This highlights an interesting problem with Alex's rhetoric. I don't think he knows what martial law is, yet it's his primary fear and his branding. He seems to think that martial law is just any kind of law he doesn't like or rules or guidelines that he finds inconvenient. And that's not what martial law is.

I don't know how to put this more bluntly than Alex has no idea what point Nick Fuentes is making. None. He's drunk, and at this point, he seems to think that he's doing his show as opposed to being at a summit of invited speakers. He's not paying attention, and he just interrupts Nick to get his talking points in, which is embarrassing. Nick is expressing a very interesting dynamic, which is that free speech is not in the interest of those controlling power, particularly when their primary reason to pursue power is to gain more power or hold on to that which they have. It's one of the main reasons that the First Amendment is there and why we need this freedom to be considered sacrosanct in our culture. Because if it wasn't, and true free speech rules were up to the whims of random elected politicians and officials, they'd probably have been gone long ago. It's, you know, it's important. The whole thing was in response to that fucking king being a dick. Uh-huh. I don't think Alex even understands the point that Nick is making.