Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 13, 2023 - The David Knight Show

03:01:25

The David Knight Show - 10/13/2023

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	The End free speech to free minds.
	soon.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Friday the 13th of October, year of our Lord 2023.
	3.
	A global day of rage, we're told.
	Well, fortunately here in the United States, we don't have to rely on a Mary Sue who's got the only key to the armory.
	We do have the ability to protect ourselves.
	As a matter of fact, coming up in the third hour, we're going to be talking to Jason Barker about the myth of ghost guns.
	Yeah, it kind of sounds like a Scooby-Doo episode, doesn't it?
	But we're going to have some serious discussions about that and some other issues.
	And we're going to begin with news that we haven't covered for quite some time.
	Domestic news is where we're going to begin.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, we have a domestic government that has ruled by a bunch of tottering people who ought to be enjoying retirement, but they're so obsessed with power that they cannot get themselves out of office.
	We had Vladimir Putin say, the system in America doesn't bring the best people to the top.
	Boy, that is stating the obvious, isn't it?
	And of course, we had Fetterman saying the same thing.
	Is he not aware?
	That he's not fit to be able to do this any more than a 90-year-old Dianne Feinstein.
	But then we have, in the House, this fight over who is going to be Speaker continues.
	Even as the guy who was the majority leader, number two, Scalise, after they kicked out McCarthy, Scalise got the nomination in private, but now he has dropped out of the race because he doesn't have enough votes to win.
	They have such a narrow margin of majority, and all the Democrats are going to vote for their candidate.
	So they're going to need to have a lot of Republicans voting for Scalise, and they don't have that vote.
	So he has now dropped out of the Speaker's race.
	As a matter of fact, this is what Speaker's race looks like right now.
	Select all images with speakers.
	We could also put Photoshop in there.
	This came out before Scalise, so we should replace one of those audio speaker pictures with Steve Scalise.
	So, again, he doesn't.
	It's the same scenario that narrowly took McCarthy out.
	So he won the nomination on Wednesday by a 14-vote margin.
	But by Thursday, it was clear that he wasn't going to make it.
	You had Thomas Massey say, look, I know everybody doesn't like surprises, so I went to Steve Scalise and told him to his face that I was not going to support him on a floor vote for Speaker.
	Why? Because of the omnibus bill.
	He says he's going to go back to doing this whole omnibus bill thing.
	Steve Scalise has been there for a very long time.
	He's in a leadership position.
	It is business as usual.
	I don't know if it's going to be any different with Jim Jordan.
	As I said, Jim Jordan, when he first surfaced, he would do a great job of working.
	Making cases, a very good communicator, logical thinker, but all he does is hold grandstand hearings.
	And maybe that's all he can do as a member of the House.
	Maybe he would be a good speaker.
	I don't know. But nevertheless, Thomas Massey said no.
	I thought this was an interesting comment.
	This is from Barry Moore, who's a Republican from Alabama.
	He said, I thought I might go with Scalise if everybody else was going to get behind him.
	That was fine, but it's just not working out that way.
	So I'm just kind of waiting to see what everybody else does.
	Not a leader, a follower.
	This guy failed the ash experiment.
	He was one of the two-thirds of the people who will do whatever everybody else is doing, even if it's the wrong thing, evidently.
	He doesn't have any reason, unlike Massey and others, he doesn't have any reason to oppose Steve Scalise.
	He's just going to go with whatever everybody else is doing.
	Yeah, me too. That's what I want to do.
	And it's amazing.
	I've seen so many people, especially when I was in high school and college, beginning to vote, Most of the people would look to see, this is why these polls that are being done, you know, way before, six months, a year before we have any primaries type of thing.
	That's why these polls are push polls.
	So many people want to be on the winning team.
	And so they look and they say, well, okay, well, this candidate A is head, so I'm for candidate A because I want to be on the winning team.
	At least six GOP lawmakers said they would not vote for Scalise.
	I'll be guaranteeing a repeat of January's drawn-out speaker vote when Kevin McCarthy took 15 ballots to secure his position.
	But anyway, so it's, now you don't, the good news is...
	We got our government shut down.
	Even the Congress has shut down.
	And to, what was it, Mark Twain, who said no one is safe while Congress is in session?
	Well, I guess we're all safe for a little while here.
	Problem is, you know, Congress has just become this symbolic appendage.
	It doesn't really matter. We're run by bureaucracies.
	We're run by, you know, we have tax policies created by the IRS. Gun policy is created by the ATF, and we've got all these different agencies are doing whatever they wish because the Congress has given up, just like this other guy said.
	Well, let's see what the majority are doing.
	So they're just kind of a rump Congress.
	Anyway, so a retired police chief points to Israel to blast gun control.
	And this is an important point on this so-called day of rage.
	That has been declared by these Muslim leaders.
	A retired police chief, writing for law enforcement today, has thoughts about what's going on.
	He said the gun control freaks in the U.S. often bloviate about why anyone would need high-capacity magazines to hunt deer.
	They ask why so-called weapons of war should be in private citizens' hands.
	He says, but have you seen what's going on in Israel?
	Now, that should answer their questions.
	And I think that's one of the reasons why all the mass media has elevated this Mary Sue story.
	I've seen one or two stories about people who had a pistol that they were allowed to have and they engaged people who were attacking and that type of thing.
	But for the most part, the story that resonates with everyone is this 25-year-old woman...
	Who was head of security for Kibbutz, and she got a dozen people or whatever together that were part of her group, and she had the keys to the armory where the guns were all locked up.
	And they were able to fight off these people who were attacking.
	Well, that's good, but I wonder how many kibitzes there were that did not have a Mary Sue or whoever the person was who had the keys.
	Maybe they were killed and that's it.
	Nobody's got any guns at that point in time.
	And so, you know, they're pushing this because they want to push the gender roles.
	They're pushing this because they want people to feel that they're safe when they're not, if they've taken the guns away.
	Unfortunately for the citizens of Israel, it took a surprise attack, says this retired police chief, that has, by all estimates, killed at least a thousand of its citizens and tore to wake up from a slumber that saw it impose draconian gun laws in a country in many ways more stringent than any such laws in the United States.
	After such a deadly attack on Israel last weekend, the government acted quickly to get guns into the hands of Israeli citizens, writes BearingArms.com.
	Well, gun grabbers in the U.S. say the military and the police should be the ones, the only ones, able to carry guns.
	And this is why they're pushing the Mary Sue story.
	See, it works. We have a hero who is going to save us all.
	We don't have to take any responsibility for our own security.
	The events in Israel prove that it isn't always possible.
	As a matter of fact...
	You know, as we have everybody talking about this day of rage, and we have a lot of people in the media hyping on it.
	I thought it was a good reminder of what this comedian had to say about America.
	The United States of America, the most powerful country on this planet.
	And it's not because we have more money or we're better looking.
	No. It's because we have something in this country they don't have in other countries.
	That's right. I'm talking about rednecks.
	Good old boys with an arsenal in their basement that have been waiting for just such an occasion since 1775.
	Oh, believe me, foreign troops land in the south, there'll be a line of pickup trucks and NASCARs heading down I-95.
	Marines will show up three hours later, nothing but beer cans and shotgun shells.
	What the hell happened here?
	War is over, baby!
	And then that meme.
	Rural America, we were coming.
	And then I got a picture of rural America.
	And you guys say, yay, that's what we've been waiting for.
	Anyway, it should be noted that less than a month ago, Hamas condemned an Israeli call for Jewish settlers to carry firearms.
	And I guess the government of Israel, when that was presented, said, not yet.
	Let's wait just a little bit longer.
	I think they knew what was happening.
	The Israeli government is backing off because, frankly, troops can't be everywhere and can't protect everyone.
	Just like police officers.
	And the guy bearing arms says, this is what my friend Yehuda Reamer, the pew-pew Jew, you know, pew-pew.
	That's what he has on a t-shirt.
	He says, people with ARs.
	Don't get into cattle cars.
	That's right. And so when we look at this, you know, above and beyond the Pearl Harbor aspect, did they knowingly open the gates and let people come in?
	Beyond that, does the Israeli government bear responsibility for not allowing their citizens to have the tools to protect themselves?
	Yes. Yes, they do.
	Yes, they do. Nobody talks about that when we have mass shootings.
	Nobody says, you know, why did the government keep people from having weapons in this school or in this church or whatever?
	Or why didn't these people arm themselves?
	I'm reminded of the Clint Eastwood movie, The Unforgiven.
	And I forget the character who did it.
	But I remember the line.
	The guy says, you just shot an unarmed man.
	And the other person said, he should have armed himself.
	Now, I'm not supporting that.
	I'm just saying that we bear some responsibility.
	If we allow the government to disarm us, we bear some responsibility.
	But the government bears a great deal of responsibility.
	A government that acts like Little Bill in that movie, if you remember.
	They bear responsibility for the murder of innocent citizens, making it impossible for ordinary citizens to have the tools to protect themselves.
	And in addition to that, this is yet another video that was put up on Twitter.
	This is yet another video of a person who was part of the Israeli military saying, I don't believe that this was a situation where they didn't know what was going on.
	Now, I've been told by some that because it was a holiday, there was a lot of stand-down, but I think to the extent of this stand-down, I just can't believe that to this extent that everybody went on holiday, that everybody took Sabbath off.
	Here's what one soldier said.
	He didn't believe it either, and he's not the first one.
	That has said this. I had a quote from somebody who was in Israeli intelligence.
	He said, no, that's not the case.
	We know what's going on. We know if a cat is walking next to that fence.
	So here's what he had to say, and since he's speaking Hebrew, I will read the subtitles.
	Listen, I was a commander in the Galani Brigade for a while, and I know where the border patrols are.
	I was a squad leader for a while, and I'll tell you what happened.
	It was done in full cooperation.
	It is impossible that the IDF, the Israeli army, or especially Shen Bet, would stand down.
	There is no way the IDF does not react immediately with the Air Force.
	In my times, he said there would be an invasion from the Gaza Strip.
	I remember I was in Nahal, Oz, and hundreds of cars, vehicles from all sides arrived in seconds.
	No way this happened without the knowledge of the IDF. And I want to tell you something.
	Listen carefully. I want to tell you, this country betrayed us back during the COVID-19 pandemic with these dangerous vaccinations.
	And now you see it more clearly.
	The army no longer serves us.
	I know it sounds hard. I know it sounds scary.
	But in my opinion, it is true.
	Let's remember that Operation Warp Speed was a military operation here in the United States as well.
	I think it is very, you know, some people say don't conflate what is going on with the vaccine with this.
	I think it shows the character of a country.
	And it's a progression.
	You do it from the inside, and you do it iteratively as well.
	And so if a government can kill you by poisoning you, that is hard to prove, isn't it?
	Especially if it's a delayed reaction for a lot of people.
	But, you know, poisoners are sneaky.
	You know, they're like spies who stab you in the back.
	And now they're more bold.
	After the spies and the backstabbers and the vaccinators have done their job and the poisoners have done their job, now they're getting more bold.
	Now they just open up and come after you directly.
	And I think that is essentially what is going on here.
	I think they did stand down.
	I think that the jab and the vaccine and using your own people as lab rats, I think that defines your character.
	It does sound harsh.
	And people have a difficult time believing the character of their governments.
	All of them.
	Everywhere around the world.
	Every government in the world should not be trusted based on what you see in 2020.
	Many of us did not trust government before.
	And this, unfortunately...
	Confirmed our belief in spades that we're ruled by criminals.
	Criminals. Superintendent trains and arms school teachers.
	We are not going to be a soft target, he said.
	The school superintendent explains that he's not a gun person, but nevertheless, he's trained and armed nearly 20 school faculty and staff members because, he said, it can take 15 minutes for officers to arrive when an active shooter incident develops.
	Or if you're in a situation in Israel...
	Where they've stood down from the border, they take hours, hours to show up.
	Anyway, superintendent at a school district in Ohio had also done this at a nearby Sydney City Schools 10 years ago following the shooting at Sandy Hook.
	He said...
	At that point in time, he worked with a county sheriff to improve school security with cameras and better doors and better locks and all the rest of that stuff.
	But he said, we understood that the most secure buildings in the country, if an active shooter wants to come in and do that kind of carnage to students, they can.
	So that's when we sat down and we came up with a plan that had an armed presence trained by the sheriff's department.
	Not a sheriff's deputy there in uniform.
	Not somebody, as we saw the Parkland shooting, who heard the shooting, but he did not want to go inside.
	And as I said at the time, there's a big difference between somebody acting as a hero and somebody who is defending their own life or the life of innocent children who surround them that they know.
	If they're coming at you as an attacker, that's a very different dynamic than if you were called to rush into the gunfire.
	You're in a safe position, and that's what that sheriff's deputy did who was school security in Florida.
	He didn't run in there.
	That's why we honor heroes.
	That's not a natural thing to do.
	We have to understand that a lot of people who wear a uniform and carry a gun are not heroes.
	And so we shouldn't fall back on hoping that we're going to be saved by a hero.
	Because if somebody attacks you and you have the ability to defend yourself, you will do it.
	I mean, that's just survival.
	That's not heroism. That's just survival.
	And so he said, time is of paramount importance.
	We need to have armed faculty on the scene immediately.
	He said they go through intense training and they are the first line of defense.
	If there is a shooter, they don't help the police once they arrive.
	They're instructed to put the threat out as soon as possible and retreat as soon as law enforcement identifies themselves.
	And the parents overwhelmingly have supported the armed response team.
	So we feel pretty confident that the community in general is supportive of having trained and qualified armed response team to back up our school resource officers and the police.
	Armed teachers is far more effective.
	You might have a police officer, maybe you got one police officer to protect the school or a couple, but they're easily identified because they have a uniform on.
	So if you got somebody who is a killer, what are they going to do?
	Take that person out, and now they can do whatever they want.
	The teachers would be carrying concealed, and they don't know which teachers have weapons and which ones don't.
	And then the teachers are there and are going to act in their own defense and in the defense of children who are around them.
	Some teachers express concern about serving as law enforcement.
	You're not serving as law enforcement.
	You're not going to hand out tickets to people.
	Or arrest people. You're there to defend yourself.
	You're not law enforcement.
	You're really there to serve and to protect.
	You know, they put that slogan on the sides of cars.
	Sometimes that's true.
	Oftentimes it's not.
	Oftentimes they're just bureaucrats writing tickets to people and harassing people.
	But they're there to protect themselves and others.
	They're not law enforcement.
	In Washington, D.C., Concealed carry trailblazer warns that without anything changing in Washington, D.C., it's going to be like the Hunger Games.
	Firearms instructor Leon Spears' office said he's not only the first training instructor authorized by the Metropolitan Police Department in D.C. to teach the 16-hour concealed carry course, but he was also the first D.C. resident to receive his own license to carry a concealed firearm.
	And he said D.C. is, quote, in trouble, unquote, right now.
	Because officials aren't being tough enough on crime and that people should pursue a concealed carry permit in order to carry a firearm for self-defense.
	They're not doing the job.
	Law enforcement there is not doing the job.
	They're not protecting anybody.
	They're not serving anybody. They may be serving summonses or tickets or whatever, but they're not serving the interest of the people there.
	The district passed 200 homicides this year in September, a milestone that was reached in late December of last year.
	So they're at a faster pace.
	And D.C. is currently experiencing a 40% increase in violent crime compared to records this time last year.
	So in the first three quarters of the year.
	They got to the record that they had last year.
	And it's looking like it's 40% higher.
	If they do not come slamming hard with a hammer for criminal activity, it's just going to be Hunger Games, he said.
	So I'm just always a proponent for people to have their firearms.
	As I pointed out, I'm the congressman.
	You know, we just had a congressman who was carjacked.
	Quayle R. from Texas.
	Other congressmen, as that happened, said, we're afraid to go out at night to go home.
	If we have a late session and it's dark, I'm not going to go out.
	So I'll sleep inside my office.
	What does it say when the congressmen are afraid of D.C.? And they won't do anything about it.
	The federal government does have ultimate control over the District of Columbia, or should.
	They should exercise their control over that.
	But even the congressmen are cowering in fear, doing nothing.
	Part of the problem with carrying in Washington, D.C. are the federal laws that say that you can't be within a certain number of feet of federal buildings or other things like that, but especially federal building schools.
	These are deemed to be gun-free zones.
	It's far too easy to inadvertently cross over into a sensitive place.
	Especially if you're part of a city that's got all these private businesses mixed in with government entities, the abundance of no-go zones for lawful gun owners, combined with the onerous training mandate that cannot be satisfied, listen to this, without traveling to Maryland or Virginia in order to complete the live fire training.
	In other words, you can go through a 16-hour class, but you've also got to go through live training, and they won't even let you do the training under supervision in D.C. That's how obsessive they are about this.
	On comments we've got here, RabidRO4CH, thank you for the tip.
	So speaking as a teacher, I'll be the first to admit that I would take joy in being the school's designated defense.
	Give me a gun and the proper training, I'll take pride in protecting the kids.
	Yes, good. And protecting your own life, because you would be there.
	You'd be threatened as well.
	I mean, this is like somebody breaking into your home.
	And Dougalug, thank you very much for that tip.
	I appreciate that. And RabidRO4CH, also a tip and a comment.
	Thank you for not taking sides the way everyone else does and simply pointing out the facts.
	I appreciate that you allow us all to come to our own conclusions.
	Thank you. That's what I try to do.
	Like I said, I'm not here to tell you what to think about what's going on with anything, especially what has been going on for a long time between Israel and the Palestinians and the rest of this stuff.
	I'm just here to say...
	Think about it yourself.
	And think about it from the perspective that you're going to answer to God for the decisions that you make.
	You know, we talk about things like turning the other cheek.
	I understand that government is not there to turn the other cheek.
	Government is there to exercise the sword of justice, not to participate in forgiveness, and to keep people safe.
	And we need to call out government when it fails to do that.
	And we need to always look at this perspective of just war and other things like that and speak out when government is not doing it.
	It's increasingly difficult to hold government accountable, but we must not stand behind it and cheer.
	If we get enough people to stand on principles, perhaps we can make a difference.
	However, understand That if you are that guy in the Nazi rally, do you remember that picture?
	I forget the guy's name now.
	But everybody is doing a Siegel to Hitler, except one person.
	And he's got his arm down.
	And you usually see that picture with a big red circle around him.
	And they eventually got him.
	But he refused to go along with the crowd.
	And, you know, you are going to answer to God someday, not to Hitler, not to anybody else.
	As we're talking about firearms, Guard Goldsmith tweeted this out yesterday.
	At large capacity, gun magazine prohibition stands firm in court.
	That's California's thing.
	I guess the court there has not looked up the definition of the word infringe yet.
	Yeah, you don't need to have all of those rounds.
	Yeah, really? Okay.
	Awootz, thank you for the tip.
	The music festival killings to me had parallels to the Las Vegas shooting, and they both contained demographics disliked by governing bodies.
	Yeah, I agree. And, of course, like I said, Petrenic came on.
	Nobody died. And I'm hearing that now as well.
	Nobody died at this concert.
	I don't believe that. And here's the thing.
	And we don't want to...
	Truth is one of the first casualties in war, and of course so is free speech.
	And we do not want...
	That's why I spent so much time talking about the baby beheadings and things like that.
	Look, I understand babies were killed, and the Muslims have paraded out the bodies of children in Hamas that were killed.
	I saw a gruesome picture of a child that was...
	You know, body was crushed.
	The head was exploded on a cot.
	You know, beheading is not the only way you kill a kid.
	But I wanted to put this in the context of, do we really normally care about killing babies?
	Don't we just do whatever we want to to babies and children?
	If they survive the abortion...
	We do what the accused, the falsely accused, the Iraqi soldiers are doing, taking these kids who needed an incubator to survive.
	They needed help and treatment to survive.
	Take them out, leave them on the floor to die.
	Well, we do that with the kids now.
	Call it comfort care. If they survive an abortion, I saw that Andrew Torba of Gab put out on Twitter, he said, well, okay, beheading babies, there's 20,000 abortions typically a year in Israel.
	I don't know how many abortions there are in Hamas, or in Gaza Strip, I should say.
	And again, let's not conflate Hamas.
	With the people in Gaza, any more than we want to conflate the people, the Jewish people, with the government of Israel.
	I mean, if you look at the elections that are there, even assuming that the elections were legit, there is not a consensus there of the people behind Netanyahu or any of these political parties.
	The political opinion is widely differentiated.
	And so we understand there's a difference between governments and the people.
	Hamas is not the people of Gaza.
	And the Israeli government is not the people of Israel.
	And that's one of the first things we need to stop doing.
	We can see that here at home, can't we?
	I mean, do you support Biden?
	Did he win the election?
	I doubt it.
	But, you know, it's...
	You know, we're not, they're not even the real government.
	The real government's the CIA in this country.
	You understand that, right?
	The CIA and the bureaucracy, that's the real government.
	These other people are just a distraction.
	And you don't even get what you vote for with that.
	I mean, it's just... So speaking of elections, we have Stink Uygur of the Young Turds is going to run for president as a Democrat.
	I guess he saw an opening as RFK Jr.
	left the Democrat party to run as an independent, so now Stink is going to get in there.
	Yes, he said, I'm running against Joe Biden for the Democrat nomination.
	Joe Biden is down 24 points on the economy.
	He has no ability to make up that kind of ground.
	You know, interestingly, Biden, according to these polls, a poll from Fox News, says that Biden beats Trump, but he loses to DeSantis and to Newcomb Nikki Haley.
	That's what we should call her, Newcomb Nikki.
	She's never seen a war that she doesn't want to take to the total extreme.
	So, Stink's website, List four issues in its brief policy section.
	So what do you think he's concerned about?
	You think he's concerned about the medical martial law that we just had?
	My body, my choice?
	No, he doesn't care about that.
	What about CBDCs?
	What about getting out of the WHO? What about the endless wars?
	What about the usury of banks even?
	Because what he focuses on are basically financial issues, but he's not going to talk about any real financial issues like CBDC. Financial purging.
	Incredible usury that has been with us and getting worse all of the time.
	I think about that as I look at inflation.
	I've said, you know, if I was going to run for office again, I would make that my number one issue.
	We're going to cap the interest rate that credit cards and banks can charge on things and tie it to whatever the official rate of inflation is.
	That ought to make them give us an honest rate of inflation, you think?
	The bankers are going to be looking at this, and their economists are going to go, wait a minute, you take us down there, we're going to be.
	You know, they probably have indexed it to inflation.
	That's why they're charging 25%, 30% on your credit cards.
	But no, it is usury, and it's been there for a very long time.
	And so they did have a cap.
	They had to have a fixed limit.
	You can't go more than 10%.
	And then after we got to inflation that was above that, They removed that cap.
	Well, they should have done. They should have tied it to the inflation rate.
	But, of course, the banks have their influence that is there.
	But anyway, he's talking about, well, we've got to have paid family leave.
	We've got to have a $15 minimum wage and affordable health insurance.
	Okay, well, define what that is going to be.
	This is a guy who has absolutely no idea about how inflation is rearing its ugly head.
	If he's out there pushing for a fixed minimum wage, it's ridiculous.
	And ending gerrymandering, which has been around always, always been around.
	What he means by that is that he's going to let the Democrats and Democrat courts decide how the districts are set up.
	Those are his big issues.
	Give me a break. Now, he's got another bigger issue.
	His real big issue is that he's not even qualified to be president because he is a naturalized citizen, not a natural-born citizen.
	So, just like we saw with Dr.
	Oz, interestingly enough, a Turkish citizen running for U.S. Senate, not an American citizen, he was the one that Trump endorsed.
	Dr. Oz. Who said, well, if I am elected to become senator, then I will become an American citizen.
	Well, how gracious of you.
	That's the guy that Trump supported.
	Why? Because he's a TV personality.
	And he went down and he lost to Fetterman.
	You understand why.
	I probably would have voted for Fetterman instead of Dr.
	Oz, you know, hoping that he's not going to know what he's doing.
	Of course, he's got a staff that's going to make all of his decisions for him.
	But what a slap in the face to Americans.
	Well, I'll become an American citizen if I'm elected to Congress or to Senate.
	Why? Why?
	Well, so that he'd be able to get to our secrets, right?
	Things that are classified, they wouldn't be able to see if he was still a Turkish citizen.
	Wow. And so, Stink, he's a naturalized citizen.
	He plans to challenge this constitutional requirement in court.
	And he has been ratioed on social media, saying, on Twitter, they put community notes, by the way, as he announces his...
	It's candidacy for president.
	Community notes saying, by the way, the Constitution bars him from becoming president.
	He's an American citizen.
	So he responded and he said, well, I've lawyered up.
	They're going to change the Constitution to win.
	And he says, my guess is I'm going to have some really strong allies in this.
	Arnold Schwarzenegger.
	Really strong allies in this.
	And he names Arnold Schwarzenegger.
	I don't know. Arnold's not so strong anymore.
	And he's not too popular anymore either.
	So, anyway, it's a joke.
	But he does say, I'm not going to go around and campaign with anybody personally.
	How courageous. A man of the people.
	Just doesn't say which people.
	The Turkish people.
	He's a man of YouTube.
	And so he knows that YouTube is going to promote him.
	You know, he was the one who, when I went to the political conventions covering them, YouTube had its own political coverage, and it was being done by Stink and the Young Turds.
	And so they were letting them do political commentary.
	They had their roundtable discussions, and they had people coming to them and all the rest of this stuff.
	It was a real harbinger of things to come.
	We're going to take a quick break. When we come back, we're going to take a look at the Jesus cult around Trump.
	Yeah, exactly.
	There's about to be a PBS documentary on what Michael Flynn and his people are doing.
	doing.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Make it possible.
	sense. Common again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, let me, before I get into this, let me just read a couple of cards that I got and thank people for what they've sent from Rob.
	He says, three hours of education each day and I can't thank you enough.
	Well, thank you, but again, the way I see education is not the filling of a bucket or telling you what to think, but to get you to ask some questions and to question what you're being told.
	And to try to do critical thinking.
	You know, it's not the filling of a bucket, but it's the lighting of a fire.
	That's what we tried to follow with our kids when we homeschooled them.
	And this is from Paul.
	He says, let's hear more original music.
	Believe me, I would love to do that.
	I wish I had more time to do that.
	Usually I only have weekends where I can do a little bit of that.
	And I am trying...
	What you heard there...
	That's kind of my adaptation of somebody else's music.
	I have other music that I'm working on that is more original and not really appropriate for bumper music, and so that's really what I've been focused on, but I do need to get some more bumper music.
	I've done some new Christmas songs already.
	It's kind of nice to be able to do Christmas songs in August.
	Kind of give you a holiday feeling.
	But I've got some of those, more of those done.
	Instrumental, of course. But I actually may put a bunch of them out as an album.
	I don't know. We'll see what happens with that.
	I don't know even how to do that.
	I don't even know how to...
	I know there's places where I can put it besides YouTube.
	YouTube won't let me put up even music anymore.
	So, there's...
	Sound cloud and some other places where I can do it.
	We'll have to see what happens with it.
	Timed non-tides says Israeli government restricts gun ownership, in other words, self-defense, rather strictly.
	So how much is the victimized citizens' blood on their own government's hands?
	Yes, I agree.
	I agree. I think there is a culpability in that, even if it wasn't.
	Another FDR Pearl Harbor, open the gates and see what happens, right?
	Let's provoke people.
	And again, provocation going back, this has been going on for a long time.
	As I said the other day, unprovoked?
	No. Caitlin Johnstone said, everybody's saying it's unprovoked.
	It is not unprovoked.
	It's a long series of provocations.
	Question is, is it proportional?
	Have they gone too far? And that is the question that we should be asking as well in terms of the Israeli government's response into Gaza.
	Is that a response that is proportional?
	Were there other things that they could have done?
	As a matter of fact, I thought it was kind of interesting.
	I'll just say this.
	We'll get to some of that later.
	But I thought it was kind of interesting as they got into this situation where the people in Hamas said, well, you know, if you bomb, we're going to execute and behead hostages on video.
	And that has not happened.
	They've been bombing. But also, you saw before that happened that they turned off power and they turned off water.
	And, um, that was something that if they hadn't done the bombing, I mean, they certainly could have done a siege like that.
	Uh, they control very tightly, really do control in spite of what, you know, I think part of the reason, uh, that I believe they stood down and these other people have been in the Israeli military believe that they stood down was because they have had, they've exercised incredible control over the movement of people in and out of that area.
	And, um, I think one of the reasons that this happened the way that it did was for people to say, well, you can't just keep them in that area and take your time and get the Hamas people out of there without killing everybody in Gaza.
	Instead, they wanted to just completely eradicate the area and push everybody out.
	By doing the Pearl Harbor thing, that allows them to have an argument that that's what they must do.
	Except they've had these people contained for many decades.
	But now, apparently, the problem solution says, well, the only solution that we've got now is a final solution for the people in Gaza.
	Let's talk about this upcoming documentary about the Reawaken America movement.
	And I've talked about this before.
	Quite frankly, I think it is a betrayal of both America and of Christ.
	And they disgust me in all of this.
	And now we're seeing all this stuff.
	Trump as Jesus, as a matter of fact.
	This has been going around the picture of Jesus, some ghostly Jesus, sitting next to Donald Trump in court.
	This person who put this up said this is the most accurate court sketch of all time because nobody could have made it this far alone.
	Really? Really?
	Well, you know, God puts people in power.
	He uses evil people as well.
	And so, you know, a lot of times we have governments that do things.
	They mean it for evil, but God uses it for good.
	We see that all throughout the Bible, going back to the story of Joseph.
	He says to his brothers, when you sold me into slavery, you meant it for evil, but God used it for good.
	Well, the government is constantly selling us into slavery.
	God will raise up one government to come after another government for his own purposes.
	But we are not to change the way that we behave because God has given us a standard.
	And even if these people who rule us don't adhere to that standard, that doesn't excuse us.
	That is the standard by which we will be judged.
	It is a standard by which our leaders will be judged.
	And it is a standard by which our country will be judged.
	And so...
	I just got to say, you know, when I look at pictures like this, first of all, you know, nobody knows what Jesus looked like.
	Yeah, long-haired hippie?
	I don't know. They look like Max von Sydow?
	I kind of doubt it, you know, but anyway, we don't know what Jesus looked like.
	And you know, the people who are passing this thing around, they have no idea who Trump is.
	That's the other thing about this.
	So, the Washington Post story says that Trump is Jesus, why he casts himself as a martyr, and why his fans go along with it.
	When Donald Trump's civil trial on fraud allegations began in Manhattan last week, some of his most avid fans pictured him sitting alongside an archetypal martyr, Jesus.
	Trump quickly circulated the faux courtroom sketch to his social media followers.
	Yeah. And they've got all kinds of things.
	Pictures of Trump with Jesus.
	Does he know who Jesus is?
	All these people who surrounded him, people like Paula White and all these other people, Robert Jefferson of Dallas, they ought to be talking to him about the real issues instead of bowing down and worshiping him.
	They should be teaching him who to bow down and worship.
	So, he says, they're not after me.
	They're coming after you.
	Well, tell that to the January the Sixers, Benedict Donald.
	Oh, all you people there on January the Sixth, they're not coming after you.
	All you people who've got decades in prison, they're not coming after you.
	They're coming after me.
	I'm your savior. I've risked it all, he said, to defend the working class from the corrupt political class.
	I put everything on the line to fight for you.
	Yeah, you know, he saved us.
	He saved us from COVID, remember?
	And he's told us that many times.
	And look, I guess in a certain way, I'm the father of the vaccine because I was the one that pushed it.
	You know, to get it done in less than nine months, I pushed them like they've never been pushed before, and that's why we have it.
	The vaccine is one of the greatest achievements of mankind.
	Let the teachers get the vaccine.
	They should get the vaccine.
	I hope they do.
	Yeah, well, you know, anybody that tells you that...
	Is betraying you.
	They're either incredibly stupid or they're evil.
	And of course, he didn't just stop when he got out of the presidency.
	You know, by the summer of 2021, when they were inventing their new threat, they'd already gone through the Omicron variant.
	And then they, oh, well, yeah, okay, nobody died with the Omicron.
	So let's invent a new thing.
	We'll scare you about the Delta thing.
	Oh, it's worse than Omicron.
	I know you didn't die with COVID and you didn't die with Omicron, but you're going to be dying with Delta.
	And so when he was speaking to his people, notice when he's talking here, he's not wearing a mask.
	People are not wearing a mask.
	He's gotten over all that stuff.
	He wouldn't do rallies and things like that for the most part before the election.
	He had a lockdown mail-in election.
	But he spoke to these people and he's saying that even though This is the summer of 2021, remember?
	Six months after they rolled out this vaccine for people.
	And at that point, it was not mandated by Biden.
	You know, not until the end of August or beginning of September was it mandated.
	But in the summer, when the Delta thing came out, Trump was saying that Biden had not done enough to stop this COVID stuff.
	So more people needed to get the jab.
	And Trump would have done a better job of getting people to do the jab.
	Is he saying, well, he needs to mandate it because people aren't taking it?
	He didn't stop the virus, you know?
	They say, oh, he gets wonderful marks.
	He doesn't get good marks.
	He's done a terrible job, including on vaccinations, including on everything else.
	And now the virus is back.
	The virus is back.
	I'm shaking hands with everybody backstage.
	I say, well, I don't know.
	Is this a good thing or bad?
	You'll read about it in three or four days, maybe.
	Hopefully not. Yeah, maybe he's going to come down with COVID and die.
	You know, he told us that he got COVID. He told us that he beat it.
	And then when he said that he got it, and he said that he beat it, they produced commemorative coins for that, to sell his cult.
	When he was booked at the Atlanta Jail, On election interference charges, of course, he put out his mugshot that he practiced.
	And it was his first post on X on Twitter.
	Since he'd been banned in January 2021, within 24 hours, he raised more than $4 million.
	But, of course, he doesn't do anything to help his fellow defendants.
	He doesn't even understand...
	By letting them twist in the wind, the reason that Fannie Willis indicted all those people was so that she could get them to turn against him.
	And he's not going to do anything to help their common defense.
	During Trump's first impeachment in 2019, Representative Barry Loudermilk of Georgia argued to House colleagues that Jesus had been afforded more rights at his trial than the Democrats had given Trump during the investigation.
	And that's the same thing that we had Bannon doing with a Catholic priest.
	Talking about Trump as the Messiah victim.
	Listen to this. Father, yesterday's Palm Sunday.
	You're in the most sacred and holy week in the Christian calendar.
	Very symbolic that Donald Trump is being brought before the magistrate tomorrow in New York, is it not, sir?
	It really is, Steve. You know, on Good Friday, Pilate is there and he talks to Jesus and he says, well, you know, what have you done?
	He says, I find no guilt in you.
	And then he goes out to the crowd and he says, shall I release for you the king of the Jews?
	And the crowd says...
	The crowd says, give us Trump.
	Give us Trump. Give us that thief.
	Give us that convicted thief.
	Trump. Not Barabbas.
	Trump's use of religious imagery has not persuaded many devout Christians that he's one of them.
	Rather, many evangelical leaders who have been supportive of Trump say that although he is a flawed person, he is valuable to their cause because of his willingness to break norms and ally himself with conservative Christian policy, which he now calls too harsh.
	Too harsh to protect innocent babies.
	Well, you know, Trump is just so Christian.
	And if you don't believe him, he'll tell you just how Christian he is.
	He doesn't talk about Christianity.
	He doesn't talk about Christ.
	He talks about himself. You know, nobody has done more for Christianity.
	Nobody has done more for religion of all type than me.
	And they're really doing things now, too.
	And I've always said it. They are against organized religion.
	They're against Christianity.
	Oh, yeah. And he's a great defender of the Bible as well.
	You mentioned the Bible. You've been talking about how it's your favorite book.
	And you said, I think, last night in Iowa.
	Some people are surprised that you say that.
	I'm wondering what one or two of your most favored Bible verses are and why.
	I wouldn't want to get into it because to me that's very personal.
	Because I've never read it. The Bible is very personal, so I don't want to get into it.
	There's no verse that means a lot to you that you think about or cite?
	The Bible means a lot to me, but I don't want to get into specifics.
	No, I don't want to do that.
	You're an Old Testament guy or a New Testament guy?
	Probably equal.
	I think it's just an incredible...
	The whole Bible is an incredible...
	I joke very much so.
	They always hold up the art of the deal.
	I say my second favorite book of all time.
	But I just think the Bible is just something very special.
	Yeah, yeah. And he's sitting there thinking, what's he talking about?
	Old Testament, New Testament...
	What is he talking about?
	I like all of them. Yeah, I like all those religions.
	And, yeah. And the people sinned a great sin.
	You might want to start with Exodus.
	And they bore him upon their shoulders and rejoiced, saying, This be our God, O Israel.
	Well, you know, I got into this because I wanted to talk about this upcoming PBS thing, exposing Reawaken.
	Now, I'm sure that they're not going to have the same complaints with Michael Flynn and his Reawaken Road show, which is really what it is.
	This road revival and tent revival type thing.
	It's Elmer Gantry type of thing.
	It truly is cynical.
	They hate you because they hate Jesus, they're saying.
	Attendees are told that now is the time to put on the whole armor of God.
	What does he mean by that? What does he mean by that?
	The retired three-star Army General Michael Flynn, the tour's biggest draw, invited people to be baptized.
	Baptized into Trump, into Flynn, into their political movement, into what?
	Pastors then lowered them under the surface, welcoming them into the movement with the name of Jesus and the Army of God.
	There you go.
	So Reawaken America...
	Launched by Flynn and an Oklahoma grifter called Clay Clark a few months after the January the 6th insurrection.
	So Alex has got his Stop the Sting thing, and Trump's got his Save America thing, and they made millions.
	Trump made hundreds of millions, $250 million.
	And so then these guys say, hey, this is going to be like falling off a log, as Roger Stone said.
	And of course, Roger Stone is one of the people hanging around with this as well.
	Attendees and speakers still insist that Trump rightfully won.
	Since early last year, the Reawaken America Tour has carried its message of a country under siege to tens of thousands of people in 15 cities and towns.
	The tour serves as a traveling roadshow and recruiting tool for the ascendant Christian nationalist movement.
	These people are dragging the name of Christ through the mud.
	They're phony about all of this stuff.
	And this is why it needs to be opposed.
	Wrapping themselves in God, patriotism and politics.
	Well, I don't have any problem with any of those things, but that's not what they're about.
	When they talk about making America a Christian nation, here's what I think of a Christian nation.
	I think a Christian nation is one that follows Christian principles as part of its legal basis.
	Things like a justified war.
	Or the fact that we have God-given rights that government can't take away.
	Those Christian principles that were the basis of America are what we're talking about.
	Not, you know, his traveling road show.
	And so there's a coming documentary, going to be out in five days, October the 18th on PBS, Michael Flynn's Holy War.
	And they will use this, they'll use Flynn...
	To mock Christ.
	Because Flynn is a mockery of Christ.
	He is controlled opposition.
	And he's controlled opposition not just to the CIA, but far higher pay grade than that.
	You want to talk about the armor of God?
	It's principalities and powers that we're fighting.
	Lies that we are fighting.
	That's who controls him.
	So he's going to discredit the truth.
	This is the whole thing. You see this all the time.
	People adding phony stuff.
	When we talk about, again, the beheadings, was there not enough atrocities and terrorism that they don't have to add some unproven, speculative, perhaps false details to that?
	Yes. Yes. They killed babies in cribs.
	Is that not sensational enough?
	Do you have to make it about beheadings?
	And you have to say, well, 40 kids.
	Well, maybe not 40 kids, but maybe it's just...
	You start doing that kind of stuff.
	You start adding shaky details, even lies, to something that's happening, and you discredit it.
	And that's what Flynn is doing.
	He's doing that to Christianity. He's doing that to the vaccine stuff as well.
	It focuses a lot on the vaccine.
	I don't want somebody like Flynn, an obvious liar and a grifter, out there talking about the vaccine stuff.
	Another one of these October 4th nonsense people.
	So he's going to discredit the truth about the vaccine.
	He's going to discredit the truth about Christ as well.
	As a matter of fact, this is what this looks like.
	This guy is out there leading prayers to ascended masters.
	He's out there leading prayers to Lucifer in church buildings, and these people who think they're Christians are repeating all this stuff.
	We are your instrument of those sevenfold rays and all your archangels.
	All of them. And I am the instrument of those sevenfold rays and archangels.
	Elizabeth Clare Prophet. A cult leader from the 1980s.
	We will not retreat.
	We will stand our ground.
	I will not fear to speak.
	We will not fear to speak.
	And I will be the instrument of God's will, whatever it is.
	We will be the instrument of your will, whatever it is.
	In the name of Archangel Michael and his legions, I am freeborn and I shall remain freeborn.
	In your name and the name of your legions, we are freeborn and we shall remain freeborn.
	And I shall not be enslaved by any foe within or without.
	And we shall not be enslaved by any foe Within or without?
	Within or without.
	So help me God.
	God bless you.
	God bless America. Thank you very much.
	Yeah. General Flynn recited the osophist Elizabeth Clare Prophet's channeled message from 1984 nearly verbatim.
	Elizabeth's full original speech can be found linked below.
	It begins by stating the following message is channeled from whom they believe is Archangel Michael, who...
	Well, there you go. Is that Archangel Michael Flynn?
	That makes sense now, okay?
	So he's actually the archangel there right now.
	Look, these people are grifters.
	They are Satan worshipers.
	They're defiling the truth about the vaccine.
	They're defiling the truth about Christ.
	It's just, yeah, you worship the father of the vaccine, Trump, and worship the father of lies.
	That's what this guy's about.
	We'll be right back. You're
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show
	Maloney says, I don't believe Trump took his own jab.
	I don't either. I don't believe that he took remdesivir that he said he took, and I don't believe that he had COVID. I don't believe that it was a pandemic.
	I don't believe any of that stuff.
	I believe they relabeled every disease they could think of, respiratory and otherwise, as COVID. I think he was in on it from the very beginning, and I'll go even further.
	I think it was a deliberate ploy to stop people from using hydroxychloroquine to have Trump talk about that and say, oh, maybe we could even inject sunlight into our veins.
	Yeah, right. And then Fauci goes, come on, come on, let's listen to me.
	I'm Mr. Science. He doesn't know what he's talking about.
	And anybody that, you know, wants to take hydroxychloroquine, it's the same as thinking that you're going to inject sunlight into your veins.
	That's how they discredit it.
	You add lies, like injecting sunlight into your veins, to the truth about hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin or something like that.
	But since when did it ever become the business of Fauci or Trump or anybody else in government at any level to tell me what I can do to my body?
	And we're not all these people.
	Pushing anything you want to do to a baby.
	They completely look the other way when it was actually your body and not some other body.
	Mark M228. It's a travesty that Trump has deserted the J6ers.
	It absolutely is. And always with the Jesus comparison, says KWD68. Billy the Kid Part 2.
	Trump opened the gates...
	For LGBT in the military.
	Oh, absolutely. The same way that he did for opening the gates for the LGBT in sports and into beauty contests and everything else.
	He was a pioneer in that.
	that virtue signaled on that as well uh narrow way narrow gate ministries it's so sad that for far too many believers have no idea how to fight spiritual warfare and do not know the weapons of their warfare if believers did 10 of what satanists did the world would be better i think it's also interesting that uh part of that ascended prayer you know we will obey your will whatever that is I don't know where I would find that.
	What's that thing, the Bible or anything?
	How would we know what God's will is?
	Well, he's revealed it, actually.
	The book that Trump doesn't like to read.
	KWD-68. False prophets, you have to know your Bible or you fall for it.
	Exactly right. Yeah, whatever your will is, we don't know.
	And my son says, Trump, I'm such a big fan of the Bible that I joke that I like it more than the book that I wrote, which is called Art of the Deal.
	Let's talk about that book instead.
	That's exactly what...
	You're exactly right. That's what he did.
	Let's see. People are so desperate...
	For the nation to be what it was that they cling to Trump.
	That's right. They don't realize that it was what it was because of a certain set of principles.
	They don't care about the principles.
	They care about a person now.
	SoloCat, 1980. Yes, Trump is one of the greatest mass murderers in history with his jab.
	I agree. And then Christian Constitutional Conservative.
	I'm very satisfied with your choice of music.
	Well, thank you. We need to have more variety.
	I feel bad to play the same songs as much as I do, but it's coming.
	We're going to get there. Let's talk a little bit about this whole gain-of-function lab stuff.
	Patricia Herity.
	The gain-of-function lab-leaked bioweapons story is pure science fiction.
	That's exactly what I believe.
	And I've been saying that for a while.
	Actually, this is an article from Simon Lee, science officer, who says, Postline Love and Fear Porn set the scene.
	We had all the practicing of how they were going to do this for 20 years.
	And actually, they began their first practice of it.
	Just two months before 9-11, one week after, we had a real death from a falsified anthrax attack that was initially, if you remember, blamed on Iraq.
	Then it was blamed on a Patsy who was killed or committed suicide.
	But investigations show that that form of anthrax, both its delivery as well as other aspects of it, could have only come from two labs.
	Both of them in America, both of them tightly controlled by the CIA. So what did they do?
	They picked somebody from another lab that didn't have access to any of that.
	Made him the patsy.
	Pushed by mainstream media with scary stories about labs genetically modifying viruses in order to make them more lethal.
	We are encouraged to believe that terrorists might unleash a deadly contagion viral plague upon the world.
	Virologists have claimed that the coronavirus probably resulted in regular contact between humans and animals, possibly in connection with the wet markets in Wuhan.
	Initially, the lab origin narrative was censored, but this has now become the mainstream narrative.
	And as Simon Lee says, this alone ought to be enough to make critical thinkers skeptical about this.
	Again, the fact that now, all of a sudden, they've done a complete 180.
	And you've got both parties.
	You've got Trump. You've got Biden.
	You've got Rand Paul. You've got the mainstream media.
	Oh, everybody agrees.
	Everybody agrees on this now.
	Because I think, and the writer here does not say it, my belief is that they're bringing this up now and pushing this because they want you to, A, be afraid, and think that it is a continuing threat, and that the continuing issues with people, health issues, and that the continuing issues with people, health issues, are not due to the real bioweapon, Trump shot.
	They're due to long COVID, or they're due to something else that's about to be released.
	The people who believe the lab leak story seem to be ignoring some simple facts.
	None of the symptoms associated with COVID-19 are new.
	They're not unique.
	They're not specific.
	There simply is no new disease.
	It is a rebranding of old diseases and symptoms and there is no proof of transmission or contagion except for a few highly flawed epidemiological studies.
	There never was a need to create a virus bioweapon when all that was needed to control the masses was relentless propaganda and a fraudulent PCR test.
	There is no new virus.
	There is no new disease. There is no contagious bioweapon.
	And there has been no pandemic.
	And there absolutely was no pandemic.
	And you can see that yourself. I mean, look at all the situations.
	I have people saying, well, you know, I carefully guarded the health of these people under my care in this rest home.
	And the guy was in tears.
	You know, late 20s, early 30s.
	He said, we started these vaccines.
	And he said, you know, we've had a dozen deaths or whatever.
	And he said, other people are just sitting around here now in a kind of catatonic fog.
	He said, we kept them safe.
	And that was in January, as soon as they started this Trump shot stuff.
	And everybody else is out there. But how are we going to keep Trump in the office of presidency?
	Get him out of there.
	I don't really care. Who cares?
	Yeah, we know what Biden is going to do.
	There was no naivety about what Biden was going to do.
	We knew he was going to mandate this stuff.
	We knew that he hated all civil liberties.
	But nevertheless, you can't continue to support Benedict Donald.
	It is pure science fiction.
	And fear that they're doing.
	Those that have been fooled by the gain-of-function bioweapon narrative.
	But look, I do believe, unlike this author...
	That there is gain of function for bacteria and for other things like that.
	They can try to selectively breed bacteria and other things like that to make them more easily transmitted and to take things that are very dangerous and make them even more dangerous.
	But let's understand that it truly is the Trump shot.
	That is the plague. The trump shot.
	That is the bioweapon. Dr.
	Sukharit Bhakti says the mRNA injections are a crime against humanity.
	They absolutely are.
	Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as effective and safe, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome, They are either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil.
	And look, I guess in a certain way, I'm the father of the vaccine.
	Yeah, like that guy, pushing everybody.
	Yeah, you need to get it. Incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil.
	Such people claim the retired University of Maine's professor of microbiology are turning their backs on the horror scenario that is unfolding in front of our very eyes.
	Somebody saying this is the greatest achievement of mankind.
	Somebody like Trump saying that.
	And yet he says, do this to save yourselves.
	Oppose this. He said, fellow citizens and physicians of the world, turn away from the perpetuation of this monstrous crime against humanity.
	Do this to save yourselves.
	Do this to save your descendants.
	To rescue the name of your family.
	Or you will go down in history.
	That's one of the greatest criminals of all time.
	And that is especially true of these politicians, of this Trump cult.
	Get yourself away from this guy who said he was the father of it, who said it was the greatest achievement of mankind.
	No! It is one of the greatest crimes in history.
	Distance yourself from this guy.
	This is why I have absolutely no respect for anybody who supports Trump I don't want to hear any more about this Machiavellian, you know, lesser to evil, any of the rest of this stuff.
	The man is pure evil.
	He has to be rejected on the basis of what he has done and continues to do.
	With a vaccine alone.
	And so, this doctor says that it is, not only is this plasmid, he says the specific focus that he's been working on is on the plasmid DNA. And I'm not talking about this, but let's just briefly go through this.
	He says it can indeed cause genetic mutation in the host.
	These mutations can be inherited.
	Maybe this is why they were so intent on injecting pregnant women.
	Because if you do genetic modification to a developing child, that's one of the reasons why they, you know, say don't do any genetic modification to unborn babies.
	Because at that stage, as they're developing, you modify them genetically.
	That is a seed change.
	That means that anything that you do to them at that stage is going to be permanent for them, and it will be passed along to their descendants.
	That's why they call it a seed change.
	And that's why there's so much...
	So many prohibitions and everything else, even in China.
	You know, even a Chinese scientist who does this to a developing child.
	The Chinese have to at least make a show of coming after this guy.
	Children of those receiving the injections then can be subjected to genetic modification without being injected themselves and without consent.
	He was asked to talk in layman's terms about the danger of the so-called vaccines.
	And so Bhakti said, so that any 14-year-old could understand it.
	So his analogy, he used a bakery analogy.
	He said the genome is an entire set of DNA instructions in the cell, packaged in the chromosomes, the books of life, which are kept safe in the cell nucleus.
	So when a recipe for a product is required, let's say a cake, the book is open to the right page and a copy is made from the recipe.
	This recipe is sent to the manufacturing site, the bakery, in the cell.
	The cake is placed for inspection on the windowsill of the cell.
	Having fulfilled its purpose, the copied recipe, which is mRNA, is then disposed of.
	Naturally occurring mRNA is short-lived, but not the stuff that Trump and Fauci and Biden put into people.
	RNA vaccines, however, direct the production of selected antigens, like the spike protein.
	More than one billion copies of the spike protein recipe are administered with each injection.
	Mass production of mRNA requires mass availability of the DNA template.
	So how do the injections do this?
	Well, the injections contain billions and trillions of minute bacterial chromosomes called plasmids.
	This is the DNA base for the replication of the spike protein and the mRNA injections.
	And these are packaged in lipid nanoparticles, tiny fatty globules, which protect the injected RNA from destruction, so it can travel in the bloodstream to reach all the organs of the body.
	When delivered to the body's organs, these nanoparticles act as Trojan horses, and they're taken up by the cell, and the recipe produces the product, which is then displayed on the windowsill.
	And what everyone must know is that outside of the cell, security guards are on watch.
	And so he said, when you put this foreign plasmid DNA into the body, he said, well, when the recipe is produced from your own book of life, your own genome, he said, our immune system, the security guards, look at it and say, well, that's authentic, that's genuine.
	He said, the distinction between genetic material that is from you and material that is not from you That ability to distinguish is given at birth and ends at death.
	He cited the example of organ rejection where non-self organs are routinely rejected, even within the same species of humans.
	He went on to say that if this intrusion is repeated, an explosive reaction follows.
	Fast and furious. This is the principle at work, he said, which explains the intensifying and worsening adverse effects following repeated mRNA injections or booster shots.
	He described the sheer volume of packaged RNA material being introduced in each of these injections as gigantic.
	He said it results in myriad immune attack events and the eruptions of these reactions can only halt when the production of the alien protein comes to an end.
	But how long does this take?
	He says, well, they tell us that the process of this reproduction is going to end in just a few days.
	He said, that is simply false.
	He mentioned an alarming find which shows that the spike protein and the multi-organ inflammation were detected in vaccines weeks and even months after injection.
	What is more, he said, this was associated often with severe and even fatal illness.
	Why on earth have they designed this to produce these effects?
	He said. It is a deliberate bioweapon.
	And they've got you looking at something else.
	What earthly reason could there have been, could there still be, for such disastrous, long-lasting production of RNA-encoded protein?
	Well, he said that if the plasmid DNA is not removed prior to the vaccines being packaged for use, it would be developed into the cells of the vaccinated.
	The result would then be the plasmid DNA would alter the book of life with its own recipe.
	Meaning genetic modification of the vaccinated without their knowledge or consent.
	The discovery of contaminated plasmid DNA in the vaccines by Kevin McKernan and colleagues immediately provides one terrifying explanation.
	The plasmid DNA had not been removed from the vaccines.
	And cell uptake of plasmid DNA alters the entire set of DNA instructions and, by definition, equates with alteration of the genome.
	Now, let me just say here, you've got people like Rand Paul calling Fauci a war criminal, and he is, but not for the reasons that Rand Paul says.
	He says he's out there doing genetic modification and gain-of-function and all the rest of this stuff at this lab, and we've got to arrest him for that, right?
	No, the vaccine, Rand, the vaccine that Trump did and that Biden mandated it, that is your gain of function.
	That is your genetic modification.
	You're a doctor.
	You know better.
	You're not a fool.
	Who has not heard of the mysterious deaths?
	These are only the tip of the iceberg, the mysterious sudden deaths.
	Well, Rand Paul says Fauci's a traitor to his country who belongs in jail.
	Should be in prison for covering up the origin of the COVID virus.
	No. He's lying to us.
	About many things.
	No, he needs to.
	And it's not because of the lab.
	It's because of the bioweapon injected into people.
	This man was a traitor to his country, says Rand.
	And so was Rand.
	And so is everyone who continues to cover up for what this bioweapon is.
	These people won't even stop it.
	The best that you see out of the political class is DeSantis saying, well, I wouldn't recommend this if you're young.
	I'm sorry, that's not good enough.
	You're still saying you're going to make it available to the elderly and everybody who is not young?
	Come on. They all are guilty.
	They've all took a stab at us.
	And they have all misdirected us.
	Every one of them has lied to us about the lockdowns and everything else.
	And then you got these celebrities like Travis, is it Kelsey?
	I don't know, the football player.
	I don't even know how to pronounce his name.
	Who's out there pushing all this stuff.
	You know, Taylor Swift's new boyfriend.
	He was called Mr.
	Fizer by Aaron Rodgers.
	And he says, oh, I'm 1,000% comfortable being called Mr.
	Fizer. He says, I got it because, you know, keeping myself safe?
	No, didn't do that.
	Keeping my family safe?
	Didn't do that. The people in this building say, yeah, I stand by 1,000% fully comfortable with him calling me Mr.
	Fizer, he said with a smile.
	Okay, well, we'll see what happens.
	He keeps getting these boosters.
	I know he's very strong, but we'll see what happens.
	Hospital that fired nurses for refusing vaccines are now begging them to come back.
	Maine General Health in Augusta, Maine, currently imploring nurses whom they previously fired for not complying with their vaccine mandates.
	They've sent out letters with a message, please think about returning to us.
	And I think that people are saying basically get lost.
	You were once a proud member of the Maine General team.
	Would you consider rejoining us?
	We would be pleased to discuss options with you.
	As you know, nearly two years ago, Maine General had to comply with a state mandate for COVID-19 vaccination.
	Or what would have happened to them?
	They would have lost some money.
	So what they did was they fired these people so they could keep the money.
	That's one thing that's happening with us.
	We lost a number of great employees as a result, including you.
	And this nurse who put this out said, I was livid.
	Despite hard economic times, she lost her job.
	She had made about $75,000 a year before being fired, but she was not tempted to come back.
	She said, how dare you force me out of a career that I've dedicated my whole life to?
	You've taken away my livelihood, my ability to earn a good income?
	Well, because it was about their money, right?
	They could make a lot more money killing people and forcing you to get injected.
	Now you think I'm going to come back and grovel to you?
	This is the attitude we should have with Trump and Biden.
	It's so obscene that they're the leading candidates.
	Just amazing to me.
	Thomas Massey, talking about the vaccines growing in lettuce.
	I've mentioned this in passing.
	We could really contaminate a lot of our food supply with unknown doses of vaccines that would deliver unknown dosages.
	And, of course, this is not just a theory that's being passed around out there.
	These are grants. That are coming from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the FDA. And so a bill has been introduced by Thomas Massey to stop that from happening.
	A vote on that bill is still pending because they can't even figure out who the speaker is going to be.
	Anyway, there has been a recent grant of a half a million dollars in California from the National Science Foundation Federal Organization.
	To involve growing lettuce and trying to get the lettuce to then produce mRNA vaccines to be consumed by people to eat the lettuce.
	I mean, they're just coming after us in every direction, aren't they?
	Massey said he's concerned.
	He said, you know, plants cross-pollinate.
	And pollen from these modified plants, food-producing plants, could carry in the wind to other fields and contaminate them.
	And of course it could. We have seen this with glyphosate and with decambra, which is another variant of that.
	These pesticides that poison the land there so that you can't grow anything except the genetically modified seeds from Monsanto are now there.
	And so farmers who would put glyphosate and especially decambra On to their crops.
	They even have a name for it.
	Decambra drift. It drifts onto adjacent fields and poisons their fields.
	So they can't grow anything unless they go to Monsanto or Bayer and buy their genetically modified seeds.
	Their land is now poisoned for anything else.
	This is what they did to farmers in India to make them completely dependent.
	Every year they had to buy seed from Monsanto, and Monsanto could charge them whatever they wanted.
	Or bear now. Bear bought them out.
	And it got them into a sharecropper scenario that was so difficult that many of them could not survive financially, and they were committing suicide by large numbers.
	This is one of the reasons why rural areas were shutting down glyphosate.
	So what was their response? Their response was to say, well, we can't have a local area say that you can't use this pesticide.
	So let's take it into Washington.
	And we can't have this patchwork quilt, said Bayer, who was losing the ability to sell their poison in areas.
	So I said, let's take this to Washington.
	We don't want a patchwork quilt of regulations everywhere.
	Let's have one regulation that lets us do whatever we want.
	And that's what they got with their dark act.
	And so this drifting is a real issue.
	Thomas Massey said, plants release pollen.
	And that can go anywhere with the wind or with insects.
	So I think this is a bad idea.
	Claire Robinson said Massey is right.
	She is managing editor of GM Watch.
	This article is from The Defender.
	She said, genetically engineering a potent immunogen into food plants is irresponsible in the extreme.
	In the case of vaccine-producing plants, you are intentionally engineering a plant to elicit an immune reaction.
	And this increases the level of risk exponentially.
	Efforts to develop transgenic edible vaccines are not new.
	It goes back to at least 1999.
	Massey said these are all genetically modified crops.
	They've been injected with mRNA or spliced with DNA with the intent of creating copies of that RNA or DNA. Plants are very effective at that.
	Yeah, we've seen that happen. As a matter of fact, one of the most heavily genetically modified organisms out there is tobacco.
	And then also closely followed by corn and soy.
	They have been doing this type of stuff for quite some time.
	And it's not just, you know, genetic modification, for the most part, is distinctive from selective breeding in the sense that with genetic modification, you can splice in things that have absolutely nothing to do with that organism.
	As a matter of fact, you can combine plants and animals together, two different kingdoms.
	You know, if you do selective breeding, you're taking dogs and you're breeding dogs with other dogs to get certain characteristics.
	And we see the wide variety of what happens within the dog kind or the wide variety of what happens within the cat kind, you know, from a house cat to a lion or a tiger or a jaguar or whatever.
	But what they're doing is they're combining dogs and cats, as they would say on the show.
	Ghostbusters. Dogs and cats breeding together is the end of the world.
	It certainly is. Thus far, not one plant-produced vaccine has been approved anywhere as far as I know.
	What does that tell us?
	Either they don't work or they're not safe or both.
	So the project's goals are threefold, according to University of California, Riverside, getting that half a million dollar grant.
	We want to show that DNA containing the mRNA vaccines can be successfully delivered into the part of a plant cells where it will replicate, demonstrate that the plants can produce enough mRNA to rival a traditional shot.
	And then finally...
	To determine the right dosage.
	Oh, so how are we going to do that?
	Well, you know, they didn't do that until they actually started putting that into people.
	That's why they tracked the lot numbers, and we found out that it varied by a factor of, you know, 3,300 percent, a factor of 33 times.
	So Massey said, and then there's another instance where things went very bad.
	He said about 20 years ago, they were trying to grow a vaccine to prevent diarrhea in pigs.
	They were using corn to grow this vaccine.
	The field the next year was used to grow soybeans, but the corn sprouted again.
	According to Massey, there were some leftover kernels and the corn was mixed with the soybeans and the contaminated 500 bushels of soybeans that were then mixed with 500,000 bushels, and so they had to destroy all those soybeans.
	The New York Times reported in December 2002 that Protagene, the biotech company that developed that corn crop, agreed to pay the U.S. government a $3 million fine to settle charges that it didn't take proper steps to prevent corn that was genetically engineered to produce pharmaceuticals to keep that from entering the food supply.
	It's unclear whether this particular project was granted US government funding, but an archived version of the website from 2007 of Texas A&M University's Food Protein R&D Center, which hosted that research, said that the center collaborated contractually with the state and federal research labs and partially funded by the Texas Food and Fibers Commission.
	In November 2000, Protegene received an unspecified grant amount from the NIH for the development of a transgenic edible vaccine intended to develop genetically enhanced corn that could serve as an oral delivery system for AIDS vaccine.
	Who do you think was involved in that at the NIH? Well, of course, the vaccines all fall under Fauci's, I think.
	And so does AIDS. You know, that's how he made his mark, was with all of the AIDS lies.
	The AIDS lies using Kerry Mullis' PCR test and everything.
	Again, Fauci at the center of all this.
	Massey points it out.
	Not Rand Paul. Rand Paul is still playing games of fear and misdirection with us.
	We'll be right back. We're
	good to go. Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, The David Knight Show.
	One of the greatest achievements against humanity.
	Yeah, that is actually what this is.
	It truly is. KWD68, we have a local man here who wears his mask in his convertible with his top down.
	I think COVID broke him.
	Definitely did.
	I made a point of driving with a top-down without a mask all over Austin.
	I even trolled some people because, you know, the summer they had the BLM stuff and I can't breathe.
	All these people are standing on the corner with their signs, I can't breathe.
	And we drove past them with a top-down.
	Karen was with me and I said, if you can't breathe, take your mask off.
	That's... Gotta tell these people.
	You know what? I can't figure out why I can't breathe.
	Yeah, Grammy for God says some people have been wearing masks for three years.
	I know. I know. I actually saw one young person wearing it at the grocery store we went to check out.
	It was bagging stuff.
	And he had a beard.
	This is like double stupid.
	Double idiocracy here.
	Wearing a beard and a mask.
	And, you know, it must be a university student is all I could think of.
	Anyway, HazelKitty57, I had a bunch of vaccines in the 1990s to work in a hospital.
	And now I have three different autoimmune diseases.
	I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry.
	Yeah, we took too many vaccines and it had an effect on Travis so that we could travel.
	And I was fooled by that as well.
	As I'm saying, you know, we just, as we learn, we pass it on to other people.
	Sometimes we learn the hard way.
	Experience is a difficult school, but sometimes it's the only one a fool will attend.
	And we got fooled. So, anyway, KWD68, that's why I grow my own garden and keep seeds for the next year.
	Good. That's the key thing.
	We're going to talk about autonomous development goals, an alternative to the UN sustainable development goals that they want to push on us for this 2030 agenda.
	That's what we're going to talk about next here.
	Dougalug, thank you very much for the tip, and thank you for this other tip.
	He said, now that we're all together, let's hit that like button.
	Thank you. Thank you for reminding me.
	Yes, that is something that helps the program a great deal.
	It helps our visibility to put that like button on there wherever you're watching it.
	I really do appreciate that. Thank you for reminding me, Doug, and thank you for the other tip as well.
	TW97401. Anyway, if you guys need ivermectin, And they had HCQ last time I looked.
	Just go to ivermectin.com.
	Oh, good tip. We'll pass that along as we did.
	Narroway Narrogate Ministries, they are starting to wear masks around our neck of the woods, too.
	Well, as long as they keep them on their necks.
	That's fine. Anyway, the witchcraft of the masks and social distancing and its curse are rising up again.
	The spirit of fear. That is.
	That is what it is. Total fear.
	So, on the Free Thought Project...
	They have an article which actually references a document.
	Oh, let me get this as well.
	Audi MRR. Thank you very much.
	That's very generous and kind.
	Thank you. I appreciate the tip.
	It says, media has already lost control of the Israel narrative.
	Public opinion seems to indicate that people are fed up with the innocent civilian casualties, no matter which side is attacked.
	Well, I hope that is the case.
	I said yesterday, I said I think that the Israeli actress and beauty queen, you know, that does Wonder Woman, I think it's Gal Gadot or something.
	I've seen some stupid stuff from her in the past, as you would expect from somebody in Hollywood.
	But she was totally grounded.
	She said the propaganda, if you think, if your response to all this is to kill all the Israelis and that's justified, or to kill all the people in Gaza and that's justified, then the propaganda is working on you.
	We have to keep these things separate.
	And we have to understand we don't want to become the monster that we fight.
	That's the key thing.
	We understand how monstrous this is.
	Well, let's not become monsters when we fight it.
	That's the challenge. That's always the challenge with this stuff.
	So this is... A chapter that they put up on the Free Thought Project from something that is free online.
	So you can go there and find the link to the bigger document.
	I just want to give you a taste of it and direct you to it.
	It's a second edition of how to opt out of the technocratic state.
	And I like his goals that he has here.
	He says the autonomous development goals.
	He said, before outlining them, it should be noted that they are born out of recognition of certain principles, first and foremost, in alignment with the universal principle of self-ownership.
	We recognize all human beings have bodily autonomy, that they alone make decisions regarding their health, their diet, their relationships, and their actions.
	And accordingly, all human beings have the right to practice or to access health care in whatever form they choose.
	And I agree with this.
	I mean, typically we hear this It has always been said in conjunction with abortion, even though we're not talking about your body.
	We're also talking about the body of a baby that is inside of you.
	of you, but when we look at what happened to us in the last three years, no question that that violated everybody's bodily autonomy.
	Every human being has a right to privacy, a right to educate themselves and their children in the manner that they please.
	Every human being has a right to grow his or her own food.
	There should be no corporate or state restriction on homeschooling, unschooling, any of that.
	Every individual has the right to participate in local organic food systems, free of pesticides, hormones, GMO, 3D printed and synthetic food products.
	So he says, so here's some goals.
	.
	Number one, promote access to non-state-funded forms of education that emphasize voluntarism, self-ownership, mutual aid, critical thinking, creativity, self-directed learning.
	These are all things, all these goals are things that you can do individually.
	Because what would be the point of having goals for autonomous living if you've got to depend on the government to do these things for you?
	So these are personal goals, individual goals.
	Number two, foster the creation of a network of homeschooling co-ops or of unschooling pods or world schooling advocates and forest school proponents.
	Any of these types of things. Number three, create localized, decentralized food systems through community gardens, food forests, connecting communities with local food producers.
	And I've had, you know, we've played the interview.
	I've had one, maybe two interviews with him, but we played it multiple times.
	One guy who learned the technique, remember the story?
	I don't remember the name of the guy or the interview, but it is there in our archives.
	But it was a farmer who was either in Zimbabwe or South Africa.
	I think it was in Zimbabwe when the Marxists took over and they were stealing all the farmers' land.
	And he said, well, your choice was you could either run away or you could fight them.
	And the people who stayed and fought them died.
	He said his decision, though, was to show them how to farm.
	Because the people who were going in and stealing the farms from the white farmers didn't know what they were doing.
	And he had already had a situation where he was using traditional, you know, factory type of agricultural stuff.
	You know, a lot of technology, a lot of chemicals and things like that.
	And it wasn't working for him.
	And he was a Christian and he prayed and he said, God, show me the right way to do this.
	And he noticed that there were plenty of things that were growing abundantly.
	Without even anyone doing anything about it, you know, the things that were growing like weeds.
	And so he thought, well, with just a little bit of maybe we're doing too much cultivation.
	So anyway, he came up with this technique, and it turned out to be very, very powerful for him.
	And he stayed and taught that to other people.
	And so this guy here in America learned that technique from him.
	And he taught people not only how to raise their own food in a more quote-unquote sustainable way, in a way that doesn't require a lot of chemicals and technology and equipment and things like that, but then he also put them together as a community and used that as an opportunity to talk to them about eternal things.
	And so this is part of it.
	You look at all these different things.
	This is all these types of things.
	They're all done with other people, really.
	You know, we talk about autonomy, but it's really autonomy from these control systems and these institutions that have been taken over and corrupted.
	So create a pesticide in GMO-free zones where communities, again, local community, work with people in the local community, can practice agriculture without fear of contamination from genetically engineered technology and toxins, promote digital privacy education and encryption tools, encourage and support access promote digital privacy education and encryption tools, encourage and support access to these tools, defund corporations, do things like mass boycott and divestment campaigns at the grassroots level around the world, support and promote the use of alternative do things like
	And I would say, and even metal currencies as well.
	The heart of our current predicament is economic enslavement, a system based on debt and the forced use of state-backed fiat money.
	Every person should have access to the currency of his or her choice.
	Protect the right of all people to access land.
	Protect the right to harvest rainwater, solar energy, other resources.
	And what's valuable about this type of thinking is it gets you to think about the different areas.
	Think about growing food.
	Think about educating. Think about your financial system is really what he's talking about here without getting involved in the details.
	Think about your health, promoting a new standard of health by fostering dialogues about practices and modalities that have been maligned or made illegal by the government.
	And then build human communities to foster empowerment, resiliency, innovation, other things like that.
	So, you know, there's a lot of things that we can do.
	We need to understand how they're coming at us.
	And the key thing, as we mention all the time, is that they want to isolate us, atomize us.
	And so some of the comments people made about this...
	Hazel Kitty57, potatoes are easy to grow as well.
	Yes. In response to KWD, FDA is looking into banning food canning.
	I guess it'll outlaw lids.
	They'll have to find mine out of my cold, dead hands.
	Oh, and there's always freezing, drying, and pickling.
	FDA morons, he says.
	Yeah. Narrow Way and Narragate Ministries.
	Get the information printed out so that you'll have it.
	Good point. Yeah, that's one of the reasons why Jack Lawson has the Civil Defense Manual, civildefensemanual.com.
	That's why he's got it in printed form, because if we have an EMP pulse or something like that, you won't be able to do anything with it.
	Radest Bro, thank you for the tip.
	He says, Hans Zimmer covers in the future.
	Yeah, could do. He's got some good ones, doesn't he?
	I love film scores.
	It really is the best, I think, music of the 20th century by far and away.
	You've had some incredible, incredible work done, not just by John Williams, but by many people throughout the 20th century.
	Fine music. Anyway, Narroway and Narragate Ministries.
	Masks were the prominent killer in the Spanish flu outbreak.
	Masks credited with killing between 50 to 100 million by pneumonia induced from breathing and bacteria from the mask.
	That's the point. It intensifies that.
	It reduces your oxygen and it reduces the contaminants.
	It intensifies them.
	And it also even breaks them up into smaller spittle particles and things like that that can not only travel farther and stay airborne longer to contaminate other people, but it can travel further and deeper inside your lungs.
	So it's counterproductive on so many different levels.
	Bethany N., thank you very much for the tip.
	I appreciate that. We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, I want to talk a little bit about...
	What is happening to free speech during this war?
	We'll be right back. Welcome
	back. I want to talk about free speech and a climate of war and what is happening with people.
	It is another aspect of this that I think is very concerning to see the right now embracing censorship.
	Those who have been victims of censorship.
	This is one of the key things.
	I mentioned this talking about RFK Jr.
	Boy, what hypocrisy. Here's a guy who was calling for the imprisonment of people that he disagreed with on climate.
	And now he's been attacked and he's a free speech advocate.
	But now people who have been free speech advocates on the right are now demanding cancel culture of people that disagree with him.
	Before I go in, let me just say thank you to Rachel, who sent a contribution by mail and said this.
	I guess I was living under a rock and didn't know about you until you guest-hosted Bradley Dean's show.
	My husband and I are regular listeners now.
	Well, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
	It's always an honor to do Bradley's shows.
	We both try to honor God with what we do.
	I'm not sure about the last name here, so I don't want to mispronounce.
	I think it is Sweenes, but I'm not sure because of the way of the printing here.
	But they say, we appreciate it and enjoy listening as a family.
	And so that's one of the reasons why I try to keep content family-friendly.
	Thank you for listening.
	I appreciate that and for your support.
	We now have achieved...
	A dumbocracy, as this article on Zero Hedge has, or I would also call it an idiocracy.
	We have ACT test scores for U.S. students have now dropped to a 30-year low.
	According to data published by ACT, the nonprofit organization that administers the college readiness exam, the average composite score fell to 19.5, a 0.3 points decline from 2022.
	In other words, it's a 1.5% drop in just one year.
	Over 18 years, they have seen it drop 8.5%.
	So it's actually accelerating when we look at this.
	And yet, it's not really a surprise when you see what has been happening in our universities.
	A good example of this is Harvard.
	They have their right smack dab At the center of this debate between how people should view what happened in Israel from the Hamas attacks and the responses to that, roughly 80% of the grades given at Harvard are in the A range.
	So maybe they're going to rename Harvard Lake Wobegon, you know, where all the kids are above average.
	Garrison Gehler's program.
	79% of grades given to Harvard students in 2020 to 2021 were in the A range.
	Everybody gets an A. They're all above average.
	About 80% of them.
	Faculty have apparently solved any equity issues by making everybody a top student.
	Jonathan Turley says, this is what we saw in The Incredibles.
	Remember, you had syndrome. He was going to make everybody a superhero because he said, hey, if everybody is a superhero, if everybody's super, then nobody will be.
	And so that's kind of the same problem that you've got there at Harvard.
	With everybody an A student, nobody will be an A student.
	So there you go. They got their equity.
	Everybody gets the same results regardless.
	And then everybody can feel good about it because we give everybody a participation trophy at Harvard.
	The Dean of Undergraduate Education said, well, the report that we have here establishes a couple of problems, two of them, and they're intertwined.
	First of all, we have grade inflation, and then we have grade compression at the same time.
	Jonathan Turley says, at the rate of this trajectory, where they have been raising the grades for everybody at Harvard, Harvard will be 100% A's by the year 2033.
	It's only 80% A's right now.
	He said, what is interesting is that Harvard is creating an effective three-grade system where you get a curve that runs from A- to A to A+. That's how you're going to distinguish it.
	So what are you going to do if you're going to decide who gets to go to Phi Beta Kappa?
	Well, Phi Beta Kappa, we don't know.
	Everybody's either A minus, A plus.
	William F. Buckley Jr.
	said years ago, I'd rather entrust the government of the United States to the first 400 people listed in the Boston Telephone Directory than to the faculty of Harvard University.
	Well, that's a good point. So let's talk about somebody who's been on the faculty of Harvard University for a long time, Alan Dershowitz.
	Yeah, KWD says, when you won't debate, you will censor.
	That's right. Alan Dershowitz wrote this op-ed piece.
	And, you know, the question is, how do we differentiate, you know, people?
	If everybody gets an A, how do we differentiate them?
	Well, the way that Harvard has been doing it for the longest time is they would differentiate people by politics and by ethnicity.
	In order to even get in, really, right?
	So how do we differentiate people?
	Well, he's published the names, he says, of students and professors who support Hamas lynchings and rapes.
	I saw this and I was like, what?
	Is this something new? We've now got claims that Hamas is lynching people?
	And you see, this is a disservice that he's doing to his own perspective.
	If he wants these actions to be recognized as monstrous, as terrorism, stop adding false details to it.
	It only hurts your cause.
	And this is why I'm so adamant about this when I see it being done by people like Stu Peters and Alex Jones and Mike Adams.
	You know, you start inflating this stuff and you discredit all this stuff, just like Michael Flynn.
	Is discrediting with his actions and the other things that he's saying.
	He's discrediting the vaccine stuff.
	And discrediting, most importantly, Christ and Christianity.
	So, again, he's going to talk about Hamas lynching.
	And he's going to add this additional stuff here so that Alan Dershowitz can come after free speech.
	He's never supported free speech, quite frankly.
	You know, if you can do this type of thing, you never really were there.
	You don't need to embellish something that's already horrific terrorism, but you do it if you want to be a propagandist for war, for total war.
	Student groups at many elite universities, and of course Harvard is one of them, but also Yale, Columbia, places like that, have come out in support of Hamas at a time when its terrorists have raped, murdered, and kidnapped women and toddlers and the elderly and other civilians, and have reportedly beheaded babies, says Alan Dershowitz.
	Well, why is that a surprise?
	You see, the progressives have always supported, just because they're Marxists, they've always supported whatever it takes to get what they want, including violence and terrorism and censorship.
	That is nothing new.
	Why is anybody surprised that the left loves terrorism and excuses it?
	Again, they did not come out and say, well, I don't think that these reports of the atrocities are really real.
	I don't think that anybody died at the concert.
	I don't think that these babies were beheaded or this or that.
	They didn't come after it on that basis.
	They accepted that those were realities and they said, and it's justified to do that.
	You see, it's a very different thing.
	Very different thing. And it's because these progressives have pushed God out.
	Dershowitz says, the open marketplace of ideas, which I support, you always hear this, but, there's a big but.
	The open marketplace of ideas, which I support, allow students to hold and express these ideas, but, but, no, there's no but.
	No but. We have to have transparency so we can hold them accountable in debate.
	So, in other words, there should be no privacy.
	I support free speech, but no privacy, no anonymity.
	No, there's no buts involved in that.
	You either support free speech, Dershowitz, or you don't.
	It's just that simple.
	For all these people.
	Groups that oppose Hamas, he said, have not been known to advocate violence against those who support it.
	To the contrary, it is pro-Israel advocates who have been threatened with and suffered from violence.
	So, again, this dividing line, though, is really...
	It's not Israel. The dividing line here is really progressive Marxists.
	He's making this dividing line about Israel.
	But understand, these same groups that are opposing Hamas have always been these progressive groups for whom the end justifies the means.
	These progressive Marxists will come after everyone who does not bow the knee to them.
	And it's been this way for quite a long time.
	But, you know, now he takes it personally as, oh, this is just about Israel and it's just about the Jews.
	No, this is what they're about.
	They've always been about this.
	Punishing anybody who doesn't bow to them and do what they say and empower them.
	Use my pronouns or else, right?
	He says silence in this context is acquiescence.
	And so is hiding behind anonymity.
	In other words, no privacy for these people.
	Let's create... Why is he saying this?
	Because he and other people now, because a lot of these leftist organizations in Harvard and other Ivy League schools have come out, and their organizations have signed collective statements saying, you know, we're on the side of Hamas and against Israel and all the rest of this stuff.
	And they want to punish these people.
	They want to put them on blacklists.
	So they can't get jobs in the future and all the rest of this stuff.
	And so they've got to know who it is that's part of these organizations.
	Give us your membership list.
	This is the McCarthyism of the left.
	And as I said, we don't want to become what we fight, do we?
	And I'm not so sure that Dershowitz isn't a leftist anyway.
	He's showing his true colors here.
	He fooled a lot of people by saying that he is behind Trump.
	And Trump fooled a lot of people.
	As a university professor for 50 years, Dershowitz said, I would not grade down a student because she supported Hamas atrocities, but nor would I befriend or employ such a student.
	Freedom of speech is not freedom from being held accountable for one's speech.
	Well, that's fine, but that's a personal thing.
	What you're talking about here, and we all have the right to boycott businesses if we don't agree with them personally, and I think we should.
	I really think we should. Look at Bud Light.
	They got a big message, didn't they?
	I would suggest doing that to so many corporations, even, you know, groups like NASCAR and other ones.
	But that's not what this is about.
	You've got a billionaire, Bill Ackman, is calling on Harvard to release the names of students supporting terrorism against Israel because he wants to be, he said, I want to be free to hire whoever I wish.
	Well, fine, you are. But remember, that's not what he's talking about.
	He wants a blacklist out there.
	And I've heard that type of speech from social media to justify censorship for a long time.
	Well, they're corporations.
	They can do whatever they want.
	That's what the Conservative Heritage Foundation was saying.
	That's what the Libertarian Cato Institute was saying.
	It's like, well, you understand there's another agenda here.
	You understand that they're really doing this on behalf of the government as well.
	And I don't like this kind of McCarthyism.
	This is beyond a person making an individual decision, which we all should be allowed to do.
	I don't want to do business with somebody.
	I can go shop somewhere else.
	But this is McCarthyism, to create a blacklist of people based on how they view a foreign government.
	Think about that.
	We're going to blacklist these kids forever.
	We're not going to debate them.
	We're not going to try to change their mind.
	We're going to radicalize them further by making sure that they're not able to get a job.
	And what's the reason these people go to Harvard and these Ivy League schools?
	Networking. They don't have anything that you can't get at any other school.
	When I went into engineering, I thought, well, you know, MIT, well, they use the same books that we used at the University of South Florida.
	At a graduate level, there would be a difference because you'd be able to work with some people who have, you know, big government research contracts, and they've got to, you know, you're working hand-in-hand.
	But when you're at the undergraduate level, you're basically working, you don't have that kind of engagement at the undergraduate level with these professors.
	You're just going with what's in the book.
	I can get their book, and I can do this stuff myself.
	But this is the billionaire hedge fund manager, Bill Ackman, and he says, I need to know who all these people are so I don't inadvertently hire them.
	Yeah, if you hire Harvard graduates, let me tell you, if you hire Harvard graduates, you're going to get these diversity, inclusivity, equity.
	I like it in that order because it spells die.
	You're going to get these die-hard Marxist anyway.
	For the most part. That's what the culture is there.
	So, just don't hire anybody from Harvard.
	You don't need another McCarthyite blacklist about these people based on their opinion of a foreign government.
	Terrorism as a means to their ends has always been supported by these Marxists.
	It's always a means of Black Lives Matter and the squad and all the rest of this stuff.
	And so again, Dershowitz goes back to the, now we learn we've got beheaded babies again.
	Like I said the other day, how about abortion?
	How about the body parts for hire that Fauci was doing?
	The transhumanism that he was using for the experiments?
	How about, oh, we got babies taken out of incubators so they can die.
	Well, how about the comfort care that we do?
	The hypocrisy and all of this stuff is just knee-deep.
	No, it's about politics.
	And it's about ethnic groups competing against each other.
	And it's about Marxists and wannabe dictators who will use any means, including terrorism, to get what they want.
	And it's about people who don't understand the primacy of these principles.
	Of unalienable rights.
	That we need to protect that because it protects everybody's rights.
	And so we got people as, you know, we got Anomaly saying, now we got these people on the right and you've got Dave Rubin who works at the Daily Wire there with Ben Shapiro saying, well, there's hope for us.
	He tweets out how people are being censored.
	And then you've got John Nolte at Breitbart cheering the censorship now.
	Hey guys, this is not about who you agree with.
	It's about a principle that is bigger than you.
	A principle that is bigger than your support of any ethnic group or any foreign government or anything else like that.
	So, I guess I shouldn't be...
	It's not surprising to see it.
	But it is sad to see it.
	We have our guest ready.
	Real quickly, we're going to talk to Jason Barker about the myth of ghost guns and some other things.
	But real quickly, let me respond to some of these comments and tips here.
	Thank you, Andromeda.
	I appreciate the tip. And YJ72, thank you.
	And he writes, if every household in a subdivision grows one vegetable fruit and some people grow chickens, we would not need a grocery store.
	Unfortunately, not appealing to some people because you need to work.
	That's the other part of it. We don't even want to cook.
	We want fast food, right?
	No truth in them says it broke my heart and made me a little mad to see all the churches closed for COVID. Yes, I remember.
	You know, it had only been like a week or so, maybe two weeks.
	And it was clear that they're not going to stay two weeks to flatten the curve.
	And I had John Rapoport on and we were talking about it.
	We said, you know, Easter's coming up.
	One or two days that, you know, everybody will typically go to church maybe for just two days if they do.
	That if all the churches would open up for Easter, they'd put an end to this.
	Everybody could see that this is a lie.
	High Boost says, I like the mask.
	It tells me who the stupidest people on the planet are and who to avoid at all costs.
	It is a mark, isn't it?
	Michael Pomeroy says, Got my monthly buy-in at Wise Wolf on 1010.
	Good. Just in time before the bump up.
	Wise Wolf on gold and silver.
	It is the best. Yes. And you can get to Tony Arterman's Wise Wolf at davidknight.gold.
	Tony has set that up.
	And we certainly do appreciate Tony's support on this.
	And again, when you look at what is happening with...
	You know, inflation rearing its head, and you've now got organization after organization talking about it, because it looks like the price of oil is going up.
	That's going to be very inflationary.
	But even more so, it's the privacy.
	It's the move against CBDC, because we can't time these markets, and there's a lot of manipulation on them.
	That is my primary concern.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back with Jason Barker.
	Stay with us. The Common Man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
	The David Knight Show dot com.
	All right.
	joining us now is Jason Barker.
	It's great to have Jason on.
	And Jason's been a regular listener.
	You see him in the chat areas there, along with Angry Tiger.
	The two of them set up Knights of the Storm.
	They've got a website, The Knights of the Storm.
	And they have been real active in terms of setting up a community.
	And so you can go there and you can see schedules for a lot of different programs.
	You can see Guards, Liberty, Conspiracy, many programs that are out there.
	They've got the schedule on a daily basis.
	And of course, the two of them I think it's very important beyond even the ghost gun issues and what the government's reaction is to it.
	But it's also important, I think, for people to understand maybe the 3D printer.
	We might need this to be able to print a lot of different things on our own.
	Who knows what the future holds?
	But thank you for joining us.
	Again, Jason Barker. Thank you, Jason.
	Good to be here, David.
	Real quick, I just wanted to extend greetings from Angry Tiger.
	I talked to him this morning. I wasn't sure if he was going to be on with me or not.
	I saw he was CC'd on the email, so I contacted him.
	For some reason, he didn't get your email.
	I've had that happen, too.
	You were talking about free speech earlier, and I've had your emails go straight to my trash.
	It doesn't happen that often.
	I think I made an exception for it now.
	But just another way they censor us.
	Okay. Well, we would love to have had Angry Tiger on, and we will in the future.
	Of course, Angry Tiger's also got his Tiger and Snake financial report that he does as well.
	But tell us a little bit about your experience with the 3D printer.
	You've got a series of articles on Substack.
	First, you talk about the nuts and bolts, really, of calibrating the printer and all that.
	But then you start to get into some of the gun issues with it.
	But tell us a little bit about your experience just in general.
	With a 3D printer, because I think people will have other uses for this over and above a gun.
	I mean, it's a legitimate use, but there's a lot of legitimate uses for 3D printers.
	Tell us a little bit about your experience.
	Oh, absolutely. I've made all kinds of trinkets, toys.
	Recently, you know what a ring camera is, right?
	I've got a Blink, because a Blink doesn't require me to have a monthly subscription to be tied to something.
	You know, after your initial free one runs out, Then you can just run it and save your videos on your computer at home.
	And I made a nice little holder for it where it fits up real nice in the wall.
	A lot of utilitarian things you could do with a 3D printer.
	And what got me into the ghost gun thing was I'm looking at this attack specifically on the Polymer 80 pistol.
	And it is a non-serialized kit you can buy online.
	And, you know, I was like, well, you don't need to do that.
	You could just 3D print it.
	So where I see this going in the future when it comes to gun control is that they'll start regulating 3D printers.
	And it'll take that, you know, that valuable tool that we have that we can use for making replacement parts for your car, all kinds of stuff.
	That'll be heavily regulated in the future if we don't nip it in the bud.
	Let me interject here.
	You're talking about little things that you did.
	My son likes to...
	He's got a 3D printer.
	He's worked with a couple of them over the years.
	He did this little stand for the coin that you did, the David Knight coin that we use here.
	And, of course, we ship that if anybody buys the coin now.
	But he's done a lot of things.
	You can find a lot of stuff that people have done that are very simple, like to take lids off of jars.
	They're very simple things like that, but it's just kind of fun to print up some of the stuff, and some of them are very useful.
	And so some of it's decorative, some of it has some functionality, but there's all kinds of things that you can do with it.
	I think it's going to be very important in the future in terms of being able to keep your vehicles running, being able to get car parts off of that kind of stuff.
	Of course, they'll also come after us for fuel, but assuming that you can get the fuel somehow, and maybe you will need to have a 3D printer to be able to print some of the things you need to do for the fuel as well.
	But, you know, and of course, they'll arrest you on the road for having a vehicle on the road.
	But if you got some kind of an off-road vehicle or something like that and you want to keep it running, you'll probably have to 3D print your own parts.
	I mean, we're going to see a lot of things like this.
	You might want to 3D print your stuff that you're using to grow your own food, some things that would help you with that.
	But, yeah, tell us a little bit about the calibration experience.
	You got one that was kind of a low-priced printer, and you were able to get this thing working.
	What was involved in it?
	A lot of tinkering, I imagine, right?
	Well, the printer I got, you can see it kind of, I don't know if you can see it behind me, but it's Ender 3 Neo.
	Ender 3 Neo is made by Creality.
	And you can get it for under $200.
	I think I paid $165 for mine.
	And right out of the box, it was great.
	They give you a couple little test files to print to make sure it works and everything.
	And it worked great.
	The problem came down to when I started printing parts that needed to fit together.
	Mm-hmm. And the learning curve is so steep, so steep.
	Like, you've got to watch all these videos and, you know, print inside walls before outside walls and layer thicknesses to get a functional part, you know, like with a 3D printed gun, right?
	So that's what kind of I really wanted to get into it and kind of dispel the myth.
	That you could just go buy a printer and start cranking out guns.
	It was very difficult.
	I found a series of videos.
	I put them, a separate substack article I wrote on just calibrating the printer.
	And it'll kind of run you through the steps.
	It'll take about an hour, two hours, something like that.
	And then you'll have something you could print functional parts with.
	So that was the first challenge I had, was getting the printer to actually print correctly.
	Yeah, and it's a very slow process.
	You point out, you know, it took you 18 hours to print one thing, and I know my son has done that as well.
	And he's printed some interesting things with, like, you know, something's got, like, a little ball that's freely rotating inside of it.
	You know, you can do some amazing stuff with it, but, you know, you have the problem that it takes a long time to do it, and maybe you get a power interruption, or maybe, you know, the thing loses its stickiness and contact with the base there, and now the whole print is reined, and it keeps going and wasting material.
	So there's a lot of practical issues and learning curve with it as you pointed out.
	Oh, yeah, and then depending on the material, because there's a variety of materials, and even who manufactures the material plays a big role in how much is going to squirt out the nozzle and stuff like that.
	And what you're talking about, the stickiness, that is the worst problem I have is that first layer adhesion.
	And if it doesn't stay stuck to that bed, you could be five hours into a print, and it'll curl up on you.
	Yeah. And that's okay.
	That's so frustrating. Yeah, all that time invested, yeah.
	But you finally got it working.
	You calibrated it. And you pointed out that especially the cheaper printers don't really come calibrated from the factory.
	So you had to do a lot of tinkering with it in order to get the thing calibrated properly.
	It prints some test things initially, but to really do anything, it took a lot of tinkering with it.
	Yeah, like I said, the learning curve is very steep.
	It was a lot more...
	I've been interested in 3D printing for about 10 years, and I actually bought a kit years ago.
	They didn't really have any off-the-shelf ones you could buy.
	You had to put them together yourself, unless you had like $5,000 to spend, right?
	That's what my son did, too.
	His first one was a kit that he put together, yeah.
	That's what I did with my first computer.
	You know, you couldn't afford the computer, so I built my first computer from a kit, you know, so...
	Yeah, but they're pretty good now.
	They're going to print, like I said, you're just printing some trinkets, some toys, a vase, a pencil holder.
	It's going to work fine, not the box.
	But you start trying to get the accurate parts, and especially when it comes to 3D gun printing.
	That's why I said, this is bogus.
	This is bogus what they tell us, that I can go just print a gun.
	And another bogus part is they want to pretend like it's all plastic.
	You can get through metal detectors.
	Completely bogus.
	This is This is my slide for my Glock.
	That's all metal.
	Everything in here is metal. If I were to print this out of plastic, it would explode in my face, even with a 9mm round.
	That's based off of Defense Distributed a few years ago.
	He's kind of the guy who spearheaded this 3D gun printing.
	Cody Wilson, yeah. Yes.
	He printed a monstrous thing called the Liberator that held one shot of a.380, a shorter 9mm, It was monstrously thick.
	And I know why he called it the Liberator, because we actually airdropped the Liberator pistol on, I forget what country it was during the war, and telling the people that you need to be armed, because that was going to help us in our war effort to have people armed.
	And it was, I believe it was a.380 as well.
	Have you ever heard of that? No, I haven't.
	No. Yeah, it was like we just made a single shot pistol, mass produced them as like stamp metal, and we just airdropped them for the people to have because they weren't allowed to have guns.
	And so, you know, we recognized back then that it was important for, you know, people to be armed, for the populace to be armed to fight tyranny.
	But we don't do it for ourselves.
	We try to take it away for ourselves.
	Exactly. Yeah.
	Speaking of which, we want you to resist your government, but we don't want anybody to resist us.
	Yeah, I wanted to talk about this because part of this is they talk about weapons of war and why do you need this and why do you need that?
	Well, I don't know.
	What about the police? Have you seen the SWAT team?
	Yeah, that's right. They're wearing the same gear that I wore in Afghanistan.
	Yeah. Same weapons, same gear.
	A lot of times better, better weapons.
	Yeah. And I did a quick search this morning.
	I want to talk about weapons of war, right?
	I looked to see how many basically armed people we have that operate internally in the U.S. Because the U.S. thinks that its job is to protect us from ourselves.
	That's not true. The purpose of the government is to protect our rights, and then when it comes to defense, it's people who invade us.
	Yes. But, you know, when you go out looking for enemies abroad...
	Then there are no more there.
	Then you create them, right?
	And then when we look internally, we're looking for enemies internally.
	And whenever they're not there, they create them.
	Like war on drugs, war on you name it.
	You know, war on education. That's right.
	But I did some number looking.
	And the police...
	This is in 2002.
	We had 708,000 full-time police officers, 35,000 full-time FBI, 21,500 CIA, 79,000 full-time IRS employees.
	That is a total, and now, granted, not all the IRS employees are armed.
	It's about 10,000. Yeah, but it's going to go up significantly because they're going to make it five times bigger.
	The Republicans saved us. The Democrats are going to make it seven times bigger.
	Yeah, so to put it in context, that's 843,000 total standing army.
	That's what it is. Focused inward to the citizens.
	And in 2021, the year prior, we only had 482,000 active duty army.
	Wow. So we had almost twice as many standing army, because they're armed, in the U.S. looking inward for an enemy to destroy.
	That's right. And that's what it is.
	It's a standing army. It's what the founders warned us about, is a standing army.
	It is. And this war on ghost guns...
	Where I see it going is, they started with this, and I'll show it.
	This is the Polymer 80. I have one.
	Stephan, he's also a listener, he has one.
	He'll tell you, it doesn't go together as easy as you think.
	For me, it was pretty easy. I had the tools and the know-how.
	I got mine operational pretty quick, but he's been working on his for like a month.
	And it's still hanging up.
	And you said that it was, besides all the effort to put it together, it was pretty expensive compared to even just going out and buying the new part that you would use to make your own, you know, going out and buying a new Glock.
	You know, putting the stuff together was very expensive.
	Oh, yeah.
	I spent $650, $700 on that.
	Wow.
	On that easy-to-get gun that criminals would go after.
	Come on, I can get that same gun on the streets for $100, $200.
	And I can buy it brand new from a pawn shop or a gun shop for about $500, $600 tops for that same pistol.
	So the idea that it's cheap, that it's easy...
	No, it's not. And then if you're going to 3D print your own, I got some numbers here.
	What was it? I got a total of $647.
	Into the other one, I did an AR platform, one that I built, that shoots.22 long rifle because I don't want it to blow up on me.
	It's a tiny round. Yeah, you've got a picture in your substack there of, you know, what the typical round would be versus the small one that you went with.
	Because, again, you know, you're talking about something that is plastic, and even though the...
	Internal core of this is going to be metal.
	It's still going to be stressing that plastic so you don't want it to blow up.
	Yeah, there's moving parts, and there's stress points.
	I think the area, if you're familiar with an AR platform, the area that the buffer tube screws into was when the early days of printing these ARs, that would snap.
	So they have to modify the model, they have to thicken it up, they have to use different materials.
	Some people will get metal inserts to go in there.
	It's not as easy as they make it sound.
	And the time, the time, 141 hours of printing time.
	141 hours.
	It's remarkable that you could go that long without losing the first layer of contact there.
	Well, I mean, it was piece by piece.
	All the pieces.
	I didn't have any failed prints.
	I did have some problems putting it together.
	That's another thing.
	The models out there, and this is a strategy that's been used.
	So if I go out there, you can find a million and one AR-style 3D models that you can then 3D print.
	Unfortunately, the ones that work are off the internet.
	They're gone. They have flooded the internet with bad models to frustrate you and take your time and waste your material.
	Yes. Because we've got a lot of people, we've got 840 some odd people and a thousand people that would do this type of stuff.
	There's a significant number of them that would be their job to do that, just flood it with garbage.
	Oh, yeah. If it's for free, I guarantee you it's not going to work.
	I did find a free model.
	It was an old model that had been removed from all the CAD sites, but I won't say where it was hosted, but I found an Kind of an unusual place where they do videos and stuff, but they can also host files.
	So somebody was sneaky with that, and I was able to get it.
	And even that one, it's been proven.
	I've seen videos where people test-fired them, put them together.
	Still, everything didn't match up quite right.
	I had to mill some plastic out, and I had to modify some things.
	Almost incriminated myself, because I built it as a pistol, small package, and I have a pistol brace.
	Getting ready to put it together.
	And I found out that the pistol brace rules had changed.
	So, I mean, and that's the danger of any kind of gun control.
	You just change definitions and make you into a felon.
	And then by default, you can't own a gun anymore.
	Yeah. And we talked about that.
	I think it was Tiger and I might have talked about this in the foxhole.
	If they can't stop someone from selling you a gun, what they can do is take away the rights of people to own guns.
	We talked about the three felonies a day, all that stuff.
	Well, of course, we saw with Trump as he went down to that South Carolina show, and they said, Hey, look, we got a pistol here with your face on the butt.
	Appropriate place to put his face, right?
	Yeah. And, oh, I want to buy that.
	And everybody's like, you can't, you're an indicted felon.
	You're not a convicted felon, right?
	Take the guns and do the due process later.
	I thought that was kind of poetic justice, but that is our, you know, that is our system.
	And if somebody gets a felony, even if it's not a violent felony or anything like that, you lose your ability to own a gun.
	And so that is, you're right, that is part of the trap.
	If they can't I get the guns away from people.
	If they can't stop people from having guns in general, they can take it away from individuals one at a time with their excessive rules.
	And they just make this stuff up.
	You know, the pistol brace thing, that was something that Trump did after he did the bump stock ban.
	And he kept that going until December of 2020.
	Started in 2019.
	And they were pushing that through, and then he stopped it in December 2020, and then Biden pulled it in there again to do that.
	So, you know, he doesn't respect the Second Amendment, and he doesn't respect the idea that if you're going to infringe on it, you ought to at least have elected representatives.
	I mean, that's been the way it's been done in the past.
	Now, we'll let the bureaucracy do it.
	We'll do it by executive order.
	That is—it truly is amazing.
	Tell me a little bit, though, about—you know, talk to people— About how the 3D printing differs from the type of thing where you would get an 80% lower and you would finish it up yourself.
	How does it differ from that?
	Okay, and this is the heart of the debate right now.
	Like I said, this polymer 80, or if you were to get an aluminum 80% AR lower, What it is, it's mostly complete, but the area that houses the trigger assembly is not yet complete.
	So it's unable to receive the device in which fires the actual round.
	And that's the controlled part of the weapon, is the lower, right?
	Whatever houses that trigger assembly.
	It's not that hard to complete them, but you've got to have the tools.
	You've got to have the know-how.
	This one, in my opinion, was really easy, and I can see why they would use this as the test subject.
	You've got to drill a few holes.
	You've got to cut out a little piece of plastic.
	Very, very easy to do.
	But this isn't dangerous.
	You know how I know that they know it's not dangerous?
	Because you can still buy them.
	They just have to be serialized.
	Mm-hmm. It comes down to tracking and tracing.
	And that's what I wanted to talk about was this was the target right now, this Polymer 80.
	They call this the ghost gun.
	But if you look historically, a ghost gun is anything that they cannot track to you currently.
	It could be, and you'll see them going after this.
	They're going after private sales.
	They're going after this so-called mythological gun show loophole.
	Homemade guns of any kind.
	If you have a gun that has a serial number filed off, that's a felony.
	It's my equipment.
	What other item is there out there that you can't just file a serial number off and it's okay?
	Yeah, yeah. Or remove the tag from your mattress, you know?
	Yeah. That'll be a felony pretty soon.
	What they'll do is they'll use the terms common sense, common sense.
	It's too close to a completed gun.
	It should be regulated like other guns.
	That's the argument they're making.
	I would argue that there is no constitutionality and regulation of firearms at all.
	I agree. But people will be like, okay, it doesn't affect me.
	And this is the problem. We're going to see this with free speech.
	We're going to see this with everything in our lives.
	It doesn't affect me, okay?
	But then they start broadening terms, just like they did with the National Firearms Act.
	There was a very few items that were on that list.
	And over the years, they've broadened it and broadened it.
	And eventually, it will affect you, and nobody will be there to protect you when it affects you.
	So I'm going after it now.
	I'm going after it. I would like to see the NFA repealed completely.
	And here's the real kicker about the NFA. It's based on the Interstate Commerce Clause.
	That's how they enforce it.
	That's their mechanism of enforcement.
	And I've got this up real quick.
	That's interesting too.
	The National Firearms Act, we're talking about the FDR version of this that was based on the Commerce Act, right?
	And so, you know, they had that same action.
	They put out price controls for agricultural stuff, and the guy says, well, I'm growing this, whatever it was, corn or whatever.
	I'm growing this in my state.
	I'm not selling it to anybody else.
	Oh, no, that's regulated under that.
	And they also use the Commerce Clause to try to justify prohibition of every drug.
	The entire drug war is now based on that.
	Which is an obvious lie because the Commerce Clause was always there and everybody agreed that they had to have the 18th Amendment to prohibit alcohol.
	So we all know that's a lie.
	We all know that's a prevarication.
	That the text doesn't mean that.
	That everybody in America knew that it didn't mean that.
	But then they come after guns.
	They come after regulation of food as well as regulation of firearms by pretending that it's the Commerce Clause.
	And again, it turns the Commerce Clause upside down because the Commerce Clause was there to prevent Inhibition of commerce.
	And so it's to keep a free trade within the United States to say, well, one state is not going to be able to restrict commerce across state lines or in another state.
	And that's exactly, though, how they're using it.
	They've perverted the purpose 180 degrees away from what it was supposed to do.
	Well, when they took the clause, which was, you know, regulating as more for foreign, you know, that's how the federal government could get their money through tariffs and stuff like that.
	That's how they were funded. They didn't take it from their people.
	But when they did the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, that was geared towards the railroad industry.
	Because there's commerce going across state lines.
	But my question is, when it comes to gun control or anything else for that matter, Texas is fighting this battle with suppressors.
	If I create it, I make it for personal use.
	There's no commerce going on.
	And especially if it doesn't leave the state, what authority do you have under your own law to regulate?
	You don't.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	You know, and I mean, the Interstate Commerce Act, which is kind of how they, you know, they kind of enforce the gun control.
	It's not meant for that anyway.
	So instead of picking apart little things like, oh, this gun or that gun or a pistol brace or a bump, let's get to the root of the matter.
	Yeah.
	So you don't have the authority to do this in the first place.
	That's right.
	You don't.
	You never did.
	Sorry, I'm ranting here.
	Oh, no, I agree.
	I don't know.
	You know, all these candidates now, it's fashionable for them to say, well, here's the different bureaucracies I get rid of.
	I don't know any of them talking about getting rid of the ATF.
	Right.
	You know, come on, start with them.
	It's such a target-rich environment when you start talking about shutting down unconstitutional agencies.
	It's almost all of them.
	But, you know, I really don't see anybody coming after that.
	And it's all just pretend and hypocrisy anyway, because, you know, you look at these guys.
	Reagan was going to shut down the Department of Education that had just been created in that election year, 1980.
	Never did it. You had Rick Perry who said, well, I've got three agencies I'm going to shut down.
	He couldn't remember the third one.
	It was the Department of Energy, and that's the one that Trump appointed him to run.
	So, yeah, I mean, it's all a bunch of lies.
	It's just amazing. Well, yeah, and if we're waiting for a savior like the NRA or these other gun groups, it's not going to happen.
	And I'll tell you why.
	With the pistol brace, and this is where I almost tripped myself up on this build, was I had a pistol brace to go on it.
	I ended up having to design a different piece to plug the rear so that it doesn't even have the tube sticking out.
	You could do that with a.22 long rifle conversion.
	You can't do it with a standard AR setup, but I was able to do that.
	Well, I thought we were good.
	Because the pistol brace ban went into a moratorium.
	There's a moratorium on it because they didn't give the public enough time to debate it.
	But I got to reading closer, and a couple of scholars that I watch online that really are into this stuff, that's where I get a lot of my up-to-date stuff, it only applied, so you can keep your pistol brace, but it only applied to those gun groups that That filed the lawsuit, if you were a member before.
	So now you've got Americans all over this country that think that they're okay right now with their pistol brace, but they're not.
	And that's another way to trip you up and turn you into a felon.
	We know what they did here in Tennessee.
	Senator Nicely told me, he said, yeah, we saw this coming.
	And so we did it in two steps.
	You know, first of all, we said that if something is legal in Tennessee, the federal government cannot make it illegal.
	And then he said, and then we specifically made the pistol braces legal.
	It's a different situation here.
	We got some good people in Tennessee.
	That's ingenious.
	And that goes to show how these gun advocate groups will not help you.
	They're in there. I mean, why would you solve the gun control problem and put yourself out of business?
	Exactly. And we're seeing that now with pro-life groups, right?
	These pro-life groups that have jumped in here as soon as the Supreme Court said, no, it's not a federal issue, it's a state issue, according to the Tenth Amendment, which I was saying all along.
	And as soon as that happened...
	You got all these different candidates.
	You got people like Pence and Trump and, you know, so many of them say, we need to make this a federal issue.
	And they're supported with all of these federal or these national pro-life movement groups which want to get their issue back.
	It took that issue away from them.
	Yeah. Oh, yeah.
	They need the wedge issues. They'll never be solved.
	Abortion won't be solved. Gun control won't be solved.
	Immigration won't be solved.
	And they're constantly giving us wedgies, aren't they?
	Yeah. But yeah, I mean, if it comes down to like, okay, you can have these items, we're going to give you permission to observe your God-given rights, we're going to give you the permit, but you have to be a member of one of these organizations to do it.
	Well, that's another tax, isn't it?
	Oh, yeah. That's right. It really is.
	And any permit is a privilege.
	It's not a right. And so, you know, all this stuff is rigged.
	I got a couple of comments I want to give to you here.
	Paleo Armory says, Ghost Gunner CNC machine is superior.
	I don't want a plastic gun.
	Trump Burger Forever says, polymer guns work just fine.
	Your comments about that? Oh, the Ghost Gunner.
	That is great. If I had the money, I would get one.
	You can actually go buy...
	A block of aluminum. It's just a block.
	And they've actually deemed it a 0% lower.
	So, I mean, this is how insane it is, David.
	They could criminalize owning a block of aluminum a certain dimension because it goes into this machine.
	And it's basically CNC. You put your bits in there and then it does all the driving around and it cuts it out.
	So it's not an additive.
	It's a... Subtractive, yeah.
	Yeah, subtractive method of creating it.
	And it's been around for a long time.
	I remember, you know, 40, 50 years ago, you know, one of the groups that I was interviewed with, they had their own CNC machine for making stuff, you know?
	Yeah. And very expensive, you know, especially then, but still expensive.
	And if they pass this stuff and say, okay, you have to register this.
	Think of the drone industry.
	You used to be able to go buy a drone and fly it around.
	Now, if you go above a certain height, if you make money with it, like if you have a side business, you've got to get a license.
	And granted, it's pretty easy.
	I remember when they did that a few years ago, and it was like, okay, it's like $25 to register it with us, but if you don't register it with us and we catch you, it's going to be $25,000.
	And it was a weight issue at the time as well.
	And they did it just before Christmas.
	And so all these people started saying, you know, if I've got like a little paper drone here, that's that weight limit.
	In other words, you made this for all drones, and it was an excessive fine.
	That's the other part of it.
	When you have these regulatory agencies, not only do we have regulation without representation, but we have excessive fines as well because they always have, I think it was FAA that was doing it, just like you've seen these excessive fines subsequent to that with people that wear the masks on a commercial airline plane or something, they're handing them out tens of thousand dollar fines as well.
	Yeah, and the problem with it is that it's going to become everything.
	Everything's going to have to be registered.
	And it's really, when you think about registration, you talk about tracking and tracing of firearms, of devices.
	They want to know what devices.
	You talked about the computer.
	Computers and software.
	They want to know who's creating this content so they can regulate it.
	They can stop it before it hits the internet.
	It's going to come to everything.
	I lost my train of thought.
	But anyway... We're talking about CNC stuff.
	I mean, talk about the difference between the CNC and the plastic stuff, you know, as people are talking about it.
	You know, you still can get a lot done with the polymer guns.
	They are pretty tough, as you point out.
	Some people in the past have, you know, it's got some stress points.
	Some people would reinforce those with metal and things like that.
	But yeah, it's...
	Largely, certainly an all-metal one done with CNC would be better, but it's going to be a lot more expensive.
	That's always the case, you know, when you trade off that you've got.
	Oh, yeah. And then you've got to anodize it and there's, you know, things you got to do to protect it.
	But what I was going to get to, I got my train of thought back, is they always sell this stuff on protecting and they'll do it on the backs of children.
	They won't look into the SSRIs.
	They won't look into the breakup of the nuclear family, the corrupt school system.
	They won't look into any of that as a potential problem.
	It's the gun, right? It's the gun.
	We have to track the gun. Okay, now we have to track the thing that can make the gun.
	And it's got to be tied to you.
	It has to have a serial number. And then so if I want to transfer it to someone else, which you can't do with a homemade gun, it has to be destroyed when you die.
	You can't even transfer it to your children.
	That's how ridiculous it is.
	Is that right? I didn't know that.
	So if you do an 80% lower and you build a lot, that gun's got to be destroyed when you die?
	Yes, it cannot be transferred by law.
	Oh man, I tell you what, this is great.
	It's a bunch of traps, isn't it?
	It's a bunch of traps that they've laid for people.
	And as we see with Biden and Hunter, you know, as many people have said, lots of regulations are like a spider web that traps the small gnats, but the big bumblebees go right through it, don't they?
	Yeah. Right.
	Well, let's talk about, you know, the big bumblebee, because on its face, gun control was the National Firearms Act came about after the St.
	Valentine's Day Massacre. And that was a mobster thing.
	Again, you have government- A drug war thing.
	Yeah, they created the problem of prohibition.
	That created Al Capone and other gangs.
	And those preferred type of weapons that they wanted to use is what they threw in there.
	You know, your Tommy guns, your short-barreled shotguns and rifles for concealability.
	That's why. Because people wore trench coats back then, and they didn't want to have them concealed.
	So now, do you see people in the kind of clothing where an SBR, short-barreled rifle, is going to be concealed?
	Why is it still there?
	But the point is that they created the problem.
	When it ended Prohibition, you would think that they could take that away, right?
	No. And here's the real kicker.
	It wasn't illegal to own any of those items.
	It was a tax. Right?
	Yes. It was a $200 tax.
	That's what everybody doesn't realize when they start talking about, you know, David Koresh and the Branch Davidians.
	You know, they came after them because they had not paid a tax is what it was, you know.
	Yeah. Yeah. Well, here's if the thing was really to stop Al Capone, which is kind of funny because if you look at the St.
	Valentine's Day massacre, there's a lot of implication that the police were involved in that, that they were getting retribution.
	So it was kind of like something that they either set up or allowed to happen, like a false flag, and then they imposed the gun control.
	But here's the thing. If the point was to stop Capone from buying these things, well, it didn't.
	All it did was impose a tax.
	And I did the numbers on it.
	I looked at the height of Al Capone's worth.
	He could have still legally purchased 32,000 Tommy guns.
	Yeah. Except we know that he didn't pay his taxes.
	We know he didn't pay his taxes, so that's how they ultimately got him.
	Maybe that's how they got him.
	But, I mean, is that really going to stop?
	Was that meant to stop him, or was it meant to make it prohibitively expensive for the everyday citizen?
	Because a gun back then was $20 to $40.
	Mm-hmm. So, you know, you're talking about 1,000% markup.
	Mm-hmm. 500,000% markup.
	Mm-hmm. Yeah, my son says the Valentine's Day massacre, quote-unquote, was a drive-by shooting.
	They outlawed fully automatic guns, and that stopped drive-by shooting once and for all, didn't it?
	Oh, it sure did. You know, it's interesting when you talk about the short-barreled rifle.
	I've talked about this many times.
	You look at the Miller case.
	This is a guy who was, they came after him after that.
	You know, it came after him for having a sawed-off shotgun, and he had a criminal record, and, you know, there was other things involved in it, like they tried to set people up.
	But he actually died before the case got to the Supreme Court, and they continued on with it anyway.
	It should have been a moot case, right?
	But they continued on with it anyway without anybody arguing the other side to push that whole thing through.
	So, you know, very, very dubious.
	And, of course, they use the sawed-off shotgun trap to get at Randy Weaver and other things like that.
	You know, it's just... And that's the way you see this stuff happening all the time.
	I got some other comments here.
	Let me run to you, Jason.
	So Bogus says, 3D printing isn't great for manufacturing.
	It's just really cheap and easy.
	Any machine shop has everything.
	Having a three-axis milling machine and lathe allows you to make anything.
	Adding CNC to a mill isn't a huge expense.
	The mill is the big expense.
	Yeah, 100%.
	And if I had the money, I would own a metal lathe, a good-sized metal lathe, and a mill.
	Mm-hmm. I definitely...
	I've seen this video.
	It's a six or seven part video of this lady.
	She made her own old western revolver from scratch using a mill and a lathe.
	Made the barrel, made the cylinder, all that stuff.
	Really, really cool stuff. But the 3D... And that's something that's a good point.
	3D printer is fast and cheap.
	It takes a long time to print, but still relatively fast and cheap.
	And the other side of that argument...
	People will say, well, you know, you could 3D print in metal now.
	Yeah, you got $20,000 a year to lease a machine?
	You know, to make a gun I can go get for $100 off the street?
	Like, seriously? Is that an argument?
	That's true. And, you know, they're not to the same quality as a forged piece of steel or, you know, milled-out aluminum.
	If you look into how they do it, there's a lot of resins and stuff that hold that stuff together.
	So it's not going to be nearly as strong.
	Mm-hmm. I've got another question here.
	Chad Warren said, could you buy a 3D printer and have a business like how you see cell phone repair?
	That's an interesting idea.
	There's a lot of different things that you could do with it.
	If you were talented in terms of doing 3D stuff, you could make some little tools and implements and things that might complement what you want to do at home.
	That's the key thing.
	Of course, as you point out, it's...
	Getting materials, you know, that would be one of the things that they would probably, like you pointed out, outlaw a 0% lower.
	You know, you won't be able to buy an aluminum block or something.
	They could do the same thing with the 3D printed stuff.
	But, you know, you mentioned Cody Wilson earlier, and he put this out directly as a challenge, and they took it to court, and they said, you know, they tried to outlaw the instructions on how to do it.
	And so he said that's a First Amendment issue, and the courts agreed with him on that.
	Mm-hmm. They also reached out because he was leasing the printers.
	And by the way, he was using industrial printers.
	This wasn't something that he had a home kit that he put together.
	This was an actual professional machine because back then, to get a decent quality product, you had to have a several thousand dollar a year lease machine.
	They actually went, contacted the company.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I had some accusations about sexual harassment or rape or something like that, which is, again, you look at it and you can cynically say, well, is this the Julian Assange tactic, you know, that they're coming after somebody with?
	And again, I don't think they were able to get a conviction on that, so that's probably what the case was.
	Yeah, and you know, like the way they did it, they took away his machines, or they had the industry take away the machines, and I guess he got other machines from somewhere else.
	But they like to use these choke points, and you talk about it all the time.
	Yeah. The choke point. And if the 3D printer, they can't regulate the 3D printer, then the choke point will be the material that you buy for it.
	Mm-hmm. I mean, even just the idea of going through a background check at a gun store is a choke point of sorts.
	And they're using a private business to enforce it.
	That's right.
	And I remember back in Obama's in 2012 or so, 2011, 2012, when all the ammo was gone and you couldn't find ammo was crazy expensive.
	And I and I asked my friends, I said, OK, we're in the military and we know law enforcement uses the same weapons platforms we do, which are weapons of war.
	They want to say, right, two, two, three, not two, two, three, rather a NATO five, five, six round nine millimeter, 40, 45.
	There's only a handful of calibers because they standardize it, right?
	Mm-hmm.
	as a choke point to get people for buying it and i remember when they were doing that with obama he also um it was like i think it's fort drum if i remember correctly in new york and they were a part you know the military sells recycled brass out there and they just said we're not going to do that anymore and they started crushing it and selling the crab the uh the the crushed uh scrap metal to uh china at a fraction of what they could have resold uh the uh you know the recycled brass form oh yeah
	and that's typical in the army that when you go to a range um you know say you fire 20 000 rounds with you know your whole unit um you've got to go pick up all that brass and turn it in and they weigh it mm-hmm So, number one, they don't want people pocketing rounds and taking it home because it is a common round.
	But also, you know, they don't really want you reloading it either.
	Mm-hmm. So if you don't come in at a certain weight on your spent brass, they won't let you turn it in.
	You got to go out there and, you know, hands across America looking for...
	It doesn't matter.
	The thing could be all like 10 years old and nasty.
	You just got to make that weight. But yeah, that's something that they do.
	And I'm surprised. I watched a pretty good documentary on the military had its own ammo producing facilities.
	So it makes no sense to get rid of the brass, because you can just send it to your facility and make new rounds.
	So I really don't get it.
	Yeah, they're up to something with that.
	You mentioned, as you're talking about it, you said, you know, working on this thing is a real passion.
	It's like the people who, the mechanic that, you know, fixes up a classic car or whatever, or they set up a car for racing on the track or something like that.
	And again, I think that when we look at the different issues with it, you know, when we learn skills, that is something that is really vitally important.
	Any skill that you use may be something that you could use as, you know, barter and trade and that type of thing.
	And I think any of these types of skills, once you learn 3D printing, I think it's got a lot of different uses that you could use.
	Doing things that would help to keep cars going, for example, or some temporary replacement parts.
	I mean, some of them are going to have really high heat, and I'm not that familiar with the different plastics to know what they can really take.
	But still, some of the comments we've got here, Jason, we've got Risha M. says, will they pull another Waco or Ruby Ridge over homemade guns?
	I imagine if they get widespread enough and if they start improving, they probably would.
	I mean, they'll do it over anything.
	What do you think? They're already saying that, specifically with this Polymer 80.
	I was reading articles on it, and they say that crime is on the rise.
	It's gone up 5,000%.
	It's like, okay, so you had one used in a crime, and then this year you had two used in a crime.
	I like to play with those numbers to make it seem like some kind of an epidemic.
	I'm sure that they're hiring hobbyists of the Mexican drug cartels, too.
	I get their ammunition stuff up, right?
	Yeah. Yeah, they probably got a factory cranking these things out, and then they just fast and furious it over the border so they can find them after a crime's been committed.
	And they say, oh, it's the ghost gun. It's the ghost gun.
	That's right. Narroway Narrogate Ministry says, yes, $200 tax stamp and the right for the government to knock on your door at 3 a.m.
	to inspect and search your home for weapons of automatic nature.
	Yeah, it is always a trap.
	Always a way for them to assert themselves in our life.
	Radice Bro, thank you for the tip.
	He says, it's called Print the Legend, and in it you learn a lot of these machine companies have ties to Chuck Schumer.
	Wow, that's interesting.
	So Harps338LM, thank you for the tip.
	He says, so we lost or gave up our firearms here in Australia.
	So what is this?
	And he's got a link to usedguns.com.au.
	So I don't know.
	I can't see that link there, but I see that it's coming out of Australia.
	So I don't know about that.
	Oh, Harps, he's got himself some firearms.
	You can find him on YouTube shooting some pretty beastly...
	He's the kind of shooter that likes to reach out and touch something, you know, at 1K away.
	And that's another thing, another argument they make is, why do you need so many guns?
	Why do you need 10 guns? Well, they're purpose-built.
	You know, I've got, I don't know, maybe six or seven ARs here.
	Why do I need more than one AR? Well, I don't if I'm only shooting one round.
	But I got one that's in.308.
	I got a.22 long rifle.
	I've got a.556.
	I've got one that's a shorter, more of a home defense.
	I got one with a longer barrel, you know, for hunting.
	If I want to hunt a smaller game, there's lots of reasons.
	And, you know, I find that it's none of your business how many guns I own, you know?
	Yeah. Oh, yeah. Some people are collectors.
	Some people are hobbyists. Me, I got so many ARs in that particular kind of platform rather than buying a standard hunting-style rifle because I like to build them.
	I'm a tinkerer. I love building things.
	That's why I like the 3D printer.
	I like to work on cars.
	I do woodworking. It's just a hobby for me, you know?
	Well, it's like, you know, the C40 organizations, these cities, and it's now over 100 of them, start out about 40 or so.
	They make it their business to tell you how many articles of clothing you can buy in a year.
	You know, they want to make sure that you don't have more than three articles of clothing, that you don't eat any meat or dairy, that you don't have more than one trip under 1,000 miles every three years.
	Whose business is that?
	Everything, as you're talking about these guns, it's all really fundamentally about controlling and watching and surveilling everything that we do.
	And that is why it's so troubling, as I was saying before, you know, you came on.
	You look at the conservatives that are out there and saying, well, we need to get rid of the people's anonymity by, you know, we've got this group that signed on in support of Hamas, and we need to know who all those people are so we can put them on a blacklist.
	It's like, these are conservatives, or at least, you know, people who call themselves conservatives, you know, people like Dershowitz at Harvard.
	I don't know how conservative he's ever been, you know, but you got other people on Breitbart basically saying the same thing, on the Daily Wire saying the same thing.
	It's just, you know, it fundamentally comes down to where they are on a particular issue, and they're more than willing to sacrifice our fundamental rights and to ignore the Constitution if it is something that they radically disagree with.
	Oh, 100%. And the whole thing about the gun control side of it is, it is track and trace.
	That's all it is. You know, as much as they want to tell you, this is illegal, this is illegal.
	No, it's regulated. It's regulated.
	They want to be able to track it.
	That's why they're going after private sales.
	They're going after, they say there's a gun show loophole.
	It's really private sales.
	If I gift you, say, hey, David, I'm not using this rifle anymore.
	Would you like it? They want us to go down and do that transfer so they have a paper record.
	And it is about tracking and tracing.
	They only care if it doesn't have a serial number or they don't know who owns it.
	And why would you do that?
	There is default.
	There's a de facto registry.
	I covered it in one of the foxholes, I believe.
	It's just paper. They're forbidden to have a database that does that automatic searching.
	But they can track guns from the place of purchase to the person.
	So it's already there.
	The registry's there. What the missing piece is the guns that they don't know where they're at.
	That's why they're going after ghost guns, homemade guns, private sales, you name it.
	And then they want to fill in that database, right?
	And they do want to go electronic with it.
	I had a video on it where they were complaining about, you know, it takes us so long to do this and we're 32,000 things a year we get or whatever that are still sitting in a box that we haven't.
	It's crazy. They do have a system that are prohibited by law from having an automated system, yet they're pushing for an automated system.
	Yes. And it's about taking the guns.
	That's right. It's not about anything that has to do with regulation.
	Registration is pre-crime.
	100% it's pre-crime.
	So they're going to tell me that I can't own this or that because I might commit a crime with it.
	Well, that's not due process.
	You know? Yeah, I just saw an article.
	I forget what they called it. I didn't have enough time to talk about it today, but I saw it on Zero Hedge.
	And they were talking about, you know, financial transactions and how they could do voting electronically, and we don't have to spend the time trying to track this stuff and authenticate it.
	What we'll do is we'll authenticate you, and, you know, we'll be able to have provenance on this.
	We'll know where it was created, who created it, where it's coming from.
	So we don't have to spend a lot of time authenticating this stuff, and it'll save us so much calculation.
	I looked at it, and it's like, well, this is just a...
	I forget the term that they used.
	And oh, this is going to be great.
	We're going to use it for all these different things.
	And it's nothing more than the CCPA, the Coalition for Content, Provenance, and Authenticity that Microsoft was putting together for the federal government, where they would mark anything that you do, just like you're talking about marking the gun with a serial number.
	Every content that you put out, whether it's a meme or whether it's a substack article or whether it's audio or audio and video, all of it would be stamped by your computer.
	And they've got a coalition between the hardware companies, the software companies, as well as the gatekeepers for what we're allowed to say, like the New York Times and BBC and other people.
	They brought this all together so they can register and control speech.
	Everything that they want to do is just like the CBDC.
	Everything is a passport.
	Everything is surveillance and registration.
	That is the society that they want us to live in, and that's why it's so important for us to start learning these skills.
	It'd be great if we had anybody in the government that wanted to oppose this, anybody that's running for office, but nobody even wants to talk about that.
	The most we get is a couple of candidates who've talked about CBDC, but they're all just ignoring this issue.
	Well, and, you know, the gun thing is a First Amendment thing, like you said.
	And look at what they're doing in Canada right now.
	They're trying to make you register a podcast.
	And they start off with, okay, you've got to make so many million dollars a year, and then you've got to get a business name, you've got to register with them.
	I mean, it makes no sense.
	I understand over the air.
	FM and AM. Because there's a limited number of frequencies.
	So you don't want to be stepping on each other, right?
	But with the internet, that's not a problem.
	So why would you need to regulate it?
	It's just their way to get their pinky toe in the door.
	And once that happens, they start broadening.
	They start broadening. Okay, now it's if you make more than $1,000 a year.
	Okay, you don't have to make any money at all.
	If you have a podcast, you have to register with us.
	And then they start nailing down the speech violations.
	And think about this, David.
	Everybody now has something that they've said or put on Twitter or Facebook or something.
	If they start broadening terms of what is hate speech and they want to put you in jail for it, what's to stop them from retroactively going back 10 years ago about something you posted?
	They've got all the stuff there in Bluffdale, Utah and other places where the NSA is storing everything that everybody's ever said or done, you know, and it's like, okay, fine.
	You know, Permit Record was what Ed Snowden called his book that he wrote about that.
	We've got just about three minutes.
	I want to say thanks to Chad Warren.
	Thank you for the tip. He says...
	Thanks for having a calm vibe on your show compared to InfoWars.
	It's like, well, I could never get into that here on fire vibe.
	Much of the consternation of Alex, who wanted me to, but it just wasn't.
	I couldn't fake it. So that's just how I am.
	And also, Super Faye.
	This is a comment from who we're talking about church, I think.
	There was one church open in rural Texas where I live, over a one hour and 15 minute drive.
	Needless to say, my husband and I found our new church that way.
	Well, good for you. And that's the key thing.
	You know, we've seen that happening.
	It has been the lifeblood of people.
	If you've got a church and you don't think it's essential, especially when there's a pandemic.
	I mean, during a pandemic in the past, you know, when there really was a plague going around, whatever it was, everybody was, you know, the church people who were serious about what they believed, they were looking at an eternal perspective.
	They weren't concerned about whether they're going to live or die.
	They were concerned about whether or not they're going to be there to help other people.
	And so that was a really key thing.
	I think a lot of people realize, well, these guys are just playing at it.
	They're not serious. I've had a lot of people tell me that.
	Well, I'm glad you found a church.
	But, yeah, this is a key issue.
	The Second Amendment is always a key issue, and this folds together a lot of things.
	And, of course, we can see, Jason, that...
	Ultimately, it comes down to controlling and monitoring, registering, and surveilling everything that we do.
	Everything just keeps coming back to that, the passports and all the rest of this stuff.
	It truly is frightening what they want to do to us, and we have to take initiative, as you did with the 3D printer, to make sure that we've got some skills and things like that, because it's going to be a mixture of black market and other things to get outside of their system, I think. Yeah, I wanted to say, Super Fae, if you're driving an hour and a half to church, that's great, because doing the right thing is going to take sacrifice.
	Yes. Fighting against free speech is going to take sacrifice.
	Growing your own food is going to take time.
	The government doesn't want that.
	The government wants you in your pod eating bugs and rely on them for everything.
	They don't want you to talk to your neighbors.
	They don't want you to know your neighbors.
	Maybe you can get together in the metaverse.
	Mm-hmm. You know, where you may be talking to a computer that's spying on everything you think.
	I mean, we have thought crimes now.
	We have people standing outside. Were you praying?
	Were you silently praying?
	Oh, yeah. Yeah, exactly.
	Yeah. Well, they let people run through the streets making all kinds of threats against other people.
	Thank you so much for joining us again.
	Jason Barker, The Knights of the Storm.
	Check out their show as well as their listing of everybody.
	Thank you, Jason. Appreciate it.
	Thanks, David. The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at TheDavidKnightShow.com.
	Thank you for sharing. If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲