All Episodes
Previous Next
May 30, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:16:08
Alex Jones Getting Appelate Relief in Texas Sandy Hook Case? TPS Ruling Overturned! AI Fraud & MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greasy, fat, and ugly in the bottom left-hand part of the screen.
Benny Johnson on the right, who was hosting Viva Frye, and James Comey, a man who should have been arrested yesterday, on the right.
Viva's appearance on Benny Johnson earlier today.
Why is James Comey's daughter allowed to continue a trial against, well, Epstein?
Gillian Maxwell?
Did he?
Like, what exactly is going on here?
There are no coincidences in life?
There's no good excuse for it.
Period.
Maybe the argument is you can't fire her.
Some people were hypothesizing that James Comey's 86-47 stunt was to make his daughter fireproof because if they fired her then it would look like retaliation.
The bottom line, I don't know Bondi.
I don't know her personally.
I didn't have any preemptive faith in her because I didn't know her like I knew Bongino and what I know of Patel.
It's inexcusable.
There's no good excuse for it.
Period.
But you have Maureen Comey, James Comey's daughter, working on the Diddy file and from What I understand, you know, not necessarily running the best prosecution ever.
The prosecution that they're running, limited to two defendants, his sex trafficking, again, it's like Epstein only sex trafficked for his own personal pleasure.
The cameras that were set up in Diddy Mansion apparently were only for his own sex video free costs for his own personal satisfaction.
Horse crap.
She should not be on that case anymore.
It's corruption to the core and it's inaction like that that will cause a lot of people to distrust the Bondi and the current administration because there's no good excuse for it that I know of.
Right.
Why would you allow Lee Harvey Oswald's kid to work in the next Kennedy administration?
Why would you let John Hinckley work for Ronald Reagan?
I don't, you know, it doesn't make any sense.
It makes zero sense.
Why would Donald Trump Hold on.
You know, it's the past administration.
She has a job.
Maybe there's some rules for dismissal.
But the bottom line is you cannot have the Trump administration pursuing Biden era policies or Biden era personnel on key issues.
We can stop it here.
Good afternoon, everybody.
Still on the road in Georgia.
And tomorrow morning is the ribbon cutting on the A Soldier Journey's Home delivery of a fully built house.
To the needs of a disabled veteran, this individual who, they do one house a year.
This is Ginger Ninja Luke in our locals community who is one of the carpenters that assisted in putting together a house from foundation to hands, keys, delivery in two weeks.
This particular veteran who is being gifted this house is a double amputee and it's a one-story, fully functional wheel-in shower.
It's an amazing place.
The ribbon cutting is tomorrow, and I'm still on the road, and then we've got to do nine hours back to Boca for the Sunday night show.
But with that said, everybody, good Friday afternoon.
I was on with Benny Johnson this morning.
Let's get mixed up between Benny Johnson and Benny Thompson.
One is a good man that I trust, and the other one is a scoundrel of all scoundrels.
Benny Thompson, bad man.
Benny Johnson.
Good man.
And we were talking about the Diddy trial.
Maureen Comey is still one of the lead prosecutors in that trial.
And the trial is progressing exactly as it should if one is operating on the hypothesis that the trial is the cover-up.
They're going to get Diddy.
They'll sentence him to 10, 15 years.
He'll get out and whatever.
I don't know how it works on the federal level.
85% of the sentence.
Apparently, it was all just, you know, to record his own private sex video stuff.
And that's it.
Nice little toe.
Nice little bow tied in this story.
Forget about it.
Shove it into the anals of history or annals of history.
Kind of pun intended.
I feel gross right there.
Good afternoon, everybody.
How goes the battle?
Viva Frye, if you don't know who I am, former Montreal litigator turned current Florida rumbler on the road in Georgia.
Never a dull day?
We should be live right now across Rumble.
We do this on Twitter also, but Twitter, you know, for live streaming, whatever, and vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
We've got some good news coming out of the day.
Some Alex Jones, mild silver lining, potential for silver lining in that an appellate judge in Texas was receptive to Alex Jones' argument that the punitive damages not being capped at $750,000 in the Sandy Hook, Texas case, but rather being blown up to $45 million, might not be legal.
But the way the media covers it is outrageous.
You got another ruling that's a good ruling coming down from the Supreme Court that is authorizing the president to be the president.
That is, what is it, bequeathing?
That is, gifting the powers of the executive back to the president.
So now the Supreme Court says, maybe in the interim, while some of the actions of the president, executive action, as relates to temporary protective status of Migrants, criminal aliens will get there.
Maybe we're going to let the president be the president, and if someone succeeds on a challenge, we'll deal with it at that point, as opposed to having the judicial overrun the executive in the interim, thus depriving the executive of even being the executive.
And there's something else in the backdrop.
I forget what it is.
What did we start off with?
We started off with the sex tapes, Epstein stuff.
There's scandal going around on Twitter.
I don't care for it.
I don't care about it.
You can go see what's trending.
it's as far as I'm concerned, pure gossip.
I could appreciate people can...
If you don't know, what's either a sex tape or something, some obviously private and private
I have little to no interest in any of these stories to the extent that there's nothing broader of more national, international importance other than people's private embarrassing predilections, whatever.
But if you haven't heard about it, that's what's going on.
And now I'm trying to see if a tweet that I put on the subject is out.
Well, that's very interesting.
Hold on one second.
Let me just screen grab this so that I don't...
Ian Carroll, who's a...
Here we go.
Let me bring this up.
This relates to some tape that people are claiming is blackmail extortion of Glenn Greenwald and its retribution for his criticism of Israel.
This is where you realize people can be a little bit unhinged.
Unless there's evidence out there that I don't know of.
Ian Carroll, who's a man that I like and get along with, puts out a tweet that says, the Glenn Greenwald scandal just proves the point.
Israel's modern image is built on blackmail.
Glenn Greenwald, you just keep being one of the best journalists of our time, and you're all good.
Sorry you're going through this.
The scandal reflects worse on Zionists than you.
Now, I haven't been paying much attention to this only because it broke today and I don't care about invading people's private lives just because someone posted a video to the internet.
that Lord knows how it got out there.
Just a mild word of advice for anybody who doesn't I don't say this one very often.
You know, keep your schmeckle in your pants.
Nothing good happens after midnight.
And don't take pictures of yourself doing sexy time.
Even if it's with your wife or your husband or you're married or whatever, don't do it.
Because even if the person that you are taking the video with is trusted, trustworthy, people can hack your phones.
People can get this information and people can use it for nefarious purposes, not necessarily for blackmail or extortion, but just for humiliation.
My goodness, I want...
So, schmeckle in your pants.
Get married, young-ish.
Stay married.
Don't get divorced.
And nothing good happens after midnight, 10 o 'clock, 8 o 'clock, depending on the day.
And don't take videos of yourselves in private, intimate, or compromising positions.
Pun intended.
It looks like that might have been what happened with Glenn Greenwald.
I mean, from the video, it just looks, I mean, it looks like he might have been paying for SEX or engaging in some fetish.
People have fetishes and that's, my goodness, I mean, be a lawyer for 10 years.
You'll realize what goes on behind closed doors and you'll understand.
There's nothing uniquely depraved about it.
There's nothing, I won't say abnormal, but there's nothing singularly unique about it.
It just becomes public, and the more public the person, the more embarrassing the incident.
But Ian Carroll puts out a tweet that says there's some knowledge that this is blackmail material and that Israel is behind it.
And I like Ian Carroll.
I know that he might be Zionist-obsessed.
He might have ZTD.
No, hold on a second.
It's not ZTD.
It would be He might have ZDS.
He might have ZDS.
I just ask Ian, sincerely, because by the way, if there is evidence that this is Zionist blackmail, I'd like to know as well.
But what evidence is there that the video was being used for blackmail at all, as opposed to just some private sex video that got leaked?
This is not like a Kardashian-esque, or who is the other one there who is, oh, the Baywatch woman.
You know who I'm talking about anyhow.
When we were kids and that one was leaked, oh my goodness, those were back in the heydays of the internet.
What evidence is there that this was blackmail material or being used as blackmail material or extortion material, period?
Because if there is such evidence, I would like to see it.
And if there is such evidence that it was being used as blackmail material extortion to silence Glenn.
Yeah, Glenn.
Glenn Greenwald.
What evidence is there that the Zionists were behind it?
Or Israel?
If they were, I would love to be the first one to know.
Or at least I would love to know.
And so I'll ask the audience to fact check what evidence there was, period, of blackmail, let alone Zionists behind it.
Because these are the types of jumping to conclusions that could cause people to question otherwise good work coming from Ian Carroll.
And I say that with actual frustration We all have our dots that we want to connect, and if you're not sufficiently self-aware of those dots that you might want to connect, you might connect them too quickly, too hastily, to your own detriment.
But that's what's going on in the news, peeps.
Buffalo Betsy in the house at our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community says, Glenn is a great journalist who has contributed so much on such important topics.
I am horrified for him and so hurt by the shit people are saying about him.
I feel gross, dirty, stupid, juvenile gossipy even talking about it.
People are into very bizarre things.
I mean, I remember...
But the main character, Michael C. Hall in Six Feet Under, I was young when I saw that.
Didn't fully appreciate it in the context of life.
People are into weird things.
People are into self-destructive things.
People are into drugs.
People are into cheating.
People are into sex addiction.
People have gambling addiction.
People are into sadomasochist stuff.
People are into bizarre stuff.
And I don't say no judgment in that.
Yeah, I think it's a little weird and to each their own and to the extent it doesn't affect anybody else.
It really is nobody else's business.
And if this was just someone hacking and obtaining private videos and then leaking them to humiliate somebody, fine.
If it was evidence of blackmail, fine.
But the reality is that Glenn Greenwald, if it was Zionists trying to blackmail him, He hasn't compromised on his journalistic integrity at all whatsoever under any circumstances.
So the argument of blackmail doesn't make much sense.
No, this is just embarrassing people with their private.
I won't qualify it as any more than private proclivities, private persuasions, private But keep your schmeckle in your pants.
Stay home after midnight.
And don't record yourself in intimate positions.
You will avoid a lot of life's problems.
All right, peeps.
Buffalo Betsy is back in the house and says, I think it's just as possible it was someone in Brazil.
He's been very outspoken in his criticism of their corruption, too.
Well, the person in the video was speaking Portuguese, as far as I could tell.
And it was clearly in Brazil because there was a...
it looked like he might have just been paying for paying for stuff i mean it's But I would say it's more likely Brazil because he's been much more critical of the Brazilian government.
And like, there's no besmirching Glenn Greenwald's reporting.
I think Israel probably has bigger fish to fry if it were to come to the issue of blackmailing journalists for their silence.
But anyway, that's it.
That's all it's worth.
Glenn Greenwald, I think nothing...
people are into bizarre things.
Other than that, Left and right are saying, keep being a great journalist and embarrassing as though this is, this too shall pass.
I had a great, great addition to that.
This too shall pass, biblical level wisdom.
This too shall pass, but do what you can to minimize the scars.
And that was in respect of a lot of things out there.
As bad as things are, things will pass.
And as bad That being said, you do what you can to make sure the scars don't run too deep, and that when you come back from it, you might not be stronger than ever, but make sure that you're not permanently traumatized and permanently compromised for the rest of existence.
What do we start with?
Let's start with Alex Jones, because when we talk about this too shall pass, Alex Jones, I don't know how anybody I published a vlog on Commitube just to, you know, keep that algorithm mildly revved up.
But I was thinking about this as I was fishing in a pond in Georgia.
We find worms yesterday that are borderline ninja worms.
These worms are so lively, so energetic that, you know, they practically or their nature's lures, but they like bounce around.
OK, so we find some worms and we decide to use them to go fishing in a small, beautiful Georgia Pond.
And I'm thinking about Alex Jones while I'm doing this because I know that he loves nature.
I know that he believes you need to get into nature to reacclimate spiritually.
And I'm sitting there fishing.
We're catching one bluegill after another.
And it's sort of spawning season or mating season.
So the bluegills have like a very puffed up chest.
They're just beautiful fish.
And we're catching one after the other.
and I can't even get the vlog off to do it.
But I'm thinking about Alex Jones and how there are, Can you name anybody else or top three people who have been subjected to the lawfare, the silencing, the de-platforming, the unhumaning?
Think of the people that you would say have been the prime targets of this, the number one, two, and three in no particular order.
I'm sitting there thinking, and I say Alex Jones.
Was the original?
Was the first?
Was the canary in the coal mine?
I cannot think of a top three other than Alex Jones, Donald John Trump, and Tommy Robinson.
Tommy Robinson, who I often refer to as the Alex Jones of the UK.
I'm curious to see if anybody has any other names that they would put up there.
Those are my top three.
Let's see what people say here.
Trump, Swedish Fish, which has to be totally unrelated.
And other.
AJ has been in the crosshairs of the deep state since the deep state got funded, says R. Moore.
Rudy Giuliani would be another good one.
Steve Bannon would be another good one.
But I think it's Trump, Jones, and Tommy Robinson.
And just yesterday, Alex Jones is in front of an appellate court in Texas.
I don't exactly know how the court system works there.
And he's appealing.
The ruling in the Texas Sandy Hook plaintiff's case.
And, you know, every time I do a video on this, and I take for granted everybody already knows what I've been talking about for damn near eight years, this is how Robert Barnes and I met.
This is the Genesis story, is that I did a breakdown of the Alex Jones deposition.
I remember, April-ish, 2018.
From the roof of my house, short hair, wearing sunglasses, total, total cringe.
I do a breakdown of the Alex Jones deposition and I hear the lawyer in that video say, "I love your work, Mr. Barnes." And I had no idea it was Robert Barnes.
And then I only found that out like a year after I met Robert.
You know, Alex Jones at that time, as was the highlight clip from that deposition.
I was going through a form of psychosis.
I was seeing things that weren't really there and connecting conspiracies that weren't really there.
And they ran with that clip.
I'm like, surely a three and a half hour deposition has to come down to more Alex Jones never had a trial in the Sandy Hook case.
They never had a trial on the merits in either Connecticut or Texas in the context of that ridiculous lawfare.
I presume all of you know this, so bear with me for the summary.
They never had a trial on the merits, neither in Connecticut nor in Texas.
He was defaulted into a verdict of liability, a finding of liability, because of alleged noncompliance with disclosure obligations, which itself was a manufactured, fabricated lie.
Of a default.
They don't say, all right, Alex, you've been such a bad boy, you don't get to defend yourself, but the plaintiffs still have to prove their case because there were issues of statute of limitations.
There were issues of actual malice, which needs to be proven even if the defendant doesn't defend.
The courts didn't say, all right, Alex, you don't get to defend, but the plaintiffs still need to prove their case.
The court came out and said, defaulted into a finding of liability.
You are guilty and the plaintiffs don't even have to prove their case.
Injustice.
Corrupt injustice.
Happened in Connecticut, and then they dovetailed off that, piggybacked off of that for Texas.
Then they have a trial in Texas.
The judge, I forget her name, it'll come up in the review.
Bella Gare or something.
They have a trial for damages only.
A trial in which the jury is hand-selected based on their propensity to issue ridiculous rulings on damages.
A trial on the quantum, not on the merits in which Alex Jones is precluded from asserting his innocence, affirming that he apologized, affirming that he corrected and retracted the statements at issue.
There was no trial.
It was a kangaroo show court of a trial.
And then after that trial, the verdict from the jury is $4 million in change on damages, compensatory damages, and $45 million on punitive damages.
A ruling which the judge upheld because it defied, I say not because, but she upheld it.
The reason for which it was contested was that it defied the statutory cap on punitive damages, which was capped at $750,000 a claim, give or take.
So this corrupt judge has a corrupt show trial in which they hand-select a jury.
To come down with the ruling on a quantum because they've already defaulted him into liability.
And then Alex Jones appeals the quantum of the punitive.
The judge upholds it initially.
And then yesterday, there's an argument in front of a appellate level judge court in Texas that is amenable to the arguments.
But I need to highlight and refresh everyone's memory.
And by the way, if you hear noise, it's because there's one heck of a storm.
Right now in Georgia.
I don't know if you can hear the rain.
It almost sounds like hail.
I need to refresh everybody's memory as to how outrageous and outlandish that so-called trial was.
Let me play you just a couple of highlight clips.
I have to go to law and crime.
Listen to this one where you can see the trial was such a show trial.
There were documentary crewmen.
In the courtroom, making a documentary of this trial while it was going on so they could manufacture a reality in which people live with the Mandela effect of thinking Alex Jones had a trial on the merits, which he never did.
Period.
Anybody who says that has a false memory and the propaganda machine worked on them.
Listen to this.
You may not say to this jury.
That you complied with discovery.
That is not true.
You may not say it again.
You may not tell this jury that you are bankrupt.
That is also not true.
You may have filed for bankruptcy.
I don't know that, but I've heard that.
It doesn't make a person or a company bankrupt.
You're already under oath to tell the truth.
You've already violated that oath twice.
You're already under oath to tell the truth, and this judge is telling him what he can and cannot say while under oath to tell the truth.
This is a judge.
This woman should be impeached.
I don't know what the rules are or the process for impeachment of Texas judges.
impeached, disbarred, and jailed, if there were any world of justice.
Today, in just those two examples...
Yet here I am.
You must tell the truth while you testify.
This is not your show.
You need to slow down and not take what you see as opportunities to She thinks she's, like, gonna win an Oscar for this.
She knows that that camera that I highlighted up in the upper right side is on her face.
This is her moment.
This is her soliloquy.
This is her moment in the non-show trial to give this speech to a man who she's gagged, to tell him what he can and cannot say, while asserting that what he does say needs to be the truth so as to ratify her compulsion to make him lie.
And instead, only answer the specific and exact question you have been asked.
No asides.
The comments about discovery.
The comments about the larynx or whatever it was.
The comments about bankruptcy.
None of those were responsive to questions.
They were just you abusing my tolerance and making assides to the jury improperly, and in these two cases, untruthfully.
Do you understand what I have said?
If her name is not Karen, she should change it to Karen.
I believe what I said was true.
Yes, you believe everything you say is true, but it isn't.
Your beliefs do not make something true.
That is what we're doing here.
Just because you claim to think something is true does not make it true.
Do you guys remember this?
Do you remember that cow?
There are no words for that.
Judge, sitting up there, berating Alex, compelling him to say what she wants him to say for the cameras so that it's on camera.
I believe that what I said was true.
It doesn't matter if you believe what you said was true.
It isn't.
Oh, I'm sorry.
You mean in defamation, sincere belief in the statement is not relevant?
Oh, but that's right, because there was nothing on the merits.
He was already found liable on the merits.
That was a judge, not an activist, not a prosecutor, not the plaintiff's attorney.
The judge, right in front of the cameras, giving them what they want to see.
Let me see.
I got another great one here.
Look at this.
This is when she's berating him on the stand.
Can you imagine the patience of a saint Alex Jones has to be sacrificed like this for the world, to be made an example of?
This is what happens when the deep state apparatus decides they need to silence you and shut you down.
So if anyone, either of you, any witness not answering the questions that you're asked, ask me to do it.
That's my job.
I like to do my job.
I'm not bad at my job.
I know you know what I'm going to say.
Oh, hold on a second.
Now I'm confused as to who that, which, which judge, I'm getting confused between the two judges.
Yeah, yeah, or I don't know.
Okay.
Okay, just answer, sir.
Barbara Bellis.
This is the Connecticut case.
Hold on a second.
Let me just see who Barbara Bellis is.
I want to make sure I remember.
Barbara Bellis, judge.
Is it Connecticut?
Connecticut.
Connecticut.
Barbara Bellis.
Yeah, Connecticut.
Never mind.
So that one was Connecticut.
The other one was the judge I was thinking of.
Scrap, but I was pulling together some highlights.
The judge, the first one we saw was Judge Guerrera.
Guerra, whatever.
Bella something Guerra out of Texas.
A hacktivist.
A judicial hacktivist.
That was the judge that Alex had his trial in front of who went ahead and ratified $45 million punitive damage award by the jury who they hand-selected so that they could get that.
And now, how does the propagandist MSM summarize what's going on in terms of the appellate-level review of this?
Listen, this is Bloomberg.
And we talk about confession through projection, not because it's a cliche, but because it's an iron law of woke projection.
Is that James Lindsay who said that?
Are we still quoting James Lindsay?
That's such a, what's the word?
A woke right thing to do, to still quote James Lindsay.
Read the headline, read the title of this article coming from Bloomberg News so you know it's got to be good.
Alex Jones bid to cut $50 million Sandy Hook verdict fines.
Receptive judge.
Also, not to be confused, it was the Connecticut case that had the $1.2 billion in damages with the multiple plaintiffs, the FBI agent getting a $90 million verdict.
The Texas case was $4.5 million compensatory damages and $45 million punitive damages.
Receptive judge.
Keep that word in your mind.
Don't forget the word receptive judge, and we're going to read the rest of this article accordingly.
Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.
So ad hominem, persuasion, setting the tone right there.
Alex Jones, who questioned the authenticity of the school shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, received a favorable response from a Texas appeals court Wednesday in his effort to reduce a $50 million verdict for defamation.
It's amazing.
They still say it.
Verdict for definition.
There was never a trial, but set that aside.
During oral arguments in Austin, justices of the Third Court of Appeals suggested a jury should have been asked specifically to decide whether to award Sandy Hook parents more than $1.5 million statutory cap on damages.
Instead, the trial judge allowed the parents lawyer to add a cap busting claim months after trial, which Justice Kelly indicated came too late, which Justice Shari Kelly indicated came too late.
Quote, how would the trial have been different if the cap buster had been amended?
End quote.
Before trial, Kelly asked Jones lawyer Ben Brooks of Brooks Law PLLC.
In response, Brooks, who didn't represent Jones at trial, said there's no way of telling how it might have impacted the legal strategy.
How about the propensity of the jury?
The parents, Neil Hilsen and Scarlett Lewis, showed no evidence that harassment they endured from Jones flaming the conspiracy theory impaired them to the point that they'd been entitled to damages above the cap, Chief Justice Darlene Byrne said.
Byrne added that Jones could have decided to give the parents more discovery records.
Byrne's added.
No, Byrne added, sorry, that Jones could have decided to give the parents more discovery records if he had known ahead of trial that he'd be exposed to larger damages.
As it was, the trial court judge found Jones didn't comply with discovery orders and issued a default judgment, a so-called death penalty sanction.
First of all, Jones complied with discovery.
So just get that out there.
He complied with discovery.
And to the extent that anything might have been deficient in that compliance, immaterial.
He was being requested to comply with Discovery in ways that he could no longer comply with Discovery, which was providing lists of videos that were on Google, YouTube, that he no longer had access to because he was deplatformed.
He complied with Discovery, and any judge who says otherwise is a political hacktivist.
Jones, who sat in the front row, stayed silent in 40 minutes.
Outside the court, the parents, lawyer.
Mark Bankston mocked Jones, enthusiastically greeting him.
Hey, man!
Jones didn't respond.
In court, Bankston and Farah Ball LLP called the court's decision pretty worthless because Heslin and Lewis will get a share of the Connecticut judgment, which the state's Supreme Court recently upheld, and Jones won't have any money for the Texas verdict.
Before arguments began, Byrne informed the lawyers that the court wouldn't be ruling on a motion for sanctions that Bankston filed on Monday.
Pursuing sanctions on appeal is, quote, unique and concerning for me, Byrne told Bankston.
Not so, he replied, noting that in 2020, the same court sanctioned Jones in this case.
That's great.
They're relying on the Jones precedent to justify more Jones sanctions.
On the cap buster question, Bankston cautioned the court against setting a precedent that would alleviate Jones of the trial court verdict on the grounds that he didn't produce records that could have helped his defense.
That sends a message that, quote, compliance with rules is conditional, end quote, on the size of the verdict, he said.
The court seemed less likely to overrule the trial court's order, handing the families a default win based on Jones' disobeying discovery orders.
It's madness.
Brooks, Jones' lawyer, said that the trial court can issue stern disciplinary measures, but that the First Amendment protects him from a default judgment.
Quote, You're telling me the trial court's hands are tied even staring down a defendant thumbing their nose at them?
End quote.
Byrne asked.
It's a pure legal fiction.
That Jones defaulted to that meaningful extent that you'd get a verdict by default.
It's a pure legal fiction.
But the fact that he gets a responsive or receptive judge, what does that tell you?
It tells you exactly what they did in the initial trial.
They got a receptive judge, Judge Bella, whatever the hell her name was.
They got a receptive jury to come down with an outlandish, outlandish award for damages.
I was there.
I saw the questions they were asking the jury, and it was clear they were hand-selecting that jury to make sure they got a response of jury that would be amenable to issuing outlandish, outrageous verdicts.
And now that he gets the slightest bit of an indication of potential reprieve, he's going to get away with it.
That's the Alex Jones story, people.
Let me see what's going on in the chat before we move into the next one.
We got Encryptus in the House who says, In U.S. federal practice, a person or other debtor becomes a bankrupt and may truthfully say in court as soon as the bankruptcy case is formally commenced, i.e.
when the petition is filed, voluntary case, or when the order for relief is entirely...
So, well, the bottom line is that they think Alex Jones has billions of dollars.
By virtue of that Connecticut judgment, de facto bankruptcy.
It's an outrage, and at some point, may we all see the higher courts spank those lower courts for making a mockery of the legal process.
A hacktivist is an activist hacker, someone who hacks computers for ideological cause.
Oh, well, maybe we're going to call them a jacktivist, a judicial activist.
Oh, what is that?
Did I just do something with my camera?
All right.
Well, That's Alex Jones.
A slight reprieve to the insanity.
And may it be overturned entirely in due course.
Overturned, as we're seeing happen now with the higher courts, in order to reestablish judicial equity when it comes to individuals or executive functions when it comes to presidential powers.
We've been talking about this for a long time now.
It's egregious.
It's black and white.
It's in your face.
It's over the top.
It's deliberate.
We have entered the world where the courts are dictating executive powers.
The courts are usurping executive functions.
There are no longer separation of powers, checks and balances.
There is the judicial branch that has usurped, appropriated, or I dare say expropriated, without compensation and without color of law, the executive branch functions.
The best one today, you have to hear the way the courts, or not sorry, not the courts rather, but the question.
We'll call them quack journalists.
Describe what's going on.
The punchline, we won't bury the lead or just get ahead of it.
The Supreme Court overturned a lower court's decision to stay Trump's declaration revocation of temporary protective status of hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens.
Listen to the way the fake news propaganda is describing it.
Words mean something, right?
And the subtle manipulation of language, it's good for sophistry.
It's good for debating when your adversary doesn't know that you're doing it.
Now that I have persuaded you to look for this in this two-minute clip, look for it.
Listen for it.
Understand what they're doing.
They've been doing it for a long time now.
All right, let's go back to that breaking news we told you about before the break.
The Supreme Court has just cleared the Trump administration.
I've got to pause it.
I'm actually distracted by the muscles on her arms.
Alright, let's go back to that breaking news we told you about before.
That's okay.
Got muscular arms.
All right, let's play this out.
Viva, shut your face.
Ban.
All right, let's go back to that breaking news we told you about before the break.
The Supreme Court has just cleared the Trump administration to temporarily end humanitarian parole protections for 500,000 immigrants.
The justices lifted these protections for migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
Let's bring in CBS News immigration and politics reporter Camila Montoya-Galvez.
Camila, can I ask you one question?
What is the legal distinction between an immigrant and a migrant?
If I may, just started off with immigrants, then she used the word migrant, and then she went back to immigration law, and now she's going to the immigration specialist, this What more can you tell us about this ruling?
Hi, Mugo.
This ruling will place half a million people Why do they always do that?
Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, Venezuela.
Cuba.
What were the three countries?
A million people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela in legal limbo and will allow the Trump administration to terminate their parole legal status and also their work permits that have allowed them to live and work in the US legally but on a temporary basis.
So they were offered a privilege on a temporary basis that they knew was temporary from the get-go that was issued arguably but not so arguably unlawfully at a blanket level to people who were here not legally but made it legal by issuing them temporary protective status which means it's temporary protective status and now that the new executive decides to revoke that temporary protective status a lower court comes in and says You can't do that.
You got to do it on a case-by-case basis.
You can issue the blanket, but you can't pull it back.
You can issue the blanket, but you can only remove it by cutting out one square after another.
These are migrants from these four crisis-stricken countries who were allowed to legally come to the U.S. under a Biden administration program that was designed to discourage them from crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally.
You have to understand, they were brought here legally through a process that was designed to deter them from crossing illegally.
So they literally were flown in.
Otherwise illegal, then blanket granted temporary protection status, which we know as a matter of fact now, by the way, was given to the Haitians in Springfield, not for temporary protective status humanitarian purposes, but so that they could be exploited by corporations in Springfield, Ohio for cheap slave labor.
That's why they were there.
I forget who it was that said it, but it was a politician who said they were there.
Because corporations needed the labor that they couldn't find in Springfield for some reason.
Do you know what it's called when you bring in people who can't speak the language so that you can exploit them for forced labor?
It's called human trafficking.
And the Biden administration was up to its wrists doing it.
Stop it.
I'm sorry.
I keep talking.
Was under a Biden administration program that was designed to discourage them from crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally.
But the Trump administration, Mugo, has argued that this policy was unlawful, that it was an abuse of this humanitarian parole policy that the Biden administration used.
And now the Supreme Court is allowing the administration to revoke that legal status and now to place these migrants at risk of deportation.
The caveat is that some of these migrants, Mugo, may be able to stay here through other means because they have applied for other immigration benefits like asylum or a green card.
Cubans, for example.
Can be eligible for permanent residency or a green card under a Cold War-era law.
And so those migrants will not be eligible for deportation.
But anyone who does not have another immigration status can now be deported from the U.S. And the administration has made this warning very clear.
If you are here illegally, you must self-deport.
If not, you could face arrest and deportation from the country.
That's probably kind of the message that Trump is trying to send.
I found the clip.
I remembered who it was.
Adam, corrupt POS Kinzinger, who talked about this.
And I remember saying it at the time when he did that interview with this idiot jackass, didn't realize that harboring an illegal alien and lying to authorities who are there to get them could be a crime.
Listen to what he describes the raison d 'etre.
Of the Haitians in Springfield, or Haitians who speak French, or I don't know if it's not Creole, that's more Acadian.
They speak a derivative of French.
They're in a town where they don't speak the language.
They're in a town that is totally culturally foreign to them.
They have obvious issues as a result of this.
Failure or impossibility to integrate, and yet they're being exploited for cheap labor for big corporations.
Some might even argue that was what the purpose was in the first place.
Give them TPS so you can exploit these otherwise illegal aliens.
What did Kinzinger have to say about this?
Look at this man's ugly, awful face.
If there was ever anybody who I would suspect would be up to no good next behind closed doors, it's this man right here.
Listen to this.
This idea that Donald Trump wants to bring iPhone manufacturing here is insane because how many people are going to want to do a job, you know, screwing little screws into an iPhone?
We don't have the people to do it because we do have pretty low unemployment in this country, and now we're deporting every immigrant that could possibly work at that place.
Remember the whole eating the dogs and cats in Columbus, Ohio thing?
Why were there so many Haitians in Columbus, Ohio?
Because they were needed for work in manufacturing, because they needed the employees.
This idea that Donald Trump wants people to understand this and truly internalize it and digest it.
Here is Adam Kinzinger explaining why he supports modern day slavery.
According to Adam, we can't build iPhones in America because Trump is deporting all of the immigrants.
Now we're deporting every immigrant that could possibly work at that place.
He actually said that.
Remember the whole eating the dogs and cats in Columbus, Ohio?
Why were so many Haitians in Columbus, Ohio?
Because they were needed for work in manufacturing.
You are a disgusting racist, and I'll just add piece of shit to that, Kinzinger, a proponent of modern day slavery.
Just one last time for the road.
Columbus, Ohio, because the Haitians in Columbus, Ohio, Columbus, Ohio thing.
Why were there so many Haitians in Columbus, Ohio?
Because they were needed for work in manufacturing.
Ohio thing.
Why were there so many Haitians in Columbus, Ohio?
Why were there so many Haitians in Columbus, Ohio?
Because they were needed for work in manufacturing.
Why were there so many Haitians?
Well, we needed them for cheap labor.
Why were there so many young kids in there?
Well, we needed their small fingers to screw in the screws.
Oh, no, that's right.
We don't do that here.
That's why we ship things out to China to be done.
And we couldn't even do it here if we wanted to, according to Adam, because Trump's deporting all of the illegals.
Holy, sweet, merciful hell.
There is a special place in hell for Adam Kinzinger.
Glad I found that clip.
So what happened today?
Oddly enough, Ketanji Brown-Jackson and Sotomayor, the two biggest idiots on the Supreme Court, dissented.
But what happened today?
The Supreme Court paused the ban on the revocation of the TPS status.
So basically, Trump can revoke the temporary status while this case gets adjudicated.
Which propagandist rag are we reading here?
The Guardian.
Supreme Court allows White House to revoke temporary protected status of many migrants.
Oh, they went with migrants.
They didn't go with immigrants.
I'm sure.
Why did they go with undocumented citizens?
No, pre-citizens.
They should call them pre-citizens.
How dare you deport so many pre-citizens?
Ruling reverses hold on Trump administration's ending humanitarian parole of Venezuelan migrants and others.
Venezuela.
The US Supreme Court on Friday announced it would allow Trump administration to revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans.
How the hell did it happen in the first place?
Hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans, Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguan migrants living in the United States, bolstering the Republican president's drive to step up deportations.
Finally, the Supreme Court comes in and says, in the interim, you can revoke the TPS.
In the interim, you can apply tariffs to foreign countries.
And no, these low-level judicial hacktivists, quacktivists, jack activists.
Do not get to dictate the executive branch and the presidential roles, the duties that he was elected for.
The court put on hold Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani.
Indira Talwani.
I knew an Indira once.
Where was she born?
New Jersey.
Indira Talwani, Englewood, New Jersey.
U.S. State of New Jersey.
That's the city.
Indira Bourne is a United States District Judge, District of Massachusetts, Englewood, New Jersey.
Yada, yada, yada.
So they paused the order, halting the administration's move to end immigration.
Yeah, okay, fine.
As with many of the court's emergency orders, after rapid appeals brought the case to their bench, the decision issued Friday was unsigned and gave no reasoning.
However, two of the justices, three liberal-leading justices, KBJ and Sotomayor, publicly dissented.
Ozia.
The court botched its assessment of whether the administration was entitled to freeze Talwani's decision pending litigation, Jackson wrote in an accompanying opinion.
The outcome, Jackson wrote, undervalues the devastating consequences of allowing the government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million non-citizens.
Holy crap!
At least she says non-citizens.
She doesn't even go with migrants.
Illegal aliens.
Illegal aliens.
Undocumented migrants, undocumented immigrants, immigrants, non-citizens, pre-citizens, presumed citizens.
Jackson also added that it is apparent that the government seeks a stay to enable it to inflict maximum pre-decision damage.
Or, you know, Ketanji, for the president to do what he's within his powers to do, what he was elected to do, what he has the discretionary power to do, it was a temporary protective status.
it could be revoked.
It was unlawfully And now we know by flights.
They didn't even want to let them cross the border illegally.
They actually flew them in to overwhelm small-town America to be exploited for human trafficking slave labor.
That's what was going on.
Period.
And Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sotomayor, the biggest idiot on the bench, ratify modern-day slavery because they approve of it, because they're the beneficiaries of it.
She added those living under parole protections in this case now face two unbearable options.
One option is to elect to leave the United States, yada, yada, yada.
The other option is they could remain in the U.S. after parole termination and risk imminent removal at the hands of the government agents or apply for asylum or other protective status if they genuinely need it.
To Jackson, either choice creates significant problems for respondents.
Go blame Biden then.
Don't blame the person solving the problem.
Blame the person who created the problem.
At a minimum, granting the state would facilitate needless human suffering before the courts, and it would be very profitable for big corporations as well.
Immigration parole is a form of temporary permission under American law to be in the country for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.
Hmm.
Surprised they didn't argue that exploitation for human slavery is significant public benefit.
It doesn't offer immigrants a long-term path towards citizenship, but it can typically be renewed multiple times.
A report from the American Immigration Council found that halting the program would, apart from the humanitarian effect, be a blow to the U.S. economy.
holy hell, I didn't read this article through to the end, and they're actually making the argument for human slavery.
As households in the U.S. where the breadwinners have temporary protected status collectively earn more than $10 billion in total income, Oh, they pay taxes.
Trump called for ending humanitarian parole programs, executive order, yada, yada, yada.
I think we can skip the rest of this case.
Plaintiffs in this case, a group of migrants granted parole, and Americans who served as their sponsors sued administration officials claiming they violated federal law, the actions of government agencies.
Talwani in April found that the law governing such parole did not allow for the program blanket termination, instead requiring case-by-case review horse crap.
The Boston-based First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to put the judge's decision on hold and the government appealed.
All right.
That's it.
So, Supreme Court may be, hopefully, a sign of things to come, dictating, ordering that Trump can be president and that, no, some New Jersey jackass corrupt judge does not get to usurp the role of the executive.
Yeah, you can issue the blanket.
Blanket TPS protection status, but you can only revoke it on a case-by-case basis.
Thus, we know that we will hand tie, incapacitate, paralyze the system for decades to come.
Almost like it was part of the plan.
You know what?
I just realized that you can see behind me that cable right there.
What the hell is that?
That's annoying.
I would have taken that out if I had seen that earlier.
My child wants to know something.
Yes, sir.
Not yet?
We got a few minutes left.
You're doing good?
keep watching.
He's watching, I'll tell you what happens.
Brainwashing conditioning to have short attention spans to be easier to manipulate in the future.
As punishments, we're going to watch an entire movie.
Popstar, keep on keeping on.
One of the greatest, most underrated comedies of all time.
That's what's going on with the TPS, people.
I need TPS for my bunghole.
Let me see.
I got some chats there, tip chats here.
We got King of Biltong in the house, so hold on one second.
Let me see if I can bring this up here.
I can.
Oh, I can.
And I will.
Biltong is one of the highest protein snacks in the world, boasting nearly 50% protein and packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and more.
Visit BiltongUSA.com.
code VIVATEN for 10% off.
We stream at...
If I can go to 5.15, Anton, we'll raid you.
Doing some light banter whilst cooking great food.
Join us in the fun on our channel, rumble.com forward slash C, which I guess is our channel, forward slash eat at Anton's.
We'll see if we can go to 5.15.
I got one more story and then we'll read some of the chat.
Over in vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Let's see what we've got going on there.
Hold on just one second.
I'm excited to get back to my studio, obviously.
But I'll tell you what, I'm using just the built-in camera on my computer and the built-in mic on my computer, and it's pretty darn good.
We've got nothing over there in terms of leftover tipped questions.
Really Red Ginger says hilarious, and I'm not...
Watch it, watch it.
You're going to hit your head on the corner.
All right, we've got one more story at least, and then we're going to get into this.
Let me see what's going on in the chat over on Crumble.
Short attention spans are the TikTok generation.
Kids born after 2020 says Mohican underscore last.
All right.
Viva, there's a Klan member behind you.
Okay, let's get to the last story.
What was the last story?
I know I had the third one.
Let me just go refresh my memory.
Okay, dude, go back and do that now.
The child has fallen and he can't get up.
What was the...
Oh, Susie Wiles said thank you encrypted.
Yes, every now and again, I need some redirected for my own apparent ADHD, OCD, ADD with...
It's called OCD with insight, or as others like to call it, pure O. When you know that you're crazy, and so you have to deal with your own acknowledgement of your own craziness.
It's a very interesting story.
And let me see, I had the AI.
Yeah, this is what I wanted to bring up.
I'm telling you, it's very funny also because it's on the heels of the poll that I did, which is, you know, even if the FBI comes up with video of Epstein, more concrete than what they're claiming they have, just so everybody understands.
Bongino didn't say that they have video of the deed, him doing the deed to himself himself, but rather, you know, of the MCC and showing no one was there, that he was all alone and that he did it to himself.
Which I say just begs the conspiracy.
And I put out a poll that said, if you were to see cut and dry, clear-cut video, what would you think?
Okay, I was wrong.
No, I still think he didn't do it.
Or C, AI, CGI.
And the majority of the people in the poll said, I believe it would be CGI, AI.
AI, it's not going to ruin the world, but it's going to revolutionize the way old people get scammed out of money.
Let me bring this one out just for a little anecdote.
When my grandmother was alive, My grandmother was diagnosed, I believe, with early onset dementia at like 85. So I don't know how you get diagnosed.
I might be, I don't think I'm wrong on this.
She was diagnosed with early onset dementia 18 years before she finally died.
She died at 103.
And, oh, I forget what happened exactly, but she calls up my parents.
This is like mid-90s, late 90s, or early 2000s, like in tears to my mother.
I heard that.
Daniel got arrested and he needs to be bailed out of jail.
And my mom was like, what are you talking about?
I just got a call from Daniel.
He needs $2,000 bail.
She was getting ready to go and give money to somebody who called her up pretending to be my brother saying he had gotten arrested and he needed $2,000 bail.
That was back when you had those phones.
Maybe it wasn't then, but you know, the dial box phones.
AI is going to revolutionize the way old people get scammed.
Or the way people get scammed, because we're in a...
where you don't even see the video and you hear, "Hey, Viva, Viva's coming." People in our Locust community getting Not me.
But listen to this.
I won't play the whole thing, but it's kind of hilarious because we've entered the realm now where AI is going to cause some real...
I made that up just now.
Federal authorities are investigating efforts to impersonate White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.
The Wall Street Journal reporting that an unknown suspect was acting as Wiles over calls and texts to big-time Republicans and business executives.
The impersonator reportedly was asking for cash.
And pardon advice.
Reports also say AI may have been involved to imitate her voice.
Now the FBI says they do not believe that a foreign nation is involved, but promises to get to the bottom of it.
Kash Patel saying, quote, The FBI takes all threats against the president, his staff, and our cybersecurity with the utmost seriousness.
Safeguarding our administration officials' ability to securely communicate to accomplish the president's mission is a top priority.
Encrypt us.
Do we hear her voice in this video?
We do not.
The funny thing is, it's not like Susie Wiles has an Alec Baldwin or a Neil deGrasse Tyson recognizable voice.
If I were to get a call from someone who sounds like an elderly lady saying it's Susie Wiles, I wouldn't know one way or the other.
It's going to lead to the most epic of pranks.
where people are going to get calls from people using their voices, indistinguishable from their voices, to get them to admit to or entertain the most outlandish or potentially admit to the most criminal of conduct.
Like I want, I don't want, it would be hilarious if you get a Justin Trudeau calling up the head of that NGO or whatever that, No, the WHO.
what's his name?
The one who was like dancing at a, potentially dancing at a, at a specific type of bar.
Um, and saying like, Hey man, I want to come and party.
Or you get like, uh, someone pretends to be Mackall calling Keir Starmer saying, let's do that again.
That blow was awesome last time, dude.
And then Keir Starmer was like, yeah, can you believe we almost got caught?
And bam, then you have some issues.
Uh, But that actually wasn't the last story that I wanted to talk about.
The last story I wanted to talk about was...
And Cryptus, has there been any other breaking news that's worth talking about since we got started?
Since we got started, no, but you did have the video queued up of the CNN reporter nearly crying in response to the White House press secretary.
Yes, I did indeed have that one queued up, and then I forgot that I did, and it's right here, Stephen Miller.
Okay, let's see this.
Okay.
Benny Johnson really, first of all, he does great work summarizing videos or captioning videos with extreme interest.
I was reading the descriptions of the videos, the clips that he was posting from our interview earlier today.
I'm like, I felt guilty the way he was describing, like, Viva demands that Maureen Comey be fired.
He's like, yeah, I guess.
All right, listen to this.
It's hilarious.
Let me pull this down a little bit here and see what's going on behind me.
Nothing's going on behind me.
The kid has been very good.
To sit here and listen to his dad rant and rave into the abyss that is the internet.
Benny Johnson this morning, very patient.
This afternoon, very patient.
We're going to go back and meet up with a kid that we met this afternoon that we were fishing with.
When kids meet kids, it's instantaneous friendship.
It's the most beautiful thing to see on earth.
There he is.
Okay, let's see.
Don't do that.
That will be used out of context on the internet.
He's too young to know.
Undocumented migrant sent a letter threatening to kill the president, promising to self-deport after the assassination.
CNN reporting shows that investigators believe the migrant was set up.
It was a victim of a setup.
What is the administration going to do now?
And this is an undocumented immigrant.
I do want to note that.
But this was someone who came forward, was a victim of a crime.
Pre-citizen.
Pre-citizen.
Enforcement believes he was set up.
Go ahead.
I want to clarify what you mean, so we're talking about the same thing.
Are you saying this immigrant was here illegally?
Yes, but I am, and that's why I said that.
I clarified that.
You said undocumented, and I wasn't clear what that means.
I'm assuming they have a fake ID.
I'm assuming they have a fake social security number.
That's neither here nor there.
That's getting away from the question, Stephen.
I want this to be...
When we use language that's designed to obscure the truth, that's not good faith.
This is not to compare and contrast.
He is...
He has kissed the Blarney Stone.
This man is a journalist's worst nightmare.
Yeah, when you twist words, we're no longer having a good faith discussion.
Oh, you mean, he's illegal?
Okay.
Assuming they have a fixed social security number.
Okay, that's neither here nor there.
That's getting away from the question, Stephen.
I want this to be...
When we use language that's designed to obscure the truth, that's not good faith.
An illegal alien is an illegal alien.
They're not an undocumented migrant.
Okay, that's fine.
That's another discussion for another day.
I don't know the details of the assassination threat.
All I can say, based on what you're telling me, is there's an illegal alien in our house We're going to get to the bottom of it, and I would gladly come back on with more information to share with you.
They were set up, just to be clear.
But quickly, where is the White House on habeas purpose?
They're saying the illegal alien was treated unfairly.
Yes, I'm sure the illegal alien was treated very unfairly.
Next question.
Hold on.
Undocumented migrant sent a letter threatening to kill the president, promising to self-deport after the assassination.
CNN reporting shows that investigators believe the migrant was set up.
CNN reporting.
Do we have the underlying story to that?
Illegal threatens president deported.
Deported, set up.
Let's see if we can find.
Man who allegedly threatened may be the victim of a setup.
Here we go.
It's interesting.
I'm going to call instinct, gut reaction.
He was set up.
Who would have set him up?
And why would someone have set him up?
Like, might it be Kilmar Garcia's wife?
If you're getting physically abused by an illegal alien, you set them up so that they get caught and then deported for being illegal?
Might it be that type of setup?
This is May 30th.
This is today.
Man who allegedly threatened Trump may be victim of setup.
Sources.
Authorities are investigating whether the man sent the letter.
The Department of Homeland Security said this week that a migrant, here you go again with that word, in the United States without legal status, so an illegal alien.
Like, why not just say illegal alien?
Two words.
Migrant in the United States without legal status.
Eight words.
What's the word?
Not parsimony.
Efficiency.
Linguistic economy.
Okay, so a letter that said he threatened to shoot and kill the president posted what appeared to be a threatening letter sent from the migrant to a U.S. Immigration Customs Fund.
Department of Homeland Security said this week that a migrant, the illegal, threatened to do harm to the president and posted what appeared to be a threatening letter sent from the migrant to a U.S. ICE agent.
Ramon Morales-Rias allegedly wrote that he was going to...
I'm not reading these words at one of the rallies and was arrested by ICE agents.
However, multiple law enforcement officials now say authorities are investigating whether the letter was sent by someone else in an attempt to frame him.
Oh, multiple law enforcement sources.
Might these be the same internal saboteurs who alleged to a court that Kilmar Albrecio Garcia was sent to...
El Salvador as an administrative heir?
Is it possible you might have activists within law enforcement who might spread this disinformation to set up or frame the Trump administration?
If I had to bet, that's where I would bet.
That's my prediction right now.
He submitted to a handwriting test that did not match the letters writing.
Oh my goodness.
Well then.
Like, as if I can't write in cursive versus not cursive.
Like, as if I write with my left hand, I might not be able to replicate it with my left.
Right, right.
Right.
Homeland Security.
Kristi Noam posted on next followings.
I'm going to keep that open in the backdrop.
To praise the agents who said we'll continue to take all necessary measures to ensure the protection of President Trump.
Good.
Thanks to our ICE, this illegal alien who threatened to assassinate the president is behind bars.
Noam has not commented on whether or not he could have been framed.
Authorities said they believed Rice was involved in a dispute with another man who was in jail on charges of threatening Trump and wanted to get Reyes deported to prevent him from testifying against his sources.
Very interesting.
This guy's friends with someone who's already in jail.
For threatening to kill the president.
The investigation into this is ongoing.
Okay, fine.
Over the course of the investigation, this individual was determined to be in the country illegally and that he had a criminal record.
He will remain in custody.
The Milwaukee Police Department, which is investigating the threat, told ABC News that it, quote, is investigating an identity theft and victim intimidation incident related to this incident.
Spokesperson for the MPD said the department will not be able to confirm names of the parties involved as the investigation is ongoing.
The guy's got a criminal record.
He's here illegally.
And this journalist is sitting there crying over good faith discussion.
The threat comes even a year after the president.
All politicians and members of the media should take notice.
The repeated attempts on his life take down this rhetoric.
Okay, fine.
Secret Service, which investigates threats against the president, referred ABC News to DHS for comment.
Oh, well, if we know that the Secret Service is investigating, well, then surely they should be investigating James Comey.
The incident was first reported by CNN.
It comes a week after the ice.
yada, yada, yada.
So we can scrap that.
Let's just go here and see.
Oh, I don't want to copy the Secret Service.
What was the name of the individual?
Yeah.
Here we go.
Let's just see.
Images.
Well, I don't want to judge anything from an image.
Let's see here.
I do not trust Tendanistu Times, but let's just see what they have to say about this.
All right.
Let's see if we get anything new here.
Okay, fine.
This looks like just rehashing.
And where did they get this article from?
From Yash Nitish Bajaj.
So the illegal is here illegally, has a criminal record.
Fraternizes, by the sounds of it, with other illegals, one of whom is in jail for threatening to kill the president, gets caught up in what is arguably, but I would say predictably, not a setup, and is now at risk of getting deported.
And law-abiding citizens and Americans are supposed to care why?
Due process?
Have a full trial.
Have a full trial on whether or not What are you supposed to do at that point?
All right, let's just hypothetically say he was framed.
All right, we know who you are.
We know you're here illegally.
You got a criminal record.
Let me go see what his criminal record was.
See if we can get that from Grok.
Now we just release you to the streets.
Hmm.
That's how you lose a country.
Oh, for goodness sake.
Now, what was the name of the guy?
See, I went to my Google search engine, but I saw Louie the Lobster returns to the sea.
Illegal threat Trump set up.
I just want to see what his criminal record was.
Man who allegedly threatened...
Okay, so...
What is that?
What do you think it's going to be, peeps?
Take a guess.
I'll say DUI.
And not for any judgmental reason, just, you know, predicting.
Ramon Reyes, a 58-year-old Mexican national, has a criminal record that includes the following based on available information.
Felony hit and run.
Arrested in 1996, though publicly available records indicate he was not charged for this incident.
Criminal damage to property.
Arrested in 1996, related to a domestic violence incident, but the charge was dismissed.
Disorderly conduct with a domestic abuse modifier.
Arrested in 1996.
Sounds like he had a rough year, 1996, just so everybody knows that I'm not making this up.
Also tied to the domestic violence incident with no further conviction noted in available records.
Those details stem from statements made by USDHS, Department of Homeland Security, and related reports.
He was arrested by ICE May 22nd, 2025, in Wisconsin, primarily for allegedly threatening to the president, though there's an ongoing investigation that he might have been framed.
His handwriting did not match a thing, yada, yada, yada.
Note, the information reflects available records and some charges did not result in convictions.
Investigations into the authenticity of the threat are ongoing, which may impact the context of his custody.
So, yeah, 1996 was a rough year.
Well, actually, let me just see how long had he been in America for.
Were these charges from abroad?
How long had he been in America illegally?
Were these charges from...
So these charges come from, I then presume, Mexico.
I hope that's right.
So the charges were from Mexico, question mark?
No, the charges were not from Mexico.
They originated in the United States.
So, okay.
See, this is where I think we run into.
1996, apparently from U.S. records, though it says he illegally entered in 1998.
Bottom line, what are you supposed to do now?
Sorry.
Okay, you didn't really write the letter to threaten President Trump.
It was the other guy that you fraternized with who's in jail for threatening President Trump.
But you're here illegally and you have a criminal record, but you haven't done anything in the last 96, 2006, 16, nearly 30 years.
So, carry on?
No, I guess not.
All right, let's see what's going on in the chat over here.
I do have one more story for you in relation to these activist government employees.
drop that in our private chat for you.
Let's see that,'cause we got, So we got Anton.
Riketa also rated you today.
Oh, well, thank you very much, Riketa.
Who was the other?
It was Riketa.
I don't think the quartering goes live until four o 'clock.
Yep, it was just Nick.
All right.
Reketa, thank you very much.
Hope he's enjoying the Karen Reid trial.
He's covering Karen Reed.
Joe Nierman is covering...
Michael Russell Lee or Anthony Russell Lee?
Matthew Russell Lee, who's Inner City Press covering the P. Diddy trial.
And you dropped something in our private chat, did you?
So while we get ready to raid Anton's...
What?
Do I want to guess?
I don't want to guess anything.
I'll get accused of being prejudiced.
U.S. I immediately go to China.
China or India.
But let me see where this article goes.
An IT specialist employed by the Defense Intelligence Agency was arrested today for attempting to transmit national defense information to an officer or agent of a foreign government.
Nathan Villas Lach of Alexandria, Virginia, was arrested in Northern Virginia and will make his initial court appearance in Virginia tomorrow.
The conduct alleged in this case is a profound betrayal of the American people and a direct threat to our national security.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Okay, fine.
What foreign government?
In the DIA in 2019, where he works with the Insider Threat Division and holds top secret security clearance.
March 25, 2025, the FBI commenced an operation after receiving a tip that an individual, now known to be Latch, offered to provide classified information to a friendly foreign government.
In that email, the sender wrote that he did not agree or align with the values of this administration.
And now you go to jail and was therefore, quote, willing to share classified information that he had access to, including complete intelligence products, some unprocessed intelligence and other assorted classified documentation.
After multiple communications with an FBI agent, who Lash allegedly believed to be an official of the foreign government, Lash began transcribing classified information to a notepad on his desk.
Thereafter, the FBI implemented an operation at a public park in Northern Virginia where Lash believed he would deposit the classified information to the foreign government.
On May 1st, 2025, FBI surveillance observed Lash proceeded to the specified location and deposited an item.
We don't know what the government is.
Which government they're talking about, a friendly one.
My bottom line is, I'm not reading the rest of this, my bottom line is that if it were actual proof of criminal conduct within the government, it would be legitimate bona fide whistleblowing.
If it's just, you know, to give secrets and embarrass stuff, all right, well, we've gone from legitimate whistleblowing to deliberate sabotage.
Encrypt us.
Tell me I'm right.
So, yes.
Actually, this guy...
We don't know what the country is, though, yet, right?
They haven't specified it?
They did not mention.
They just said a friendly and or allied country.
They've been very vague on that.
What could it be?
Friendly?
I mean, I can only think Canada, England, but Lach.
So the name Lach sounds like it's Dutch.
Or German?
Nathan Villas Laach.
Let me go see if there's an origin on that.
Grok.
What is the origin of the name Barabi?
You want to go to the pool?
We'll see.
What is the origin?
Nathan, okay, no, is Hebrew origin.
Villas, middle name, multiple.
And Laach, a rare North German surname, likely of low German origin.
It is thought to refer to someone with a distinctive gait, possibly slouching.
Okay, so Laach, German.
I would have gone with Dutch.
And there you have it, people.
Thank you for being here.
Hope the show was entertaining.
snip clip and share away.
I do want to, I played the clip yesterday.
Gosh, I can't stand that flipping...
Anton's live when you're ready.
Anton's live.
Rate him now.
I was going to finish with I cannot explain how much I hate Adam Kinzinger.
And then I like to think to myself, maybe he's a nice guy and maybe I'm judging him too harshly.
but he is a pathological proven liar who has tried to strip people of their freedom and for that reason deserves to be locked up.
Um...
And I will be back at my studio on Sunday.
We're going to have one hell of a day of driving tomorrow.
I'll tell you what.
The new tires on the car.
We couldn't find a place to go off-roading out here, but the new tires are so quiet.
The ambient decibel level while we're driving is at a cool 86. You want to say hi to Anton?
All right, peeps.
Thank you for being here.
Snip, clip, share away.
Louie the Lobster, the book if you want to get it.
Oh!
Give me the book.
Give me the book.
Ginger, you left it in my hotel room.
Ginger Ninja, I'm going to sign this one.
Write a note to his kid.
And Louis the Lobster, you can get it on Amazon.com.
Shh, shh, shh.
Hold on a second.
Shh.
No, I'm just going to do a little back crack.
Just a little back crack.
Shh, shh, shh.
Quiet.
Shh, shh, shh.
There you go.
Get out of here.
All right.
Go rate Antons.
And I think America's Untold Stories are live at 5.30.
So that Get out of here.
Get out.
Watch it.
Okay, people.
It's over.
Locals will come for a shortish after party.
We're going to talk and party.
Okay, rock on.
Godspeed.
God bless.
See you all Sunday.
Viva and Barnes.
Law for the People Sunday night.
Law Extravaganza.
1800.
6 o 'clock Eastern on all platforms.
▲
Export Selection