All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 6, 2023 - Blood Money
01:29:13
They Were All Inside Jobs with Joe Olson (Eps 156)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Blood Money episode 156 with Joe Olson.
9-11 was an inside job.
COVID was an inside job.
Nearly all of them are inside jobs.
This would mean that people like Merrick Garland are criminals.
But why didn't Donald Trump expose Merrick Garland when he had a chance?
Why didn't Rudy Giuliani expose what happened on 9-11 when he had a chance?
Big questions. Thank you for joining us for this episode of Blood Money.
This episode is brought to you by the following sponsors.
Today we have a very special guest, Joe Olson.
Joe, how are you doing, sir?
Oh, it could be worse. We could be living in a communist dictatorship.
Yep, yep, and unfortunately it seems like that's what some of the powers that we want to have happen here.
But a quick little background story for the viewers out there.
So I've been hearing about Joe for quite a while.
The way I knew about Joe, because I didn't know him by name necessarily, but I had heard stories about how there was this guy out there who had evidence that essentially remote control planes were used To knock down the World Trade Centers on 9-11, September 11, 2001.
And so I had heard about this guy and I kept trying to find this guy, you know, who we have right now on Blood Money.
And by the way, I apologize that we're doing this with audio only.
This is the, after trying, you know, many attempts to do this interview, this seemed like the best way to convey this information at this time.
So, you know, I was looking for Joe Olson, you know, for, I mean, I think over like actually nine months or so.
I've been trying to track him down because that story about remote control airplanes potentially being used on 9-11 was so mind-blowing to me that I wanted to find out more.
about what Joe had and crazy enough we're in Austin at the American Liberty Awards and I'm passing out America Happens the America Happens network flyers and I start talking to this dude and it turns out to be Joe Olson so anyway wanted to say that story but Joe let's dive right into it man I mean let's dive right into the big headline remote control airplanes being used on 9-11 Okay,
well first of all, I'm a trained structural engineer.
I've been registered in the state of Texas for over 40 years.
I've worked in hundreds of multi-story buildings in 20 different states.
I've been self-employed, so I don't have any kind of influence as far as that particular threat vector.
But I do have clients that, you know, you can't make public statements that are completely outrageous.
And not be affected by your state registration, and they'll also have an impact with your clients and their clients.
So bottom line is, I have to be very careful about everything that I say.
I seldom watch Good Morning America.
I normally listen to talk radio in the morning, but for some reason on September 11th, I turned on talk radio and went, man, this is boring in South Dallas.
I'll see what the weather's like because they usually get pretty good weather reports.
I turned on the Good Morning America and they said, oh, the North Tower is smoking.
It looks like a plane flew into it.
It's like, oh, my God, this is really tragic.
But I had been Pretty familiar with the World Trade Center buildings because they were outstanding structural engineering achievements.
And so I was going, well, I know that they were designed to withstand three impacts of a 707, which is the prominent airliner at the time the buildings were designed.
So I was sitting there watching it, and then the second plane hit the South Tower.
So then I start calling all of my friends, and I go, man, it looks like we're under a genuine terror attack.
And then the stuff hit at the Pentagon, and then they said they had a plane that was flying around Pennsylvania looking for a mine shaft to disappear into.
And so I was going, man, this is really crazy.
And then about an hour after impact, the South Tower leaned over 22 degrees from Plum.
And I thought, well, what's going to happen?
and it's going to snap the columns on the stretch side by tension, and then it's going to compress the ones on the other side, and they're going to bend over, and the top 22 floors are going to flop over and hit the side of the building, and then it's going to slide down and land on the sidewalk.
Well, then what happened is the building turned exactly upright.
And then it fell down into its own footprint and didn't leave the debris field.
And I said, this is controlled demolition.
So that's on, like, day one.
Well, then I get copies of the 9-1-1 Commission Report, which was as accurate as the Warren Report, put together by the same nefarious government sources.
And so I knew that was absolute BS. And then I started getting information from a bunch of different sources about possible nuclear use.
And I list those in an article that I wrote for Veterans Today called Unequivocal 911 Nukes.
And I will send you that so that when we do the video presentation for this, you can put that article up.
But in the process of doing discovery on this whole system, in May of 2014, Veterans Today started running a series of articles called Nuclear Education.
And by March of 2015, they'd already published two dozen articles on nuclear education, and these were complex articles.
I've been studying global warming for decades, and one of the forces of global warming is variable volcanic input.
And that's based on natural earth fission of 700,000 cubic miles of uranium and 1.2 million cubic miles of thorium that are inside the 259 billion cubic miles of mostly molten rocks that we're standing on.
And that's what keeps the rock molten.
And it also produces a whole bunch of byproducts, which are what they call daughter elements.
The Russians call them elemental atoms.
And these are produced when you break a large uranium atom or a large atom of any type apart.
You get the particles of that, which are the neutrons, protons, and electrons, which are themselves atoms.
And then under high heat pressure, they want to form compounds.
And so the Earth has been naturally producing petroleum.
It produces groundwater.
It produces the inert gases, which are period 8 on the periodic table, which is argon helium.
Radon, which is radioactive and has a half-life of 2.5.
Four days, which means that you have a pound of radon.
At the end of a month, you have an eighth of an ounce of radon, because it's naturally decaying very quickly.
But that's proof that what we have going on, because radon, all of the inert gases, cannot form compounds.
So they cannot come from any other source other than radioactivity, which is natural radioactivity happening inside the Earth.
So I'd already studied that.
But then they started introducing other concepts in these nuclear education articles that took me quite a bit of time to study.
But by March of 2015, I had a pretty good handle that it was absolutely nuclear weapons that had caused the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings.
So I got in touch with one of their editors, James Spencer, and we did about a dozen interviews on YouTube before they took his channel down, and unfortunately we didn't have those backed up, so they just pretty much disappeared.
And then in 2018, I was contacted by Robert David Steele, He said he wanted to write a memorandum for the president on 9-1-1, Time for Truth.
And he contacted 28 authors.
I was one of the authors.
I've met about half of the other authors that were on this particular list of folks.
And I've been in email and...
Telephone contact with a whole bunch more of them.
But bottom line is, he said that Trump will not review anything that's more than 800 words.
So he said, if you've got information on what you think happened on 9-1-1, you have to do it in less than two pages, 800 words, and you have to include a picture.
And I went, okay, Mr.
President. Let me write you an article.
So the article that I wrote for James Fetzer, and this was in July of 2018, is Joe Wilson's Memorandum for the President, 9-1-1 Twin Towers Destroyed Using Clean Nukes.
So this ran with a photo, and then I didn't follow up too much on that until a year later.
I was getting ready to be a guest on Coast to Coast AM, and they had previously interviewed Judy Woods, And they'd also interviewed Richard Gage.
And so I thought, well, maybe they'd be a little bit interested in this.
So I wrote another article based on the material that I discussed with James Fetzer, which is the Unequivocal 911 Nukes, which was posted at Veterans Today, July 30th, 2019.
I'll send you a link so you can post this stuff.
In that article, I described the fact that I had My first major climate article was posted at Infowars in April of 2009.
And then in May of 2009, I got a notice from Infowars that they were having a DVD premiere in Austin with Richard Gage and Alex Jones.
So I drove up to Austin.
It was a four-hour long press conference with a two-hour long DVD video and about an hour presentation each from 2009.
Alex Jones and Richard Gage.
I got to meet Richard.
I got there an hour early.
I reviewed the signed, stamped, approved drawings for structural plans for buildings 1, 2, and 7 that had been approved by New York City.
I watched his side-by-side video demolition of those, and I went, Jesus, this is compelling evidence, but I don't think you could do this with thermite.
And so I went ahead and did a little bit more research, and that's what's included in my unequivocal 911 nukes.
What I give you is the actual detonation velocity, which is what separates the molecules in a big system.
For instance, if you've got steel and you hit it with a high enough velocity that you exceed the speed of sound in steel, which is 6,100 meters per second, you can fragment steel.
and the same thing with concrete at 3200 meters per second the highest measured velocity detonation velocity for thermite is 895 if you uh want to melt steel and let me see if i've got those numbers where i can find them real handy steel melts at um 2700 degrees and then it vaporizes at 5200 degrees And thermite burns at 4,000 degrees,
but it takes a 3,000 degree ignition system, usually magnesium, that you use to light the thermite, and it's kind of fickle.
So to be able to take those whole buildings down with thermite would be a physical impossibility to wire every connection that was required to do that.
So that's item number two as far as the thermite thing.
And the other thing is, thermite is not a catalyst.
It's not something that sits there and makes reactions happen over and over like the palladium in your car catalytic converter does.
It is a reactive.
And so if you start with thermite and you ignite it, there's no thermite left over.
And any thermite that's left over didn't contribute to the melting of the steel.
So that's item number two.
And then you'd have a building that has 2,200 tons of aluminum sheeting so that they didn't have to paint the building placed over the outside box columns.
And this would form an oxide coating between the iron or the steel and the aluminum.
And so if you have...
Iron and aluminum and oxygen, and they're together, and you vaporize all those materials with the heat from a nuclear reaction, then you're going to have those microspheres floating around going, well, let's just form some thermite flocculate out in the cloud that's six inches deep of dust that's all around the World Trade Center building.
So any thermite that you found on the ground is not proof that thermite was in the building.
Because it couldn't have destroyed the buildings unless it was just excess thermite and already the amount of thermite by their own admission in their...
God, I'm trying to remember the name of their publication.
Nuclear... World Trade Center Misinformation, I believe, was a pamphlet that they had.
But in there they said that it takes 0.3 pounds of thermite to melt one pound of steel.
Well, if you look at the 2,200, or the 100,000 tons of steel that's missing, and you multiply that times 0.18, that ends up with an enormous amount of thermite, and there again, if it didn't perfectly And one of the other people that popped up during this quote debate on how this
happened is Judy Woods, who has a PhD in mechanical engineering, specified in materials science.
Which, you know, is a course that I had to take as a structural engineer, but I don't think she took very many structural engineering courses.
So she comes up with a hypothesis that it was directed energy weapons.
And directed energy weapons definitely exist, but number one, they take an enormous amount of energy.
And I agreed with her calculations that she put out as far as the mass of the building, and also her calculations on the amount of energy required To demolish the buildings, but I didn't see any way possible that that could be done from any particular source, and we're getting more of an evidence stream that that is not what happened.
So the next thing is, if you could pull up the FEMA 403, underline Chapter 2 document.
Sure. Question about, alright, so, 403 you said, right?
Yes. Alright, so quick question about like, so the theory thus far for people that are looking for alternate truths has been that thermite was used.
Somehow it was like painted on the walls which then made the concrete and steel disintegrate much faster.
But you're saying it's nuclear material.
Where would the nuclear material be placed?
WTC.com One and two, this is a Federal Emergency Management Agency, 403-CH2. And in there, they do a very good description of how the buildings were built.
The buildings had what's called a Vander Rear Exterior Truss System.
And this consisted of 16 by 16 square box columns that were 34 inches off-center, giving you those real narrow window spaces between them.
And then they had horizontal strips, which are called scandal sections, where your floor joists are welded top and bottom cord into that particular wall panel.
And it's plate steel that's two inches thick and 52 inches high.
And that's what gives you your horizontal support on the building under wind load.
These buildings had five acres of wall area.
They were basically square.
They had one acre of floor area, but being 1,300 feet tall, they had five acres.
And they were designed to take 120 mile an hour wind load.
I guarantee you 120 mile an hour wind against five acres is more force than those jet airplanes could produce.
That's number one. Number two, the impact is totally inconsistent of what would happen with an airplane hitting a building.
And so now if we pull up to chapter two and we scroll down to page 18, there's two figures.
One of them is figure 2-15, impact damage on the north face of the World Trade Center building.
You said page 18?
Page 18. It's 2-18.
There'll be two plates that show the exterior of the building.
One of them has a bunch of color panels.
And the other has an actual photo of the outside of the building.
Alright, one sec. So we're on page 18 now.
Okay. Yeah.
Interesting, isn't it?
Alright, say that again. Explain that.
Okay. Now, if you look at figure 216, what you see is three or four different colors of these three-story tall, what they call waffle panels.
And they were built at a shipyard over across the Hudson, brought over by barge and swung in with cranes.
And if you read through the chapter two, it explains exactly the sequence of operation for building this building.
And as far as building the building, FEMA got this portion of it correct.
Now, if you look at those color panels, you'll notice that column line 133 and column line.
This is on figure 216.
This is the one with the colored exterior panels.
And you can see how they checkerboarded these waffle panels in the exterior walls so that they wouldn't have a common failure plane on any axis.
So if you look at panel 133 and you scroll down to where the floor height of 95, 96, and 97 is, you're missing an entire three-story wall segment.
And then if you look over at 127, you're missing that same wall segment.
Well, this is not natural failure playing for these buildings.
They were splice-bolted on that 52-inch high spandrel section between each one of these.
They were in-bolted, and then they were welded to the floor joists on all three floors connecting these panels together.
This building was designed to stand 120-mile-an-hour hurricane load, And they had five hurricanes during the 30 years that the building was standing.
So that's item number one.
And then if you look at the photo, which is 215, this shows the impact on the outside of the building.
And you can see where those two waffle panels are missing in the center of that photo.
But then if you also look, you see a stripe that's going from the bottom left-hand corner of the photo up to the right-hand.
And you can see how the box columns and the aluminum sheeting that's fitting on it have all been sheared in a south, or let's say lower left-hand corner to upper right-hand corner as it's struck across the building.
and they had to have something that created the sound of a jet going into the building but the the impact was from something that was traveling faster than a high bypass fan 767 jet engine can do at that altitude the radar tracks show that it was going at over 500 miles per hour well if you got a jet engine that's 15 feet in diameter and 90% of the air is not going through the jet engine,
then what the jet engine does is it's made to pass air at a fraction of that amount of atmospheric pressure at 30, 40,000 foot altitude.
You bring it down to 1,000 foot above sea level, and you've got five times as much air pressure blowing against the front of that fan, and you will rip the engines off of the plane.
That's why they've got a V-Max of 737 at that particular altitude of about 300, less than 300 miles per hour.
So, bottom line is, you know that it wasn't a jet airliner that hit the building, and if you go online, you can find plenty of photos that show how they did graphic design Computer-generated graphics, CGI, of these planes where they not only penetrated the building and didn't leave any debris on the outside of the building, but the nose of the plane popped out of the other side of the building.
If you've ever seen the impact of a goose or a seagull on a jet airliner, you realize that this is pretty unbelievable.
And certain portions of the jet plane would have had to have been apparent At all four of the crash sites, there was no recognizable debris from a jet airliner at either of the World Trade Center buildings, the Pentagon, or Shanksville.
So, that kind of puts that little item to rest.
Okay, now, after I published...
So, wait, wait. You're saying that, like, what impacted...
It was an airplane, or it wasn't an airplane?
Could you clarify?
Well, they needed something to generate sound.
And if you're down in a canyon full of skyscrapers, and you hear something go by real fast, It's going by so fast that you're going to be looking for where the sound comes from, and it's already going to be past you.
You can see that with jet airplanes.
You go outside and your ears tell you the jet airplane's over here, but moving at 300 miles an hour, it's actually a lot further ahead than where you're looking.
Well, double that speed.
And then what are you doing?
You're looking for something that you're not going to see in the sky, but then you're going to hear the impact.
You're going to have a certain amount of debris that's falling down at the street level based on this particular impact.
And you're going to have an impact site on the face of the buildings that looks exactly like they have in figure 2-15 impact damage on the north face of WTC1. So that's exactly what you've got there.
And, you know, I'll debate any qualified structural engineer or any qualified investigator that wants to debate this.
I've offered to do that, the same thing with climate, and nobody will debate me because they know that everything that they're saying is false.
So, getting back to unequivocal 9-1-1 news, I go through the facts that I also met Christopher Boleyn at the Austin Truth Fest, and this was on September 11, 2016, which was 15-year anniversary, and I hate to call it anniversary, but 15-year memorial of what happened.
And this was in Austin, Texas.
It was less than 15 minutes from InfoWorld's world headquarters.
Not only did they not cover it ahead of the event, they didn't send a reporter there and they didn't mention anything after the event.
And one of the speakers was Jim Mars, absolute expert on the JFK, snubbed by the CIA and LBJ. So, you know, they had an opportunity to promote an event, but they didn't want to get involved with Christopher Molen.
And in the last three years, I've been to dozens of Infowar events all across Texas, and I've talked with Owen Schroeder, and I've, you know, tried to talk to Alex.
I've talked to people that are close to Alex, and it's like, oh, we know exactly what happened on 9-1-1.
You can't tell us anything. No, I'm telling you, you don't know what happened on 9-1-1, and you've never talked to a structural engineer that's done a proper analysis of it.
And so that's why we're having this discussion today, because I've been blanked out from them.
I can't make a comment on anything at Infowars site.
I'm completely blocked because I disagree with them on global warming because they are the omnipotent scientists there, and I disagree with them on 9-1-1.
So it's like, I'm persona non grata and it's really funny that here's somebody that complains about being censored when he turns around and censors people that he has every right to be able to discuss this stuff with in public.
Alex, I challenge you to put me on your program and let's discuss this where people can actually see the video and I'll explain everything to you so that even you can understand it.
Okay, so, right after my article at Unequivocal 911 Nukes was posted at Veterans Today, I got an email from one of my readers.
He said, you need to read the Palmer Report.
Well, I pulled up the Palmer Report, and this was prepared by four PhD physicists in Europe who had independently verified everything that at that point was in 80 articles at Veterans Today.
And so I forwarded this to Veterans Today, and they posted it September 1st, 2019.
Breathtaking, solving 9-1-1, the Palmer Report.
Now, the Palmer Report's a 5,000-word article.
It has 45 PowerPoint slides, and it has three 90-minute videos explaining the entire sequence.
I have very little objection to what's in the Palmer Report except for what they did.
Didn't know and omitted just because they were not informed.
Physicists don't know much about building construction, number one.
Number two, these physicists had not done near the amount of research on radiation and nuclear that I had.
And so I'm reading their article and one of their Little photos.
This happens to be their figure 6-25.
They mention that iron has four stable isotopes.
And I went, wait a minute.
If iron's got four stable isotopes, how many radioactive isotopes does iron have?
Oh, let's see. It's got 24.
Okay. Well, what is steel made out of?
It's iron, which is an element, and carbon.
Carbon has two stable, 13 radioactive isotopes.
What about the concrete?
Oh, it's made with calcium, carbon, and silicon.
Well, calcium has five stable, 21 radioactive isotopes.
Silicon has three stable and 20 radioactive.
So right there, you have just four of the elements that this building is built with that are gamma ray absorbers, which is what the bomb was that they planted in the basement of the building, and you have over 100 isotopes.
And then if you add in the calcium sulfate that's used to manufacture sheetrock, you have sulfur atoms with 4 stable and 19 radioactive.
Then you also have in the granite bedrock underneath the building, you have a certain amount of phosphorus with 1 stable, 20 more radioactive, and a certain amount of sodium with 1 stable and 18 radioactive.
So to combine, the whole site had 150, at least 150 elements.
And this doesn't include the nickel and the aluminum and all the other stuff.
Nickel is used to make stainless steel, which all the elevator doors have.
None of those materials are down in the basement of the building when they started cleaning it out.
So all of that stuff was vaporized.
It was either vaporized or it was fragmented by the detonation velocity.
So, based on the Palmer Report, when the buildings were built, they were built on granite bedrock.
And at one time, the Hudson River was a fault line that goes pretty much north-south, right where the Hudson River is right now, between two different rock formations.
One of them was thousands feet thick of granite And the other was like basalt, and there was a little bit of a fault line where they split, and that's where you end up having the base, river base for the Hudson River.
But at the last ice age, that area was covered with a thousand feet of ice, and when the ice retreated, it dropped all of the entrained dirt and rocks, rubble, on top of Manhattan, And it was 40 feet thick.
In addition, it raised the sea level by at least 330 feet, which puts the Hudson River 15 feet below grade level.
When they dug the foundation for the building, they got down to the bedrock and they realized that they couldn't go any deeper without doing blasting.
And blasting would blow out the earthen dam that was less than 100 feet wide between the Hudson River And where they built the bathtub retaining wall around the basement of this building.
So the building doesn't go any deeper than that except that they did extend columns down into the bedrock which they drilled which they didn't hit any cavities.
We'll bring that point up a little bit later.
Bottom line is, what they proposed, and this makes perfect sense to me, is that there was one elevator shaft that was completely clear from the bottom basement level, which had six levels of basement, up to the 110th floor.
And that was elevator number 50, which conveniently happened to be in the center of the building.
So if you placed a one kiloton nuclear bomb We're good to go.
In Afghanistan at the end of his term, just to show, first of all, that we had something that was a chemically reactive explosive that was decaying over time, and we wouldn't be able to transport it.
The same thing with nitroglycerin.
It just gets more and more dangerous the longer it sits.
And so we dropped that bomb, but we didn't need that anymore because we had bunker buster bombs that could bore a hole through 4,000 feet of granite.
Okay so the bottom is acting like a lens and it's forcing the stuff up through the core of the building and first of all you have a white flash just exactly what happened in Hiroshima In Nagasaki, when we demolished those towns.
You have a light flash that burnt people's shadows into the buildings and into the sidewalks where they were standing at the time of the flash.
Then you have a shock wave.
Wait, wait, you're saying that actually happened by the World Trade Center where people's shadows were imprinted in the walls?
Well, no, what happened is that you have the building that is this giant grid of horizontal 52-inch steel panels with openings in it and steel collars beside it.
Those work as a wave guide.
So when you send this giant flash of light up through the building, It's going to come out through those holes and you're going to have fire trucks that the front end of the fire truck is burnt and the back end is completely untouched.
And that's what Judy Wood says.
That proves it was directed energy weapons.
No, it was a directed energy weapon, but it's not the pipe you're talking about.
This weapon was not microwave and it was not a laser.
This directed energy weapon was plasma.
And the plasma that blew out of the building came out through those holes between the steel and it melted portions of cars and then didn't melt the other portion of the car.
And that's exactly consistent with all of the evidence on site.
So, other corroborating evidences.
Both buildings fell in 12 seconds and that's By everybody's measure from the videotapes that were made outside the building that weren't subject, because there were so many independent ones, they weren't subject to news media manipulation like the plane impacts were.
Both buildings collapsed in 12 seconds.
Exactly 14 seconds prior to the collapse of both buildings There was a 2.2 average, one was 2.1 and the other was 2.3.
Richter scale explosion in the base of the building, entirely consistent with a one kiloton bomb going off and then sending this flash up through and then a shock wave and then an enormous heat wave, 10,000 degree hot heat wave, that vaporized the whole core of the building.
Now, if you've got a building where the whole center of the building is based on the center core square columns, and there again, look at the FEMA 403 drawings for the floor plan, and you can see exactly how it was laid out.
What page is that?
What page is that? Oh, let me pull out my...
It's on a bunch of different pages, but yeah, I've got my on copy of 403 handy, so let me pull it out It's pretty early in this yeah here. We go figure 2.1 Shows the arrangement of the columns what page and the exterior walls?
It's figure 201. It's on page 2-2 right Right. Okay, got it.
So that's the center area that, should that be destroyed, the building would go down.
Yes, and what happens is, because the floor joists are supported, those interior columns, as that interior is eaten out, all four sides are going to start to tilt in, and when they do, they're going to form a triangular section where the floor hits the floor below it,
And then it starts pulling the wall in, and as the wall comes in, the combination of the wall falling on top of the floor and the floor falling on the floor below is going to form a triangular compression zone that will blow out down the face of the building in sequential, just exactly what architects and engineers for 911 claim is squib lines from explosives.
But you couldn't simultaneously put off that many explosives and all of them go off on 110 floors on two different buildings at the same time and not have any measurable amount of Floor it didn't fail that way and it's impossible to have that many Detonation in that size of a building first of all the building was 50% occupied so you couldn't have had that complete of the exposure So I
Realized this is complicated But if anybody that wants to spend the time and go through this FEMA report and verify that everything I'm saying about the FEMA report and about the initial condition of these buildings is correct so there again You know, I don't have to prove this to every layman in the world.
What I'm doing is I'm trying to get somebody from the American Society of Civil Engineers, or the American Steel Institute, or the American Concrete Institute, or somebody at FEMA, or anybody that thinks they're qualified to debate these facts.
To debate these facts.
And I'm trying to get Alex Jones to invite me on to Infowars so we can discuss this with a wider audience and present all the material in a coherent form with visual presentation at the same time so that we can actually have a real discussion about what happened.
Because what we've had is 23 years of We've had trauma-based mind control and over $4 trillion of wasted military industrial complex funding, and we've massacred at least 2 million people in the Middle East,
and we've created at least 40 million Yeah, I mean, for anybody looking at that, it's basically how the population of Europe's been diluted.
Right now we have open borders in the United States.
And they are intentionally trying to dilute the population of the United States.
So it seems to be like this is part of their overall plan.
Oh yeah, they've destroyed Europe.
60% of France is white now, and it used to be 99%, you know?
Same thing with all of the Scandinavian countries.
They bought into this crap about, you know, taking care of these poor migrants.
Well, yeah, when you have a government that destroys their homes and their businesses and then provides free transportation and free money to come over and mooch off of your society, then you're going to get more of what you're funding.
It's absolutely insane.
So anyhow, after they wrote their great article, and I have no problem with what they said in the Palmer Report, except that they just didn't, they weren't knowledgeable enough about the other elements that were involved in the destruction.
I wrote a follow-up article, which is called, Exposing the NIST Jenga Gang.
And that's also at Veterans Today.
And that's where I go into this information about the isotopes and more information into the lies that were told on the NIST report that said that, well, we can tell you what caused the start of the collapse.
That's when these jet planes hit the buildings.
And then the buildings just, you know, what was the word that they used?
But anyhow, basically, they just caved in on themselves.
Spontaneous destruction just fell down on themselves.
Well, what about Building 7?
It wasn't hit by anything.
Oh, Building 7 had an office fire, and I've got to give architects and engineers credit for this.
They went to Dr.
Leroy Halsey, civil engineer professor at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks, and they did a finite element analysis on Building 7.
And they showed that it was physically impossible for what the NIST failure diagram was.
They said that there was a fire under one of the bar joists and it heated up enough that it slipped off the haunch that it was sitting on and the whole building just collapsed in on itself because Yeah, I mean, for anybody following that 9-11 official narrative, it's about as credible as the COVID-19 official narrative.
It's just like all other official narratives.
It's clear that everything that they've told us is a lie, including the Pentagon, including Flight 93.
But Joe, let me ask you this.
What do you think were the exact sequence of events, pre-9-11 as well, in terms of prepping 9-11 and then leading us into what actually happened on 9-11?
Oh yeah, that's easy to prove.
First of all, we had a U.S. Army Intelligence Group called Able Danger.
And for over a year, they've been tracking Mahama Adda and his gang all across Europe using a system called Mind Like a Steel Trap.
I get so busy thinking about one thing, I can't switch quick enough to another.
They had a computer program, I'll think of it in just a second, that they used to track words.
So if there was something like bombing or, you know, hijacking, anything that could be considered was terrorist-related, they used this computer program.
And in January of 2021, when baby bush took office the very first thing he did was disband the able danger unit and then on september 10th rumsfeld said that the pentagon was missing 2.3 trillion dollars but we're going to find out where that money went well on september 11th of 2001 the pentagon ordered
The 40 members of the Able Danger Group to be at the Pentagon and they were at a room adjacent to where all the quote financial records were and one guy showed up late so only 39 of them were killed that day in that building.
But bottom line is that's a little bit suspicious.
And then prior to 9-1-1 We also had four FBI field offices, one in San Diego, one in Phoenix, one in Oklahoma, and one in Florida, that all recorded Arab flight school anomalies.
Students were showing up and they were saying they wanted to fly 747s and they couldn't even fly a Cessna 150.
And so four field offices reported it.
This was reported on Phoenix TV just this last week.
They said, well, we had a guy here in town that could have possibly stopped 9-1-1 because he said he reported it to the FBI, and the FBI told him to go pound sand.
So then, on August 16th of 2001, the student who was in Oklahoma named Zakaris Massari, And I'll go ahead and spell his name because you can't miss him on wiki if you look it up.
It's Z-A-C-A-R-I-A-S, underline, Moussaoui, M-O-U-S-S-A-O-U-I. He was hijacker number 20.
He had 56 hours of dual time in a Cessna 150 in Oklahoma, and they said, it's time for you to drop out of flight school.
You're wasting our time.
None of the instructors will sign you off to do a touch-and-go solo, which I did after seven hours of training.
You know, if it's a least bit intelligent and a least bit dedicated to figuring out how to fly an airplane, it's not impossible to do.
But he went up to Minneapolis because they had a flight school up there called Pan American Flight School, unrelated to the bankrupt airline.
But he went to that flight school and he said, you have 747 simulators.
I want to learn how to...
Land a 747.
And they said, well, okay, show us your flight book and we'll enroll you for student loans.
And he showed them his flight book and they said, well, wait a minute.
You can't even fly a CIS for 150.
If you're taking flight lessons in our simulator, it's $200 an hour.
We can't get you student loans.
So how are you going to pay for this?
He goes, no problem. Pulls out $5,000 cash.
And they went, Okay, we'll come back tomorrow and we'll talk to you.
They contacted the local FBI office.
Agents Colleen Rowlett and Harry Samet went over and pulled up the immigration records.
This guy had overstayed his student visa, so they went over to arrest him on student visa charges, and they found his laptop.
He was hijacker number 20, who wasn't able to make it that day because he got arrested on August 16th.
They were ordered by their local office to not investigate this, and so Harry was so upset that he wrote a 26-page affidavit.
He said, I'm going to go over the heads of the people here in Minneapolis because I don't think they realize how serious this could be.
He sent it to 50 different email addresses that he had with the FBI office in Washington, D.C., and he was ordered Do not interrogate that prisoner and do not open his laptop.
So that's how this particular portion of the fraud goes.
And so you have the FBI totally involved in that.
So, hang on.
Just sorry. So the FBI is actively trying to suppress information that could have stopped 9-11 is what you're saying.
No! It gets worse.
Yeah, the FBI was responsible for the February 1993, February 26, 1993.
They had an informant named Imad Salem, who was trying to frame a guy in New York that was head of a Muslim Brotherhood group called Ramzi Yusuf.
And so they said, okay, here's what we're going to do.
We're going to provide you with a ban We're going to load the van with fake explosives.
We're going to give you a fake detonator, and we want you to blow up the World Trade Center building.
And he went, well, wait a minute.
I can find a driver, but I'm not going to be that involved in this.
But he audio taped the FBI framing him in 1993.
And that explosion killed seven people, injured hundreds, but it didn't bring down the building.
And they managed to get this guy to go ahead and testify against Ramzi Youssef, and so that guy's in jail like two life sentences plus 240 years or something like that.
It's like absolutely ridiculous.
You can bet he's in a solitary cell so that he can't ever tell anybody what else the FBI did.
But wait kids, there's more.
There was a John Hopkins event along with Rockefeller, a tabletop On a pandemic that was going to be happening.
And this was in June of 2001.
And the exercise was called Dark Winter.
And they said, yeah, we're going to for sure get a, you know, we're going to have some kind of massive event and we're going to have to have a worldwide pandemic, you know, because we haven't had one since the Spanish flu.
So we're ready for another one.
And We're going to be prepared for it.
They had a dozen more exercises on that before the woofloo thing hit with the 2001 event in 2019 when they did their next tabletop exam.
And then two months later, surprise, surprise, the fat stew hit us.
Yeah, absolutely unbelievable.
But even more shocking...
It was an event that was held by NASA in July of 2001.
And this event was called Future Wars 2025.
And True Stream Media has a great presentation on that.
It's about an hour long, but this is like a day-long seminar with over 100 slides.
And what the people from NASA said is that in order to have continuation of government, we need to have the population With a trauma-based mind control, and that's exactly what happened two months later.
So we also had Susan Lindauer, who was a CIA asset, and she was getting chatter that there were planes going to be hijacked and flown into the World Trade Center building.
In May of 2001, she was Spreading this information around to interested parties with the FBI and the CIA, but because she was not allowed to talk to anybody in the FBI, they tried to put charges against her.
They held her for two years, and then they realized that she had enough evidence on them just exactly like Ahmed had on his FBI handler, and so they dropped the charges.
But she's written a great book.
She's done great interviews.
It's called Extreme Prejudice is the name of her book, but I've seen her online audios, and I've also seen Colleen Rowlett, the FBI agent in Minneapolis, did an hour-long presentation to the University of California.
So those are both available online.
And then you had Sybil Evans, who was an actual Farsi translator with the FBI, and she said, we had all of this stuff sitting in FBI files, but they wouldn't hire an extra translator or two To be able to verify all of this stuff was going on.
So, you know, bottom line is, was there premeditation on the part of the FBI? I think so.
And then you had NORAD. Who managed to have exercises of hijacked planes in Nebraska and Alaska, and they shipped the pilots that would have been guarding the Northeast Corridor to these exercises so that they couldn't possibly respond.
Now, how do you get a half-dozen cavemen to get NORAD to behave that way, to get the FBI to behave that way, to get the CIA to behave that way?
Absolutely stunning. And this just goes on and on and on.
If I could do a half day with Alex Jones, this would be absolutely 100% over.
So maybe Alex will, somebody will forward this to him and he'll be able to understand what we're talking about.
So, bottom line is, what is some more stuff that we've got on this particular little I'm trying to remember.
There's plenty. Oh, I know what else it is.
Yeah, we also had some more little FBI business to take care of.
This is something that came out last week.
The Newmark 4.
Let me see if I've got that marked where I can find it real handy.
This is a group of four guys that were blacks that had a religious conversion and decided they were going to be Muslims.
And they were approached by the FBI And the FBI, again, planted explosives along with the—and this happened on May 20, 2009—the FBI in New York— PD gave these guys a fake bomb and weapons of mass destruction charges were filed against them.
They were sentenced in 2010 to like 25 years in prison.
This is an article.
It was at democracynow.org, 2023, July 31st.
Newberg 4 released because of FBI malfeasance.
And then you had the Whitmire kidnapping team, which was six rednecks that they managed to corral together with 12 FBI informants.
And one of the informants admitted in court that, yes, she did smoke pot with one of these kidnappers, and she did have sex with him, because sometimes when you're with the FBI, you have to do something, you know, just to get somebody's confidence.
So there you go.
And all six of those guys have been acquitted.
And the man who was in charge of the sting operation that's set up by the FBI for the Whitmer kidnapping was immediately moved to Washington, D.C., and he was the one who was in charge of January 6th.
So you want to know what happened on January 6th?
You had probably 1,000 federal agents And who are the two that we know are federal agents that have not been indicted?
Oh, that would be John Sullivan that was videotaping inside the building and sold his news footage to CNN for $80,000, because he's a reporter and he's exempt from being one of the mobsters that knocked down the doors of the building, even though he's admitted Antifa.
And the other one is Ray Epps who was out there inciting riots the day before and during the day that it happened.
And those two haven't been charged.
But they'll go out of their way to find somebody who's an Oathkeeper that wasn't even in town that day.
And attack him and put him in jail for 22 years.
We have an absolutely 100% rogue federal government.
And I did a 20 minute long special with James Thatcher.
If you go to Bitshoot and put in Joe Olson, FBI, you can see my rant on what J. Edgar Hoover did to the OSS twice during World War II. He should have been fog-marched out in front of the Capitol building and shot with a firing squad.
He was an absolute 100% traitor the whole 24 years since 1924 that he was head of the FBI until 1978.
And he was absolutely duplicitous in the JFK, RFK, and MLK murders.
Of course. Yeah, 100%.
So, if you've got a government that can assassinate your leaders and can state-set bombings and kidnappings and create foreign wars and kill millions of people, you have a federal government that is not worthy of respect and is probably irredeemably corrupt.
And I don't know how we get rid of these...
Go ahead. So what were you going to say?
Sorry, you were going to say, I don't know how to get rid of these people, you said, or...?
Yeah, how do you?
So let me ask you, in terms of, so what you're saying is they put some kind of nuclear device that pointed upwards right into those beams?
No, it was in the elevator shaft.
Elevator shaft number 50.
If you look at the World Trade Center plan, in the basement, there's three stairwells that go down to the lower floor of the basement, and there's one elevator, which is the ninth grade elevator.
It was one of the few, well, it was the only elevator that had continuous from the sixth floor bottom basement up to the 110th floor.
Continuous travel. So, if you place a bomb right there, then it will go up through that shaft, and then They go through a very detailed mention of how they blew out the non-continuous elevator shafts on the other floor to create an open cavity for this thing to blow out.
So there again, the Palmer Report is absolutely excellent as far as their graphics, their 90-minute oral presentations, and their 5,000-word article.
And at the time this was originally published at Veterans Today, they had all of the 80 articles So I could paint a picture here.
So it's a nuclear device that's been placed on an elevator shaft.
The elevator shaft, I'm assuming, has largely steel walls.
This has been placed on the lower floor, like on the sixth floor, as you said, the nuclear device, or where is the placement of it?
It's placed on the granite bedrock in the basement of that elevator shaft.
And then when it explodes, it creates heat enough to melt not only the elevator shaft, but everything around it?
Oh yeah! And that gets to the last two slides in the presentation of Palmer Report.
This is their slides number Let's see, their figure numbers are 6-25 is the one that shows the blast going up through the center of the building.
But if you go to 6-44 and 6-45, they show the 100-foot-heat hole that was melted into the granite bedrock underneath the building.
And you can't do that with remote-directed energy weapons, and you can't do that with thermite.
And that's where the steel fell down.
And if you look at it, you can see the igneous rock formations that are along the side of the granite that were not there when they built the original foundation of the building.
And then to add additional bit of evidence, this was just posted today at Principia Scientific.
And that is that they've had first responders, and I'll send you this one.
Post-911, first responders have enormous amounts.
They've killed more first responders from secondary effects from nuclear radiation than they did from the original explosion.
and that brings up an additional point that um i'm sorry that richard gage uh he's you know once once you find something everything else is confirmation bias and you won't find anything else that you're not looking for and he's refused to look at anything other than thermite and he says that all of the health problems were due to asbestos in the building well like i said i've worked in hundreds of high-rise buildings and They outlawed
asbestos in 1972.
These buildings were under construction.
World Trade Center 1 was the first one that was built.
It was partially framed when they stopped putting any asbestos on the 33rd floor.
So the whole top half of that building had no asbestos.
World Trade Center II and VII had no asbestos.
So you can't blame asbestos for health issues that the first responders and the downwinders in Brooklyn who were shipped to the nursing homes and killed with remdesivir that were also suffering from these same nuclear radiation-affected outcomes.
And then you also had the fact that the buildings We're 2500 degrees hot in December.
And you can't have a 2500 degree hot fire from anything other than nuclear decay.
And they were constantly pouring water on it the whole 24-7 for the three months up until the point where they could finally finish removing the rest of the debris out of that giant hole that was melted into the metamorphic rock underneath the building.
So let me ask you, was that giant hole, and you're saying that it was continuing to be on fire or melt, like that thing was where...
It was a pile of... Huh?
Yes, it was a pile of steel, and all of the concrete dust and all of the steel had been made radioactive, just like we mentioned before about the...
Radioactive isotopes of steel.
When you get steel in it, it either absorbs neutrons or it knocks neutrons out.
Those form either plus or minus isotopes of the four stable isotopes of steel.
And those will be radioactive for a certain period of time.
And I didn't look up all 150 of the available isotopes.
And what their radioactive half-lives were.
But just glancing through them, the half-lives of these things had, just like we mentioned, radon has a 2.4-day half-life.
Well, these also have a half-life, and it was about 30 to 90 takes.
So if you have 150 available isotopes, and they're all decaying, With a half-life of 90 days, you can keep the basement of that building 2,500 degrees hot even in December when it's pretty frickin' cold in New York.
So, bottom line is, we've laid out absolutely 100% of the evidence at Veterans Today, Palmer Report, and me and James Fetzer.
And all we're waiting for is a forum where people can actually engage us in a real debate, and we can show all of the evidence in a very coherent and logical form, just like I'm doing right now with you audio, and I wish we had a way of doing that video, but we will cross that bridge someday in the near future, because I'll figure out a way to do it, even if it ends up being Friday in Dallas.
Like I said, I've got contacts up there that can do a studio presentation.
A question now, so that area we're talking about which is where it was continuous like lava or you were saying until December it was still on fire, is that where the nuclear device went off?
No, it went off at 30 foot on the top of the granite at 40 feet, but because it was a slow reaction nuclear bomb, instead of having a real fast chain reaction, they managed to use a tamper.
It keeps the nuclear material fissionable for probably 20 minutes, and so as it's slowly fizzling, it's burning a hole in the granite, and as it's burning a hole, it's releasing alpha, gamma, and beta particles that are Smashing into the granite and eating a hole in the granite, vaporizing the granite, which is pouring up through that center hole where they blew out the elevator corridor.
So you've got this giant chimney that's just sucking all of this heat out, and then when the building actually starts collapsing, there's a giant void underneath it for the building to fall down into, which is why it was almost leveled with the street level when the building collapsed.
was finally resting place and that's why Judy Woods is absolutely nuts that you couldn't do that with a remote do you couldn't bore a hole underneath the building and make the building fall down it the only evidence that's 100 percent consistent is that this was a one kiloton maybe a two kiloton bomb that was placed in the basement it was a slow reaction gamma ray bomb that we used for our bunker buster bombs that had been developed 10
years prior to this, and that's exactly what they did to burn a hole in the granite, for the building to fall into and then they exported all the material amazingly enough under police guard to an island that was off of the coast of Manhattan and the name of the island was Freshkill Island and that's where they when they had butcher shops in New York back in the 1890s they would butcher animals and they would deliver the carcasses
and bones over to this island and that's why it was called Freshkill Island That's where they put all the material prior to shipping it to China and having it melt it down.
And water happens to be an excellent gamma absorber, which is why it's used in all nuclear power plants.
Number one, it's a gamma absorber.
Number two, it's the highest transfer media, which has the highest specific heat of any compound known to man.
And so it's a great heat transfer mechanism, number one.
Number two, it has three stable states of matter on the planet, which are liquid, solid, and vapor, which is ice and liquid water and water vapor.
And in the process of changing between those phases, it also does an enormous amount of energy transfer.
I'd like to do a great program with Corrine sometime in the future on global warming because there's an enormous amount of stuff on that as well.
But for people that don't have patience to wait or you want to do a little bit of extra homework, there again, you can go to Bitshoot, put in J-O-E-O-L-S-O-N, comma, climate change.
I've got the 10 tutorials with James Betzer on what's going on with the climate fraud.
You can put in comma, Twin Towers.
I've got an hour-long interview that I did with Betzer describing exactly what we're talking about today, where I'm actually able to point in real time to the visual presentations.
And then you can also do Joe Olson comma, FBI, and you get my about 25-minute rant.
And I've read easily a thousand books on history and biographies, and I know what's going on in this world.
And I've been very discerning.
In order to get my engineering education, I had to have four hours of chemistry, three semesters of calculus, two semesters of physics, one semester of a Special mathematics calculus for engineers called numerical method and then two semesters of thermodynamics.
So that's my education as far as the climate fraud.
Very well educated, far more than Alexander Occasional Cortex or Greta Thornburg in our side because she's a high school dropout.
And then as far as structural engineering, I took all of the required courses for structural engineering, but structural civil engineering also includes environmental engineering, And it includes airport, road design, subdivisions, as well as sewage treatment plants.
So it's a very broad-based thing, but bottom line is I had a dozen courses that involved structural steel design, concrete design, indeterminate structural analysis, strength of materials, engineering labs where we did material testing, soil mechanics.
Bottom line is I understand structural engineering, and I understand thermodynamics, and I understand that we're being lied to about global warming, and I understand we're being lied to about what happened to the World Trade Center building.
And because of those, there's a little bit of overlap with chemistry and biology.
When the WooFlu thing started, I had read a book called The Great Influenza by John M. Berry, 400 pages long.
My grandmother was orphaned in 1919, When both of her parents and her 10-year-old brother died of, quote, the Spanish flu.
And she was 12 years old.
She never made a big deal about growing up as an orphan, but she 100% believed in vaccines.
And so, you know, I kind of went along with the rest of the crowd.
And so my daughter had a febrile seizure at 18 months old back in 1982, within hours after getting her DPP shot.
And then I started to really question the vaccine industry.
And when John Amberry wrote his The Great Influenza book, I'd already read it twice because I'd read the first three quarters of the book and I went, Jesus Christ, this is going someplace where I had no idea Where I was going and when I got to the end of the book I said well I need to read the first half.
I went ahead and read the whole thing twice.
It's out of the thousand probably close to two thousand books I've read cover to cover.
This is the only one I read cover to cover twice within a week because it was just so impactful what he did in his research.
But bottom line is I'm co-founder of Principia Scientific.
We wrote a book that was issued right after the climate game thing happened in And that's when they proved that the 2000 journals that published scientific work were all in collusion with a group that was trying to push the carbon warming hoax and that you weren't going to get a work published elsewhere.
We wrote a book called Slaying the Sky Dragon.
It had eight authors. I'm one of those eight authors.
I've been interviewed on that particular subject on Coast to Coast AM five times.
615 radio stations, 2 million listeners.
I've written 200 articles on fake history, global warming, green energy, peak oil, big bang, 9-1-1, the Apollo mission.
I mean, you know, I'm a very objective, empirical, evidence-based researcher and absolutely fearless on exposing the frauds that we're being subjected to.
And that's how they're doing this.
I mean, we've had, at this point, Three and a half years to flatten the fear.
It's absolutely insane that there's people that are willing to go put a mask on and then turn right around and get jabbed again.
You know, despite the overwhelming evidence of how, first of all, ineffective they are, and second of all, how damaging to people's health they are.
So, I've been a co-host at TNT Radio.
Since January of 2021, so we're coming up on our second year of broadcasting.
This is a weekly broadcast on Saturday evenings with two of my co-hosts who are at Principia Scientific, which John O'Sullivan and I founded in 2011.
And we currently have over 5,000 members.
Our website gets about 10 million views per month.
Here again, we've got great articles.
I've just sent you one of those great articles on the first responders.
Let me see if I can pull it up again so we can get the exact title of it.
Post-9-1-1, first responders' deaths now nearly equal those of the attack casualties.
And this is by Ethan Sarek.
And there again, it's at Principia Scientific.
And so, bottom line is, The evidence is absolutely overwhelming, and I challenge anybody who's got standing to debate me.
I'm not going to debate every layman in the world, and I'm not going to sit around with a You know, the nuclear weapons do not exist crowd and try to debate stuff that's absolutely 100% proven.
I mean, if you're going to tell me that nuclear bombs don't exist, then tell me how you can power a nuclear submarine for 30 years without ever refueling it, and you can circle the globe if you can stay underwater for nine months at a time.
And tell me again how dangerous CO2 is when the atmospheric level is 400 parts per million, but in order to scrub it out of a submarine, it's pretty intensive energy requirements.
And so submarines operate for nine months at a time under 8,000 parts per million CO2, and none of the submariners have an issue with carbon dioxide, because NASA themselves proved it was the safest fire suppression system for the space shuttle and for the space station, because up to concentrations of 50,000 parts per million.
carbon dioxide was completely harmless, had no measurable side effects.
Carbon dioxide increases photosynthesis in a direct linear fashion for terrestrial plants up to 1600 watts per million, which means if you put four times the amount of CO2 in a greenhouse, you will get four times the rate of growth.
From any living plant that's inside that particular facility.
So bottom line is, how many lies can these people tell us before people start going, you know, there's a whole different system of reality that's based on empirical stuff and not based on lies, and there are people who are able to articulate What those actual facts are and what the actual relationships are.
And we need to have a new set of thought leaders and a new set of spokesmen in order to have a new democracy and get rid of the reset that they're trying to put on us, flip the table on them and have a reset for truth and the sacredness of humanity.
Exactly, exactly.
Well, Joe, this has been some incredible information.
Is there anything that we didn't discuss that you'd want to mention in closing?
I'm trying to think, man.
We covered these two subjects very, very well.
I've also, one of the interviews I did at Coast to Coast, and it's available to Coast Insider, it's Body Electric Secrets.
This is an article that I wrote based on a book by Robert O. Becker, and he was an orthopedic surgeon at the Syracuse VA Hospital, and He was doing experiments to try to figure out why you could cut the limbs off a salamander and it would regrow a limb or regrow an eyeball and He was wondering, how long the evolutionary scale did we lose the ability to regenerate cells?
And so he started doing testing and he found out that the body has two electric circuits.
One of them is the motor nerves and the other one is the sensory nerves.
And they operate on DC volt, milliamp, and milli-volt currents.
And just the slight amount of currents, if they're properly directed, They were able to regrow amputated limbs and decodated spinal columns in lab rats in 1965 when the federal government quit funding them.
And there again, if you go to Principia Scientific, look up Body Electric Secrets.
It's a great book report, but it's an absolutely fabulous book.
I've talked to dozens of doctors and nurses in the last three years.
I've attended over 50 Open Texas and medical freedom rallies all across Texas.
And none of these people in the medical industry are ever taught any of this, as long as they're not being taught anything on nutrition.
And they're only taught like four hours on vaccines and basically four hours of vaccine.
Oh, they're a miracle.
Oh, very good. You've got to give them more vaccines.
You've got to put a pill pusher.
Absolutely insane.
We're not allowed to discuss this.
And then the next thing is the peak oil lie was dreamed up by John Rockefeller because he wanted to be able to go over and continue monopolizing oil fields by saying, well, you've got oil pouring out of the ground right now, but it's going to run out because this is leftover dead dinosaur juice.
And that's absolutely fallacious.
It's exactly like we mentioned earlier about the daughter atoms being created by the destruction of large atoms.
If you go to uranium, you can pull up what the daughter reactions are.
Those are the immediate terrestrial reactions, but there's a whole lot more that go beyond that.
One of the articles that they had at Veterans Today on Nuclear Education was on the Bridgman Effect.
And the guy that won the 1946 Nobel Prize for Physics was named Percy Bridgman.
He had been working at Harvard University and developing the specific heat coefficients for multiple materials under really high temperatures and really high pressures.
And he was able to prove that under 50,000 psi pressure, That everything in the metallic series, which is like a quarter of the periodic table is in the metallic series, is fissionable.
And so when you get down to 40 miles deep in the planet, Every one of those metallic series elements is capable of having fission, and that's going to provide more of the protons and neutrons and electrons to be able to create new little atoms, and the atoms are going to be at high heat and pressure, and they're going to form groundwater, which is 99% elemental water.
And they're going to be able to form petroleum products.
So the planet has a, it's not inexhaustible, it's probably not constant, but if we limited our oil consumption to the rate of production, then we would absolutely have a billion years worth of Based on the amount of uranium and thorium and other fissional elements, we've got a billion years worth of petroleum products sitting under our feet.
If we're not using them, they're bubbling out of the ground and becoming an environmental hazard.
So why do we let these idiots that have no education in chemistry or physics or thermodynamics dictate our energy policies to us and try to destroy the most functional system that we've developed in all of civilization and that is thermal energy has freed us from the drudgery of muscle and sail power which is what we had up until the invention of the internal combustion engine so bottom line is i reject everything that they've got for hypothesis
on everything that they have to say because our government lies about absolutely everything And I've done an enormous amount of research and articles on history.
You'll absolutely be shocked.
My website is slayingfakescience.com, and I'll send you a link to that so you can put it up.
I've got probably 100, maybe 150 articles here on history.
I've got some on satire.
One is really good on proxies.
Because they build this whole thing using proxies because, you know, Fahrenheit didn't get around to inventing the thermometer until 1660.
So you don't have any record of thermometers before then.
And they were poorly calibrated and very poorly distributed.
So anything that's based on past temperature is based on proxies.
And every one of those is an absolute 100% joke.
I'll debate anybody on carbon-14 dating, on isotope dating, on ice cores, on tree rings, on any of the little funny baloney proxies that you want to bring up.
I will destroy any proof that they have any scientific basis at all because they're all based on 100% fraud.
I'm so glad you're at the American Liberty Awards.
Not only did I get to meet you, I got to meet Three of my other co-hosts at TNT Radio.
Oh, that's awesome.
Jorge Merrick was there, Brian McFarlane was there, and what's the other guy's name?
Anyhow, got them written down, but bottom line is I've been interviewed by those two guys.
I've been interviewed by at least a dozen hosts on TNT Radio, in addition to all the other interviews that I've done.
But bottom line is, you know, my motto is, find and share truth, it's your duty as an earthman.
Yeah, yeah.
Thank you so much, Joe.
I really appreciate it, brother.
And for the viewers out there, thank you so much for joining us for this episode of Blood Money.
Please remember to check out AmericaHappens.com for all of our episodes.
And remember, please donate, because...
Without your support, we wouldn't be able to get some of this amazing information out there, the truth.
And please make sure you join us for our HN News Live every Tuesdays and Thursdays at 2 p.m.
Pacific, 5 p.m. Eastern.
Blood Money with Yours Truly, 4 or 5 days a week.
Daily Devotions with LW every morning, our morning prayer series.
Conspiracy Truths with Mindy Robinson.
The State National University with Gianna Michele.
Thank you so much for joining us and I will see you on the next episode of Blood Money.
Truth in Media is not free.
If the corrupt corporations run the media, then all we get is a pile of lies.
So please support Truth in the Media by donating to americahappens.com by simply going to americahappens.com, clicking on the support tab, and entering a generous donation.
Thank you so much. Thank
you. Thank
you. Check
out the America Happens Network.
▲
Export Selection