What Alex believes is that he was attacked in the car and then dragged a mile and a half and then killed at the point where he was found. That seems inefficient. Now the problem that I have with that is why the hell would the murderers cut him up fairly cleanly, but not deeply enough to kill him, which likely would be impossible if he were fighting back in any way, particularly considering that the cuts were on his wrists and his throat. You know, like he would be fighting, and then if you're trying to not kill him, but then you get deep enough because he's fighting back, there's no way to create that scenario without accidentally going too far. He was driving. No, because he's parked in this field. Ah, he was parked. So then, they would have had to have done it in the car, which means that they would have had to have been in an enclosed space with him. And further, any of the cuts he had would clearly cause bloodstains on the murderer, and more importantly, no bloodstains in the car where the murderer would have been. That physical evidence of a person attacking him in his car would be open and shut and it doesn't exist.