had the medieval indulgences.
	Well, if you sin, you got to pay the Pope.
	It's like, well, if I sin, I sin against God, not against the Pope.
	But anyway, you know, but we have the same kind of indulgence for these billionaires.
	You know, how does paying you make this any better?
	And he also mentioned that they're trying to create a planetary utopia.
	Utopia was his, you know, conversion and utopia were this bishop's terms.
	And they do want to have a planetary court, a global constitution, and a world parliament, and all the rest of the stuff as part of their worldview.
	And back when this first came out, again, in 2014 or 15, when I was looking at the background of John Schellenhofer, the chief scientific advisor for the Pope, He's tied strongly to Prince Charles, or I guess we should say the man formerly known as Prince, now known as King. Closely tied to Prince Charles, who had put together and was really kind of running this thing he called the Earth League.
	And they were the ones proposing a global constitution, a global parliament, a global court, a global government, all the rest of these things.
	And it was John Sheldon Huber. John Sheldon Huber was pushing this depopulation stuff along with Charles.
	And Charles also pushed what he called a reference to the Magna Carta, right?
	Which is, well, we go back and we trace the beginnings of due process and accountable government and so many other things to the Magna Carta.
	But he says we're going to have a Terra Carta and the Earth Charter, right?
	So again, reproducing, you know, government at a global level.
	Throwing out a charter that began to respect our individual rights and moving to something that subjugates us to that global government.
	Because we're all going to die.
	The end of the world is always 10, 20, 30 years away, but we've got to act now to stop that from happening.
	He said, I was actually shocked that one of the leaders of the Club of Rome, its Vice President, Carlos Alvarez, He said, This
	was done at exactly the same time that Paul Ehrlich's...
	They created the Club of Rome, 1968.
	And also in 1968, Paul Ehrlich does his population bomb.
	And I want you to see a little bit of this report...
	That talks about, and you'll see in it, all of the major influencers at the time, from Walter Cronkite to Johnny Carson, even Richard Nixon, all just pushing this mantra that we've got too many people.
	We've got to slow the population growth down.
	Well, they've managed to bomb the population now, haven't they?
	We've got just total collapse of population.
	But here's what they were telling everybody in 1968.
	Overpopulation so long predicted has stolen upon us.
	It's getting worse week by week.
	In the 1960s, a new kind of fear began to spread across America.
	The U.S. could be busting out at the seams by the end of the century.
	If we do not by humane means limit our numbers, then numbers are going to be limited by more famines and shortages and consequent social conflicts.
	The idea that human population was outstripping the Earth's ability to support mankind was a powerful one.
	And in the hands of one man...
	Population growth will kill you stone-cold dead.
	The message reached a wider audience than ever before.
	But what became of the population bomb?
	How many years do you have to not have the world end to decide that it didn't end because that reason was wrong?
	Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich didn't start out as a prophet of doom.
	His area of study focused on butterflies.
	But after visiting the crowded streets of Delhi, he had a realization.
	If we continue to let population grow, and if we continue to exploit the underdeveloped countries, if we continue to pollute the seas with a wide variety of compounds and so on, it's very difficult for me to picture things holding together for more than another decade or so.
	The basic point is so simple.
	We have a finite planet with finite resources, and in such a system, you can't have infinite population growth.
	He's still selling that live.
	...in a slim volume called The Population Bomb.
	It was a call to action for many, including a student Ehrlich advised, Stuart Brand.
	There's too many people, and we'd like to see people have fewer children and better ones.
	The whole idea that people make more people who make more people until there's too many people and by then it's too late, that's a very persuasive argument.
	Adrienne Germain, a young women's health advocate, found herself drawn to Ehrlich as well, due to his support of birth control.
	The message was that we were already in a crisis, and if we didn't have urgent and immediate action, the world would simply destroy itself.
	Look at what the year 2000 will be.
	Our cities are going to be choked with people.
	They're going to be choked with traffic.
	They're going to be choked with crime.
	They're going to be choked with pollution.
	Somebody choked Nixon.
	in which to live.
	I wish I could choke that guy.
	Net world population is increasing by 23 people every 10 seconds.
	It's clear that world population growth remains completely out of control.
	And that's the way it is.
	Totally. Many of my friends bought it.
	Totally. I've recognized an event for 60 people to starve in public.
	What were you trying to prove?
	It's about pain in the world.
	Maybe anybody who's thinking of having a third child ought to go hungry a week.
	The mode became don't have kids.
	There's enough of them in the world.
	And if your friends have kids, it's fine if they feel uncomfortable about that.
	We had formed an organization called Zero Population Growth, and then Johnny took me on The Tonight Show.
	Would you welcome Dr. Paul Early.
	We have to get the death rate and birth rate in balance, and there's only two ways to do it.
	One is to bring the birth rate down, the other is to push the death rate up.
	I did the show many times, and we went from six chapters and 600 members to 600 chapters and 60,000 members.
	We're starting in now.
	This is the first step. The Bagley's belong to a growing number of young marrieds who favor ZPG, zero population growth.
	How many children do you have?
	Two. I have two children.
	Ehrlich's views on how to bring the birth rate down were concrete.
	Compulsion if voluntary methods fail.
	Creating a blacklist of people, companies, and organizations impeding population control in the U.S. Responsibility prices for childless marriages.
	A tax on children.
	And a luxury tax on diapers and cribs.
	The concerns about population became misanthropic, and it was taken with so much seriousness that Paul Ehrlich could recommend things like putting stuff in public water that would make people not as fertile.
	Panic is not too strong a word to use for some of the advocates that I referred to as true believers.
	It was a zeitgeist that was taking shape.
	Attention, all citizens.
	Childbearing is herewith forbidden.
	One of the things about Zeitgeist is they have astonishing durability.
	It appears that large families are on the way out, and ZPG may be possible.
	Yeah, well, sounds pretty familiar, doesn't it?
	Do you see how these strains of narratives and propaganda and censorship and blacklisting of people that he was proposing out there, do you see how this all comes together?
	I remember I was in high school at the time when all this stuff was happening.
	I used to have these arguments with my best friend.
	He bought into this stuff 100%.
	I didn't believe any of it, even then.
	But they're running all this same stuff, the same play on us over and over again.
	So we got the climate MacGuffin.
	We got the COVID MacGuffin.
	We got the World War MacGuffin.
	Because these people, it is a satanic agenda to kill, to erase the human population.
	And these people are moving ahead with it, reducing people, killing people with their shots, killing people with their wars.
	The Club of Rome, as these people are focusing on, said this is a Masonic organization.
	Why is a Pope doing this?
	Because it's condemned... We're good to go.
	The Club of Rome's most famous foray into fiction came in 1972 when it released a study called The Limits to Growth.
	Funded by the club and written by a group of MIT-based systems engineers, the study predicted that the world would come to an end by about 2070 if population growth were allowed to continue.
	The authors hyperventilated that there was no other avenue to survival than radical reduction in the planet's human population.
	Population control, they said, was the only feasible solution to mankind's dilemma.
	And, of course, we've seen this over and over again.
	The Gaia theory. Oh, well, you know, we take the Gaia, the Greek goddess representing Earth and everything.
	And we revive that and we say, well, the Earth is a special thing that just happened.
	We don't know how it happened.
	But, you know, it's just a special event.
	And people have become a virus.
	And like any virus, people need to be eliminated.
	Because we're going to kill Mother Earth.
	You've heard this over and over again.
	That's a central thesis of that.
	The limits to growth assumption of an immediate end to scientific and technological progress was completely wrong.
	To demonstrate just how wrong the study was...
	Other scientists backed up this computer model that they're talking about to 1870 instead of 1970.
	Remember, this is not 1970.
	By 2070, the world will be over.
	So they said, oh, let's try this with 1870.
	And then use the same rules that were laid out in the limits to growth model to predict developments over the following century from 1870 to 1970 using only 1870 science and technology.
	And the computer predicted that the world would come to an end before 1970, largely in part because of the society's inability to cope with the massive amounts of horse manure that was going to be generated.
	Because again, you know, there was going to be no innovation.
	There'd be no wonderful cars out there.
	Well, the world's going to come to an end because now we've got cars that burn stuff.
	We've got smog and other things like that.
	That's what they're complaining about in 1970.
	And you saw the pictures of the people in the smoky city and they had real masks on their face.
	Real plexiglass masks and stuff.
	But... No, you can also change the way the engines work and get rid of the smog and the pollution, even for diesels, even for coal power plants.
	No, the technology will change, but again, these people extrapolate the stuff out, assuming that nothing is going to change.
	During his presentation... The Masonic leader, Alvarez Pariah, predictably called for the Great Reset.
	Nothing has changed, he said, in recent years.
	While we need to quickly change the patterns, the abilities of everyone, and not only of an elite that seems to be the problem, seize the solution and impose them on people.
	So in other words, we have an elite group that sees the problem.
	And since the rest of you don't, we're going to have to impose a solution on you.
	That is the central conceit of all this stuff.
	And so again, he says, so whose idea was it to buy a mason to this?
	Whose idea was it to have all this overpopulation?
	By the way, that was a report from the New York Times, which was surprisingly accurate.
	Real surprised to see that. So, are we going to continue to buy this?
	Is it going to be fool me once, fool me again and again and again?
	When you look at Shanghai, where we saw zero COVID, zero COVID, these absolutists, you know, we've got to act right now.
	The world's going to end. We've got to do everybody do what I say right now, and we've got to zero out whatever it is that I think is a problem.
	Whether it's population growth or whether it's COVID, we've got to have zero this, zero that.
	That's why I talk about Biden's energy policies are zero energy.
	Zero energy, zero meat, zero dairy, zero travel, zero new clothes, all the rest of this stuff.
	I mean, this is what the C40 is talking about.
	Three items of clothing per year, per person, all the rest of this stuff.
	And so... After China went, you know, locked everything down in Wuhan and then let everybody out in a couple of months, unlike us.
	Then they brought it back, especially as a weapon, in Shanghai, which was the most western of any of the Chinese cities and the most prosperous.
	And so for Halloween, you had people showing up.
	And Halloween costumes that were mocking the Chinese lockdown authorities.
	And it had been a year since they'd had any demonstrations about any of this stuff.
	This is from The Guardian.
	And they said Halloween revelers in Shanghai poked fun at Chinese authorities with their costumes, dressing up as COVID prevention workers.
	Remember that? We saw the armies of these guys and women who were dressed in white with masks and hoods and all the rest of the stuff, and they were going around beating people and locking people away.
	And so these people show up on Halloween dressed like these goons and thugs who were the arms and legs of this government mandate.
	And... So, Audi, Modern Retro Radio, says the COVID lockdown mandate compliance test was also a fool-me-once situation.
	Well, it certainly was for the people in Shanghai, I think.
	At least these people who were there.
	He says, I'm confident America won't comply with that nonsense a second time.
	I'm not. I'm not, because I'm looking at what's going on with Trump.
	You know, I think, you know, if Trump is there, I think they can fool MAGA twice, three times, four times.
	I think they just keep fooling them over and over again.
	It's amazing to me.
	And so I'm not confident that that is not going to happen.
	My son said he likes the costume of the guy with the giant swab here.
	They had police.
	He's got a really long swab.
	And look, he's got somebody kneeling down there.
	I'm going to swab your nose.
	For those who are listening, he's got a swab that's probably about six feet long and a proportionately big tip there.
	Yeah, they got that same treatment I played.
	That lady who was in the car is like, No, no, not again.
	A lot of people are like that.
	Police has shepherded away people with particularly subversive costumes that were there.
	One person, here's the picture of this guy.
	Pull the volume down a little bit, I'm going to talk to you.
	So he's dressed up, he's holding a book, and he's got a sign there in Chinese.
	The sign says, studying medicine cannot save the Chinese.
	And he's dressed as a very famous Chinese philosopher who was skeptical of authority.
	And so here are the police coming along, shoving him.
	Get going. And the police, look at the cop, still got a mask on his face.
	And tell this guy, go along.
	Yeah, move along. Move along.
	Nothing to see here. So he's dressed up as Lu Jun, a Chinese writer from the early 20th century whose fable about a useless scholar has become a meme for China's youth.
	And so he had that sign there that said, Studying medicine cannot save the Chinese.
	And he was standing there.
	You saw him holding a book.
	He had the sign. And he said, those who can do things, do things.
	Those who can speak out, speak out.
	And that's the point at which the police moved him off the street.
	They said, the Halloween festivities were the largest gathering of people on the streets of Shanghai since thousands of people in cities across China demonstrated against the zero COVID regime in November of last year.
	Many people vented their frustrations on social media before taking to the streets in November last year.
	Other tongue-in-cheek costumes posted to social media this year include a person dressed up as Winnie the Pooh, because, you know, that's been something they've been mocking lately.
	She had that picture of she walking alongside Obama, and Obama was skinny and tall, and she was short and heavier, and then they juxtaposed that with Tigger and Winnie the Pooh walking side by side.
	And so, after that, Winnie the Pooh has been banned everywhere.
	As a matter of fact, even that disgusting...
	Blood and Honey thing where the guy, you know, the slasher film with somebody wearing a Winnie the Pooh head, that Blood and Honey thing was banned, not because it was disgusting and stupid, but it was banned because of the Winnie the Pooh reference in it.
	They don't want people seeing that as President Xi slashing people, because he did, injecting people with his stuff.
	Several people dressed up as the COVID protection workers who wore white hazmat suits and, of course, the big giant swab that's there.
	So, as all this is happening, if people are going to wake up, there is a massive COVID inquiry that is happening in the U.K., And they've gotten more of these private messages from people like Dominic Cummings and, you know, just one foul-mouthed tirade after the other, like when we saw the transcripts from Richard Nixon.
	And so people were talking about that, but not so much about the substance.
	And so the Daily Skeptic says, well, what the COVID inquiry really should be about, but probably never will be.
	And so they had about 10 questions that should be asked.
	I said, number one, how was a case of COVID defined?
	Can you ask the people that?
	Can they explain that to us?
	How was COVID hospital admission defined?
	How was a COVID death defined?
	See, they lied to us with all these different rules, these different definitions.
	Number four, how did the definitions impact the perception and the management of pandemic services?
	Number five, what was the point of mass testing?
	That's carried out during the pandemic.
	Number six, were the tests used adequate and were they well interpreted by those responsible?
	Please explain to us, you know, your systematic misuse of the PCR tests.
	Number seven, what was done to minimize the risk to those in care homes, either residents or new intakes from cleared hospitals, quote-unquote cleared.
	Number eight, why are the models so central to the debate when they're mostly based on assumptions?
	Nine, did the predictions from models reflect the flowing realities?
	Ten, what was the basis of the scientific evidence used to make decisions?
	Eleven, what was the basis of the scientific evidence used in the models?
	Twelve, why were the measures such as school closures and vaccinations aimed at those who are least at risk of disease and consequences?
	13. Why has there been a dearth of research into the mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and of organized attempts to plug that gap?
	Why were the lessons of the Italian Lombardi outbreak, which peaked in March 9th of 2020 without any society-wide interventions, why was that not used to inform policy?
	Oh, that was a big tell, by the way.
	We had weeks of that data, and we said, look at this.
	It's going down, but you also...
	The first two weeks of data they had, they said, well, people who had problems were a couple of years past life expectancy and they had two and a half comorbidities, but we're going to call it COVID. Why does the inquiry continuously refer to the Chinese evidence, which is of dubious generality to Europe?
	And of course, as I said at the time, why do we believe anything that's coming out of China?
	Finally, why is the inquiry not exploring the collateral damage caused by the restrictions?
	And then I've got one more question for them.
	When are you going to stop killing people?
	Because you look at what has just happened in the Netherlands.
	The fifth Dutch cyclist, bicycle racing, has died of heart problems this year.
	The guy's 20 years old.
	He's an athlete who pushes very, very hard.
	And that's the thing. The subclinical myocarditis, they don't realize they've got heart damage.
	First symptom is they die immediately of a heart attack.
	20-year-old Dutch cyclist, Mark Grunenveld, passed away apparently of a heart attack.
	Several reports, for instance, in Dutch claim that he dropped out of the race for mechanical reasons and that his subsequent collapse was unrelated.
	Liars. Yeah, just a coincidence, right?
	But there's four others as well.
	One guy, Van Houdanik, was 27 years old.
	He had a heart attack.
	He had to be placed in an artificial coma.
	He would subsequently undergo surgery to have a defibrillator implanted.
	He was retired from professional racing.
	Just two weeks before that incident, a 32-year-old Dutch cyclist suffered what he himself has described as cardiac arrest while sleeping.
	He says, I'm happy to even be alive.
	Two other professional cyclists, one 35 years old, another 25 years old, announced their retirement this summer after they both discovered to have heart tissue scarring.
	Oh, what happened with all of this stuff?
	And why is it that we can't talk about that?
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and when we come back...
	We're going to talk about what is happening with the...
	Are we going to be taxed to fund a war?
	How is this negotiation that is happening with a new speaker, what does it tell us about these people in Washington who really don't care about any of the stuff that I've been talking about?
	They can't be bothered to look.
	Instead, they're going to misdirect us to another war, because as Gerald Slenty is going to be joining us in the third hour, says, when all else fails, and when you realize what they're doing, they take you to war.
	And that's one of the reasons why I showed the pictures of Benjamin Netanyahu bragging about how he had used his own people as lab rats, and now he's willing to use them for the greater agenda.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your mobile device.
	Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go.
	And James Barker, good to see you, Jason Barker, sorry.
	The UN has papers going back decades that talk about depopulation, but only in first world nations.
	The idea is to replace first world people with third world for a worker class easy to control.
	Yeah, I agree. And you see that reflected in this mysterious Deagle thing, right?
	Two-thirds of people disappear in the U.S. and about the same number in Great Britain.
	Large numbers, not quite that large in some of the European countries, but third-world countries, they see an increase in some of those.
	And Harps, good to see you, Harps.
	Thank you for the tip.
	He says they're going to kill koalas in New South Wales so they can build a wind farm.
	Ha! Well, you know, hey, we kill our eagles and our large protected species here as well as who knows how many bats and whales and all the rest of the stuff.
	They call it euthanizing by hitting them over the head with a blunt instrument.
	All this is for the environment.
	They're psychopaths. Yeah, they used to get upset about that when they did that to the baby seals.
	Remember that? I think it was Bridget Bardot posing with bloody pictures of baby seals that had been bludgeoned.
	But that was to...
	I don't remember what the purpose of that was.
	It wasn't for wind farms.
	But yeah, they are crazy. They want to cut down the trees now.
	They were right about trees absorbing CO2 and cooling things, but now they just want to cut the trees down and bury them.
	They truly are idiots.
	And when Bill Gates talks about that, he says, well, that's an idiotic idea to think that we ought to plant trees.
	We should cut them down and put them.
	The smart ones of us want to cut the trees down and bury them in the ground so the CO2 that's sequestered in them doesn't get out in the atmosphere.
	These people are dangerously crazy.
	But right now, and this is sent to me by a listener, I apologize, I missed, I didn't put the name down, but I thought this was a good meme.
	There's a new game show in town, Win Uncle Sam's Money.
	Today's contestants are Zelensky and Netanyahu.
	And so we have the House approving last night nearly $14.5 billion in military aid for Israel, along with supposedly a cut.
	And it's not a cut!
	When you say, I'm going to give the IRS, which currently has their entire budget, is $13 billion.
	I'm going to give them an additional $60 billion.
	And McCarthy's GOP says, no, we're going to cut it from $60 to $40.
	And then Mike Johnson says, we're going to cut it from $60 to $46.
	You're still going to be increasing it by $46 billion, when their entire budget right now is $13 billion.
	It's not a cut.
	But the AP, the Associated Press, lies in a departure from Norm's.
	Who is Norm?
	Johnson's package required that the emergency aid to Israel be offset with cuts in government spending elsewhere.
	These are not cuts.
	A cut to a planned increase is not a cut.
	You know, the IRS is still going to be five times bigger with this so-called two episodes of cuts by McCarthy and then by Johnson.
	And yet, it's still going to be five times bigger.
	And Biden is so angry that we're not going to make it seven times bigger that he's threatening to veto this.
	And listen to the lies that they put out.
	Biden has said he will veto the bill.
	With 12 Democrats joining the Republicans on a largely party-line vote because there's been these cuts, says the Associated Press and the Democrats.
	Johnson said the Republican package would provide Israel with the assistance needed to defend itself, to free hostages, and to eradicate the militant Palestinian groups accomplishing all of this while we work to ensure responsible spending?
	Responsible spending? And reduce the size of the federal government?
	No, you're growing the IRS to be five times bigger than it is right now.
	And Biden and the Democrats have their own lie.
	They say, well, we can't do this type of thing because this is going to set a very, very dangerous precedent that whenever we need to have money for an emergency, and again, we're talking about a foreign country, whenever we need to have money for an emergency, then we're going to tie it to some budget cuts.
	We can't do that. But understand that Biden asked for $14 billion and they gave him $14.3 or $14.5.
	They can't even make up their mind because, you know, we're only talking about a couple hundred billion.
	So that's a couple hundred million.
	So that's not important.
	You know, round off air.
	So I think it's $14.3.
	But anyway, they gave him hundreds of millions of dollars more than he asked.
	He asked for $14 billion.
	They gave him $14,300,000,000.
	Which is more than he asked.
	And now he's saying, that's not acceptable.
	And so what is not acceptable?
	There's two things involved here.
	Money for Israel and taking money from the IRS increase.
	Well, there's more money for Israel than what Mike Johnson is doing there.
	So what is unacceptable to them is any cut in this army of IRS agents who are going to go to war with you and I. To make sure that we own nothing.
	He's preparing that army right now.
	And shame on Mike Johnson for not tackling that head on.
	And when he says, we're going to show that we've got responsible spending and we're going to reduce the size of the federal government when he's going to still grow the IRS to be five times bigger than it is now.
	Mike, you say you're a Christian.
	God hates liars.
	Don't lie. You ought to all send him a letter.
	Say, come on. You say you're a Christian.
	God hates liars. Stop lying about this.
	And so many other things.
	So, again, he's also tied Ukraine to border security.
	And they're saying you can't do that either.
	We've got to have money for Ukraine to protect their borders, but nothing for this border.
	And the thing about that is, is that there's no money involved whatsoever with the border thing.
	It's changing the rules.
	It's certainly not a cut to anything.
	He's just tying the border protection rules.
	You've got to change the rules to protect the border instead of destroying the border.
	Oh, no, we can't have that either.
	That's why I said, Mike Johnson is a very clever politician if he can make that case and say, wait, you say that you can't sign this because it's just not acceptable?
	And yet I'm giving you more money for Israel, which you say, oh, we've got to have this money right now for Israel.
	Well, it's right there, even more than you asked.
	But you don't like the fact that I cut your increase to the IRS. That's what they need to be talking about.
	But they want to pretend that they're actually cutting that.
	Yesterday I said, you know, the Congressional Budget Office is saying, well, if you cut the number of IRS agents, it's going to increase our deficit by $26 billion.
	Well, here we are a day later, and they're saying it's $12.5 billion.
	So which is it? Does it matter?
	Round off air with these people?
	They don't care about any of this money, but they do want to take everything away from us.
	How did they determine this yesterday?
	How did the Congressional Budget Office determine that it was going to be $26 billion then, and that's being reported as $12 billion?
	Cut it in half?
	Is this being determined by a PCR test?
	How did they determine? But I said yesterday, I said, do you understand...
	How reprehensible this is.
	Rather than up front saying, well, we're going to have a new tax.
	Or we're going to raise a tax rate or something.
	No, they're saying, we're going to reduce the deficit by squeezing you with these police state tactics.
	With the IRS, it's going to be five to seven times bigger than it is right now.
	Support for Israel may be a political game for my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, said Dan Goldman of New York.
	But this is personal for us Jews.
	Hey, Dan, Biden, he didn't cut that.
	He increased what Biden was asking for.
	The lies are just piled on top of one another, and of course, this is all being put out by the Associated Press.
	Again, more than they ask for, what Dan Goldman and the Democrats and Biden are upset about is that there's a little bit of a hitch, just a little bit, and their massive war against you and I. We have met the enemy, and the enemy is us.
	It is the U.S., the United States.
	That's the enemy. And so Biden is looking at the border deal thing.
	Crying crocodile tears about this.
	The specific asylum reform that's come up in private conversations with administrative officials...
	According to people familiar with them, is a change to the credible fear standard and so forth.
	Under the current law, if a migrant is subject to expedited removal put through the credible fear process, that person is required to show a significant possibility of credible fear of persecution, torture, or fear returning to their country.
	You know, kind of like the German Christian homeschool family that the Biden administration went to a great deal of trouble to try to throw out.
	Who had been accumulating so many fines it was more than their entire income for their family?
	Who had had two children born while they were here in the United States for the last decade that Biden wanted to throw them out?
	Again, everything they do is a lie.
	Everything they do is a double standard.
	You need to stop the welfare magnet.
	If you're going to bring people in, you say, all right, anybody who wants to come in at this point, since we're broke here in the United States, we have no money, pay for our bills.
	Anybody who wants to come in the country, you want to come in and work, that's fine.
	You want to be a citizen. But you're not going to get any welfare ever, ever.
	That was the basis on which people came to the United States in the early 20th century because there was no welfare state then.
	Can't the conservatives say that?
	Can't they make that something that is part of the border reform?
	Because that's the central issue that we need to be concerned about.
	And if you took out that welfare magnet, conservatives are supposed to not like the welfare system.
	If you took that out and you said, okay, you can come, but, you know, if you run into problems, there'll still be people around.
	You know, Americans, maybe they've forgotten how to look after their fellow citizens, but we used to do that on our own without the federal government.
	But there'd be Americans that'd be around charitable institutions and churches that would help people if they needed it.
	But, no, you're not going to get any government money if you come to America.
	End of story. So it's not a crisis, it's an invasion, as many people are pointing out.
	One guy talking to Reuters saying, we've got civil protection officials, we've got ambulances that are escorting people as you see them moving.
	Now this is the one that I showed you yesterday.
	5,000 people.
	As far as the camera can see, you've got a sea of people filling up the road.
	Now that's 5,000 people.
	And we have had, in September alone, we had 150,000 people come in.
	So that's like this every day.
	Every day, this number of people are walking into the United States to be supported by you and I. You've got 5,000 people there.
	30 days of September, you had 150,000.
	That's 5,000.
	That's a caravan a day, every day for 30 days.
	That's what's going on with Biden.
	A million people just this year.
	People approved for walkovers include individuals that we want to kill everybody in those countries, right?
	Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, some of the largest numbers coming from Muslim-majority former Soviet republics such as Tajikistan, Kurdistan, and Uzbekistan.
	So, again, all these people that we say they're very dangerous, we need to bomb their country, and maybe we do bomb their country, and then we let them come in so they can bomb our country back.
	This is a planned takedown.
	This is a tall betrayal.
	Federal government's lack of intervention at the southern border is a telling sign, but they don't have the interest of the vast majority.
	Boy, is that an understatement.
	No. They hate us.
	They hate us. This is a war against the USA. Just like Trump's injections were a war against the USA. Before Gerald comes on, I want to get into a little bit of what is happening with money.
	And of course, we're seeing banks closing very rapidly across the San Francisco area.
	Now, they're closing branches everywhere very rapidly, but it's especially noticeable in San Francisco.
	So the question is, why there?
	Partly because the economy has been so bad there.
	Partly because they have, with their green lighting of massive looting mobs, organized crime to come in and clear everything out of a store.
	So the retail stores are closing down.
	The businesses are closing down.
	Well, they do need fewer banks there in San Francisco.
	But branch banks are vanishing across the country at a record rate.
	In San Francisco, 20 branches shuttered across the city through October the 28th.
	And all over California, 277 branches have been closed so far this year.
	Second only in this century to 2020 when Trump locked everything down.
	They had 325 branches closed that year, but we're on pace to catch up.
	Some of the closures are related to well-known crises like the failure of Silicon Valley Bank or could be a result of consolidation or of the exodus of retail businesses.
	But still, when you look at this happening, there is a push to get rid of cash.
	And this is one of the ways that you do it.
	And so when we look at other countries that are further along this path, I think it was Norway, if I remember.
	It's one of the Scandinavian countries.
	But I believe it was Norway. Pretty much gone cashless, and they're shutting down all the ATMs and the branches of the banks and everything, because, you know, hey, we're not going to let you have cash, so we don't need these branches.
	We'll save a lot of money. In Korea, they've announced a pilot project to explore CBD use in the carbon credit market.
	Again, your indulgence for using energy.
	The use of a CBDC within the carbon credit market, the Bank of Korea, is talking about doing this, you know, again, at a wholesale level.
	But they've already talked about how they would use a CBDC to monitor your personal use of what they call carbon.
	How much meat do you eat?
	That type of thing. How much traveling are you doing?
	So we know they're going to move it to that area.
	The CBDC usability test is conducted to check ways to build future infrastructure to stably support digital transformation of the economy.
	We don't want that.
	And cooperation. And so they said the Bank of International Settlements is part of this.
	They said that outside systems such as carbon credit exchanges can be linked.
	With a CBDC system.
	And of course, they'll make it retail as well.
	To ensure that any decision on introducing CBDC can be made quickly, the Bank of Korea has launched several pilots to prepare for that eventuality.
	You see? They're going to spring it on us suddenly.
	Be a crisis. Oh, we've got to do it right now.
	They'll do it at warp speed. Some of the reasons cited for these preparations are a persistent decline in the usage of cash.
	Which, again, they're pushing. You know, as one person said, we have feminism, you know, pushing people to not want to have children.
	And that's what they're doing, again, with cash and other things.
	It's psychological, and then they get up to a certain point, and then it's like, okay, now just drop the hammer, and we're not going to let you do it.
	Some people will kind of go along with the psychological and conditioning, and for the people who don't, you know, some people get the Brave New World treatment.
	You know, just drop out.
	Take, you know, sex and drugs.
	Don't give a damn. Take a gram, that type of thing.
	And for those people who don't go along with the Brave New World treatment, you get the 1984 treatment with a boot stomping in your face.
	Persistent decline in the usage of cash, rising concerns about market strength, data concentration of big tech, and it's not just in South Korea.
	It is also in Switzerland, where they're developing a CBDC pilot, the central bank there.
	It's called Helvetica Phase 3.
	Will, for the first time, see orchestration of a real Swiss franc with CBDC settling digital security transactions?
	And they said, well, this is just for wholesale transactions.
	And it's not for the individuals who are doing retail.
	We hear the same thing here.
	And we hear, at the same time, other articles saying, well, this isn't going to happen right away in the United States.
	It's going to be several years away.
	No, we've already got something called FedNow.
	Maybe you should pay attention to the names that they use.
	And that is wholesale.
	But the wholesale projects, pilot projects that they're doing in Switzerland and the Bank of Korea and in the United States, they're all there to set up this digital infrastructure that they're going to drop like a hammer on us at some point in time.
	And that's why I say when we're looking at the projections about inflation, how that's going to affect gold, for me, the central thing, which is, you know, we have things that look at...
	You know, what is happening with war, what is happening with oil, and these other things.
	We've seen some stuff that looks like that, but what we've not seen before is this global push to try to push us into a global ID and to watch and control everything we do and to do that through the money.
	That's where the mark of the beast is, the mark of the government, to make sure that you can't buy or sell without that.
	Now, you need to do something to prepare for To participate in some kind of a black or gray market for this kind of stuff.
	You're still going to...
	They'll still have CBDC stuff that'll be there.
	That will monitor and track what you're doing whenever you interact with government.
	But there needs to be a way for you to be able to escape that to some degree.
	So again, davidknight.gold is what Tony Arterman set up, and start preparing now for that.
	There's a lot of preparation that needs to be done.
	As a matter of fact, when you look at...
	What needs to be done to prepare for food, for self-defense and things, CivilDefenseManual.com, Jack Lawson's books.
	He's got two of them there. That's a great place to start for physical stuff.
	But it's also, you have to prepare in terms of being able to exist in that economy.
	Part of it is going to be bartering.
	And some skills, but a lot of it is going to be if you're going to be able to barter with gold, with silver, and that type of thing.
	And so, again, davidknight.gold, Tony Ardobin, wisewolf.gold.
	Take a look at that. Before we take a break here, some of the comments.
	This is about heart attacks.
	Distorted perception says lots of coincidences.
	People are too accepting of these things.
	It's kind of scary, to be honest.
	Mystery deaths are no big deal, right?
	Mark M228 says, Cyclists should have among the strongest and healthiest of hearts, thanks to all the writing that they do.
	And again, soccer players as well, right?
	These people are in great shape, and they've got hearts before this.
	They've got hearts that they could push to the extreme, really high pulse rates and things like that.
	But they were strong, and they could handle it.
	But they don't realize now.
	Is that they've got damaged hearts.
	And the first sign of it is when this happens.
	One person said, yeah, I've heard the Earth has enough resources for even most of the elites.
	Most of us, but the elites are hogging all the resources and then lie about the population.
	Yeah. Brian and Ted McCartney.
	Decrease the surplus population.
	Straight out of Christmas, Carol.
	Yeah. The... The Ebenezer Scrooge Malthusians that are out there.
	Well, if they're going to die, they better do so.
	Decrease the population. Because it's all about my money.
	Syrian girl, you notice none of these population experts ever volunteered to be the first ones to stop breathing.
	Sarah Kai says, yes, the systematic sterilization of the generation built on that lie.
	They were born in the wrong body.
	That's the other part of it. That's the other part of it, yeah.
	The psychotic behavior, says Tony, talking to Harps as they're destroying, killing the koalas.
	Destroying the ecology for the sake of the environment.
	It always comes around to that.
	Okay, we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to have Gerald Slenty.
	He's going to be joining us, TrendsJournal.com, a great publication.
	We'll be right back to see what Gerald Slenty...
	I haven't talked to Gerald since all this stuff happened in the Middle East, so we're going to be talking about that when he comes back.
	We'll be right back. The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially please keep us in your prayers If
	you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	Joining us now is Gerald Salenti of TrendsJournal.com.
	A great publication. He always sees this stuff coming for the longest time.
	For years, we've been talking about the crash in commercial real estate.
	And for years, Gerald has been saying, well, when everybody starts to see what's happening, they're going to take us to war.
	Well, Gerald, it's been a couple of weeks since we've talked.
	Actually, two weeks ago.
	So it's been about a month since we talked.
	And in that time, they've taken us to war.
	What's your take on all this?
	Again, you get the Trends Journal.
	Yeah. People, number one, people don't have a clue what's going on.
	All they do is they hear the headlines and the crap spewing out of the prostitutes' mouths.
	Let's go back to December of last year.
	Benjamin Netanyahu becomes Prime Minister.
	This is a guy that's being brought up on Twitter.
	Criminal charges. And he passes this thing called the Judicial Reform Act, which basically says, screw the courts, no more courts, forget the judges, the politicians are in charge.
	Anybody could Google it up.
	39 weeks in a row.
	39 weeks in a row, people taking to the streets in protest of the Judicial Reform Act.
	Hundreds and hundreds of thousands, week after week after week.
	Not my language.
	Language from the top politicians in Israel, from HaHa, that's the Israeli newspaper, from the Times of Israel, from Jerusalem Post.
	There's a civil war going on in Israel.
	That's right. A civil war going on.
	And we're writing week after week after week after week of what the mainstream media called the extreme right-wing government of Netanyahu.
	They're attacking Moss.
	They're killing people.
	They're stealing more land.
	This thing is blowing up.
	And we said, when all else fails, they take you to war.
	Because these protests are going to keep building up, building up, building up, building up.
	What happens? Hamas attacks, they kill.
	You go to the Jerusalem Post, type it right in.
	You know, you'll have a headline story, and then you know what they'll have under it?
	A hundred and, was it, 1,114 people.
	Israelis killed all of them.
	Over and over and over again.
	How about all the Palestinians that have been killed?
	How about all the Palestinians that have been killed before this?
	No, no. No.
	So, what happens is, not my, not coming from me, coming from Haaretz, the Israeli newspaper.
	They knew this was going to happen.
	They knew the attack was going to happen.
	And Netanyahu blew them off.
	They wanted the attack to happen.
	Now, I ask people, do you know about the protests going on in Israel before this?
	Don't have a clue. Don't have a clue.
	Don't have a clue. They hated Netanyahu.
	They wanted him out of it.
	Now he's in charge again.
	Slaughtering people in front of our eyes.
	Could you imagine if the people in Gaza were Jewish?
	And the Palestinians were bombing them?
	It's almost 10,000 now.
	Mostly children.
	Destroying a place.
	Could you imagine if they were Jewish?
	And they were getting killed.
	Oh my God, this is terrible!
	And again, here.
	See that? Yeah, Crusades 2000.
	This is from the Trends Journal 2006.
	Yeah. Ready?
	Let me get just a...
	The seeds of the Crusades 2000 had been planted in full view of the world, and all those watching could have anticipated the eventual harvest.
	The memories of what had happened and what would occur had been fought by rigid ideology, fanatical religiosity, patriotic fervor, government propaganda, and ulterior motives.
	Regardless of England's reasons or intentions were, self-serving or otherwise, Crusades 2000 was set in motion by the 1917 Balfour Declaration that laid the foundation for Israel.
	This is the quote. His Majesty's government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this objective.
	Wait a minute.
	His Majesty's government Views with favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people?
	His Majesty's government?
	You mean some slimeball from a murderous family?
	From England where the sun never sets on the British Empire and they slaughter people all over the world?
	And people call him His Majesty?
	A damn crime syndicate?
	Who the hell is he to say what's going on in Palestine?
	Calm down, Salenti.
	Don't you understand?
	This is his majesty.
	Yeah, yeah. Well, things really haven't changed much, have they?
	You know, everybody knows Smedley Butler's war is a racket, right?
	Yep. But the part of the quote that I hadn't seen before was he said, we've got profits and dollars and losses and lives.
	And he says it's a global thing.
	And boy, it's really true now, 100 years later.
	It's especially true.
	Here, you're a devout Christian, right?
	Let's turn America into a Christian state.
	And let's give Christians in America the priority above everybody.
	And we'll call it a democracy.
	Yeah, well, you know, yesterday I played a clip of some Orthodox Jews who were protesting the, you know, what is happening.
	And you had some Israeli soldiers there and you had Israeli cop and he, you know, walks as if he's going to be walking past one of these guys.
	And he puts his foot there and then brings his arm around and slams the guy down to the ground.
	I mean, it's like the guy's lucky that he didn't crack his skull.
	And, you know, and then starts attacking the other guys.
	I said, OK, so who's anti-Semitic here?
	Yeah. This is the government, and we need to separate the government from the people that are there.
	And I've played over and over this last week, last couple of weeks, Gerald.
	A clip from Benjamin Netanyahu where a couple of different calls that were recorded where he called in and it was a public program and he's, you know, talking to the World Economic Forum and bragging about how he was going to use his own people as lab rats.
	You know, I've been on the phone 21 times with them and, you know, we're going to give them all the information on our people.
	They're going to put them at the front of the line and all the rest of the stuff.
	He needs to be called Benjamin Netanyahu because this guy used his own people as lab rats.
	And this is what I said. All of these people, when you're talking about Trump or you're talking about Biden or you're talking about Netanyahu, they've all used us as lab rats.
	They've all poisoned, tried to poison their own people.
	Why would we ever follow them into war?
	They don't even have the decency to acknowledge what they did and call it a mistake.
	They just move on to a war.
	They're evil people.
	Yeah, exactly. Again, the Jewish people are above everybody else in Israel.
	Don't believe me.
	How about that nobody knows, when I say nobody, I'm talking about maybe 0.1% of the people in America know, of the nation-state law, That under Netanyahu in 2018 passed.
	Here, this is from Vox.
	Mainstream. Israel's usually controversial nation-state law explained.
	Ready, number one. It states that, quote, the right to exercise national self-determination in Israel is unique to the Jewish people.
	I mean, the other people are below you.
	Yeah, that's right. Mm-hmm.
	Number two, it establishes Hebrew as the official language and downgrades Arabic.
	Number three, it establishes Jewish settlements as a national value and mandates that the state will labor to encourage and promote its establishment and development.
	Oh, settlements?
	You mean stealing land?
	Colonizing it?
	In violation of the Geneva Convention?
	In violation of Article 242 of the United Nations?
	This whole thing, I'm tired of it.
	This guy, Isaac Herzog, the president of Israel?
	God gave us this land.
	Who the hell are you talking to?
	Who are you talking to?
	Come over here, Herzog. Come over here and you tell me that your God is better than my God.
	I don't tell you that my God is better than your God.
	Don't you tell me that your God is better than my God and you are the chosen people.
	I'm just a piece of crap.
	Who are you talking to?
	I'm telling all my Jewish friends.
	You better do everything you can to promote peace.
	Because this is why they go against the Jews every now and then and try to wipe you out.
	And you're outnumbered, man.
	Get it in your head. You got 16 million of you and 8 billion of the others.
	You got 1.8 billion Muslims and you're only 16 million.
	You're outnumbered.
	You better stop this genocide and this hypocrisy that you're better than everybody else.
	I don't want to hear it.
	Well, you know, there's a lot of Jews who push back against this, even in Grand Central Station.
	And that, of course, is not reported.
	You know, when you've got protesters who take over the bridge and say, well, we've got to have vengeance, we've got to have war, because it just keeps escalating.
	You know, I look at this and I look at both sides.
	I want you to see pictures of babies mutilated and torn apart.
	And then the response of everybody is, amazingly to me, is instead of, what can we do to try to defuse this situation?
	Everybody gets their bloodlust and wants to eradicate the other side.
	I know. And that's why, you know, first of all, I don't want to see this stuff.
	I understand how this is being used.
	And I understand, you know, when I talk about abortion, I say, you know, show people pictures of aborted babies because they take all the parts out to make sure they got everything when they rip the babies apart when they're alive.
	And show people what the procedure looks like.
	There's a great cartoon about that called The Procedure.
	But they don't do that.
	And they know why, because that would get people so upset.
	And they know what they're doing when they show people these mutilated babies.
	On both sides. The babies that are killed by the Hamas terrorists and the babies that are killed with the Israeli bombs.
	They show everybody these babies because they know how visceral that is.
	And they want people then to not say, let's stop it, but to jump in and become the Hatfields and McCoys.
	And that is what is happening.
	And you say, you know, when they say, my God is greater than your God, that's what Allahu Akbar is about.
	And so you've got both of these groups out there that are in this holy war to completely eradicate the other side, commit genocide against the other side.
	And yet we've got to be in it because we've got to be in every single one of these wars.
	And on our side, we've got the new speaker, Mike Johnson, who is out there saying, yeah, you know, well, my eschatology says that, you know, God's going to protect Israel and establish them.
	I'm going to do everything I can to help them.
	And heck with America.
	I say, as a Christian, God's given you very clear rules.
	And those clear rules take precedent over your imagination about what the end of the world is going to be like and your role in it.
	He's told you certain things to do.
	He's told you, blessed be the peacemakers.
	He's told you not to murder. He's told you to have justice.
	And if you're going to ignore that, then maybe you're going to be on the wrong side of these future prophecies that happen, regardless of whether you've got these future prophecies right or not.
	All right. Let's...
	You said so many things here.
	Sorry. No, no, no.
	I'm trying to... I want you to keep going with it, and it's so important.
	And you mentioned this guy Johnson, this little clown boy.
	Again, he calls himself an evangelical Christian.
	And he's totally anti-abortion, right?
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. But you could slaughter people, that's okay.
	Yeah, that's right. Don't kill a baby, but you could kill all the Palestinians you want.
	That's right. What hypocrisy.
	Don't call yourself a Christian.
	Christ doesn't believe in this.
	Would you say, blessed are the peacemakers?
	Yeah. So who are you talking to, you little clown?
	Who are you talking to?
	And again... It's a religious war.
	Here it is. Crusades 2000.
	Again, I wrote this in 2006.
	Israel is not a country that should be there.
	It was invented in the Balfour Declaration, brought to you by the Rothschilds.
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
	Again, His Majesty declares, His Majesty, oh, of course, I'm His Majesty.
	We don't pee, we don't poo, we're above you.
	We're a crime syndicate.
	That's all that royal family, who the hell are you talking to?
	We're talking to the masses that swallow our crap as we kill people all over the world.
	Look at this clown, this King Charles.
	Look at the billions that they have.
	This little slime ball never worked a day in his life.
	They got this money by stealing it and killing people all over the world.
	Yeah. They created a phony country called Israel.
	Oh, the Jewish people should have their state.
	No other religion should.
	Yeah, and there's a lot of Orthodox.
	Not to interrupt you.
	Yeah, go ahead. But here, you were talking about the...
	This is from the New York Times.
	Mm-hmm. Jews say, cease fire now.
	Never again for anyone.
	Jewish voices for peace.
	I imagine they had to pay to put that in there.
	I don't think that... Oh yeah, it's a paid advertisement.
	Yeah, New York Times won't cover their peace demonstrations and they have to pay to put that message in, right?
	Every one of my Jewish friends except one.
	Every one of them are totally opposed to what's going on in Israel.
	Every one except one.
	And again, as I said, don't call me an anti-Semite.
	It has nothing to do with that.
	Three of my last four girlfriends were Jewish.
	So don't call me an anti-Semite. My best friends are Jewish.
	So save your anti-Semite stuff.
	Shove it. Oh, by the way, the people running Israel aren't Semites.
	They're Ashkenazi Jews.
	They're from Eastern Europe.
	Palestinians are Semites.
	They're from the Mesopotamia region.
	Oh, and you think of the name, Ashkenazi.
	A-S-H-K-E-N-A-Z-I. And Netanyahu fits the Nazi and Ashkenazi perfectly.
	A mass murderer.
	You know, one of the things, you've noticed that his son is in Miami, right?
	Yep. He's not going there to fight.
	You've got all these other people going to war.
	They're sacrificing.
	His son is, you know, hanging out in luxury in Miami.
	Yep. And that just says everything, I think.
	Sitting there, pushing more like Lindsey Graham or something, you know, in Miami, instead of doing anything about it.
	And he is of age to do something about it.
	Oh, yeah. Yeah. Oh, yeah.
	He's a draft dodger.
	Mm-hmm. Yeah. Again, you know, this is from...
	Like George W. Bush. Yeah.
	Netanyahu ignored warnings from security services, New York Times.
	They knew it was going to happen.
	As we warned, the covers of the Trends Journal were all there.
	When all else fails, they take you to war.
	Look what happened to little Georgie Bush.
	People couldn't stand him.
	The dot-com bust happened.
	We were in a recession.
	All of a sudden, 9-11, the war on terror.
	We're going to get that guy Osama Bin Laden dead or alive.
	88% of the people swallowed the crap, spewing out of the mouth that a little daddy's boy, a little coward of nothing, a little moronic piece of scum crap.
	And Netanyahu did the same exact thing.
	Oh, and by the way, the data coming out from the Israeli ministry...
	They had this planned in the sense that they want to wipe the Palestinians out of Gaza and grab more of that land and throw them out and throw them into the Sinai.
	The data is there. The facts are there.
	It all came out. Hardly reported anywhere except on a few sites.
	A Pearl Harbor type of thing.
	Exactly. You want to get them out of there?
	They want to steal more land.
	And there's been a big back and forth, as you pointed out, you know, between all the military and intelligence people and, you know, some of them, oh, mea culpa type thing.
	But Netanyahu, very much like Trump, he didn't make any mistakes.
	He's not going to own up to anything, you know?
	And... It's amazing.
	It's amazing to see it.
	But yeah, it is.
	As you point out, the country is severely divided.
	And this is one way that as soon as this happens now, I don't want to hear any dissent.
	We're all in this as an existential fight and everybody line up behind me and be quiet.
	You know, that's what happens.
	And look at one of our top trends for 2023.
	It's there for everybody to look at.
	Middle East meltdown.
	We said this was going to happen.
	Word for word, January 3rd, 2023, when we put out our top trends, Middle East meltdown was one of them.
	Again, week after week after week after week in the Trends Journal, we were showing how this extreme right-wing government of Netanyahu, not our words, right?
	Again, we repeat what the media is saying and then we give our analysis how they were just slaughtering Palestinians, throwing them out of the mosques, stealing more land.
	Oh, they call it settlements.
	What the hell are you talking to? Settlements.
	It's still in a damn land.
	Yeah, that's why these Hamas people, you know, the name they came up with, the Al-Aqsa, you know, attack or whatever.
	Again, a response to what happened in the big mosque there that they built over the Jewish temple.
	And that's a big part of the thing motivating them.
	And whenever you look at all this stuff, it's like, how do these people think that this is ever going to do anything other than just escalate us?
	I know. It's just heartbreaking.
	But it's strange because people want to get revenge.
	And so it's like, all right, let's nuke them.
	And it's like, okay, calmer heads come back and say, well, nuking them is not really going to be a solution.
	We've got to do something else.
	So what do we do?
	Do we pull it back and we just use conventional weapons until we just level everything?
	That's still not a real solution because people are going to perceive that essentially the same as a nuclear weapon.
	They have to be, as you pointed out, they have to be smart about this stuff because of blowback on this.
	Even from just a strategic, secular standpoint, if they could get into that mindset, you've got to start to have some measured response.
	They've got the leaders of Hamas are running this show with a big financial network out of Qatar.
	Why is that happening?
	You know, our government is complicit in covering that up.
	Netanyahu's not, you know, sitting in commando raids to take these guys out in Qatar because, you know, our government doesn't want to have that happen.
	That's a big stinking flag to me, the fact that these guys are allowed to do this kind of stuff.
	You would think that when you have an atrocity like this, get the people who did it, get the people who led it.
	But no, they're not going to do that.
	Instead, they're going to use it for their other agenda, which is to clear the land off.
	I've got a listener here, Gerald, distorted perception, says, I say that we're probably going to start seeing false flag sacrifices on our soil to get us emotionally invested in this war.
	I don't even want to think what they will do to get what they want.
	What do you think about that? He's 100% right.
	Yeah. 100% right.
	Yeah. And again, going back to Hamas, let's put this into perspective.
	You had 2.3 million people living in an open-air concentration camp called Gaza.
	Couldn't go in, couldn't go out.
	Again, the United Nations saying that, what was it, like 60% of the people were unemployed?
	I mean, it was devastating.
	And the United Nations said by 2020, it was going to be a horror.
	And now we're three years past that.
	So, if you were locked up in a concentration camp, if they keep stealing your land, you think you want to blow the brains out of the other people?
	I mean, come on. And then, again, I totally opposed what Hamas did.
	Totally opposed to it.
	Let's look at the other side of the story.
	Look what's going on, and look what they've been doing to make this happen.
	And, again, not my...
	Haha, that's the Israeli newspaper.
	Over half of the people that Hamas killed were soldiers, police, and security guards, not civilians.
	Meanwhile, over the course of the year before this happened, some 300 Palestinians were killed before this happened.
	Thousands have been arrested with nothing, no cause, that have been thrown into jail.
	They don't talk about that.
	About all the Palestinians that have been locked up.
	So when you have this kind of thing where they're stealing your land, they're killing your people, they're locking you up, you think you're going to go out of your mind and want to kill people?
	Yeah, yeah. It's very much like what Americans did to the Indians on the reservations.
	Yes. Concentrate them into an area and then make sure that they can't really make a living.
	They're totally dependent on what you allow them to do and you don't allow them to get in or get out or whatever.
	And, you know, you had several situations that happened after they put Indians on reservations.
	They would break out, you know, they get off the reservation and momentarily go to war before they were conquered and put back into it.
	But, you know, that really was a predecessor, not just of what we're seeing here in Gaza, but it's also a predecessor of what they want to do to all of us, isn't it?
	That's really what the smart cities and the 15-minute cities and all the rest of the stuff.
	You don't own anything.
	You don't have any ability to make a living.
	You're not going to go anywhere.
	You're locked down permanently here, and you'll take what we give, and that's it.
	Don't worry about it.
	You worry about climate change?
	Get rid of those wood-burning pizza ovens?
	Oh, yeah. We're going to be annihilated!
	World War III, we had forecast it began with the Ukraine war two days before the Ukraine war.
	You can look at the cover of the Trends Journal.
	COVID war, Ukraine war, world war.
	World War III has now expanded.
	Oh, there's this thing called the Samsung option.
	Have you heard about that? Oh, yeah.
	Yeah, yeah. Pull the temple down and kill everybody.
	That's right. And how many nuclear weapons does Israel have?
	I don't know. They don't tell people.
	What are they saying? Between 200 to 400.
	Oh, wow. Yeah.
	They're going to wipe out everybody.
	It's going to be the end of the world if we don't stop this.
	I'm telling everybody I know.
	Do anything you want in any way you can to bring peace.
	Any way you want to do it, don't ask me what to do.
	Do it the way you want to do it.
	And you've got Mark Levin and you've got Ben Shapiro pushing that Samson option.
	What an arrogant little nothing of a boy.
	What an arrogant little boy he is.
	Ben Shapiro. Yeah.
	And Mark Levin. Boy, I tell you, it's just...
	It's amazing to see this.
	You know, we have our own.
	I mean, we've got Lindsey Graham.
	We've got Nuki Haley. You know, they always kill everybody.
	Kill everybody. It's one of the reasons I keep pushing these people out there.
	And, you know, they say it openly all the time.
	Lindsey had several episodes this last week.
	Yeah, no limit to civilian casualties.
	Kill everybody. Yep.
	Again, look at the cover of the Trends Journal.
	It just went out. It's a perfect Satan.
	And it says it's politicians.
	Yeah. Peace.
	War is the only solution.
	That's right. How demonic could you be to think like this?
	And by the way, I'm not a pacifist.
	I'm a fighter.
	Used to teach close combat.
	Had my own school for many years.
	I'll attack the attacker.
	I'm a man of peace.
	Because when you're a real fighter, you know that, hey, man, don't want to get in a fight.
	Anything could happen. I don't care how good you are.
	That's right. That's like a lot of people in the military.
	You know, they've seen war, and it's like, let's not do that.
	It's these people like Lindsey Graham and Nuki Haley that...
	Little cowards. Yeah, yeah.
	Little cowards. Little fat boy Graham couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag.
	And they keep putting this little clown out there time after time after time.
	Oh, and by the way, they're calling it, quote, a religious war.
	Lindsey Graham keeps calling it a religious war.
	Okay, why am I involved in a religious war?
	What religion is Lindsey?
	I don't know what religion Lindsey is, but I've never seen him do anything religious.
	Yeah, the religion of Satan.
	That's what he is. There's not a war that that little slime ball didn't love.
	And again, a little nothing of a boy.
	A little nothing of a boy.
	I'm telling all the people, you better do something in the name of peace.
	As you well know, I launched Occupy Peace.
	Just don't talk about it.
	You came up here and spoke at our rally.
	I keep having...
	Oh, by the way, I contacted...
	The last rally I had was in May, and Dennis Kucinich...
	RFK Jr.'s former campaign manager was a speaker here.
	He's no longer the campaign manager.
	Because RFK Jr.
	is totally pro-Israel.
	And I no longer support RFK Jr.
	I just asked for all my donation back and I gave him top donation.
	Don't support him anymore.
	And I've spoken with RFK Jr.
	Don't support him anymore.
	Yeah. That's the way these politicians are.
	That absolutely is. Geesebusters, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, thank you, David. Great to see Gerald back.
	It is good to have you back.
	And I want to give this comment to you, Gerald, your comments.
	Narrowway Narrowgate Ministry says, Hamas's controlled opposition, created by Israel in 1987, funded, armed, and supplied by Zionist Israel to do their bidding, the videos clearly show Israelis skipping town, allowing the attack.
	Your comment. I don't know.
	I know they allowed the attack because, again, according to the New York Times report, the Israeli intelligence agency knew this was going to happen.
	And again, Phil Giraldi, this is a top CIA guy, and Scott Ritter.
	Scott Ritter is no man like him.
	This guy's been on the other side.
	He's been there. He's been all around the world.
	Same with Giraldi. He's a top CIA guy.
	Phil Giraldi was the guy that went into George Bush's office, showed him the documents.
	There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
	And Bush told him to leave the office and Giraldi quit.
	They both reported that Israel has the best intelligence of anybody.
	They knew this was going to happen.
	And as I said, Netanyahu let it happen because when all else fails, they take you to war.
	He was failing 39 weeks of protests.
	And about Hamas, George Soros even supported Hamas.
	Fox News did a story back and it just was re-reported.
	And so did Netanyahu.
	So, again, but now they were on the other side.
	They saw them as a check against the PLO. And they play those types of games.
	We do that as well with the geopolitics.
	It's like, okay, well, this group over here is not as bad as that monster, and then all of a sudden now this group that you supported, now they become the worst monster.
	We've played that film over and over again on our side as well.
	And, of course, this one person says, this is Mark, he says, I heard the Israeli, Surveillance system is good.
	They know when a cat is walking along the fence, you mean to tell me they totally missed the attack?
	And it's not just that.
	It's also U.S. satellite intelligence is there.
	They said, well, you know, we just pulled back, and, you know, they've got this automated smart wall, and so we sent soldiers to the north, and we didn't have that many soldiers that were there.
	And then the U.S. says, yeah, we don't bother to look there anymore.
	We used to do that, but we don't bother to look there anymore.
	So there's a lot of suspicious stuff there.
	Requires a good deal of faith in people that I don't trust.
	Again, the data came out.
	The data came out. The people, the long articles we wrote about in detail quoting the top Israeli officials saying that they knew it was going to happen.
	Yeah, yeah. It's there.
	It's not our words.
	It's coming from the Israelis that we report.
	This is what they said. This is what they said.
	This is what they said. This is what they said.
	We're not making this up.
	There's another comment here, GeorgiaBoy1142, if it showed me one thing, it was never give up your Second Amendment.
	And that's one of the things that's happening right now, Haratz, if I'm pronouncing it correctly, is talking about the fact that they're forming militias.
	Remote communities. The first time I've seen militia used in a way that is not a dirty word.
	You know, they usually talk about an insurgent army or something.
	They call them a militia to try to demonize the word.
	But that's really what militias are for and what the power of the community is for.
	And when we look at this...
	This ought to be a warning to everybody that we need to start making, you know, community commitments.
	When we talk about something like a false flag or something happening here, and the million people that are being let in, millions of people that are being let in by Biden, you know, he's let in, since he's been in there, four million people, twice as many people as you've got in Gaza, you know? And so...
	And a lot of people, they're not just people coming in from Mexico.
	They're coming in from all these nations that we've been at war with, nations that we've been bombing, and I'm sure that they would love to bomb us.
	And we've probably got a lot of people in the American government that would kind of give them a hand or look the other way, which is what we're talking about here.
	And so what are we going to do?
	What are we going to do to protect ourselves?
	It really is about that, and it is something, you know, before we get to the point of a nuclear war, this type of thing may be happening as well in order to get people galvanized for that.
	Exactly. When all else fails, they take you to war.
	The economy's failing.
	The stock markets are a joke.
	They're a total joke. They have nothing to do with reality.
	Totally regained, nothing to do with reality.
	Oh, by the way, China's buying up more gold than anybody right now.
	And again, if people, to me, the only solution to this is peace.
	And it's up to every individual to do whatever you can to In the name of peace.
	And again, if you want to donate to Occupy Peace, go to OccupyPeace.com or do whatever you want.
	But it's not like I just talk about it.
	We're fighting for peace.
	I'm a warrior for the Prince of Peace.
	And if we don't stop this, we are going to be annihilated in nuclear destruction.
	This isn't like a...
	Again, your top trend for 2023 was Middle East meltdown.
	We said this was going to happen.
	Yeah, that's right.
	And you know, it is important you say, everybody do what they can for peace.
	And I think about that clip that I played yesterday.
	Again, you know, a couple of Orthodox Jews that are there and they're protesting.
	And that guy just starts attacking and beating them.
	You know, a big guy, real big guy.
	And of course, he's got a uniform, so you can't do anything about that.
	And I looked at that and I said, okay, well, you look at this and from one standpoint, you know, these guys got the crap beat out of them.
	And, you know, the Israelis are still going to go to war with all this stuff.
	And yet, from another standpoint, when people see that, it It gives them a chance to really see the viciousness of this, to see the politics of this.
	And from that standpoint, it was a big victory for these guys who were pushing for peace because other people got to see that side of it, see that perspective of it, and say, do you really want to Are these the guys that you really want to be on their side?
	You know, Hans, are we the baddies here?
	You know, I mean, you look at this and it's like, okay, so who are the aggressors?
	Who are the bad guys in this?
	And so it is very important for us to take that path.
	And I think that's one of the reasons why...
	It was so powerful when Gandhi did it, when Martin Luther King did it.
	And again, just these four or five guys that were there in that video.
	And when they were attacked, when you're attacked like that and people see it, that is a very, very powerful statement.
	And you may wind up with your head bleeding on the sidewalk, but you've done something that is very important.
	And again, there's a whole group of Orthodox Jews that are totally against the establishment of Israel.
	They don't believe in that.
	And they're totally opposed to what's going on.
	I said every one of my, except one of all my, I got Fort, my closest friends are Jewish.
	My best friends.
	Only one of them is on the other side.
	Everyone, the other three, are totally opposed to what Israel is doing and have been for a long time.
	And again, here, this is another one that came out recently.
	U.S. says it will retaliate if American forces are attacked in the Middle East.
	Remember that? Yeah, yeah.
	Tell me something, David.
	What the hell are we doing in the Middle East?
	Yeah, what are we doing in Syria?
	Again, look at how many attacks have been in Syria.
	I'd like to answer your question before you go any further.
	Yeah, go ahead. We're stealing their oil.
	Yeah. That's what we're doing.
	We're stealing their oil in Syria.
	As I said, you think we would have invaded Iraq if their major export was broccoli?
	Mm-hmm. We're stealing their oil.
	We're stealing it out of Libya.
	That's what they overthrew Gaddafi.
	That's what we're doing there.
	What right does America have to be in the Middle East?
	Oh, we're protecting them.
	Israel's our greatest ally.
	What ally? What are you talking about?
	What are we doing there?
	I'm an American.
	I'm a patriot.
	I believe in the Founding Fathers.
	No foreign entanglements.
	Get the hell out of there.
	Secure the homeland with our forces.
	Close down the bases overseas.
	Bring the troops home.
	So I'm sorry I interrupted you, but that's what we're doing in Syria.
	And the United States says that It will retaliate if American forces are attacked in the Middle East.
	United States Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said that Washington is prepared to retaliate if U.S. troops are targeted in the course of the Israel-Hamas war.
	All right? Anthony Blinken, who goes to see Netanyahu, and you know what the words of his mouth come out?
	I am a Jew, and I am the Secretary of State.
	Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
	You're a Jew? And you're the Secretary of State?
	Hey, a little blinking boy, you little scum, you're a little daddy's boy, a member of the club that got there.
	Just to make this clear, how about saying, I am an American?
	Yeah, yeah. How about that?
	I agree. Never mentions the word that he's an American.
	I'm a Jew and I'm the U.S. Secretary.
	I'm the Secretary of State.
	I hold the power.
	Well, we've got Rashida Tlaib, who is, she's a Palestinian, and that's her first loyalty.
	You know, we've got, I don't even remember the guy's name.
	I've never seen him before. Some congressman, he shows up in an Israeli Defense Force uniform.
	And so, you know, that's where their loyalties are.
	They're telling you exactly what it is.
	Yeah. You know, America is last on their agenda.
	My only loyalty is America.
	Yeah. Yeah. I could care.
	I'm an Italian. I could care.
	I'd hate to see a war go on, but oh, oh my God.
	No, I was in Italy.
	Hey, you guys caused your own problems, man.
	Keep me out of it. Mm-hmm.
	Mm-hmm. Yeah, we've got to get involved in every one of these fights.
	And as Radice Bro, thank you for the tip, he says, Americans will be on the front lines slaughtering innocents as always in this war while Israel sits in the back seat.
	Well, we'll always get right in the thick of it.
	Hazel Kitty57 says, yeah, RFK Jr.
	is against the Second Amendment. He is also pro-choice, and now we have seen that he is also pro-war.
	I think it's interesting when we look at this.
	Now, I thought it was an interesting move.
	I don't agree with what Johnson is doing in terms of saying, well, our first priority is Israel.
	It's like, okay, great to know that.
	But what he has done is he has split Israel funding from Ukraine funding, and then he coupled Ukraine funding with the border.
	And it's kind of interesting, and he coupled the Israeli thing with reducing this massive army of IRS agents that Biden wants to stick on us.
	He still wants to grow it to four and a half times.
	Mike Johnson's reductions are still going to have an IRS army that's four and a half times bigger than what we have today.
	But that's not good enough for the Democrats, right?
	Even though they're going to get more money, even his budget, you know, Biden asked for $14 billion.
	He says, here's $14.3 billion.
	And get rid of some of the IRS agents.
	And they said, no, you can't do that.
	It's more important to them to have an army against us of IRS agents than it is for them to get their funding to Israel that they said is their top priority for the Democrats.
	I think that's an interesting move that he did with that.
	And when you look at the border...
	Of America. And he couples that with Ukraine, which is about where their borders are going to be drawn.
	And there's no money involved in that.
	It's just changing the way that they're going to be engaging and enforcing the borders, if you can imagine them doing that.
	But even with that, it's like, no, you can't combine those two things either.
	I mean, they hate America.
	They want open borders.
	They want IRS agents after us.
	And we can clearly see that with these two things being split, can't we?
	Yeah. Again, this guy's a little clown boy, this Johnson.
	Another crap Johnson, like Lyndon Baines Johnson.
	A little clown.
	This guy's a little nobody.
	And a hypocrite.
	He calls himself an evangelical Christian, and he supports murder.
	I hate abortion, but Israel can murder anybody that they want.
	You also said...
	Before I forget, very important.
	Again, from the beginning we said that Russia would defeat Ukraine.
	It wasn't even going to happen. Someone mentioned a false flag event happening in the United States.
	Ukraine is going to do something Bombing a nuclear power plant in Ukraine or doing something really, really, really big to get back onto the headlines.
	Ukraine is going to do a false flag or a major event to get back in the headlines to get more money to keep the war going because they lost.
	I agree. You're absolutely right.
	Yep, yep. He's got to get the attention.
	He's been kicked to the back, and I'm still sending a lot of money to him, but he's been kicked to the back, and he's got to get to the front again and get that attention.
	And you just saw, I don't know if you saw it over the weekend, Blinken dressed his little kid up as Zelensky.
	And that was two days after the Babylon Bee did a joke, and they said some kid dresses up like Zelensky, and immediately Congress gives him $45 billion worth of candy.
	And then two days later, Blinken dresses his little toddler son up as Zelensky.
	I can't stand that little scum, Blinken.
	What an arrogant little jerk.
	And he's a disgrace to America.
	Going to Israel, I'm a Jew, I'm Secretary of State.
	In other words, saying, I'm Jewish and I'm in control of your country.
	Rather than I'm an American.
	Never mention the word as an American.
	That's right. That's right.
	And again, this is, look at the hypocrisy that repulsive kids have.
	We don't want to give money to Ukraine, but we'll give it to Israel because we get a lot of money when we run for office from all of these people.
	Yeah, yeah. And we don't want to be defamed by the Israeli, you know, the AIPAC. Yeah, so we'll give money to Israel, but nothing to Ukraine.
	We like that war, but not that war, because you're little war whores, that's why.
	Well, you know, Mike Johnson was in that camp.
	He was one of these people saying, no money for Ukraine, and I'm opposing it, until he becomes speaker.
	And then it's like, okay, yeah.
	We've got to stop Putin and we've got an axis of evil.
	And it's like, you know where the axis of evil is?
	The axis of evil is running right through the center of Congress that still doesn't care about people being poisoned.
	People are still being poisoned with stuff.
	They don't care what happened with any of that.
	They don't care about the medical martial law.
	That's your axis of evil.
	The people who are...
	Going to increase the IRS and make it five times bigger, and he's talking about how he's going to reduce the IRS and how he's going to be fiscally responsible.
	You don't have the billions of dollars that you're spending on all this stuff.
	You don't have it at all. I mean, there's nothing fiscally responsible or conservative about any of that stuff.
	Yeah, no. They're losers, man.
	They're little freaks.
	Again, I was the assistant to the Secretary of the New York State Senate.
	Mm-hmm. I was there.
	It was the worst job I ever had.
	And I've been working all my life.
	All my life I've been working.
	I hated that job and I quit.
	To watch grown men grovel It wasn't my trip.
	My friends couldn't believe when I quit.
	It was my dear friend.
	He died, Brian Donahue.
	His wife became the lieutenant governor of the Pataki.
	Nobody could believe I said, I'm not going to do this, you guys.
	I'm not going to suck my way up to the top.
	It was disgusting. It was the lowest life of people that I ever could imagine.
	That are the politicians.
	These are the people I hated in high school and college that wanted to be class president in the student council.
	I know. I remember. I remember.
	My same experience, I remember that.
	Yeah. Really smarmy, you know.
	It's like, so who cares?
	We are on the precipice of nuclear annihilation.
	That's right. Yeah.
	That's the bottom line with all of it.
	Yep. Well, yeah, it is.
	So... You've been right about all these different trends.
	When we look at commercial real estate, that's another one.
	Just looking at the economy, pull back a little bit.
	I know the nuclear thing is there at the forefront, but you've been right about the commercial real estate.
	What do you think about Biden's giving $45 billion?
	He said, we're going to convert these commercial buildings to residential.
	What do you think about that?
	Again, in the Trends Journal magazine, and when, of course, if you go to your site, then people get a discount on it.
	We only put the data in, and then we give our analysis.
	Buildings built in the last 50 years, according to the data, are non-convertible into houses.
	These are just big open spaces, steel and glass.
	To cut them up into spaces is more expensive than if you knock them down and rebuild them.
	That's according to the data.
	So this is just more political stupidity hype.
	Do you think that he's going to give them $45 billion and just kind of use them to house people?
	Because we're seeing in London now, you've got all these people camping out on the streets.
	I mean, we went there multiple times.
	I've been there for 20 years, 20 plus years.
	But we went there multiple times, never saw anything, never saw any homeless encampments and stuff like that.
	But that's now become a thing.
	You think that they're going to use maybe take over this commercial stuff, pay these guys, and just use this to cram people in out of sight?
	What do you think? Yeah, they'll do that.
	Yeah. Yeah. But again, it's not going to, it's going to go, again, none of this means anything if we don't stop this war, the Israel war.
	Yeah. None of it means anything.
	Yeah. Again, everyone look up the Samson option.
	Israelis. If they lose, they're going to annihilate.
	That's their thing.
	This is a religious war, and it's not my religion.
	I'm not telling you to believe in my religion.
	Don't tell me to believe in yours.
	And I am tired of hearing that you're the chosen people and that God gave you this land.
	I'm not in kindergarten.
	Mm-hmm. And I'm telling everybody, whatever way you can do it, in any way you can do it, that's my message over and over to everybody I talk to, do anything you can in any way you want for peace.
	I agree. Any way you want to do it, but do it.
	There's going to be a big rally in Washington, D.C. this weekend.
	You might want to go there.
	Okay. All right.
	And we won't have RFK Jr.
	speaking at this one. All right.
	No, and again, I've spoken with RFK, and I demanded my money back.
	I donated a lot.
	I donated the most I could donate.
	I said, I want my money back.
	They're giving it back to me.
	I said, I don't support him anymore.
	Again, everybody that wants to look at RFK Jr., he's really a very smart guy.
	When he talks about Israel, he's really ignorant.
	And that's not my words.
	That's the words of Max Blumenthal.
	From the gray zone.
	A Jewish guy that spent a lot of time in Israel and in the West Bank.
	And he's on Jimmy Dore, put Jimmy Dore, Mark Blumenthal, Max Blumenthal, Kennedy.
	And Blumenthal rips Kennedy apart.
	Fact after fact, after fact, after fact, after fact.
	Well, he wouldn't come on and talk with me.
	And even when I was agreed with him on the germ game stuff, I liked that chapter of his Fauci book.
	It wasn't going to be a challenging interview.
	That was before he was running for president.
	But I was very concerned from the beginning when he said, you know, that clip surfaced where he said, you know, let's lock up the Koch brothers and stuff like that because they disagree with me.
	You know, and he didn't come out and say, well, I used to think like that, but now that I've been censored for the things that I've said, I have more respect for the First Amendment.
	I could have respected that.
	Instead, what he did when somebody finally asked him, somebody finally asked him, he said, well, I wasn't talking about them.
	I was talking about corporations, and I think fraudulent corporations ought to be given a death sentence.
	Well, I agree with that, but that's not what he said.
	He said, let's give them three hots and a cot.
	You don't give a corporation, if you're going to put a death sentence on a corporation, you don't give it three hots and a cot.
	So again, he was lying about that because of the political perceptions that he wanted to put forward.
	And so he's been calculating this stuff like every other politician.
	He's been calculating his positions, I think, as to what it's going to do for him.
	And the only person I've seen who has stuck to his principles so far Regardless of what it cost him, it was Thomas Massey.
	Everybody else is just calculating on this stuff, you know?
	Thomas Massey, to me, is the best one out there.
	Oh, yeah. And I was very disappointed.
	Even Rand Paul has voted for supporting Israel.
	Yeah? Oh, yeah. Well, look what he did with all the COVID stuff.
	I mean, he's covered.
	He's covered for all of this COVID stuff.
	Dr. Fauci, your vaccine is going to cause people to be vaccine hesitant.
	Well, they ought to be vaccine hesitant.
	But, you know, he's pushing for this lab leak theory because they don't want people looking at what their vaccine did to people.
	So let's go back to the narrative about it being this weaponized virus out of Wuhan.
	I've been very disappointed in Rand Paul.
	Of course, his wife was out there buying stock in Gilead that makes Remdesivir when all that stuff was running.
	So, I mean, he's not on the opposite side of Fauci.
	Both of them are getting rich off of this thing.
	It's a shame.
	But anyway, thank you so much for being on, Gerald.
	Always great talking to you, and I'm afraid that you've been right about all this stuff.
	As you point out, when you make these predictions about the trends, it's not that you want to see it happening.
	It's just what you see happening.
	And you saw this happening from quite a distance in terms of time, and it all is happening there.
	So everybody needs to pay attention to what Gerald says.
	It's never futile to stand for peace forever.
	As I mention all the time, you know, Martin Luther said, if I knew I was going to die tomorrow, if I knew the world was going to end tomorrow, I would still plant a tree today.
	And so that needs to be our attitude.
	We're going to do the right thing, regardless of...
	What it appears, even if it appears to be completely hopeless, we're going to stand and do the right thing, and that needs to be the attitude that we take.
	And so I really do appreciate you taking that attitude when it comes to warm peace, Gerald.
	Thank you. Appreciate that.
	Thank you, and thanks for all you do.
	And again, everybody that you want to get to Trends Journal, please tell them how they could get it from your...
	That's right. With the code NIGHT, you can save 10% off of the Trends Journal at trendsjournal.com.
	Excellent publication. I've...
	I've interviewed you on a regular basis for years, and it is always a pleasure to talk to you, and you always see what is happening, and it is very important for people to see this, and at this point, we're really getting up to some really serious things that are going to be happening shortly if we don't stand against this.
	So thank you so much for standing against it, Gerald.
	Appreciate it. Thank you for all that you do, and thank you for having me on.
	I very much appreciate it.
	Thank you. Thank you. Before we break, I got one more comment here, and it's from GeorgiaBoy1142.
	He says, it's real easy for U.S. forces to be attacked when they're all over the face of the planet.
	I think that's maybe the reason they do this, right?
	It's Pat Buchanan. He says, we've set up tripwires in pretty much every hotspot everywhere in every country.
	We've got bases all over the place.
	Yeah, it really is about that.
	And it's about the oil. Always has been about the oil.
	Well, that's it for today's broadcast.
	Have a great weekend, everybody, and hopefully we'll see you on Monday.
	Have a good one. They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	TheDavidKnightShow.com If you like the Eagles...
	the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.

▲