Today, Dan and Jordan set out to check in on what Alex Jones was up to on the day after the 4th of July, the day after his predictions of "antifa chemical warfare" failed to materialize. Weirdly, they don't find Alex apologizing for spreading stupid fear, they find him getting super mystical and talking to a guy who likes to pretend he's in the Illuminati.
Not always, but I'm always thrilled when the United States does well.
Especially when it's camaraderie-based.
It's not like...
Crushing other countries.
When it doesn't feel like war, I can always feel a little bit of national pride.
But I remember when I was younger, I guess, I don't know what years it would have been, but it was around when Thierry Henry and Zinedine Zidane were around.
One of the considerations, though, is that there's a lot going on in Alex's world right now.
It takes a lot of attention.
That's required.
You've got to focus on this stuff.
One of the other issues is that it's a time suck.
Like, if I check in on something as a potential Wacky Wednesday thing, and I listen to, like, two hours of somebody talk, and, like, this isn't good, this doesn't work, then that's two hours lost.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I'd like to support the show, I like what these guys do, please feel free to do so by going to our website, knowledgefight.com.
We're recording this on Sunday, and there was a whole weekend of nonsensical bullshit, so if something pops off tonight, don't blame us for not knowing about it.
It's in the future from when we're recording.
But the 4th of July predictions that Alex had did not come true at all.
Bringing Christianity back into America and love of our nation and love of our people in unity, the exact opposite of what the globalists are saying and what the globalists...
Not someone loving that crowd of people there, but I saw Trump in the office of president with his wife, turning the tide with all those people together in a huge ritual.
Yeah, that's a completely made-up thing Alex is saying to demonize the LGBTQ community.
It's become an incredibly common occurrence on this show to hear Alex say shit like this that's just completely not true, but it hits the ear fresh and offensive nonetheless because of the scale of what he's lying about.
about.
unidentified
Alex is repeating talking points from the far-right in the fascist smear campaign coming out of Europe, which these attacks have been directed against the LGBTQ community in recent weeks.
to backlash from a recent pride parade held in Warsaw.
And as we discussed in the episode where we covered Stefan Molyneux going to Poland to become a white nationalist, Warsaw and Poland is not the chillest place in the world right now for non-heterosexual white dudes.
Nope.
Jaroslaw Kaczynski, the head of the Law and Justice Party and the power behind the Polish president at the moment, he has labeled the LGBTQ rights movement a foreign import and a threat.
The environment in Poland is not good from a political perspective right now.
From articles that I've read and information I've found, it does appear that socially the population is trending towards greater acceptance and support for LGBTQ folk, but that's caused a harsh backlash from the far-right ruling party.
Part of that backlash has been attacking Warsaw Mayor Rafal Roszkowski.
For participating in the Warsaw Pride Parade and for saying, quote, not everyone has to go to equality parade, but everyone should respect minority rights.
It's really important for me that Warsaw be open and Warsaw be tolerant.
That is a sentiment that is in direct opposition to the far-right agenda in Poland.
And so, to attack the rising tide of public acceptance of LGBTQ rights, they've launched a public campaign to portray the demands of equality as actually being an attack on families and an attempt to sexualize children.
So weird to see bigots across the world, from Warsaw to Austin, coming up with the exact same smears and narratives, almost like they're working out of the exact same playbook.
The day after the march, a march for life and the family was held in 130 towns in Poland.
The march had been held in previous years to protest abortion, but this year was co-opted by this anti-LGBTQ momentum, and it made its theme, quote, protecting children from premature sexualization.
All of this is absolutely what Alex is lying about and embellishing when he says that a mayor in Europe was having sex with children in the street.
That is Alex knowing that his audience is full of dumb bigots who will accept his version of the story when in reality the mayor of Warsaw just expressed support for the pride parade.
That is what he is embellishing and lying about.
And this is why I never accept those arguments that people make that it's like Alex is just an over the top guy leading you to the truth.
Yeah.
unidentified
They're like he is just like he wakes you up out of your skull.
He literally said that a mayor is having sex with children in Europe.
What he is embellishing is a mayor expressing support for a pride parade.
That is not leading you to the truth.
That is leading you towards accepting far-right fascist smears coming out of Europe in service of dehumanizing, delegitimizing, and oppressing LGBTQ individuals who are just trying to accept or be accepted.
So when we talk about the idea that Alex is hyperbolic in order to wake people up and that being complete bullshit, you see here the thing that he is being hyperbolic about and the thing that he is exaggerating, which is they want to fuck your kids, he then turns around and uses as an introduction.
For his sales pitch about why he needs to keep existing to fight back against this imaginary bullshit that he has exaggerated to make you scared of, to make you worried about.
This is a very easy game to figure out if you just pay attention to the structure of his show.
Now, one of the things about Alex is that he knows a lot about history.
It's really funny that Alex thinks that the Battle Hymn of the Republic is somehow going to trigger libs, or that it's in any way in line with his distorted version of Christianity or even American history.
For one thing, the song itself is just a new set of lyrics that were written in 1861 and set to a pre-existing tune from the song John Brown's Body, which itself is based on a folk song whose precise origins are a matter of dispute.
A good many scholars have argued that it has its roots in African American communities in the pre-Civil War South.
The Battle Hymn of the Republic was written by Julia Ward Howe, someone who Alex would absolutely have called an SJ dub if he was around in the 1800s.
She was decidedly a dedicated abolitionist and wrote her song specifically to give a more cleaned up version of John Brown's body to rally the Union Army to defeat the Confederacy.
After the Civil War, Howe dedicated herself to the battle for women's suffrage, putting her squarely on the right side of history on two important issues of her time.
Quote, In the beauty of the lilies, Christ was born across the sea, with the glory in his bosom that transfigures you and me.
As he died to make men holy, let us die to make men free, while God is marching on.
The only people who should be triggered by the playing of the battle hymn of the Republic are people like Alex, whose family fought for the Confederacy.
This song is literally about killing his family members who took up arms to defend slavery.
I don't think that people who don't know about the song's histories would be that triggered by it either.
I feel like most people who don't really think about it all that much just kind of accept it as a patriotic classic that gets brought out every time we have an America fetishizing holiday.
When you were young, like four, five, six years old, God telling you you have a mission.
And then envisioning what was going to happen.
And then later it happens, and you look back and you say, that wasn't like Oprah Winfrey's The Secret, where you just say something and it magically happens.
And he saw the mainstream media come out with a bunch of hit pieces about how Trump's stupid and all this is...
Like, Trump is making this about himself.
But...
Then those pieces were immediately taken down because the media realized they were going to come out with this attack, but then no one liked it, so they doubled back.
Really?
I don't know that this is true.
I have no way I can confirm or deny this.
I think what Alex is talking about is other people posted streams or rebroadcasts of CNN or MSNBC, and those guys.
hit with copyright strikes.
Right.
unidentified
That's what I'm guessing he's talking about, but I'm not really sure.
He's not specific enough that there's any threads I can pull, and I don't care.
It could just be completely made up.
Right.
But part and parcel of this narrative is that the reason that they ended up taking all these things down was because the backlash from the patriots and the good Americans was so strong.
Now, if you're wondering how Alex gauges that, he explains in this next clip.
Also, it kind of suggests that when he says that he watched dozens and dozens of YouTube videos and looked at the comments, it's more like he went to dozens of videos and looked at the comments without watching the video.
This is a guy on July 4th telling you how much America sucks, and you wouldn't let that guy clean your toilets, you wouldn't let him work on your pool, you wouldn't let him get anywhere near your children.
The article that Alex is responding to is something that Dylan wrote in 2015.
The article was updated this year, but I compared the articles, and it appears that the only update was giving it a new headline.
Apparently, that gives Alex just enough justification to report on a four-year-old article that was written and published while Obama was president, as if it's somehow a recent thing and an attack on Trump.
Dylan's argument comes down to three points as to why staying with the British Empire might have led to a better outcome, generally speaking.
The first is that slavery would have been abolished sooner.
And this is not a debatable point.
England had abolished slavery before the American Revolution and abolished it in all of its colonies except India in 1834, with India following along in 1843.
The Emancipation Proclamation didn't formally abolish slavery in the United States until 1865.
I'm sure Alex would probably say that who cares about an extra 22 years of non-slavery, but I think that's a pretty dumb argument.
So Dylan's first point is absolutely correct.
If we were still in the British Empire, slavery would have been outlawed sooner, and possibly even without a civil war being needed to do it.
The second argument that he makes is that while there would have been inevitable conflict and violence between the colonists and Native Americans, it would have been far less horrible if the colonies had remained as a part of the British Empire.
Dylan's not painting a utopian version of what would possibly have been.
Rather, he's just pointing out that the ethnic cleansing that took place in our early history was the direct result of an insatiable hunger for Western expansion, which the British set limits on with their proclamation of 1763.
It's hard to know exactly how things would have played out, but if you look back at what our independent country did to Native peoples, it kind of does make you think a little bit.
But that's why he has tons of caveats in there about, like, there still would have been fighting, people still would have been violent towards each other.
The last point Dylan makes is that the parliamentary system of government is more stable than what we have come up with.
Parliamentary systems, he says, are less likely to collapse into dictatorships since they lack the focus on a singular authority, which characterizes presidential systems.
He further points out that parliamentary systems generally experience less gridlock and legislation can be generally passed much easier in that sort of system as opposed to our conflict-based system that...
Often ends up in a situation where one side wants something, one side wants the opposite of something, and no one can make any headway.
Agree or disagree with Dylan Matthews' points, it's not fair to say that he hates America from the text of this article.
It's one thing to dispute his premises.
It's entirely another to accuse him of being a demon because you don't want to engage with his ideas, then do a little segment on your show where you call him ugly and imply he's a danger to children.
This is childish bullshit, but it's no surprise coming from Alex.
Dylan's article was originally published on July 2, 2015.
And on July 7, 2015, Vox published a response article with the headline, quote, No, the American Revolution was not a mistake.
In this article, Jeff Stein does exactly what Alex Jones is incapable of doing, taking Dylan's points, considering them, and expressing counterpoints that he feels make a better argument.
Surprisingly, not once in Stein's article does he call Dylan ugly.
Fox published both of these articles because they both bring up interesting perspective on history.
They both use primary sources to defend their differing views on how things would have been different if the United States hadn't declared independence.
Fox published both of these articles not because they hate America, but because they're media outlets that are interested in publishing interesting content.
In contrast to that, Infowars is a media outlet interested in publishing content based on personal insults, making shit up, and lying about headlines.
The difference could not be clearer.
It's really interesting to me, especially within the context of these free speech Dumb Dumbs.
This whole idea of dangerous ideas.
You guys can't exist in the marketplace of ideas and debate our ideas.
Alex is talking about a four-year-old Vox article that they themselves published a response to from another author where there was a debate between the two.
These articles are not just articles that exist where a guy made this point and...
Completely unrelated, another guy made a different point.
Jeff Stein's article is in direct response to Dylan Matthews' article.
There is an interplay that's happening between them within a media source.
Vox is allowing these ideas to be discussed and interact with each other for public consumption.
That is a marketplace of ideas.
One guy saying, American Revolution, bad.
The other saying, aha, no, good.
It was good.
And in fact, I disagree with some of your points.
Now, here's why I disagree with those points.
That is...
What Alex and his dickhole friends pretend they want to do.
In reality, what Alex wants to do is say these people are a bunch of globalist fucks and call them ugly and then imply that they want to hurt your kids and then make money off of doing that.
Any free speech advocate on the right, all they really want is to be wrong loudly and never have to deal with it.
They don't want any argument.
They don't want any kind of learning possibility.
They don't want any pushback.
They want to be able to say what they want to say, no matter how wrong, no matter how racist, no matter how stupid, without ever having to deal with the consequences of it.
Leo came here Wednesday and he said, I brought you a bottle of champagne that was very expensive in all the news in Italy when Trump won three years ago.
And so he brought me a bottle of it.
Decorative boxes right over there on that desk, if somebody could bring it to me out of the dark over there.
And I was kind of like, well, what are we going to celebrate?
Well, just the fact that Trump's in there.
But now that after this 4th of July speech that's his biggest yet, the way the left demonized it, lied about it, said it was all about him when it wasn't, how well it was received while they're trying to ban the American flag and trying to do all of this, this is a very...
Good time to celebrate.
So I don't normally have champagne, you know, at 1230 noon.
I actually don't really drink much these days.
But in celebration of this, I am more than happy to do this with Leo Zagami and his lovely wife who's here.
So in a minute, she'll have to come up and share out of your glass.
I have to thank also the people at the Fiumicino Airport, my friend Andres Signini, who came to pick us up outside of the airport and brought us through the VIP line so we could avoid any control.
So now, Jordan, we've talked about Leo Zagami a little bit in the past.
He popped up in our 2015 investigation as a complete weirdo, saying absurd things that Alex accepted as smart-sounding because he thinks anyone with an accent is a genius.
To recap for anyone who missed those episodes, Leo Zagami's whole thing is that he used to be in the Illuminati, but now he's become a whistleblower, warning the world about their nefarious satanic plans.
He also apparently is a Vatican insider, which I guess just comes with the territory.
If you're in with the Illuminati, you probably get invited to some Vatican mixers.
There's very little reliable information about Leo Zagami online.
For the most part, no one really cares about him outside of conspiracy circles, so the only real coverage of him comes from that perspective, which isn't super critical and all of it's pretty dicey.
However...
There is an amazing story to be told here.
And in order to tell you it, I've had to scour message boards, long-dormant conspiracy sites, and foreign YouTube channels.
What I'm going to present to you today is as close as I can get to the actual true story of how Leo Zagami got to where he is today and how he clearly demonstrates how little research Alex and his team do on somebody before they allow them to be presented as a credible guest on their show.
So, there isn't too much concrete information known about Leo Zagami pre-2008.
According to the bio he has on his website, he was working as a DJ and record producer under the name Leo Young until 2006, at which point he decided to start exposing the Illuminati.
His father was a professor of psychology named Elio Zagami, and his mother was Jessica Lyon Young, who Leo alleges is, quote, a member of the Queen Mother of England's family.
He doesn't specify how he's related to the Queen Mother, and from digging around as much as I can, I can't find any close relations with the Queen Mother who have that name.
The only references I can find to Jessica Lyon Young being related to the royal family come from various websites that have reposted Leo's self-written bio.
Given the other things I know about him, I strongly suspect he's making up his connection to the Queen Mother.
Leo's life story up to going public against the Illuminati goes something like this.
He was born into a Scottish Sicilian Illuminati aristocratic bloodline, and as such, he's been a part of the Illuminati since the day he was born.
Of course.
As a lifelong member, he was groomed as a prince of the Illuminati, reaching the rank of the 33rd degree of Masonic initiation at the notorious Italian P2 Lodge.
Before he decided to expose the secret society, he was set to replace the previous king of the Illuminati, but Leo was disgusted by the Satanism he was surrounded by, so he turned his back on at all.
Leo Zagami was kicked out of Kirby Lodge within two years of joining for behavioral problems, including, but not limited to, excessive use of profanity.
After that point, he started just joining a bunch of fake lodges that aren't even involved with the Masons, but they seek to create the illusion that they are.
If he ever reached any high level of initiation anywhere, it's in fake Masonic lodges, which seems on brand.
The politician offered to answer any questions Kerry might have, which led to a correspondence.
In his messages, he makes a number of predictions that do not come true, and they should have, based on him saying that the things were set up in advance.
They weren't predictions in the way he was saying it.
He was saying, "This is what the plan is." For instance, he said that Siv Janssen would be elected Prime Minister of Norway.
Oh, okay.
Interestingly, in February 2008, Leo Zagami had been interviewed on Project Camelot, so he was in place to be a valuable source to check in with about this letter from an alleged Norwegian politician.
While it may seem like an irrelevant joke now, Project Camelot was a pretty large platform in the conspiracy community a decade ago, and Leo undoubtedly got a whole lot of traction out of being featured on the show and being mixed up in the story of this alleged Norwegian politician warning about Planet X. A cynical mind might suggest, as you kind of already have, given how wrong the alleged politician was about pretty much everything, it's likely that the letter was a bit of a stunt.
And maybe the only person who stood to gain anything from that kind of stunt was Leo himself.
I have no idea, though.
I can't prove it either way.
It could be an amazing coincidence that right after he got interviewed in Oslo for Project Camelot, Carrie received a mysterious whistleblowing message from a Norwegian politician.
Soon after his appearance on Project Camelot, Leo's wife left him and took their son with her.
It's very hard to determine what actually happened here, but I can tell you that I don't believe the version of the story that's repeated ad nauseum in conspiracy circles.
David Icke pulled this exact same stunt in 2012 when he divorced his second wife, Pamela Lee Richards, who said he decided they needed to split up after 11 years of marriage because he, quote, became suspicious that she was a shape-shifting alien.
When intimacy deteriorates for these people, their loved ones strangely always end up being secretly involved with their imagined enemies.
You can even see this with Alex Jones as he blurs the lines between the actions of the globalists and his ex-wife.
In a message board post, Leo wrote that his wife, quote, started to say to me that I should stop immediately my Illuminati confessions on the net and convert to a strict and more fundamentalist view of Islam, otherwise she will leave me.
That was obviously a brainwashing imposition for me, and I couldn't accept such a proposal.
So Leo would go on to later claim that he'd converted to Islam to infiltrate the religion, and he became a Muslim, quote, during an Illuminati ritual he made in Egypt under the Great Pyramid of Giza.
So after his wife left, he miraculously realized that the version of Islam that she followed was actually a form of the New World Order brainwashing and represented a system that was afraid of Leo's life's work.
So because his wife was involved with this New World Order brainwashing that was afraid of him, Leo was punished by having his marriage broken up and having his child taken from him.
Now, from what I know about Leo and from what we can learn about him and what we will learn about him today, I don't believe this angle.
I think he's a maniacal shithead who, if not directly abusive, is someone who you might want to divorce from if you find yourself accidentally married to him.
While Leo was in prison for that difficult 12 hours, he had a breakthrough when he met with a priest.
He found the strength to tell the priest about his, quote, forced conversion into Islam to please my wife's family and the way they sold me out to the authorities as only a true Judas could do.
Yes, my wife sold me to my worst enemy, the Norwegian Freemasons.
So the conversion to Islam was both forced by his wife and an intentional plan to infiltrate the religion.
When he was arrested for that 12 hours, the Jesuit Freemason Norwegian police confiscated his computers, which is where he kept all the proof about all the stories he tells about bigwigs and Illuminati.
And this is another essential piece of this hero's journey that he has.
This tragedy that makes him unable to unequivocally prove his point to the masses.
If his wife hadn't been brainwashed into filing false charges against him, he never would have had his computers seized, and he would still have all the proof he needs to take down the global satanic conspiracy.
But now he just has to be totally right about everything, and everyone just looks at him like he's a madman.
So Leo claimed in May 2008 that he, quote, personally controls major parts of the Illuminati, but he was now using his influence in the organization for good.
As you've already pointed out, this makes no sense.
He claimed that he was protected by a 12,000-man-strong paramilitary group called the Green Lion Security Team.
According to his own book, Confessions of an Illuminati, Volume 2, he was arrested in July 2008 when he arrived at a courthouse for a child custody hearing.
Apparently, he had recently appeared on an Internet conspiracy show and, quote, in a typical Italian act of bravado, he not only threatened to kill the Norwegian Prime Minister, Jen Stoltenberg, Right, right, right.
Leo was lucky to walk away without facing any charges or jail time from that, but I would say that the experience probably didn't do much to help his already enormous persecution complex and tendencies towards grandiosity.
He continued unabated, pretending that he was in charge of a large portion of the Illuminati.
Not one to let this craziness cool down to room temperature, Leo Zagami made another interesting religious conversion in 2009.
There's a pretty consistent thread through his work that the Kingdom of God is going to be started in 2019, which makes it particularly upsetting to have him now, in 2019, popping champagne with Alex Jones as they celebrate Trump's Fourth of July speech.
matrixism was a religion created by anonymous individuals online in 2004 right after the release of the third matrix movie leo would later go on to imply that he was involved in the creation of the religion which might be true since the founders were anonymous i can't really confirm or deny it what i can confirm is that creating a religion based on a movie does seem to be squarely in the category of things i would believe leo's For sure.
It's very weird how he's eluded, first of all, just outright exposure and also prison time in his life.
So you could say that at this point, in 2009, when he has announced that Matrixism is the official religion of his world...
Leo was fully back on his bullshit.
He had a fake faction of the Illuminati he was now in charge of.
And segments of the conspiracy world that had previously promoted him and raised his profile were kind of forced to go along with his new developments or risk having to admit that they've been fooled by a narcissistic weirdo just because he had an Italian accent.
I will talk English so my English listeners understand better.
I was arrested last night here in Italy for saying that the Italian government is a government of criminals, that the bourgeois have stolen everything, and us aristocrats are now living a miserable life, but also the poor people are living a miserable life because the order of things has been changed.
But we know that on the 21st of December 2012 there will be a new world order and a new...
Sacred Roman Empire, which is the old sacred Roman Empire, rising again with an Emperor, which is the Prince of Sant 'Elia, here for you, Baron of the Roman Empire, and...
And basically, I will be elevated to the rank of Emperor.
This next clip, put your mic down for it, because if you thought that the revelation that he is Jesus is shocking, this next clip is so much more shocking.
So, Bismillahir Rahmanir Rahim, and Shatani Rashim, because we are against Satan, both me and Osama Bin Laden, and I was the one who signed the order which was given to Commandant Giorgio Balestrieri to bring down the Twin Towers.
So it's my sole responsibility, but when you understand the full picture in 2012, you will thank me for it.
This sounds almost like if Robert Evans from The Kid Stays in the Picture was just a little bit more drunk when he was giving those interviews, he'd be like, yeah, that does sound like you.
Robert Evans, you probably think you were Jesus while you're producing Rosemary's Baby.
And the Vatican has finally accepted that I am that Messiah because I showed them the codes that were hidden inside the Vatican that only the real Jesus could have.
So I leave it to you to decide if I'm the Messiah or not.
Before Alex ever started having Leo on as a supposed guest in the Illuminati and as an insider in Vatican affairs.
All of this.
All of the things that I've told you about his past, including an interview that is publicly available where he declares himself the Messiah and solely responsible for 9-11.
You'd think that Alex would want to ask him about how he'd taken this responsibility for 9-11, how he declared himself the Messiah, as recognized by both the Jews and the Vatican.
Or you'd want to ask him about how he'd proposed to outlaw Christianity in favor of his new cult of Matrixism, once the New World Order, which he himself was the head of, took power in December 2012.
I think the record clearly shows that Leo Zagami is less an expert in anything than he is an unhinged lunatic.
But he's the sort of lunatic that's very useful for someone like Alex.
A person like Leo is useful as a force of escalation.
Any decent mainstream news outlet can tell you about the corruption at the Vatican and how there's a systemic problem within the Catholic Church where abuses have been covered up and abusers protected, and that should make you feel mad and cause you to want to see actions taken.
But Leo Zagami, by pretending to be an insider, can tell Alex that the priests are actually abusing children because it serves the purposes of demons, which they've conjured to the earth using black magic.
And you can see how these two situations imply slightly different solutions.
That's the sort of role that Leo Zagami can play towards radicalization, escalation of rhetoric.
I mean, Tommy Robinson is a perfect example of that.
Now, Jordan, you might remember how I told you that Leo Zagami used to go by the name Leo Young, and that until 2006 or so, when he decided to turn on the Illuminati, he'd been a DJ.
According to his music biography, Leo began DJing on a church radio station at the age of 13. By 1988, he claims he'd reached the national finals in the prestigious DMC DJ Championships.
This very well may be true.
I can't find a list of that year's finalists for the Italian competition, so all I can say with certainty is that he didn't win.
The experience at that contest, however, encouraged him to get more involved with the rave scene, where he spent the next decade.
He claims he is, quote, While I'm not positive that history bears out that Leo Zagami organized the first rave in Italy, he's not making up that he was involved.
I found a mention of him in an essay posted on the Red Bull Music Academy's website titled, quote, The Rise and Fall of Roman Techno, 1988-1994.
While there isn't much about him in the article, this is what is said.
Quote, for all the excitement amongst these young DJs and those who history has forgotten, such as the notoriously wild Leo Young, around acid house techno and the soon-to-emerge hardcore breakbeat scene, the vast majority of Roman club owners and party promoters were less enthusiastic.
This is an article about the rave scene, which centered more or less around drug use, and Leo Zagami is described as, quote, notoriously wild.
The mind reels at what he must have been up to in order to get that reputation.
Leo is generally considered to be as mad as an upside-down clown, renowned for a reckless penchant for ludicrous quaffering, questionable neo-pagan mystical interests, threatening verbal behavior, and convincingly delivered allusions to a bloodline of eccentric castle-dwelling Italian aristocrats.
It seems like that was always kind of a part of his personality, where you just ramble about nonsense.
Make no mistake about it, Leo Zagami, then known as Leo Young, was an active member of the house music scene in the late 80s, early 90s in Italy.
He held a three-day rave called L 'Impero D 'Essensi in 1989.
Then by 1991, he was running a weekly club night called Uona in Rome.
He did a 12-hour DJ set at a Berlin venue called Tracer.
And he was said to be a fixture there between 1995 and 1996.
He claims he was the first DJ ever to play at the Bolshoi Theater in Moscow, which I'm not sure is true.
He claims that he gave Prodigy their first gig outside of the UK, which probably isn't true, but might be.
It's absolutely crazy that Leo Zagami was a fucking rave DJ.
But his bio for his DJ life kind of undercuts a lot of the claims that he makes about his current hustle now.
For one, consider this line talking about how much he admires his grandmother.
Not only did she get Leo his first international DJ residency, but she also financed him going to learn more about recording by becoming a student of the famous London production duo Double Trouble.
If he was Illuminati royalty and all that, it doesn't seem like he'd make a specific point of his grandmother paying for him to study with some London DJs.
The next line is even weirder, though, talking about how when things were going well for him in London, quote, unfortunately he had to go back to Italy, where at the time you had to do an obligatory year of bollocks in the military before getting your passport back.
If he was a member of the ruling elite bloodline and the prince of the Illuminati, you'd think they'd easily be able to get him out of something that trivial if it interfered so drastically with his life.
Curious in its absence from this long-winded and very clearly self-written bio, which was penned in 2006, absent is any mention of him being a 33rd degree mason, any mention of any involvement with secret societies at all, any mention of the Illuminati, none of that is in there.
The only time the Vatican even comes up is when he says that, quote, the Vatican boys weren't happy with him hosting a rave in an old church.
If I'm being honest with you, I don't know what to make of all this.
My mind goes back and forth between thinking that his luck had run out with the club scene between 2006 and 2007, and it wasn't paying the bills anymore, so he decided to rebrand.
Then I also think it's possible that maybe he did way too many drugs, and he started to believe his own bullshit.
With the information available, there's no way to tell.
All I can say is that Leo Zagami is low-key one of the most interesting people who's ever been on an episode of InfoWars, and all of the things that make him interesting are literally never brought up in any of his appearances.
God, that means that there was a time in Leo Zagami's life where I would have totally wanted to hang out with him and listen to everything he had to say.
Just a few months back, New Interplanetary Melodies, an Italian record label, released the fourth in their series of Artist Spotlight mixes.
and it was about quote the legendary Leo Young I've listened to the whole thing and it's pretty serviceable I'm not sure any of it reaches the level of being a hit but none of it is stuff that if you heard in the clubs particularly like in the early 90s you'd be yelling for them to turn off yeah yeah yeah Leo Zagami is still an active DJ and what does gigs are you and you're talking about now like now like now now yeah like Al he's on his wife was hosted a Yeah.
When I stumbled into some of this stuff, like when I was looking into his history, all this stuff about like, wait a second, you claim that you secretly infiltrated Islam and all this stuff.
I'm like, this is a fascinating story.
And I'm like, hours into this rabbit hole.
And then I'm like...
Wait a second.
He claimed he's a DJ.
Is there any music available?
And I'd start looking into it.
I'm like, oh, he's not making that up.
It was just the craziest rollercoaster ride to go down.
I want to become American because Donald J. Trump is the president.
If it was another president, I would have probably renounced to this idea.
But the fact that Donald J. Trump is the president forced me to become American because he's the only president in the world that is opposing globalism.
I think Alex realized in the middle of the quote that it was a Spider-Man quote, and he tried to save it by throwing in another quote about power afterwards that wasn't related to what he was already saying.
What I'm getting at is Lord Acton sucks, and Alex only quoted him because what he wanted to say was a Spider-Man quote, and he didn't want to look stupid in front of Barnes and Leo Zagami, which on its own is incredibly sad.
Since the word's creation, it's been co-opted by a ton of occult weirdos, including Helena Bovlatsky and the Theosophical Society, and it's been adopted into all their mythologies.
It's the same thing with Lovecraft creating the fictional book The Necronomicon, when then a ton of real-world weirdos pretend it's a real book in a central part of their occult shenanigans.
There's a number of definitions out there for what counts as an egregore, but the general rule is that it's a thought form that's brought into existence.
Santa Claus is an egregore.
For the most part, the New Age and occult world's take on it is basically just dressed up versions of basic self-help ideas.
Basically just artistic expressions used to warn people not to let negative thoughts consume them lest they manifest those negative thoughts.
So that's sort of what you might call the mainline version of new agey and occult nonsense, but that's not how everyone understands egregores.
I found an interesting post about egregores on the blog of Nazi-friendly and explicitly white supremacist radio show Red Ice Radio, where the author discusses how a listener named George had told him about a conversation he'd had with a, quote, heiress of a rich Jewish banking family who was not the Rothschilds, although her family dwelled Oh, that's...
The article goes on to suggest that it's very possible that the elite Jews of the past created an egregore which serves them, which explains their world domination.
The article says, quote, My friend, you change a couple of words in that sentence and you got yourself an Alex Jones quote.
I found an identical post to this on David Duke's website.
A closer look revealed that this article wasn't actually written by someone who worked for Red Ice.
It was a reposting of an article that was originally posted on the website of a guy named Henry Macow, with a byline on it for Henry Macow, Ph.D. His Ph.D. is apparently in literature, so it's definitely a good credential for him to tout when publishing his rewrite.
Yeah.
Glimpsing around Macau's site, you get a pretty good sense of what he's all about.
His most recent post was, quote, Jews use immigration to divide and conquer.
A quick look through his archives shows the following headlines from pretty recently.
So Henry Macau runs a clearly deeply anti-Semitic website where he wrote an article in 2007 arguing that the Jewish god is an egregore that was caused to be created to destroy non-Jews, which was then widely circulated on very high-profile anti-Semitic...
Websites and media outlets like Red Ice, David Duke's website.
But why do I bring all this up?
It can't just be because I love saying egregore, even though I do.
In 2008, when Leo Zagami's wife left him after he went on Project Camelot, Leo reached out to Kerry to prove that he knew about that alleged Norwegian politician who had contacted her warning about Planet X. He was clearly looking for a rebooking on the show.
As evidence of his claims that he knew this Norwegian politician, he provided two letters that he'd written and sent to two friends wherein he'd mentioned to them that he knew the politician.
One of those two people was Henry Macau.
I'll read to you now from his letter from March 13, 2008, which I'll remind you is after Macau wrote his article accusing the Jewish religion of being based on a communist egregore named Lucifer.
Leo begins his letter, quote, Dear Henry, thank you for your continuous support and please forgive me if I could not reply earlier.
The letter is mostly about how his wife was secretly working for the Illuminati and that's why she left him.
And then awkwardly shoehorned into it are a couple references to this Norwegian politician.
The content of the message is less important than the clear, friendly tone of it.
He refers to Henry as my friend and dear Henry multiple times.
And he ends the letter fraternally yours.
Leo Zagami is listed as a source or reference in no less than 15 articles on Henry's website, dating back to 2007.
The two men have a long-standing relationship, and let me put it simply, egregore is not a commonly used word, and Henry seems to use it in one specific way.
Here are the headlines that come up when you search Henry Macau's website for the word egregore.
Quote, Purim.
Jews celebrate the slaughter of their opponents.
Quote, Jewish shakedown of Poland de-emancipates Jews.
Quote, Jews, the unloved people.
And then here's another one.
Quote, Leo Zagami.
December 12, 2012 starts seven years of tribulation.
That article is just bullet points of a Skype conversation that Henry had with Leo, and it includes this passage.
Quote, Leo mentioned the Kabbalist concept of the egregore.
Then it says in parentheses, see Macau, the god that serves elite Jews, with a hyperlink to Henry Macau's article about how they created an egregore.
All this is enough to be really fucking suspicious.
But, to add a little icing to the cake, I should tell you that Project Camelot was not the first high-profile interview that Leo Zagami did in his anti-Illuminati career.
In December 2006, he appeared as a guest on Red Ice Radio, the white supremacist show that reposted Henry Macow's article about the Jewish God being an egregore, which justifies anti-Semitism.
This, Jordan, is what you call way too many red flags.
So, I think that Leo, even on top of all of the interesting aspects of his life, is clearly involved with a lot of people who have...
Oh, shall we say, deeply anti-Semitic worldviews that they perpetuate.
He's a dear friend of Henry MacHouse from way back.
I don't think there's any conclusion you can draw other than some of that stuff is probably in his worldview.
And when he talks about egregores...
On Alex's show, it's clearly, it exists in the context of Henry Macau and the egregore accusation of the Jewish God being a creation out of the minds of elite Jews of the past in order to subjugate the world.
It's a con that, in much the same way burning coal releases gases that are destructive, burning this sort of coal, this sort of con, the byproduct that pollutes is that other people become much more stupidly hateful.
Yeah, that is probably a big part of what makes it so objectionable.
So there was all this efforts to sort of demonize America, and you get a sense for how important American history, American freedom, American liberty is all connected together.
That's the reason why the president had that ritualistic celebration yesterday, did so celebrating our military prowess, did so celebrating the spirit of our history, did so by celebrating all of the heroes and patriots over time who've done extraordinary things to keep the light of liberty alive.
And not only here in America, but around the world, because it's America that led the world.
Every other democratic country post-dates the American Revolution in any meaning.
No matter how much I like Barnes, But if my lawyer was sitting in between two people saying that Trump just exercised literally, using magic, literally, and I didn't say anything?
Well, I mean, the reason why InfoWars is targeted is for the same reason that all these sort of anti-American activities are taking place by people like Congressman Castro, by people like Congresswoman Omar, by people like AOC.
It's people who really don't love and believe in America because it's the greatest resistance to the efforts that they're trying to do.
So InfoWars is America.
InfoWars is Americana.
InfoWars is Independence Day.
InfoWars is July 4th because it reflects and represents Americana at its core, not just protects it.
So, you know, Julian Castro, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Ilhan Omar, they're all anti-Americans who don't love this country and actually working against the country.
Now, Robert Barnes, Alex Jones, Caitlin Bennett, they're all what America is really about.
Man, you know, if there were something really easily distinguishable to tell between the two groups, I think that would probably make what you're saying kind of overt.
President Trump talked about America forever, no matter what.
And I believe what he meant was the spirit of America will be here forever.
They can't crush it.
They can't kill it.
They can't destroy it.
They can't wipe it out.
Just as the idea of InfoWars will be here forever.
They can't crush it.
They can't destroy it because the audience continues to support it, because the audience continues to believe in it, because the audience keeps it alive by doing things like going to InfoWarsStore.com and supporting it in any and every possible way they can.
The thing is, I think in the present day, I recognize the stakes of the things he's saying.
And they become so serious that I allow Alex to really guide what I need to cover.
Whereas I approach this episode, since the Trump is doing an exorcism in his Fourth of July speech, is so goddamn stupid that I just allowed myself to be like, now what's interesting to me here?
How much do I know about Leo Zagami?
And it led me down these roads that are far less...
I mean, they're disturbing in some ways, but they're less awful.
I think I need to carry that with me in the future.
I think it's a lesson learned of, you know, don't shy away from the important stuff when Alex is being a dick about it.
But also trust that there's a better story to be told somewhere else than where Alex is pointing.
Because, I mean, at this point, if we're doing another episode on him being a complete and utter bigot who wants to start another civil war, it's like, everybody already knows.
You know, if he wasn't mixed up with people trying to rationalize anti-Semitism and he didn't have complete, real dicey, dubious history in his personal life, you almost think, God, I want to talk to that guy.