Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 29, 2025 - Viva & Barnes

01:12:11

Dan Bongino & Kash Patel Speak! Epstein Questions Persist! Jan. 6 Bombers Identification? & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
	You are staring at King Charles III.
	For those of you listening on podcast, it's King Charles III.
	I'm on the road, so my microphone is bad.
	I've forgotten my headphones, so you're going to see me without a hairband.
	I will feel very uncomfortable.
	The lighting is 50-50.
	But we shall start today's episode off with vomit in the mouth.
	Coming from the mouth vomit of King Charles III.
	I would like to acknowledge that we are gathered on the unceded territory of the Algonquin and the Shinabeg people.
	This land acknowledgement is a recognition of shared history as a nation.
	While continuing to deepen my own understanding, it is my great hope that in each of your communities, and collectively as a country, a path is found Toward truth and reconciliation in both word and deed.
	I would like to acknowledge that we are gathered on the unceded territory of the Algonquin and the Shinabeg people.
	The unceded territory.
	Which means that this territory has not been given up.
	And yet it's still being occupied by the very people who are recognizing that it hasn't been unseated.
	It's so insulting and so enraging and so virtuous of the people who are basically admitting that they are the oppressors of some sort occupying the unseated land of the natives.
	Giving them the credit, while they don't respect the treaties that they've signed with them over the years, while they've basically reduced them to, I'm not even saying this to be funny or demeaning, reservations and casino rights, whatever they can give them.
	They can't even give them clean water.
	But they recognize the unceded territories of the Apanami, while they systematically treat them like second-class citizens.
	It's an amazing thing, but at least they recognize their land.
	And it's like I keep using the word struggle session.
	It's not a struggle session.
	It's like they get to be the worst oppressors on earth, but so long as they thank the victims of their oppression for their oppression, they're somehow absolved of their oppression.
	Holy crab apples, people.
	That's King Charles III.
	All right.
	As you can see, I'm on the road.
	And I don't have my headphones.
	I don't need the good camera.
	The mic is pretty good, but I'm in a hotel room where you might hear the air conditioning unit make some noise.
	You might hear a child make some noise in a bit because I've got a kid.
	He's got the earbuds for the phone, and hopefully he's not just playing some terrible video game.
	He's probably playing some terrible video game.
	I'm in Georgia for what they have, the Soldiers Journey Home.
	Not a charity.
	It's a fundraiser where they actually build what they call a forever home.
	It is a mortgage-free home for a disabled veteran, and they make it accommodated to the disability, and they do it once a year.
	It's a member in our local community, Ginger Ninja, who's got a channel on Rumble as well, who partakes in the build because he's a carpenter, and he's one of the volunteers, and I got invited down to document, partake, see, and be there for the cutting of the ribbon, which occurs, I think it's the day after tomorrow.
	And it's an amazing thing.
	They build a house from foundation to keys in hand in the door within two weeks.
	And it's a forever home for a disabled that they do one a year.
	And it's an amazing organization.
	And I'm flattered and honored to be down here to be able to do this.
	It was about an eight and a half hour drive that we broke over two days.
	And we're in Georgia.
	And I want to meet up with Luke after this stream.
	But that's why the studio is on the road.
	And the equipment is pretty damn good, by the way.
	This is the built-in mic.
	On my laptop.
	And so here it is.
	All right.
	Now, all let's say, good afternoon, everybody.
	Thank you for being here.
	Viva Frye, former Montreal litigator turned current Florida rumbler.
	And we've got a theme to the show today.
	And that theme is Cash Patel and Dan Bongino.
	More interviews on, I think both of them are on Fox News.
	I mean, it would be cool.
	I mean, I don't think CNN would want to have mom, but they should maybe, you know, do some independent media.
	Hint, hint, wink, wink, nudge, nudge.
	All right.
	But Dan Bongino, Cash Patel, did a couple of interviews and said some very interesting things.
	We're going to get into it.
	But we started off with the Canadian craft, and I just want to highlight what's going on in Canada, which is going to sort of dovetail into what's going on in the States, because there's also been some revelations of a potential new COVID strain that's coming out.
	While Dan Bongino and Kash Patel are still tackling the cover-up of the old strain, while they're talking about the auto-pen scandal that might undermine, if not negate, some of Joe Biden's pardons to the extent that he even gave them, which is now at issue.
	Not whether or not he was mentally all there when he did, whether or not he even gave them.
	And if he didn't give them, and it was a staffer who did it without his knowledge or authorization, they might not be so valid anymore.
	Then you might be able to go after the Fauci's for crimes against humanity, which many of us want.
	Then you might be able to go after the Adam Schiff for Brain McSchiff faces and the Kinzinger's and the Liz Cheney's for their constitutional violations in the context of that kangaroo court sham of a January 6th investigative committee.
	We'll get there.
	But meanwhile, up in Canada, if you think it hasn't gotten crazy enough, they're thanking the natives for the land that they've stolen.
	I mean, I'm not saying this from my own perspective on activism.
	They're acknowledging that it's stolen land if they're calling it unseated.
	We never gave it back.
	They never gave it to us.
	But we thank you for your sacrifice.
	If that wasn't enough of the insanity going up on in Canada, listen to this.
	I'd say, like, special place in hell for anybody pushing this toxic crap.
	This is from Global News.
	COVID shot is safe during pregnancy, Canadian doctors say, after U.S. move.
	Let's play this here and see what this sounds like.
	Go like this.
	Go like this.
	Bring it all the way back.
	And let's hear what RFK is saying.
	I couldn't be more pleased to announce that as of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC-recommended immunization schedule.
	Last year, the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot, despite the lack of any clinical data, to support the repeat booster strategy in children.
	There's no evidence healthy kids need it today, and most countries have stopped recommending it for children.
	We're now one step closer to realizing President Trump's promise to make America healthy again.
	It's fantastic news, and it's common sense.
	They never tested it for pregnant women.
	Period.
	You can go to the UK website.
	They said they have not tested the safety or efficacy on pregnant women.
	There's even a warning.
	You can go find it unless they've blown it off of the website.
	I have it documented in my Twitter diary.
	They said it has not been tested for pregnant or breastfeeding women.
	While simultaneously saying it's safe and effective, admitting that they've never tested it for the very people that they're saying it's safe and effective for.
	All right.
	You've got RFK Jr. doing real stuff in the States.
	You've got actual progress as relates to pulling that toxic jab from recommendations to people who never need it in the first place.
	A demographic of people who were never at risk for COVID in the first place.
	You can all go fact check me all you want.
	This is now basic common sense everywhere except for Canada, it would seem.
	Canada's gynecologists say COVID-19 vaccination remains safe and strongly recommended during pregnancy and while breastfeeding.
	Based on what, may I ask?
	What was the amount of people, pregnant women, on whom this was tested?
	The answer is, I think.
	It might be a french fry.
	It might have been one.
	The Society of Obstetricians, oh, they're going to say, well, it's the data that we've collected afterwards that makes it safe.
	So they've basically admitted to, even if we accept what they're saying, which I don't, real-time experimentation where they tested it on pregnant women, and now they've gathered the data to say our test was successful, it's safe and effective.
	It's not even safe and effective against COVID, let alone for vulnerable people.
	For people who are not vulnerable to COVID in the first place.
	It doesn't matter.
	Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada issued the Assurance Wednesday.
	Trust us.
	A day after the U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime anti-vaccine activist.
	Lie.
	This is Canadian media for you, by the way.
	Where's this article coming from?
	Let's see who's there.
	Canadian press.
	A long-time anti-vaccine activist declared the shot is no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women south of the border.
	What's the rate of myocarditis?
	If I'm going by Kieran Moore, the chief medical officer of Ontario, one in 5,000 per dose for young boys, men, who are not at risk for COVID in the first place.
	In what realm of the universe does that risk benefit make math sense?
	Pregnant women who become infected with COVID-19 are at higher risk of severe illness requiring hospitalization and intensive care than women who are not pregnant, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said.
	Getting the COVID-19 vaccine also helps protect against serious complications associated with the virus, such as premature birth.
	Preterm birth, it said.
	Quote, we have mounting increasing scientific evidence about the impact of COVID-19 infection or other respiratory viruses on pregnant people and how vaccination does reduce that.
	Dr. Dereen El Sha'al, a maternal fetal medical specialist at the Ottawa hospital, said in an interview.
	El Sha'al, who is also speaking on behalf of the SOGC, said pregnant women remain a priority population for COVID vaccination in Canada and that the shot also provides some immunity against the virus for the baby.
	Kennedy's move to discontinue the shot in the U.S. is not based on any medical evidence, she said.
	I don't even want to go on.
	I have to go on.
	But I must.
	There's been no study.
	There's been no clinical trial, no follow-up studies that have suggested any adverse outcomes or impact from COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant populations or infants that would significantly influence the decision made by the authorities in the U.S., she said.
	Citing, quote, an age of growing misinformation and disinformation, the SOGC urged women and healthcare providers to rely on, quote, evidence-based science and clinical expertise to make vaccination decisions.
	Elshar said it was important for the group to issue a statement to reassure pregnant women in Canada who see U.S. misinformation on news and social media.
	A special place in hell for anybody who today is still saying that is safe and effective for pregnant women because they just don't know and for young children who were never at risk in any realm of the statistical universe.
	And it only increases risks for things that are exponentially more dangerous than COVID infection in children.
	Let me see if I can find this.
	Viva Fry, UK breastfeeding.
	I want to see if it's...
	Let me see here.
	Here we go.
	This is it.
	Ba-da-bing, ba-da-boom.
	I mean, my Twitter feed, if it's good for nothing, it's good for something.
	It's good for the diary.
	This is when I had the fight with the vax-pushing demon doctors on the internet.
	This is from the Government of the UK website.
	We'll see if it's still up there.
	I'm curious to know if it is.
	The absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of the development to first identify and select COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Skip down to the bottom part where it's highlighted.
	Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated.
	These judgments reflect the absence of data at the present time and do not reflect a specific finding of concern.
	That was a couple of years ago.
	And because I can steal, man, what the demons are going to say, they're going to say, well, now we've got a lot more data.
	So we know that it's safe and effective now because we've gathered the data from having administered it to breastfeeding women, pregnant and breastfeeding women, when at the time we didn't have enough data.
	And now we have enough data because it's so safe and effective.
	So we've experimented in real time and now we've collected the data from that real-time experimentation.
	Consent be damned.
	Enlightened consent be damned.
	Special place in hell for any of the demons who are still pushing this safe and effective COVID jab on pregnant women, breastfeeding women and children who were never at any statistically meaningful risk for COVID infections in the first place.
	You remember that one case of...
	The first teenager in Canada to die from COVID.
	14-year-old teenager.
	Does anyone remember that?
	Oh, let's see.
	It was...
	Alberta.
	COVID.
	Teen.
	Death.
	Viva.
	Fry.
	Yeah, it was the first teenager to die from COVID.
	And it was used by Dina Hinshaw as the rallying cry for vaccinating children.
	Hinshaw apologizes after Alberta mistakenly reports a 14-year-old's cancer death was caused by COVID-19.
	Just so you know who you're listening to, that was, oh, this was psycho.
	Please remember, if your child has any of the core symptoms of COVID-19, such as cough, fever, shortness of breath, or loss of sense of smell or taste, you should assume they have COVID-19 and they're legally required to isolate.
	This is a woman.
	When was this from?
	2022.
	If you have a kid that has symptoms of COVID, just remember what they did to us.
	They never did this to me because when my kid had COVID, I was eating food out of his mouth so that I could get COVID too.
	Just listen to what she's saying and never forget and never forgive and hold the line.
	Please remember, if your child has any of the core symptoms of COVID-19, such as cough, fever, shortness of breath, or loss of sense of smell or taste, you should assume they have COVID-19 and they're legally required to isolate.
	Legally required to isolate a child?
	Earmuffs, child.
	Fuck you, Dina Hinshaw.
	Forever.
	And for the rest of your life, nobody should ever forget.
	legally required to isolate a child, aka child abuse, but it's not child abuse because the government of Canada that's still reciting the prayer of...
	Straight to hell, Dina Hinshaw.
	Anyone who is feeling ill must stay home and away from others for five or ten days, depending on their immunization status or until symptoms improve, whichever is longer.
	Can you appreciate this was the level of their so-called science?
	You have to isolate for five or ten days.
	If you're vaccinated, it's only five days.
	You still got COVID somehow, but it's only five days.
	Vaccinate your kid.
	I'm sorry.
	Isolate your kid.
	You're legally required to isolate your child.
	This was in the Peel region in Ontario.
	They were telling you that you had to isolate your kid.
	And you had apparently some parents online posting, oh, my kid's in the other room crying and I'm slipping food under his death.
	Idiots.
	This is the same woman who said that the...
	She lied about it because the sister of this kid had to come out and say, my brother had stage 4 brain cancer, was in a coma when they tested him before he died.
	A special place in hell, especially for Dina Hinshaw.
	Holy hell.
	Legally required to quarantine your child.
	There's not enough middle fingers on two healthy people's hands for Dina Hinshaw.
	All right.
	Well, I don't feel any better now.
	So everybody, how goes the battle?
	If you haven't seen the two interviews, Dan Bongino on Fox News this morning, Cash Patel with Brett Baer yesterday.
	Good thing about doing a lot of driving is I can listen to a lot and then I got to like bookmark things and timestamp things.
	We're going to get to it.
	There's a few highlights that I want to bring to everybody's attention.
	But first, let me bring this up here.
	Kickbacks, corruption, through and through.
	Thank goodness you got RFK Jr. doing some good stuff.
	But the people who are taking some flack, I put out a tweet earlier that Bongino and Kash Patel's blessing and curse is that people have very high expectations of him.
	And it's a blessing and a curse because people have high expectations and when you don't deliver, people start getting frustrated quickly.
	And then the lesser good faith actors might start imputing ill intent to not performing two-part.
	You know, my father used to say growing up, Dave, if you were a stupid kid, I wouldn't get angry with you for not doing well in school, but you're not a stupid kid.
	At least that's what he said.
	And I didn't do very well in school.
	In any one of the three high schools that I went to in a period of five years, I didn't do very well.
	And teachers say, you're not living up to expectations.
	We're disappointed in you.
	And we're harder on you because we know you can do better than we are on someone who we don't think can do any better.
	So in that sense, the expectations and the very high expectations for Dan Bongino and Cash Patel have been their blessing and their curse because we expect great things from them.
	And not only when they don't come, but when we start feeling mildly disappointed, well, you're harder on the people that you had higher expectations of than the people you had no expectations of in the first place.
	Nobody's going to give Comey a hard time for being a deceitful scoundrel.
	People are giving Pan Bondi a hard time, but those are the people who, you know, might have had expectations that were unwarranted in the first place.
	But Bongino and Patel.
	People had and still have extremely high expectations of them, and they've got arguably the hardest of the tasks at hand.
	RFK Jr., people have very high expectations of, holding his feet to the fire, and he's delivering.
	Harmeet Dillon, high expectations, holding feet to the fire, and she's delivering.
	There is something to say about the constitutional rights division of the government.
	Health and Human Services, it's a big, I think it's like one of the big, I think it's the biggest branch of the government versus the FBI and that hell hole of a cesspool that Bongino and Patel So they did a couple of interviews, but I want to also start this off with people accuse me of being a bit of a sissy Canadian.
	And maybe I am.
	But we're going to start it off with a bit of the human element to this.
	And I say this not I'm not sharing it.
	Hold on, I've got to refresh my screen, it might seem, here.
	I'm going to refresh.
	Give me one second here.
	And we're back.
	I have been accused of being a sissy.
	I have been accused of being a Canadian snowflake.
	I don't think I'm a Canadian snowflake.
	I might be too sensitive for my own good, despite the brash appearance and the brash demeanor.
	There are humans behind all of this.
	And it's very easy, especially when you live online and you don't meet the people that you interact with online, to treat everybody as though they are a stereotype of themselves, a character in a play and not an actual human, not an actual living, breathing human being with thoughts, emotions, families, you know, histories to themselves.
	And sometimes I look at myself and I say, are my being unbeknownst?
	Sometimes I say, Viva, you're being too hard on him.
	This is a human.
	He's got emotions.
	He's got a family.
	Then I realized that I unfortunately think he's a psychopath, sociopath, evil human being.
	To his core, that's what I think.
	Maybe I'm wrong, and maybe one day I'll realize I'm wrong, and I'll have to repent.
	I look at the James Comeys of the world, and I look at James Comey in particular, and I say, he is a liar.
	He is a scumbag.
	Maybe I'm being too mean on him.
	He's got a wife.
	He's got kids, you know.
	Celebrates Pride Month once a year.
	He must be a good person.
	He is, I'm convinced, he's a truly awful and truly evil person.
	But maybe I'm wrong and maybe one day I'll have to apologize.
	When you know the people, it makes it a little bit different because you can see the person, you know the person.
	But some people out there don't see the people, they see The interview with Fox News and Bongino started off with what I think is a human element that many of us are forgetting, or at least quickly forgetting that they get drowned in our high expectations and our disappointment, at least for the time being, with certain results which, you know, early on, but some disappointments which are undeniable and understandable.
	But I want to play the beginning of the interview.
	First off, it's the beginning and then it's the end because there's two segments where Bongino answers a question honestly that typically people don't answer honestly.
	How you doing?
	Good.
	Let's get into it.
	Listen, before we get into specifics, what did you think the job was going to be like?
	What is it like?
	You know, the biggest lifestyle change for me has been family-wise.
	I mean, we already went through this with my time in the Secret Service, but you know, when the president called and asked if I would take the job, Talk is cheap.
	And then when the opportunity comes to do stuff, I didn't mean me, you know, I meant you.
	It's kind of a, you're a fraud.
	I mean, you don't sound like a fraud.
	You are one.
	So it was a lot.
	It's been tough on the family.
	People ask me all the time, you know, do you like it?
	I say, no, I don't.
	But I didn't, the president asked me to do this to like it.
	You know, nobody likes going into an organization like that and having to change things and make big, bold changes.
	But, you know, I was at one of our facilities yesterday down in Winchester, and a woman who worked there very nice said, you know, I used to watch your show.
	I miss you.
	I said, you know, I miss me, too.
	You know, part of you dies a little bit when you see all this stuff from behind the scenes.
	You're doing this for country, so we appreciate that, and we thank you.
	I don't know what people think me and Cash are doing all day.
	I mean, I gave up.
	Everything for this.
	I mean, you know, my wife is struggling.
	I'm not a victim.
	I'm not Jim Comey.
	It's fine.
	I did this and I'm proud I did it.
	But if you think we're there for tea and crumpets, well, I mean, cash is there all day.
	We share it.
	Our offices are linked.
	He turns on the faucet.
	I hear it.
	He's there.
	He gets in like six o 'clock in the morning.
	He doesn't leave till seven at night.
	You know, I'm in there at 730 in the morning.
	You know, he uses the gym.
	I work out my.
	But I stare at these four walls all day in D.C., you know, by myself, divorced from my wife.
	Not divorced, but I mean separated divorced.
	And it's hard.
	I mean, you know, we love each other and it's hard to be apart.
	But you're doing some great work.
	You have to appreciate what it takes to actually be that honest and also what that means.
	Cash Patel gets there at 6 o 'clock.
	I don't judge.
	Cash, as far as I can tell, he's not married, doesn't have kids.
	And if you're not married and you don't have kids, you have...
	I mean, you might have the mission in life of also finding a wife and making babies, but you have one mission in life.
	And when you dedicate your life to that, you know, you sacrifice in that you don't necessarily go out and meet a woman and have a family, and that's a big sacrifice that some people tend to regret later on if they put too much into their career at the beginning.
	When you have a wife and kids, and you have a family, and all the money in the world is not worth sacrificing love and family, period.
	And so you have to appreciate exactly, it's a very, very big thing to admit, and a deep admission at that, that people shouldn't forget about.
	And you're dealing with someone who, you might be disappointed with the speed of the results, you might be disappointed with some of the results.
	You're dealing with someone who, by and large, people have known for years, who sacrificed time with family, family, and financial considerations.
	Some people have to say, yeah, well, you know, he sacrificed wealth, big deal.
	Well, first of all, You're not sacrificing anything if you don't have something to sacrifice in the first place.
	Sacrifice has to mean something.
	And so saying that he's sacrificing from a point of wealth to undermine the sacrifice is not just counterintuitive, but it's contradiction in terms.
	If you don't have wealth to sacrifice, it's not a sacrifice then to not have wealth to sacrifice.
	If you don't have a family and loved ones that you're giving up time with, you're not sacrificing the same thing.
	That being said, can you imagine when he says, you know, something about, like, you know, we finally see what we're looking at here, and you get involved in this voluntarily to serve country, and the sacrifice might be much more than you thought, and the depravity might be much more than you thought.
	So in all of this, in the disappointment that there is out there, and people are disappointed, people don't believe, don't lose sight of the human element, that this is a human in there.
	With wife, kids, who is now in a DC hellhole.
	And it is a hellhole.
	I don't care where you live.
	I don't care what DC looks like with the cherry blossoms.
	It's a disgusting hellhole.
	You know, when I went to DC and I was like, I don't have to work there.
	I don't have to live there.
	And as beautiful as it is superficially, I worked in a big law firm and you get into your law firm and you go up and you take the elevator.
	The elevator is nice.
	You take up four floors on the building.
	You got flavored water and it's all well lit and it looks like a palace.
	But the difference between a palace and a prison is very, very thin line.
	You know, you wear a nice suit and tie and you have your Sanka sets.
	Those become prisons very quickly.
	And after, you know, I was in there for years, not enough money on earth they could pay someone to like to live there.
	You go in there, you get the neon lights and you're stuck there 12, 13 hours a day, six days a week.
	It becomes a prison and the opulence, the importance of what you thought you had becomes a prison.
	To have to be stuck in D.C. and working with that corrupt Politicized, weaponized FBI to be looking at the stuff that they're looking at, just the criminal side of it, but the corruption side of it.
	And then to know that you have tens of millions of people with the highest of expectations, you can imagine the toll that takes on a person.
	And you shouldn't forget about that.
	But now setting that aside, because at the end of the day, there's the professional side, there's the personal side.
	Don't become inconsistent.
	considerate inhumane people because you have high expectations of people, then you'd regard them as something of slaves to your expectations.
	The professional side of it, I want to highlight this one because this was...
	Yeah, sorry, sorry, right here.
	Posted this one right before we went live.
	I want to see James Comey charged and arrested.
	And I appreciate what everybody's saying out there.
	I appreciate what Bongito's saying, that you can't just First of all, the FBI, it's not clear that they have charging capability over James Comey.
	The longer this goes on, the more I'm getting confused as to what the power structure is in this.
	You got the FBI, which I don't think has the authority to press charges.
	They have the authority to recommend.
	You got Secret Service, which I don't know if they have the authority to press charges, but they have the authority to recommend.
	You got the DOJ, Department of Justice, which I know has the authority to press charges.
	Upon recommendations, I don't know who's handling this James Comey investigation, if there is a James Comey investigation, but holy hell, there should be.
	And I don't care that it would be difficult to prove a theory of the case.
	I will lay out the theory of the case as to why James Comey should be charged.
	But I'll play this clip from the Bongino interview from earlier as well.
	The shells on the beach.
	Can you not talk to social media and say, y 'all take this down?
	If you see anyone posting this, take it down.
	It's a threat to the president's life.
	Second thing.
	First thing.
	If a social media post of 86-whatever is a threat to the president, well then it sure as hell was one coming out of the former director of the FBI.
	First things first.
	Can you arrest people that post these like Comey?
	We make arrest decisions based on an interaction with the Department of Justice, with the FBI, Federal Bureau of Investigation, not prosecution.
	The problem is a lot of these cases haven't been a Secret Service agent is you're going to prove intent.
	And here's what you don't want.
	Say you arrest them and he goes, there's not a magistrate that's going to...
	You've got to build the right case.
	You have to build a case.
	You need to build probable cause.
	I don't want to do what the left did, which is jump the gun.
	I mean, then you have a situation like – You know, this guy was engaged in one of the biggest scandals in American history.
	He got $200,000, I believe, and his pension.
	You have to do this the right way.
	Prove intent.
	And here's what you don't.
	You're going to prove intent.
	You've got to prove intent.
	I appreciate what Bongino's saying.
	Let me prove intent of James Comey.
	It'll be a little repetitive, but I'll lay this out there, because I am.
	Someone who respects free speech.
	It's the most fundamental, not freedom of expression, free speech.
	That being said, when you exercise your free speech to issue a clear dog whistle, it crosses the bounds of free speech.
	And if people are on the fence about the intent, how do you build the case about James Comey's intent?
	You know, he's got such an airtight alibi, airtight case.
	He was just walking along the beach.
	And he came across the shells on the beach and, you know, he didn't know what it was.
	And he just posted it and it's all very innocent.
	I will prove intent.
	I will prove intent that at the very least deserves charges and may he make his defense in court.
	Some people I don't really think fully appreciate this.
	This was James Comey's Instagram timeline when he posted the 86-47.
	You see right here, he's all cutesy on the beach reading his own book.
	What does it say there?
	That's right, James Comey.
	I think it's called FDR Drive.
	So chronologically, him on the beach reading his book.
	Oh, him on the beach, 8647, and then the summary of his book.
	Oh, then he didn't know what 8647 meant, right?
	He deleted it.
	Wrong.
	Wrong and wrong, and here's the intent.
	He posts him reading his book.
	He posts 8647.
	Then he posts this summary of his book.
	In which he says, Garcia, the main character of his book, Belize Buchanan, went far beyond the protection of the First Amendment when he singled out his enemies by name and suggested, quote, something should be done, end quote, about them.
	When he singled them out by name, 47, suggested something should be done about them, 86. His fans have obliged killing or grievously injuring some of his foes.
	So I appreciate that you need to show mens rea, or at least show probable cause.
	When charging someone.
	This is unequivocal, categorical, black on white, his own admissions, probable cause.
	On the beach reading his book, puts out a message about naming one of his political foes and something should be done to them.
	And then after that, he literally posts, that's what the book is about.
	And that's what he was reading.
	And that's what happened on the beach that day.
	Charge James Comey.
	And if they can't do it because it's the FBI and they don't have charging powers, recommend charges be brought by Pam Bondi.
	I won't lose track of the fact that Pam Bondi is a human.
	I don't know her on a personal level.
	I never had extremely high expectations of her.
	I was actually sort of more eager that it be Matt Gaetz, whom I do know on a personal level.
	If the FBI can't bring the charges, make the recommendation, there's your mens rea.
	He knew damn well what he was doing.
	And if you have to go investigate the copycats, you go after the big dog.
	Too thin, Viva, in my opinion?
	Heartland Denison, I know you.
	I respect you.
	You've been on the channel for a long time.
	I respectfully disagree with you.
	But the bottom line?
	Hey, maybe I'm wrong and they'll get an acquittal.
	Maybe he'll get a dismissal.
	Charge him.
	and by the way charge him and then if you find out that he happened to have been lying about anything about any of the excuses If he deleted photos off his phone?
	If he deleted videos?
	Well, then you got obstruction.
	They're masters that the punishment is the process, or the process is the punishment.
	There's enough to charge him.
	Investigate him, and if it turns out he made misleading, false statements, deleted what might be otherwise evidence off of his phone, you just got another charge right there.
	So that was one part of it.
	Another part of the interview which I found very interesting.
	Hold on, here we go.
	I want to say this.
	Let me get which one it is here.
	Was it this?
	No, this one I think is the one I just...
	This is what we just did.
	Yeah, but they've...
	Oh, it was the Blongino.
	It was about the Epstein thing.
	Apparently.
	The scoop is that there's going to be video that's going to confirm that Epstein took his own life.
	It's not video, or at least from what Bongino said, it's not video of him actually doing it.
	It's video of the MCC, which is the Metropolitan Correctional Center, which is where Epstein was.
	And it shows that he was the only one that was in the vicinity.
	That no one else was there, and he was alone in his cell, and he ended up taking his own life.
	Now, this is the problem.
	And this is, again, no criticism of Bongino, except maybe that first Bartiromo PR disaster.
	It will linger and haunt for a long time.
	The problem is people are saying, I don't believe Bongino, period.
	I don't believe the video.
	And even if I see the video, This is the problem about living in a post-truth world where you genuinely don't know what to believe anymore.
	And we've been told enough conflicting stories and or outright lies.
	And I'm not talking about Bongino or Patel right now.
	I'm talking about the corrupt administration prior to where they told us that cameras malfunctioned.
	And we said, that's bullcrap.
	The cameras couldn't have malfunctioned.
	No, no, they did.
	and they deleted the footage.
	But they told us all the footage was deleted.
	People are going to say, what do I know about this footage?
	What do I make of this footage?
	So people are going to say, on the one hand, I don't believe the footage is authentic.
	I'm going to say this.
	Assume the video that we're going to see is authentic.
	There are two elements to the conspiracy here.
	One is that someone actually killed Jeffrey Epstein and they're covering it up.
	The other is that Epstein was allowed to kill himself while they passed it off as a suicide while it was facilitated by the corrupt and weaponized FBI that existed at the time.
	I'll play the clip now and I'm going to shut my big face and you'll understand what I'm saying here and we'll get to this here.
	We'll get to all the questions.
	Listen.
	I'm just telling you what we see in the file.
	I just want to be crystal clear on this.
	I am not asking anyone to believe me.
	I'm telling you what's there and what isn't.
	Right.
	There is nothing in the file at this point on the Epstein case.
	and there's gonna be a disclosure on this coming shortly.
	We are working through some There is video, that is something the public No, no.
	not the actual act, but the entire MCC Bay There's video that when you look at the video, and we will release, that's what's taken a while on this, we are working on cleaning it up to make sure you have an enhanced, and we're going to give the original so you don't think there were any shenanigans.
	You're going to see there's no one there but him.
	There's just nobody there.
	So I say to people all the time, if you have a tip, let us know.
	But there's no DNA.
	There's no audio.
	There's no fingerprints.
	There's no suspects.
	There's no accomplices.
	There's no tips.
	There is nothing.
	If you have it, I'm happy to see it.
	There's video clear as day.
	He's the only person in there and the only person coming out.
	You can see it.
	If you've seen the tweet, then it'll be repetitive.
	This is where I would have had follow-up questions.
	If you think Dan is lying and that the videos doesn't exist, There'll be an impasse.
	Either that video comes out or it doesn't, and you'll either be right or wrong.
	When that video comes out, to the extent that that video exists, I'm going to leave this up in the backdrop and bring it up if I need it.
	If that video comes out, some people are going to argue, okay, so if it doesn't show what happened in his cell at the time it happened, someone could have snuck in behind the camera, someone could have snuck in through another door and killed Epstein and then fled.
	And if you don't have contiguous.
	You don't know what happened in the cell and you don't know if someone came in through a vent in the ceiling, killed Epstein, then crawled back up.
	So there'll be that element of doubt, even if what Bongino is saying is true.
	The most important thing, take for granted.
	In fact, operate on the basis that what Bongino is telling you is true.
	There was no one else there.
	That's exactly the subsidiary element of the conspiracy.
	How was it that no one else was there?
	And this is not a shot at Patel or Bongino.
	These are the questions that I have of the previous administration.
	How is it that no one else was there when you're dealing with the most wanted, the most relevant perpetrator in America at the time?
	How is it that he was alone in his cell?
	How is it that he was alone?
	How was it that he had extra bed linens in his cell as was reported at the time?
	Some people say, yeah, even that doesn't make sense because those bed linens, they're like made like tissue paper.
	They can't support any weight.
	And that's the purpose of it because, you know, you don't want people hanging themselves with their bed linens.
	So you give them tears like paper.
	You can sleep in it.
	It might give you a little layer of warmth and comfort, but you can't hang yourself with it.
	How was it that he had so much of this linen that he could fashion a rope to hang himself?
	Was the linen, in fact, the tissue paper linen, or was it regular linen?
	And so the very facts of the video are the very elements of the conspiracy.
	How was it that any of this could have been allowed to happen for the most wanted, relevant perpetrator, defendant in America at the time?
	I mean, let's see what those questions were, because there's a number of questions, that this is what the general population who have been traumatized by however long of pathological lies from corrupt administrations and a weaponized FBI, he committed suicide.
	The footage was deleted and, you know, the cameras malfunctioned.
	All right, no, well, there's some footage.
	It shows that he was alone.
	That's the conspiracy.
	How was it that he was left alone, unsupervised?
	Who within the MCC made that decision to leave him unsupervised?
	Did they get any calls from outside forces to make sure that he's unsupervised, to make sure that there's extra linens?
	You know, in a prison, I presume it sort of operates a bit like a hotel.
	You know who's servicing what rooms.
	You know who's delivering what to what rooms.
	Who delivered extra linens to his cell?
	This is what the population wants to see by way of total transparency.
	He was taken off suicide watch.
	Just before his successful attempt after his previous unsuccessful attempt.
	From what I understand, I might be wrong.
	I don't think I am.
	The psychologist, psychiatrist, whoever met with him face to face and said we can now take him off suicide watch, he's no longer suicidal.
	Malpractice, maybe.
	Who was that person?
	Like, who is that doctor?
	What are their political leanings?
	What are their connections?
	That's where there could be conspiracy here.
	How did he end up with extra bed linens in his cell?
	Okay.
	What were those linens made of?
	I'd like to know that.
	And most importantly, this was Brianna Morello.
	I can't really steal her thought, although it's, you know, questions we were all asking.
	Who was Epstein in communication with in the week before he took his own life, even assuming he took it this way?
	Was he in touch with other people who were not his lawyers?
	Was he in touch with politicians?
	Who did he have visitors from?
	Who did he get calls from in the month or two leading up to his death?
	These are questions I would have had, but the Fox News hit, in as much as it's 15 minutes, which is pretty long format, is still pretty short format.
	And these are questions that people have.
	And the longer that they go unanswered, the more they're going to think nefarious thoughts of everyone involved.
	So those are follow-up questions I would have loved to have answered, or I would love to ask, and I'll give everyone the link there.
	You can go share the tweet, and maybe we'll get answers to those questions, because they're not questions that are going to go away.
	And I believe what Bongino's saying.
	We're going to see a video that's going to show Epstein was alone in his cell when he took his own life.
	Next questions are, how did that happen?
	Who facilitated that?
	What's the doctor who told him that he's no longer at risk for suicide?
	And how did it happen that he was allowed to take his own life when he was probably the most relevant, needed, defendant, potential witness that could implicate everyone from Prince Andrew to Stephen Hawking in some broad, global blackmail conspiracy?
	So there's that.
	We're going to get into Patel in a second.
	I don't think I had any more on Bongino's interview.
	It's good.
	It's true.
	It's only been a few months.
	They're recovering from the PR disaster of the Bartiromo interview.
	There are a lot of questions that people have.
	It's not clear what they can discuss, what they can disclose.
	It's not clear what's a current investigation that they cannot disclose information about.
	You know, the FBI's classic line.
	We cannot comment on the existence or non-existence of any investigation.
	I would like to know, to the extent that it's...
	Is Comey under investigation?
	Have recommendations for charges been suggested against Comey?
	Is the Epstein case closed?
	And if it is, why can't we have access to all of it?
	Is the Butler assassination attempt case closed?
	These are the biggest issues of our current time.
	And we have questions and we need answers.
	I appreciated Bongino's answer.
	I personally don't care about the cocaine in the White House anymore.
	But I appreciate Bongino's answer in that interview.
	It's still an unsolved criminal case that is highly relevant.
	I could care less about that one, but I appreciate that it's, you know, still relevant.
	How did that get in the House and who participated in the cover-up?
	At the end of the day here, also, you're not just dealing with crimes, you're dealing with cover-ups that could lead places.
	You know, sometimes you just need the pretext.
	Let's go reinvestigate the cocaine in the White House and see where that may lead.
	We saw what happened with Russia.
	Lo and behold, we're just, you know.
	Getting a FISA warrant against Carter Page.
	Boom!
	We've got everyone in the Trump administration being wiretapped but not wiretapped.
	I don't care about the cocaine case, but I can appreciate why it's important and where it can lead.
	January 6th pipe bomber.
	Bongino says there's going to be some disclosures in that.
	We know what he said he knew, and I have no doubt that he knew what he was talking about when he was confident it was an inside job.
	We'll see about that.
	January 6th pipe bomb.
	January 6th confidential human sources infiltrating the insurrection we care about.
	Epstein, I appreciate that some people don't think it's relevant, don't care about it.
	He's dead, and what difference does it make at this point?
	I vehemently disagree with that.
	Him having been allowed to kill himself doesn't resolve the conspiracy.
	It actually just creates the second element of it.
	And there was another one in there.
	The COVID cover-up.
	Hold on.
	This is another one that we're talking about here.
	Where was it?
	There was a question of a COVID cover-up.
	Was it Bongino?
	I think it was this right here.
	Bongino tweets out.
	This was yesterday, May 28th.
	As we read and process reports of a new COVID strain emerging, I want you to know that we are actively investigating in multiple field offices the cover-up of the origin of the COVID-19 virus along with associated matters requiring our attention.
	You deserve answers.
	We do.
	I think we're going to get them.
	I think a lot of us are impatient.
	But one thing that's very interesting, by the way, I do question, legally speaking, if there's a new COVID strain that comes out that results from gain-of-function research that Anthony Fauci was not participating in but was indirectly participating in.
	I wonder what good a pardon will do for that.
	That's assuming the pardons even remain valid, because if it turns out that Joe Biden did not issue those pardons, there's grounds to contest them, not on the mental acuity of Joe Biden, on whether or not they were actually fraudulently issued without his knowledge in the first place.
	And then, holy crab apples, it's game on.
	Now, let's bring it up to Patel here for a bit.
	Patel was also out there.
	I want to hear right here.
	Leave a fry, Michael.
	What's this one?
	Oh, Cash Patel.
	Here we go.
	Listen to this.
	Well, it's actually on, you know, the Chinese virus, the China virus, which was used as a bioweapon to sway elections, to steal the election from Donald Trump, to allow them to change the rules, to steal it, period.
	Listen to what he has to say here.
	Doing a lot of things all at once.
	One of the operations is on fentanyl, Operation Raptor.
	It's really across four continents, but not only the fentanyl, but also the precursors to fentanyl from China.
	Brett, almost no one's talking about it.
	Fentanyl is a synthesized manufactured drug.
	You don't clip it from a tree.
	And if you want to choke off the amount of fentanyl that's pouring into America, that's killing an American citizen almost every seven minutes, you've got to go to the source.
	So one of the first things I did when I became the director of the FBI, I said, we're going to mainland China.
	We're hitting up the fentanyl precursor laboratories and the banks that are moving the money and the transshipment routes.
	We started that over almost 90 days ago.
	We are going to suffocate the snake.
	We're going to cut off its head.
	We're going to use our inner agency partners at Treasury for sanctions, at State Department for diplomatic negotiations.
	But the simple fact is the Chinese and the CCP have gotten smart.
	They said, OK, we're going to stop sending fentanyl precursors directly to Mexico because you've done such a good job at suffocating the southern border.
	We're going to send them elsewhere through other agencies, through other countries.
	And we are attacking those points to choke off the fentanyl precursor distribution.
	No one has done that before.
	To date, this year, we have seized 1,000 kilograms.
	Of fentanyl in the United States of America.
	That's 480 million lethal doses.
	That's enough to kill everyone in America and Canada combined.
	And that's just in these three months.
	They're playing the long game.
	The fentanyl production by the CCP, I firmly believe, is their way of killing tens of thousands of military-aged men and women in the United States of America.
	They are wiping out generations of Americans that could come here and be an FBI agent.
	Well, I would say he views it as the perspective from the FBI, being an FBI agent.
	I view it as military-age men who can serve in the military to defend the country against foreign invaders.
	Who might those foreign invaders be?
	Well, it might be a Chinese army now invading a country that has been dwindled of its defense resources because of the opioid war that China has been waging against America.
	Appreciate that, by the way.
	We want to give...
	You have to appreciate how important it is that Patel, at the highest level of government, is now saying what was once fringe conspiracy theory.
	I think it was Steve Bannon, who, I don't want to say said it first, but has been saying it for a long time.
	I've been saying it for a long time, but less time, that the fentanyl crisis is chemical warfare.
	And I don't want to, I know Bannon said it.
	I don't want to not give anybody credit who deserves the credit.
	Do it all the time, but I do my best.
	The fentanyl crisis was chemical warfare and is chemical warfare against the fighting aged men and women of America.
	And once upon a time, that was called crazy conspiracy theory, racist conspiracy theory, because you can't say anything about the Chinese Communist Party without someone saying, oh, you're talking about all Chinese people.
	Chinese people are as much a victim of the CCP as the rest of the world.
	It was once conspiracy theory to suggest that this was chemical warfare intended to wipe out the defense bracket of a country, and now Kash Patel, at the head of the FBI, is saying it out loud prime time.
	That's progress.
	When I've been saying for a long time that Canada has become a national security threat to America, now you understand why.
	And now you understand what Patel's getting at right there.
	You go to mainland China, but mainland China, mainland Communist Party has gotten smart.
	They're now using other countries to ship the precursors to to make the fentanyl super labs.
	And Mexico, with its highly militarized border, might be getting a little bit too difficult to smuggle it in over.
	Where have they been going?
	And don't forget this.
	China has secured financial business interests in Mexico.
	China has infiltrated Mexico.
	It's also infiltrated Canada.
	There's a reason why Pierre Poilier, leader of the Conservative Party, at one point during the election, referred to Canada as the fentanyl capital of the world.
	And you had a bunch of brain-dead, retarded liberals say, this is an insult, Canada's a great place.
	Go Google it, you stupid jackasses.
	Vancouver is literally referred to as the fentanyl capital of the world.
	The fentanyl super labs that exist in Canada, that are operating virtually unabated, will blow your mind.
	The amount of fentanyl production out of Canada, from precursors that are being shipped to Canada, will blow your mind.
	The amount of that fentanyl, which is more than, not only can be consumed by Canada, but that could kill all of Canada, is being shipped abroad, will blow your mind.
	I've had the good fortune of having him on the channel.
	He knows this better than anybody out there.
	China has infiltrated Canada.
	Economically, financially, militarily, they are shipping their precursors to Canada, and Canada has become the fentanyl capital of the world with their fentanyl super labs, manufacturing it in numbers that are destined for export to other countries, including America.
	Who do you think Patel is talking about when he says other countries now have become the relevant choke points to address?
	Canada.
	And you get No, we got to go elect the same government that put Canada into that situation of despair in the first place out of spite to Trump.
	Congratulations, idiots.
	You've cut your nose off to spite your face.
	So Patel now is saying out loud what we have known for a while, what many of us have been saying for a while, and he's saying it loud and clear.
	And it's a very, very important thing, not just to say out loud, but to understand and appreciate.
	In Canada, over 600 Canadians die monthly.
	From opioid overdoses, 80% of that is attributed to fentanyl.
	In America, 100,000 a year?
	And it typically tends to be younger men aged 18 to 35?
	Well, you know, when you are the Chinese Communist Party playing a very long game chess, what does that mean in a generation?
	It means that you've successfully wiped out the fighting-aged men.
	And now you've got an administration that is understanding this existential threat coming from both China and from Canada's hat.
	I'm sorry, America's hat, Canada.
	Get there in a second.
	I want to say Swampy12345 is, I believe now, a member of our VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com community.
	Swampy, welcome to the channel.
	Thank you for coming.
	Bondi Patel Bongino would have been great on the Warren Commission.
	I get the joke.
	Encryptus says Bongino is not sitting like he used to.
	It should be shoulders back, chest out, head up.
	The exact opposite right now.
	Contrite may be the word.
	Sad and aged 10 years.
	You know, some people are saying, you know, he looks like he's being held hostage in these interviews and the other part of it says like, maybe that's exactly, But there's no question demeanor is different.
	But there's also no question he is literally carrying the weight of the world on his shoulders right now.
	He's got the expectations, high expectations of everyone out there.
	And it's not just that people can be unforgiving if they don't deliver results.
	People can be immediately...
	It's a tough thing.
	They are answering letters from God right now.
	Trump is doing a very, very, very good job doing it.
	But even Trump, in his interview with Bret Baier, was expressing some frustration.
	You know, he said, you know, my team is doing well.
	But, and it's quite clear that on certain issues, Butler assassination attempts, other files, even Trump.
	It sounded like he's expecting more results quickly.
	GingerNinja1776, who is the man that I'm here to meet, who's partaking in the build.
	I'm going to meet him after this stream.
	There are not enough middle fingers on two healthy people's hands for Dina Hinshaw.
	That's a keeper.
	Yeah, we'll put that on a – Nobody knows who Dina Hinshaw is outside of the stream.
	Maybe we can put her on blast the way she deserves to.
	Commander Kim!
	It says, how do we know that Epstein wasn't extracted and gave up the goods on everyone?
	What is Dan supposed to do?
	That Epstein is napping on a beach under witness protection?
	We know, Dan.
	Trust Dan.
	Hold on.
	Let me read this again.
	How do we not know that Epstein wasn't extracted?
	We don't.
	We'll never know if Epstein's not dead.
	There are people out there who don't believe that Epstein is dead or who believe that Epstein is not dead.
	But, you know, if they've got the goods and they've got to maintain that story, you know, for the narrative.
	We got to see some goods.
	I mean, you know, it's one thing to say, okay, Epstein's dead.
	It doesn't matter whether or not he did it or someone else killed him.
	So we can move on from there.
	But you move on from there to the network, not move on to another subject entirely.
	Encryptus says, devil's advocate on the video.
	AI video is extraordinary now.
	And that is just the tools us plebs can use.
	What about an AI that the government has?
	I put out the poll.
	You see video footage of it.
	What do you think?
	He didn't kill himself?
	He did kill himself?
	Or AI generated?
	And the majority of the answers, I think it was like almost 50% of a four-option poll said AI generated.
	That people would believe it was AI generated.
	This is unfortunately the reality of the world in which we live.
	It's post-truth now.
	We're going to quickly get to a point where we – Ah, cripe.
	I'm just king of Biltong.
	I was trying to read your thing live.
	Biltong is one of the highest protein snacks in the world, boasting nearly 50% protein and packed with B12 creatine, iron, zinc, and more.
	Visit BiltongUSA.com.
	Code Viva for 10% off.
	Yeah.
	I mean, the funny thing is this stuff, I'm obsessive compulsive and it's an issue.
	This stuff keeps me up at night and I'm sufficiently Okay, let me see.
	What else do we got here?
	There was more coming from, I think there was more from Patel that I wanted to get to.
	Yeah, I think that should be it.
	But speaking of something that's funny, speaking of AI, The breaking news of the day, by the way, is that Trump's AI czar, David Sachs, claims Senator Elizabeth Warren controlled the auto pen for Biden.
	I want to know.
	OK, I haven't read this yet.
	Encryptus sent this to me before the show.
	I was busy driving, multitasking and trying to keep up to date with the news.
	And I hadn't read this.
	A key Trump administration official has claimed the left wing Elizabeth Warren called the shots on the Biden administration's restrictive approach to cryptocurrencies.
	White House artificial intelligence and crypto czar David Sachs argued Tuesday night that Warren has a, quote, pathological hatred, end quote, for crypto and pushed the Biden administration to suppress the nascent, nascent technology.
	Hold on one second.
	Look up nascent.
	Continue.
	Nashent or not.
	How do we spell it?
	Nassient Oh, like naissance.
	Like, if I could get a country of origin in a spelling bee.
	Country of origin?
	It is from probably Latin or French.
	Naissance.
	To be birthed.
	All right, so she doesn't like it.
	Quote, this is a financial system in the future, Jesse, and we have to encourage it.
	Saks told Fox News, Jesse, is Fox News the only outlet that gets...
	I mean, it's one thing to go on friendly journalism, but come on, throw some bones to the independent media out there.
	What the Biden administration was doing, and let's face it, it wasn't Biden.
	Elizabeth Warren controlled the autopendant during that administration.
	How does he know that?
	She, for some reason, has the pathological hatred of cryptocurrency.
	Again, fine.
	Sachs later clarified to the post in his comments were specific to crypto.
	And pointed to Warren's close ties to former Securities and Exchange Commissioner Chair Gary Gensler, another critic of the decentralized currency.
	Quote, just to be clear, I was talking about the issue of crypto, end quote.
	Sounds like he got a call from a lawyer.
	Saks emphasized, it won't come as a surprise to anyone in the crypto community that Elizabeth Warren was calling the shots on crypto policy during the administration.
	See, that's what I call.
	So, It got me excited.
	I thought there was some definitive evidence that Elizabeth Warren, for whatever the reason, was the one controlling the auto pen for everything, not just for crypto.
	And then he has to walk it back like a little sissy because he's going to get sued for defamation for making a defamatory accusation about the Pocahontas pathological liar woman who is less Indian than I am.
	But she still says the land recognition whenever she gives a speech.
	So good for Elizabeth Warren.
	Bambi Rose says, why not start arresting the people in the videos that they've already looked at?
	There's going to be answers.
	Patel says they've got to protect the victims, which means there's a perpetrator.
	And I don't believe that it was only Jeffrey Epstein trafficking for his own personal solo satisfaction.
	So there's that.
	All right, let's go to the locals chat and see what's going on in here.
	Viva, try rsbnviarumble.com for DJT press conferences, etc.
	That is from Care Grant.
	If you understand that Sheetz went down his back, not up his skull like a rope on a normal hanging.
	This is from Bill Brown.
	You see how the angle of pressure changes, breaking bones.
	Oh, I see what you're saying, Bill.
	That's interesting.
	So people often say that there are broken bones here, which is inconsistent with the hanging.
	And Bill is saying, I don't know, if you hang yourself upside down with your head's pointing down and the sheet's going up, that could break these bones with the pressure and make it look like a neck strength.
	That's interesting.
	I hadn't thought about that.
	Yeah.
	And Cryptis, can you possibly make...
	Says Boopsie.
	Well, now I gotta go up to the tipped chat and see what's going on here.
	Oopsie, says, The Comey 8647 thing gets handed over to the Secret Service, not the FBI.
	Then Cash says the FBI is overwhelmed with Comey copycats, but wouldn't those be handed over to Secret Service too?
	The FBI, quote, doesn't prosecute, end quote, but Secret Service doesn't prosecute either, right?
	So Secret Service must be, quote, investigating, end quote, Comey's 8647, but the FBI is investigating all the Comey copycats?
	Can you help this make sense to me?
	I can do one better.
	I'll see if I can get a direct answer from anyone within.
	I'll tweet it out to Kash Patel.
	I don't think he follows me.
	My understanding, they're all within the broader umbrella of the DOJ.
	It's just that some make recommendations, other make prosecutorial decisions.
	So Boopsy, I don't have a Yeah, I'll see if I can't get a direct answer to that.
	And see if I can tap my sources in the journalistic sense, not in the biblical sense.
	All right, let's see what we've got going on here.
	No, we've done good.
	Oh, there.
	Okay.
	So other breaking news of the day.
	I mean, the news is breaking so fast that there is an overturning of the ridiculous court decision that prohibited Trump from imposing his own tax.
	So this was from five hours ago, where we were all lamenting in the judicial activism of the federal court system, telling Trump, we get to decide what your tariff policy is, not you.
	U.S. Trade Court blocks Trump's sweeping tariff.
	What happens now?
	Spoiler alert, a court of appeals just overturned that, but we'll get to that in a second.
	A U.S. federal court has blocked President Donald Trump's sweeping global trade tariffs in a major blow to a key component of this election, economic policies.
	Can you imagine a federal court that thinks it has the power to do this?
	It's like, you know, they overturned Chevron because administrative bodies should not have the right to write their rules, interpret their rules, and enforce their rules.
	That is what the rogue activist federal judicial branch is doing right now.
	The Court of International Trade ruled that an emergency law invoked by the White House did not give the president unilateral authority to impose tariffs on nearly every one of the world's countries.
	Oh, why not?
	The New York-based, you know, it's going to be good, court said the U.S. Constitution gave Congress exclusive powers to regulate commerce with other nations, and that was not superseded by the president's remit to safeguard the economy.
	Even I know that there's a precedent that authorizes Trump, the president, to do this.
	I forget what it's called right now, but I mentioned it in one of the earlier streams.
	The White House has asked the court to block the order of suspending the
	Okay, a three-judge panel ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, law that Trump cited to justify the tariffs, did not give him power to impose the sweeping import taxes.
	The court also blocked a separate set of levies that the Trump administration imposed on China, Mexico, and Canada, three affiliated countries, and that two of them are owned and operated by the first.
	In response to what the administration said was the unacceptable flow of drugs and illegal immigrants into the U.S. However, the court was asked to address teleacupon.
	What has been the reaction so far?
	Well, it doesn't really matter.
	I can tell you what the reaction has been so far.
	Overturned!
	I hope I didn't misread this, by the way.
	I'm going to fact check myself in real time.
	Federal court temporarily reinstates most of Trump's sweeping tariffs.
	May 29th.
	A federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated the most sweeping of presidential Donald Trump's tariffs a day after a trade court had ruled that Trump exceeded his authority in imposing the duties and had ordered an immediate block to them.
	The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal District in Washington's order provided no opinion or reasoning but directed the plaintiffs in the case to respond by June 5 and the administration by June 9. Okay,
	US, which we have seen and proven in this very live stream.
	Reporting by Summer Zen, Samuel Indic and Sarah Marsh.
	Additional reporting by...
	So overturned.
	And they didn't give any opinion, A, because they didn't have enough time to, and B, that's how absurd it was.
	That the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington had to overturn the judicial activism coming from the lower levels.
	So the news moves fast, people, and there needs to be some SCOTUS intervention to rein in the judicial activism that is attempting to usurp the executive function of the presidency and turn America into the parliamentary government that the Democrats so desperately want to turn it into so they can look like Canada and implement the same policies as we do in Canada.
	Oy, oy, oy, oy, oy.
	T. Brooks123 says, all the FBI need to investigate and build a case.
	Give Dan time.
	It's only been 90 days.
	He's probably still looking for wind.
	where the bodies are buried.
	Oh, no, I agree.
	It's just the...
	Don't trust me, you'll see the file too.
	Part of the question, part of the very question is, what file are they looking at?
	Are they looking at the file that was prepared by the corrupt, weaponized former FBI?
	Because if they are, people are saying, we don't want you to look at the file.
	We want you to investigate the investigators.
	We don't want you to rely on the findings of the crooks.
	We want you to go investigate the crooks.
	We don't trust the file.
	So that's what they need to make clear from a PR perspective.
	All right, are they temporarily relying on that file to make observations?
	And are they investigating those who prepared that file because nobody believes that file that they've inherited?
	It's a massive tightrope.
	It's probably hell on earth as far as an environment goes that they're working under.
	All right, what we're going to do, we're going to have a very, very quick after party because the kid here has been very good and I don't want to push my luck.
	We're going to have a quick after party on Locals and it might be very quick because I'm going to go meet Ginger Ninja, but there's going to be a ton of exclusive stuff over on Locals when I meet Ginger Ninja and we might go And I'll post some videos of that.
	So thank you all for being here.
	Sorry for the...
	Sorry.
	Can we raid Dr. Drew?
	Yes, absolutely.
	Did you hurt yourself?
	I knew it.
	Kid thinks you can slide on carpet on your knees.
	It's going to have outright carpet.
	We're going to raid Dr. Drew.
	Go say hi.
	Show some love.
	Thank you all for being here.
	I'll be back in my studio by Sunday.
	So tomorrow's stream is going to be...
	Is going to be...
	Hold on a second.
	It's going to be from a hotel as well.
	What day is it today?
	It's Thursday today, so Friday.
	I'll get a car vlog on.
	Maybe I'm going to synthesize this while the stream into a...
	And that's it.
	Boopsie says, if I remember correctly, you gave the name.
	You gave the name COVID-19, which stood for Coronavirus-19 for the year 2019.
	But coronaviruses can be as simple as the common cold.
	So I think it is a narrative they want to continue.
	The scare of COVID.
	But the viruses will continue to mutate.
	Am I wrong?
	Thank you.
	The COVID was never, as far as I'm concerned, it was just a bad flu season.
	You know, everyone seems to forget 2018.
	We had such a bad flu season in Canada and in the States that hospitals were overrun and they suspended elective surgeries.
	You okay?
	They suspended elective surgeries.
	So this was just a bad flu season, repackaged and rebranded.
	But I do believe it came from a genetically modified or gain-of-function virus that might have made it a little bit more virulent than the flu.
	Because I believe I got COVID.
	Go back and watch my video, the vlog on when they removed Donald Trump from Home Alone on the Canadian broadcast.
	I was so sick, I thought I was going to die.
	Like I was Googling encephalitis.
	I was Googling, you know, can I...
	And I thought I was catching some sort of brain-eating virus.
	And I was so sick and had such high fever and such a massive headache.
	I was like, if I were an older person living alone, I think I would have been hospitalized.
	And then I probably would have been killed by the treatment they would have given me.
	So I do believe it was a virus.
	I believe it was more virulent than a standard flu.
	I believe it was the result of gain of function research in Wuhan, China.
	But I do believe it was And if anybody believes the excuse for that, I've got a bridge to sell you.
	Okay, go raid Dr. Drew.
	Okay, stop.
	There's people downstairs.
	Okay.
	Locals after party.
	Here we come.
	Everybody, Godspeed.
	I will see locals now.
	I will see everyone on Rumble tomorrow.
	Thank you all for being here.
	Like, share, subscribe.
	You know what to do.
	Snip, clip, share away.

▲