But this document that Alex is talking about, the International Institutions and Global Governance Program from the Council on Foreign Relations, that is a document that was released on May 1st, 2008, and has what appears to be a very scary title. For someone like Alex. If you actually read the document, the first thing that jumps out to you is that in the first paragraph, they literally say that the program is funded by a grant from the Robina Foundation, an organization I have literally never heard Alex bring up. That seems strange. Also, it specifies who's running this program, who's in charge of ushering it through. It's not David Rockefeller. David Rockefeller's not involved in this report at all. His name does come up, but only as some foundation with his name on it being like an attaché. Doesn't mean he's personally involved in this. As is always the case, Alex doesn't understand what a document is about. But he relies on being able to create fear out of a title that includes words like global governance. In reality, what that refers to here is not so much the creation of a world government, but the idea of managing an approach to issues that aren't isolated to one country or region. As the document explains, quote, "The program will take an issue area approach, focusing on arrangements governing state conduct and international cooperation in meeting four broad sets of challenges: 1. Countering transnational threats, including terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and infectious diseases; 2. Protecting the environment and promoting energy security; 3. Managing the global economy; and 4. Preventing and responding to violent conflict." They go on to explain that there's a variety of approaches that they are studying. Quote, A narrower, informal coalition of like-minded countries is basically a description of alliances. This is saying that it's possible that in some instances an organization like the UN might be best equipped to respond to a crisis, but in others, perhaps just countries on the same page would be best. That seems counter to the idea that this document is about establishing a one-world government. If you read the whole thing, it's about global cooperation, not global government. Governance is the word they chose to use, which sounds similar to government but doesn't mean the same thing.