Pam Bondi "Girl-Boss" Fail! "Gunperson in Dress" Mass Shooting in Canada! Trump Immigration W & MORE
Pam Bondi’s chaotic handling of Epstein files—redacting abusers’ names while exposing victims’ details, deleting prosecution memos, and dismissing critics like Thomas Massey as "failed politicians"—reveals either incompetence or sabotage amid the DOJ’s partial compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Meanwhile, Canada’s media botched a school shooting narrative, initially calling the shooter a "gun person in a dress" before correcting to a transgender teen, sparking outrage over perceived bias and privacy concerns like Google’s access to Nest Cam footage. The episode ties these failures to broader distrust in institutions, from Trump’s waning immigration support post-2026 agent shootings to radical gender policies allegedly harming children. [Automatically generated summary]
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, in a throwback to my childhood and the commercials that came from the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-day Saints, they made some good ones.
I have remembered this one for my entire life, and it might be something that others should listen to, watch, digest, and make part of their own core memories as well.
When you tell one lie, behold.
Missed the entire beginning part.
He says, How can I go to that movie?
How can I go to that movie?
I know.
I'll say you've got to go to gyms to finish your science project.
That's a good lie.
When you tell one lie, it needs to a nuts.
Tell two lies to cover each other.
Then you tell three lies.
Oh, brother, giving trouble up to your ears.
So you tell four lies to try to protect you.
Then you tell five lies to folks won't suspect you.
Then you tell six lies and then you collect a life full of worries and fears.
So you lie and lie without even trying.
And you try, you tell, will be multiplied.
And you'll be suspected, rejected, disliked, and you shot.
When you lie, you're closing the door on everything good.
I'm not going to Jim's really.
I just want to go to a movie.
I'll never lie again.
Honest.
That's good.
Are you all right?
There's no such thing as a good lie from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Mormons.
Now, I'll tell you one thing.
That kid's a terrible actor.
I really wasn't believing his coming to the moment of realizing that lies were bad.
He didn't sell me on it.
The song has stuck with me since I was a child.
Easily, that is a 1988 ad.
If anybody can fact check that while we're watching.
And it was a great one.
And it was a great message.
When you tell one lie, it leads to another.
When you tell two lies to cover for the other, then you tell three lies.
And oh, brother, you're into something up to your knees.
You can't keep track of them anymore.
And the idea that people seemingly have forgotten the age-old basic thing, don't lie.
I mean, there's no such thing as a good lie.
You know, tell your, I don't want to say wife that she looks good when she doesn't, because my wife always looks good.
You don't need to tell someone they're ugly.
They have, you tell someone they've got food in their teeth to avoid further embarrassment for them.
But you can tell your kid, no, we can't go to the store because the store is closed.
It's a lie.
I mean, when the kid grows up and finds out that you were lying to him, you might have some other problems.
But I'm watching this and I'm seeing actually how the chat is interpreting about whom I'm talking when I posted this.
The funny thing is when you post things on the internet and when they're sort of like, you know, the ambiguous posting where you don't tag the person about whom you're thinking when you make the post, everybody reads it through their own blinders.
People read this as maybe potentially trans drugs mind.
You're lying to a child when you tell a boy he can be a girl.
He can transition out of the sex that God gave him.
And whether or not you don't believe in capital G God, just believe in lower B biology.
Am I talking about kids?
No, I'm not.
I'm actually just talking about Howard Luttnick.
And again, not in the judgmental, you must resign Howard Luttnick because you told a lie.
People are just A, incapable of telling the truth when they know it might not allow for them to get the result that they want.
And then they lie.
And then Howard Luttnick, in that interview with Miranda Devine, says, I met Epstein once, one and done.
It was a creepy thing.
He talked about the right kind of massage and I never saw him again.
Boom.
Oh shit, is it embarrassing when the information comes out that you took your family to visit him on an island?
And then you have to come and then you have to answer questions during these congressional hearings or whatever they are.
And it distracts from everything.
And then you've got to say, yeah, you know, oh, I'm remembering a few more things.
I didn't remember when I told Miranda Devine, the journalist in that interview, that I took my family to his, we don't even need to call it a pedo island, but to his island after that very bizarre encounter.
Now then people say, well, he wasn't under oath, so it's not a lie worth it, doesn't matter.
It's embarrassing.
It's a distraction.
When you're supposed to be out there talking about the economy, you end up having to talk about Jeffrey Epstein and your lies.
And it's a lesson.
I say, like, you know, when kids grow up to be adults and they haven't learned the proper lessons of childhood, they turn out to be, I won't use hyperbolics or swear words because I said I wouldn't.
They turn out to be jerks or mildly dysfunctional adults.
I often do say, you know, if a child doesn't change their behavior in adulthood, like if you just say you take the behavior of an 11-year-old child in a 30-year-old adult, they're assholes.
They're people that generally nobody wants to hang around and generally are regarded as pathological.
The movie Step Brothers, it's a great movie.
I think it's one of the funniest movies ever.
What makes it so funny is I realized that I'm watching this movie, like, oh my goodness, this is as though the script was designed for 11 to 13 year old boys.
And they said, we're going to make it funny by putting 30-year-old adults, 40-year-old adults, or however old they were.
And that's what made them absolute dysfunctional jackasses of adults.
They were nothing more than 11-year-old boys in the bodies of 30-year-old adult males.
Don't lie.
Period.
It's a very easy rule to live by.
And if you lie, expect to get outed one day.
Now, with that said, people, good afternoon.
How goes the battle?
Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, turned to current Florida Rumbler.
And we have got some stuff to talk about.
Some of it's going to be fun/slash funny slash irritating.
And others of it is going to be tragic.
And arguably, but not arguably, the result of encouraging lies in children.
When the adults haven't learned the lessons and then they pass on the wrong lessons to children, yes, telling a boy that he can become a girl is a lie.
Telling a girl that she was born in the wrong body and can become a man, a boy, is a lie.
Saying that there's no biological differences between boys and girls is a lie.
And when you lie, disastrous consequences come.
When you jack up people with foreign hormones and you mutilate their bodies in an irreparable manner, terrible things happen.
And we're seeing them out of Canada now.
But before we get into the show, make sure that we're live across vivabarneslaw.locals.com, where we have some of the best memes of all time.
And I want to show you this one right here.
This is Fantastico.
That's me.
That's actually me if I now, the hand is way too big.
Hand is way too big.
Fingers are not pudgy enough.
Kind of look like Passion Warrior says, Don't worry, Viva, your beard will look like this in just a week or so, right?
Nah, give it a couple of weeks.
It'll come back.
Still feeling young, naked, not ugly, but I'm forcing myself to smile.
Okay, people, let's talk about one thing that I didn't get.
The ambiguity posting.
I said I wouldn't swear, but sometimes it just gets so frustrating living on the internet.
And maybe that's the time when you're supposed to take a break from social media.
Here, I just want to bring it up yesterday.
Now I can talk about it because Barnes talked about it during yesterday's Bourbon with Barnes.
And I might post the clip to that for those who are not a member of our viva barneslaw.locals.com community.
Here, I can tell you who I'm talking to here.
Probably Mike Davis in particular and anybody else on the internet who says, Viva, you should really drop Barnes.
His TDS is over the top.
Oh, Barnes is Barnes.
I liked Barnes when he was right about COVID.
I liked him when he was right about Alex Jones.
I liked him when he was right about the weaponization under the DOJ, but I don't like him now because he says things that upset me now.
He's now critical of this administration and it upsets me, so I don't like him anymore.
If you only followed somebody because they said what you already believed or said what you liked, congrats, disingenuous, and you are the one who is intellectually dishonest.
But I am so flipping fed up with people suggesting that Barnes is taking me down or that I would be better off.
Barnes, you meet people throughout your life.
And let me take the swear word out.
I said I wasn't going to swear over New Year's, but I'm doing it anyhow.
You meet people throughout life.
And if you're lucky, you can amass 12 people who you can rely on, whose judgment you can trust, and who you can have faith in until evidence to the contrary.
People change.
I don't know.
Hypothetically, people have mental breakdowns.
People get addicted to drugs and chemistry changes.
One of them should be your spouse that you get married to and touch wood, everything works out properly.
You stay married for the rest of your lives until death de apart.
The other one is your own parents.
If you are fortunate enough, or at least not disfortunate to have dysfunctional parents, you have parents that you can rely on, have nothing but your best interest in their heart, in their heart of hearts.
A good father, a good mother will never have anything but the truest, sincerest, bestest interests of their children above and beyond their own.
I am not marrying Barnes, but I will say this because I did do commercial litigation.
Guys, this is a long-winded way of saying I'm getting divorced and I'm coming out of the closet and Barnes and I are getting married.
That's a joke.
But I've long said that what makes for a successful relationship, in as much as I can been married for 2007, so we're going on 19 years.
It's either 18 or 19 years.
The hell's my problem.
If it's 2007, so that's 2017 is 10, and then that's three to 20, and then six, that's 19 years.
You know, it's not advice.
It's not lecturing.
I'm not able to teach anything.
I've just, in my own life, discovered that what I find makes for a successful marriage makes for a successful business relationship, corporation, partnership, minus the sex.
If you end up having sex with the people you do business with, shit's going to go down and it's not going to end well.
But what makes for a successful marriage is always giving your spouse the benefit of the doubt, never minimizing their contribution while maximizing your contribution.
It's the easiest thing to do is build resentment.
Say, you didn't do X, Y, and Z, and I did A, B, and C, and I contribute more than you do, and you don't contribute enough.
I might say that because I probably recognize that my wife contributes, I would say probably more in certain respects, but we each have our respective lanes in a marriage.
But when you start to minimize, take for granted, that's when things go sour.
When you start to count pennies, that's when things go sour in marriages and in business.
Now, when you meet someone who's utterly trustworthy and whose judgment is not just good, but insightful, and their wisdom is beyond your own, it gets a little irritating.
And now, so I said on the internet, because we're going to get into this, it's absolutely wild.
While my New Year's resolution was not to swear on Twitter, and I think I've been pretty good for the last six weeks, but to everybody now who is trying to sow Discord, and it's an S-E-W, not S-O-W, between me and Barnes, I say this somewhat apologetically and totally.
I say this somewhat apologetically and totally unapologetically.
You and the traitorous horse you wrote in him.
I don't get involved in relationships transactionally or out of convenience, and I don't turn on good people because of public pressure.
There are few people whose judgment, guidance, and wisdom I trust more than Robert.
Dirty Laundry Revealed00:14:34
And there are even fewer people to for whom I would say this.
So rest assured, if you're one of those people trying to sew there, see, I spelt it right there.
That Discord, know that I see you, know that I hear you.
And know that I tell you to fuck off.
Crap, I broke my New Year's resolution.
Now, why is this?
Barnes is a big boy.
He picks his fights.
Sometimes he picks fights that I wouldn't pick.
And he's picked a fight with Mike Davis.
And Mike Davis, let me actually make sure that I don't mangle his role within the administration.
What is Mike Davis' role in Trump admin?
I'm just going to get this.
I sometimes memory fart.
Mike Davis, prominent conservative lawyer, founder of Article 3 Project.
He's not holding any official position inside the current administration.
Davis publicly stated in late 2024 he was not joining the administration and was not under consideration.
That said, he maintains significant influence in Trump's orbit, particularly on legal and judicial matters.
He's been described as a key legal advisor and one of Trump's most vocal public defenders.
Well, that we've seen.
Well, that would explain why he gets to swear so much on the internet.
His close ally, Stephen Kenney, formerly with the RNC, was appointed to in 2025 to the White House counsel's office specifically to advise on judicial nominations.
Reports and interviews, including whatever.
The Article 3 project has shared lists of potential judicial picks.
Yada, yada, yada.
All right.
Barnes has picked his fight with him.
And then I noticed yesterday that, you know, there's things that cross certain lines, even if the information is technically public.
But there are things that you just shouldn't do.
And you just, that are just outright wrong to do.
One of which is posting someone's, you know, what I presume they thought was their address.
Oh, crap.
Hold on one second.
Let me see this here.
Link to tweet with one of which is, you know, when Laura Loomer posted an SEC filing that provided the address of Riley Gaines.
I said, this is, it's dirty.
You don't do it.
Period.
Doesn't matter if it's public information.
You know, public information, you can go to courthouses and pull up stuff.
Then to put them on blast and not redact what is not necessary information, you can question people's intentions for doing it.
Won't change anything if they did it out of malice or out of incompetent stupidity or whatever.
The outcome is the same, especially when, specifically with that incident with Riley Gaines, where you know that people are very angry at Riley Gaines and looking to dox her, looking to harass her, potentially worse.
Mike Davis posted this as if it was some sort of gotcha on Barnes.
In response, Barnes says, it's well known in antitrust circles what a SCSI lobbyist.
I repeat this with no knowledge of it.
I don't have the insider information.
And Barnes is a big boy and makes sure that he knows what he's saying when he says it and, you know, has a good track record for that.
It's well known in antitrust circles what a SCSI lobbyist, Mr. Diem, is in betraying MAGA voters for his secret corporate clients, paying him as much as $1 million per to derail populist initiatives.
That's why Davis runs interference for Bonte and Blanche continuing screw-ups, which we're going to get to in a bit.
And now just Matt Stoller's tweet says, Dave, Davis used to have credit in MAGA world until he kept denying there was anything in the Epstein files.
Then even MAGA people realized he was shilling for Bonte to keep his various lobbying clients happy.
He'll probably get a pardon.
Don't know if his clients will, though.
Then we get Barnes.
Then we get Mike Davis getting personal and getting dirty.
Your rogue DOJ buddy knows you're dumb enough to manipulate like this, Robert.
Just about no one else listens to this person.
Whether or not that's true, I happen to think it's false.
But even if it's true, not listening to wise men makes you dumb.
That's actually good.
Write that down.
And then, when it gets below the belt in a way that, you know, now that I know that he's not a formal official member of the Trump administration, the potential consequences for doing something like this might be different, legally speaking.
I don't think there's any legal consequences, but if they were members of an administration, you can make arguments of meaningful doxing/slash harassment.
If this were, in fact, anyone's current address, which it's not.
By the way, Barnes, is this your tax lien?
You have money to donate to Bernie and act blue, but not to pay your taxes.
And then he shows a lien, which from what I understand is was accurate.
Barnes talked about it on the Burden with Barnes yesterday and says, you think it's going to be an own to tell me that I fought the IRS and what they were claiming from them?
You think that's an own?
And Barnes says, that's, I'm proud of that, bro.
He said, bro, I don't use that word because the kids use it these days.
But posting that, presumably, if you thought Barnes still lived at that address, you know, that's, that's, that's beyond dirt.
And that's beyond dirty.
And there are many reasons for which people can have liens, one of which is contesting IRS decisions.
Another could be weaponized IRS, just hypothetically.
And it was dirty.
It was wrong.
And then people see that and then come to their own stupid conclusions.
And then people come see that.
Oh, my goodness, a man with a lien.
Holy crap.
Like, like the IRS has never abusively gone back and audited people and then made back claims of hundreds of thousands of dollars for what you ought to have paid in taxes.
As Mike Davis, you know, whether or not he's shilling for Bondi in the DOJ, coming out and saying, shut your filthy mouth, pleb, and pay more in taxes to the IRS.
Oh, yeah, dude, that's not the own.
That might be thank you for doing the promotion that A, Barnes might be targeted by a weaponized DOJ, which oddly enough, he's talking about these days.
And B, fights the IRS, both for his clients and for himself, presumably, and might even get targeted because of his advocacy for his clients, such as Alex Jones, Ralph Nader, Wesley Snipes, and others.
Dirty.
It's dirty.
Mighty Piss says last night's Burden with Barnes was awesome.
Go check it out.
I might post a clip to whet the appetite of everyone so they can understand what goes on at our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
It was dirty.
It was overtly wrong.
And it was arguably, but not arguably an attempt to dox Barnes.
I mean, as if anybody people think you're like, oh, you can go get that information.
Yeah.
And when someone who gets it blasts it on the internet, dirty, dirty and wrong.
And now between the fight of Mike Davis and Robert Barnes, I know which side I'm tending to think is the right side in all of this.
And that's all I have to say about that.
Let me just do one thing here, and then we're going to get to some tips before we get into the next story of the day, which is girl boss failure, Pan Bondi.
It's amazing.
I'm like, I'm doing a poll.
I have to, I'm going to.
It's amazing that people are posting clips of Pan Bondi, thinking it makes her look good.
And it's the usual suspects, and I'm not going to accuse anyone of shilling.
Everyone's got their blinders.
Everybody's sort of taking their position already.
I say this.
Let me set this as a standalone phrase.
There is a difference between bias and judgment.
And bias means you come in with a foregone conclusion to fit to changing circumstances.
Judgment is when you change your mind or reassess based on additional facts that have come in.
I have zero bias against Bondi.
If anything, I would have had a bias for Bondi because I have a bias for Trump.
And I'll say a bias, but I'll predicate it by saying it's not a bias either.
Back in 2016, 2015, you know, I was on the fence.
I said it would be great to see Trump and Bernie duke it out for the presidency.
Two quasi-populist, anti-war, anti-foreign intervention, which may or may not be as much the case these days.
It would be great to see them battle against each other and have to sharpen their own political ideas against one another for the betterment of America.
And then there's a, you know, I've got a picture where I had a Bernie mug because someone got me a Bernie mug made in America.
And they think it's an own.
There was a lot of overlap between Trump and Bernie back before Bernie sold his soul to Clinton and back before Trump reassessed the need for certain foreign interventions.
But let's set that aside.
People watch these videos and I cannot understand how they see what they claim to see.
Some would say, you know, they are clearly pro-administration and are going to try to spin things for the benefit of the administration.
And that's fair game.
We'll get to that.
And then we're going to get to Canada.
But now, before we get into any of this, let me just see what's going on in the chat on Viva.
Oh, hold on.
Get this out of here like this.
And all right, good.
I think we just got raided.
Did we just get raided?
Yeah, we did.
The quartering has raided.
Thank you, Jeremy.
This out of here, like this.
And now let's see what's going on here.
All right.
Oh, I saw something.
You see all the victims in the room standing there with their hands raised, and she ignored them.
We're going to get into that in a second.
Let's just get into that right now.
I got to stop looking at that meme of me stroking my fake beard.
Today was a hearing with Pan Bondi before.
You know, these things are always dog and pony shows.
They're always just grandstanding and they're always irritating to watch.
But sometimes the recipient of the grandstanding does better or does worse than others.
Lutnick, you know, despite his lie and everything, you know, he did good.
He's a charismatic speaker to some extent, which I think some people get used to.
And then thinking, well, I'm a charismatic speaker, so I can say things that aren't exactly true and no one's going to catch me and they'll never catch up with me.
And then, lo and behold, that hammer falls at some point in time, and then you're humiliated.
And people are always going to say, oh, is he lying to me now?
So these things are always grandstanding dog and pony shows.
But the news of the day is, we're getting the live updates.
Bondi clashes with Democratic lawmakers in heated questioning on Epstein files.
President Donald Trump met with Israeli prime minister.
That's going to, what's it?
Is it the seventh time visiting Trump or visiting?
How many times has he visited?
Let's just, let me just get this right now, just so we don't make any mistakes.
How many times has Netanyahu visited Trump in his first year of presidency?
Let's see.
I think it's seven.
It's either seven or nine.
Benjamin Netanyahu, now we've got okay, okay, the second term.
Stupid.
It's seven times.
Nothing's going to quell concerns.
Benjamin Netanyahu has visited Donald Trump during his second term starting January 20th, 2025, seven times in face-to-face meetings, with the seventh occurring today.
All right.
So they're meeting lawmakers.
And Here, this is when we want to.
Why don't I take this back up?
Some uh, you know, what to know.
Pam Bondi, attorney general.
Pam Bondi has repeatedly clashed with Democratic Democrats and the House Judiciary Committee during her testimony.
We're going to get to it during her testimony at a Justice Department oversight hearing as they ply her with questions.
That's probably not the right word you want to use.
Stupid people.
Ply typically means get someone drunk so you can take advantage of them about the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein records.
Mastie blasts redactions.
Survivors attend the hearing.
Trump Netanyahu meeting.
Yada yada.
New poll.
Not that I trust it, but support for Trump's immigration agenda is in free fall in early 2026 after federal immigration agents shot and killed two of them.
Wow, this is framing that you just, I don't believe the polls.
I do believe that that's true, but the framing is just, you know, oh, it's falling after the Trump administration brutally kills two American citizens.
No further context needed.
The dumbed-down electorate, certainly on the Democrat side, thinks that these were two innocent people, that these were just, you know, overt slangs in the streets.
Doesn't matter.
That's what's going on.
Now, I'm not going to go through the entire thing.
I was listening to it at, you think it's annoying to watch the highlights.
I was listening to it at 2X, and I'll say one thing: people are posting clips and highlights, and I think they think it makes her look good.
And I don't know how they think that.
And I say this without bias against Bondi.
I was indifferent to her coming in.
I didn't have enough knowledge of her to determine or predict whether or not she would be a good or bad AG.
I did want Matt Gates, thought he would be much more of a bomb thrower, you know, that you'd actually have meaningful arrests.
So I had no bone to pick with Pam Bondi before she got in, but my opinion changed.
And I've, you know, enumerated the reasons repeatedly: persecution of Roger Veer, Bitcoin Jesus, not pardoning, dropping that case, the persecution of Douglas Mackey, Ricky Vaughan for the meme.
He had to get exonerated on appeal.
The continued persecution of Dr. Kirk Moore, which they only dropped after a week of the trial, Pfizer Bondi.
What else?
Second Amendment issues, First Amendment issues, and then the Epstein thing came into play.
So now I think she's thoroughly corrupt and thoroughly incompetent.
I think Trump's admin would be better off replacing her to the extent that they can.
And I think they have methods of doing that.
But people are posting this.
Chief Nerd, I don't know, he says, AG Pombi, Pam Bondi just put Jamie Raskin in his place.
Quote, you don't tell me anything, you washed-up loser lawyer.
You're not even a lawyer.
You can let her filibuster all day long, but not on our watch.
Not on our time.
No way.
I told you about that, Attorney General, before you started.
Failed Lawyer Quotes00:15:56
You don't tell me.
Oh, I did tell you because we saw what you did in the Senate.
Not even a lawyer.
Committee will be in order.
We will give you a few more seconds.
I said that already.
45 seconds.
Okay, I'm timing right now.
Is there anybody on earth that watches that and says, well done?
Don't tell me.
Attorney General, before you start.
You don't tell me.
It's not possible.
I refuse to believe that anybody looks at that and says, holy crap, Apple, she just owned Jamie Raskin.
And the problem is, when you can't own Jamie Raskin, I jokingly call him Ratskin because he makes me.
When you can't own Jamie Raskin on the merits, you've lost.
And it was one, you'll notice a trend.
It was a diversion of answering the legit questions with the most juvenile ad hominem.
You don't tell me you're a failed lawyer.
When it comes to Massey, he's a failed politician.
You're not even a lawyer.
First of all, you don't need to be a lawyer to be the attorney general.
You don't need to be a doctor to be head of HHS.
So don't drop stupid leftist talking points that you think own anybody when it's the exact arguments that were used by the left to undermine the people of Trump's administration who are actually doing amazing work.
Is this the longer clip of it?
Here, let's listen to this one.
This is Disclose TV.
Pan Bonte.
Another diversion.
And appreciate it.
The question is about, when Massey asked the question, we're going to get to it, about Epstein.
But, you know, instead of talking about Gerlaine Maxwell, who hopefully will die in prison, hopefully will die in prison.
I'm talking about Irina Zarutska.
I have a couple who died on a subway.
Right.
And I absolutely.
You don't talk about that.
I have been talking about it and actually helping with these issues.
But we're going to move back to you.
I bet we are.
Yes, of course, because you're here to testify.
I bet you are.
Look, you don't have to give people good arguments.
You could actually have proper retorts and then make them look stupid for maybe pulling hairs.
I bet you're going to come back to it.
Yeah, that's why you're there to answer questions.
It's not picking on you.
You're the person of the hour, the girl boss of the hour.
That's what the whole point of this endeavor is.
So of course we're moving back to you.
It is all about you.
So as we've heard, she took the fifth in response to every single question in that committee hearing.
And her lawyer dangled the offer of clemency.
Should Donald Trump pardon or commute her sentence?
Should she be released from prison?
Yes or no?
You said you hoped she dies there, so I'm hoping the answer is no.
I already answered that question.
Good.
I'm very glad.
I really like this bipartisan agreement about you.
But you don't want to talk about Irina Zarutska.
You don't want to talk about her violent crime, but I am not here to testify before Congress.
You are.
That is your job today.
But you're getting obsessed with attack.
Obsessed with attack, total diversion, and not actually answering any meaningful question.
But let's get to the some of the diversions, which are absolutely so insane that you watch it and you laugh, except you might want to cry.
Remember, when we had, we had Scott Besant, who was up and Van Hollen.
Let me take this back out.
Scott Besant, Treasury Secretary, I believe, was up there talking about, you know, he's up there for the economy.
And you got Van Holland, the man who went down to El Salvador to have Margaritas with Kilmar Abrego Garcia, asking Besant about something totally unrelated.
Oh my gosh, I want to brain fart in terms of what he was asking them about.
Oh, it was about Epstein.
My bad.
And he's like, I'm here to talk about the economy and you're asking me about Epstein.
And now listen to this when you have Pan Bondi, AG, presumably up there to talk about Epstein and other things.
What does she want to talk about?
The Dow, the Dow right now is over.
The Dow is over $50,000.
I don't know why you're laughing.
You're a great stock trader, as I hear, Raskin.
The Dow is over $50,000 right now.
The S ⁇ P at almost $7,000.
And the NASDAQ smashing records.
Americans' 401ks and retirement savings are booming.
That's what we should be talking about.
We should be talking about making Americans safe.
We should be talking.
Should be talking about making Americans safe after you, as Attorney General, are talking about the Dow.
Remember, Jamie Ratzkin is a failed lawyer, and now she's attacking him on the trading stuff as if insider trading is not sufficiently a bipartisan issue.
So, yes, you want to go on insider trading and go after politicians for insider trading, Pam.
You would be welcomed with open arms by lots of members on the right.
We should be talking about American safety.
So, let me talk about the booming stock market, you know, where however many tens of millions of Americans don't even have enough money to invest in that booming stock market.
You talk about prioritizing the wrong people, the wrong entities, the donor class and not the citizen class.
And then you talk about the Dow Jones and the market when you're up there facing an ongoing debacle in the Epstein files.
I don't know who looks at that and says she owned them with that diversion.
Talking about, what does a Dow have to do with anything?
That's what they just asked.
Are you kidding?
Mr. Jordan, am I?
Mr. Jordan, I do have to ask you, what does the Dow have to do with your role as Attorney General?
I'm not kidding.
What's the answer?
There is no answer.
It's performative rubbish of the highest order.
And if I didn't know any better, you know, I might think that she was put up for that failure, much like Joe Biden was put up for his debate failure, so that there could be a damn good reason to replace Pam Bondi with someone who might do the job of an attorney general.
But wait, there's more.
And I saw the comment.
Why are you torturing us with this stuff?
Because it's important.
This is the one with Thomas Massey, where I had a run-in with Johnny MAGA back in the day.
I said, I can't take anything the account says seriously.
And I believe this is going to be more confirmation to that.
It's funny, actually.
You can go back and find that tweet.
I said, well, now I know I can't take anything that comes out of this account seriously or accurately.
And the caption to the video.
And again, by the way, that's not bias.
I'm not biased against Johnny MAGA's Twitter account.
I have now exercised my good judgment based on prior, well, prior experiences of neoplasma, based on my experience, to have come to a conclusion that what comes out of this account is partisan crap.
And the description, and you'll watch the video and you'll tell me if I'm right or wrong.
Spoiler, there's only one answer to that.
I'm right in this particular case.
Pam Bondi claps back at hysterical, rabid Thomas Massey.
Quote, you have Trump derangement syndrome.
You're a failed politician.
Fire emoji?
All right, so Ratzkin is a failed lawyer, successful business trader.
They're not going after insider trading that I know of yet.
Thomas Massey is a failed politician who's one of the two politicians that actually got this bill signed into law that compelled the disclosure.
And he's got Trump derangement syndrome.
Let's hear hysterical, and I put it in quotes, rabid, and I'll put it in quotes, Massey.
He didn't sound hysterical or rabid to me.
And I've got nothing for Massey and nothing against Massey.
I'll respond and then the gentleman can move to share questions.
Within 40 minutes, you asked me a question.
Within 40 minutes, Wexner's name was added back.
Within 40 minutes of me catching you red-handed.
Red-handed.
There was one.
You have to understand that.
He had asked the question.
I'm sorry, I probably should have prefaced this with a little context and explanation.
He had asked why Lex Wesner, Wex Lesnar, whatever the hell the guy's name is, Lex Wesner, why his name was removed as one of the co-conspirators?
Because they were only supposed to redact victims.
And his question was, why was Lex Wesner's name redacted?
And then her answer is: well, we unredacted that within 40 minutes.
And he says, it was within 40 minutes of me discovering that you had actually redacted the name of a co-conspirator while simultaneously telling us that there were no other co-conspirators in Epstein's sex crimes.
So, with that context, now go back and listen to her try to laugh off getting caught red-handed, busted on her own terrible defense of her own grotesque incompetence in the disclosures, redactions, and release of the Epstein files.
Respond and then the gentleman can move to chairman's questions.
Within 40 minutes, you asked me a question.
Within 40 minutes, Wexner's name was added back within 40 minutes of me catching you red-handed.
Red-handed.
There was one redaction out of the 700.
And we invited you in.
This guy has Trump derangement syndrome.
He needs to get you're a failed politician.
He needs red matter.
Chairman, please restore his time and remind the witness of the rules here.
No credible information.
None.
I mean, this guy has Trump derangement syndrome.
Don't listen to him.
We added that back.
We unredacted that redaction within 40 minutes of getting busted by people who are paying attention to the disclosures and the redactions, unnecessary in some cases and necessary in other cases when they weren't done to protect the victims that they claim they want to protect.
There's no way that anybody can look at that and say she did good.
These are the highlights.
Let's go.
Eric Daughtry, breaking AG Pan Bondi and Thomas Massey got into heated exchange.
Quote, he's a hypocrite.
He voted against the ban we pushed on deep fake AI porn.
Only two people.
Diversion.
Wait until you hear this.
And just understand what you're looking for.
And I say, again, if you don't teach kids the right lessons, they grow up to be dysfunctional adults.
When I was a kid, it happened probably more than once, but I remember once.
Core memory.
I didn't do my homework.
I'm getting in trouble.
And I say, but dad, sis didn't do her homework.
And he says, I don't care about her.
I'll get to her later.
Right now, I'm talking about you.
You didn't do your homework.
Whether or not she did, good diversion, not going to get you out of doing your homework.
Well, all right, let's see what the question was here where we got to his vote on the AI porn case, which I understand, by the way, he abstained, voted no for other reasons.
I think it was because it was like some sort of pork fat bill that included a bunch of other crap.
But listen to this and appreciate what you're looking for when people refuse to answer for illegitimate reasons.
Did you ask Merritt Garland that the last four years?
Did you talk about Epstein?
I am reclaiming my time.
I'm glad you're asking about Merrick Garland.
You don't get a reclaim time.
When I don't answer questions, this goes over four administrations.
You don't have to go back to Biden.
Let's go back to Obama.
Let's go back to George Bush.
This cover-up spans decades, and you are responsible for this portion of it.
And that's where the pressure is.
I want to know at what point, at what point, did the FBI and the DOJ decide that Lex Wesner was not a co-conspirator?
Because our Epstein Files Transparency Act requires you, please put it back on the screen, to release the internal decision about whether to prosecute him or not.
And it's not in the files, and it's not in the files for any of these other men.
The gentleman has may she answer.
And he's a hypocrite because he voted against the ban that we were talking about on deep fake AI porn.
Only two people voted against it, and you were one of them, hypocrite.
There are no words for this level of stupidity.
And she's got her talking points.
She's like, okay, you got to come to this.
You got to mention this when you're talking about Massey, the classic talking board.
He didn't tweet about Epstein back in 2020.
You got to get to this point, find a way to do it.
You know, you could be good at diversion or you can be bad.
That's terrible.
That's embarrassing.
I don't know that there's anybody who says, I'm proud, MAGA, I'm a proud Trump supporter, and Pam Bondi is representing the DOJ well.
I don't think there's anybody on earth that can say that.
And if you can believe it actually gets a little worse, we're going to get.
I say, when you make Ratzkin look quasi-reasonable, you have failed to such a degree that I don't know that there's any class in debate or public talking speaking that can remedy that problem.
Listen to this.
You're running a massive Epstein cover-up right out of the Department of Justice.
You've been ordered by subpoena and by Congress to turn over 6 million documents, photographs, and videos in the Epstein files, but you've turned over only 3 million.
Late, by the way, also, after having said that there was nothing to turn over.
I hate it that they've actually managed to give a legitimate talking point to this scumbag of all scumbags, Jamie Raskin.
I'm going to disagree with Raskin on one thing at the end here, but you know where I'm going.
You say you're not turning over the other 3 million because they're somehow duplicative, but we know that there are actual memos of victim statements in there.
And you also took down the Department of Justice's prosecution memo from 2019.
So it's clearly not all duplicative.
But even if it were, why not release it?
Just release all the duplicative stuff.
As if there's not already duplicative stuff in there, because there is.
Go look up the words, quote, torture video, end quote, and you'll get a number of results which are duplicative.
You'll also get an email where Epstein is talking about, where are you?
Are you okay?
I love the torture video.
In the half you did produce, you redacted the names of abusers, enablers, accomplices, and co-conspirators, apparently to spare them embarrassment and disgrace, which is the exact opposite of what the law ordered you to do.
Even worse, you shockingly failed to redact many of the victims' names.
This is the problem where I hate, politically speaking, I don't know him personally, Ratzkin.
And you gave him this legitimate talking point.
The failure to redact the names is inexcusable.
The failure to properly redact to disclose identifying information on the victims while claiming that others don't care about the victims.
It's inexcusable.
Private enterprise, you'd be fired already.
And now you get to give Jamie Ratzkin legit talking points that this snake can now come out and in his own mind and to his own base, look like the man who's holding people who can't do their jobs to account.
Screams Cover-Up00:03:33
Which is what you were ordered to do by Congress.
Some of the victims had come forward publicly, but many had not.
Many had kept their torment private, even from family and friends.
But you published their names, their identities, their images, their bank information on thousands of pages for the world to see.
So you ignored the law, and even with over 100,000 employees at your disposal, you acted with some mixture of staggering incompetence, cold indifference, and jaded cruelty towards more than 1,000 victims raped, abused, and trafficked.
This performance screams cover-up.
It doesn't scream cover-up, in my view.
A, it doesn't scream cover-up because nothing in there has incriminated Trump individually.
It doesn't scream cover-up.
It screams sabotage.
And I'm getting more and more convinced that this is, in fact, not a cover-up.
This is not incompetence.
This is sabotage.
And you make Jamie Ratzkin look quasi-reasonable.
We've got a big problem.
Here, let's go to RT.
I love getting my news from all sources.
Ted Liu had his moment.
Let's listen to this one.
Because I believe you just.
And by the way, if you make Ted Liu look reasonable, if you give Ted Liu his moment, this is like giving the kids who would never win a participation trophy, except it looks like he almost earned it.
Because I believe you just lied under oath.
There is ample evidence in the Epstein file.
Don't you ever accuse me of a crime.
I believe you just lied under oath.
And this is all on videotape.
You said there's no evidence of crime.
I'm showing you.
Here is a witness statement.
Don't you ever accuse me of a crime, liar.
Guys, Threat Operations Center.
He drove Donald Trump around in a limo.
He overheard what Donald Trump said to Jeffrey on the cell phone.
He was so angry.
He was going to stop a limo and hurt Donald Trump.
Oh, yeah, we believe this.
He met a girl who said she was raped by Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.
She later had her head blown off.
And the officers at the scene said that could not have been suicide.
No one, no one at the Department of Justice interviewed this witness.
You need to interview this witness immediately.
Epstein should rot in hell.
So should the men who patronize this operation.
And as we sit here today, there are over 1,000 sex trafficking victims, and you have not held a single man accountable.
Shame on you.
If you had any decency, you would resign right after this.
Here we conclude.
The gentleman has expired.
Let's hear the clapback.
May I respond?
Yeah, I don't know how you respond.
No one can ask me.
I did not ask a question, Michelle.
You're allowed to.
I did not ask a question.
Horrific crime in California.
Diversion.
He doesn't want to talk about a horrific crime in California.
He does not want to talk about it.
I did not ask a question.
As far as I understand, by the way, that claim from Ted Leah has been thoroughly debunked, if I'm not mistaken.
But you allow him to throw in bullshit into otherwise legitimate critique.
And now that bullshit has more of an air of legitimacy because of the nonsense.
It's inexcusable failure.
Whoops After Mentioning Potential Harm00:06:39
And it's, I don't know how it's ongoing and how people are not, some people are speaking up, being vocal about it.
But I don't know that there's anybody on earth who can pretend to be impressed by that performative rubbish.
It's like girl boss on steroids who thinks I can insult, I can divert, I can evade, and I can shriek my way out of responsibility for what is legitimate criticism of what appears to be inexcusable, inexcusable incompetence.
Now, we're going to get into the Epstein stuff in a second, but I want to say hello to a few people over here.
Ralph 123 going to ring the bell of vivabarnslaw.locals.com, made by Ginger Ninja.
Welcome, Ralph, 123.
And I believe there's another one.
Howard the Duck says so or so.
Good.
So I didn't make a mistake.
It's funny.
And I went, especially, I got it right one of the two times.
Definitely.
That's for sure.
And we got a Rumble rant coming from King of Bill Tong.
Did I have it in the house here?
Can I bring it up?
Oh, I can bring it up.
Okay, good.
We got premium Bill Tong from Biltong USA, high-protein, keto-friendly, no-additives, U.S. sourced beef, authentic South African flavor.
They also have beautiful uh foreign, what are they called? Imported candies.
Is that the right word for it?
Let me see if I can.
I'm gonna bring up the website because I want to show everybody.
You gotta celebrate goodness and celebrate awesomeness.
And we're gonna get to that other chat in a second.
By the way, everybody, it's not the sponsor for today's show, but download Rumble Wallet.
If you want to support the channel, you can tip via crypto.
Go to Google Play or Amazon, whatever the stores are.
Download the Rumble Wallet if you want to invest in crypto at your own risk and peril.
Don't lose your 12-word seed password thing.
And download the Rumble app so you get real-time notifications.
This is built on USA.
Get some.
Support a company that does good, makes good food.
Little cookies, biscuits.
Don't eat too much dried mango.
It will act as a natural accident.
I know from experience, dude.
And then we got one more up here, which says Kash Patel changed co-conspirators into victims when he testified to Massey.
Yeah, I've seen that link, bucklebrush.
I think you shared that and I watched it.
And I appreciate that.
It's abject failure.
Now, a final word on the Epstein disclosures because, you know, there's more stuff that keeps not coming out, but getting discovered.
Jake Shields, some of you might have legitimate grievances with Jake Shields.
He has been bitten hard by the anti-Israel bug, and I will not call it an anti-Semitic bug, although I think he might even call it an anti-Semitic bug.
And he discovered something yesterday.
Hold on.
Was this Cernovich reposted?
Okay, so this is a screenshot.
Jake Shields, former UFC fighter.
I don't think I have any of his cards.
Who, you know, I've had some issues with Jake in terms of what he posts on X because when you repost with affirmation actual, definitive, demonstrable Hamas propaganda, you can get duped a couple of times and then people will start understandably questioning your judgment or discernment.
Doesn't mean they're always wrong.
And Jake discovered something yesterday.
Hey, Grok, I'm reading the Epstein files and just noticed something extremely disturbing.
He often responds with whoops after he appears to have raped or had killed someone.
Will you look at all the times he said whoops and tie it into my theory?
Now, I think the issue is I've got to actually bring this up in not incognito because it won't bring up the results in incognito.
And it's kind of, look, it's a theory, and some people will say it's a stretch.
And others are going to say it's a very weird, common thread that is discoverable throughout these files.
The use of the word whoops.
I reviewed recent Epstein files releases.
This is from Grok.
You take it for what it's worth.
Grok is so imperfect it sometimes can't even properly identify a photograph.
But you can also verify this, and it seems to be mildly accurate.
I reviewed recent Epstein file releases via public sources.
Whoops appears over 400 times in his messages, often in disturbing context.
Responding to Mary Kennedy's 2012 suicide, whoops.
After news of an alleged rape, whoops.
In a permission to kill exchanged about a liar, whoops.
On a mother-in-law's death, whoops.
The pattern aligns with your theory of it following violent or fatal events, though it's circumstantial.
More files may release more.
From recent Epsteins, I see here.
On Robert Maxwell's 1991 death, Epstein emailed whoops in a thread about mysterious circumstances.
2025, referring to a false story.
Whoops after mentioning potential harm.
2014 message on a family death.
Whoops.
In response to, look, it could be innocent.
It could also not be.
And it's very, very bizarre.
Now, hold on a second.
Screen share.
I want to get to the other one.
There's a few other things that you might want to look at.
Let me see here.
Why did I have this one up that I wanted to highlight here?
Oh, yeah, this was age 10.
There's no whoops in here.
This was just from somebody to somebody.
From somebody, subject redacted.
Why, who knows?
To Jeffrey Epstein, age 10.
And there's a picture, a JPEG.
It couldn't have been a bottle of scotch.
Could have been a cheap Beaumore, or it could have been a 10-year-old kid.
We don't know.
Names are redacted.
Why?
Maybe it's coming from the victim.
Unlikely.
Why would the name be redacted?
Maybe it's one of the cases where Lex Wesner or another alleged co-conspirator was improperly redacted.
But within 40 minutes, they'll unredact that if they made a mistake in redacting it the first time.
And then going back to the thing here, he says, here, Jeffrey is emailing a longtime friend who killed himself in prison after being convicted of severe trafficking.
Whoops.
Jean-Luc Brunel to Jean-Luc from Jeffrey.
Whoops.
Re, he deserves it.
And now we know that Jake Shields follows Cernovich and gets notifications from him.
Egg Cream Mystery00:07:40
As do I.
So yeah.
Whoops.
Then there was one last thing before we move on to the story coming out of Canada.
One that I found.
What did I say here?
Jeffrey Epstein joking about inviting the Pope over for a massage.
I appreciate that.
From what I understand, there's a website that Ian Carroll, who also has been bitten hard by the anti-Israel bug, put together, I think maybe with Whitney Webb, or as I like to pronounce her name, Whitney Webb.
And there's got to be more effective ways.
I'm just, I'm just like throwing darts.
There's the old expression: you know, how do you find a needle in the haystack?
You set the haystack on fire.
I don't know how to find a needle in the haystack in this digital haystack, but apparently they might have created some sort of, I don't know, software that scans through the 3 million documents more effectively than me just thinking of fun words to look up.
This, why did I think, why did I get this one?
It had to do with, let's see, in the bottom here.
Oh, yeah, not going to F for.
Okay.
So Jeffrey Epstein is writing to Mark Epstein, his brother.
I thought I'd invite him for a massage.
S.
This is like, if I don't know what is happening to the text that is getting identified as an X equal.
When he hears, oh, Jesus, I'm coming, he feels happy.
That is Jeffrey writing his brother in response to his brother writing him.
You're probably smart enough to get out of town when the Pope is here, but if you're in New York City, he will be staying around the corner from you.
You should invite him over for an egg cream and exchange stories.
I'm going to London on the first for a couple of days and then to Italy for a few more.
I haven't been in London since I visited you there with Paula and Seymour in 1985.
I'm expecting to still not like the place.
I'm having dinner with Aldean while there.
No, I'm still not going to fuck her.
And I don't know if they're joking.
You know, I forget who described Epstein's emails as very trollish, but it definitely sounds like they might have had connections to the highest up out there.
And I don't even know what egg cream is, and I don't want to ask.
But maybe I'm going to have to go look up the lexicon for Pedo Talk to understand if that has any code word.
There's the link to that.
So that's what's going on in the Epstein files.
And the debacle that we had today is not going to quell anybody's concerns.
And let me just go to the chat and say, I'm going to show one more thing after this, but I want to see what's going on in our viva barnslaw.locals.com community.
Clean shaven Florida man.
That's got to be an oxymoron like Jumbo Shrimp.
Oh, Rumble Viva has so much more room.
On a Rumble, Viva has so much more room for activities, Jar.
And I don't know what that means.
Down here to the bottom.
How these messages are worded are so bizarre and F'd Up says Mighty Pit.
Absolutely.
Egg cream is a soda.
What kind of soda?
Egg cream soda?
What the?
What the?
That's the most disgusting thing I've ever heard of.
Hold on.
Let me let me.
Egg cream.
So this is going to taint my trying Arizona chocolate egg cream soda.
Finally found it.
Hope it's.
Okay, that sounds like the most disgusting thing on earth.
Okay.
I'm not ever going to try that.
Ask Mark Robert, he made egg creams.
Oh, by the way, everybody watching, tomorrow we are reviewing Scarface.
I was going to put it to a poll, but I didn't want anyone thinking I was being serious.
Is Scarface too mature for a 10-year-old boy?
The answer is going to be yes.
So I'm going to have to watch that after hours.
But it's Viva and Grobert, Viva and Lord Buckley go to the movies.
Last week we reviewed Casablanca, and this week we are reviewing Scarface.
Now, I'm going to have more to say on Scarface this week because I'm going to do some like deep dives into the history, the historical accuracy.
But last week, we reviewed Casablanca.
Is this how you do it?
Oh, yeah, here we go.
Viva and Lord Buckley go to the movies.
Tomorrow, it's going to be Scarface.
Subscribe, join, come, support.
It's fun.
And I'm excited to go back and look at the historical context of Scarface living in Florida now, because I remember I started watching it again.
I was like, oh, dude, that's Fort Lauderdale.
That's like 20 minutes from where we are.
And this is part of our now shared history as a Florida man, which I consider myself to be.
So tune in for that tomorrow.
It's going to be amazing.
I wanted to bring up a couple more here.
Viva, can you go to the client privilege claim by Bondi for not releasing some documents versus adhering to the law itself?
I can, not right now, but a special SOV says, Na Viva, you missed an out is good egg cream.
I'm not, I'm not, I don't drink, it was like carbonated egg cream.
I'm not doing it.
Gross, gross.
Scarface is overrated.
I haven't seen it in a long time.
I just remember the chainsaw in the shower scene, which I believe was what led me to believe it might be a little too mature violence.
You know, we watched what's that in Deadpool, and that's cartoonish violence.
I remember the chainsaw in the shower scene not being cartoonish violence.
That being said, when I re-watched Terminator 1, and I remember that not being cartoonish violence, and Robocop as an adult, it's like, that's cartoonish violence.
How did I ever take that seriously?
Bill Brown says, I'm messing with Zippity part in my doda day.
They're both useless twat waffles, said Bill Brown.
To whom?
To whom, however.
All right, one last thing.
Goodness is its own reward, and everybody should remember that, especially on Twitter.
I came across a tweet yesterday, and I was like, oh, it's a straw man argument.
And then I go to the person's handle just to see, you know, maybe they're being sarcastic and I don't know.
And so the tweet reads like this.
Remember, people, goodness is its own reward.
John Harold at Patel underscore Patriots says, holy shit, Unicorn appears in the Epstein files 42 times.
This proves unicorns are real.
This also proves unicorns are sex traffickers.
Unicorns must be held accountable.
All of Twitter, the last two weeks.
And then Unicorn apparently does actually appear 42 times.
And I'm like, this is that's the worst straw man argument I've ever heard if it weren't satirical satire parody, which it ended up being because I can't detect sarcasm on Twitter, apparently.
But I was like, I read off like you stupid jerk, what kind of moron you know, and I just said nice straw man, but there's a material difference between unicorn appearing in the files and torture video appearing in the files.
Whoops, bada bing, bada boom, the joke going back to Jake Shields' discovery of whoops.
And here you go.
Oh, are you okay?
I love the torture video.
That's just something you typically see coming from Jeff Epson all the time.
And it turns out that the dude posts a lot of satire, and either I'm dense for not getting it, or it was a little too subtle satire.
But the moral of that story is goodness is its own reward.
And before you go ham on somebody on Twitter for being a moron, for being a jerk, for being dishonest, whatever, give them the benefit of the doubt until they demonstrably prove it.
And so when it comes to Kinzinger, Adam Schifferbrains Makes Shift Face, Ratskin Raskin, you don't have to give them the benefit of the doubt anymore because they have a proven track record.
And until you know that, it might be misunderstood satire, misunderstood parody, misunderstood sarcasm as it was under those circumstances.
And I'm glad I didn't put my foot deeper into that hole.
Nest Cam Surveillance00:07:26
Now, people, before you go anywhere, we're not going anywhere.
We're going to cover that story out of Canada.
Then we're going to go to vivabarnslaw.locals.com for the after party.
Subscribe.
Make sure you have notifications turned on.
Download the Rumble app.
Download the Rumble wallet.
Download Rumble, etc.
And what was I going to do here?
I was about to do something.
Oh, that's right.
I was going to show you.
Yeah, hear my voice.
The Rumble wallet.
Is that clicking?
Download Rumble.
Okay.
If you want to support 25 thumbs down, let me go ahead and add to that.
Tip: if you want to tip, you can go here, go to the Rumble wallet.
You can tip with Bitcoin, scan that QR code.
If you have a wallet, if you have crypto, that's Bitcoin.
If you want to tip with XAUT gold-backed crypto, you can scan that.
If you want to invest, you can use the app the Rumble wallet to do that.
And the best way to support, if you want to join the community, vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
Ton of exclusive stuff.
An amazing community there.
Slightly less trolling than on Twitter, but there is some trolling nonetheless.
And easiest way, freest way, like, share, tell someone about the channel, etc.
Now we're going to go to Canada.
Not literally.
We're just going to go there in our minds right now, unless you're there.
And in which case, you know, sorry.
And I'm not trying to be annoying or trying to be rude.
Canada has gone to hell in a handbasket in no time at all.
In my lifetime, in the last decade.
You think, how much damage can a politician do?
How much damage can one man do?
Well, when they're part of a globalist apparatus that the seeming intent is to destroy the country, and when they have the backing of other globalists and when they have the backing of their political party, when they have the backing of a government-subsidized media, and when they have the backing of a brainwashed populace, 10 years-that's how long it takes.
You remember when Justin Trudeau infamously had that stupid statement that he said, person-kind?
Do you remember when he corrected a woman on her statement and then man explained to this woman, actually, it's person-kind?
Because the woman said, Man, did you say mankind or humankind?
Hold on, it's right here, I think.
Maternal love is the love that's going to change the future of mankind.
So, we'd like you to look-we like to say people-kind, not necessarily mankind, more inclusive.
There we go, exactly.
Yes, thank you.
We can all learn from each other.
Maternal love is the love that's going to change the future of mankind.
So we'd like you to.
Lady, shut your trap for a second, okay?
The man is going to mansplant you.
We like to say people kind.
No, we don't, because we're not retarded, Trudeau.
We like to say people kind.
Nobody says people kind.
It's not a word.
It's a made-up word.
And you're a jackass.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, we've actually gone from people kind.
We've gone from Justin Trudeau retardation to mainstream retardation.
We've gone from people kind to gun person when that gun person is a man, allegedly, apparently, as at the best information as of going live today.
People kind to gun person wearing dress kills nine in school shooting.
Dozens also injured in Canada's worst school massacre for 30 years.
Sleep apnea.
Try this Japanese trick.
It's genius.
Okay.
And now we've got to go to flipping archive to get this out of here.
And we'll see if this has been archived.
Oh, now I got to go identify the motorcycles.
And I could hear everybody in the audience saying, Vivo, you idiot.
Oh, come on.
Now it's going to ask me to do motorcycles.
Come, this, this.
Am I helping AI overtake the world?
Okay, there you go.
That's enough.
Is that enough?
Am I going to get to the stupid article?
Yes, we are.
Thank you.
I've passed the test.
Canada school shooter was transgender teenager.
Eight killed and dozens injured in country's worst school massacre for 30 years.
Let me just take a break here for a pause for a second.
I literally said this in our locals community yesterday when someone posted, you know, it was an article to an AI rendition of what they thought Savannah Guthrie's mother's kidnapper looked like based on the video of the Nest Cam, which by the way, always records you.
And now you know that if you've got the Nest Cam, you are always being surveilled.
And if the government wants to get whatever, they can because it's always there, apparently.
And who was the person that revealed that inadvertently?
None other than, you know, I said just because he's potato the head, but now he's spud brain.
It's amazing.
Sort of just opening a parentheses, but it'll be, it'll be worthwhile.
If you have the Nest Cam, people, it's spying on you all the time.
And listen to Potay the Brain actually confirm that for you.
This is the technical part of the story that I want to learn more about, that I bet many viewers want to learn more about, because this is a key part of the breakthrough.
My sense is that the engineers and the technicians at Google, the company that owns Nest, deserve a lot of credit for this breakthrough.
And you can read between the lines of Kash Patel's statement and get that sense.
He said, working with our partners, they were able to obtain this video.
Well, for viewers who aren't familiar with how Nest works, these are some of the Nest cameras.
So here's one of them that's for outdoor use.
Here's an indoor camera that's for indoor use.
You plug these in, you're able to see whatever the camera sees.
But unless you have a monthly subscription to the cloud interface, there's not a backup of the recordings.
You're able to see the video live if you have it plugged in.
You're not able to see a backup.
A lot of people don't bother to pay for the backup for $10 a month or whatever it is because all you're ever going to see on your cameras is, well, in the Tucson Desert, maybe a coyote every once in a while.
But in this instance, according to the FBI, the Google engineers, these data forensics experts, were able to somehow retrieve the raw material that was coming off the camera live that was being fed onto the servers live, even though there was not a subscription.
There's going to be a lot of questions about that.
And so far, we've only seen the video from what seems to be the doorbell camera and not from any other cameras around the homeboard.
So you're constantly being surveilled, people.
Now, some people are going to say, look, if it's going up to the cloud, it's always, you know, it's there anyhow.
And you're probably right.
But public service announcement, those things, even if you don't get the backup, they'll be able to find it.
And in this case, they're celebrating it as technological breakthrough to potentially find the kidnappers in the future.
They will use it for 24-7 constant surveillance.
Now, getting back to the story in Canada, which is gun person wearing a dress.
And I had to make sure that the information was accurate.
There were people posting identities of the wrong shooter.
And this is actually how I started this parentheses in our locals community.
People were, you know, there was a link to they've identified the kidnapper based on AI.
It's like, dude, I'm not misidentifying anybody, putting a target on someone's back because of suspicion based on an AI rendition.
And I don't feel morally exonerated to say I'm washing my hands of it.
It's just the AI results that I've prompted in.
Misidentifying the Shooter00:08:32
People had misidentified the wrong person as the trans shooter.
It's now been confirmed that the shooter's trans, which makes the gun person politically retarded.
It makes identifying the gun person in a dress and some outlets still referring to him as a her, the shooter as a woman.
These mother effers don't care about truth.
They don't care about honesty.
They don't care about reality.
They care about politics and they care about spin.
We now know this is in the Telegraph.
So reasonably comfortable confirming another transgender shooter, apparently who was on Reddit, if the reports are accurate, talking about having suicidal ideations and looking for help on Reddit.
You know what you find on Reddit?
You find weaponization.
You find radicalization on Reddit.
That place is a toxic hellhole.
It is a breeding ground and a training ground for extremism and violence.
A school shooter who killed eight people during a rampage in a remote part of Canada has been identified as a transgender teenager, Jesse Van Rutelsar.
Rootslar, who was born male, who is male, who is mentally unwell, dead now, and just killed eight innocent people at least, who was born male, but identified as female, shot and killed his mother and brother at home on Tuesday before killing four students and one teacher at Tumblr Ridge Secondary School in British Columbia.
Van Rootslaur opened fire on police when they arrived and rounds were fired in their direction, said Dwayne McDonald, Deputy Commissioner of the British Columbia Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the RCMP.
Van Rootslaur, who police had earlier described as a gun person wearing a dress, died at the school.
He was not a student at the time of the shooting.
The killer began transitioning six years ago, police said.
Death toll was downgraded from 10 to 9.
Police, they mistakenly reported a female victim as dead after she was airlifted to the hospital.
Van Rootstar previously had guns seized from his home during mental health checks, but the weapons were returned after the gun owner filed a petition.
Another 27 people were hurt during the attack, including two with life-threatening injuries.
It's the worst shooting in 30 years.
The last one was École Polytechnique, which there was a lot of disinformation and spin on.
I'll get to that after.
Remind me to get to Marc Le Pin, whose real name was.
Does anybody know?
His real name was Gamil Rodriguez Lias Garby.
And there was, in fact, potential religious elements to that misogynist shooting.
They say Marc Le Pin because it sounds like a nice white French Canadian name.
The man, last name, G-H-A-R-B-I.
And there might have been something of a political cover-up at the time to this day that most people don't know about.
27 people were hurt.
Maya Gabella, critical condition.
We don't need Maya Gabella 12 is in critical condition after being shot in the head and neck.
An alert was issued about an active shooter at the school in the small town of Tumblr Ridge.
The suspect was initially described as a female in a dress.
These motherfuckers actually come out with disinformation that will get people killed because they're going to be looking for a female in a dress and not a man in a dress.
The authorities and the politicians responsible for this cannot go to hell fast enough.
May they live a long, healthy life, hearing echoing in their head for the rest of their lives what disgusting, evil pieces of rubbish that they are, that they have contributed to the downfall of society.
They have brought violence onto the innocent and they have brought mutilation onto the mentally ill who needed protection of adults, not the affirmation of adults.
A female in a dress.
Well, that couldn't possibly be misunderstood because it's not the case.
Just not reality.
As part of the initial response to the active shooting, police entered the school to locate the threat.
During the search, they located multiple victims.
An individual believed to be the shooter was also found deceased with what appears to be self-can't just self-inflicted.
Can't do it before killing six innocent people.
Let's see what's going on down here.
Incredibly difficult, yada, yada, yada.
We don't need to go into this.
It's just, it's just, it's an atrocity.
Now there's an account on X, and I'm not trying to use the account as a shield because I just, you know, I want to make sure not to repeat inaccurate information, especially when it could potentially lead to identifying people who are not responsible.
And there are some who had to delete a couple of tweets yesterday because they showed a picture of the wrong person.
And how quickly that can go very, very sour can't be underestimated.
But there's a journalist, Wesley Yang, at Wes Yang, who is tweeting out a long thread.
And I'll give everybody the link and you can go check out his work.
Whenever a trans-identified murder emerges, as they do with metronomic regularity, the dilemma that the media and police face is this.
Should we try to protect the interests of the transgender movement by hiding that the murderer was trans so as not to associate transgenderism with psycho-murderers, or should we try to advance the agenda?
What's truly amazing is if you go in there looking for a woman in a dress, you're actually impeding law enforcement and you're actually making it more dangerous for people in there who are not going to be looking for the right threat, potentially.
Then you got Reddit excusing the murder.
But there was a video which I found interesting, which was allegedly the individual at a gun range in Canada, which I'm not going to find, obviously, because I didn't bookmark it.
And the person was firing what appeared to be a desert eagle.
I am not a gun aficionado.
ran it by a number of people i know our locals community kyle seraphin who identified this as a desert eagle now the interesting thing is in canada you need to have a very specific license to own small arms And I'm fairly certain that the desert eagle has been effectively rendered illegal in Canada since 2021, 2022.
Now, there might be the grandfather clause in as to possession of it.
If you've owned it, you can't sell it, you can't transfer it, so you can only own it.
I'd be curious to know if that's the right, if that video is, in fact, of the now-deceased shooter, and if that video was in Canada.
But if it wasn't in Canada, it would raise even more questions.
And the bottom line is, we've got another one.
There's another tragedy coming out of the country with some of the strictest gun laws, certainly the strictest gun laws in North America.
The misdirection is going to be placed everywhere except for where it should be, which is adults lying to children and mutilating their genitals, putting them on hormones which mess up the brain.
According to now-deleted Reddit post by Strang, he had used psychedelic mushrooms, nearly set his house on fire, and ended up in a mental hospital.
After he was released, he was repeatedly seeking in other psychiatric substances.
There was the post on Reddit where he was apparently from Vanish Van Shitty TV, which Van City is how they describe Vancouver.
And again, you have to take a lot of this with a grain of salt until you can definitively confirm.
But now, a sufficient amount of information has been released and confirmed by legacy media.
This is Van Shitty TV1.
Jesse Strang is the Tumblr Ridge shooter.
Asked for help on Reddit and stating he was feeling suicidal.
More astronomical failure and child harm from the BC NDP government, who share responsibility for what happened.
And then he says, Hi, kind of need help.
TW Thoughts with Suicidal Thoughts, I guess.
I, male to female, 15 years old, am trying to get HRT hormone replacement therapy for my transition.
As of right now, I have been on a six-month wait list for visiting a specialist in Price George for a month.
Oh, Prince George.
I think that means Prince George.
That's Prince George.
I know exactly where that is.
I'm from British Columbia, Canada, live in a very rural area.
I am noticing heavy changes in my appearances every month.
By the time I'm actually able to visit, I may have severe damage from testosterone changing my body.
I may have damage from testosterone changing my body.
Need Help with HRT00:03:46
Assume this is real.
You understand the level of indoctrination that a kid has to have to think that the natural release of hormones in your body is damage as opposed to nature if you don't believe in God running its course.
It's extremely stressful.
The weight alone makes me want to die.
The uncertainty of not knowing how the HRT will affect me, not knowing if I'll ever be me.
But add on to it, the slow degradation of my body, degradation in front of my very eyes, awaiting.
You know, he's repeating what doctors and what his parents' mother presumably told him.
I'm genuinely considering taking my own life.
Is there any way, literally, any way possible I can speed up this process?
I've heard the general practitioner in BC can technically prescribe HRT to a transpatient, but I don't know.
This is the consequences of adults who, A, never grew up and who are B, teaching the wrong lessons to kids.
And you now have nine dead, innocent people.
Some people might put a caveat on the mother who may have had a contributing hand in the mutilation and indoctrination of her son.
The brother, students.
And you have the fucking media saying gun person, not gunman.
And then they were describing this person as a woman in a dress.
a special seat in hell for all of them well let's see this i'm i'm I'm going back to, we're going to go to locals in a bit.
We're going to go raid.
Who are we going to raid?
We're going to raid redacted, but let me just see this.
It says, apparently, it says, turns out the wrong person was the right person.
Why am I not seeing my locals page?
Am I looking for the wrong avatar?
What in the hell?
Where's Molly?
Where's locals up here?
Here it is.
Okay.
Sorry.
Jeez, I can't see this.
Useless twat waffles.
Okay.
Jump to recent messages.
viva turns out the wrong person was actually the right person after all um oh well good Then I guess the person who deleted.
No, it says they're literally not the same person.
I'm not getting involved in it.
Just before you identify people, you really need to make sure that they're the right people.
Bill Brown says, we'll be back with more news as soon as we make up some.
And then we got that.
All right, people, we're going to have our locals after party.
I'm going to give everybody the link right now.
Come to locals, locals, booyah.
Come to Viva and Lord Buckley.
Go to the movies.
Tomorrow, seven o'clock.
Viva and Buckley.
That says Bucklet, but you know what I mean.
And let's go raid Redacted.
I think that's the one we're going to raid right now.
And then we're going to mosey this party on over.
Pizzagate is much worse than we thought.
Epstein documents just changed everything.
Oh, man, they really.
And they got Liz Crokin on.
Okay, go check out Raid.
Go Raid Redacted.
Let me know from whence you came.
Raid Boom Shakalaka.
Say hi for me, and I'll catch up on them afterwards.
After we have our locals party, Viva, Raid, Booyah.
Viva Rai.
And now we're going to go chat it up on a VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
And that's it.
Everybody, Rumble.
What day is it?
What day is it today?
It's Thursday.
No, it's not.
It's Wednesday.
Wait a minute.
It's Wednesday because I bowled yesterday.
I'm going to talk about my bowling over on VivabarnesLaw.locals.com.
Got a couple more things to cover.
And we're going to have our daily after party.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
If you're not coming there, I will see you tomorrow.
Enjoy Redacted or whoever else you decide to watch.