Today, Dan and Jordan learn that, when you're listening to InfoWars, sometimes you're thinking "eh, what the fuck" like when Alex Jones complains about how Marc Maron wants to sodomize him. Other times, you're thinking "what the fuck?!?" like when Alex begins to describe his feelings about Somali pirates.
Yes, this is a surprising way to learn that we received a MacArthur Genius Grant, but it is, and apparently they've gotten a lot stingier over the years, but that's fine.
If you out there give out Genius Grants, or you just like what the show is and what we do, you can join up and support the show by going to our website, knowledgefight.com.
We have a little button there that says support the show.
And so he complains about chemtrails in a way that does not do it for me and I'm not interested in talking about for the first 40 minutes of the episode.
But the first clip we will hear Alex make some incredibly untrue predictions about his future.
The minute July 4th done and the new Obama film is released, I will launch immediately.
In two months, give myself three months because it takes a few weeks to have it mass-produced and mastered and shipped because this time I had the DVDs come in for Obama Deception the day it was released.
It actually came in some on the Friday before and then some on the Monday the 16th.
And then we had to get caught up.
It took us about a week to get caught up shipping.
Uh-uh.
This time, take this next Obama film.
We're going to have it done.
Let me think.
April, May.
We're going to have it done the first week of June.
We're going to have it a week and a half, two weeks before it's even released.
Here's a little secret.
We're going to have everything packed and ready to ship for people that have purchased it sitting in there, and we're going to start shipping it three days before the official release date.
So you literally get it.
UPS on average takes three days.
Some places four days in the U.S. You will get it on the release date.
That's what we're doing.
Same thing with this film.
We don't have time to screw around.
Who knows how long there'll be an internet?
Who knows how long we're going to be here?
They're openly announcing they're getting ready to shut down the web, cut it up, reduce it.
But, I mean, we have seen sort of shades of it before, so I don't think it means anything in terms of the timeline.
I think we're just seeing the evolution of it.
We're seeing the salesmanship get better, as maybe he directs himself more towards being a sales operation, as opposed to pretending to be a journalist of some sort.
So, after he talks to Sweeney, he gets Tyler Palmer in studio, and that's his Ecola Blue sponsor, the water filtration guy who has a Tatooine school bus water filter.
And in the middle of them talking about their water filters and how great they are and all that stuff, just doing an infomercial, Alex remembers that somebody on Air America was talking shit about him.
And this tickled me to no end.
Because you're going to be so excited to find out who this is on Air America who's been talking shit about Alex.
So, yeah, it's interesting that Alex lacks any context.
It's willful, though.
He just wants to say that that's what Marc Maron is saying as opposed to dealing with the, like, oh, he's accusing me of exaggerating my victim status and what have you.
So he's responding to this, and he's got Tyler Palmer just sitting there hanging out.
He's like, I paid for this time to come on and pimp my water filters, and you're just getting mad at this fucking junior varsity guy on Air America.
I don't know what's going on here, but Alex decides he's got to break down the entire clip of Marin.
Hold on, hold on, wait a minute, but this guy wants to rape me.
Back to him.
unidentified
In the name of b****.
To make themselves known to people.
They're misguided, and when they are charismatic, like someone like Glenn Beck or somebody like Alex Jones, and they're exploiting the damage of people who live in this world who are desperate, angry, and misguided.
That they become dangerous populist leaders.
They are the criminals.
If the FEMA camps are for anybody, it's for what these people will do when they think the end of the world is here.
Which, when we now see, or whenever they have the sort of cover to do it.
Yeah.
unidentified
Which we now see in late 2018 into 2019 with Alex's complete flipping on his position about Rex 84, his opening up to the idea of FEMA camps for immigrants and asylum seekers and stuff like that.
I think that was really about all that I found interesting in this episode, because the rest of it is dog shit.
He sits down with George Humphrey, but Alex even explains at the beginning of the interview, they're like, I'm having George Humphrey come in because we didn't get some stuff we needed for his interview on the documentary.
So he's just there to have him say some lines.
And it's really terrible.
He's talking about how he goes to a coffee shop, and a third of them are Democrats, a third are Republicans, and a third are Independents, and they're starting to turn on Obama.
I mean, they're coming out in ragtag ships to basically do battle.
With all their different stolen ships, like something out of a Hollywood fantasy movie, something out of Waterworld, to have a battle with the U.S. Navy.
These people are unbelievable.
And look how they ran off the Delta Force and the Army Rangers in Somalia.
You can even hear in there that he is defending the Pittsburgh shooter because he says he knows they're coming for the guns, not that he was acting out of paranoia that Alex had instilled in him through his constant exposure to these narratives.
So he knows that they're coming for the guns.
It's something we already covered when we talked about this more in depth.
Alex is dealing with this as like, it was a rational decision to kill those cops.
That's 90% of it, but 10% of it is, because he knows they're coming for guns.
He's just sick of life and sick of it all.
So he, just like the Somalis that have nothing to live for, he just goes ahead and starts killing.
You've got to be desperate and hardcore to be the Somali pirates steaming out to face down the U.S. Navy in fighter bombers, waving AK-47s in the air, ready to die.
So if you diagram that sentence, he's saying that, like, okay, so this Pittsburgh shooter was rational because he knew that they were coming for the guns.
They take over a bunch of boats, and because insurance stuff and all that, and the difficulties of trying to get the boats back by fighting and stuff like that, most of the ransoms are paid off.
And so these Somali pirates make tons, or at the time at least, before the problem was taken more seriously, they made tons of money.
So the women flocking to them is more...
A function of an economically depressed Somalia where there is an outlaw business where people are very, very successful.
So you're saying that these women who are with men in the Mexican cartels, they aren't attracted to the brutal, vicious nature of their business and their psychopathy, but instead they're attracted to the large sums of money that these guys get?
The idea that the government is trying to put out anti-gun propaganda and then it not working is evidenced by gun sales doesn't make sense.
But the idea that Alex is saying they're going to take your guns, you should get more, and people do buy guns, that is evidence that the propaganda is working.
So Alex is looking at this backwards and sideways and wrong.
But the reason he's doing it is in order to reinforce those same narratives that led the Pittsburgh shooter down the path that ended up in him murdering police officers.
So that's real cool.
I like that.
I say facetiously.
So I told you we're not going to talk much about chemtrails.
They say, oh, we're just testing it right now, testing the terraforming technology with all these giants.
See, that's the legalese.
It's like U.S. Code, Title 50, Chapter 32, Subsection 1520A, Paragraph B, states, oh, we can't do any chemical, biological, or radiological testing on the American people or the military without their consent.
Actually, it doesn't say anything about consent, and he's talking about paragraph A. It's actually the stuff about the prohibited activities, but go ahead, Alex.
We've talked about this before, but just because it bears bringing up how consistent his stupidity is.
Yes, there are these exceptions in paragraph B, but the exceptions begin subject to subsections C, D, and E. The prohibition in subsection A does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for the following purposes.
Subsection C says the Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection B only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.
So, the exceptions are actually Enclosed within the consent thing.
Just because you can say a lot of words in a row, and they do in fact correlate to a paragraph somewhere, does not mean that those words correlate to the paragraph to which you are thinking.
American men with big cats all over them, strutting around, no fear, bugging their eyes out, the little guy at the supermarket, but these big boys see a cop, they start urinating down their leg.
Alex seems to be fundamentally misunderstood about what the Somali pirates were doing.
Prior to this episode being recorded, and later on too, people from the New York Times and the Guardian, among other publications, did interviews with actual Somali pirates, and to a man, they all made it very clear that their only motivation was money.
They were committing these crimes just to extort the ransom money from the ships.
There was no grander political statement behind it.
They weren't trying to wage war with the ships or any government, and weren't fighting for freedom.
It was just a criminal racket.
That's all it was.
And this is super interesting, because what Alex has done in his head is transform this mafia activity into something grander, something that fits his fantasies about what he'd like to see his militia community engage in if they weren't so cowardly.
It should be noted that there were side benefits to the pirates' activities, but they certainly weren't the primary reason they committed their crimes.
Because they scared off a ton of fishing boat traffic, local fishermen were able to boost their yields, which was a real help to local economies.
Additionally, the ransom money the pirates received was infused into local communities, which in turn began to help them flourish.
None of this excuses sea piracy, and none of it was the reason that they got into privateering in the first place.
I mean, whenever you have an economically depressed region that is depressed economically by a, let's call it, exploitative behavior from others, and then part of that economically depressed region is like, holy shit, what if we just started stealing our shit back?
It's just more complicated than the black and white picture that Alex is presenting, although his version is like, it's the good side of black or white, which is weird.
So also, Alex, throughout these statements that he's making about these Somali pirates, he seems to think that they're the same people who fought the U.S. in Mogadishu in 93, but that's absurd.
Mogadishu is on the south coast of Somalia, whereas the piracy was mostly surrounding the Gulf of Aden, which is between the northern coast of Somalia and Yemen, and it's also 16 years later.
Sure, there may have been some overlap, like a couple of the pirates were veterans that took down that Black Hawk helicopter, what have you.
But it's crazy to think that it's mostly the same personnel or anything like that.
And he seems to be conflating those two things in his mind because...
Mogadishu is an embarrassment for the UN.
So I think that there's a possibility that he thinks that these are the same Somalians who...
You give him 12 hours to get out of the ports, and you destroy Somalia's ports.
I mean, do you think that's a bad idea?
unidentified
Well, I think personally what I would like to see first, I would like to see the restriction on merchant vessels having weapons be taken off and have it be a requirement that they have either armed guards on board or trained crews with weapons on board through high-risk areas.
And we should be commissioned by the Queen!
I would also like to see some kind of mechanism for trying the pirates, because this is also bogus.
So, I think Captain Sweeney is fairly right there, and especially the part about, no, you're going to end up killing people who aren't the pirates, which is evidenced by what happened recently.
And Alex's response to that is, he knows about that.
When Captain Sweeney brings up that Indian Navy taking out this Thai fishing boat, Alex...
Before Sweeney even says it, Alex knows what story he's going to bring up, which means that Alex is aware that if you do just indiscriminately go bomb all these places, you're going to end up killing tons of people who are the wrong people, and he doesn't give a shit.
It does kind of sound like also what he did was on the 9th started talking about Somali pirates and kind of got a little excited and then spent the rest of the night like watching YouTube clips and all.
I don't know what else to say other than it's like his ability to support and love white supremacists is restricted because when they kill people it's bad.
And they're saying that I made this white supremacist kill three cops and shoot two others when it's admitted it was a domestic dispute with his mommy kicking him out.
And it turns out the guy didn't like me and attacked me all over the web.
And they knew that.
So the issue here is that must mean we're really getting to him.
Within hours of these cops being killed, the Southern Poverty Law Center fed my name into the newspapers.
And then, of course, it turned out it was all a complete frame-up and a lie.
We know the Southern Poverty Law Center and ADL have been caught on record.
I mean, I have the mainstream news stories from the 80s and 90s creating and leading fake Nazi groups and trying to get violence.
I don't know if they're involved in this, but more and more, that needs to be investigated and looked into.
We were taken with it as well, and that's why we're going to go to Mr. Black right now.
Mr. Black, good to have you on with us.
Thank you.
Okay, you got the floor for the rest of the hour.
I don't want us to take much more time than that because I want you to be able to complete the interview that you've been gracious enough to do with us there in your offices.
William Black is a professor of economics and law at the University of Missouri, Kansas City, and has a deep resume in the world of finance.
He played a major role in mitigating the damage that was done during the SNL crisis, which, as he explains, he did by working against very harsh opposition to re-regulate the...
Earlier in the interview, Alex tried to characterize the hyperinflation that he's afraid of leading to the Weimar Republic-style hyperinflation, and Black disagreed with him.
So Alex is even just misrepresenting that there.
But two important things there.
Start that music cue right after he says crony capitalism, because that means one thing to Black and something else to Alex.
But he got the soundbite he needed, and then we're going to move along.
We got it.
That's great.
Second thing.
Alex in that clip very clearly demonstrates that he is aware that the National Socialists just called themselves socialists.
So like I said, they don't agree on pretty much anything, really, when you get down to the core of it.
But that's not entirely fair.
They agree about the description of the problem, namely that the banks and lending institutions were to blame for the 2008 financial crisis.
But I think almost...
Almost everyone agrees about that, save for the politicians who rely on donations from those sectors to fill their coffers.
So they agree on the description, but if you take a look at Black in his public statements, you'll see that he's not at all on the same page as Alex in terms of prescriptions.
One small caveat, though, they are in agreement that they need to put people responsible for the crisis on trial, and if necessary, send them to prison.
Alex probably is less interested in the trials part.
He seems to call for summarily locking up bankers quite a bit, but the two guys definitely are on the side.
These people need to face consequences.
But again, I think almost everybody who's not biased about the subject agrees on that, too.
They would be reticent to admit it or publicly acknowledge it.
So where do they differ?
Here's one piece of information that should tell you just about everything you need to know.
In the 2016 election, William Black served as an official economic advisor for the Bernie Sanders campaign.
The same Bernie Sanders that Alex does a killer impression of.
The same Bernie Sanders who Alex believes advocates economic positions that will lead the U.S. to collapse and becoming a totalitarian hellhole.
William Black is Bernie Sanders' economic advisor.
Crazy.
William Black's a pretty far-left dude, especially from an economic perspective.
His testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the financial crisis could not be more clear in its point that the crisis was a failure brought on by deregulation and not enforcing the regulations that do exist strongly enough.
In his Senate testimony, he explains that the repeal of Glass-Steagall was a big deal, but on the ground level, what was worse was how the Clinton administration, quote, implemented the Reinventing Government Initiative, which was hostile to regulation and enforcement.
We were instructed, pursuant to that initiative, to refer to and think of the industry as our clients.
That's a mindset that destroys effective supervision.
He goes on to spell it out, saying, quote, The most difficult aspect of the current crisis to contain was that roughly 80% of non-prime loans were made by entities not subject to direct federal regulation, primarily mortgage bankers.
All the regulators needed to do to prevent the crisis was ban lending practices that were rational only for control frauds engaged in looting.
The regulators consistently refused to do so because of their anti-regulatory ideology.
He goes on to say, quote, effective financial regulatory cops on the beat are essential to our ability to prosecute elite white-collar criminals.
Though economics is very complicated as a game, Black's argument is very simple.
There are tons of institutions that were engaged in what he calls control fraud, which is an idea that he pioneered, which is the idea that they take their institution and control it as an instrument of fraud.
The chief way that this fraud was done was in the form of stated income loans, or what the industry calls liar's loans, where the lender knows that the recipient of the loan doesn't have the ability to repay the loan and assists them in lying about their income.
According to Black's testimony, the incidence of fraud in stated income loans was nearly 90%.
So it's more complicated than this, but his basic point was that any institution that's engaged in stated income loans is pretty clearly doing so to commit a fraud, and should be on everyone's radar.
Because of deregulation and deprioritization of this form of crime in the late 90s and onward, the regulators were hamstrung in terms of dealing with this, which led to what amounted to a decriminalization of control fraud in the large financial institutions.
In that environment, there's no incentive to play by the rules, and doing so is actually a great disadvantage, which increases the likelihood that the behavior will become endemic.
The problems that William Black saw in the financial world were all things that he felt would be taken care of with regulation and regulatory follow-up, which Alex would not be in favor of.
He also advocated for tying professional compensation to a firm's, quote, demonstrated long-term performance, which is something Alex might be in agreement with unless the John Birch Society president is in the room at the time.
Okay, so his advice is instead of paying mortgage bankers a shit ton for doing something immediately and then dumping on it later, we should tie their income to long-term performance growth.
Because of things that were done during the Clinton years.
And he also makes a very salient point about the idea of needing to look at these situations outside of the context of politics.
And the idea of trying to blame some administration for X or Y or Z is foolish because you just need to deal with the problem as the problem.
And the problem is these institutions taking their ability to Yeah.
Yeah.
These stated income loans that he's talking about, which 90% of which were fraudulent, they were fraudulent at the direction of the lender, not the lendee.
Yeah.
unidentified
It wasn't – it was massively more – More prevalent for the person giving out the loan to coerce or be like, you should lie about your income and your ability to pay back this loan because they were lying about the security of these loans.
I don't know exactly the words they'd use, but it probably felt like that.
So anyway, I read over his Senate testimony for the Judiciary Committee, and that's a pretty fine distillation of a lot of what he's advocating for.
A lot of it...
It comes down to regulatory failure and a need for stronger regulations and enforcement of those regulations.
So I don't think Alex knows what he is into.
I don't know if Alex knows what William Black is about outside of having seen him do an interview with Bill Moyers where he talks about how the financial system is corrupt.
And Alex probably just took the surface-level things that he agreed with him about and assumed he must believe all the...
So you've listened to this whole interview, obviously.
Based on the way that Alex is talking so far, from what I've heard and can gather from their, like, tones of voice and whatnot, Alex probably does know more about him than just, like, a surface-level belief in his globalist stuff, just because he's clearly trying to get his soundbites.
I don't think he's read, like, what he was, like, specifically involved in during the SNL crisis.
Like, I really don't think he does, because if he does, if he did know those things, well, I guess it wouldn't serve his interests at all to debate him, because William Black's much smarter than him.
I think our mantra should be, not a penny more until we have a Pecora investigation started.
Pecora was the guy, experienced prosecutor that we brought in the Great Depression to say, find out the facts.
And the Wall Street fat cat hated him, detested him, fought him every step of the way.
But he found the facts.
He found the widespread fraud, and it led to many of the statutory changes that for 50 years worked so successfully in America until Wall Street finally got enough political juice to get rid of the laws right near the end of the Clinton administration.
Which, uh, it was a very interesting period right after the Great Depression where Pecora was bringing in these, like, bank heads and just fucking dunking on them in court and stuff like that.
Embarrassing them to the point where they had to resign and stuff like that.
The thing is that's interesting to me about this is that the system worked well enough in the aftermath of the Great Depression that the conclusion of the report of the Pecora investigation, if you actually go back and read it, it talks about how...
It lays out all the causes of financial misdealings, games that were being played by banks and lenders and stuff like that.
And then it explains like...
We don't really have recommendations because they have already been taken care of over the course of this investigation because by the time the investigation ended, Glass-Steagall had already passed along with other banking reform bills and stuff like that.
So the system even worked better then because during the investigation people were like, oh, this stuff is, oh, we're starting to learn stuff.
So this guy was finding these problems, and then when they found the problems, they were like, oh, let's do something about these problems, instead of being like, whoa, whoa, whoa.
What if we just rode out the investigation, and just saw where it landed, and saw maybe, I wonder if we could influence public opinion so that the investigation itself wouldn't even have mattered.
I bet we could wring another few years of as much money out of this as possible, and oh shit, Trump was elected.
But again, the important thing to remember is that when the Pecora thing came to a head and when the SNL crisis was dealt with, all of it was about regulation and re-regulation of markets that had fallen into negative patterns.
So for Alex to be having this guy on who's sort of like bread and butter and everything that he's advocated for kind of comes down to regulating markets, it doesn't seem like that's something that...
that Alex should be into.
But he is an expert, and thus Alex needs him to sign off on this idea that the collapse and the crisis that happened in 2008 was planned.
That's important for Alex.
So in this next clip, he tries to lead him down that road, and we'll see how Black responds.
That the people that remove these laws, because I remember seeing Senator Dornan and others say this was going to happen on the floor, but he was against it.
They knew from setting it up, from running it up to running it down, they fully knew, and this was premeditated.
I'm telling you that in the trade, everybody knew that if you made something called a liar's loan, It was because they were frauds, overwhelmingly, and that it was going to produce a disaster.
Now, Congress, of course, is paid not to know, right?
The bankers don't go in front of Congress and say, Hi, we want to produce a disaster.
Please take our money.
They tell Congress, Hey, we have this wonderful new thing, financial derivatives.
And everybody, which is to say us, you know, on Wall Street, says this is the greatest thing.
We need it because unless we have it, we can't compete with the German massive, what are called universal banks that can do anything.
So we have to get rid of every protection we've ever put in place in the United States so that our big banks can compete with their giant banks.
It doesn't mean that they intended for a collapse to happen just because they looked the other way.
Maybe some people had misgivings about looking the other way.
Maybe had a suspicion that something bad could happen.
Yeah, of course no one was like, hey, we're going to fucking destroy everything.
Of course not.
And having him on there, it's really interesting to see this.
That was definitely an attempt on Alex's part to get that soundbite he needed.
Him signing off on the idea of it being intentional.
But because Black knows things and understands things, he's like, well, On the part of the people committing the frauds on Wall Street, yes, it's intentional.
So I don't know who that Al-Qaeda member who's been killed 15 times is because he doesn't use any specifics, but he does talk about Chemical Ali.
Chemical Ali was the name given to Ali Hassan al-Majid, who was the cousin of Saddam Hussein, and also a guy who authorized indiscriminate use of chemical weapons on the Kurds in an attempt at genocide.
On June 24, 2007, he was found guilty of crimes against humanity and sentenced to death.
However, his execution was postponed, and the then president of Iraq was hesitant to sign the execution order over political reasons.
This was allegedly all cleared up on February 2008.
Chemical Ali was also sentenced to death on December 2, 2008, in a separate trial, this time for, quote, playing a role in the killing of between 20,000 and 100,000 Shiite Muslims during the revolt in southern Iraq that followed the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
He was also sentenced to death a third time on March 2, 2009, this time for the assassination of Grand Ayatollah Muhammad al-Sadir.
He's just been sentenced to death a bunch of times.
This is almost certainly what Alex is confused about.
But because he's an idiot and he can't read, instead of getting to the bottom of where his confusion stems from, Alex insists he's right about everything, and any deviation from that is proof of a media psyop.
It's pathetically childish behavior.
Chemical Ali was executed on January something, 2010.
I can't remember the exact date.
But that's the time that he died.
All the other times are Alex just misunderstanding different trials.
In the interest of total fairness, though, I should point out that there was a rumor that Chemical Ali was killed in Basra on April 6, 2003, but it was only that, a rumor.
I mean, we're caved in here, and I'm saying, let's dig our way out, and then people are arguing, going, I don't know, the ceiling's supposed to be six inches from the floor.
That was a protracted metaphor that he gave, and I agree it's convoluted as hell.
But what he's just trying to say is we're good guys, trying to help everybody, and everybody's punching me in the stomach, metaphorically.
Stupid.
Stupid.
I can't believe that he imagines that he is a force for good, but I can see that delusion.
But the idea that he, in his house-slash-mine metaphor, he's like, please stop, like, the idea that he thinks he's doing this politely is very bizarre.
But you should have heard there at the end, he says, Can't you tell this is a self-fulfilling prophecy?
Well, that's because he's talking about the Pittsburgh shooting.
The Pittsburgh shooting happening is a self-fulfilling prophecy because of what all of these gun grabbers are doing.
So, again, he's trying to justify the actions of this guy who killed cops and at the same time complaining about people who are saying that he's advocating for this.
This is your fault for putting out that MIAC report, reporting on people who will do things like this guy.
It's not my fault for sensationalizing that MIAC report, making guys who are in that MIAC report feel safe, and then saying that they should be fighting against you because the MIAC report's conclusions are correct based upon your behaviors that wouldn't have existed if you hadn't put out the MIAC report.
But this document that Alex is talking about, the International Institutions and Global Governance Program from the Council on Foreign Relations, that is a document that was released on May 1st, 2008, and has what appears to be a very scary title.
For someone like Alex.
If you actually read the document, the first thing that jumps out to you is that in the first paragraph, they literally say that the program is funded by a grant from the Robina Foundation, an organization I have literally never heard Alex bring up.
That seems strange.
Also, it specifies who's running this program, who's in charge of ushering it through.
It's not David Rockefeller.
David Rockefeller's not involved in this report at all.
His name does come up, but only as some foundation with his name on it being like an attaché.
Doesn't mean he's personally involved in this.
As is always the case, Alex doesn't understand what a document is about.
But he relies on being able to create fear out of a title that includes words like global governance.
In reality, what that refers to here is not so much the creation of a world government, but the idea of managing an approach to issues that aren't isolated to one country or region.
As the document explains, quote, "The program will take an issue area approach, focusing on arrangements governing state conduct and international cooperation in meeting four broad sets of challenges: 1. Countering transnational threats, including terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and infectious diseases; 2. Protecting the environment and promoting energy security; 3. Managing the global economy; and 4. Preventing and responding to violent conflict."
They go on to explain that there's a variety of approaches that they are studying.
Quote, A narrower, informal coalition of like-minded countries is basically a description of alliances.
This is saying that it's possible that in some instances an organization like the UN might be best equipped to respond to a crisis, but in others, perhaps just countries on the same page would be best.
That seems counter to the idea that this document is about establishing a one-world government.
If you read the whole thing, it's about global cooperation, not global government.
Governance is the word they chose to use, which sounds similar to government but doesn't mean the same thing.
And the report is very specific about this program being about studying these problems and the approaches that can be taken to them with a broad spectrum.
There are multiple paradigms, I guess, of organization that are being looked at, which does imply the possibility that just...
A country responding itself could be the right thing in many instances.
Which is just, I can't get over the humor of that as in being in Alex's documentary.
But we'll leave that aside for now.
Alex responded to him as someone who was trying to lead down paths and then just sort of gain credibility to his arguments by attaching them to William Black.
This is what happens when you internalize narratives like Alex Jones's.
What you do is you exclude people with actual expertise on issues.
And because they don't fall exactly in line with Alex's ideas about the Federal Reserve and that everybody crashed the economy on purpose, they are now Glenn Beck's.
They're controlled opposition.
When in reality, they're telling...
studied approach to what happened.
So what you do is you poison the well in more ways than one.
Like you ruin your own ability to look at the world really.
And then you also create, I don't know if you call it an oppositional defiance.
You have a built-in excuse for why the world doesn't...
And from that perspective, even if you take away the merits and just it being the right and just thing to do, in terms of social inclusion and stuff like that...
That alone is enough of an argument to be a damning indictment of just a mentality of exclusion.
Yeah.
It always will end up becoming...
It's a piece of paper that's folded over and then it gets folded again.
Also, I just remembered that someone sent me a message on my personal Twitter, and I forgot to check.
I saw a notification, but I didn't check it, and I apologize.
I will get back to you.
I never use my personal Twitter, and I'm probably going to just get rid of it because I haven't used it in forever, but I don't want that person to think that I'm ignoring them.