Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 17, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:22

The David Knight Show - 10/13/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Free speech to free minds.
	Soon.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 17th of October.
	Year of our Lord, 2023.
	Well, today we're going to begin with Biden's wars.
	He says, yes, no problem.
	We can have multiple wars.
	We can have two wars. Janet Yellen has treasures.
	Certainly we can afford two wars, can we?
	We're going to talk about that.
	And we're going to go back and review what Julian Assange told us about U.S. wars.
	And then, of course, the other big story that is out there today everywhere is Trump got a gag order on him.
	Well, bless his heart.
	The guy who put the masks on us, maybe she should make him if he wants to talk.
	Make him show up at the debate and defend his policies and what he did to us.
	Well, we'll talk about that. We'll talk about the election as well as what is happening as the world moves toward war.
	We'll also be talking about the moves to end bail.
	And we'll be talking to someone with the American Bail Coalition in the third hour.
	I think you'll find that interesting.
	We'll be right back. Well, again, one thing after the other with Biden, and one war after the other,
	as a matter of fact, one of the things that's concerning is, as we look at the move to try to consolidate behind a Speaker in the House, and there's a lot of pushback by establishment Republicans against Jim Jordan.
	He's just too conservative, they said.
	Well... Anti-war has said that Jim Jordan is amenable to putting out a combined bill for Ukraine and for Israel funding.
	I wonder how Thomas Massey is going to react to that.
	To me, that sounds like an omnibus war bill.
	You know, take both of them or leave both of them.
	Well, I think I'll leave both of them.
	I think I would leave him if he does something like that.
	But that is precisely...
	What Janet Yellen is saying.
	Well, she talks about two wars.
	Oh, yeah. Yeah, we can fund the Ukraine war as well as the Israeli war.
	Not a problem. And the most amazing thing of it all, I think, is to see the arrogance, the arrogance of Joe Biden.
	Listen to this. Are the wars in Israel and Ukraine more than the United States can take on at the same time?
	Why are the United States of America?
	For God's sake. The most powerful nation in the history, not in the world, in the history of the world.
	The history of the world.
	We can take care of both of these and still maintain our overall international defense.
	We have the capacity to do this and we have an obligation to do it.
	We are the essential nation to Paris, the former Secretary of State.
	And if we don't, who does?
	We are the essential nation.
	I've never heard that essential word before.
	Oh yeah, from that globalist Trump.
	You small businesses out there on Main Street, you're not essential.
	It's the big businesses, the Wall Street businesses that are out there.
	The big box, they're essential.
	The rest of you shut down.
	Yeah. For God's sake, he says, oh yeah.
	And he taunts God.
	When you look at this arrogance and pride, I just pray that God strikes him down instead of this country.
	That is the type of thing that God has always punished with every country.
	And so now we've got a bipartisan, by war.
	Looks like both parties can sign up for both wars.
	We've got the Uni Party, by war, bipartisan party.
	And of course you heard him say, we are the essential nation.
	Well, he says the Secretary of State said he was trying to quote Madeleine Albright, but as people pointed out, she said, we are the indispensable nation.
	You folks are not essential, but their government is, and their geopolitics are.
	And of course, it was Madeleine Albright who did not have the decency, even denied it would kill 500,000 children with sanctions.
	She just said it was worth it.
	And so, whatever happens, it will be worth it to them.
	Your life is cheap.
	Your life doesn't matter.
	It'll be worth it to them.
	And so, Janet Yellen is out there asking the same question.
	Can we handle two wars?
	Can we really afford to do this?
	Oh, yes, we can.
	What this all means. Paul Tudor Jones, the famed investor, was on CNBC this week and he said, this is the most threatening and challenging geopolitical environment that I've ever seen.
	At the same time, the U.S. is in its weakest fiscal position since World War II, with debt to GDP at 122%.
	Can America, can the West afford another war at this time?
	I think the answer is absolutely.
	America can certainly afford to stand with Israel and to support Israel's military needs.
	And we also can and must support Ukraine in its struggle against Russia.
	And look, the American economy is doing extremely well.
	Yeah, yeah. Somehow she seems like the bankers that were telling people in 2005, 6, 7, you know, you can afford this mortgage.
	Go ahead, load it up.
	Come on. Yeah, America can certainly afford to stand with Israel and to support Israel's military needs, and we also can and must support Ukraine and its struggle against Russia.
	Who's going to support us?
	What happens with our war economy?
	What does that look like? And the bottom line is that we don't have two wars.
	We had seven wars under Obama.
	Trump kept those seven wars going.
	And then Biden lost and got kicked out of Afghanistan in a fire drill.
	You know, bug out and leave everything behind this disorderly withdrawal.
	That should inspire confidence from everybody, right?
	Absolutely. And we're still sending them billions of dollars, even after we're gone.
	It wasn't enough that we left them, you know, all these weapons and pallets of cash.
	No, no, no. War is the lifeblood of the state.
	This is in their interest.
	It is not in our interest.
	Another banker war.
	Another central banker war.
	Oh, certainly. We are the greatest nation, the most powerful nation that ever existed.
	Wow. Wow.
	And he really believes that.
	He saw the arrogance in his face.
	Makes me want to throw up.
	Can you imagine what God thinks of that?
	Makes me want to throw up to see that.
	We do need to come up with funds both for Israel and for Ukraine, said Yellen.
	It's really up to the House to find and to seat a speaker and to put us in a position where legislation can be passed.
	Bingo! We get the message that, you know, It's tough for Jordan.
	Can't get that speakership.
	You know, you want to be speaker, don't you?
	Yeah, what are you willing to do for that?
	You want to sell your soul?
	Well, you don't have to sell your soul, necessarily.
	Just sell America's soul.
	Sell America out.
	Oh, it'll be fine.
	You know, Trump supports you. Everybody's been told that you're conservative.
	As a matter of fact, the left has built him up, said, he's so conservative, he can't be there.
	So this so conservative guy...
	It's going to probably wind up funding both of these wars, which Kevin McCarthy wouldn't be able to do, you see.
	That's how it works. It's just like Trump is able to lock us down and create this vaccine and all the rest of the stuff.
	Do everything the World Economic Forum had demanded, and yet nobody suspected anything because we all know that no matter what Trump does, he's anti-globalist.
	And if you don't believe him, just ask the left.
	They tell us all the time how anti-globalist he is, as he's doing everything the globalists wanted to do in 2020.
	Amid renewed focus on the Israel-Palestine conflict, Zelensky warned in recent days that, quote, international attention should not be shifted away from his countries.
	He's so desperate for cash and for attention.
	He wanted to go to Israel.
	And Israel said, not now.
	Not now. But I'm all dressed for war.
	I've been dressed for war for the last couple of years now.
	Can I come? I'm all dressed up.
	No place to go. So, yeah, we're going to have no, you know, there won't be when Jordan becomes a speaker, if this is true, what is, what Janet Yellen wants, what anti-war says, other people are saying.
	This is his deal, his Faustian bargain that he makes to become speaker.
	We don't have, won't have a declaration of war.
	We never do. What we'll have is a financial finesse.
	We'll just fund it.
	We'll just fund it. For the military industrial, let's stop calling them the military industrial complex.
	Let's call them the military industrial corporatocracy.
	The corporations. It's not very complex.
	It's not complicated. We know who they are.
	You know, we know that Austin has come from Raytheon.
	They had to pass a special exemption for him because he had been with Raytheon for so long.
	It's the military industrial corporations.
	And it's a military industrial corporatocracy that wants war.
	War all the time. We could be looking at a war economy that nobody today has ever experienced before.
	You know, not since the last fourth turning.
	We had the Great Depression, World War II. And so, I've been warning about this for quite some time, and of course it wasn't Me that came up with it, it was Strauss and Howe who said in the early 90s, you know, we have this cycle every four generations.
	You have massive economic disruption always.
	Everybody looks at the institutions and say they're not working.
	And it's usually accompanied by war, they said, because as Gerald Slenty has pointed out many times, when all else fails and when you realize what these people are up to, they take you to war.
	And so, you know, that's in the cards.
	That's the time in which we live.
	And so, we could be looking at a war economy that nobody alive today has really experienced.
	Who can blame the markets for being jittery?
	Says Benjamin Pinkton on Zero Hedge.
	The events of last week are shocking, if not entirely surprising.
	The world now holds its breath as Israel prepares for a full-scale ground invasion of Gaza, with only unseasonal torrential rain, delaying the seemingly inevitable.
	And again, it's like, what are they waiting for?
	Is it Iran and Hezbollah threatening to open another front?
	They're moving people away from northern Israel for that eventuality?
	So, are they hesitating for that reason?
	Are they hesitating because the second U.S. carrier group that is going there to essentially have Israel's back and also to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, it wasn't quite fully ready.
	Talk about readiness.
	And so they're delaying the deployment of the second one.
	I think it's Eisenhower.
	I think the first one was Ford.
	The presidents are going to rescue us as always, aren't they?
	Yeah. But anyway, it could be that.
	It could be the threats from Iran.
	It could be the fact that the carrier groups are taking a while to deploy.
	It could be the weather, not a rain.
	As he says, the title of the Daily Mail suggests that it never rains, but it pours.
	U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken now finds himself the busiest man in the Biden administration as he jets around to be chastised like a naughty boy by world leaders in the global south.
	He has warned in recent days that Azerbaijan could soon invade Armenia.
	And some analysts have pointed out that the U.S.'s military preoccupations, along with the absence of monsoonal rains in October, present China with a window of opportunity to attack Taiwan.
	So while they're having unseasonal rain in Israel, they're having unseasonal non-rain in China.
	Climate change.
	Notice the weather variation is what happens.
	Meanwhile, the second U.S. carrier group deployed to the eastern Mediterranean has been temporarily delayed to ensure that the flagship, yeah, it is the Eisenhower, is in peak readiness.
	That's a nice way of saying it's not ready.
	It's not ready. Two carrier groups armed to the teeth as an act of gunboat diplomacy with a clear message for Iran, don't try it.
	Well, I think the clear message for Iran is what we see coming from Lindsey Graham and Newcomb Nikki saying, let's do it.
	Whether they did anything or not, let's attack them anyway, you know?
	I mean, it's... I saw that yesterday.
	I played that from Lindsey Graham.
	Well, if it is proven that they did...
	Well, yeah, but we don't have to wait for that.
	Let's just do it anyway. We've been wanting to get after Iran for 20 years.
	Probably some of these people for 50 years.
	Still angry about the takeover of the U.S. Embassy, except what they don't understand was that the U.S. government took over their government 20 years before that, or 25 years.
	Throughout the elected leftist regime that they didn't like, the CIA didn't, and put in a ruthless Shah of Iran, trained his secret police, trained by the CIA, and To take recriminations on families of people who opposed the Shah of Iran.
	It was ruthless. And what we got from that, the blowback we got from that, were the Ayatollahs in Iran.
	But for Americans, ground zero begins the day they took over the embassy.
	Nothing happened before that with Iran.
	They didn't even exist before that in the minds of most Americans.
	So potentially we're on a path to something worse.
	Than great power tension and regional proxy wars.
	Nile Ferguson wrote in the Times, what we have is, quote, a cascade of conflict that has the potential to escalate to a third world war.
	Well, that's been in the works for quite some time.
	And many of us believe that is their deliberate intention.
	Joel Skousen has been saying that for quite some time.
	Way before the Ukraine thing happened.
	It's their intention to start a third world war.
	And we know that that is the time that they understand this timing.
	They understand we're in the fourth turning.
	They refer to it obliquely as the Fourth Industrial Revolution and a lot of these other things.
	But of course, you know, the Fourth Turning that was the Civil War was part of a global industrial revolution and the creation of nation-states, the change from agrarian societies with, you know, city-states as being the economic power to a centrally controlled nation-state government.
	And part of the Industrial Revolution.
	With events moving as fast as they are, nobody can anticipate what might light the fuse on the geopolitical powder keg.
	Well, you know, Biden has been playing the role of, I guess, Guy Fawkes.
	He's loaded everything up with explosives in the parliament, and he's just lighting fuse after fuse, just waiting for him to all go off.
	It would be...
	It'd be funny if it wasn't so dangerous and lethal.
	Jake Sullivan's now infamous statement just two weeks ago.
	Listen to this. I had missed this.
	He said, the Middle East region is quieter today than it's been in two decades.
	It's starting to look like Neville Chamberlain walking off of a plane saying, peace in our time, isn't it?
	Yeah. Just to, you know, give us all assurance.
	Well, you know, two wars.
	Two wars. Which two wars is it?
	You know, because, I mean, we're still occupying Syria.
	We've invaded Syria. We're occupying Syria.
	We're taking over their oil fields.
	Like Trump said, just take the oil.
	Just take the oil. It's ours.
	You know, we're the most powerful country.
	Just take the oil. And so we're there.
	The only acknowledgement of the fact that we're there is occasionally when some rockets are launched and some American personnel or soldiers are killed in Syria.
	But yeah, we're there. Got boots on the ground.
	Stealing the oil. So many different wars and so many different levels.
	And we give arms to both sides, as we just saw with what happened with Hamas.
	You know, as Scott Ritter has pointed out, we are the indispensable armors of the world.
	And so now, which two wars?
	Again, will it be a war with Russia and China?
	Will it be, you know, something else?
	Putin has arrived in China to meet what he calls his dear friend, Xi.
	Better make sure you get the pronouns right.
	So he's going to meet with Xi.
	And we've got a gang in Washington, the most powerful army on earth.
	We've got a gang that can't shoot straight.
	I haven't had a very good track record, have we, since World War II? I haven't won any of these asymmetric wars, have we?
	Got the crap beat out of us in Afghanistan.
	He ran out of there with his tail between his legs.
	Trump could have shut it down.
	Should have shut it down. Promised to shut it down.
	He could have withdrawn in an orderly fashion.
	So could have Biden. But no, they planned on never leaving.
	They got kicked out.
	Iran warns of preemptive action against Israel.
	Preemptive action. Oh, that sounds like Pearl Harbor or something.
	Well, no, it's kind of the, you know, attack before you are attacked.
	That's what we do. We've been to make sure they don't get the nuclear weapon.
	We've been doing primitive attacks against them.
	We have assassination teams that take out their physicists and stuff right up next to them with a motorcycle and throw a bomb onto the car with a big magnet on it, blow them up.
	That type of thing's been going on for quite some time.
	We attack them with cyber warfare, took down all their computers, With Stutznet, remember that?
	I'll never forget seeing Catherine Herridge, who was the Fox correspondent for national security issues.
	Nothing but a mouthpiece of the CIA and DARPA and the rest of these people.
	And she was actually on, you know, talking about the threat of cybersecurity, and she used Stutznet as an example.
	That was the thing that we did.
	But, you know, we're trying to sell the idea that we've got to up our game because we're in danger.
	We're the ones doing that.
	And so, you know, when you look at Iran, they're making the same argument that we always make.
	They have to attack first.
	Same argument that Japan made, you know.
	We don't defend Gaza today, said Iran.
	Tomorrow we have to defend against these phosphorus bombs and children's hospitals of our own country, he said.
	And of course, that's something that not too many people have talked about in the news media.
	The white phosphorus being released on civilian targets by Israel at the beginning of this.
	Again, you know, the threat is to make sure that we don't escalate this.
	The threat is to make sure that we don't become the monsters that we fight.
	Look at this phosphorus stuff.
	If I remember correctly, that was what was dropped on, you know, I did that in Vietnam.
	That picture etched into everybody's memory, if you're of a certain age, of that young girl running down the street naked, all the clothes burned off of her, screaming, right?
	What a horrific picture that was.
	And I remember that young girl has now grown up, and she's become a Christian missionary, essentially.
	What amazing things God can do in terms of changing the evil that men do for good.
	So, Angry Tiger.
	Okay.
	Resolution for Restoration of Peace and Constitutional Order.
	Good for him. He put this up on Substack.
	He said, yes or no? He said, what would you change?
	And essentially, I'll just paraphrase it.
	It's just something put out to say, hey, we need to restore peace and constitutional order.
	And one of the things we need to do is remember that Article 1, Section 8, only Congress has the power to declare war.
	And so we demand that all U.S. forces that have been deployed elsewhere without a declaration of war be brought back.
	Was that too hard for Trump to do?
	Evidently it was.
	He didn't do any of that.
	And so, as he points out, be stood down from alert status as a result of illegal proxy battle or war.
	As the U.S. Constitution was not amended, it's still there.
	You still swore to uphold it.
	This is from listener Chris Lavin.
	He says, well, judging from news reports, it looks like Israel and their plans are to, quote, act in the heat of passion, unquote, against Palestinians.
	Right now we need to think back and we need to reflect on the act of forgiveness and compassion.
	We've had a recent example of this demonstrated by the Amish back in 2006.
	The shooting there in Nichols Mines, Pennsylvania, they publicly forgave the shooter, and they showed compassion for his family.
	That's tough to do, isn't it?
	It's really tough to do.
	Now, the...
	The government still, in other words, you'd still forgive people, and God can forgive mass murders, and does, I believe, if they repent.
	He's promised to do that.
	But, you know, we still had government execute some of these mass murders who said they had become Christians.
	I think it was Ted Bundy, Son of Sam, I think both of them, said while they were in prison that they'd become Christians.
	I don't think it was, I would hope that it is not just so that they could get a parole or something, or not parole, but get commuted to life sentence instead of being executed.
	But the government's job is to mete out justice.
	But justice has to be measured.
	And that's why we don't give carte blanche for even governments wearing uniforms to shoot civilians.
	And I began this first comments about this.
	I said, you understand the principle of just war is to try to minimize war.
	We understand that violence is endemic in human nature.
	We understand that there are violent criminals out there who will kill us.
	That's why we have police, sheriff, things like that.
	Unfortunately, they get off of their mission far too often.
	But we have law enforcement to do that.
	We have the military in order to protect us from attack.
	And to act defensively, to try to spare civilian life with the intention of ending the war.
	And we don't get into a war without having a debate about it and a formal declaration about it.
	Once it starts, yeah, you give it to the president.
	He is going to be the executive to run it.
	All of these principles are very important.
	But again, what Chris Lavin says is very important.
	Let's pray for restraint.
	Pray for the families on both sides.
	Pray for a return of the hostages.
	Ask our leaders to stop this.
	Which is, you know what, angry tigers putting together with that petition.
	He says, it feels to me like the world is sitting back and waiting for the worst.
	Now is the time to step out and strike while the iron is hot to defeat war, to defeat violence, to defeat the pessimists of peace.
	I implore everyone to ask for peace, ask their leaders for peace, Stop this madness and pray, he says.
	And of course, that is the thing that we can do.
	You know, people say, well, I haven't even got a prayer.
	No, you've always got a prayer. You've always got that.
	It's not the last resort.
	It ought to be the first resort because our weapons are mighty.
	They have weapons of war.
	They have chariots or F-35s.
	I don't know. Maybe you'd be better off with a chariot than an F-35.
	It's harder to eject the charioteer than it is to eject the pilot.
	It's all under electronic control.
	But God can burn their chariots and fire.
	It's something that was a weapon of war at that time that was almost invincible.
	Metal. Not something that is going to catch fire.
	But God can do that.
	And so, God can change hearts.
	We pray for our leaders.
	What do we pray for? Well, it'd be great if God would turn their hearts towards Him.
	Give them a heart for obeying him, a heart for their fellow man.
	But, you know, barring that, as they say, a fiddler in the roof, is there a prayer for the czar?
	Yes. Keep the czar far away from us.
	So, you know, that is our prayer.
	Our prayers for peace. For everybody.
	And I'm quite disgusted by seeing these voices on the left and on the right.
	On the left, kill all the Jews.
	On the right, kill all the Palestinians.
	I've seen Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin.
	These guys are so angry they can't even talk.
	They're on the verge of screaming in tears the whole time, shaking with anger.
	I'm sick of that.
	That's dangerous propaganda, folks.
	These people are not in control of themselves.
	They can't see the bigger picture.
	They're going to strike out in a way that is going to escalate this.
	They should not be listened to.
	They're not rational voices.
	They're not guided by God.
	Don't listen to them.
	It is a siren song to crash us onto the reef.
	Columbia, South Carolina.
	Quote-unquote religious leaders meet with Lindsey Graham.
	This was sent to me by a listener.
	Yeah. Lindsey Graham alongside faith leaders.
	What faith is it?
	That pushes constant unrestrained war.
	Please explain that to me.
	I'd like to know. Maybe it's the same faith that told people, you know, if the government tells you to put pinwheels on your head, put pinwheels on your head.
	If the government tells you to inject poison into your arm, put poison in your arm.
	These same people, these same Christians, who for the longest time, well, Romans 13 says you do whatever the government says, right?
	Unless the government tells you to do something that directly contradicts your religious beliefs.
	You know, like saying you can't have church services or something like that.
	And yet, and I said all along, for years, all these Roman 13 people, I said, that exception?
	You do whatever the government says unless it tells you to do something that is against your religious beliefs?
	I said, you watch.
	When the government tells them to do something in direct violation of God's commandment, they'll cave.
	And they did. They caved on the church shutdowns.
	Then they caved on the religious issues, not understanding that this is training for slavery, training for mark of the beast, mark of the government stuff.
	They caved on all of that.
	And they attacked people.
	Who had religious objections to that.
	So what does Julian Assange tell us about the U.S. wars years and years ago?
	Well, Julian Assange was asked, this is from Inversionism on Twitter.
	He put this up and posted a video in a thread.
	He said, Julian Assange was asked over a decade ago, after seeing thousands and thousands of documents and videos from various leaks, what had surprised him the most?
	And here's what he had to say.
	It's the big picture of the war that nearly all the deaths are in incidences that kill just one or two people.
	A little girl on the street in a yellow dress who would frequently go Go to collect candy and so on from US troops.
	One day a tank goes past and for an inexplicable reason a shooter comes out of the US tank and blows her away.
	There are just so many of these incidences.
	I spoke before about checkpoint killings in one incident.
	After the car was shot up and examined, according to these internal US military reports, the man killed was a doctor delivering a pregnant woman to the hospital.
	We see a very interesting example of a town of 40,000 on the Syrian border.
	His population went from 40,000 to 2,000 over a year or so.
	And that town and that circumstance has not been reported at all that we could find in the mainstream media or, in fact, in the alternative media.
	There was just no reporters there as that town collapsed and people fled across to Syria.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And of course, one of the videos that he saw, I'll never forget, and of course, the U.S. military and intelligence community will never forget it.
	Collateral murder.
	And it was the gun site, it was a gun ship, you know, It was an AC-130 ghost gun ship or something.
	You know, where they've got, they're firing from a very long distance.
	And the people don't even know they're there.
	They're so far away you can't hear them or see them, anything like that.
	But they could see the people on the ground.
	And you see people coming out and they shoot them up.
	The guy has got a camera.
	Just shot them up. Then they stay on it.
	And then a hospital truck shows up.
	Clearly marked. With a Red Cross or Crescent or whatever it was at the time.
	And they wait until they come out and load everybody up into the ambulance and then they shoot the ambulance up.
	Same people. And they released that and called it collateral murder.
	Very prophetic. Because collateral murder is what they're doing to Julian Assange for showing their crimes.
	Their war crimes. You see, this always happens.
	That's why we have to keep our goal as the just war.
	Once you get out there and people are shot at and their friends are getting killed and so forth, then it's on.
	It's on. That's why you've got to be very careful you don't open this Pandora box.
	So, inversionism said, again, summarizing that, so much of the death, what's surprising was so much of the death, It was not because of wartime conflict, but because of soldiers killing civilians, either accidentally or intentionally.
	And inversionism says, when your mainstream media and military is constantly telling you, quote, these people hate us.
	They want us all dead.
	They hate America.
	They hate freedom. They can do it in the voice of Mark Levin or Ben Shapiro.
	Creating this evil boogeyman that you must eliminate in totality.
	There will obviously be some sociopaths out there that have no humanity, who have no problem killing innocents, killing children.
	This is what we're seeing now with Hamas and Palestine, or with Israel and the bombings.
	That's why when Gal Gadot, the actress who plays Wonder Woman, said, if your response to this is to kill all the Jews or kill all the Palestinians, then the propaganda is working on you.
	So, some of you might remember some of these old videos when WikiLeaks first came to prominence.
	Like the soldier throwing a puppy dog off a cliff for no reason.
	Or the soldiers entering homes and mowing down an entire family, including kids, without knowing if they were terrorists or not.
	I saw these videos years ago, and they're still burned in my mind.
	I wish I could forget them.
	And, of course, collateral murder.
	What they're doing to Julian Assange.
	And Virginism says that every American needs to come to terms with the fact that the U.S. military has committed evil acts just as awful as Hamas and Israel has.
	And advocating for more war, for more death, for more destruction at the behest of these criminal central bankers like Yellen and the people they control like Biden.
	That doesn't fix anything.
	It only makes them more rich and powerful.
	Everything they push us into, whether it's the COVID war or the climate war or the fill-in-the-blank kinetic wars, everything kills us, makes them more rich and more powerful.
	Have you seen a pattern here?
	Stop being a pawn in their chess game.
	All the wars are bankers' wars.
	They really are. They really are.
	We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we're going to talk about what is happening with the U.S. troops being sent on their way.
	But before we go on rumble, Timed Non-Tides says Western goats, including Israel, have waged war against their own people.
	Building surveillance states, suspending all rights, forcing medical experiments, and controlling and limiting all resources.
	Well, as a matter of fact, I had this for later, but let's just play this right now.
	This is Netanyahu going to the World Economic Forum and talking about what he was going to do.
	I have to make sure that the future of the Jewish state is safe and sound.
	That's my one goal.
	And I would like to be remembered as the protector of Israel.
	That's enough for me. Protector of Israel.
	He's saying this at the World Economic Forum.
	Prime Minister, pleasure to have you on.
	Thank you. Ah, Fareed Zakaria.
	The guy who was telling us we're going to have to get used to vaccine passports.
	In short, I gave Pfizer the argument that they could benefit from the data that we could produce, and they were convinced, and then we went along and did this.
	Our health system did exactly that.
	We have a digitized system for distributing health.
	1,400 sites in a very small country of 9 million.
	And they just work it out.
	And again, on the distribution, you know, I take I don't call him that much, five times a day.
	I heard that you had been on the phone 70 times with the Pfizer.
	And he's on the phone right now with the World Economic Forum.
	Not 70, but 21 times.
	But also I speak with Stefan Bansel of Moderna.
	I've spoken to the heads of the other companies.
	I think you need personal leadership here.
	You know, it's like checking on munitions in a war.
	You really have to make sure you're getting, first of all, the stock of vaccines.
	Yeah, it was munitions, wasn't it?
	And they have to be distributed basically in an optimized way that keeps changing, but we're doing that.
	Traded his country, just as Trump was to ours.
	And I think the important thing is not merely what we've done for Israel, but the fact that Israel can serve as basically a global, really, truly a global test case.
	Not for dangerous experiments, but to understand this safe experiment that we're carrying out, what is the best way and what is the efficacy of using this later Moderna inoculation to Move the economies forward, to open up the economies.
	What risks are we taking?
	What's the infection rate?
	And so on. So that's basically what we're doing.
	And I think a lot of countries will profit by it.
	Oh, yeah. Yeah. A lot of countries will profit by that.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	Craig, when we come back, we're going to take a look at the deployment of U.S. troops now already.
	U.S. troops now already.
	U.S. troops now already.
	U.S. troops now
	already. . .
	Making sense.
	Common again. You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As I watch that...
	It used to be an American understanding.
	It was embedded in that novel by James Fenmore Cooper that our interests are not aligned with our government's interests.
	The militia, you know, and the individuals in that story who would say, well, you know, you've got your war that's going on between the British and And fighting the French and the Indians, well, good for you, but we're in this to protect ourselves and our loved ones and our family.
	And that's what we're going to do.
	I'm sorry, I'm not taking orders from you.
	Who do you think you are? You're ordering me around?
	We'll see about that.
	So the U.S. has tapped 2,000 troops for potential deployment to support Israel.
	Wall Street Journal says...
	They're not expected to serve in any combat roles.
	They're going to be in advisory capacities.
	I've heard this lie my entire life, which has sent advisors to Vietnam.
	Yeah. Kennedy.
	Kennedy. He would have ramped it up, I have no doubt in my mind, just like JFK did.
	Just like LBG, I mean.
	It isn't clear under what circumstances the U.S. could deploy the troops or to where, but the Pentagon decision signals it's preparing to support Israeli troops should Israel launch a ground incursion into Gaza.
	Well, you know, they said they were going to deploy the aircraft carrier, but wait, we're not quite ready yet.
	Better get ready. I guess I've been spending too much time deciding, you know, which...
	Accessories they're going to wear with their high heels and dresses.
	They're at the Pentagon, right?
	Our leaders, give me a break.
	Of all the people you would not want to follow, those are the ones.
	Separately, a defense official told the AP the troops would, quote, not be sent to Israel, but could be sent to countries in the region.
	Oh, well, or like Iran or something?
	I don't know. There are signs that Israeli leaders could be delaying not only out of concern for some of the 200 hostages that Hamas has, but also due to the threat of Hezbollah, the surrogate of—it's not a militia.
	They're terrorist organizations.
	They use that term militia because they want to demonize the term militia.
	The threat of Hezbollah opening an all-out war in the north— If Israel does go into the Gaza Strip of full force, but without knowing the exact location of the hostages, it could be highly dangerous for the captives.
	Do you think that...
	I mean, we're talking about 200 people here.
	How many people in Israel have died from the shots, from the Trump shots?
	I venture it's a lot more than 200.
	He had an agenda that he wanted to get done with World Economic Forum.
	And, you know, to help Pfizer, Moderna...
	Help them with their profits. I'll offer my people as lab rats.
	Do you think that he really cares about this stuff?
	You know, you go back and you look at Reagan, who deployed troops to Lebanon, and they had the Marine barracks there.
	It was bombed, killed, what was it, a couple hundred Marines or something?
	And Reagan said, this place is crazy.
	We'll never solve this. And he got out.
	He was man enough to do that.
	He was a man enough that he didn't have, he wasn't insecure.
	Well, will they think that I'm weak?
	Will they think that, you know, not respect me as president or something?
	No, he was a man enough, he was big enough, he didn't need their respect.
	He respected himself.
	So the U.S. Marine Rapid Response Force is now headed to the waters off of Israel.
	And again, the response from the Washington Post is to talk about diversity, equity, and inclusivity.
	Except I put them in the order of D-I-E. And so Washington Post says, behind closed doors, Marines are struggling with a glaring diversity problem.
	Maybe they're struggling with a readiness problem, you think?
	We've got everybody contemplating their genitals and they can't decide what they are.
	And this is from the top down being pushed on people, being pushed by the Washington Post.
	This is what the Washington Post and the Democrats and Biden are worried about.
	Folks, if you don't understand this, everybody says, well, look at how much money we have given to Israel over the years.
	And it's been a lot. And they've gotten more than anybody else has in foreign aid.
	And I don't want to see foreign aid for anybody.
	Let everybody pay their own way.
	And I don't like the geopolitics.
	I don't like, you know, what is being done.
	It's ripping off the American taxpayer to give money to the military industrial corporatocracy.
	And yet, you know, when you look at this, what is the U.S. really focused on?
	As I pointed out the other day, we give $3.8 billion to Israel.
	How much has the U.S. sent abroad to push the LGBT agenda?
	$4.1 billion.
	So the country that we've given more aid to other than Ukraine, country that we've given more aid to over the years than any other, Is less by about a half a billion dollars, you know, to, well, let's say, you know, 300 million.
	Less than we spend on promoting the LGBT religion.
	And that's really what this story is about.
	They begin by talking about race.
	And they talked to Zach Mullins, and he works with the Marines.
	And they said, did you know that you're the only black fighter pilot in the Marine Corps?
	He flies F-A-18 Hornets.
	He says, well, I never really thought about the numbers, just because it was the job that I wanted to do.
	So, why is he the only black person there?
	Has he been discriminated?
	Have other people been discriminated against?
	Did the black president, Obama, discriminate and say, don't let any black people fly planes?
	We don't want that happening here.
	No, of course not. He wanted to do this.
	He sought it out.
	It's not an easy path to take.
	It's hard. And it used to be That the Marines focused on merit.
	And so, you know, if somebody's not interested in it, it's the same debate that we have about, you know, well, why aren't there more women executives?
	Well, it's because a lot of them want to have a family.
	And a lot of them, they're working for a while, and it's not a permanent thing.
	They would much prefer to have a family.
	You've got to want this, first of all.
	Secondly, you want to be able to merit this.
	And so, this is not an indictment of the Marines.
	Should we put people in just because of the color of their skin?
	Or because of what sex they are?
	Or because they can't imagine what sex they are?
	They don't know what sex they are.
	That's the next thing. Yeah, we should put people in because of what sex they are.
	And we should put people in who don't know anything about sex and gender.
	Completely deranged. That's what we should do, right?
	Do we want the best people for the job, or do we want to have diversity?
	That is not a virtue.
	They go on to say the Marine Corps, in step with the rest of the U.S. military, has spent decades making a concerted effort to push to be more reflective of the diverse nation that it defends.
	Why? Why?
	Why be reflective of the nation?
	You want to defend the nation.
	That's it, right? This is not a corporation, or maybe it is, right?
	As I said, it's a military-industrial corporation.
	And so they're acting as if they're Coca-Cola or something.
	If this is a war, you want to have whatever it takes, whoever the best person is.
	If it's a corporation, you want a virtue signal about this.
	And you want to run it according to the rules of ESG and all the rest of this stuff.
	But this should be about having the best people in place.
	And of course, they've been working on this for decades.
	Because it was 40 years ago that this is what the Marines were about.
	You begin with raw steel.
	Shape it with fire, muscle, and sweat.
	Polish it to razor-sharp perfection.
	We're looking for a few good men with a medal to be Marines.
	Well, that's a good commercial.
	I see Travis in there.
	Look at that sword. That's great.
	What a great analogy.
	And what a great slogan.
	But they're not looking for a few good men.
	They're not looking for a few good women.
	They don't care if you're good or not.
	It's got to be about diversity, reflecting our society.
	That's what this is about. As a matter of fact, we go back to December this last year.
	December 23rd, 2022.
	Headline says, U.S. Marines are going to ban the use of sir and ma'am in a new transgender policy.
	Wow. Wow. Wow.
	From a few good men to people who can't even use, they're going to dictate what pronouns they use.
	In order to prevent gender misrepresentation that could cause discord among officers.
	Well, if you don't know which of two genders you are, then maybe you don't belong in the military.
	Let's just put it that way.
	Even Corporal Klinger knew that.
	Corporal Clinger said, I can't...
	He knew the difference.
	He pretended he didn't know the difference so he could get out of the military.
	But now we've got a military that's being run by Corporal Clingers at the top.
	That's all they want. You know, people like Dick Levine.
	He calls himself Rachel.
	They recommended...
	The study recommended that...
	They get rid of ma'am and sir.
	The study, by the way, was done by the University of Pittsburgh.
	This university just keeps showing up in things.
	This is the place where the baby body parts were sent.
	The heads chopped off of babies and the hearts pulled out of babies that are alive.
	They deliver the babies alive so they can get these valuable organs.
	That's the way you do it. And then they give them to the University of Pittsburgh so they can make humanized mice.
	What an abomination that place is.
	They just keep showing up with this stuff over and over again.
	It's amazing. And so we have a couple of comments here on Rockfin.
	Audi MRR, hey, how you doing?
	Thank you very much for the tip. That's very generous.
	I appreciate that. He says, migration, replacement, neglected borders, etc.
	Tells me that the stage is being set for a false flag.
	They'll be blamed on migrants while politicians who planned all this play dumb again.
	Yep, that's right. Modern retro radio.
	I agree. You know, you bring them in and just kind of stand down, right?
	That's what we were talking about. You know, everybody's saying, well, it's Pearl Harbor.
	It's Pearl Harbor with Hamas.
	It's like, yeah, we've stood down on our border for a long time, haven't we?
	And we don't do anything about it.
	So, you know, we know what this looks like.
	Kissinger's even telling us the truth about that now.
	Yeah. All those people we bought into, they're going to slit your throats.
	Ron and Casey DeSantis and the three kids greet 270 Americans who fled Israel on the DeSantis Airlines plane, as they're calling it.
	They got tourists that were stuck there out.
	Biden couldn't be bothered.
	I guess he's trying to find his way off of the stage.
	All right. He never can be bothered to help any U.S. citizens with anything.
	Doesn't that tell us everything about this?
	The utter contempt that they have for American citizens.
	U.S. citizens were evacuated from Israel to a Mediterranean island country of Cyprus by Royal Caribbean cruise ships as well.
	But, you know, Biden's not going to do anything about it.
	He's... Not interested at all.
	Married couple, Ron and Linda Newman, were among those on the first flight the DeSantis Initiative got out of Israel.
	They also spoke to the press on Monday.
	I don't know how we got on this plane.
	There was no way to get out.
	We were in an area that was getting hit.
	It was a miracle. I thought we were stuck.
	He said, to get off that plane and be met by Governor DeSantis, it meant a lot to me.
	It really helped me to be welcomed back, he said.
	He's a Vietnam vet, so he knows what war is like.
	National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said on Sunday, there is no path so far to get U.S. citizens out of Gaza as the border with Israel remains sealed.
	He said they won't even pretend to care about Americans.
	They don't even bother. That's least of their worries.
	DeSantis said, well, there was a void of leadership.
	Well, that's one way to describe the Biden administration.
	So we just stepped up and led, and we're happy to deliver that.
	Well, again, it is just amazing.
	The utter callous disregard of the Biden administration to not even pretend that they care.
	Also on RockFan, truck driver Ron, thank you very much for the tip.
	And a comment from Jason.
	Hey, Jason Barker, how you doing?
	The Army, be all that you can be.
	It's whatever sex you want to be.
	That's right. Yeah, and come in and we'll pay for the operation.
	And as Jason pointed out, we had him on.
	You keep doing these operations and you don't have to be deployed.
	You know, it's a racket.
	This is what they're recruiting now.
	What they're recruiting. So, I saw this on Zero Hedge.
	Let's examine some real crimes committed by presidents.
	And it doesn't print out on here who actually wrote this.
	I don't know if this is coming from Zero Hedge.
	I hope not. This is a pretty clueless article here.
	When I first saw this, I thought, oh yeah, let's talk about the real crimes committed.
	Oh, here we go. It's from the Mises Institute.
	How sad that they have become cheerleaders for Trump.
	And I say that, you know, they do point out the crimes of everyone, every president, except for Trump.
	Crump. Yeah.
	The Crump criminal.
	But they excuse him as a victim.
	They say there's an entire class of people above the law or who at least act like they're above the law.
	That is the political class, the hypocrisies of their effort to convict Trump and to block him from holding office again.
	You see, it immediately goes to his defense.
	Wait a minute. I thought he was above the law during 2020.
	I thought he could order us around, lock down our businesses, destroy Main Street, take our jobs, close our churches and schools, tell us to wear masks.
	Wasn't that Trump that did all that?
	Don't you guys on the right ever remember any of this stuff?
	I am so sick of this job, listening and watching these people on the right excuse everything that Trump did as if he was the victim.
	He's the Benedict Donald of all of this.
	Nobody could have conned the conservatives like Don.
	And that's what we got out of this guy.
	And he's still conning them.
	And they're still working with this.
	Why? Because they make money off of this.
	I'm sick and tired of this grift, the lying conservative media.
	As well as the lying leftist media, but the right is hanging on to Trump and making him more and more popular.
	It's a chain reaction.
	It's an echo chamber.
	And so, because this is the Mises Institute, they start out by talking about libertarians like Murray Rothbard.
	They ground their moral opposition to state power in their appeals to natural law.
	There is no special status that someone can attain that allows them to commit crimes.
	Unless they're Trump, of course.
	Unless they're Trump. If they're Trump, they can violate the Constitution.
	If they're Trump, they can violate national security laws.
	Nothing ever should be done to him.
	Right? He's a mass killer.
	He and Fauci and Biden.
	Mass murderers and Netanyahu.
	The idea that nobody, not even the president, is above the law is right in line with this view, but...
	Equally under the law, equality under the law, is a denial of their political authority.
	Well, yeah, we see this all the time.
	We see it from George W. Bush.
	I wish I could just order people around like the, you know, the Chinese president or Trudeau.
	I love China. You know, they do whatever they want there to save the environment.
	They don't have to answer to anybody.
	Well, I think Bush W. and Trudeau and Bush H.W. and the rest of them, I think they've pretty much been able to do whatever they want to without following the law or the Constitution.
	This article says, so it's bizarre to hear the political class use this slogan of equality under the law as a rallying cry when their wealth, their power, their status is built on their political privilege.
	And also, like Trump, On their political victimization.
	The way to get Trump, again, let's go back to Trump.
	See, the only thing that matters, it doesn't matter that we're going into a world war.
	It doesn't matter that the border is wide open, that he left it wide open.
	None of this stuff matters.
	You know, the economy doesn't matter, the slavery that they're coming up with, every kind of justification that they can come at us for ID, except when you vote, of course.
	But you had to have a justification for everything else in life with an ID, except for voting.
	Which, by the way, that's the only thing I think you ought to have an ID for.
	And if you don't want to produce an ID because you don't want to be a part of this criminal grift we call government, and you don't want to vote, fine.
	That's the only thing you should have an ID for.
	You want to be a part of this system?
	Get an ID and you can vote.
	If you don't want to be a part of it, just get out of it.
	But they will get you an ID for every activity of life, except for voting.
	So the way to get Trump, Mises Institute is concerned about they're going to get Trump, right?
	The way to get Trump is not to show that he did anything immoral or wrong, because, you know, Trump doesn't do anything immoral or wrong.
	But to prove that he technically broke some rule made up by members of an earlier political class.
	You mean like the Constitution or something?
	You know, that was an earlier political class that made up the Constitution.
	He doesn't care about that.
	Yeah, take the guns.
	We don't have to do any due process.
	You got to get the shot.
	I don't care what you think about your religious liberty or your medical concerns.
	You got to get the shot. Yeah, don't tell me that Trump wouldn't have forced people.
	Probably wouldn't have been more effective at it than Biden.
	And so they go down a litany of all these different, and they come after George Bush so that, you know, they don't appear to be partisan.
	George H.W. Bush launched a war in Iraq without any congressional authorization.
	It was based on lies about babies being taken out of incubators.
	Then he had President George W. Bush conducted warrantless searches and surveillance on American citizens based on the lies of 9-11 and the lies about weapons of mass destruction.
	Produced by torture.
	But Trump would never do anything like that.
	No, Trump promoted the woman who ran that program to be the head of the CIA. It's kind of like Dave Chappelle said about Trump.
	He said, you know, the thing that's amazing about Trump is he comes out of this building where, you know, all the elite leaders are, you know.
	And he tells you, you know what these guys are doing in there?
	It's absolutely criminal. And then he goes back in and he joins them again.
	And that's what he did. He tells us, you know what they did?
	They lined you into a war with weapons of mass destruction.
	And then he promotes the woman who did it.
	Did the torture. Covered up the torture.
	And produced the lies.
	And then he says, Barack Obama conducted more illegal wars in Libya, Syria, Pakistan, Mali, and Yemen.
	In many of those wars, Obama expanded George W. Bush's policy of giving support to al-Qaeda, which is treason.
	Combined, all of these illegal wars have killed millions of people.
	And then we have Trump's war.
	The COVID shot.
	Or as Netanyahu referred to it, you know, the shots of the ammunition in that war against their own people.
	And the war that they bragged to the World Economic Forum, how they're working, we're doing exactly what you guys want us to do.
	You proud of me yet? Did I get a gold star?
	May I get a little pat on the head?
	I've been on the phone five, six times a day with Pfizer and Moderna.
	I'm doing everything they want.
	I've sacrificed my people as lab rats to that corporation.
	Gone to war with my own people.
	Are you proud of me yet? You're going to trust this guy to run a war?
	You're going to trust what he tells you happened?
	A lot of people. A lot of people in Israel, a lot of people who are in the Israeli military, a lot of people who are in the Israeli military intelligence saying, I don't believe this story, that they just snuck in.
	So, yeah, these people who run all this stuff, poor Trump, the only president who did nothing wrong.
	Well, we'll close this segment here by talking about Switzerland.
	Switzerland is trying to get back to their neutrality, always famous for being neutral.
	And now Switzerland's biggest political party wants to double down on neutrality, just as the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East make a non-aligned stance more difficult to sustain.
	No, it makes it more rational, quite frankly.
	The right-wing Swiss People's Party, which is set to win the largest share of votes in the election later this month, is seeking to collect 100,000 signatures by May to trigger a vote on whether to enshrine everlasting neutrality into the Constitution.
	That would allow it to roll back sanctions against Russia, That Joe Biden was so happy to see Switzerland do.
	So people looked at this.
	And people in Switzerland, it's like, okay, we're getting drawn into this Ukraine thing by Biden.
	We don't like this path.
	So the biggest political party, the one that's expected to win in these elections this month, putting together signatures for a referendum to put neutrality into the Constitution, And it's interesting, this article from mainstream media, Bloomberg, calls the people who want peace the right wing.
	And I guess, you know, the commies do want war everywhere, don't they?
	They want war between different ethnic groups.
	They want cultural conflict.
	They want war everywhere.
	Because that's their path to power.
	More than 90% of the Swiss population still supports neutrality.
	For the Swiss, the impartial stance is a national myth of almost religious consecration, quote-unquote.
	So, it should be.
	And it's not a myth, I think.
	I don't know how this guy means it, but I just got to say this.
	It's not a myth in the sense that it's a made-up story.
	That's false. It's not just a fictional story.
	C.S. Lewis said, the story of Christ is the greatest myth that mankind has ever seen.
	And by that, he was not attacking its veracity, its truth, its historicity.
	He was just saying it was an epic story.
	And of course, Switzerland's epic story, going back to its origins, I remember I was at the village of Altdorf where they have this great, one of the best statues I have seen.
	They've got some great statues in Switzerland.
	I have one in Lucerne, the Lion of Lucerne, in honor of Swiss mercenaries.
	And it's this big lion that's dead on its shield with arrows through it.
	What a powerful statue, sculpture that is.
	But then the one in Altdorf is a picture of William Tell.
	And he's got the crossbow slung over the shoulder, and his hand is holding his young son, and they're walking.
	And that is the foundational myth, the epic story, the true story of how they resisted tyrants.
	You see, the Swiss people have kept these values, as we would see with...
	The James Fenmore Cooper story.
	They have kept these values closer to them than we have.
	You know, the last Mohicans have gone, the last of the Americans apparently have gone as well.
	But in Switzerland, they still adhere to that.
	Switzerland, a country that put a cross on its flag because it was so Christian.
	And the country from where we got the Red Cross, which is just an inversion of the Swiss flag.
	White with a red cross on it, whereas their flag was red with a white cross on it.
	We're going to take a break and we'll be right back.
	The Common Man.
	The Common Man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com Thank you for listening.
	thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	The E. Dave TheDavidKnightShow.com Alright, let's talk a little bit about it.
	I want to thank some of the people who have supported the program.
	On Zelle, let me start out where we left off.
	We had, in terms of October, this is going back more than a week.
	Jeffrey C., Sylvia D., Mona N., Madison F., Jonathan M., Gretchen C., Rogelio J., William R., Marco V., Felicia H., Kimberly M., and Juan R. Thank you all for supporting us.
	Very generous. I appreciate that so much.
	And let me just read real quickly the...
	That was via Zelle.
	This is contributions we got via mail.
	And we don't have any way to thank these people directly, except, you know, if somebody sends something on Cash App, if they can find us there, I can click a little thing to say thank you and acknowledge that we got it.
	But for those who have sent things by mail, Let me acknowledge that.
	Jack H., Scott C., Margaret T., Jennifer L., David W., Sue and Dave W., Susan L., David and Joan F., Lyndon A., Stacy P., George M., Stephanie K., William M., John R., Joel B., and Rob 42, New Jersey.
	Thank you all. I really do appreciate that.
	And just to let you know, we have updated the gas gauge.
	It's at three-eighths. It's actually at 42%.
	But, you know, it's closer to three-eighths than it is to 50% at 42%.
	So it is in between the two.
	We only have the gas gauge set up to mark out one-eighths.
	And so that is where it is right now.
	I see on DLive, Defy Tyrants 1776, Trump has committed genocide bigly.
	Mass murder. Yeah, that's exactly it.
	But of course, everybody is so concerned about his gag order.
	And I gotta say that I certainly applaud the sentiment of putting a gag in his mouth.
	He was very proud of the fact that he had a mask on, if you remember.
	I've played this before, but this is Trump with his mask.
	But now he's upset.
	He wanted to put the mask on us.
	He was happy to put the mask on himself.
	But now he doesn't like having a gag on himself, right?
	Speaking of COVID-19, Goldman Sachs put out a model yesterday saying that if there is universal masks, it would be a net positive for GDP. I would...
	Oh, I have. I mean, people have seen me wearing one.
	I mean, I'd have no problem.
	Actually, I had a mask on.
	I sort of like the way I looked.
	Okay? I thought it was okay.
	It was a dark black mask.
	Yeah. Yeah.
	Very appropriate for him, actually.
	He's got a presidential seal on his cheek.
	Surrounded by men in uniform because Operation Warp Speed was a military operation.
	A war against the people of America.
	Yeah. So, yeah, he was very...
	I look really great in that.
	And he did a photo op.
	People took pictures of him.
	As a matter of fact, he even tweeted it out.
	Here's his tweet. Donald Trump, and this was on July 20th, 2020.
	Yeah, 2020 is hindsight, isn't it?
	We should have some 2020 hindsight.
	Let me remind you of what this guy did to you.
	He said, we are united.
	This is Donald Trump tweeting out a picture of himself wearing his mask.
	And says, we are united in our effort to defeat the invisible China virus.
	Yeah, it was invisible because you made it up.
	There was no pandemic.
	Many people say it's patriotic to wear a face mask when you can't socially distance.
	Well, there's nobody more patriotic than me, your favorite president.
	That's what he actually put out.
	Yeah, so let's gag this guy.
	Let's kick him off of social media.
	I don't care. He didn't care about anybody else being gagged.
	Masks on our faces.
	He didn't care when other people were kicked off of social media and silence.
	So now he gets the treatment.
	Yeah, what goes around comes around, pal.
	So anyway, I don't know.
	Stick a gag in his mouth.
	I'd love to. Maybe Fauci could recommend something as leftover.
	You know, they had a lot of these things.
	Fauci told his little puppet, this little quizzling Trump, told him what to say, told him what to do.
	And Trump modeled it for everybody.
	And I don't know, what is going to happen to him if he doesn't listen to the judge?
	And this headline from WND, he was silenced because he used the T word.
	The T word. Well, he's used the P word and he's used a lot of other words that we would like to silence him for.
	And WND is just, they want to silence President Trump.
	Well, we can all dream, can't we?
	Now, he says, this is all part of the Democrat Party's plan.
	Pal, don't you realize by now, they want him as a nominee.
	Trump is just goading them.
	They know exactly what they're doing.
	James Carville, when the Republicans said, we're going to impeach Biden, James Carville said, I can't believe what great luck this is for us.
	It's going to energize the base.
	It's going to increase the fundraising.
	So what are you going to do to Trump if he violates their gag order?
	First of all, the gag order is very narrow.
	It's like putting a face mask on that doesn't cover your nose or even your mouth.
	It's like a little Hitler mustache or something.
	So, the gag order is you can't talk about the judge, you can't talk about the prosecutor, and you can't talk about the court staff or their family.
	Because, you know, he likes to attack people's families as well.
	So you can't talk about those people.
	Other than that, he can say anything he wants.
	And he's out there, I'm a candidate for presidency and they're telling me that I can't speak.
	Send me your money. Look at what a victim I am.
	No, you can say anything you want, pal.
	As a matter of fact, I think the appropriate punishment, I mean, what is she going to do?
	What would she do? Would she put him under house arrest at Mar-a-Lago?
	Would she fine him a couple hundred dollars?
	Maybe a couple thousand dollars? He would raise thousands of times more money if they gave him a fine.
	What is she going to do to punish him?
	To me, I think the only punishment for this loud mouth who is afraid to debate is to send him to the debates.
	She ought to say, if you're going to say stuff I don't like, I'm going to make you actually go to the debate and talk about issues and defend your record with other people.
	That's what he doesn't want to do.
	He wants to play this game.
	He wants to goad them.
	And get them to strike out against him.
	And he wants to play these silly little apprentice games.
	This reality TV game.
	So he doesn't have to wear the gag to work.
	He can still, as a candidate, he can do whatever he wants to.
	He just can't talk about the judge, the prosecutor, or their families.
	And so what was the T word that he said?
	That was a good headline.
	It got me to click on it.
	Like, T-word. Tyrant?
	No, no.
	Thug.
	She says, is it appropriate for a defendant to call a prosecutor a thug and remain on the streets?
	you Well, I don't know. I guess so.
	Maybe. I don't know. And then these other people are like, well, what is a candidate supposed to do?
	Remain silent? And you see, this really gets to the heart of it, doesn't it?
	Because his campaign is not about you.
	His campaign is not about America.
	His campaign is not about our freedom or the Constitution or to make sure that none of the stuff that happened in 2020 that he did ever happens to us again.
	That's not his campaign.
	His campaign is himself.
	The campaign is all about him.
	The campaign is all about his victimhood.
	And so, in a sense, to say that he can't talk about his victimhood is to take away his campaign.
	He doesn't want to debate issues.
	He doesn't have a vision for America, except for his Freedom Cities, which is his repackaged smart cities from the World Economic Forum.
	You can't see through that, can you?
	He has no agenda for the U.S. except for the U.N. 2030 agenda and for the World Economic Forum agenda.
	That's his only agenda. He doesn't have anything in mind for us except what they want to do.
	He's a big promoter of CBDC, just like Biden is.
	The two frontrunners want CBDC. Which, by the way, regardless of what happens with war and austerity and inflation, with the price of oil or interest rates or whatever, far and away from the economic aspects of it, as I've said, gold and silver as a hedge against the CBDC that the establishment parties want.
	That the leading candidates want.
	And again, you can find that at davidknightshow.com.
	I'll take you to Tony Arderman and start setting aside some physical gold and silver.
	Yes, for economic hedge, but also for the T word, tyranny.
	Tyranny. These thugs are going to come around and tell you that you cannot buy or sell unless you get the mark of the government.
	That beast. So, again, he doesn't want to talk about anything except himself and his enemies.
	So this is putting a gag on his campaign.
	That's the only thing his campaign is about.
	Him. Him.
	Rumble, by the way, has secured the debate, the live streaming rights to the third Republican debate, which will be held on November the 8th.
	Trump, of course, will not be there.
	And if Trump and Biden are the candidates, it's interesting.
	They don't want debates and they don't want elections.
	Both of them are playing these games behind the scenes.
	Biden is tying everything down so much with the party apparatus, with the DNC, so much so that RFK Jr.
	said, well, I'm going to run as an independent.
	But Trump is doing the same thing.
	He's quietly going behind the scenes and changing the rules of the Republican primaries so the delegates are not awarded proportionally, but it's a winner-take-all and many other things that he's doing behind the scenes.
	Refusing to debate both of them because they don't want to talk about you.
	They don't want to talk about the issues.
	This is all about them, their career, and their agenda.
	The World Economic Forum agenda.
	So, it's going to be November 8th in Miami.
	NBC News will cover its Salem Radio Network, and it'll be a partnership with those two, and with the Republican-Jewish Coalition.
	So the candidates who do show up will all be talking about Israel probably the entire time.
	It's not going to be about you and I. It's not going to be about America, even for those people who show up to the debate.
	It will be on the RNC channel on Rumble.
	It's where you'll be able to see it if you want to watch it.
	I don't. While Rumble's CEO has noted that live streaming these debates has helped to promote open dialogue, Google, which owns YouTube, has been accused of burying Rumble's debate streams and its search results.
	Of course they do.
	We know that's going to be the case.
	Trump has called this federal gag order so unconstitutional.
	It's like everything I did in 2020.
	Yeah. The guy who didn't care about social media censorship until it happened to him.
	And nobody cares about what happens to them.
	Everybody is focused on what happens to Trump.
	It's only about poor Trump and what happened to poor Trump.
	Headline after headline after headline.
	Top of the news, you know, these conservative sites and everything.
	And yet, 1,400 athletes have died with this injection.
	And that's just the people that there were news articles about.
	If there wasn't a news article about it, we don't know.
	And there's a lot of countries that we don't know about that.
	That's just athletes, by the way.
	Dr. Makis out of Canada goes through and he talks about sudden deaths by profession.
	Here's all the stories about, you know, recent stories about pilots who died on the job or nurses who died on the job or athletes who died on the job.
	All of them from the Trump shot.
	The man says he's the father of the vaccine because nobody else could have conned the conservatives like him and he's still conning them.
	One of the most despicable things I ever saw was Mark Levin, beginning of 2021.
	Trump needs to take credit for this stuff.
	Biden is saying it's his vaccine now.
	Trump is the one who...
	Yeah, okay. People are already dying.
	Mark Levin didn't care.
	He doesn't care if you get involved in a war for Israel either.
	He doesn't care about the Israeli people either.
	He's got his agenda.
	He's got his marching orders.
	To comprehend the magnitude of this issue, athletes die.
	One has to consider the total number of victims.
	Records indicate an astonishing 1,400 athletes.
	But I've seen higher reports than that.
	Those 1,400 sudden deaths were among 2,003 athletes reported to have suffered major unexpected health issues.
	And almost all of them were people that had been reported in the media.
	But what about the people that weren't reported in the media?
	There are also many countries or states with large populations that have no reports at all on our list.
	So the organization that put this together called Good Sciencing.
	Yes, Trump is our poisoner-in-chief.
	Trump is our mass murderer.
	On Rumble, Michael DeSilvio.
	He's a poor billionaire ex-president with an army of Secret Service agents.
	Yeah, yeah. And if you think he's going to save you...
	Maybe you don't remember that he had more bankruptcies than pretty much anybody else, and certainly of any casino owners.
	He had at least six bankruptcies of casinos.
	Somebody who can't even make a profit with a casino.
	Pathetic. Rock fan.
	Brian and Deb McCarthy.
	Watch a clip last night from the author of Trump's Art of the Deal, who said Trump is not bright.
	Well, there you go. That he never reads.
	I know somebody else like that, by the way.
	I used to work for it. It's so self-absorbed and no regard for anyone but himself.
	And it's not new news.
	Yeah. It's funny how alike these two are, really, if you stop and think about it.
	Rumble. North American House Hippo.
	Thank you for the tip. Says, good morning, David.
	Sorry I can't afford anymore.
	Well, thank you. That's very generous.
	I appreciate it. An unexpected day off for me because my wife is ill again.
	Oh, I'm sorry. I can't vote.
	But when my wife voted for Trump and Marco Rubio, it was with disgust.
	Yes, it is a disgusting exercise.
	Well, again, locally, it does make a difference.
	I mean, this is not a theory.
	It was real.
	2020, I think the takeaway from that is to understand that local officials can make it better or worse.
	They can make it a lot better or a lot worse than what the federal and state officials do.
	Those are the most...
	And we got it exactly upside down.
	We focus all of our effort On federal offices, and especially on the president, where we have the least amount of influence.
	And, you know, it really is at the local level.
	And I can't help you with that.
	You've got to do your own research.
	There's too many local things.
	And that's one of the reasons why it gets that way.
	We need to understand what the bigger agenda is and see where these people...
	If you understand where the bigger agenda is, you'll see how these people fit into it.
	If you knew the agenda of Dark Winter and all the germ games and all the rest of the stuff, you would immediately see, would have seen, what was going on with the so-called pandemic.
	And so it's important to understand that.
	Because they talk about it openly.
	And so understand that so that you can push back against it.
	And my son reminds me that North American House Hippo's wife was coerced into taking the shot in 2021.
	So I'm very sorry that she's ill.
	Please keep his wife in your prayers.
	God is bigger than any of that.
	By the way, when we talk about speech and gag orders, here's a Canadian nurse facing disciplinary hearing because she put up social media posts that criticize the COVID mandates.
	Not too many people are talking about that.
	Everybody's talking about Trump's gag.
	Trump is not allowed to criticize the judge or the prosecutor or the court staff.
	But this nurse was not allowed to criticize the global pandemic agenda that Trump was pushing, which is more important.
	Oh no, the issue is Trump is just, you know, this is awful.
	Can you imagine an election where you're not allowed to do ad hominem attacks on people, your personal enemies?
	Imagine that.
	Imagine that. Yeah, because that's what Trump's campaign is all about.
	Ad hominem attacks on his personal enemies.
	That's all it's about.
	The Justice Center for Constitutional Freedom and Canada has argued in her defense, has asserted that she has the right to express her views on vaccine mandates, vaccine passports, and related issues like freedom of choice and medical privacy.
	But hey, Trump is what's important, not any of that stuff.
	And so the judge says Trump doesn't have the right to say and do exactly what he pleases.
	Wasn't that what Trump said in 2020 about church and about work and about travel and about everything else?
	You don't have the right to do whatever you want, as he was the little puppet of Fauci.
	So let's take a look at all this canceling that is happening everywhere.
	I saw yet another cancellation.
	This is a Polish musician removed from performances and teaching job after social media posts criticizing gender ideology.
	This person, Iwa Justka, career has been suddenly ended.
	Very similar, and I've talked about this in the past, about Stalin.
	It's a Stalin-esque tactic.
	Shostakovich, very popular composer in the Soviet Union.
	Everybody loved his work.
	The critics loved what he did. Until Stalin went...
	And Stalin said he didn't like it.
	And then all of a sudden, the next day, all the critics hate it.
	And the next thing he knows, he's canceled everywhere.
	And that's what's happening.
	Except, who is Stalin in this particular case?
	Well, Stalin, the Stalinists, are the LGBT mob.
	And so, the same people that Trump loves so much.
	The same people that Trump wanted the men in the women's sports.
	He wanted men in his beauty contests way back when.
	But what this reminds me of, wasn't anything, is I do music for the show here.
	And there's a lot of good stuff that I got that's very cheap.
	A lot of it free. It was put out.
	But they also have samples that you can buy for virtual instruments.
	It's a company called Spitfire Audio out of the UK. And they make all kinds of instrument libraries.
	And they have, you know, all free libraries.
	And they have one that's called Piano Book.
	But the co-founder of this company, because he was defending J.K. Rowling in her war with the trainees, I said, hey, if this transgender issue, if you're a parent, it's in the mail.
	And if you have a child with autism, it's already at your doorstep.
	And for that, he was kicked out of the company that he co-founded.
	And I just went back recently to look to see what he was doing.
	And I saw that right after he was kicked out of this company, about nine months ago, he did one more thing on his own.
	He had already booked for one of his projects, he had already booked a major recording studio, big recording studio, where he could fit an orchestra in it.
	And so he was already on the hook for it.
	He'd already paid it. So he said, what do I do with it?
	And what he did was he got in a musician, a friend of his, who had also done a lot of engineering, and he recorded just a single guitar in this big recording studio.
	And he put it out and he said, the most over-engineered virtual guitar you've ever seen.
	You know, just one guitar in this entire studio to hold an orchestra.
	And it sounded really cool.
	They did some neat stuff with it.
	And he put it out for free.
	One thing called Piano Book.
	And so I listened to what he did.
	And I thought, yeah, let me get that sample.
	His entire Piano Book thing has been shut down now.
	He doesn't even have that. He's been kicked out of the company that he co-founded.
	And then even as he says, well, let me just, you know, he loves what he does, making music.
	But because he offended the Stalin-esque LGBT, he's kicked out.
	And even that is shut down.
	And that's essentially what happened to this person.
	An electronic music artist, electronics teacher, shared her troubled experiences in an exclusive interview.
	She revealed that her ongoing harassment and professional elimination began in July after she publicly voiced support for J.K. Rowling.
	Same thing. And for Professor Kathleen Stock, both of whom have been critics...
	Of this gender theology.
	Her Instagram post was met with fury of hate messages and threats which called for her cancellation.
	The post featured several screenshots, including one that defined the term lesbian as a female homosexual.
	I thought that was a definition.
	That's my definition, and I'm sticking with it.
	Even as it critiqued the derogatory usage of the term TERF. Which they use as a pejorative against people.
	They say that it stands for trans-exclusionary radical feminist, a TERF. They weaponize this term.
	And many times it is accompanied with threats of violence.
	And of course in the LGBT there has been a civil war between the L's and the T's for quite some time.
	But she put this post out, so are you a woman who experienced sex-based discrimination?
	Have you been canceled for expressing your views regarding recent misogyny and hatred toward feminists like J.K. Rowling, Kathleen Stock, and others?
	Are you worried about constant language change, which dehumanizes women's bodies and women's rights and women-only spaces?
	Are you frustrated with constant policing, gaslighting, fear-mongering?
	Contact me. I want to hear your voice.
	Let's do something about this.
	And so the Stalinists did.
	They canceled her. They contacted her.
	As a result of the post, she faced severe professional consequences.
	She was removed from a compilation album.
	She had her workshops and her gigs canceled.
	Even began enduring harassment from local musicians.
	Because, you see, we're now a Stalin-esque society.
	So, New York City is pushing for online digital ID verification for age, saying it's to protect the children.
	Of course, in New York, California, other places, they are hardcore pushing sexual grooming on children.
	But now they claim that the children are going to get harmed online.
	Now they're going to get harmed in the schools, harmed in the libraries.
	They're pushing pornography to these kids at an early age.
	But no, we now have to have people who use the internet need to have a digital ID in order to protect the kids.
	The New York Child Data Protection Act and Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation.
	Which bell's safe?
	Safe. Safe for kids.
	Say the people who groom kids at school.
	The people who groom kids with their drag queen performances.
	The people who groom kids at libraries with their pornographic books.
	In Austria, a new digital ID system to be pushed.
	This is full-on the UN and the World Economic Forum.
	And of course, you can see that, can't you?
	But nobody can see this with Trump and what he was doing in 2020.
	And the disguise of secure and seamless access to various government services, the same thing that they did in India.
	And the same thing that we saw in that video that was produced by Ukraine.
	By 2030, the war is going to be over.
	And everything is going to be so convenient for you because everything will be done electronically.
	You know, you'll get all of the...
	You'll be able to comply with all of our rules.
	And you get your licenses and pay your fees and all this stuff.
	And it'll be so wonderful because it'll all just be there with this magic mark of the beast thing.
	They're pushing about 2.8 million people.
	To get ID Austria.
	This digital Leviathan will force everyone to comply.
	Citizens otherwise will be barred from a wide range of essential government services.
	Same thing they did in India.
	Reclaim the Net says, echoing the Orwellian undertone, registering for ID Austria.
	For those without handy signature, that's what they've been using before.
	Necessitates a physical visit to a registration office, presenting a passport, residence permit, or a driver's license, or any form of identification that's already been serving the purpose.
	Here in the U.S., they're trying to set the post office up to administer this type of thing.
	It's aimed at providing users with highly secure access to an array of government and commercial services.
	Oh, but of course, the illegal aliens who come into Europe and to America and everywhere else, they're given everything without an ID. They don't need it.
	It's just for us.
	Sweden is considering facial recognition and drone surveillance.
	Why? Because of rising gang violence, just as Audi, Modern Retro Radio, was saying earlier.
	Problem, solution. Problem, solution.
	Oh, we brought in gangs, and now we got gang violence.
	Well, here's a solution.
	All of you get an ID. In the same way, we've got artificial intelligence here.
	And it's being used to create all kinds of fake stuff.
	So you need to get an ID, not the AI. You need to get an ID. And so illegal aliens and artificial intelligence...
	Oh, look at the problems they've created.
	But you are the one who have to get the ID. No, this is chaos for control.
	And we need to get smart.
	Remember that? You know, the two, the Hegelian characters in opposition, the hero and the antagonist was chaos.
	Maxwell Smart worked for control.
	Well, we need to get smart about this.
	We need to understand how they're controlling us.
	Problem, solution.
	Here's an example of what this is going to look like.
	A Chinese man fined over $144,000 because he used a VPN, a virtual private network.
	And this was three years of his salary.
	He makes less than $50,000 a year, but they took all three years of his salary because he was using a VPN network to work for a Turkish firm.
	I don't know why he had to use that, but maybe, you know, he's trying to get around the great firewall of China, and they don't like that, and so they made an example out of him.
	A precedent-setting verdict.
	So for three years, they took all the money that he made.
	He was making less than $50,000 a year, but three years worth of work.
	And you know, when we look at this, this German homeschooling family that they now graciously given another year to, They said, yeah, we fled Germany because we didn't, for religious reasons, we didn't want to put our kids in the German schools.
	We wanted to homeschool them. They are antithetical to our religious beliefs.
	And they came up with fines that were more than their income, just like this guy.
	But George W. Bush and Obama and Trump and Biden administrations don't believe that they should be treated as refugees.
	From religious persecution.
	And since they've had two kids here, they also don't believe that the anchor babies thing applies to them either because they're German Christians.
	They're white Christians.
	So, can't apply to them.
	And when we say, well, only look at China, you know, taking a guy, penalizing him three years income because he used a VPN. Well, the EU is going to ban private messages this week.
	This week. You know, I said one of the strikes that kicked me off of YouTube.
	2020, the year the world became China.
	Got kicked off for that.
	Because that was true. The EU is now becoming China.
	Banning private messages.
	You know, they've got to know everything that you're doing.
	No encryption.
	Nothing. And of course, they're defending this.
	In the name of protecting children from child sexual abuse material.
	Except these groomers, these cynical liars are pushing it on the kids and their education.
	Finally, the Telegraph in the UK comes after George Orwell.
	George Orwell was, quote, sadistic, misogynistic, homophobic, and sometimes violent, quote unquote.
	They tweeted that out on Sunday.
	They tried to cancel Orwell for being all of those things.
	And what is that based on?
	Well, it's based on a biography of Orwell's wife, Now, this is not Orwell's wife's own biography.
	This is something that somebody has done decades after her death.
	And, you know, coming through and piecing things together with this, perhaps.
	In one of these things, the writer of the biography said that she wanted to visit a friend.
	So that she wanted to visit Orwell's wife.
	But found that it was difficult because Orwell would either claim to be ill, requiring her to stay at home and tend him, or contact her while she was away, requesting that she come home again.
	So the person who put this together says, therefore, this is evidence that he had a controlling environment here.
	Which means that he was a misogynist and all the rest of the stuff.
	As people have pointed out, one person said, George Alexopoulos said, well, what the telegraph has done is pure Orwellian.
	And here are the four steps.
	First of all, you identify behaviors that were once accepted but no longer accepted.
	Two, you find some figure from the past that is inconvenient and you want to erase.
	Number three, you identify this now problematic behavior that you've now said is problematic, that this figure may be engaging in, and you use that to destroy their reputation.
	That's the Orwellian steps.
	And, of course, we see this over and over again.
	This is what they do to tear statues down, and now they have turned it on to Orwell himself.
	And of course the BBC, caught yet again in a lie, had this for retraction.
	Now before we go, earlier on BBC News, we reported on some of the pro-Palestinian demonstrations at the weekend.
	We spoke about several demonstrations across Britain during which people voiced their backing for Hamas.
	We accept that this was poorly phrased and was a misleading description of the pro-Palestinian demonstrations.
	Now here's the weather. That's it.
	Now here's the weather. That was poorly phrased.
	Now here's the weather. We're not going to admit that we lied to you.
	Now here's the weather.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	On Rumble, Trump burger forever.
	My good friend at 35 died suddenly on a walk with his new fiancée shortly after the jabs rolled out.
	I'm very sorry. We're seeing that everywhere.
	I saw another comment that was saying, I'm not very well versed on this.
	What would you people recommend or read, get up to speed on history and things like that?
	I would suggest that you start preparing.
	And I would suggest, as I said before, you know, prepare for where, you know, this attack is coming from.
	CBDC and things like that.
	Prepare to get out of that.
	Go to the David Knight show dot not the David Knight show dot com, but go to David Knight dot gold.
	You can go to the David Knight show dot com and you can find where the program is and how you can support us.
	But go to David Knight dot gold, gold and silver, things like that.
	And also go to civil defense manual dot com.
	This is a great set of two books and you can see a couple of sample chapters there from Jack Lawson to see what it looks like.
	The level of detail that's there.
	Now is the time you need to start preparing to build community.
	To feed yourself, to learn some skills, to learn how to prepare food.
	I mean, you know, you can go out and start buying canned food right now, but, you know, there's other things that he's got there as well that you can do yourself.
	And start to build skills that are going to be valuable to you.
	So, you know, gold and silver and skills are going to be things that you can trade on.
	Let's talk a little bit about the election and issues with that, because I had a follow-up to what I talked about yesterday.
	For Mike Lindell and my pillow, there is no turning back.
	And as I said, I feel very sorry for him.
	He really does have himself in a difficult position.
	He is on the edge of rain, as they point out.
	of the Minneapolis Star Tribune, admitting even a shred of doubt in his rigged election narrative could mean victory for the voting machine companies that are suing him for more than a billion dollars.
	Lindell has very little left to give, even if he were to settle the defamation lawsuits he and his company are both defending.
	He says that he's run out of money to pay his lawyers.
	I mentioned this. He owes them millions.
	And, you know, he's had the same people who have been working for him for a very long time.
	He said, look, you know, I'm going to keep trying to pay these people.
	But he has been canceled.
	He's been purged. He's now been sued.
	As far as a lawsuit goes, They have produced an unbelievable amount of documents.
	The Smartmatic case alone, more than 6 million documents have been produced.
	Lawyers for that voting machine company said they would press on with their case even if he winds up representing himself in the eventual trial.
	And so, again, that may be what he has to do.
	And so as I talked to Someone in this article, they said a bankruptcy could discharge the defamation claims unless the claimant can prove that the conduct was willful and malicious.
	But even with that, they...
	I know somebody who got like a $1.5 billion judgment, and he's still paying himself over a million dollars a year, and he hasn't had to pay them a penny.
	So that could work if he wanted to go that route.
	He should talk to Alex. But I do feel sorry for him.
	I feel like he certainly did not do this as a grift.
	I think he honestly, truly believed it.
	And it's sad. And there's a lot of people who honestly, truly believe this.
	There's articles being written all the time about what's going on with Michael Flynn's phony Elmer Gantry tent revival that he's taking all over the country.
	Again, it's another one of these Stop the Steal grifts, another one of these Save America grifts.
	His is Reawaken America.
	Because, as that one part of the saying is, you can fool some of the people all of the time.
	And these are the people that he is praying on as he leads prayers to Satan.
	Helmed by Lieutenant General Michael Flynn and Clay Clark, the QAnon conspiracy theories and the doomsday prophecies, a two-day church revival held in August outside of Las Vegas.
	Look, this is not Christian. This is not a church.
	This is not Christian.
	It is a lie from hell.
	Just disgusting to see this thing, this so-called Christian nationalism.
	It is, again, plagiarized satanic prayers.
	And you see this kind of stuff at the...
	Look at this.
	This picture of Trump.
	It's like Rocky Balboa or something, you know?
	This boxer.
	It's just amazing.
	The idolatry.
	And the desperation of these people.
	They have focused everything on him.
	And they project him into the role of their Messiah.
	And what does Messiah mean?
	Well, it means literally anointed one.
	We use the Greek term Christ, but that's what they're talking about.
	So this one person says, you know, when they arrested Trump, the Lord said something very clear to me.
	They also arrested who?
	Jesus. How did that turn out for them?
	Said a Newport Beach-based social media personality whose YouTube channel blends discussions of gold cryptocurrency and the Bible.
	Yeah. And this liar, this false teacher, he said, well, you know, touch not my anointed.
	That's written in the Bible.
	Well, you know.
	Judas went out and hanged himself.
	Flipped to another part of the Bible.
	Do thou likewise.
	You're going to just jump through, pull a phrase here and there out of context?
	Touch not my anointed.
	Touch not my Messiah.
	Touch not my Christ. They're setting up Trump to be an antichrist idol.
	It's just disgusting to see this.
	And so I constantly get people to say, why are you still talking about this sting stuff?
	Because this is still going on.
	You know, I talked about that, was it yesterday, the day before?
	And people went, oh, don't, you know.
	And I think it was yesterday that I played the clip of Steve Pachenik and the Sting there on InfoWars with Owen.
	And so, you know, I get all these people, why do you keep talking about this?
	Same thing in...
	2021, all these people, why are you still talking about Trump?
	Just leave him alone. He's not president anymore.
	I said, you don't understand.
	He's still running.
	He's still grifting people.
	He's still destroying people's lives.
	And you all think that he's wonderful.
	They hated me for it. They said, well, you know, he's not running for it.
	Of course he is. And so I got on to post the videos yesterday.
	I see this on Twitter from a guy who's got 16,000 followers.
	His name is Josh Power.
	And even though he's only got 16,000 followers...
	He got 3.2 million views on this video.
	He got nearly 3,000 comments, 2,000 retweets, and nearly 4,000 likes.
	And I looked at this video, and this person is, and I don't know how recent this was, but this is a clip, a woman telling the right-side broadcasting all about the sting and her QAnon theory that it's still going to happen.
	The election, I believe, was stolen.
	But we know that.
	Space Force has it all.
	Trump has all the information.
	It's going to be overturned.
	What do you think Space Force has?
	Space Force is a military branch of the, you know, just like the Army, you know, all the military.
	And they literally, walk up here.
	They literally, the night of the election...
	They literally watched the election be stolen.
	They know. They watermarked the ballots.
	They know exactly...
	All this Pachinic stuff.
	They know what fake ballots, alright?
	They knew the election switches.
	They know what countries were involved.
	They followed the money.
	They know what every politician that's been paid off.
	They know there was 260,000, 269,000 sealed indictments, but I think it might even be up to 500,000 sealed indictments.
	And I believe that we're going to have an emergency broadcast and the military is going to come in with martial law.
	And we are going to be shown eight hours on, eight hours off of videos for seven days, the world.
	And they're going to be showing us taped tribunals, taped confessions.
	And the world is going to be awakened to what's really going on with the deep state.
	Yeah, maybe the taped confessions and stuff might be the kind of stuff that I showed you at Pachenik, that he was done on Infowars.
	As a matter of fact, it was amazing.
	I pull up Twitter and I see that.
	I'm not looking for it. And that's the first thing I see.
	And then Karen is going through and purging her emails.
	She hadn't done it for several years, a person emails.
	She got all the way back to November 6th of 2020.
	She said, look at this. And this came up again.
	And this is, took a screenshot of it.
	Here is the email that I sent her.
	On November 6th, at 7.49 in the morning, before the show started, I was fed up with what I'd seen Steve Pachinik do the preceding day.
	And I said, my comments on his latest bombshell sent it to her and one of the person.
	I said, is there fraud?
	Obviously. I said, did everyone know that there'll be fraud?
	Of course. Is CISA tasked with election security?
	Yes. But, number one, CISA is not a creation of Trump.
	It's the latest instantiation of CISPA and on and on.
	So the plan is to allow massive voter fraud, throw the country into turmoil and chaos, and then expose them as criminals.
	So I had that Biden laptop workout.
	Again, this is November the 6th, 2020.
	The Friday morning, as I'm putting the show together, and I see this stuff from Pchenik, I was steamed.
	And they pulled that fraud two days after the election.
	Instead of lighting more forest fires, how about putting out the big fire, the lockdown, and allow in-person voting and support the Constitution, individual liberty, stop the fear.
	Trump would have easily won in an honest election if he had done that, especially if he would have stopped the fake lockdown.
	Even I would have voted for him if he would have done that.
	As a popular president, one who has courageously took on Fauci and exposed that as fraud and saving the nation from a technocratic bureaucratic tyranny, he would have been in a strong position to expose mail fraud with credibility.
	But if true, his secret Machiavellian plans will likely be ignored as partisan gamesmanship, just like the laptop.
	Meanwhile, the U.S. burns in chaos.
	Maybe that's the plan. And I said, I didn't jump into Pizzagate.
	I didn't allow Pacinic to come on my show and say that no one died in Vegas for headlines.
	I'm not buying this. There will be exposure of fraud.
	This is patently obvious and predictable.
	If the plan was to give them a long rope, it's likely that rope will be used to hoist the planners.
	So here's my conspiracy theory.
	CIA operatives would like to come on here and spread the idea that CISA is going to protect you.
	They're the good guys. The long-term plan is for electronic voting.
	Blockchain voting. U.S. Postal Service is already on it.
	They don't want you to understand that is the most dangerous, corruptible way to vote.
	And then they want you begging for a trustworthy electronic voting system after all this manufactured chaos.
	But what happened...
	Was that they foolishly focused on just two electronic voting companies.
	They completely ignored how they got to a point where they had a mail election.
	And now Trump is saying, well, I can do voter harvesting better than anybody can.
	That's what I'm going to do.
	Well, again, this is how we got here.
	And this is why. People are still focused on that.
	They refuse to see what has happened.
	That is what I truly could not have predicted, that this illusion would go on for year after year after year.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be back with our guest.
	We're going to talk about what is happening with bail.
	You want to know why we see crime skyrocketing?
	It's catch and release, catch and release.
	Very dangerous thing.
	And so we're going to talk about the importance of bail, misconceptions about bail.
	Stay with us.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, joining us now is Jeffrey J. Clayton.
	He is the Executive Director of the American Bail Coalition.
	And I wanted to talk to him about what is happening all over the country as part of what we see happening with these prosecutors who are turning criminals back out on the street, catch and release.
	What triggered this in particular, this has been going on for a while, it's been going on for several years, but in L.A., they recently...
	Came up with a zero bail release policy, and 12 cities in L.A. County have sued.
	And so we want to talk about that lawsuit, but we also want to talk about the broader issues involved with bail, why that has been a long-term part of our government and our criminal justice system, and the importance of it and the misconceptions about it.
	So joining us now is Jeffrey J. Clayton, Executive Director of the American Bail Coalition.
	Thank you for joining us, sir. Thanks for having me on.
	Let's talk first of all about what is happening with this lawsuit, the issue right in front of us, and then I want to get into, you know, as I said, what is the misconceptions about bail, what is it good for, and the importance of it, but tell us a little bit about that lawsuit first.
	Absolutely. And really, it's sort of a combination of two lawsuits.
	There's an activist legal group called the Civil Rights Corps that's been suing small cities throughout the United States for now going on seven years over their bail systems.
	And their final stop is Los Angeles.
	We've been... Thank you.
	And what happened was neither the city, the sheriff, or the attorney general, who was named as a defendant in the case, defended the case.
	And so the activist group won that the bail schedule was unconstitutional and arguments, frankly, that I think, you know, maybe some defense could have been put on.
	But because none was put on, the judge decided to go to the zero bail schedule, which Los Angeles adopted during the pandemic, pending the outcome of the case.
	So these judges got together and said, well, we've got to do something.
	So they set a new sort of interim process of a bail schedule that we think will be in effect for a while until we figure out what the next stop is going to be.
	But in the meantime, it means things like shoplifting, some driving under influence crimes and other crimes that now have bails are going to have zero bails automatically, which is another important problem there is that they're not going to be seeing judges as the default.
	Right.
	The default before was bail and then they could see a judge.
	Now it's just going to be zero.
	They're going to be released and not see a judge.
	So it's not like they're kicking them to a judge to have it evaluated at that point.
	That's where we stand. And so we're going to see, you know, the impact of this zero bail schedule when it's enforced, not during a pandemic, and when, you know, you're seeing crime increase.
	And we've seen the result of this when we look at the massive looting that is shut.
	Even, you know, big box retailers from Wall Street can't survive with the kind of looting that we have seen going on.
	And that's being facilitated by just this catch and release.
	You know, you don't have to pay bail.
	You don't have to see a judge. You just immediately release the people.
	If there's no penalty for organized theft, this is going to continue to escalate.
	Let me ask you, you said that they went back to, you know, they had a zero bail policy as part of the COVID lockdowns and things like that.
	This other policy, though, that they said was unconstitutional.
	How long had that been in effect prior to the change with the pandemic?
	Well, the bail schedule statute in California dates to the early 90s, I believe, and requires a bail schedule and has various rules on when the judges can go up and down.
	With the whole idea that we have a uniform bail schedule, right?
	That we treat people equally is the reason that we have a bail schedule, and now we're saying, oh, it's unconstitutional because people can't afford it.
	Well, that's really not why it was created.
	It was created to very much avoid that problem.
	But the big problem now is, you know, What are we going to do with all these people on zero bail when they continue to re-offend?
	And they know those loopholes in the system, they're going to exploit it.
	And that's what we've seen in other places where we make the rules beforehand rather than leaving it up to judges.
	Yeah, I know. Or having a bail set.
	Yeah, the leader of the Conservative Party in Canada was questioning about that.
	And he said, you've got to be kidding.
	They said, well, how... Can you prove that people being released early without bail has anything to do?
	And he goes, yeah, we've had situations where people come out and they would be caught, released, and then go back and commit another crime, be caught and released, and do that several times a day.
	And he said, and it's a very small group of people that just keep, you know, repeating offenses like this.
	And the person says, yeah, but can you prove it?
	And he goes, are you serious? Were you listening to what I had to say?
	I mean, this is the insanity of this.
	Now, you point out this exact bail schedule goes back to the 90s.
	But, of course, bail has been around.
	It's nothing new. It's been around since the creation of our business.
	Form of government that's always been with us, right?
	Tell us a little bit about the purpose of Baal and a little bit about the history of it.
	I mean, the right to bail dates to pre-Magna Carta.
	There's a lot in English history that I'm not going to get into.
	The Five Nights case, Lord Coke, all that sort of thing.
	But the essence of it was that the government could not imprison you, that you had to submit security for your appearance.
	And really, in this country, it was the right to bail by sufficient sureties, which was the original sort of Pennsylvania-Massachusetts constitution.
	And really what it means is a third party putting up a financial guarantee.
	Mm-hmm. As part of the common law that that meant was you had arrest powers and you could go across state lines.
	The Supreme Court, I believe, in the 19th century called it the option to select the jailer of one's choosing.
	And I believe the Supreme Court also said the bail industry is a friend to the friendless in a way when you need a friend and you don't have one.
	And so obviously there was a divergence in the late 19th, actually early 20th century when the English Supreme Court said it was against public policy to have compensated sureties.
	In other words, bail agents that take a fee to act as your personal surety.
	Whereas Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, of course, said, no, you can do that and states can regulate that.
	And so 46 states have said that you could have commercial sureties in the United States.
	And so really it is an ancient form of our due process.
	It's been around for centuries.
	And so what is new is the idea that we don't have any Baal.
	And again, if you don't have a situation...
	Where you have, as you pointed out, you choose your own jailer, which says that you're going to be back for the trial, and they're going to keep an eye on you, that type of thing.
	What we see is what is happening in L.A. and in San Francisco and the rest of these people.
	It is total anarchy, isn't it?
	Yeah, it's end money bail, and then what?
	And really, there's only two options.
	We go to the federal system of detaining three out of four defendants using what I would consider to be an arbitrary power that we really didn't have, or we say, you get a zero bail, and we just release people that are completely dangerous.
	And so, in California, for example, the measure of staying in jail, and this is how bail protects public safety, so to speak, is the measure of getting in or out of jail is putting up the security.
	If you don't put up the security, you stay in jail, which means the rate of new crime is zero.
	Mm-hmm. So that protects public safety.
	That's what people aren't taking into account here.
	And that's their whole argument is we don't think those people should stay in jail because they can't afford it.
	Well, in reality...
	They can't find somebody in the community to put up for them to make the guarantee.
	That's what we're talking about. And we say in our tradition, well, then we should not release them because they're not going to come answer for the crime.
	And so that's the distinction.
	And those people that stay in jail have a zero new crime rate other than the crimes they commit in jail.
	And that should be factored into all of this.
	Unfortunately, it's generally not.
	We just say, well, you put them on bail, they still commit new crimes.
	That's true. But when they stay in jail pending trial, they don't commit new crimes.
	Now, at your website there, the American Bail Coalition, you address some of the facts and myths about bail.
	And the first one that you address is kind of what you just tangentially touched on there, that poor people are languishing in jail for the sole reason that they cannot afford a bail bond.
	And so what would you say in terms of that?
	And you have a couple of points that you point out, but tell the audience why that is.
	It's not about poor people languishing in jail.
	Well, judges are tasked under state and federal law with adjusting the bails based on people's incomes, and that's what's supposed to happen.
	I think what we've seen and what has been a problem and where the other side has a point, so I'll address their argument, is that we've had bad due process in this country when it comes to bail.
	In other words, You put it in jail, you cannot afford it, and you're there really because the bail was set too high arbitrarily by a bail schedule, and it needs to be adjusted, and then you sit there for a week.
	In some cases, we've seen in some jurisdictions, people sat there for 30 days to see a judge to have a bail adjusted.
	Now, that becomes a problem, but that's a problem of due process.
	And I think that has been improved.
	But generally, what we see is that people who are stuck in jail have multiple reasons for that.
	And it's usually repeat crimes where the judges have set the bills.
	They've burned all their friends and ties to the community.
	In other words, nobody believes that they're going to show up.
	Nobody believes that they're going to show up to sentencing.
	Nobody believes that they're going to go to prison if they get sentenced.
	And so they're not willing to put up with them.
	And so that's generally where we see that.
	But I do agree that some of these lower level charges that we've seen, sleeping on the park benches and stuff, we had a lot of arbitrariness in the system that needed to be fixed.
	But on the top end, you know, felons, repeat felons.
	I mean, these people are multiple time violent criminals.
	The average person who doesn't post bail in this country has 10 prior strikes or more.
	Prior felony convictions, prior misdemeanor convictions, prior failures to show up in court.
	So they're not, you know, we rarely see a first timer that can't afford bail that's stuck in jail.
	And so, in a sense, what it is is a risk assessment on this person not showing up or committing more crimes while they're out.
	That's one of the things that drives the amount of the bond.
	And as you pointed out, it should be adjusted also for their income.
	But it's kind of a thing that says this is the seriousness of the crime and the risk of letting this person out.
	And so if that is judged by the judge and by the people who might produce the bail as being too much of a risk, that person stays in jail.
	That's essentially what's going on with it, isn't it?
	That is, and really it's not a scientific or calculated, there's not a calculator to do this, right?
	You're taking in the interests of the people who are prosecuting.
	The victim of the crime under Marcy's law in the state of California and other states has a right to be heard on bail, of what they think the bail should be.
	So the judges have to balance all these factors.
	Like you said, the crime, the prior record of failing to appear, you know, all these various factors, ties to the community, whether they're employed, you know, whether they live in another state, all this sort of thing, all goes into the calculus under various state statutes.
	So you're right. It's not a precise balance, and some people are uncomfortable with that, but that's the process that we have in this and many other parts of our criminal law.
	Yes, yes. Now, you're with the American Bail Coalition, and it is the bail industry, and as part of your facts and myths here, you say, well, one of the things that has been said about this is that the bail industry is completely unregulated and takes advantage of consumers.
	Give your side of the story.
	Well, we're regulated by departments of insurance.
	We're required to be regulated as insurance companies by the Comprehensive Crime Control Act.
	And so we're regulated heavily in all the states that we do business.
	There's been lawsuits over consumer protection laws being applied, and I would just say they're continuing to be applied in various states.
	You know, I think the laws are enforced on bail agents.
	The other thing that I've been working on over the last seven or eight years in this role is regulating bail recovery agents.
	And there are still some states like my home state of Colorado where you could just announce that you're a bail recovery agent, which means you're being transferred to rest powers and you have no regulatory oversight by the state.
	So our policy has been If you have arrest powers, you should probably be regulated by somebody.
	And we think state departments of insurance, but other states do it differently and use sort of the same bodies that regulate police officers' arrest powers to impose some training and other requirements.
	But overall, by and large, we're regulated fairly heavily, other than what I would say, that little area that we're trying to improve.
	And of course, arrest powers because if this person skips, they've got to be able to arrest this person and bring them back.
	To me, it seems like a very ancient perspective of, you know, things like putting, like, marks of retainer on, you know, deputizing people to go get something done because people understood that that might be a more efficient way to do it.
	Rather than have a large bureaucracy, is to farm out some of these things.
	One of the things that the bail industry is accused of, and the whole bail process is accused of, of course, this is an accusation that is thrown against everybody at one point in time.
	If they don't like what you're doing, they call you racist.
	So this is the accusation of racism.
	Talk about that a little bit. Well, at least from my perspective, from the Corporation of Insurance that underwrite bail, we cut through all that.
	We allow people in whatever communities that want to become bail agents and service personal sureties to be able to do that.
	And I think without that level of national underwriting, it would make it harder for there to be people to come into the bail industry other than, you know, longtime property owners in those communities.
	Two is largely the system, and I'm not going to get into the reasons why, has disparities in it.
	If you just look at the raw numbers in terms of population versus the amount of criminal justice involved individuals that are minorities.
	And so we serve those communities.
	We allow them to get out of jail as appropriate, secure their release, and go through the process.
	And that's an important thing, as we know, for various reasons.
	You know, they put on a better defense.
	They get their act together in terms of probation and trying to argue for a better sentence.
	I mean, generally, just things tend to work better if they're able to secure their release and get out.
	Yes, yes. Let's talk a little bit about how this has started to come about.
	And this is something that has been...
	Changing over the last several years, Chris Christie did one of the first movements of this when he was governor in New Jersey.
	He worked with Democrats to essentially, did he completely remove bail at that point in time?
	But that was one of the first places where we saw this, wasn't it, in New Jersey?
	It really was, and that was kind of his pivot to the federal system.
	So to go kind of a little bit back in time is that there was bail in the federal system until the Bail Reform Act of 1984 when we came up with a new idea, which is we'll just lock up the people that we label dangerous, and we'll let everybody else out and supervise them using federal pretrial services and the U.S. Marshals Service to arrest them.
	That was the federal model.
	Largely thought unconstitutional because we had this right to bail, but the U.S. Supreme Court decided otherwise.
	And so that was the movement in New Jersey.
	I would think of it more as a hybrid system where we wanted to lock up more and deny bail to more people, say it's too dangerous to get any bail, and that we were going to not require bail on some of these people and give more summonses to some of these people on the lower end, and we'd still have a shrinking middle of bail in the middle.
	But as the system was implemented, I think the Chief Justice really just wanted to get rid of bail.
	And so you really have seen it largely eliminated.
	And we go to a system of just, you're detained and you're there at the will in jail, period, pending some trial.
	I would know certainty of when that's going to be, or you get released on your own recognizance.
	And in the case of New Jersey, there's very little oversight and supervision when that happens.
	And so you see crazy results under that.
	And you see an expansion of the government wanting to detain because judges can't do bail.
	And so you see a lot of that.
	And you've seen a percentage of motions filing for detention increasing.
	And so it's really a question of whether that's a system of long term.
	Is that better?
	You know, for the half a billion dollars, you know, they spent on it?
	We don't think so. We think you could have just done summonses and kind of targeted these repeat offenders without having to spend all this money.
	So I'm not sure it's really a better system, but that's kind of where the public policy debate lies right now is to end cash bail and then what, right?
	What do we do then?
	And none of the alternatives really seem to be much better than the constitutional framework we've been working in, you know, for 400 years.
	Yeah, and just keep people in jail longer, have more overcrowded prisons, and of course the whole idea, you talk a great deal on your website about reform for a speedy trial.
	I think a lot of people who watch this program are looking at this and thinking about the J6 people, you know, the January Sixers.
	Very few of them in jail for any accusation of a violent crime, for example, and yet Not given a speedy trial under, you know, difficult conditions and awaiting trial for a couple of years, two or three years, many of these people.
	Talk a little bit about the speedy trial aspect of this.
	Well, you just made the argument for overturning USV Salerno, which is since 1984.
	In 1984, if January 6th would have happened, one, there would have been bail.
	So they would have had a 76% chance of getting out, not a 76% chance of staying in.
	So we flip-flopped that since 1984.
	The other thing that's been unbelievable that a report called Freedom Denied from the University of Chicago...
	Pointed out recently is that the speedy trial time when there was bail in the federal system was 60 days, was the average felony.
	That's up to 360 days now.
	And so what's happened is, and as Justice Thurgood Marshall predicted, when we take a shortcut to a conviction, there's no pressure to do anything.
	And that's what we've done. If the prosecution knows you're in jail, they have every incentive to go as slow as possible and delay everything because they've got you.
	And they know you're incarcerated, you're not going to commit a new crime.
	They've done their job. And so that's what we've seen over time.
	And that has had a devastating impact on civil rights and also unnecessary pretrial incarceration.
	If we can try them in 1984 and 60 days with all this newfangled technology, exchange of electronic discovery, all this stuff that we say should improve it, why has it gotten so long?
	And really, it's just lack of incentive.
	If the prosecutor knew that the bail industry could come bail out 50% of them, they'd be in a hurry to convict them.
	So we're seeing that around the country as the In South Carolina, for example, the average felony case is two years.
	And obviously, the bail issue becomes a lot bigger when you're going to be sitting there for two years.
	And so speedy trial is the number one way to reduce unnecessary pretrial incarceration.
	The other example I'll give is Michigan.
	You know, 18% of defendants, pretrial costs, 82% of jail costs.
	And those are people that stay 30 days and longer.
	So you can do all the bail reform you want, but if you're not hitting the 82%, what are you really doing?
	And if you could cut that amount of time in half, you would cut the amount that they have to sit in jail pending this outcome in half.
	We'd get them onto probation, get them onto treatment, or get them in prison where they belong.
	We have to get to this fork in the road.
	And the more that we, you know, Don't focus on speedy trial and allow this to happen.
	We just take a shortcut to conviction.
	And then everybody's arguing, oh, we need preventative detention.
	We need to lock more people up.
	Yeah, because we never get there.
	And we need to get there. That's what this is all about.
	And that is what deters crime.
	You know, certainty of getting caught, swiftness of punishment.
	And that's basic. And that goes back 300 years.
	That's right. And that's what we need to focus on.
	And so the two extremes that we've got, and we don't like either one of those, you either just immediately release these shoplifters, these shoplifter gangs who just turn them right back out.
	Or you lock people up for, instead of a couple of months, you lock them up for a year or maybe two years.
	Or, as we saw in the case of the J6ers, lock them up for three years.
	Not accused of a violent crime.
	And I'm just curious, maybe you know, maybe you don't know, what was the argument for keeping these people locked up?
	For that long time, was it that they could not get to a, would not give them, why would they not give them bail?
	Did they just not have that in the District of Columbia?
	Or were they saying they were too dangerous, even though they were nonviolent?
	Do you know what the justification was for keeping those people locked up for three years?
	In general, there was a statutory presumption that they stay in jail just under the federal statute because of the level of the crime.
	And the defendant has to rebut that presumption.
	That's how heavy it is. You know, you've got three out of four defendants in any federal criminal case stay in.
	So it didn't surprise me at all that people charged with insurrection related crimes like this, even if they had no background, would face detention.
	And that's wrong.
	And here's the reality.
	The reason there is bail is to challenge arbitrary preventative detention.
	The community can say enough.
	You've gone too far.
	We're bailing these people out.
	Now that doesn't exonerate them, but it sends a message to the government that you've gone too far.
	And that's why that extreme, I think, is bad.
	The other extreme is just as arbitrary, is that we say, well, basic shoplifting, okay, Well, what if it is the 15th time?
	What if it is special circumstances where they use the gun, or there's something that the statute didn't anticipate that we want judges to do?
	So, it becomes arbitrary to go in both ways, and that's why this history of bail and securing your release has been kind of the best way to draw this balance and let judges, you know, when people say...
	We need judicial discretion, and everybody loves that until they lose, but that's the best system that we have, and either side just ends up being too arbitrary, I think.
	Give us an idea of where this issue is now.
	We saw this several years ago in New Jersey, and of course it's made the Democrats stationed in California, Illinois, Connecticut, other things like that.
	What is the general situation?
	Is this something that is rapidly spreading, or is this something that is rapidly spreading in the heavily Democratic states?
	Well, I would say that what happened in New York, the three-time rollback by two governors of the original law, has really sort of stalled out this idea that this is some successful solution.
	I think we are seeing it in two places remaining, which is sort of Los Angeles and California.
	And what just happened in Illinois with the Illinois Supreme Court affirming the Safety Act, which is basically a smaller version of New Jersey.
	In other words, we take New Jersey and we say the list of crimes are going to be a lot smaller than what we have in New Jersey.
	So I think there's been some conversations in other states about going more to detention policies, but not So, as you look at this, how would you say the momentum is?
	Is the momentum swinging back in your favor then?
	I'd say so. I think the idea that we can just wholesale allow a bunch of people to get out of jail free card is going to be good public policy is sort of like, you know, saying defund the police was going to work.
	I mean, that just violated the basic common sense doctrine.
	And basically it violated the whole doctrine of what I was saying of criminal deterrence.
	We can't prosecute and incarcerate everybody.
	We have to send the message that you are going to and convince people that we are going to get them if they commit crimes.
	And as soon as we lose that and we have said, well, you don't have to respect the police, well then look where we are.
	So that's the policies we need to go.
	And bail is part and parcel of that, which is, you could have bail set, you could stay in jail, we just won't know until you get there.
	And that's the message that we need to have.
	I think it is swinging towards your direction because people have seen what is happening in California.
	It is absolute total anarchy.
	And, you know, well, these people are nonviolent, so let's just let them go.
	People realize, they're starting to realize now exactly how unworkable this is.
	I think it's very important. I think it's one of the fundamental things in terms of due process.
	You know, we have these things that are there.
	Things like trial by jury, habeas corpus, bail.
	These are tried and true.
	They were there for a reason, and it is very foolish to discard these things.
	And we do it and eventually discover why they were there.
	And now we can see... Thank you so much for joining us, sir.
	And again, it is the American Bail Coalition.
	And we have to, it's very important what is happening to our justice system and how it is being ripped down at the foundation.
	And I think this is just one more of the things that we need to reclaim and understand the true importance of it and why it is there.
	You know, don't tear down the fence if you don't understand why it was put up in the first place.
	So thank you so much for joining us and explaining that.
	Thank you. You got it.
	It was a pleasure. Thank you. We're going to be right back, folks.
	Take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Take a quick break.
	Take a quick break.
	you you Well, we have some time left.
	I want to talk a little bit about what is happening in the news, but first let me say hi to some of the people left.
	Comments on Rumble, One Mind Covenant.
	Thank you for the tip. It says, Vicki B. in East Tennessee, my monthly buck, David.
	Let's all give a buck today and get that percentage up.
	Buck the system. Give a buck for truth.
	Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	Every dollar. Really do.
	Appreciate it. By the way, one of the ways that you can help us that makes a difference is and help to get the information out.
	And I think what I do here is I've got a little bit different perspective than what some of the other people have out there.
	We all need to get as many perspectives as possible.
	If you can like the broadcast wherever it is that you watch it, please do that and pass it around if you like it.
	Give it to other people to take a look at it.
	But yes, liking it really does help to increase its visibility, and that is a big deal.
	I'm not very good at promoting, and so I need your help in terms of promoting.
	Also, if you could pray for us.
	And I want to try to pull that back up again.
	There was another tip that was there, and I want to thank on Rockfin, Liberty Mama.
	Thank you. That is very generous.
	I appreciate that. Very generous.
	Why does Israel need a Second Amendment?
	Ask gun owners of America.
	Well, everybody needs something that respects our God-given right.
	And I think gun owners of America knows this, even though the general tone of this article is that the Second Amendment is giving us something.
	It doesn't. If there's something the government does that gives you the right to keep and bear arms, then that is not any right.
	If it's coming from the government, that's a government-granted privilege.
	If it is yours because you are a human being, created by God, and endowed with basic inalienable rights, which is what our country was founded on, that idea, and that's what is reflected, none of these Bill of Rights gives us anything.
	We already had those things.
	What it does is it stops the government from taking it away from us.
	And so they say the truth is the individual right of the people to keep and bear arms is necessary to the security of a free state.
	That's why Israel needs it.
	That's why every country needs it.
	But I guess, you know, as you look at this, most countries don't trust their people.
	They are afraid of their people, so they don't want them to have weapons.
	This goes back to ancient times.
	You know, earlier in the program, I was talking about William Tellman's crossbow.
	Well, you know, crossbows were made illegal.
	For people in Britain.
	They wanted them to train, and they did have them train the yeomanry, what we call the militia, trained on a regular basis.
	They were required to train with a longbow.
	And you remember, Travis, when we went to Warwick Castle, and they had a guy there who was illustrating it.
	He said you can actually see it in the skeletons.
	It had a denser bone on their left arm where they held the bow out on the right arm.
	So they practiced quite a bit with the longbow.
	They wanted them trained for that, but they were concerned about the crossbow because the crossbow was powerful enough that it could penetrate armor.
	So let's not let the ordinary people have that.
	That type of attitude that you still see, well, I don't know, that particular type of gun...
	Just too dangerous for the ordinary people to have it.
	All of gun control in every country flows from politicians who are afraid of their own people and have an inordinate fear of their own people.
	Could it be that they know things that they've done to us, that they are worried about us coming back to them?
	That's what I've always suspected.
	Well, you know, if you're so afraid to give us guns, then you must have done something to us that we haven't found out about yet.
	And so I guess now, as Israel has reversed itself, perhaps I understand that the people there are going to perceive Hamas, for the time being, as a greater threat than Israel.
	Whether that is true or not, probably is at this point in time.
	But I thought it was interesting in this article, they quoted a tweet from Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	She states the obvious.
	And then about the right of gun ownership, and then she states an obvious lie.
	She says, our Second Amendment is the best protection from every threat.
	If you're armed, you can protect yourself from criminals or terrorists who want to hurt you or your family.
	There's the obvious. And then she says, as she just heard in that first statement, she follows it up and says, and the Second Amendment gives us all the right to To protect ourselves from a tyrannical government.
	No, it doesn't.
	No, it doesn't. We had those rights as human beings.
	Everybody has them everywhere.
	And so, Elon Musk...
	Even chimed in on that as we saw how vulnerable everybody was in this attack.
	Elon Musk's comment was in response to end wokeness who put up the past three plus years have been one long infomercial for the Second Amendment.
	Elon Musk replied and said, as tragic as mass shootings are, armed citizens are essential to the defense of democracy and to the defense of our lives, quite frankly.
	It's our lives that we're trying to defend more than anything else.
	Here in Tennessee, we just had in Nashville a man who we talk about locking up dangerous individuals and releasing them, catch and release, catch and release.
	This is somebody who was twice deported.
	They didn't release him back in the United States, but they sent him abroad.
	A Honduran migrant twice deported has now been charged with two murders in Tennessee.
	Whenever I see this type of thing, it always reminds me of the distraught father.
	From El Salvador, whose daughter was murdered in school in Long Island, New York.
	And he said, murdered by MS-13.
	You know, kids who had come here illegally, that the government knew that they were here illegally, would not deport them.
	Kids that they knew were in MS-13 because they had tattoos all over their face.
	But we're not going to do anything about it.
	And the father said, we came to America to escape MS-13 in El Salvador.
	And I have said, well, if you don't have border control, there's nothing to keep MS-13 from coming to wherever you are.
	And that is true for all of us.
	She had the interaction with him because of the language and the culture and that type of thing.
	She interacted with him. But they're going to be interacting with all of us.
	And in this particular case in Nashville, the two individuals who were killed were Hispanic.
	Not clear if they were in the same community or not, but still a heinous crime.
	The top destination for immigrants released at the border.
	And this is from Homeland Security Reporter.
	They have it on Washington Examiner.
	It's a map, and they color in the different states based on how many immigrants are processed with the clearinghouse in different states.
	And so they said the two heaviest ones, Not the two, but the four heaviest, I should say.
	Florida, Texas, California, New York.
	All of them have seen over 100,000 immigrants in their legal system in the first 11 months of fiscal 2023.
	Because the fiscal year starts before the calendar year does.
	So over 100,000 illegal immigrants in their system.
	New Jersey and Colorado each had 50,000 to 100,000.
	And then I was kind of surprised to see that Tennessee was in the third tier of 25,000 to 50,000.
	Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Virginia.
	25,000 to 50,000 processed.
	This is how big this problem is.
	And of course, Biden isn't interested in doing anything at all about it.
	On Rumble, a message from Jason Barker and a tip.
	Thank you, Jason. He says, push the merchandise, David.
	Okay, let's push the merchandise here.
	We got a MacGuffin t-shirt right here, and I'll show you what this looks like.
	I like this design.
	It has the website on it, but it has just the MacGuffin.
	And I think if people see this, they might think, is that a restaurant?
	Tell me about that restaurant or something.
	And that gives you an opportunity to point out to them how these various scams that they run on us, regardless of whatever the justification is, it's just to motivate you, just like the MacGuffin in Hitchcock's movies.
	They always have the same goal in mind.
	Whether they're going to talk about climate or they're going to talk about COVID or any of these other things, it's always the same goal in mind.
	Even as they constantly change the climate thing, it's always the same goal in mind.
	So it's a conversation starter.
	Also gets the website out there for people.
	We do still have mugs at the website.
	We have the coin. I love this coin.
	Jason Barker designed this coin.
	It doesn't do it justice to see it on the website, but it is really a nice coin.
	And it comes with a little stand here that we've got that's a part of that as well.
	But please take a look at thedavidknightshow.com and you can see the merchandise that we've got there.
	Several different t-shirts.
	We've got some new designs that are going to be coming.
	We'll tell you about them when they come.
	But I appreciate that, Jason.
	I'm not good about plugging this stuff.
	And so let's get back to the news.
	I hate selling stuff, by the way.
	But while we're talking about pricing things, we have Governor Nuisance in California has just decided that he's going to have a special minimum wage for people who are involved in health care in California because he really does care.
	After requiring that all these health care workers get their vaccine, he really does care for you now because he wants to run for president.
	And so they just passed a bill, and he signed it, to raise minimum wage for health care workers to $25 an hour because they care so much.
	And this is kind of strange because it was just last year that he cared so much for fast food workers that they raised their minimum wage for that particular industry.
	I thought, this is really kind of strange.
	They're going piecemeal, right?
	Yeah. Well, let's set a minimum wage for this type of work, and we'll set a different minimum wage for that type of work.
	For the fast food workers last year, the minimum wage for everybody in California was $15.50 an hour.
	Then they raised it for fast food workers to $22.
	Now they have raised it for healthcare workers to $25 an hour.
	This is what these type of people, these central planners, these centrally controlling people who want the government to make decisions about everything in our lives, that's what they're doing.
	And I think it's kind of interesting that they're doing this piecemeal, industry by industry.
	In terms of general news, one more item here before we take a quick break, and we'll come back.
	But an Epstein victim.
	who testified against Ghislaine Maxwell has now died and her family doesn't believe that she died of an accidental overdose.
	They said before her death, she was ecstatic.
	She was all set up, had a whole new lifestyle.
	She was, you know, her husband, and she had just purchased property a couple of weeks before she was found dead in this new house.
	And they said, this doesn't make sense.
	This is not where she was.
	And the timing is very suspicious.
	And then as this is happening...
	You know, we have the guy who was the billionaire founder of Victoria's Secret, Les Wexner.
	And this is the guy who, I think he gave that mansion that Epstein had in New York, I think he gave it to him at a sweetheart deal or something like that, or let him stay there.
	I forget exactly what it was about that, but again, had been a big financial supporter of Jeffrey Epstein.
	And, of course, he was a big financial supporter of Harvard as well.
	So now we've had a couple of billionaires who have now pulled away funding from Harvard because the students, the Marxists there, are now celebrating the Palestinians and Hamas.
	You know, they're not out there saying, no, no, no, they didn't commit any atrocities.
	No, they said, no, they did commit atrocities, and that's great.
	We love that. And so these billionaires are saying, really?
	Really? Maybe I don't need to be giving money to this institution that trains people like that.
	And as I pointed out yesterday, there's a reason that they do that.
	They think that it is virtuous to use violence against anybody that they label as a colonizer.
	They see Israel as a colonizer.
	They see America as a colonizer.
	They see Europe as a colonizer.
	So, you know, Israel, America, Europe, all must be destroyed according to these Marxists, according to the same rules.
	And so this really is a product of Harvard.
	But I thought it was kind of interesting that Les Wexner has now severed ties with Harvard.
	They never had a problem taking anybody's money.
	Harvard has absolutely no standards whatsoever.
	They would never kick off this Wexner guy because of his associations with Jeffrey Epstein.
	No, it's perfectly fine with him.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	And, of course, there's more that are going to be coming up.
	We're about to have the election in Argentina.
	And so all these things are in view.
	I thought it was kind of interesting looking back at the 2020 election.
	This is something that just came out, a new book that is based on interviews this guy had with Romney.
	Dozens of hours. The book is about to be released called Romney, A Reckoning.
	I don't know if it's going to be a reckoning for Romney in this life or not.
	But anyway, the author of this book, who said that he had dozens of hours with interviews with Romney, said that Romney told him that Oprah Winfrey, the Democrat, the occultic Democrat, made a pitch to him to run together in order to save the country.
	Well, that's kind of interesting.
	Was she suggesting that Romney run again as president and she would run as vice president?
	Or did she want to be president and have him on as a running mate?
	Who was going to be on top there?
	Romney told the author, Coppens, that he dismissed the idea, believing that a campaign like this would inadvertently help Trump.
	So they wanted, let's have a, you know, let's do this to save the country from Trump.
	A source familiar with Winfrey's thinking said she was never serious about running, although some who were close to her thought that she should.
	And, of course, Romney's time had passed.
	Romney was there in 2012 to make sure that Obamacare went through.
	Romney had already done Obamacare, Romneycare, if you want to call that, in Massachusetts, along with Ted Kennedy.
	And so the fix was in. Regardless of who won in 2012, whether it's going to be Obama or Romney, they were going to put in the same type of move towards central control of our health care.
	Which we were always pointing out was a danger that they could do to us exactly what they did in 2020.
	But of course, they didn't need Romneycare or Obamacare.
	They had Trump there to do that to us.
	But anyway, after the story was published...
	Spokesperson for Oprah Winfrey denied this, that she was not calling to be a part of the ticket and never considered the idea of running herself.
	But as we look at the latest poll from Trump, and again, the primaries have not started, but they're polling Biden versus Trump and Biden versus DeSantis or Haley, Newcomb, Nikki.
	They say that both DeSantis and Haley, We're to edge out Biden, but Biden would edge out Trump.
	I think we know this.
	I think the Democrats know this.
	This is why they keep pushing on that.
	And the interesting thing is that Biden has outraised Trump, DeSantis, and Haley combined.
	All of the field.
	He's got more money in cash than all of the GOP field combined.
	Which is not really too hard to do when you're able to take money from foreign entities in violation of the law.
	You don't have to pay any taxes on millions of dollars and there's no penalty for any of this stuff.
	Get out of jail free card.
	And we should not be surprised that Biden has got that much money because there's no rules that apply to him, evidently.
	Let's take a look at these foreign elections.
	We had New Zealand, as I pointed out briefly yesterday, elects its most conservative government in decades.
	And so, the next Prime Minister will be a former Chief Executive of Air New Zealand.
	He's put together a coalition with a smaller Libertarian Party.
	I think, but I'm not sure that this is the group of people that we talked to when we went to New Zealand in 1998.
	Karen and I were thinking, at least I was thinking, of moving to New Zealand and went there to see what it was like and They had always been socialist and they bankrupted the country and they couldn't even pay their embassy personnel in other countries.
	And so they kind of hit the wall with that.
	They didn't have something like a petrodollar where they could just write blank checks and print more money.
	And so they had to confront that reality, and they turned around very quickly.
	So there was a lot of talk in the news media about how New Zealand had a reckoning and realized that they were on the wrong path with socialism and they were turning it around.
	And there was so much talk about that.
	We wanted to see New Zealand, and so we went there and enjoyed the country.
	It was a beautiful place, very interesting, and the people were nice.
	But the politics were horrific, and I had established contact with a guy who was, they called him the Rush Limbaugh of New Zealand at the time.
	Remember, this is 1998. And so we had scheduled to have dinner with him and some members of their Libertarian Party.
	And he did not make it, but the other people did.
	And we wound up having a dinner where we all talked about whose government was more horrible than And they wound up convincing me that their government was even worse than America.
	So we did not make the move.
	Just did not feel comfortable with it.
	I'm past the point where I could feel comfortable living in any other country.
	As a matter of fact, I couldn't feel comfortable living in a heavily Democrat state anymore either.
	Or even some areas that are more libertarian, but maybe not as Christian.
	It's like, I'm right here where God wants me to be, where I feel comfortable, right here in the smack dab middle of the Bible Belt.
	I'm right here in the belly button of the Bible Belt.
	That's where I feel most comfortable, and I can relate to the people.
	But yeah, it was truly amazing, and they told us a lot of things, and we...
	You know, even to the extent that the control of construction, they had so many controls, not for the kind of stuff that we see, the nonsense stuff that we have here about, oh, it's going to be energy efficient and all the rest of the stuff.
	It's like, well, hey, if I'm paying the energy bill, don't worry about it.
	You know, that's their climate nonsense, their climate MacGuffin.
	But there, they would say, well, you can't have a house that is higher than this, you know, one or two stories or whatever it was.
	And you can't have too much on the outside of it because it looks too fancy or whatever.
	And it's like, why can't you have a house higher than this?
	Well, because you might block somebody's view.
	And you can't have some of these things on the outside because, you know, it makes other people feel bad if they can't afford to have as nice a looking house as you do.
	Wow. The envy that is the foundation of socialism.
	The envy is so ingrained in people.
	This isn't going to last.
	And, of course, that government didn't last.
	So maybe this one will. Maybe they learned from their experience with Jab, Sinda, Arden.
	We'll have to see.
	But the Green Party...
	Got 10%, and the Libertarian Party, the ACT Party, got 9%.
	So that's really kind of, you know, where those people are.
	They really are still not quite out of the woods yet.
	In Ecuador, they rejected the socialists.
	And they rejected a 35-year-old outsider.
	So that's good. So New Zealand, they're moving to the right away from Jabsin to Arden.
	Ecuador, same thing.
	And Argentina, again, as they're about to have the final election, the guy who came out in the initial run, Javier Malay, As the New York Times likes to label him, a far-right libertarian.
	I guess they've never seen the Nolan chart, you know, where he says, well, it's not right and left, but it's also up and down.
	Anyway, leading in the polls of Argentina's presidential election that will be coming up this month.
	And so this is the New York Times' effort to try to destroy him.
	They say, well, as a libertarian, he says that humans do not cause climate change.
	Yep. People should be able to sell their organs if they want.
	And again, you know, they're going to pick some of these applications of people being able to make choices about their own body.
	I mean, this is the New York Times.
	New York Times doesn't have a problem with Planned Parenthood.
	Selling the organs of babies that they've murdered.
	They have a problem with you selling your own organs if you want to sell a kidney or something like that.
	And this is something Walter Williams used to always talk about, you know.
	And, you know, this is a side issue.
	I mean, we've got more fundamental issues, as we saw in 2020.
	And then saying that his nation's currency is not even as good as manure.
	Well, he's certainly right about that.
	You might say that it's not useful as toilet paper.
	That might be a better analogy.
	But then, this is the kicker.
	This is how they come after the New York Times comes after Javier Malay.
	He called the Pope a filthy leftist.
	And now he wants to be president.
	That's their headline. Quite frankly, they're accurate about that.
	The Pope is a filthy leftist.
	He is... It's about as leftist as anybody is.
	Filthily so, even other Catholics say so.
	As a matter of fact, Javier Malay is a self-identifying Catholic.
	He called Pope Francis an imbecile.
	He called him, quote, the representative of the evil one on earth.
	He says because he defends social justice.
	And last year, Malay said the Pope, quote, always stands on the side of evil.
	Now, the New York Times says because he supports taxes.
	No, because he supports. He stands on the side of evil because the Pope always supports climate change.
	Depopulation is that agenda.
	You go back to his first encyclical about the climate.
	The Pope brought in John Schellenhuber, who has a long history of pushing for depopulation.
	That's his central thing.
	And of course, John Schellenhumer has been the court jester for the Pope as well as for then Prince Charles, now King Charles.
	In terms of pushing world government, you know, the Earth League that Charles put out there had to call for a planetary parliament and a world court and all the rest of the stuff and an Earth constitution and all these different things.
	I mean, it is a one world government and the Pope has been full on with that.
	Most traditional Catholics don't see the Pope as Catholic.
	Is the Pope Catholic?
	It's not a rhetorical question.
	It is a genuine question, and it is answered in the negative by most Catholics who are not just cultural Catholics.
	I don't know why the New York Times thinks that these types of attacks on Javier Malay are going to outweigh the fact that they have 133% inflation, as I pointed out.
	133% interest rate by the Argentine Central Bank that controls this currency that is, quote, not even as good as manure.
	And even with a 133% interest rate, can you imagine what your house payment would be if your interest rate was 133%?
	We can't even imagine what life is like with that.
	But they're claiming even that that is not keeping up with inflation.
	And of course, their inflation figures are just as cooked as their other economic data as well.
	Their inflation, according to the official rate of inflation, is 138%.
	Poland was the one country that went the other way.
	And I think it is interesting.
	I saw this from the Wall Street Journal.
	They said they thought it was Ukraine fatigue.
	And that the ruling party there, the conservative party, which has stood for the family and family values and a lot of other things like that, but jumped in to become the war party.
	And I think that this is a rejection not of their genuine conservative values, but a rejection of their war party values.
	And I don't think that that is a Christian value, quite frankly, to continue to push on the Ukraine stuff.
	So I think that is why they are the lone ones out as people rejected that and moved away from them because of this manic pushing of war.
	In Norway, yet another one where you have a historical blow to the left.
	Norway's center-right opposition made near unprecedented gains at the local level.
	Why is this happening so much?
	And I think it truly is the rapid rate at which our societies are being taken down the LGBT road, the rainbow road.
	And I think people see that deconstruction of their society.
	They see the deconstruction with the open borders and bringing in literal armies of foreign people to duke it out.
	I mean, what are you supposed to do when you have a small Italian island, 6,000 people?
	And just in the last few months, they brought in 18,000 people.
	Most of them young, single men.
	These are not refugees. These are not families freeing some kind of persecution.
	And they have no job, no way to make money.
	They're there to live off of the people.
	And that's three times the number of people that were there already.
	This is the reason why people are pulling away from these left-leaning ones.
	Hopefully, These organizations are genuine about this.
	In Italy, we already saw the betrayal of that.
	We saw Maloney, who positioned herself, said, I'm going to do something about these open borders.
	And she's flip-flopped after she got into office.
	This is the kind of betrayal that we always have to be on the lookout for.
	And when the politicians, whether it's Maloney or whether it's Trump, When they do exactly the opposite of what they campaigned and said they were going to do, exactly the opposite of what you supported them for, you need to call them out on it.
	And, of course, Breitbart, you know, now pushing the editor, Joel Pollack, said, yeah, bring in the Hamas, the Gazans, the Palestinians and the Gaza Strip.
	Bring them in. He's always pushed against open borders.
	And as strong as they were, and as that has been their issue, never would criticize Trump for what he did not do, and for what he did do, on even that issue.
	So again, in Norway, the final one there, where the center-left party, been beaten by a center-right party, the worst loss that they've seen there since 1924, in a century.
	There's a major move as people are waking up.
	The question is, will they wake up quickly enough?
	But the big issue is, not if God is on our side, but if we're on God's side.
	That's it for the broadcast.
	Thank you for listening. Let me tell you, The David Knight Show, you can listen to with your ears.
	You can even watch it by using your eyes.
	In fact, if you can hear me, that means you're listening to The David Knight Show right now.
	Yeah, good job.
	And you want to know something else?
	You can find all the links to everywhere to watch or listen to the show at thedavidnightshow.com.

▲