All Episodes
Previous Next
Plain Text
Dec. 16, 2021 - The Charlie Kirk Show
35:08
Democrats Discreet Plot to Kill Election Integrity Everywhere
Transcriber: nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v2, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|

Time Text
Federal Takeover of Elections 00:10:25
Hey, everybody.
Today in the Charlie Kirk show, okay, Build Back Better might be dead, but there is a new federal takeover of our elections that might be coming soon.
We dive into that in great detail.
I want to thank those of you that support our show at charliekirk.com/slash support.
When you support us, you allow us to hire more staff and reach the new heights.
Please consider supporting our show before the end of the year.
Jim from Alabama.
Thank you.
Denise from California.
Thank you.
CharlieKirk.com/slash support.
John from Pennsylvania.
Tracy from Idaho.
Thank you.
Molly from Alabama.
Diane from Ohio.
George from Elmhurst, Illinois.
Bernadette from New York.
David from Ohio.
Michelle from Ohio.
Terry from California.
Sandra from Mississippi.
James from Texas.
Catherine from Washington.
Elizabeth from Florida.
And Anne-Marie from California.
CharlieKirk.com/slash support.
AmFest is just hours away.
AMFEST, AmericaFest, the biggest speakers in the movement.
Tucker, Candace, Greg Gutfeld, and more.
If you want to be there, go to AMFEST.com.
Make sure you're subscribed to the Charlie Kirk Show podcast.
Maybe you're listening and you're not yet subscribed and get your friends to do the same.
So take out your podcast application, type in Charlie Kirk Show.
You subscribe by hitting the plus sign in the upper right-hand corner.
Build Back Better might be dead, but something else is alive and it's not good.
Buckle up.
Here we go.
Charlie, what you've done is incredible here.
Maybe Charlie Kirk is on the college campus.
I want you to know we are lucky to have Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk's running the White House, folks.
I want to thank Charlie.
He's an incredible guy.
His spirit, his love of this country, he's done an amazing job building one of the most powerful youth organizations ever created.
Turning point USA.
We will not embrace the ideas that have destroyed countries, destroyed lives, and we are going to fight for freedom on campuses across the country.
That's why we are here.
Hey, everybody.
This episode is brought to you by my friends at ExpressVPN.
Expressvpn.com/slash Charlie.
Secure your device, anonymize your online activity, protect your action online.
Expressvpn.com/slash Charlie.
Help our show out by also helping yourself protect yourself.
Expressvpn.com/slash Charlie.
There's a lot of different stories I want to get into, but I want to give everyone here a little bit of a victory moment and then a massive warning because I think we're all being played.
So let me start with the victory.
It is incredibly unlikely.
Basically, it's not going to happen.
The Build Back Better bill.
It's unlikely it's going to get passed.
The Build Back Better bill, which gives $100 billion to illegal aliens, gives 68,000 new IRS agents, massive tax increase, hundreds of billions of dollars to clean energy.
I mean, it is a blank check to fundamentally transform the country.
Thanks to Joe Manchin and Kirsten Cinema, it looks like that bill is not going to pass.
But I don't think that's news to most senators.
I think that's news to us.
We knew that Manchin was playing games.
We knew that Manchin didn't want to see this bill passed for a while.
We thought that there might be a scaled-down version of it.
But I think months ago, Manchin and Biden and Cinema and Democrats knew that this bill was probably $3 trillion too ambitious.
So instead, I think there was this skit that was being played on the American people the last couple weeks.
Look how big this bill is.
Progressives then can say to their base, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, we did everything we could, but those stupid Joe Manchin types stopped us.
You see, so Warren and Sanders can go back to their base and their voters and say, we tried to spend $3 trillion, but it's not because of me, it didn't happen.
But instead, what we are seeing, and it's been unfolding in the last couple of hours, is what the real agenda is.
You see, I think this is not new.
I think that Joe Manchin, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, I think that they knew that they were not going to be able to come to a consensus on the big spending bill.
And so you must then ask yourself the question: what is the most important thing for the Democrats if it isn't $3 trillion to go subsidize illegal immigration?
So some of you might be saying, well, Charlie, it's gun confiscation.
Yep, that's important.
Not the most important, though.
Maybe it's amnesty, very important to the internationalist regime, but not the most important.
Maybe it's pandering to the tech oligarchs.
Very important, but not the most important.
Charlie, maybe it's shredding the U.S. Constitution.
Very important, but not the most important.
Charlie, maybe it's making Roe versus Wade the law of the land.
Very important, but not the most important.
No, no, no.
The issue that connects all the other issues is how do we choose who gets power?
It's the most important question.
How do we go about choosing who's in positions of power?
How do we allocate what the sovereign is, the people, how do we distribute our power, our individual people's sovereignty, to people that then have the FBI at their disposal?
What I'm talking, of course, about is elections.
Elections are the most important issue to the left.
This is why at every single turn, if you watch very carefully and closely, there's almost an Operation Mockingbird type agenda.
And this is on the front page of the Washington Post continually.
They are a threat to our democracy.
We must do everything we can to protect our democracy.
Our democracy is under attack.
Now, of course, we are not a democracy.
We are a constitutional republic with democratic means of electing our officials.
Major difference.
We've gone through that in great detail.
We don't have to do that again today.
You guys can go back in the archives of the Charlie Kirk show or if you're really interested, go to charlie4hillsdale.com.
We have a lot of good videos.
We've partnered with Hillsdale College to explain that.
Massive difference between a republic and a democracy.
It bothers me anytime people say that we're a democracy.
We aren't.
We're a republic.
And one of the most important indicators of where the other side wants to go is you can see in the activism, the lawsuits, and the energy of the left that elections are the most important thing.
Dailywire.com writes, the Senate is tabling Joe Biden's signature bill back better legislation until next year, overstall the negotiations with moderate Democrats.
Therefore, Chuck Schumer is likely to push a vote on the Build Back Better plan until next year.
However, Schumer is still holding out hope for action on voting rights this year.
They're hoping for an agreement on rules changes between four moderates who have been meeting.
Joe Manchin, John Tester, Tim Kaine from Virginia, and Angus King from Maine.
Now, the Build Back Better plan has been tabled, but instead, a now unknown, non-defined bill that is basically a laundered version of HR1.
You can rest easy that the Build Back Better, IRS expansion, spying on your bank account, trillions of dollars we don't have, that bill is likely dead.
However, I think it was all a game to try and see like, well, we can't agree on spending, but in D.C., we can agree that voting rights in our democracy, regardless of the political party that you're in, is something that we can build consensus on.
I could just see Lisa Murkowski, who came out in favor of the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, say, oh, yeah, I agree with that.
Mass mail and voting.
No more voter ID, the nationalization of our elections.
No more state-run audits.
Forget county or states that actually run their elections.
What we are seeing in the last couple of weeks and what we're seeing unfold in real time was a massive game where they say, well, we might not be able to agree on tax rates or on spending, but the one thing that Mitt Romney and Lisa Murkowski and Liz Cheney and the moderate Democrats and Kirsten Sonoma and Joe Manchin can agree on is that every person has a right to vote, as if that's not already the case.
We have voting months in most states.
We have ballots going every single direction.
We don't even know where they're going.
You see, Democrats know that if they can fundamentally change our elections permanently through a federal national takeover, to almost institutionalize what Zuckerberg did with $420 million from the Center for Technology and Civic Life, then all of a sudden they can get gun confiscation.
Roe versus Wade can be the law of the land.
Green New Deal, Build Back Better.
And so I believe Schumer is smarter than we give him credit for.
I think Schumer is craftier than we give him credit for.
He knew that Build Back Better, whatever, was not going to come easy with Manchin.
Instead, put up a fake fight and retreat to the consensus thing that can bring everyone together.
The nationalization and federal takeover of your elections.
On a daily basis, people are being inundated with ads for overpriced boxers with some sort of slick ad campaign, and some would say innuendos.
Personally speaking, I prefer to keep this topic very private, but I'm happy to tell you about a company that is a great product and shares our values.
Permanent Changes to Voting Laws 00:15:36
I want to tell you about Under TAC, the only men's basic brand that is unapologetically Christian, pro-American, pro-military, very, very proud, pro-2A.
They put comfort and functionality first by integrating a quick release fly and secret pocket in extra-wide waistband for cash or tactical necessities.
They're also anti-bacterial, anti-pilling, and the moisture wicking fabric is super soft and comfortable.
Under TAC is durable, fade-resistant, shrink-resistant, and ultra-lightweight.
Here's the best part.
They are 30% less expensive than the competition.
Go to undertack.com.
That's undertackwithac.com right now as a special Christmas offer.
Get 20% off with the offer code, Kirk20.
That's K-I-R-K number 20.
Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.
Get undertach.com.
That's undertech.com.
Promo code Kirk20 for 20% off.
We know that the American culture has been hyper-racialized in recent years.
There's a recent picture that I think has been verified.
It is in Denver at Centennial Elementary School.
Denver public schools are now promoting racially segregated playtime for equity.
This is in Denver, Colorado.
Families of color get their own separate playground night where white people are not allowed to send their kids.
So white people are not allowed to go to this playground while families of color are only allowed.
That's at Denver Public Schools.
Now, the hyperracialization of the American culture has many different motives, the people that are doing this.
Partially, it gives meaning to people that are godless and don't know their place in the world, their place in the cosmos.
And so, because of that, the kind of hyper racial activism makes people feel really good.
Secondly, the motivation is also about power.
It really kind of lowers the sophistication of any argument or conversation.
It immediately kind of turns conversations into tribalism or tribal arguments.
Tribal, of course, comes from a Latin term, which means tri.
There were three different tribes that used to be fighting amongst each other, all just based on skin color, on immutable characteristics, things they couldn't change.
It's actually where we get the word tribalism for, triangle, triune, tribalism.
But the most obvious reason why they want everyone to be talking about race all the time and the alleged racial inequalities that exist in America, which is all a bunch of nonsense, is because they've wanted to use that conversation and that narrative as a means to the end of changing our voting laws.
It's always been about changing our voting laws and the other things as well.
Trying to lessen the sophistication of our political discourse, trying to give power to people that otherwise would not have it, trying to crush the weak on behalf of the strong.
It also creates beautiful smokescreen for, quite honestly, morally questionable corporations and companies and private actors that they're going to say, well, we're giving $100 million to BLM.
And then people just move on.
Like, oh, yeah, who cares if you're dumping opioids in the heartland or who cares if you're spying on citizens or lying about your products?
Or who cares if your product gives people cancer as long as you give $100 million to BLM?
We're going to kind of move over you and focus on the rural Christians in Oklahoma because they're the real problem.
And so what we have here with the racial component, and it all makes sense when you put it together, is that they want to use that now as an excuse, using the legacy of John Lewis, is what they say, to permanently change our voting laws.
Now, we went into great detail what HR1 was, House Resolution 1.
It was an unprecedented federal takeover of our elections.
Joe Manchin voted against that.
So HR1, as it was, is dead.
That doesn't mean that they can't rebrand it, that they can't put a new name on it, change a couple things, and then put it up for a vote again.
I mean, HR1 would permit voters with DMV records to register online, which of course would allow illegals to be able to register.
And for all of you listening right now in New York City, illegals can now vote in New York City elections.
It's incredible.
You illegally enter a country, New York City says, yeah, why don't we give you voting rights?
The death of the citizen, Victor Davis-Hansen would say.
HR1 would require each state to provide an online voter registration application.
It would give everyone a mail-in ballot, whether they requested or not.
It would create a whole new federal board of elections.
It would require states to use automatic voter registration.
It would require states to allow any eligible voter to vote by mail.
It just goes on and on and on and on.
And so Manchin shot that down.
But the deal that I think that was privately brokered between Manchin and Cinema and Schumer and Pelosi and Biden is that, look, we're going to fight publicly over Build Back Better.
We're going to wrestle about the multi-trillion dollar bill of new IRS agents and $3 trillion, even though we have inflation, but that's probably not going to be a meaningful outcome.
But instead, I think there have been private vote negotiations going on for the John Lewis Voting Act while the kind of, let's say, theatrical Broadway show of the Build Back Better cable news appearances were happening in the shadows.
You've had all these Democrats starting to concoct a new federal takeover of elections.
And we're going to go into what that would look like and how we stop it.
Look, stocks are at all-time high.
People are saying things are going well, but you know they aren't.
Interest rates are at zero, and the government just printed $5 trillion.
What could possibly go wrong?
Consumer confidence just hit a 10-year low and inflation hit 6.8%, with parts of the United States seeing rates as high as 8%.
Something is not adding up.
Inflation is here, everybody, and you've got to do something about it.
Put some of your assets into precious metals, and it will keep your money away from the volatility markets and inflation to let you sleep at night.
This month, Noble Gold is giving away a free America, the beautiful solid silver five-ounce coin with any qualifying plan you start.
So talk to an expert today at Noble Gold, and they'll run through the options to keep your money safe.
No pressure, no hassling, no call centers, just a chance to speak to someone who knows what they're talking about.
So go right now to noblegoldinvestments.com or start by calling 877-646-5347.
NobleGoldInvestments.com.
That's noblegoldinvestments.com.
There was a new article out this morning that ranked the top news podcasts of 2021.
And the Charlie Kirk show made the cut.
I think there was only 10 or 15 that were mentioned, right?
It was a big deal.
And most of them were like New York Times.
Bongino was there and many other friends, and we were listed as well.
So thank you guys for helping with that.
It's a very competitive space, and we have been doing this a long time.
The fact that we get, we're in that kind of top sphere is a big deal, and it's thanks to you.
So thank you, thank you, thank you.
Okay.
The HR1, as we know it, is dead.
But basically, they're rebranding it, putting a label on it, the John Lewis Voting Rights Act.
Now, we're being told that the John Lewis Voting Rights Act is a much different bill.
And it's not fair to say that it's a substitute for the For the People Act.
But it's not, they're not done deliberating or adding things to it.
But let me just tell you one part of the John Lewis Voting Rights Act that is cause for a fire alarm.
It would require categories of changes in state or local election procedures to go through a process called pre-clearance.
Essentially, you must get approval from the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division before being implemented.
So let's just stop there.
They want to make anti-racism, wokeism, diversity, equity, inclusion a roadblock to any state or municipality changing their voting laws.
I have to hand it to the Democrats.
This is a brilliant, Machiavellian legislative strategy.
There's other things in the John Wright's Voting Rights Act that, quite honestly, really doesn't bother me.
New rules for polling places on Indian reservations, requiring public notice for changes to voting laws, like really kind of boring stuff.
But then kind of fit in the middle of it is like, oh, now I see what they're trying to do here.
And it's stuck in the middle of all this.
And by the way, they might add parts of HR1 onto this.
And so on this show, we have been unafraid to cover one of the best books ever written, Age of Entitlement, by Christopher Caldwell.
Christopher Caldwell factually and I would say very precisely offers skepticism towards the Civil Rights Act that was passed in the 1960s.
Now, the media always misrepresents me when I talk about this.
I'm not saying that every part of the Civil Rights Act was unnecessary, nor am I saying that there is not circumstantial racial conditions that need to be fixed.
That has never been my position, nor is it the position of Christopher Caldwell, by the way, if you actually read his book, because he gets slandered and misrepresented intentionally.
Instead, what Christopher Caldwell argues in Age of Entitlement, historically and factually, is that the moment to try and fix and adjust the nation's laws to fulfill the promise of the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal created an entirely new regime that allowed the eradication of private property, the intimidation of the fellow citizens.
And if you actually look into the public polling between whites and blacks at the time, both wanted moderate and then measurable changes, not bold, dramatic, over-the-top new institutions of the federal government.
And what happened, it was a whole new division, the Justice Department of the Civil Rights Division, if you will, that was created.
Now, at first, it really didn't get a lot of coverage.
At first, this kind of anti-racism movement was met with open arms from members of both political parties.
That is, until basically, and Barry Goldwater, to his great credit, he was wrong about a lot.
He was right about a lot, though.
Barry Goldwater, towards the end of his life, became very pro-abortion, very bizarrely.
But Barry Goldwater was so right about warning about the ramifications of what the 1964 Civil Rights Act could mean for private property.
Now, some of you have asked in recent days and months, you've emailed us, freedom at charliekirk.com, Charlie, how can the government come into a private business, like in New York, for those of you listening on WABC right now, and mandate that people wear masks?
The answer is easy.
We decided to end the idea of a truly private business with the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.
Now, there's a legitimate argument for why that was necessary.
The legitimate argument is that there were people that owned businesses that were actively not serving, that were not offering services to people of skin colors they didn't like.
That's an evil thing.
I'm not defending that, obviously.
But what was never quite thought out or mapped out was how could this possibly go wrong?
How could allocating this sort of centralized government power under a regime of anti-racism or diversity, equity, inclusion, how could this ever be misused?
And so, one example, and then we get the affirmative action movement that came not far after in the 1970s, which of course is the lowering of standards for certain people of skin color and the act of discrimination against other people of skin color, in particular Asians and white students.
So, what Christopher Caldwell talked about in Age of Entitlement is he predicted that there would be a whole new enforcement arm of the United States federal government that will grow in power, stature, and credibility that could be used for any means whatsoever.
And it goes back to what Cicero wrote and what James Madison wrote.
Cicero, a one-year Roman council, had his head cut off by the second Roman triumphant, was incredibly brilliant.
I think he died right before Caesar.
And Caesar had a beautiful, I mean, Cicero had a great quote: the more laws, the less justice.
James Madison had a similar quote where he said, we can never allow the laws to become so voluminous that they suffocate liberty.
I'm paraphrasing James Madison.
The point is that if you have all these laws on the books, then the power is in the administrative state.
The power is in the technical regime because they get to choose what laws they enforce.
And more specifically, they get to choose who they enforce them against.
And so the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which is now going to be the new replacement, if you will, the legislative laundering that is happening.
So HR1 is dead, but then they resurrect it, redress it, put a new branding package on it, name it after somebody that is in great esteem with a lot of people in the ruling class in D.C., John Lewis, which makes it very hard to vote against.
They know what they're doing here.
They know that they want to try to have a branding package that any Democrat that dares votes against the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, that they're going to have to answer to Joy Reed of why they voted against the John Lewis Voting Rights Act.
So essentially, the one component of this bill that we know of, while a lot of these negotiations are occurring, is that you are going to need approval from the Justice Department Civil Rights Division to change any of your state or local voting laws.
States' Rights vs Federal Control 00:04:32
So let's say that Maricopa County or in Arizona, they want to say, you know what?
We want to strengthen our signature verification in Arizona.
It's too weak.
You're going to have to go in front of the Justice Department, Merrick Garland's mom and dad's targeting Justice Department.
You're going to have to go in front of the lackeys of Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch.
You're going to have to go into the Obama sycophants that run the Justice Department in the Civil Rights Division, which is the lowest level of Dante's Inferno equivalent of the American bureaucratic state.
You're talking about people that are the most, let's say, anti-Western, anti-American, angry people you can imagine.
They are sue happy against Republicans.
And you're going to have to go in front of this Commissar Commission and say, hey, before we change this law in Arizona, can we get your permission?
Now, mind you, I do think this is wildly unconstitutional.
It says very clearly, I think in Article 4, 5, the Constitution.
No, it'd be Article 2, Article - I don't know.
You can get it.
There's seven articles.
I forget which one.
That states determine the manner and the setting of how elections are undertaken and electors are chosen.
States run the elections.
Remember, the states created the federal government.
the federal government to not create the states, but who knows where the Supreme Court would rule on the John Lewis Voting Rights Act.
I'm sorry, Article 1, Section 4, Clause 1.
Thank you.
And what the Democrats have done here is by having this kind of fake debate around Bill Backbatter that they knew was dead on arrival, by making it seem that HR1 is dead, all of a sudden they're going to have some sort of negotiation by creating a Justice Department Soviet show trial,
thumb up, thumb down type approval that if you want to put in voter ID, purge your voter rolls, get dead people off the rolls, limit the mail and balloting custody, you have to get approval from the Justice Department.
Can I be blunt?
John Lewis Voting Rights Act would kill the entire state-based election integrity movement.
The John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which is now, according to Schumer, the top priority of the Senate and the top priority of the House, would make it impossible to do audits, get to the bottom of elections, control custody of ballots.
Essentially, instead of taking over like HR1 would, it would say that you need the rubber stamp from the Justice Department to conduct elections the way you want to.
It is a brilliant, sinister, and secret backdoor plan to undermine our elections.
The same Department of Justice that attacks parents, the same Department of Justice that colludes with the National School Board Association.
I recently received a question from a listener.
She wanted to know if it was possible to avoid digestion problems by eating only healthy organic food.
It was a nice thought, but unfortunately, it's just not possible.
You see, your natural ability to digest food declines with age.
This is because your body produces fewer enzymes, which are proteins responsible for digesting food.
Fewer enzymes mean more difficulty digesting food.
Even organic foods won't provide enough enzymes to properly digest them.
This is especially true if you cook your food because cooking kills enzymes.
This is why you have digestion problems even after a healthy meal.
Your body just can't produce enough enzymes to get the job done.
That's why you need to supplement with a high-quality enzyme supplement that could be a huge help.
I personally recommend Mass Zymes by Buy Optimizers.
It is the best-in-class supplement loaded with full-spectrum enzymes for digesting protein, starches, sugars, fibers, and fats.
Taking Mass Zymes daily helps top off your enzyme levels and replace the enzymes your body is no longer producing.
Listen, life is too short to suffer from digestion problems.
If you want freedom from your food, especially this holiday season, go to MassZymes Risk-Free and experience the magic of high-quality enzymes.
For an exclusive offer, my listeners can go to masszymes.com/slash Kirk, M-A-S-S-Z-Y-M-E-S.com slash Kirk.
Contact Your Elected Officials 00:04:34
Again, that's masszzymes.com/slash Kirk.
MassZymes.com slash Kirk.
So if you live in Arizona, it's very important to communicate to Mark Kelly and Kirsten Cinema that you will not tolerate a vote on the John Lewis Voting Rights Act.
And by the way, don't even call it that.
Just call it the acronym.
Say John J L V A K A, the death of states rights and election integrity as we know it.
But if you live in Georgia, go contact a teenager who calls himself a U.S. senator named John Ossif.
Contact the anti-Semite, Raphael Warnock.
But another senator is kind of popping onto the scene, which is a very good sign, by the way.
This guy was a sycophant the first six months of the Joe Biden regime, but he is bouldering onto the scene.
Now, he's a J.B. Pritzker type.
And so he hard to miss.
And so I'm talking, of course, John Tester from Montana.
Tester is someone that can be won over.
Tester represents a very conservative state and an increasingly conservative state.
And he wins because he has kind of this like blue dog appeal.
And I bring money back to Montana.
Montana's a strange state like that.
But Tester voted against Joe Biden's vaccine mandate.
Tester has also said, I don't know about this voting rights thing.
I'm not crazy about this.
So if you live in Montana, contacting John Tester's Senate office and saying, we're not going to put up with this.
You can call it voting rights.
You can call it all these different things.
That is nothing more than camouflage in disguise for what we know it really is, which is the disintegration and depletion of fair, free, honest, and transparent elections.
Other states, obviously West Virginia is in play.
And do not discount Nevada, Cortez Mastro.
She's going to have a tough race in Nevada up against Adam Laxalt.
There's a lot of Democrats that are at risk, everybody.
Gene Shaheen in New Hampshire.
There's a lot of states where this issue is not popular.
The point is that you have to contact your elected officials.
And here's what you could do if you're in North Dakota, South Dakota, and you have nothing but Republican representatives.
Every Republican representative needs to get read into what the true agenda here is, which is not Build Back Better.
I think it's fair to say that's smokescreen.
We know it's in it.
It's awful.
It's garbage.
Don't vote for it.
Thank you for not supporting it.
But now we need to pivot and have a zero tolerance policy for this John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which is nothing more than a snake in the grass to try and kill the election integrity movement, to try and destroy the questioning of mass mail and balloting.
That is the goal of this next federal takeover of elections.
But every Republican needs to be in an active posture right now.
And so if you live in North Dakota, you live in South Dakota, if you're listening right now in Tennessee or Kentucky, I don't think any of those senators would vote for this, but they need to not be taken by surprise.
They need to not even entertain and issue some sort of milquetoast press release.
Oh, yes, we stand for democracy.
However, this bill goes too far.
No.
Do not even give them the footing as if there is a problem that we need to expand the entire apparatus of our elections.
Instead, we need to do the exact opposite.
We need to say, we know what this is.
You're trying to destroy states' rights.
You're trying to destroy individual sovereignty.
And you're trying to torpedo this bottom-up people-centered election integrity movement.
Build Back Better is dead.
Merry Christmas.
But a federal takeover of elections is imminent.
Happy New Year.
Thanks so much for listening, everybody.
Email us your thoughts, freedom at charliekirk.com.
If you want to support our show, you could do so at charliekirk.com slash support.
Thank you so much for listening, everybody.
God bless.
For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to CharlieKirk.com.
Export Selection