All Episodes
May 27, 2025 - Viva & Barnes
01:35:41
Bitcoin Conference in Vegas! Peter Hotez is a Hack Quack! Liverpool Attack Updates & MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
What you are looking at right now, for those listening on podcast, Rebel News journalist Alexa Lavoie is about to ask MP Ahmed Hussein a question.
You will not believe his answer.
I'm sorry, I'm sorry.
Do you believe that the public servant should be accountable?
Do you believe on the freedom of press?
Do you believe on freedom of the press?
You're not a real journalist.
Stop pretending to be one.
What do you mean we are not?
We are bringing politicians accountable.
You're not a real journalist.
So you don't believe on freedom of the press?
But you're not press.
I'm press.
You're not.
Yeah, I do.
You're registered.
So what is it for you, a journalist?
You're not.
What is it for you, a journalist?
A non-partisan media house that's recognized.
So you think that CBC is completely neutral?
So you think that CBC is neutral?
You're not a journalist.
Stop pretending to be a journalist.
Wow.
Yes, that is very, very frustrating.
That's Ahmed Hussain.
Ironically, telling Alexa Lavoie she's not a journalist, not understanding.
How that statement can be flipped on him.
Ahmed Hussain, do you remember the one that we saw with Omar Algebra also refusing to answer a question from also a rebel news journalist?
I just want to play the arrogant, misogynist pomposity coming out of Ahmed Hussain's filthy mouth.
Listen to this walking, talking piece of trash.
Listen to the disdain.
Look at that face right there.
That disgusting scowl.
Eh, eh, you're not a journalist, woman.
I don't have to talk to you.
Man, warning?
It's not real.
Leave us alone.
I'm sorry, I'm sorry.
Do you believe that the public servant should be accountable?
Do you believe on the freedom of press?
You believe the freedom of the press?
You're not a real journalist.
In my country, you don't have to talk to me like this.
20% of Canadian MPs, give or take, born outside of Canada.
Ahmed Hussain, born in Mogadishu.
You're not a real journalist.
And some might say, Ahmed, you're not a real Canadian.
Oh, you see how that works?
Oh, no, that would be mean and racist.
But looking at her, looking down at her, a lowly woman.
In Canadian media.
No, she's not a real journalist, Ahmed, but you are a real Canadian.
You are an MP.
Holy crabapples.
It's enraging.
If you don't know who Ahmed Hussain is, let me just bring up an interesting statement he had a while back after the October 7 attacks.
When he had to make a statement about allegations against staff of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine refugees in the Near East, that they had a hand in the atrocity that was October 7th.
Statement.
January 26, 2024.
Ottawa, Ontario.
Global Affairs Canada, the Honourable If you have to say that you're honourable, you're not honourable.
Ahmed Hussain.
Minister of International Development today issued the following statement, quote, Today I spoke directly with Commissioner General Philip Lazzarini of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, UNRWA, to express Canada's alarm about allegations of his agency's staff being involved in Hamas's brutal terrorist attack against Israel on October 7, 2023.
Canada is taking these reports extremely seriously and is engaging closely with, With the UNRWA and other donors on the issue.
Canada welcomes United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres' direction that the UNRWA swiftly investigate these extremely serious allegations.
Canada has temporarily paused any additional funding to UNRWA while it undertakes a thorough investigation into these allegations.
Should these allegations prove to be accurate, Canada expects UNRWA to immediately act against those determined to have been involved in Hamas's terrorist attacks.
As UNRWA undertakes this investigation, Canada will not reduce its support to the people of Gaza.
Canada will continue to work with other partners to provide life-saving assistance to civilians in Gaza.
Canada remains deeply concerned by the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and continues to call for the rapid, sustained, and unimpeded passage of essential relief so that it can reach those in need.
We We urge all parties to uphold international and Kind of late for that, Ahmed.
It's kind of late for that after October 7th, whatever you think weaknesses, Kind of late.
Oh, what's that?
The same organization that you've been funding money to?
Actively involved in it?
Well, we're going to look into these allegations and then we're going to do probably nothing.
I just saw a comment in the chat that said, F Canada.
You have no idea how bad it is.
You have no idea how bad it is.
I'm not saying F Canada as in I have any...
It has fallen.
And whereas we say, you know, Canada is falling, Canada has fallen.
It has fallen, and it fell a long time ago.
And now we're only realizing just how far back it has fallen.
20%, 17% to 20% of Canadian MPs are born outside of Canada.
You have people representing Canada who are not Canadian.
Oh, now they're naturalized citizens.
You have 20% of politicians.
Who were born in foreign countries, now representing Canada.
And I dare say, if you think it's a negative, the way I say it, well, that's because you have this preconceived stereotype in your head.
Foreign people entering countries are going to bring with them the culture of the countries from which they are emigrating.
It's the way it is.
If you think that's a bad thing, or if you think that I say that and you should interpret it as a bad thing, that's on you, not on me.
Import.
Culture.
Practices.
You know, maybe the misogynistic practice of looking down on women and not having to answer their questions.
20% of Canadian MPs not born in Canada.
What do you think that's going to do to a country?
You think that's going to impact policy?
Top five countries.
Importing immigrants to Canada right now.
Oh, and by the way, the Canadian government has finally recognized that the mass importation of student visas has put Canadians out of work, has allowed for the exploitation of cheap labor.
Oh, it's amazing.
They finally now admit what we've been saying for the last however many years.
Canada fell, and it fell a long time ago.
And if you had any lingering doubts, I've got...
He's just one of the best sources of info and intel.
You know, some of it's new, some of it's old.
This one happens to be over five years old.
I see this video, and as I'm freaking out watching it, because I can't believe that it's real, I looked at it over five years ago.
Gurdeep Panter, who is a Punjab artist, author, teacher, this is real.
This is real, people.
And it's from five years ago.
If anyone had any doubts as to when exactly Canada became an actual national security threat for America, it's been at least five years.
Guru Deep Pandhar is doing a Punjab music dance with the Canadian Armed Forces.
Now, if that in and of itself, and by the way, notice the part of the video where they're literally Punjab dancing in front of a burning helicopter in the backdrop.
Just let that sink in for a second.
Set all of the Punjab aspect aside, I don't consider myself to be, you know, in UFC fighting condition.
But I...
If I had to run 50 miles, I could run 50 miles.
In fact, I did run 50 miles for anybody who doesn't.
Go look it up.
Bear Mountain.
I ran a 50-mile ultramarathon in 12 hours and 14 minutes.
Look at the fitness of some of the people in this.
Now, maybe you don't have to be in the tip top of, you know, Ronda Rousey level physique, Conor McGregor level physique to be in the Canadian Armed Forces, but just look at the level of fitness.
readiness and lethality that one can surmise from this video of Gurdeep Panter dancing Punjab dances and music to celebrate the diversity of the Canadian Armed Forces.
Are you ready?
First, pick up your left leg up and bring it back.
Up and back.
Up and back.
don't mean to fat shame to observe that if this is the Canadian Armed Forces I certainly hope that it They'll surprise you with their physical acumen.
They hide it behind their guts.
*Music* Thank you.
What the hell is going on?
I will not swear.
I will not use the Lord's name in vain.
I'm going to actually use Satan's name appropriately.
What in the name of sweet satanic holy hell are we watching?
I'm not going to play the whole thing.
They're dancing in front of a burning helicopter.
This literally looks like terrorist propaganda.
I don't even know what the rationale is.
What was the thought process here?
Haha, it's going to look really good if Canadian Armed Forces are doing a Punjab dance in front of a burning helicopter.
You have diversity of stupidity at the Canadian Armed Forces.
Let me just skip to the end here.
It goes on.
Canada is fucking big.
Fucking talk.
It goes on.
Oh, she's a guy.
Oh.
Oh!
And I want to highlight something.
If one were intending to infiltrate, weaken for the purposes of taking over a foreign country, what would they do?
They would have one of their assets come in and put out a propaganda video that would be so utterly demoralizing and humiliating in the public's eye, in the international community's eye.
But have them think that they're celebrating their own greatness.
That's exactly how you would do it.
You wouldn't do it by way of like Chinese military operation.
You would have it by way of slow infiltration, demoralization from within, and then get a performer, a comic, a dancer to come in and say, no, no, guys, we're not making you look stupid.
We're making you look super duper ultra mega lethal ready because you're so diverse.
You've got people of all physical attributes.
You've got people of all shapes and sizes.
And you're dancing to Punjab.
And it's good.
So go ahead and blast it to the world.
Holy hell!
That's five years ago.
What do you think has happened since then?
Mark Carney got elected.
The Liberals got more seats.
And Canada is on life support.
If it's not already long gone.
India air bombing 1985 was the warning Canada wouldn't hear.
You got members of Canadian Parliament.
Who are terrorist sympathizers?
You got Ahmed Hussain putting out a very stern statement against the UNRWA active participation in October 7. You got Jagmeet Singh, who is a Kalistani terrorist sympathizer who can't go back to India because of his terrorist sympathizing leanings.
This is Canada.
And they put together that and utterly mock the Canadian Armed Forces.
And then they wonder why people aren't signing up.
Then they wonder why people are not being recruited.
And then they wonder why Canada, a country of 40 million people, that has a landmass bigger than that of America, less than that of Russia, has what?
15, 20,000 service members ready to protect a country of 40 million?
You know, Mark Carney was going around saying Canada's not for sale.
It doesn't have to be for sale to be for the taking.
And Canada is for the taking now, if it has not already been taken.
Okay, we're going to get back into this in a second.
Encryptus, sir, how goes the battle?
I was really hoping we could play a quick clip.
I just dropped it in our private chat.
It's one you'll enjoy.
Let's play the quick, quick clip.
One that I'm going to enjoy.
Why do I think that I'm not...
Ha ha ha ha ha.
Let me just make sure the volume is not going to blow out our ears.
It's from Team America.
let me let me watch it offhand first Yeah, it's from Team America, people.
We will not play that one.
But it is a classic movie of all time that I might actually have to rewatch.
Tonight.
Good afternoon, everybody.
Viva Frye, former Montreal litigator turned current Florida rumbler, David Frye.
I think I ran this one across all platforms, but ordinarily, should I disable the YouTube, the commie tube?
And I'm going to leave it open for a little bit more.
Barnes is in Vegas at the Bitcoin conference in Las Vegas, and he is either going to join us at five o 'clock or take over at five o 'clock, depending on our technical abilities to hear one another during the stream.
Barnes is out there.
It's amazing.
I couldn't go.
I'm going to be up in Georgia for the Soldier's Journey home build that I'm driving to the day after tomorrow.
The weekly lineup, daily at 4 o 'clock, and we talk about all things law, news, and humor-related.
And we've got some stuff to talk about today.
And we're going to go over the pond to the other country that has fallen, arguably, but not arguably fallen, the United Kingdom, the UK, England.
There's some good news.
There's some bad news.
There's some...
Tommy Robinson is out of jail.
That's the good news.
The bad news is the country has fallen.
We're going to get there in a bit before I even get anywhere.
What I do want to do is thank our sponsor for today's show, which is The Wellness Company.
People, here we go.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Let me bring this down.
And as we...
You've probably heard that RFK Jr., known for his sharp mind and relentless energy on the campaign trail, is taking methylene blue to stay focused, energized, and mentally resilient.
Now you can experience those same benefits with ReCharge from the Wellness Company.
This doctor-formulated nutraceutical is the first to combine methylene blue with urolithin.
A. Creating a unique formula designed to optimize mitochondrial function, improve energy, and elevate cognitive performance.
Methylene blue crosses the blood-brain barrier to enhance memory, focus, and executive function by increasing ATP production, the true fuel of our cells.
It also works as a potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory and helps protect against aging and cellular damage.
If you're looking for the real mental and physical edge, Recharge delivers.
10% off, people.
Get it now by going to twc.health forward slash Viva.
Promo code Viva will get you 10% off and free shipping.
Feel the difference.
Think clear.
Recharge.
Thank you to the sponsor for today's show.
The link is in the description.
Go over there and show some love.
And now we'll get into some good news.
I remember when people caught RFK Jr. on the plane, putting that in there and his drink, and people thought he was doing something illicit, illegal.
And then it was like, dude, first of all, it's methylene blue.
And now the Wellness Company, which has put out some great stuff, has put it in a nutraceutical recharge.
Go get it.
Do we start with the good news?
We'll start with the good news.
But you'll tell me what you think, people.
Because I don't know if I'm projecting.
I can accept the idea that I am projecting.
First of all, Tommy, if you're watching, I don't think you are watching, but if you are watching, I have my best friend in Montreal.
When I saw this come across my feed, I'm like, oh, I won't mention his name because he might not want me to mention it.
But if he's watching, Jay, you know I'm talking about you.
He looks exactly like my best friend.
I was like, oh my goodness, my best friend made it onto my Twitter feed.
This is Tommy Robinson after he got out of, how long was he in jail for?
I would say 12 months.
He was in jail for a long time, mostly in segregation, which is solitary because they put him into a prison which has a demographically disproportionate amount of people.
From a group that wants Tommy dead.
For obvious reasons.
He gets out.
He looks like this.
If I'm looking at his eyes, man, and I am, I'm looking at a man who I see deep sadness in his eyes and what his country is doing to him.
Maybe I'm just projecting.
Maybe I'm not.
But he's looking fine and he shaved off the beard.
Check this out.
You did it before and after?
Yeah, it found religion and they went on a rant about mainstream media, government and immigration.
That's LBC.
That is Tommy Peeps.
He's got his freedom.
Do I see a little nick?
It looks like someone nicked him on his screen.
I like him better with the long hair, but for obvious reasons.
That's Tommy Robinson.
out of jail.
When he was in jail, it must have...
They posted this, which is the amount of mail that Tommy received in jail.
Tommy Robinson, on his Twitter feed, which I think he now can post to, says, Thank you to each and every one of you who sent mail to me as I sat in prison during the last seven months.
As you can see, there was a lot.
These trolley loads were just...
Yet I read every single word and it meant more than you'll ever know.
Laughing, crying, learning.
The support of you, the people, helped me through the darkest days.
Thank you.
Check this out.
So it's wild.
But Tommy's out.
He's out and he's eating good food and then this will be the end of it.
The last clip, just so we can celebrate.
A minor temporary cessation of the tyranny over in the UK because they've pressed charges against Tommy for harassment, but here he's having some food with his family.
Very short clips.
Thank you.
I don't know how the stomach can acclimatize to having that type of food given what he's probably been eating for the last seven months in prison.
I imagine there might be some upset grumbly tumblies, but Tommy is out.
And now back to real life or regular life, and I just hope for all things possible that he gets the hell out of the UK.
At what point do you not fault someone for fleeing the country and claiming asylum elsewhere?
Does Tommy have to stay there and fight for a country that at every turn is trying to lock him up and have him killed in jail?
Does he have to sit there and go back to jail for harassment because everything, the judiciary is corrupt in the UK, the politicians are corrupt, the country has been utterly Invaded and taken over by foreign interests, foreigners.
It's a hard reality to admit right now.
There's nothing bigoted about it.
There's nothing other than pure observation, statement of fact.
The UK has been taken over.
It's been taken over by foreign, by domestic policy, immigration policy that has allowed for it to be taken over.
Gotta close down to immigration.
Everybody's gotta speak English.
We're gonna deport illegals.
Oh my goodness, it's like Keir Starmer, it's gotten so bad, even Keir Starmer, who has been instrumental in the downfall of the UK, has to take to Twitter now and start sounding like a right-wing Nazi.
And I'm saying that tongue-in-cheek glib because these were never right-wing policies to begin with.
Respecting your border, respecting your front door is not a right-wing nationalist policy.
It's common sense, good parenting, so to speak, from a government.
Now we'll get to the bad news of the UK.
There's a driver, the driver of yesterday's incident.
It's an amazing thing.
The driver of yesterday's incident had been identified as a 52-year-old white.
British men.
You will all know there have been very many recent cases.
Let me take this back again.
There have been very many recent cases where it would be a social media hate crime to accurately point out the race of a perpetrator.
The Christian man, boy, who stabbed the three girls at the Taylor Swift dance thing.
racist to say Muslim.
In fact, I'm fairly certain people were...
I'm pretty sure people who posted that the individual was Muslim shortly thereafter ran into certain potential legal problems or at the very least visits from the UK authority.
I reserve the right to be wrong on that, but I'll look to the chat for correction or affirmation.
So people were rightly questioning why yesterday they so quickly identified the man as being white.
Set that aside.
I gotta preface it because otherwise it's gonna sound like I'm talking for myself here.
Here.
Police naming Liverpool's parade suspects' ethnicity may cause future, quote, challenges.
Former Superintendent Dal Babu, my dog's name was Babu, but we spelt it B-O-B-O-O.
Dal Babu says although decision was correct to counter misinformation, it may be exploited.
By far right.
Dal Babu, pictured in 2013, says it doesn't take rocket science to predict what will happen.
The far right will twist at this and say, right, you've named him because it's a white person.
Why aren't you naming the next person?
Why are they using a 2013 picture of Dal Babu when we're talking about something that happened yesterday, 12 years later?
I just got to see something here.
When I say that the media covers...
I wonder what he looks like now.
Dal Babu today.
Images.
Images.
Oh, boy.
He doesn't look bad, but he doesn't look like that anymore.
All right, whatever.
We'll get back to that later.
Merseyside Police's decision to release details of the ethnicity of the suspect in the Liverpool parade collision.
They're still calling it a collision.
Parade collision.
Could raise, quote, difficulties and challenges, end quote, for forces in the future, former superintendent.
Is it Merseyside?
Police said they arrested a 53-year-old white British man from the Liverpool area about two hours after the incident that left dozens of people, including four children, injured.
The miracle in this, by the way, I think he injured 65 people.
Touchwood, Pupukane, and Ahura, nobody died yet.
I think they're charging him with attempted murder, which means that he didn't actually...
He didn't kill anybody.
Small miracles.
Injured 65, nobody died yet, and hopefully it stays that way.
Dal Babu, who was a senior Met officer, told the Guardian's first edition that the decision was unprecedented, end quote, but he could envisage pressure being applied to forces in the future to release details on the racial background of suspects.
It doesn't take rocket science.
Babu stressed the decision had been correct, end quote, to share the information on this occasion to combat, quote, I don't want you to think I'm the bigot here.
I get accused of being too naive, too tolerant, too loving, too forgiving.
If the rationale for identifying the individual was to combat disinformation, How many white Muslims are there?
The rationale is that this is somehow going to quell potential concerns, but say he's white, therefore he couldn't be Muslim?
Or he's dark-skinned and therefore is Muslim?
Listen to this.
As of 2025, the global population 2.5 billion.
Based on available data ponds, 100 million while other 10, what's going on here?
The number could be as low as 10. The idea that they would assume that he can't be Muslim because he's white, if that's the reason for which they want to identify him to quell those concerns, is utterly idiotic.
And the fact that they identify the white guy this time when they haven't done it for all the other times doesn't confirm that in this instance, It wasn't potentially ideologically motivated.
It just means that in every other time when they didn't do it, you now know damn well why they didn't do it.
But let's just finish that article before we get into the next one.
You could imagine a situation where the far would say, oh, you haven't, okay.
It's really important that people don't see it as a precedent because every incident will be different.
Yeah, don't hold us to a standard.
Everyone is going to be to a different standard depending on who did it and what we want to cover up for as long as we want to cover it up like we did with that.
Christian Nigerian boy who stabbed three girls when he was, in fact, I believe, carrying a Quran at the time, if I'm not mistaken.
Senior legal source said there could be circumstances where naming the ethnicity of a suspect could cause riots rather than quell them.
No shit, Sherlock.
So what you're basically saying here is, if you say the person's white, nobody's going to riot.
If you say the person is an illegal foreigner who goes around stabbing Brits, They might riot, so you're going to hide that information from them.
This is exactly how they victimize you, and then they suppress you and give themselves more rights to conceal their own failed policy.
Now, just as a matter of fact, as relates to this particular story, the driver has been accused of suspicion of attempted murder, which means that there was intent, so not...
53-year-old British man who injured 65 people when his car rammed into a crowd of Liverpool soccer fans celebrating their team's Premier League championship was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder.
The driver was also being held on suspicion of dangerous driving and driving on drugs.
Okay, fantastic.
The incident left 50 people at the hospital for treatment of their injuries.
11 remained hospitalized in stable condition.
The wounded included four children, one of whom had been trapped beneath the vehicle with three adults.
Police had closed off much of the area.
Not much.
Mostly.
We closed off most of the area.
Not all of it.
So you basically entirely fail.
That's sort of one of those things where like, yeah, well, we did 90% of the cordoning off, but the 10% is where the person got through.
Well, we did our job not, no, you did your job zero.
But the driver is believed to have maneuvered around a roadblock by following an ambulance that was rushing to treat a person suspected of having a heart attack.
The force has not identified the arrested driver.
Police in Britain usually do not name suspects until they are charged.
Detectives...
There's no question about it.
Detectives were still working to piece together why the minivan plowed into crowds packing a narrow street just after players of Liverpool fan club had celebrated its championship with a nobody.
The incident cast shadow over a city that has suffered twin tragedies linked to soccer team and led to widespread expression of shock, sadness, and support.
Crime scenes scoured for evidence.
We can skip this, but suspect partly identified to stop rumor mill.
Do you know why there was the rumor mill?
Because in the last time when you concealed the guy's identity, and I believe it even went after people for accurately describing it, you did it because you didn't want people rightly objecting to the consequences of failed policy.
Police quickly identified the suspect as a white local man to prevent misinformation from flooding social media.
Okay, fine.
Whatever.
That's it.
Last summer, a teen.
In the nearby town in Southport, killed three girls in a stabbing rampage at a dance class and wounded 10 others, including two adults.
An incorrect name of the suspect was spread on social media and people said he was an asylum seeker.
In fact, he had been born in the UK, rioting spread across England and Ireland targeting Muslims and refugees in hotels for asylum seekers.
Do they mention that guy's name?
Hold on a second.
Let's do this in real time.
Here.
Name.
In the aftermath of the cell port knife attack, there was a sense of national trauma over the killings.
Do we inadequately Let's see this.
Anger and disbelief soon followed, prompting burning questions over the identity, background, and possible motive of the attacker.
Despite public demands for information, the police provided few details about the attacker.
There was very little information.
He was not named because he was 17 at the time of the attack.
The UK's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation had told BBC Panorama that he believes the quality and quantity of information released by the authorities in the hours after the attack was inadequate.
Did they name the guy?
I know they named the guy.
What's his name?
Mohammed.
Was that his actual name?
Yeah, I'm looking for the source now.
I think he might have changed his name because I believe he was a convert.
Let's see if we can get that source real quick.
That's what's going on in the UK, people.
They'll tell you when the suspect is white to avoid rioting, but they won't tell you when he's not because it might lead to rioting, because it might be the case that the open borders and the systematic protection of the Pakistani, not even grooming gangs, rape gangs, it might have led to some riots if they had revealed that information, so they withheld it from the public for the public's own good, so that the public wouldn't riot.
As a result of the failed policy of those in charge.
Oh, Lordy.
That's what's going on in the UK.
And Wallen Cryptus finds that piece.
His name is...
So it's Axel Ruda Kubana.
All right.
What was it before?
It was Muhammad.
He was born in Muhammad.
Give me a link for that.
I want to double check that.
I'm looking for the original link where they're only showing the name Axel, but I did research into this at the time, so I'll work on that and get back to you.
What was the original name of the England stabbing 17-year-old?
Let's see if we can just get this here.
I thought he was born Christian and converted because his parents were Nigerian.
Let's see there.
Let's do this.
17-year-old suspect in the incident, Axel Rudakubana.
There was initial misinformation online, falsely naming the suspect as Ali al-Shakadi, which Merseyside police clarified was incorrect.
He was born in Wales to Rwandan parents, not Nigerian, my apologies, was charged with three counts of murder.
Did he convert to Islam?
I believe, if I'm not mistaken, there was no definitive evidence he converted to Islam.
Official reports of the court documents consistently describe him as coming from a Christian family with his parents being devout Christians from Rwanda.
Am I going crazy?
Did they not just say that he was from Rwanda?
Okay, fine.
Predominantly Christian country.
His mother is noted as having evangelical Christian yadda yadda.
However, speculation about his religious affiliation arose due to the discovery of an al-Qaeda training manual in his possession and his production of ricin leading to charges under the terrorism.
Yes, speculation about his religious beliefs began to arose when he had an Al-Qaeda training manual in his possession and his production of ricin.
Some sources, particularly on X, have claimed This is from Grok.
Others argue his possession of jihadist materials reflects an obsession with terrorism and genocide rather than a genuine religious conversion.
Merseyside Police and the Crown Prosecution Service have not classified the Southport attack as terrorist incident stating that no clear ideological or religious motive.
Claims of Islamic conversion appear to stem from misinformation and assumptions following the initial false narrative that he was a Muslim immigrant.
Without concrete evidence, public declaration, or witness testimony, the idea of his conversion remains speculative.
But he had al-Qaeda training material in his possession.
Draw whatever conclusions you will from that, people, but don't go too far, because he might have had al-Qaeda training manuals.
That doesn't mean he went through any conversion, and even if he did, it wouldn't have been an authentic conversion.
It might have just been so that he can carry out Al-Qaeda type stabbing attacks in London, but they have to hide that information from you.
Pretend that, you know, there is a Muslim population within Rwanda, but even...
But he was born in England, so call him an England boy.
Holy merciful crabapple.
Spinnaker over in our locals community has something interesting here that I'm going to bring up.
Spinnaker, you will find this interesting, Viva.
You must be really bad if someone on Reddit would post it.
What does this have to say?
Our Torontology.
God, I hate Reddit.
Modern day Toronto is proof that this multiculturalism shit isn't working.
Well, the fact that it's posted doesn't mean anything.
How many thumbs up did it get?
How many upvotes did it get?
We got people in the city protesting and literally fighting over conflicts and shit that has nothing to do with Canada.
Russia, Ukraine, Eritrea, Brawl, Hindu, Sikhs, Israel, Palestine.
Different groups segregate themselves so much that entire religions in the greater Toronto area are now dominated a single ethnic group.
Markham, East Asian.
Brampton, South Asian.
Vaughan, Europeans.
People are struggling to find jobs and or places to rent simply because they don't belong to the preferred ethnic group.
All these different groups don't actually like one another.
They tolerate each other at best and only interact when absolutely necessary.
Even in this sub, man's, many will say...
People don't come to Canada to be Canadian.
They come to Canada to be whatever they were before while living in Canada.
There's little to no actual loyalty to this country.
It's interesting.
I'll read a couple more tip questions there.
Encryptus, what's up?
So it looks like I might have been wrong.
I'm just finding articles about misinformation about his name, and a couple Muslim names have come up as misinformation.
But there is news about this guy.
A couple of weeks ago, on May 8th, he attacked a prison officer where he dumped boiling water on a prison officer.
This is him in prison?
Yes, this was on the 8th of May.
Put that link in the chat, I'll bring that up.
And now Finboy Slick put out something here.
Let me bring this one up before I get that up.
Finboy Slick put this in.
Translate AstraZeneca in Latin and a road to death.
I'll be shocked if that's true.
I'm going to do that in real time.
I think that's not true.
And I think the fact check behind this is that it was if you take Astra and then you do Latin, then you do like another language.
You can language combine.
We'll get there in a second.
Rustin says, Viva!
I am a bit surprised by you insisting Thomas Robinson must leave the UK.
He has become a national hero to many for standing up to the insidious oppression by the government.
If he believes in his heart, this is what needs to do.
May he survive and do well.
Yeah, or everyone loves a martyr, we're saying, when it's not them.
So I don't know why you'd be surprised by me.
First, I'm not insisting he must leave.
I believe he should.
They want him dead, and it's nice.
I mean, you know, the martyr is an inspiration to others.
Most people, you know, will encourage a martyr to be a martyr so long as they're not that martyr.
It's very easy for people to say, Tommy, you know, sacrifice your life for England when he's going to get locked away on contempt and then something happens to him in prison.
You know what happens ultimately?
Yeah, for a little while people remember him.
And then 10 years later, he's still dead.
His family is growing up without Tommy.
And everyone has fond memories of what Tommy once tried to do 10 years ago.
Maybe I'm cynical and maybe I'm a coward and I can appreciate people saying both to that.
Encryptus, what's up?
That article I dropped in our private chat here in Rumble.
So, that's my thoughts on that.
Everyone always encourages, go do it, go do it, be a martyr.
Holy crab apples.
Police investigate alleged attack on prison officer by Southport killer.
Police are investigating an attack on a prison officer by Southport killer, Axel Rudikabana, That's a weird way of putting it.
The officer had boiling water thrown over them.
How did they get access to boiling water?
The officer had boiling water thrown over them.
Is it missing an S, or does the officer identify as they?
They're not even trying to be funny anymore.
This is the idiocy of the world in which we live.
The officers had boiling water thrown over them.
Unless they don't want to identify the gender of the officer, They were taken to a hospital and discharged on the same day, the minister says.
The prison service has said violence in prison will not be tolerated.
Thanks.
Thanks for stating the obvious.
Pushed for the strongest possible punishment for attacks on the hardworking staff.
The attack, first reported by The Sun, has renewed concerns about the safety of prison officers after an attack last month in the Manchester Arena bomber Hashem Abedi at another prison.
Abedi attacked three prison officers at HMP Franklin by throwing hot cooking oil and using homemade weapons to stab them.
How the hell do they get access to hot cooking oil?
The number of assaults on staff in prisons in England and Wales per year has reached its highest level in a decade.
Gee, I wonder why.
According to data from the Ministry of Justice, in response to the rise of these attacks, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmoud previously announced that the use of tasers will be trialed in prisons and confirmed the prison service will conduct a snap review.
of the use of protective body armor for prison officers.
Asked if prison officers are safe on interview with the BBC earlier this week, Prisons Minister James Timpson said, I think it is fine to work in our prisons.
Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick.
Okay, whatever.
That's wild.
Pretty much anything can be used to cause bodily harm.
So what we're concerned is the intent of the people to do this.
Okay, we got that.
That's wild.
And totally a normal-looking innocent.
Can't identify him right away.
And then when people spread misinformation that might actually be somewhat accurate, you've got to go after them.
Holy crab apples.
All right, peeps.
What I was going to do here is get to the remaining...
Tip questions.
Well, let me bring up the tip questions here in Cryptus.
We got that.
Viva!
crushing it.
Thanks for all the great content as always, says Eric John, pizza artist who did a fantastic, It was beautiful.
Eric John, pizza artist, says Babu was deported and fled to the UK for a life in law enforcement after his New York City restaurant, the Dream Cafe, went out of business when he switched to an all-Pakistani menu.
Is this true?
Babu fled to UK-Pakistani...
Oh, no.
No, no, no.
that's okay.
I didn't get it.
I don't get jokes when they're written.
I think that's from an episode of The Seinfeld.
That's what I think it's supposed to be.
Kicking Snow says, My origins are Great Britain and French.
Those nations failed because many people and others left for freedom in the West.
After World War II, England should have begged us to return or offer dual citizenship.
That's kicking snow.
King of Biltong is in the house.
And he says, Biltong is one of the highest protein snacks in the world, boasting nearly 50% protein and packed with B12, creatine, iron, zinc, and more.
Visit BiltongUSA.com.
Code Viva for 10% off.
Biltong is delicious, amazing South African beef jerky, if we can call it that.
Eric John Pizza, British PM, was tossed out of a pub by the pub owner today, tagged you and encrypt us on X. I just dropped it in our private chat, and there's a video.
There's a video?
Well, let's see what happens here.
And I'll get the last one.
There's no way to get access to anything in my weld-the-door-shut jail.
Okay, well, let's see what this link is right here.
Oh, boy.
Oh, this looks interesting.
Do I see someone wearing a mask?
Are we sure this is news?
Let's pull this up and let's see what's going on here.
Here we go.
It's this.
It's this.
Turn the volume down.
Volume's good.
That man is not allowed in my pub.
Get out of my pub.
Go on!
Get out of my pub!
Why are they wearing face masks?
This is a joke.
Is this recent?
This can't be recent.
Hold on.
Let me see what's going on in this.
This can't be new.
Keir Starmer being thrown out of a pub in Bath by the landlord.
When is this from?
I don't believe that there would be this many people wearing face masks at this point in time.
We'll fact check that in a second.
Thank you for the link.
The original post is February 15th of this year.
That's the original post.
That's not necessarily the original video, but when would Keir Starmer have been...
All right, people, that's what's going on in the UK.
Now we're going to swing on back to America.
For another classic video.
We'll go back to Canada in a second.
People don't talk about these things once they fall off the back burner.
And then even I sometimes forget to not follow up.
But when there's no news, you sort of forget things puddle along.
And we're talking about the fall of Canada and things that we forgot about Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act, which sought to criminalize.
promotion or advocating for genocide with potential life in prison.
It was one of the bills that died under the prorogation of parliament of the prior session, much like what happened with the Online Streaming Act, which...
Bill C-11?
Which, yes, Bill C-10 originally Government prorogued, ended session, all the bills die on the table.
And if they want to bring him back, they bring him back to the new session.
Bill C-63, which was supposed to be the Online Harms Act, which we talked about a lot at the time in terms of whether or not
It looks like they're going to bring it back, people.
You elected him.
Nobody else elected this liberal.
Three passport carrying WEF globalist whore.
Canada did.
Gave them more seats.
And they will have effective control over the Canadian government for the next four years because the NDP, if they don't outright cross the floor, are going to be a tacit, informal, or I even dare say formalized alliance that will give the Liberals a full, clear 172 plus seats.
For full majority control.
This is coming from the National Post.
Amy Hamm, the Mark Carney threat to free speech.
Who could have thunk?
Who could have thought that a climate crisis globalist whore would be a threat to free speech?
Having been elected to the party that he was advising informally for the last five years, the very same party that wanted to put out these laws that criminalize speech, that want to criminalize disinformation online, that basically are laws intended to...
Amy Hamm of the Mark Carney threat to free speech, he talks about controlling online platforms the way Trudeau did.
No shit, Sherlock.
He was advising Trudeau when Trudeau was talking about controlling the internet.
He was the informal advisor for damn near five years.
And I don't know what it takes to wake Canadians up, but I guess what happens when the Prime Minister Mark Carney cannot be trusted with our charter-protected right to free expression.
I highlighted it yesterday.
Free expression.
Slight nuance difference than freedom of speech.
One is the freedom to speak.
The other one is the freedom to express.
And I think there's a conceptual and zeitgeist difference that we are witnessing and it's why America is where it is During the election campaign, Carney spoke scornfully of our most essential freedom, our speech from which all other freedoms flow.
Carney has hinted that his liberals will bring back some iteration of Trudeau's tyrannical, there's no other word for it, Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act, which was killed when the former Prime Minister prorogued Parliament this January.
You will recall that this now defunct legislation would have granted judges the ability to mete out life sentences for hate speech.
Don't worry, they wouldn't do it.
Not even denial of genocide or promotion of hate speech.
Would have created a government digital safety commission to police Canadian speech and imposed life-destroying fines upon those whose speech was deemed hateful by our own government senses.
It was frightening, not apparently.
But apparently not.
Okay, fine.
In April, at two of Carney's rallies in Ontario, he announced his government's proposed plan to tackle crime and improve public safety.
Quote, large American online platforms have become seas of racism, misogyny, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, and hate.
Isn't it wild?
You have all of these things in your country.
It's almost like you've imported a lot of people who don't get along abroad and have imported that conflict into the country.
And it's not to say that foreigners should not be welcome.
But when you welcome foreigners into your country, you make sure that those foreigners expose the values of your country and don't import the conflict from which they are either fleeing or looking for opportunity to import that conflict.
Yadda, yadda, yadda.
Okay, so the bottom line...
We know everyone can agree that kids are vulnerable online to hatred, to violence, to being bullied.
We've got to criminalize that.
To seeing and being affected by terrible things online.
We need to do a better job to protect kids.
They always hide behind the kids, literally.
Sometimes physically.
Back to Carney.
He says last month, quote, new online platforms have created new threats, including perhaps especially for children.
And as much as we as parents want to protect, they want to protect kids while simultaneously want to sterilize kids.
We want to protect kids, but we'll give them medication that will destroy their lives, destroy their bodies.
These people are demonic.
We can't always be there.
We can't always be looking over our kids' shoulders.
That's why we need the government.
I added that.
To see what they're doing or what they're exposed to online.
And so while protecting children is, first and foremost, a parent's responsibility, it's also a collective responsibility.
Only in communism, you communist piece of globalist filth.
The children don't belong to the parents.
The children belong to the collective.
Bullshit.
They don't.
You have nothing to say about the way I treat my kids and the way I raise my kids and what I teach my kids.
Except in as much to prevent actual abuse, but you seem to be intent on promoting that actual abuse.
The government's going to come in and tell me what's best for my kid.
By the way, that was my line in the sand in Quebec when they eliminated parental supremacy from the Youth Protection Act and the government gets to decide.
Some disgusting, stupid, partisan, ignorant twat of a government bureaucrat is going to tell me what's best for my kid.
You can go straight to the bowels of hell.
With the support of many Canadians, my government will act to protect children online and bring those who seek to harm them to justice.
Including the transgender movement that seeks to sell them puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy online?
Will it harm?
No, no.
No, no.
Because that's liberation.
We will first introduce legislation to protect children.
The bottom line is we know it's coming.
They're going to do it exactly like they did with the previous Online Streaming Act.
And they're going to bring back the piece of legislation that died when they proroged Parliament.
And they've already pushed, pushed, pushed, pushed, pushed.
Oh, back up for Prorogation of Parliament.
And now we're going to push forward from another enhanced, increased step.
They're going to do it.
It's going to happen.
And you're going to have brain drain, financial drain, economic drain out of Canada because people are going to leave that hellhole as predicted and as predictable.
Protect the kids, peeps.
Confirmation.
That video was in 2021, perhaps on April 19, 2021.
The Cure video.
So we got confirmation.
By the way, I should...
I am a master fact checker because you have to look for the hints.
So kick and cure Star Morata thing 2021.
And by the way, whatever account shared that without specifying that information, I would immediately...
It was very, very clear to identify in my video from today that that video was from five years ago.
Sometimes it's relevant, sometimes it's not.
In that case, it was particularly relevant.
So that's what's going on in Canada, peeps.
Viva!
PJ The Belt and Unacceptable Fringe have been doing a good job updating the Alberta separation.
Updating the Alberta separation on there.
And we're going to follow that.
We're going to follow that.
Let me just double check one thing to see what's going to happen when Barnes comes back on here.
Okay, there we go.
You can just send me a Rumble Studio link, so let's do that.
We're going to get Barnes from Vegas after we come back to America, and I'm going to take some of the chat here and see what's going on.
Bada bing, bada boom, there you go.
Okay, sorry.
I just got to check something here.
So I got everything here.
We're going to get this going up soon and it should look like it's going to work.
Okay, boom.
All right, peeps.
Let me see what's going on in the chat over here.
Finboy Slick, if you wanted to fact check it in real time, translate Google.
I don't know what that is, but I'll get to that in a second.
Canada didn't vote for Carney.
Canada didn't vote Carney and Ontario did.
First of all, it's the same complaint as always.
Quebec, Ontario voted them in.
Those are the two most populated provinces.
And the Maritimes voted him in.
The Yukon voted him in.
British Columbia voted him in.
It's a very big problem that, yes, you do have two provinces which dictate the election outcomes in Canada, which is exactly why one of the provinces should separate.
The one that is getting tyrannized and brutalized by the Liberal government because the have-not provinces vote in these governments is exactly why Alberta should separate.
Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan.
Get them out.
There is no way to get access to anything in, And now Roostank says, Viva, don't hurt yourself patting yourself on the back so hard.
Joe Rogan has Jamie, PBD has Rob, and you, sir, are lucky to have Encryptus.
Well, hold on one second.
Why?
Yes.
I am.
Okay, let me bring up a story here, which is going to be fun stuff.
You remember Peter Hotez?
A man who will not dare dignify.
A discussion with the man who is now the Director of Health and Human Services has this to say about the safe and effective, wonderful Jimmy Jab.
Double down, triple down.
This man, the face of health, the face of science.
And if you criticize him, you're a far right-wing extremist antisemite because I didn't know Peter Hotez was Jewish until he brought up antisemitism.
I do think the boosters were helpful because it wasn't always about death and hospitalization.
There were a couple of other things going on to keep up with boosters.
One was long COVID.
You know, if you were vaccinated and keeping up with your boosters, you had a greatly diminished likelihood of getting long COVID.
I think that was important.
The other was, you know, I don't think we adequately explained.
That this virus is a, you know, we called it a respiratory virus.
It was probably first and foremost a thromboembolic virus, right?
I'm curious as to when that became the case.
It was, you know, causing coronary artery blockage and heart attacks and strokes.
And so actually one of the best ways to protect your heart health was actually getting vaccinated and keeping up with your boosters.
Can we encrypt this?
Are we able to fact check this in real time?
When do the words, what was the word you said?
Thromboembolic?
No, causing, it was probably first and foremost, the thromboembolic virus.
Thromboembolic virus.
This is what you actually would call, in my view, unless I'm mistaken, and I don't think I am because I lived through it.
A, this is gaslighting.
This is gaslighting of the highest order.
I don't recall ever hearing that COVID was a thromboembolic virus at any point.
Up until I saw this clip, I was like, that's interesting.
It was always a respiratory virus.
And I remembered because you had people saying respiratory and you had others saying respiratory.
And I was thinking, it's not respiratory, it's respiratory.
It was always sold as, described as a respiratory virus.
Why would they now, five years later after the pandemic, Why would they need to transform reality to now describe it as having always been something which it was never described as, as far as I can remember?
And that being a thromboembolic virus?
Why do you think?
I heard a cough in Cryptus.
Why do you think?
So according to the NIH, an article published September 2020, I just dropped that in our private chat here, thromboembolic disease in COVID-19 patients, a brief narrative review.
So this definitely was talked about there.
But what this basically means is simply that it...
Is there any way to look up the frequencies of the search terms of respiratory virus over the last five years versus thromboembolic virus over the last five years?
Yeah, I've never heard of it until now either.
I know because the fact that there's going to be some, we know that they did mention that you could get...
No, but you could get clots or heart damage from COVID infection.
We knew that, but that mostly came out after the jab came out.
I'm telling you, what we're witnessing right now is the real-time historical revisionism to now say, oh, we always described it as being...
We called it a respiratory virus.
It was probably first and foremost a thromboembolic virus, right?
It was causing coronary artery blockage and heart attacks and strokes.
And so actually one of the best ways to protect your heart health was actually To get the jab, which could carry a risk of 1 in 5,000 myocarditis, depending on what your age bracket was.
Why they're doing it, in my view, is quite clearly now to confound the heart issues that they are now noting, which I would dare say increased after a certain specific date and time, so that they can then say, well, all of these heart issues that we've now noticed as a spike are the direct result of the thromboembolic virus that was COVID, despite the fact that it was passed off as a respiratory virus with potentially heart issues as a result of infection.
It's mentioned everywhere.
I don't know why I didn't hear about it either, but there's quite literally thousands and thousands of articles.
on exactly that.
All right.
Well, I'll still, Now, let's see something here.
Oh, by the way, if you didn't know, by the way, if you didn't know, Hotez is a Jewish man.
And I didn't know this because I never knew it.
Hotez does not sound like a Jewish name, but the issue was that it became a source of anti-Semitism to criticize Peter Hotez.
Now, I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to hear Robert Barnes, but I am going to turn over the channel to Robert Barnes.
Does he know he's on camera?
Am I good?
I'm live.
I'm live.
All right.
Here at the Bitcoin conference in Las Vegas.
I can't hear anything.
I can't see anything.
I can only talk.
So what we have here is the Bitcoin conference.
We're meeting up with Chris Pavlovsky, the CEO of Rumble.
Apparently there's been updates on the Rumble Google lawsuit that we will have an update on on Sunday, what the chances of Rumble prevailing in that case are.
We're also going to be talking today about other aspects of Bitcoin, including the Roger Ver case.
Roger Ver is known as Bitcoin Jesus, and we're here at the Bitcoin Conference in Las Vegas.
This is a man who was the leader in promoting Bitcoin, particularly its democratizing aspects, the ability to free up financial capital in such a way that ordinary, everyday people can have more power than central banks and central planners.
In that capacity, he was launching a political revolution.
He was aware of that as somebody who started out a libertarian activist and advocate, basically exposing Ruby Ridge, exposing what happened in Waco.
Because of it, the federal government, when he was just a young kid, a young libertarian advocate, tried to put him and succeeded at putting him in federal prison for doing what?
For not selling or buying fireworks over the internet in the right way.
That educated him as to the necessity and moral justification of his cause that we need to have the central government have less power, not more.
And he saw Bitcoin as a way to challenge and contest and question that centralization of power financially and politically to free up not only individual enterprise, but to free up ordinary everyday people to not have the social digital credit score system that we see being employed as we speak in countries like China.
He said, that's it.
I've had enough.
I'm going to leave the country.
I'm going to pay all my tax and be finished with it.
He hired accountants.
He hired lawyers.
He hired a team of financial and tax professionals to advise them on the proper way to do so.
The only reason he owed any tax at all, And in that simple single step, they were able to completely control who could leave, when they could leave, how they could leave, but more consequently, could create a property tax in direct violation of the Constitution's requirement that any direct tax on the American people,
including a property tax, It has to be apportioned equally amongst the states and has to be uniform across the nation.
This constitutional provision was only limited by the 16th Amendment, which said the income tax did not have to meet the apportionment or uniformity requirements.
But what they were taxing in the case of the exit tax is not income.
They were pretending your assets as income.
It is a government fabrication.
It is a lie intended to be able to steal people's money and property and be able to impose new extraordinary radical power over people's lives.
In the 1930s, the IRS said, This is the logic of where the government wants to go.
And they decided to use the exit tax as the way to begin to launch it.
The constitutionality of the exit tax has never been adequately dealt with by the Supreme Court of the United States.
So how do they decide to enforce it?
by select civil and criminal proceedings.
The first ever exit tax to reach a criminal case is the case of Roger Ver.
Even though Roger Beere followed all the rules as he understood them to be, the IRS itself couldn't make up its mind about whether Bitcoin was an asset, whether it was income.
If it was income, what kind of income was it?
Especially in the exit tax context, you're supposed to treat it by the mark-to-market value, based on the market valuation of Bitcoin at the time, based on the value of Bitcoin later, based on the value of Bitcoin at the time of actual purchase, based on the Bitcoin value at the time of actual sale.
All these things were undetermined and undecided by the IRS.
Despite that, Roger Ver went to great lengths and great efforts to pay every penny nickel diamond dollar they could possibly say is due for a tax that is unconstitutional to begin with, just so he wouldn't be subject to federal U.S. governmental control as he launched his Bitcoin revolution to economically democratize and politically democratize the world to give ordinary people real power against the concentrated corruption of our government and system.
That's just the beginning of the Roger Ver story.
We'll get back to more.
After now, back to Viva.
Hold up.
Hold up.
I wasn't trying.
I didn't want to do that.
Well, it's a good thing I'm sitting here listening to this.
This is a first time that we've ever done this because Barnes is at Vegas and I wasn't there.
And it's an interesting conference on Bitcoin.
Okay, hold on one second.
I've killed the stream on Commitube so that we have it over here.
All right, let me see what else I had in the backdrop before we keep going.
Oh, did everybody see, by the way, we're going to get to Biden's.
This was another story I had on the backdrop, which we'll get to.
Biden's, they all all of a sudden are like rewriting history yet again.
They should have seen Biden's mental decline as if they didn't have all the indications in the world.
There's a new episode of Michael Knowles.
On PragerU, and it's our reading and discussion of the old man in the sea.
Now I can tell my wife is absolutely going to kill me for the shoes I wore.
It's worth mentioning, the only reason the sharks were able to start eating his prize catch is because the fish was so big, he couldn't put him on the boat.
And he harpooned it, and then it started bleeding, and then he knew that he had accomplished his goal.
At that point.
But then as he sees it start getting eaten away, then he sees his dream starting getting eaten away.
But where I also took from this differently the second time around than the first time is as he sees the fish getting mutilated and destroyed and his beautiful catch turned into not chum, then he goes to start killing the sharks, which I did not even, It was an action movie.
Like, he's fashioning weapons and stabbing sharks in the brains and seeing them, you know, one after another.
Gouging out their eyes.
Gouging out their eyes.
And I couldn't believe that I didn't realize the graphic nature of the violence from a literary perspective.
His catch is now not only being destroyed, but he's turning into a murder of other animals.
And this entire venture has now proven to be a total disaster in that he kills the beautiful fish, loses it.
And then turns into something of a monster by killing other animals for only doing what God intended them to do, and then ends up with nothing except, you know, the scars on the palm of his hands and laying in a position of Christ on the cross.
But isn't he doing what God intended him to do when he was born to be a fisherman?
We're going to pause it there.
And if you want to hear the analysis, I can tell you, I wasn't in a dark place when we discussed this book, but when I did read The Old Man of the Sea a second time.
God-created creatures that were out there to do their thing.
Go watch it, people.
It was actually quite fun.
Link.
Now, there we go.
We got that here.
Okay.
Oh, and by the way, also, I'm a senile old buffoon.
As we talk about this.
And we talk about Rumble.
We should also talk about the Rumble partner companies that put out amazing products that are delicious and that I drink.
Oh, there we go.
Well, it's empty now because I needed the coffee out of the box.
1775 Coffee People is giving away free starter kits loaded with premium coffee and gear while coffee prices have jumped over 30% this year.
1975 said, screw it.
We're keeping our...
And we are going to hand out free kits like caffeinated Oprah on a rampage.
If you've been waiting for a sign from up above.
Or just a halfway decent excuse to finally try it.
This is it.
It's only live while quantities last.
You'll get three bags of coffee, two 16-ounce of your choice, dark or medium, plus the longevity blend infused with anti-aging CAAKG, clinically proven to reduce biological age.
Translation, your coffee in the morning is not just going to taste great.
It might actually make you look and feel younger.
You cover two bags.
$17.75 covers the rest.
That's a full 16-ounce bag plus premium gear, a matte black tumbler.
For author, gold scoop.
Or a reusable K-cup filler.
My mug's not here.
Whole bean, ground, or pods.
Your call.
Start your day with coffee that actually backs what you believe in.
A company that values you as a customer.
Smooth, jitter-free, anti-woken, laced with the kind of energy that keeps you young, sharp, and mildly dangerous.
Go to 1775coffee.com.
Promo code or forward slash Viva.
Grab your first starter kit before someone else realizes it was a terrible decision not to order theirs.
Link is in the description.
Now let me see what's going on here.
All right, people.
Let's just do one more.
I'm going to see if Barnes comes back in and how we're going to do this for the rest of the show.
Joe Biden.
It's crazy.
There's historical revisionism.
Oh, he's back in.
Now we're back, as Paul Harvey would say, with the rest of the story.
So Roger Ver, where we left off, had decided to exit the United States in order to be able to preserve and protect the freedoms of other Americans in the United States.
Contrary to what Elon Musk and some others thought, he didn't leave the United States in rejection of Americans.
He did so to protect and advance the interest and the freedom and the liberty interest of Americans and those around the world.
And the only way he could achieve and accomplish that was to exit a country that wanted to use its legal authority and control over him.
To silence him, to suppress him, to censor him.
He recognized, about a decade before everybody else did, not only of the incredible exponential power of Bitcoin to be an individual tool of freedom in the toolbox of liberty, but also the great dangers of the central governments and central banks and central planners to try to use censorship and financial mechanisms and methods and means of control to suppress these new,
Thank you.
He leaves, and he begins and continues his effort to be Bitcoin Jesus, advocating for Bitcoin in its truest, purest.
In a way that could unleash individual economic freedom and opportunity, but also disempower central banks and central governments.
He is so successful doing so, he creates opportunities of different forks within the Bitcoin movement, all kinds of other efforts to be able to achieve this.
Democratic dream, little d democratic, little individual empowerment.
In that capacity, he writes and publishes a book called Hijacking Bitcoin.
Who were the main adversaries in this context?
It was the central intelligence agencies, the central banks, the central planners, the central governments, who were doing everything possible to suppress the freedom capacity that Bitcoin provided.
And even though it was a computer algorithm to your ordinary everyday boomer, to younger generations, it was red-pilling them on the importance of monetization.
People that never had any interest in a 19th century Austrian economist were now college dropouts telling you all about Austrian economics, about the gold standard, about fiat currencies.
All of a sudden this became a form of currency of its own kind.
It was using the opportunity to get independent and wealthy to red pill the world.
And that led to a book called Hijacking Bitcoin.
Within a month of that book being published, the U.S. government came in and indicted Roger Ver.
For what, you might say?
He followed his advisors.
He followed his accountants.
He followed his lawyers.
He paid tax he didn't even owe.
He paid tax that was unconstitutional in the first place.
Why?
Because they wanted to suppress and censor his message and to send a message to everybody else.
Stick your head up and challenge what we're trying to do.
Stick your head up and advance a cause of Bitcoin as a tool of individual freedom, and we will lock you up.
Look at what we did to Bitcoin Jesus.
If the government can crucify Bitcoin Jesus, imagine what they can do to you if you advance the individual cause that Bitcoin can be on the freedom opportunity space.
And so they decided to indict him.
Now, you look at the underlying nature of the indictment.
Not only is it a completely novel indictment, there's never been an indictment challenging somebody over a disagreement over how Bitcoin could be taxed.
There's never been an indictment on the exit tax, an exit tax that most legal scholars consider unconstitutional in the first place.
Nor has there ever been this kind of prosecution brought for someone who had already left the country, taxing him for things that happened after he was no longer even a citizen based on money he made that was not even from the United States.
He asked them over and over and over again, do I owe any tax?
They never answered him.
Instead, their only answer was an indictment.
Even God answers people's prayers now and then.
The government thinks it's above and beyond God in the prosecution of Roger Ver.
But that wasn't all of the wayward, rogue nature of the Veer prosecution.
The second aspect is it was a selective prosecution, because almost nobody else that was similarly situated has ever been prosecuted.
What's unique about Roger Veer is his outspoken speech.
It's the only reason he's being indicted.
It has nothing to do with tax, and it never did.
Last but not least, the government committed extensive and expansive misconduct and malfeasance in the investigation and prosecution of Roger Ver.
First, they lied to a federal judge to steal his attorney-client privilege communications.
But they didn't end there.
After stealing those attorney-client privilege communications, they then lied about what they found.
And they didn't just lie about what they found to the federal judge.
They turned around and lied to a grand jury about it.
They lied within the Justice Department to their own superiors about it.
They lied to a foreign government in Spain about it.
They lied to anybody and everybody they could to secure a bogus indictment and a bogus extradition request riddled and littered.
With lies and misrepresentations.
This case is an egregious case of government malfeasance and misconduct.
It is a classic example of true lawfare, which has three constituent components most commonly attached to it.
That is novel theories of prosecution.
In other words, a basis, a legal theory, a factual evidentiary pattern that is never or is rarely used to prosecute someone.
That is all over the Roger Ver case.
They are selective in the prosecution.
In other words, similarly situated people, people who also, there's disputes about an exit tax or people who are disputes about a Bitcoin tax, were not similarly prosecuted.
And what's distinctive about Roger Ver is his speech and advocacy in the court of public opinion.
Last but not least.
Government lies to judges.
Government lies to juries.
Government lies to government agencies.
Government lies to foreign courts.
Government lies to foreign officials.
This is the most egregious case of criminal lawfare in the last half decade, not named January 6th for Donald Trump.
And it is embarrassing to the Trump administration that has an official public policy to promote crypto, an official public policy to make America the heart and the safe haven for Bitcoin around the world.
For a Trump administration that has an official DOJ policy, they will not use criminal prosecutions to create new regulations like this case does.
Everything about this case...
And if Trump is going to honor and keep his word to the American people, to keep the policy commitments he has towards Bitcoin, towards crypto, towards the end of lawfare, then he needs to dismiss the case against Roger Ver tomorrow.
That's what needs to happen if we're going to have Bitcoin Jesus free.
And there's nobody better to pardon Bitcoin Jesus than Donald Trump himself.
This is from the Bitcoin conference.
Everybody have fun.
Sweet.
I'm coming back.
Kicking him.
All right.
Hold on.
Let me turn my volume down here.
Tell you, it's a good thing I'm not going too far from my computer.
So Barnes has gone from the Bitcoin conference.
We're at an hour and 17 minutes, so we are actually going to do the one last story, and then we're going to go raid somebody.
I was just about to say testify Barnes, but I didn't even get it in time here.
Testify Barnes.
And that was what I was going to bring in there.
So Barnes is at the Bitcoin conference and yeah, it's a, um, Righteously hard.
Because first of all, you don't just go hard against people you dislike.
You sometimes go hard against the people that you love and respect because you expect more from them and you want more from them.
Barnes coming out and saying, as we've been saying for a while, that to pursue a Biden-era prosecution of Roger Ver, which runs afoul of and contrary to all of the Trump administration policies vis-a-vis Bitcoin, normalizing it, nationalizing it, not taxing it, to maintain that prosecution makes zero sense.
Pam Bondi has dropped the ball on a few cases where they didn't intervene or they are continuing to pursue.
And this is one of them.
So Righteous Barnes is right on, as always.
And I think he's going to go now and have some fun in Vegas.
They have good cigars in Vegas.
So at the very least, we know Barnes is going to get a good cigar.
Barnes is just using this for his next...
Hold on.
Barnes is just using us for his next big thing.
He doesn't care.
Let's flesh this one out, people.
One statement.
How many loser think problems does it have with it?
Barnes is just using us, which is what we call reading intentions.
Assuming intentions, mind reading.
He doesn't care.
Also mind reading.
Actually, Barnes is just using us as ad hominem.
There is devoid of fact, devoid of substance, and I didn't mean to bring it up, but there we go.
Let me see something here.
I want to bring up this.
I'm gonna bring it out of here now.
Alright, so we're gonna end on the story that bit of a, not a hiccup, but there was no audio interplay between me and Barnes at the conference, so Barnes ranted, Barnes raved, and now Viva's gonna do it live!
Tie up the show with Joe Biden, for those of you who didn't know, his cognitive decline.
Unless I close the link on this.
That's very good.
My kid's playing an internet game that...
Get out here and go out and close the door, please.
Where is the thing that I'm looking for?
Here we go.
Biden's aides.
In case you didn't know, people, let's go ahead and rewrite history.
Now, nobody knew, nobody could have known, and they're all taken aback by how they were misled, even though they were participating in the misleading.
Biden aides considered undemocratic actions to keep cognitive decline hidden.
Trump out of power.
Author.
This is the original sin.
The chances that I'm told he's a decent journalist.
He followed me on Twitter and now I have followed him back and maybe I'll get him on to talk about the book.
Jake Tapper, I know, is Jake the fake Tapper.
Jake the crapper Tapper.
And I can go fake the Jake, Jake the fake crapper Tapper.
Jake Tapper is a propagandist and a pathological liar of the highest order.
Period.
Alex Thompson, I don't know much about.
But I'm told he's a good guy.
Original Sin co-author Alex Thompson details how unelected aides shielded Biden from public scrutiny.
You think Kamala Harris didn't know then?
Oh, I didn't know anything.
They all knew.
Jake Tapper knew.
Everybody knew.
I knew.
I knew and I wasn't even on the inside.
Alex Thompson, co-author of the recently released expose on former President Joe Biden.
How did that work out for you?
How about tell the truth?
They can't tell the truth because it would reveal their corruption and their criminality.
They can't tell the truth because it would reveal that they've systematically lied for years.
They can't tell the truth because it would reveal the network of dishonesty and corruption involving the highest upper ones in the echelons of MSM fake news propaganda like Jake the Fake Crapper Tapper.
I think there was a feeling like a lot of members of the Democratic Party were seeing this or moments of Biden seeming out of it, that going public wasn't going to change his mind.
It was only going to help Donald Trump.
And I think that's how a lot of them rationalized it.
When you have convinced yourself The irony being Biden was almost that last president.
You can rationalize anything to yourself.
Quote, now whether or not history will judge him as being right or wrong, we'll see.
But this is also part of the reason why the White House was shielding Biden from as many people as possible, including cabinet secretaries.
Bream went on to question Thompson about his about an aide he spoke to who said Biden, quote, just had to win and then could disappear, end quote, because Biden's aides, quote, could pick up the slack and.
They're not predicting for the future.
They're describing the past.
Bream described the quote as essentially admitting Biden shouldn't be running again.
Also admitting he shouldn't be the president.
Then, also potentially admitting that some of his acts were not done of sound mind, Nobody wants to open that can of worms.
Who would have been running the White House in the second term?
Bream asked Thompson.
I'd ask Thompson this question.
Who was running the White House in the first term?
Who was running the White House in the last year of Biden's presidency when he pretty much did everything he could to exacerbate every international conflict on earth?
Who was running the presidency when Biden was siphoning, funneling, laundering hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine?
Who?
We know it wasn't Biden.
We know it was the people who knew that Biden wasn't cognitively fit and he was the perfect tool for them to carry out their globalist military-industrial complex neocon war-whore ambitions.
Well, this person went on to say, when you're voting for the president, you're voting for the aides around him.
But these aides were not even Senate-confirmed aides.
These were White House aides.
These were unelected people, Thompson replied.
One of the things that really comes out in our reporting here is that if you believe, and I do think a lot of these people do sincerely believe that Donald Trump was and is an existential threat to democracy, you can rationalize anything, including doing some undemocratic things, which I think this person was talking about.
You can rationalize anything, including trying to take his life, including trying to lock him up, including trying to bankrupt him.
You can rationalize anything.
And they've done it.
They've rationalized everything.
They've destroyed democracy.
And they nearly destroyed these United States of America and this amazing experiment that was, that is, and that will be these United States of America.
They nearly destroyed it because they thought they knew better.
They should all be in jail.
By the way, let's see what Jake the Fake Tapper has to say.
Thompson and CNN's Jake Tapper have been doing the rounds discussing and promoting their new book entitled Original Sin.
I suspect and have it on good information that Thompson wrote probably 85% of this book and he would have to because if Jake the fake Tapper wrote any of it, he'd have to be a filthy pathological liar, which has garnered a lot of attention.
The book has been compounded by other revelations showing Biden's cognitive abilities were likely hidden from the public and by those closest to him.
She knew and she lied about it from day one.
She lied about it until she saw her opportunity to come in and steal that nomination.
She knew.
She hid it.
They are all a bunch of liars.
Alex Thompson, I don't know well enough to accuse him of being a liar.
He seems like a legit, authentic...
Jake Tapper is a liar.
Jake Tapper is the problem, now pretending to be part of the solution.
Ruth Dane says, if you are fortunate enough to get another interview, another interview, I never had an interview with RFK, ask if you and your son could go with him for a beginner's intro to falconry.
RFK is an expert.
Talk about a great lesson.
I've never had an interview with RFK Jr.
I would love to have one, but I'm going to reach out to Alex Thompson right now because he is the man who I think would be amenable.
If he goes on Fox News, maybe he'll come on Viva Friday, talk about the book, because I got questions.
I won't accuse Thompson of anything because I don't know who he is.
I just know that his co-author, Jake Tapper, is a pathological liar who has now been exploiting of his pathological lies to hawk his new book now, turning CNN from a propagandist network that was participating in and complicit with the lie.
To now selling a book so that Jake Tapper can profit off his own lies and complicity in promoting that lie.
How do you do that?
How do you not have the slightest bit of integrity or fear of some spiritual, metaphysical higher power that will reveal you to be the pathological scumbag liar that you are?
I don't understand how people do this.
Finboy Slick, there's a picture of Disco Man.
Disco God Viva still has in fact check the screenshot.
That screenshot and link.
Well, I got to show everybody what he's talking about.
I can fact check this one in real time.
Hold on.
Hold on.
Here we go.
Fact check.
Not me.
Too tall.
Legs too slender.
Too much hair on his chest.
And yeah, there's another joke there that I'll hold off on.
Finboy Slick, that is amazing.
And you make the best absolute memes on earth.
All right, so that just about does it.
In Cryptis, I don't know if you're still in the backdrop.
Are we going to raid America's Untold Stories?
Yes, if we can give it another five minutes.
I actually just dropped KJP in your DMs saying Biden was the sharpest ever.
I cannot hear.
KJP is Karine Jean-Pierre.
Oh, please bring up the events.
Yeah, I'll bring this up in a second here.
Hold on, let me open up a window.
Find the Kamala one where she denied having known about his mental decline.
Yeah, that's what I'm looking for now.
It's pathological.
Where's the Karine Jean-Pierre?
Is that in our Rumble chat?
In Twitter.
We're going to centralize messaging while we're live here.
Ooh, ooh, ooh.
Okay, no, I thought someone got back to me.
Ah, forget it.
That's her saying it's Karine Jean-Pierre.
Oh my goodness, they're going to come up with these all day long.
We can all agree that Karine Jean-Pierre was the worst press secretary in the history of these United States of America.
She was the worst one ever, not because she was a pathological liar, but because she was so flipping bad at it.
She was awful.
Her body language always exuded weakness and dishonesty.
He is the sharpest as ever, as I have known him to be in my engagement, in my experience with him.
He is the sharpest as ever.
I mean, Jen Psaki, for all of her circling backs and verbal diarrhea and propaganda promoting rubbish, was at least mildly compelling when she did it.
Mildly sincere when she did it.
I dropped.
Two videos of Kamala saying that in your Twitter DMs.
Ah, very nice.
Very nice.
And we shall get these immediately.
And then we shall end the show and bring it on over to...
AgentGuru underscore IO.
Let's bring this one up.
And then we'll bring up the second one.
Hold on.
Hold on.
Share screen.
Here we go.
This is it.
Bada bing, bada boom.
More complicated way.
I think a lot of people would say she can't say anything else.
She couldn't tell if there was a problem.
I'm not lying.
But I'm telling you a fact.
But if there ever is a problem, do you think that you could go tell the American public?
Do you think in your role that you're in a position to do that?
Of course, if necessary, but there's no need for that.
There is a political argument that is being made that is not based on substance.
And you're asking me to hypothesize around what are my duties to the American people as Vice President of the United States that are based on ethics and morals and the law.
I will always follow those rules.
But I am suggesting to you that it is important we not be seduced into one of the only arguments that that side of the aisle has right now on this issue in a way that is intended to distract from the accomplishments.
When was this one from?
This one was from...
August 29th.
Let me ask you in a more complicated way.
Let's try this one.
Harris, you were a very staunch defender of President Biden's capacity to serve another four years.
Right after the debate, you insisted that President Biden is extraordinarily strong.
Given where we are now, do you have any regrets about what you told the American people?
No, not at all.
Not at all.
President Harris.
It's amazing.
All right.
Encryptus, have we rated America's Untold Stories?
No, we're just waiting for them to go live another minute or so.
Why won't they go live?
Not sharp.
Not sharp.
Not punctual timing.
America's Untold Stories, Mark Robert and Eric Hundley.
And I actually think Mark Robert just sent me, if I'm not mistaken, a chat here.
Okay, well, this is international politics.
All right, let's get to some chat.
She keeps her brain.
I will not read that.
I'm not reading that.
You know what?
I'm just going to go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
There's a bunch of chats that I can't read in good conscience, people.
Not the least of which, because I have young ears who are standing here.
All right, so let's see.
I'm so happy I don't have to hear her anymore, says Teeley1776.
She has a PhD in word salad, says Paracleric.
What's up?
One more thing.
It's the 1776 Law Center event, and they just went live.
Okay, hold on.
So we're going to end it on this.
1776 Law Center.
Donate now.
Sooner than later.
In fact, it'll be right now when I remember to send in cryptos pictures.
This is going to be auctioned with a signed Louis the Lobster book and the proceeds because Adam the lectern guy said, I'll give you two Viva.
You got to auction off one for a fundraiser of your choice.
And I tried to do one for something that is not connected to me in any sense because this is Barnes' fundraiser or raising funds for legal work.
And I tried to do it on eBay and eBay canceled the auction because they said it was auctioning off the proceeds related to violent events.
Some bullcrap.
Uh, so that's it.
But 1776 law center.
This is in cryptus who was, uh, help helping out with this.
You can join our events in, when is it?
August 14th to August, August 16th, August 16th to August 17th.
I gotta know that I gotta be there for that.
I'll give everybody the link.
Event, singular, dot gives, forward slash 1776law.
Help if you can, and if you can't, just spread the word.
All right, now we're going to go.
Yep, the kid is showing the rumble.
What does it say here?
250,000.
We're almost at 500,000.
Oh, before you go, make sure that you subscribe.
Thank you.
Subscribe and go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
You can do it.
That's vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Make sure that you subscribe, hit the notifications on the way out, share the channel, snip and clip.
By the way, go check out the interview that Phil Holloway and I did with Megyn Kelly today.
I dare say there might be a viral clip in there that's going to make the rounds and reverberate through the interwebs of historic times.
If you touch a little mushy face, you just want to squeeze your face.
All right.
Go and enjoy the day.
Did you wash your hands?
We got some...
You know what's always nice when people touch your face?
In fact, I should...
All right.
Get out of here.
Go.
Subscribe before you leave.
And we're going over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
All right.
Locals?
Here it comes.
Encryptus, I can leave now?
We've raided?
Absolutely.
Ready to go?
Okay.
Kids are dirty.
Disgusting germ bags.
Well, they're disgusting in the germ bags.
I can see the germs now on my face like an aura of bacteria.
Locals, here we come.
Wait a minute.
Hold on a second.
Tomorrow is Wednesday and then Thursday in Georgia.
Okay, go.
Enjoy the day.
Heads.
Okay.
Peace out, peeps.
Export Selection