Claims: in rendlesham incident

3 claims
Narrow claims Pick any combination. Press Enter to apply typed text.
Clear filters
Speaker
Target
Topic
Certainty
Claim text
Date range
06 Mar 2020
Jenny Randles, who initially covered the Rendlesham Forest UFO case, later stated that no unearthly craft were seen.

So, Jenny Randles is the person who first primarily covered the Randlesham story in the press, in the London Evening Standard, and even wrote an early book about the event. Her works are largely credited with building some of the early hype surrounding the alleged sighting. But, in 2011, she said, While some puzzles remain, we can probably say that no unearthly craft were seen in Rendlesham Forest. Boo. We can also argue with confidence that the main focus of the events was a series of misperceptions of everyday things encountered in less than everyday circumstances.

06 Mar 2020
Lieutenant Colonel Charles Halt changed his story to support the UFO narrative despite contradicting documented evidence.

Lieutenant Colonel Charles Halt's story has also changed, but it changed to support the UFO view. He currently believes that a UFO did show up back in 1980, which, like I mentioned earlier, relies on him kind of negating a bunch of documented evidence that some of it he himself created.

06 Mar 2020
Kerry Cassidy claims that the Rendlesham cover-up involves remote viewing, Scientology practices, and psychic abilities.

And these individuals are remote viewers, involved in remote viewing, involved in the origination, or putting together the protocols with Ingo Swann of the original. And this involved Scientology practices as well. So it's important to know that all of that is just information, a way of packaging information, a way of using your psychic abilities in a certain controlled way to access events and Future, past and present events, things going on that are what we call signal non-locality.