Claims: about boston lockdown

6 claims
Narrow claims Pick any combination. Press Enter to apply typed text.
Clear filters
Speaker
Target
Topic
Certainty
Claim text
Date range
04 Nov 2019
The Boston lockdown did not involve military control of civilian governance.

The second characteristic is military control of civilian governance. This did not happen in Boston. Massachusetts National Guard were allowed to partake in policing activities at the order of the governor, which is completely constitutional. And they were not in charge of normally civilian governmental roles. The chain of command and governmental structure remained unchanged from how things were on April 14th before the bombing.

28 Oct 2019
The Boston lockdown is a martial law exercise designed to exterminate 'Patsies' (conspiracy theorists).

Now, it's all a martial law deal on Patriot State that teaches to be good slaves. And they even have said later today on the menu, as part of your vacation, we will have a controlled demolition of an explosive. So be ready for that. And we'll kill any media we see following us because we're busy exterminating our Patsies right now.

28 Oct 2019
The Boston lockdown was not strictly enforced; people were free to leave their homes and businesses remained open.

You'll be able to see a few people because the shelter-in-place request was a request. It wasn't enforced. It wasn't like you have to stay in your homes. If you wanted to go out and about and enjoy, I don't know, Longfellow Park and just take the risk so you could see an empty park. You could. Multiple Dunkin' Donuts places were still open. Because Dunkin' Donuts is a goddamn institution in New England.