And one of the things that has never charmed me about that argument is that like if you look at the reality of stuff, no one is ever really shutting down language. They're expanding language. Right. The reality of, you know, back in the day when America was great. Nope. Don't even say those words. In the 50s. Don't even like it. You had straight people and the queers, right? In the 50s. Right. I don't like that. Back when America was great. I'm going to let you continue. I'm being satirical. I get it. Satire. Yeah, you had that dichotomy back then. And there were a bunch of people who didn't fit into that dichotomy, and they were limited. But the major prevailing people in society, most people didn't give a shit. Right. And eventually those people forced a conversation and the language got expanded. And it didn't hurt the larger portion of population that are heterosexual, cisgender, any of those sorts of designations. It doesn't hurt them at all. All it does is expand what people's identification are. Because back then there was heterosexual and the negative. Everybody else. Right. Yeah. And it was not a straight dichotomy because back then there were people who were like, well, I'm not really what these people think I am. The queer, I'm bisexual. Or I'm, you know, there's a whole spectrum of things. And as time went on, the language expanded. And so Alex's arguments about this idea of like it closes off language and all this stuff, I think exactly the opposite. Of course not. I think all it does is expand language.