Claims: in protocols content

4 claims
Narrow claims Pick any combination. Press Enter to apply typed text.
Clear filters
Speaker
Target
Topic
Certainty
Claim text
Date range
27 Jul 2017
The dialogue in the Protocols between Machiavelli and Montesquieu concerns methods of taking over a country rather than anti-Semitism.

And the dialogue in hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu... It's not about anti-Semitism. It doesn't have anything to do with the Jews. It has to do with which way is better to sort of take over a country. Despotism or liberalism, which is the preferred system.

27 Jul 2017
The Protocols claim that political freedom is a bait used to attract masses and crush authority.

Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one's party for the purpose of crushing another who is an authority. This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been infected with the idea of freedom, so-called liberalism, and for the sake of an idea is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears. The slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand. Because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the old, already weakened by liberalism.

27 Jul 2017
The Protocols advocate for wars that do not result in territorial gains but instead establish economic dominance.

It is indispensable for our purpose that wars, so far as possible, should not result in territorial gains. War will thus be brought on an economic ground, where the nations will not fail to perceive, in the assistance we give, the strength of our predominance, and this state of things will put both sides at the mercy of our international agenter, which possesses millions of eyes, ever on the watch, and unhampered by any limitations whatsoever. Our international rights will then wipe out national rights in the proper sense of right.

27 Jul 2017
The Protocols claim that the press is used to create discontent and influence people while remaining hidden.

In the hands of the states today, there is a great force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the press. Ooh, I bet they're bad. The part played by the press is to keep pointing our requirements, supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and to create discontent. Oh, so the press is bad! Press is bad. Press is bad, and they're going out of their way to disseminate... False information to make everybody feel bad. Yes, because in this conception, the elders of Zion have taken over the press, and in Alex Jones' conception, the globalists have plants and basically control All of the mainstream media, the MSM. Oh, I didn't know that the elders took over the press in this. Through the press, we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade. Thanks to the press, we have got the gold in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears.