All Episodes
Previous
Feb. 12, 2026 - Viva & Barnes
01:18:05
Canada Goes Full "Suicidal Empathy"! Bondi Testimony Fallout Continues! Save Act to Senate & MORE!

SUPPORT VIVA! GET MERCH! www.vivafrei.com BUY A BOOK! https://amzn.to/4qBXikS SEND ME SOMETHING! David Freiheit 20423 SR 7 Ste F6319 Boca Raton 33498 TIP WITH CRYPTO! bc1qt0umnqna63pyw5j8uesphsfz0dyrtmqcq5ugwm THAT IS ALL!

|

Time Text
Specific Issues with Thomas 00:03:50
Within 40 minutes, you asked me a question.
Within 40 minutes, Wexner's name was added back within 40 minutes of me catching you red-handed.
Red-handed.
There was one redaction.
And we invited you in.
This guy has Trump derangement syndrome.
He needs to get you're a failed politician.
He needs to watch.
Chairman, please restore his time and remind the witness of the rules.
There is no credible information.
And now I have to start with the intro video that I realized you didn't hear because the Viva Golf voice was on mute.
We're starting with a blast from the past, which is a video from yesterday's Pam Bondi testimony before the, was it before the house?
It was before the house.
And some relevant facts, which we're going to have to clarify today.
We're going to start today's show.
Let me bring this one back out.
I'm going to keep this one of the, I'm not going to keep it in the backdrop.
I'm going to give you all the link right now.
We've got to get clear on a few things.
I was lamenting over in our viva barnslaw.locals.com community before going live.
It's getting impossible to actually be able to rely on any information whatsoever.
And it's not because of or only because of AI.
It's because of disinformation.
It's because of noise.
And it's becoming impossible to know that what you're looking at is authentic and real.
Know that the interpretations you're getting are accurate.
And it's even becoming impossible to cross-reference things to make sure that when people say there's an AI-modified image, that it's an actual AI-modified image and not an image that is making the okay, we're going to get into it because in a number of things today, you just don't know what you can trust anymore.
I want to get into specific issues about Thomas Massey and that run-in with Pam Bonte yesterday, in which the relevant matter of fact or the disputed fact, or you need to reduce the debate to the issues.
And the issues are Thomas Massey taking issue with the fact that on a document disclosed in the Epstein disclosures by Pam Bonte and her team, they redacted the name of Les Wexner.
I'm going to remember his name now because it's like Sido Bob from The Simpsons.
Congressman Les Winen says that you don't do good work.
And then Sido Bob says, well, I suggest you do a little more listening and less whining.
And then Lisa says, there's no Congressman named Les Whining.
Les Wexner.
His name was apparently redacted from one document where he was listed as a co-conspirator.
And Thomas Massey took issue with that during the hearing.
Pam Bondi's retort to that was, oh, that was one document in three million.
As if that is an indication that it was either an oversight or a deliberate act, which is even more suspicious if they singled out and pinpointed one document of the however many million.
Then the question became, and it's the question I asked, and I think I've got an answer for it.
Were there any other documents that were disclosed in which Les Wexner was identified without redactions as an unindicted co-conspirator?
And the answer to that is yes, but not very many.
And so the question becomes: all right, this redaction of Les Wexner redacting his name as a co-conspirator, was it a mistake?
Was it an innocent mistake?
Or was it something much more sinister?
And then, to the extent that there were two or three, I think, maximum other documents where his name wasn't redacted, does it show an inadvertent error or improperly executed malice?
But you can visit all of the redacted, unredacted documents if you're a congressperson and you want to get a hold of them.
James's Epic Fail 00:14:44
And this is why we're going to bring in Ivan Rakelin in a bit.
And by in a bit, I mean in two seconds once I bring up his tweet.
Ivan is on the ground, on the beat, as we say in the industry.
And he was just outside the room where they were providing access to unredacted Epstein files.
I'm not going to play the whole thing, just a couple of minutes here, not even a couple of 30 seconds.
All right.
There's Congressman Timmons from South Carolina.
Just got out of the DOJ Annex over here at 145 N Street, Northeast, Washington, D.C.
So inside of here are the four terminals that Todd Blanche, the Deputy Attorney General at the Department of Justice, is supposedly allowing only members of Congress to have access to.
So from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. is what I'm hearing.
Four terminals for members of Congress.
They can sign up for up to two hours of monitoring the Epstein, unredacted Epstein files.
But we know that they are redacted because some of the files were redacted by SDNY, sent over to the DOJ, and they still haven't unredacted them.
And what you just actually, I didn't capture it on.
We can pause it there, and Ivan can pop on and unmute his mic and enable his camera when he's able to.
So, Ivan, how go, sir?
Let me, let me, I don't, I feel naked being on the, on the, on the right.
How goes the bat?
I'm sorry, what is my hat saying?
Dump Lindsay.
Ivan, sir, how goes the battle?
It goes pretty well.
I think we're making progress.
They're continuing to provide us limited hangouts and we're continuing to push for greater, moderate-level hangouts, right?
So the battle continues.
My audience knows who you are, and I'm just going to, you're the deep state marauder.
People can look you up.
You're awesome.
You have some great insights.
You're on the.
I have breaking news.
So earlier today, I believe, is today the 11th or 12th?
Today's the 12th.
So then I think yesterday, maybe, I was on the front cover of the, what did I call it?
The super SPLC.
What does that sound for?
The Southern Paul.
Oh, super pathetic libtard communists.
That's what they are.
Communists.
Super pathetic libtard communists or censors, if you will.
I was on the cover with Stuart Rhodes on their latest edition.
So it is an honor to be considered as far and hard right as opposed to far wrong.
I'm bringing it up here.
I don't want to donate.
I'm fairly certain it was either.
No, I was in Media Matters for America recently because of Stuart Rhodes or with Stuart Rhodes.
So he seems to be the common threat of getting called out by these leftist activist organizations.
Ivan Rakeland, deep state marauder, former Green Beret, wicked intelligence on the ground journalism.
And you've been hounding, what's her face now?
I'm going to forget her name.
Oh, come on.
The prosecutor.
No, no, no.
The one in the one in Jocelyn Valentine.
Now, you were outside yesterday, the portals, which is where they give access to unredacted documents of the 3 million.
The first question I have is a logistical one.
Barring some AI software that you bring in, which I don't think you can bring into implementing, how the hell do they say, okay, here's 3 million unredacted documents.
You have two hours.
Get what you're doing.
Right, exactly.
Greg, I want to start with that too.
Let's contextualize this.
So you have four terminals.
There are 434, well, whatever, 435 House members.
Everyone except for Clay Higgins voted for the release for the Transparency Act on the House side.
And all 100 senators voted for the release on the Senate side.
So we're looking at upwards of about 530.
A couple didn't vote.
So let's just say 530.
530 members.
Four terminals.
The buildings only open from 9 a.m to 6 p.m.
You can do the math.
You know what is it?
150 days.
It'll take them.
It's impossible each to have one session of two hours in each particular case, because you have to sign, you have to register, you have to put be put in the queue to be able to see these.
You know the quote-unquote unredacted files which we're finding out, that some of them are redacted because SDNY provided redacted files that the DOJ can't unredact, supposedly.
I don't know.
And then when you, when you do all the numbers right, how much can you sift through in two hours right?
No it's, it's you would.
Is this full transparency or is it not, I guess?
On one side, I guess the DOJ can argue, well, we've released more than the previous admins which they have.
So if you're half glass full, you can agree that.
You know, Todd Blanche is doing everything in his power to try to get everything out.
But on the flip side, the law says, uh, in 30 days you were supposed to do that and Donald Trump signed the law.
So then the counter argument to that is, hey, Todd and Pam, you're subverting the president of the United States and all of Congress except for Clay Higgins.
So I think the argument is being won by those that voted for the release, meaning Thomas Massey Rohana, Nancy Mace, Lauren Bober uh, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and now you're starting to see Anna Paulina Luna jumping into the mix publicly demanding the release and, like you saw in that video, Republican that doesn't really come out much right.
He's not a very, you know, a bomb thrower, if you will.
You have Republicans that weren't vocal before are starting to engage, and I caught him at the tail end where he was doing a video to post, potentially on his ex, about how he just finished in that particular annex to take a look at the Epstein files, and what I heard him say was that Ghislaine Maxwell should not be uh well, he didn't use the term commuted, but something similar.
He said she needs to face more punishment based on what he saw.
I don't know what he saw.
I mean, that's up to him to decide what he's going to say and he's thinking that maybe if this DOJ is not going to hold people to account, then maybe if those crimes occurred in a state or if there's a nexus to a state, then a state ag can start prosecuting and leveraging their power to go ahead and hold people to account, which I mean.
That's a, that's a big statement, because a run of the mill without i'm not trying to offend him or anything, just you know, somebody that's not really public and vocal with the big profile, like congressman Timmons, I mean, he represents kind of the average Republican.
And so if he's demanding transparency and accountability, the White House's narrative is not being accepted.
The massey broader public transparency narrative is being bought in like by the day.
And I would say that the demand for the reason why I did that video is everyone should be demanding that their own member of Congress that voted for the transparency.
Well, are you going to stand behind your word and actually go there and try to find more details since this DOJ is only released supposedly 50% of the files?
I think that's such a hot butt topic that I think people are going to start pushing for that.
Got to understand this now.
So my understanding, as you've explained, is that some of the documents came, call it pre-redacted and they cannot be unredacted from the SDNY.
I'm not going crazy.
This is the same SDNY that Pam Bondi wrote the letter to Kash Patel about, where they were so untrustworthy that they were withholding documents from Pam.
Right.
And so now you've got context.
It's the same SDNY Viva that Todd Blanche used to work at underneath U.S. attorney James Comey.
And Todd Blanche was a Democrat all but up until about five minutes ago.
I've been saying, and it's my operating theory that this is not incompetence.
It's sabotage.
And if one, I mean, you couldn't be this incompetent.
There's enough evidence to that it's great.
For me, it's a gray area.
I mean, I don't have full evidence, right, to say other either way, but no, well, it's all, you know, you operate, it's obviously a statement of opinion where, say, this is my conclusion after having looked at the evidence.
Right.
But so let me ask you this, Ivan, you know, people are going to.
And that's why I said that the argument is the momentum is on Thomas Massey's side.
And the problem, I think, with the messaging, the only thing that I would recommend to Congressman Massey and those that are on that side of the argument is in order for this to move forward more quickly for the transparency part, remind America that President Trump signed this into law.
He is responsible for the release just as much as Thomas Massey and the rest of Congress is.
But now, Ivan, you get to this.
Trump just put out a truth post, which I originally, again, thought was fake because I don't think anybody could have looked at what Pam Bondi did yesterday and said, well done.
I appreciate some people say my poll was a little too artificially dichotomized.
It was great or epic failure.
That's by design.
But I didn't think anybody could look at that and say, job well done.
And Trump comes out with a post and says she did a fantastic job.
Is someone advising?
Like, I don't know if you know this or, you know, I was told in my understandings that Trump drafts his own posts, period.
Sometimes he could not.
So he comes out and says she did a fantastic job.
And I'm not trying to overplay it.
She's lost Stephen Crowder.
I shared his post earlier today.
He said, look, she's got to arrest people or, you know, find someone, replace herself with someone who can.
She's lost Patrick Bett David.
She's lost Salty Cracker.
Salty Cracker quote tweeted Trump and said, nah, I'll bring it up in a second.
Is there anybody out there who is not a partisan hack?
And I'm not referring to the administration.
Cat turd, you don't expect him to say anything different.
A war clandestine, you don't expect him to say anything different.
Farash, you don't expect him to say anything different.
And members of the administration who risk termination if they say anything different.
Is there anybody out there who's mildly independent that thinks that she did a good job?
Yeah, you're referring.
I like how you follow this very closely as well.
If you're looking at those that are not in the admin or trying to get into the admin or how somehow financially remunerated through money or access, if those outside of that ecosystem, is anybody thinking that what Pam Bondi did in general terms yesterday was favorable?
I don't think so.
So it's that performance, they're losing all the independent coalition that was built in order to win and secure this presidency for President Trump.
The coalition is fracturing by the minute, by the second.
You know why?
It's because exactly what I said on January 6th of 2025.
I said, if in one year, the CNN reporter asked me, what do you think will happen?
Or will you be disappointed if in one year no one has been hung for treason?
And I responded with, will I be disappointed?
The country will be apoplectically furious that that has not happened.
And where are we at?
We are over a year into it, and the ship is absolutely sinking.
And the reason being is because there's been zero accountability.
James Comey, the indictment, an epic fail.
Letitia James, the indictment, an epic fail.
I mean, John Bolton, what's happened to him since he was quote unquote searched?
He wasn't even arrested.
No one's been arrested, except for a Patsy pipe bomber in order to run the, you know, run the deep state narrative.
And it's just Jack Smith out there treasoning with John Brennan and James Comey as they install governors in Virginia to continue to freely treason, and that's why I mean it.
The art hold up.
I think we uh Ivan, if you could hear me, I think we lost your audio, Ivan.
Okay, does it?
I don't think anybody else hears Ivan, if I don't hear him.
Uh, did we lose his audio question mark?
And I think the answer is going to be yes, this stuff, this is this, is like, yeah, we lost Ivan Ivan, hold on, they were trying to cordially interact.
She just flipped her lid off.
Ivan, I don't want to disappoint you, but we didn't hear the last 30 seconds of what you had to say.
I don't even know.
I don't even know where.
That's quite unfortunate.
Where did I leave off?
Uh, it was the apoplectic.
If nobody gets uh, you know punished, I will not use your terminology.
Well no, that wasn't my terminology, it was the terminology of the questioner, so I'm just quoting the CNN reporter.
And then you went on.
You know they've, all they've got is the Patsy pipe bomber now.
Well we, we might be having, uh with this might have been, so long as they don't get you Ivan no the the, the.
We're losing uh, we're losing connection, I think, on you no, so can you hear me now?
Yeah, we're good.
Okay, i'm gonna say this that I, I responded with.
The country will be furious if no one's been held account right, basically.
And so no one has been held to account.
We haven't seen James Comey, who was an epic fail and it wasn't even an arrest, it was a failed indictment.
Letitia, James fail.
It's just failure after failure, and all the White House and the DOJ, all they're focusing in on, oh, look at all the petty crime that we've addressed that local law enforcement is responsible for, and we're going to claim the numbers that we were part somehow part of that right.
Well Also, the Dow Jones, Ivan, you can't forget about the Dow Jones during the Attorney General testifying on the Epstein files.
The reason why Donald Trump loved it and put the truth post out about it is because all she did was address what Donald Trump wants her to, and she didn't address a single thing that the rest of the entire country wants to be addressed.
That's why.
Co-Conspirators Unveiled 00:15:37
Ivan, I don't want doom pilling, and I'm going to go over some of the other stuff afterwards, but you said that we're making progress.
Good.
Now, the question is: this: I like to say, you know, Trump can turn very quickly and he can actually, there's still a way in my view to spin all of this to really mobilize people just in time for the actual vote of the midterms.
And I do think that which actually early voting already started, Viva, in some states for the primary.
March 3rd is the first state, Texas, for example, is one of the big ones where primary voting begins.
So we're two weeks out, basically, two and a half weeks.
Let me bring this up here, Ivan, because this is something I do want to ask you.
You've got a bigger brain on this than I do.
If Ivan, Viva can't acknowledge the judicial coup holding everything back, they are just dumb.
Well, first of all, no fae contract.
We've talked about it multiple times.
And the problem is, you talk about the judicial coup, and then others might retort, myself being one of them.
Well, that's what happens when you don't impeach rogue judges and show a little bit of the law, even if they don't get convicted.
It's what happens when you don't impeach corrupt judges.
Now, some people are going to say they can't get their state attorneys appointed because of the blue slip.
Well, then you go after Grassley, which they also haven't done.
So, complaining about the judicial coup is one thing.
Well, I've acknowledged it.
I think, Ivan, we've put out practical steps that can be established to fight back against it.
What if you can still work the problem while the judicial coup coup is working on and you're working that problem through impeachment pushes?
Remember, you can arrest people and then have them rotting in solitary confinement pending a hearing.
Haven't we seen that before, Viva?
Well, I don't, and I don't promote abusing of that pre-trial detention like they're doing with the Patsy Brian Cole Jr., but you're complaining about someone saying that the judicial coup.
Yeah, we've seen, we've been talking about it.
So, what's the kiss, Viva?
And an eye for an eye, okay?
Well, I won't say the eye for an eye leaves everybody blind, but I will say that if you become the monster, you haven't defeated the monster.
I would rather have mutually assured destruction than for my kids to have to deal with this.
So, I'm okay with being blind as well.
So, now the question is, Ivan, proactive, what can still be done?
What should people do before I carry on with some of the other details of yesterday's hearing?
Let's just back up, right?
Whatever you think of what occurred yesterday was either fantastic or it wasn't fantastic.
I think when you look at Truth Social, there's one narrative, and there's only one hundredth or one thousandth of the audience of America is on Truth Social.
And so, about 99% of the remainder that are very astute political observers are on X.
And so, when X in the totality is essentially agreeing that we all want transparency and this White House wants to move on from that transparency, they're losing the plot.
And so, this exercise yesterday only exacerbated the desire for America to even further expose the Epstein information.
And so, I'm only here to kind of be the catalyst.
And that's why I put that video up because it wasn't public really yet the address of where that annex is.
Well, if you're, if that is the focal point of where further information can be accessed, then get.
Oh, you do now we've lost him.
So if that's where you can get the access, you got to go in there and get the access when you still can.
I'm talking for Ivan right now.
We'll wait for him to.
I'm logging into my UH Truth social account because I do want to show you that even the responses to Trump's truth post have been very bad.
Uh, let me see here.
Uh, you're impossible not to uh we we Ivan, we didn't hear you there either because I uh, you were, you were not.
Um uh, I said it's gonna be impossible for any member of Congress that voted for the Epstein files release to not go to that 145 And Street location to start to do their own research, because the constituents by you platforming me and others talking about it and knowing exactly where to go.
You're gonna have patriots that are monitoring that site from 9 a.m to 6 p.m, watching and observing which member of Congress or members of Congress are coming in and out, and we're gonna get more and more information and it's not going away Ivan, i'm gonna read some of the responses to Trump's truth post, because there's even widespread condemnation to that post over on Truth, even in an environment that you know.
Call it an echo chamber.
More so, more so than twitter.
Okay uh Ivan, where can people find you?
And what?
Uh, what's what's next on your schedule?
Uh, where can people find me?
On X AND Rumble, as long as Dan Bongina doesn't tell Chris Povelowski to censor me on UH, Rumble and on X, as long as Elon still continues to allow us to speak there.
I'm going to put the links in there for you afterwards Ivan, and now i'm going to go over some of the other follow-up stuff from yesterday and we'll talk obviously, in the future and you'll come back on whenever you.
All right man, have a good day.
Yep, all right.
Now i'm just going to read a few.
I can't log into my account on UM on the, my platform, the the top, the top uh posts.
President Trump, if you want to energize your base and bring others into your camp like you've never seen before, bring the hammer of justice down on all perverted and satanic people who are involved in abusing people in the epstein files.
Your voters expect you to do so.
The country cannot move on from this level of evil and pretend it didn't happen and see no consequences, that one has a hundred whatever they call them thumbs up.
Here you got um.
Her testimony was a dumpster fire sir, do better, and I hate that expression.
And when you are going to?
Yeah, i'm not reading the rest of this, but it's uh basic, widespread condemnation on truth itself, and I know that Trump reads it and I know that Trump reads the room and uh, it's an amazing thing.
I think, you know, an overcompensation for what people claimed was a lack of loyalty to members of his inner circle in 2016, and now it's over loyalty and I am giving Trump the benefit of the doubt because there is no strategic reason for which Trump would do this.
I know people say extortion.
I know people say Israel.
I know people say donors he's not up for re-election.
Uh, you know, there might be donor expectations, which there are, the donor class that he Seems to be listening to, more so than the people that elected him.
But there's no good reason for this from Trump's perspective.
What the sabotage might be?
Stick a bunch of people in his administration who are not, say, implicated in the Epstein enterprise, capital E, capital E, but who are involved in the Epstein files, like Luttnick.
Stick some people in there and then say, look, if this comes out, you know, Lutnick's going to name is going to be up in there.
Bannon's name is going to be up in there.
A lot.
And these are the members of your, you know, who have been members of your administration, core supporters.
And so it's going to embarrass Bannon.
It's going to, they're going to use that as a cudgel.
It's going to involve Luttnick.
They're going to use that as a cudgel.
I mean, there's so many other people in the admin whose names are tangentially or directly implicated that they said, yeah, you're not the problem, Trump, but your administration is.
And so getting back to the Lexner issue and the video of what I think is an embarrassing diversion, a juvenile cop-out from Pam Bonte.
You're a failed politician.
If Thomas Massey is anything, it's not a failed politician.
And I don't have any ties to Thomas Massey.
I think he follows me on Twitter, which I'm flattered about.
But I was never a Thomas Massey supporter as if I'm a sycophant or anything.
And he does good work and period.
I've got nothing for him.
I've got nothing against him.
I say, I got something for him now because he certainly got something done that to get up there and say, you're a failed politician.
You've got TDS.
First of all, he didn't have TDS until the Trump admin and Trump himself went to war with Thomas Massey.
Marjorie Taylor Greene, you know, didn't decide to go on CNN and The View.
She was kind of pushed in that general direction.
And so whether or not Marjorie Taylor Greene has TDS, Trump derangement syndrome, it might have been something that was born out of Trump calling or suggesting that Marjorie Taylor Greene is a traitor and the Trump machine and Trump himself going to war on Thomas Massey over what?
Disclosure of documents that only exonerate Donald Trump.
So that video of the back and forth with Thomas Massey and Pam Bonte.
The question is this, and I was looking through this to try to make sense of it.
The document that Thomas Massey said, look, you corrected it, Pam Bonte.
You unredacted what was redacted as identifying Les Wexner as a co-conspirator 40 minutes after I found it.
And she says, well, there were 3 million documents.
And then the question that I had is, how many of them identified Les Wexner as a co-conspirator?
This is the document I believe in.
Again, if I make a mistake, I will correct it.
This, from my understanding, is the document that originally had Les Wexner redacted as a co-conspirator.
And this, from what I understand, is the document after Les Wexner was unredacted to publicly disclose him as a co-conspirator.
What's amazing is the people out there trying to reduce this into a debate of semantics.
Oh, there were no co-conspirators.
Okay, well, I'm looking at a document right here that has one co-conspirator, two co-conspirators, three co-conspirators, four co-conspirators, five co-conspirators, six co-conspirators, seven co-conspirators.
Oh, I'm sorry, eight co-conspirators.
Former girlfriend does not say co-conspirator.
So don't give me this nonsense.
Oh, there were no, there were no, there were no sex crimes.
I mean, it was only Epstein and nobody else.
Okay, I just saw seven co-conspirators.
And allegedly and apparently, Les Wexner was initially redacted.
Thomas Massey knew what he was looking for or found a needle in a haystack.
And Pam Bondi's answer, 3 million documents.
How many of them Identified Les Wexner as a co-conspirator.
And, you know, you try to, I looked through.
I found, let me see where the document is.
I believe it's this one where Lex Wesner, Leslie Wexner, resides in Ohio.
SDNY is currently in contact with his attorneys and a subpoena has been served.
There is limited evidence regarding his involvement and he's listed here.
So the argument is going to be: it was a mistake.
Pam Bondi or whoever redacted it shouldn't have.
We corrected it within 40 minutes.
The argument is going to be, and this is a point against Thomas Massey, or it would be if someone were out there doing their job properly, defending themselves properly, Pam Bondi could have said, look, it was a mistake, but there were other documents that were not redacted that identified him as a co-conspirator.
This being one of them.
hold on the dog wants to leave and then the only problem is going to be well this one you know it says secondary co-conspirators This is the one I found today that apparently was never redacted to hide that Leslie Wexner was a secondary co-conspirator.
What does that even mean?
Epstein co-conspirators released 2019.
And this is roughly the same time as the other document.
We got the, I don't know, from two.
I don't even know why this is all.
This is probably redacted because they're employees at the FBI, I presume, and you don't want to.
Co-conspirators, primary co-conspirators, redacted.
Currently living in New York City, but owns home in both Miami and North Carolina.
Served as Epstein's personal assistant and traveled with him most of the time, however, wherever he went.
Arranged massage appointments from New York City.
Blank was blank.
Okay, fine, whatever.
Multiple people.
Here's another one, co-conspirator.
And this is co-conspirator, primary co-conspirator.
So we got a redacted name.
Why?
Don't know.
Another redacted name, currently living in Florida, been cooperating during a proffer.
She provided the information described above.
Okay, blah, blah, blah.
One of these is Maxwell.
I guess these are the same ones that were listed in the other document.
You got another one currently living in Connecticut.
Multiple victims and cooperating co-conspirators advised blank worked out of Epstein's New York City residence and his personal assistant and was in charge of making phone calls to set up massage appointments.
This is all, at least according to this document, not about child sex trafficking to other clients, but people who worked to satisfy the prurient interests of Jeffrey Epstein.
Glaine Maxwell, okay, that's unredacted.
Secondary co-conspirators, Jean-Luc Brunel.
Do we all remember who Jean-Luc Brunel is?
Let me just refresh everybody's memory on him.
Jean-Luc Brunel was a French, is this him?
Model Scout gained prominence.
Let me just go with the Epstein stuff, make sure we got the right one.
Here we go.
He gained prominence by leading the international modeling agency, Karen Models, and founded MC2 Model Management with financing by Jeffrey Epstein.
Just so everybody sees what I'm looking at.
And it's Wikipedia, but we just need, yeah, when Wikipedia, when Wikipedia is forced to say it, you know, it's bad.
Let me get the Epstein number out of here.
The subject of a 60 Minutes investigation in 1988, Brunel faced allegations of pimping and sexual assault spanning three decades.
So he's a co-conspirator, involved in sexual assault.
And we're being told that it was only for the puriant interests of Jeffrey Epstein.
Brunel came under scrutiny for his ties to Epstein, with whom he had worked since from the early 2000s to 2015.
He was accused of grooming girls and taking part in an alleged sex trafficking operation involving Epstein.
In 2019, the French National Police launched an investigation on Brunel after he went into hiding following Epstein's death.
He was arrested 2020.
French prosecutors charged him with rape of minors.
Oh, I thought it was only Epstein.
However, he hanged himself in his cell at La Santé Prison.
That's ironic.
La Cente means the health prison.
Sorry, I don't mean to laugh at that.
He hanged himself in his cell at La Cente Prison before his trial could proceed.
That's one of the other co-conspirators.
But we're told, you know, it was only Epstein.
So we got Jean-Louis Brin, we got another redacted, and then we got Leslie Wexner.
So Pam Bondi could say, look, it was an accident.
Don't know how it happened.
You want to figure out how it happened.
But there's another document that identified Les Wexner as a co-conspirator.
So you're making a mountain out of a molehill, Thomas Massey.
And I don't think anybody would have bought that answer, but it would have been better than calling him a failed politician and saying he had TDS.
And so there's a couple of other documents, but that's it.
The bottom line is when you are losing the likes of Patrick Bett David, and he came out with a very insightful post that everybody should read, everyone should digest.
The Epstein files have become the biggest black eye for this administration.
Epstein Files Black Eye 00:02:13
Not to say, haha, I said it first.
Been saying this for six months.
Robert Barnes and I have been saying this for six months.
And not for the purposes of taking down the Trump administration.
That would be stupid.
This administration needs to succeed.
I would be one heck of a mole to the, oh, yeah, no, no, I'm going to be dedicated to making sure this administration succeeds for the purposes of taking it down.
But he puts out, he says, it's the biggest black eye ever.
There are a few issues that unite Americans across politics, religion, and income levels.
Protecting kids is one of them.
The last three administrations failed to address it.
This was an opportunity to finally confront it head on.
The quote, attack, deny, never apologize, which is a Roger Stone-style thing.
Playbook doesn't work when children are involved.
Yes, there's a lot to celebrate.
Murder down, Border Secure, American projecting strength, markets performing well.
But none of that matters to parents if kids aren't protected.
And you certainly don't get to say, yeah, I'm here for Epstein, but the Dow Jones is doing great.
It's also true that many on the left are more focused on taking down Trump than protecting children.
Otherwise, this would have been a priority years ago.
They would have done it under Biden.
Biden had interest in taking down children, not taking down pedos.
Still, this has been badly mishandled.
When it comes to kids, transparency, accountability aren't optional.
Major fumble, no other way to say it.
When was this from?
Yesterday.
It's been a fumble since whenever.
And then people are going to say, well, you know, the buck stops with Trump.
And you're right.
It does.
And he made some bad appointments in his first term.
And it seems to be a mistake that's repeating now.
But I'll tell you, when you lose PBD, or at least get that legitimate righteous criticism from PBD, when you get salty cracker, I showed it when Ivan was on screen.
When you get salty cracker, nope, cut your losses and fire her.
Agreed.
Said it six months ago.
And not because I had anything against Bonnie from the get-go.
I didn't.
Who else?
Do I have Steven Crowder's post out here?
I don't know that I have Steven Crowder's post out here.
But it's it, but it's black and white at this point in time.
And then the question is going to be: well, you know, people are getting embarrassed.
Too effing bad.
Oh, the underlying issue.
Oh, there was no trafficking.
Bull crap.
Voting Save Act Integrity 00:11:10
We just got it.
We got Les Wexner and we got Brunel for decades.
Bull crap.
And that's that.
Let me see what's going on here.
I've fallen well behind.
We're going to get into the other Thomas Massey Save Act clarification because, again, you don't know what you can read.
I try to make sense of it.
I do my best and I hope I do good enough.
One can only hope to be value-added in this world.
Then we're going to get into the outrage in Canada.
Barnes was right, says King of Bill Tong.
Looking for real food, try some Bill Tong made with clean ingredients and done the right way at Bill Tong USA.
We don't make processed junk.
Check out Billtongusa.com, code Viva, for 10% off.
Go support Bill Tong.
He's a good man, great man.
I've had him on the channel, actually, South African out of Texas, making American-made beef jerky called Biltong.
It's a South African thing.
It's flipping delicious.
And it's good to support people who do good, who do good locally, and who are themselves hardworking, American-loving, freedom-loving people.
Over on our vivabarnslaw.locals.com community.
We'll go to the tip questions before we get into the next segment of the day.
Bannon's Cold Open today was a cover-up for Bondi.
It was severely edited to make her look good.
Bannon's got his own problems right now.
You know, I posted, if you're at our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community, you saw it was not behind a paywall.
So, everybody who's watching right now, please go join as a member of our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
I posted my thoughts on this.
Bannon's got, I say, I would be mortified if I were Bannon.
I would never be in a position where I would be fraternizing, giving PR advice to a convicted sex offender.
Period.
Full stop.
One of the most glorious, I'm going to take this out for one second and come back to this.
The most glorious move that I made in my life was when I left the big law firm, thinking I was going to go to do commercial photography at Dawson College.
And before I could even get put on the waiting list, ultimately to not get into commercial photography.
Apparently, universities don't think a well, how old was I?
30, it was a, oh, let's say give or take.
A 35-year-old man, father of one, is going to be particularly interested in actually pursuing commercial photography.
So I was put on a waiting list and ultimately rejected Dawson College.
And then I learned you don't need to get into commercial photography to love and continue with photography.
When I left the big firm and you could decide what cases to take, you were the master of your domain, the master of your ship, the captain of the ship, and you can handle the file the way you want.
Nobody's going to tell you what to do, not even your own effing client.
And I remember I had a client who's no longer among the living telling me to do something that would have violated the agreement I had with the lawyer from the night before.
And I said, I'm not doing that.
We just agreed last night that we're doing X, Y, and Z in court.
I'm not going in and saying, oh, yeah, no deal.
He says, he said to me, and I remember clear as day, do it.
Show him that you're a bulldog.
And I said, that's not showing him that I'm a bulldog.
That's showing him that I'm a snake.
And in as much as you think it would help you, A, it wouldn't.
It won't work in front of a judge.
And you will get the reputation of being a deceitful bastard for the rest of your professional career.
And rightly so.
Now, I forget why I went on that tangent.
Bannon giving advice to a convicted sex offender.
I mean, and I and I hypothesize, you know, you've got to steal man for those who aren't there.
You got to give the benefit of the doubt.
I said, okay, maybe he, maybe there was a finance, you know, he was getting paid for his expertise.
You know, even drug dealers and rapists and murderers deserve lawyers, and you don't judge the lawyer for representing their client.
Same can't really be true when it comes to giving PR advice for what was described as a comeback tour, but of another word when you, a rehabilitation tour.
And so he's got to, he's got to live with that.
I don't know what his explanation is.
Down on the money, I don't know, coerced, extorted into giving the advice.
He had a set of skills and he uses them on whichever clients.
He'll either explain it or not.
And I suspect it'll be more silenced than anything else because I don't think there's any good answer for it.
But all that to say, when I, you know, the freedom of being my own lawyer is I turned down more clients than I took and more files than I took because you take a file that you don't really believe in.
A, it will show in the performance of the file and you do things that you think are wrong.
And those favors to your clients become blackmail material by your clients.
Bill Brown says, stop lying to yourself.
You have the answer.
You've always had it.
You're just too busy negotiating with comfort to avoid the work.
The quote hard thing, end quote, and the quote right thing end quote are the same thing.
And you know it.
Quit the negotiating, execute.
Then we got Bill Brown with sorry, I don't know that Michael Jordan ever said that.
And I will not defame Michael Jordan.
So, those are our tip questions over on Viva BarnesLaw.locals.com.
All right, the other issue of the day is something that I had to clarify yesterday.
In the smear campaign going on against Thomas Massey, the position of the day yesterday is Thomas Massey is voting against the SAVE Act, the SAVE Act, which would require identification, voter ID to vote.
It's an obvious necessity if elections are to have integrity and thus be believed.
I tweeted out earlier today.
It's an old expression.
I forget the guy who said it.
Go to my Twitter feed if you want to see it.
If you have integrity, nothing else matters.
And if you don't have integrity, nothing else matters.
It was an ambiguous.
So who am I talking about?
It's a good principle of life.
I sure as hell wasn't talking about myself.
I live by these standards.
But it's when it comes to other issues that it becomes more important.
The second people no longer trust you, you're fucked.
Period.
I'm sorry to swear.
The second you're caught in a lie, you're fucked.
Even if it's immaterial.
And now Lutnik, who may have been great.
I keep forgetting his position.
Lutnick positioned.
What is it?
United States Secretary of Commerce.
Might have been good at his job, might be good at his job.
The second you are publicly caught in a lie, it's it.
Everyone's going to remember that.
You put the vase back together, you're always going to see the lines where it broke.
If you have integrity, nothing else matters.
And if you don't, nothing else matters.
And if elections don't have integrity, nothing else matters.
They could be legit.
If nobody believes the results or the legitimacy of the results, you got a big problem.
So yesterday, people were going out and saying Thomas Massey is voting against the SAVE Act.
He's a traitor.
He's a Democrat, whatever the hell you want to call him.
And I had read, no, he wasn't voting against the SAVE Act.
It's passed the House and it's going to the Senate now.
It passed by one vote.
He was voting against a rule that modified a certain procedure that would allow for debating, bringing up his tweet, that would allow for debating spending bills without 24-hour notice.
So Thomas Massey tweets, there's a false rumor that I voted against the SAVE Act today.
I'll vote for it when it comes to the floor.
I voted against a rule that allows it to get to a vote.
Did I read that probably?
That allows it to get a vote, but the rule also suspends House rules and allows spending bills to come to the floor with no 24-hour notice.
Okay.
And then he shows a portion of the rules.
Now, some people are going to say, Thomas, that is a distinction without a difference.
You didn't vote against the act, but you voted against a rule that would have brought the act to the floor for a vote on the act.
And so by voting against the rule, you create all sorts of delays.
You might make it impossible for the act itself to get to the floor in order to get voted upon.
And that might be true, but you might want to explain that.
Now, it's politics.
Nuance is tough to explain.
If you're explaining, you're losing.
But it was, in fact, incorrect to suggest that he was voting against the SAVE Act.
He said he'll support it.
But why would there be a rule in there that changes the rules about bringing spending bills, whatever the hell it was, to the floor with no 24-hour notice?
How could that be abused?
What's the purpose of that?
What article did I just bring up here?
House passes GOP elections overhaul.
The Save America Act faces a filibuster roadblock in the Senate, even as conservatives seek out workarounds.
This is from yesterday.
Yeah, yesterday.
House passed a major GOP election overhaul Wednesday after intense pressure from Donald Trump, tech mogul Elon Musk, hard right influencers, not just right-wing, not just conservative, no, hard-right and not commentators, influencers.
But the legislation still has no clear path forward in the Senate where Republicans privately acknowledge there is not enough GOP support to skirt a Democratic filibuster as Trump is demanding.
Well, now you understand and the filibuster.
If you don't do it, they'll do it when it's beneficial to them.
Save America Act, an updated version of the bill tightening voter registration standards that the House passed last year was approved on a 218 to 13 vote.
One Democrat, Hillary Heller, I don't know who that is, Henry Kueller, voted for it, down from four who backed the earlier effort.
Conservative hardliners wanted the bill attached to a massive government funding package this month, threatening to extend a four-day partial government shutdown until Trump intervened and ordered the House Republicans to pass the bill without it.
Hmm.
Sounds like some politicians might have actually been successful politicians in separating these bills from the pork fat that makes them unsupportable.
And then if you don't want to support the pork fat and you vote no on the bill, they say, oh, you voted, how could you, you traitor, you voted against the Save Act bill and all of its fattiness that has nothing to do with election integrity.
The legislation would trigger major changes on how Americans vote, including requiring voters to present proof of citizenship to register, eliminating mail-only registrations, and requiring photo ID in every state for the first, God forbid, do it the way every other civilized country on earth does it.
It would also require states to take new steps to remove non-citizens from existing voters.
God forbid.
I mean, it's enough that illegals count in the census towards, what is it called, seats, representatives.
Oh, no, but now you have, this is controversial.
The GOP's hope is that it focuses on election integrity and Trump's false claims that the election was rigged.
You mother effers, you are worthless sacks of filth, MSM.
The 2020 election was not just rigged.
It was fortified.
It wasn't just fortified.
It was manipulated.
It was fraudulent.
Period.
Oh, my God.
It's like they've forgotten about the article that explains how it was rigged to control information, change laws.
Oh, my God.
They're proud of it when they want to frame it their way.
Or whatever.
The House vote hands a hot potato to the Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who has ruled out changing Senate rules to weaken the 60-voter supermajority threshold to pass the bill and has reacted coolly to suggestions of, quote, talking filibuster approach could work instead.
Eyes on the Controversy 00:03:23
Let me actually probably read this.
Okay, the vote is also meant to satisfy the president's demands for a voting crackdown.
Okay, we got that there.
House GOP leaders deployed a procedural feint using a Senate-passed shell bill to try to fast-track consideration in the other chamber, part of the Trump-backed push to try to force a reckoning on the filibuster.
Senator Lisa Murkowski poured cold water.
These analogies are terrible.
Even before it was the House vote, Wednesday, Murkowski announced she would oppose it, lambasing the bill as, quote, federal overreach.
Her move sparked an onslaught of recriminations from House Republicans who are still pushing Thune and Speaker Johnson to find a way to send the bill to Trump's desk.
Bottom line, and you can agree or disagree with the rationale.
Why would they change the rules to allow spending bills to come to the floor with no 24-hour notice?
And how could that possibly be abused?
I don't know, to continue funding certain things that people don't want to fund.
But the reality is, and again, say it's a distinction without a difference.
If you vote against the rule, you're effectively preventing a vote on the act.
But Thomas Massey has made it abundantly clear he will support the act, is vocalizing his opposition to that rule.
And some might say rightly so.
But to understand the truth, it's a little more nuanced.
It takes a little more time than some people want, have, or are disciplined enough to put in to understand it.
And I hope this Canadian schnook has made sense of it for you because it took some time to make sense of it for me.
Like, share, and subscribe.
All right, people, we are going to go back to Canada at this point in time, and it's going to make you puke.
I mean, it's going to make you want to put your fist through a computer screen, which I won't do because it's a fancy computer.
The dog just moses on in.
All right, now people wanted proof of life.
Oh, you know what?
You know what I guarantee you he did?
I guarantee you the dog pissed outside the office.
Let me just get this back up to darkness.
This is Winston, and we can see if he's recently urinated.
Hmm.
He's a filthy rag.
This is Winston.
He's blind, so he doesn't need to have his hair cut around his eyes.
If you see, let's see if you can see his eyes.
There you go.
You see that whiteness in his eyes?
Oh, that's this side right here.
There you go.
Whatever.
Anyhow, blind.
But since Pudge has passed, he started doing it a little bit before, but I think now he's doing it out of loneliness.
He started peeing in the house just for no good reason.
And he's got a big bladder and he drinks a lot of water.
So I'm going to use that as an excuse to go find another companion for him because I want another dog in any event.
We're going to go to Canada after we go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com to see what's going on here.
Bill Brown says, Viva, did he vote for the act on the floor or not?
I don't think it went to the floor for the vote yet.
Did the did get my fat fingers to do this?
Did Massey vote for the Save Act?
I don't think I don't.
No, I don't think it went for that vote yet.
I think he voted against the rule, the rule passed by one, and now they're going to send it to the Senate.
How that works.
They're going to send it to the Senate.
Says Dred Roberts.
So, okay, I have to go refine that.
Bill Brown says, we'll be back with more news as soon as we make it up with the memes.
Allie Michael.
Oh, Madness Cold Open Today was a cover for Bondi.
Identifying Mistaken Shooters 00:14:54
It was severely edited to make her look good.
Dude, if in order for it to have been edited to make her look good, it would have to just not be played.
There's no way.
The only question is, how bad did you actually think it was?
Okay, speaking of how bad do you think it was?
There's been a mass shooting in Canada.
And again, it's been carried out by, put it in quotes, a transgender individual carried out by a male, a boy, whatever you want to call the person at that age, named Jesse Stranger, or Jesse Strang.
And some people saying, well, what difference does it make the gender perspective, the gender ideology?
I can tell you exactly what difference it makes.
You're going to start noticing a common denominator.
And other than the tool used to carry out the act, there's going to be some other unfortunate common denominators.
And when it comes to the tool used to carry out the act, you might be finding that no matter how strict the laws get, they'll either find a way illegal to procure that tool or they'll use other tools to commit their acts of unhinged violence.
And then the question is going to be, why are they committing these acts of unhinged violence?
You know, the stabbings in Japan, the car attacks in China, the acid attacks in London.
You know, it's not a joke.
It was a meme that became reality.
Well, now they're illegalizing knives.
Well, all right, that's great.
They're illegalizing knives because after having illegalized guns, where you still have mass shootings in Australia, you still have a lot of shootings in Canada.
In fact, shootings in Canada have only gone up with increasingly strict gun laws.
Go make sense of that.
It'll befuddle the lefty Democrat liberal idiots because they're morons.
It's not going to befuddle anybody else because criminals don't follow the law.
That's kind of the thing about being a criminal.
Set that aside.
As they outlaw one tool, well, then criminals use another tool.
And they literally got to the point of outlawing knives.
I mean, in Canada, I think it's two and a half inches long.
You can't carry around in public a knife that has a blade that's longer than two and a half inches long.
You can't carry around a knife in public for the purposes of using it as self-defense.
So, another shooting, another transgender kid, adult.
And there's a number of things that are severely problematic here.
The first thing is making sure that you understand what is real and what is not, and making sure that you do not promote disinformation deliberately, some or inadvertently for others.
And immediately, as of this shooting, the media, and I'm not being glib and I'm not trying to be funny.
It's fucking sick.
It's sick, unhinged, and I would dare say depraved.
When some people make a mistake in terms of identifying apparently the wrong shooter.
And the irony is: I'm not even sure.
Pleb the reporter, truck driver Pleb apparently initially posted a picture of what he thought News was saying was the shooter in the early hours of the shooting.
He deleted it because apparently he thought he made a mistake.
It's not even clear that he made a mistake anymore.
Deleted it and said, I posted an image of someone I believe to be the Tumblr Ridge shooter before that identification had been verified.
The post was removed within minutes.
I've also been proactively reaching out to accounts sharing the same information to make sure that good.
That's what you call self-regulation.
Some Canadian flag account is going to eventually have the same connotations of the Ukrainian flag in your bio with this type of idiocy.
This is exactly why social media needs to be regulated.
It's a detriment to society.
The stupidest people are propped up by bots and are given huge platforms to spread bullshit with zero consequences.
First of all, the pleb is not propped up by bots in any realm of the universe.
But understand what they said here.
Social media is a detriment to society.
The stupidest people are propped up, given huge platforms to spread bullshit.
This is reality, by the way.
Like I said, regulated.
Haha, you idiot.
Some people actually self-regulate by acknowledging mistakes, deletion, retraction, and apology.
Meanwhile, MSM literally referred to the shooter as a female in a dress, a woman, and then a gun person in a dress.
These are the actual headlines.
Canadian school shooting, nine killed by quote, female in dress in Tumblr Ridge.
That actually statement came from the police.
You'll understand why in a second.
Another headline: Canadian school shooter identified as 18-year-old woman with mental health issues.
Never.
This is Sodom and Gomorrah level depravity.
This is biblical levels disinformation lies pleasing the devil.
Gun person in a dress behind Canada's deadliest school shooting in decades.
This is reality.
And some jackass is going to say you need to regulate social media.
The funny thing is, shame and authenticity and reliability is the regulation on social media.
Legacy media is out there saying gun person when they find out it's a boy, woman in a dress, mother effers.
And it's all the way up to the top and from the top down.
It's demonic.
It's demonic, is the only way to explain this.
Listen to this.
I was going a little hard yesterday.
I don't even think I was going hard enough.
This is the RCNP press conference as of the day before yesterday.
I listened to the whole thing.
This is the RCMP press conference.
Look at this MoFo's face.
This mother effer's face gets up there and actually says this in a room in the area about the crime with potential victims' families in the audience.
They're going to see it.
This is beyond insult to injury.
It's demonic.
It's beyond suicidal empathy.
It's demonic empathy.
Well, first off, thank you for your question.
We're not hiding it.
In fact, you're the first media.
The question was, why are they hiding the fact that the shooter identified as transgender?
Oh, we're not hiding it.
We're just calling him a woman in a dress, a gun person.
Well, first off, thank you for your question.
We're not hiding it.
In fact, you're the first media to ask the question.
I will say this.
We identify the suspect as they chose to be identified in public and in social media.
I can say that Jesse was born as a biological male who, approximately the information that I have, approximately six years ago, began to transition to female and identified as female both socially and publicly.
There's only one thing to say to them.
Fuck you, whoever you are, sir.
You deserve to lose your job.
We identify the mass murderer the way they chose to be identified.
Why?
You want to show sympathy to the dead mass murderer?
You want to respect their chosen.
Who the fuck is this person?
To get up there and tell the public, we're going to identify the person the way they chose to be identified.
I can confirm that Jesse.
Is he on a first name basis now with mass murderers?
A media to ask the question.
I will say this.
We identify the suspect as they chose to be identified in public.
You wouldn't want to upset their wishes there, RCMP constable, whatever the hell you are.
You wouldn't want to upset their family.
Oh, no, that's right.
Their family's dead because he killed his mother and brother.
We identify them as they chose.
Oh, you are so fucking virtuous.
I'm sorry.
This is insanity.
This is institutionalized insanity.
Let me just play it one more time so we can do this.
We identify the suspect the way they chose to be identified.
Because in death, when they're burning in hell after having killed nine people, 10 now, I believe, we wouldn't want to identify them in a way that they chose not to be identified in their mass delusion that led to this in the first place.
We identify the suspect as they chose to be identified in public and in social media.
Fired.
Fired.
All of them.
Fired.
Here's a link to that just so you have it so that you can bask in it.
It's on my Twitter feed.
It's even worse.
If you can imagine, it gets even worse.
I apologize for swearing.
There was another one.
Let me bring this one up here.
There was another clip from that one right here.
It's on my pinned video now.
Understand what we're witnessing right now.
By the way, you don't see the journal.
It's a global, I believe it's a global news journalist.
I might be wrong on that.
It's a woman asking this officer about the killer.
She, because she's not retarded, is referring to the killer as a he and a him.
This guy, because he is retarded, a man, corrects the woman and uses what he thinks are the proper identifiers.
You could make this up if it were in a George Orwell novel that no one would believe even in fiction.
If you have questions, I'm prepared to take them at this time.
Officer Renina Daya from the Global Communities, could you please expand a little bit on the suspect?
Was he known to police?
Were there any red flags regarding his mental health?
So a suspect is identified as an 18-year-old female.
Fuck you again, sir.
I'm sorry.
So, I'm sorry.
Did you understand what he just did?
So, lady, the suspect is identified as an 18-year-old female.
Why?
Are you going to add that to the statistics of a female crime?
This guy, you know, the more I listen to him, he deserves to be in jail for get fired.
So, woman, the suspect is identified.
It's like, it's like they didn't do it.
It just happened.
The suspect is identified.
So, a suspect is identified as an 18-year-old female by the name of Jesse.
We have a history of police attendance at the family residence.
Some of those calls are word, pardon me, related to mental health issues.
Can you understand the depraved audacity that this SOB corrects a female journalist with pure delusional fiction?
Was he known to police?
Other mental health issues?
Well, there were, oh, so a dummy.
Did you get the memo, woman?
He's identified as a woman, as a female.
It'll go down on the stats of female mass shooters now.
The condescending, you know, there's only one other person on earth who could do it and be just as disgustingly condescending.
Oh, that's right.
He learned from that person, Justin Trudeau.
So, a suspect is identified as an 18-year-old female by the name of Jesse.
We have a history of police attendance at the family residence.
Some of those calls are were, pardon me, related to mental health issues.
This was a mentally ill kid who, instead of being treated, was coddled, who instead of being treated was affirmed, then jacked up on HRT, whatever the hell they jacked him up on with.
Then he was on whatever other SSRIs they jacked him up on.
If he was, I'm not sure that he was, but you know, where I'm going being somewhat hyperbolic.
Then he's taking mushrooms and psychotropic drugs recreationally.
But he's been identified as a female.
So that's why we came here today to ask you.
Justin Trudeau, by the way.
Do you notice this is how bad influences trickle from the top down?
This is how bad habits trickle from the boss down.
That RCMP officer is empowered to be a misogynist piece of filth to judge and correct an actual woman who's actually right because they've decided to cater to the whims, the delusional, mentally ill whims of a dead mass shooter.
Where did he learn it from?
I learned it from watching you, Dad.
So that's why we came here today to ask you to also look into the policies that religious charitable organizations have in our legislation so that it can also be changed because maternal love is the love that's going to change the future of mankind.
So we'd like you to look.
We like to say people kind, not necessarily mankind.
So that's why.
Sorry, woman.
The man is explaining it to you.
And so above and beyond everything, that's reality.
And if you had seen that video, you might think that that was fake.
You might think that that was AI generated because in no realm of the universe could law enforcement defy reality, desecrate the victims' memories, double injure the families who now have to see the law enforcement is more interested in catering to the identity of a dead mass shooter than actually preventing the crime in the first place.
And when it comes to stuff that you don't know what you can believe and you don't know what you can't, I'm not sharing this to put anyone on blast.
I still haven't been able to determine if this is a real video depicting what it's supposed to be depicting.
Concerned citizen, citizen, sorry, concerned citizen posted this video that says this is Jesse Van Rutzelar, the 18-year-old trans shooter who murdered at least 10 people at Tumblr Ridge yesterday in Canada.
Instead of dealing with his obvious mental health issues, Canadian health authorities convinced Jesse he was a trans, pumped him full of hormone puberty blockers and a whole heap of other medication.
They literally poisoned his body and mind instead of getting them the help he needed.
Now, let me play this for you with the caveat that I'm not convinced.
I'm not sure.
I've read conflicting reports that this isn't the actual shooter, that this video was uploaded to the internet in 2019 at an age when Jesse would have been 11 or 12.
Now, I don't know if that means that he posted this video on his own YouTube feed back in the day.
Because apparently it was posted to show a crazy laugh, practicing a crazy laugh.
Why Videos Beautify Martyrs 00:05:52
We don't need to watch any more of that.
And so AJ Jones posted it.
And I said, we're going to go, I'm going to open this up in non-um-incognito because people are saying it's not him, but it was posted on his YouTube channel.
In which case, if he's posting this at 12 years old, it's still an indication of something.
And let me see if we're going to get the answer here.
You know, the bottom line, I don't know if that's actually him or if he actually posted that or if it just happened to be on another YouTube channel named Jesse Strang.
And this is the world in which we're living.
You don't know what you can believe, you know, if it's AI, but then the use of information for inaccurate purposes.
So that if anybody does post it, like Pleb posts something and then someone else for the rest of his life is going to try to hold that against him, Pleb the reporter, truck driver Pleb, you don't know what you can believe and what you can't.
And so above and beyond qualifying everything with this is the best of our understanding as of today, the bottom line of what is now known is that this individual was, quote, trans, was a man who had suicidal ideations, jacked up on whatever the F he was jacked up on, had clear mental health issues, known to police.
And now they're going to come in and say, you can't criticize the trans ideology because that would be transphobic.
We got to come down even harder on the guns because somehow this kid who had his guns taken away from him, but then got them back after petitioning for them to get back, somehow had a Desert Eagle, according to one of the videos out there, even though Desert Eagles have been outlawed effectively in Canada since 2022.
They're going to go for everything else that involves empowering the very same dumbass, shitty government that caused the problem in the first place.
They're going to go empower the dude over there who's correcting the woman and saying, well, we identify the killer by the way they chose to be identified when they were alive.
Imagine being the family of the victims having to look at that.
That's the absolute state of Canada.
And if you can imagine, and I don't think you're going to be able to believe this, it gets even worse.
And I say this with the caveat that it's very difficult to actually know if this is true or not, because when things get modified on the internet, and if you don't have archive footage or the archived link, again, it becomes very difficult to know if this is accurate or some form of insidious disinformation or sincere and honest mistakes.
This is from Cosmen Zurudu, who actually I should see this, managing editor at Juno News.
Okay, so this is actually much more legitimate.
I didn't fully appreciate when I first saw this that he's the managing editor at JunoNews.com.
They do great work.
T-Post, the post-millennial.
And so he tweeted this out.
This is so messed up because it's beyond messed up.
Canadian media outlet City News is applying beauty filters to make the trans mass shooter Jesse Strang Van Rudelstar look more female.
We saw this with Alex Predi out of the States.
This is demonic.
So apparently, and I tried to reverse image search to see if I could get the original listing of this photograph and I wasn't able to find it because apparently they uploaded or updated the thumbnail, whatever on YouTube, and I couldn't find an original link that was an exact match for this image.
But apparently, that was the image.
And they made that's that's a that's the edited image from City News compared to the original actual photo of the actual man, male mass shooter.
It's demonic.
You've got the government playing into the delusion.
You've got the government-funded media beautifying the delusion.
Why would they do that?
You got to ask yourself, why would they do that?
Well, you do that.
You beautify martyrs so that they are more socially acceptable, so that they're more marketable as martyrs.
And I say this from a historic biblical perspective.
Everybody who is a saint is beautiful.
And I'm not saying this in any demeaning way of religion.
Look, you don't want people using bad photos of you in real time or after your life.
And the same goes for depictions of people who were martyred as saints.
Well, you got the filthy, propagandist, demonically possessed government and government-funded media.
They want to make martyrs of these people so that it's easier to use them as poster children of their movements.
Because at the end of the day, by the way, don't ever think that the media and the people who are going to complain that it's transphobic to make these observations don't think they're not going to claim that this kid was a victim of transphobia.
They're already doing it, incidentally.
So they need to beautify their martyr.
The same way they needed to beautify their martyr in Alex Predi.
And look, what happened to Alex Predi was totally, totally disastrously unfortunate.
They literally photoshopped him to make him more attractive so that it's an easier sell for a martyr for the movement.
I mean, imagine what an absolute insult that is as well.
That fake media has to make you more visually palatable in order to be able to market your death for their propagandist needs.
And it appears they've done the exact same demonic tactic up in Canada.
That's that.
Rumble Wallet Dominance 00:02:57
Now, before we go raid redacted, I want to read some of the chat and I also want to remind everybody as to how they can support the channel and the work that I do.
Let me bring this up here.
I say the work that Robert and I do on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
By the way, we were right.
Absolutely total vindication in our righteous criticism.
Had it been listened to six months ago, this catastrophe wouldn't be here today.
Dominant One says, Good logic finally decided it's not gay to put Anton's meat, Anton's firm and juicy meat in your mouth from Killing Bill Tongue.
Thank you very much, Dominant One.
And Randall J. All says, Thank you.
You are the first podcaster to agree with me in that we are in times such as Sodom and Gomorrah.
God save the USA.
I think he meant to say God save and not God Day of the USA.
If you want to support the channel, let me refresh this here.
Download the Rumble Wallet, download the Rumble app.
Do it anyhow, because you get the Rumble app, you'll get real-time immediate notifications when your favorite creators go live.
Download Rumble Wallet if you want to invest in crypto at your own risks and peril.
But if you want to tip, look at this.
You can go to the Rumble wallet.
You can tip in Bitcoin.
Booyah, right there.
You can tip in XAUT, which is gold-backed, gold-tethered crypto, courtesy of Tether, which is now a stakeholder in Rumble and an innovator with Rumble.
Scan the QR code, and you can tip in crypto if you so choose.
And if you just want to support the channel, you can go to vivafry.com to get merch.
I'm not particularly good at selling, you know, selling my stuff, but like, share, subscribe.
This is, we're community-based over in viva barnslaw.locals.com.
You can get some merch.
Everybody needs clothes and shirts.
10 bucks a month at locals, 100 bucks a year if you get the whole thing.
The easiest way is to like, share, and subscribe.
Now, let me bring up the tip questions over on locals before we go there for our after party.
Roosting says, Billboard Chris, 19 hours ago, Jennifer Strang, the deceased mom whose son murdered her and his stepbrother and several school children, unfortunately never learned the lesson that it is damaging to affirm a delusion and to enable a mental health crisis.
I encourage the rest of society's trans activists to wake up and realize that nobody is transgender.
We don't have gender identities.
We have personalities and personalities don't require sex change.
You know, I said parents are going to start learning when they start getting sued for the damages they've enabled or caused to their children and when they become the targets of the violence.
It's just the horrendous tragedy.
Had Jesse merely taken his own life, it would be a tragedy.
It would be a tragedy that was egged on by facilitating delusions and affirming delusions.
The fact that he killed his mother and stepbrother makes it even worse.
Unfortunately, the mother's not going to live to have learned that lesson, but sometimes your sole purpose in life is to serve as a warning to others.
But to take out nine other, six other school children, seven, I think it's seven now.
Tragedy and Warning 00:02:55
You know, once upon a time, I was in circumstances where I said, this person's crazy in my immediate orbit.
They're going to kill themselves and somebody else.
And the only thing you can hope is if they only kill themselves before they do something worse.
And this person, unfortunately, took out many innocent people before taking themselves out.
I have not seen this.
Ian Runkel says the response.
This is CTV News.
Mass shootings in Canada have helped prompt changes to firearm laws over decades.
And then Ian Runkel says, the responsible thing to do is wait before commenting.
But if you ever find yourself writing a sentence like, mass shootings in Canada have helped, you should be hounded out of every newsroom on the planet and made an absolute pariah.
And then Finn Boy Slick says, you're missing the important part, though, Viva.
Did he perform a land acknowledgement before he started gaslighting?
He did not do it.
I don't know if it did.
I don't think they did the land acknowledgement there.
By the way, before we go over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com, I do, we're going to go raid redacted.
But before we even do that, what was I just about to do?
Oh, yes, that's right.
Viva and Lord Buckley go to the movies tonight, people, on CommiTube, just because he set up the channel and that's where it is.
Viva, we're doing Scarface.
And I don't want to spoil it.
I don't want to spoil it.
I'm going to actually have insights to add tonight.
Last week we did Casablanca.
Go check it out.
Subscribe.
And I don't know that the link is up yet for tonight.
Let me see if it is.
It's live.
Oh, we got it right here.
Okay, this is it.
Scarface, people.
Check it out and come tonight.
And then I'm going to be on with Matt Gates later tonight.
And then I'm going to be on with Star Wars Girl, I think at 10 o'clock tonight.
No rest for the wicked people.
Come subscribe and we're going to review Scarface.
I'll say one thing.
My memory of the chainsaw scene was accurate.
All right, with that said, everybody, we're going to go over and raid redacted.
They do great work, and we must support those who do great work.
It is next in the lineup.
We're going to do this.
Where's my page here?
Let me get mine.
Okay, I can't get back to my thing here, but here we go.
This is, we're still live, and we're going to go raid redacted and come on over to Viva Barnes Law.locals.com.
But go raid redacted if you're not doing that.
Come over to come on over to locals.
Viva Barnes Law.
10 bucks a month.
You could even be, you could just join as a member and then, you know, tip if you want to.
But now I'm going to go into the local into redact and say Viva Raid Booyah.
Thank you for the raid.
It says Anthony Goodley.
My pleasure, Redacted.
And now we're going to go over to Viva Barnes Law.locals.com for our after party.
Export Selection