As for this Atlantic article, it's not announcing plans for Democrats to steal the election. This was an article about oral arguments that are being made before the Supreme Court in the Colorado case regarding making Trump ineligible to be on the ballot. The attorney representing the voters from Colorado was warning the court that if they didn't make a determination in a timely fashion, they ran the risk of creating a scenario where representatives in Congress had to, quote, This was a lawyer urging the court not to delay the decision because the consequences of not providing solid legal guidance could be a disaster. The House Democrats cited in this article all express a desire for the court to decide because, as Adam Schiff said of the alternative, quote, that would be a colossal disaster. We already had one horrendous January 6th. We don't need another. The point of this article is not that Democrats are announcing a plan to steal the election. It's reflecting an almost universal sentiment that the Supreme Court needs to make a decision on this, and if they don't, shit's going to be bad. The takeaway from this article is that the court can't dodge this. They just can't do that.