All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 16, 2023 - The David Knight Show
03:01:00
The David Knight Show - 10/16/2023
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 16th of October, year of our Lord, 2023.
Well, today we're going to talk about news and truth.
We've had an interesting couple of developments in terms of the propaganda wars going in both directions on what is happening with Israel and Hamas.
We're also going to talk about border migration.
We now have a move...
To bring in the Palestinians into the United States, of course.
Let's make everybody's problems our problems.
And it's being pushed by, of all people, the editor of Breitbart.
Breitbart that has made our open borders their number one issue.
Oh, well, it's not a problem.
Just bring in the Palestinians, they say.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
The beginning of this, that the concern shown by governments for their own citizens is nothing but phony.
They don't mind sending us off to war.
They don't mind jabbing us.
And another example of this is an Israeli boy that they used for their vaccine campaign has now died at the age of eight from a heart attack.
A heart attack. It was so important for Netanyahu to use his own people as lab rats.
And of course, he and Kissinger and Lindsey Graham and both parties will use us for whatever their geopolitical aspirations are.
And they don't care what happens to us.
An Israeli boy, reports LiveSite News, featured in a video used to push COVID vaccines on children in a nationwide Israeli campaign, died from a sudden heart attack.
His grandfather was a physician.
They say a distinguished physician.
The boy died unexpectedly of cardiac arrest while taking a bath.
Taking a bath.
Not even in sports.
And so, when I saw this, I thought, well, is the grandfather going to have the integrity now to oppose the vaccines?
After it has killed his son.
You know, we see many mainstream articles about all the people that have been killed in this terrorist attack.
I remember seeing one of them retired, he's in his 80s, retired Israeli physicist killed by Hamas.
But what about the physicians who are pushing their kids to the forefront to be used as lab rats?
Will they get a clue? Will this wake him up?
In 2020, at the age of five, this boy appeared in a video produced by the regional council.
The video was part of a government program aimed at pushing vaccines on kids, the COVID vaccines, despite the fact that they had been telling us all along that there was zero chance of it happening to kids.
Remember that? That was one of the big red flags about all this stuff.
They kept talking, and of course Trump still talks every time he mentions it, about the 1918 epidemic of flu.
And yet if you look at that, the people who died had a big surge in terms of age demographics, a big surge of people over 80, and children under the age of infants, I forget whether it's one or two years old, But that is always the case, really, especially if there's something going around.
But in terms of every other demographic, they were all roughly the same.
That was not the case with their so-called COVID pandemic.
It looked exactly like the actuarial table, where it's basically very low at a young age and increases exponentially with age.
And that's what they were reinterpreting, that data.
They were lying to us with propaganda.
And so the children had no risk of anything.
There wasn't a pandemic to start with.
Their own data showed the children had no risk.
So why would you do this?
The family put out a statement.
Our Yonatan Moshe passed away recently on the eve of Yom Kippur.
Yonatan suffered a cardiac arrest in her home.
And since we have fought by his side after he collapsed, So, that's all they said so far.
They've not talked about this.
And again, his grandfather is a distinguished physician.
One Israeli commentator said, so where are the headlines about this?
Where's the investigations about this?
How many more children will die on the golden altar?
Oh, that's a good way to describe it, isn't it?
Yeah, bring your children and lay them on the altar for Pfizer.
And Moderna. And Trump.
The sacrificial altar.
Biden demands it.
There are already two control studies, said the Israeli commentator.
Two control studies indicating that mRNA vaccines cause heart problems.
Remember that at any given moment, this can happen to your beloved children and grandchildren.
And then in Argentina.
Last year, an Argentine boy who had similarly served as a national poster child.
How uncomfortable for these people that the poster children are dying.
It was a national ad campaign there in Argentina.
He died suddenly at the age of four last year.
According to reports, he was rushed to the hospital because of a fever and vomiting.
So he died suddenly there.
But again, this one is absolutely along the lines of the vaccine, the heart attack.
And notice that this is a sort of Damocles that is going to be hanging over everyone's head that's been vaccinated.
The Argentine government used this photo of this boy on their website and still are using it to push the vaccination of children.
He's holding up his fist with a slogan, Vaccines Protect Us.
The cynical government lies in propaganda.
I wonder which untested Trump vaccine these boys got.
And as I look at this, I don't know how anybody can support that fool or traitor Trump.
But let's talk a little bit about the consequences of what is happening.
As everybody is waiting to see what the Israeli government is going to do in terms of pushing everybody out of the Gaza Strip, George Soros once blasted the U.S. and Israel for not embracing Hamas.
He said that...
And remember that I get a lot of...
A lot of email from people, and I've shown this, and I've talked about it as well, the fact that Israel, in misguided geopolitics, as we see the U.S. government doing all the time as well, decide that it would be better to have Hamas than what they thought was a more radical group.
I think it was the PLO at the time.
But they encourage the creation of Hamas, and we do that all the time as well.
We're always creating monsters that come back with our geopolitics.
If Israel had accepted the results of the election, said Soros, that might have strengthened the more moderate political wing.
Well, yeah. At one point in time, they thought that Hamas would be more moderate.
But no. And so, it was not a sticking point for him.
That they said we will not acknowledge the existence of Israel.
He said, well, that could be made a condition for eventual settlement rather than a precondition for negotiation.
So they don't believe that you even exist, but you should make peace with them.
And then we have the BBC, and I think that's a very interesting back-and-forth statement.
Between a guy who worked for the BBC for 30 years and hasn't been there for 20 years.
And as I said, the BBC has said we are not going to use the term terrorism.
And this is this whole idea that one person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter.
And that's why I began, when I first talked about this last Tuesday, I said...
You have to understand the idea of a just war.
And, of course, the BBC doesn't.
Completely pagan. The reason why you wear uniforms, even.
And of course, the terrorists don't wear uniforms.
The terrorists, as we've been told over and over again, when US soldiers were fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, they would mix themselves in amongst the civilian population to use their own people as human shields.
They would put themselves into mosques and then snipe at soldiers.
To say, well, you know, we can get them to fire back at us if they blow up the mosque.
We can use that as propaganda.
So they don't follow the rules of a just war.
They don't try to minimize civilian casualties.
They don't try to identify themselves as soldiers.
They hide. They're cowards.
They're murdering cowards.
And so we have to make a distinction from the very beginning, the difference between terrorism and a war.
If they don't like the way they're treated, people ask me, you know, what's the difference between, you know, what is going on there, these freedom fighters, and what happened with the American Revolution?
Well, the difference is a just war.
You identify yourself.
You carry a flag.
You wear a uniform. You do all these other things to identify yourself.
And that's the big difference.
If you've got a gripe with somebody, if they want to go to war, fine.
Put on a uniform. Go to war.
Don't hide amongst the civilians.
Don't kidnap civilians and use them as human shields.
Don't use your own people as human shields.
Don't kill and target civilians.
That's the difference.
And so this BBC chief political correspondent, John Sargent, Got into a heated discussion with GB News anchor who was doing it, and they had a Jewish guy who was, his National Jewish Assembly chairman was the guy who was debating him on it.
But you basically didn't need to have anybody debating him.
He just basically laid it out there by himself.
He says, well, you know, people have found this very difficult to follow.
They think, well, it's obvious.
The U.S. government calls them terrorists.
We've heard this from other people who call them terrorists.
They don't seem to understand the BBC operation, the news operation, is not like a government.
Oh, come on. Come on.
It is government propaganda writ large.
The BBC is as much government propaganda as Pravda and as Vestia in the Soviet Union.
There's much government propaganda as the Washington Post, the New York Times, and the New York Post on the conservative side.
Anyway, the mainstream media is nothing but propaganda.
BBC is more like PBS. They are owned by the government, run by the government.
And what he's trying to say is that people, this seems pretty obvious to people, they know what terrorism is, but we know better.
We know better. Just because the U.S. government or some other government labels it as terrorism.
Well, look, terrorism is not a political designation versus a freedom fighter, right?
You could call somebody a freedom fighter.
That's your opinion, whether they're fighting for freedom or they're fighting against freedom.
But terrorism is about a tactic, you see.
And that's what he won't admit.
That if you're going to use violence...
And, you know, murder and threats and fear to achieve your political objectives.
That's terrorism. And, of course, governments do that all the time as well.
But terrorism is a tactic.
Focusing on civilians is a tactic.
And so he says, well, a lot of people just don't understand.
It seems to them like it's common sense to call them terrorists.
He said, here are these people who are acting outrageously.
Outrageously. Poor sportsmanship, I guess.
They must be terrorists.
And so then the host interrupted him and said, well, do you think maybe it's because they slit a baby's throat?
He says, oh, no, that's an atrocity.
Is that not a terrorist act?
No, that is a different matter, he said.
You are trying to, if you ask me what I think about that, right?
A straightforward question. I left the BBC more than 20 years ago.
What do I think about Hamas?
Terrorism, right? This is a terrorist act.
That's quite straightforward. But ask me when I was in the BBC as a correspondent, and I would give you a completely different answer.
Well, first of all, the whole thing about focusing on babies.
That's why I focused on babies.
I find it amazing, as I said, you know, whether we look at, they cut off baby sets.
Okay, well, didn't we do that?
Didn't our own government do that?
Didn't Fauci do that? Didn't Fauci pay Planned Parenthood?
For babies' heads and hearts and livers and all the rest of the stuff.
So he could engage in his disgusting transhumanist mice experiments?
We're not outraged about that.
As a matter of fact, these people who exposed it are the ones who are going to jail.
Just like the CIA whistleblower, John Kiriaka, who exposed the torture by the CIA so they could produce lies about weapons of mass destruction.
He's the one who goes to jail.
Nobody else. There was civil action against the psychiatrists who trained the CIA to torture.
But that was lost as well.
Gina Haspel was promoted by Benedict Donald for lying us into the Iraq War and using torture to do it.
And so, when you look at this, again, this whole, I don't understand why.
They're going to try to make the case on the beheading of babies, which I think is something that they...
I'm sure that some babies were beheaded.
I'm sure that babies were beheaded in Gaza Strip with bombs that landed.
I've seen baby...
I saw a disgusting picture of a baby's head exploded on a stretcher in Gaza.
But isn't it interesting how they always go to babies...
And that still tugs at our heartstrings, except when we've had so much propaganda about abortion from entertainment, news, Planned Parenthood, politicians, everybody.
So much propaganda about abortion that our hearts have been so hardened to it that we don't care.
I mean, they know that this strikes a resonant chord with everybody, but we have seared our consciences when it comes to abortion, haven't we?
Oh, we can justify a war because the Kuwaitis take babies out of incubators and leave them to die.
But this happens all the time, and we call it comfort care when it's an abortion.
It's just amazing to me.
This terrorism thing does not hinge on whether babies were beheaded, because quite frankly, we don't care about babies, do we?
Do we really care about babies anymore?
Let's be honest about this stuff.
The BBC is not trying to decide who's done well or badly in the Middle East and then tell people what they should think.
You see, anybody who tells you that they are objective, like the BBC, you should walk away.
That person is either a fool or a liar.
They're a fool if they believe it because they're not aware of their own biases.
As I've said over and over again, the best way to look at this is Matt Drudge, for example, America's editor.
He was clearly identified with conservative causes and the right and everything before Donald Trump.
And he so despised Donald Trump, he's gone hard to the left, or he's sold it or whatever.
I kind of think that Matt has gone to the left, frankly, just because he hates Trump.
He was very, very connected to George Conway, who has been at the forefront of opposing Trump.
He's very much connected to George Conway.
Conway was the lawyer for Monica Lewinsky.
He gave Drudge the information about Monica Lewinsky, and that made the Drudge Report.
And so the people that he's been connected with on the conservative side, and of course, you know, big friends with Ann Coulter, who was a big Trump supporter and then big Trump opponent because of what he actually did.
A Trump supporter for what he promised.
A Trump opponent for what he did.
But anyway, getting back to Matt Drudge.
Matt Drudge, everybody understands that he's changed sides, right?
How do we know these changes?
He doesn't write any articles.
He doesn't write articles.
All it is is what he chooses to report.
And what you choose to report will show your political bias.
There is no such thing as objective news.
Newsweek, Time, CNN, Fox.
I mean, you know, and of course, CNN and Fox, they are appendages of the two political parties.
That's their business model.
You know, they suck up to one party or the other.
That's where they get their guests and so forth.
But everybody understands that part of it.
And if somebody tells you that they're objective, run away from them.
The important thing is to take a look at this and to be honest about where you're coming from and then tell people what you think instead of pretending that you don't have an opinion.
And so the host then rejected and said, well, the problem is that some people, like, they do have an agenda.
And that agenda is to support Hamas and Palestine.
Or to support Israel.
We've seen this on both sides.
So, he said, I spent 30 years at the BBC. I was never told what to say.
But I certainly knew what the rules were.
Yeah, you won't find at any of these news organizations a written set of rules.
You'll know what the rules are.
You'll know what the rules are just by watching what everybody is doing.
Yeah, everybody's cheering Trump.
Well, better not criticize him.
You know, everybody's telling everybody that Trump's playing 40 chess when he's stabbing you in the back or in the arm.
Well, no, that's...
There's no written rules that you've got to say that, but that's what they want you to say.
So, he wanted to say, so what did the BBC staff say about the Nazis, he said, this BBC veteran?
Were they allowed to call them wicked or evil?
No, they were not.
And they were told not to rant.
They simply called them the enemy.
Look, to say that the BBC and mainstream media don't weaponize labels, they are incredibly deliberate about all of their weaponized labels.
Don't call them illegal aliens.
They are undocumented migrants.
We're children of undocumented migrants.
Not anchor babies and so forth.
Don't say pro-life.
You are anti-abortion rights.
And if you say otherwise, you will have your story spiked.
It will not be passed around.
It will not be accepted by the Associated Press.
Do not pass go. Do not collect $200.
And, of course, it's the same way on the other side as well.
Here's an example from the right.
Gateway Pundit. 68% to 89% of Palestinians support terror attacks on Israel, according to a poll.
Is that what the poll said?
No, it isn't. As a matter of fact, if you look at this Gateway Pundit story, scroll down and show the poll results.
Poll results are 88.9% support the firing of rockets from Gaza at Israel.
Well, if that's terrorism, then Israel is engaged in terrorism.
I think that's war. I think it's horrible.
I think it needs to be minimized as much as we can.
You need to try to control it.
You need to try to make an effort not to hit civilian targets and all the rest of the stuff.
That all comes out of the just war theory.
But that is not terrorism.
That is war. Next one.
75%. 75.4%.
Believe the deterrence of Palestinian resistance has increased.
Again, does that prove that these people are terrorists?
No. And I could go on.
They've got six different points here.
Not a single one of them shows people supporting terrorism.
As a matter of fact, when they say 89% of Palestinians support terror attacks against Israel, and they say that's quite a majority, well, that comes from the support of firing rockets from Gaza at Israel.
And look, as we look at the water being turned off, that whole issue.
Water was turned off, then it was turned back on.
Israel supplies 10% of the water to Gaza.
And then other people have shown pictures of Hamas bragging about the fact that they're ripping up water pipe infrastructure and using it to make rockets to shoot into Israel.
So again, that's part of their war, and if your priority is war, that means that you're going to bring hardship and death to your own people.
That's why our priorities should not be war.
And whatever these people do, this is not what America should be involved in.
As a matter of fact, and then go over to CNN. Now, here's an example.
CNN has got such a reputation for fabricating news.
A lot of people believed this CNN parody.
I'll let you see a little bit of it.
To me, it was quite obvious that it was a parody from the very beginning, and the person who put it together and put it out on social media admitted that it was a parody.
But it's pretty believable when you look at CNN's past history here.
Yeah, we're getting video three now, Jerry.
Now, you can see the area is completely deserted, but I want you to get them off the road and get them laid down next to the road, okay?
Closer to the road, Jerry.
Move. It looks like we're in the middle of a forest.
Close, close, close. So you get the idea.
So you get the idea. He put a voiceover on there, you know, and says, okay, make it look like this and do this and, you know, pretend that this is happening and so forth.
And CNN is outraged because Calissa Ward was taking cover in a ditch.
As rockets are being fired overhead and the Iron Dome anti-ballistic missiles are going off and so forth.
So they're very angry about that.
But why is that getting passed around by people, by the millions?
Because that's the type of thing that we have seen CNN do in the past.
And of course, it wasn't that long ago.
That we had CNN telling us, you know, preparing us with propaganda that we're going to have to accept the jab and the jab passport.
Remember this? May you see your papers?
I don't think I have them on me.
In that case, we'll have to ask you to come along.
From Casablanca to today, a demand to produce personal documents can be uncomfortable.
But post-pandemic, it's something we'll all likely have to get more and more comfortable with.
We could be asked to show proof we've had the shots in order to get on an airplane, go to a concert, or go back to work.
Joining me now is medical ethicist Arthur Kaplan.
Medical ethicists, give me a break.
And so, again, they are part of the propaganda operation.
We have seen them fake the famous clip.
As a matter of fact, that's on social media.
After most of these things were taken down, saying this is the real clip, showing what was aired on CNN, and this is the fake clip from CNN after they cleaned it up, and this is what was really going on that people picked up.
No, that was a parody.
But, of course, we've all seen the...
So many things from CNN that are rigged just like that to push their agenda.
And the fake footage, which has been viewed over 5 million times on Twitter, audio intended to sound like a CNN producer, began, yeah, we can see the area is completely deserted, but I want you to get them off the road.
Get them to lie down next to the road, okay?
And again, it was pretty clear to me that it was parody, but a lot of people believed it.
Despite the audio clearly being manipulated, the video was circulated widely with many viewers, seeming to believe that it was legitimate.
And of course, as they are pushing back on this, the Daily Mail says, oh, it was Snopes who first pointed out, give me a break.
It was anybody, I think, pretty much could see it.
But this is why...
We have to be careful about what is put out.
Because there's that discredit when you put out the fake parody.
The people who put that out were discredited.
And it can be used now to say, see, look, CNN is legit.
They're not. I mean, they're propagandists.
And so, by putting out this fake cherry on the top, it removes...
The truth that CNN is nothing but propaganda for a lot of people.
Listen, put that out there.
And that's why, as I said from the very beginning, I go back to this all the time.
This lie about the sting of Steve McKinnick.
And, you know, this got shared around with social media five million times over a couple of days.
Well, it was four million shares.
Of what Steve Pachenik put out about the stain.
And I talk about this all the time.
Let me play it for you, just so you can see what that nonsense looks like.
This is even more ridiculous and even more unbelievable than the CNN parody.
Fauci says, and Fauci trained me at Cornell.
Oh, sorry. Let's take this.
It's happening now, and the reason I couldn't come on the Alex Jones campaign, The show last night was I was not given the permission that I needed to in order to say what I'm about to say now.
You didn't have permission. The federal government, I'm not paid by them.
This is really a sting operation.
Contrary to what everybody else said, Trump knew this was happening.
Eric knew this was happening and warned the public.
I knew this was happening.
However, I did not say anything about it.
What happened was we marked, watermarked every ballot with what's called the QFS blockchain encryption code.
In other words, we know pretty well where every ballot is, where it went, and who has it.
So this is not a stolen election.
That's why we're still fighting over this, three and a half years later.
We burst the entire game of war along the lines of Sun Tzu, the art of war.
And Trump was brilliant and still is brilliant at it.
All of this was expected.
All of this is part of the sting operation we're running.
And let me tell you that 48 hours ago, not only did we put markers on those ballots, but I can say now, with the pollution of people in the intelligence community and elsewhere, we sent out thousands and thousands of national guards to 12 different states, Washington, Delaware, Texas, Arizona.
Alabama and everywhere.
So now you have to consider and rethink what this is really about.
The genius of Trump is that he is able to pull back at any point and manipulate the opponent without the opponent ever realizing.
When we exposed Hillary Clinton, we now exposed, and it was Trump who initiated this, The Biden family.
Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Jim Biden, Frank, the whole family.
Well, he sure got the Biden's, didn't he?
Right into a game where they were convicted and you're seeing what's happening now.
What was not announced was that we watermarked all the ballots with what I said at QFS blockchain, which is a very hard encryption code to break.
And the second thing is we sent probably 20,000 or more Our National Guard's 48 hours ago, none of it was reported, and I thank the press for not reporting it, and others.
So what in fact is happening is you're seeing a sophisticated sting operation that was initiated by Trump.
Well, Steve, you've just broken certainly perhaps the biggest news since the election here on this show.
I have to play this out logically in my head.
That's why I go on your show.
Well, I love you, Steve.
I'd kiss you on the lips right now if it wasn't digitally.
Yeah, okay. Well, there you go.
That was passed around from Clarence Thomas' wife sent that.
To Mark Meadows, Trump's chief of staff.
Rush Limbaugh talked about that.
And the next day.
I talked about it the next day, too.
And this was something to set up this whole idea.
That, you know, we know this all happened.
We got the proof.
Well, we're still waiting for your proof, Bechenik, and all the rest of them, Rudy.
We're still waiting to see your proof.
But anyway, that was used to set up the Stop the Steal grift.
That was used to set up the Save America grift by Trump.
And it was used to discredit people.
Of course, Alex used it to make money.
Stop the steal thing.
But that's what I'm saying.
You have to be careful what you jump into.
And the reason I pulled that back up as well is because I had a listener who sent me a thing and said, did you know that Steve Pacinic said that he...
New Fauci, going back to Cornell?
I said, I didn't know that.
And he sent me the link to it.
Well, I didn't reply to him.
He just sent me the link with that.
Here is a little clip where he says that.
Fauci says, and Fauci trips me to Cornell, and I like Fauci.
But Fauci, unfortunately, is a very strong Jesuit follower.
In other words, he's more Catholic than the Pope.
He's a great theoretician.
He was a great epidemiologist.
But in the real world, Tony has never left NIH after 40 years.
And Tony will probably leave soon.
I'm glad he helped out Trump.
Yeah, okay. Oh, that's a lie.
Well, you know, maybe he was with him at Cornell.
That's the part I do believe.
And I think probably both of them, instead of Fauci studying medicine, he was probably studying psychology because that's what Pachenik is.
Yeah, he's a disinformation psyop master.
His degree is in psychology.
Everything he does is a psyop.
And that's what Fauci does as well.
He's a master at behavioral psychology.
But yeah, it's great.
You know, he helped Trump and it's really good.
You know, Tony is a great guy.
Yeah. Anyway, so where are we with all this stuff?
How do we sort out the people who are on our side?
Well, we've got a representative here, Brian Mast, a member of Congress.
Brian Mast. And he's from Florida.
And he wears his Israeli Defense Force uniform to Capitol Hill.
And he says, I'm doing it because Rashida Tlaib's got her flag.
So, she's for the Palestinians.
And Brian Mast is for the Israelis.
Is there anybody in Congress that represents us?
No. No. At least they wear their uniforms and stuff, unlike most of them.
As I've said before, they ought to put their sponsorship on their suits like they were a NASCAR driver.
You see all the Pfizer and Moderna stickers and the military-industrial complex stickers on there?
Most of them don't fly their flag, but they're not on our side.
They're owned by foreign governments.
They put other governments' interests ahead of ours.
They put corporations' interests ahead of ours.
That's what it's become.
Just a perfect example of that.
He says, as the only member to serve both the U.S. Army and the Israeli Defense Forces, I will always stand with Israel.
And he said when asked why he was wearing an Israeli Defense Forces uniform to the GOP conference meeting, He said, well, Tlaib has got her flag.
I've got my uniform.
So, who is it that is on our side?
Is anybody on our side in Congress?
No. Maybe Thomas Massey.
I can't think of anybody else.
The ideology behind celebrating Hamas' atrocities.
And this is one of the other reasons why, my first day back after the attacks last Tuesday, I said, um, the, uh, What we need to pay attention to is a celebration by the left of these terrorist acts.
And there's a reason why they celebrate this.
Because there is a commonality here.
They're Marxists, by the way.
You know, the interview that I had with a guy who wrote the book about diversity, inclusivity, and equity.
I like it in that order because it spells die.
I disagree with him.
It is Marxism. It is not cultural Marxism.
It is pure Marxism.
It's a kind of Marxism that was pushed out by Antonio Gramsci.
The Marxism that marches through the institutions.
And the Marxism that has captured all of our institutions.
And you can especially see this in the reactions to terrorism.
From BLM, from universities, and all the rest of them.
Just like Madeleine Albright, when she was asked, do you regret killing a half a million Iraqi children with your sanctions?
She didn't have the decency to say, well, I didn't kill half a million children with sanctions.
No, she just said, it's worth it.
It's worth it. When you look at these people from Black Lives Matter and our universities, what do they say?
They say it was justified. They don't try to say, well, no, I don't think they beheaded any babies.
I don't think they did this.
I don't think they did. They don't.
Typically, there are some people who are out there saying, well, it wasn't a shooting at the concert.
That's nonsense. But of course, that's what Steve Pachinik did that one time when I banned him on my show for saying that about Vegas.
But for the most part, they're not denying that the acts were committed.
They're saying the acts were justified.
And they celebrate that.
And so you have to understand that they're doing this because of their Marxism.
As a matter of fact, there's a video of a captured farm worker from Thailand.
And not just one, several of them.
And Hamas and others are about to decapitate somebody that they have wounded, about to decapitate him with a hoe.
And they take that video and they put it out.
They're proud of that. They're proud of that.
These are the people, by the way, that the left wants to bring to America.
And so, although it may seem odd, says this writer on Zero Hedge, this is from, well, I don't see the author here.
Anyway, although it may seem odd to celebrate atrocities, this is a key part of the ideology of decolonization.
That was put out by Franz Fannin.
And this is, you hear them all the time, talking about colonizers and all the rest of this stuff.
And this is why they celebrate this terrorism.
Hamas marching in, slaughtering women, children, pensioners, parading the stripped and raped corpses of young girls is a decolonial praxis.
Decolonization is ultimately about killing.
To Franz Fannin, who wrote in The Wretched Earth, he said, At the level of individuals, violence is a cleansing force.
It frees a native from his inferiority complex and from his despair and inaction.
It makes him fearless and restores his self-respect.
And this guy is starting to sound like Nishi.
Anyway, illuminated by violence, the consciousness of people...
He says, You notice the pattern of behavior?
You notice how Black Lives Matter and Antifa and these university professors and these Marxists, communists, you notice how they worship death and violence?
They do it with abortion.
They do it with terrorism.
They're actually pretty consistent if you stop and think about it.
It tells you who they serve.
This person who wrote this article said the only critique I've ever seen from any of the leftists, they all agree with this, And this is why you see them cheering in the streets.
So the only critique that I've had is from an Indian Marxist, B.K. Jha.
And he nails it pretty well.
The Indian Marxist who criticized this idea of celebrating terrorism and violence and it being justified in a wonderful thing to restore your humanity after you've been colonized.
So the Indian Marxist says, well, a fundamental objection may be raised against Fannin's view that violence frees the individual from his fear and from his inferiority complexes.
Fannin's own psychiatric case histories prove beyond doubt that the act of killing is dehumanizing and that it leads to neurosis and to distortion of personality.
Yeah, the fruit of that action.
Is against that individual, even in this life.
He says, an African militant, and these are people that Fannin, who is a psychiatrist, had actually treated.
An African militant had planted a bomb in a cafe, killing 10 people.
Every year, at about the same time, he suffered from acute anxiety, insomnia, and suicidal obsessions.
An Algerian whose own mother had been wantonly murdered, himself wantonly murdered and killed a white woman who was on her knees begging for mercy.
As a result, he suffered what Fannin calls an anxiety psychosis of the depersonalization type.
Thus, Fannin's own deep understanding of such cases makes his theory of renovating violence more difficult to understand.
In other words, these are people that he's treated.
People that he's written about.
What terrorism, what killing innocent people does to them.
Fannin's absoluting, absolutization of violence goes even further.
For him, violence is not just a method.
He proclaims it to be of value in its own right, and he equates it with revolution.
This is why I say, you know, when somebody asks me, what's the difference between what's going on in Gaza and what happened with 1776?
The just war theory.
The just war theory.
Again, it's not to say that there weren't any atrocities.
Probably were on both sides.
And that Mel Gibson movie, The Patriot, he goes nuts.
In that movie, they show the cold-blooded killing of people by Tarlington, a British, who had a very bad reputation.
It was like a General Sherman.
But in the movie, remember, they blockade a bunch of people into a church and burn the church down with the people, and it burned them alive.
Now, there's questions about whether or not that happened.
But I would not question whether or not things like that did happen in a war.
But we don't embrace that.
We don't celebrate that.
We, as a society, must reject that and punish it, not celebrate it.
And that is what's so disturbing to see these leftist, socialist, and they're all Marxist organizations.
BLM is Black Lying Marxist.
That's what this stands for. Black lives don't matter to them.
Nobody's lives matter to them.
The Antifa, they are fascists themselves.
Fascist authoritarian.
So Scott Horton says it's all really about provoking your reaction.
With terrorism, as with all asymmetric political action, the action is in the reaction of the opposition, says Saul Alinsky in his Rules for Radicals.
This is not conspiracy stuff.
This is not four-dimensional chess, he says, Scott Horton.
It's just plain old two-dimensional chess.
That's all it is. Beheaded babies or not, Hamas certainly murdered hundreds and hundreds of innocent civilian Israelis and non-combatants.
It is called a tactic.
Again, terror.
Violence, fear, intimidation as a way to achieve your political means.
And there are people at the grassroots level They get caught up in it.
You know, like these two cases that I just talked about.
But it's really for the geopolitical calculations of the people with the various governments.
They're trying to make you angry.
They're trying to make you hate.
They're even trying to drive you crazy.
For the purpose of making the more powerful force, in other words, United States and Israel, Do even worse to their own people, such as getting the U.S. to invade Afghanistan and getting Israel to bomb the Gaza Strip, you see. That's what it's about.
And we've already seen this immediately, right?
Regardless of whether this was a stand-down like Pearl Harbor, not a stand-down, but an open the gates and, you know, we know about this, don't tell anybody.
We'll take this attack and we'll come after them.
Regardless of whether or not it was that or not, Immediately, Netanyahu promised to escalate this.
Not to have it be proportional.
Not to go in as a surgical strike and to get all these people, but, you know, level Gaza and people talk about this for generations.
Annihilate the area.
Annihilate everybody, you see.
And so, as I said before, When Caitlin Johnstone said, people keep saying this is unprovoked, unprovoked, unprovoked.
No, it was provoked.
But their response to that provocation was not proportional.
And it was not justified.
And it was unhinged terror.
And so then the question becomes, is that going to be the response of the Israeli and the U.S. government?
Well, they've been provoked.
Are they now going to escalate it?
Finally, there is this article.
It was written by a Jewish guy.
And he was, let's see, this was put on VFP. I saw this because it was linked by Drudge.
It's an essay that he wrote.
He said, once I was a peace advocate, now I have no idealism left.
And his cousin was Daniel Pearl.
The journalist who was kidnapped and then executed simply because he was Jewish.
And he said when that happened, his family's response was to set up a charitable organization to try to argue for peace.
And he said, but, you know, as he went to Israel, he volunteered to join the military.
So they put him in a kibitz.
Very communal, very much community.
As a matter of fact, when you look at how collectivously organized Israel is, that's one of the reasons why most Jewish people are coming from the left.
It's very collectivist in its understanding.
And so when this guy comes in, he doesn't have any family there.
He's an American organization. Jew, and he wants to fight for Israel.
They put him with an adopted family, and he said the family was all leftists like me, and he said they were mocking me for being in the army.
I said, we're trying to avoid getting into the army.
Come in here, you know what you're getting into and so forth.
And so he said when all this stuff happened, the family that he was staying with and had come to know as family, The ones who adopted him, in a sense, they were abducted.
He said they were eventually released.
Somebody got them out somehow.
But he said they're not okay because they've seen their neighbors murdered and killed.
And he says now as he's looking at this, he said he could handle all this other stuff, but now at this point in time, he doesn't have any idealism left.
He said they have killed my idealism.
And he said, in a sense of irony, he said, and I can't forgive them for that.
You see, here's the difference.
For Christians, this world is not our home.
I have strong attachments to this country.
But we're called to protect innocent life.
But... Innocent life is not the concern here, right?
When we're talking about terrorism, and when we're talking about baby murders, if innocent life was the issue, then we would care more about the 60 million plus babies that were killed by Planned Parenthood than we would about 40 babies that were allegedly killed.
We would care more about the hundreds of babies that survive an abortion and are left to die, Than we would about a couple of babies that were taken out of, you know, incubators, allegedly.
And it wasn't happening.
And so, when we look at this, if we're strong Christians, and this is a test for all of us, right?
I understand this is not easy.
And for all the people writing me saying, well, I think, you know, we got to do something about this.
Are we justifying? Government is there to hand out justice.
And to try to create law and order.
And of course, that's breaking down here in our society, as we can see, deliberately.
We see our government deliberately turning its back on law and order and on justice.
And so, when we look at this from a larger standpoint, I hope when this comes to us, And who knows how we're going to react, right?
But if we're strong Christians, we understand that the wrongs that are done to us, we leave at the cross.
Just as the wrongs that were done by us, we leave at the cross.
I know that sounds like idealism, but it's not just a philosophy.
It's what we live by, if we are Christians.
And if we are not able to leave the wrongs that were done to us at the foot of the cross, then there's no forgiveness for our wrongs either there.
And so, be careful when you ask for vengeance.
If you would rather have vengeance carried out by corrupt, self-interested governments rather than by a just God, be careful what you ask for.
If you want vengeance and justice, we will all get that.
If we don't accept the mercy of the cross, we will all get that vengeance and justice at the hand of God.
He has been patient and long-suffering with us all.
And so when this comes to us, as I believe it will, I don't think America is going to continue to be isolated on its own, as we have been.
And so when it comes to us, it will be a test, won't it?
It'll be a test of whether or not we really believe what we say we believe as Christians.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Liberty. It's your move.
And now, The David Knight Show.
I love this headline.
Europe successfully closed its borders to the unvaccinated.
Why can't they do that with the illegal immigrants that are pouring in?
Good question, isn't it?
It all comes back to these fundamental questions, doesn't it?
You know, we look at 2020...
The pandemic, the vaccine, the mandates, the lockdowns, the masks, the rest of this stuff.
The greatest bipartisan betrayal of this country in my lifetime, perhaps of all time.
By Trump, by Biden, by Republicans, by Democrats.
Oh, they claim they can't protect our border.
Oh, but they were able to, especially in Europe, they were able to run their vaccine passports.
Not as much here. Because we had cars.
And we better keep our cars and we better keep our guns because that's what they're going to try to do to us.
Those are deterrents.
Those are ways that we escape their net.
So Europe has entered its second great migration crisis since 2014.
From the Italian Institute...
International political studies, a graph of migrant arrivals from Italy from January 2010 through September 2023.
Travis, pull up that chart if you can and show people how it went up as they took out Gaddafi.
Massive wave of migrants coming in from Libya.
They started to get that taken care of and now they have lost it again.
So before the end of 2023, the EU, Norway, and Switzerland together are projected to receive more than a million asylum applications.
And therefore, to meet or even exceed the 2016 record of one and a quarter million, Germany alone has seen a 74% increase.
Scroll up a little bit and show that chart.
There you go. You see how it went up, then went down, now it's shooting back up again.
Who knows where it's going to stop? Thank you.
Germany alone has seen a 74% increase in applications compared to the same period in 2022.
So far, the EU, which is entrusted with the security of European borders, and the EU doesn't care anymore about the security of borders.
It despises the security of the EU borders, just as our federal government despises that.
So far, it's reacted with tepid half measures, proposing to fast-track the approval process outside of Europe for those applicants who they say have the least chance of success.
The rest will enter the Shenzhen area as before and live on state entitlements while their applications are being processed over months and years.
And that's what Biden is doing here.
Now, come on in. Come on in to Texas.
And, of course, when you look at the numbers of people coming in, The numbers of people coming in through Texas dwarfs what's going into the EU. The examples of Denmark and Hungary show that the migration policies of individual member states can have dramatic impact on the settlement of migrants domestically.
Both countries have taken a hard line against mass migration, and Denmark has seen their asylum applications fall by 56% compared to 2022.
Listen to this. Hungary has processed only 26 applications.
26 applications for all of 2023.
They have control, but they're the only ones.
Migration is now the most important political issue for 44% of Germans.
And then, of course, the energy crisis that was, again, manufactured crisis by Biden and others.
That has also energized, so to speak, the German public.
This is one of the reasons why you're seeing AFD, the alternative for Deutschland, soaring.
Collectively, the ruling parties right now, the ruling coalition that's there, claims that it only has a loyalty of 33% of Germans.
And so what is the response by this criminal regime in Germany?
The ruling coalition has the approval of only 33% of the people.
They're massively moving towards AFD. So there's a move to make AFD illegal.
That's their response. Yeah, talk to us about democracy.
The media cannot suppress the migrant problem or talk it away because the consequences are very immediate and extremely visible at the local level.
And this is happening in the United States, even in these Democrat sanctuary areas.
Every last community has to find housing for new arrivals.
Generally, they're accommodated at first in school sports halls.
In the longer term, the migrants receive housing rented by municipal authorities, which is expensive and in extremely short supply.
So we know how to handle that, just as I think it was in New York City.
Where they just threw out a 90-plus-year-old pensioner, a South Korean War veteran.
American who was at a hotel.
They just throw him out on the street.
Sorry, no room for you.
We've got to bring in foreign refugees.
And so, I'm sure you've seen this now.
Everybody has picked this up.
As of Thursday, I think it went out.
I haven't talked about it yet.
Kissinger. Henry Kissinger.
Says that Europe let in too many foreigners.
Who would imagine?
Ah, by the way, played the Pachenik stuff.
He was Pachenik's boss during the false flag operations of Operation Gladio, where the Italian Prime Minister was killed and You had the Red Brigades and other things like that going through Italy and Germany.
And it was a NATO false flag.
Pachinic was involved in that.
Bragged about it, as a matter of fact.
The Italian government found that they held an inquiry and they said that he had ordered the execution of Aldo Moro based on Kissinger.
So, it was a mistake, was it?
Was it Kissinger? Really, it was a mistake?
Who knew that this would happen, right?
Give me a break. I saw one headline that says, now he tells us?
No. He knew all along.
He says, now it was a great mistake to let in so many people of totally different culture and religion and concepts because it creates a pressure group inside each country that does that, right?
That's probably what it sounds like when he says it.
No, it was done by design.
It was done by design.
And so why is he saying this now?
He's saying this now to defend Israel and to support Israel.
He now says, He says, Israel must vindicate its sovereignty in that area, and it cannot permit Gaza to return to a state where it could emerge, could take thousands or a large number of hostages, kill thousands, and then live in that condition side by side with Israel.
And so he's in the uncomfortable position of saying, you know, when we create this type of situation, it creates conflict.
And that's exactly the kind of situation that they've been engineering for Europe and for America.
We've seen it in Israel and Palestine.
And so then, where do the Palestinians go?
Well, in 2015, Kissinger was co-signatory of a letter to Congress demanding that borders be kept open to Syrian and Iraqi migrants in the wake of deadly Paris terror attacks.
They've committed terrorist attacks in Paris.
Let them in anyway. The letter said to do otherwise would, quote, be contrary to our nation's traditions of openness and inclusivity, would undermine our core objective of combating terrorism.
He said categorically refusing to take Muslim migrants only feeds the narrative of ISIS. And so you should bring in the terrorists with open arms.
And he's not the only one who's saying that now.
And, of course, the terrorism has not stopped in France where they have brought in so many people, allowed them to come in, allowed them to stay.
I mean, we've seen the Charlie Hebdo attacks.
They came after the cartoon company, killing people there.
Louvre and Versailles were both shut down with bomb threats.
They've got 7,000 troops on the street to try to keep order.
This is what it looks like.
When we follow the policies that Henry Kissinger and the Bilderberg Group and the UN and the World Economic Forum have demanded from us and have tried to guilt trip us into.
And the sad thing is that it's not just the Kissingers and the people on the left.
And we also see this in London.
London streets.
Flooded with pro-Palestinian protesters.
That's one of the reasons why Sadiq Khan is mayor.
We've got Jamal Bowman, part of the radical left.
Democrat says we need to welcome the Palestinian refugees.
Same thing that Kissinger is saying.
Welcome Palestinian refugees as experts predict that 1 million people will flee the Gaza Strip.
There's about 2.4 million people.
He said 50% of the population in Gaza are children, except that Egypt has closed its borders with Gaza.
Why is it that none of the Arab states want to bring in the Palestinians?
We should shame them on this, but nobody wants to talk about that.
Saudi Arabia doesn't want them.
Egypt doesn't want them. They've seen what happened in Lebanon, but nobody wants them.
Iran doesn't want them to come in.
So Egypt has closed its border with Gaza and is unwilling to receive any Palestinian refugees.
Why is it? Are they racist?
Do they know what is going to happen to their country?
Do they understand the pattern of violence that we've seen elsewhere?
And so Jamal Bowman says 50% of the population in Gaza are children.
Understand that it is the second generation.
It truly becomes dangerous.
Because even though maybe it's peaceful refugees who come into the country, they come in with absolutely nothing, and the kids grow up with the kids that were there in France or elsewhere.
And they grow up and they're taught in the schools, because the schools are run by people like Henry Kissinger and their agenda, they're taught that the people in their host country are evil.
That they're colonizers.
And that violence is justified against colonizers.
They see other children have got things that they don't have.
And it's that second generation then...
That becomes the really dangerous terrorists.
Not so much the first generation.
They understand what they fled, and they're grateful that they were able to flee that.
But it's usually the second generation that the terrorists come out of.
Census data shows that about 170,000 Palestinians are already living in the U.S. According to the State Department, the U.S. took in 25,465 refugees.
That's 25,465 more refugees than Egypt took.
Or Saudi Arabia. And so, Republican lawmakers have begun to speak out against this idea of resettling Palestinian refugees in the U.S. Marco Rubio said, the U.S. is the most generous nation in the world, but we are in no position to accept additional refugees.
Especially from a region with as high a risk of terrorism, given our nation's inability to secure our own border or vet those who are already here.
Well, I guess the problem is that the Palestinians want a place to go, since no Arab countries will take them.
I guess America has to take them.
And, but even if the official position of the government is that they won't take it, they can still come through the southern border because that's all wide open to anyone and everyone who wants to come in, right?
Come in through Mexico.
We see a Palestinian rally in Philadelphia where they congratulate Hamas for a job well done.
Again, they're not denying the violence against civilians.
They are celebrating that.
And you have to understand one of the reasons why the squad wants to bring them in.
It's not for humanitarian purposes.
They see the Palestinians as being the army of Marxists for them.
The same reason that Kissinger was doing this stuff.
They want to mix it up.
They want to take it down. That's the way they get civil war and conflict.
Having different ethnic groups.
White supremacists, they called, they slammed the white supremacist settler colonial state of America, said it's the same as Israel.
Job well done. There's no difference between these colonial settlers in the Zionist state of Israel or in America.
You see, that's their ideology.
And so they think that violence makes them stronger and more acceptable.
Take a look at Sweden. What is happening there?
Executions, bombings, and child assassins.
And this is happening because of migration and because of the drug war.
I think this is what's going to happen to Texas.
Texas has finally started to take some measures forward.
I'm still skeptical as to whether or not these measures are anything other than virtue signaling because that's all I saw when I was there.
But maybe they have started to learn a lesson from this.
But going back to Sweden, innocent bystanders, including a 12-year-old girl, being gunned down as a country that was once deemed peaceful and safe becomes a terrifying gangster paradise.
Again, it is organized crime.
It is foreign gangs.
Daily Mail goes out of its way not to identify these gangs as non-Swedish.
The gangs that have turned Sweden into a war zone.
But you can't escape it.
One of them is the Kurdish Fox, is what they call it.
The other one is the Greek. This is the same type of thing we're going to see in Texas.
All the gang warfare that is going on in Mexico because of the drug war.
It's going to eventually spill over across the border.
And I think that's exactly what Biden wants.
Just two decades ago, Sweden had one of the lowest gun violence deaths per capita in Europe.
Now it's at the top of the league.
But wait a minute, they've got gun control, right?
We'll tell that to the criminal gangs.
Gangs are hiring children as assassins and furnishing them with weapons, giving them the addresses of targets, according to a police chief, Anders Thornberg, who has a Swedish name, unlike the other people that are there.
But, again, let's not point out, other than saying that they're Turkish and Greek, let's not point out that they're not Swedish.
And then we have the Breitbart editor, Joel Pollack.
Truly amazing, the position that he has taken on all this stuff.
Because Breitbart has more than anything focused on immigration, focused on the border.
And so, as information liberation points out, he immediately came out on the day that the attacks happened in Israel.
He says, I've broken the Sabbath and the Jewish holiday to deliver this message.
Israel should wipe out Gaza, he said.
Allow 48 hours to evacuate women, children, and the elderly.
Destroy everything that remains.
Plow it under and annex it to Israel.
Joel Pollack is the editor of Breitbart right now.
And then within a couple of days, he said, we, we, meaning the U.S., we should give civilians from Gaza temporary refuge during the war.
Well, you first, Joel.
An interesting choice of terms, we.
Again, like the people who wear another country's uniform or fly another country's flag in Congress.
Joel Pollack has just phoned the flag of Breitbart.
He criticized GOP efforts to ban the U.S. from accepting Palestinian refugees.
He wants to make Israel's problem our problem.
Because that is what the open border immigration stuff is.
They've seen how effectively it works.
And I've got to say, you know, when I look at Breitbart...
I saw them as they were cheering the vaccine, the Trump shot.
They were cheering Trump's phony pandemic.
They're pushing that fear.
They're pushing the lockdown. They have said nothing, by the way, nothing at all about the jabs killing people.
Total crickets. You will not see any of that stuff at Breitbart.
No, they continue to focus on the border.
And now you've got Joel Pollack saying, well, send the Palestinian refugees to the U.S. Why?
Why? Well, like I said, nobody wants them.
So let's push him on the U.S. He wants to make us the world's toilet.
Hey, you got some refuse here that nobody wants?
Let's turn it into the United Sewers of America.
I'm disgusted with Breitbart.
Just amazing. And now this, it's a total betrayal.
You know, Breitbart never talked about censorship except when it affected them.
With the exception of Alam Bakari.
None of the other people there.
And John Nolte, who used to be their editor, who now writes on entertainment.
One of the biggest vaccine pushers you'd see anywhere.
It was as bad as anybody on CNN. And so the House Republicans have introduced the Gaza Act to stop Biden from importing terrorists into the United States.
Tom Tiffany and Andy Ogles have introduced legislation to ban Biden administration from importing Palestinians.
Well, they're going to have to get a speaker first.
I mean, this is the internal chaos that's going on inside the Republican Party.
The bill exclusively shared Breitbart News ahead of its introduction.
See, Breitbart News is still pushing, well, we've got to control the borders, I bet.
Joel Pollack is not happy about the fact that they gave this stuff to them.
As a matter of fact, he opposed it.
At a time when the threat of terrorism is not only grotesquely on display, they said, but being encouraged and justified, it is critical that we do our best to ensure the security of our nation, said Ogles.
Following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, Biden used his administration's parole pipelines to To resettle nearly 100,000 Afghans across American communities, many of whom were not interviewed in person beforehand, and who were found to be linked to terror.
You know, this is happening at the same time a lot of people who put their lives on the line as interpreters were left behind.
Because it's the same kind of chaos that you saw in the evacuation.
And the retreat by Biden.
They don't know what anybody's doing.
So you leave people who put their life on the line.
You leave them behind and abandon them.
And then you bring other people in that you don't even vet.
That's the U.S. government.
Even in Nashville, we've got the Socialists of America in the streets cheering terrorism.
Cheering terrorism. They want to have that terrorist army.
They want to get more people here.
And then finally, the Biden regime is threatening banks that don't give credit lines and loans to illegal aliens.
Give them what you've got.
Forget the American dream.
We've got to build schools for any kids whose parents want to send them here to be educated at our expense.
Forget any of that stuff.
And how is he running it through? Well, it's his criminal department of justice combined with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Frankenstein monster created by Elizabeth Warren in the wake of the last financial crisis, the Frankenstein monster that is beloved by the big banks because the CFPB pushed new rules that effectively pushed out small and medium-sized the Frankenstein monster that is beloved by the big banks because the CFPB pushed new rules that effectively pushed out small and medium-sized banks of being able to make a lot of loans that they used
So this consumer financial protection board is now saying that financial institutions, they're reminding people, Thank you.
Well, that doesn't say.
That's not what it says.
It doesn't say regardless of their immigration status.
What it says that you will not discriminate against people on the basis of their national origin, race, and other things like that.
But think about that.
On the basis of their national origin...
It doesn't say on the basis of their nationality, you see.
If this really was about people who come here as refugees or people who come here as illegal aliens, then the bill would have said you will not discriminate on the basis of nationality.
But it doesn't say that.
It says on the basis of their national origin.
In other words, they were originally from somewhere else, but now they're citizens here in the United States.
That's really what that law is about.
That law is not about putting illegal aliens at the forefront of this.
And so now you've got four out of seven Americans want a southern border wall, which is the thing that is constantly being pushed by Breitbart.
As you just see with what Biden is saying.
Give them loans. Put them at the front of the line.
I don't care if they don't have money to pay you back.
We're going to shut you down if you don't give them the money.
Make the loan. It may be a bad loan, but you make the loan or I'm going to shut you down for sure.
And so when you have that type of situation, as I said over and over again, the wall isn't going to stop anybody if you've got that kind of a welfare magnet.
If you're making all kinds of promises about all the goodies that you're going to give people, They're going to get here somehow or the other.
If you're going to offer them a pot of gold, they're going to get over any barrier that is there.
They'll figure that out.
And that's all they've got to figure out, is how to get in.
So that's not going to stop anything.
Texas, the Senate has passed for, I think it's the third time now?
Yeah, third time. The Senate has passed a bill, and it keeps getting shut down in the House.
The bill is to allow state and local police the authority to arrest illegal immigrants.
Why would they not have that authority?
See, everybody is looking the other way.
Nobody is doing anything. Everybody is, well, it's not my job.
Somebody else's job. Texas reached a record number of illegal immigrant apprehensions in fiscal year 2023 with over 1.8 million apprehensions.
Like I said, when we're talking about Europe, I said it's far, far bigger in the U.S. Just in Texas alone, double what went into all of the European Union.
And we know what that looks like.
This isn't a projection.
This is not a theory.
It is a conspiracy by people like Henry Kissinger and others, Bilderberg and World Economic Forum and others.
The federal government's unwillingness to enforce federal immigration laws and secure our southern border, they said.
We are going to have to be able to arrest them ourselves.
Well, look, here's the thing.
I think that as we saw, I think it was Italy, where they said, okay, you've got these boats and they're just bringing people in from northern Africa over and over again.
So, let's take the people off the boat, let's sink the boat, destroy the boat, and let's put people in prison for six months to a year or something like that before we send them back home.
There has to be some kind of a deterrent.
This whole catch and release thing, or dropping somebody over the border without holding them in detention.
Texas needs to put them, I think, in an open-air prison.
We talk about open-air prisons all the time.
That's their plan for all of us is an open-air prison with 5G and smart cities and 15-minute city and all the rest of the stuff.
Put them in an open-air prison.
Put them in an open-air prison in Texas over the summer.
They may not want to come back quite so quickly.
And then you send them back home.
But let there be some consequences for it, first of all.
Even in Chicago. The majority of people there want to end the sanctuary city policy.
I don't look at this and rejoice as Breitbart and some of these other people do, because this is destroying the country.
It may or may not destroy the Democrats' election hope.
Trump may revive that.
They may stuff the ballots.
A lot of different things can happen with these elections.
And frankly, I care what happens to the country.
I don't care what happens to the politicians or the elections of the political party because these politicians don't care about this country.
We'll be right back. You're
listening to The David Knight Show.
Let's talk a little bit about domestic news.
We have billion-dollar supersized prisons, say, to be built across the United States.
What's that about? Well, you know, if the open-air prisons or the smart cities don't work, they've got other alternatives then.
They are building domestic Gitmos.
And, of course, Marty Gosfeld was put in one of those.
The CMUs, the Communication Management Units, They said initially it was going to be for radical terrorists, like the ones who supposedly flew two planes and made three buildings collapse in New York City.
But now you see people who are dissidents in America being put into these communication management units because they don't want them communicating with anybody outside.
I think... You're going to see a lot of J6ers put in these types of things as well, because they were abandoned by Trump after he fleeced them and used them for his own purposes.
Billion-dollar supersized prisons everywhere.
Alabama is building one.
It's going to cost over a billion dollars, and it's not the only one.
Nebraska is building a $350 million, 1,500-bed prison.
In Georgia, a $1.7 billion facility with 4,500 new beds.
It's going to be added there. So some of this is to replace collapsing prisons, as we saw with Trump being indicted there in Fulton County.
You know, the jail is just falling apart.
And so some of this stuff has to be torn down and rebuilt.
But they're also expanding it.
You know, we've gone through massive prison expansion with the War on Drugs, a policy that was pushed by Joe Biden.
It has been a for-profit business in many cases.
It's not clear from this article just how these things are going to be run.
But Bianca Tylek, Executive Director of Worth Rises, it is a non-profit dedicated to dismantling the prison industry, believes the more beds there are, the more people will be put in them.
I don't know. You know, when we look at this, when we look at the ramping up of the IRS, the ramping up of the prisons, building a wall across the border.
I mean, the wall is not the problem, folks.
The welfare magnet is.
If somebody wants to come here and work, there ought to be a way that we can allow them to do that and not put them on welfare.
That was not anything that ever happened with immigration in the 1800s, in the early 20th century.
It was not, come to America and we'll immediately put you on unemployment like they do in California.
And if we have any doubts about what this looks like, just take a look at the UN's digital ID governance framework.
The United Nations Development Program, the UNDP. What are they developing?
Well, a new form of infrastructure.
Except this infrastructure is digital.
This infrastructure is an airless prison.
The top of their homepage, they say, governance for people and planet.
A planetary governance.
A corporate governance.
It'll have the facade of national governments will remain to fool some people.
But, you know, when we look at it, it's the same type of thing that they've been preparing for a long time.
Same type of thing that CNN was preparing us for when it ran that report.
Yeah, that's exactly it.
Remember that? But we're going to have to have that because of the vaccine, the vaccine passport.
A robust digital public infrastructure.
DPI has become increasingly crucial for governments, especially when it comes to delivering large-scale public services, they say.
This is their document.
Well, as reprinted by technocracy.com.
No, technocracy.news, I'm sorry.
So, in order to deliver large-scale public services, they've got to have a digital infrastructure.
To identify everybody.
Well, guess what? I don't want their public service.
I don't want to be serviced by them.
You know, this reminds me every time I see that of the Twilight Zone episode where the aliens come to Earth and they say, why are you here?
To serve mankind. And then at the end of the episode, a guy gets on the ship and he sees that To Serve Mankind is a recipe book on how to cook humans and eat them.
For the public sector, the debate isn't about whether to adopt digital technologies, but which ones to embrace and how to ensure their seamless and effective integration.
The DPI, the Digital Public Infrastructure, is made out of digital building blocks, says the UN, laying the foundation for subsequent innovations.
Oh. So they're doing it from the inside, and they're doing it iteratively.
The only thing they don't mention here is that it is being done based on chaos as well.
It's imperative, says the UN, to be intentional and meticulous from the outset.
Don't forget the Machiavellian stuff, too.
Intentional, meticulous, and Machiavellian.
Those are all essential ingredients as we lie to people about what is happening.
They go on to say, the UN says, the importance of legal identity is an integral part of Agenda 2030.
Right there. Agenda 2030, lock you down, make sure that you don't have freedom, economic, travel freedom, anything.
Key to that is your identity.
Your identity papers, please, right?
Because that's what authoritarian governments always do.
And the Sustainable Development Goals, a central goal to that, Sustainable Developmental Goal Target 16.9, they quote their own documents, aims to, quote, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration, and underscores the widespread significance of civil registration in societies globally.
I don't know. I think we were just fine in America without that kind of stuff.
My mom told me the story about when she went to get her marriage license.
They got married in the 30s, early 30s.
And when they went, she took her father along because she didn't have a birth certificate when they went to get the marriage license.
And the person who was offering them the thing said, well, I can't give you a marriage license if you don't have a birth certificate.
How do I know that she was born at home?
And my grandfather said, because I just told you so.
You're calling me a liar? He was able to get the person to issue that.
I don't think that would work today, but anyway, such governance ensures that stakeholders are both cognizant of the rules and committed to adhering to them.
So you understand, this is for the good of the stakeholders, not for the public.
Public isn't going to own anything.
We're not stakeholders.
So we just have to understand that, you know, it's going to be stakeholders who own everything, stakeholders who govern us, and it's going to be corporate governance.
And the amazing thing is how out in the open this conspiracy is.
The question is, for all the people who think Trump is going to save us from this, why didn't Trump get us out of the UN? Why didn't he reduce our commitment to NATO? And on and on.
Instead, he put Newcomb Nikki Haley in at the UN. A new brain map has revealed thousands of different cell types.
Researchers studied 100 tissue samples from different regions across the human brain and analyzed the RNA in millions of individual cells to see which genes in the brain were being expressed to make different proteins in the cell.
Well, that's kind of interesting, isn't it?
Maybe we can do something and pass some kind of mRNA across the blood-brain barrier to change some of this stuff.
But there's so much that they don't understand about all this.
We just identified all kinds of new brain cells, they said.
They found more than 3,300 cell types in the human brain.
They refer to that in this article as diversity.
Isn't it interesting that these people will ignore the Creator and worship the creation?
You know? They'll see this incredible machinery here, and they don't think anything about it.
It's like... Taking a look at some complicated automobile in the future where we don't know anything about them and, you know, just saying, well, it's amazing how these things used to just pop out of the ground and evolve from nothing.
We had a plane that was trying to fly back to Panama, well, trying to fly from Panama City and to Tampa and Had to turn around.
The headline says they had an explosive adult diaper.
And they searched the plane for a suspicious object only to find an adult diaper.
How did this happen? You know, I don't know.
I guess somebody thought it was a bomb.
No pun intended here, I guess.
I guess when somebody says, is that an explosive?
And... The person might have said, depends.
I don't know. And then it was on.
We think we've got a possible plane hijacking here.
In Tennessee here, I don't think I have reported this, the fact that the Biden administration has finally laid off of this family in Tennessee.
It's a German homeschooling family.
Who was facing fines that were going to be more than their entire income because they wanted to homeschool their kids because of their Christian beliefs.
The government under George Bush didn't believe that they were refugees, didn't give them refugee status, but they were given a deferred, under Obama, they were able to win a deferred status because of the time he was kicking in DACA. And they've been on that status for quite some time.
It's even surprising to me that they've had a couple more babies after they came to this country, but evidently anchor babies don't apply if you're white Christians.
Different set of rules for different people, right?
And so they got a sudden order after years of being here.
They... Obama tried to get them thrown out in 2012.
They came in 2008 with five children.
Now they've got seven children.
But again, those two children who were born here in the United States They'll throw these people out.
There was a lot of pressure.
This was reported by LifeSite News, and Homeschool Legal Defense is representing them.
And you had Republicans here in Tennessee, Congresswoman Diana Harshbarger, and Senator Marsha Blackburn wrote letters, and they've now backed off and given them another year.
Isn't that great? But not permanent status.
Truly amazing.
So the Homeschool Legal Defense Association said it's tough to know.
Is it a new official who came into ICE and looking at this?
Or is this new policy from the Biden administration?
Is it just an individual ICE officer who doesn't understand this?
Or was there some superior in the bureaucratic process somewhere who just decided that they wanted to affect the deportation?
I don't know, he said.
He's the one working on it as a lawyer.
You see, we have these bureaucracies, it's like the IRS, when the law is sufficiently complex, you know, these bureaucrats can pretty much do whatever they wish.
A law that is sufficiently complex, like the IRS, is the same as having no law at all.
And so, you know, it could be just the opinion of one individual.
Because these people are not elected and they're not accountable to anybody, you can't get them out.
We have regulation without representation as well as taxation without representation.
We'll talk about that as well.
There's been some new move by the IRS, an important court case coming up that is going to wind up affecting, well, it's only going to be affecting the really rich, they tell you, but it's going to wind up affecting everybody.
There's a single tax law that isn't extrapolated in some way, shape, or form to everybody.
A sponsor of a Kansas Born Alive law said, I personally saw a baby survive an abortion attempt.
So this is a law that would require basic medical care for newborns who survive botched abortions.
He says he knows such legislation is necessary because, he said, contrary to the abortion lobby's narratives that this never happens, he personally witnessed a baby survive an abortion attempt.
And, of course, Ralph Northam, governor of Virginia, said, oh, yeah, call it comfort care.
He said the law will require that they exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of a child as a reasonably diligent and conscientious health care provider would render to any other child born alive at the same gestational age.
And ensure that the child who is born alive is immediately transported to a hospital.
On October the 9th, Republican State Representative Ron Bryce, who is a doctor, appeared in the Wichita Eagle with an op-ed detailing an incident that he witnessed in 1988 as a medical resident in Texas.
He was called to a code blue, typically an alert for medical emergencies.
Yet when he arrived in the room, neither the female patient nor the attending surgeon showed any signs of an emergency situation.
Bryce then heard the cry of a premature infant, who accomplished the seemingly impossible, he said, and survived his abortion.
Though strong enough to live briefly outside the womb, he was still too young to survive very long, separated from his mother.
Bryce transferred the baby boy to the neonatal intensive care where he died after several hours of difficulty breathing.
Was this in Iraq?
No. It was in Texas.
Again, yeah, we want to have a war over comfort care.
But nobody pays any attention to it here.
He said, this is the first I knew of an infant surviving an abortion attempt.
And I assumed that it was rare.
But then our county health department investigated infant mortality cases and found 27 of these babies born alive over a three-year period.
We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
And the IRS has got a court case now that is going before the Supreme Court.
And it is something that is going to, as the headline says, a $15,000 tax bill is going to ignite a constitutional challenge that could redefine U.S. tax law.
And it truly is amazing.
This is about unrealized capital gains.
The ability of the government to have you pay taxes on something that you haven't made a profit from because you haven't sold it.
Everybody has seen paper profits and paper losses on things, but they want to be able to tax you.
This is moving the bar into a kind of wealth tax, which is what they're trying to do.
So this couple had invested in an Indian company, and they were handed an unexpected tax bill, despite never enjoying a single penny of profit from their venture.
So they got a tax bill for $15,000.
The Moors, the family, argues that this tax violates the 16th Amendment of the Constitution, transforming their case into a constitutional crusade.
And as they talk about in this issue, there's a lot of individual details in this that it may turn on rather than the larger issues.
But this goes back to the 2017 tax bill.
Who was president then?
Oh, Trump. Okay.
So the Trump tax thing.
The case hinges on a provision in the 2017 tax bill that imposes a one-time tax on investors' shares of profits that have not been distributed to them.
And so how do you tax profits that you have not received?
But again, this is part of a move to go after, I believe, a kind of wealth tax that people want to impose.
In Argentina, the central bank now has just increased their interest rates.
The interest rates are 133% in Argentina.
And, you know, that's like the Fed raising its equivalent to this is a central bank of Argentina and their interest rate.
That'd be as if the Federal Reserve increased the rate up to 133%.
And, of course, it's not even equivalent to the rate of inflation either.
But this is a move that's being done by the Central Bank of Argentina desperately trying to protect not the economy and not the people that are there.
We're trying to protect their precious peso, the Argentine peso.
It's one of the reasons why Javier Malay, who is, again, they've not had their election yet, but he is, you know, he came in first place, the libertarian economist, and he says, we've got to just get rid of the peso.
Just peg our currency to the U.S. dollar, something like that.
He goes, I understand... The US dollar's got its issues, but we've got to peg it to something outside of Argentina.
The Argentine central bank, he said, is one of the worst of the worst.
The monetary authority raised its key interest rate 15 percentage points to 133%.
However, prices, even by the government's measures, which understate what the actual inflation is, even their understated official inflation rate, is 138%.
So it's not going to keep inflation under control.
The dollar blue rate, again, that's kind of the black market rate, but they call it the blue market.
The dollar blue rate touched a record low of 1,040 pesos per dollar on Tuesday.
And again, the central bank doesn't care about the economy.
Doesn't care about the people.
It cares about saving its peso.
The government is trying to gain time and unfortunately this doesn't solve anything.
The effect is essentially going to be nil, said an economist there in Buenos Aires.
And so where does all of this stuff, we're talking about the war and everything else that is happening.
Where does this leave us?
Well, this is an article from Tuomas Malin on Substack, picked up by Zero Hedge.
The Sword of Damocles, an economic worst-case scenario for the Israeli-Palestine war.
And he's got 10 points.
And basically, what we're looking at here, quite possibly, if we get a wider war, and we now have two U.S. carrier groups there, two British carrier groups there, The conflict, he says, so we could get into a, here's what the worst case scenario that he laid out looks like.
First of all, we have it escalate into a regional conflict with the U.S. becoming directly involved.
Again, we've got two carrier groups there already.
Number two, OPEC responds with an oil embargo.
Number three, Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz.
Number four, the price of oil reaches $300 a barrel.
Number five, Europe succumbs to a full-blown energy crisis due to a LNG shortage, liquid natural gas.
A massive spike in energy prices reinvigorates inflation, with central banks responding accordingly.
Number seven, financial markets and the global banking sector collapse.
Number eight, debt crisis engulfs the U.S., forcing the Federal Reserve to enact yet another financial market bailout.
The petrodollar trade collapses and hyperinflation emerges.
Now, that's the worst-case scenario.
But you notice how all this is tied to energy.
And, of course, anybody who's old enough to remember when OPEC first asserted its power, we know just how fundamental energy is to the entire economy and to inflation, how it was that embargo that created energy The stagflation, as Gerald Slinty said, I think it'll be dragflation.
He said this a couple of years ago.
He said, you look at all the quantitative easing and all the rest of this stuff, even without the disruption of oil.
But of course, it's not even what OPEC does.
It is Joe Biden who has, from day one, focused on destroying our energy supply.
He's depleted our strategic oil reserve, and he has, on day one, shut down pipelines and other means of domestic oil production.
If he was a foreign entity, we would say that he was at war with America, right?
I mean, we're looking at, in his scenario, he says, well, what happens if we get involved in a And an Israeli-Palestine-Palestinian war, and it gets bigger, we get directly involved in this, and things start shooting at.
But Biden did all that.
He did all that as part of the war on climate change.
He did all of that already.
The Strait of Hormuz is a pivotal, narrow strait for global oil markets.
One-sixth of all oil.
And one-third of all liquefied natural gas, or LNG, consumed in the world passes through it.
About a third of all energy passes through that little narrow strait.
It has eight islands, of which seven are controlled by Iran, but it has a military presence in all eight of them.
Thus, Iran has a military capacity to close the strait.
Well, I don't think that they will.
I think that's the reason that you've got two carrier groups from the US and two aircraft carriers from Great Britain as well.
But if this all isn't enough...
You've got Looney Lindsey Graham out there saying that we have to go to war with Iran and we have to shut them down preemptively.
Here's Lindsey on Iran.
The money financing terrorism comes from Iran.
It's time for this terrorist state to pay a price for financing and supporting all this chaos.
Yes, if you're the Iranians, if it were up to me, this war escalates.
I'm coming after you. I think this is what I'm trying to clarify here, because I'm wondering...
Us and Israel. Us and Israel.
The United States and Israel...
No, I want to be crystal clear.
Let me just understand you, just to be clear.
You're saying that you would want the United States and Israel to bomb Iran, even in the absence of direct evidence of their involvement in this attack.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
I don't care if they're involved or not.
I just want to bomb Iran. And that has long been the plan.
If we go back and we're going to look at Wesley Clark.
After 9-11, about 10 days after 9-11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz.
I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the joint staff who used to work for me.
And one of the generals called me in.
He said, sir, you've got to come in and talk to me a second.
I said, well, you're too busy. He said, no, no.
He says... We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq.
This was on or about the 20th of September.
I said, we're going to war with Iraq.
Why? He said, I don't know.
So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan.
I said, are we still going to war with Iraq?
And he said, oh, it's worse than that.
He said, he reached over on his desk, he picked up a piece of paper, and he said, I just got this down from upstairs, meeting the Secretary of Defense's office today, and he said, this is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran.
I said, is it classified?
He said, yes, sir.
I said, well, don't show it to me.
Well, he could have gone to Mar-a-Lago and seen it there, I guess.
I don't know. We've known this for the longest time.
They've got an agenda. Their geopolitical agenda is to go after Iran.
They don't really care what it does to the rest of the world.
They don't care what it does to our economy, to our lives.
They're perfectly fine if it kicks off World War III. If it kicks off hyperinflation, they don't care about any of that stuff.
Single-minded. And I don't care if Iran's involved in this or not.
Let's go after them. Let's have some excuse to go after them.
They haven't been looking for an excuse to go after them.
And again, Newcomb Nicky and Lindsay, Loopy Lindsay, these people are just knee-jerk militants, always ready to go to war.
From financial chaos to hyperinflation.
Again, as he's looking at the sword of Damocles hanging over us.
Going back to this author, he says, naturally reinvigorated inflation pressures would force central banks to to enact another round of interest rate hikes.
This would wreak havoc among consumers and corporations but also in the capital markets.
Yields of sovereign debt would likely explode.
This would be followed by an utter collapse of asset and credit markets, just like in the spring of 2020.
At this point, we would most likely see the central banks take their monetary perversions to another level.
This means that while they would be raising interest rates to quell inflation, they would also enact asset purchase programs to support the sovereign debt, credit and asset markets, and of course, to bail out their friends.
The bailout of financial markets would reach several trillions of US dollars, just like in the spring of 2020, where it was the big guys who were essential that got bailed out.
If you were a Main Street small business, you were not essential.
Just like if you were not one of the half-dozen big banks that had formed in the decade prior to 2008, if you weren't one of those half-dozen big banks, well, you were too small to succeed, and you weren't going to get a hand.
But the too-big-to-fail banks were going to be bailed out.
This is a push of vast amounts of money, and especially U.S. dollars, into the global economy.
To naturally increase inflation pressures massively.
He says, but there's a risk of something even worse.
As a nuclear option, OPEC could stop using the US dollar and the oil trade altogether.
This is happening gradually.
And so again, you know, how do we go bankrupt as a country?
Well, gradually and then suddenly.
And so it is a very dangerous path that they have put us on.
Oil and gold are soaring as of the end of the week, last week.
Don't know what's going to happen today.
Markets have opened, but I haven't seen a report on it.
While the dollar is relatively flat overnight, both gold and crude are soaring.
As an bond bid, as fears of what lies ahead in Israel and Palestine.
So, again, it continues.
Even if we don't get involved in some kind of a hot war, it's the economic repercussions of this that are going to be very concerning.
Inflation is going back up and we're going to need to have shock-inducing rate hikes.
I'm going to say several economists as they look at all this stuff.
Again, it is, you know, gold is going up.
Gold is a hedge against that.
I always see, though, gold.
I don't try to time the markets in terms of, you know, inflation, in terms of war and things like that.
It is a good hedge against that.
I see gold now, though, as a hedge against the central bank digital currency.
Against this digital ID that is so central to everything they want to do.
It is central to the UN 2030 agenda.
And the digital ID that everybody is going to have is going to be the CBDC. Absolutely is going to be the case.
Again, if you want to try to have at least some insulation from that system, go to davidknight.gold.
That's what Tony Arterman has set up.
If you would like to buy gold and silver, I had somebody ask a question last week.
I think they said they were a college student or something that didn't have a lot of money.
It's like you can buy any amount from Tony.
He doesn't have a minimum amount that you can buy.
And you can also set up to save money on a gradual basis.
He's got Wolfpack set up that way.
As well as having a community of people that you can talk with there.
Again, that is davidite.gold.
Let Tony know that you're coming from this program.
His site is wisewolf.gold.
And some of the comments that we see here on Rumble.
Chevkin321, people don't realize war with Iran is also a war with Russia.
Well, it seems like they want that pretty badly, doesn't it?
We're going to leave the Ukrainians to kind of hang out there as we use them in our proxy war with the Russians.
Now that is escalating, so we'll talk about that when we come back.
On Rockfan, Angry Tiger, thank you for the tip.
Good to see you there. He said, Is that they've always sold it to other countries.
We never get to use our own oil, and oil-producing countries in the Middle East don't pay a lot for gasoline like we do.
Yeah, there you go.
And on Rockfin, Risha M., thank you for the tip.
Great show this morning.
Would you be willing to have a USS Liberty survivor as a guest?
There are still folks who don't know what happened to them.
Yeah, sure. And of course, people don't know what that is.
USS Liberty was a ship that was attacked for a very long time by the Israeli Air Force there off the coast of Iran.
That was, I think, was it Johnson?
Lyndon Johnson that was president at that point in time?
I can't remember. But it was...
Yeah, it was a very famous case, but of course, nobody ever got any answers.
Not from the U.S. government and not from the Israeli government.
So, yeah, I'd be interested if somebody wants to come on and talk about that.
We will be right back.
We will be right back.
We will be right back.
you you you Thank you.
Well, while we've been talking about wars and the lies that get us into wars and the lies that keep them going, this happened at the end of the week.
I didn't get to this on Friday.
Kim.com commented on Washington's pivot after the Hamas attack on Israel.
He said, Washington just dumped Ukraine into the waste bin of U.S. victim nations.
Quote, as long as it takes, unquote, is now as long as we can, unquote.
And quote, we are coming to the end of the rope in financing Ukraine.
These were quotes from the State Department.
Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians died for empty U.S. promises of unwavering support.
Ukraine has been wrecked and it won't recover for decades to come.
Zelensky is finished, and Russia has won.
The United States, its Western partners, and NATO defeated.
Why would any nation trust security guarantees by the U.S. government ever again?
Well, this is something I've been asking.
A long time before this, quite frankly.
But he said, the people of Taiwan must watch very carefully who they are counting on for their security.
What does this tell us?
It is an admission of U.S. bankruptcy.
The U.S. government can no longer afford a prolonged war in Ukraine or anywhere else in the world.
Lies and deception propaganda are not enough to stay afloat.
Corrupt journalists don't win wars or pay trillions of dollars in deficits and liabilities.
And, of course, it's the corrupt journalists who are the handmaids of this.
The Iranian intervention in Israel via Hamas accelerated the inevitable outcome for Ukraine.
A threat of war in the Middle East with all of its dire consequences for the oil price and a fragile U.S. economy was all it took.
The world is witnessing the rapid end of U.S. dominance and the rise of multipolar order, but never underestimate the arrogance of the U.S. government.
They may end civilization in a nuclear war rather than accept responsibility for destroying the U.S. from within via blatant corruption.
Well, I've got to say, I completely agree with what he had to say there.
And it was Jack Kirby.
I'm sorry, John Kirby.
Oh, they call him Jack Kirby sometimes.
Jack is a nickname. Who said that Ukraine, funding for Ukraine is coming soon.
Near the end of the rope and is not going to be indefinite.
So that last week, Thursday I think it was.
In the near term, he said we've got appropriations and authorities for Ukraine and for Israel, but you don't want to be trying to bake in long-term support when you're at the end of your rope.
So even going back before that, and even going back before, The Israeli-Palestinian thing happened.
You know, the attack happened from Hamas on Saturday.
So three days before that, we saw article after article about how Ukraine was freaking out because of aid from the Congress being shut down.
And, of course, at that point, they were saying, well, it's just the Republicans don't want to continue to support this war.
But now you're hearing it from the State Department.
After what happened with Hamas and Israel.
And so they were freaking out.
The Brits were saying that they were at the end of their rope in terms of financial stuff.
They warned they were running out of weapons to give to Ukraine.
And of course, all this is being done in a context where the Ukrainians...
Are losing the counteroffensive in a big way.
Douglas McGregor, Colonel Douglas McGregor, retired, says the U.S. is facing a geopolitical reality check in Ukraine.
Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians killed, wounded, reportedly inducing thousands of exhausted Ukrainian soldiers to surrender.
Ukrainian soldiers are tired of dying and their feelings are justified.
And what was this for, really?
We don't want to allow the people in eastern Ukraine who are geographically close, who are culturally close, religiously close, speak the same language.
We don't want them to be allowed to be a part of Russia.
And so we'll shell the civilians there for eight years.
And then Russia invaded.
So, again, when you look at it, it all goes back to and has the fingerprints of the U.S. government on it.
Nobody will be allowed to leave our jurisdiction.
That is the type of thing that we've continually seen from the U.S. government.
On Rockfin, thank you very much, James.
I appreciate the tip. Thank you.
And on Rockfin, Jason Barker.
Hey, Jason, good to see you.
I think once a month David should do a Hawaiian shirt day.
Yeah, they go full steeper.
You know, it's kind of interesting when the listener sent me that link to that little video where I cut it out where he was talking about how he and Fauci go back to, what was it, Columbia or something?
Some Ivy League school or something where they were there.
He has a lot of videos up there, you know, because he kept going on Infowars pushing those lies well into 2021.
But I haven't seen anything posted from him for quite some time.
And the thing where he sold the sting two days after the election, that we got thousands of National Guard troops going around arresting people.
We got this blockchain watermark.
That video that I played for you, where he was pushing that, that is not on his website.
So I don't know what kind of lies he started spinning after that, but he didn't want you to see that one.
So I thought, let me just play that for people.
A lot of people maybe haven't seen that particular one.
We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
The Common Man.
They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
And the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially please keep us in your prayers Well,
we may not have oil or natural gas or any functional fuels, but we've always got wind power, right?
That'll be fine. No, wind power is not cheaper than gas.
It turns out it is incredibly expensive.
And this article from Daily Skeptic points out, advocates of net zero policies repeatedly reassure the public that they are advancing cheap green energy.
I mean, you know, it's coming from sunlight and wind.
It's an ample supply of that.
And it's just always there.
Except the devices that you're using to pull power out of the wind and from the sun don't last forever, and they are incredibly expensive with their own problems.
Unfortunately for the hard-pressed British electorate, cheap green energy is nothing more than an empty political slogan.
Arrived at by a dishonest sleight of hand.
Specifically, the politicians simply ignore the true costs of cheap green energy, which soon become very expensive, factoring in all the costs.
The chart in this article, and show that, Travis, no, wind power is not cheaper than gas.
The chart is from the UK's own electricity generation costs of 2023 report.
And it is the centerpiece of green propaganda, supposedly showing the levelized cost of electricity.
But they use deceptive calculations to arrive at a distorted cost for electricity generated by wind power over the lifetime of a plant, by which means the government can falsely claim that offshore wind is two and a half times cheaper than dirty old gas generation.
The most outrageous trick in this analysis is that the government has treated completely reliable electricity generated by gas in exactly the same way as extraordinarily unreliable electricity generated by a wind farm.
This is not even apples and oranges comparison.
This is an elephants and microchips comparison.
In other words, factoring in to all of this, Factoring into the fact that this thing is not going to last forever, you also have to factor in all of the storage.
And then we get back into one of the biggest battery scams of all.
But it's also something that whether it is put on land, The cost that it has done to wildlife, to bats, to large birds as well, even to eagles, is incredible.
And then when you look at what happens, I say, well, we'll put it offshore.
Well, even offshore, it has big issues for humans.
You know, the low-frequency audio disruption that you get from this is one of the reasons why they started relocating them out at sea.
But now we're starting to see massive die-offs of whales, and it is all being run by foreign governments.
Isn't that always the case?
Not foreign governments, foreign corporations, the multinationals.
Just like the toll roads, right?
Selling us out to international stakeholders.
The crony capitalism of the green agenda.
Foreign firm is going to begin offshore wind farm construction at a New Jersey state park.
A Danish company will begin construction of its offshore power complex this week.
Off of Island Beach State Park in New Jersey, one of the most popular family beaches there.
Surveys show a dramatic decline because of this in support for green offshore wind projects nationwide.
Yeah, they're not in my backyard.
Not at my beach.
And, of course, we saw the same type of thing happening when they wanted to put it off of the coast of the luxury islands in Massachusetts and other places.
As I said before, to make these things work, you have to have massive battery backup.
And we still can't really control the fires that are happening from the cars, the fires that are happening from even the small scooters.
This is sent by David Weatherby, and he sent this to me in the middle of last week.
This is airplane flight suspended at Luton Airport after a huge fire tears through the terminal's car park.
And it was by an EV. So they completely shut down all the flights.
They're all flights currently suspended as emergency services respond to a fire.
And terminal car park number two.
And I guess, you know, if you've got enough electric vehicles there, you could call it a terminal parking place.
Terminate all those cars.
Access to the airport is currently restricted.
We ask that people do not travel to the airport at this time.
And as he says, nothing to see here, right?
And he says, and of course he drives a bus in Orlando.
He says, wait until Universal gets their electric buses.
Well, since then we've now seen pictures of the EV fire that started it all in that car park.
Here's what it looks like.
There it is. Self-igniting.
And of course that spreads.
Shuts down an entire airport. We've had entire ships loaded with cars taken down.
And in China, a vast graveyard of electric vehicles.
That is a place that is ripe for a fire.
Aerial shots of cars parked cheek to jowl in vast open areas of China.
And it's an example of the failure of central planning.
And I said, the secret vast lot is near the city of Hangzhou.
In the lot, hundreds of discarded failed EVs are rotting away, covered with weeds and cobwebs.
And it's going to get even bigger.
The reporter who filed this original article said, Dan Murtaugh wrote, said these cars were mostly no-frills EVs with batteries that would be lucky to get more than 62 miles on a charge.
That was the beginning of the EV industry in China.
They were built in the mid-2010s when generous government subsidy, crony capitalism, or the kind of corruption that you see in China where you have people in the government owning shares in these things, So, government subsidies lured hundreds of automakers into the field, purchased by ride-hailing companies, who were less concerned about long-term quality.
Well, this article from Slay News is somewhat skeptical that these were all done simply by ride-hailing companies, by taxi companies.
And they point out that the writer, Dan Murtaugh, Was not concerned at all about the waste of material.
He argues that EV technology has advanced so rapidly over the past decade that older models have become obsolete.
So it's not a bug, it's a feature.
No, what this is is yet another example of the malinvestment in China by their centrally planned economy.
And of course, now we're seeing a lot of articles about the overbuilt commercial real estate, massive ghost cities that they built and abandoned, and even their Belt and Road initiatives, which in many cases were nothing more than debt traps for the people there.
And debt traps in the sense that, oh, well, now you owe us, so you don't have any money really to pay us for this, so we'll take your minerals that you've got there.
In many, many cases, the promise of building infrastructure that they said they were going to do, they failed in these projects, but they still have the people on the hook to pay them off.
Slay News says, as we know, gas-powered vehicles can often provide decades of service if maintained properly.
However, the EVs raise concern about their disposable nature, as many will just replace the vehicles when they get old.
It's a planned obsolescence.
And this has been one of the key features about one of the hidden costs of EVs is the short battery life and the incredibly expensive replacement cycle on it.
I know that... Eric Peters talked about the Chevy, I think it was the Volt.
They got the Volt and the Bolt. I think the Volt was the first one.
And it had a small generator motor.
So it was completely electric.
It wasn't a hybrid or anything.
But it had a small generator that ran off of gas to extend your range.
It could charge the batteries and recharge them on the fly.
But that made it non-zero emission.
And so the government said to General Motors, well, you can't really sell that thing.
My son looked at one of those and said, you know, that really, Eric Peter said, this is the one electric car that I really like.
So my son looked at it.
Problem is, is that you would think that it doesn't, because it's got that generator, it doesn't need to have really big batteries.
But the problem is, is that those batteries are still incredibly expensive to replace.
And so since they stopped making these things a few years ago, All of them have got batteries that are kind of old and facing replacement in a few years, and they're incredibly expensive.
They're expensive or more expensive than some of the all-electric cars.
So again, it's the battery issue.
And the battery issue is a big issue of disposal and recycling.
Wherever we look, we see this hypocrisy of, well...
We want to be fuel efficient.
It was all about fuel efficiency for the longest time.
That's what the EPA was doing.
And yet they don't care when these vehicles are 50% heavier than standard internal combustion engines.
Don't worry about that at all.
And we don't worry about the recycling of these things or the fire hazards or any of the rest of this stuff.
And they're not trying to reclaim any of these materials and recycle any of them in China or elsewhere.
As I point out here, well, maybe these things were used for the taxi companies or maybe not.
Show some pictures of these vehicles there, Travis, that are parked in this graveyard here.
Some of the cars were abandoned so suddenly The personal items such as children's toys could still be seen in the back seats.
A detail difficult to reconcile with theories that the cars were abandoned because the owners ran out to buy newer models or because they belonged to rental fleets.
Analysts told Bloomberg the early adopters of EVs in China were mostly taxi companies rather than individual private owners.
These corporate purchasers Create a wave of demand that supposedly established EVs in China much more solidly than sputtering sales to consumers in the U.S. It is all being driven by centrally controlled planners.
There is no concern as to whether or not these things are efficient, whether they're lasting, whether they're recyclable.
Same thing that's happening in China that happens here.
Here you see it with big failures like Solyndra, the big failures of the electric bus company that Lala Harris was celebrating, going bankrupt, even though they were selling buses at nearly a million dollars apiece, they still couldn't make it.
And even though the federal government was offering massive subsidies for people to buy those buses, putting pressure on people to buy those buses, even though you got California saying we're going to outlaw non-electric vehicles, they still can't make it.
None of this explains why China did not recycle the vehicles for valuable rare earth metals.
Bloomberg said that was disturbing for an industry that ostentatiously prides itself on being earth-friendly.
There's nothing earth-friendly about any of this stuff.
If you're going to be earth-friendly, first of all, you're going to be concerned about efficiency, weight, and other things like that, and whether or not these things are going to last.
And they're not. Some of those EV-happy ride-hailing companies look like excuses to make huge inventories of unwanted electric cars disappear.
Bingo. Bingo.
Others appear to be rackets cooked up to absorb the huge subsidies doled out by the Chinese government.
And that is the case as well.
You see, many of these green companies here in the United States are also backed by Chinese people who want to get Chinese billionaires and multi-millionaires who want to buy their way into U.S. citizenship as well.
And so they put their money in there.
Whether they get it out or not, doesn't matter.
They get their citizenship, which is what they're really after.
And that's what we saw with the failure of Solyndra.
Even Chinese state media, which tends to underestimate or understate embarrassing details, reported over a billion dollars in EV subsidy fraud in 2016.
Well, we're going to take a quick break.
I see a comment here from Max Burns talking about Jim Jordan.
We'll talk about Speaker of the House as to whether or not they can get any of this stuff together.
He says, Jim Jordan, Speaker of the House, is in Israel first politician, not an America first.
Well, we'll talk about whether that's going to happen when we come back on Rockfin, Audi MRR. Good to see you there.
Modern Retro Radio.
He says, just imagine how bad morale is among our military, the non-sociopaths, that is.
One unnecessary invasion after another.
Well, that's right. Absolutely.
But it is true to form, isn't it?
As we see Ukraine being kicked to the side.
We'll be right back. Analyzing
The Globalist Next Move.
And now, The David Nutt Show.
you Well, before we get into what is happening in the house, I don't know if they're having an election right now, what's going to happen.
But it's been shut down, as long as they don't have a speaker.
But there's more crazy stuff about the environment.
And this truly is an amazing story.
It was sent to me by a listener that the Department of Justice is now going to sue eBay for selling rolling coal devices.
And they could fine them as much as $2 billion with a B. $2 billion.
That's just insane.
I've got to say, you know, I'm not a big fan, since I like to drive a convertible, I'm not a big fan of rolling coal and massive amounts of smoke right there.
But I do get kind of a dark joy out of...
That people are flaunting this when everyone else is so precious about emissions.
You've got to really kind of love that.
But I think it is truly amazing the reach that the EPA will go to along with its criminal department of justice.
They filed a lawsuit claiming that eBay enabled the sale of more than 343,000 rolling coal devices.
Each one of these could spur a fine of up to $5,580 under the Clean Air Act.
Again, this is the EPA as a weaponized bureaucracy.
This thing's got to be shut down.
This is created by Richard Nixon, jumping on the bandwagon of Earth Day and all the rest of this stuff.
And yes, at the beginning, there was a lot of very dirty sites that needed to be cleaned up.
One of the guys that I worked with before when we were working on environmental issues, he had spent his entire working life at the EPA. But he went there when the purpose of it, the stated purpose, and what he agreed with was to clean up pollution.
But as he saw what happened, you know, it has now become a weapon to, you know, go through the Waters of America Act or whatever.
It's been used as a weapon to control people, especially a weapon to shut down internal combustion engines, as well as other practices that the EPA has gotten to.
Now they've extended this to shutting down power plants on the basis of emissions.
And now this excessive fine of $5,580 under the Clean Air Act.
Again, no protection against excessive fines in the Constitution.
To me, that seems to be excessive.
eBay denied the charges in a public statement.
And again, why are they going after eBay?
Well, because they're lazy.
If they wanted to apply these fines, they don't want to go after the individual drivers.
The individual drivers would push back on this, on the successive fine.
And you can imagine that if they went after thousands of, you know, 343,000 people, that would be very difficult to do.
And all of these people would be pushing back very hard and very publicly against it.
It's easier just to go after one giant corporation.
We just had the IRS come after Microsoft for $26 billion, something like that, a back bill of tax.
Now they've got an army of lawyers and they'll contest that.
But at the same time, Microsoft just bought Activision for just under $70 billion.
So they're out there buying something three times the size.
And it's just one of their acquisitions.
So as astronomical as that fine is, it is not that big a deal for Microsoft.
Certainly they don't want to pay it, but I mean, you know, they can afford to pay it.
If they came after all these people have rolling coal devices added to their trucks, they could not afford $5,500 fines.
And they would fight that.
So they go after eBay because they've got deep pockets.
I remember when I was in Texas in the early 1980s at Texas Instruments, one of the guys that I worked with was on a jury trial, and he said it was a lawsuit brought by a cowboy against the ranch.
And he said they were pressuring them and rushing them.
And so as part of this rushing thing, he had an accident, and I forget the details of the accident, but it messed up his leg so that he couldn't walk, he couldn't work anymore.
And so he wanted a, he sued them for compensation.
And so my friend was in on the jury and he said they talked about it.
And he said the other jurors agreed that they really didn't have any liability for this.
They really hadn't caused this accident.
It was something that, you know, this guy did.
That was tragic.
But he said, and he just came back, he was just astounding.
He said, the other jurors there said that, he said, we don't care if the ranch caused it or not.
Because they've got deep pockets.
This guy can't work now, so they need to pay that disability.
And, you know, we're going to give him the lawsuit.
But they didn't do anything wrong.
It's like, well, they got deep pockets, so we'll just take it from them.
Anyway, he held out on that, and, you know, it was a big fight.
It's like, you know, 12 angry men.
Actually, it's like one angry man, 11 socialists, deciding what's for dinner.
And I understand, you know, the situation that the guy is in.
But again, they're abusing their parents.
This is what the EPA is doing here.
They're coming after, you know, don't make me defend eBay.
I'm not any friend of the billionaires who put this thing together.
But again, they denied it in a public statement saying they'd blocked more than 99.9% of the listings for the products cited by the Department of Justice, including millions of listings each year.
I didn't realize that rolling coal was that popular.
But anyway, eBay has partnered closely with law enforcement, including the Department of Justice for over two decades, and identifying emerging risks in assisting prevention and enforcement.
This is the kind of crime that they're concerned about, right?
Not drug cartels coming across the border, but, you know, somebody blowing, rolling coal and blowing smoke.
Well, I think the government is blowing smoke at us, don't you?
And then in New Zealand, we see this is part of a global agenda of cows that they claim are blowing smoke.
They're not rolling coal, they're rolling methane.
In New Zealand, they call it a burp tax.
So I don't think the cows are burping, but it causes a pre-voting stink with New Zealand farmers.
It may be one of the key reasons why they just put in a conservative prime minister down there.
A lot of people are pointing out, Jab Cinda Arden, and her glee, her authoritarian glee at imposing misery on the people down there.
But the party, even after she left, it was no fun after she couldn't order people around based on a fake pandemic.
But her party was still going to order people around based on fake climate change.
So hopefully this is going to change.
New Zealand has a plan to tax farmers for their livestock, burps, and farts, and it's causing a stink ahead of the general elections.
And that's one of the reasons why you had a more conservative person elected there.
I think that was a key issue there.
If you don't have food...
And that's what these people are. They're absolutely insane.
And I think people are starting to see that now.
Even to the extent that in Australia, they want to destroy forests.
And it's not just in Australia.
And it's the koalas.
They want to plow it under.
Get rid of those eucalyptus trees there.
Since leftists have long been known for situational values, it's not surprising that they now exhibit situational environmentalism.
Something is deemed to be irreplaceable natural resource that must be preserved at all costs, but then a few years later it can be destroyed because, well, if you want to make a buck, you've got to break a few green eggs and ham.
And this is coming from the New American.
And so now it's become a new agenda that the tree huggers now want to cut down the trees and bury them.
Because somebody has come up with a way to make money from that.
You know, we had to transition away from paper supermarket bags, as I point out, in New American, and plant trees.
And actually, people got indulgences for their pollution by planting trees.
And now, all of a sudden, just to show how fake this stuff is, the climate MacGuffin, They do a complete 180.
And now we want to bulldoze 70 million acres and bury it in the ground.
Not even use it for anything constructive.
Not allowed to use it to build a home or even a paper bag.
I know they just want to plow it under.
This is the insanity, but it is...
We've been seeing this from the very beginning from the environmental movement.
Again, the first eight years or so, the planet was going to go into a global ice age.
Then, just like that, they just flip around and now it's global warming.
And now they're doing that with the trees.
Climate activists want to save the planet by cutting down and burying trees.
And we must dramatically accelerate forest-thinning treatments, they say.
So even Gates is saying...
Gates has thrown his weight behind the practice of cutting down trees and burying them to address fears over carbon emissions.
Except that he's the one saying, are we the crazy people or are we the scientists?
Well, I think he's the crazy guy.
Crazy rich. Getting crazy rich off of all these things.
And whipsawing it back and forth.
Look, for the longest time...
We all know that these people don't make any money when the markets go sideways.
They make money by pumping and dumping things.
And they create expectations of unlimited profits, and then they seed the marketplace with doom and gloom.
And they profit when it goes up, and they profit when it goes down.
They don't make any money when it goes sideways.
And the same thing with us. During the New York Times Climate Forward Summit in September, notice how the progressives and the Marxists always use that forward, right?
Gates didn't hesitate to share his thoughts on the role of planting trees to mitigate climate concerns.
He called that now complete nonsense.
Well, of course it isn't complete nonsense.
And they completely discount the fact that trees are taking this dreaded carbon dioxide that they call a pollutant.
No, it's a part of what God set up.
It's a symbiotic relationship between plants and animals, especially with trees.
They provide shade.
They provide, you know, they're very concerned now, well, we need to put stuff up that is going to reflect sunlight and everything.
No. The sunlight makes the plants grow.
They take in the carbon dioxide.
They release oxygen. So he says now that to have trees and even to plant them, now Gates says that's complete nonsense.
Now, he's the one who is good.
He says, I mean, are we the science people or are we the idiots?
Well, the people who listen to you are the idiots, and you're crazy rich.
He says, the John Muir Project says this is spectacularly bad and counterproductive ideas.
He said, trees and forests are by far our best, most effective means to reduce any excess of carbon in our atmosphere.
Well, you know, maybe it wasn't ever about carbon dioxide.
Maybe it was about money and control.
Maybe it always was, and I think it is.
So net zero is going to require us to live like slaves, as I pointed out last week.
They want us living in earthen huts.
And so people are starting to wake up to this, and that's the key thing.
It's why we have to keep hitting this and get people to awaken to what is actually being done with this, as Alex Newman points out on Epoch Times.
He says, the era of unquestioned and unchallenged climate change claims is over.
And we should be attacking them on all these lies and contradictions relentlessly.
It's not about science.
As I said, for the longest time, if they hide their data, it's not science.
And we've seen that, whether you're talking about the COVID pandemic or MacGuffin, or whether you're talking about this climate MacGuffin.
But there is never an end to another project That has to be done immediately, and we have to destroy everything that we've got out there now.
And so before it has completely sunk into people that the rabbit trail they put us on is a dead end, now you've got the White House saying, well, we need to spend $7 billion on hydrogen hubs.
Hydrogen hubs. Another technology that I've talked about in the past and people have criticized me and said, well, hydrogen's got these problems and these problems.
It's like, fine. I get that.
It does have the advantage.
I understand that all of these technologies have issues.
And I understand that they are pushing us to make this transition when they don't have any alternative.
They're pushing us into austerity, poverty for the purpose of control.
And so, while I look at, you know, the hydrogen stuff as, well, okay, maybe that would work.
But it's with all of this stuff.
They don't want to wait until they've got something that works.
Because it's not about that.
It's about destroying our ability to live freely.
And it's also about their ability to own everything.
And to control our movement and every aspect of our life.
So now, we're going to make a very quick pivot.
Away from trees.
And now we've got, you know, instead of saving trees and planting trees and getting carbon credits for planting trees, now we're going to destroy trees.
And now you're going to pay gates to destroy trees.
And so now we're going to pivot, perhaps, from the battery electric vehicles to hydrogen hubs.
And we're going to start with $7 billion of that.
Because this is all just about making you poor.
Making them rich and giving the government a way to control us via disruption and chaos from the inside and doing it iteratively.
We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
Unlike most revolutions where the people rise against a real economic oppression, in our case here in Boston, we are fighting for purely an abstract principle.
It is, however, not nearly so abstract as a young gentleman supposes.
The issue involved here is one of monopoly.
Today, the British government will monopolize the sale of tea in our country.
Tomorrow it will be something else.
I'll be right back.
I'll be right back.
You're listening to The David Knight Show.
Well, Angry Tiger comments on Rock Band.
He says, I roll coal all the time.
I just smoked out the UAW guys on strike this morning.
They're going to get, they better support rolling coal because if they go with the EV thing, they're going to be out of work permanently.
Fox News, Brett Baer, had an interesting comment on this Speaker fight that's going on right now.
And he said, Republicans told me that Jesus couldn't get 217 votes for Speaker right now.
Well, I don't think they need Jesus for Speaker.
I think they need him for House Whip.
Get a scourge of cords and come after these bankster puppets and pharmaceutical puppets, the pharmakia there.
Barry said, I've talked to a lot of people up there, you know, private conversations on background.
A number of them told me crazy things.
Jesus couldn't get 217 votes.
He says, what's happening here?
He says, is this particular conference governable?
Can you get to 217 for anybody?
Well, McCarthy said, well, you know, it took me 15 rounds to get there.
It'll be interesting to see what happens.
But as we look at what is going on in the House, and I don't have a dog in that fight, because as far as I'm concerned, with the exception of Thomas Massey, nobody has stood up to any of this stuff that's been rolled on us.
You want to talk about rolling coal?
How about rolling lockdowns and rolling drugs and injections and all the rest of this stuff?
And I think the big problem that they have that has created this civil war is really Trump.
You know, Trump is the reason that's there.
And, of course, with his endorsement of Jim Jordan, that is going to be a big obstacle to Jim Jordan getting elected.
You know, Trump is there.
He's polarized the party just like he's polarized the country.
And everybody's lined up on one side or the other.
I thought it was kind of interesting to see in Louisiana, a Republican, just as they point out, he basically rolled coal on a Democrat.
They say that he smoked him, but of course he rolled coal on this Democrat.
And so there isn't even going to be a runoff in this election.
He just won it outright.
And I think we'd be seeing a lot more of this if it wasn't for all the infighting that is happening with Trump and the division that he's caused and how he has become a polarizing lightning rod for voters everywhere.
We see these types of things in elections where he's not involved.
And when he gets involved, as he's involved in the speaker race right now, it turns into a civil war.
A Republican, Jeff Landry, won a landside election on Saturday.
To flip the Louisiana governor's mansion to the Republicans in one of three main gubernatorial elections this year, shocking political observers with a victory that saves him the trouble of having to face a Democrat in the November runoff.
And so, again, you can see what happens if we get the divisive uncle out of there.
House GOP has moved to finally expel George Santos from Congress.
Question is, what took so long?
Guess I had to wait until after McCarthy got out of there.
This is coming from a fellow congressman in New York, Anthony D'Esposito.
He said on Twitter, he said, today I'll be introducing an expulsion resolution to rid the People's House of fraudster George Santos.
To oust Santos.
I saw that he got into some kind of a shouting match with some pro-Palestinian protesters.
Because, remember, he's not Jewish, George Santos, but he passed himself off as Jewish.
And when he was called on that, everything about this guy's biography, everything, everything is a lie.
And of course, many indications, he's been indicted, a lot of indications, a lot of allegations, that he committed fraud and not just lying to the public about everything in his biography or background.
But when he said he was Jewish, because he's running in New York in a Jewish area, so it was to his advantage to say that.
And then when he was called on it, He said, well, I'm Jew-ish.
And so I guess he's trying to get those street creds up, getting into an argument with someone.
To oust him from Congress would require support from two-thirds of the House, a milestone that Nick LaLoda says is attainable.
I think there's probably going to be more consensus to get rid of George Santos than there will be to put Jim Jordan or anybody else there in as Speaker.
I predict this resolution is going to catch fire.
Many people feel how we do.
Well, again, the Democrats don't really care about ethics.
The Republicans, they don't care about that.
They just want to get another Republican out because then they got a chance of getting that seat back for the Democrats.
And the Republicans don't care about ethics either.
For them, it's also about the numbers.
Take a look at Menendez.
You know, it's a club, and Menendez, the senator who has got all these allegations and indictments against him of fraud and corruption and, you know, favors for sale to foreign governments and all the rest of this stuff.
He has, this is not his first rodeo with all this stuff.
They came after him before.
And again, it was Jack Smith who tried to get a conviction against him before and failed.
And it seemed to be pretty obvious at the time.
But he had as a character witness, Lindsey Graham.
Because, again, you know, the Senate is a club.
And they cover for each other on their corruption.
And they support each other on war and all the rest of these things.
This isn't the first time that the House has tried to remove George Santos.
The Democrats sponsored a resolution to expel him in May of this year.
But, you know, when McCarthy was there...
And McCarthy, and also Marjorie Taylor Greene, going to support him, going to keep him there.
Because, again, while I don't care what he did, he's a Republican.
We're going to stand behind this corruption.
It's a very concerning thing when we see that integrity doesn't matter to either party.
Republicans voted to refer the motion to the Ethics Committee, a stalling motion, which has investigated Santos since March.
They can't figure out what to do with it.
And then, of course, we have Trump having to walk back his criticism of Netanyahu eating crow in a very big way, because, you know, Trump's Always shooting from the lip, you know, and jumping out there.
Whatever the situation is, he's going to comment on it.
And so, you know, just from just improvising there on the stump speech, he got himself into it pretty deep.
But don't worry, because you've always got people who are going to make excuses for Trump.
And here's Jack Hillner at American Thinker doing exactly that.
Is calling all Trump supporters far right.
And he goes, why?
Why would anybody say that?
You know, anybody who supports Trump, for example, he says Jim Jordan is labeled to be a hard rightist.
And he goes, so what are the policies that actually made Trump far right?
And when I saw this, I thought, okay, good.
Is he going to finally take a look at some of the policies of Trump instead of this personality hero worship that we see all the time?
Because policies do matter.
The promises matter, but it also, what did the guy do when he was in office?
It's important when somebody's running as a candidate and they haven't held office.
He had never held office anywhere before, so we didn't really know what he was going to do.
But as he's talking about different policies, it's like, okay, well, if he agrees with us on what the problem is, even if he doesn't have exactly the right solution, like at the border, maybe he will do something about it.
But then after the person has been in office for four years...
Then he has to run on his record.
So what is his record? Well, this guy, Jack Hellner, got it completely wrong.
He says, for example, he goes down policy after policy.
He says enforcing border laws that Congress passed and building a wall.
Trump didn't do that except in your imagination, Jack.
Really, seriously.
He didn't build the wall.
He repaired the wall mostly, and he added about 40 miles of new wall.
But you've only got about 400 miles of wall in a 2,000-mile border.
These people are delusional.
Supporting limits on abortion, he says.
Is that what got Trump labeled as far-right?
Well, again, Trump...
It says that's too harsh.
He doesn't support those anymore.
Come on, Jack. You got to get up to speed here.
Trump didn't want people to be fired for refusing to take a vaccine, just like most Americans.
Why would people refuse to take the vaccine that he was boasting that he stopped all the testing on?
And these people, you notice that he doesn't say anything about what, you know, Trump is far right because he produced a vaccine without testing it or anything?
No, he doesn't talk about that.
They completely ignore the fact that he developed and bragged and pushed the vaccine.
And I can tell you that he would have bribed corporations to get this done.
And a large part of what Biden's mandates were, were bribes.
As a matter of fact, you've now had, in terms of talking about the vaccines and the vaccine mandates, $1.8 million is now going to be given to some of the people in the military who sued over these vaccine mandates.
But only the people who sued.
No compensation for the many, many soldiers who got kicked out.
And no compensation for the people who got injected and are going to be living with this time bomb in themselves.
Nothing about that. And so two different groups are going to split that $1.8 million.
And quite frankly, I think one of the groups, I think it's nine Navy SEALs or something, are going to split $900,000 each.
If they got the vaccine, I don't think they took the vaccine.
I think it was to stop the Pentagon.
Do you think the Pentagon cares about a $1.8 million fine?
They light their cigars or their missiles.
They light their missiles with million-dollar bills.
They don't care about that.
And if somebody got the vaccine, $100,000 is not sufficient compensation.
And so I don't know what is going on with that.
Anyway, so isn't that great?
We can cheer Trump because he didn't get a chance to mandate the vaccine.
He would have. If he had been there.
I'm telling you, he would have done it with blackmailing incentives.
Trump moved to rapidly get schools and businesses back open after the initial shutdown.
This isn't far right, says this person.
Hey, pal, who shut them down?
Who shut them down? Who told schools, businesses, and churches you're not allowed to be open?
Nobody has ever done that in the history of America.
Except for Trump.
He did it. And he did not move to rapidly get them open.
As a matter of fact, the reason we had the mail in election is because he shut everything down.
And because he refused to hold the convention.
Because he refused to go out and hold events.
He played along with all this stuff for Fauci, and he used Fauci to endorse him.
Put together a video. Trump opposes allowing men to compete against women.
No, he doesn't.
No, he doesn't.
He has supported this forever.
From the very beginning, he was pushing that.
And he was pushing men to be in beauty contests.
Yeah, let them be on my beauty contest.
I think men should be allowed to compete.
He said this a long, long time ago.
It's amazing to me to see all of these right-wing publications out there saying, look, we got two, was it Miss Universe or something?
Two Miss Universe contestants, one of the national men dressed up as women.
And yet, this is what Trump was pushing 15 years ago.
He's one of the first people to push that.
Just like General Flynn, who's going around presenting himself as some kind of a Christian nationalist, was pushing in the Pentagon, pushing the transition of that Navy SEAL, who now regrets it.
He says, how did they gaslight me with this stuff?
He says, we absolutely got to shut this down for kids.
I was an adult.
He said, I blame myself for letting this happen to me.
But he goes, they gaslighted me on this thing.
And he says, it's my responsibility.
I shouldn't have let it happen.
But he says, you can't let people do that to kids.
Trump was pushing this.
Flynn was pushing this from the very beginning.
What does it matter with the MAGA people that they can't see this?
Trump does not believe that climate change is the greatest existential threat.
Oh, he doesn't? But he wouldn't do anything about the Paris Climate Accord.
I remember at the time when it was so frustrating for six months, he was still going, yeah, we'll stay with it.
Ivanka says it's good. Rex Tillerson says it's good.
And even when he said, we're going to move away from it, and I'm going to get rid of it after the election, after the 2020 election, I'm going to say we shouldn't have it.
And I said, well, if you don't get rid of the treaty, this fake treaty.
I remember playing a clip from Casablanca with Humphrey Bogart.
We'll always have Paris.
You know, I said that, yeah, we're always going to have this Paris Climate Accord because he isn't going to get rid of it, and he never did.
He didn't get rid of it. Trump sought to make NATO pay what they were supposed to.
Why would that be an unpopular policy or a far-right policy?
Except he sought.
He sought. He wished in his heart of hearts, in his 4D chess game of strategy, that's what he really wanted to do.
But he was just too weak to get it done.
Just couldn't get it done.
I don't know what happened. On Rumble, RCF2020. Thank you for the tip.
He says, where's the tree-hugging elf when you need them?
Yeah, that's true.
Yeah, the tree-huggers.
Well, we're about out of time here, but I wanted to say one thing, too, about Disney, which I thought was kind of interesting.
And I saw that these are spread out a couple of days apart, you know, and at first everybody is portraying Disney as desperate, cutting the prices of children's tickets by more than 50%.
And, of course, as this is happening, we're seeing that Dollywood around here is so packed that they're extending their hours.
I mean, I don't know what time they close, but we see the messages that, well, we've extended it from, let's say, 7 or 8 o'clock or something until another 2 hours or 3 hours or 4 hours because they had so many people packed in there.
Disney has got a lot of empty space there because they charge so much.
And right now, the current prices for children are $104 and up.
And so they're going to do some limited time child tickets.
But of course, their business model is to get the kids to bring in the adults.
And after they started talking about this, a couple of days later, they said they're going up on the adults' tickets.
So they're going to go down a little bit on the kids' tickets, and then they're going to go up on the adult tickets.
And So they were going to take the three-day child pass to $150.
Right before the special, it was $340 for a three-day pass.
Pretty amazing.
But again, when we look at what is happening with Disney, the Magic Kingdom, as I was looking at these articles, And it dawned on me just how, you know, they say it's crashing and burning according to this, and the magic kingdom is now becoming the tragic kingdom.
You know, it really always was about pushing magic.
In a really deep sort of way.
You know, if you look at Mary Poppins, it was really a pretty dark story.
And there was a video that went viral a few years ago where they recut scenes from the trailer for Mary Poppins and they put a scary soundtrack with it, called it Scary Mary.
And when you look at this, you realize just how dark it was.
In many different ways, even though they had this shiny veneer on it.
And here's some of the clips of it.
And as I was looking at this and thinking about Scary Mary, and looking at some of this Disney background here, they had another series of books.
I'll just stop talking.
You can see it visually if you're watching this.
There's people flying, kids running.
She's throwing stuff around, people screaming, flying up chimneys and all the rest of the stuff.
Yeah, Disney has always leaned on magic in a really kind of a strange way.
But as I was looking at that, in one of these articles, they mentioned bed knobs and broomsticks.
You know, they originally were going to do that.
Bought that from a writer called Mary Norton.
And she wrote a book that was called, it was based on the magic bed knob, or how to become a witch in ten easy lessons.
And bonfires and broomsticks.
So they bought the two of those together.
They bought the rights to them.
And then they were able to do Mary Poppins, so they put it on the back shelf for a few years.
Then they did that one as well.
And now you've got a British university that is offering a degree in the occult.
It's very easy for them to insinuate these things in, isn't it?
Disney's been doing it long before Harry Potter.
That's the real tragedy of the Magic Kingdom, I think.
Thanks for listening. Let me tell you, the David Knight Show you can listen to with your ears.
You can even watch it by using your eyes.
In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to the David Knight Show right now.
Yeah, good job.
Ha ha! And you want to know something else?
▲
Export Selection