Feudalism is the number one government in history. In recorded 7,000 years of history, guess how many governments are estimated to have been feudalist? 99% of the Greek democracies and the Roman republics and everything, that's less than 1%.

With a parliamentary system, there's always new parties, dozens of them. And they all get in coalitions that outvote the majority. So you end up with these constantly shifting tyrannies.

So the Social Security Administration database is used as a source of truth by all the other databases that the government uses. So even if they stop the payments on the Social Security Administration database, like unemployment insurance, small business administration, student loans, all check the Social Security Administration database to say, is this a legitimate, alive person? And the Social Security database will say, yes, this person is still alive even though they're 200 years old. But forget to mention that they're 200 years old. It just says – it just returns – when the computer is queried, it says, yes, this person is alive. And so then they're able to exploit the entire rest of the government ecosystem. So then you get fake student loans. Then you get fake unemployment insurance. Then you get fake medical payments.

They found systems they thought impenetrable already mapped, networks they believed hidden already exposed, power structures built over decades revealed in hours. Their traditional defenses—slow walking decisions, leaking damaging stories, stonewalling requests—proved useless against an opponent moving faster than their systems could react. By the time they drafted their first memo objecting to this breach, three more systems had already been mapped.

The last point Dylan makes is that the parliamentary system of government is more stable than what we have come up with. Parliamentary systems, he says, are less likely to collapse into dictatorships since they lack the focus on a singular authority, which characterizes presidential systems. He further points out that parliamentary systems generally experience less gridlock and legislation can be generally passed much easier in that sort of system as opposed to our conflict-based system that... Often ends up in a situation where one side wants something, one side wants the opposite of something, and no one can make any headway.