Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 7, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:02:18

The David Knight Show - 11/7/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Transcription by CastingWords
	Using free speech to free minds.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	it's Tuesday, the 7th of November, year of our Lord, 2023.
	Well, today we're going to begin by taking a look at gun issues at the manifesto that was released.
	It's very interesting because you see the same five or six things that are done all the time, all the time by the left.
	And we'll talk about how this is a pattern that we see in terms of their reaction, their cover-up, their misdirection.
	As to what is happening with this, but there is also an interesting case that is going to the Supreme Court that has Vox, a leftist publication, all tied up in concerns about what's going to happen because it's going to be a big win.
	A big win for free speech, a big win for the Constitution, and the leftist authoritarians hate that.
	So we're going to begin with a manifesto.
	We'll also take a look at what happened with Trump.
	There's some updates as to what happened in Israel.
	And as Joe McGuffin sent to me, there's some interesting information about U.S. military activity in the area.
	We'll be right back. Well, by now you've probably seen or heard the pages that were leaked.
	There were three pages that were leaked as photographs of the manifesto that has been hidden, hidden by the Nashville Police Department.
	They said, well, we're going to release it, but then the FBI got involved, and we don't want you to release that.
	And so they fought tooth and nail with it, and you have, for the only thing that doesn't make any sense to me about all of this is why the school itself We'd want to keep this hidden.
	There may be some other information about the school that is derogatory, that is not surface, but what we see is a pattern of hatred that if this had been released, it would have blown their gun control narrative out of the water.
	Folks, we don't need gun control.
	We need education control.
	Our educational institutions are out of control, and they have weaponized a program Of racial hatred.
	Of violence. And as you see with this person, of self-hatred.
	All the transgender stuff is really about taking the self-loathing liberal mentality and taking it to an all-new level.
	Hating what gender you are.
	Not just the fact that you're white or your skin color or whatever.
	These self-loathing liberals, they must hate everything about themselves.
	And so this is essentially...
	It's like an essay from one of their classes, K-12 plus college.
	This is the kind of person that the educational institutions are producing and seek to produce.
	This is by design.
	They want this. They want lunatics who hate themselves, who hate their body, who hate their gender, who hate everything about themselves and hate everybody else, And they want to turn them loose in society in the same way they want to bring in terrorists from the Middle East or saboteurs from China in addition to economic refugees to go on the welfare state.
	They want to destroy this country.
	They have many different ways to do it.
	This is just another one of them.
	So what we've seen with a manifesto, handwritten, dated February the 23rd, Oh, wow.
	What is that?
	And with their daddy's Mustangs and convertibles, I don't know if that is a Mustang convertible, or is that two different classes of things?
	She would not like me.
	I've been known to wear khakis.
	I don't carry backpacks, and my first car was a Mustang, and I like convertibles.
	Anyway, this is the kind of stuff, right?
	And then filled with profanities I won't bother to go into.
	Kill all these little crackers with all your white privileges.
	F you, F you, F you.
	Filled with hate and absolutely deranged.
	And you see, this is why red flag gun laws don't matter.
	You take a gun away from somebody that's this filled with hate from the time they spent in the educational institutions, they'll find some way to kill you if they're filled with that kind of hate.
	And we've seen that over and over again.
	Waukesha, Wisconsin. You know, we don't want to talk about that, do we?
	We don't want to talk about the racial motives.
	We don't want to talk about the fact the murder weapon was not a gun.
	It was an SUV. Targeted children.
	Targeted grannies in a Christmas parade.
	In May, the Star News, which is the parent company of the Tennessee Star, a conservative paper here in Tennessee, filed a lawsuit against the Metro Nashville Police Department and another one against the FBI to try to get them to release the documents.
	And those lawsuits remain active.
	But now this has been leaked.
	This person, Hale, killed three students, three staff members.
	And again, when you talk about killing nine-year-olds, point blank, The level of hatred and insanity of this person.
	But that is what is being pushed everywhere.
	Just as I said yesterday, you know, going through this fetishized ritual that the Washington Post did with taking down the statue of Robert E. Lee.
	That's not just about white people.
	That's not just about the Confederacy.
	This is about destroying America.
	This is their agenda.
	To breed hate and to get you to respond in kind, by the way.
	It's one of the reasons why I talked about that yesterday.
	The fact that we as Christians need to understand that the...
	The foundation of our country was based on Christian ethics.
	And let's not lose the Christian ethic.
	That we transcend this tit-for-tat violence.
	That we don't escalate that.
	That we de-escalate that.
	That we rise above it.
	I know that's not easy to do.
	Christ does not call us to easy things.
	I know that everything in your human nature wants to go against that.
	You see the slaughter of children, videos, and you know, I don't need to know anything else about it.
	Let's nuke Gaza.
	Okay, well, that's not going to work out for a variety of reasons.
	And a lot of people say, well, you know, Gaza is so close, it could destroy your country as well.
	Oh, okay, well, let's just bomb them back into the Stone Age or something like that.
	You have to pull back from this hatred.
	And it is escalating and even spilling over worldwide, this hatred that we see in the Middle East.
	But this is a program of hatred that has been festering for a long time, injected into our kids when we abandoned them to the state to be raised.
	That's what taking your kid to a government school is.
	Abandoning them to the state to be raised.
	And let me tell you, a lot of the private schools...
	They teach the same thing as the government schools do.
	Why? And you can do that with the private schools, especially if there is money that follows the students into that, into charter schools.
	The whole thing about schools has been taken over.
	Our country has had the Marxist authoritarians who have marched through the institutions, and they are as thoroughly in control of all the schools as As the leftist mentality controls social media, Apple, Google, all the mainstream media companies.
	And so, she called herself a transgender man.
	Former student at this elementary school.
	The leaked manifesto refers to the shooting as, quote, death day.
	Said, can't believe I'm doing this, but I'm ready.
	I hope my victims aren't.
	The manifesto also indicates that the shooting was racially motivated.
	Want to kill all you little crackers?
	Kill those kids? Yeah, and that's one thing.
	I've never figured that out.
	What the cracker thing is all about.
	Not that I care.
	I've been called cracker or whatever.
	I don't really care.
	You know, haters gonna hate.
	What does it even mean?
	It's like... Anyway, I guess today it would be crockers.
	They'd be wearing Crocs or something.
	I don't know any more than I understand the hatred of khaki pants, backpacks, Mustangs, and convertibles.
	Their haters are going to hate.
	So the key thing is she doesn't hate those things.
	The key thing is she hates herself.
	Everything about herself.
	Many of the victims' family members are seeking to block the public release of the manifesto, but Republican Tennessee Senator Bill Haggerty called for his release, saying, I think people deserve to know what took place, what was in the mind of this sick person that committed these heinous murders.
	Well, we know what was in the mind, and we kind of knew this already.
	But the question, Senator Haggerty, is who and what and how is this hatred being put in so many people's minds?
	And we look at this now. I mean, you know, the hatred that came out immediately after pictures of the massacre.
	People said it was justified.
	You can't ever justify something like that.
	And you can't justify what is being done by the state of Israel and Gaza now, either.
	I mean, what is the matter with people on both sides of this?
	But anyway...
	We now know the mass murderer was not just nuts, but viscerally hated students at this school.
	And I hope I have a high death count ready to die.
	Ha ha. Kill those kids going to private fancy schools.
	She planned to make a videotape at 1120, according to the direct leave for school at 1135, then attack at 1230.
	But she attacked at 1011.
	After sending an Instagram message to a friend who called 911, and she was dead by 1027.
	Shot by cops after she murdered three nine-year-olds and three adults.
	Again, so sad to see this, and nobody wants to talk about why.
	Nobody wants to talk about SSRIs.
	Nobody wants to talk about the institutions that inculcate this kind of hatred in people.
	No, no, take away the gun.
	And we know what their motive is on that.
	On X, conservatives blame the anti-white, anti-Christian hate with which Hale was inoculated, much of which is found in the DEICRT propaganda.
	Well, it's just propaganda.
	It's their curriculum.
	This is what happens when racial division is sown into every aspect of public school curriculum, says Sarah Fields of the Texas Freedom Coalition.
	So what are we going to do about it?
	Nothing. You know, they'll wring their hands, but they'll continue to fund the schools.
	We'll continue to educate kids the same way.
	And I think that we're going to somehow get a different result.
	And you know, if you just vote for those Republicans, they'll fix all of that stuff.
	No, they won't. They won't.
	They won't get rid of the Department of Education.
	They won't stop bribing people to push hate to the institutions.
	When you vote for these Republicans in Congress, you vote for your Republican president, they're not going to do anything about this.
	And they probably won't do anything about it at the state level.
	We have to have a grassroots movement to defund these schools and to rethink the way that we're educating our children.
	And to reactivate the family instead of constantly turning to the state to fix all of our problems.
	To the state to educate our kids.
	It's exactly what I would expect.
	A bunch of anti-white hate, vitriol, fanatic, psychotic ramblings, all about wanting to kill those kids.
	Is that another? Patriot voice.
	When those kids is mentioned, that means white kids, despite the fact that the lunatic was white.
	Well, of course, it's not despite that, but it's because of that.
	It is the program of self-hatred, self-loathing.
	This is just, and this has been going on all of my life with the left.
	And so this is, you know, when we look at this, thank you, when we look at this, it is just on steroids.
	But it's the same thing in principle that I've been seeing all of my life.
	The truth is, tragically, this killer was fully indoctrinated in every poisonous, woke ideology parroted over the past 15 years by the Obama administration, the Biden administration, the Clinton DNC, Hollywood, corporate America, universities, schools, and mainstream media.
	What's missing from that?
	That's Tom Moore, commentator Tom Moore.
	What did Tom forget? Trump.
	Trump. Trump was pushing this transgender insanity...
	At the same time that he was praising Hillary Clinton.
	Do you understand who that guy is?
	Boy, if there's ever been a Manchurian candidate for conservatives, it's Donald Trump.
	He has pushed all of this stuff, and nobody ever holds him responsible.
	Why? Because as the Wall Street Journal said when they were talking about DeSantis, why are the Republicans and Republican politicians in Florida Why are they endorsing President Trump instead of DeSantis?
	And one of them said, well, because if you go against Trump, that's suicide.
	They're afraid of him.
	They're afraid of Benedict Donald, this New York gun control, Hillary-loving, transgender-pushing liberal, adulterer, failure at casinos.
	Do I need to go on? This guy who has failed at everything except...
	At pushing the World Economic Forum agenda on us.
	He's failed at everything else.
	If, in fact, that's what he wanted to do.
	Because all whites are racist, they share collective guilt for the sins of the past, real and imagined, so that guilt can only be expiated by abolition of whiteness.
	Yeah, that's the writings of these people, like white fragility.
	We believe that so long as the white race exists, all movements against what is called racism will fail.
	Therefore, our aim is to abolish the white race.
	Well, yeah, it's right there.
	White fragility, it is a policy of genocide, and Hale was just doing what she was taught.
	Now, the Nashville mayor's office came out and they confirmed the authenticity of this.
	We had some interesting statements from the police department that seemed to muddy the water for some people, but I think it was just the language that people didn't really understand.
	The Nashville police department So the photographs are not MNPD, the Metro Nashville Police Department, not MNPD crime scene images.
	I think all they were saying was that they didn't get this from us.
	This wasn't the stuff that we had in our custody.
	Must have gotten it from somebody else.
	And, of course, the FBI has these pictures as well.
	The Behavioral Analysis Unit obtained the manifesto And they kept it.
	And so the police department there in Nashville is simply saying, they didn't steal it from us.
	Well, we'll find out.
	But that's really what they are focused on, isn't it?
	Not the content, but the provenance of this.
	How did they get this?
	And so it's now being labeled as sensitive content, censored on X, censored on Reddit.
	Of course, it's being censored on Reddit.
	Reddit was always the first and the worst in censorship.
	I remember before any of this stuff started on social media, Reddit was infamous for censorship.
	Facebook as well, doing the same thing, hiding this everywhere.
	They don't want you to see it.
	Too late, it's out.
	And we knew this anyway, didn't we?
	Metro Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell said he has directed the city's legal director to initiate an investigation to leak, but he wouldn't address the veracity of the documents.
	Well, I think actually he just did.
	How did this thing leak out?
	Well, I'm not saying that's the real thing, but we're going to find out who leaked it.
	You know, that type of deal. Multiple sources said a guy who, of all things, It's an investigative reporter for a TV station.
	It is News Channel 5.
	It's a CBS affiliate.
	It is owned by Scripps, which owns about 120 TV stations still.
	Many newspapers and things like that.
	It's a big Wall Street corporation that owns all these, and it's a CBS affiliate.
	And so, of course, this is the way they react.
	Phil. Phil. Phil?
	Yeah. Hey, Phil?
	Phil? Phil Connors?
	Phil Connors, I thought that...
	No, it's not Phil Connors.
	It's Phil Williams.
	Phil Williams? Phil?
	Phil, is that you? You sound just like all the mainstream media always does.
	It's like Groundhog Day again, isn't it?
	Always is with these guys.
	And so here's what Phil. Phil?
	Phil? Phil says, multiple sources have told me that the selective leak of three pages of the Covenant School shooting manifesto is extremely misleading.
	People who have read the whole thing say there's something in there for everybody.
	And others said she hated everybody.
	So this is an investigative reporter.
	And now he's doing the investigation that he wasn't interested in doing for, when was this, Mac and May, I think?
	Six months? Six months he doesn't care, but then when somebody shows what's really in the mind of these people who are being weaponized by our school systems, now he cares.
	Hates everybody. Well, again, this is what we've heard from these people over and over again.
	The spin from mainstream media.
	Rents, repeat. Rents, repeat.
	It's always the same stuff from these people.
	It is always Groundhog Day.
	No, no, no. Don't believe that stuff.
	Even though they said they hate white people.
	Don't believe that. That's not what this is about.
	Really? The trans terrorist words are in black and white.
	Yet mainstream media hacks like Phil.
	Phil? Phil? We're trying to gaslight you into thinking that they're being misconstrued, says Zero Hedge.
	Yeah, so now we know why the cover-up.
	Because this killer sounds exactly like the stereotypical college professor, the stereotypical college student today.
	Parotting, regurgitating, vomiting this hatred that has been stuffed into them.
	On a daily basis, by people in authority, you know, the Milgram experiment, and the people around them, their peers, you know, the Ash experiment.
	Facebook immediately censored it, as I said, March 27th, just days before the Trans Day of Vengeance, which was April 1st, April Fool's Day.
	The manifesto, which one official described as astronomically dangerous, dangerous to them, Because it shows that the real violence is not the gun, it's the school.
	We have all this stuff about school shooting, but it's the school, it's the curriculum that is violent.
	We never had any of this stuff before.
	Even RFK Jr., that I grew up in school in the Northeast, he wasn't even in the South like me.
	He said people used to bring their guns to school for target practice and things like that.
	I know. We're the same age.
	I used to see people riding around with rifles in the back of their pickup truck window, gun racks and things like that.
	It's the people that have changed.
	The guns have not changed.
	And it's this curriculum that is changing them.
	It's the schools that is a key instrument in terms of changing this.
	So when we talk about school shootings, the emphasis should be on the school, not on the gun.
	Because that's where the weapon, where the killing is taking place, in the mind.
	Out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks, the killer writes, and the killer takes action with whatever tool they have.
	The problem is not the tool.
	The problem is the hate that's being inculcated everywhere.
	So, they were going to release it.
	Then the Nashville Police Department said, no, we can't do it.
	After the stonewalling began, there was a lawsuit filed by the National Police Association that joined the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and in Davidson County.
	They all sued. To see this manifesto.
	The National Police Association did.
	So where is this stonewalling and this hiding coming from?
	It's coming from the FBI. It's coming from the federal government.
	Because that's where this curriculum of hate is coming from as well.
	And being weaponized.
	The FBI also denied a request for the manifesto.
	Saying that this is going to interfere with enforcement proceedings.
	What? You're not going to have a trial.
	The shooter's dead.
	There's not going to be any enforcement proceedings.
	Putting this stuff out there is not going to prejudice the public and contaminate a jury.
	The perp is dead.
	There's not going to be any trial. There's not going to be any enforcement proceedings.
	So, as usual, the FBI is telling an FIB. The Federal Investigation Bureau is lying.
	They're fibbing as usual.
	Jagger Hoover is fib as usual.
	And then you have the people who are still doubling down on the hate.
	Openly talking about it.
	Here's USO Sirius.
	USO Sirius, I guess, is what he's trying to say.
	Again, anonymous pseudonym because this guy's a coward.
	I hope it was Republicans that lost their lives.
	One good thing about gun violence is that it occasionally wipes out full Republican families in one fell swoop.
	There you go. Hatred.
	Same kind of hatred we see with the Israel and Palestine thing that's going on.
	The Tennessee Three.
	Remember, they did an insurrection in the Tennessee Capitol, and unlike the so-called insurrection on January the 6th, they actually got in contact with the legislators, the legislators pushed and shoved them, and you had, unlike in Washington,
	D.C., instead of having an army of armored cops with shields and everything else to provoke people, the way the Tennessee State Police did this was they used their bodies, unarmored, No helmets.
	They used their bodies to shield the legislators as the mob penetrated into the Capitol building, started pushing and shoving and hitting the state troopers as well as the legislators who were there.
	But that wasn't an insurrection.
	As a matter of fact, one of the three leaders of it, the Tennessee Three, Justin Pearson, here's a picture of him invited to the White House because Biden likes that kind of insurrection.
	You know, one man's insurrectionist is another man's hero.
	And so, these insurrectionists in Tennessee were heroes to Biden.
	Even though they got much further, did more than anybody did January the 6th, he was invited to see Biden.
	And so, what have they had to say about this?
	Nothing. Nothing at all.
	Complete silence.
	These Tennessee three who were there led a big mob of people to say, we gotta stop all guns in Tennessee.
	Well, good luck with that.
	Good luck with that.
	You know, that snowball's chance.
	Well, not in Tennessee, but in hell.
	I bet you're going to get that to happen.
	But they had, remember, the three of them, well, two of them were expelled.
	The two Justins.
	And then just in time, they were installed back in by their respective jurisdictions.
	And so, again, these people who came after all this stuff and said, we've got to ban the gun.
	They're trying to ban the wrong thing.
	What should they ban? You know, whenever something horrible happens, and we always have to look to government to fix everything.
	And so what is a government's response?
	Well, we've got to ban something, right?
	And we've got to use force against somebody.
	So what should we ban?
	Well, obviously, I don't think the gun.
	Maybe what we should ban is the hate that's at the center of this.
	Remember, Nuki Haley got herself projected onto the national stage because after Dylan Roof went in and shot, I forget to count the number of people, it was a small group, a small prayer group.
	Everybody was black but him.
	And he goes into this prayer group, and after they do their prayers, he shoots and kills them.
	Just amazing how heinous that was.
	Well, they dug around, they found a picture of Dylann Roof with a Confederate flag in the background, and so Nuki Haley decides she would ban the Confederate flag.
	And so I think if we can find that this is the motivation of this manifesto killer, maybe we should ban the LGBT pride flag.
	Let's ban that flag.
	Oh, but you say that doesn't represent all the LGBT people.
	Well, you said the Confederate flag represented the hate of Dylann Roof.
	So doesn't the LGBT flag represent the hate of the LGBT people?
	Yeah, of course, we know how this is going to work.
	That is not going to happen.
	But, again, they were appointed back in with a special selection, reappointed after they're kicked out.
	The anti-whiteness movement has been mainstreamed by American universities and corporations, and it has blood on its hands, says J.D. Vance.
	Well, he's right, except that he forgets K-12.
	It starts way before universities.
	And it's after the universities that they go into the corporations.
	Again, J.D. Vance needs to understand this is a K-12.
	That should not be sacrosanct.
	We're in a fourth turning.
	And if we don't get rid of these institutions that have failed, it's going to get much worse.
	There's a lot of institutions that are going to go.
	And we need to throw out the ones that are evil.
	And I'm saying that the institutionalized schools are antithetical to education.
	They're not antithetical to education.
	They're not the same thing. Call it the department, the federal department of schools.
	It's not the department of education.
	They're not educating anybody.
	As Charlotte Disabee said, they're deliberately dumbing people down.
	So the Nashville mayor, Freddie O'Connell, has ordered an investigation, just like Hillary Clinton.
	Remember, when Hillary Clinton's emails are 30-some-odd thousand, she put them on, these are many of them classified, many of them were above top secret because they were born classified that way.
	There were things, communications between her and other heads of state, heads of departments, those things are, they don't need to go through a classification thing.
	They're born as classified.
	So she puts all this stuff.
	She creates a website called ClintonEmails.com or HillaryClintonEmails.com.
	But it's right there. Right there.
	Puts up a storefront on the internet for it.
	Come and get the emails.
	And then when somebody does, and they see this, even though Hillary Clinton had violated all of the national security laws and all the national security rules as Secretary of State, What did she do?
	Well, she said, who did this?
	Who put this stuff up?
	Well, you put it up on the internet.
	No, who talked about me doing this crime?
	Who was it that did this?
	And again, you know, just like the red herring.
	She just drug this smelly fish over the trail to throw the hounds off.
	And that's exactly what this Nashville mayor is doing.
	That's what these people always do.
	Who did this? Forget the crime.
	Who did it? Who did it? Same, same tactic.
	Over and over again.
	So the Tennessee Star authenticated the documents.
	A radio host authenticated them.
	And so did News Channel 5.
	Phil? Yeah, that guy.
	He authenticated them as well.
	But then he tries to spin it.
	Says, well, I know this is an illustrative of the full manifesto.
	So, you knew all this stuff about the manifesto or you didn't care to know as an investigative reporter, Phil?
	So, did they help to conceal it?
	Or are they just making this stuff up now?
	Or are they finally interested in it?
	No, none of these things are happening, actually.
	And so...
	As J.D. Vance said, you know, this is the anti-whiteness movement.
	It's got blood on its hands. This is what it produces.
	He said, in the meantime, say a prayer for every kid who lost their life and every parent who lost a child.
	Yeah, you see, the deal is that ideas have consequences.
	But the left says it's not the ideas.
	The left says it's not the hate that we're inculcating in people.
	It's the gun. It's the gun.
	No, it is the hate. So let's sum this up before we go to break here.
	We got five points because we see this kind of thing happening every single time.
	This is the M.O. of the left.
	First of all, you have the government and the media, after they cover everything up and then after it gets released, they are furious.
	They're furious that their cover-up has failed.
	And like Hillary...
	They want you to forget about the crime.
	They want you to forget about the hate.
	And they want to get you to forget about the motivation of this person.
	And they want you to focus on who released this.
	And we're going to see a lot of stuff.
	Who released this?
	My tooth comb. It'll be all about that.
	We don't want to talk about what's in there.
	I'm just going to tell you, Phil knows.
	And Phil says there's nothing, you know, this is not typical at all.
	So just disregard what you saw with your own eyes.
	We've got to figure out who put this stuff out there.
	Just like Hillary. Also, all of this content, again, is regurgitation of our educational system.
	The stuff that is hammered into these kids from kindergarten on up.
	Self-loathing hatred.
	Hating themselves, driving these people nuts, getting them to hate everybody and everything.
	So you've got to defund these schools.
	Also, you know, where Phil comes in, it's the same type of thing we've been talking about with the pharmaceutical companies and the mainstream media.
	As people expose what has happened with these things, whether it's studies or whether it's documents that they find of Pfizer, confessions, the Pfizer manifestos, if you will.
	And we've had a lot of those releases.
	We've had so much evidence of deaths, of cover-up, of conspiracies, of crimes.
	And how do they react?
	Exactly the same. They say, well, that's just misinformation.
	That's not real. That's not an accurate picture.
	Well give us an accurate picture.
	Show us the manifesto, Phil.
	Let's get the full manifesto.
	And if you say that when people criticize Pfizer's poisons, you say, well that's not an accurate picture of all that stuff.
	Well, give me the data then.
	You're holding the data.
	You're withholding the data.
	You're hiding the data about what Pfizer did before the release, what they learned afterwards, what the FDA knows instead of the FBI. It's the FDA with them.
	And so you have these federal agencies that are complicit in the cover-up.
	You have these federal agencies and the people who are involved in it hiding the information.
	And then saying, well, it's all misinformation.
	Whatever these people have...
	Oh, don't pay any attention to that.
	Well, you can make all this go away.
	You say it's misinformation? Prove it.
	Release your data. But they won't release the data.
	And I don't think you're going to see this released just like I don't think you're going to see the pharmaceutical stuff released.
	Who knows? I hope I'm wrong.
	But this is an MO of these people.
	This is how they operate.
	You're a liar, and I've got the data here that proves that you're a liar, but you can't see that data.
	I'm going to hide that data from you.
	I'm going to hide it at all costs from you.
	I've seen this thing running this way with Michael Mann and his hockey stick, hockey puck garbage about climate change and all the rest of this stuff.
	These people make up stuff.
	You're a liar. I'm a scientist.
	I'm the authority. I'm the law enforcement, and you can't see my data.
	And then finally, The fact that these Tennessee Three insurrectionists celebrated by Biden.
	And they don't care about the kids.
	They don't care about the hate.
	They don't care about the problem.
	They've got a different agenda.
	And so they're going to use the death of these kids to try to take away guns that we can use to defend ourselves against them.
	Them! Them!
	The Antifa communist terrorists who took over the Tennessee state capitol.
	These violent people.
	They want to make sure that you don't have guns for self-defense.
	And Biden wants to make sure that you don't have guns for self-defense against him and his goons, his IRS army, his FBI army, all of these people out there.
	It's always the way these people operate.
	Those five things.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	We'll be right back.
	The Common Man. .
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.
	Download our app or listen now at APSRadio.com.
	Let me get some of your comments here about this.
	And we began the program with a tip.
	Thank you very much, Chase Broden.
	Thank you very much. He says, Thank you for everything you've done, David.
	To find a man willing to stand by his principles in these days is not easy.
	Almost non-existent.
	I haven't missed the day of your show for roughly three years.
	He said, I honestly hate the thought of knowing that someday this will all be in the past.
	I won't be able to tune in to hear what a good person says about this.
	Well, thank you. I've got to say, I just looked at the article that was put out by George Mainstream Media.
	You know, eight ways that you can keep from aging.
	Aging is a disease, and you need to do these eight things.
	I looked at him and I thought, okay, well, I've got one of those covered.
	I don't smoke. I don't get sleep.
	I don't get exercise. Not in this job.
	And a lot of other things.
	I think the low-cholesterol ship has sailed a long time ago.
	All the rest of this stuff.
	But thank you. Appreciate that.
	Dougalug, thank you for the tip.
	Grant777. And the press secretary would not say one thing about the shooting, except trans are under attack right after it.
	Yeah, that's right. Portray them as victims.
	Boy, I tell you, the way they spin this and lie...
	Turn everything upside down?
	Inside out? Spin it around 180 degrees is still doing that.
	Hell 9000 Watson.
	Funny how some manifestos are immediately released.
	Yeah, isn't it? Isn't it?
	Jim Z7 says, he or she fancied herself a person of color.
	Self-loathing liberal.
	I hate the white skin I'm in.
	I hate the gender that I'm in.
	She had to do the deed before the crank wore off.
	Couldn't wait for her own schedule.
	Yeah, again, failed even at that.
	The Daily Mock News says, that girl shooter went to a school first to shoot it up, but it was security guards, so she went to the school that was wide open with no guards.
	A good point, and I should make that.
	You know, that's the one thing, and when you talk about this in this next story, by the way, Vox is very upset about the fact, and this is the headline, I saw this and was like, oh, I've got to read this.
	A boneheaded state official may have just handed the NRA a big Supreme Court victory.
	Well, it's not the NRA, but it's the Second Amendment that they just handed a big victory to.
	And in this case, they talk about the Parkman shooting, Marjorie Douglas Stone, what?
	I forget the name of the school, but it's in here.
	We'll get to it in a minute. But the point being is that, as you point out, there was another school the shooter was going to go to, and they had school security.
	But they had school security at this school.
	They had a guy in uniform with a gun.
	What did he do? Well, he hid.
	He hid. And I've used that as an example many times.
	I've said, look, we call people heroes when they risk their lives to save other people.
	Right? So he was not a hero.
	He did what... Most people would be drawn to do.
	You have to go against your self-preservation.
	You know, as John Wayne said, courage is not being unafraid.
	Courage is being afraid and saddling up anyway.
	Well, he was afraid, and he didn't saddle up.
	And I said, if you had had not just school security that failed, school security said, well, I said, as we saw with Daryl Gates, so you go back to the Rodney King riots, okay?
	Daryl Gates had already been famous at that point in time for creating SWAT teams and militarizing the police and all this other kind of stuff.
	They had armored vehicles.
	And what did they do during the L.A. riots?
	They circled the wagons and protected themselves, just like this guy at the school shooting in Florida.
	And so what's the solution to this?
	The solution is that people do not depend on On other people to defend them.
	That you take responsibility for this yourself.
	That you have a weapon.
	So that if somebody comes in, an armed teacher could have protected those kids because an armed teacher would have been protecting themselves, quite frankly.
	You don't have to be a hero to try to protect yourself.
	But when there are kids around that you know that are there, it may push you to be a little bit heroic, or maybe even a lot heroic.
	But for the guy who is outside the building, for the guy in uniform who doesn't know these kids, You know, and when he looks at them, he's just looking at them typically, you know, are they doing something wrong?
	Is there something I can write them up for, something I can correct them about?
	He doesn't really have, you know, that's his relationship with him.
	If he's got any relationship with him at all, it's not of a hall monitor.
	And so he's not going to protect them.
	And that's why you need to have the ability, that's why teachers need to be allowed to protect themselves.
	And because the other thing about it is that the shooter is not going to know which teachers are armed.
	Because they're not wearing something to identify themselves as somebody carrying a gun.
	All of it is superior to having to any other alternative that is out there.
	But the key thing is the schools.
	The schools are the danger.
	The schools are the danger more than the gun because the schools are weaponizing the mind.
	The schools are destroying the soul of these kids, turning it to hate and to murder.
	It's the schools that did that with their curriculum that they've got there.
	It doesn't work with everybody.
	You know, I went to government school.
	I didn't turn out to be a socialist.
	But, you know, there was a lot of friction there between me and the school when I was there.
	I didn't buy into what they were saying about evolution.
	I didn't buy into what they were saying about politics.
	We had a lot of disagreements.
	Or Earth Day that was being pushed.
	All these kids who were running for a class president and all the rest of it.
	They were the ones out there carrying the placards about Earth Day.
	And it's like, oh man. This is going to be difficult as they get older and I get older.
	And certainly it did.
	Grant 777 says, of course, the FBI, the Federal Blockage of Information Agency.
	Yeah, if they don't block it, they destroy it.
	Alan BJ. It was an anti-white, anti-Christian hate crime.
	That's why it was covered up.
	There's a lot more than we have not seen.
	Yona says, the right to bear arms enforced by the state agents not allowed for most citizens anymore.
	Exactly right. So let's talk about the Supreme Court case that Vox is so concerned.
	Their subtitle, Democrats need to be smarter while the GOP is controlling the Supreme Court.
	Well, they don't control the Supreme Court, unfortunately.
	Or maybe, I don't know. Fortunately, I don't know what the GOP would do.
	My son says there are people in the chat saying that they think the manifesto is suspicious because it's written in perfect cursive.
	But it isn't, though.
	It isn't. Again, these people have by their actions admitted that they think that it's right.
	And I think that it fits exactly with a narrative that they would not want you to see.
	They want to make it about the gun.
	They don't want to make it about the killer.
	They don't want to make it about the hate. They don't want to make it about their curriculum.
	They don't want to make it about the DEI or the CRT or the Project 1619, any of that stuff.
	And this person had been totally immersed in that artificial world.
	So let's talk about the Supreme Court situation.
	Every now and then, the Supreme Court says Vox.
	Remember, these people are hard left.
	I'll read it to you as they write it, and then I'll comment here.
	Every once in a while, the Supreme Court takes up a case involving a public official who acted so foolishly, without any regard for the ordinary norms governing law enforcement, or without any insight into how their actions could undermine some of the government's most important work, that you wish the justices could each take turns smacking them upside the head.
	Well, what is really happening here is that you have a state official who is a petty-fogging little bureaucratic tyrant on a power trip.
	Just like Jab, Cinder, Arden, or any of these other people, right?
	It is a type, or Trudeau, or pick anybody.
	Pick some of the better-known politicians.
	But it's a lesser-known politician that acts just like these politicians on the world stage that we've seen to a nauseating extreme.
	And they got called out on it because what happens is, just like the governor in New Mexico, you know, well, I can order people to do anything I want as long as I say that it's about coronavirus or pandemic.
	So I'm going to order you to not be allowed to have guns as a health issue.
	You know, I'm not going to pretend it's a pandemic, but, you know, the American Medical Association has said that gun violence is a pandemic, so I'm going to go with that.
	I'm going to say, well, you can't have guns now.
	And all the other Democrats are like, no, no, this is not going to work.
	But these people get this taste of power, and the Boromir gene kicks in, you know, from Lord of the Rings.
	I can save everybody with my power here that I have.
	The National Rifle Association versus Vulo, which the court announced that it would hear last Friday.
	It is such a case that involves two unrelated actions which former New York State Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vulo took against the NRA. You see how this is?
	This is somebody in financial services for the state of New York deciding that she's going to do gun control.
	There's no end to this.
	These little bureaucrats.
	She wasn't elected by anybody.
	She was an appointed bureaucrat.
	And she's going to take away your guns and she's going to find a way to do it.
	And they're all over the place, these people.
	And I hope they get slapped down.
	Not for being stupid.
	For being a tyrant.
	Which is where they're coming from.
	So anyway, she took action against the NRA, one of which successfully shut down an NRA program that, and this is the words of Vox, an NRA program that recklessly endangered countless New Yorkers' lives.
	We'll explain what that is now.
	Sometimes Vox and the leftist press says things that are just so incredibly stupid that, in their own words, you just want to smack them upside the head.
	And that's exactly what this is.
	When is somebody going to smack these people upside the head?
	When you've got people on the left, journalists, demanding censorship and all the rest of this stuff.
	Anyway, this doesn't recklessly endanger...
	Any New Yorker's lives.
	As a matter of fact, it's there to preserve their lives, you see.
	And this is what the Second Amendment debate is about.
	A gun in the hands of a law-abiding citizen who is using it to defend their lives and the lives of others is something that the Founding Fathers said deserves a place of honor amongst all things that are good.
	That's not what they're talking about.
	They're talking about putting guns in the hands of people that they have driven into insanity.
	First, stupidity.
	Then, insanity.
	Deliberately dumbing them down and then weaponizing these people.
	And so, in 2017, the Department of Financial Services in New York opened an investigation into Cary Guard.
	This is an NRA-endorsed insurance program.
	That according to the Federal Appeals Court that heard the Vulo case, quote, provided liability defense coverage for criminal proceedings resulting from firearm use even where the insured acted with criminal intent.
	Now, let's talk about that.
	What does it mean to act with criminal intent?
	Well, if you were in a place like New York and they say you can't carry a gun or you can't carry a gun here, well, you're acting with criminal intent.
	If they tell you that you can't use a firearm to protect yourself, you're acting with criminal intent.
	And of course, there's going to be allegations of criminal intent if the government is going to come after you for defending your life.
	But as we all, you know, as the axiom goes, it better be judged by 12 than to be carried by 6.
	Take your day in court instead of a coffin.
	And so that's what this is.
	But that's the spin of that court.
	That's their characterization of it.
	That's what Al Vox characterized it.
	Anytime that they're going to make allegations against you and charges against you, where you would use the carry guard, they would come after you and say, well, you're carrying this.
	And we don't like the way that you're doing it or the way that you're using the weapon to defend yourself.
	And we've seen this over and over again, haven't we?
	Especially in places like New York.
	Kerry Gard, says Vox, offered to pay both civil and criminal legal costs up to a million dollars for a civil case and up to $150,000 for a criminal case.
	So this is an insurance policy that the NRA offered to people.
	And said, if the customers who shot another person allegedly in self-defense...
	See, now they put the allegedly in.
	They don't say even where the insured acted allegedly with criminal intent.
	But then when they talk about self-defense, they insert allegedly.
	They're not biased, are they?
	The courts are not biased.
	The press is not biased.
	Vox is not biased. One pitch to the NRA's members told them, quote, you should never be forced to choose between defending your life and putting yourself and your family in financial ruin.
	And I'm not going to show up, but I mean, on social media, there was a video that was going around.
	There's a guy in California, and he's walking up to his door, and he's got cameras all over the place.
	He's got a camera at the door front, and he's got a camera out on the side or anything.
	And as he's fumbling in his pocket to get his keys, some guy comes up and pokes a gun in his back with a mask on and everything.
	So you see the guy running up and poking a gun.
	He turns around, and with his hand, one hand, he knocks the gun to the side, and with the other hand, he pulls out his concealed carry pistol.
	And a gunfight ensues, and other videos show them running around, hiding behind cars and things like that.
	But the bottom line, that's what it's for.
	What's he going to do? Call the police?
	File a report over his dead body?
	And one of the things that he said was, he said, there's nothing, and it looked like he had a very nice house.
	He said, there's nothing in my house that's worth dying for, except for my family that's in there.
	And so, when the NRA says this, you should never be forced to choose between defending your life and putting yourself and your family in financial ruin.
	Again, go back and think about that Luby cafeteria shooting in Texas, and the woman who was a dentist, and she carried it.
	But at the time, Texas said you can't carry.
	So she would have been acting with a criminal intent if she had carried that pistol in.
	So she left it in her gloved compartment of her car.
	And then some lunatic...
	Drives, I think it's a pickup truck, drives it into the side of the Luby building, crashes it through, jumps out and starts shooting people.
	And at first she goes for her purse to get her, or I think it's where she kept her gun, typically, to get it, and she realized she didn't have it.
	And she was eating lunch with her parents.
	We tried to get them out of their water.
	She thought they were following her when she ran after the shooting was going on for quite some time because the guy was just walking around shooting fish in a barrel, shooting people in Luby's cafeteria who were all unarmed because Texas said you can't carry it.
	And so her parents died and she testified about that and she actually became a state representative.
	And worked on that. And now, you know, Texas has constitutional carry.
	Finally, constitutional carry is allowed here in Tennessee as well.
	New York generally does not permit insurance companies, says Vox, to have contracts intended to, quote, insure a person for that person's intentional criminal acts.
	You know, like constitutionally protecting yourself with a gun.
	And so not long after the Department of Financial Services in New York opened its investigation into Carygard, three insurance companies that underwrote or administered Carygard or similar programs entered into a consent decree where they agreed to stop providing this kind of insurance.
	You see, this is, you know, we're getting into the specifics of this case.
	Together, the three companies also agreed to pay more than $13 million in fines.
	So this little bureaucrat with the Department of Financial Services in New York goes after these insurance companies and said, well, if you're going to pay the legal fees for somebody so they can have a day in court, we don't want trial by jury.
	Come on. You know, just take the gun, take these people, throw them in jail, steal their money, do the process later, maybe, right?
	Yeah, again, you know, this is the way people in New York like Donald Trump think.
	And so they said, you know, well, you don't want to do that.
	And so you better back off of this.
	Pay me $13 million and get out of this and don't do it again.
	And so Vox comments on that thuggery, that coercion, that blackmail, that defiance of the Constitution and our individual God-given rights.
	Vox looks at that and says, well, that's all well and good.
	Nothing in the Constitution prohibits New York from targeting insurers who sell a product that will encourage people to shoot other people.
	That's not what this is about.
	This is about intimidating and targeting companies who defend our God-given rights as protected and respected under the Constitution.
	That's what this is about.
	But then the bureaucrat Vulo did something incomprehensibly stupid, according to Vox.
	I thought the other stuff was stupid.
	After that happened, then you had the Parkland shooting.
	And after the shooting, this little bureaucrat at the Department of Financial Services in New York issued a guidance...
	Which encouraged insurers to, quote, continue evaluating and managing their risks, including reputational risks that may arise from dealing with the NRA or similar gun promotion organizations.
	So now, after they got what they wanted and coerced and blackmailed these companies, now they're going to scold them, scold the NRA. And, you know, as I said before, teachers caring in Parkland would have been the only real defense against that.
	But they didn't take that.
	The guidance and a similar post-Parkland communication between the Department of Financial Services in New York and the insurance industry...
	Do potentially violate the First Amendment, says Vox.
	And while the Constitution permits a government official to ask any company to stop doing business with the NRA, it does not typically permit the government to coerce private businesses.
	Wait a minute. What happened in 2020?
	I thought that was coercion of, in 2021, I thought that was coercion of private businesses.
	You'll lock down or I'll take everything that you've got.
	You vaccinate your employees or fire them.
	Or I'm going to make sure that you go out of business.
	Didn't we just go through all that?
	Now, Vox, of course, doesn't see that connection there.
	I see the connection there. And quite frankly, some of these people who I think should and could, and I hope they will, sue over the damages that were done to them by Trump's lockdown, by Biden's mandates, and the rest of this stuff.
	I hope that they sue, and I hope that if this goes the way that it should go, And the way that Vox is afraid that it's going to go, I hope they'll reference this case as well and say, you can't coerce private businesses into halting lawful business with an advocacy group.
	Well, lawful business with anybody.
	When does the government get the opportunity to coerce...
	And again, it's going back to the fact that it was medical martial law.
	And it wasn't Vox.
	It was... Daily Beast that criticized me for calling Trump's lockdown medical martial law.
	Can you believe how crazy this guy David Knight is?
	So, the guidance from this New York financial bureaucrat looks suspiciously like coercion, they said.
	Yeah, so do the jabs, so do the mandates about injecting your employees and all the rest of this stuff.
	As a general rule, the government has a virtually unlimited right to express its own viewpoint, as do government officials.
	Okay, let's stop right there.
	Unless what? Unless that viewpoint is a Christian viewpoint.
	Unless you silently pray.
	Oh, that's not allowed.
	See? Again, Vox has made two conclusions and extrapolations about this thing that affect both the medical martial law in 2020 and this ongoing suppression of a constitutionally protected free exercise of religious faith.
	We're not talking about establishment.
	That's a completely different thing.
	Establishment was when you had an official state religion, and all the states did have an official state religion.
	The state would be Catholic. Another one would be Baptist.
	Another one would be Congregationalist.
	Another one would be Presbyterian or Quaker or whatever.
	But those were official state religions.
	In some cases, you had to attend.
	In other cases, you had to merely pay.
	Some places, you had to do both.
	And very much like the official state religion of secular humanism and transgenderism and transhumanism that is put out in their seminaries that we call government schools now.
	Those are religious institutions.
	They're selling you a worldview of That has a lot of religious presumptions about it.
	It's a worldview, a comprehensive worldview, how you understand the world, how you act within it, what you're allowed to do, what you're not allowed to do.
	That is a comprehensive worldview.
	It is a religion that is being pushed into schools.
	And you want to see what it produces?
	Take a look at that killer in Nashville.
	And so then they referenced, they said, You need to do this because I say so, and you wouldn't want something bad to happen to you.
	So I'm going to protect you from the things that I would do, or maybe a different group of people with a different set of uniforms would do.
	So you better do this.
	It's a protection racket, just like the mafia.
	Bantam books involve the ominously named Rhode Island Commission to Encourage Morality in Youth.
	A government body that identified books and magazines that it deemed objectionable for sale, distribution, or display to youths under 18 years of age.
	See, the only thing that's changed is now they've got, you know, race pimps and Marxists who were writing this stuff and transgender perverts who were pushing what they think is the morality that should be given to youth.
	But the real problem...
	It's the government is teaching morality to youth.
	It doesn't matter who's morality.
	Probably in 1963, I would probably agree with what the government morality was at the time.
	But the principle remains the same.
	If you agree with the government putting out morality to kids, be aware.
	That in 60 years, the government may completely change in terms of morality that is teaching kids, which that is what has happened now.
	And so the principle is that we don't want government teaching morality to kids.
	That is the real establishment of religion that everybody turns a blind eye to, including the conservatives.
	The conservatives want to run the schools so they can teach their morality.
	The liberals want to run schools so they can teach their morality.
	I don't want any of them teaching morality.
	It then sent notices to booksellers and distributors seeking their cooperation with the commission in removing the books that they had targeted and reminding those sellers of the commission's, quote, duty to recommend to the Attorney General prosecution of purveyors of obscenity.
	So, if you don't do what I say, I'm going to tell these other guys and they're going to come bust your head, right?
	You don't want to talk to Luca Brazzi.
	Or the local police official that I report you to.
	That's what it is. It's just the mafia.
	According to one book distributor, he was often visited by a police officer shortly after receiving such a notice.
	And the officer asked the distributor what steps he had taken in response to the notice.
	You know, just like we had these little bureaucrats coming around during the pandemic.
	You know, we told you that you've got to put up signs about social distancing and masks and all the rest of this stuff.
	Are you doing that? Well, what authority do you have under law, sir?
	I'm telling you what to do.
	And I'm telling you that you don't do that.
	We've got many different ways that we can destroy your business completely, forever.
	You may think that this is going to destroy your business, and it might destroy your business, but I can guarantee that I will destroy your business if you don't put up signs demanding that people wear masks and keep apart from each other.
	Put little stickers on the floor.
	Tell everybody they've got to come in one door and out the other and all the rest of this stuff.
	Phantom Books held that this level of pressure, a level that explicitly mentioned the possibility of prosecution, followed by a visit from an inquisitive police officer.
	An inquisitive police officer.
	Nobody expects a Spanish Inquisition, right?
	That's what they got.
	They said it crosses the line from permissible persuasion to impermissible coercion.
	Yeah, as I said during the pandemic, go ahead and give me your medical opinion and your medical recommendation.
	I like to have second opinions and third opinions and so forth.
	But guess what? I'm not taking orders from any doctor.
	I'm not taking orders from Fauci.
	I'm not taking orders from Trump.
	I'm not taking orders from Biden.
	And you don't have the authority to give those.
	But that's basically what happened in Vulo.
	And this is what this person is saying.
	Essentially the same thing that happened in 1963.
	So Vox is saying that it looks like this person has overstepped their authority.
	You think? They overstepped from the very beginning, even when Vox thought it was something good.
	The NRA says Vox has sought an extraordinary remedy in this Vulo case.
	According to the complaint it filed in the trial court that heard this case, the NRA wants a court order requiring...
	The New York Department of Financial Services to, quote, immediately cease and refrain from engaging in any conduct or activity which has the purpose or the effect of interfering with, terminating or diminishing any of the NRA's contracts and or business relationships with any organizations.
	And so, Vox thinks that's extraordinary.
	What's extraordinary about that?
	They're just asking for relief.
	From a little bureaucratic tyrant who thinks that they can threaten anybody who's doing business with an organization that they don't like.
	And that's the principle that's involved here.
	I know that we're incapable of thinking in the abstract in terms of principles as a country.
	But it doesn't matter whether you like the NRA or not.
	But for the liberals, they don't like anybody being able to do anything outside of the government's permission.
	Among other things, says Vox, that could prevent New York from enforcing its law prohibiting insurers from selling products that encourage people to shoot other people.
	They can't give up that line.
	This is not something that encourages people to shoot other people.
	Now, they might have a little bit more of an argument with this case, but this is not what this is.
	This is a news item, as we have Thanksgiving coming up.
	Florida roofer offers customers AR-15s and a turkey if they let him do the roof.
	And he's not encouraging people to shoot other people.
	You just say, this is a great gun?
	Just like, you know, hey, this is a great SUV. Don't use it to run people down in a Christmas parade, okay?
	That's not what it's for.
	And the AR-15 and no other gun is there to shoot innocent people.
	It's there to defend life.
	It's what it's about.
	It's there to kill killers.
	It's like a double negative, right?
	Negative one times negative one is a positive one.
	And so that is our algebraic equation here for how these guns work.
	But of course, the liberals don't do math either.
	A Florida roofing company is making a holiday offer to customers.
	Buy a roof, get a turkey for Thanksgiving, and an AR-15 to protect your family.
	Again, you know, as Joy Behar would explain to us, you can't go turkey shooting with an AR-15.
	There'll be nothing left. Well, that may be true.
	A turkey, but not a deer.
	Okay, she was saying that about deer.
	The world's a crazy place right now, said the president of the roofing company, Roof Easy.
	And they can get a roof and an AR-15 for protection on both ends.
	Why not? Yeah, your roof protects you.
	And so does your AR-15.
	They're located in Cape Coral, Florida.
	He said, I actually saw this idea.
	A company did it in Alabama.
	So I figured, hey, we're in Florida.
	This is the most Florida thing you can do, so let's do it.
	Any homeowner who wants to participate in the deal has to follow the same rules as if they were buying a gun themselves, he said.
	That means that you've got to go through a background check, and then three days later when the...
	The government approves you exercising your God-given rights.
	Then you can go down and pick up your gun from him.
	He said, he went on to say, everybody needs an AR-15.
	He said, liberals think that it stands for assault rifle.
	And, you know, people like Joy Behar think that it's something like an RPG rifle.
	But he says it doesn't.
	It's an Armalite rifle is what it stands for.
	He said if a homeowner doesn't want the free gun, they'll deduct $500 from their roofing bill.
	And, of course, others have done this.
	There was a Ford dealership that did it, this article points out, from Fox News.
	They said a Ford dealership did this in South Carolina back in 2019, giving out guns and Bibles.
	So again, you know, cling to your guns, your Bibles, and your Ford.
	Just don't be bitter about it.
	No bitterness is necessary.
	And a Wisconsin glass-making company in 2018 gave all of their employees a gun of their own choice.
	There you go. That's important.
	John Bennett, thank you very much for the tip.
	He says, thank you, David, for all you do.
	Well, thank you, and bless you and your family.
	That is a blessing to us.
	Thank you very much. By the way, let me, while I get this, I didn't mention this yesterday.
	I had a couple of people who have been supporters for quite a while and contacted us many times.
	And they both asked for prayer, so I wanted to pass this on to all of you as well.
	We told them we'd pray for them, and we did.
	But it is funny, as I said before, you know, God asks us to pray, yet He's sovereign, and yet He wants us to be able to see the results in this.
	And so there's also corporate prayer that we're told to ask for.
	And I think the important thing about that is that the body of people who are praying can see that their prayer was answered.
	That's the whole point. And God knows what we need.
	But we can see this, and when we see Him working in response to this, it glorifies Him.
	And I've got to say that it has been at the foundation of my personal faith in God and in Christ to see these prayers answered.
	And in ways that cannot be explained, different things, I won't go into all the details about it.
	But over the years, to be able to see that happen in a way that cannot be explained by coincidence or wishful thinking or interpretation or whatever.
	That's why I would also encourage people, if you have questions about that or struggling with it, look at the diary of George Mueller.
	He kept a detailed diary over his life, and it was truly amazing.
	Truly amazing. And I encourage you to keep a diary.
	When you ask God for things and when he answers those.
	And so let me just throw this out real quickly.
	A listener in love of the road.
	Prayer requests for his mother.
	He said, you mentioned having an issue of bacterial infection from root canals.
	He said either Thursday or Friday last week, he said his mother is going under.
	And, okay, this is sent on November the 5th, so I missed the day.
	But you can still pray for them.
	She had a root canal earlier this year, had a lot of problems with it.
	She tried using oregano oil to get rid of the infection.
	That didn't take, so the surgery will hopefully take care of it tomorrow, so you can pray that that will take care of it for her.
	And so, anyway, and I'll mention that whole thing about the root canals again.
	I've seen so much stuff about root canals and infections and how it festers with stuff.
	I just had mine taken out, you know, and I'd had some problems with them, and I had them taken out.
	And this is from someone who has also supported the program for quite some time, Charlie.
	Says, for the past 22 years, I've hoped and prayed that there would be successful lawsuits and legal resistance to the outrages and the intrusions that take place at airports.
	And by the way, you saw that the TSA is going to, the Chinese are going to start demanding people wear masks, and the TSA is going to go back to, they want to swab people now.
	Oh, it'll be voluntary, they say, but we'll see about that, how long that lasts.
	But they want to swab you and test you for flu.
	Can't have flu. If you got flu, you can't fly.
	Or RSV. Or a rhinovirus.
	Or a coronavirus. Because, you know, coronavirus is a whole, you know, family of these things.
	So, again, you know, they're going to, they're putting in that health dictatorship and the health pass and permissions.
	TSA wants to be like China.
	They really do. Our government does.
	And so he says he's got a situation where he's got to travel cross-country.
	And he says, I'm giving in to the system by applying for one of those travel cards.
	So for the last 22 years, you know, since 2001, he hasn't wanted to get involved in this stuff.
	But he says he finally has to do it because of his age and because of the age of his car.
	He can't do a cross-country thing because of the time.
	He said he used to fly regularly, but no more.
	But he has to do it now.
	And he says, last time he drove cross-country, nearly wrecked me.
	So here's his prayer request.
	He said, please pray that I'll endure this with dignity and aplomb.
	Because that's a real trial, isn't it?
	You just want to lash out at these people, verbally if not physically.
	I understand. I understand.
	I have that feeling as well.
	He says, please pray that I'll endure this interview here, where he's got the travel card or where he's interacting with TSA, I think.
	Even if the interviewer is nasty or aggressive.
	And so, again, pray for Charlie with that.
	Some of the other comments, my son said, just when I thought TSA's pat-downs couldn't get any more invasive, they have to swab you in case you got a bomb shoved up your nostril.
	That's right. Just like American Carol.
	I mean, they put that thing out of American Carol, having people literally strip at the airport.
	They did that before the underwear bomber.
	We've got to stop telling these people what to do.
	Even if it's a joke or sci-fi, they take it as a manual of what to do.
	Risha M, MKUltra, never stopped.
	That's right. Today, MKUltra is called social networking, says Jim Z7. The Joker A says, expanded to mass conditioning entire generations.
	And distorted perception says media has us all hating each other.
	Yeah. I've seen a lot of videos of blacks jumping white kids, straight versus gay versus Muslim versus Jew.
	World War III things are all messed up and we're going to see chaos.
	And that's the whole thing. You know, that's why I don't want to show pictures of the massacre.
	I don't want that happened in Israel.
	I don't want to show pictures of the bombings and the kids' bodies that are blown apart.
	I don't want to show pictures of the strikes against buildings and envoys and all the rest of this stuff.
	And the violence and the hatred that is there.
	And when you show this stuff, all it does is feed that.
	People look at that and say, yeah, yeah, I told you that group is just like that.
	Everybody in that group is just like that.
	That's why I don't want to show this kind of stuff.
	Because you look at that and say, yeah, that's the opinion I had of that group that I don't like.
	And look at them doing that now, again.
	I showed that one video.
	I've showed it a couple of times.
	And it was Israeli army, Israeli officer, and some Orthodox Jews that were there.
	And the fact that the political entity is attacking the Orthodox Jews who don't agree with the politics of this war.
	And that's the reason I show that, is because we've got to understand several things.
	First of all, the other people are not monolithic.
	There's going to be differences of opinions.
	You know, I've talked over and over again about how you've got Jews and Arabs trying to come together in Israel and Gaza and other places in the Palestinians trying to stop this and to work for peace.
	You have, at the same time, you've got violent Palestinians in New York, Rioting and protesting and stuff.
	You've got peaceful protests of Jews saying, let's have a ceasefire, let's stop this war.
	And Grand Central Station, a large number of them.
	What does the media cover? They cover the violence.
	They cover the hate. They don't cover the peace.
	They don't cover Gerald Slenty's Occupy Peace.
	So, again, that's what we need to do.
	But we understand that our future, our life, is not under the control of politicians.
	It really isn't.
	Because this time that we have on Earth that may be controlled by politicians is just a short period of time.
	And we need to take that eternal view of it.
	We need to understand that God is in control.
	He's not going to allow anything to happen that isn't going to be ultimately to our benefit.
	Even if it results in our death, it's going to be ultimately to our benefit.
	That's the perspective we need to take on this.
	And so when we look at what is happening, we understand that God doesn't control, that God controls things, not the government, not the president, not the congress, not the speaker, not any of these people, right?
	Even if they start a war, they do not have any power over us ultimately.
	So we don't need to freak out about this stuff.
	Stay calm. Carry on.
	Stay in contact with God.
	Use this as an opportunity. Every time you go through a crisis, use it as an opportunity to get closer to God.
	That's what he uses these crises for.
	So don't waste it.
	Right? You know, the left never wastes a crisis.
	They always use it to push their agenda of chaos and oppression.
	Well, don't you as a Christian ever miss this I don't know.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	As a virtue signaling political trip.
	And she wore the same armor that she tried to outlaw in New York State.
	That prohibited. I don't know if she successfully did it or not.
	Trump burger forever.
	Politicians wanting to ban guns need to put their money where their mouth is and decline their own armed secretary.
	Yeah. I've heard there are only one or two concealed carry insurance companies that will actually pay out before a trial.
	Sadly, most of them require you to go broke first.
	Oh, that's sad.
	Georgia Boy, 1142.
	Just buy the turkey and the rifle.
	It's a lot cheaper than a roof.
	That's right. That's right.
	But if you need a roof anyway, might as well get the free turkey and the rifle.
	And you might as well support somebody who supports the Second Amendment, even if it is for attention.
	Andy says, I had a root canal go bad.
	It was my fault for not having the permanent crown put on in a timely manner.
	Had that thing pulled instead.
	Yeah, I had one that I had put in.
	I mean, they were putting like bleach or something.
	That's what it tastes like. And, you know, it's disinfectant.
	And then they just kept doing it over and over again.
	It's like, get this thing out of my mouth.
	So, as we look at how they are working against us, we've got a single group of 1,200 migrants surge across the Arizona border.
	And this is not the only one. We have caravan after caravan after caravan.
	I've shown you the picture a couple of times of the 5,000 people coming through.
	But that's typically one day that's happening every day.
	That's not an extraordinary event.
	And so, you know, in Tucson, Arizona, single group of migrants, initial headcount was over 1,200.
	Of course, all of them released.
	All of them released. And these are not just people coming from Mexico.
	These are people coming from Central and South America, coming from China, coming from the Middle East, coming from Africa.
	They're coming from everywhere. This is what Biden wants.
	Saturday's group was just one of two large groups of more than 1,000 migrants to cross the border near San Miguel since November 1.
	They will likely be released to non-government migrant shelters in the coming days since October 1, just in the Tucson sector.
	More than 60,000 migrants have poured in, making it the busiest sector in the nation.
	San Miguel alone is just one crossing point located within the sector experiencing a surge of migrant crossings.
	You see, when we look at what is happening even in sanctuary cities like New York City, hey, we're full up.
	We can't handle it anymore. I mean, this is an attack on us from Biden, just like all the banning of appliances and of oil and of energy and all the rest.
	Everything Biden is doing, It's an attack on America.
	He's not just at war with other countries.
	He's at war with us in this country.
	Here's an example.
	Take a look at Afghanistan.
	Since we left, we have given them $11 billion.
	After we're gone. After we were thrown out.
	After we lost the war. $11 billion to Afghanistan.
	And this is from the...
	This is the American government saying this.
	The Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction.
	He's got an acronym for that.
	CIGAR. Give that man a cigar.
	S-I-G-A-R. CIGAR. It works out to $80 million every 10 to 14 days.
	They've been giving the people who, you know, in Afghanistan, giving that money to the people that, in this particular case, We lost the war.
	We used to do that all the time.
	After we would defeat somebody, we would give them money.
	As a matter of fact, there's a funny Peter Sellers movie called The Mouse That Roared.
	I'll play the trailer of it.
	But does this not describe American foreign policy to a T as a satire?
	And this goes back to the 1960s.
	Why is the smallest country on earth declaring war against the United States?
	There isn't a more profitable undertaking for any country than to declare war on the United States and to be defeated.
	No sooner is the aggressiveness than Americans pour in food, machinery, clothing, technical aid, and lots and lots of money for the relief of its former enemies.
	We must declare war on the United States.
	Thank you. I'm Field Marshal and Chief Constable Tully Bascom and you're prisoners of war.
	I know it'll come. Bow and arrow.
	But we thought of one.
	Blithering idiot. And what are they going to do now?
	How am I going to tell the President that we've been successfully invaded by a bunch of 15th century Europeans?
	Oh dear. This is most terribly complicated.
	Peter Sellers. Peter Sellers.
	And Peter Sellers in the comedy classic The Mouse That Roared.
	Yeah, the only difference is that instead of a small country of men armed with bows and arrows invading our country, we invaded their country after we were told that these people living in caves with bows and arrows had taken down three steel skyscrapers with two jet planes and had flown a jet at an altitude that is lower and faster than that jet could possibly go in real life to attack the Pentagon and so many other lives.
	But it's always about the money, isn't it?
	And that $11 billion is an addition to the astronomical amount of state-of-the-art weapons, which they've now been able to sell probably to the people in Gaza.
	Or whatever, to Hamas.
	But that doesn't include the $11 billion that we paid since we got thrown out of Afghanistan.
	Does not include that money.
	And the pallets of cash.
	Remember the massive pallets of cash that were left behind?
	Vehicles, weapons, cash, all this stuff.
	And we're still paying them.
	$11 billion.
	$80 million every 10 to 14 days.
	And so, in addition to that...
	We see something else.
	The UN has said that opium supply in Afghanistan has dropped 95% under the Taliban.
	So, we were using this, as we know, for the longest time.
	Geraldo Rivera actually did a report 20 years ago.
	He said, look, we got U.S. troops that are guarding the poppy fields.
	Oh, well, we need to keep their economy going.
	Their economy going?
	You mean your economy going?
	You mean your drug war?
	And your DEA, and your CIA, and your black ops, that economy, that's the economy we've got to keep going.
	Because it's the U.S. government that's behind the drug war.
	The U.S. government that's pushing it.
	The U.S. government that is creating stuff like the crack cocaine epidemic.
	I wouldn't be surprised if fentanyl was a creation of the U.S. government and the CIA as well.
	Time will tell. But it's our phony drug war, our phony Afghanistan war, And of course, no matter what happens, we always pay.
	You know, in Afghanistan, we were there for the opium and for the lithium.
	The opium was part of the drug war.
	The lithium is part of the climate war against us.
	And understand the drug war is not a war against drugs.
	It is a war where they use drugs against us.
	And they use drugs against us to destroy our constitution, our rule of law, and to corrupt our institutions.
	That's what the drug war is about.
	And the climate war is another government war against us to destroy everything that we've got.
	To shut down all energy.
	To shut down food. You know, we are really at the war horsemen of the apocalypse, aren't we?
	Pestilence. Famine.
	War. That is the policy of pretty much every government against its own people now.
	By the way, Not just every government, but every politician.
	Trump didn't get us out of this phony war.
	Instead, he came up with a phony agreement.
	I'll end the war after my term ends.
	My first term. I'm not going to do it my first term.
	I'll do it in May of 2021.
	Same thing he did by saying, well, I'm not going to get out of the climate agreement.
	Not that he has any say.
	He didn't have any say about that.
	And neither did Biden or John Kerry, who said they self-ratified it.
	And if you're going to take the position that they could put us into a treaty, then Trump could take the position he's going to take us out of it.
	But that's not what was really going on anyway.
	It was really Mitch McConnell.
	We should have said, well, we're going to vote.
	We'll see about that. You don't ratify treaties, Kerry, Obama.
	It's the Senate that ratifies treaties.
	But Mitch McConnell didn't want to do that.
	And he could have done that at any time, even after the 2020 election, during that transition period.
	Mitch McConnell could have done it.
	I remember having... But I can't remember his name.
	Not Mark Moreno, but another climate guy that I worked with.
	He was calling on Mitch McConnell to have that guy that does JunkScience.com.
	Can't remember his name right now.
	Anyway, so Trump said, well, you know, when I'll get out of the climate crisis, Paris Climate Accord, but I'll do it after the 2020 election.
	It's like, what's that? I'll get out of Afghanistan, but I'll do it after the 2020 election.
	I'll do it in May. So, yeah, he made that phony statement.
	And then, of course, you know, Biden didn't abide by that either.
	So they threw us out.
	But Trump had campaigned on getting us out, but he didn't do it for four years.
	He said, well, I'll do it sometime in the next term.
	You see how that happens, right?
	How that works. Anyway, while we were guarding Afghanistan, by the way, it's not just that the supply of opium in Afghanistan has dropped by 95%.
	When we were there, they were having record bumper crops every year.
	And the entire time that we were in Afghanistan, Afghanistan supplied over 90%, sometimes as much as 95%.
	But over 90% of the world's opium came out of Afghanistan while we were there.
	And it went from like 10% up to 90% while our war on drugs was happening there.
	Let's take a look at some other things that are happening in the news.
	Tyson has recalled 30,000 pounds of fun nuggets.
	Due to metal contamination.
	I wonder how much those fun nuggets weighed if they didn't have the metal in them.
	Tyson Food, the same company that I just pointed out a couple of days ago, has now joined with a Dutch World Economic Forum company to start producing bugs.
	Surprise, surprise! Tyson has got metal in its fun nuggets.
	I guess they've gone from being a part of WEF to a part of WTF. What is going on with their fun nuggets with metal in them?
	But they're not the only ones.
	You've got a couple of companies that are having to recall cinnamon applesauce pouches.
	Again, this is for kids.
	You know, fun nuggets and applesauce pouches.
	This is kids' food.
	This kids' food has got lead in it.
	Two more companies are recalling fruit puree pouches due to potential contamination with lead.
	According to the FDA. But, of course, the FDA is not concerned about the injections, the genetic code injections that have graphene in them.
	They don't care about that. They don't care about the DNA contamination.
	But, no, they're going to tell you that you've got to stop using the BVO and you've got to, you know, we're going to ban this color dye and all the rest of the stuff.
	Talk about straining at nets and swallowing a camel hole or injecting a camel hole.
	Schnucks branded pouches.
	Sold at that store in Eatwell Markets, as well as Weiss-branded pouches, sold at their grocery stores.
	In addition to a third company, the Wanabana Apple Cinnamon Fute Puree, sold by a lot of different retailers, including Sam's Club, Amazon, Dollar Tree, that were recalled last month.
	That reminds me of when they're giving them the lead, when Karen and I... Went to the UK. Like I said, we had no money when we went in 1980, and so we just hung around.
	And we would go to everything that was free, all the free museums.
	We went to museum after museum after museum.
	One of the ones that we went to, they had a class coming through there, and they were trying to teach them about life in Tudor England.
	And so they had the costumes, they were very detailed, and they were velcroed up the back.
	So I'd have a couple of students, and they'd get up there, and they'd put their arms through this thing, and they'd velcro it in the back.
	And then they would talk about life in Tudor England.
	And they said, you know, everybody except the king.
	King was eating off of silver plates, of course.
	But everybody else was eating off of lead plates.
	And the teacher said, so how do you think you would feel if you ate lead?
	And so I went, oh, yeah. She says, yes, and he says, heavy.
	But that's our thing about lead in kids.
	That's what I always think about.
	But, yeah, this is our food supply.
	The FDA, though, is right on it, and they're encouraging, even as they want to get some of the lead contamination out.
	They want graphene in your vaccines, and they want bugs in the rest of your food.
	We'll be right back. You're
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Hear news now at APSRadioNews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	I had a couple of commenters say that they had fentanyl used on him during some procedures in the hospital and that it wasn't that great a pain reliever.
	Yeah, the same thing has been said about the opioids, which fentanyl is supposed to be a more concentrated form of that.
	And so, yeah, it is interesting.
	But boy, I feel like they really can be addictive.
	You know, like the crack cocaine stuff that we know that they put together to fund their war.
	Let's talk about elections.
	I need to talk about what is unavoidable, I guess, that I've got to talk about this Trump situation.
	Let's put it in the proper context here.
	Trump and his allies plot revenge, says the Washington Post.
	And, of course, this isn't just an attack piece from the Washington Post.
	Yes, they do attack him. Yes, they don't like him.
	But understand that he's openly talking about it.
	Yeah, I'm going to get even with these people.
	And his lawyer, Ty Cobb, said he's a deeply wounded narcissist and capable of acting except out of his own perceived self-interest and out of revenge.
	And so...
	You know, remember, I played the clip for you yesterday.
	I played just a little bit of it here. Trump talking about Hillary.
	Well, I think her history is far from being over.
	I'd like to answer that question in another 15 years from now.
	I think she's going to go down at a minimum as a great senator.
	I think she is a great wife to a president.
	And I think Bill Clinton was a great president.
	You know, you look at the country then.
	The economy was doing great.
	Look at what happened during the Clinton years.
	I mean, we had no war.
	The economy was doing great.
	Sounds like the way he describes himself.
	It's just like the Clintons.
	Because we're jealous as hell. You know, people get jealous and they hate you.
	People don't like them because they're jealous of them.
	But Bill Clinton was a great president.
	I mean, I hope we can be so lucky in terms of the economy and in terms of other aspects.
	I mean, we weren't in wars with two...
	I'm not blaming Afghanistan, by the way, is probably a place that we should be.
	Iraq, we shouldn't be.
	Bill Clinton was a great president.
	Hillary Clinton is a great woman and a good woman.
	Yeah, okay. Well, he said, I'd like to go back and revisit that in 15 years.
	Interestingly enough, it's almost been exactly 15 years.
	He said that on November the 12th, 2008.
	And so here we are on November the 7th.
	We're only five days away from exactly 12 years to the date that he said that, talking about how wonderful Hillary was.
	And remember, when people said, you've always been a friend of Hillary's, and you've supported Hillary.
	And we had a lot of people. You've got Fox News out there.
	After RFK Jr. said he's going to run as a third-party candidate, they wanted to take him down.
	And so they said, well, he has endorsed Hillary Clinton three times.
	So has Trump, who they're pushing, who they're afraid to criticize.
	And it's not to say that any of them are right.
	It just goes to show that they are as evil as she is.
	Well, they all say that she's really good.
	She must be. Maybe I was wrong about Hillary.
	No, I'm not wrong about Hillary.
	But, yeah, when he was called out on that, people say, you've always been a supporter of Hillary, and you've given her money and all the rest of this stuff.
	You say great things about her. She was at your daughter's wedding.
	I paid her to be there, he said.
	You see how that works? You pay politicians in order to get them to do things for you.
	And so he wanted to be a politician, so people would pay him.
	Like the big pharmaceutical companies did.
	After he had RFK Jr.
	in to bid his price up, they paid him, and he put in the pharmaceutical executive, the CEO of Eli Lilly, they put him in, Trump put him in as head of the FDA. I'm sorry, HHS. Brought other guys in, like Scott Gottlieb, To be the head of the FDA who is working for Pfizer and has now gone back to work for Pfizer.
	That revolving door.
	So that's how politics works in Trump's mind.
	People pay you to do things for them.
	I want to be the person who's collecting the money and handing out the favors to people instead of somebody who's having to pay Hillary to come to my wedding.
	I mean, wouldn't that be awful if you had to pay Hillary to come to your wedding?
	I'd pay her to stay far, far away from my daughter's wedding.
	Anyway, the Washington Post says Donald Trump and his allies have begun mapping out specific plans for using the federal government to punish cities and opponents should he win a second term, with the former president naming individuals that he wants to investigate or prosecute, and his associates drafting plans to potentially invoke the Insurrection Act on his first day in office to allow him to deploy the military against civil demonstrators.
	This is not just the Washington Post making this stuff up because they hate him.
	I mean, it sounds really bad, doesn't it?
	Except there's a lot of people out there with MAGA who would say, well, that's good.
	I hope he does that. Well, you understand that you're pushing a civil war, right?
	And Trump understands that this is Banana Republic stuff because he will condemn this as Banana Republic stuff, and then at the same breath, he will come back and say, but now I can do it to them.
	So they made it into a Banana Republic, so now I'm going to be Banana Republic back to them.
	And then everybody can fight a civil war over which dictator do you want to rule this banana republic with nuclear weapons?
	Biden or Trump? That's where we are with this.
	In public, Trump has vowed to appoint a special prosecutor to go after, in his words, go after Biden and his family.
	He says...
	Now, Washington Post, this is where their bias comes in.
	Ridiculous. And he's frequently made corruption accusations against Biden and his family that are not supported by available evidence.
	See, that's where Washington Post is lying to you.
	Very well documented.
	He said, it would resemble a banana republic if people came into office And it started going after their opponents willy-nilly, said a constitutional law professor at the University of Virginia.
	It's hardly something that we should aspire to, but it is.
	And, you know, are we going to have a civil war over Trump and over his petty vendettas and vengeance?
	Because that's really what January 6th was about, you understand.
	It was Trump who gave us the lockdown mail-in election.
	It was Trump who locked us down.
	It was Trump who created the poison injection.
	And yet you had people showing up on January the 6th to do whatever was necessary to keep that guy in office.
	And as I said at the time, First of all, I knew it was a grift.
	I pointed that out. That's why I got fired.
	And I'm glad.
	I have no regrets about that.
	And it was a lie.
	It was a grift, the Stop the Steal stuff that Alex did, the Save America stuff that Trump did.
	That was a lie. They threw their own supporters.
	After they ripped them off, they threw them under the bus and threw the entire conservative movement under the bus, knowing that it would be used like this.
	I knew. They knew. They knew fully well I was there.
	I know they knew.
	I told them. And they didn't deny it.
	So, you know, don't tell me that I'm misconstruing this stuff.
	I was there. You weren't.
	Okay? President Trump has always stood for law and order and protecting the Constitution, said a person who's organized a pact for him.
	Is that true? He's always stood for law and order.
	He stood for the law. He stood for the Constitution.
	The guy who said, take the guns and do the due process later.
	The guy who said, well, I'm going to do an executive order to ban bump stocks and do gun control by executive order.
	The guy who said, gotta get the shot.
	You gotta get the shot.
	Yeah. Yeah, that guy always obeyed the law and the Constitution.
	So... In New Hampshire, in October, Trump said, this is third world country stuff.
	Arrest your opponent.
	And then he says, and that means that I can do it too.
	You see? In the same breath, this is third world stuff, and I'm going to do it.
	You want somebody like that?
	You want a third world dictator like Biden, and he is?
	You want a corrupt dictator like Biden?
	Or do you want a corrupt dictator like Trump, who wants to be bribed?
	He wants Third World Order stuff.
	He doesn't want the Constitution.
	Believe him when he tells you this stuff.
	When he says, I'm the father of the vaccine and all the rest of this stuff.
	Believe him when he takes credit for this stuff.
	Believe him when he says that he wants a civil war.
	Because that's what he's talking about.
	January the 6th, J6 Part 2.
	And the people who are rotting in jail, as this guy is complaining about how he's the victim, I think the people who are the victim of Trump are his supporters who are rotting in jail.
	He's still at large.
	You know, he goes on the stand, and that's what we're going to talk about here.
	He goes on the stand. Believe him when he says that.
	Instead, you know, he also knows my people, my people, the grace of you, they would still vote for me and still support me, even if I shot somebody on the street, Fifth Avenue.
	Kelly, General Kelly, who was his chief of staff, Said they would expect Trump to investigate him because since his term as chief of staff ended, he has publicly criticized Trump, including by alleging that he called dead service members suckers.
	He also said, get that disabled guy in a wheelchair out of here.
	No one wants to see that. He's a loser, right?
	Kelly added, he said, there's no question in my mind that he's going to go after the people that have turned on him.
	Well, I guess I'm okay, because I never really supported him.
	I said he's maybe better than Hillary Clinton, but, you know, not much different, actually.
	I had not seen that clip of a 2008 And Julian Assange had not seen it either.
	Remember, that was my attitude.
	Well, we know what Hillary Clinton is.
	We don't yet know what Trump is.
	So, you know, vote against what we do know is evil.
	But now we know that Trump is evil, and I'm not supporting him in any way, shape, or form.
	I wouldn't support him in 2020.
	I won't support him ever.
	You know, I want Trump for prison, just like Hillary for prison.
	But Trump allies, such as Russ Vaught, his former budget director, who now leads the Center for Renewing America, Are actively repudiating the modern tradition of a measure of independence for the Justice Department, arguing that such independence is not based on the law or the Constitution.
	Voight is in regular contact with Trump.
	And would be expected to hold a major position in the second term.
	In other words, you want to complain that we've got a Department of Justice that is politically weaponized?
	That's what Trump wants to do.
	Just like I said about the schools.
	I don't want the schools instilling morality in kids.
	You know, it all began when they were instilling a morality that was in line with parents, for the most part, the vast majority of parents.
	Now they're instilling morality that is antithetical to what most parents want.
	And they're grooming these kids to mutilate themselves.
	But the principle is that if you're going to allow the schools to instill morality, you're going to get there eventually.
	And if you're going to say, well, the Justice Department is going to be weaponized against my political enemies, that's what Trump is saying.
	And that's what Russ Voigt is saying.
	And they're talking about how they are going to do their own lawfare.
	Warfare through the law.
	And so it's not going to be any different.
	We've also heard Trump say, well, we're going to do a better job of ballot stuffing.
	He already gave us one of the worst ways, one of the worst corruptions of our election process with the mail out ballots to everybody.
	And now he wants to do ballot harvesting.
	He thinks he can do ballot harvesting better than them.
	He thinks he can weaponize the Department of Justice better than them.
	I don't want any of that stuff.
	That's one of the reasons why I adamantly oppose Donald Trump, because he's no different from Hillary Clinton.
	He's cut from the same mold.
	He is a totalitarian, petty-fogging, narcissistic tyrant.
	Who disrespects the Constitution and hates us.
	Hillary Clinton called us despicable, right?
	What was it? Deplorable.
	Thank you. That was Sylvester who said, you're despicable.
	Hillary Clinton said we're deplorable.
	And then Trump said we're non-essential.
	What's the difference?
	What's the difference, okay?
	And I'll just say this.
	Because he wants to use government to get even with his enemies.
	And that's what this is all about.
	Trump doesn't want to debate.
	He doesn't care about the policies.
	He doesn't care about you and I. He's going to push the World Economic Forum's goals just like he did in his first term, especially in his fourth year.
	He doesn't care about policies.
	He doesn't care about the Constitution.
	He doesn't care about you any more than he cared about the January of the Sixers.
	Instead, what he cares about is his own power.
	And his ability to get revenge.
	And in all of this, just understand that when he says he's going to get revenge, that this is antithetical to Christian principles.
	This is antithetical to the Christian principles that founded our country.
	He is antithetical to Christ.
	He is an antichrist.
	You understand who you're supporting if you're supporting this guy.
	And he is against the Constitution as well.
	The Constitution doesn't have any clauses in there about weaponizing the government against your political enemies, but that's exactly what he wants to do.
	And so, understand that as you look at all of this political warfare against him, as I said before, are we going to become the monsters that we fight?
	Well, Trump wants to become the monster that he says he's fighting.
	He wants to become Hillary.
	He wants to become Joe Biden.
	He wants to be better at being a monster than they are.
	And so, quite frankly, that's why I don't care about this being weaponized against him.
	He didn't care when they were censoring us.
	He only cared when they censored him.
	And most conservatives only cared when he got censored.
	They didn't care when they were censored.
	They didn't care when other people were censored.
	But they cared when Trump was censored.
	We live vicariously.
	This little tyrant, this little antichrist.
	And so it's interesting to see Mark Meadows, another chief of staff, is now being sued by his book publisher.
	They want to get their $350,000 book advance back.
	And they're also seeking a million dollars in damages.
	They said he lied in his memoir.
	So I guess the publisher now wants to stop the steal.
	Because he's stealing money from them.
	He said the main theme of his own book was that the 2020 election was stolen from Trump.
	The lawsuit comes after Meadows reportedly told the special counsel investigating Trump that he'd warned the former president again of making claims of fraud, that neither he nor his boss really believed the election had been stolen.
	This is another one of these examples of when you tell the public one thing and you say something else, when you're in court...
	Under oath and looking at prison time.
	And so he told his publisher one thing, and he told the public and the MAGA crowd that he thought would buy this book another thing.
	And then when push came to shove and they put him under oath in a courtroom, oh, then he says something completely different.
	He doesn't want to risk jail there.
	And we have seen that.
	As a matter of fact, This whole Ray Epps thing.
	And I don't know or care whether Ray Epps was a Fed or not.
	I'm just telling you that whatever Ray Epps, whatever one federal agent provocateur could do, pales in comparison to what Alex Jones did or what Donald Trump did or what any of these people did.
	Pales in comparison.
	And the reason they're focusing on Ray Epps is Is to distract people from what they did.
	And so we had, as Darren Beattie at Revolver focuses on Ray Epps and things like that, and Tucker Carlson and all the rest, as he focuses on that, one of the people, and I forget the guy's name, he's whispering in his ear, and when he was under oath in court, he said, no, he told me not to do that.
	He didn't tell me to go, you know, attack the barricade.
	He told me not to do that.
	That's what he said when he was under oath.
	Then he gets off, he gets out of the court, and he gets on MAGA radio, conservative radio, and he's telling everybody exactly that.
	No, he told me to go do that.
	He told me to attack the barricade and everything.
	This is the same thing Mark Meadows is doing.
	He tells his publisher who's going to produce a book to sell it to the MAGA crowd, oh yeah, Donald Trump won.
	I'm with him 100%.
	And then when he's in court facing jail for lying, if he commits perjury, then he tells the truth.
	I saw the same thing with Bannon, Steve Bannon, you know, recording three days before it happened.
	He said, okay, here's the plan.
	Okay, we're going to lose, but then we're going to use this thing.
	He's telling his Chinese investors, you know, we're going to lose this election, but then we're going to take this in and, you know, say that it was stolen from us.
	That's the plan. That's the game plan.
	So the book was called The Chief's Chiefs.
	And the publishing company has pulled it a day before they filed the lawsuit.
	They said Meadows reported statements to the special prosecutor and or his staff and his reported grand jury testimony squarely contradict the statements in his book.
	One central theme of which is that President Trump was a true winner of the 2020 presidential election and that the election was stolen and rigged with help from allies and liberal media who ignored actual evidence of fraud right there in plain sight for anybody to analyze, leading to the wrongful election of President Trump, said the lawsuit from the publisher.
	And they pointed out that Chapter 1 begins with a sentence, all uppercase, I knew he didn't lose.
	And so the publisher is suing him.
	They want their advance back of $350,000, and they want an additional million in damages.
	It was published a year after Trump lost.
	The sheer volume of falsehoods that have been published about the president's time in the White House is astounding.
	Said Meadows, I consider this book to be a small opportunity to correct the record.
	The lawsuit details how the alarm was raised by the publisher in December 2021, just before publication.
	They contacted him with concerns that the book might include misstatements.
	But they said they would proceed with the publishing of the book, but they were withholding the final $116,000 advance while they investigated.
	And now they want it all back, evidently.
	They've given him $350,000 in addition to this $116,000 that they left out.
	They said, Mr. Meadows is aware of the specious allegations published regarding a portion of the book which was taken out of context and which have already been addressed by both Mr.
	Meadows and his lawyer and so forth.
	So again, this is all taken out of context.
	Well, here's the context. The first sentence of the first chapter.
	He didn't lose the election, in all uppercase.
	My son says, when they lie about this, it legitimizes all the corruption in their mail-out election.
	Yeah, that's right. Risha M., thank you for the tip on Rockfin.
	And Jeff Ingram says, Letitia James' campaign on getting Trump now when Trump wants to do the same thing, he's the bad guy.
	Yeah, he is. He is.
	He is. Because he's embracing the same tactic.
	He is a bad guy. He's become the monster that he says, I'm being attacked by these monsters.
	I'm going to be a monster too.
	You see? They take an oath to the Constitution.
	And you should condemn him.
	For bragging about the fact that he's going to violate the Constitution, that he's going to use his position as President to attack his personal enemies.
	That's reprehensible.
	It's reprehensible when Letitia James does it, and can you not see that it's as reprehensible when he does it?
	Are you that blind?
	Unbelievable. Unbelievable.
	Okay. My son says the context.
	I'm getting that out of context, right?
	Oh, okay. No?
	Okay. In reference to his not locking up Hillary, Chefkin321 says, Trump wants to lock us up in Freedom City.
	That's exactly right. But the key thing is that all of his whining about how he's being attacked and everything, at the same time he wants to do it.
	All of his whining about the ballot corruption, and what is he doing?
	He's plotting on how he can do ballot corruption.
	And it's all about him.
	It's not about the Constitution.
	It's not about our liberties.
	It's about his freedom cities.
	It's about his gun control by executive order.
	It's about his World Economic Forum poisonous genetic code injections that he can't stop patting himself on the back for.
	Trump testimony wraps up in the New York civil case.
	And again, this is where the judge...
	I don't know if the judge is that stupid.
	Maybe he is. He doesn't look particularly intelligent.
	But he says, as Trump is grandstanding on the stand, on the witness stand, he says, this is not a campaign event.
	Oh, yes, it is.
	It is a campaign event for Biden.
	It's a campaign event for Trump.
	You don't realize? We're not doing debates anymore.
	We do these kind of show trials.
	It isn't about us.
	It's not about the Constitution. It's not about the economy.
	It's not about war and peace. It's about Trump and his personal vendettas and Biden and his personal vendettas.
	That's what it's about. That's why I say, forget about the president.
	Forget about that.
	Focus on your share.
	Focus on your local elections.
	Focus on your life. Most importantly, focus on your relationship with God.
	Trump is not God.
	He is the idol of these MAGA people.
	He is not God.
	He is a corrupt New York politician in the mold of Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton.
	He hangs out with the Epsteins.
	He takes the flights, all the rest.
	He is a corrupt person in every regard of his life, bragging about his infidelity to his wives.
	Of course, he's going to brag about his infidelity to the Constitution and everything else.
	We're going to take a break. Do we have our guest?
	Okay, good. We're going to calm it down here a little bit, and we're going to talk politics about another country, and we're going to talk economics.
	Joining us when we come back is going to be Axel Kaiser.
	His book, which I bought last time I talked to him, I thought it was an excellent book, The Street Economist, and we're going to talk about what is happening.
	Central and South America, particularly Argentina, are they going to be able to get out of the throes of a failed central bank of hyperinflation and of the socialists who are running that country?
	When we return, we will talk to them about the possibility of that.
	Stay with us. We're
	good to go. Making
	sense. Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	APS Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your mobile device.
	Get the APS Radio app today and listen wherever you go.
	Okay, and so my son says it was out of context, the comment that I made.
	So I wasn't yelling.
	I was yelling at people who...
	We'll excuse what Trump did, but that was not my listener who was doing that.
	So, I don't know, maybe this is a new listener, I thought.
	I hadn't seen the name before, but yeah.
	So, again, let's put my comments in context.
	But, joining us now is the author of this book, The Street Economist, Subtitle is 15 Economic Lessons Every Citizen Should Know.
	Axel Kaiser is the author who is joining us now.
	He's an internationally known writer and economist.
	He is involved with...
	Many different in Central and South America.
	He's a Chilean-German lawyer.
	He's also a senior fellow at the Atlas Center for Latin America, based in Miami.
	A visiting scholar at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.
	Besides being a best-selling author and well-respected in terms of his ability to explain things.
	And that's the key thing. If you really understand something...
	You can simplify it for people.
	And that's what he does.
	He's got 15 simple examples.
	It's not a lot of economic analysis and not a lot of jargon.
	It's just in everyday street terms.
	And it's been very successful in terms of getting people to understand what is happening.
	And when you combine an explanation of free market economics...
	With the hyperinflation sitting in Argentina, that starts to move things.
	And so last time he was on, we talked about Javier Malay in Argentina, a surprise, strong showing by him in the first election as a libertarian economist.
	He came in first place, and since we spoke, there's now been another election, and I wanted to get Axel Kaiser's comments about that because he knows Javier Malay, who's in Argentina.
	Again, Axel is in Chile.
	So thank you for joining us, sir.
	Thank you very much for having me.
	Now, since we last talked, as I said, we've had this election, and Javier Malay came in second.
	I was surprised to see that the guy who is the socialist candidate, who is now the finance minister, edged him out in first place, but there's now going to be a runoff between the two of them.
	Tell us a little bit about that and how you see this.
	Why did that happen? Well, actually, you know, you have a problem in Argentina that it's called Peronism.
	Peronism is a religion.
	It was developed by Juan Domingo Perón, a general who Ruled in the country for many years.
	And he was a fascist, basically.
	A collectivist, a statist.
	Not a communist, but he didn't believe in free markets.
	He didn't believe in economic freedom.
	He believed in these sort of corporate arrangements.
	And that the state had to basically control people's lives and the economic system and give everyone benefits and social rights and things like that.
	And this became, over the decades in Argentina, sort of, you know, religion in the country.
	It's like if you would say about, maybe we would talk about Saudi Arabia or any of these Muslim countries, and you could not imagine them without being Muslims, you know what I mean?
	And so, to some extent, Peronism became part of Argentina's identity.
	And it's the mythology that gives Argentinians, a large part of the population in Argentina, a sense of belonging and also meaning and all of that.
	It's very connected to Evita Peron and we got in America, you know, the Broadway show Evita and all this other kind of stuff.
	And so they attach a personality to it, and people get attached to that person, like a celebrity.
	You know, you've got a celebrity politician that everybody wants to follow.
	And so that's a big part of it as well, isn't it?
	Yeah, but it's even more than a celebrity, because Evita Perón...
	You have the cult of personality until today.
	It became like, let's think this in religious terms.
	It's like, you know, it's like having saints in the Catholic religion.
	Or the cult of Maria Magdalena, for instance.
	So she's a patron saint of fascism.
	Yeah. It has a religious component.
	So it's not like, oh, we admire Taylor Swift or whoever it is, and then when she's dead, no one cares.
	This goes way beyond that.
	They managed to create a very strong, as I said, mythology and...
	With religious fervor.
	So the people who follow this are fanatics.
	This is one element that I think we usually tend to underestimate the importance of ideas, culture, the mentality, no?
	And now we are seeing this war between Hamas and Israel.
	You can have a new grasp on the importance of ideology or fundamentalism and ideas.
	So in Argentina you have this.
	And the other problem is that they, Massa and the Peronists, they control the government.
	So they had mobilized lots of resources in order to win the election, to bribe people, to tell them that if Millet wins, they are not going to receive the benefits anymore.
	This is actually what they did.
	If you went to the train stations and the bus stations in Argentina, before the first round, you saw signs that were put up by the government, by Masa, Showing people how much the price of the train ticket and the bus ticket would increase in case Milei was elected or as compared to the price of the transportation tickets
	if Masa was elected.
	And so, Millet was like 10 times higher.
	And so, they scared people into voting against Millet by telling them that all these subsidies were going to go away and then they would have to pay much more for transportation, which in a country like Argentina, with 150% inflation almost, And a ruined economy, it makes a huge difference for people who have to take the train every day to go for work.
	And with that kind of inflation, when I reported on it, I said, you know, again, Masa, the guy who is his opponent, the Peronista, is the finance minister.
	And so he did a big tax cut, and then he gave some new entitlement programs, or an increase in entitlement programs as well, didn't he?
	I mean, essentially throwing gasoline on the dumpster fire, right?
	Didn't he do that as well, besides the propaganda stuff?
	Well, yeah, of course.
	They lower taxes and also they, you know, give a lot of money away so people can, you know, with both of them.
	This is a classical assistentialist policy and mentality that we have seen in Latin America, but especially in Argentina for over a century, I would say, even.
	And so there is nothing new there.
	Now it's very hard for Millet to win, but it's not impossible.
	I think he has a good chance of winning.
	And next Sunday, I think it's the election.
	And the person who came in in third place will be moved out.
	That was a conservative person.
	Is that correct? So you expect that he'll get he'll inherit in this three way race.
	That conservative vote was being split between Malay and this other person is now eliminated.
	Is that correct? Yeah, Patricia Woolrich came in third place and she already has endorsed Millet and also Macri has endorsed Millet.
	I mean, that doesn't mean that necessarily all of her voters will go and vote for Millet because the ability of politicians to mobilize the people that supported them has decreased over time.
	So it's not It used to be the case that one politician would say, okay, I support this guy and many people will follow him.
	But that's not the case anymore.
	But a percentage of them will go for Millet.
	So that's why he still has a chance.
	And he said they're going to be starting from a clean slate because there were lots of attacks and aggressions between the two of them during the campaign.
	And now they are together and trying to win the presidency.
	Because if they don't do it, Then you will have the same cronies and criminals.
	Basically, there are a bunch of criminals, the people who are running Argentina now.
	Masa even had ties to the narco cartels and things like that.
	And so they don't have a chance, in my opinion.
	I mean, if Argentinians really vote again for Peronists, In a country where the finance minister has the people living with 140% inflation with almost 50% under the poverty line and where the country is broke and no investments are available and so on and so forth, then you can only explain this in terms of ideology.
	And more even so than in terms of, you know, mobilizing resources by the government so that people will vote for you, which is something they will do anyways.
	I think that's not enough because people are really suffering now.
	It's not like they have a lot to lose if they vote for Millet.
	Let me ask you this, because in the comments after the election, mainstream media here in the United States was going back and looking at comments from people who voted one way or the other.
	And I don't know if it was just the way that they selected it.
	If it was truly representative, you've got to try to always...
	Try to see through the smoke in the mirrors that the mainstream media is using.
	But what they were doing, at least in terms of what they were talking about, they said most of the older people were supporting Massa, I think is his name, the Peronista.
	And it was mostly young people who were saying, we've got to try something different.
	This just isn't working. We were supporting Javier Malay.
	Is that kind of similar to what you see there?
	A generational gap where people that are older maybe are buying into this personality cult, this religion of the Peronistas?
	There is a generational gap.
	There is no doubt that Millet has managed to create a structural change in public opinion in Argentina that means that younger generations who vote for him, they are not Peronists anymore.
	I mean, they are lost to the Peronists.
	And so that is a great achievement.
	I think it's unbelievable what has been going on there because this is like converting Muslims into Christians, you know?
	It's like something, yeah, it's huge.
	So even if he doesn't win the presidency, I think that is part of his success and no one can deny that.
	But of course, in the older generations, the Peronist mythology is much more prevalent and they tend to embrace it in a stronger way than the younger generations who are Also, very much worried that they will have no opportunities in this country.
	And actually, many young people are living in Argentina to other places.
	They are going to the United States or Europe.
	Many of them have European passports, you know.
	And so, I happened to...
	I had a girlfriend for a long time who was from Argentina and all of her family had already left and many of her friends.
	We're talking about 25-year-old people, 30-year-old people, because they think there is no hope in this country.
	And the human capital is the first one to leave.
	And so they all support Millet.
	All of them. The older guys tend to live a lot from government assistance, you know, the pensions and things like that.
	And they are still in this mindset.
	They still have this mindset of government has to take care of us and give us everything and journalism is good and Masa is the guy.
	But there are also in the, you know, generations, let's say the baby boomers, There are many who vote for Millet because they just are anti-establishment.
	They don't want the same people to be in power anymore because the corruption scandals and all that has been completely insane in Argentina over the last years.
	And decades. And so they would vote for Millet just to get rid of them.
	And not that they are really classical liberals or people who endorse the free market, but I think they are a different type of person.
	They could vote back for a fairness that they consider honest in a couple of years from now.
	So I think if Millet...
	I mean, if it was only with people under 30, Millet would have won in the first round.
	I mean, the election took place between, you know, people above 18, under 30, Millet would have won in the first round.
	But that tells you something about the future of the country.
	So I think I'm optimistic in that sense.
	I agree. Yeah. In the medium term, very hard.
	Yeah, it is. Yeah, people who just want to get rid of the corruption that has been so ingrained there.
	But a comment from a listener, ALC28, says, Many people are afraid of freedom, and they really are.
	They'd rather have the free stuff than freedom.
	They will give up their freedom.
	They think that they can purchase their security and their comfort by giving up their freedom.
	And, of course, Benjamin Franklin said, no, it's not going to work.
	It never worked. But that is the calculation that they're doing with that.
	So I think that may be it. But, you know, it's interesting, Axel.
	The New York Times saw this and said, well, you know, we think that...
	Javier Malay is appealing again to the younger voters who are not attached to the Peronista personas and they see that it's not working.
	As you pointed out, they're even leaving the country to try to find economic opportunity that is not there.
	And so the New York Times says, yeah, but he might have a problem because there might be these Taylor Swift fans who are going to attack him.
	And they've organized a group called Swifties Against Freedom Advances.
	And that's because he's called his.
	Isn't that funny?
	They don't see the irony of that, I guess, because Freedom Advances is Malay's party.
	So they're writing themselves against Freedom Advancing.
	They're pretty much self-owned, aren't they, right?
	Yeah, yeah. But let's talk a little bit about that because I had an article.
	Obama has come back and has now commented on his disdain that he has for the free market because he's kind of our paranistas, part of that group.
	And this headline from Washington Examiner says, Obama warns about the dangers of market-based systems.
	Being compatible with slavery.
	And I'll just read you two sentences that he had here.
	He says, just because an economic system generated wealth and innovation doesn't mean that it guarantees a good society.
	He said, market-based systems have been compatible with slavery, caste systems, colonization, war, fraud, autocracy, and the poisoning of our natural environment.
	And it's like, wow. This guy really does hate free markets.
	He's not even talking about capitalism, which some people might attribute to crony capitalism.
	He's talking about the free market and your ability to have a choice there.
	It's all about colonization and exploitation and fraud and autocracy.
	But at the very beginning of it, he says, just because an economic system develops wealth and innovation, well, that's what an economic system is supposed to do, isn't it?
	You know, Obama makes a fundamental mistake there because he's ignorant in economics.
	I wish he could read my book, Street Economics, to learn something.
	But the fundamental mistake that he makes, and many people on the left make, is, you know, to confuse...
	The free market and something that is, you know, something that exists, like free market institutions, with things that have existed all over, you know, throughout human history.
	That's right. For instance, I mean...
	Slavery. Slavery, for example, yeah.
	The Roman Empire had slavery.
	They didn't have free markets. Exactly, and they didn't have a free market.
	So the right question would be for Obama to ask, where...
	Are the places where my ideas, let's assume it's democracy and human rights and prosperity and social mobility, where are those places Or what characteristic do those places have where you find respect for human rights and you have prosperity and social inclusion and things like that?
	And the thing that you will find is that all of these places, with no exception, have a market economy.
	There is zero exception to this rule.
	And now, if you go to places where you have zero market economy or almost no market economy, you will find none of these things that Obama claims to value.
	So the real question is, what would happen in the absence of the free market and not if you have, you know, a paradise because you have a free market.
	And in the absence of a free market, You wouldn't have prosperity, inclusion, social mobility.
	You wouldn't have respect for human rights and so on and so forth.
	And when you have a free market, it's a necessary condition for having a free society that is inclusive.
	It's not a sufficient condition, but it's a necessary condition.
	And this is what Obama doesn't understand.
	And that's why he doesn't value the free market.
	Because yes, you could have spaces of free markets where you have slave trade, for instance.
	But that doesn't mean that you have the slave trade because you have free markets.
	You would have the slave trade regardless of the type of economic arrangement that you have in that society.
	And that's what happened throughout human history. - Yeah, so when we look at places like communist China and we can see that we've got autocracy, we've got fraud, we've got corruption.
	We have the poisoning of the natural environment that they have in China.
	We see that we have all that stuff because of an authoritarian, centrally controlled and planned economy.
	That is inherent in that system that you have all those things.
	That's also another point.
	It's the same mistake that Pope Francis makes.
	If you take a look at the countries that respect the environment the most, it's all capitalist free market economies.
	It's not the socialist countries.
	It's not underdeveloped countries.
	It's not Haiti or some country in Africa or even the former Soviet Union.
	It's not what happens.
	I mean, the Soviet Union was a An environmental disaster.
	Yes. It was horrible.
	People don't know a lot about this, but it was much worse than any Western capitalist country that you could see.
	And because we have a free market economy, because we have innovation, we can not only provide food and shelter for everyone, but we can improve the technologies so that we can become cleaner and cleaner in the way we produce stuff.
	And this is what... It has been going on actually over the last decade.
	If you take a look at the amount of CO2, for instance, produced per dollar GDP of output, you can see that it has dramatically declined everywhere in the US and even in China.
	But if you take a look at soil pollution and water pollution and things like that, air pollution, There's a famous study that was made decades ago, years ago, I don't remember exactly the date, but it showed that when you surpass $15,000 in per capita income around that benchmark, then all these pollutants start to decrease.
	And so water starts becoming cleaner, air starts getting cleaner, and so on and so forth.
	So economic development, thanks to free market economies, makes the world cleaner in the end.
	Of course, you can always say, well, you know, if we went back to the Stone Age, we wouldn't have any poisoning of the air and things like that, which is also not entirely true, because back then we had some volcanic eruptions that were much worse than anything we have ever seen.
	But that's not...
	Reasonable to argue, you know, and that's the problem with the extinctionists nowadays.
	They say, oh, humans are a plague.
	We have to, more or less, everyone has to die.
	Not us, but everyone else has to die so that the earth will be clean and pure again, which is an anti-humanist and genocidal way of thinking.
	I'm not saying Obama thinks like that.
	But he's very confused when it comes to the free market.
	It's like saying, well, democracy is also compatible with corruption.
	It's also compatible with human rights violations.
	It's also compatible with, you know, all sorts of evil stuff.
	But that doesn't mean that it is because you have democracy that you have that.
	It's when you have democracy, and liberal democracy especially, that respects fundamental rights, where you have less of these sort of evils in general, as a general rule.
	You have exceptions, of course.
	And so he wouldn't say that if he was speaking about democracy.
	But because he hates the free market or because he doesn't like it, We just cannot think clearly about it.
	That's right. Yeah, cause and effect.
	You know, what actually caused it, or is this something that was there, there before and after?
	Again, the book is The Street Economist, Axel Kaiser, 15 Economic Lessons Every Citizen Should Know.
	And Obama should know these too, but he doesn't.
	So, you know, and you got to say, look, this centrally controlled economies work really well for people like Xi and China and Obama.
	You know, he's done really well in terms of trying to plan economies and other people's lives and take away their choices.
	But talk a little bit about one of the lessons that you've got in there.
	You say only two ways to make a living.
	From your own work or from somebody else's work?
	And I guess you would say that Obama and the Peronistas are making their living from somebody else's work, right?
	So, yeah, you know, this is a very fundamental lesson and a very deep thing.
	If you really think about this, when we were in paradise and all you forms of utopianism, you know, offer a place where you will not have to work.
	Or you will not have to put so much effort in order to, you know, provide for your life and your family's life.
	And so socialists and collectivists and people like Obama tend to believe that there's a moral value When you don't have to really put your own effort into achieving something like providing for yourself.
	They think it's the responsibility of the community, of society, to make sure that everyone has enough to survive.
	And when they do this, they basically promote policies that destroy incentives so that people can create wealth, and they create incentives, and you see this in Argentina, of course, and also in the US to a different extent, that people will live at the expense of someone else.
	Because, as I say in the book, you have only two ways of supporting your life.
	You can work for yourself and provide for yourself, or you can live out of someone else.
	Someone else pays your bills, basically.
	That's what we do as parents.
	We pay our kids bills.
	Why? Because they are children.
	They cannot provide for themselves.
	It's a natural order of things, right?
	But when you are an adult and you are not providing for, unless you are ill and you have some sort of different problem, and you are not providing for yourself, someone else has to provide for yourself.
	And this is the promise that is offered by the left worldwide, that you will not have to worry because someone else has your back.
	They will pay for your bills.
	It's of course not the politicians who promise this, that take their money from their pockets in order to pay for them.
	It's through a tax system your neighbor or someone who is rich or has a better situation than you and you will take away from him and will give it to you.
	Because to some extent they feel that it is unfair that some people have more than others and they feel it is also unfair to have to work.
	for making a living.
	It's a fundamental problem that you have with this mindset, which is the utopianism behind it.
	It's the idea That life is unfair because you have to work in order to make a living.
	And if we just were in the perfect place in paradise again, we wouldn't have to work.
	And they are trying to offer that.
	They're trying to tell people, you know, don't worry, this time it's not God who is going to provide for everything in paradise.
	This time it's the state, it's the government.
	It's us in charge of the government.
	It's Godverment. It's Godverment, as I call them.
	And we had this in spades, didn't we, with the lockdowns?
	And I don't know what they did in South America, but, you know, we had the lockdowns, and then they gave people stimulus checks.
	Don't work. Stay home.
	I'll give you this money. And that was training for universal basic income.
	Is that something that's being pushed by...
	I'm sure it is. It's a globalist agenda.
	I'm sure it's being pushed in South America, the universal basic income.
	We've even got former economists like Charles Murray that I really respected when he talked about how welfare state had actually harmed the people it was supposed to help and made them dependent on the state.
	And now he's pushing universal basic income.
	It's truly amazing to see how this is being pushed.
	But it also, I think it's amazing, Axel, how quickly...
	People caught on to that and how quickly they became dependent on it, saw that as an entitlement, and I shouldn't have to go to work.
	I want to stay home and continue to collect my check and so forth, and stimulus check, not even working from home with a Zoom, but I want to stay home and get that stimulus check.
	It worked really well. Yeah, that is a big trend nowadays to argue for UBI, especially because of all the technological innovation that is coming and the argument that it will replace jobs and destroy jobs and machines are going to do everything in the end.
	Actually, Elon Musk recently had an interview, I don't know if you saw this, with the Prime Minister of the UK. And he said that he believed that all jobs were going to be destroyed by AI. All of them, all of them.
	No exception, basically.
	And that we wouldn't have a UBI, but we would have a universal high income or something like that, he called it.
	Because we would have so much resources, so much money in the end, that we would be able to provide everything we wanted for everyone.
	And no one would have to work unless you wanted to.
	Well, this sounds like a point in time where you don't have the economic problem anymore, which is how to provide and to get the resources.
	I don't like the UBI because they are...
	First of all, they are arguing for the UBI on top of all the welfare measures that we already have.
	It's not like we are going to shut down the welfare state and we are going to give a UBI to people who cannot, you know, reach a certain amount of money so that they can support themselves.
	It's apart from everything the government is already doing, they want to introduce the UBI, which I think is horrible.
	And... And even if you got rid of all the welfare state and you had a very small government, which would be much better for everyone, the problem with the UBI is what you just said.
	You make people dependent on these handouts.
	And this has not only...
	Of course, you solve the economic problem of the resources that you need for eating and shelter and all that, but you have another element that you have to take into account.
	People need to find meaning in life and they need to feel useful members of society.
	And there is no better way to achieve that than through work.
	And so if you have people depending on government and money that is being just given to them, their sense of dignity, of self-worth is going to dramatically plummet.
	And we have seen this in welfare states all over the world.
	Even in countries like Sweden or Denmark, you have that problem.
	And then you will have a social crisis and probably disenfranchised people that will go on streets burning cars like you see in Europe.
	All these migrants that you see destroying things in Europe are on welfare.
	All of them. Most of them are young men who are not even working.
	And they don't have any direction.
	You know, when I looked at asymmetric warfare centers here in the U.S. and you had these military people who were analyzing what was happening in these other countries, they said, you know, the thing that's motivating them is not Islam or any kind of radical religion.
	What motivates them? These are typically – the profile is typically somebody who's in their 30s.
	They're well-educated. They might have been an engineer or something like that.
	But now they see that they have no control over the future because, you know, we've come in and bombed their country and we're occupying it.
	So they see that they have no control over the future.
	That helplessness radicalizes them, turns them into terrorists.
	Then they turn to religion.
	But they're radicalized by having absolutely no control or purpose in their life that's been taken away from them.
	And so when you look at the people that are being brought in with the open borders into Europe and into the United States, we know that they're bringing them in.
	It's going to develop into a sense of hopelessness and frustration.
	They want them to be radicalized in that.
	But, you know, when we look at what the...
	We look at what the technocrats are doing.
	George Gilder said these Silicon Valley people, he called them neo-Marxist, Axel, and he said the reason he called them neo-Marxist, he said they've got a fundamental conceit like Karl Marx who said we have with the Industrial Revolution, we've got We can make more physical goods than we ever need.
	And now we just have to figure out how we're going to distribute those.
	And we'll let the government do it. And so George Gilder said, that's what the Silicon Valley people are saying.
	They say, we've got all this technology.
	We've got genetics, robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotech.
	All we have to do is just figure out, we have infinite physical goods.
	We just need to put it out there.
	It sounds like that's what Elon Musk is telling Rishi Sunak.
	What do you think about that?
	Does that sound like Marxism to you?
	Well, you know, the problem with it, Marxism promised something like having a utopia where no one will have to, where they will really freedom from want, right?
	Yeah, freedom from want, exactly. That's what, with their technology, yeah.
	Yeah, and that machines would do everything and would create all of the prosperity for us.
	This is a mindset right now.
	In Marx's utopia, it would be the communist society that would create all of this wealth.
	He didn't really detail how this was going to happen.
	A lot of hand-waving going on there.
	Yeah, he was selling the dream, you know, and of course, I mean, I have the thesis that Marx knew very well that he wanted to create dictatorships and destroy the existing order and send, you know, millions of people to their death.
	And the way he had to, the way he sold this was by saying, at some point, we're going to be so happy and no one will need to work much more than he will, you know, You know, in order to provide for himself and his family, and we will be so wealthy.
	Everyone will have so much from everything.
	So that part of the story is similar to what Marx envisioned.
	Now, I think there are other utopias, not only Marxism, that had promised something like this.
	This is why I... In my view, the idea of paradise is so powerful because almost all sorts of utopias, not all of them, but offer something like a paradise on Earth where people will live in security and you will not have this existential fear that you will not be able to find food and resources to provide for yourself and your family.
	And so I think in Silicon Valley right now, you are seeing this form of utopia.
	Only there are better reasons now to believe that this could happen actually, because if it is really true, That general artificial intelligence can surpass human beings in everything we do and produce limitless resources, more or less, then yes, at some point you will have superabundance and the economic problem will be over.
	I don't think this is going to happen, but if it's true...
	Yeah, you know, it's interesting when we had Michael Bloomberg running for president in the 2020 cycle briefly, he made a statement that a lot of people got very angry with him because he denigrated farmers' contributions.
	They're stupid. Anybody can do that job.
	People said, no, it's a complicated job.
	You've got a lot of different things that you've got to manage.
	You're an entrepreneur. You're taking risks.
	You've got to be able to fix equipment, all this kind of stuff.
	But what he was saying in the context, Axel, was he was saying, well, you know, we had the agrarian culture, and we replaced it with an industrial culture.
	Culture, industrial society.
	And he said, so, you know, those people who are working on the farm, they worked in the factory.
	But he goes, now those of us who are smart can replace all of them.
	And we're working on how we take everybody's jobs.
	And he said, we have to figure out how we're going to keep them, after we take their jobs, how we keep them from coming after us with guillotines.
	That was what he said.
	And so that's exactly the way I see this UBI. You know, these people sell us these utopias that you're talking about.
	And we're going to have everything that's going to be handed to us on a silver platter.
	You know, the artificial intelligence is going to do this, says the world's richest man.
	And then he's just going to share that wealth with you.
	And yet, the reality is that it's really more of a pacification.
	And it kind of reminds me of what H.G. Wells did with the time machine.
	You know, he goes forward in the future and he sees little pink creatures that they have everything provided for them, it seems like.
	And they call them the Eloi.
	And then at night, the Morlocks.
	they want to eat.
	Yeah.
	You know, and that's really what I think is in the mindset of these billionaire technocrats who are telling us about this utopia that's on its way.
	I think they're setting us up to be Eloy.
	Well, you know, I think in the case of Elon Musk, maybe he's even worried about this.
	He didn't say this when he was speaking with Sunak, but he doesn't seem to be like one of these hardcore ideologues in that sense.
	And he's very worried about artificial intelligence going wrong and, you know, maybe becoming a threat to humanity.
	But he believes strongly that That we will come to a point where the machines and artificial intelligence can provide for everything.
	So you will have your personal trainer will be some sort of robot and you will have your psychologist will be some AI that knows you better than yourself and things like that.
	But we have to think about what it means to be human, because now we're entering an age where this is going to be the defining and the most challenging question.
	And if we get it wrong, I think we are heading to collapse and to widespread chaos in the world.
	Even if we have AI producing, or because we have AI producing all of this free stuff.
	So yes, there is some...
	Some element of that, what you are saying is like, okay, we are the rich guys, we are going to give you the crumbs of everything we are producing so that you are not coming after us and creating a revolution.
	But you could have this revolution anyways.
	Because if you are on UBI, and you used to work as a lawyer, or you used to work as whatever, white, blue collar works, and you are on UBI, and you have the other very smart people who are running the show, you will have a caste system, basically. Yes.
	And that is very, I would say, incompatible with human nature and the way we humans work.
	I agree.
	And I think that caste system is a technocracy, you know?
	Exactly. And so we will feel like we are not even the slaves, because there was something that you could say, at least if you were a slave, you were forced to work for someone.
	And you could always think, I mean, I could be free someday, or I could, you know, or this is an abuse that is being committed against me.
	But if you are on UBI, you don't even have that.
	It's like you are just some sort of dependent, like an infant, and these very bright people are feeding you and are giving you stuff so that, you know, you are just remaining peaceful and not bothering them too much.
	That's right. Yeah, and they've been very obvious about the fact that's what they want to do.
	Yuval Harari says, you know, the future doesn't need you.
	We just need to find a way that we can pacify you.
	Maybe we can do it with entertainment until you guys just kind of breed yourself out of existence or whatever, or we find some way to quietly kill you.
	It's very sinister when you look at it.
	The big design that they have.
	And that's why, you know, when you look at...
	That's what I like about your book.
	You talk about real, tangible issues and how economics is at the center of what we do in terms of helping us, giving us a mission, part of our humanity.
	How entrepreneurs or social benefactors are not just doing it for their own good, but society in general benefits from that.
	You take away all that. You take away the entrepreneurship.
	You take away the pride of being able to create something.
	That's really destroying us at our core of humanity, isn't it?
	Exactly. Let's go and tell, you know, painters and artists and people who work, agricultures, who really love what they do, or at least they feel like they are needed, you know, because otherwise society doesn't work.
	And we all do things that other people value.
	That's why we get some income.
	And now you will tell them...
	We don't need you. Like, you are completely not only replaceable, but your existence doesn't matter to anyone.
	Yes. In terms of collaboration and in terms of, you know, this is a very hard appeal to swallow.
	I don't believe that it's going to work.
	I don't believe this is going to end well if AI starts producing everything.
	And, you know, no psychologists will have a job.
	No doctor will have a job because AI will do everything.
	No architect, no nothing.
	Mm-hmm. What are we going to do all day?
	Watch movies? With fake actors that are being played by AI? I mean, what are we going to do?
	Music that's done by AI and recycling other people that have been around there.
	It is crazy. And yet, you know, this is kind of, again, what is the fatal conceit of all these utopian societies?
	Is that somebody that's designing the society knows how to run everything.
	That they've somehow got godlike intelligence, and they know how to run it.
	And so now what they've done is they've moved this away to try to make this feasible to people, since they've run that into the ground.
	But we'll create artificial intelligence that has godlike intelligence, and it will tell you what to do.
	It is, there's a...
	Yes. I'll tell you what, my spidey senses are going off when I hear this kind of stuff happening all the time.
	Yeah, more than utopia, we're going to get dystopia.
	We're going to have, you know, more along the lines of Altus Huxley, Brave New World.
	We will have, like, a totalitarian technocratic society where, you know, we're going to be just, like, cocks in the machine, and they're going to tell us, not even that, because we will not even be part of the machine.
	Maybe we will feed the machine, like in Matrix, you know?
	Yeah, exactly. So that's all what's going to be left for us.
	I mean, it's very hard to really foresee what's going to happen, but I could not imagine having, you know, hundreds of millions of people unemployed with nothing to do at being peaceful and just happy, you know, meditating the whole day.
	This is not going to happen. I agree.
	Yeah, Jason Barker. Let me give you this comment from one of our listeners.
	And, of course, he's also got a broadcast.
	He says, Knights of the Storm, as well as the Foxhole Report, Jason Barker says, the new caste system they want is about removing hope.
	There is no mechanism to get out.
	And that's why the 15-minute cities and the death of private transportation.
	Do you agree with that? To me, that sounds spot on.
	I think that's exactly right. I agree.
	If you lose hope, you lose everything.
	And you cannot have hope where you yourselves are not...
	You cannot envision a way in which you can somehow fulfill a potential that you have.
	And that potential that you can fulfill or develop needs from others and needs the case.
	I mean, you have to be able to make the case that you are useful to others and that other people value you for what you are capable of offering as a human being in different aspects of life.
	And yes, of course, people can tell you But you will still be able to love to have children and your family, and this is important.
	Of course, that's all very important.
	I hope that AI doesn't replace that, because now you will have, like, AI girlfriends that will look like robots, like, all in these movies, and they look like humans, and they are pretty, and, you know...
	So even that...
	It's going to change if this continues to develop in that direction.
	But I think we will live in a hopeless society.
	And when you have that, you have the perfect ferment for a social explosion and a revolution.
	That's right. Because someone will come and say, enough, and they will try and offer you some sort of hope.
	And if you take a look at the Nazis, it's exactly what Hitler did with the German people that were...
	Completely despair because they, I mean, desperation because they were, you know, hyperinflation, depression, and they had no hope.
	Then you had this guy.
	You had the same thing in the Russian Revolution and the same thing in the French Revolution, the great, the three great revolutions we've had and genocidal revolutions we had in the last, in modern times.
	Why wouldn't that be the case now in an age of superabundance?
	It could be the case. Yes.
	Of course. Yes.
	It could happen. Yes.
	Yes. Because, again, you know, life is more than just about what we own.
	But these are...
	Existential questions, really, that you give very simple answers to in terms of, and I say existential issues because this is, these are, it's a thin book, it's easy to read, and it is a way for you to try to explain to people who have been deceived into what this is about.
	Why these utopian systems, why these centrally controlled systems really don't work.
	And why it's doomed to failure, why it is doomed to despair.
	And so this is a great way, this book, you do a great job, Axel, of distilling these arguments, giving real-world examples that people, if you look at this, you can explain it to your children, you can explain it to your friends if they are hearing this siren song of Free Stuff Forever.
	And they're going to keep us safe if we just surrender everything to them.
	Thank you so much for joining us, and very interesting.
	We'll be watching again. You said the Argentina election is, what, about two weeks away or so?
	Yeah, it's November 17th, so I think it's next week.
	Yeah, it's almost, yeah.
	Okay, on the weekend. Okay, we'll be looking and keeping our fingers crossed that things will work out better for the people in Argentina, that they can take a step back towards reality and away from hyperinflation and authoritarian socialist policies.
	Thank you for all the work that you do, and thank you for this excellent book, The Street Economist by Axel Kaiser.
	Thank you very much, Axel. Appreciate it.
	Thank you. Thank you.
	Thanks for having me. All right, folks, we're going to be coming right back.
	Stay with us. We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk a little bit about what's happening with banks still happening in the United States.
	We're still having some problems with the processing stuff, as well as some updates on the pharmaceutical industry and its machinations about controlling us.
	We'll be right back. Using free speech to free minds.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	A.P.S. Radio delivers multiple channels of music right to your mobile device.
	Get the A.P.S. Radio app today and listen wherever you go.
	All right.
	And again, I can't apologize enough.
	I lost my temper with a caller who was putting out a hypothetical about Trump.
	So I apologize. My son is getting up his name so I can apologize directly.
	Apologize about that.
	Sorry. Northern Cardinal said our new immigrants don't have to work or they lose their welcome benefits.
	Sergey Drobin, thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that very much.
	And I apologize to Jefferson 3355.
	I misconstrued your comment.
	I apologize for that. It's easy to get things out of context, but what I said still applies in general, but not to you.
	I wasn't talking to you. I was talking to the people following Trump, so I get it that you're not following that.
	Let's take a look at what is happening with the bank deposits.
	Again, reported this on Friday.
	Some of the biggest banks, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan, And ADP that handles paycheck processing.
	A lot of people are not being able to see their direct deposits were not happening and other deposits were not happening.
	And they said, well, it's a temporary thing, but we got it fixed now.
	Well, it still continued into yesterday.
	I thought that it was over, but the reports are that it is still going on.
	According to CBS News, customers, major U.S. banks, including Bank of America, Wells Fargo, are still complaining about delays with their direct deposits on Monday, following a glitch with processing payments that began on Friday.
	The Federal Reserve on Friday said the problem wasn't related to a cybersecurity issue.
	It wasn't hacked, they said.
	And they said that it had been resolved.
	Can we believe either of those?
	It is possible that it was hacked.
	It's also possible that it was some kind of an inside job.
	You know, many times these cybersecurity things really are an inside job.
	Somebody wants to get even with a company or something like that.
	It could also be that these banks, who are insiders as part of the Federal Reserve System, you know, maybe this whole problem with this corporation called the Clearinghouse, it's the payments company, That operates the only private sector automated clearinghouse system in the United States.
	That's ACH. And so it's the only private one.
	It's the only competitor to the Federal Reserve.
	It's a competitor to their FedNow system, which is the precursor to their FedCoin, the CBDC. So again, you know, I'm...
	Just a coincidence, I'm sure.
	Clearinghouse said that some ACH payment instructions were sent to banks on November 2nd with masked customer names and account numbers due to a processing error.
	Those payments were delayed. Many of the delayed payments have already been posted.
	They said, we'll continue working with the financial institutions to ensure the remaining transactions get through.
	And JPMorgan Chase has said that they will refund any overdraft fees that happen because, you know, people were expecting the payments to be made and it was their fault they weren't made and so maybe you got a direct payment that you make expecting that to be there so they're going to take care of any overdraft fees.
	One person though on Monday morning said, Said to Bank of America on X on Twitter, day four Bank of America, still no direct deposit, no update or potential resolution, or at the very least, what's being done to resolve this issue?
	No transparency, no assistance, no communication from you at all.
	Nothing. Wow. This is so bizarre.
	Which reminds me of something that Catherine Austin Fitz was saying in terms of looking at what is happening and where this is all leading to.
	Again, she has the Solari report, and she was talking recently about changes that are coming to the banking system, how they threaten our freedom, and what can we do to prevent them.
	She was Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development during the Reagan administration.
	She understands...
	This, at a very fundamental level, she also knows a lot of the people who are big players in this.
	This past summer, after Chase banked Mercola, along with two of his executives and his families, she put out a four-part video series on banking at chd.tv, where she's got a weekly show called The Financial Rebellion.
	And she co-hosts that with the general counsel of the Solari Report.
	And in that, she said, how to develop a successful relationship.
	I mean, do you really think that, you know, when J.P. Morgan says, well, we pride ourselves on the fact that we have a personal relationship with our 80 million customers and our 6 million businesses that we have out there, do you believe that for a moment?
	There's absolutely no way that they can have a personal relationship of any sort with that many people.
	And so she says, how to develop a successful relationship with a great bank?
	She says, we're talking about a significant relationship here.
	It's very important that your banker knows you and you know your banker.
	You need a relationship where you can pick up a phone and call if there's a problem and you can get things handled.
	You're not going to get that at the big banks.
	And of course, that's one of the reasons why they want to drive small and medium-sized banks out of business.
	And, you know, why we should be very concerned about that.
	This consolidation, as we see in every one of the industries, is a very negative thing in terms of our freedom, but also in terms of even the services that we get.
	She says, it's so important that your basic transactions run on a platform you can trust.
	One of my favorite quotes is from a Swiss doctor who said, the currency of the future will be relationships of trust.
	And this extends beyond the bank.
	This is why I wanted to talk about this.
	This extends beyond your banking relationships.
	Now, there are much more important relationships where there's trust.
	Your relationship with your spouse, your relationship with your neighbors, your local community, your church, all these different things.
	These are the things that are going to be the currency of the future.
	You know, we talk about how they want to take all that away from us with CBDC, and I mention that all the time, and, you know, if you go to davidknight.gold, it'll take you to Tony Ardobin.
	I really do believe that we need to try to put Some things away and some real stuff that is not tied to the currency because we look at what happens when there's massive inflation like there is in Argentina.
	But, you know, it's important to have that as a separate thing.
	But it's not the end. It's simply a means to an end.
	You know, and so, you know, having your money not tied up in a bank, not tied up in a fiat currency, that's an important thing.
	But that's still just a means to an end.
	You know, money does not give us meaning in life.
	It's going to be those relationships.
	And the currency of the future will be the relationship of trust.
	Who do you trust? And who is it that you know?
	And the people around you.
	That's the important thing about all this.
	The rest of this stuff is just means to an end.
	And so she talks about this in terms of the growing role of artificial intelligence.
	She said, AI is a component piece of a system that is very successful at brainwashing, at propaganda, and at mind control.
	And when you combine it with entertainment and subliminal programming and software that creates addictions, you create this phenomenal infrastructure of things that really draw people in.
	Part of AI's power is access to tremendous amounts of data about what we're thinking, what we're doing, what we want.
	So it's the surveillance component.
	It's the next level, as I pointed out, the progression from being able to tell people propaganda with newspapers and then make it more effective and more visceral as you added audio, and then you added audio and video.
	But then in the 21st century, what they focused on And again, plotted this out in the middle of the 20th century when they didn't have the technology to implement it.
	But they got that technology in the 90s to be able to push out on social media and on the internet their narrative and then to measure our response to it.
	And so if you look at this as a continuum, you see that artificial intelligence is now taking this to a weaponized extreme of being able to not only throw out Their narrative in a very propagandizing way, very effective propaganda, but also to actively measure our response to it in a way that we've never seen before.
	That's what's new about artificial intelligence.
	That's what's threatening about artificial intelligence.
	And that's why Biden has put out his executive order to take control of this, just as he did with CBDC. And don't think that Trump wouldn't do the same thing.
	I mean, it was the Trump administration with Jared Kushner and Steve Mnuchin, who were the first ones to push CBDC in the White House.
	Again, because it was their authoritarian in their nature.
	They don't support the Constitution and individual rights.
	And when the technology comes along for them to do something with that, they'll grab for it.
	So the projections for crypto.
	The common understanding is that Nakamoto is the ultimate altruist and abandoned his 1 million bitcoins for the benefit of humanity.
	But Nick Carter, a well-known figure in the cryptocurrency community, says he doesn't buy that story.
	He's convinced that it's actually the U.S. National Security Agency, NSA, responsible for creating Bitcoin.
	He believes it was written by NSA cryptographers as a monetary bioweapon.
	Catherine Austin Fitz believes the same thing.
	And that's my concern about it.
	She says, you know, what happens to Bitcoin and other crypto after hundreds of hours of looking at the custodian issue?
	She said, depends on how they roll out the complete control.
	As long as they have the ability to assert complete control and shut crypto down and marginalize it, it's easy for the globalist to assert control.
	Until then, they can continue to pull the money out of precious metals and of real and hard assets by encouraging the people, the public, to go to crypto.
	I have no problem with crypto in general if it works, but you've got to be careful how these people are going to use it.
	That's why I like to say that money is what you hold.
	And if you want to know how to get something that you can hold, davidknight.gold.
	Thank you so much for joining us today.
	Have a good day. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	The David Knight Show dot com.
	If you like the Eagles, the Cars, and Huey Lewis and the News, you'll love the Classic Hits channel at APS Radio.

▲