All Episodes
Sept. 19, 2024 - The Charlie Kirk Show
34:58
The Single Question JD Vance Can Use to Trounce Tim Walz ft. Megyn Kelly
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey everybody, welcome to the Charlie Kirk Show.
Never fear, Charlie is here.
We have Megyn Kelly in the chair alongside him.
A phenomenal conversation with one of the legends, one of the best, Megyn Kelly.
Charlie's interviewing her.
I chime in a little bit, but in order to save Charlie's voice, which you'll hear, does not sound so good.
But this is a phenomenal conversation.
Charlie Kirk, Megyn Kelly, the way you can get involved and stay plugged in in the meantime is going to members.charliekirk.com.
Think about becoming a member today and joining this growing community that is supporting freedom of speech, boldness, the truth, Without fear of censorship or cancellation, you guys mean the world to us when you join members.charliekirk.com.
You also get merch, you get discounted tickets, you get access to members-only lounges, you get our episodes ad-free, and so much more.
Check out members.charliekirk.com.
Buckle up.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country.
He's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created, Turning Point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of The Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals.
Learn how you can protect your wealth with Noble Gold Investments at noblegoldinvestments.com.
That is noblegoldinvestments.com.
It's where I buy all of my gold.
Go to noblegoldinvestments.com.
Honored to be with you here with Megyn Kelly.
We also have producer Andrew co-piloting.
Megyn, welcome to the program.
I apologize for my voice but I've just been talking too much.
I gotta ask Megyn, have you ever lost in all your years of broadcasting, have you lost your voice?
I bet the answer is yes.
Many times and in my experience you have this like spectrum where it starts off kind of You like it, it's like, in my case, like a little close to Demi Moore and it's like sexy and then it just crosses over to disgusting and you gotta know just where to land it when you do your broadcasting.
You can get to the place where you've gone too far.
I think I'm living in that place right now.
Andrew, please go ahead.
Well yeah, Megan, thanks for joining us.
You know, Charlie called me this morning and and sort of muffled out like, hey, I think
I think you need to be around for today's show.
I can't talk.
And I just, Megan, you know, this as much as as anybody, how hard Charlie works.
And I literally he's he's doing like five events a day.
He vowed to his audience he was going to leave it all out on the field this election cycle.
So it's one of those days you just kind of have to, like, you know, throw your hands
up and laugh because we we warned Charlie.
He was going too hard and this is the result.
I know.
Well, we need him fit and perfectly able to talk to people and convert them, because I've been watching him do that out on the trail.
But, whoa, you know, I gotta pull it back, Nelly, because we got a long stretch here between now and November 5th, and we need you.
We do.
Yes, we do.
So, Megan, I want to get your analysis here of the state of the race.
The debate is a distant memory.
It's only like nine or ten days ago.
Where do you think things stand right now?
And has Kamala Harris successfully introduced herself to the American people?
Not at all.
No.
She remains an avatar.
She's an empty vessel and people are seeing that.
I mean, the one good thing that came out of that debate, other than they're eating the dogs, is the fact that she is overconfident now and is giving interviews.
It's awesome!
I encourage her, in her newfound bout of confidence, to continue getting out there.
Do it!
NABJ, she's doing Oprah later today.
She gave that disastrous interview to that local ABC Philly anchor who was terrible.
He did an equally poor job to what we saw at that debate moderation.
I mean, ABC's on a roll.
David Muir's ratings are down by 12 percentage points.
There's no question why that is.
People know he tried to flip an election.
I mean, he tried to weigh in and actually spin the election in her favor.
So she's feeling good, and that's good for people who want a sane result in this election.
Put herself out there, just let her keep talking, and they'll see.
I mean, did you see there's this one clip going around from when she left the NABJ yesterday?
With a very friendly audience.
You could not have a friendlier audience than she had.
And she dodged and weaved all their questions.
And at the end she gets up, she shakes their hands, and I mean, she turned and stone cold, she ran out of there to where those three journalists are looking at each other like, What the?
She doesn't have an authentic, warm, genuine bone in her body.
She's all about maintaining this facade until she gets to November 5th, and then doing whatever it is her bidders tell her to do.
We don't know who's actually going to be president, so I guess it won't be much different than it is right now if she wins.
So, kind of piggybacking on that, we were told that the ABC News moderators would just be moderators, not fact-checkers.
Interestingly, the CNN debate back in June, they did not do any fact-checking.
They decided to throw that kind of, let's just say, precedent out the window.
And interject in multiple cases to make Donald Trump seem as if he's lying.
When Donald Trump was actually right on the crime statistics, he was right about post-term abortion.
Megan, as somebody who understands the media and studies the media, when did we make that change from debate moderators regulating a discussion to actually intervening to fact-checking the substance of a debate?
I mean, that's a Trump phenomenon.
I mean, having anchored a bunch of these, I can tell you that my general approach was, I'm not going to fact check these guys unless they're attacking the integrity of my question.
Otherwise, it's up to the other panelists to fact check the candidate.
If he lies, that's their problem.
It's not really my problem.
But if he's going to attack my question, I'll defend it.
I don't have a deep objection to contentious, obviously, exchanges at a debate between a moderator and a candidate.
I think it can make for great TV.
But you must do it to everyone.
If you only do it to one side, you're a hack.
And that's what ABC proved last Tuesday.
They're hacks.
Those were not honest journalists out there putting aside the dishonesty of their so-called fact checks, which themselves were non-factual.
The nerve of only doing it to one side.
And it's not like she didn't lie.
If you look at CNN after the debate, you had that Daniel Dale guy who hates Trump saying that he lied 33 times and she lied once that he could find.
He didn't seem to count the good people on both sides or the bloodbath lie.
He didn't even call her out for lying specifically on the fracking thing, though I think that's what he was referring to, claiming that her position has never changed.
I mean, we could keep going.
So it was insane to me that they didn't even bother to make themselves look good, like a fig leaf position, by offering her at least one here or there.
So they're owning their bias is really what they're doing.
They're trying to openly win points with the left.
And I'll bet you that They haven't heard most of the criticism that they've received.
They're watching the numbers go down.
They're probably curious as to why that happened.
Because in their bubble, I guarantee you they're getting nothing but praise because their side does think one-sided fact checks are okay.
Their side did criticize Dana Bash and Jake Tapper for not intervening in the debate because Joe Biden couldn't.
And they wanted to get plaudits from those same groups, and I'm sure they did.
Yeah, Megan, that to me was the key.
I think that they heard CNN, the pushback that CNN, Dana Bash, and Tapper got, and they were like, we're not going to recreate this within the Acela corridor.
She said that.
Lindsay Davis said that.
I didn't even catch that.
Well, so here's another question from Charlie.
I'm going to throw it up for you.
Do you think that Trump should have been more Trumpian in the sense that should he have attacked the moderators as opposed to just sort of sitting there and reacting to it?
Yes.
Yes!
He needed one of his Trumpian or, you know, to cite another great one, Newt Gingrich-esque moments.
You do not lose as the Republican candidate when you are attacking the moderators, the media in general.
And in this case in particular, because they really were biased.
The average Joe sitting at home could see it plain as the noses on your face.
The amount of fact checks on Trump and the nature of the questions to Trump, so adversarial,
so negative about everything, unlike the questions to her, you could tell they didn't like him.
You could tell that they were much more inclined to her.
And as the fact finder sitting at home, you start to dislike the moderators.
So Trump should have jumped all over that.
And frankly, all he had to do at the beginning was to say about her, did you see?
She didn't answer the question.
She talked about how she's from a middle-class family, which by the way, she's not.
That's all you're going to hear.
You wait.
Wait to hear her spell out her economic plan.
Let's make every question about that, because that's what's hurting Americans sitting at home tonight.
We know she's from some family where she was raised by mostly her mother.
We know she continues to tell us she's from the middle class, which is not true.
She was born to two PhDs.
But okay, wait until she gives you her plan.
I'll cede my time.
I'll see.
I will see it every answer until she tells us what her plan is.
It would have been so great.
And then when the moderators kept doing that, he could have said, how come you never fact checked her?
You know, I came on here, notwithstanding the fact that I know you're in the tank for Kamala Harris, because I thought I'd get a fair debate.
Once again, you disappoint the people at home who don't want to talk endlessly about the 2020 election.
I thought we were supposed to get past that.
Why don't you ask me some questions about My thoughts on immigration and what we should do about it.
So whatever.
He could have turned it on them so easily.
And instead he just ran after every liver snap she threw and the rest of us were at home like, don't do it.
Don't go.
Come back.
You knew he was going to do it and he did it.
And I'll add to that, the Kamala team psychologically profiled Donald Trump better than anybody that I've seen.
When she mentioned the rallies, Megan, I told my team, I said, that is someone who really knows Donald Trump.
That right there was planting a landmine right beneath Donald Trump saying he's going to step on it.
Charlie, when you were watching this in the moment, weren't you like, Oh no!
I was like, he's totally gonna go for it.
Don't do it.
Don't do it.
You don't need to tell me that life is precious, that it could get all taken away in an instant.
That's why I keep a four-week emergency kit from My Patriot Supply in my home.
It's got everything my family could need during a crisis.
With over 2,000 calories a day, there's enough to go around during times of social unrest.
We've seen mass panic in our lifetimes before.
Some were not that long ago.
I'm not gonna take my family's safety for granted anymore.
Are you?
ready whenever disaster strikes. We've seen mass panic in our lifetimes before,
some were not that long ago. I'm not going to take my family's safety for granted anymore,
are you? Right now you can get $50 off the same four-week emergency food kit that I keep in my
home. Go to mypatriotsupply.com and save $50 on a four-week emergency food kit from MyPatriotsupply
and we'll send it over as fast as humanly possible.
Trust me, I know my order showed up in one day and it shipped for free.
Get your 4-week emergency food kit at MyPatriotSupply.com.
That is MyPatriotSupply.com.
Megan, can you expound on that point more?
The psychological profiling of Donald Trump, rally sizes, John McCain.
Somebody knew their stuff.
Yeah, I mean it was unfortunate because that's exactly and not just that but the personal insults and the attempt to demean him over and over.
She tried to emasculate him which was very irritating to watch because this is the same party that lectures us and how what we really need is to unite and be kind and the other side is so toxically masculine and then she gets up there and says you're a disgrace.
You're an embarrassment trying to needle him.
And Trump did a better job of not responding in kind, because of course he can.
She's an idiot, and he held back from actually saying that.
He has on the campaign trail.
But you could see his anger level was rising and his tone was rising and who could blame him?
But that was her goal because she's trying to make him seem like, you know, this angry, nasty man to these middle American women sitting at home wondering whether they can stomach four more years of Trump.
They don't love Trump like his hardcore supporters.
They're trying to decide whether they can tolerate him.
So she was trying to make him look kind of nasty and like not someone you'd want in your living room on your television or otherwise every night.
And unfortunately he wasn't able to totally control that.
It was it was effective and I will say we did discover her best skill which is memorization.
She's an excellent memorizer.
I guess she could have been a Hollywood actress.
I mean, sure, like look at, she can do the Latina accent and she can do that urban accent and she can do, I don't know, all of them, the Indian accent.
And then she can go out there and memorize lines perfectly.
So the Democrats were smart to pick her because they don't actually want somebody with their own independent thoughts.
They want, I don't know, whoever's going to do what Obama wants, whoever is going to do what Jake Sullivan wants.
I really don't know.
You tell me who's actually governing right now.
They want another four to eight years of that.
And by that standpoint, she's got the perfect resume.
She can memorize.
She can do accents.
She's a minority.
She's a woman.
Done.
You can see exactly why they planted her in, you know, bottom up, bottom up.
Trust us.
I think that's exactly right.
And Andrew, can you talk about some of the data?
Amazingly, despite how the media said Donald Trump lost the debate, independents actually tilted towards Donald Trump after the debate.
Andrew, can you talk about some of that?
And I'd love to get Megan's thoughts there.
I think it's really important.
Yeah, absolutely.
That was my next question.
So we looked at some of the analysis.
You had that Reuters focus group where it was 6 out of 10 after the debate.
We're now leaning or going to vote for Trump.
You had independence tracking with Republicans in the live debate analysis.
Fox did a couple of great segments on this.
Something we We haven't seen since 2016.
So yeah, she's really good at memorizing things.
She's really good at goading Trump.
She's an actress, sort of vapid line memorizer.
We see that.
And so the question is, did she win, but was it ineffective?
Did it not matter?
And what are we to make of the fact that it seems like Undecided went with Trump anyways?
I said this the night of the debate, right after it ended.
I refuse to say that she won and Trump lost.
And I will say that.
I mean, I have said Trump has lost in the past when I thought he's lost.
I did not see that that night.
I thought she won on points.
Like, if you had to say, okay, Who scored more blows than the other one, like in a boxing match.
I guess you'd give it to her.
That's what I said that night.
But my feeling was the average person sitting at home saw somebody who was somewhat emotionally unregulated, rolling her eyes, shaking her head.
Remember the chin, you know, like, oh, oh, you know, she looked off-putting and she looked a little emotional, which is the last thing you really want to look when you're running to be the first female president in US history.
Not to mention the personal insults, which are nasty and the average person sitting at home wouldn't like.
She's doing poorly with men.
Are men going to respond well to a woman trying over and over to emasculate a man, a man who was our president already and served honorably in that role, who then doesn't respond in kind?
Like all these sort of behind-the-scenes subliminal things, I thought, were going to work against her.
In the minds of people, and I think that's what the polls have reflected, that people don't like her anymore than they did going into that.
Though if press, like who won, you had to pick one.
Okay, I'll give it to her because on points, she threw more blows.
But you still walk away saying, like in the Apollo Creed-Rocky fight, I'm on Team Rocky.
I like that guy better, even though technically the other one may have won the match.
That's well said.
So, I was raised as a middle class kid.
I grew up a middle class kid.
I grew up a middle class kid.
I believe in the ambition, the aspirations, the dreams of the American people.
You know, we have ambitions and aspirations and dreams.
The ambition, the aspiration, the dream.
I started my career as a prosecutor.
I was a career prosecutor for most of my career.
Having a background as a prosecutor.
I intend to create an opportunity economy.
Developing and creating an opportunity economy.
Would I imagine and believe in coal?
An opportunity economy.
She's an actress.
She's an actress.
She is fake.
You do not know what you would be getting if you elect her.
That's the thing.
There's nothing authentic about her.
Love him or hate him, you cannot say the same about Donald Trump.
As Hannity once said to me, Trump doesn't get in trouble because he lies, he gets in trouble because he tells the truth.
And it's the truth.
He lets it all fly, and he doesn't really much care if it's going to result in a bad news cycle for him.
She's exactly the opposite.
She stands for nothing.
She's reversed herself on everything just to win elections.
I think people are getting this at a gut level when she gets out there more.
Because, you know, even at the Black Journalists Association, it was like, I'm a gun owner.
You know, she does her little John Wayne routine, like, I love them, their guns, and I used them when I was enforcing the southern border, when I was a border state AG.
Right?
That's her one routine.
And then you get in front of a different audience and it's like, oh no, I'm for an assault weapons ban.
Absolutely right.
And then I have yet to hear somebody say, what about your proposed buyback program, your mandatory buyback program?
And what about your statement that you think you have a right to go into private citizens' homes to make sure they're complying with your law in California, that they lock up their guns, that you think Again, John Wayne style, you can unleash that on the citizenry and just walk in over dinner and take a look at their gun cabinet.
Who's going to ask her these questions?
These reporters are a total fail!
At that NABJ, the one reporter from the Griot decided to ask her, What do you feel joy about?
Instead of anything I just listed, I can't with this press corps.
The Politico guy, Politico, which is constantly lecturing us about good journalism and what hard politics looks like, they decide to waste their questioning on whether Just how racist has Trump been with respect to the Springfield migration issue?
Is this just naked racism or is a federal response warranted here?
To Trump's comments?
What are you, like, the feds are going to go in and shut him up?
The feds are the one who caused the Springfield issue.
So I'm not exactly sure what he meant.
But anyway, she's an actress and the press is a failure.
And this combination is what has led to her being as tight as she is in the polls with Donald Trump right now.
So, Megan, I have a question for you.
You know, we, and I love how you bring such an insight on the journalistic aspect of this and the press corps' role in so much of this, and we are going to get to what is a woman, but had the shoe been on the other foot, and I know they don't like it when we do whataboutism and all this stuff, but Trump has just nearly been assassinated twice.
And the press has, in this galling manner, been blaming Trump.
You brought up Springfield for his language that he's used about Haitian immigrants or whatever.
What would have happened had the shoe been on the other foot?
And my premise is that the First Amendment would just be completely obliterated already.
I mean, the press would be calling on social media sites to be completely shut down.
Elon Musk would be at jeopardy.
Had the shoe been on the other foot, what role does the press play in this?
Because they wanna blame Trump for what he said about Haitians, apparently.
I just wanna say, I know the mainstream media will skip,
I saw two dead cats roast down on a barbecue on Chris Ruffo's feed in Dayton, Ohio, which is right next to Sprayfield.
All right?
I can't remember which publication it was that tried to run this down and fact check it.
They were saying, could be chicken.
No way.
Tastes like chicken.
They consulted with veterinary experts.
I think it was Washington Post consulted with veterinarian experts who said, could be, could be chicken.
They didn't actually cite or quote any veterinarians in the piece.
They just went to one to say, Eh?
Chicken-esque.
Well, I have eyes, and I know what a chicken looks like, and I know what a cat looks like.
And I'm sorry to say, I agree with Chris Ruffo.
There were two skinned cats on a barbecue, a stone's throw away from Springfield, and in a house owned by immigrants or rented by immigrants, though not from Haiti, from the Congo.
I don't give a damn.
There are multiple reports now.
The media is working so hard to debunk each one of them, and some have fallen apart, and some are unverifiable, and some could be true because they have not yet been debunked or verified either way.
I just think the whole thing is so hilarious because Trump has got us talking about migration in Springfield, Ohio, in a way we weren't before, and it's driving the media insane.
Babylon Bee nailed it when they summed it up saying, like, media rushes to say no animals are being eaten in, or no animals are being killed in Springfield, Ohio, just women and children.
Yes, that's actually true.
Yes.
An 11-year-old boy was killed by Haitian migrants, one of whom drove into his school bus and 20 kids were hurt.
And a woman's mother-in-law, elderly mother-in-law was killed by another Haitian migrant.
They're giving them driver's licenses and they can't drive.
You heard the people complain about what's happening on their front lawns with mattresses and they're threatening and they can't walk outside.
And the grocery stores, how people are opening up the cans of food and sticking their hands in and then throwing the spaghetti sauce on the floor of the grocery.
I'm sure it's Shangri-La, Washington Post.
Okay.
If it's so great, why don't you bring them to Martha's Vineyard?
We know how that worked out the first time with the illegals.
Let's see if you do better with illegal Haitian migrants.
Some 1 million so-called legal migrants are here.
They're awaiting their asylum claims, to be sure.
Sure, Jan.
Sure.
That's not going to happen.
They're already here.
And every Democrat every other day on CNN and MSNBC is calling for amnesty for these people.
They're saying we have to find a path to citizenship for the ones who are in this country now.
10.4 million let in under Joe Biden, minimum, excludes the gotaways.
2.3 million under Trump.
10.4 to 2.3, and they want amnesty for these people.
It's just absolutely insane.
So the media decides to zero in on whether they can find dead cats or eaten cats or ducks.
Miraculously, they can't find the eaten goose, and therefore they want to slam the ball in the end zone and say Donald Trump's a liar.
Meanwhile, I think he's sitting back laughing because he's made them focus on one of the issues that is the best for Team Trump-Vance.
Hey everybody, Charlie Kirk here.
You've asked and MyPillow listened.
They're finally bringing you the most requested offer ever.
Right now, you can get the Queen Size Premium MyPillow for only $19.98.
MyPillow is made with patented adjustable fill.
It adjusts to your exact individual needs, regardless of your sleep position.
It helps keep your neck aligned and holds its shape all night long, so you get the best sleep of your life.
But that's not all.
Get their six-piece kitchen and bath towel set for only $25.
The brand new mattress topper for as low as $69.98.
And their famous MyPillow bed sheets for as low as $25 and so, so much more.
Go to MyPillow.com or call 800-875-0425.
Use promo code Kirk to get huge discounts on all MyPillow products, including the premium queen-size MyPillow for only $19.98.
That's the lowest price ever.
Don't delay.
Order today.
Use promo code Kirk at checkout.
That is promo code Kirk at MyPillow.com.
Check it out right now.
Wonderful organization.
MyPillow.com.
I wanted to get your reaction to this, Megan.
Cut 91.
This is Peter Doocy asking KJP, when is, when are you going to stop calling Donald Trump a threat?
And the Orwellian nature of this, where she turns it around and said, you asking the question is dangerous.
Cut 91.
Two days since somebody allegedly tried to kill Donald Trump again.
And you're here at the podium in the White House briefing room calling him a threat.
President Biden has been clear-eyed about the threat that the former president represents to our democracy.
How many more assassination attempts on Donald Trump until the president and the vice president and you pick a different word to describe Trump other than threat?
Peter, if anything from this administration, I actually completely disagree with the premise of your question, the question that you're asking.
It is also incredibly dangerous in the way that you're asking it.
And now for you to make that kind of comment in your question, because your question involved a comment and a statement.
You know, it is, uh, that is also incredibly dangerous.
Your reaction?
At least, I mean, this is another, this is a blatant DEI hire.
100%.
She got up there when she got the job and touted the fact that I'm black and I'm gay, just like Don Lemon.
I'm black and I'm gay.
Remember when CNN was thinking about firing him and he was like, just a reminder, I'm black and I'm gay.
And they fired him ultimately anyway.
That's why she's there and she's an empty vessel and she says empty things that mean nothing and tried to turn this around.
I mean, it doesn't even make sense what she's saying.
It's dangerous for him to say what they're saying is dangerous?
That makes absolutely no logical sense.
The double standard on language that is enforced by this White House, top Democrats, and the media has never been more glaring.
You know, Charlie Cook had a piece up the other day about how they blamed the Paul Pelosi attack on rhetoric from Republicans back in 2010.
He was attacked last year.
So some 13 years later, Republican comments caused this guy to get attacked by this insane lunatic out in San Francisco.
But the ubiquitous comments by Democrats and their media enablers and Hollywood celebrities who support them, You know, from Madonna outside saying she wanted to bomb the White House, to Johnny Depp and what he said, to Kathy Griffin with the severed Trump head.
I mean, we could be here all day if we relived it.
That had nothing to do with influencing either one of these shooters, especially the latest shooter, who actually was retweeting the exact language of Kamala Harris, that Donald Trump is a threat to democracy.
You can easily go out there and say, Donald Trump has a controversial or bad temperament.
I'm sick of talking about Donald Trump, and if we reelect him, he's going to be in my living room every night, as I said, and I don't want that.
I think he's mean to people.
I don't like the mean tweets.
Whatever, you could find ways of criticizing him that the other side might say, I disagree, but it's acceptable.
It's within the bounds.
Or he isn't pro-abortion enough, right?
All the things that we've always been arguing about.
Dems and Republicans.
All of that is inbounds.
This stuff painting him as El Diablo is out of bounds.
It's deeply wrong and it is incendiary.
And the problem is it's not just Kamala Harris or Joe Biden.
It's all of them.
All of them.
This week, post-second assassination attempt, you had MSNBC with a guest comparing him to Mussolini and Hitler.
Hillary Clinton went on there and doubled down just two nights ago about what a deep and dangerous threat he is to the country, saying he unleashed the worst threat on our democracy since the Civil War.
Worse than 9-11.
Back to that nonsense.
All because of an election protest that he launched that looked very much like the protests they had launched, including Hillary Clinton, multiple times before.
It's just everywhere.
And so this really is unlike what the Republicans have said in the past about the Democrats.
There is just no way of tying What Republicans have said about Democrats are about issues to the prior violence we've seen in this country.
And this has gotten so bad, there's no way of denying the Democrats rhetoric likely played a role in influencing one or both of these shooters.
I'm sorry, but that's the truth.
So Megan, I want your thoughts.
I think that the failure of Our side to force the issue on the trans issue, what is a woman, the medical mutilation of our children would be political malpractice.
I think that we need to start to flush this out and get them to explain to the American people why they think it's okay for a 14-year-old to go under gender reassignment surgery, especially in the J.D.
Vance-Tim Wells debate.
Megan, this is an issue that you've done incredibly heroic and courageous coverage and work on.
Megan, do you feel as if we're talking about this issue enough this political season?
No.
Imagine if Trump had looked at Kamala Harris and that debate and said, what's a woman?
Define what a woman is.
Amazing.
J.D.
Vance could still do this.
J.D.
Vance, if you're listening, you should do this to Tim Walz.
Make him define what a woman is.
100%.
See if he answers it.
Just say that.
Just say, can you answer what a woman is?
Go ahead and define it.
Oh my God, it would be amazing.
Thank God Trump at least did make reference to her ACLU questionnaire or Kamala's ACLU questionnaire from 2019 in which she did openly back taxpayer-funded sex change procedures and operations for both Prisoners and illegal immigrants in this country.
Unbelievably radical.
He threw the line out but didn't, of course, really hammer it.
And it was to the point where The left doesn't even believe him.
Susan Glasser of the New Yorker tried to fact check him like he's an insane lunatic.
She had no idea it was true.
Time Magazine, same thing.
They had no idea this was true.
Even to them, these progressives, it sounds so nuts.
They're like, definitely not.
She didn't say that.
That's Trump spewing nonsense.
Time Magazine at least admitted its mistake and corrected its piece.
Susan Glasser of the New Yorker, Fail.
Didn't do it, and is still letting her untruth hang out there, among many others.
So yes, this is the perfect debate in which to do it, because J.D.
Vance has the capability to, and also because Tim Walz is the most radical person in the country on this, except for maybe Gavin Newsom.
They might be tied for how radical they are on the trans issue.
And Minnesota is about as leftist as they come when it comes to the trans issue and children and this ought to be shoved down Tim Walz's
throat. I mean I've been raising a big deal about what's happening in Minnesota repeatedly
on my show and elsewhere and what's happening is it's actually very funny Charlie, we get calls
from all these organizations trying to get me to comment because they're going to do a fact check
on me and they want to like give me the chance to back off of my comments.
And I never do, because what I'm saying is 100% correct.
People forget, I practiced law for 10 years.
I know how to read the law.
Trust me.
I litigated at the very highest levels in this country.
I tried jury cases.
I argued in front of federal appellate courts across this country.
I know how to read and interpret the law.
And not only did I read and interpret this one, I then took the time to call up lawmakers and family law attorneys and experts in Minnesota to make sure that what I was reading and seeing was correct.
And I am 100% correct that he has made Minnesota a trans refuge for children trying to get these sex change procedures and operations Who don't have parents who will, quote, affirm them.
Minor children who aren't allowed to smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol, drive cars, or vote are being allowed to flee to Minnesota to be taken into the custody of the Minnesota court system and chop off their body parts because they find some sympathetic judge who says their loving parents don't get to decide for them anymore.
Thanks to Tim Walz.
And if J.D.
Vance does not raise this at the vice presidential debate, it will be political malpractice.
I totally agree.
Megan, thank you so much for joining us today, and thanks for bearing with me and for us.
You're a true patriot and a friend.
Anything we can ever do for you, we are here, and thank you for all you do for our country.
Thank you.
You're doing enough.
You're doing the Lord's work, Charlie.
Hot tea, a little lemon, and lots of honey.
Good luck.
Thank you, Megan.
See you guys.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
We appreciate you bearing with us as Charlie nurses his voice back to health.
Thanks so much.
We'll talk to you soon.
Export Selection