Claims: in isis structure

2 claims
Narrow claims Pick any combination. Press Enter to apply typed text.
Clear filters
Speaker
Target
Topic
Certainty
Claim text
Date range
19 Oct 2017
ISIS is a loosely connected group of mercenaries rather than a cohesive ideological organization.

It's entirely possible that what's really going on with ISIS is that it is a loosely connected group of people who are then taking responsibility for so many different terrorist attacks because they are directed by their relative, you know, their battlefield generals, if you will. And a lot of times they probably end up fighting with each other in ways that are unpredictable. Do you remember when the NWO happened in the WCW? It was pretty like. Remember when he was saying that it was like one big group, but then it ended up turning into the Wolf Pack and then Hollywood, the black and white, and then the Luchador World Order Hispanic group came around. I gotcha. There's something of that. Maybe there was a central idea to ISIS at one point, and then it became fractured. There's a whole lot of possibilities in terms of maybe it's just different groups of people who were looking for funding and different people came calling. It's possible. The only way you fight a war on this level is with money. And they all need money, and they don't necessarily work or live together. So if they don't have a centralized tax plan or whatever it is you want to go to, they all have to have money to support themselves. So they all have to find a way to get that money. And if their goals temporarily align with Russia, they get Russian money. It's like odd jobs. Exactly. They're mercenaries less than they are a cohesive ideology.