Claims: in media incentives

4 claims
Narrow claims Pick any combination. Press Enter to apply typed text.
Clear filters
Speaker
Target
Topic
Certainty
Claim text
Date range
08 Nov 2021
Media personalities like Tucker Carlson prioritize shocking twists over rigorous proof to satisfy an audience incentivized by the attention economy.

Folks like Darren or Tucker or Alex, for that matter, they don't really understand what it means to prove or demonstrate something. And I suspect a large part of that is because their audience, they don't incentivize them doing so. The attention economy that they profit off of is much more interested in shocking twists and surprise reveals. So it's easy to blow people's minds by pointing out that the head of the DC office used to be the head of the Detroit office and then take credit for having proven that the large events in both places were secret FBI plots. The actual content and arguments being made are meaningless, but they leave viewers with the feeling of having something was revealed to them.

02 Oct 2020
The Alex Jones media economy creates a perverse incentive structure where being disruptive is rewarded over substantive content.

But what is rewarded is when you go out and record yourself disrupting an event that someone you don't like is holding. This creates a perverse incentive structure where a struggling creator could easily be convinced that trying itself is not worth it because the things that get the most attention are the things that take You know, just being a dick. You just have to be a big enough dick in just an inappropriate enough situation, and you'll stand out. That's the economy of the Alex Jones media, and it's pathetic.