All Episodes
Previous
Jan. 9, 2026 - Viva & Barnes
01:25:34
"MAIDS" in Canada is Now Straight-Up MURDER! Comer Complains About DOJ Inaction! AND MORE!

Support Viva: GET MERCH! www.vivafrei.com BUY A BOOK! https://amzn.to/4qBXikS SEND ME SOMETHING! David Freiheit 20423 SR 7 Ste F6319 Boca Raton 33498 TIP WITH CTYPTO! bc1qt0umnqna63pyw5j8uesphsfz0dyrtmqcq5ugwm THAT IS ALL!

|

Time Text
Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, in today's intro video of something along the lines of there would be a mild amount of infighting and looking for explanations to answer this query by Mr. Comer in an interview with Catherine Harridge.
I present to you journalism.
Surprisingly, behold.
I'm sure you've seen a lot of the comments on X.
This is a very popular chart on X.
It says zero arrests for some scandals that are very important to Republicans.
Is that what accountability looks like?
Listen, that is the biggest complaint of every Republican on the House Oversight Committee is there haven't been enough arrests.
Now, some of those issues, I don't know, it's going to be hard to arrest people.
With the Biden Autopin scandal, what we produced in our investigation is evidence that the pardons and executive orders that were signed with the Autopen in the last year of the Biden administration should be declared null and void.
Now, President Trump tweeted after we issued our report that he was going to declare them null and void, but I don't believe the paperwork's ever been done, and you're still going to have to go to court for that.
But our congressional investigation will serve as basis to uphold the declaration of those pardons and executive orders being declared null and void.
Someone for the Department of Justice just has to take it to court.
Okay, so someone from the Justice Department has not picked up the ball yet.
It appears that way.
What's kind of funny, and it's not funny, look at James, Mr. Comer's fingers as he is forced to reveal what he acknowledges are going to be uncomfortable truths.
Look at his, I'm not one to talk, but look at his hand wringing or his hand nervous fidgeting.
Well, yet.
It appears that way.
Okay, well, that must be frustrating.
Very frustrating.
There is the meme of the black hole that is Pam Bondi's desk.
And there are rumors.
I mean, for anybody who speaks with anybody on the inside, and I'm sort of like maybe one step removed, there are known issues of things being on the to-do list and whether or not it's a Homer Simpson saying, I have a to-do list, or people saying, yeah, there's to-do, and then there's maybe to-do, and then there's the to-do, but not to not do, do-do.
There is a known issue that's been going on for quite some time.
The meme about Pam Bonte's desk, the inaction on certain issues, and there might be more than one reason for why that's happening.
Comer is disappointed at the speed of things.
I want to, you know, just give everybody the steel manning here.
Can I zoom in on this?
So it's the meme.
We've seen it on the internet.
Russia collusion hoax.
It says number of arrests, Russia collusion hoax, zero.
People are saying, oh, you know, it's coming.
It takes a long time to get it going.
You know, Merrick Garland only indicted Trump two years into his tenureship or whatever, tenure as Attorney General.
I'm like, yeah, he got to Steve Bannon real quick.
He got to the Jan Sixers real quick.
He got to Peter Navarro before Trump.
Like Trump was the culmination of the lawfare, not the one example of it took two years to get to Trump.
That was the culmination of years of lawfare.
And I'm not suggesting that this DOJ should engage in unjust abusive lawfare.
People are saying, just wait, Viva, it takes a long time, Rico, whatever.
Yeah, just keep holding your breath.
Russia collusion hoax.
January 6th is the one that really irks me.
I'll take this out for one second.
I'll bring it back.
I was listening to Bourbon with Barnes.
It was actually his Tuesday night, Bourbon with Barnes, while I was jogging.
And he did say something that made me feel smart for having had the initial observation and for having taken flack from people on the interwebs who were saying, Viva, you're too negative.
All you do is criticize.
Harmeet Dylan came out and said, don't worry about the five-year statute of limitations.
Rico, don't worry about the five-year statute of limitations, ongoing conspiracy.
And my observation at the time, and I feel now confirmed in my assessment, is that that's an argument for why the statute of limitations should not apply or has been told or paused.
It's an additional argument to the charges.
You want to avoid having to argue why you didn't take certain action within the statutory timeframe.
You don't want to have to argue the exceptions to that.
And so it's not, you will always have, yeah, he told the prescription, you know, like when you're in the practice of law, as I was for 13 years, I did civil.
And certain lawsuits need to be filed within a certain period of time.
Copyright infringement has certain statutory delays.
There's always the exception for, as we said in French in Quebec, impossibilité d'Agire, the impossibility to act.
If you didn't know of the copyright infringement, if you didn't know of the defamation, if you didn't know that they had stolen money from you because they concealed it, you could have a suspension.
And you'll have to argue that.
They're going to say, I stole that money from you 10 years ago.
You should have taken that action no more than seven years ago and you didn't.
And too bad.
And I'm like, how would I suppose to know you hid the fraud for those seven years?
I only discovered it now when I went back and saw that you false.
Whatever.
It's an argument that you have to make.
You don't want to make that as the starting point.
You want to avoid that if you can.
File in time.
And so everyone's like, well, no, Viva, don't worry about the statute of limitations on January 6th because RICO, because conspiracy, ongoing crimes.
All right, make that argument when it comes.
But for the time being, what you're telling me is we have let certain periods of limitations lapse, and now we're going to have to argue the exception to get out of it.
January 6th is the one that really irks me because the abuses that occurred, I say, on January 6th in the following years in that committee, that unselect committee of criminals, as far as I'm concerned.
You don't delete records after your committee findings unless you're dirty criminals.
Adam Kinzinger, Liz Cheney, I'm looking at you.
The abuse was so bad that Trump had to come in and pardon the Jan Sixers to rectify and remedy the abusive process, the judicial abuses, the violation of rights, the violation of civil rights, the violation of Brady rights.
It was so agreed just Trump had to come in and pardon 1,500 people.
That's 1,500 people that were victims of some form of judicial abuse, and no one has been punished for it yet.
Not only has no one been punished for it yet, we're going to get to it in a bit, some of them are still working there.
Some of them got promotions.
So that's a long way to say the one that pisses me off the most for the time being is January 6th.
The Russia collusion, man, you're going to have to argue conspiracy to conceal because that's now a decade old.
It's a decade old, people.
Then we got Mar-a-Lago raid.
I don't think you're going to get arrests for the Mar-a-Lago raid because I'm not convinced anyone did anything actually illegal in the Mar-a-Lago raid.
It was just an abuse of what they were entitled to do.
Not sure that anyone actually broke the law for that.
Biden Autopin is another one.
I'm not sure you're going to get arrests out of that, but you might get declarations of invalidity of pardons that might and probably will necessarily need to be tested by the courts or at least ratified by the courts, but they haven't taken any action on that, apparently.
2020 election, I know a lot of people have some big issues with that.
What do we got?
Epstein, don't get me started, people.
COVID?
You know, you're going to get restitution for civil violations.
No one's going to jail over that except for maybe Fauci should, Albert Buerla should, falsifying your trials, both civil and criminal.
What do we got under that one?
Benghazi, good luck.
Doge findings.
I don't think anybody gets arrested for that.
Although I think they are now just referring criminal investigations into Tim Walz for his act of knowing participation or turning a blind eye to the Minnesota fraud.
So we might be getting something there.
And then Ukraine impeachment hoax.
You're not going to get any arrests on that either.
It was a hoax.
Impeachment is a political process, barring falsifying documents.
I mean, I guess you could go after obstruction of, I don't know, government proceedings to the extent it obstructed Trump from being president, not once, but twice.
So you might not get arrests on a lot of that list, but Comer is clearly expressing a bit of frustration.
It's on somebody's desk.
Nothing has happened.
Now, I've been saying from the beginning, it's quite clear that the weakest links are, in my humble view, within the DOJ, Pam Bondi, and Todd Blanche.
And unfortunately, those are the two highest up links, or relatively speaking, highest up links.
Arguably, Susie Wiles is even higher.
And then not arguably, Trump is the highest.
And Trump could excise those weak links, replace those weak links.
Many people were clamoring for that to happen.
And now that I speak out loud, it's interesting that the initial pick, Matt Gates, has been receiving some fire, as some like to call it on the internet, which is interesting.
I hadn't put that together, that Matt Gates was the original AG pick, had to back out because of controversy.
Now, Bailey, Andrew Bailey, is now replacing deputy director.
We'll see if he works his way up.
But my humble opinion from the very get-go, and it wasn't the opinion I started off with, it's the opinion I worked into as facts emerge.
And it wasn't motivated by the Epstein-Bindergate debacle.
It was motivated by a bunch of other stuff, righteous and legitimate, is that Pan Bondi has been the weakest link.
And Todd Blanche, weak or corrupt link, I don't yet know.
But when you throw out that unsigned memo that causes unnecessary and immeasurable goodwill damage with your base, whether you did it on purpose through corruption or you just did it because you thought it would work and it was just tactically stupid, the outcome is the same.
The only question is the intention.
So there's problems, and I think Pan Bondi is that problem.
You have an explanation that came out of the DOJ, and Catherine Herridge brought up the explanation, or at least the response.
She's doing good.
She's doing good work.
Very diplomatic.
And so maybe that gets, you know, more answers or at least gets the sit-down interview.
Catherine Herrid says, update, Justice Department response to Chairman Comer's frustration over DOJ's alleged lack of action on criminal referrals.
Attributable to a DOJ Spocks.
That means spokesperson.
I thought it was that show, the Stargate.
What the heck is that show?
The one, Spock, what's he from?
For goodness sake.
Can you believe this?
I'm going to actually totally blank on the name of that show.
Star Trek.
Oh, geez, Louise, I'm going senile.
It's not Spocks.
It's short for spokesperson.
We appreciate Chairman Comer's leadership and oversight.
Unfortunately, long-standing federal rule 6E governing grand jury secrecy prohibits the department from discussing the existence or details of pending criminal investigations.
That will always hold true, so we'll see.
Can only wait for so long before you see action or inaction on that.
This is not discretionary, and it is a principle we have explained repeatedly to the House.
What would materially help the department carry out its mission is swift action by the Senate to confirm the president's nominees.
More than a year into this administration, critical DOJ positions remain unfilled.
We also urge Congress to address the growing problem of activist judges who are undermining the president's lawful agenda.
The people, the American people, deserve a fully staffed Justice Department and a judiciary that respects the Constitution.
Now, some might say this is a little bit frustrating of a response because what you have right now is just everybody pointing a finger in another direction.
Comer says they're not doing it.
We've put it on their desk.
They say we can't do it.
We're understaffed.
We also can't talk about ongoing grand jury stuff, yada, yada, yada.
The Senate's not confirming there's judicial activists.
Well, if, and to the extent that the administration or anyone with an ear to it is listening, we, that is to say, Viva and Barnes, law for the people, Sunday night law extravaganza in our locals community, Viva and Barnes, law for the people, consistently in all forms of public broadcast, have been complaining for a long time about the judicial activism, have been calling for people to get impeached over the judicial activism.
Judge Boesberg, federal judges impeach them over their lawless judicial activism.
Nothing's happened.
You know, the fact they're understaffed, get your stuff together.
Everybody's saying, you know, just wait, just wait, give them more time.
If they're understaffed and you're being told to just sit there and wait, nothing's going to get done.
If they're understaffed a year in, that's borderline inexcusable.
You push whatever paper and you, you, I don't know, quip whatever people, if that's what the whip does, and you get those, it's like Billy Madison.
You get your ass out there and you find that freaking dog.
So even that explanation doesn't make any sense.
But what doesn't make sense, and I've been paying attention to it, and it's not to be nitpicky, it's to say you can't say on the one hand, we have smashing successes, which they do, on the general fighting of crime, and then simultaneously say, but we're understaffed, so we can't have the deep state arrests that you're clamoring for.
Those two affirmations, maybe they're not totally mutually incompatible.
Someone on Twitter sassily said, no, no, what they're doing is touting their successes despite being understaffed.
That's not what Kash Patel.
That's not what the DOJ is doing.
There has been a radical reduction in crime.
And it's something fantastic that this administration, you know, A, should be boasting about, and B, would be able to boast about if there weren't so many other distractions that are unnecessary because of some bungled operations or bungled PR moves.
There have been massive movements downward of violent crime, and it's amazing.
Kash Patel says, this is in respect of a post, and that's, what's his face?
White House, pathological liar indeed, scum of the earth.
FBI director Kash Patel says lawmakers can lie.
FBI results don't.
Since January 2025, the FBI made 40 violent crime arrests in Rhode Island, 8% increase.
Violent crimes against, ooh, what's the VCAC?
I forget that now.
Targeting the most dangerous offenders, agencies, two killer.
They're talking about some of the successes of the FBI, which operates under the DOJ.
And they've been also just talking about nationally double-digit reduction in crime.
And it's the case.
America, from what I understand, has record low homicide rates right now, certainly compared to the summer of love, which was also the summer of murder, death, and destruction 2020.
But you can't, on the one hand, say we have smashing successes of the DOJ and look at the reduction in crime nationally.
We've busted fentanyl rings.
We've busted drug dealers, human traffickers.
We've found 35,000, 40,000 children, which they have.
And then say, but we can't have any deep state arrests and we can't move fast enough there because we're understaffed.
If it's not mutually incompatible, it's at least mildly conflicting.
And at least one excuse undermines the other success.
One success undermines the other excuse.
And by the way, I appreciate some people say double-digit reductions in the reports of crime.
And some people say, you know, there's a number of other reasons.
And other people say, well, we don't trust the numbers anymore.
Don't trust the stats anymore now than we did a year and a half ago.
There's nothing really to you can do to disprove that.
It's just a question of faith in the system, which is also not at all time highs.
So that's the issue: you can't suck and blow.
You can't flip and flop.
What's the other one there?
You can't, you know, you can't say A and not A, which seems to be what the issue is in terms of explaining away some of the frustration about the attack on the deep state that has not yet been, or if it's occurring, that we have not yet seen, and you can't wait forever.
And if the excuses that you're understaffed telling people to wait is not going to resolve the issue.
There have been no impeachments of judges.
There has been judicial activism frustrating Trump's policy, Trump's administration.
You got to impeach those judges.
And if you haven't heard that before, welcome to Viva Fry daily live streams at three o'clock on Rumble, Sunday night, Viva and Barnes, Law for the People, across all platforms.
VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com for the best above-average community out there.
How goes the battle, people?
Am I schnitzing?
The air conditioning doesn't seem to be particularly on blast.
And I'm also getting somewhat frustrated at life and at the world.
This is the daily show, three o'clock.
I pulled, this, I'm getting old.
Like I want to say, I was lifting those heavy bottles of water.
And I, you know, like an idiot, when they say, like, you know, lift with your legs, and I literally curved my back over to try to put a bottle.
It was one of those big ass bottles and under a bike rack.
And I hurt my back.
Yeah, well, it'll be fine.
What I was going to say is, everybody, what's up?
See what's going on.
Suck and blow, flip and flop, frickin' fracks, SVA 123 in our locals community.
So we are live right now on Rumble.
We are live in our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community.
How many of the unjabbed have been hired back instead of being blacklisted? says Anita B. Deep.
Hem and Haw, hoot and holler.
No, those are not the right ones.
And then we got Jarhead.
Faith in the FBI when the reduction happens.
No faith when they arrest an alleged bomber.
Hold on a second.
Faith in the FBI when the reductions happen.
No faith when they arrest an alleged bomber, says Jarhead.
Is that supposed to be a critique of my intellectual inconsistency?
Hmm.
Let me think about that in a second.
We got a tip question coming from Hope for Better says, I started setting up a Rumble wallet, but they want biometrics face scan.
Can you suggest a video call to verify, identify them?
I'll screenshot that.
You're not the first person that has taken issue with it.
I just like, I don't, I mean, I'm not involved.
You know, I'm exclusive to Rumble, but I'm not involved in any of these decisions.
And I appreciate some people are very sensitive to the biometrics.
I'm less sensitive just because every time I cross into America from Canada, my biometrics are scanned.
You know, my face is on the internet all day long anyhow.
I mean, for me, it's less of a concern.
I will ask the team, but I have nothing to do with that.
So don't get mad at me if nothing happens.
Now, I can't bring him up because I didn't open up that tab and I'll have to do it this way.
Ginger Ninja 1776 says, there's a ton of BS going wild right now, but White Pill, the relentless legend, Robert Barnes and Rich Barris spent two full days pushing good, effective change to RFK, Vance, DHS, Department of AG, etc.
Yeah, it's amazing, dude.
Part two, real men are still following through, cutting through the crap to push for the best possible outcome for we the people and the Constitution.
We move forward despite enemies, the enemies within.
And Ginger, thank you.
I mean, I saw it on Barnes.
I mean, I saw it on, and I retweeted it.
And this is the amazing.
You want to talk about tribalism?
People have convinced themselves that Thomas Massey is the worst person on earth, a libertarian, which is admittedly that libertarians are a little flaky, if I can put it that way.
But Barnes posted this picture.
Oh, no, sorry, this is Thomas Massey.
Look who I ran into here in DC.
Barnes Law, a man and who knows the respects, the Constitution.
See, this is good.
Now you're in Brendan Dilley, always adding something wonderful to the debate.
The Weeble Wobble fuck is an absolute retard, just like you.
I use the word retard.
I like to think on the one hand, when I use it, it's contextually justified.
It's not just the response, and it also goes with a little bit of substance.
Brendan Dilley is, I mean, these people are idiots, is the bottom line.
Like, I didn't know that this is where it was going to go.
Idiots.
This is how you actually turn people off of a movement, of a party, of a team.
Like, who the hell?
I'm just, I got to do it.
I got to do it live here.
Let's just go see.
I can hear you.
Two of my least favorite people on earth.
This is when he brings in his silo now.
You can say that again.
Well, you know, they flock together.
They're all everywhere.
They literally, which one tops?
Oh, they got, they got that humor.
It's such a constitutional scholar.
Ask him why the constitution war is the five.
All right.
Well, anyways, that's what that's what you get there.
Then I put it up and let's just see who goes here.
Is he not Canadian?
Just like you.
Oh, that's good.
He legitimately looks.
These people are idiots.
So, anyways, Barnes was there, met with from what I understand, Barnes was up in DC, met with JD, met with Thomas Massey, and getting a lot of good stuff done.
At least getting, you know, good policy.
People have been listening to Barnes and I, me, and Barnes, us, from the beginning, you might have had some action, judicial impeachment action taken against Boesberg, for example.
You might have seen exactly where things were going well in advance.
All right, 808 Scotty says, this is what happens when these Karens have too much time on their hands and too much free money allowing them to cruise around interfering with law enforcement.
Well, that wasn't the segue that I was going to get into, but it's as good as any.
808 Scotty, thank you very much.
There has been a breaking development, or at least new video footage released in the shooting of her name is Good.
I forget what her first name is.
And like I say, it's going to change maybe 1% people's mind, if that.
For anyone who hasn't already thoroughly made up their mind and taken a position and dug their heels in, it'll change nobody's opinion.
But there is new video.
And if you haven't taken a position, or if you already believed that it was, why does this not do it?
Hold on.
Okay, hold up, hold up.
There we go.
If you already took the position that it was justified or based on whatever you've already analyzed and came to the conclusion it was justified and horrible, maybe you could say justified and potentially unnecessary, but that's nice, retroactive.
Well, you could have done this.
You could have done that.
You could have just had the car run over your leg and live with it.
This is the new footage that came out because when the incident occurred, you did see that the officer who fired the shots was holding a camera.
And I'll play it without commentary.
And people, I know it's the internet.
You could be this, a woman is dead and her partner and I don't know whose kids they were, mother of three, is now there.
Everyone's life is sort of ruined right now.
Some people are going to say, well, the officer is going to get over it.
The officer who killed the woman is also going to be broken for life.
People out there who, you know, I say play internet tough guy, but people out there who say righteous, justified kill.
Dude, nobody, nobody, even a police officer, wants to have to kill someone, even if it's justified and warranted.
This man is going to be damaged for the rest of his life.
Her partner traumatized, messed for life.
Like that line from Heat, if anybody remembers it, when the cop is trying to tell the woman to turn on her husband, Val Kilmer, and if they don't, they're going to come take their kids, put them in the home, and put them in foster care, and they're going to be fucked for life, is what the line was.
Her partner is going to have nightmares from this for the rest of her life.
Because, in as much as I have now begrudgingly come to the conclusion it was justified and justified based on what actually happened, it was a situation where within, you'll see, five seconds, three seconds, things escalate, and the consequences are so wildly beyond anybody's reasonable prediction that, you know, that's it.
Irreversible.
And she's going to live for the rest of her life replaying this in her head over and over again for the rest of her life.
Why did we do it?
What if we just done this?
What if we just done that?
It was a momentary act of pure stupidity that had devastating, irreparable, irreversible consequences.
So this is the police officer walking around the car with his camera.
That's okay.
We don't change our plates every morning, just so you know.
And they'll be in the same plate when you come talk to us later.
That's fine.
You have sent us an informal fucking factor.
You want to come at us?
You want to come at us?
You should go get yourself some lunch, big boy.
get out of the mall everyone can pick up on whatever they want there I think one thing that is not disputable any longer, whether she was trying to flee, whether or not she was trying to flee without caring if she ran over a police officer, flee.
Flee from what?
Drive, baby, drive, drive, is what her partner says.
Get out of the fucking car.
Get out.
Oh!
Like, what is this?
Grand theft auto?
Drive, baby, drive.
Get out of the car.
Drive, baby, drive.
What do you think is going to happen?
And there is clear contact with the police officer.
Now people are going to say, well, he was on the side by the time he fired the second and third shot.
You're not going to get perfections from escalations that occur within a fraction of a second.
And that's not the legal standard to retrospectively, retroactively analyze it anyhow.
And that's it.
That's the.
That's the other angle from the man who took the shots.
Then there's another one from further away where you can see.
And then people are going to say it doesn't matter.
The cop should have just gotten hit by the car.
What's the worst that can happen?
You are playing with not just fire, Russian roulette, in a sense.
You don't know how these situations are going to unfold.
Drive, baby, drive to where?
For what end?
There's a cop in front of her car.
Why is she giving her partner stupid instructions?
Why is she listening?
Whether or not she just panicked and wanted to get out of there, she quite clearly hit the guy.
And whether or not you think, well, that's, you know, like the Rittenhouse prosecutor.
You know, the cops just got to take their lumps, take their chances when people steer at them with their vehicles.
Sometimes they just got to take a beating, take a little broken leg.
That's not how it works in real life.
You're playing with more than you can afford to lose.
And legally speaking, that's not the standard.
So that was the breaking video that came out now that's offered yet another angle, the probably the most important one, the angle of the individual who fired the shots.
And then some people are going to say, why was he holding his phone?
Shouldn't he have been paying attention to whatever?
I mean, maybe he didn't have body cam and he wanted to make sure that he had this on camera, this interaction.
Now, let me just see what the chat doth say on the ice ass shot twice through her driver morons as she drove by him safely.
Well, if that's what you got from this, the second two shots, I appreciate people are going to make people are going to make an argument about that.
Read her case history, David.
Well, I presume everybody wants to say, well, she was an activist.
She was an ice agent.
I appreciate that.
I mean, it's also true.
That's not to say then, you know, that doesn't her bad poetry doesn't make it anything funny.
The fact that she was an activist doesn't mean that she deserved it at that moment.
I appreciate people are going to say, well, that's only three shots in a second.
Hell, I can get off.
Let me see what's going on here.
Why is everybody in caps?
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
George Carlin.
Now, before we get into the next subject, that would have been the perfect segue into it.
King of Bill Tong is in the house and he says, King of Bill Tong, try our Bill Tong.
More than 50% protein packed with B vitamins, creatine, iron, zinc, and much more.
The perfect snack addition to your weekly meal prep, Bill Tongusa.com, code Viva for 10% off.
And by the way, everyone, you can't really see it here because I got that thing up on the thing.
But if you want to support the channel, all of the links are in the description.
But you can tip with crypto.
Download the Rumble wallet if you're not averse to the biometric facial recognition to get into it, which I appreciate some people might be.
And I'll impart those concerns onto the team.
Go to Tip with Crypto.
Bitcoin.
Look at that.
Here, I'm going to bring it.
You can scan that right now if you've got a wallet.
Tip with crypto.
Or if you want to, by the way, also make sure you're subscribed on Rumble.
Turn on notifications.
Download the Rumble app so you get notified when people go live or join us at vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
You can also do XAUT, which is tethered to gold.
And you can actually, if you decide to redeem it for actual gold, you can actually go to Switzerland and actually redeem whatever you have in XAUT for the actual bar or however much gold it gives you at the holding place in Switzerland.
No joke.
Scan that if you want to support the channel.
And that's that.
George Carlin.
George Carlin said, never underestimate the stupidity of people in large groups.
Never underestimate human stupidity.
I think it was Albert Einstein who said, Three things are infinite.
Two things are infinite.
The cosmos and human stupidity.
And I'm not so sure about the cosmos.
This woman, I don't know who she is, hadn't heard of her before going live today.
And then I see it because it's in response to the Minnesota stuff.
I'm going to play the better part of this, if not all of it, and periodically pause because it's absolutely hilarious.
The level of stupidity.
When I say, you know, that video, you can watch that video.
And if you're already convinced one way or the other, it's going to do nothing to convince you otherwise.
Even the people who say, yeah, it hit him, but still not justified.
Understood.
And I can appreciate that.
You should probably never become a cop and never get yourself involved in that type of interaction.
Minnesota rep Sandra Feist or Feist, humbled by U.S. Border Commander, after an interview at Minnesota Capitol Building with Ingram Angle, Border Patrol Commander, CMDROP at large, CA,
was verbally attacked by state rep Feist, Commander Bovino, who articulated, articulately and calmly wiped the floor with her uninformed Democratic talking points until she emotionally walked away, upset at being beaten down with the facts.
Let's make this unhinged rep American.
Well, I mean, I didn't know who she was beforehand, but we know who she is right now.
Let's just watch this.
It's actually quite phenomenal.
A lot of it's going to be a little too low to hear, but I want to hear what she said beforehand.
Do we hear anything?
I don't have a right to have this experience to be residents.
Yeah, for you, person, like the state representative teacher.
Where did you learn?
If anybody has the link to her prior foul language, I would say drop it in the chat, but I don't think you can in Rumble.
But locals, if anybody has it, I'm going to go try to find it while I play some of this now.
So I do like this cop.
Look at her face, by the way.
She is literally the meme.
That one, like, the woman, you know, who's super happy.
Watch this.
Such a simple question.
I'm asking you guys.
Simple question there.
Yeah, credit to Laura.
Learn how to.
You know, it's very interesting.
When we make our community safer, we're residents.
Thank you that you don't know that as representative Nadu.
Could you explain to me why are you not arresting criminals?
Why are so few of the people that you have arrested, detained, and deported people with criminal records?
They're all criminals.
They've all crossed the border illegally.
Crossing the border illegally is a civil offense.
No, 18 USC 1325 illegal entry.
That's a federal crime.
Like, you appreciate we've gone through this and I won't belabor it.
There was that meme going around.
Can you imagine anyone dumb enough to actually suggest that entering a country illegally is only a civil offense?
You have to be next level stupid to believe it, and you've got to be next level dishonest to say it, knowing what a load of rubbish is to take advantage of the people who are next level stupid who are going to repeat it believing it.
No, it's only a civil, of course.
Yes.
That's still considered civil immigration enforcement.
Got to get my points.
Got to consult my phone.
Can you imagine like we are all actors on a stage?
That building's kind of beautiful.
I like that skin fade on the.
How is deporting construction workers?
It's protecting public safety.
Deporting illegal aliens and criminals making America a safer place.
Double-digit drops in crime.
Have you looked at your statistics nationwide?
Or you don't care about that?
Over the last week.
Since we've been conducting kind of digital digital digital double-digit drops in crime.
Correlation is not causation.
I've got to pause it right there, people.
Do you see her smug, idiotic face?
Correlation is not causation.
How would you ever prove a causative reduction in crime?
Ever.
How would you ever prove it if contemporaneously with arresting and deporting illegals and criminals, you have a reduction in crime?
How would you ever correlate that?
I said, and I still mean it, like they could say that the correlation does not equal causation when Chris Wideman snapped Anderson Silva's leg in half when Anderson Silva went to kick him and he put up a shin block and then he hit it and he snapped his leg in half and it was horrifying.
Correlation does not equal causation.
His leg didn't crack in half because of Chris Wideman's check.
It was going to crack in half anyway.
It was spontaneous.
And it just so happened that it was right there at that time when quantum physics decided to snap Anderson Silva's leg in a half.
That's how stupid these people are.
Faced with that hard reality, correlation does not equal causation.
Well, he died within 20 minutes of taking the jab.
Correlation does not equal causation.
He had another underlying health issue.
Moron.
I feel like, like, Judge, whatever, what's her name?
The old lady there.
Moron.
I'll get it anyhow.
When we're there, that does cause that.
Then, what causes it then?
Well, I don't know.
I saw him was ice shooting a woman who was a bystander.
Don't drive a 2,000-pound missile at an ice agent.
You won't have an outcome that you don't agree with.
Representative.
I thought that volunteers were supposed to be trained to de-escalate.
And that is, they did.
They shooting someone in the face because it's not de-escalation.
So, do you appreciate what she just said there?
I thought law enforcement was trained to de-escalate.
He should have ninja jumped out of the way.
And if it means getting his leg run over, that's the price he should have paid to de-escalate because emotions.
Going back to her next talking point.
Got to see what's going on.
Officer waiting patiently.
I like his watch.
Is that a TSOT touch?
She's texting somebody.
What that?
Like, what is going on here?
What is she trying to do?
Mr. John.
I work with OAN.
Oh.
We love watching representatives use their First Amendment.
I think it's fantastic.
Well, I'm a former member of the ATLU of Minnesota board that I believe it was first about that.
Good.
First of all, the American Civil Liberties Union.
She's a commie and she believed in the First Amendment.
I like this.
How about the Second Amendment?
I believe in that one.
Don't have a problem.
You don't have just the ones that sue you there, Representative, right?
What about that Second Amendment?
Well, I don't know if you heard, but we had a shooting in a school here in Minnesota recently.
What's that got to do with the Second Amendment?
Well, I think that if we had some common sense gun violence prevention.
Who gets to say it's common sense?
You?
Well, yes.
Exactly.
And I think that's definitely the problem.
Is it?
Well, I think it's pretty good.
When you use that violent rhetoric around children, yeah, I'd say that you probably are not exercising a lot of common sense.
Correlation does not equal causation.
So don't bother looking at radicalization of kids.
Don't bother looking at correlation of SSRIs and other psychotropics and the over-medication of children.
Don't bother looking at anything, especially when the crimes themselves tend to be committed under circumstances where people did not follow existing laws.
Set all that aside.
More laws, less justice.
Here as a volunteer for the Minnesota Ethan government.
And the point of Minnesota using government is to encourage some children to participate in our civic institutions, to learn about them, to learn how to exercise their constitutional rights.
I do the same thing.
I haven't interfered with anything, but I do the same thing.
I take children to shooting ranges and I teach them to shoot to exercise their Second Amendment rights.
Right, it seems like you want to take away.
I don't have strong advocates about the Second Amendment.
I just care about it.
Can you imagine?
Can you imagine?
I'm sorry.
Just being so stupid to say I have strong feelings about one amendment of the Constitution, but I don't have strong feelings about the Second Amendment of the Constitution.
All amendments are equal, except some are less equal than others.
I believe in the Constitution, at least with respect to the provisions of the Constitution that I believe in.
And I don't believe in the Constitution when I don't agree with the provision.
It's amazing.
Correlation does not equal causation, by the way, everybody.
Just the ones you want, right?
Just those, just those rights you think you need to camera.
That's always the ellitmas test for you, folks.
Always the litmus test.
I just watch people to live in peace.
Me too.
That Second Amendment does that.
Really?
Well, all I've seen here in Minnesota is people dying, including children.
What about the lives that are saved by guns?
We don't talk about that, do you?
Does anybody die from fentanyl?
I'm just wondering because the end-all is get rid of guns, people don't die.
Is fentanyl still killing people in Minnesota?
Just wondering.
Because it's illegal.
Because it's illegal.
The government, we don't hand out fentanyl.
Is fentanyl killing people in Minnesota?
See, see, see, this is where she needs to be.
This is where you need to count to 10.
This is dumb.
And she's standing there.
By the way, I really don't want you to leave, but yes, it's time to go.
All right.
What's amazing?
I gotta just right here.
This, this, we're all gonna know the meme, people.
Let me pull it up.
Hold up.
Wait a minute.
Her.
Tell me it's not the same person.
Where's the one where she's nice?
Oh, gosh.
Okay, so we got the.
Oh, here you go.
They start off nice.
And then they die.
I would love to see where are the memes now.
Where are they now?
Once upon a time.
It was one of my ideas.
So that is the quality of the legislative representation that we the people get.
At least not we the people, me.
Those the people up in Minnesota get.
Yeah, I don't touch my First Amendment, but I'm going to use my First Amendment to infringe on your Second Amendment because not all amendments in the Constitution are equally constitutional.
And I just want to, you know, rip it up, tear it up, cut it out, just make a little mishmash party out of it to get to the Constitution that I want, which is we, the government, have all the guns, and we will tell you how to exercise your First Amendment and what the F are you going to do about it right now because you no longer have the Second Amendment.
That is how the tyranny starts.
Okay, so that was fantastic and hilarious.
Now, what I did want to see here, because I saw another chat come in, it's assault with a deadly weapon on a peace officer, a felony in most, if not all, jurisdictions, says Roddy Yoda, Rod Yodo.
Yep.
And let's take a quick second before we get into some other stuff to see what's going on on vivabarnslaw.locals.com in our standards.
Somebody, I really, it's really good for these itch bays to see other itch bays just like, no, Minnesota representative, a wall supporter, probably of the people, average person is that effing dumb.
Grabs her phone, runs.
Let's be real.
When it comes to local and state level legislators, you have random ladies and guys like this one in the vid who are in way over their heads.
And yet, and yet, I mean, we freak out.
You know, you want congressmen, senators, presidents, and you focus on national elections.
The majority of the micromanagement of everybody's daily lives occurs at the municipal, local, and state level.
These are the people who make life living hell within these states.
These are the people who oversee the biggest frauds in American history in Minnesota.
And these are the people that basically steal your tax dollars, squander your tax dollars, and feel ever so righteous and ever so morally superior as they do it.
Okay, speaking of morally superior, this is going to enrage everybody out there.
And if it doesn't, you might be Dr. Kvorkian's offspring.
I've been talking about it for a while.
What we refer to colloquially as MAIDS.
It's the euphemism for the Nazi practice of mercy killings.
Medical assistance in dying up in Canada is now top five leading causes of death.
The government injecting people and killing them under the pretext of medical assistance in dying for what started off as, you know, incurable illnesses, insufferable pain with no prospect of healing.
And the Supreme Court, it's 2017 give or take, basically came down with a ruling that said it's a constitutional right to be able to end your life.
And so the government has to offer that to you.
And at the time, the Liberal government wanted to introduce medical assistance in dying, euthanasia, mercy killing, murder at this point for the mentally ill.
And there was some sufficient pushback about that.
So they sunsetted.
They put in a restriction that was going to sunset in 2025.
And I think they've pushed it back a little bit because of the political pushback.
And in the interim, you've heard horror stories of veterans calling up veterans affairs to deal with their PTSD, getting offered death, euthanasia, medical assistance and dying, state-sanctioned murder.
And you know Kayla Pollock.
She's the woman who was rendered a quadriplegic because of a booster shot, a Moderna booster after two Pfizer shots, quadriplegic.
And at the hospital, three times unsolicited, the government says, look, you're not going to get any better.
Your life is terrible.
We can't do anything for you.
Have you thought about killing yourself?
They've unsolicited offered to Kayla Pollock three times medical assistance in dying.
A story is now coming out of Canada of an individual, healthy, 26-year-old young man murdered by the state.
And once upon a time, I put out a tweet and I said, when the number had gotten to like 13,000 Canadians put to death through medical assistance and dying.
And I said, put out a tweet and I said, Justin Trudeau murdered 13,000 people last year through medical assistance and dying, something along those lines.
Then they get a call from the Bar Society of Quebec saying, we got an anonymous call that we don't like that.
Someone didn't like that tweet.
And, you know, that tweet's borderline unethical.
And I said, borderline, that tweet is accurate.
You know, the tweet's accurate, right?
And the individual said to me, well, Justin Trudeau didn't murder them.
I was like, oh, so you didn't understand the hyperbole.
Would you like me to retweet that Justin Trudeau didn't physically with his own hand kill each and every one of these people?
And the person said, yeah, that would help.
I got permission to say all this.
I said, I'm going to tell this at the same time.
And so then I put out a tweet.
I said, yeah.
Clarification, subsequent to an anonymous ethics complaint to the Bar Society of Quebec, where I haven't practiced in two years because I've been living in Florida.
I should clarify that Justin Trudeau did not physically with his own hand kill 13,000 people.
If he were to have done that at one hour a person, that would have taken more than a year.
When you kill a healthy person, it's murder.
And I'll call it what it is.
And people need to understand this is where we're at.
This is not where we're going.
And I had to independently verify it myself because it was referencing a Facebook post by the kid's mother.
And it's, you know, unless there's a massive, massive mistake in the factual record here, the story is true.
The individual was healthy, but suffered from mental illness and depression.
He had been previously rejected to take his own life.
The government had previously been refused the luxury of murdering a healthy citizen.
And then he applied a second time.
And I guess despite his mother's protest, they killed him.
Medical assistance.
Viva, why do you call it murder?
You oppose a cancer patient?
Do we know?
I support someone who is terminally ill the right to take their own life early so they don't go through the brutal, hellish, irreversible suffering that comes with cancers, that comes with terminal illness.
My father-in-law passed away from cancer.
I say the blessing was it was only a year.
And the bigger blessing is he only spent two days in hospital by the time he was admitted.
But I had clients whose loved ones passed from pancreatic cancer.
That's hell on earth.
And if they don't want to go through three weeks of gasping to breathe with no prospect of getting better, they should have that right.
Yes.
Extending it to the mentally ill, only if you're a murderer.
Extending it to mature minors, only if you're a murderer.
Healthy 26-year-old man killed by MAID for mental illness.
It's coming from the Western Standard.
They do good work.
Leia Mushett.
And it was also written up by Drea Humphrey from Rebel News.
It's been all over the place.
Calgary, a 26-year-old Ontario man has been euthanized by medical assistance in dying maids.
He was murdered by the government, despite his doctor describing him as a young and healthy.
Keanu Vafian died from MAID, was murdered on December 30, something his mother, Margaret Marsilla, announced on a Facebook post on Tuesday, stating the doctor who approved his euthanasia found a loophole to kill her son.
Vefyan received MAID in Vancouver by a new household name in MAID, Dr. Ellen Weber, referred to as Dr. Death Number Two.
I think she's killed a thousand people now, if I'm not mistaken.
Someone can check that and I'm going to double check it myself.
I think she's proudly boasted now.
I don't know if it's in this article, having killed a thousand people.
These are people who are literally in love with death.
And I can see how they rationalize it to themselves.
Oh, they're not maximizing death.
They're minimizing suffering.
They're actually doing this act of graciousness to someone who is in such suffering that them by murdering the individual actually minimizes their suffering and maximizes their non-suffering.
So therefore, by the consequentialist equation of all of this, they're doing good by murdering.
We be a member of the Clinicians Advisory Council, CAC, for dying with dignity, yada, yada, yada, has a long history with MAID and she is one of the leading clinicians contributing to its administration.
Reported in 2023 by Right to Life UK, Weeby had administered MAID to over 400 patients.
And in a video obtained by the New Atlantis, Web told listeners, it's one of the most rewarding work we've ever done.
Listen to this.
Vefean had previously tried to apply for MAID in 2022 for diabetes and visual impairment.
I'm sorry.
In a civilized society, especially one with universal healthcare, you treat these conditions.
You don't kill the person behind these conditions.
But as we're going to see, there might be some ulterior motive of reducing expenses on the system and, you know, maybe harvesting whatever healthy organs a 26-year-old kid has left in his body after the state murders him.
Four years ago here in Ontario, we were able to stop his euthanasia and get him some help.
He was alive because people stepped in when he was vulnerable and not capable of making final irreversible decision, wrote Marcilla in the Facebook post.
Back in early 2022, she found out her son had first been scheduled to euthanize himself.
According to the free press, Vafean was 23 years old at the time, had diabetes, had lost vision in one eye.
He had no job.
He had no job, girlfriend, or plan for the future.
Marcilla then learned Vafean had applied for MAID for late July, scheduling his death for September 22nd.
Vafian's doctor for MAID was Joshua Tepper, the executive director of MAID House.
This is a horror movie located in Toronto.
Tepper had written to Vafean by email to confirm his scheduled euthanasia.
Hi, I am scheduled to die.
The rise of Canada's assisted suicide program confirming the following timing.
Please arrive at 8.30.
Can you believe this?
This is dystopian hell on earth.
Whoopsie doodle.
That's I'll have to take that in a second.
I will ask for the nurse at 8:45 and we'll start the procedure around 9.
Procedure will be completed a few minutes after it starts.
When Marcia found out about the scheduled appointment by asking her daughter to access Vafian's email, Marcia added Vafian had a rough time in his life.
During his childhood, he'd gotten divorced.
Let's go down here.
Soon after, let me see.
He wasn't up for college, smoked a lot of weed.
According to Marcia, he was unhappy and once went blind in his eye in April 2022.
That was his tipping point.
He then posted about her son a day after finding out about his scheduled euthanasia.
Can you effing believe it?
The doctor literally has given him a gun to kill himself, she wrote.
Let's go down here.
Five days later, Tepper texted her again saying he would not go with killing his son and wanted nothing else to do with Vafian.
However, Vafian was still euthanized at the end of 2025 due to mental illness.
As Marcilla wrote, this approval occurred despite euthanasia for mental illness being banned until 2027.
Somehow, Dr. Death Number Two found a loophole in the system, one that now demands to be exposed so that no other parent has to endure this.
Marcia is now promising she will seek justice so parents who have lost a child with mental illness do not have to experience the same actions.
Dr. Flipping Death.
It's not healthcare.
This is failure of ethics, accountability, and humanity.
No parent should ever have to bury their child because the system and the doctor chose death over care.
When I say there might be ulterior reasons for this, I've talked about it at length, won't go back into it in any great detail.
New Brunswick passed a law called Avery's Law, makes organ tissue donation automatic with some exceptions.
Okay.
This is happening at the same time.
There's another province.
I think it might be Nova Scotia, but there's two provinces in Canada that have now passed laws that make organ donation mandatory.
Not only are they mandatory with some exclusions, the amazing thing about it is they don't have to wait for you to be dead.
Pre-death approval by coroner, this is from the actual law.
The chief coroner may allow the removal of organs or tissue after the death of a person, notwithstanding the death has not yet occurred.
If, in the opinion of the physician, the death of the person is imminent by reason of injury or disease, the physician has reason to believe that the death may apply when death occurs.
I'll have to see what those are.
A consent under this act has been obtained for the donation after death.
They don't have to wait for death if, in the opinion, the person is the death of the person is imminent by reason of injury or disease.
Or by, you know, they just want to kill themselves.
And you think we're exaggerating?
We're not.
Again, these are things that I've talked about at length, but cover them just right now.
Ontario men, this is back in 2024, granted euthanasia for controversial post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome.
So they force you to take a jab that causes damage and injury that they deny it'll cause, deny you vaccine injury through the support program, as they're doing to Sean Hartman, whose son died from the jab 33 days after taking it.
They injure you with that crap.
They tell you, we're not going to compensate you.
We've got a pretty shitty healthcare system here.
And we'll kill you.
Not terminal.
Just the man had injury from vaccine.
There was another one, which is, as far as I'm concerned, among the worst.
Woman with chemical sensitivities chose medically assisted death after a failed bid to get better housing.
This is in 22 and 22.
She had multiple chemical sensitivity.
It's also known as an allergy.
She couldn't get an adequate lodging.
I don't know, government-funded housing.
And so they killed her.
Cheaper.
Cheaper to kill than to treat.
And it's going to be even profitable to kill as opposed to treating and then harvest those delicious organs for anybody else out there.
It's government murder.
And there's a financial incentive for it now.
And as the guy who worked with Buffett said, show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.
A CBS article, CBS, CBC article from back in the day said, you know, don't worry about medical assistance and dying.
Not only will it not cost us extra money, it might actually save us money.
No shit, Sherlock.
There's always been the old proverb of law: it's cheaper to kill than it is to injure.
You injure someone, you got to compensate them for the rest of their life.
You kill them, at least in Quebec and, you know, to some extent Canada, you pay a lump sum for all their damages, and it's as of the date of the death.
Cheaper to kill than to treat.
Steal their organs after you kill them.
They don't have to be dead before you do it.
And if you get a vulnerable person who doesn't have any advocate in the hospital, well, the coroner can say, yeah, they're close enough to death.
I've determined they're close enough to death.
Trust me.
Trust me, bro.
It's murder, period.
Full stop.
And Canada has become an absolute hellhole.
And there are people justifying this and defending this and saying that I'm exaggerating.
I'm not.
It's getting worse than you could have possibly ever imagined in your wildest nightmares.
Dan Sundon says, Viva, you better get your permanent resident alien card fast, then complete naturalization after five years of residency in the U.S. From your mouth to God's ears, Dan.
And the wheels are in motion.
Now, by the way, it was Ivan Rakeland who called me before because he was at court today for the Brian Cole Jr. pipe bomber.
Can you hop on now, question mark?
And I'm thinking, do I want to get greedy and do this behind the viva barnslaw.locals.com community and then publish it to the internet and try to entice people to come on over to the community at vivabarneslaw.locals.com I want to thank our community with some perks, and this might be one of them.
Now, what I wanted to, let me see if he's gonna, if he's gonna be able to get.
Yes, he's coming on okay, perfect.
Uh oh, he's in the backdrop here.
Now let me just see one thing.
What else I had on the on the backdrop for stories?
Uh, we got Sandra Feist Feast.
We got Breanna Morello's tweet.
Sudden and unexpected, we got the.
We got the.
We got that.
And what was this one?
Hold on a second.
This was okay, that was the same one.
I had two tweets of the same one.
Um, so we might.
When, when Ivan Rakelyn gets in, let me just actually give everybody, oh there, he is good sir, all right, I don't know if you can see me.
Okay, I can see you.
Man, how you doing?
Hold on, i'm gonna get sent.
It's a weird view.
Oh, you're on okay, hold on.
Let me go to locals and just see if um uh, let me see if the audio is good audio.
Let's see if you're not too loud, I can bring you down on my end.
Um Ivan, before we get going on this, just remind everybody who you are, Ivan Rakelin.
Uh, in today's capacity, I am an attorney observing the, just as a private citizen, though observing the arraignment of Brian Cole Jr outside Of the U.S. Federal District Courthouse for the District Of Columbia.
This is the federal, you know, one of the 94 federal districts, not the circuit court up the street over there.
So, this is the arraignment.
And oddly enough, I mean, there are gonna be so many issues with this case because it was filed today, which is over five years away from when the event occurred, right?
So, it's interesting how they delayed it until today.
And oddly enough, in the courtroom, you had the family once again.
It was really short, actually, hearing.
So, you had the family present.
We had a couple of journalists there.
Kara Castranova from Lindell TV was there.
Myself, we had Jocelyn Ballantine as the assistant U.S. attorney without her co-counsel this time.
I'm not sure if he was a little bit perturbed or apprehensive based on the last interaction we had.
But as I'm talking here, there's a chance that she might step out.
I'll get to that on why that may be the case.
She may step out right behind me.
I don't know if you can see.
My angle is pretty bad.
It auto-rotates, man.
Yeah, you got to get one of those, like, extend one of these things so that you can get the hold on.
I do, but it's in the car.
I don't know.
So, what I want to say is during the hearing.
Hold on, wait, wait, let's stop right here because presumption of knowledge.
Today's hearing is for Brian Cole Jr., the suspected pipe bomber.
I believe the total Patsy, but we'll see.
The 30-year-old autistic man who has been arrested for the pipe bombing.
It's one charge of transportation of explosives and the other one, I think, is planting them.
Then, the issue is that he was arrested back in December.
The indictment for.
I believe the affidavit for probable cause came down about a month and some odd after Steve Baker's story.
They said they discovered new evidence that places him within the pings of the geolocation, that he was buying these materials over the course of three years.
And the initial issue was that they went by affidavit for probable cause and they didn't have a grand jury indictment.
And when they were going to go for the original hearing, that became something of an issue.
And so, on the eve of the original extended preliminary hearing, they went out and got a district-level grand jury indictment, which was arguably, but not arguably potentially problematic and wouldn't justify continued detention or became relevant in respect of the delays within which someone has to be released from custody after the arrest.
They then subsequently went and got a grand jury indictment, which we covered a couple of days ago, two charges, and they got their grand jury indictment.
And now, the question is, did they get that?
Yeah, but the grand jury indictment, yeah, was in the local court for the District of Columbia, not the federal court.
No, but they got a federal court, they got a federal indictment.
And then a couple days ago, they had, yeah, they ended up getting the federal grand jury indictment.
And so, today was the arraignment.
And so, that lasted maybe 15 minutes.
That essentially was where he pled guilty or not guilty.
And what I found another oddity, I mean, I mean, maybe it's normal.
I don't know if it is, is that they didn't require Brian Cole Jr. to say anything.
His attorney actually pled for him.
And so, the attorney essentially said he pled not guilty for him.
A lot of traffic here.
But he confessed, Ivan.
I'm being glib.
Interesting.
Valid point.
So he confessed without an attorney by Jocelyn Ballantyne, who I'd like to review for people tuning in for the first time.
She was the one that went after General Flynn.
She was the one that went after the Proud Boys by compelling a false coerced testimony of Jeremy Bortino, a Proud Boy that was injured at the December rally.
So he didn't even make it to the January 6th First Amendment election justice rally.
And so they used him as the main witness to go after the Proud Boys.
And the assistant U.S. attorney that was leading that effort was none other than Jocelyn Ballantyne, the same assistant U.S. attorney in this particular case.
And so last time you saw me confront her, and this time, as we exited the courthouse, she saw me recognize me while I was in there, obviously.
Oh, another person that was in there was the sedition hunter author, Ryan J. Riley from Nothing But Chumps, known as NBC, Nothing But Chumps, right?
So he was trying to get information, and so was the reporter from the Wall Street Journal who was asking me about scam blondie.
We can talk about that if we have time later.
Oh, yeah.
We'll save something for the exclusive locals after party.
Okay, okay.
And then one last thing, though, Viva, is that she exited the courthouse and Kara Castranova started to ask her questions in the hallway.
And instead of exiting how she would normally exit, she essentially did.
No, she's still in hiding in the courthouse as Kara Castranova is waiting for her to exit the U.S. attorney's office.
She's literally in hiding right now because she saw me, she saw Joseph Philip Daniel.
You got Tommy Tatum right here you saw in the background, also an independent journalist, and Kara Castranova with Lindell TV.
She doesn't want independent Patriot voices, right, to ask her simple questions.
So if I had another opportunity to speak with her, which I'm probably, I'm pretty certain I will here.
I'm going to keep you on, Ivan.
I'm going to ask her, were you directly coordinating?
I just tweeted it out just before I went live.
If you want to pull that up, let me do it right now.
Basically, I asked, this is what I'm going to ask her: Did you, Miss Ballantyne?
Did you directly coordinate with Nancy Pelosi on the weaponization of the Proud Boys, or did you communicate with the general counsel Ted Debias of the U.S. Capitol Police in that particular Proud Boys persecution?
America wants to know.
Jocelyn Ballantyne, I've been going not hard on.
I mean, we're just remotely.
Any other questions that I should have a second participated in the extorting the wrongful guilty plea for Michael Flynn?
She tried to get Enrique Tario to lie to implicate Trump.
She's somehow still employed there, still at the DOJ, involved in this file.
Now, this was the arraignment.
I thought this was the preliminary hearing where they were going to debate whether or not to release him because they didn't respect the 14-day delay within which to hold the preliminary hearing because of the issue of the fact that they didn't get an indictment, a federal grand jury in time.
And now they just, as a matter of law, had to release him.
Did they not get to that today?
No.
He was all they got to was the arraignment.
The next preliminary hearing is January January 28th.
Shut up.
At 3:30 p.m. They were supposed to determine, I thought at least whether or not they were going to release Brian Cole now because they didn't.
No, only one question was handled today, which was guilty or not guilty.
Guilty, not guilty, arraigned.
And so that's it.
And so the judge didn't decide on anything.
I guess maybe the judge is going to make a determination based on the, you know, how it is.
Judges are going to decide their own timeline.
Well, one other thing is that Ali is going to be the judge in that particular that's going to take the case from here on out, I believe.
And this is the same judge that I think has dual citizenship, dual loyalties, total radical leftist, if I'm not mistaken.
And so it's going to complicate things.
I know most of us agree that he's a Patsy in some way, shape, or form.
Some people think he's a full Patsy where he had nothing to do with the January 6th pipe bomb situation.
I'm of the opinion that there's a potential he may have proximity to the January 6th pipe bomb event in some way, shape, or form.
And I agree that it wasn't him that placed it, but I think he does have some level of complicity is my opinion.
I don't have it based on any sort of really evidence to support that.
It's just my gut feeling based on the relationships of his father and his involvement with, I think, the left and the Democrat Party.
Maybe that's biased, but I think there's something there there that I haven't run to ground yet.
And I think I want to, you know, and others can do the same thing.
But I think that's where we need to focus our attention while we await January 28th is to determine what ties does this family have, particularly his father, as it relates to the Congressional Black Caucus, right?
There may be nothing there, right?
But I find it odd that there's not really been a further investigation into the Congressional Black Caucus, which is essentially a branch or even a co-equal to the DNC in terms of political clout and influence that may have something to do with what occurred on January 6th.
You say like no, but for sure.
You say it's a gut feeling, but it's based on past, not, I mean, every experience is past.
It's based on how the intelligence works.
You find a disenfranchised, mentally vulnerable individual, you can radicalize them.
If this pipe bomb could have been constructed with materials that people have for home improvement and home, what's it called?
The gardening.
So like the facts that I think are so suspicious in all of this is that he bought the allegedly the sulfur powder in 2018.
He then buys the caps.
The timeline is I don't even know.
Like, I respect you, but I don't even know why you even give it any credibility or weight to even acknowledge that that is even remotely a fact that should be even considered in this fact pattern.
I'll tell you what.
Indict this individual.
I'll tell you what.
Fantastical.
It's like, oh, back in 1894, his great-grandmother purchased potassium chloride or something.
No, but seriously, people are going to say the AV.
People get into the realm of Q-tardism here.
No, no, because you have to appreciate.
Not you, but I'm talking about the indictment.
Because you got to imagine, they've raised the best evidence that they have right now.
Like, this is the biggest case ever.
They've come up with the most compelling evidence imaginable.
And that is that he bought the sulfur powder in 2018.
The caps and pipes in 2019 and 2020.
The potassium nitrate, we don't know.
They don't know when he bought the potassium nitrate, but he bought it from Home Depot.
And then at some point, decided to put it all together because he got pissed off about the 2020 election.
He's been planning for this entire life, Fiva.
So what makes more sense to me is as an embryo, he was planning this.
No, but what makes more sense is the intelligence knows you want you want to get a guy, use him as a Patsy.
He's like, hey, dude, everybody's got whatever that sulfur powder is.
Can you check your camera?
I saw your interview with Steve Baker.
He said that he said that the Patsy file was pulled based on his interactions with the current supervisory special agent.
I mean, I can't just trust people blindly, right?
He's done great work, but there's more that, and I get it, he doesn't want to disclose his sources.
So we're kind of in this trust me, bro phase, which I get it.
Like he may be right.
The issue with that is, and this is where people who want to discredit will pretend to take things literally when they're not meant to be literally.
I'm not discrediting Steve.
No, no, no, that's it.
But and when people say, oh, there's no such thing as a Patsy file.
He is saying is that there was a guy involved who said, Oh, they went back to the Patsy file because they that guy might have known what they investigated back in the day, not aware now, but knows why they dropped the case or didn't pursue it against.
Yeah, I mean, let's face it, Steve has more credibility than the entire FBI.
I'll grant that.
And so, when Dan Von's get me in trouble with Bongina, well, when Dan, when delegate Dan Bondina, along with Kash Patel and Scam Blondie, come out in their press conference with Judge Janine Pirro, who were duped, in my opinion, by this Jocelyn Ballantyne to believe this Patsy.
I mean, they made fools of themselves, and that's when I thought to myself, you know what?
Originally, I didn't think Steve Baker's evidence was compelling.
I mean, it's not, I can't discredit it, but when they came out with their press conference, it made Steve Baker's research and story that much more credible, plausible, credible, and plausible based on what he provided than what the FBI has provided.
So, in my opinion, I think Shawnee Kirchhoff, based on the evidence in the court of public opinion right now, there's more weight to alleging that she was the one involved rather than Brian Toll Jr.
Well, the curious things are, as far as I understand, she has yet to sue Steve or the Blaze.
And as far as I understand, there hasn't been really any more of a demand for a retraction or a cease and desist letter of demand, whatever.
You can make of that what you want.
Some people would say, just ignore it, it'll go away, and that's the better way to deal with it.
Yeah, I'd like to ask her attorneys or her, can you provide the puppy video?
I thought you only had one dog.
How is it puppies you were hanging out with?
Were you hanging out with the puppies before you placed the pipe bombs or after allegedly?
Well, because it may have been the same night, especially considering you know, and I'm not trying to put it.
But were you playing with the puppies the minutes before you got into that video frame or after the video frame?
People were making jokes about playing with puppies can be touching boobies.
And even when it comes to Julie Kelly, he doesn't believe the timeline.
So, that what's the word?
That alibi wouldn't even apply.
Well, we do agree on some instances.
I agree with Steve and Julie Kelly, even though Julie likes to block, just like Dan Von Gina.
Well, I would say, like, I think Bongino left, and I think you know, people can derive decipher from that what they want, but maybe we'll be conflicted in terms of his behavior on Twitter for the last few days.
Set that aside, but um, they come out with that.
He's just crashing and burning.
I mean, I mean, if I were his PR guy, I would say no, he's a very, I mean, the psychological profile of somebody like that is uh, he's very defensive, so he's very he's very delicate in his skin because he knows that there's something there that he doesn't want to disclose.
And so, instead of kind of sharing his inadequacies and limitations, he just goes out and tries to aggressively go after anyone asking questions.
And that's the same demeanor that I saw with Julie Kelly.
Anytime you question her, she gets all crazy about it.
Yeah, well, I'm comfortable in my skin, so are you if I'm wrong on something?
It's like, okay, great.
I'll be the first one.
I want to be the first one to criticize and acknowledge my error before anybody else so that I can make fun of myself.
Well, and also, to be honest, I appreciate when I say he's a Patsy, it's my personal belief because I, the evidence as told by them, makes zero sense to me.
I do believe we might find out that you know he was, you know, he was involved in some in some way, but the reactions to the Blaze story and the absence thereof, I do, I totally want to see Jocelyn come on.
So, but all that to say is, um, the story just makes zero sense.
The the the flimsiness with which they apparently threw this together, couldn't even get a grand jury indictment, but then had to go get one to to compensate for the fact that they now the defense is going to have an argument.
That this grand jury indictment was after January 5th or 6th, there's an argument that the statute of limitations were on at least on one of the charges.
I forget which.
It's one of the two charges is subject to a five-year statute of limitations, which we were told by Hermit Dylan, you know, wouldn't be an issue because of Rico or whatever.
Do it.
I'm going to have to move my car because they're giving tickets.
So that was it.
That's it.
He just, the lawyer pleaded not guilty.
What did what did Brian Cole look like?
Oh, so here today I was able to see him and didn't say a word, didn't look into the audience, if you will, and just kind of stood there.
I think he was shackled and he was in prison garb.
Just complete silence.
Not a peep.
Parents crying or anything?
Are they distraught?
No, they're just there sitting.
Just to me, they were much more calm in their demeanor.
Can you imagine?
He's been locked up now for a month.
Yeah, 30 days.
The question I had was: I'm not just so weird.
Well, what's weird is how are they?
How does the family, or does the family not have any idea as to where he was on that day?
Like, have they not their own alibi of him playing with puppies?
It'd be nice for a spokesperson to come out and give an alibi on that day.
I would, I mean, presumably, that's why I say it.
I'm kind of torn on where this is at.
I think it was probably a conspiracy where maybe Brian Cole Jr. was involved in it in some way, shape, or form.
Maybe not placing the pipe bombs.
And so that's why they want to throw all blame potentially on him.
I don't know.
There's many theories that can explain away what's going on.
And it's really going to come to us independent inquisitors, if you will, that are going to get to the truth.
Because if the level of corruption is what I believe it is based on five years of information gathering, same thing with Steve.
And I guess same thing with Kyle.
He's been looking into this.
I just think that it's too big of a scandal to let it out publicly.
And so just like what we're going to do with Epstein, we're going to force that to be released, you know, whatever it takes at this point.
And there's a lot of leverage now that we have.
I think we have enough leverage and enough enough people looking into this that we're going to get to the truth of it.
Well, I would just be, I would be shocked if the parents couldn't pinpoint where he was on the evening, which is why I say, if he was in fact a useful Patsy, don't show your license plate, Ivan.
If he's not my car, okay.
If he was a useful Patsy and he was involved somehow, then they can't say, oh, we have an alibi.
He wasn't involved at all.
Then there might be some rationale to say, plead, you know, I don't know, admit that you did it so that you can argue covered by the pardon if he was somehow involved tangentially.
So there's multiple.
Yeah, so he may be already pre-pardoned and they're not even exercising that based on the pardon that President Trump gave all day sixers.
It's like I don't believe.
My interpretation of the pardon as drafted is it doesn't cover this on January 5 and it doesn't cover this based on the fact that he wasn't.
The counter argument is to say this occurred on January 5th, so he should be then.
But then they're gonna say, you know, statute limitations, there's just so many complexities with this.
And and who's at the root of it all?
The person we're waiting to go?
Hey, where's she at?
Is she still in there?
Okay, go get it.
My goodness, it's fun to watch people on the street.
I, it's crazy.
So you're real time.
We're trying to get these folks.
So anyway, Ryan Riley, I posted a tweet.
You want to scroll through it?
I I confronted him on january 6th.
He's been the lead sedition hunter, kind of coordinating, collating and being their mouthpiece for the feds uh, for nothing but commies or nothing but chumps.
NBC one of the key figures and continuing to spew the disinformation about january 6th and covering up for the feds direction.
So he happened to be in the.
Let me see if I can just keep scrolling.
It might be a few down because I did, I went on a retweet tirade earlier today.
Well, I was, I was not retweeting some of your tweets.
It makes it difficult.
Part of me still, I say, feels bad.
Part of me can simply say that.
I was just having a field day with Mr. Bongino.
He's having a field day with Dave Smith.
And it's not, it's just I got blocked a while ago.
My first comment.
He blocked me right away.
Yeah, he should have a PR team that says just there's nothing to benefit from what you're doing.
It might, I don't know, maybe it's going to be good for you know, uh, eyeballs for the show when it comes back.
I don't, some of the stuff that's been going on is um unbecoming, but there might be movement.
Let's see, but I haven't while we do that, let me just show one thing.
I think I just got a tip in crypto here.
Look at this.
Oh, now we're getting notifications.
The new crypto wallet, yeah, BTC sessions tipped with Rumble, and I think it was $20.
Thank you very much.
Very nice.
How do you know?
Does it come out in USD or does it come out in Bitcoin or Ethereum?
It comes in Bitcoin, but then it converts the notification through the Rumble Wallet app tells you what it came in as.
So that's that's totally cool.
Yeah, I was looking into that as well.
Vicky Bubby says, Love the show.
You just need to turn your mic up.
You're always 30% lower than your guests.
Yeah, I mean, I keep forgetting in Rumble Studio, I can actually bring down his volume.
Locals, get some questions in if you have any for Dan Sunday.
Oh, here Dan Sundon says, remember, the female officer in question never made that claim.
Someone else did.
She didn't have two puppies, only an older.
It wasn't old, but it was not a puppy.
It was an adopted greyhound, which dies later.
Where is the test?
Well, that was what people noticed: is that they didn't know who confirmed the story.
Was it the FBI?
Was it her attorney?
Was it a, it was an unnamed source in the original NBC article.
Um, I'm just like, as far as I know, she hasn't, they have not sued.
And Steve Baker's thus far, his reporting has been more logical.
And you haven't spoken to time because I would love to, I would love to speak with the mother or the grandmother to see what their positions are.
Kara Castranova spoke briefly before the hearing began, and she's going to do a piece as soon as she's out of there.
She's keeping an eye on Miss Valentine right now.
So we'll see what happens.
Hey, let me let you go because I don't want I'm gonna move the car.
Do it, do it.
Go text me if there's anything.
I'll be live for a bit.
I'm just like a pedestrian here.
Yeah, he's gonna sell us.
So get in your car.
Call me later anyway.
Let me know what happens.
Yep, yep.
All right, man.
Godspeed.
Bye.
All right, bye-bye.
And then I want to raid the White House before I get to because I love being able to say Viva raids the White House.
What's going on at the White House?
Okay, good.
There's something going on at the White House.
We'll see it in a second.
There was a tipped question from vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Duck fat.
And whenever I see this, I see F that.
I vaguely recall a story about Cole's parents and problems with their business and possibly losing their home.
I can, yeah, the details were that they have a bond company and they had issues with some Trump era policy.
They were the ones who posted bond for illegals.
And then the father, Cole's father, did an interview where he was complaining about the policy, begging the Biden administration to do something.
They're Democrats, the family.
They're registered.
And by the way, my understanding of voter records that were pulled because of primaries where you have to register, Brian Cole Jr. voted for Biden in the primaries in 2020.
I posted that a little while back over Christmas.
Maybe I'll repost it.
And then the other question is, you know, whether or not some people say, how did the feds even get their clause into him?
Well, maybe, you know, he had some accounts on some sexy time websites.
And maybe, you know, they get him on something else and say, plead guilty to this because it'll be, or get involved in this.
Otherwise, we'll use this on you.
And even if you get arrested for this, it'll be better than the arrested for the that.
And if you know what I'm getting at, you know what I'm getting at.
The old lady doesn't even protest.
Now she is CIA.
The lady doesn't even protest.
And now she is CIA.
Dan Sunday said the Cole family had a lien on their home for over $200,000.
That's not good.
Viva, we love you, whichever way it works out.
Remember, those videos on locals are available to non-subscribers.
Yeah, but even the funny thing is, even my after party, the after party, I think, is only for supporters.
But even when I post something, it's people complain because it's behind an email address.
You have to register to become a non-paying member on locals.
Let's go raid the White House.
All right, I got to do it just for the meme value.
Copy.
Let me see what's going on here.
They are having a President Trump participate in meeting with oil and gas executives.
Okay, let's go raid the White House.
So we're going to do this.
By the way, everybody, before we do that, make sure that you're subscribed.
Hit the notifications.
Sunday night, Viva and Barnes Law for the People.
And our Locals Afterparty, I might open up some replacement baseball cards that I got.
And at least one of them is good.
And then the other three are UFC.
What was I going to say?
So before we go, let's raid the White House.
Like, share, turn on notifications.
Download the app.
Get the Rumble wallet if you want to tip and support the work that we do.
Or just join at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
10 bucks a month or 100 bucks for the whole year if you get it in one shot.
Okay, hold on.
This is the biggest thing ever.
Come here.
We are live to 11,000 people right now.
So make sure 11,000 people.
The kid has made pasta.
This is beautiful.
It smells like pasta.
So we're going to make we're having homemade pasta tonight.
We're going to Home Depot and get a pasta.
You're going to Home Depot?
Did any package come in the mail?
No.
Go ask mom and then bring it in with you.
They're going to Home Depot to get a pasta maker, but they've made pasta.
Homemade.
Delicious.
Okay, so that's that.
That's it.
We're going to go have our locals after party like we have every episode.
And watch this, guys.
You ready for this?
You all ready for this?
Oh, no, they were ready for this.
Raid.
White House.
Please review the raid details.
Confirm raid.
And now we're going to go over here.
And now we're going to go like this.
Viva raids the White House.
Booyah.
Okay, this is funny.
Oh my God, that was pathetic raid by Viva.
Who says such terrible things about me?
I tell you, it's like people think I don't have human emotions.
Okay, here, let's just see what's going on here.
Viva Fry, NeuroDivergence in there.
Thank you, Neuro.
I mean, that was pathetic.
You are a useful idiot.
I don't think that's directed at me.
Whatever.
Okay, now we're going to go to vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
Let me refresh here, people, and give you the link.
For anybody who doesn't want to go raid the White House, come to Locals.
And we're going to have one heck of a banger show on Sunday.
It's going to be amazing.
And that is it.
Let's see if Ivan's going to get any interview with.
Oh, that's me.
Hold on a second.
Okay, so we're good.
Let's go to Locals Afterparty, do a little QA, and see what else is going on.
Home Depot has pasta makers.
Trump will come after you, Viva.
It is a, yeah, okay.
So that's it.
Go.
Enjoy the day.
Rumble if you're not coming.
And locals, here I come.
Booyah.
▲
Export Selection