Viva & Barnes - Kash Patel's Girlfriend Sues Elijah Schaeffer for $5 MIL Man Charged Over Portnoy Incident & MORE!

Nov. 11, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:12:11

Kash Patel's Girlfriend Sues Elijah Schaeffer for $5 MIL Man Charged Over Portnoy Incident & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	What if I told you we had entered the realm of the universe where man denied the most basic facts of life, science, and God?
	What if I told you that we lived in a world where a man had to tell a woman that she had to live with a man dangling his ding-dong in their locker room?
	Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the state of California.
	Behold.
	Senator Wayna, as the only black lesbian here, can I please ask you a question?
	Because I flew here to do that.
	Okay.
	As a lesbian woman who was attacked in a woman's locker room at Gold's Gym this week by a self-identifying trans woman with a documented history of domestic violence, I'm deeply concerned about women's safety in female-only spaces.
	What would you say to women who are seeking assurance that their safety will be protected from men who by California law can self-ide as women in women-only spaces, sir?
	Please tell me.
	Yeah, so we want, I mean, everyone to be safe.
	And we also know that we have trans people, both men and women, who are men and women.
	And so the I'm not going to swear today.
	I have turned over a leaf.
	What the flipping fudge is this jackaninny of a buffoon saying?
	First of all, the arrogance of his posture is enough to make you want to wretch.
	The color of his socks is enough to make you want to wretch.
	Maybe you can't see them with my face here.
	Hold on.
	I'm not coming.
	Look at his socks.
	Everything about his arrogance, pomposity, and what the hell is he saying?
	We have men and women, and there's women and men.
	And then I appreciate your concern as a woman, but a man wants to abuse you and I want to let that man, I mean woman, do it.
	You know, so trans women are women.
	Senator, you've done great things with the trans women are women.
	Two plus two equals five.
	Deny the most.
	This is a man telling a woman that a man who thinks he's a woman is a woman.
	Congratulations, this misogynist piece of shit.
	I did it.
	There I went already.
	This misogynist POS sitting with his legs crossed, lecturing a woman on what it means to be a woman.
	And gosh darn it, if a man says he's a woman, then woman, you better deal with that man as a woman, woman.
	The bills you've passed with the housing.
	I've read a lot of your bills.
	And like you said, there are bills that need to be opened up.
	And I'm telling you now, millions of women across America are being harassed and sexually assaulted in locker rooms.
	I'm a lesbian black woman.
	I'm not transphobic.
	I'm not homophobic.
	And I do respect a lot of the things you've done.
	Oh, well, you are now by their definition.
	You object to a man in the woman's locker room who self-identifies as a woman?
	You're a transphobigot.
	But I do see a lot of these bills that you've passed that are dangerous for women and young children.
	And I understand that you're trying to be on a level playing field.
	And I'm here to represent my community because I hear a lot of things about my community and these bills.
	And I'm telling you as a woman, first and foremost, that this is dangerous.
	And we need your help because you're in the office.
	You're going to go in the political spot.
	I want to support you.
	I have millions of people behind me watching this right now.
	And we want to know, are you going to protect women?
	Not trans women?
	Women.
	Women, trans women are different things.
	Women.
	Listen.
	Can you hear there's a man in the audience lecturing her about what it means to be a woman?
	We're living in an absolute bizarro upside down universe where the patients have taken over the asylum.
	Whoa, woman.
	You're going to tell me what a woman is, woman?
	We need to protect women's safety.
	I was assaulted our women.
	I was assaulted.
	No, they are not.
	They are men.
	I was assaulted by women.
	He broke his wife's jaw so bad she needed a reconstructive surgery.
	I'm a lesbian.
	I'm not transphobic and I'm black.
	So if there's another black woman in here who wants to tell me how they feel, please join in.
	But all of you are not.
	And I don't know who you are or what you are.
	Excuse me, woman.
	The man has told you that trans women are women.
	The man has spoken.
	Now sit down.
	I'm a lesbian.
	This is actual insanity.
	This is institutionalized insanity.
	And I'm telling you right now, men are harassing women in the locker room.
	Excuse me, ma'am.
	Women are harassing women in the locker room.
	Let's be scientific here.
	I'm just telling you, sis, I want to woo, woo, woo.
	No, just let's.
	Now I'm done.
	And by the way, I respect what you have to.
	I just want to let you know.
	You shouldn't.
	Let's get this in without.
	I appreciate your point of view.
	Now let me tell you something, my man.
	Sorry that you were wrong.
	Multiple times.
	I appreciate you talking about it.
	I think we need to protect the safety of all women.
	Including man-women.
	And I also know that trans women are also brutalized in this country.
	Probably by other transgender individuals with serious mental issues.
	That's kind of what the prevalence of violence is among the trans community.
	It's not heterosexual men hunting down trans people.
	This is like in Canada when they called it an indigenous genocide because Indigenous men were killing Indigenous women.
	And they say, oh, they're only doing that because of the patriarchy, because of the white European man's impact on the Indigenous community.
	Indigenous genocide, violence against Indigenous women perpetrated by other Indigenous men who largely suffer from alcohol, addiction, drug addiction, and other social problems.
	Blame it on Whitey.
	So women and sister women are brutalized in this country and we have to protect the safety of all women.
	We have to protect women.
	We cannot be raped in the bathrooms by men that want to save their women.
	They're not women.
	They're not women.
	I'm leaving.
	It's okay, but I'm not leaving.
	I am leaving because you know what?
	You guys are not protecting women.
	You're doing a lot.
	The bills that you're passing for the law, I read a lot of them.
	They're great.
	But this thing's with the trans, it's not right.
	Thank you very much.
	Thank you very much.
	Be gone, woman.
	And now let's have the real men talk about what it means to be a woman.
	Thank you.
	And my name is Tish Hyman.
	You heard me, sister?
	All right.
	Don't let them use it.
	I'm going to reach out to this woman.
	It's wrong.
	My sister's in jail.
	She can't get free tampons herself, but she can get free transformation medication.
	Big format is best.
	I like this woman.
	Yeah, Scott.
	Yeah, Scott.
	Well, things were going so smoothly.
	Yeah, until we had diverging thought.
	Things were going so smoothly until someone who's actually a reasonable, logical person came out with actual logic.
	Yeah, things were going so smoothly when we were all ideologically aligned.
	Well, let's talk about another uncomfortable moment.
	When we first started talking in 2008.
	Holy shit.
	So that's coming from Andy Noah, by the way.
	So I'm not going to play the whole thing again.
	Okay, I'm going to leave this up in the backtime because I'm reaching out to her.
	Ass woke San Francisco congressional candidate Scott Wiener.
	That's his actual name.
	This is the guy that was dressed in like leather setups with like some sort of butt plug or butt pill in one of his pictures.
	You go look it up online.
	It's rancid.
	She's the woman who was banned from GeoSFit gym after complaining about a convicted woman beater being in the locker room.
	Weiner says trans women are women.
	The problem is, it wasn't even only Wiener.
	It was other people in that crowd saying that men are women.
	Now, in that particular crowd, it was a man telling this lesbian woman he knows what a woman is more than she does.
	It's not just, I won't judge sexual orientation based on observations of that man telling the woman that a man who thinks he's a woman is a woman.
	It's not just men doing it.
	It's not just misogynist men doing it.
	There are, and I firmly believe this such things as misogynist women.
	I wake up this morning.
	I've got my morning routine.
	Don't ask what it is, but it involves reading my phone and reading things.
	They weren't fucking born male.
	This is, this is, this is like an okay.
	When I say this, I had to double check what the hell was going on here.
	This is an article in, let me just put this up so you can see this.
	This is an article in The Times.
	Transgender women to be banned from all female Olympic events.
	IOC, the Olympic committee, likely to announce new policy early in New Year after findings of scientific review about the permanent physical advantages of being born male.
	Can you believe?
	I'm sorry.
	Can you believe we are living in an era where people allegedly have landed on the moon?
	Quantum computing, artificial intelligence, and you've got the times of whatever the hell saying, well, recent scientific advances have shown us that there's an advantage overall speaking to be born male.
	Oh my goodness.
	Shocker.
	This is the reality in which we live, denying the most basic sets of facts.
	And now it comes as a stunning shocker to some that being born male has physiological advantages over the broad spectrum.
	That when you take any high-performing athlete, I think of in every freaking sport, if you just took those who performed the best at every freaking sport, maybe with the exception of gymnastics, which is a subjective element to it, they would be the best of the best would always be men.
	And not because men are better, just because they are biologically created for what they were created for or created the way they were created.
	This person, I swear to you, I thought it was a joke.
	Dr. Helen Weberly, she, her, championing equality.
	Equality means letting people with a physiological advantage, innate, inherent biological, physiological advantage, beat the shit out of women.
	That's what that's what equality means to this misogynist.
	Trans rights, supporting gender identities, working for a better fight.
	Yeah, yeah, okay.
	Go back here.
	She says, they weren't fucking born male.
	They are female and always have been and are now being excluded because their birth certificate was written wrongly and they have so many sodding hoops to jump through to correct it.
	There.
	I swear to everything holy, I thought this was a joke.
	There's no way that this could be serious because there are parody accounts that this would be the tweet from the parody account.
	And I thought it was parody.
	Then I have to look this woman up, assuming she's a woman, to determine who she is.
	It's a real person.
	It's an objectively real individual who put that tweet out there.
	Dr. Helen Weberly, leading voice in transgender advocacy and media in the UK.
	It seems that at one point she got fired from her job.
	I don't know if it was nursing or in medicine for prescribing treatments for transgender kids.
	She got fired, terminated.
	She took it to appeal and apparently it was reversed on appeal, where they said the reasons for her termination or whatever were, I didn't get into the thick of it on that case.
	Then she let her license lapse anyhow.
	So she's no longer practicing whatever she was practicing before.
	Now she's an online trans rights activist saying that they were always female and that it's the birth certificate that made the mistake and not the scientific determination of what makes a man a man, a male a male, a female a female, and a woman a woman.
	It's abject insanity.
	We're living through abject insanity.
	Are we on the tail end of it?
	Time will tell.
	I think people have had enough of the mentally ill, misogynist abusers, exploiting of people's tolerance and exploiting of this social credit score, this social contagion to carry out their perverted fetishes to dominate women.
	Going into a woman's locker room, recording, walking around with your dick flapping around is not about equality.
	It's not about tolerance.
	And it's sure as sugar is not about trans rights.
	It's about dominance and abuse and misogyny.
	Anyways, we don't need to get too far into it.
	I just wanted to start the show off with something funny because I woke up this morning and by the time I was done my wording routine, I said, I've read the stupidest thing on the internet.
	And by the way, just to know, I read in the bathroom.
	You shouldn't do it, by the way.
	It's not good for you.
	You end up spending a lot more time there than you should.
	And you end up getting frustrated before breakfast and other reasons.
	All right, people, how goes the battle?
	What is the word of the day?
	The word of the day is insanity.
	And we're going to get into all of it.
	The word of the day, Wiener is a dick.
	I get that one.
	Yeah.
	Oh, hold on a second.
	Why can't I?
	There we go.
	Wiener is a dick.
	It's ironic that he's a perverted 2SLGBTQIA plus minor perverted individual.
	And his name is Wiener.
	And the other Wiener, Anthony Wiener, who had stuff on his laptop, which was called the laptop from hell.
	Oh, is that Hunter Biden's laptop?
	Whatever was on Anthony Wiener's laptop is said to have made officers sick.
	His name is also Wiener.
	Nomen S. Omen.
	There is an omen.
	There's an indication in the name.
	All right, before we get into reading some chats, for those of you who don't know who I am, Viva Fry, David Fryhead, former Montreal litigator, current Florida Rumbler.
	And this is the daily show on the Rumbles.
	We are on Rumble.
	We are also in our VivaBarnsLaw.locals.com community where I should have made sure that we are all good because, hold on, we're all good there.
	And we are all good in our community.
	I'm going to get to some tip questions in a second, but before we get anywhere, I want to thank our sponsor of the day because it's an objective.
	Oh, look at that.
	What do I have right here, people?
	IQ Chef IQ.
	Why?
	Because Thanksgiving is just around the corner and cooking at Thanksgiving is high stakes.
	It feels like a overcooked turkey can ruin everything.
	I just had a guest over last week and I didn't use my flipping thermometers and I overcooked two beautiful pieces of steak and it very much drove me crazy.
	That is why I love my Chef IQ sense.
	The wireless cooking thermometer takes all the guesswork out of holiday cooking.
	USDA says cook says turkeys got to be hit 165 degrees Fahrenheit to be safe.
	But if you overcook it, it's great.
	It'll be safe to eat, but no one's going to eat it.
	The way to make sure that you hit the perfect temperature is with Chef IQ.
	You'll do it every time.
	Whether you're roasting, grilling, pan searing, even smoking turkey, it's got you covered.
	It's an amazing thing.
	It's a hard thermometer.
	Let me just show this.
	You can actually use it as a dart if you want to do that.
	Made out of metal.
	You stick it in the turkey.
	It has an app that you download onto your phone.
	It tells you what the temperature is.
	You can gauge what you want to cook it to.
	You can get notifications on your phone and it'll tell you, depending on what you're cooking, what the temperature it needs to get to is.
	And if you like it a certain way, like you like at Pittsburgh Rare, it'll tell you how to do that and gauge it throughout.
	It's an absolutely amazing thing.
	Now, by the way, you can get a discount.
	You can get 30% off site-wide with code VIVA.
	Go to chefiq.com forward slash your promo code Viva.
	I forget exactly how it works.
	It's great for chicken, steaks, fish, whatever you're cooking.
	You can leave it in there the entire time.
	Just make sure it's not touching any portion of the element.
	They're amazing.
	And it will save Thanksgiving and save potentially some arguments among family.
	All right, let's get to the show.
	Allie Michael says, I don't mind if you swear it.
	You do it so the rest of us don't have to.
	It's a bad habit.
	It's a good habit to get out of.
	The climate has changed.
	Winter has come to Montreal.
	Expect global warming to kick in anytime around here in May.
	Yeah, it's getting cold in Florida.
	I think it was like 60 degrees today.
	I'm waiting for it to get cold enough so that the iguanas start falling out of the trees because I have yet to experience that in Florida.
	The last time it got that cold, I was back in Canada and missed the moment, but I'm going to find iguanas falling out of trees.
	For those of you who don't know, it gets so iguanas are, what do they call them, cold-blooded animals.
	They take the temperature of the surroundings.
	And if it gets below, I think it's like 47, 48 degrees, that's when they sort of start losing consciousness.
	They literally start falling out of trees, losing their grip.
	They don't die.
	When it warms back up, they regain consciousness unless they get run over by a car.
	But I'm waiting to experience that one day myself.
	What did hyphen put here?
	Hold on one second.
	Hyphen has his own.
	We don't look at competitors' thermometers.
	I can tell you what's wrong with your thermometer.
	You can't leave it in the grill because it'll melt.
	Get your hyphen, get your thermometer out of here.
	All right, people.
	What do we start with?
	Let's start with something that's going to get me into trouble because when the topic of Israel comes up, no matter what I say, someone is going to accuse me of something, being a Mossad agent, being a Jew.
	They're going to accuse me of being loyal to a country that I would not move to or live in.
	They're going to accuse me of being a self-hating Jew, depending on which side is coming at me from this.
	The news of the day.
	Hold on one second.
	Hey, Viva, just recently started following you.
	Great stuff, man.
	Keep it up, says Rooster83.
	Thank you very much.
	Rooster.
	The news of the day is there was a man who has been arrested for allegedly hurling an anti-Semitic slur insult at Dave Portnoy while he was doing one of his pizza reviews in front of a restaurant.
	Depending on what you read and where you read it, you're going to get different stories.
	The not the trope, I should say, but rather the oversimplification, the internet meme, if you will, that's running around now is that the man was arrested because he hurled, said an anti-Semitic slur at Dave Portnoy.
	In reality, as is typically the case with everything, you got to go read and get the full story in order to have a full understanding.
	And you may come to the conclusion that it's unjustified, unwarranted, abusive, whatever, but at least you need to get things right.
	Mississippi, this is from what I pick.
	I picked The Guardian.
	Why did I pick The Guardian?
	Because they're a propagandist rag.
	Mississippi student arrested for yelling anti-Semitic comments at Dave Portnoy.
	I read the headline and I say it should not be illegal to yell anti-Semitic comments at people.
	It should not, I say, you're going to go harass somebody.
	You might be getting into the realm of criminal harassment, intimidation, especially if it's not someone who's a celebrity and you accost on the street.
	Saying mean, vile things to people is, on the one hand, the price you pay in a free society.
	And to the extent it's, you know, a mean comment, a nasty remark in passing versus abusive harassment, stalking, and whatever, where words can go not necessarily coupled with physical action.
	You know, you live in a world where you have to take the good with the bad.
	And if you want to criminalize people being assholes, it's only a matter of time before someone says, oh, did you question the George Floyd narrative?
	You too deserve to get sued now.
	We'll get to that as well.
	So I read the title.
	I think, oh, this is going to be one of those situations where they're going to be criminalizing some speech.
	It's going to allow some people to come to conclusions now that there's prioritizing protections over one group versus another, which is also something that actually sows division among society.
	You protect all people equally.
	Because if you protect some people more, you got your animal farm.
	All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.
	And when you have some that are more equal than others, that is exactly how you sow social divide.
	So the headline would lead you to believe it was just a comment and the man was arrested.
	University student charged with disturbing peace after yelling and throwing coins toward Barstool Sports founder.
	All right.
	Well, now we get a little bit more of the story.
	Mississippi State University student has been arrested after yelling anti-Semitic comments at Barcelona.
	Say it again.
	Something tells me the throwing of the coins might have been the determinant element and not necessarily him saying, well, watch the video.
	I think he said, F the Jews.
	Oh, yeah, terrible.
	Idiot.
	Thank you for your exposing yourself.
	Go on with your day.
	And we all now know who to avoid.
	You start arresting people for, if that were the extent of the statement.
	The arrest of the 20-year-old Patrick McClintock, a mechanical engineering student at MSU, I think he was a mechanical engineering student, came after Starkville police were made aware of a video circulating online that depicted an individual yelling an anti-Semitic statement and throwing coins towards another person outside a local business, the police statement said.
	According to a video of the incident, which has gone viral on social media, Portnoy could be seen recording a segment of one of his one-bite pizza review outside Boardtown Pizza and Pints last Friday.
	A few moments later, we don't need to read this.
	I'll show you the video.
	Following the incident, Starkville police issued a statement saying, every person has the right to feel safe and respected in our community.
	Offensive words alone are protected.
	But when the behavior disrupts public events or risks violence, the Starkville Police Department will step in to maintain public safety.
	Police issued a warrant over the weekend charged with disturbing the peace.
	And by the way, this is exactly the distinction that Trump was trying to draw with burning the flag.
	Yes, you should have the constitutional right to burn the flag.
	I'm always on the fence about that.
	And I appreciate when there are veterans who say they fought and died for the freedom of citizens to show their protest by burning the flag.
	I don't know how much more of an argument you can have, you know, in as much as you find it detestable and loathsome to support that freedom of expression.
	And when Trump comes out and says we're going to criminalize burning the flag, and everyone's like, oh, my goodness, she's violating freedom of expression.
	It's like, no, when it's done in a manner to incite, to provoke, or when it violates local ordinances on public burning.
	Yeah, that's fine, but then it's not the burning of the flag per se.
	It's the other intrinsic acts and the context of starting a fire in a park is illegal.
	Well, it doesn't matter if you're starting with a flag for the purposes of expression or because you want to do a barbecue over lunch.
	It's illegal.
	Same day, Portnow released a video came out in an interview with CBS after the incident.
	Portnow said there has been a definitive shift towards anti-Semitism.
	Speaking to CBS host Tony Duckil, Portnow said, for me, being a Jewish person, like, you got to step up.
	You're kind of someone people look up to in the Jewish community.
	You have to be like, all right, this is normal ha-ha with it, guys.
	This is normal ha-ha with the guys.
	People are coming up with real hate early in the year.
	All right.
	Let's close this.
	Let's bring up the video and then you can see.
	And then we can steel man both sides.
	Whether or not this was disturbing the peace, whether or not he rolled the coins, whether or not he.
	Here's that.
	Where is it?
	Hold up one second.
	Oh, apparently this is the video.
	Right here.
	This is a video.
	Oh, my gosh.
	That feels very loud.
	So you hear, I'm going to lower the volume just a little bit.
	You hear, F the Jews, and then what is clearly coins.
	All right, now, shall we steel man both sides of this?
	Uh, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I'm, I, I. I'm going to see what the chat's going to.
	Had it been limited to the guy walking by and saying F the Jews to Portnoy while he's doing his video, would an arrest have been warranted?
	There, I think it's going to be much more gray, in my humble opinion.
	The second you start throwing things, it's no longer the speech per se.
	It's the act of speech and throwing things.
	In fact, it could be no speech and throwing things.
	When they chuck gravel at Justin Trudeau, no longer a question of speech.
	That's a question of actus of a crime.
	So throwing the things is where it ends, in my humble view.
	Some people are going to say, oh, he just rolled them on the ground.
	And, you know, it wasn't an act of potential assault or whatever or disturbing the peace.
	He just, he, after just, he threw the coins on the ground as a gesture.
	All right.
	If, first of all, none of us can see that from the video.
	So the second there's a prima fasci indication of throwing something at a group of people, because it wasn't at Portnoy.
	There were other people there.
	You've thrown something.
	That's a problem.
	That's illegal.
	Above and beyond the words.
	If he rolled it on the ground just as a gesture, you know, the mocking here, pick up some coins.
	Like, like it's the oldest trope in the book.
	You grow up.
	It's like, it's so funny, eh?
	As if the stereotype is that the Jewish community are stingy or good with money.
	The stereotype that Jews are stingy, and you grow up with this joke, and it's so freaking hilarious.
	It's like all the other ones.
	Like, here's a quarter on the ground.
	The old, the old stupid joke, which makes no sense, is, you know, why are Jews so good at football?
	They're always trying.
	Oh, no, what was it?
	It was why did Moses spend 40 years in the desert?
	Someone dropped a quarter.
	That's the joke.
	That one actually is a little bit more visually funny than the football.
	Why do Jews make such good football players?
	Because they're always trying to get the quarterback.
	The premise of the joke doesn't make sense.
	The Jews are stingy joking when you're a kid.
	Here's a dollar.
	Viva.
	They didn't come a viva then.
	It's funny, haha.
	It gets real old and there's nothing original about it.
	So if his argument is, well, I just threw the coins on the ground as that gesture.
	That'll be his defense, maybe to like a more serious crime.
	But it's quite clear that that exceeded mere words.
	And the irony about all of this, and it's where people do not have consistent reasoning.
	Some people are going to say, well, he didn't throw the coins in a way that could hurt anybody.
	And so therefore, it's expression.
	Don't be so sensitive.
	If it were anybody else, they wouldn't have been arrested.
	Bullshit.
	Bullshit.
	The Christmas, the subway guy, the subway sandwich guy who threw the sandwich at a cop.
	Well, some people say, oh, that's much different.
	He threw it at a cop.
	Okay, so you can't throw things at cops, but you can throw things at citizens.
	Bull crap.
	Well, if the rationale is, he threw it in a way that couldn't possibly have hurt Dave Portnoy, so it can't be a crime.
	Well, nobody gets hurt with a sandwich.
	And when this guy threw the sandwich at the, I believe it was an ICE officer, the right was like, lock him up and punish him.
	The MoFo got away with it, by the way.
	He got acquitted based on pure jury nullification.
	This video, let's make sure it's not going to blow everybody's ears out.
	Sandwich threw a sandwich at a cop.
	Can't hurt him.
	I mean, you don't know what's in the sandwich.
	You know what's in the coins.
	There's an asymmetrical reasoning by many on the internet that, oh, when this guy threw the sandwich at the cop, it was clearly an act of assault.
	Whether or not it was felony versus misdemeanor.
	It was clearly illegal.
	You don't throw things at people.
	You can't throw things at people.
	That's no longer speech.
	Get in their face and say, F you, ICE officer, you're a PIG, whatever the hell else.
	Those are words.
	The second you throw something, it's assault.
	It's a crime.
	Disturbing the peace.
	I'm going to turn the volume off.
	And by the way, we're watching this.
	The SOB got acquitted.
	So he got arrested, and everyone's cheering on.
	You can't do this.
	You can't throw things at people.
	You can't splash a cup of water in somebody's face, even if it's room temperature.
	It won't hurt them.
	It's just you can't throw things at people, period.
	Let me just bring this up actually because I can't get over the fact that the flicking guy was acquitted by a DC jury.
	No Shiat Sherlock.
	Yeah, we're not playing the whole thing.
	Jury acquits DC sandwich guy charged with chucking a sub at a federal.
	How do we feel about that?
	Well, it was just a sandwich.
	It couldn't have hurt anybody.
	Freedom of speech.
	Bullshit.
	Nobody's going to say that.
	The double standard is actually not that there's extra protection when it's done to a Jewish guy.
	The double standard is it should be tolerated somehow, throwing things at a Jewish.
	Well, it couldn't hurt anybody.
	It was just a gesture, just rolling coins on the ground.
	Bull crap.
	It was just a gesture throwing a foot-long, fluffy, delicious bread at a cop.
	I'm joking, I don't like subway sandwiches.
	Sean Dunn faced a single misdemeanor after a federal grand jury refused to indict him.
	Sorry, Sean Dunn faced a single misdemeanor after federal grand jurors refused to indict him on the felony charge sought by prosecutors.
	Jurors showed no appetite for the Justice Department's case against sandwich guy, the DC resident who chucked a subway sandwich at the chest of a federal officer, finding him not guilty Thursday after several hours of delay.
	How do you find him not guilty?
	Thank you.
	I know the law.
	F it.
	The jury, which feasted on sandwiches for lunch Tuesday, Thursday, according to a person familiar with the jury lunches, this is a real article, deliberated the charges for several hours before delivering the verdict.
	The resident, Sean Dunn, a former Justice Department paralegal, faced a single misdemeanor count after a federal grand jury rejected more serious charges over the encounter, which took place at the Nile, whatever.
	Border Patrol officer Greg Larmore received two gag gifts related to the incident.
	A plush sandwich featuring a raccoon.
	No, featuring a raccoon, featuring a cartoon of Dunn throwing the sandwich and fell in.
	Okay.
	Larmore had testified that the sandwich exploded all over his chest and claimed he could smell mustard and onions.
	The onions is where I would lose it.
	I hate onions.
	A photo showed that the sandwich was still in its wrapper on the ground after it hit Larmore in the bulletproof test.
	Images of Dunn became a symbol of resistance.
	Look at this.
	With murals popping up, depicting a man throwing a sandwich.
	He's just throwing something.
	He can't hurt anybody.
	I guess.
	Sean Dunn told MBC News it was heartening to get so much support from his fellow Washingtonians, but that he's not comfortable with the hero narrative.
	Ask if he thought residents who lack full representation in Congress were registering their dissent to the federal takeover of the city in the finding.
	He said, perhaps.
	Grand jurors in Washington rejected several cases against defendants that were brought by the U.S. Attorney's Office, which under the Trump administration has been run by two Trump loyalists, Ed Martin.
	As always, we accept the jury's verdict.
	That is the system within which we function.
	However, law enforcement should never be subject to assault, no matter how minor.
	Even children know when they're angry, they're not allowed to throw objects at another, Piero said in a written statement.
	You believe that?
	It's just pure jury nullification because they wanted to.
	And in this case, it sounds like, based on what we know, pure tolerance, just because some people want to pretend that shouting something while throwing something is pure speech.
	And we don't know where the pennies fell.
	We don't know yet.
	But you know that something was shouted, something was thrown, how far it went, the manner in which if his defense is, I only rolled them on the ground and nobody could have gotten hurt.
	He'll raise that defense.
	Not to prove his innocence, but prima fasci, there's enough to say that man, what he did in conjunction with what he said, exceeded speech limits and the legal limits of conduct that should be tolerated in a free and democratic society.
	So that's the Dave Portnoy story.
	Roosting, when are you going to interview Gad Sad and help see why Barnes suggested he is less a honey badger and more a honey bitch?
	His cancel anti-Israel speech stance, Ryle Barnes, who sees free speech for all.
	Owen Schroyer also got a lot of criticism for questioning other stances of Israel.
	Owens only asked questions.
	Please comment.
	Well, Gad Sad has an open invitation to come on whenever he wants.
	We're friends.
	I hope we're still friends.
	And I would love to have him on because I would have some disagreements as well.
	I do think there's a reflexive, there's a reflexive tendency to write any criticism of Israel off as anti-Semitism.
	And the word has been abused so much right now that even in cases where it's wholly warranted and objective, people begin to question whether or not it's being properly used.
	The idea that you can't criticize Israel or that any criticism of Israel is inherently anti-Semitic.
	I said it before, it's stupid because if I criticize China and, you know, everybody, oh, criticize communist China, the Chinese communist government, nobody calls you anti-Chinese.
	Nobody calls you chinaphobic, depending on how you do it.
	So the government is to be distinguished from the people.
	It's to be distinguished from the religion.
	And there is no government on earth that should be immune from criticism, period.
	And some governments are worse than others.
	And there's no reason to believe that the government of Israel is somehow less corrupt, more righteous, more trustworthy than any government out there.
	To say that would be anti-Canadian.
	Are you suggesting that Mark J. Carney is less trustworthy than Benjamin Netanyahu?
	No, but Netanyahu's an ally.
	Well, Canada's supposed to be an ally.
	So now we can't criticize any allies.
	And if you do, you're going to go find some inherently evil, discriminatory reason to promote forbidding such criticism.
	No.
	That being said, when you understand where someone comes from and where Gad Sat has come from, where he's gone to, and what he's seen happen now in Canada, you can understand certain reflexes.
	But life trauma doesn't justify every foible in one's reasoning.
	And there is a discussion to be had there.
	But Gad's got an open invitation.
	And I think we're still friends.
	F. Chaton says, not that it changes anything, but this likely tangent to Dave go off a bit deep.
	Hold on.
	Not that it changes anything, but this is likely tangent to Dave going off a bit, going off a bit deep on a few.
	Yeah, he went, look, he goes on.
	First, I never even knew Michael Rappaport was Jewish until, say, relatively recently.
	But post-October 7, you know, things have become tribalist would be the understatement of the century.
	And then some people are going to say, how can it not be tribalist?
	You have a terrorist organization that slaughtered over 1,200 innocent people.
	Then you get the other people coming and say, no, no, it wasn't 1,200 law.
	We're caught in the crossfire, IDF, whatever.
	Bottom line is it's tough not to be tribalist when the discussion is between what is an imperfect Democrat state of Israel versus a terrorist government of Hamas.
	That being said, an imperfect government of Israel is not innocent of the same type of misconduct that every government on earth throughout history has and will continue to be guilty of because no government is perfect and all government gets corrupt at some point.
	Old man Toby says, why didn't Portnoy just handle it himself?
	Self-defense, right?
	It's a culture thing with Jewish people.
	My upbringing would have been to throw hands.
	Well, I mean, that's great.
	So both of them will end up in jail.
	And depending on the preferences, one person will get different treatment or worse.
	That's stupid.
	You're going to fight over words?
	I mean, who's the bigger baby at that point?
	Oh, you should, he should fuck the Jews.
	So I'm going to go beat him up now because that's going to show what a man I am.
	Well, that's childish.
	I mean, it's childish and also stupid.
	So great.
	He said, fuck the Jews.
	You overreacted.
	You got to a fight.
	You knock them out.
	You go to jail.
	Your life is ruined.
	What did it get you?
	Oh, hold on one second here.
	Someone said, no, hold on one second.
	Found the video link showing the situation.
	I can't even see the coin throw in the video, just a gesture.
	Well, we don't care what you can see in the video.
	You hear the coins.
	So it obviously happened.
	Can't see it.
	It happened.
	I mean, I'd love to see it.
	Hold on here.
	Video link.
	Thank you.
	Let me see if we can get this up here.
	Hold on one second.
	I can't get these comments to.
	Can I copy it from here?
	No, I can't copy it from there.
	Give me one second.
	Let's do this.
	It's like, we're not, we're not.
	Oh, this?
	Okay, I got it.
	Good.
	Let me see if I can bring this up here now.
	I can't get it.
	Hold up.
	Hold up.
	Wait a minute.
	YouTube here.
	Ah, the link doesn't.
	Let me see if I can't find the link in our, in our, in the chat and then bring it up.
	Um, sorry, guys, hold on one second, refresh.
	I want to see this.
	Let's see if we can do this in real time.
	I'm going to scroll up and see where the link was.
	Okay, here we go.
	No, because you put the words in it.
	Okay, fine.
	Whatever.
	If we find it, we'll find it.
	NeuroDivergent, who's in the crowd, see if we can get the link.
	Okay, it doesn't matter.
	Let's move on, shall we?
	Unless I want to actually see what's going on in the chat.
	See if people think I'm let's see what people are using to discredit me that are ideologically based.
	I already did.
	He didn't even look at himself.
	No close movement.
	Okay, this isn't it.
	There is no proof of intent of assault with someone throwing coins and saying a slur.
	It was an insult, not assault.
	There's no proof of intent to assault when someone throws something.
	Apply that rationale to the sandwich guy.
	He couldn't have hurt the guy.
	He just threw it in his general direction.
	It hit him in the chest.
	Throwing something at someone, gravel, coins, sandwiches, is itself, I don't know if it's assault, because they went with disturbing the peace.
	You throw something, it's not words anymore, period.
	M. Sidloy says, on this Remembrance Day, Veterans Day in the U.S., let us not forget that our freedom isn't free.
	Let us remember those who paid for our freedom.
	Well, you know what?
	I'm going to do something.
	It's Veterans Day in America, Remembrance Day in Canada, and it makes me sick and irritated to see the RCMP virtue signaling their way, attempting to virtue signal their way out of the atrocity that they just performed at that ostrich farm.
	And it's so irritating because what they do after having slaughtered these animals, they come out with post after post about Remembrance Day as if as if they are on the side of freedom and what our forefathers fought and died for.
	And they're not.
	And there's only so many times you can reply to one of their posts before you start looking like the lunatic.
	And I appreciate that I might be looking like the lunatic at this point in time because I'm livid with the RCMP.
	And we're never going to forget this.
	Never forgive, never forget when it comes to what they did.
	This was sent to me by Bill Brown, a veteran and a member of our locals community.
	I'm not going to play the whole song.
	I'll give everybody the link so that you can go and give it the full view that it deserves.
	But there's lyrics in here that are particularly poignant.
	And this is to remember those who fought and died so that we could have freedom and a better life.
	And how many of us today, you know, rice patty to rice patty in three generations, take our freedom for granted to the point where we sacrifice it, give it up willingly for a mere taste of what we think is security being granted, gifted to us by a corrupt piece of shit government that will always be corrupt and that deserves to have the least amount of power necessary to maintain the fabric of society.
	I wouldn't hurt nothing at all.
	But here we are, our leaders have a plan.
	I'd only kill if it's for them.
	Here we are I drove in a car To come kick your door Now let's tell to this.
	It's just you and me.
	I'll blow your fucking head off for my country.
	We'll pause it there.
	I mean, if that doesn't touch you, then you have to check your soul.
	That that it's the type of thing that uh, only I, someone who's experienced, would have those thoughts to put into words.
	And i'm listening to him like this is, I wouldn't hurt a thing, but my government's got a plan for me.
	But the the, the absurdity of war, in a sense and, and obviously that song is by men who served um and um I forgot what I was gonna say, who had these observations, and I was listening to the words.
	Like the absurdity of the war.
	The song is a fundamentally anti-war song.
	I drove in a car, flew in a plane to kick down your door.
	What was it for for?
	For my country was to kick to, to kick you, to kick your front door, like the idea you've traversed continents to go to a door, kick it down.
	And now it's just you and me.
	I'll put an effing, i'll blow your effing head off for my country, and that's it.
	I mean that's the absurdity of of war.
	It's the absurdity of violence sent out by old, rich men who send young men to die and women so they can get richer.
	And the absurdity of flying halfway across the world so you're busting down a door in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and at that point in time, it's just two people, two specs on this earth and they're going to do what they need to do to survive.
	So did I share the link.
	It's, it's an amazing song.
	Uh, I say it's a song, it's amazing, it's a work of art, it's, it's poetry.
	Um, poetry that was, you know uh, written with the blood of men, through the trauma of men.
	So to the veterans watching, thank you for everything and especially, you know the the the, not the sympathy, but appreciation for the sacrifice which many come back from war, from what i'm told, saying, if I, if I knew now, if I knew then what I knew now, I wouldn't have done it.
	And if everybody had that mentality, we might have far less war than sending young men into trenches in World War One and millions to the slaughter.
	For what?
	Okay, speaking of popular topics that are always having an Israeli undertone, has everybody heard the news of the day you have to have, because I I put the vlog out on Commie TUBE before going live, because the audience is now overlap somewhat, but not entirely.
	Alexis Wilkins many people believe in a proxy lawsuit has now sued a third person, and we know this man.
	Some of you may love him because he's very critical of Israel.
	Some of you, some of you, may hate him because you think he's an Anti-semite.
	I happen to know Elijah Elijah Schaefer personally.
	I do, I've said, I say these things to him publicly, personally, privately, whatever.
	I think the reflex, you have, when you go through litigation, you get what I call litigation trauma.
	You think everybody's trying to get you.
	You don't trust anybody.
	You don't trust your lawyer.
	You don't trust the judges.
	And it's understandable because by and large, everyone is out to screw you.
	It's only a matter of time before you question the most, you know, the people who you think ought to be the most loyal to you.
	In conspiracy theories, you end up coming to a point where you've seen so many conspiracy theories come true.
	You start to see them everywhere, even in places where they don't exist.
	And this is what happened to Alex Jones temporarily in the context of Sandy Hook.
	And in as much as what I think, you know, in as much as what he said, I think was factually incorrect and offensive and hurtful, the idea that it gave rise to the lawsuits is obscene and absurd.
	And I think Alex Jones is a good man, a smart man, and I think he's a righteous man who's made some mistakes and who is traumatized by his own life experience.
	With Elijah, there's a little bit of race obsession.
	There's a little bit of Israel obsession.
	And it's understandable in certain people's mind where there seems to be some political statistical overrepresentation of subject matter, political interest, financial interest, economic interest, and political attention that pisses people off.
	And they then focus on it.
	I might say a little bit too much, and they might see things where they don't exist.
	When the Sam Parkers of the world are accusing me of being an Israeli influence operation, I mean, you're seeing things that are not there.
	And then the only question is, why are you seeing them that they're not there?
	And what else of your other judgment is also not there when we're listening to you?
	Elijah Schaefer is getting sued for $5 million by Alexis Wilkins.
	Let me just pull up an article because we'll get into the lawsuit.
	I just want to read the summary because I want to see how Alexis Wilkins sues Elijah.
	I thought I had an article up here.
	Who do we take?
	Do we take Newsweek?
	We're not taking the Times of India.
	We'll go with Newsweek.
	Let's go with this one here.
	Plus, I don't think I've read this article yet.
	It's a full list of people being sued by Kash Patel's girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins.
	Can you imagine?
	Like, you live your life, you try to succeed, you try to define your place on this earth, and you are known as Kash Patel's, you're known as someone else's entity.
	Like when I was in the practice of law, I was always, oh, Mortimer's son.
	I was like, dude, I'm also my own lawyer, but it's tough to get out of the shadow of your father when your father has as massive a professional shadow as my father does, in a good sense.
	It was great.
	Alexis Wilkins, the girlfriend's FBI director, Kash Patel, has filed multiple lawsuits over what she says are damaging and false claims.
	She's an agent of Israeli intelligence, working as a honeypot to compromise Patel.
	I think there's three.
	There's Kyle Serafin, there's Sam Parker, and now there's Elijah Schaefer.
	Newsweek has previously contacted me again.
	Wilkins26 is a country music singer, podcast host, writer, and conservative political commentator.
	She has over 90,000 followers on Instagram, where she regularly shares political content and videos of her performing at conservative events, including ones organized by Turning Point USA.
	She kind of looks like, Maria, has anybody ever seen Harold and Kumar go to White Castle or Harold and Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay?
	Two of the funniest movies ever made, in my humble view.
	She looks like Maria from the movie.
	All right, so let's go here.
	She and Patel reportedly started dating in 2023.
	Another reason why the idea that she's an Israeli honeypot sought to infiltrate the FBI, they started dating before Patel was in the FBI, but I appreciate the stomach, the straw, what's the word I'm looking for?
	Steelman retorts to that.
	Patel has always been an integral part of the Trump campaign, Trump movement, MAGA movement, deep state fighting movement.
	So if anyone wanted to get, you know, not privileged access, look, he's still a legitimate political target for that type of infiltration, because even if he wasn't the FBI director in 2023, he was a prominent figure in the MAGA Trump movement.
	Wilkins' name, though, has been pushed into the public consciousness following conspiracy theories circulating online about her, as well as by Patel having issued a statement where he slammed baseless attacks against her.
	Baseless rumor has circulated online.
	And they say baseless.
	I can tell you the basis.
	I think it's a stupid basis, but they have a basis.
	That Wilkins is a spy working for Mossad, Israel's national intelligence agency, and that her relationship with Patel is a honeypot operation.
	Wilkins has so far launched three defamation suits in connection with the conspiracy.
	She has addressed herself.
	Okay, she says she's shocked.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	I was being accused of manipulating the person that I'm in love with.
	You know, that's a horrible accusation.
	Yeah, that's part of being in the public light.
	People are going to make horrible accusations of you.
	When pressed by Kelly, this is Megan Kelly, on whether she's an operative, she said definitely not, adding, that's not a firm note.
	That is a firm no on that front.
	Kyle Serafin.
	Let me take this out.
	And people are going to say Viva's only saying this because she's scared of getting sued.
	I'm not scared of getting sued.
	I'm scared of saying something stupid.
	I'm scared of saying something dumb that discredits my, you know, the way people perceive my critical assessments.
	So yeah, it's called credibility and it's also called not wanting to wrong people wrongly.
	You can wrong people for good reasons.
	It's not really wrong at that point.
	It's sort of like justice.
	I don't think she's a honeypot asset trying to infiltrate the FBI or the Trump administration via Kash Patel.
	The rationale to it is that she created content for Prager U. Prager U.
	I don't know if it's run by Marissa Streit.
	Marissa Streit is a central executive principal at Prager U. Apparently she served in the IDF.
	And so now Prager U, which is also overtly pro-Israel, overtly supportive of Israel, it's hard to call them an agent an asset when they're publicly stating their mission, which Marissa Streit does.
	If anybody wants to call Marissa Streit an agent of Israel, I mean, I'll understand the argument.
	I wouldn't call it stupid, but she's a public, self-avowed supporter of Israel.
	That's hardly an agent in the sense of agency.
	That's more like a supporter, which she is and proud of it.
	She is.
	The argument is that because Alexis Wilkins had some content creating relationship with Prager U, on the one hand, some people thought she was Marissa Streit.
	And at one point, I think AI was giving wrong information on her.
	That's the argument.
	It's a stupid argument.
	Is the janitor at Prager U, because he's working for a company whose principal worked in the IDF, is he an agent of Israel?
	If he is, okay.
	I mean, so people are going to think you're stupid for saying it.
	Is it defamatory?
	I don't think so because I think it's quite clearly your opinion, a stupid, baseless opinion predicated on a wrongful interpretation of the facts.
	Set that aside.
	Kyle Seraphin, former FBI, I just had him on yesterday, 230,000 followers.
	He's being sued.
	Filed a defamation case against Seraphin.
	I said this in the hierarchy of the quality of the cases.
	Kyle Serafin's, even though I still don't think it's justified, certainly has the strongest allegations.
	Unfortunately for Kyle.
	Those courts' files, they read Seraphin has maliciously lied about Alexis Wilkins, falsely asserting that she's an American-born country singer as an agent of foreign government assigned to manipulate compromise FBI director Kash Patel.
	The filing states Seraphin is using fabricated story as self-enriching clickbait.
	Wilkins seeks to hold defendant Seraphin accountable.
	Seraphin has continued to post about Patel and Wilkins.
	I'll take how to catch a lawsuit from the FBI's director's girlfriend for 500, Alex.
	Okay.
	Sam Parker.
	Sam Parker, he ran for Senate or something.
	I'll show you what he said about me.
	It's hilarious.
	Wilkins has also filed a defamation lawsuit against Sam Parker, former U.S. Senate candidate in Utah.
	Parker has two social media accounts, one based Sam Parker, 99,000 followers.
	The other, Sam Parker for Senate, $170,000.
	Yeah, his lawsuit was even a little bit weaker as far as I'm concerned, but he's repeatedly lied about Wilkins, falsely asserting that she is an American-born country singer, foreign accent.
	Yeah.
	As with the suit filed against Seraphin, the lawsuit states Parker is using this fabricated story as a fundraising clickbait.
	Well, certainly, even when Sam Parker accused me of being an Israeli spy Jew, he then tried to sell his book in the next link.
	how to identify, I don't know, the international Jews, I think they called it.
	It's quite hilarious.
	I don't care.
	And it's like, it's a stupid statement that anyone in the public eye knows they're going to have to deal with.
	I said it jokingly before I ever got accused of being a Mossad agent.
	I was like, well, you know, you've gotten sufficiently, I say popular, but at least you're sufficiently well known to the general public that you get accused of being both, by the way, incidentally, a Mossad agent and a self-hating anti-Semitic Jew is what I also get, which is the ultimate irony.
	But that's exactly what the Israeli Mossad Jew plan is, right?
	Sam Parker?
	All right, whatever.
	So he got sued too.
	And Elijah Schaefer.
	Let's bring this out now.
	The lawsuit against Elijah Schaefer, in my humble view, is so patently absurd.
	And look, people, I'm familiar with defamation by implication.
	And someone gave a reasonable analogy that, you know, if you drop someone's photograph in a thread discussion about sexual predators, there's a potential defamation through implication that you're implying, suggesting that the person who you've featured a photograph of is a predator because you put it in the replies.
	You're not saying anything.
	You're just showing a picture.
	All right.
	Sexual.
	First of all, you know, sexual predator, the allegation would only stick if there had already been discussion around whether or not the individual is a sexual predator.
	Otherwise, people are like, what the hell are you dropping a picture of like big bird, drop a picture of big bird in a discussion about sexual predators?
	People are like, what the hell are you doing, dude?
	I pulled out the highlights from the lawsuit.
	This is my tweet.
	Alexa Wilkins' lawsuit against Elijah is so bad it defies word, defies words.
	In fact, it defies words specifically words because according to the allegations of the lawsuit itself, no defamatory words were spoken or written.
	While defendant may not have included any caption to spell out the meaning of his post, he didn't have to.
	I appreciate the concept of defamation through implication, but I do not think this comes close to that exceptional form of defamation.
	I also think that if he called Alexa, Alexa, Alexis, a honeypot or mossad agent, false as that may be, it is still obviously a statement of opinion.
	The lawsuit looks ridiculous.
	It looks desperate.
	It reflects poorly on an administration that prides itself on free speech.
	Let me just bring this up here.
	Was it paragraph 11?
	No, let's go back to this one.
	Paragraph 12, in a responsive comment, a quote post.
	So this person on the bottom, I don't know who Hen Matsik is.
	Do I want to see if they follow me?
	Says, you know, writes a whole article about honeypot female operations operatives that, you know, they've done it in Iran.
	They've done it elsewhere.
	In a responsive comment, a quote post published that same day, September 14th, defendant posted without caption a photograph of Ms. Wilkins arm in arm With Kash Patel, which she originally shared on her Instagram account on January 24, whatever, January 2024.
	In the photo, Ms. Wilkins and Patel, I love it here.
	It says, Ms. Wilkins and Patel, which kind of implies that it's Ms. Patel, I would have said Mr. Patel, are dressed up for a formal event, and Ms. Wilkins is wearing a fitted red halter neck cocktail dress.
	Oh, that's the definition.
	Hold on, why did I put that in different order?
	This is where it is.
	Defendants posted the photo receiving massive engagement.
	While the defendant may not have included any caption to spell out the meaning of his post, he didn't have to.
	Listen to what they impute into that post.
	Ever since Kash Patel was appointed as director of the FBI, February 2025, the conspiratorial corners of the internet and social media have been spreading a false narrative that Ms. Wilkins is a Zenrai Mossad agent, Honeypot, who was only in a relationship with Kash Patel to spy on and manipulate the United States government defendant's wordless reply to a Mazig's lengthy description of female Mossad agents seducing high-ranking enemy officials, juxtaposing a carefully chosen photograph of Ms. Wilkins in a sleeveless red dress, embracing the director of the FBI, unmistakably accuses.
	Listen to this, Ms. Wilkins of being a Mossad agent for Israel who has, quote, seduced director Patel to compromise him a honeypot.
	The insidious insinuation, understood by an ordinary viewer as evidenced below, is that Ms. Wilkins is a spy for a foreign government, conducting espionage to undermine our national security and to manipulate federal law enforcement at the highest level and even committing treason.
	They read all of that into that post, which, for all anybody knows, I mean, we know what Elijah thinks, but might have been just a good jab, a trope, a joke.
	These accusations are categorically false and the defendant knows it.
	Well, there's two things to that.
	Let me bring it down here.
	The post reasonly applies herself as a Mossad agent manipulating director of the FBI.
	Let me give you all this.
	You can do with it what you want.
	This is a question that I've had with a number of people.
	If somebody says they're a Mossad agent or they're a spy or they have interests or allegiances to a foreign, if someone just says that you're a Mossad agent or a Russian asset, I mean, on the one hand, Rachel Maddow got away with it because the judge, I say rightly concluded.
	The only thing I disagreed with were the politics, but then, you know, Tucker Carlson got away with it too.
	When someone says there, Rachel Maddow was different.
	She said he's literally a Russian asset, literally.
	And it was in respect of a journalist who had worked with Sputnik, I think.
	I forget who it was exactly.
	When someone says you're a Mossad agent, on the one hand, generally I think they're stupid.
	I don't know that anybody takes that as a statement of fact as opposed to a statement of opinion.
	You can never disprove it.
	And you can never really prove it setting aside having a contract between the individual and the Mossad government or the Mossad and Israeli government.
	I think everybody takes that as a statement of opinion, an assessment, their personal assessment.
	But maybe I'm just too jaded and too tolerant of words.
	The thought of suing Sam Parker, I got to show you what he said about me because it's flipping hilarious.
	Sam Parker, J-H-O-Viva.
	It's so flipping batshit insane.
	I almost feel bad.
	And then, you know, then people are out there.
	Well, if he doesn't sue, if he doesn't sue, then that must mean he knows it's true.
	Because truth is the ultimate defense to deafen.
	Or, like I say in my vlog, like Winston Churchill said, you're never going to get to where you're going if you stop to throw stones at every barking dog.
	This is what Sam Parker said about me.
	How to spot an Israeli influence operation.
	Viva Frey, David Freyd, who is a Jew from Canada, living in the U.S., LARPing as an American patriot, misdirecting attention to China.
	So now, which really confused me.
	Now, if you criticize China for being the communist regime that it is and trying to kill Americans with fentanyl and infiltrate the West via Canada, buy up assets, buy up mine.
	If I criticize China, that's to the benefit of Israel.
	So now we can't criticize China.
	I think that makes Sam Parker a Chinese asset.
	Bada bing, bada boom, my opinion.
	I'm joking, even I don't even think he is, but that would be the logical conclusion using the same rationale.
	If you're directing attention away from what we perceive to be the animal, you're an asset of that nation.
	Anybody directing attention away from China must be an asset of China.
	All right, whatever.
	Shilling for an Israeli spy apparition.
	What the fuck are you talking about?
	This is the international Jew, my friends.
	First of all, I'm only international because I come from Canada and live in the States right now.
	I don't plan on living in Israel.
	I would not live in Israel or any country where they would impose vax mandates, make you take six freaking shots, have a green passport, and not let you travel if you didn't get the job.
	And for God's sake, that's exactly why I left Canada in the first place.
	Set that aside.
	They literally clothe themselves in our garb and use faux patriotism all to win our affection.
	I can say one thing.
	I'm glad I won your affection, Sam.
	And to disguise their true identity and loyalty.
	Watch this short clip all the way through.
	So the rationale for Alexis being an agent is the exact one this nutbag is using on me.
	And like I say, you get conspiracy crazy.
	You see it everywhere, even when it doesn't exist.
	I'm wearing one of my favorite pairs of socks today.
	It's George.
	My goodness, that's loud.
	Sorry about that.
	Washington, but I've got a bunch of Prague socks that I got the last time I was here with Mercy's Strike.
	I was there with Mercy Streit.
	Oh, Mercy Streit, CEO Prague, who was born in Los Angeles and moved to Israel at a young age where she completed her primary education and served military unit in the IDF force.
	Oh my goodness.
	Oh, I hung out with someone who was in the IDF.
	Holy crap.
	I hung out with people who are in the American military as well.
	Am I an U.S. asset as well?
	Let's get back to the socks.
	And they're amazing.
	Apparently, they're giving them away now.
	Any donation to PragerU, you get the American flag socks made in America, not made in China, which is a number one thing for me.
	That's totally something a Jew would say.
	Only buy Made in America, people.
	All right.
	So would I sue him?
	Hells to the bells.
	No.
	And my response was, are you fucking retarded?
	Are you just insane?
	And the thing is, this, it's an insanity.
	It's an insanity that results from obsessive, irrational trauma.
	Or I should say, from obsessive thought process based on the trauma of, yeah, I've seen them here and there and there.
	Now I'm going to see them everywhere.
	Hold on, let me just let me finish the end because Justin Trudeau was there.
	Justin Trudeau coming out of Canada.
	He's ruined the cute socks.
	And we're going to take back cute socks and make them cool again.
	That's it.
	That's it.
	Is Viva Fry promoting America, Canada, or is...
	Okay, sorry.
	So it's funny.
	I would laugh it off.
	They're suing Alexa, Alexis, I should say.
	And the problem is, you read through the lawsuit, and there are a lot of people who say this doesn't read like a lawsuit that was drafted by Alexis for Alexis or even by the attorneys for Alexis.
	It sounds like it's a proxy lawsuit to defend Kash Patel against these allegations.
	And even from a practical perspective, suing is the Streisand effect that you presumably, if it's fake and it's stupid, deal with it.
	It's the fucking internet.
	You're in government.
	You're the director of the FBI.
	You're dating a young attorney.
	Take it as a freaking compliment, Cash.
	Take it as a compliment that it's so people are so damn jealous that you got a girlfriend who's 19 years younger than you, smoking hot, and she's with you.
	You should take it as a compliment that people are trying to find any reason other than personality and actual love, which I have no doubt that it is because I don't believe the theory.
	But you sue you.
	One sues Kyle Serafin, former FBI whistleblower, you know, kicked out of the FBI and persona non-grata among the current FBI.
	Sam Parker, I don't know who the hell he is.
	And Elijah Schaefer.
	What do you think the public response is going to be?
	When you try to shut people up, they do not think that they were wrong.
	They, in fact, double down and are further convinced that they had been right all along.
	Oh, and by the way, apparently she's five feet tall.
	So like it's one of the few people who I'm actually taller than.
	How tall is how tall is Kash Patel?
	Hold on one second.
	How tall is Cash Pat?
	So the lawsuit is in my view.
	He's six feet tall.
	No, that's not him.
	Did I say internet can't believe Kash Patel is 5'9?
	His cute little legs.
	So they're making fun of Kash Patel, who probably is 5'9 for being that's three, that's three inches taller than me.
	So anyways, that's it.
	The lawsuit is nonsense.
	I appreciate the argument of defamation through implication.
	Generally speaking, it needs to be a little bit more objective than that.
	You know, there was a case that I looked up.
	It was a 1990s case.
	That's the quintessential precedent where it was accusing someone of fraud.
	I didn't say it, but you really implied in the context of the discussion they were guilty of fraud, which is itself defamatory per se.
	I think it's a garbage lawsuit.
	Kyle Seraphin's, you know, his statement was a little bit stupider, Kyle.
	I told you that we told publicly and then you make up for it and whatever.
	But bottom line also, someone says, I think you're an agent of Mossad.
	Defamation?
	And it's only going to serve to now allow people on the left and the right.
	That's the insidious beauty of this, the damage being done by this.
	Now people on the left are going to say, look, even the right are not also pro-free speech.
	Sure, they want, you know, they were all for pro-free speech when it came to calling Biden a Ukrainian puppet, his kid, a Ukrainian asset.
	And now they're suing each other for alleging that the girlfriend of the director of the FBI is a Mossad agent honeypot.
	Honeypot.
	So the left is going to rejoice in this division.
	The right is going to say, whoa, you guys call yourself the party of free speech.
	Nobody's going to benefit from this.
	And I don't think Alexis is going to get one red cent from any of the three in this case.
	But maybe I'm wrong.
	And then the flip side is, even if she does, and if she gets crippling judgments, like they got against Alex Jones, it's not because what I feel to be the abuse or the exploitation of the judicial system is only directed against people.
	You don't like that, you that you do like that.
	You object to it.
	You have to object to it, period.
	And that they might come across a jury that's going to be sympathetic to Alexis and the administration, maybe even for political reasons get in front of a jury.
	You're not exactly going to be want to be a judge or a jury member that says no to the girlfriend of the director of the FBI so there might be political pressure to come down with a wrongful decision here.
	I'm not going to tolerate it, Any more than you should tolerate it when it was against Alex Jones.
	And this is where we're at.
	So in the chat, I see here, it's Lawford.
	Let's see here.
	One, lawfare, two, justified.
	So put either one or lawfare, two or justified for what you think.
	And we'll see how far back I've fallen on.
	Oh, crab apples.
	Oh, am I going to be able to bring these up here?
	I am not going to be able to bring up the rants that way.
	So let me bring them up here.
	One, lawfare, two, justified.
	Let's go down from the bottom to the top up.
	Free speech for life.
	I know that I have never seen this handle before because I don't remember it.
	Kash Patel wants to know if you can please turn your computer on and send him the passcode.
	He thinks you have a hardware issue.
	Please give it.
	Okay, that's that's a mean.
	That's a mean.
	I didn't even get that joke.
	I was thinking FBI wants to infiltrate my computer.
	That, sir, is a politically incorrect joke.
	Shame on you, Mr. Free Speech for Life.
	M. Sidloy says, I'm a Massad agent.
	My job is so secret.
	I don't know what it is.
	Well, then the other argument is this.
	You don't have to be, you could be an unwitting asset.
	And that's how you're always going to get out of there.
	Well, I think she is an asset.
	She might not even know it.
	Finboy Slick says, I think Mossad would be upset with Cash for making his performance as an asset.
	The obvious sabotage of MAGA is way too obvious.
	That's what I can relate to for what people think.
	If Cash was in there, if people are going to say that Cash is a deep state operative, they've been saying it since the Epstein debacle and since the debacle with the Tyler Robinson manhunt and statements.
	People think that.
	And if people think that, they're going to look at this and say, if one wanted to sow discord among the conservative movements and sabotage the administration, this is what they would do.
	I'm not saying I believe that at all.
	You can't pretend not to understand that argument if someone were to make that argument.
	Super Buffshaft says this is going to sound bad, and I hate saying it.
	But to me, in this time in history, it's more patriotic to become a politician or get into elections than to join the military.
	Our enemies are already here.
	Certainly more effective in terms of subterfuge, not subterfuge, but infiltration.
	King of Bill Tong, Bill Tong.
	I can't bring it up.
	I'm sorry I didn't put on the capture the rants.
	Holy crap, it's already over.
	Okay.
	We also specialize in imported foods.
	Check out Bill Tong USA for a great selection of imported foods, candies, groceries, and of course, Bill Tong.
	BilltongUSA.com, code Viva for 10% off Bill Tong.
	Thank you very much.
	Everyone, check it out.
	Viva, I would debate you.
	The sandwich was tossed at the officer with intent.
	The coin target, if at anyone, would be a crime, but merely tossing the coins is not enough.
	Well, first of all, they charged him.
	So you're going to have to agree that they presumed it was sufficient for a crime.
	And what's amazing is I agree with you.
	The sandwich, debate me.
	We don't disagree.
	You're just coming to conclusions based on a lack of information, which is a problem.
	Yes, he tossed it at the officer with the intent to hit him or with the reasonable probability that it would.
	Throwing it into a crowd of cops.
	Well, I didn't mean to hit anybody, but I reasonably would have hit somebody.
	Fine.
	I don't know how those coins were tossed.
	I just know that coins were tossed.
	And so throwing objects is beyond words.
	Now, it might be that he rolled them in a way that they would have done.
	But then, you know, an old lady walking across the street trips on a coin.
	You can go there.
	You don't know how they were thrown.
	I don't know how they were thrown based on that video.
	We just know that coins were thrown.
	Therefore, speech was exceeded.
	It was act.
	Okay, then we got that.
	All right.
	Now we got to go raid.
	I'm not going to use my fat fingers and screw up again at Jeffrey Epstein's Israeli Masad connections exposed.
	Oh, what I love also people saying, no, no.
	There's so many people.
	It's so easy just to find flaws in people's reasoning on the Alexis thing.
	They say, no, no, call it saying that it's objectively defamatory.
	They should get sued.
	It's enough of this.
	You go through anyone who says that.
	Go through their timeline.
	Go search their handle and see when they've called someone an asset, a puppet.
	See when they've denied the way George Floyd died.
	And then say, all right, hey, live by the sword, die by the sword.
	You deserve to get sued for defamation.
	Oh, no, no, no, but when I said it, it was true.
	All right.
	Okay, and that with that said, everybody, before you leave, make sure that you subscribe, turn on notifications, and thumbs up.
	What do we have?
	I got, yeah, we had over, what do we have?
	We had like, do we have 10,000 people?
	We had a lot of thousands of people here.
	Hit that thumbs up button if you can.
	Let's, we're going to go raid redacted.
	They're talking about Epstein.
	And you're going to get booted out unless you opt out.
	I'm going to read some of the chat before we head over to vivabarneslaw at dotlocals.com.
	Rumble, thank you for being here.
	Stay tuned for tomorrow.
	It's going to be another beautiful big day of stuffs tomorrow.
	So meaningful Veterans Day to everybody.
	Thank you, veterans.
	And may we one day live in a world where innocent young men and women are not sent to the slaughter to make the military-industrial complex and rich politicians richer.
	Amen.
	All right.
	Hitting confirm raid.
	Go over to Redacted.
	Let them know from whence you came.
	Raid confirmed.
	And now I go Viva in the house.
	Booyah.
	All right.
	And for the next few seconds here, let's just go see.
	That's their chat.
	Let's go here.
	And all the way to the bottom.
	Redacted are tin hats.
	I don't know what that means.
	Super Bush says, take care, Viva.
	Good job, Amigo.
	Thank you.
	Let's see what we got here.
	Happy, unwilling shilling for corporate shills day.
	Redacted and Kim Iverson only care about Israel, not America.
	They are, well, care about it in what?
	In the attention sense?
	Redacted is definitely critical of Israel, not supportive.
	So I'm not sure what that means.
	To save time and money, they should settle the case by tossing a coin.
	I'm with Alexis and I am with Candace.
	I am with Alexis and I am with Candace.
	That seems like two mutually incompatible positions to take.
	Cash, the king of the I appreciate the good thing Trump, I appreciate the good thing Trump's admin has done, but since he cannot run again, I'm getting disappointed with his statements lately.
	Yeah, it's dude.
	I'm all with this.
	All right, well, forget.
	I'm not.
	There's a little bit of obsession about a certain demographic in the chat over there.
	Let's go to Rumble.
	Love Rumble.
	Let's go to Locals.
	I'm going to give everybody the link to Locals.
	Come on over and enjoy the after party.
	And if you're not coming, bye-bye.
	I'll see you tomorrow.
	Let's see how it.
	You know what's amazing, by the way, what I'm finding is on Commitube, whenever you do a video that has anything to do with if it mentions Israel or Jews, it's instantaneously, instantaneously suppressed.
	It's wild.
	But then I say that.
	And then meanwhile, Candace Owens gets millions of people watching her streams, which deal with that by and large.
	So maybe my audience actually just, the one that's left over on Commitube just actually doesn't like it, but who knows?
	All right, come on over to VivaBarnes Law.locals.com for the afterparty.
	I will see you tomorrow.
	Otherwise, and that is it.
	Peace out.

▲