All Episodes
Previous
Jan. 11, 2026 - Viva & Barnes
02:31:07
Ep. 299: ICE Shooting - Justified? Barnes Goes to D.C.! Madness in Canada! Jan. 6 Fallout & MORE!

Support Viva: GET MERCH! www.vivafrei.com BUY A BOOK! https://amzn.to/4qBXikS SEND ME SOMETHING! David Freiheit 20423 SR 7 Ste F6319 Boca Raton 33498 TIP WITH CTYPTO! bc1qt0umnqna63pyw5j8uesphsfz0dyrtmqcq5ugwm THAT IS ALL!

|

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, because I'm totally senile and don't yet remember if we collectively watched Michael Fanone, one of the key witnesses for the Jan 6 insurrection Fed surrection persecution, talking tough about taking up the Second Amendment to protest ICE.
This type of rhetoric sounds very insurrectionist to me.
Behold.
And this ain't the first time that we've seen ICE and CBP abuse their power.
It's probably the millionth fucking time that we've seen this happen.
And it's not even the first time that someone has been seriously injured or lost their lives.
And so these politicians and these local, state, and municipal law enforcement agencies need to wake the fuck up.
You know, I appreciate the foul language coming out of the mouth of the mayor of Minneapolis.
And I think that his sentiment in the moment was appropriate.
That being said, what are you doing?
What are you directing your law enforcement agencies to do to protect your citizens?
How are you going about doing that?
I don't need to hear from the chief of police that we all need to remain calm and protest peacefully.
Fuck you and fuck that.
What are you doing to keep me safe?
What are you doing to keep my mother safe, my sister safe, you know, my community safe from these thugs?
That's what I need to hear coming out of these agents or these officers.
Because if you're not going to do it, then it's time for the American people to organize and to utilize their Second Amendment right to protect themselves from what has clearly become an unaccountable and lawless agency that's killing Americans.
Alex, I'll take crazy stuff I've heard and will get you locked in jail if the other side said it for 800.
Okay, whatever.
That's Michael Fanone.
I don't remember if we watched this, but what's truly fascinating is they've decided it's cool to swear.
They've decided it's cool to swear when my New Year's resolution has been not to swear quite so much.
Still swearing a little bit, but I've been good on Twitter, unless I'm direct quoting somebody.
I try to become a polite boy on Twitter.
Michael Fanon suggesting that people exercise their Second Amendment right under the Constitution, the one that they want to simultaneously take away, to fight the government.
I mean, this guy probably gets an erection from the insurrection that he's thinking that he's promoting right now.
This guy, not to be glib, because he did get, you know, roughed up on January 6th.
One of the more humorous retorts to the tough talk from Michael Fanone, star witness for the January 6th Fed surrection and ensuing persecution is you couldn't defend the Capitol building from a bunch of rowdy rioters with pepper spray and flashlights.
You're going to go fight ICE?
Could you imagine him saying, take up arms and fight ICE, which is exactly what he said.
They cloaked it in his Second Amendment.
Time to exercise your Second Amendment and fight the government?
I mean, I'm not one to criminalize speech, and there's no butt to that.
I, you know, you, you more inclined to let people push the envelope.
We're going to talk about a couple of decisions tonight that, you know, potential jihadists pushing the envelope.
I don't seriously think that that man should be criminally charged for what he said there.
I'm just saying, if past his prologue and the precedent has been set, then he should get charged for what he said there.
How hilarious would it be?
At the end of the day, the Trump administration comes down and charges Michael Fanon for, I don't know, uttering terroristic threats.
That's what someone could easily qualify that as.
And I'm not trying to be, no, they went after that guy who said time to melt some snowflakes and showed a picture of his gun.
We covered that story.
If that is uttering a terroristic threat, which I don't think it should have been, this sure as sugar is.
The other case there involving the guy with the blue mouth who went after Joe Rogan, Liver King, challenging Joe Rogan to a fight.
He had his terroristic utterance threats dismissed or those charges dropped, as they should have been.
But if that's the precedent, Michael Fadone, you might have opened your big mouth a little too big for your own good.
We'll see.
I don't expect anything really to happen.
We'll find out if anything does.
One of the issues of the evening stream is going to be whether or not this administration is doing enough and what they can do in the.
It's not just, like you know, near future, now they're into the.
It needs to be done in the immediate future in order to change the tides for elections that are coming up in January February March April May June July August September, October.
Nine months, November could have probably just done that very easily by going.
November is uh 11, so how's my problem?
September October November, October is the 10th month.
Yeah, we're about, you know, 10 months away from midterms people, 10 months away from potentially a meaningful shift in the balance of power in American politics.
We're fast approaching that point where it's no longer sit tight and wait, trust the plan.
Uh don't.
Don't complain too much to you.
Better get things done, like not just yesterday, because you can't go back in time, but this week.
And we've got an upcoming grand jury in Fort Pierce up in Florida, which I might make the trip up there just for the sake of it.
They're, you know, confidential behind closed doors, but who knows, good things happen when you leave the house.
But we'll see what's going on.
Let me see what's going on here, did I?
Yeah, with Viva.
What the hell, Viva hold on.
What happened?
Let me see this start making them go broke with Lawfare.
Buckle Brush Jones, I don't know if.
Yeah, what you see this one.
I catch up on the chat too late.
Anyhow, all that to say everybody, good evening, how goes the battle?
Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator turned current Florida Rumbler.
I got a new shirt.
My wife ordered me new shirts.
All I do is wear a merch.
Uh, before we get into it, if you want to get some merch and i've been saying like haven't gotten new merch out, and i've been saying it for a long time Viva Fry for merch.
Vivabarnslaw.locals.com, where we have I mean, it's an amazing community.
I've been posting my daily thoughts.
I missed yesterday.
Yesterday I went the entire day.
I went for a jog in the morning and I saw one of those big fat, juicy green caterpillars and it's my white dragon.
I chase them because I love those caterpillars.
I've seen them six times in my life and I remember.
Each time I was like oh, i'll post that remember, post that.
After you get back from your jog.
It's saturday.
I end up going to the beach with the kid that I forget to post it.
Uh, when you see a beautiful creature like a big fat caterpillar that's as thick as my finger, it's got no natural defense mechanisms that you can see, but clearly it does because it lives, it's an amazing thing.
And I just look at these amazing creatures and say yeah, if there's ever some evidence of a clock maker who made the clock that is known as this universe, that fat, juicy caterpillar which then metamorphosizes into a beautiful bird not a bird sorry, I got my birds in the beast mixed up uh, a moth, whatever.
This one I think was a luna moth.
It's amazing.
We're live on VIVA Barn.
There you go.
Look at that.
Hawk moth caterpillar hatches to this.
Look at that.
Oh my goodness, that looks like a bat, that looks like an owl.
That's natural mechanism is an owl.
Kyle Serifin retweeted.
Um well, we'll get to that in a second.
Uh, last tuesday I think I forgot to get to some super chats on Comic TUBE because I forgot that I was streaming on Comic TUBE.
Miscoozy, if you're going to be upset if I don't read your tip question or super chat or Comic TUBE chat, don't do it.
I do my best.
We're going to get to this in a second textmaster says, I want to invoke the Insurrection Act because ICE needs a para parameter around them when they work.
Deny the domestic terrorists the ability to attack and set up a pr photo, yep.
And Andy Olson says how to not get.
How did not get your ass kicked?
I had to make sure I wasn't going to get in trouble for you.
Chris Rock has two of the all-time classics in terms of stand-up comedy, which was actually insightful political observations.
Both of which, I guess, that one included, could not be repeated today.
We've got one hell of a show.
Barnes is in the backdrop.
He's fresh off a trip to DC.
He came back, which is always encouraging.
Whenever I go to Canada, it's 50-50 that I could get back, you know, that I don't get arrested in Canada.
When Barnes goes to DC, 50-50 that he doesn't get, that's a joke.
That's a joke.
So Barnes has an amazing, had an amazing experience up in DC.
You know, there's a lot of talk, humorous and less than humorous about black pillars on the internet.
And I firmly believe that black pillars, there is such a concept as black pilling or doom pilling.
And that is reserved for people who say, be violent, do stuff that's going to actually hurt you, your family, and the cause.
That's one aspect of being a black pillar.
The other one is dooming people into inaction.
Withdraw from the process.
Don't participate.
Don't vote.
There's nothing you can do about it to change it.
It's all poo-poo-caka.
Yeah, those are black pillars.
Barnes and I are the utmost of red pillars out there.
Constructive criticism where it's warranted, shameless mockery when it's warranted.
You know, a pat on the back when it's warranted, and practical solutions to what we raise as constructive criticism.
And there's going to be a whole heck of a lot of that going on in the show tonight.
Robert, come on in whenever you're ready.
VivabarnesLaw.locals.com.
We have our exclusive after party of the Sunday show and of my daily show.
And Robert has Bourbon with Barnes's in the evenings.
And we've got an amazing community there.
We are live on CommiTube.
Let me see what's going on here.
I see my face.
And we do not have any super chats yet to speak of.
And let's see what's going over on Rumble.
Oh, yeah, that's what I wanted to show you before Barnes gets in here.
Barnes, come on in whenever you're ready.
Download the Rumble Wallet app from Android for that other, no, from Google Play if you have an Android, or from Apple if you have Apple.
And you can open a Rumble wallet.
You can, it's not investment advice.
If you invest in crypto, you don't just, if you invest in anything, expect to lose at all.
Don't invest more than you can afford to lose.
Get the Rumble wallet.
You can hold crypto, buy crypto that's tethered to gold, tethered to the US dollar or Bitcoin itself.
You can tip.
Oh, you have to look at this.
If anyone has a phone on them and you want to tip Bitcoin, look at that.
You go there, scan this, and you can tip in Bitcoin.
You want to tip in gold-backed currency?
Then you go like this.
You go back here.
You go to X-A-U-T, which is tethered to gold.
And you can, as much as you can accumulate with the Rumble Wallet, you can go to Switzerland literally and redeem your gold, actual gold, from the vault that they have their gold in that they tether to the crypto.
You can scan that and tip with that, and you can tip with USDT, the dollar.
So it's an amazing thing.
It's going to revolutionize the way creators can make money, transfer money, tip money, and invest, really.
That's it.
Viva is wearing the same glasses my wife wears.
Well, you're what?
I was going to make a funny joke, but yeah, it was the only frame they had left that fit my lenses because the frames kept on breaking.
Well, until Barnes gets in here, I actually will bring up one quick thing just to show you what was going on in Canada.
There was a, what do they call it? A Canada First rally up in Toronto.
Travel Fund 69, don't get distracted by the name, was doing a lot of the on-the-ground work during the Ottawa Trucker protest.
We ran into each other a few times.
And, you know, it's, I jokingly say, but it's not a joke.
It's the real.
Like government is the only institution that gets bigger every time it fails.
It's the only corporation that gives itself more power with each successive corruption, failure, scandal.
And right now, what we're witnessing up in Canada is quite literally the culmination of failed domestic policy, failed immigration policy, failed economic policy, and communism.
What you're witnessing up in Canada right now is the V for Vendetta culmination, the dominoes falling, and the poo-poo hitting the fan on the streets.
Check this out.
Let me just make sure the audio is not going to blast everybody's ears out.
This is from the Canada First Rally in Toronto.
And you'll notice that I clipped this section from Travel Fund 69.
Go check them out.
Anti-fascists come and start actually throwing fists.
Shit, this is crazy.
Didn't expect this.
I didn't expect this.
Holy shit.
This is just a case of United States.
Watch for the punches to be thrown here.
Antifa masked thugs.
There's one guy who's got the courage to show his face.
The cops are using their bikes as battling lines.
Okay, so watch right here.
There you go.
Punch.
Boom.
Right there.
He's going down.
Oh, my God.
He hit the cop.
He hit the cop.
Holy shit.
The guy hit the cop.
Well, in fairness, the cop hit him first, but.
Holy shit.
Move back.
This is Canada, people.
You let in.
I'll stop it right there and I'll give everybody the link and you can find the link to the video.
You let in a demographic that doesn't espouse Western values.
You empower thugs that want to terrorize people who do love their country.
And that would be Antifa.
And then you just let them duke it out in the streets at a protest because you are incapable of actually preventing conflict.
And some might even say deliberately allowing it to happen.
What were they protesting?
It was a Canada first rally.
This is the trucker-esque type crowd.
I'd say conservatives, people who love their country, protesting the poop that's going on in their country.
The censorship from the Carney government, the open borders from the Carney government, the Chinese infiltration into the Canadian government.
I talked about the euthanasia.
I won't talk about it again because it put out a separate clip.
What's amazing and what's truly amazing, it's gotten Elon's eye a little bit.
I'll have to show you this.
It's caught Elon's eye where so Doge Designer tweets out, breaking.
UK, Canada, and Australia are considering a coordinated ban on X, believing that it will together, that doing it together will send a powerful message to Elon Musk.
X is the number one news app across these countries.
Trying to suppress X will not silence the truth.
It will amplify it.
To which Elon Musk has a, I don't know what that face is.
Now, this is what's amazing about this.
Community notes is more than useless on X.
It's an actual purveyor of disinformation.
Contrary to reports, Canada is not considering a ban on X. That's what readers added.
I voted this as not helpful.
Who said that?
The guy, Evan Solomon.
Evan Solomon, you don't know him if you're American.
He's like a propagandist from CNN who used to work in Canadian media.
He's now a Canadian MP.
He just tweets out, you know.
No, there's no contrary to popular belief, there's no ban that we're going to talk about.
Evan Solomon, MP for Toronto Center, Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation.
Retweets are not endorsements.
American Online.
This is what Evan might have forgotten about when he was being the propaganda arm of the liberal government.
This was Mark Carney.
I believe this was during the election, which would explain the song, the song, The Sign here.
This is what he said during the election.
American online platforms have become seas of racism, misogyny, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and hate in all its forms.
And they're being used by criminals to harm our children.
My government will act.
Oh, yeah.
And today we're announcing our plan to fight crime, to protect Canadians, and to build communities that are safe, secure, and strong.
A plan to make Canada secure, to make Canada strong.
I mean, why don't you just view these bumbling idiots as the paid actors that they are?
First of all, he wants to be like, he wants to be the white Obama.
This is just so smooth in his delivery.
So dramatic pauses.
American platforms are spewing hate, disinformation, and whatever.
We're going to act.
What do you plan on doing about it?
Oh, no, that's right.
But Evan Solomon said we don't plan on banning Twitter.
Contrary to media reports, Canada's not considering a ban on X.
No, it's just considering a permanent suspension of X.
It's just considering an algorithmic suppression of X. Do you know if you go to Instagram in Canada, you actually cannot access Patrick Bett David's Instagram account?
You go to Canada right now, you are already cut off from the world in a way that rivals North Korea.
I mean, I'm exaggerating and it's hyperbolic, but we're in the same direction.
We're just not the same distance yet.
You can't access certain accounts, certain information in Canada.
And they come out there and they say, no, no, don't worry, we're not going to ban them.
Just going to permanently suspend Twitter.
Algorithmically demoted.
We're going to artificially prop up CBC news.
So when you go to YouTube or you go to Rumble, if you can still get it in Canada, what you're going to see is going to be propped up other news to the suppression of the real news, what people want.
And that's how they do it.
And are not liars when they say, we're not going to ban it.
We're just going to find other ways of suppressing it.
We're going to find other ways of prioritizing trusted news sources.
And that's exactly how they go about doing it.
Now, by the way, Travel Fund 69 is in the house over on CommiTube.
Someone was throwing rocks as well.
Travel Fund 69.
I was watching your coverage and I'm like, this is not something that I would do anymore.
It's just, it's not safe, even as anybody with a camera.
And Tifa doesn't want people with cameras.
Now, I say everyone's like, yeah, well, if everybody's too scared to do it, then no one's going to do it.
Those situations escalate real quick.
And before you know it, you're in a world of pain, literally.
And the cops are sure as hell not going to do anything to help you.
Lorena, Lorena, Morena says $13.99.
Thank you very much, Lorena.
And now let's, do we got another one?
Did another one just come in?
We got another $10 one over on CommiTube.
That was the political leaders of the left are using people as pawns.
They encourage them to play games with the law enforcement.
When tragedy happens, they benefit.
No one on the right is glad.
Absolutely.
We're going to get into this tonight because I presume you're talking about what happened in Minnesota, which is, it's a tragedy.
It's an avoidable tragedy.
And I wouldn't, I'm not ever going to be one of the people who sits there and says FAFO or posts some nasty, nasty tweets about whether the woman deserved it and whatever.
But this is one of those situations.
It might be superficially comparable to Ashley Babbitt, but it's not.
It's wildly different based on the factual pattern that actually exists.
Now, hold on.
I wanted to bring up the Rumble chats before we get going here.
Robert, come on in.
BioMan's Man says, crazy how much time everyone has.
Well, it was Ingram who's like, you know, gets one of the protesters to say, I'm paid for being here.
Randy Edwards says, oh, Kennedy, start with a peaceful protest and the hockey game breaks out every time.
Ricky Ricky Bobi says, just tipping since you said my name correctly last time, the Talladega nights.
Ricky Bobi.
Absolutely.
There's no way to read that name anymore.
NPayne 7211.
Want to thank you for your hard work and for spreading the truth.
Thank you very much.
Oh, Barnes is in the house.
Okay.
Sorry, I was on the wrong screen.
Sir, you look very dapper.
How goes the battle.
Good, good.
Good, good.
I got distracted.
We saw each other briefly before the stream, and I don't think you were dressed like that, Robert.
I got like, this is a had to get appropriately attired for the show.
Robert, we're going to, well, you can tell everybody what's going to, what we're going to talk about tonight.
Let me just do one thing here.
Actually, we'll just take this.
Michelle Tofoya is seriously considering running for office.
She's a natural senator.
Reach out to her.
Bada bing.
By the looks of the lineups happening all across Alberta to the petition to have a referendum on Alberta independence.
We will have a free nation of Alberta come November 2026 from your mouth to God's ears.
I'm not that optimistic.
Robert, what are we talking about tonight?
So tonight we got the ice shooting in Minneapolis.
Is it a case of self-defense?
Some people are conflating and confusing a wide range of standards, Fourth Amendment issues, other cases.
They're trying to cite a case called Barnes versus Felix.
People thought that was somehow a reference to me.
It's not.
But as Nick Ricada pointed out, a lot of people haven't read the follow-up Fifth Circuit decision after SCOTUS's decision.
We have lessons from D.C. Frank Capra famously did the great film, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.
Well, Barnes went to Washington, and we got some big news.
We'll be detailing some of that, including very promising information of many good people doing really good work.
I do these meetings off the record, so I don't disclose anything about who I met, where I met, or anything like that, but some big, big takeaways, including a lot of great people wanting to do really good policy.
And we'll also disclose on this show who is sabotaging the Trump administration, not only from within, but from without.
Some of those people were trying to discourage, deter, or even, you might say, intimidate me from covering what I found out, but their efforts are unlikely to be availing.
But tune into the rest of the show to find out.
The Supreme Court made a big ruling on habeas rights.
The Third Amendment, could there have been a Third Amendment case in Minnesota concerning the hotel and ICE officers?
The election fraud executive order by President Trump.
A federal court has struck it down.
We'll get into the details of that.
Another federal court demands those welfare fraud funds keep coming, keep rolling out in another judicial usurpation decision.
Worldwide wrestling and ESPN faces a class action over their recent agreement.
What happens if you become a stateless citizen?
Well, that happened to a young woman who became one of ISIS's child brides.
And now the European Court of Human Rights is taking up her case against the United Kingdom.
The First Amendment, is there a First Amendment right for jihad?
Well, in this context, it would appear so.
A big Fourth Circuit ruling about the prosecution of a Islamic cleric, well, not full cleric, but minister, you might say.
The is there a right to your own highlights if you're a high school football athlete?
That case is now going through the court system.
The Ohio, the abortion, what is the abortion law standing after its constitutional amendment?
That went up to the Ohio Court of Appeals.
The Trump executive order on Venezuelan oil.
Jack Smith's paid informants ratted out.
And the big, big successes of Robert Francis Kennedy Jr.
Past week and not only changing the entire food pyramid and inverting it back to its proper form, but also a big, big change to the vaccine schedule that can have big impacts going forward.
So, that and answering your questions on the rest of the show.
And let's start the show off by pissing some people off.
I'm reading the chat.
Here you go, everybody.
Behold.
Oh, for everyone.
I don't understand.
Look, I understand people being unhappy with some of Massey's political pushes.
I don't understand people's vitriolic demonizing of Thomas Massey as an individual.
It makes me very suspicious that the people doing it are not doing it of good faith, or there is some coordinated campaign to do it because you might not like that Massey was at that press conference for the Epstein files and had those idiots with the billboards behind him.
Marjorie Taylor Greene meeting up with Code Pink and then allegedly potentially writing out the location of, I forget who it was that was having dinner.
By the way, she proved that was false right away.
But it shows how the certain people within the White House were trying to trigger Trump's paranoia by blaming.
There was even someone on our locals board who believed that story.
There's zero chance of that story being true.
She's pointed out repeatedly, it's complete defamation and libel that Code Pink being able to protest Trump at that restaurant had absolutely nothing to do with her.
And it did involve some secret service breaches and the way they manage the restaurant security.
But that tells you that there are some key saboteurs and they may be connected to a large part of it.
We'll be getting into that.
Most people wanted the meeting off the record.
Thomas Massey didn't care.
Massey was like, hey, Barts, we got to take this photo in front of the...
Let me ask you this, Robin.
Did...
I don't want to pry or push, but I'm going to.
Did they want the meeting off the record because you may have been going a little hard on some officials and you are toxic in DC?
There may have been some of that.
It's also because they need a whole bunch of good people wanting to do really good work, and they're being constantly sabotaged by a couple of these rogue actors.
And there's a range of sabotage happening in different places, but we'll highlight and focus on one particular tonight.
But that is part of the concern.
But I generally do it this way because the problem with the official, if you're an official meeting, you know, I'm always in cash, never in writing for a reason.
So there's ways in which you can have the most impact and effect and be able to help people get through good policies and good ideas done.
That if you're always on the record, it's official, all the rest, that really restrains what can be achieved and attained.
So it's much easier to meet people outside of government buildings, meet people in a wide range of places, meet people at all levels, meet people that may be just at the local IT department, say, or someone that's a secretary, receptionist staffer.
If people ever remember Pelican Brief, remember who his source was in the movie, Denzel Washington's journalistic character, it was a janitor in the White House because he hears and sees a whole lot of things.
So there's all, if you know how that town works, you talk to people all the way up and down the ladder and you do it outside of the official formal structure to figure out, okay, what's attainable, what's not, what's happening, what isn't happening, who are the hurdles, what are the obstacles.
There was a lot.
I mean, it was, for the most part, it was the most encouraged I've ever been out of any trip to D.C. since I was like a young teenager.
Every other trip has been, you feel the oppressiveness of the town when you're there.
And it's kind of weighty.
And then it's a closed town that you have these small group of K Street lobbyists because they're literally on K Street, a lot of them in Washington, D.C., and the establishment, and they're locked in with the think tanks and the press institutions.
And so independent ideas basically just can't breach the system.
That has totally changed.
This Trump administration is light years better than his first term.
The old Bushites who dominated throughout large parts of the personnel are gone.
The K Street lobbyist crowd are on the outs for the most part.
And that makes it very open.
And then you have a lot of people wanting to serve the interest of voters who have prioritized serving the interest of voters, who want reform and remedy.
And this is throughout the entire government at every level.
And in fact, they're eager, hungry for good policy ideas.
You might, if you've been paying attention, some people put one and one together on the locals board, but you might have seen some good announcements this week coming out of the administration.
It's because they want good ideas throughout the administration.
There are some people that are more consistent than others at being committed to the voters' interest over the donors' interest.
But there's some that are purely there to serve the voters' interest and for the reform rem These are people that have taken huge financial and personal sacrifices to be there.
And so we also figured out, so one obstacle is just making sure they have all the best ideas.
So a lot of what 1776 Law Center is doing, I thought we could have some impact.
We can have extraordinary impact because of the intersection of law and politics that we uniquely intersect and have sort of a certain skill set, you might say, as the great Liam Neeson says in the movie, take it.
So there's some great opportunity for real reform, real remedy, positive change at every level and throughout every aspect of the cabinet.
Let me ask you this, Robert.
Before we even get into the substance of your meetings, people are jokingly suggesting that we're black pillars or that you're anti-Trump.
And I'm like, okay, only fools would say that.
And I don't consider myself a black pillar because I believe black pillars, call to violence, call to inaction, call to withdrawing from participation.
We've been complaining about Pam Bondi for a while.
And some people are saying, Viva, it's not realistic to say replace Pam Bondi.
Am I wrong in thinking two things that on the one hand, she need not necessarily be replaced, but Trump could say, look, I'm putting an advisor in the backdrop and Pam, you know, you're going to listen to him.
Or flip side, they could replace her, maybe even with Harmee Dillon, someone who's already been approved by the Senate because you have like an emergency period that you can replace her with someone who's already been approved.
And what would be required in just sticking someone, I dare say, competent in there and to get them approved by the Senate?
Of those three options, are they realistic?
And how long would an outright replacement that goes through Senate confirmation take?
Well, one component on people that, you know, this was even a discussion on the Viva Barnes law at thatlocals.com board, where the top favorite topic was the trip to D.C., second favorite was the ice shooter or no favorites, as the case may be.
What was also universal was in the response of all the people trying to do good work throughout the administration, of which there are far more than even I had hopes for, is that they encourage us out in the court of public opinion to keep doing what we're doing.
That, in fact, the only leverage they have is the voter.
And if the voter isn't expressing concern, if the voter isn't expressing questions or skepticism or as appropriate criticism, then the effect of it is that they have no leverage, that they have no means to argue with other people who want to go a different donor-driven policy to say, no, we can't do that because the voters are demanding this.
The voters are upset with this.
Remember, the James Comey indictment only even happened after Trump directly went to Bondi and said, please do the job.
Why?
Because voters were demanding it.
So if I can pause you there, there's no good reason why it took seven months to come up with that two-charge indictment.
There was no new information that was revealed.
I say, we had already pointed out Comey's black and white perjury years before.
There was no good reason why it waited until the eve of the statute of limitations, gets dismissed because of whatever, there might be some judicial activism.
But if you file it in April, if that happens, you have time to refile without having to fight statute limitations issues and said now they got to appeal it.
So there was no good reason why it took seven months to do that.
Oh, not at all.
And a shout out to all the people I've met at Thomas Massey's office, a bunch of idealistic, you know, optimistic, positive people.
I get people that have their disagreements with Massey.
Massey is an honest, old-school, sincere Eastern Kentucky, libertarian, inclined populist who's keeping his independence to it.
And I get for some people, that's iconoclastic.
For some people, that's annoying and irritating.
He's one of the best advocates for a law, a lot of different key policies throughout.
And anybody that's been in the food freedom movement knows he's been the number one advocate for it in the House, number one advocate for disclosure of the Epstein files.
Number one, and by the way, that happened long before Trump came onto the table about the issue.
He was talking about it during the Biden administration.
The number one advocate for a wide range against surveillance state in general.
Number one person you can rely upon to oppose any stupid war, endless war.
So as he points out, he votes with Donald Trump more than 90% of the time.
The very few times he doesn't is when he thinks the budget is a runaway budget, when he thinks an endless war is right around the corner, when he thinks the surveillance state wants to steal our privacy, when he thinks that the big ag and big corporations are trying to deny us our rights or food freedom or medical freedom.
Lead advocate exposing January 6th.
And the best example is I got a bunch of questions about this from your show with Steve Baker.
Who is Thomas Massey?
He's the guy when he finds out that Steve Baker's had a heart attack and is in the hospital.
He takes off, how does he react during Christmas break?
He personally, he and his wife personally take that time in their Christmas vacation to instead go down and be there for Steve Baker.
And you saw him.
He got emotional when he was telling you the story.
That's who Thomas Massey is.
So if you got him, you know, yeah, Massey's a little sassy, as he likes to say himself.
He also corrected me on my pronunciation of Appalachia.
So we were having a fun conversation about a range of topics and issues.
But he's a good man trying to do right.
And we need a lot more of those in Congress than otherwise.
Another little tidbit, it's interesting.
If you go to Congress at the right time, if you time it right, you know what's happened up there.
You can get in there without almost anybody noticing you, by the way.
You can visit a whole bunch of different congressmen without anybody knowing you even went in the office.
And they don't always take visitor notes, by the way.
So it's easy to boom, boom, and you can talk to a lot of folks.
You know what they have done?
They have propagandized the living daylights.
The Democrats, and Mike Johnson's such a wuss, and that was universally understood, by the way.
He's just weak, weak, weak, weak.
That he's just not respected by almost anybody.
But they've put plaques all over the place about January 6th.
There are more plaques about the horrors of January 6th than there is to the Constitution of the United States.
Speaker Johnson should have those plaques taken down, and every congressman should have the Constitution of the United States, or at least some part of it, to put as a plaque outside their door.
That's what they need to be reading every day, not the horrors of January 6th nonsense.
But so that's my tidbit on Massey.
The people that work with him are really these good, optimistic, idealistic.
Mr. Smith goes to Washington kind of people.
So the it was a Fed surrection that required the pardoning of all of the of the you know of all the victims of that persecution.
How the hell do they have memorial plaques to the events of that day there?
If Trump adds, you know, maybe tasteless plaques to, you know, famous pictures, rip those freaking plaques out and melt them down into a statue that pays tribute to the people that were victims of the persecution.
And your tax dollars went to help put those plaques there, by the way.
And it's amazing.
It's the number one thing that's in there.
Like you still have the beautiful old murals that are throughout that are about the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights.
And I love all of that.
They got some cool statues in different places to different people.
But the number one thing was all about, oh, the horrors of 10 UA6 when our democracy almost fell.
I mean, yeah, the democracy fell when you green lit a fraudulent election, you bumps.
Robert.
I got to bring it up.
I apologize for getting distracted.
Barnes is grifting, Viva.
Don't let him take you down with him.
I appreciate you must be new to the channel or you are a robot that does not know of my relationship with Barnes.
There are two people on this earth, you know, from a non-family perspective that I trust.
Barnes is one and Chris Pavlovsky is the other.
So if anyone thinks you're going to sow discord among me and Barnes, good effing luck.
Barnes is the smartest man from a legal perspective I've met, from a historical perspective that I've ever met.
From an emotional quotient perspective, Barnes doesn't have the emotional sensitivities that other people have.
So would you explain everybody up there thanked us for being straight, for being direct, that if we see something that's going to be problematic from the voter perspective, to be very, very vocal about it.
That, you know, I was even having a discussion with one of our board members where they were like, you know, will this lead to, you know, if we're negative, won't that lead to losing the midterms?
Not being negative, not warning them is what can lose the midterms.
It's the, when I was a, I practiced lawyer and I've said it a few times, but I had a number of restaurant clients and they said, the worst thing is not a client who doesn't complain about the meal.
It's the client who, it's not, sorry, the worst thing is not the client who complains about the meal.
It's the client who doesn't and never comes back again.
And that's how businesses go out of business.
They say, well, no one ever complained.
Well, that's because some people don't.
They just leave and they say, I'm never coming back again.
That is the same analogy with voters.
And so the ones that are, there's definitely blackpilling.
I say grifters, I hate that word.
There are people out there who fight for the sake of fighting.
And you can tell because they'll fight just for the sake of fighting.
But the constructive criticism, the worst thing that you can have is a voter that just tunes out because they feel like they're not getting listened to.
That's how businesses go out of business.
And that's how parties lose elections.
And that was from all the insiders that we talked to throughout the DC.
That was a universal message that they appreciate and welcome and need constructive feedback, including when it's critical about a bad policy idea or the lack of a good policy idea being pushed and promoted because we are their leverage.
We are their capital because the donors aren't on the side of these reform issues for the most part.
They're not even on the side of the anti-censorship efforts, it turns out, by the way.
But so the so the so shout out to everybody that I've met with up there from all levels of government.
Lots of good people doing lots of great work.
And we definitely have your back and we're going to continue to have your back.
And the appetite for good policies, there's a lot of good policy.
I mean, you saw a half dozen just announced this past week.
There's more coming in that direction because a lot of people with institutional influence want these good ideas.
We were able to help show the popularity that the voters want this.
This is the political capital.
And we were able to come up with a lot of really good ideas.
Some of them are simple.
Some of them are broad.
Some of them seem small, but have great consequence in all of the different departments.
And they're eager to get those.
How do we help promote and protect small farmers?
How do we help promote and protect more medical freedom?
How do we help promote and protect, get more capital in the hands of ordinary people?
How do we help make things more affordable and accessible?
How do we show people that we are on the side of ordinary, everyday people in this administration and that this administration wants, I mean, there's people who've given up millions of dollars to go down there and help.
Literally, I mean, it's talking about people who made big, big money, who took massive financial sacrifices.
Now, one of the key places where it won't surprise people, who the big inside saboteur is.
I'll get to a second as to who the outside saboteur as just one example.
There's others too.
There's a bunch of them.
But we're going to highlight one example.
The big inside saboteur is, of course, as your video described, the desk where all good ideas go to die.
And that is Pam Bondi.
Pam Bondi is sabotaging the Trump administration all the way across the board.
All the way across the board in ways people don't even know.
Cases that have been dropped, cases that have been declined, cases that have had sweetheart bogus deals, cases where Trump was given wrong advice about pardoning people.
I mean, cases that should have been pursued that weren't.
Cases that were being pursued that got shut down.
And then cases that shouldn't be pursued that are.
It is a disaster.
And this is from everybody.
Members of Congress, as is now public, so it won't be a surprise on this, have given Bondi wrapped up, easy cases to prosecute.
She's refused to do any of them.
The president, she is ignoring the direct request of the president to pursue these cases.
And incidentally, I also have my sources, and I have also heard not just the exact, I mean, we've heard this, and this is why it's become my opinion, but I've also heard, and this is not to protect Bondi, this is just to throw someone else into the mix, that Todd Blanche is playing a very active role in this sabotage.
It varies.
It's all be what I got was that some other people like the Stanley Woodwarders, number three, Todd Blanche, number two.
I think somebody suggested we call him Blanche Dubois after Street Guardian Desire?
Yeah, Street Card Name Desire.
But they're taking their instructions directly from Bondi.
It's all coming from Bondi.
Bondi, like there were people who said they thought Blanche could do good work if he was outside the control of Bondi.
People said Woodward could do good work if he was outside of the control of Bondi.
Is Bondi corrupt?
Is it financially motivated or is it corrupt and stupid?
It's both.
And who she's facilitating and protecting and enabling.
And these are the outside saboteurs.
It's two primary people.
One is Mike Davis.
So what Mike Davis is doing, Mike Davis got credibility because we, I mean, we platformed him.
Other people platformed when most people didn't know who the heck he was.
And then he would just imitate our statements about the law fair and he pretended he originated it, you know, stuff like that.
He used our platforming in part, along with others, including Richard Barris and others, to get access to Steve Bannon and promote himself as an antitrust advocate that he was for unleashing on big tech.
All garbage.
What he has been doing since the Trump administration got in is monetizing his access for a million dollars a pop.
So what happens is, and he's working with Arthur Schwartz.
A lot of people probably don't know who Schwartz is.
Schwartz has convinced people he has all this political juice.
No, he doesn't.
People may, Schwartz has abused his access to Donald Trump Jr. to infiltrate a wide range of staffers throughout the administration, throughout members of Congress, you name it.
He portrays himself as kind of a person who can be a dirty trickster who can take people out.
And so he terrorizes anybody that's trying to do good, conscientious work in the administration.
And it's the threat of, you know, Mike Davis will say something like, you know, I'm not going to say anything, but I think Arthur will unless you play ball, stuff like that.
And so now, here's the thing with all this.
You don't have to take my word for it.
Just Google Arthur Schwartz lobbyist, and you're going to find all kinds of interesting pieces.
Like you look at this, like it appears Davis will go out and say, hey, this case may happen.
There should be an antitrust case here.
Then he and Schwartz go to the actual company that could be the subject of it, shake him down for money.
Then they go to Pam Bondi and make sure the case gets shut down.
And they're getting a million dollars a pop for this, according to at least one published source.
So, but here's the thing: if you're Mike Davis and you're pretty much kind of a nobody, the if you're Arthur Schwartz and you're really a nobody who pretends to be this big player because you misuse and abuse your access, Mike Davis misuses and abuses access to Steve Bannon to promote a completely false image of who he really is and what he's really up to.
The how do you make sure you get these big corporations to write to these big fat checks?
You go to the press and brag about it.
In fact, he just did it in Wall Street Journal last week.
But then how do you get away with being the source of the story when the White House or other people get agitated?
What the heck is this about?
Well, you convince them, oh, it's these good government officials.
They're the ones leaking the story when they're not leaking the story.
They haven't leaked any of these stories.
All these leaked stories that you're seeing is lobbyist pitch, which is what Mike Davis has effectively become.
I don't know if he's registered as it, but that's what he's effectively become, corrupting the entire Justice Department process.
Mike says, hey, I'm just representing my clients.
How'd you get those clients, Mikey Boy?
Did you have them before the Trump administration started?
The Mike himself and then some people on his behalf were trying to intimidate.
Oh, Barn, this is false and defamatory.
Then sue me, bro.
I'll prove it in court because Mike Davis is a fraud on MAGA.
And what he's been doing, and he's made it a nightmare, a nightmare, living nightmare for a wide range of people to even stay working for the government.
What's the, you said it was published in one source.
What's the source and what's the nature of that public?
Well, this is the, these people are such halfwits and midwits.
The years ago, I mean, I'm back to the 1970s, they were concerned in antitrust in particular, that these big companies that want to be able to have a monopoly without meaningful scrutiny for these big mergers, that they would be paying lobbyists to get sweetheart deals.
So Congress imposed a special law that requires them to disclose anybody they hired connected to it.
And that's where the first million dollar got published related to Davis.
But the second reason is these Dimwits go around bragging about this.
The Democrats are building up a file that's getting bigger, bigger.
I found this out talking to a range of people.
It's not the source people made the photo with, other people.
As to what the, and then that was Matt.
Massey's walking in and goes, Barnes, you want to troll the internet?
Let's do a little photo shop.
Yes, I was on a lower step, everybody.
I didn't shrink to five foot five.
The, but that, but Massey's great.
Massey's fun.
The, and he's so conscientious and optimistic.
He's like, the whole world's coming after the guy.
And he's still boom, boom, boom.
The, uh, but the, the Democrats are building a massive, massive file.
Because I was curious, I was like, well, why haven't they raised Democrats' raises?
They've raised it a little bit.
Raskin did a hearing with one witness who was a former antitrust lawyer who blew the whistle on this because, I mean, to give you an idea of how bad it is, you have these conscientious good people brought in Gail Slater's old school antitrust, a lot of optimism across the aisle.
She got 78 votes because antitrust is perceived as something that should be nonpartisan.
And the team she brought in was an exceptional team.
One of these people get two of them got fired by Bondi simply for objecting to the various pay-for-play scams that Bondi is running.
And she just fired him.
And one of them was a tenured professor.
So he went public.
And so I was like, why haven't the Democrats made a bigger deal of it?
Because they know it's going on every single day.
And so they're waiting.
They just want the file to build and build and build and build.
These people are doing things that, frankly, are borderline criminal, if not criminal.
In terms of Mike Davis and what they're asking government officials to do, whether they recognize it or not.
I think Davis saw it as one chance to get rich and decided that was it.
Some people cared about Magus.
Some people saw it as an opportunity to get rich.
Mike Davis is in the get-rich quick category.
And the consequence of doing so is all this great work that should be happening in the fraud department, should be happening over at FTC, should be happening in the antitrust division.
None of those things are being done and things that could translate directly to affordability.
These are things that impact the one he's bragging about in the Wall Street Journal could have helped bring down prices in the housing market.
And he's making sure those prices go up because they're paying him a million bucks to corrupt the policy of the DOJ.
And he just considers it legal advocacy.
Either way, the net effect is it corrupts the Trump administration's ability to do its job.
And Arthur Schwartz misused and abused his access to Donald Trump Jr. has infiltrated a bunch of staffers that have this respect for this guy that's a total scam artist, a bottom barrel grifting bum, is who Arthur Schwartz is.
Has been all the way back.
He tried to run interference for Rick Grinnell, claiming that Grinnell and Pence had nothing to do with the arrest and seizure of Julian Assange when he knew just the opposite was true.
So that's who that guy is.
And he uses his connections.
He has some Israeli connections, things like that.
No surprise there, unfortunately, to a lot of this going on.
But basically, you have this between the fraud civil division and the Key Tam department, which is Key Tam whistleblower claims, et cetera, explains in part what's happened on Pfizer and Brooke Jackson's case.
And in the antitrust division, and in the civil and criminal fraud separate divisions, they're all being effectively corrupted by these fake MAGA folks grifting, making millions of dollars to get cases killed using the threat of Arthur Schwartz terrorizing them.
And the key complicit party in all of it is Pam pay-for-play Pam Bondi.
She's firing people that raise questions.
She's preventing, you know, ask yourself why a bunch of these good people we haven't seen, at say, doing press tours, we haven't seen coming out in public, pushing the narrative on these good policy ideas of the Trump administration.
It's because Pam Bondi shuts him off from doing so, prohibits him from doing so.
I mean, she's running a completely rogue corrupt shop that is, and what she thinks is: if I don't go after the deep state, I'll get to stay in power.
I'll get to keep doing the pay-for-play scam and scheme for my buddies and pals.
That's why she's refusing Trump's own request to get these people prosecuted and indicted.
That's how it, and again, they're bragging about it to the Wall Street Journal.
Just go and read the Wall Street Journal piece, folks.
Those just came out, and it has all this in it for the most part.
The people just don't know the backstory.
So those are the saboteurs.
Tons of good people doing.
And, you know, what's a possible solution?
Well, the vice president talked about it this week.
He said, we need a new assistant attorney general in charge of all fraud, including going after the NGO fraud, including going after the various welfare, refugee immigration fraud, including going after big tech fraud, big ag fraud, big corporate fraud, all of that fraud.
Fraud on the government, fraud on the people.
That would incorporate using FTC and antitrust, Key TAM, putting them all together under a new assistant attorney general that will report directly to the White House so that Vice President Vance can make sure it's getting done.
Ask yourself why that's even necessary.
It's necessary because certain people have figured out Bondi is a huge problem.
Her desk is a black hole where good cases and good ideas go to die.
Okay, so the question here is: first of all, I want to read the Wall Street Journal article, but the idea that they're pocketing a fee.
I don't want to ask you, not your sources, but the concept is that they're pocketing a fee to make investigations go away against people that they are.
And big corporations, especially.
I mean, look at Arthur Schwartz is bragging that Oracle, Larry Ellison, is a client of his.
They apparently are attempting, well, they're kind of public about this, trying to get the Trump administration to open up a merger issue involving Paramount trying to buy Warner Brothers instead of Netflix.
And they want to weaponize the government to favor the people paying Arthur Schwartz and say, hey, stop that so that Oracle can buy, you know, that's Larry Ellison, that Ellison's son owns Paramount, daddy's money.
And so that they've already bought CBS, where Barry Weiss is busy burying stories left and right and pushing an Israeli gatekeeping message all over the place.
They've already bought TikTok, which is suppressing independent dissident information, especially if it concerns Israel.
They've already got Paramount.
Imagine if they own Warner Brothers on top of it.
There's problems with that from a wide range of legal perspectives.
But that's what's happening.
Sometimes they appear to be pushing, hey, this would be a good case to investigate.
So they're doing the old Coelho scheme.
A lot of people may not remember him.
Congressman Tony Coelho, Democrat, figured out in the early 80s the way Democrats could have a huge monetary edge in campaigns is they would let some of their true believers propose really dramatic regulatory policies, and then they would go to the big companies and shake them down and say, we can help kill this very dangerous, scary idea for the right donation, bro.
And then they would kill it.
And so it was all like they would come up with a scary policy solely to shake down people for campaign donations.
Basically, Schwartz is running something comparable, something analogous, and in the process is undermining key people throughout the Trump administration and undermining, because I heard this from multiple places and multiple people and multiple sources, not only on the Hill, but throughout the executive branch of government, that this was a massive, massive problem.
Because people have been wondering that there are people that pay attention to certain key TAM cases, fraud cases, antitrust cases that had already heard this scuttlebutt going back six months.
When I was saying that basically, if you're under investigation, just call up Pam's lobbyist pals and then Pam will help make sure it all goes away.
That's what I'm talking about.
It's just at a scale I was astounded by.
And then when I had not paid a lot of attention to this left-wing press because it was the left-wing press that they were going to to get it covered, knowing that MAGA doesn't read the left-wing press, but their future corporate clients do.
So they say, look at this New York magazine article about how we're rigging stuff.
Look at this article, how we're rigging stuff.
Look at the American Prospect article about how we're rigging stuff.
We can rig it for you.
That's what they're doing.
And then making life living hell for good, conscientious people in the administration.
And so, and the irony of all this, who cares about Mike Davis?
He's a blowhard.
He's mid.
He's mid times mid.
Lawyer up, everybody.
I mean, that's a joke now.
It's a meme.
He knows as well as anybody.
He's been running cover for Bondi all along.
This is why.
Because he's running cover so that pay-for-play Pam will be able to pay, effectively help him get these million-dollar paychecks.
Knowing that as part of that, Bondi is not going to touch the deep state for a second.
Because if she stays away from the deep state, she can keep her job longer and keep the pay-for-play scams rolling and running and going.
And it turns out that Blanche isn't the key problem.
Woodward isn't the key problem.
Pam Bondi is the key problem.
And I heard this from multiple places and multiple sources.
And so the, and again, tons of good people up there doing great work.
You're going to see lots of, but a great idea by JD, great by JD Vance.
It was JD's idea, by the way, to do the, to do, hey, we need a fraud assistant attorney general because he's seeing this.
He's seeing that the, why aren't there investigations into the massive welfare fraud implicating Democratic officials?
Why isn't there more investigation of the immigration NGOs that systematically and systemically are violating our laws?
Why isn't there more investigation, as Trump a member called for, with the Soros organizations running these RICO operations effectively, but it's just conspiracy to aid and abet, but sometimes it's literally RICO in terms of some of its corruption of businesses and enterprises into creating these riot environments that are, you know, do we really think a lesbian couple just got the idea out of the blue to travel to Minneapolis to know where, to know where to interrupt ICE facilities?
Don't think so.
So JD's on top of it.
Other people are on top of it.
And my prediction is Pam Bond, if the administration is going to get serious, Pam Bondi needs to be gone and sooner rather than later.
Well, so then, and then the practical reality, who would be able to replace her as an interim appointment?
It would be someone who's already sent it confirmed.
There's a range of people they could.
I mean, Harme Dillon got a lot of votes.
Gail Slater got a lot of votes.
So those are all people that'd be very good.
The idea for AAG for fraud is a great idea to make them directly reportable to Vice President Vance.
Great idea.
That would cut through a lot of this crap.
That would help Vance be in a position to make sure the good, righteous work that a lot of people, I mean, a lot of people who have given up careers and professions and money and all the rest to go down there and work for the administration have the authority and backing and support to get it done.
Think how much affordability could be a winning issue for the Republicans in Trump in 2026 if they unleash the fraud division, unleash the Key Tam division, unleash the antitrust division.
Imagine that.
Imagine if almost every day you saw an antitrust case brought against big tech, another one against big ag, another one against big pharma, another one against other, against various people in the Wall Street housing industry that are inflating prices against big banks.
You know, there's a long litany of these people that have relied on monopolistic practices.
I mean, I'll give an example.
My nephew was talking about this.
There's people that help grade the quality.
Well, you might know about this a little bit, Viva.
There's people that grade the cards, how good your card is, but it's 10 out of 10, 9 out of 10, 8 of 10.
Well, one of the companies that does that is busy buying up all of its competitors.
And then they're telling people, ah, this only grades out an eight out of 10.
And they're like, okay, so they sell it.
They go buy it.
That's who they're behind the buyer.
And then regrade it.
And regrade it's 10 out of 10.
So there's just a little example.
But those are all the kind of cases that could be brought that people in the administration want to bring that want to expose the NGO fraud, want to expose the Soros fraud, want to expose the immigration fraud, want to expose the welfare fraud, want to expose the government fraud, want to expose the Doge referrals.
Well, they want that, but they're being blocked by Pam Bondi and these corrupt outside actors like Mike Davis and Arthur Schwartz.
Well, two things about the fraud in and of itself.
So the story went viral.
Then people are like, no, no, we knew about it all along.
And then I feel like I'm taking crazy pills where the people saying that the DOJ has been on this Minnesota fraud, they're citing trials, indictments, convictions that occurred under Biden's DOJ.
And there's been some arrests under the current DOJ, but not the ones that Bondi took to Twitter to celebrate.
And then the question is: why the hell?
It's not a question of vengeance and unjust retribution.
Why the hell is what's his face?
Tim Walz not facing.
I know they've referred a letter that came from Anna Paulina.
Why the hell is he not under investigation?
It's patently obvious that he was people.
A bunch of members of Congress have delivered these cases in neatly wrapped up.
And instead, they're not being delivered on.
And that's why, like, I was curious, like, why go out of your way to set up what appears to both of us to be a Patsy on January 6th?
And then it made sense that Bondi believes that as long as she doesn't offend the deep state, as long as she does the CIA's bidding, as long as she does the National Security Establishment's bidding, as long as she, I mean, you have Trump complaining about these defense contractors ripping the taxpayers off to line their pockets.
And he's saying something needs to be done about that.
Well, procurement fraud is a big issue.
I know people who have volunteered to work for the administration because they had intricately understand the procurement fraud, have a history of investigating it going a quarter century.
And why?
Because Pam Bondi wants to keep the deep state on her side.
As long as the deep state isn't at her throat, that's why she brings the Comey case in a way that has the highest chance of getting dismissal.
People need to really appreciate this.
They have to appeal the decision now because, from what I understand, they are beyond the statute of limitations to bring charges again.
And they're only beyond the statute of limitations because they waited until the 11th hour to file those weak ass charges.
Then some people say, oh, no, Viva, conspiracy, that tolls the statute limitations.
And they don't understand.
That's an extra argument that you have to make to get past the fact that you didn't file within the required time.
There was nothing new that even required for a two-page indictment on Comey to wait seven months to have it tossed because Halligan allegedly wasn't properly appointed, which I disagree with, but you set it up so that you're right.
It was a weak ass indictment, even if it gets through the procedural rigor more, whatever that word is, rigor or more.
You know what I mean?
The procedural stuff.
And then it doesn't.
And now they're fighting to keep it alive, but then saying, oh, no, no, Viva, don't worry.
There's upcoming grand juries in Florida for Pierce.
That's when it's all going to come on.
I'm like, okay, first of all, that doesn't mean that you don't criticize what has been borderline neglect in terms of legal proceedings to begin with.
I'm reasoning they're all sitting on it.
I mean, by the way, there's efforts afoot in the House of Representatives to physically go and arrest, have the sergeant of arms physically arrest Pam Bondi and hold her in jail on the House in the Capitol until she complies with the Epstein file disclosures.
But now this makes a ton of sense.
She's been misleading the president repeatedly to said certain things were happening that weren't, said certain things weren't happening that were.
And as the president's going to discover over the next year, as the Epstein files get disclosed, we were right all along.
He is exonerated in the Epstein files, but Pam Bondi lied to him about what was in it.
And she got counterfeit cash to play ball because he doesn't want to rattle any cages anyway, despite his big talk.
Dan Bongino is busy.
They're sending him back out to run cover for them.
I don't, to be honest with you, do I know why?
I don't.
I don't understand what caused this big flip with Bonjio.
But that is what he's going out there to do.
And maybe he thinks he's defending righteous actors.
He's defending the people interfering with the righteous actors.
He's defending the people who are making life miserable for the righteous actors.
And what I think some of these people misunderstand is they think they have more political juice than they do.
They think they've been able to gaslight a bunch of high-ranking staffers principally, because these are mostly kids in their 30s, into thinking they have a bunch of political power that they don't have.
Oh, look, Mike Davis is on Steve Bannon.
Let's see how long that lasts.
Let's just say a little FYI.
There may have been a lot of people that woke up this weekend that once we were able to make the rounds, figure out what was going on and get the word to the right folks.
Some people ask it in the chat, does the President Trump know this?
He does this weekend.
He knows at least a good part of it.
Steve Bannon knows this weekend.
And a bunch of people woke up.
And, you know, it turned out Mr. Smith goes to Washington.
Can't have a happy ending after all.
But when people say, does Trump know he knows it now?
He knows that Jocelyn Ballantyne has been the prosecutor in the pipe bomber Patsy.
A lot of that information was never given to him.
Yeah, well, I mean, what happened is Susie Wiles in order to get a lot of the inside intel information.
I'm never going to disclose sources, period.
But a lot of the inside, I'll get in the bourbons at Viva Barnes Law.locals.com.
Monday night, Tuesday night, Wednesday night, Thursday night, got to hop over to head to Seattle, get a bench of hearing Friday.
But here's one little tidbit.
What happened is Wiles wanted to prevent leaks.
And so to prevent leaks, she has done aggressive gatekeeping of Trump.
So I understand her logic for that.
The first administration was killed by leaks or badly harmed by it.
However, a maybe unintended side effect has been that accurate intel often does not get to Trump because the kind of people who, all these good faith actors who are, you know, at different levels of the government, but many of them are at second or third tier levels, sometimes fourth or fifth tier, before they could talk to somebody to get to Trump or they themselves could get to Trump.
Now they can't.
So I don't believe Trump even knows that Ballantyne is running the Patsy case.
Doesn't even know all of the concerns and criticisms of how that came about.
And so the he, my understanding is he only found out this weekend about the scale of the issues involving Bondi and the Justice Department.
That his own antitrust division is being sabotaged.
His own Key Tam division is being sabotaged.
His own fraud division is being sabotaged.
His FTC in critical parts is being sabotaged.
And it's being two big players in that are Mike Davis and Arthur Schwartz.
And there are these rogue corrupt actors that need to be outed so that Washington understands these are not people to trust, not people to deal with, not people to rely upon.
And he needs to fire Pam Bonte.
There's no doubt about it.
And I think that's going to happen sooner rather than later.
What do you make of what's coming next week by way of the grand jury inquiries into deep state shenanigans, the Russiagate hoax?
What do you think is going to happen?
And does it do me, is there any practical purpose for me to drive an hour and a half up to Fort Pierce for this grand jury hearing, which happens behind closed doors?
No.
I mean, here's the problem.
People are assuming that grand jury is looking into that.
This is just a grand jury being convened.
So the subject matter of the grand jury is unknown.
So the people are assuming, hey, this is the Southern District of Florida.
This is a prosecutor who has a good reputation as not being a deep state affiliated associated prosecutor.
And that he is going to, and we know that there's already been some action down there because some people quit.
And when I saw some people quit that were bad faith actors, that's a good sign out of the Southern District of Florida.
And so the, and again, they have jurisdiction and venue because they took the advice that we and others gave them early on, said, look, go to the Southern District of Florida.
By the way, Mike Davis takes credit for this.
This is trying to be great.
It's funny.
He didn't originate any of this.
He just, he would steal our stuff and then pretend he came up with it to show he's the lawyer on the front lines, giving the good advice.
It's all garbage.
But he just stole from us.
I didn't really care that he was stealing from us.
I didn't know he was stealing from us in order to line his own pockets by representing people that would undermine and corrupt the efficacy of the Trump administration and hurt them politically.
I mean, these guys are so slow.
What they're doing could damage JD Vance and the administration, which means Democrats would come in in 2028.
And these boys better get their extradition ready to roll.
They better find out where they can go and not get Maduro'd.
I mean, because what they're doing will be seen as by a range of people already seen as, by people within Congress, by other people that have knowledge of the situation.
Because the antitrust world is a small world.
Key TM World's a small world.
Fraud investigation is a small world.
And he's put a kind of target on himself by doing all the McKismo when the McKismo was always an act because he knew that none of this was happening.
And the reason it's not happening is so that Pam Bonte can keep the pay-for-play scheme running, ongoing.
It's like Ulysses S. Grant's second administration.
And if they were successful, they would end up sabotaging themselves because Democrats would put them at the top of the list because they'd be easy targets.
So it's the only reason Democrats have let it go on so long because they're like, oh, this is great.
We can build one case, two cases, three cases, four cases, five cases to make the Trump administration look like fraud on what issue?
Affordability by covering up for their corporate pals, by inside deals being done with NAGA lawyers.
I mean, it was a gift to the Democrats what these dimwits are doing.
Like I said, I don't mind crooked.
I don't mind greedy.
I don't mind stupid.
Don't put all three together.
And that's what you have in Mike Davis and Arthur Schwartz.
Robin will read a bunch of the humble rants before we get into some other stuff.
If it's not a feeling, Prosecutor Trump probably doesn't like him.
Bucklebrush says, please play Bongino versus Bongino so we can watch him describe himself by Kyle Seraph.
And well, I'll only steel man a little bit right now.
We don't know what Bongino is going to talk about in his first show back, but I don't think it's going to be ratting out the corruption of the administration based on some exchanges with some people on Twitter.
We'll see.
Have you been blocked yet, Viva?
No, he still follows me, but there's a whole bunch.
I got blocked.
I got blocked for one response.
Have you seen the new game out?
Block Gino.
Black Gino.
Look, I don't like it.
People complain that you blocked them.
And I say, like, everyone's a big boy.
They do what they think is best.
I don't think what he's doing is the best social media strategy.
What do I know?
He's been instructed to do this by people who don't have the best interest of either him or the administration at heart.
And he still doesn't understand that.
That's the reason.
I mean, look, you know, he before going into the FBI, he had the, I listened to it.
It was an amazing podcast.
I would have preferred, and this is because I'm a sissy Canadian, some humility and some understanding the legitimate grievances of the people who are disappointed, not declaring war.
Now it's going to say he's declaring war on Candice, Tucker, Megan, Nick Fuentes.
First of all, I still don't think that's a good idea, but fighting with the people and blocking the people who are legitimately disappointed and have legitimate grievances, a better tact, which would have, I think, been better long run for him personally, for the show and for politics, is: I appreciate some of you might be disappointed.
I did the best I could.
We still need to win this, and I'm going to do what I can to make sure we can while addressing the legitimacy of your grievances.
And I'll be back in February looking forward to it.
What we saw is, you know, I hope everyone's doing well on a personal front.
I think it's a bizarre meltdown that I think is going to be counterproductive.
It all kind of makes sense that Bondi's running this heavy interference and that she's got cash on a short leash and that for whatever reason, Bongino just stepped in line, and that she's got Woodward and Blanche not willing to do anything to stand up either with any consistency.
Even when they know there's cases they have like, this is wrong, this is bad, this is a bad idea, but okay, they feel all this pressure from the likes of Mike Davis and Arthur Schwartz to play this game.
But I was like, why haven't they gone after Antifa and Train Tifa, which has connections to the Charlie Kirk murder and assassination?
Especially now you kind of know why.
Why aren't they looking at the government connections or NGO connections?
Now you know why.
And that bridges us to the next case.
Why is there a couple of lesbos from outside the state going knowing where to go and knowing to go to Minnesota to try to obstruct ICE officers and create a false flag event that could undermine our immigration enforcement?
It's because it confirms what we've long suspected.
We would have seen all these prosecutions if these people were not connected to powerful deep state rogue actors.
And it's confirmation of it now that I know why Pay-per-Play Pam is doing what she's doing.
So I'll preface this by saying the fact that they're lesbian is irrelevant except for the fact that they're quite clearly political activists based on social media, based on ties, based on affiliation.
Now, I would say from a legal perspective, the fact that they're politically, what was what I just used, affiliated or that they're political activists is also irrelevant in determining the rightness or the wrongness or the justified nature of the shooting.
They could be political activists, the most vitriolic, awful people on earth, and can still be the victim of police brutality and unlawful police force.
So who they were, what they did on a personal level didn't factor into my analysis of the shooting.
I know it did for other people.
You know, now they say, oh, they're despicable people.
And as though that makes this less of a tragedy, it's not to be holier than now.
It's just, you know, that doesn't make me feel good as a perspective of being a human.
Whether or not they were toxic political activists, what happened to her is a tragedy regardless, but it's neither going to attenuate nor minimize the lawfulness or not of the shooting.
Everybody saw what happened.
This was a woman who, at first, they're saying, oh, she's just dropping her kids off at school.
She's a political activist.
I'm sure she and her wife would be proud to admit it.
They were apparently not instrumental, but well-versed in instigating and interfering with ICE enforcement.
Not that that changes, whether or not what happened to her was lawful, but that's who they were.
All right.
The incident itself, we've all seen.
We've all seen the angles of right now.
It was her blocking the ICE operations deliberately.
It was her, you know, say mouthing off to some extent.
Her wife is there recording this as it's happening.
And then there's an incident where the, you know, the police officer on the side has his hand on the window, says, get out of the car, get out of the car.
And her wife, for whatever reason, says drive, baby, drive, drive.
There's a cop in front of her.
Now we've seen his, he was holding a camera and ultimately eventually a gun.
We've seen his footage now.
It quite clearly seems to indicate that he did get hit or pushed by the vehicle.
It was like dropping a phone, Viva, is not indication of getting hit.
From what we've seen, the guy got hit.
And then the question is, well, the wheels were pointing in the other direction.
From what we've seen, the car started accelerating as she's saying drive, drive, drive, and it's pointed at the cop.
It doesn't get traction because of the icy roads.
Then the wheels turn.
There's a shot fired, bang, bang, two more as the car goes by.
She's dead after all of this.
A stupid, you know, V-for-Vendetta type escalation incident that is now going to be weaponized by both sides, but one by one side more effectively than the other, because a dead woman shot in the face is going to be easier to market as victims of police brutality than convincing people it was a lawful, justified shot.
Because it was borderline.
I think it was now that we've seen all the evidence and I've seen the analyses on both sides.
And it was unfortunate.
But yeah, you're driving your car speeding off with another cop with his hands in the window and a cop in front to off to the side.
You're putting people's lives at risk.
And that cop had less than one second to decide what to do.
I think I've just tainted the analysis, Robert, but I think you came to the same conclusion.
Unfortunate, but justified.
Yeah, I was on with Alex Jones Live.
We were going to debate Venezuela, but this story broke live.
And so we were watching the video footage live.
And so there's been a bunch of misrepresentations out there.
They're misrepresenting what the internal policy is for the police officer and the ICE officer and how to handle this kind of scene.
The general protocol is for an ICE officer to not get right in front of a moving vehicle for the purpose of trying to stop it.
That's the policy.
What the officers act, and even then, it includes a bunch of exemptions and says, if necessary for your defense, for the defense of others, to try to prevent certain crimes from occurring, you can be in that position.
So people are misquoting it.
They're highlighting provisions or they're taking out all the exemptions and all the rest.
Nick Ricada made this point.
He's like, yeah, if you've got all the exemptions, then yes, you can try to make an argument.
But so that argument's a red hair.
Second argument is Barnes versus Felix.
That's a Fourth Amendment case.
That's about whether her estate could bring a claim against the government.
That is not a self-defense case about the officer.
Those are two separate things.
But even that case, by the way, so in Barnes versus Felix, officer comes up, asks a person to get out of the car, is coming up.
Then the person jumps back in the car and takes off.
The officer jumps onto the car and tells him to stop and then shoots him.
Even under Fourth Amendment analysis, which is less generous than a self-defense is for a criminal defendant, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it's summary judgment, that there's not even a dispute worthy to get to a jury.
What he did.
So people focused on the Supreme Court saying that you don't, remember, we covered this case.
You don't look at the limited timetable.
You look at the totality of the circumstance.
But even that case said, in the totality of the circumstances, what the officer did in preventing this person from fleeing when he is an imminent risk to others was in fact completely appropriate because you can defend yourself.
You can also defend others.
That guy was much more aggressive than this officer was.
Third, there's been a lot of misrepresentation, as you point out.
Just happened to be dropping the kid off and suddenly ended up with the officer shooting him.
The left just lies so badly and so egregiously, it's unbelievable.
But they're used to getting away with it.
But in fact, that's not at all.
These were out-of-state people who came for the exclusive and primary purpose to obstruct a ICE deportation.
And by the way, go take a look at who it is they were deporting.
They weren't deporting like the guy that's been here 20 years.
It's a nice little gardener that goes to Catholic church.
They were deporting the sodomites, the rapists, the child abusers, the murderers, the assaulters, the domestic violence guys, the gang members, some of the worst of the worst.
That's who they were protecting.
They were protecting some of the worst criminals on the planet.
And so they deliberately obstruct knowing where they're going, which tells me it's organized.
The fact they're out of state, the fact they know how to do it, the fact where they're at, all that.
Officers come up, and this officer is just walking around where they're talking smack to him.
And hey, try to do something.
And he is, and he's not standing in the center of the front to stop the vehicle.
The vehicle at that point's not moving.
He's just trying to get a sort of map of, okay, what are we dealing with?
Is there somebody over on this side or somebody over on this side?
That's what he's doing.
He's going around and he's filming it.
So to, you know, if he was out to do something illicit, he wouldn't be filming it, everybody.
So he's filming it.
So, I mean, above and beyond a body camera to protect himself, ultimately, but also develop evidence.
And as he's to the corner of the vehicle, not in front of the vehicle, she suddenly, and as the other officer is going up thinking he's going to be able to open the door and have her come out, that's when she suddenly hits the gas.
And if you look at the vehicle from behind, you will see the vehicle does not turn right away from the officer.
It initially turns left right into the officer.
That's why he gets hit.
You can tell that if you see the video from behind, it's clear.
All the other video confirms this.
It's now subsequently come out, but I was watching it in live time.
And it clearly hits him.
And at that point, you have somebody who is a dangerous fleeing criminal who has committed a federal felony of obstructing a ICE federal investigation deliberately, knowingly, and intentionally, by the way.
But her intent otherwise is irrelevant.
What matters is his state of mind, not hers.
And his state of mind is: this is someone that is trying to kill me.
This is someone that might will probably try to kill others because they're there to obstruct in the first place.
And driving a big vehicle, even at three miles per hour, at two miles per hour, is by law considered a dangerous weapon.
So it's just the same as having a big gun to somebody's head.
And so the and in fact, it can get worse.
And so as he's jumping, trying to get out of the way, you can tell he gets hit by the way he falls back and is about to fall back.
He pulls the trigger, hits, and kills her on the spot and disables the vehicle from being a future dangerous weapon, just like disarming somebody.
It is as clean a shoot as you get in law enforcement.
And it's all filmed on videotape with multiple witnesses all over the place.
All these people pretend, oh, he wanted to kill her.
He was, why?
He didn't know she was going to be there then.
Well, not just that.
He's recording.
I don't know if he had body cam as well, but he's recording on his iPhone, trying to get the plate, trying to record the incidents, not knowing where it's going to escalate to.
Let me bring this up.
This is Andrew Bronca, for anybody who doesn't know him, Law of Self-Defense.
Did I just close the window?
No, I didn't.
This is he, in his analysis, I didn't notice it the first time about the wheels.
I'll just play this here.
Up in front is directly in front of her vehicle, and you can see the wheels spin in place.
You see that right there?
Right there, spinning in place.
So she's stepping hard enough on the gas to spin the wheels.
The moment they get traction, that vehicle is shooting at the officer.
The officer can see notice it's going towards him.
See, and he.
That's all.
I'll stop there because I did not appreciate it.
I didn't see it until his analysis that the tire skidded on the ground, pointing slightly to the left.
It then turns to the right.
But it's, you know, yeah, it's one little tidbit as a guy that does stunts talked about online.
He's been hit by a vehicle going two miles per hour as a stuntman, and it broke a bunch of bones in his body.
Right.
And again, it's, does the officer have reason to believe that this person with this dangerous weapon and the way they're using it intends to or could cause serious bodily harm or death to him or others?
And how can we say it is utterly unreasonable for him to think anything but that in that instance?
Alonzo, it's not going in reverse.
That's because he was reversing the video to show the wheels going forward.
And you can see it, by the way, I saw one of the videos from behind, and you can see it's good that she appears to have turned it that way because you see it go like this before.
It only goes back like this after she's been shot.
So, which would be even further affirmation that she was initially trying to turn it that direction towards the officer.
And that's what he sees.
He sees it coming towards him and accelerating.
It could kill him in a second.
It could harm other people.
This is someone that's there to obstruct to begin with.
That's why they're there.
And so clean self-defense.
Now, could Minnesota bring a prosecution?
That's what I was, yeah.
I was just going to ask.
Because he'll face state charges.
They'll sue the state.
They'll get paid out at the state level.
Federally, I presume he might.
Oh, they can't sue the state.
They'd have to sue the feds.
That they're not going to have much success with for a bunch of reasons.
Can they not sue the state?
They can't sue the state.
Not for federal state.
The state can bring a criminal prosecution even against a federal agent.
The federal agent can then remove the case to federal court.
We'll see whether, in my view, it would be another bogus case, but the, because I think ultimately this will be in the clear.
And if you see even a commie state like Minnesota not bring a state prosecution, then you know just how clear his self-defense rights are.
Okay.
I was, I was, that's interesting.
Okay, good.
And not good.
It's some, it's hindsight is amazing.
Some people are saying the second and third shot are going to be problematic, but all three shots came off in less than a second.
I think it's 0.7 seconds, part and parcel of.
And it's within their training to do it that way, by the way.
Okay.
Well, that's, I mean, it is terrible, but this is a case of NGOs or activist organizations using people as human pawns in their game.
And they've got their martyr now.
She's no Ashley Babbitt.
This was a far more immediate risk.
And now we've seen it all from all angles.
We've seen it in slow motion.
Go for it, Robert.
And further context for these people that think totality of the circumstances hurts his defense.
Literally just the opposite.
It helps his defense.
One aspect of those totality of the circumstances, what does he know as an ICE officer?
There have been over 60 incidents just this year by protesters trying to run over ICE officers.
This officer was involved in an incident where he was dragged by an illegal criminal pedo that he was trying to arrest.
He got stitches, and I noticed there was, you know, to his brachial artery.
He knows what the guy whose arm is in the car is at risk for grievous bodily harm if she takes off and starts dragging this guy by his arm.
Correct.
To defend the other people, to defend himself, to defend the community.
He did the right thing, pure and simple.
Robert, let me, did I start reading Hrumble Rants and then stop and forget?
The only argument I can think of is, Your Honor, she was a really bad driver.
Please convict this man, Joe Maskew.
The good lady is exactly the same person as Ben Soof.
Easy crazy people.
The good lady is exactly the same person as Ben Soof, example, crazy people.
Oh, I see crazy people.
Yep.
Matt Reese says, I saw about 20 ICE protesters today.
They were blowing whistles and looked like a group of homeless meth addicts.
They might be.
Ginger says, it's not in their training to shoot three times, Robert.
That fudlore has been going around Twitter.
It's incredibly discrediting for anyone who repeats it.
I'll double-check that independently.
Matt Rice, so I saw that.
Hope you have proof of your allegations, says Barry N. McGrowan.
Oh, Barry N. McGrowan.
I don't know what that means.
I'm not out here making these accusations unless I do.
Just FYI.
And I have no knowledge of them.
You came fresh and hot off a meeting in D.C. Where did they last say the best place to express frustration is Twitter X emails calls?
Is that Viva volume lower than Barnes?
That might be a microphone thing.
I think we checked out here.
Female Prosecutor.
Hold on, hold on Playbond University.
Oh, that's where I stopped.
That's right.
You would see the movie.
Is this?
Have I seen the movie?
Is this thing on?
No, but I was just listening to the guy, I forget his name now, on Rogan.
I'm going to watch it.
King of Bill Tong says, look at it.
I'd like to actually see it in the theater.
King of Bill Tong says Bill Tong is one of the highest protein snacks in the world, boasting over 50% protein, packed with B vitamins, creatine, iron, zinc, and more.
Visit Billtongusa.com.
Use code Barnes for 10% off.
And I just had the Doozeldor, the Carnutzel before going on.
It was amazing.
Eric John Pizza, who has his own show where he makes pieces that look like people and things, says best political show on Sunday nights ever, all week, Eric.
According to Dan Bongino, black pillar individuals who adopt nihilistic and defeatist philosophy regarding the political future of the MAGA.
Doesn't President Trump deserve the benefit of the doubt?
It does the benefit of the doubt.
It doesn't mean the benefit of the doubt does not mean immune from criticism, period.
Ginger Ninja, you seem to be some of the most loyal people to Trump working in this administration need that criticism when things go AWOL so they have political capital to correct course.
But for the criticism, first of all, but for the blowback, Iran probably turns into something more than it did.
But for the blowback, Venezuela might have turned into something more than we'll see where it goes from here.
But for the blowback, Comey never gets charged.
But he still hasn't gotten charged for his 8647.
Charging for that, that we're within the statute of limitations for.
And just look at this past week.
He got a great idea for a new assistant attorney general to run all the fraud to make sure it gets done right under a vice president van.
Fantastic restructuring idea that could solve many, many problems.
You got the proposal that Wall Street shouldn't be buying up all our homes so that we can own nothing and be happy about it, World Economic Forum style.
You got announcements of buying bonds to get the housing mortgage rates down because the Fed keeps keeping them too high compared to where they are to make housing affordable and accessible again.
You got, hey, you big banks, you weren't allowed to charge us serious interest rates through all the history of both Judaism, Christianity, and Islam in most societies and civilizations through all of human history.
Maybe you shouldn't be able to jack up 25 or 23, 24% into credit card rates.
All of those this week.
It's a coincidence.
Paris and I happen to be in town.
I tell you, just coincidence.
But those are all four great ideas.
Do you think those ideas happen if we're not out there saying, hey, we need action on this arena because voters are worried?
And declassifying or changing the schedule of marijuana, which I know you'd been pushing.
I don't know if it goes all the way, but it's certainly a politically, obviously net positive decision that doesn't come at anybody's anybody's real expense.
Particularly with young minority voters, young voters and minority voters.
That's who like, so that's a medical freedom aspect.
They get to choose what goes into their body, not the government, within a greater degree of flexibility.
So the, and there's going to be a lot more coming, by the way.
There's a lot more good policy.
It's only happening because we give the good people the political capital they need to get those policies through.
I didn't realize intolerant leftist said you didn't answer.
Barnes, where do your contacts say the best place to express frustration is?
I thought I read it as a statement.
So where's the, I would imagine truth social is a good place to try to reach everywhere.
Everywhere.
I wouldn't worry too much about truth one way or the other.
I mean, that just on Trump's own feed.
But, you know, it's everywhere.
X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, doesn't matter the comments on platforms.
But in truth, the podcasters in our realm that a lot of people with influence watch, right?
You know, Kanis Owens might have a big audience, but it's all people who have no influence, to be blunt about it.
By contrast, people that watch this, people that watch Richard Barris, people who watch it, I got recognized more in DC than I've ever got recognized.
Robert, three times yesterday, I got recognized.
I went to Deerfield Beach, getting out of the car.
I was like, Aviva, I love the show.
Then coming back, and then at a red light on, I don't know, North Federal Highway.
So it feels good.
It's not a question of popularity.
It feels good that people appreciate the work that you and I do.
Oh, yeah.
And they value it.
That was probably one of the most common statements I got was: thanks for what we're doing.
Keep it up, maintain it, because it is critical to give them the capital they need.
Because it's really a wide open town.
So much more wide open than DC has ever, ever been.
I joked with somebody.
I think we could bring the Visigoths in and take this whole thing over.
I see why they're so nervous about January 6th, that they realize the system is fracturing.
The old establishment is getting cracked.
And so there's great opportunity.
And the only thing that's going to make that deliver is not just seal clapping whenever Trump gets suckered into supporting some donor-driven cause.
It's saying, hey, that's not our direction.
Over here is our direction.
That's what gives all the other people around Trump to say, hey, we need to get this.
And look at when we got four good announcements in a week.
Four.
Well, let's get to the let's get to the other one before we get to the less good stuff.
RFK revamping the vaccine schedule and revamping the, what's it called?
The food chart thing.
Yeah, the food pyramid.
The food guideline.
And so Mary and my wife are like, hey, Dave, how do you feel about that?
I was like, I'm just happy red meat is high up there now.
And she's like, well, there's been no new science.
We were just discussing.
It's like, it's not no new science.
The old food pyramid was propaganda garbage.
And it's so good.
I remember growing up.
I'm like, well, if I don't eat fat, then I won't get fat.
So I used to go to the restaurants and load up on bread, load up on rice.
This is when I was younger and could digest it.
And then you realize that was all literal corporate propaganda that we were brainwashed into thinking that you want to eat starches and carbs over proteins and red meat and eggs.
I mean, I grew up in the era where you took the egg yolk out because that had the cholesterol in it as because cholesterol is bad.
And you go full circle now where everyone is like, yeah, the protein is good.
The cholesterol is good, cholesterol.
Red meat, you know, better to have leaner than fattier.
It's the way, it's what made us what we are today, evolutionarily speaking.
And RFK Jr. has been getting the big fat W's, but we haven't been hearing them because they've been sort of drowned out with the concerns about regime change in Venezuela.
Yeah, the huge, huge, huge announcement.
So basically, Robert Kennedy came in on the vaccine front and removed the most problematic vaccines from the recommended list.
So for those that don't know how this whole scam came about, two things happened.
One was the Congress in the mid-80s, the big pharma said, golly gee, we won't even make these vaccines unless you give us immunity.
And the thing, I was telling people this in Washington.
It's like, okay, you want immunity?
Agree to no profit.
Agree to distribute it at cost.
See how many of those vaccines disappear from the marketplace then?
Because it will diminish their brand because of how much these vaccines cause injury.
And more and more people are alert and awake to it.
What they wanted was guaranteed profits plus no liability.
And that's what the childhood immunity, but how do they get the guaranteed profits?
Well, first you get the law that says they're immune if they manufacture these vaccines.
Then there was an old provision that had the Secretary of Health and Human Services help let schools know what vaccines are needed or recommended or not.
And this was never supposed to be part of this process.
But behind the scenes, this is where, like, when you have rogue actors who know how to work the system, they get very pernicious things through.
But that means you can take the same methodology and get righteous things through.
Once you understand how the system really operates, Bobby does better than anybody up there.
And by the way, everybody that's good faith on the cabinet side at every level loves Bobby Kennedy.
He's got far more political capital than he even knows.
It's amazing the conversion and transformation that's taken place.
They all want to be associated with him.
They all want to be affiliated with him.
They all want to work with him.
He's got to use that because he's got, I mean, I mean, I heard it from everybody, no matter who they were.
So the people who probably would have considered him persona non grata just 18 months ago.
Now it's like he's the greatest.
So, you know, he's got he's doing a lot of, and he's having the most success because he understands how the system works.
And how the system worked was it needed to be re so what was originally designed just to help schools know which and it was a funding mechanism, by the way.
It was that if it was recommended by HHS, then there would be federal funding to support these vaccines being included on school list.
Then they used the law to say now they have immunity, but now they have guaranteed profits because everybody has to buy it, has to get it to go to school.
And then they gave kickbacks to the doctors and the medical associations.
So that's how this whole scam came about.
And all of a sudden, you weren't getting good science.
You were getting bad science.
You were getting vaccines, and almost all of them had never been properly clinically tested against an actual placebo.
They would test the vaccine against another vaccine.
They would test it against another dangerous drug and say, look, it's just as unsafe and ineffective as that one.
And thereby call it safe and effective.
So by removing it from the recommended part of the list, it now can't be mandated for most school systems.
There's some school systems that have their own list, but most don't because they don't want to get into the legal risk.
So they go with whatever HHS recommends.
So it doesn't matter if it's on a list.
It has to be on the recommended list in order to get mandated or under the kids' law to be immune.
So the net effect is if they, you know what you're going to see?
You're going to see a lot of these vaccines disappear because they knew they were unsafe, knew they were ineffective.
And now that it's no longer mandated in most jurisdictions, and now they can face liability, this is going to be a massive boost to the health of our kids and our next generation.
Huge win, huge win.
Second big win was finally fixing the bogus food guidelines.
Our food pyramid was created by the sugar lobby, created by the ultra-processed food lobby to tell us, you know what's at the top of the food pyramid?
Fruit loops.
Fruit loops is what you should be eating every day.
Not good, all natural milk like you can get from Amos MillerOrganicFarm.com.
You can also get some good pumpkin pies to help support 1776 Law Center.
He's got that up and going, by the way.
We'll be promoting that in a little bit at 1776 Law Center in the coming week or so.
But it's and also give Bobby credit.
He knows how to package this.
He says, what's the message?
Eat real food, real food, not fake food, not some Bill Gates beyond meat food, not some ultra-processed chemical-laden crap made in some New Jersey factory, but real food from your local farm.
Real meat, real vegetables, real food, a little less sugar.
Don't eat all.
He's taking all the, I mean, imagine we were paying to get poor people to drink bad food that made them so unhealthy they had to go on Medicaid.
So unhealthy that many of them were disabled for certain areas of work.
So, so limited that they couldn't even serve in the military if we needed them.
And the government was subsidizing this because the big sugar industry bought them off.
By the way, people remember, if you want to know some of these people that are connected to the Mike Davis of the world trying to protect and promote him, go back and see if they were also on the big sugar lobby earlier in the year trying to pretend big sugar was good.
So a huge, two massive monumental shifts that are science-based.
Well, my other favorite thing to do is to watch journalists try to try to get one over on Bobby Kennedy.
I can't believe you're doing da-da-da.
He's like, well, here's why, here's the science, here's the fact.
And every time he comes back, we just follow the science.
And this is what the science has always said.
The industry lobbies lied about the science in order to get this crap stuck into our bodies that has caused the health epidemic of chronic disease in America.
And what does that relate to?
You want to get healthcare costs down?
You want to get them more accessible and affordable?
Insurance premiums and healthcare access?
Make people healthier.
How do you do that?
You remove these bad, dangerous drugs from the time they're little children and babies.
Chemicals.
And you get them with good food.
Bobby Kennedy's getting two birds, one stone.
It is amazing.
It's just a shame that we didn't get enough of it.
I heard it because I follow the news and I follow the bourbon with Barnes's, even though I don't always comment.
Well, I catch up with him in the morning while I'm doing my jog.
So we didn't hear about them, Robert, partly because we're still hearing some disconcerting news about the action in Venezuela, which it hasn't descended into full-blown internal civil war in Venezuela yet.
It hasn't descended into ongoing protracted military, I would say, involvement yet.
And then we had that executive order, which apparently seeks to, I don't know, nationalize or secure the proceeds from the oil that Venezuela is going to sell through America.
First things first, I mean, I've been following it.
It doesn't look like it's fallen into internal civil war, but it's tough to tell.
One thing is clear that for everybody saying, oh, this was just an arrest and, you know, it's not regime change and it's not protracted military action.
Well, Trump literally mentioned it during the press conference.
And it looks like, you know, the way things are going right now, they've called off or they haven't called on additional strikes because I guess it was, you know, not, it was about a little bit more than just arresting Maduro and his wife and bringing them to New York.
What is going on with the executive order to protect the proceeds from the Venezuelan oil?
The first question I have is, how much oil does Venezuela put onto the international markets?
And bottom line, is this going to be a good thing?
Like it seems to be, you know, in the news, and is the executive order going to remain enforceable?
What's a good opportunity for a programming note?
Monday at 3 p.m. Eastern Time, we will be live with Max Blumenthal of the Gray Zone.
Is this tomorrow?
Yes.
Okay.
Well, then I'm not going to Fort Pierce.
Okay.
I thought it might have been the weekend.
Okay.
Three o'clock tomorrow.
Blumenthal.
Okay, amazing.
Yeah.
And he and his wife have covered extensively Venezuela.
They come from the more left anti-war perspective.
Max is the son of the famous Sidney Blumenthal, though they don't share a lot of political viewpoints in common these days.
Max did good work exposing RussiaGate, Spygate, the Ukraine Gate, the exaggerations concerning the January 6th.
So, even though he comes from the left, that hasn't deterred his independent investigative journalistic work.
We don't share opinions on a wide range of political topics, but his investigative work has been fantastic.
And in that respect, so he's going to be on, we're going to cover two.
The main topic will be Venezuela.
He'll know what the defense is going to look like.
So, you're going to get a sneak peek at the Maduro trial defense.
Also, he can tell us what's going on.
He has ties and connections to people that are down there.
What's going on?
What's likely to go on in Venezuela in this capacity?
And then on Tuesday at 10 a.m. Eastern Time, I'll be live with the Durant and go over all the different constitutional, legal, and other issues that Maduro may raise in his Venezuelan defense, as well as the geopolitics of Venezuela, Iran, which Lindsey Graham is like, please, please, can we invade another country for?
The Gaza, which might be about to heat up.
BB saying, Come on, let me go back in there and purge them all.
Just one last try.
Please, Mr. President.
All of that.
I already mentioned that.
I was going to pull up some gems from, is this one from Mike Davis?
Oh, yes.
Level Gaza says any ceasefire.
And he's ceasefire must end.
Israel must finish the job.
Yeah, it's kind of interesting how Davis is on the deep state side on all these issues, huh?
Just a little FYI about what he may be actually up to when he's saying, We're going to break the deep state and take them apart.
Oh, by the way, I cheer every single one of the deep states' wars.
Hmm, might be a little contradiction there, eh?
The uh, uh, that might expose what he's really up to.
So, the uh, but yeah, that'll be the Durant 10 a.m. Eastern time tomorrow, three o'clock.
With back, also, Max has got a good article up on how the EU plans on rigging the elections against Victor Orban in Hungary.
So, we'll have that to cover as well.
The so it's an interesting, it's not clear to me.
I have a hunch that the this is a case of you know, where there's some weakness in the administration, the president was given bad intel on Venezuela, on their oil industry in particular.
And it probably relates to a certain man named Paul Zinger who bought up Sitko's debt that Venezuela owes him.
And he was probably the one singing a song for Trump about how there's all these great oil reserves, the biggest in the world in Venezuela, that could be great for the American economy and security if we can get our hands on it.
Truth is, Jugo Chavez, never known as being afflicted with an undue truth disclosure disorder, he and Nicolas Maduro tended to greatly exaggerate.
Most people in the oil industry that I knew said that about 90% of what they're calling their great oil reserves are not capable of being withdrawn and used in a usable format in the current oil market anyway.
But their current contribution to the oil market, am I wrong?
It's about a million barrels a day that they are like 2%, 3%.
Well, that's about, I think, Canada, if I'm not mistaken, produces three times more.
Iraq produces four times more.
I didn't, I didn't compare it to Russia.
And even, and the worst, the other part is that it's heavy oil of the kind that is very expensive, more expensive than almost anywhere in the world to extract and refine.
So, the other thing is the U.S. refiners dating back to 2017 had shifted after Trump put on sanctions on Venezuela, had shifted to Canadian heavy oil rather than Venezuelan.
It would not be that easy to just go back.
So, that's why Trump had all the oil execs in.
And he was saying, Look, and he put an executive order, says I won't allow any of the oil revenue to go to any of these creditors or any credit or claim against the government of Venezuela, except to be used as the U.S. and Venezuela agree for it to be used, thinking that could help incentivize development.
But all the executives were like, it's still a nightmare because right now oil is at 50 to 55 bucks a barrel.
The other people very unhappy with Trump at the moment are all the shale people in Texas.
They're like, we're already losing our hat when this goes down to 50 bucks.
You want to get it down to 45?
40?
We'll be broke.
And a bunch of the shale people back Trump.
There's some of the biggest backers of Trump.
Now, they don't have the same influence that's a single individual like Paul Singer does.
I think Paul Singer wants to line his pockets with billions of dollars and misled the president into believing that there was these huge oil reserves, easily accessible, that could not only line his pockets, but he probably didn't pitch it that way.
Trump is very well known in Washington.
This was confirmed.
If he thinks you're working for a lobbying private interest, he doesn't trust you and doesn't want to deal with you.
So Arthur Schwartz has been lying about a lot of this.
Mike Davis has been hiding a lot of this from Trump.
That's why they go to the liberal media most of the time and elite.
So I think that's what Singer did because what everybody's saying is, you know, that there is no big oil, easily accessible oil.
Then you have the problem of infrastructure.
Their infrastructure is so underdeveloped down there for over a decade of neglect that the estimates are it would be hundreds of billions of dollars just to be able to get it back up to snuff, and it would cost you 90 bucks a barrel to sell it 50 bucks a barrel.
Sorry, I didn't mean.
I didn't mean to bring this one up.
I meant to bring this one up is for the singer Jewish.
No, I meant to bring up 40 bucks in oil.
Well, 40 bucks a barrel.
It becomes not economically feasible for Venezuela to refine their oil.
I didn't, I did check it out Robert, it is they.
It is generally poor quality sour crude, and if the price per barrel you know it goes down too much, it's going to be cost ineffective to refine it further.
And then you have the problem of the government, and the interesting thing is that's not the worst of it if there's no government, it's even then it's way, way worse tried to defend those oil fields.
People should google who's taking over oil fields in large parts of Mexico if Mexico can't protect all of their oil fields.
Who, by the way, are sending it to Cuba that this was all about?
Marco Rubio's goal was not anything to do with Venezuela, it was to cut off Venezuelan support of Cuba.
So his lifelong dream of taking over Cuba with Trump even joking, he'll be the next president of Cuba uh, could happen.
Well, he needs everybody else to cut off their oil, like the Mexicans and the Russians.
And so that's the uh.
Well, hope like that's going to happen.
I was going to say China's taking over Mexican oil fields, but i'm not sure if that's right.
Who?
Drug cartels?
Okay fine, drug cartels that they're taking over all kinds of things.
They provide security for some of those operations.
It's like uh, the Chicago Bulls games.
You'll park your car and some little kid comes up and says 10 bucks to go protect your car from him.
That's what it is.
There's no four foot.
So the problem is you've got FLN down there.
You got all kinds.
You got a range of terror, you got TDA, you got a range of dangerous violent groups that, if the government isn't secure and collapses for any reason, you've got another nightmare On your hands.
So, you've either got a socialist government that is hostile and adverse that might take it away at any given time.
And on the other side, even if it's even worse if you don't have the socialist government, because then you have a bunch of terrorist criminals, gangs, and cartels that will jack.
So, that's why all the oil companies are like, We're not really interested in going back in.
So, when Trump said, Oh, I talk to oil people, I bet the oil person he was talking was one person, and it was Paul Singer who probably misled him again.
Um, okay, and of the executive order itself, is it illusory?
Legally, big question marks.
Can you just by executive order prevent an asset from being collectible or attachable?
Well, it's an undetermined issue.
We did run a thing like this before, it was the oil for food in Iraq.
Google how well that worked, being littered with corruption and fraud.
But if it, who would have the say the legal interest and the political interest to challenge the executive order, even the Democrats wouldn't want to challenge.
So, anybody who, anybody who owns Venezuela owes debts to tons of people.
So, anybody that Venezuela owes debts to.
Okay, interesting.
Robert, I got to catch up on the chats on viva barns, law.locals.com.
There's a couple on point right here.
Uh, do you think the uprising in Iran will result in a regime change?
And do you think Israel or the U.S. will get involved, at least from afar?
Asks Tsadaka.
Um, yeah, we're going to cover that with the Duran.
Uh, I think that uh, long and short of it is, it looks like the protests are petering out.
Uh, and I think there's good reason you can uh also follow Doomberg, who's written and commented on this, not Doom Kock, you made that uh, yeah, I know, I know.
The Doom Kok's cool too, but uh, this is Doomberg, the oil expert, and the uh, uh, he believes there's good practical and tactical reasons why it is unlike that we're mostly likely doing bluster to try to motivate the protest, and it's because somebody in the State Department, the CIA, still believes that threatening, you know, is they have this imagination where all the Iranian people are sitting around saying, I just wish the Shah would come back.
I just wish America would come and invade us and we and they can't wait for us to come there.
When instead, these people are protesting economic conditions, everyday certain cultural liberty issues.
They are anti-American to this day.
And so, what happens is whenever we stick our neck in, that discourages the protest, leads to the protest coming down, leads to more counter-protest, and we end up protecting the regime that we're trying to overthrow by talking about how we'll get directly involved.
And it's because these people are delusional, like George W. Bush, the Iraqi people can't wait for us to come in and free them.
That's not what this population believes.
And so, you're likely to see that peter out is my best guess at this point.
But we will do a deep dive on it on the Duran on Tuesday.
The real super pleb says, Barnes, most of our Gulf Coast refineries are set up for heavy sourlike.
I've worked in the industry for 10 years.
I mean, I guess it doesn't seem to be.
That's correct, but my understanding is a good number of those were retrofitted to try to do Canadian oil instead of Venezuelan oil.
And it would be a little bit, it would be difficult for them to just quickly turn the spigot.
Gray 101 says, Mr. Barnes, my family and I are truly grateful for Mr. Kennedy's hard work, but none of it survives the next Democrat White House unless it's legislated.
Yeah.
Well, some of these things will be harder to reverse because of the way in which he's putting them in, how he's papering the file, so to speak.
But I agree that the best way to make sure his best reforms get done is that they get legislatively implemented.
Sandy Pauls, what's with the timing on Kennedy's announcements?
Does he time them with other big announcements to reduce potential pushback from institutionalists, or does someone else keep trying to drown his announcements out with the news?
I think it's just coincidence that they happened and it's unfortunate because it would have gotten more, better publicity.
Gray 101 says, if you ever start to think- Actually, I think he was trying to help the administration given there was a lot of voter blowback over some of these big announcements.
He's trying to say, well, here's something good.
Here's something good.
Here's something good.
Just the same reason why Vance spent the whole week.
And then you saw Trump at the end of the week.
But, you know, the ideas may have come from Vance.
Just saying.
To counteract that other narrative.
Gray 101 says, if you ever start to think President Trump cares about us average Americans, remember he told Marjorie Taylor Green and the Epstein victims weren't worthy of the honor of a White House visit, but Bill Gates and buddies are.
And again, that's because Pam Bondi lied to him about the nature of what was in the Epstein files.
He thought it was a bunch of people making false accusations against him and people close to him.
It was totally nonsense.
It's a deep state running a scam, and they use pay-for-play Pam to do it because Pay-for-Play Pam needs to protect the deep state in order to keep her scam and scheme going.
And this is Gray 101 says, Barnes, according to former MTG, he yelled at her.
His concern was you're going to hurt my friends.
I have no doubt that's a concern.
Oh, because when he gets convinced of something like that, he loses his cool with people he shouldn't, and he leads them to make a bunch of bad decisions.
But understand the source of these bad decisions is bad intel and bad information from pay-for-play Pam.
Jimmy P says, should MAGA try to get Bondi indicted first to spoil Dem's advantage?
Bondi is a traitor heading to the ninth circle of hell.
You'd have to have a new attorney general to indict her.
Okay, and then we got the Google.
Hold on one second.
Goldwater Geezer says the good girls were blocking other ICE operations that day.
ICE would get out of their cars, then the girls would speed away.
Their timing was off on the last one.
I didn't get him.
Follower 46 says, I've repeatedly listened to Mark Smith of the four boxes diner say that we shouldn't push for Bondi to be fired.
This has always seemed odd as she is so toxic for Trump.
Is the Federalist Society pro-Bondi?
And if so, why?
I presume they are.
Just keep people connected because he's protecting the deep state and big corporations.
Then we got Defend 612, look it up a George Soros production, says Pierran.
Stingray says, an Ohio police officer, Connor Grubb, was recently acquitted on all counts, including murder and involuntary manslaughter in the 2023 shooting of a pregnant woman, Takia Young, who was accused of shoplifting and drove her car toward him in a supermarket.
I remember that.
I remember that, I think.
Barnes, what's this about?
That was way back at the beginning of the year.
People were reminding people that Stephen Miller made some promises.
But again, on this side, once again, the key problem has been Bondi.
Please remind everyone in the community that Bongino signed a non-disclosure agreement and that the general public.
Well, we talked about this, Bandalici.
The non-disclosure agreement does not prohibit a wide range of free speech.
I believe Bongino will may use that as an excuse, but he's been given bad advice to do this whole attack everybody who's credited societies.
And that's coming from the donor class, everybody.
He may not realize it, but it's the donor class saying, hey, Bongino, get out there.
You're the top podcast.
Run interference for us so the reformers don't get any political currency.
So the good ideas don't get anywhere.
They don't tell him that part.
They say, oh, these are doomers and black pillars.
And they're just, that isn't what they're doing is they're trying to help the donor class dominate over the voter class.
And they're using an unwitting, I think unwitting, person, Nintendo Bongino, to facilitate and enable them.
Well, I say when you're quote tweeting or reposting Mark Levin and when your feed looks like Mark Levin's Saturday morning feed, you might want to take a step back.
But he's a big boy.
He does what he'll make his own decisions.
Piscatla says, you don't need to answer that.
I know the answer is yes.
Hold on, let's go up here.
Hey, did you notice the people following you, Robert?
I've had people following me more than a little, and I'm always unimpressed.
When I'm particularly unimpressed, I pop out of the car.
What's cracking, my boy?
No, no, no one's followed me.
STFU, Veel Man.
USA now says, shut the fuck up, Viva, steelmanning vagino.
The vast majority of us know better.
You're imputing intentions, but it doesn't matter.
Bottom line, it's not anything that I would do.
The only question is, how much of how much he over-under before Bongino blocks Viva?
I'm going to say 45 days.
He won't block.
Well, I'm also not, I'm not jumping on the pylon.
I also am a bit of a humanist.
I don't think he can't possibly feel good at the blowback he's getting, and he'll have to reflect on it.
It's not Skinner and all the kids are wrong.
There's legitimate grievance out there that he's going to have.
Be careful, Viva.
He might go full karate.
You seen the Bongino karate class?
I see that.
I've seen the, well, I see there's a number of videos.
Like, if I ever got the interview with him, if he ever decided to sit down, I would ask him that question in that podcast because it was from January 2025.
What cause is nearest to your heart?
And the answer is Israel and the defense of Israel.
Like, that's a bizarre answer.
I would like to know why that answer was the answer because there's 50 other things.
You know, America, veterans, my family, you know, there's a million other answers that if that weren't the recommended answer, I would never in a million years expect that to be the first answer.
But we'll see.
Maybe I'll get maybe it would be a good interview, but I'm not sure that I'm not sure that it'll happen.
Barnes, I sent Bondi and VP a message on X. Bondi needs to do the job that President Trump asked her to do, says Shofar.
Dan Sundon says there is no general right of public access to the proceedings of a grand jury.
Oh, no, that much I knew.
There's no access.
I just want to see maybe I'll bump into someone on the outside.
Robert, are they done it at the courthouse?
Yeah, they do, but they guard their secrecy very strictly.
Okay, so I can't do it.
We got Max Bloomfield.
In fact, you don't want to because they may misunderstand it.
Excuse me.
Are you telling me the man that signed almost all the checks in his business is not keeping track of what's going on in his administration?
Come on.
That's LKD.
Dude, it's too big.
It's too big.
It's too.
And I get why Wiles did what she did, but this is one of the downsides if you don't protect against it.
And unfortunately, she hasn't protected against it.
The gatekeeping so strictly that it's a little less chaotic and there's no leaks has the downside that good intel and information can get blocked from him.
If you have a bad faith actor like Pay for Play Payment, Andrew Piscadlo says, I despise our politicians.
Here's the reality.
We don't own them.
I told that story about the suit and how much they make to illustrate that fact.
The only way to raise their pay constitutionally is for the next session.
Raise their pay to 2 million or more.
I don't care.
Make it a big crime to do Insider Trader.
Make it $10 million salary enforceable at the state and level.
Make it punishable by death to be bought out bitch on the stock market.
The corruption is within the prosecution, Barnes 2025.
We both said then we got Andrew Piscadlo over here.
Well, I'll read this one.
Then we're going to get Make RFK Jr. acting AG, says Howard the Duke.
And Andrew says, I met.
A bunch of people have asked me.
They've asked me, can you make Kennedy head of commerce, head of Justice Department, head of the CIA?
There's like, I've got requests.
I was going to tell him that there's about six other cabinet positions they want you to run, Bobby.
But there's actually, you know, good people throughout large parts of the administration.
Not Ratcliffe.
That's a problematic one.
That's another story for another day.
This is Piscadlo talking about my suits.
The two-piece was at least $10,000, likely more.
Oh, he's talking about the suits.
One place he could do it.
I won't read this one, Andrew.
I got a couple of get to the others.
Okay, we got that.
Chant says, I think you get a talk that basically says we'll kill your whole family unless you do as you're told.
I wouldn't be surprised.
And Robert, does the understanding of Pan Bondi change your analysis of Dan Bongino?
Not I think we covered that.
Does JD Vance at least know Bondi needs to go?
We got that.
And why doesn't President Trump himself figure out Bondi's betrayal and break his bondage?
Pay to play, Bondi.
You're fired, says Polyella.
Okay, we'll come back to some other stuff.
I'll get back to these afters.
We're going to have our locals after party.
Robert, what do we want to get to?
Now we get to these random cases.
Well, life could be a lot worse.
You could be a stateless citizen after being an ISIS child bride.
So this was interesting.
So I read this case and It's not to say I sympathize with the terrorist.
This is a girl.
This is a British-born woman who that which is the key element here.
Like when they said they stripped her of her of her citizenship, her passport, I was like, oh, so she was naturalized.
They just, you know, no, this is a British-born woman of, I forget her name.
It's obviously Islamic descent.
It's she's Islamic.
She goes and converts to ISIS, allegedly.
She flees and goes to Syria in 2015.
When she's underage, by the way, to join ISIS at the age of 15.
She then, you know, gets captured after the fall of ISIS.
She's in some camp and she says, I was the victim of basically suggesting I'm the victim of trafficking, but in the interim, she has her citizenship stripped of her.
So she's a Brit in Syria, Muslim Brit in Syria, now no longer a Brit because they stripped her of a citizen.
I'm like, that's very wild.
Like, why would they do that instead of taking her back and then arresting her and jailing her for whatever crime she committed?
Because she's now stateless, which is which is bizarre.
But they did make the compelling argument that she was basically trafficked as an underage bride and then discarded after ISIS falls.
And so I was for the first time like, all right, I mean, she was definitely a minor.
I'd say, on the one hand, not responsible, legally speaking, you know, and that I didn't actually agree with the stripping her of her citizenship, but it looks unlikely that she'll ever get it back.
Yeah, it's why, I mean, so in the UK, apparently, I'm going to ask Alexander McCourse this question on Tuesday on the Duran.
They can just revoke your citizenship for national security reasons.
It's like, what?
The, I mean, some politicians think you're a national and they can just take it away.
So I did not know that was the law.
And the issue here is you have, you know, someone who's underage was in fact trafficked.
ISIS was doing that regularly.
Came to greatly regret and resent the fact that she ever got involved in any of it at all.
And now she's stuck in sometimes called a refugee camp.
Other people called a detention camp in Syria.
She's stuck in a detention camp in Syria, can't get out, can't go anywhere because she's been stripped of her UK citizenship.
So she files a complaint with the European Court of Human Rights that the United Kingdom is a signatory to.
And one of their clauses is you can't punish people for being trafficked.
And like, this kind of looks like you're punishing her when she was underage, ends up getting trafficked for it.
And they haven't identified any crime she's committed.
It's another, like, hey, you were in ISIS.
She was a trafficked young girl in ISIS.
So it's not the same thing as like an actual ISIS terrorist.
They haven't accused her, to my knowledge, of any ISIS activity on her own accord or any commitment to do so now.
In fact, she is constantly complaining about it.
And now she's supposed to be a permanent, stateless citizen.
So the European Court of Human Rights is addressing the unique question: is it punishing someone to strip them of their citizenship when where they're at is a consequence of them being trafficked when human trafficking is prohibited by the European Court of Human Rights and the European Convention that the UK has signed on to.
So it'll be an interesting case to watch and kind of the horror nightmare.
I think UK did this just to scare and intimidate people in general.
And hey, if you do this, look at our power.
Because it's not like they have a problem with Islamic immigration, this group of labor government, right?
They're bringing it in and mad.
What I found curious: like, could they have done it to her if she were in Britain?
I mean, maybe it's a stupid question.
Could they have done it to her in Britain and then what would they have done?
Deport her?
And if so, to where?
Like, exactly.
It seems that they could only do it once you're out of the country.
Maybe that logically makes sense.
Well, if you've joined ISIS and you've joined Syria, good riddance, and now you're no longer British.
But it seems like they could only do it while they're abroad and make it effective.
All right.
Well, don't.
But speaking of Islamic troublemakers, a would-be jihadist, you know, preaching jihad of different kinds, has been in and out of federal prison now for almost 20 years since 9-11.
But the interesting thing, this was one of the dangerous aspects of the 9-11 prosecutions.
His prosecution, along with some others, seemed to be basically a way to punish people for First Amendment speech.
And the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals took that up finally about 20 years late this week.
So this was a guy who was basically convicted for encouraging, inciting people to join, to join ISIS.
No, not ISIS, to go to Afghanistan.
Sorry.
It was to do jihad.
Yeah, yeah.
And it was the question is, at what point does his speech become actual aiding and abetting terrorism above and beyond protected First Amendment rights, which is you want to go, A, you want to go join Jihad, go join Jihad versus join Jihad.
This is how you do it.
Was he promoting, was he providing material support to terrorists?
I mean, it's interesting.
If your speech does influence people to join ISIS, Robert, is that not, is that no longer a First Amendment protected speech?
So, I mean, the great danger is if they start saying you made a speech and this person went and did something bad and they were inspired by that speech, you can see how quickly the First Amendment will disappear.
Because then all of a sudden you're getting held liable for what somebody else does rather than you.
So he was charged with conspiracy to levy war against the United States of America, which I always found kind of peculiar, and other similar statutes, along with terrorism and other components.
But the levy war one was like, whoa, that's a big, big claim.
And they claimed it was conspiracy, facilitation, and solicitation.
So the First Amendment law generally is that unless you are entitled to call for lawless action, for example, and like the analogy it might have is Tucker Carlson is highlighting how the lieutenant governor of Florida and the head of the anti-Semitism enforcement department within the Trump administration has been coming out saying we should have hate speech prohibitions,
EU style, on anti-Israeli statements and critics, which is another attack on the First Amendment.
So this is a variation of that, just in a little different context.
So this is an Islamic elder in the D.C. suburbs in Virginia who told a bunch of young people you should go after 9-11 and after the announcement of an attack on Afghanistan, that they should go support Afghanistan, and including even going to Pakistan doing so, and to join the jihad and defend Afghanis against the evil empire, if you will.
But it was really generic statements.
So generally speaking, you're entitled to encourage and incite lawless action as long as it's not imminent lawless action.
The only other time your speech can be the basis of criminal prosecution is when you go beyond that.
So for example, if you facilitate, if you're accused of facilitation, aiding and abetting under that wing of the statute, under that clause of the statute, then the person has to actually go do the illegal act.
If it's solicitation, they don't have to go do the illegal act, but you have to have the intent that they do the illegal act.
And how we have salvaged and protected the First Amendment in the past from these kind of prosecutions is it's got to be specific.
It's got to be, here's how you build a bomb, George.
And then George goes and builds the bomb and does something because that's not really speech.
It's more conduct.
Even though it's your speech that is the act, the actus reus, if you will, it's conduct in building the bomb.
And you're describing how to build a bomb.
So historically, you always had to have those specific details.
They didn't have any of that in this case.
The Fourth Circuit finally, after decades of this guy languishing in federal prison, got around to saying, you know what?
Our First Amendment has never allowed prosecution for death speech because he didn't give them any specific plan.
He didn't give them any specific crime to commit.
He said, go defend Afghanistan against the evil Americans.
Well, if that could be a crime, then hey, go defend Gazens against Israel can also be a crime.
That's why it could be so dangerous how they could use this to start circumventing First Amendment freedoms in a wide range of contexts.
Those don't remember Brandenburg versus Ohio, that was a Klansman calling for violence against the black community there.
And the Supreme Court said, but it wasn't imminent.
It has to be imminent and likely in that general context, or it has to be specific and detailed.
It has to be more like an act than speech.
And fortunately, the Fourth Circuit recognized that and said this prosecution was always a violation of the First Amendment and ended the case, setting up a good precedent for others going forward.
This feels like the capitalist selling the rope to the communist with which he's going to hang him.
You know, they're saying like imminence, if you're telling people to go join a terrorist organization, I mean, that's, I guess the question is when you say material support, does material support include moral support?
It usually has to be more.
It has to be like the means to do it, the money to do it, the tools to do it, the technique to do it, because that's really more like acts, right?
If I tell you how to break into somebody's home, that's not really speech, right?
That's really more of an act, a plan.
But if I say, you should take the money from the oligarchs and take them down, that's not really a plan, that's speech.
That's always been the difference.
And it's shocking that they did not recognize this difference for two decades because of the 9-11 fear paranoia was so off the charts.
Robert, I want to bring this one up because at the risk of needling you again, Logjam says, what will Bannon do now concerning the vischoi?
I got to see what that word means.
Mike Davis.
Expect some positive action pretty soon in that regard, put it that way.
And then we got a charity here in my hometown was giving away soda this week with their food drive.
It was their main advertisement.
It's very irritating as a parent.
And like, it's very irritating.
It's garbage food.
Captain Kirk is the one and only captain, Mr. Barnes.
Take down the next-gen bullshit.
Harry Toe says your audience is on drugs.
Captain Picard is the best captain ever.
All right, I'm not getting into some Star Wars or Star Trek wars.
Hold up.
Wait a minute.
Something right?
I want to bring this one up over here.
I think we got, I'm going to catch up.
Why don't they just remove us as LKD because they don't know to, or at least?
Piscatla says, that's a killer shirt and waistcoat.
Now I have to do a similar one.
If you could go ahead and stop a little bit.
What does that say?
If you could have to look for money laundering, that'd be great.
Does Trump realize Bond is a problem?
I'm so appalled by Trump's foreign aggression and wars that I'm ready to vote Democrat for the House to get a Trump impeachment.
Am I off base? says Ron.
No, I understand that sentiment.
And it's good to relay that sentiment because it helps motivate the president to not let the deep state and donor class trap him in foolish conflicts that will, as he's already seeing in Venezuela, they lied to him and misled him about the nature of the oil there.
Dan Sonnet says, Mr. Smith goes to Washington, D.C. was a show, the great moviegoers, how bad the corruption was and now a thousand times worse.
And F. Chaton, I actually want to field this one.
Question for Barnes.
This almost supernatural tech claim rumor used by the U.S. and Venezuela, how true do you think it is?
Frances, what I've heard, like they were using fake photos, though.
Well, but and the fact that here's the uh what I was tracking the the head of counterintelligence for Venezuela who is also in charge of the air defenses has now been arrested in Venezuela.
My guess is the U.S. was trying to run interference to hide who helped them because they wanted them to keep helping them.
And so they were saying, oh, we use these crazy weapons that nobody's ever heard of.
We can shut down radars.
We can do this.
We took out all of the guard by this supersonic weapon that caused everybody to bleed from their nose.
They even put out a fake photo showing Nicholas Maduro with his shirt soaked with blood.
It was a fake, man.
There's so many AI fakes.
How many people were taking the fake bait on Iran?
There were people cheering.
Remember the Canadian protester who was smoking a cigarette, lighting something?
They were in Brampton, Ohio, or something, an attractive young lady smoking.
First of all, don't smoke.
It's all propaganda, but when they're saying, they were convincing him, it was all Iran.
It was like some of this are like, hold on, I've seen that before.
Hold on, I've seen.
So they did the same thing with Venezuela, that the deep state psyops are going to be off the charts now that we got AI involved.
Even what they described, and Francis, I read the same reports.
Oh, it caused nosebleeds.
And an explosive force can create that pressure change that can cause bleeding.
I mean, that could just be being too close to any detonation.
Plus, it would be in Venezuela's interest to promote this.
This was some guy, Rando, talking that got promoted on X by the press secretary.
I'm like, okay, this feels like a psyop.
This feels like they're trying to run a cover trail to try to hide who it was that we bribed to be able to land so easily and take them.
That's what I think the U.S. is doing.
We have these super duper secret weapons that manage to maneuver around all the I don't.
I'm not buying that.
In the 1870s, a series of civil rights enforcement acts were passed to counter corrupt judges, letting the KKK off the hook in southern courts.
Could those same laws be used against corrupt judges, letting Antifa politicians and illegals off the hook?
This absolutely, and I think I have reason to believe.
Let's put it this way, certain civil rights prosecutors in the Justice Department would be doing precisely that, but for the interference of Pambondi who, in order to not have their lives be made miserable, they have to run onto social media and say all kinds of nice things about Pambony.
So just just say it.
Booma says, who are the rogues we've covered?
That, Roostang says, is Roberts position.
Is Roberts positioning Charles Dickens famous book behind him to remind us of the phrase it was the best of times, it was the worst of times.
That opens Charles Dickens Novels, a Tale Of Two Cities encapsulating the paradoxical nature of the era surrounding the French Revolution.
Netje, good catch there.
My friend Michelle Tofoya is seriously considering running for.
Okay, that I got there.
All right.
Oh, we'll come back to these.
What we should start doing.
We got some elections, we got habeas.
We got maybe a little third amendment.
We got some frozen welfare funds unfrozen magically by the federal courts.
And we got WWE class action and Jack Smith paying some informants to infiltrate the Trump campaign.
Let's do the on the same topic, the art.
What was it?
Uh, the third amendment, violations.
Because uh, down in Minnesota, it was Minnesota where the ice agents were getting kicked out of a.
Oh, that was good, you nailed Minnesota.
You got that right Much better than I got Appalachia, right?
Well, I was watching Fargo over the holidays.
I got to watch that movie again.
It was great.
And the Minnesota accent is as close to Canadian as you get in America.
So the story of the week was that allegedly ICE officials were being kicked out of a Marriott or a, it was, it was a, which was a Hampton Inn that was owned by a Hilton, I think.
Okay, Hilton.
So they're getting kicked out because they say, we don't want to, we don't want your cann here, so we're going to kick you out.
And then when you first sent me that article, I thought maybe the government was going to use the excuse that you can't get kicked out for political orientation.
But no, the argument might have been that you can't compel under whatever, I forget what law it is, but I remember you can't compel you can't compel a private residence to house the military.
And so the question was whether or not that argument could extend.
It's not mutatis, mutatis, because it doesn't apply.
To me, it doesn't apply to anyone offering their services for money, but set that aside.
Could you make that argument to empower private corporations from offering their services to the military if they show up and try to use it?
Now, I say this, it's a bit of a double-edged sword.
When the RCMP was using, I forget what hotel it was up in Canada when they wanted to kill those ostriches, I was celebrating the fact that they were being kicked out of there because I thought it was the righteous thing to do.
And plus, they can go find whatever military barracks or whatever government stations they want to stay in.
The question was: could these private corporations, which offer services to the public, invoke Article III, the Third Amendment, to say, we can refuse you and you can't compel us to house you.
To me, the answer seems obviously no.
You might want to shame them and use some public pressure if you don't like what the ICE agents are doing to say if you house them, we're not going to stay there as general population.
But they were on some sort of government list in any event.
And to me, this question seems like an obvious no, but someone might try to test the theory anyhow.
Someone earlier in the chat was like, Barnes is not a constitutional lawyer.
Well, I've won First Amendment cases, Second Amendment cases, Fourth Amendment cases, Fifth Amendment cases, Sixth Amendment cases, Seventh Amendment cases, Eighth Amendment cases.
I'm hoping someday to be able to win a 10th Amendment case, but technically that's supposed to be the state biting the right of the people, but the courts haven't enforced that.
But I would love someday to try a Third Amendment case.
It's the only amendment that has not by itself been adjudicated by the Supreme Court of the United States because the Third Amendment stands as follows: No soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner.
Not in a time of war.
And even in a time of war, it has to be prescribed by Congress.
So the question is: does that apply to ICE?
Probably does.
And does it apply to the hotel?
Probably does.
So the government likely cannot compel anyone to house a member of the federal law enforcement under the Third Amendment.
It's a quartering clause that, fortunately, we haven't had to use very often.
Some years ago, they stationed the National Guard dealing with prison riots inside the prisoners' accommodations, and the courts recognized that was a Third Amendment violation, unless it came with the consent of the owner.
So it's one of those amendments that you ask your average person, not like Amy Coney Barrett, who didn't remember the First Amendment, right to petition the government for redress of grievances, which I've litigated that, right?
Religious freedom, right of press freedom, right of speech, right of association.
And I've even litigated the right to petition.
That's the one Amy Coney Barrett forgot was in there.
But even some of your top people that understand the Constitution, you ask them, you want to do a little trick question on them, ask them what the Third Amendment is.
And they'll always be like, oh, that dummy.
You know, because it's not something that comes up every day.
But it was a little fun topic that, yes, indeed, the Third Amendment probably would have protected Hampton Inn's right to refuse service to federal law enforcement.
Not that it was the right policy for them to do so, but in those ICE officers' defense, I think they probably got an upgrade from the Hampton Inn if you've ever stayed in a Hampton Inn.
All right, well, that's very interesting.
Okay, so that was the Third Amendment.
What was the other one?
Oh, well, okay, one that I don't care about, but I do think it's also kind of interesting.
The WWE.
So how did it work exactly?
They were on ESPN and then went...
Peacock.
They went from Peacock to ESPN.
From Peacock to ESPN.
And the Peacock subscribers or viewers, the people who already paid for that were told we'll merge you in when it goes to ESPN.
You're going to be guaranteed getting the service that you paid for.
And it turns out that some of them are not getting the service at ESPN to cover WWE events.
Some are, but not everybody's able to merge it or register or get that benefit.
And they're filing a class action lawsuit, which seems like an absolute no-brainer, a breach of warranties and representations.
I just don't understand who watches WWE.
I say that as someone who watches a lot of UFC, but fake wrestling doesn't make any sense.
Robert, no more complicated than that.
It's a clear breach of warranties and representations to consumers.
It's a classic unfair trade practice, which is an often underutilized or sometimes forgot area of law that is in pretty much every jurisdiction, state, and even there's certain federal components do.
Because yes, it looks like ESPN did a bait and switch in promoting its WWE ability to collect WWE revenue.
And so a good number of ESPN subscribers were promised, grandfathered in, turned out nope, oops, a little rug pull.
And now they're going to have to pay the price for it in court, it would appear.
All right.
Now, do we do one more here and then we head over to Viva Barnes Law for the after party?
Sure, we got elections, habeas, pros and welfare funds, high school highlights, Ohio abortion, and Jack Smith paid informants to infiltrate President Trump.
Well, let's do the paid informants.
I'm not totally up to speed on that.
There was a lot of news last week.
What, I mean, so hold on.
In terms of Jack Smith, now, of the chicanery that we now know that he's been up to, we know that he was not disclosing to the judge that they were looking, that they were seeking the phone records of sitting members of government, that the judge didn't ask and he didn't think it necessary to tell.
Basically, not basically spying on government and getting a sign-off by the judge because they're much like they did in the FISA case, withholding salient information from a judge who's rubber stamping things, thinking that these people are on the up and up.
Who's the paid informants that Jack Smith was using now?
So, yeah, I mean, what's come out new is there was the things that were always suspected that have been effectively confirmed, which include his abuse of the grand jury process by grand jury venue shopping, getting an indictment in D.C., and then going down to Florida, the fact that he never apparently took the appropriate oath of office to begin with, that he was likely never even properly assigned the position to have the power that he employed, that he was acting lawlessly and without authority,
that there was all kinds of coordination with the Biden White House in ways that were hidden and covered up.
And he lied about under, in some cases, declarations in court.
But last but not least, what also got disclosed is that he was paying people to infiltrate President Trump's organizations in order to inform on them.
So it was a regime change within a regime change, you might say.
So, an ongoing coup, independently confirmed, where your taxpayer dollars went to a prosecutor who wasn't even authorized to be doing what he was doing in the first place, abusing his power for politicized reasons as now is revealed with his connections and coordination with President Biden in order to infiltrate the Trump campaign and other people with bogus actors.
The only thing I wouldn't be surprised to see is if at the end they said his name was Mike Davis.
That's just a joke, everybody.
Now, let me just see.
I'm going to see.
Yeah, we can't raid Salty Cracker.
So we're going to raid Nerd Roddick.
So it'll be a change in substance for everybody who wants to get away from the politics.
Salty's live.
Let me make sure that.
Okay, good.
They're still live.
They're reviewing movies, I guess.
Nerd Roddick.
If you want to get a breakaway from politics.
So what do we have left over for the locals after party, Robert?
We've got elections.
Does Trump's executive order withstand the federal judiciary?
Speaking of the federal judiciary, are they allowing all the welfare fraud funds to be frozen or not?
We've got a habeas corpus decision by the Supreme Court of the United States.
If you are a high school athlete, shouldn't you get royalties from your highlights?
Nope.
And the Ohio abortion law update after the referendum passed last year or two years ago.
We're going to raid NerdRoddick before you leave.
If you're not coming over to locals, Comitube as well, I'm going to read some of the Commitube chats before we go or as we raid.
Make sure you're subscribed, turn on notifications, and share the channel, people.
Remember, 3 p.m. tomorrow, right here, live with Max Blumenthal inside what the Maduro trial defense might look like, inside what might happen in the near short term in Venezuela, and how the EU is trying to rig the Hungarian elections against Victor Orban that are upcoming.
And then on Tuesday, 10 a.m. Eastern Time, live with the Duran on Rumble, on YouTube, on their locals channel, the Duran.locals.com, breaking down everything, including the Maduro trial, Venezuela, Iran, Israel, Ukraine, you name it, with the Duran on Tuesday.
And if you come to the after party, just put in the tip to the locals board and we will get to your question for the tip of $5 or more.
I was going to say something that had to do with, I forget what I was going to say.
Confirming raid, people go see Nerotic now.
Nerdrodic.
Let me just do one thing because I got to open all of these on my backdrop here.
Close this.
Close that.
This is minimized.
Hold on.
I'm going to open up a bunch of the CommieTube chats and just read them out loud while we do this because I think there's a few that I missed.
And then I'm going to get to some of the other tip questions.
To make the best of Venezuela situation, President Trump should say, now that Maduro's out, we're lifting the sanctions.
That alone makes things better for Venezuela.
Then let Madero win in court and return, says Sparky.
Then we got Sparky also says, free Greenland from Danish tyranny and brutal oppression.
Free Dutch Antiels from Dutch tyranny and brutal oppression.
Then we got that one.
Okay, and then we got stopping in to watch Barnes be wrong, says your Barmy.
Remember the Iran bombing?
Distance yourself soon.
What are these idiots who are saying distance yourself soon?
You don't know that Barnes and I have been doing this for six years now, people.
Six freaking years.
And you're right.
Barnes was wrong on Iran.
The bombing stopped.
And but for the grace of God, the damage was done.
The minimal damage was done.
Is Trump going to look away from the next war to start long enough to clean up his administration from Bondi?
He says, Psycho 13.
And that about does it over there.
Then we've got, as we, well, you know, we'll save the, let me go here.
Let's see what we're going to do.
Hold on a second.
What is going on here?
It was at this moment Louis realized why Rob bought him lunch every day for the past two years.
Okay, that's funny.
Let's go to some of the tipped ones before we get going here.
House cleaning, oh, housing clause related to the owner being forced to take an officer, pay for their keep, running a hotel, they take a fee.
That's what I would have, I would have, I would have gone with you.
It's services, it's not a private home.
Uh, they're not, they're not taking it from you, they're they're they're paying for it and it's open to the public.
But Trump had two paths, says Free SCO1.
He sided with the deep state neocons headed by Lady Lindsay instead of siding with the fiscal conservative libertarian side of the party.
The Spineless Freedom Caucus goes on X and Fox News with great speeches, then vote with Trump every time.
Only Thomas Massey and Rand Paul stand on principle.
I applaud the Dems for taking the house.
I applaud the Dems taking the House in the midterms and the impeachments that follow the Republican Party needs to learn a lesson.
Ours can't win without a win-win proposal.
We keep Maduro.
There's another country that has an outstanding warrant on a U.S. official.
It's Lindsey Graham.
We send Lindsey Graham to Kiev, let the Ruskies get him, and let him serve time.
So we keep Maduro, the Ruskies get Lindsey Graham.
Why do I not see the right one?
Did I open this one up here?
Oh, this is where I am here.
Trump had two paths.
Okay, I got that.
Tal Oran says Sadaka, and several others have shown videos of the protesters begging Israel and the U.S. to help.
I don't trust anything I see on the internet.
Dan Sundon says the UK could send those undesirable people to the Falkland Islands off of South America.
Remember that war with Argentina?
Oh, look at this dog.
Hold on one second.
Look at that slobber on that goober's face.
Oh, yeah, that's weird.
Frenchies don't usually slobber quite that much.
Look at that drool.
Louis is begging my husband for popcorn.
That's from Marina for real.
Red Sox 1983, you're missing context on this.
She isn't stateless.
She is both Pakistan and UK citizenship.
UK got their first and stripped of UK citizenship.
Oh, and the trafficking is suspects.
I'll double-check that.
I didn't, I just read, asked where she was born.
She was definitely born in the UK.
This is on the stateless woman case.
2CV TV has the best, most up-to-date reporting on Iran, says Spam Ranger.
If you get a chance, ask Rock, is the revolution in Iran petering out compared to 14 days ago?
I'll check that.
U.S. oil refineries in Texas are primarily designed to refine heavier crude oils, which are more viscous and often have a higher sulfur content.
This is because nearly 70% of U.S. refining capacity operates most efficiently with heavier crude.
Love that OG law statement.
Just sue me, bro.
Sadaka says, Do you think the uprising in Iran will did I get this one?
We got that.
All right.
I'll get to, I'll just make sure that I've got all of them before we keep going.
Robert, what do you want to take us on here?
He just remember we got the 10 a.m. on the Trump.
I didn't go yet.
I didn't.
I'm such an idiot.
And 3 p.m. Eastern tomorrow, live with Max Blumenthal, Hungary and Venezuela.
All right.
So now we're going to locals.
I thought I hit the button.
Oh, my God.
Okay.
We're going to locals now.
Rumble, peace out.
YouTube, Commitube, peace out.
▲
Export Selection