Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 15, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:08:59

Ro Khanna "Epstein" Amendment! The Butler PA Scandal! Canada a National Security Threat? AND MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	But our concern is she said she had the records on her desk generally.
	And I know in our lawsuit they told us she had no records.
	So something's going something's wrong.
	Either they don't know how to deal with FOIA or basic transparency law, or they're kind of panicking and just trying to move past this by saying like silly things like, we're not going to give you any more records about this issue.
	I'm thinking that should suffice.
	It's very strange.
	But our concern is she said she had the records on her desk generally.
	And I know in our lawsuit, they told us she had no records.
	So something's going, something's wrong.
	Either they don't know how to deal with FOIA or basic transparency law, or they're kind of panicking and just trying to move past this by saying like silly things like, we're not going to give you any more records about this issue.
	That is Tom Fitton from Judicial Watch.
	For those of you who may not know who he is, he does great work specifically in respect of access to information, demands for communication of documents and receiving those documents.
	And we've actually been talking about it somewhat on the show on the Sunday nights with Viva and Barnes Law for the People that Tim Fitton, Tom Fitton, sorry, Tom Fitton has been voicing some frustration that the documents that he's getting back subsequent to FOIA's are heavily redacted or non-responsive.
	And that even as relates to FOIA requests for documentation from the Biden administration that Tom Fitton has been requesting via FOIA, they've been coming back redacted for no apparently good reason.
	Whereas the unredacted documents might be mildly compromising for the Biden administration.
	And this Epstein debacle is not letting up.
	And then some people are going to say, well, of course it's not letting up because the shills and the hacks on the internet are just doing it for clicks.
	That is the most disingenuous, insincere accusation on earth.
	Amazing thing.
	I was getting ready to respond to someone's tweet yesterday that I'm glad I reached out privately and said, how did you mean this?
	Was this sarcasm or was this really the most judgmental thing you could have paused?
	It was bad sarcasm, or at least a bad attempt at sarcasm, which translates relatively badly on the internet.
	But in going to respond to this accusation, which no one has made of me, because it's not true.
	And anybody who makes the accusation is a dirty, rotten liar.
	Oh, it's not true, period.
	I was going back on all of my covering of the Epstein situation over damn near half a decade.
	And I should say, let me rephrase this.
	Over half a decade.
	I remember where I was, kicking myself out of my own stream.
	I remember where I was when Epstein took his own life.
	And by the way, I'm not harping on the Epstein was killed conspiracy.
	I won't belabor the point.
	Even if Epstein took his own life, that's a conspiracy that needs answers for.
	That's not an answer in and of itself.
	Yep, he took his own life.
	Nothing we could do about it.
	But I was going back on some of my videos on the subject.
	And holy crab apples.
	Does anybody remember this Viva?
	I was in New Brunswick, 19, not 19, 2019.
	I had just gotten judgment in a Régie de Legement.
	Let me bring this out.
	I had just gotten judgment in a Régie de Legement, which is the administrative tribunal for rental board cases.
	I had a case that was before the Régie de L'Orgement, the rental board.
	We had, I think it was close to 20 days of hearing, 20 days of trial before the rental board tribunal, because I should weigh my words because it's still not, you know, it's all public.
	I just won't be too judgmental of the psychopath plaintiff.
	Because my client was the land owner, the property owner, and was being accused of mold infiltration, chemical sensitivities, all this stuff.
	And it was an ever-moving goalpost of complaints.
	We had experts come in.
	There was no mold.
	There was no toxic chemicals, whatever.
	It was a very beautiful, multi-level property.
	We had like, I don't know, 20 plus days of hearing.
	It spanned over a year and a half.
	And we got a judgment that was a smashing victory on all fronts.
	And I got it as I was on vacation or annual road trip.
	And I was in British Columbia, not in British Columbia, New Brunswick, beautiful province.
	And this was after days and days of Epstein.
	They're going to kill him.
	They're going to kill him.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	He killed.
	He got killed.
	I'm not playing the whole thing, but look at this.
	All right.
	You have all been asking for a vlog on Jeffrey Epstein.
	I wasn't going to do one because I didn't think I had anything insightful to add to the conversation, but something happened today, which I found to be very fateful.
	No, that's very loud.
	Okay, whatever.
	That's when I had that corny.
	I love the music, but it's not fitting anymore.
	Everything I said in that video is as true today as it was six years ago.
	And then there was periodic updates as there were breaking details.
	I don't think Trump is in the file, period.
	Whether or not someone within the administration might be tangentially related in that it's embarrassment, whatever.
	Possible.
	You know who's been oddly silent on all of this?
	Bill Clinton, Bill Gates.
	Some of the biggest players have been oddly silent at the situation as if to say, let's not jinx the non-release of the non-existent files.
	But the bottom line, trying to shame anybody into demanding answers and voicing frustration is disingenuous.
	It's almost beyond gaslighting.
	It's like it's insulting.
	Not that feelings matter, but to say to somebody, you're the problem for asking for answers for something that you've been asking for answers from for six plus years and that everyone was saying, yeah, we need answers.
	We need answers.
	We need answers.
	No more answers.
	Nothing's going to happen.
	Disingenuous.
	And it's also not the way elections are won.
	It's the way successes are washed away under the bridge.
	And so Tom Fitton voicing some frustration.
	He's a good man.
	He's Been an ally of the administration of conservatives for years.
	And so you don't get to write him off.
	The odd thing here is that, in the wake of the non-disclosure, because there's no file to disclose, it's on my desk, but we don't know what the it is.
	And we don't want to, you know, if someone misspoke, fine.
	There's no client list.
	He killed himself.
	No incriminating blackmail.
	Move on.
	We can't release the file because it contains, you know, CP, CSAM, and we don't want to re-victimize the victims, but there's no file.
	What's the other one that's going on?
	The file has been irremediably corrupted, and therefore asking for it is useless.
	These are like, this is whack-a-mole in terms of an explanation.
	There's no client list, but we can't release it because it would incriminate unindicted third parties, unindicted co-conspirators who might just be washed up by guilt through association.
	There's no client list, but we can't release it for that.
	There's no client list, but we can't release the information because it would re-victimize the victims as if what anybody's looking for in this is CP or CSAM.
	And then the latest one is the file is irremediably, irreparably corrupt, and therefore it's going to be basically useless to release it.
	Well, those are many, many ways of gaslighting everybody and causing a great many people to have questions where they might not have even had questions in the first place.
	The one that's actually amazing, I was watching Joe Nearman.
	Could have started off the show with Joe Nearman.
	Joe Nearman had a good take on this.
	He's like, you can't blame people for wanting answers.
	You can't blame people for saying, for being unsatisfied with the, there's nothing there there after years of there's something there there, never let it go, never give up on it.
	Joe had this to say.
	I'll play a bit of it.
	The outrage that MAGA has been expressing toward President Trump and his administration for the last week to 10 days over the Epstein debacle is not because they came out and told us that the evidence that they have indicates that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, nor is it because they said that the evidence they have indicates that there was no client list.
	Most of us were sufficiently savvy to recognize that deep state puppets like Merrick Garland and Chris Ray were likely to destroy any incriminating evidence relating to third parties before you guys would get in there.
	Okay, fast forward, the end of this, the moral of the story is B cops, go in and reinvestigate from the beginning.
	I'm like revisiting this as we go along and life can only be understood backwards, yet must be lived forwards.
	Do we all remember the incident that a year of email inbox during the critical period of Jeffrey Epstein case went missing from Acosta's Alex Acosta's email account?
	Alex Acosta is the one who struck the sweetheart plea deal with Jeffrey Epstein, who, according to the Daily Beast back in the day, said, yep, I was told he's intelligence.
	I was told to leave him alone.
	A year of emails during the critical period disappeared from his inbox.
	I still have my emails from my practice of law on my own from 2010 and on.
	We back them up because if we don't back them up and I get audited by the Bar Society, I get in trouble.
	A year.
	But by the way, it wasn't only his email address, email account.
	So, you know, it's nothing suspicious about that.
	As if you want to delete incriminating potentially information, you would only do it on the one account where it would be, you'd do it across the board and say, oh, system-wide failure.
	What can we do?
	Wash our hands of it.
	No harm, no foul.
	So it's not going away.
	Had the excuse been from the very beginning, you will never be able to trust the file.
	So there's no point in releasing a corrupted file from the FBI that is a criminal organization under Biden.
	You know, Merrick Garland, James Comey, Brandon, whatever.
	If that were the excuse, that should have been given as excuse number one.
	And incidentally, nobody would have had a problem believing that.
	That's been my theory from the beginning.
	That was one of my objections from the beginning.
	How can you make conclusions based on a file that was prepared by criminals?
	Now, everybody wants to go 4D, 5D, 728D chess.
	One thing that is the upside from all of this controversy is that you literally have Democrats clamoring now for the release of an Epstein file that we are told doesn't exist.
	You have Democrats now who are basically conspiracy theorists demanding the release of the Epstein files.
	And you have one, I think one of the only, if not the only reasonable Democrat I've ever met in my life.
	I want to see if the chats can, I sort of like, you might know the answer because I've shared the anecdote, but when I was in DC, I saw a couple of politicians talking outside.
	It was talking about a bill that would, something about limiting spending in elections.
	And I'm like, oh, this actually sounds reasonable.
	And I see the government official, the Senate, if he's a senator or a congressman.
	And I go like, I want to hate this guy, but what he's saying isn't ridiculous.
	And I go look through my Twitter feed and it's the only Democrat politician who's active on social media that I've never had an issue with.
	Well, you're going to know because it's in the title.
	What an idiot I am.
	It's RoCanna.
	So RoCanna puts out an amendment to whatever bill is currently before Congress saying, let's have an amendment to compel the release of the Epstein documents.
	But before we get to the wording of that bill and what I believe is some sincere but sincerely wrong interpretations of it, it's unanimous across the board.
	And it makes me stick to my stomach that you actually have these jackass scumbags, Gavin Newsom.
	Not talking about Rokana right now because I still think I like Rokana.
	The scum of the earth, Gavin Newsom, is actually like, these are layup gimmies that he's been given for political fodder.
	Axios, the one who broke the story originally about the memo that concluded that Epstein killed himself.
	There was no client list and there was no blackmail material, unsigned, undated.
	They say Helps Republicans block Democratic maneuver to force release of Epstein files, and we have the article.
	Then Gavin Newsom, with the easiest, most, what the heck is this?
	Is this a hair?
	Yeah, that's a hare.
	With the easiest, you've given him a golden goose for a week or so just so he can put out these cheap, easy layup tweet gotchas.
	Why try so hard to block a list that quote doesn't exist?
	Okay, this is like it's a low-level Twitter troll, but it's Gavin Newsome-level Twitter troll that's been handed to him for no better reason.
	Who else?
	Oh, there's one from Nikki.
	Oh, there's one from Nikki, Kevin Spacey.
	You got Kevin Spacey people coming out now saying, Release the Epstein files, all of them.
	For those of us with nothing to fear, the truth can't come soon enough.
	I hate to make this about me, but the media already has.
	He's got a point.
	I did ask him in response to this in a sincere question, like, did he ever visit Epstein's Island?
	No, no, no, culpability, although I do think anybody who went to Epstein's Island is culpable of something, but maybe that's judgmental of me.
	You got Kevin Spacey coming out right now and saying, release the Epstein files.
	Who else was it?
	Oh, Hakeem Jeffries, for once in his entire life, made some sense talking about the Epstein files and releasing them.
	Only two things can be true.
	When they spent a few years talking about how important the file was, release it, getting to the bottom of it.
	They were telling the truth then, or they're telling the truth now.
	There's a little bit of nuance in between, but set that aside.
	When Hakeem Jeffries is being given lob balls to smack a home run with, you're doing something wrong, people.
	And I say that out of love, not out of any hatred.
	Who was the other one?
	Ah, yes.
	The woman who thought she might be president if things had turned out differently.
	I shouldn't say that.
	The woman who, strong suspicion that they would not have been unhappy had things turned out differently on July 13 in Butler, Pennsylvania.
	Nikki Haley says, release the Epstein files and let the chips fall where they may.
	This is why people don't trust the government.
	You can never go wrong with being transparent.
	Redact victims' names, but release the rest.
	You're making Nikki Haley make sense, for goodness sake.
	Some people want to think it's 3D chess.
	All right, they got Democrats acknowledging the existence of a list, put that in quotes, confirming the existence of it and demanding the release of it.
	Some people are going to say, well done, Trump.
	You played them.
	They asked for it.
	Give it to them.
	But the problem is this.
	When you have stories like that from Axio saying Republicans are blocking the proposed amendment to compel the release of the Epstein files, you know what they're going to do with that.
	Like it's you don't have to be a scoundrel to think like one.
	I was a lawyer for 13 years.
	I can think like a scoundrel.
	It's how you have to anticipate what a scoundrel is going to do to you.
	The only problem is it's a little difficult to keep up with the truly smart scoundrels.
	There's one lawyer in particular.
	He knows who the hell he is.
	I'm looking at you right now.
	If you're still alive, I don't know if you're still alive.
	So you don't have to be a scoundrel to think like a scoundrel, but you know damn well that if they put out an amendment asking the compulsion of the release of whatever the Epstein file is and Republicans block it, holy sweet merciful hell.
	What do you think Republicans would have said had the shoe been on the other foot and it was Biden's administration blocking the release of the Epstein files or Clinton or Obama?
	Yeah, this sort of spans Obama's era.
	You know what would be happening.
	You'd be screaming bloody murder and rightly so.
	So Rokana, thus far, the only reasonable Democrat I've ever seen, he's probably more of a centrist than a Democrat, said this.
	Mr. Speaker, I introduced today an amendment demanding the full release of the Epstein files.
	The Speaker's Rules Committee should demand a vote tomorrow of every member of Congress.
	Yes, we should release it, or no, we should not.
	This is a question of whose side are you on?
	Are you on the side of protecting the rich and the powerful who've put their thumb on the scales of government to suck out millions of dollars while working class Americans suffer?
	Or aren't you on the side of the people?
	The Attorney General said on her desk was the Epstein file.
	And now she's saying, no, no, no, nothing to see.
	Don't release it.
	This is a question of trust.
	We need to release the Epstein files so we can restore government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
	And every member of Congress tomorrow should be forced to vote on this amendment.
	Mr. Speaker.
	Amendment.
	Okay.
	You can't say that you can hate Democrats and you can acknowledge that a great many of them are the scum of the earth.
	Adam Schiff for Brains McShift Face, Jerry Nandler, Nancy Pelosi, Gavin Newscomb, Kathy Hochl, Gretchen Whitmer, Andrew Cuomo.
	I can name them all.
	Mocha, you can't put Ro Khana in that class right now.
	Maybe he's done something that I don't know about.
	Maybe he'll do something in the future.
	But for now, reasonable argument, reasonable proposal, and the amendment itself is not unreasonable.
	Here's the amendment.
	Amendments to Rules Committee Print 119.6, offered by Mr. Khanna of California.
	Add at the end of the following new section, section, whatever this is, preservation and release of records.
	The Attorney General shall retain, preserve, and compile any records or evidence related to any investigation, prosecution, or incarceration of Jeffrey Epstein.
	B, not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this act, the Attorney General shall release and publish any records or evidence related to any investigation, prosecution, or incarceration of Jeffrey Epstein on a publicly accessible website.
	Sort of like what we had with, what's it called?
	I'm looking for the word the WikiLeaks.
	People can navigate.
	People can look through emails.
	People can look through the documents.
	The argument that you are hearing from many, I call them on the right, but the counter argument that you're hearing, they might be the center, they might be the right, they might just be people who think the argument holds water.
	And I say this with deference.
	I think it's a sincere misunderstanding.
	I don't think anybody's malicious in this argument.
	The argument that you're hearing from some is you can't release it because that would require the, that would compel the production of CP, CSAM, that would re-victimize the victims.
	First of all, the argument, as far as I'm concerned, is probably more of a misunderstanding than a tenable argument.
	You would not have, by way of an amendment, an order for anyone to break the law.
	So it would go without saying that any production of documents would be within the rules of criminal law as relates to the production, reproduction, possession of CP or CSAM.
	So it sort of It goes without saying that it would be operating within the bounds of the law.
	Also, there would be means, procedure through which the AG, when releasing it, would clearly redact, censor, or not disclose anything that would be considered CPC SAM, disclosing the identities of victims, witnesses, etc.
	So I think the argument is a non-starter from the get-go.
	That being said, if you think it's a concern, and I've tweeted this, you could add a very simple caveat.
	Let me see here.
	The attorney general shall retain, preserve, and compile any records or evidence related to any investigation.
	That's fine because that doesn't require, it doesn't compel production.
	Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this act, the AG shall release and publish any records or evidence related to any investigation, persecution, or incarceration of Jeffrey Epson on a publicly accessible website to the extent that such publication does not violate any existing rules of criminal law as relates to possession or distribution of CSAM or CP, something along those lines.
	I don't think it's necessary, but if it's necessary, that's as easy a fix as there is.
	Now, some people are hypothesizing, and you can't blame them, that it's such an easy fix, that the reason why it wouldn't be in there is because Democrats want this as a talking point, to say Republicans opposed it if they had a legitimate legal reason, knowing that they couldn't pass it this way because it might entail the production of documents that would violate the law.
	So some people are saying it's drafted deliberately like that so that Democrats know it would never pass, so that they can use the Republicans' refusal to pass it as a political cudgel against them, and that Democrats get the win, Republicans get the loss, and everybody rejoices because the Epstein file at the end of the day is not made public.
	I don't think so.
	I don't think that was Rokana's intention in drafting it this way.
	But to the extent anyone has any reticence about the possibility, add that caveat, except in as much as permissible under the criminal laws of the land.
	Period.
	Problem solved.
	There were also some rumors that some people had gotten the call to shut up about the Epstein file.
	I think it was Luke Rudkowski who published this earlier today.
	I don't place much stock in this, but some people suggesting...
	Yes, some people have changed their tune enough about the Epstein file because they got the call.
	And now they know to shut up because it's politically.
	Benny Johnson had reported that he had Laura Trump on his channel.
	She said, look, we've heard you.
	We're going to work our butts off to release more documents and that there's a change in tech.
	And I believe that.
	But do I believe that people got the call?
	No.
	First of all, everybody knows this is not helpful to the Trump administration.
	They don't need to be told that reporting the truth or highlighting this is not something that they would like to be celebrating at this point in time.
	The other reality is as well, you're not going to make it go away by ignoring it.
	What you're going to do actually is just for the people who are interested in it and the people who feel slighted by this, they're going to be quiet and they're going to move on and they're never going to vote again.
	And that's going to cause some problems.
	The other thing, at least the silver lining, even if it is true, it means the administration is listening and they know there's a very, very big problem here that needs to be remedied sooner than later.
	So I think that's the latest as to what's going on with the Epstein stuff.
	Let me make sure that I got all of this here.
	It's just amazing about that.
	I'm going back and like, you're living life backwards when you go back and even re-listen to yourself from six years ago, reread articles from six years ago.
	And yeah, that's what's going on there.
	Let me see.
	We got Old Man Toby says, Viva, I think there's Jim Epstein living in Florida somewhere.
	And let me go back here.
	Candace Owens for VP, Tom Massey for president.
	20 Chase says Mark Kernke.
	Democrats never do anything honestly, Viva.
	Yeah, like Rokana strikes me thus far as being the most honest and the most intellectually honest and sincere person that I've ever seen that puts a big D in front of the name.
	True, however, that I said this to Federman.
	If you consider the Democrats your party, then we might already have a problem.
	But until I have definitive evidence that Rokana is of bad faith, which I do not have, in fact, I have only evidence to the contrary, he'll get the benefit of the doubt and he'll get proper treatment.
	And then if I ever find out that he is an Adam Schiff level Democrat or a Gavin Newscomb, well then, you know, Twitter SAS shall be tweeted accordingly, people.
	All right, Peeps, that is as much as we're going to do about that.
	I just got the call.
	I'm told to move on to another subject.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	I'm joking.
	All right, what I am going to move on to, however, is our sponsor for today's show.
	And it's the wellness company.
	And we are looking at this, Peeps.
	Let me bring this up here and let me make sure I can hit the play button on this.
	And Peeps, most people don't realize pork is one of the biggest sources of parasites in the world.
	Study after study proves it.
	The CDC says pork is the primary source of trichinosis infections worldwide.
	The WHO and the CDC list pork as a top source of tapeworm and toxoplasmosis.
	I can never hear the word toxoplasmosis and not think train spotting.
	Research shows pork has a poor detox channels, making it easy for parasites to survive and pass into humans.
	If you eat pork or sushi, travel, have pets, or simply want to protect your gut and immune system, it's one reason to do a targeted medical grade full-body parasite cleanse at least once a year.
	That's why the wellness companies created their ivermectin plus Mibendazole parasite cleanse.
	This uniquely powerful combination helps eliminate unwanted parasites and support your immune system, digestion, and overall health.
	Fill out the quick intake form on the interwebs and you get a four usage supply medical grade cleanse shipped straight to your front door or your back door if you so choose.
	Head over to TWC.health forward slash viva.
	Promo code Viva will get you 60 bucks off and free shipping.
	And TWC.health forward slash Viva, 60 bucks off, free shipping.
	And I don't want to get biblical, but I was just talking to somebody yesterday as to the rules of kashrut for anybody who cares.
	And you can only, if you're, if you're a kosher member of the Hebrew tribe, you can only eat animals with split hooves.
	So, no horses, but goats.
	No, let me think of another one.
	No water buffalo could be good in theory.
	You could even eat giraffe technically.
	It's got to have a split hoof.
	And then the kid asks, well, what about pig?
	Because a pig has a split hoof.
	Smart kid.
	It knows that.
	I was like, ah, yes, but the pig does not chew its own cud.
	That's the religious explanation.
	The practical one that everyone always says to explain away the rules of kosherness is that pork historically has always been a fast rotting food.
	Shellfish as well, high in toxins.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	The only problem, bacon is the most delicious food on earth.
	Lobster is the most delicious crustacean on earth.
	Octopus, squid, delicious.
	What's the other one there?
	Oh, calamari.
	Let me see what else.
	Oh, yes.
	Oysters.
	I had a bad experience with oysters, so I stay away from that for now.
	But that's it.
	All right, people.
	The Remanded is on.
	Hold on.
	Let me bring this up here.
	I'm using StreamYard because we've got a guest, Susan Crabtree, who's coming on in a matter of minutes.
	Let me bring this up here.
	So the Remanded says, Ostrich Farm Appeals Court concluded before noon.
	Defense cited U.S. policy changes and exemptions.
	Outlook positive.
	Written judgments pending publication.
	Are they going to, the remanded, so this is Katie Universal Ostrich Farm out of Canada.
	They had their appeal of the ratification of the order to kill their 398 healthy ostriches in the British Columbia farm.
	They had their appeal in Ottawa.
	The question is, are they going to issue a judgment on the bench and a written publication for later?
	That's good.
	I'll definitely see if I get updates from Katie.
	Let me see if I got my phone on here.
	I do have it on.
	Let me see here.
	Okay, good.
	I'll get you news, by the way, as soon as there's news from the ostrich farm.
	That does it for that.
	What I was going to do here, I was going to go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and see what's going on.
	By the way, everybody, if you want to come over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party today, there will be no paywall yet again because I'm using StreamYard, which allows everyone to come.
	No paywall.
	I think you have to become a member, which requires an email address.
	Come on over there and we're going to have our wonderful after party to talk about stuff, mingle, fraternize, and voice our frustration at the state of the world.
	But let me go to the chat there and see what's going on.
	Allie Michael says you have to clean seafood well.
	Cook it till done.
	Should be fine.
	Yes, but there are certain heavy metals and toxins that you can't cook out of some food.
	And shellfish, especially depending on where you get them from, could have been shellfish are the ocean's cleaners.
	Have you all seen that video?
	Let me see if I can get this.
	It's actually a sea sponge.
	It's so cool and so gross.
	A science girl posted it yesterday.
	Hold on one second.
	Sea sponge.
	Science girl.
	It's a sea sponge eating.
	And it's absolutely the coolest thing.
	You want like.
	Oh, come on.
	I can't find it.
	This is irritating.
	I just watched it yesterday.
	I'm going to see if I can find this.
	Science Girl posted it.
	Here.
	Give me one second.
	I got to find this because it's cute.
	It's amazing.
	And if you want to talk about intelligent design, the question you would ask yourself is, why on earth would any intelligent design make it so flipping complicated?
	Holy crap, apples, there's a lot of video on this channel.
	This person does nothing but post videos that are intriguing, that get people to watch, engage.
	I'm going to find it.
	Unless I'm not going to find it.
	Holy cow.
	I'm scrolling down.
	I've barely gone 13 hours on this person's Twitter feed.
	Anyhow, look, it looks literally like a robot stuffing its spongy hands into a hole in the center of its body.
	Phallic, gross.
	But if you were talking about intelligent design, holy crab apples.
	They are the filters of the sea.
	They pick up the toxins.
	They eat all the crap.
	And that's why they are highly concentrated in some of these toxins.
	All right.
	Susan Crabtree is going to be on in a second.
	If you don't know who she is, you've got to follow her.
	We're going to do some follow-ups on the groundbreaking documents that were released over the weekend as relates to the one-year anniversary of the Butler, Pennsylvania, egregious, murderous failure, assassination attempt on Donald Trump, and murder of Corey Comparatori.
	Susan Crabtree has been following this from the beginning and has been amazing.
	So she'll be on in a second.
	And what I'll do right now, because I see King of Biltong, is in the house over on Hrumble.
	King of Biltong says Biltong is one of the highest protein snacks in the world, boasting a nearly 50% protein and packed with B12, creatine iron, zinc, and more.
	Visit Biltongusa.com, code Viva for 10% off.
	He's sort of a de facto sponsor of the channel.
	But it's driving me crazy.
	I want to find the flipping video here.
	Oh, was that it?
	No, that wasn't it.
	How many videos can possibly be posted here?
	Yeah, it's not going to happen.
	All right.
	By the way, okay, so until Susan gets here, let's just do one quick story coming out of Canada.
	Something I've been saying for a while, you know, perfect segue from Katie Ostrich Farm and the government coming in and ordering the culling.
	It's the CFIA, the Canada Food Inspection Agency, came in and determined that two ostriches on this farm died of the H5N1 virus, and therefore every ostrich on the farm needs to be slaughtered.
	There were 400 at the time.
	It's a long saga.
	CFIA comes in, issues a cull order.
	Universal Ostrich Farm gets an emergency injunction to enjoin application, enjoin enforcement to this order to kill 400 ostriches.
	They weigh 400 pounds.
	Some of them have been in the family for 30 years.
	They go to a federal court.
	By the time they have their hearing, their evidence, the ruling is issued.
	It's been five months since they got this kill order, since two of the ostriches allegedly died from H5N1.
	But the federal court says, kill them because there was nothing unreasonable with the CFIA, this administrative body's ruling.
	Okay.
	This is what's going on in Canada.
	They're a threat to their own.
	The government is a threat to its own people.
	And that's something I've been saying for a little while.
	It's a threat to America as well.
	I saw this tweet and I swear to you, I thought it was Babylon Bee parody because there is a very funny, it's actually a National Post parody Twitter account.
	It's got the yellow square and I think it's a P in it.
	I thought this was parody.
	The headline is opinion, let's free ourselves of the US and forge closer ties with China as if they need to forge closer ties with a country that has already invaded Canada effectively.
	I thought it was parody.
	It's not.
	It's the Globe and Mail.
	And I said, I said it before, I'll say it again.
	The Canadian government has caused Canada to be a national security threat to these United States of America.
	And I say this with no rejoicing in the misery that the Canadian government is causing its own population.
	Open borders, flooding of the country, arguably some connection to COVID when you had two Chinese spies doing Lord knows what up in Winnipeg and then fleeing off to literally Wuhan, China.
	You've got the Canadian government at one point in time training Chinese soldiers on Canadian soil for wintertime combat.
	You've got Chinese infiltration in Canadian politics.
	You've got Chinese members of parliament joking about the bounty on other members of parliament.
	China has already invaded Canada as has India.
	But I said it before.
	The joke was Mark J. Carney, three passport carrying globalist whore.
	When he got elected, said, we've got to strengthen our ties with foreign adversaries because big bad mean Donald Trump is going to put on tariffs and it's not nice for us.
	I'm going to pay for that in my butt.
	Hold on a second here.
	Carney was saying we've got to forge stronger ties with other adversaries, with other neighbors because Trump is the problem.
	My goodness.
	Bus.
	Bus.
	Verify.
	Let's go.
	Bring this article up.
	Let's free ourselves of our U.S. Ourselves of the U.S. and forge closer ties with China.
	Not parity.
	Candidates deal with the U.S. to drop the digital service tax, which benefits U.S. tech giants such as meta platforms.
	It benefits Canadians who get news in Canada who can't get it right now.
	But set that aside.
	Hold on.
	Where's the article?
	Right here.
	At the expense of Canadian fiscal sovereignty and the Trump administration's latest threat of a 35% tariff on Canadian goods perfectly encapsulate our current predicament.
	Washington no longer views Canada as an ally.
	You have made yourselves a threat.
	It's quite unfortunate.
	Terrorists crossing the border.
	Fentanyl superlabs.
	But rather as a subordinate.
	Canada is a subordinate to the U.S. It's not a mean thing to say.
	You've got to recognize your positions when you want to negotiate.
	You're not equals.
	Canada's got a GDP that's half of that of California, which is one state of the union.
	Sorry.
	It's a visa that is subordinate from which to extract concessions.
	It's a stark reminder that trade diversification is no longer optional.
	It's an urgent national imperative.
	The rub is that our longstanding subordination to the U.S. is also holding us back from partnering with China.
	One of the world's most important economies.
	Also one of the world's most terrible governments.
	Communist.
	Human rights abusing.
	Who the hell wants to partner with a country that...
	Social credit scores...
	I don't even know how to go into it.
	To achieve economic sovereignty, Canada must break free from the made-in-Washington narrative that China is an unreliable trading partner bent on world domination.
	It is!
	You idiot!
	Who wrote this?
	Who wrote this article?
	Julian Karagwizian and Robin Shaban.
	It is!
	It is!
	Holy crab apples!
	Give me one second.
	I'm just going to do this.
	All right.
	Back to this article here.
	The rub is...
	Canada is a must-break free...
	Okay.
	As the largest economy in the world on a purchasing power parity, China is set to be a core driver of future...
	China had to have paid for this.
	This is...
	Not...
	This is not sponsored by Pfizer.
	This is sponsored by China.
	It also now accounts for a third of the world's manufacturing output, more than all the G7 countries, plus South Korea and Mexico combined.
	Awesome.
	Now do global pollution, you idiots.
	What percentage of global emissions is China responsible for, if that's what you assume is going on here?
	And now the low-cost manufacturing, but rather advanced production of the world-beating technology.
	China leads in 37 of 44 critical technologies from AI to green energy.
	They lead in pollution.
	They lead in human rights abuses, maybe tied with other countries.
	I don't want to get into that for the time being.
	If Ottawa is serious about building a strong independent economy, we must build a more reliable political relationship with China that supports access to its growing markets and tech hubs.
	We must sell out to China.
	Can you imagine this?
	This is in one of Canada's most prominent publications.
	With Canada in the throes of a productivity crisis, Canadian businesses need to be adopting and implementing leading technologies from around the world, including China.
	Yet our federal government remains trapped in strategic paralysis, clinging to an Atlanticist G7.
	Holy crap, Apple, they have a new ist, people.
	Racist, misogynist, now you're an Atlanticist worldview, while our largest trading partner, end quote, closest ally, end quote, treats us with.
	contempt you kind of have done something to deserve it canadian government not the canadian people ottawa's acquiescence to washington when it comes to chinese technology creates a self-inflicted economic wounds that are only getting worse from the huai 5g ban where you don't care if the communist country of china spy on you i guess to the men wangzhu extradition case ottawa's compliance with u.s demands has alienated canada from china oh my gosh this is unbelievable and brought retaliatory measures in diplomacy
	and trade the 100 tariff that ottawa imposed on chinese electric vehicles on october 1 2024 mirroring the biden administration's tariff and denounced later the same day eventually triggered retaliation against canadian canola and pork costing mostly western farmers a billion dollars the irony while canada enforces washington's decoupling from china the u.s quietly reestablishes its own commercial ties with China.
	Even as Washington pressures allies to shun Beijing, it is finalizing a bilateral agreement with China.
	Canada and other allies are enforcing rules that the rulemaker.
	Oh, whatever.
	Let me see what's going on here.
	That's what's going on in Canada, people.
	You want to ally it more so with the Chinese Communist Party because they're reliable human rights abusers.
	They're reliable communists.
	But after all, if you're Justin Trudeau who has a deep admiration for the basic dictatorship of China, it's the next step.
	You imagine like, okay, let's get some more 5G spy towers from China.
	Let's let China buy up farmland, acquire mineral rights in important, well, I'm gonna, did I send the link?
	Mineral rights in important mineral companies.
	Nothing to see there.
	What could possibly go wrong?
	All right.
	Well, that's Canada, people.
	It's a big problem.
	There was a tweet the other day that said, you know, like the people relishing in Canadia, Canadia, Canadians' misery are expats, podcasters, you know, people in Canada who are sufficiently wealthy that this doesn't impact them.
	The reality is it's an abject disaster.
	And the government is turning Canada into basically a Chinese, a mini-Chinese dictatorship.
	That new bill that they're proposing to pass basically turns Canada into a dictatorship.
	Government can open your mail, seize your phones, access your data, prohibit cash transactions greater than $10,000, freeze your bank accounts with no lawful authority.
	They've already done that, ratified that.
	And you have a country like Canada that benefits security-wise from everything America produces for them, yields to them, and doesn't understand that it's not an equal relationship.
	And as such, you don't get to negotiate as though it's Mike Tyson fighting Derek Lewis.
	It's kind of like Mike Tyson fighting Urkel, and you have to discuss accordingly.
	So there's that.
	Trudeau played skin.
	I'm not reading that.
	What the heck, man?
	Alberta Prosperity Project, a costed planet to become a new nation from GGFD.
	Elijah Fire says, LOL, love you, Vivo.
	C.E. Verar says, I'm afraid China already has in a charity has, I think that's Canada in a bad place.
	Let me bring this up here so we can see these.
	Ginger Ninja, Canada's GDP is 2.5 trillion.
	New York's GDP is 2.3 trillion.
	Texas's GDP is 2.7 trillion.
	I'm fairly certain California's GDP is 3.8 trillion.
	If I'm not mistaken, California's GDP.
	4.1 trillion.
	Okay, that's right.
	So California's GDP is basically twice that of Canada.
	More diversified as well, Canada, and geographically more concentrated.
	It's like, it's all I have to say.
	The government is destroying Canada, making life a living hell for Canadians.
	And that's why, in my humble view, Canadians are hell-bent on pretending that Trump is the be-all and end-all of their miseries, because it's a lot easier to, you know, poo-poo on a boogeyman than actually address the fact that it's your own government that's doing this to you and not Donald John Trump.
	The remand it says Robin Shaban, a founding partner of the Canadian Consulting Firm to R Strategy and a co-author of that article published in the Globe and Mail, met ours, prior CCP member.
	Oh, yeah, partner of Chinese law firm.
	That reads like a puff piece and a, what's the word I'm looking for?
	A propaganda piece for the government.
	All right, I hope Susan's coming.
	If Susan's not coming, I'm going to read some of her tweets anyhow.
	Let me remove this and see what's going on over on vivabarnslaw.locals.com.
	My wife is making marmalade, says Lefson, and a strawberry crep cake for her birthday.
	I offered to make her to take her out to cook, and the response was no and tell no.
	Though she might decide if that heat warning proves out to go just for comfort, but she wants that specific dessert.
	No places around here makes it.
	All right, people, by the way, I'm going to be on the redacted at 4.15.
	So we'll be raiding the redacted.
	And yeah, I just hope nothing happened to Susan or there wasn't a miscommunication.
	We'll give it a few more minutes and then I'm going to go on with the show.
	I wanted to show you one thing also before.
	I was on yesterday with Richard Sorette, who is an awesome dude.
	One of the best Canadians out there, staying there and fighting the good fight, one of the best voices of reason out there.
	He started, he had a radio show.
	He's no longer doing the radio show, and now he's trying to put together a channel.
	Well, he's had the channel.
	Bottom line, he's doing interviews.
	If you would be so kind to go watch it and subscribe and help him out, because it's frustrating to get to on these platforms, it's frustrating to try to grow.
	And he does amazing work.
	We were talking about Epstein yesterday.
	Might be repetitive, but go check it out.
	That's Richard Soretti.
	He's an amazing guy.
	D Day Man says, ever consider going on the unsubscribed podcast?
	I'm not even gay, but I love those guys.
	There's no podcast I wouldn't go on.
	I'm an open book when it comes to the podcasts.
	And I love going on.
	I would love to go on adversarial podcasts.
	I've been on with Pisco Liddy.
	I'm game for anything.
	I don't know who they are.
	And I'm not saying that from a point of arrogance, but I'll go look them up.
	Unsubscribed.
	All right.
	Before we get, if we get Susan Crabtree on, I'm going to pull up this tweet from her doing the summary synopsis of what has been going on with the Secret Service and the one-year anniversary of one-year anniversary always feels like the wrong way to describe it, but the one-year anniversary of the failed assassination attempt on Donald John Trump.
	This was a post from July 10th, five days old now.
	I want to read this.
	I don't think we covered this yesterday.
	We got touched on it yesterday, but I was waiting to see if we could get an interview with Susan.
	Secret Service cites reforms ahead of the one-year anniversary of the Butler assassination attempt that nearly took President Trump's life.
	Even though Secret Service decided not to fire anyone and only suspend six agents and not the supervisors responsible for January 13, July 13th, the agency insists for the first time under new leadership that it is instituting all 46 recommendations issued by Congress in the wake of the assassination attempt failures of last year.
	Secret Service notably did not address retention and low morale issues.
	I was talking about that at the time, you know, where they were saying like these hearings are causing low morale issues of Secret Service.
	Like, of course, you would have low morale within the Secret Service.
	You nearly got the president murdered.
	And you've been like obviously favoring DEI initiatives over talent and competence.
	That almost got the president killed and that got another man murdered.
	Obviously, morale is low.
	It should be low.
	And you have to build up morale.
	It's not something you start with.
	It's something that you earn and something that you have to deserve.
	There is an ongoing brain drain, mass exodus of senior agents to retirement and transfers to other agencies, such as the DEA from the U.S. Secret Service press release.
	Listen to this.
	Of the 46 recommendations currently made by congressional oversight bodies, you needed congressional oversight to make 46 recommendations.
	The Secret Service implemented 21, 16 are in progress, and nine are addressed to non-Secret Service stakeholders.
	Among those changes to the Secret Service protective operation policies to ensure clear lines of accountability and improved information sharing with local law enforcement partners.
	I got to read that again, just so you can appreciate what the heck we're talking about.
	Among those changes to the Secret Service's protection operations, policies to ensure clear lines of accountability and improved information sharing with local law enforcement partners, like they needed oversight to know that that's not just a recommendation, but like the reason why they're there.
	The creation of an aviation and aerospace security division dedicated to maintaining the agency's critical aerial monitoring capabilities.
	Like you needed that in the wake of the known Iranian threat to assassinate Donald Trump with drones.
	You needed oversight.
	You needed this debacle in order to get that recommendation and implemented modifications to the agency's resourcing process in order to ensure that assets are better accounted for and appropriately applied.
	This is like you're a kid who needs your parent to tell you how to wash the dishes.
	These recommendations are coming from oversight when this should be things that the Secret Service are saying need to be done from the get-go.
	One year ago, I was by President Trump's side when a lone gunman attempted to assassinate him in Bunsen, said Secret Service Sean Curan.
	My heart will always be those impacted by that day, especially Corey Compatora, who lost his life while protecting those around him.
	Since President Trump appointed me as the director of the United States Secret Service, I have kept my experience on the July 13 top of my mind, and the agency has taken many steps to ensure such an event can never be repeated in the future.
	Nothing is more important than the Secret Service and the safety of our security of our protectees.
	As director, I am committed to ensuring our agency is fully equipped, resourced, and aligned to carry out our important mission each and every day.
	President Secret Service is grateful to the continued and unwavering support of President Trump.
	What else is Trump going to do?
	The Department of Homeland Security and Congress, Congress, as we continue to work to ensure that the events of July 13, 2024 are never repeated.
	The statement concluded.
	It's a wild thing that you needed that failed attempt on Donald Trump's life.
	I'm wondering if there's a time zone difference.
	You needed a failed attempt on Donald Trump's life in order for them to implement basic security protocol.
	Yet we should be able to communicate better with local law enforcement.
	Yet we should secure the sky with drones, considering there's a credible threat from Iran to assassinate the president via drone.
	And it takes someone getting murdered and nearly earth-shattering global catastrophe to do this.
	what else do we have here?
	I think we covered this yesterday.
	I think we covered this yesterday.
	Yeah, I think we covered it.
	Did we cover this yesterday?
	I'll go check in the chat.
	Anyhow, that's it.
	Stop that there.
	Let me go see what's going on in the chat over here.
	Butler guy looked like he'd been...
	Abolish all three-letter agencies.
	Duff as 360 addicted.
	Trudeau's probably.
	Oh my goodness.
	There's some silly people in the chat in terms of theories about Butler.
	But I had a lot of questions.
	I'm thinking there might be a time zone issue.
	But we'll see.
	All right.
	And what else do we have going on to discuss over here?
	Oh, do I want to?
	Oh, yeah.
	Okay.
	All right.
	All right.
	Hold on.
	Let's bring this back so that we can have a flashback that will make you want to puke.
	Remember what I said, like, you know, the Democrats literally dance on the graves of children for their own political profit.
	And the Texas disaster was prime example.
	People saying Texas got what it deserved because it voted for Trump and somehow the children deserve to die in a flood because Trump cut staffing to the NOAA even when he, whether or not there was any cut in funding, staffing at the NOA was actually more than usual and that they got what they voted for in respect of the death of children.
	You won't believe this if you've forgotten about it.
	Let's play it.
	No question about that.
	But as you point out those statements from J.D. Vance and Vivek Ramaswamy, of course, President Trump and his supporters have contributed to this violent rhetoric as well.
	Well, absolutely, George, we were just looking back this morning at some of the things that former President Trump has said.
	He warned last March of potential death and destruction if he were charged by the Manhattan District Attorney.
	Our country is being destroyed as they tell us to be peaceful.
	Trump in January warned of bedlam in the country if the criminal charges against him succeeded.
	And of course, in March, he said, Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath for the whole.
	That's going to be the least of it.
	It's going to be a bloodbath for the country.
	That will be the least of it.
	He said he was partly joking and that that was taken out of context.
	But those are indeed his words.
	And you have heard it from supporters as well.
	And supporters are certainly in some parts angry.
	And let's remember January 6th in so many ways for the campaign.
	January 6th will probably be in the background after yesterday's event.
	This is a very difficult time for this campaign.
	I'm sure this week in Milwaukee that President Trump will highlight this and President Biden is going to have to figure out how to go forward with his campaign and what exactly they say.
	Can you believe the question about that?
	Western Landsman, who is this?
	Flashback, ABC Stephanopoulos, and rabbits blame Trump for the assassination attempt in Butler.
	Unbelievable.
	President Trump and his supporters have contributed to this violent rhetoric.
	Well, absolutely.
	By the way, do we all remember the bloodbath?
	Like, I went out of my way to make sure that that was the bloodbath.
	Do you remember what she just said?
	Hold on, back this up a little bit.
	Let's hear what she said about the bloodbath.
	If I don't get elected, there'll be a bloodbath, she said.
	They warned him bedlam in the country if the criminal charges against him succeeded.
	And of course, in March, he said, now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath for the whole.
	That's going to be the least of it.
	It's going to be a bloodbath for the country.
	That will be the least of it.
	He said he was partly joking and that that was taken out of context.
	Oh, let's fact check this one.
	We all remember this.
	China now is building a couple of massive plants where they're going to build the cars in Mexico and think they think that they're going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border.
	Let me tell you something to China.
	If you're listening, President Xi, and you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal.
	Those big monster car manufacturing plants that you're building in Mexico right now, and you think you're going to get that, you're going to not hire Americans, and you're going to sell the cars to us.
	No, we're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you're not going to be able to sell those cars.
	If I get elected, now if I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath for the whole.
	That's going to be the least of it.
	It's going to be a bloodbath for the country.
	That'll be the least of it.
	But they're not going to sell those cars.
	They're building massive factories.
	A friend of mine, all he does is build car manufacturing plants.
	We could stop it there.
	Yeah, he argues it was taken out of context.
	Rabbits.
	Is her name Rabbits?
	What an absolute piece of human waste.
	They argue it was taken out of context.
	The campaign that I went on at that time to get, there was the video that went viral from who did it initially go viral by?
	This account right here, ASIN.
	I don't know if it was intended to be viral taken out of context.
	Never got community noted.
	It's unbelievable.
	Never got community noted.
	Look at this.
	Is community notes going to fact check this video before the damage is done?
	It's going viral and idiots are repeating it as though Trump threatened a bloodline if not re-elected.
	Elon Musk, are you paying attention?
	Your community notes don't work for shit and they don't work when they're most needed.
	Get on this ASAP.
	Oi oi oi oi oi.
	Well, they didn't.
	They still don't have community notes on that.
	So that's that, people.
	Oh boy.
	Now, let's see what's going on over on vivabarnslove.locals.com.
	Bill Brown, a member of our community, believes he broke his toe.
	I'm not laughing at your misery.
	I apologize.
	All right, people, we're going to end on one last story, which is going back to Canada.
	Could have done this one at the same time.
	You recall after Mark J. Carney, three passport carrying globalist who spent the last decade living in England, globalist banker, WEF speaker, Davos, Bilderberg attending, globalist of the highest order, has three passports, Canadian, British, Irish.
	I don't care why he has them.
	He's got three passports.
	He was, I say, anointed.
	When Justin Trudeau resigned from the Liberal Party, said he'll replacement, they'll hold internal leadership races and he'll be replaced and then they'll call an election.
	And in comes a man who people really had not heard of, Mark J. Carney, globalist banker for Bank of England or the chair of the Bank of England on the board of directors of Brookfield Assets Management.
	Nobody had really ever heard of this guy.
	And those even who knew of his existence knew very little about him, which might have been the best possible thing any unscrupulous party could do.
	Christia Freeland was one of the other people running for the leadership race.
	Karina Gould, Christia Freeland, Madame Ukraine, the woman who siphoned off more money than Canadians can afford to the combat in Ukraine.
	Karina Gould, the member who took that picture with the confirmed Nazi soldier from World War II, were the other two candidates.
	Mark J. Carney gets elected, landslide, destroys everybody, gets appointed the leader of the party, doesn't disclose his financial interests in a company that he had just stepped down as the chair from Brookfield Assets Management, doesn't disclose his financial interests or potential conflict of interest before the election, because from what I understood of the timing of all of this, he had 60 days from being appointed as leader of the party to disclose his finances for the purposes of conflict of interest.
	But lo and behold, they called the election to be held before that so that he was elected prime minister of Canada without having disclosed his financial conflicts of interest.
	Does everybody follow this?
	By the way, if I'm taking a victory lap for my P. Diddy prediction and my Epstein memo assessment, I was also 1000% right about what went down with that Canadian election in terms of deficiencies of the so-called Conservative Party's running of it.
	Set that aside.
	He gets elected and he still hadn't disclosed any financial Potential conflict of interest.
	Well, it came out the other day.
	And, you know, it doesn't really kind of makes it.
	Let me see.
	I want to show.
	Hey, look at this.
	Look at this, by the way.
	What's amazing also is seeing how the various outlets report on this.
	From Global News, Carney's ethics filing details Brookfield conflict of interest screen.
	Polyev pushes Carney to sell assets.
	He will be conflicted at every turn from a video.
	CBC, state-funded propaganda, Polyev slams Carney over investment disclosure, says PM needs to sell assets.
	The way that you see the framing of this, like CNN does the exact same thing.
	When there's a bad story for Democrats, Fox News will say something along the lines of Democrats caught lying, whatever.
	CNN will come out and say, Republicans pounce on Democrats getting caught for lying.
	It's all framing.
	And when you are a state-funded propagandist outlet like the CBC is $1.6 billion a year in direct funding to them in Radio Canada, it's a crown corporation.
	The issue is not the conflict of interest.
	It's how Pierre Polyev reacts to the conflict of interest.
	But let's go to the propagandist outlet to see what they have to say.
	Polyev slams Kearney over investment disclosure.
	It says PM needs to sell assets.
	Ethics Commissioner published list of assets Kearney put into a blind trust.
	I think there were over 100 conflicts of interest, if I'm not mistaken.
	We'll see if it's in here.
	Conservative leader Pierre Polyev has pointed to a list of assets that Prime Minister Mark Carney transferred into a blind trust as evidence that the liberal leader wasn't being honest with Canadians on the campaign trail.
	Too bad.
	Hey, maybe if you had gone on some podcasts and talked about this, people would have heard it.
	People were talking about it during the election.
	Last week, the Ethics Commissioner publicized the list of Carney's investments before they were transferred to the trust.
	Carney transferred his assets shortly after winning the Liberal leadership, but before being sworn in as prime minister.
	We want him to explain to the Canadians why he told Canadians the opposite of the truth during the election.
	During the campaign, Carney declined to say what stocks he had transferred into the trust, stating that he had gone above and beyond what's required by the rule of ethics.
	Oh, bullshit.
	A blind trust means that the trustee is the legal owner of the assets and can buy and sell them as they see fit.
	It's a blind trust.
	He doesn't know what's going on with it during his premiership, but he knows what he put into it before he became prime minister.
	Pretty useless.
	The trustee is barred from seeking input from Carney.
	Oh, okay.
	Surely there will be no conflict in terms of what Carney's going to decide to do, knowing what he put into the blind trust.
	It's only blind in terms of how it performs once it's behind the trust.
	Carney knows what he has and what his interests are.
	Carney is barred from knowing what assets are in the trust.
	He transferred them there.
	He's barred from knowing what assets are in the trust.
	He knows what he transferred into it.
	Polyev said Carney made false statements by saying he didn't know what was in the trust, though he would have known what assets when he transferred them.
	Polyev also pointed to Carney saying he owned only cash and personal real estate as an example of a false statement.
	It was patently false.
	It was patently and provably false for him to say that he owned nothing but cash and real estate, the conservative leader said.
	But those comments referred to assets that Carney held outside of the blind trust.
	The ethics disclosure shows that the only assets Carney holds outside the trust is the copyright to his book values.
	The filing shows Carney had held hundreds of different stocks in an investment account managed by a third party.
	Hold up.
	Where was I here?
	And then he says he should sell them.
	It's not entirely clear if Carney would be able to do so, given that they are legally controlled by the trustee.
	Can you believe what a bunch of godforsaken scoundrel these scumbags are?
	Oh, I'd love to sell them, but I can't sell them now because the trustees got them.
	Oh, my goodness.
	Criminals.
	This is criminal corruption, in my humble opinion.
	The prime minister's office said in the statement Friday that Carney has worked, quote, to not only comply with his obligations.
	Do you know how many liberals, I mean, the thing is conservatives have also been found to be in conflicts of interests.
	Do you know how many liberals have been found to be in conflicts of interests?
	It's so obscene.
	It's beyond.
	Justin Trudeau.
	Oh, gosh, there's so many of them.
	Ferguson, the Speaker of the House, was held in conflict.
	Everybody, they are a bunch of Godforsaken corrupt criminals.
	I'm sorry.
	I don't know if Godforsaken counts as using the Lord's name in vain.
	I keep saying that, but Godforsaken.
	It's one word.
	Oio Yoi.
	Let's get back to that article.
	Back to the article, people here.
	According to the filing, Carney also held assets in Brookfield Assets Management and Stripe Inc.
	He previously sat on the board of directors of both company.
	Commissioner is required by law to make the prime minister's ethics disclosure public within 120 days of taking office.
	I think that's 120 days of taking office as prime minister, which was when he got appointed.
	And then they called the election before then.
	Ethics Commissioner, is that Mario Dion?
	No, that's a new, okay.
	The ethics commissioner also published details about the constant of interest screen designed to prevent Carney from making decisions that benefit decisions to the benefit of his former employers.
	Marc-Andre Blanchard, Carney's chief of staff, Privy Council Yada Yada, tasked with ensuring Carney is not made aware and does not participate in any official.
	Okay.
	Polyev has defended a blind trust.
	They got to make it about Polyev.
	He's defended blind trust in the past.
	This is corruption, people.
	And it was not disclosed beforehand.
	And now they're disclosing it.
	What time is it?
	404.
	Okay.
	Redacted is on, people.
	I'm presuming there was a time zone issue.
	We'll get Crabtree on sooner than later because I still got a lot of my questions, which I had lined up here.
	But what we're going to do right now, go raid, redacted.
	So we go like this.
	Raid, redacted, confirm.
	Wait, before I confirm the raid, people, subscribe.
	If you want to get...
	No, here, hold on a second.
	Confirm the raid, people.
	Go.
	Go raid.
	P.O. box.
	If anybody wants to send anything here, but a bing, but a.
	No, that's the raid.
	Okay, come on.
	Hold on one second.
	People often ask, Viva, how can I send you love mail or hate mail for that matter?
	PO box, peeps.
	Link to the PO box.
	P.O. box here.
	Bada bing, bada boom.
	If you want to get some merch, I'm going to get to the tipped questions before we end this.
	If you want to get some merch, vivafry.com.
	And we're going to have our after party while I am simultaneously live on Redacted.
	Here, vivafry.com.
	Get some merch if you want to get.
	Thank you for your Attention to this matter merch is out and it's great and I love it.
	Go get some.
	And I'm going to get to the last of the tip questions before we head out for the day to our viva barnslaw.locals.com after party link.
	And as you can, let me see here.
	It hasn't happened yet, but one day someone's going to send me a pack of cards because as you can see here, I've been doing a lot of research into this is a problem.
	This is how you know search engines are tracking everything about you.
	Oh, the UFC, which one is this?
	It's like Topps 2025, the Hobby Box.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	Oh, no, that's what they call the breaker delight box.
	Spoiler alert, people, that box only comes with 12 cards and it's ridiculously expensive.
	Anyhow, if anybody wants to send, I'm on Viva.
	It's called Viva Breaks now.
	I'm going to open this up and anybody sends any love letters.
	I'll read them while we're live.
	It'll be a fun time.
	So P.O. Box, you all have it right now.
	And we're going to go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party and go watch me on redacted.
	Show some love there.
	Viva Raid.
	Viva Raid Booyah.
	They're going to air the segment that I did with them at 4.15.
	And I was just going to go here to give this link to everybody.
	Come over to viva barnslaw.locals.com.
	All right.
	Now, quickly before we go, there was one tipped question right here.
	We got Carney only has 100 plus content of interests.
	This post cost Canadian $14.
	Jeez, Louise.
	I'm not laughing at you.
	You have to laugh.
	Otherwise, you cry.
	I didn't realize the exchange rate was that bad.
	Holy crap.
	MBP 1974.
	It's always a Praetorian guard.
	And over in our Viva Barnes Law.locals.com community, the bestest above-average community out there.
	The tip questions we got, Kimmy Hunt.
	I'm glad I saw this before we ended.
	Kimmy Hunt is currently going through chemotherapy.
	And if anybody can support her, because it's, it's, this is link to Kimmy Hunt's give, send, go to help her with her chemo she's going through right now.
	Let me read the actual tip question.
	Ryan PD 911 says, what is the status of the Alberta and Saskatchewan leaving Canada?
	It's a long, long road away, but the political movement is there.
	The people-powered movement is there.
	The federal government clearly is getting nervous because they're already seeking like judicial opinions as to why a province can't separate.
	They're already like exploiting the native population, the Indian, the Indians.
	I mean, that's what they're called under the Indian Act in Canada, but the Indigenous population of Canada saying, oh, no, no, they can't separate because it would violate our treaties with the government.
	So, you know, the liberals always love exploiting children.
	They love exploiting minorities and they love exploiting the vulnerable for their own political profit, which is what they're trying to do right now.
	Kimmy Hunt says, watching you as I get my chemo, thank you all for keeping me company.
	Kimmy, I didn't, chemotherapy, I didn't realize that depending on what type you're getting, it lasts like four to eight hours.
	And they, damn, Kimmy, stay strong.
	And Patricia Carey82 says, Viva, how did Donald Trump, Jay Trump, go from that to Donald W. Bush to Donald Joe Biden?
	Look, I'm not getting blackpilled yet, though I'm on the verge.
	So the story's not over.
	We don't know what chapter of the story we're on, and we don't know how this ends.
	And there has to be redemption at the end of this.
	So vocal criticism for the purposes of support so they can fix this.
	They must.
	Okay, now we are ending on Twitter.
	Goodbye, Twitter.
	See you tomorrow.
	And now we're going to go end on Rumble.
	And I'm going to make sure that everybody gets their butts on over to Redacted.
	Okay, ending on Rumble.
	Rumble, if you're coming, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.

▲