Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 3, 2024 - Viva & Barnes

01:40:42

Ray Epps Fed-Surrection Cover-Up? Hunter Biden Pardon Fallout! Plan-Demic Failures & MORE!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You want us sick, you think we're dumb.
	You want us blind and you want us drugged.
	You want us poor while you get more of everything.
	But you don't get to tell me what to think and what to do.
	You don't get to tell me what is true.
	You're just liars, cheats and crooks.
	Change the rules and you burn the books.
	And so I don't believe a single word you say.
	You're all liars, fakes and cons.
	Watch out and we want you gone.
	So don't believe this time you'll get away.
	You want us tricked, you want us numb.
	You want us scared and you want us stung.
	You want us shopping, you want us far in every way.
	You want our minds, you want our time.
	You want us framed up in your crimes.
	I hope you know that it's time to go and we're taking names.
	Cause you don't get to tell us what to think and what to do.
	No, you don't get to tell us what is true.
	You're just liars, cheats and crooks.
	Change the rules and you burn the books.
	And so we don't believe a single word you say.
	You're all liars, fakes and cons.
	Watch out and we want you gone.
	So don't believe this time you'll get away.
	Oh, All right, people.
	Let's get this show going.
	Drop out the intro music.
	No one will ever accuse me of having a good voice, people.
	Good morning.
	If I look distracted and pissed off, holy hell.
	It's because I am.
	It's straight up.
	First world problems, and I can't complain too much.
	But it's a culmination of irritants.
	And any one irritant on its own would not be a problem, but the culmination of irritants of life.
	They can make you want to put your fist through the computer screen that you have not yet gotten the replacement of, number one.
	I'm trying to get back on Facebook, not for any particular reason, but at this point, out of sheer stubbornness to figure out what the hell the problem is with Facebook in terms of locking you out of your account, sending the two-step verification to a cell number you haven't had in three years.
	It's like it's designed to make you go crazy.
	The other stuff is irrelevant.
	Let's see.
	Hold on.
	What's going on?
	You're getting a text?
	Oh my goodness.
	It's actually a culmination of 15 different things.
	Nobody cares, but that is it.
	No, Bill Brown, you are not an irritant.
	Bill Brown of our Locals community.
	I wanted to get back on doing the local supporters interviews, and we haven't been able to do that.
	I set up the stream, accidentally didn't set it up on YouTube, and now I fixed that.
	Okay. Everybody?
	I'm going to start with the intro video that I could not vet before getting going here today.
	I wanted to put together the montage of all montages of the Hunter Biden pardon madness.
	We didn't get to it yesterday in the detail that I wanted to because we had on Mel, Village Crazy Lady, talking about the Matt Gaetz extortion scheme.
	And that went on for a little bit longer than I thought it was going to.
	And then we ultimately didn't really spend too much time talking about the Hunter Biden pardon.
	What it means, what it doesn't mean, what it entails, what it shows about the hypocrisy, the intellectual dishonesty, the scoundrelism of the left.
	Let me see if this is going to be the montage that I want to play here.
	Let's just play this for a second.
	He very clearly said he would not pardon his son, he would not commute his sentence.
	I don't know if this is a six-minute montage.
	How stark is this difference?
	I mean, how can Republicans keep making this argument now that Joe Biden has really put it out there?
	He's now been pretty emphatic over the last few days that he does not plan to pardon or commute his son.
	What that really is him saying is, I don't plan to use the powers of the office, the powers of the presidency, to provide private relief for my family.
	In a sense, he's staking out a pretty bright line between being, as he says, a president and a dad.
	And that's not just an emotional expression.
	He's in effect saying, I don't think that I should.
	I don't have a right, even if it's legal.
	This goes on for six minutes.
	We use this power in a way that is not available to so many other Americans facing similar kinds of struggles.
	I think it's a big deal because it really undercuts the argument that this is rigged on the other side, right?
	But now it highlights that this is rigged.
	We're going to get into this in a second, actually, because there's so much.
	And Don866 over in our locust community says, liar, liar, pants on fire.
	Wait until you hear the mental gymnastics as to why it's not a lie.
	You actually won't believe it, and I'm not going to spoil the punchline just yet, what I am going to do before we get too far in and I forget to do it because of how irritated I am today is we're going...
	The healthy stuff of the day, people.
	Let's talk about being naked.
	And not physically, but metaphorically speaking.
	Metaphorically speaking.
	Who knows what movie that's from?
	By the way, by the way, 60% of US adults...
	We're not on the...
	I'm doing...
	That's the 5G free, which is the next one.
	No, we're talking about being naked and not going soft.
	Evolution, they say, has gone soft, that men have traded their strength for comfort, but if you're not about to let your instincts go dull, it's time to fuel up with something raw, real, and primal.
	Naked organs, and you can play it like a maraca when you're...
	Taking it in the morning.
	We're talking pure bison liver, kidney, heart, and testicles.
	Some of the most nutrient-dense foods on the planet.
	You'll notice, by the way, when animals go and devour other animals, they go for specific organs because they are nutrient-dense.
	I'm not saying that, you know, lions go for the bison's testicles.
	I'm just saying it happens in nature.
	Bison liver alone packs up to three times more vitamin A than muscle meat, along with high levels of vitamin B12, iron, folate, all essential for energy, immune, health, keeping you sharp.
	And the best part?
	You get all these powerhouse nutrients in a form that's easy to take.
	It's a pill, people.
	It's a supplement, and it's deliciously easy to take.
	Head over to BeNaked.com, promo code Viva, and you'll get 15% off.
	Time to silence the noise, reclaim your power, and get back to being unstoppable.
	BeNaked.com, promo code Viva gets you 15% off.
	It is a Rumble partner.
	And so we're going to talk about a tweet from Chris today, CEO of Rumble.
	Support. The parallel economy and the companies that love you, respect you, and don't treat you like absolute crap.
	And be naked is one of them.
	The other, 5G-free people.
	And this is about protecting your data.
	Which is not how I got locked out of my Facebook account, but it doesn't matter.
	60% of U.S. adults have had their data hacked or exposed.
	I actually have had my, not data hacked, but was exposed when I donated to the trucker convoy.
	Whatever. Relying on big tech or government for your protection is like trusting Kamala Harris to answer a question.
	Don't hold your breath.
	5G Free's Faraday laptop and phone holders aren't just cases.
	They're total signal shutdowns for your devices.
	Slip your gear inside and it blocks everything EMF, radiation, GPS, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, cellular tracking.
	All of it is gone.
	Not only does it protect your privacy, but it also keeps you safe from constant EMF exposure, which has been linked to certain serious potential health risks.
	5G Free, your devices stay dark, secure, and protected.
	Go to 5gfree.com, promo code VIVA.
	15% off.
	Protect yourself and your data.
	It's another Rumble partner, people.
	5gfree.com, promo code VIVA.
	Get yours.
	I ordered my, I hope I ordered my Faraday, my EMF wallet there, the thing that protects your credit cards.
	Links are in the description.
	LS, who says my blood?
	Maybe I'll go get, I'll do my blood pressure.
	I got a little home device.
	And if it's not like the irritants of life that are going to get your blood pressure up, it's the abject stupidity, hypocrisy of the people around us.
	And I'm talking to Democrats today.
	I'm talking to capital D Democrats.
	People who voted for Kamala Harris.
	People who supported Joe Biden.
	I've like, once upon a time, had a discussion with not my boss, but the boss of someone near and dear.
	And we were discussing as to whether or not the brain of a lefty liberal Democrat is different physiologically, physically, chemically than the brain of a right-wing conservative Republican.
	It is obvious that there is a difference.
	And I try not to think along the lines of, like, left versus right, but there is a brain difference in people who have no problem being lied to, who have no problem lying, and I've lived long enough now to firmly understand the idea when I was, you know, heard this expression growing up that liberalism is a mental disorder.
	Liberalism! It's a mental disorder.
	Because on the one hand, you have your leaders, progressive leaders, liberal leaders, Democrat leaders, and I'm talking Canada and America, who are just scoundrels.
	They have no qualm lying.
	They have no shame getting caught in a lie and pretending like it never happened.
	What we're witnessing right now, it doesn't just highlight hypocrisy.
	It doesn't just highlight dishonesty.
	It highlights the willful delusion of...
	Tens of millions of people who have no qualms being treated like idiots.
	I'm not trying to be glib or facetious.
	There's something broken about a progressive, liberal, lefty brain.
	It doesn't work properly.
	It doesn't think logically.
	It doesn't compare comparables.
	It doesn't understand basic logic.
	And it doesn't have basic moral decency.
	And I'm not saying that the right conservative brain does it.
	There's plenty of hypocrite scoundrels on the right.
	I don't look at Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the Conservative Party, and say there's a virtuous, ethical man.
	I happen to know he's not much better than many other politicians, but he's a little bit better.
	If only, maybe, because he fears getting caught in a lie.
	As opposed to Justin Trudeau, who just doesn't get phased by being caught in a lie.
	Joe Biden doesn't get phased by being caught in a lie.
	Karine Jean-Pierre doesn't get phased.
	Press Secretary Jen Psaki?
	He doesn't care.
	And they don't care that you know that they're liars.
	Whew. few Thank you.
	See, my heart rate is actually surprisingly low.
	I'm going to get the machine.
	So the news of yesterday, and it's an amazing thing.
	I was on with Luke Redkowski.
	We talked about it more than we talked about it on my show.
	I was on yesterday with Mel.
	We were talking about Matt Gaetz.
	The news of yesterday, which is already old news as of today.
	Is that Joe Biden pardoned Hunter Biden.
	But it's not just a pardon.
	And by the way, today we're going to talk about that.
	We're going to talk about that new COVID, that 576-page report about COVID response that confirms everything the conspiracy theorists had been saying from the beginning.
	And we're going to talk about some other stuff.
	Ray Epps, my own personal conspiracy theory.
	Joe Biden pardoned.
	Let me see here.
	We've got to get the actual document.
	Is it a PDF?
	If I go to images.
	Oh, documents.
	Here we go.
	Let me see this here.
	Oh, mother effers, people.
	Look at this statement from Joe Biden on the pardon of his son.
	This doesn't have the pardon, but we're just going to read this.
	Never mind what we said.
	Today's a different day.
	Today I signed a pardon for my son Hunter.
	From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department's decision-making, and I kept my word even as I have watched my son being selectively and unfairly prosecuted.
	Hold on.
	I've got to make sure that this is legit.
	This is from Document Cloud.
	I'm so nervous about getting something wrong here.
	This is the actual document.
	Can you imagine Joe Biden?
	Whose DOJ went after Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro for contempt.
	And this mother effer is complaining about his son who lied on a firearm application.
	The party of gun laws is now complaining after having selectively prosecuted, some of you might not have much sympathy for her, but Jenna Ellis, Jeff Clark.
	I can't even come up with the names of all of the lawyers.
	Peter Navarro, Steve Bannon, Brian Colfage.
	These mother effers selectively prosecute people, in some cases, into suicide.
	And I'm talking about the January 6ers, and we're going to come to that today at some point.
	This scumbag projecting Darvo mother effer.
	Deny, attack, reverse victim and offender.
	Accuse your adversaries of doing what you are doing so as to create confusion.
	They're arguing?
	That his son has been unfairly prosecuted without aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple purchases, or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser.
	People are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they filled out a form.
	Can you believe the passive?
	No. People are rarely brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they lied on a firearm application.
	I appreciate some of you out there don't like that requirement.
	In the first place.
	Mind your own effing business.
	Shall not be infringed means shall not be infringed.
	I've got to tell you what kind of drugs I'm doing.
	I appreciate some of you feel that way.
	It might be that many are never brought to trial on felony charges for lying on a firearm application because they plead.
	Like Hunter tried to do before that bogus plea deal was blown wide open.
	Going to be relevant when we get to Dan Goldman's statement here.
	Those who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions but paid them back subsequently with interest and penalties are typically given non-criminal resolutions.
	It is clear that Hunter was treated differently.
	By the way, none of this is new.
	So when he said he wouldn't interfere because he was going to let the prosecution, the system, play it out, he was banking on him getting acquitted or not charged.
	What he basically said is, I'm taking my second kick at the can.
	Because I let it play out, and it didn't end the way I think it should have, and now I'm claiming victimhood.
	It's an amazing thing.
	I'll get two kicks at this.
	I won't pardon him right from the beginning because that would just look corrupt.
	I'll let the system play out.
	I'm not going to get involved.
	But if the system doesn't acquit my son and not bring charges, then I'm going to get involved.
	The charges in his cases came about only after several of my political opponents in Congress instigated them to attack me and oppose my election.
	This could have been written by Donald Trump when they came after him for the Russiagate hoax, impeachment one, impeachment two.
	They are telling you what they are doing.
	A carefully negotiated plea deal agreed to by the Department of Justice unraveled in the courtroom with a number of my political opponents in Congress taking credit for bringing political pressure on the process.
	Had the plea deal held, it would have been an egregious injustice.
	It would have been fair.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	No, it would have been fair.
	I'm being sarcastic.
	Fair, reasonable resolution of Hunter's cases.
	No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter's case can rely on any other conclusion that Hunter was singled out only he is my son.
	And that is wrong.
	There has been an effort to break Hunter, who's been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution.
	In trying to break Hunter, they've tried to break me.
	And there's no reason to believe it will stop here.
	Enough is enough for...
	Is this...
	No, this is it.
	This is it, man.
	Like, this is so outrageous.
	I feel like I'm reading parody and I'm feeling like maybe the chat is saying, Viva, you're reading parody, you idiot.
	Stop doing it.
	You fell for it.
	This is real.
	Like, when I say that reality and parody have married and merged so much, they're indistinguishable.
	This is indistinguishable from what the onion, not the onion, sorry, the one that's funny, the bee.
	The heck is it?
	The B. It's called the, um...
	For goodness sake.
	This is what someone would have drafted if it were intended to be parody.
	No reasonable person who looks at the cake.
	We got that.
	For my entire career, I have followed a simple principle.
	Just tell the truth.
	Just tell the American people the truth.
	They'll be fair-minded.
	Here's the truth.
	I believe in the justice system, but as I've wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process and it led to a miscarriage of justice.
	This should have been written for Donald Trump.
	And once I made the decision this weekend, there was no sense in delaying it further.
	I hope Americans will understand why a father and a president Let's go to the, um...
	A full and unconditional pardon from Daddy.
	For his son.
	For those offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period of January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024.
	A decade.
	Including, but not limited to, all offenses charged or prosecuted, including any that have resulted in convictions by special counsel in the United States court, yada, yada, yada.
	In testimony whereof, I hereunto sign my name and cause it to be done in the city of Washington.
	First day of December, in the year of our Lord, 2024.
	And of the independence of the United States.
	Can you believe this?
	A decade.
	I was looking up, you know, a lot of the statute of limitations.
	This is only for federal crime, so it doesn't really...
	The Babylon Bee, thank you.
	I couldn't remember what...
	This is only for federal stuff.
	So, you know, like, whatever the statute of limitations is on, you know, like, rape.
	On a state level, sex trafficking on a state level, which is a state crime.
	Oh, is sex trafficking a...
	Wait, hold on.
	That's a federal crime.
	Sorry, hold on.
	Let me not make a mistake here.
	Sex trafficking crime.
	Federal? Yeah, sex trafficking.
	Human trafficking is a crime.
	It's a federal.
	Well, so he's got...
	He's out.
	A decade, people.
	And what does that decade coincide with?
	His involvement in Burisma, his involvement in Ukraine, his involvement in peddling influence in American politics.
	There's so much to get to on it.
	Yeah, sex trafficking is across state lines, therefore federal.
	Yeah, sexual assault is per state.
	I don't know.
	We haven't heard any allegations of that.
	There's just so much to get through in the corruption, the insidious projection corruption.
	Joe Biden, you have to appreciate also that he didn't pay his taxes in time and he paid them back later with interest.
	Who financed his repayment of the millions that he didn't pay in tax?
	Where did that revenue come from?
	Oh, that's right.
	It came from his dirty dealings in Ukraine.
	It came from his dirty dealings in China, procured as a result of selling influence and access to his daddy, who was president of these United States of America.
	No investigation into that.
	They had a corrupt plea deal to bypass a trial and what that would have exposed via public court hearings.
	It was a corrupt plea deal that was so corrupt that when the judge became aware of it, they're like, how the hell did you guys come to this corrupt plea deal?
	No. We are shredding this plea deal.
	And then he's scheduled to go to trial.
	And then he goes to trial.
	And my prediction was that he was going to get acquitted because when Jill Biden shows up at court to stare down the jury, I guess they didn't get the message.
	I thought he was going to get acquitted.
	He gets convicted.
	And then, before he gets sentenced, and apparently before he can talk if that's what he was going to do, no trial on the tax stuff, by the way.
	Daddy comes in and saves the day.
	comes in and saves the day.
	A decade is now all forgotten.
	Now, this is the amazing part here.
	Let's go back to the montage for a second, shall we?
	Yeah, let's go back to the montage.
	Because you have to hear these people lie through their godforsaken teeth and get made fools of by the man who said, I would never do it.
	I would never interfere with this.
	I would never...
	Tip my fingers on the scales of justice while I'm prosecuting Donald Trump, while I'm jailing Peter Navarro and Stephen Bannon for contempt of Congress of an invalidly served subpoena that has never been done before.
	You want to talk about selective prosecution?
	Things that have never been done?
	Eric Holder refused to turn over documents as relates to the Fast and the Furious, which was the government illegally selling guns to the cartel or funneling guns to the cartel that resulted in a border agent getting murdered.
	And that son of a bitch does not turn over documents and does not get prosecuted for contempt of Congress.
	A situation that led to murder.
	Steve Bannon, who defies, as a result of executive privilege, an unlawful invalid subpoena issued by an unlawful, illegally formed committee.
	Gets charged, gets prosecuted, gets convicted, and has to serve his time before his appeal can be heard.
	Oh yeah, let's hear about, let's talk about selective prosecution, you dirty, rotten scoundrel.
	Here, let's go back to this.
	Can I?
	There we go.
	Both things can't be true.
	And so I think for the president, it's really hard for him.
	I won't pardon my son.
	I will not commute his sentence.
	How hard that is.
	It's also coming through that Biden's a decent guy.
	June, by the way.
	And a great father.
	It's June 13th.
	Exactly what Joe Biden said after Donald Trump's conviction.
	That we have to have faith in our judicial system.
	That no one is above the law.
	And that a jury of 12 ordinary people looks at facts.
	Not political spin, and decides whether someone has broken the law.
	And the fact that he's going to respect this verdict, even though he can wipe it out with a stroke of a pen, even though he could have kept it from happening with a stroke of a pen, tells America what they need to know about the man who occupies the Oval Office.
	And I feel like that just undercuts whatever the Republican argument here is about Biden rigging the system among the voters that will actually matter in this next election.
	Well, there are three things there.
	I mean, number one, the conviction of Hunter Biden shows the system is not rigged.
	It also shows this is the way the rule of law looks.
	This is what it looks like when no one is above the law.
	And President Biden has also said, you know, has said on the record that he will not use his pardon power to free his son if Hunter Biden gets a prison sentence.
	there are some people who are...
	We'll stop, because it's six more minutes of this utter hypocrisy, and it's not just Joe Biden who said it.
	I don't have the full montage of the Karine Jean-Pierre, but let me see if I can pull up at least a couple of them here.
	What was this one here?
	Thank you.
	No, it's not that one.
	When I get my new computer, we're going to be able to see these in real time.
	Flashback, Karine Jean-Pierre.
	Listen to this.
	I mean, you saw these yesterday, but we're going to get a little more into this.
	Second one, would the president pardon or commute his son if he's convicted?
	You asked that already.
	I've asked it.
	Not too long ago.
	Are you stupid?
	And I was very clear, and I said no.
	No. Karine Jean-Pierre said no.
	You didn't hear me, jackass?
	You asked me this question.
	I already answered it.
	How dare you ask it again?
	Oh, but he did it a little bit later.
	Here, how about this one?
	How about this one?
	Let's go with this one.
	This one's good also.
	The president would not pardon or community consensus for his son, Hunter.
	I just want to make sure that that is not going to change over the next six months.
	It's still a no.
	It will be a no.
	It is a no.
	And I don't have anything else to add.
	Will he pardon his son?
	No. What was it that Malcolm X said about the white liberal?
	I mean, it's worth...
	It's because I'm noticing a trend.
	Set aside Karine Jean-Pierre.
	She's, you know, she touted her identity politic credentials the first day she came into office.
	I think she said she was a black woman, lesbian immigrant.
	Did I miss any there?
	So you can't attack her because if you attack her, you're going to be a racist, misogynist, xenophobe, homophobe.
	Set aside Karine Jean-Pierre.
	I noticed a trend of the people on the Fox News montage.
	White liberals.
	Malcolm X. I'm going to read the entire thing.
	Maybe I'm going to have to skip a few words in it.
	Because Viva ain't interested in getting cancelled just yet.
	Malcolm X, quote, The white liberal is the worst enemy to America and the worst enemy to the black man.
	Let me first explain what I mean by this white liberal.
	In America, there's no such thing as Democrats and Republicans anymore.
	That's antiquated.
	In America, you have liberals and conservatives.
	This is what the American political structure boils down to among whites.
	The only people who are still living in the past and thinks in terms of, I'm a Democrat or I'm a Republican, is the American, African American.
	I'm not getting in trouble today, people.
	He's the one who runs around bragging about party affiliation, and he's the one who sticks to the Democrat or sticks to the Republicans.
	But white people in America are divided into two groups, liberals and Republicans, or rather liberals and conservatives.
	And when you find white people, vote in the political picture.
	And when you find white people vote in the political picture, they're not divided in terms of Democrats and Republicans.
	They're divided consistently as conservatives and as liberal.
	The Democrats who are conservative vote with Republicans who are conservative.
	Democrats who are liberals vote with Republicans who are liberals.
	Sounds like actually like a blue pill versus a red pill.
	You find this in Washington, D.C. Now the white liberals aren't white people who are for independence, who are liberal, who are moral or...
	Who are ethical in their thinking.
	They are just a faction of white people who are jockeying for power for the same as the white conservative are a faction of white people who are jockeying for power.
	Now they are fighting each other for booty, for power, for prestige, and for the one who is the football in the game of the African American.
	20 million black people.
	I should say black people.
	20 million black people in this country are political football, a political pawn, an economic football, an economic pawn, a social football, a social pawn.
	The white liberal is the worst enemy to America and the worst enemy to the black men.
	And if the montage has taught us nothing, it's that Malcolm X, at least in respect of this particular quote, is...
	Let's just see if we go through...
	We're skeptical about that, but I don't think there's any reason to doubt...
	He's one of the greatest most decent men I know.
	Do we have an exception here?
	Who's this?
	Letting the world know that he will not wipe away the decision of 12 of his son's peers to convict him of federal gun charges.
	And when it's over...
	You didn't hear Joe Biden whining about a Trump judge, even though the judge here is literally a Trump judge appointed by Trump.
	He's speaking about a DOJ prosecution of his own son, but because of how those words so completely contrast with what his opponent, now a convicted felon himself, continues to say about the U.S. courts.
	We're done.
	Do you understand what is also so insidious about that is that They lie to your face.
	They get two kicks at the cans because had he been acquitted, then Biden would never have had to pardon him and he would have been able to stand true to his undertaking not to pardon him and let the system play out.
	They lie for virtue points at the time.
	And they get them at the time because liberals, progressives, Democrats are dumb, low-information voters.
	So they lie at the time.
	They get the virtue signaling points at the time.
	They know damn well they're lying.
	They know damn well they have no intention of respecting that undertaking.
	If he gets acquitted, all the better.
	Never have to do it.
	And if he doesn't, I'll wait until the time is right to do it.
	Is the time right to do it?
	To be a hypocrite and a liar during election?
	Hells to the bells?
	No. That's when you say it.
	That's when you go and get those virtue points.
	Look how much better I am than Donald Trump.
	Look how much more ethical I am than Donald Trump.
	And they get those points.
	Oh, they get the media running in tandem like Operation Mockingbird 2.0.
	Liars, thieves, and crooks.
	The opening theme to the show.
	Five times August.
	Get it on that Apple place where you get music.
	We're just going to go through some of the mental gymnastics of people who I believe are mentally impaired, mentally compromised, however you want to call it.
	Who's the one that said?
	Pardoned his son.
	Let me see here.
	Ah, here we go.
	This one's great.
	Claude Taylor.
	And for those of you who don't know, Claude means Claude.
	Claude Taylor.
	Who is this person?
	Chair Mad Dog Pack.
	We'll do billboards.
	I do Room Raider.
	Former White House staff on Blue Sky.
	The Blue Sky now is the latest avatar indicating stupidity.
	You got your Ukrainian flag.
	You got your syringe emoji.
	You got your face mask emoji.
	You got your rainbow flag, whatever the heck it is now.
	You got your mastodon, whatever the hell it is.
	I don't even know if mastodon is still around.
	And now, add it to the list of indicators of mental illness, of mentally deficient idiots, dishonest scumbag liars.
	Blue sky.
	By the way, pedo porn central, if anybody's into that.
	I'm not even going to that website.
	Claude Taylor says, Yes.
	Joe Biden didn't lie.
	He changed his mind.
	There's a difference.
	I support him 100%.
	You know what this is like?
	I swear.
	Now, I'll steel man this a little bit.
	Can you lie about something that you undertake not to do in the future?
	Most honest, ethical, moral, God-fearing people would say, of course.
	It's like when you get married.
	And you say, till death do us part well.
	Some people say, it's not a lie because circumstances change.
	And I guess, you know, like, barring the unforeseeable, when circumstances change but within the realm of reality that exists as reasonable futures, when you make the undertaking, if those reasonable realms of reality occur and then you change your mind, yeah, that's called a lie.
	Like, I guess the issue is, I promise never to eat meat.
	I'll never eat meat again.
	Well, if a meteorite that only kills plants hits Earth and destroys all plants, you didn't lie because you're forced to eat meat.
	You might say the circumstances changed in a way that was unforeseeable when I made the promise, and therefore it's not a lie because of that.
	If you have a relationship, which is the way I responded to this, and I say, I promise I'll never cheat on you.
	I mean, this, first of all, I'll never cheat on anybody because I believe you're taking your own life into your own hands when you do that.
	I will never cheat on you.
	And then you go cheat on someone?
	I didn't lie.
	I just changed my mind.
	Oh, no, I'm sorry.
	Unless, you know, someone...
	You lied.
	Because you said you wouldn't do something, and then for no better reason, within the realm of predictable futures, you then went ahead and did it after having scored all of the virtue, ethical, and political points that you wanted by asserting the lie.
	But these people are idiots.
	They don't mind getting lied to, and they don't mind lying in turn.
	They don't mind becoming a part of the lie.
	Is it because they're unethical?
	Is it because they're stupid?
	Is it because they would fail a basic IQ test in terms of which one of these has similar patterns?
	I mean, pattern recognition is a very, very important thing for survival.
	And it seems to me...
	That many of these idiots, let's go to Brian Taylor Cohen, do not understand pattern recognition.
	Dinesh D'Souza says, no one is above the law except my son Hunter.
	Now, you'll notice Dinesh didn't make it about himself or even reference his own pardon.
	He's just highlighting Joe Biden's hypocrisy to which Brian Taylor Cohen, his name used to be No Lie with BTC, ripping off Bitcoin as far as I'm concerned.
	Says to Dinesh D'Souza, you were literally pardoned by Trump.
	Yeah. Trump said he was going to pardon Dinesh D'Souza.
	Because Dinesh D'Souza was the victim of the actual targeted prosecution, selective prosecution, that dirty old Joe talked about in his letter, his mea culpa, his backtracking on his lie, about his son.
	Dinesh D'Souza was prosecuted in a way that nobody else has been prosecuted before.
	For similar circumstances.
	We're going to talk about pattern recognition that is lacking.
	Is this one from, what's his face?
	Yeah, Geraldo Rivera.
	Geraldo Rivera says most dads, including this one, would do what Joe Biden did.
	He said he wouldn't do it, Geraldo.
	I mean, I know that you don't mind spewing lies and you don't mind being lied to and you don't mind people thinking of you as a liar so long as you get to cash that fat check.
	He said he wouldn't do it.
	So saying that most dads would do it would be fine.
	He should have just then left that possibility open from the beginning.
	Okay, blood is thicker than water.
	Oh, yes.
	He was willing to tarnish his honor and reputation to save his child, who he believed was being shafted.
	Too bad, but it's not like he appointed him ambassador of France.
	Now, for those of you who don't get the reference, I don't know that Trump has Charles Kushner ambassador France.
	I mean, You want to talk about Trump wants to pardon him so he can become ambassador to France.
	I don't think he's named it.
	I'm not even sure that he's doing it.
	Trump selects Kushner's father for ambassador to France.
	At least that's according to CNN politics.
	So for those of you who don't get the reference, Geraldo is now trying to draw an analogy to Charles Kushner being selected to be an ambassador to France.
	Oh, it's not like he's picking him to be ambassador to France.
	Stupid people, or at least people with low IQs, can't recognize patterns, similarities, and differences.
	So you might look at this and say, a pardon is a pardon is a pardon.
	No, it isn't.
	Not when you've been convicted and served your freaking sentence.
	It's actually going to segue perfectly into pardon all Jan 6s, which is where this is going to go.
	Charles Kushner, for whatever he did wrong, and however you feel about having Jared Kushner's dad get involved in politics, I can understand people don't like that.
	Certainly don't like the names and don't like the implications.
	Set that aside.
	Charles Kushner served his sentence.
	He suffered the actual consequences of being adjudicated a felon.
	He served his sentence, and afterwards, for what the pardon is for, to relieve people of the undue burden of the felony convictions when it's not necessarily serving a practical purpose, then you can get a pardon.
	So if Hunter wants to go and serve whatever sentence he was going to get and then get pardoned, well, then you might have something closer to an analogy, to an analogous comparable circumstance.
	Geraldo, you idiot Rivera.
	Until such time as that happens, you don't have comparables.
	Let's get some more takes before we get into the purpose of the part and then segueing this into January 6th.
	Here, let's go.
	Here's another.
	Oh, no, this is not the right one.
	Let's get this out of here.
	Hold on.
	Miscusi. Stop that one.
	What were the other great takes that we had here?
	Oh, my good Lord.
	I almost forgot this.
	Here, let's start with stupid people who can't identify patterns and thus can't identify distinctions.
	President Biden pardoned his son.
	Who is this guy?
	Richard Angwin.
	I love discovering idiots.
	Political junkie.
	Progressive. Okay, well that means that his brain is smoother than most.
	President Biden pardoned his son Hunter and the GOP is upset.
	Can you believe the hypocrisy?
	And there's a meme that says conservatives are more pissed at Hunter Biden for buying a gun than they ever were at Kyle Rittenhouse for using his to kill two human beings.
	Oh, don't mention that they were two convicted pedophile disgusting criminals to begin with who got exactly what they were asking for by attacking a man with a gun.
	Set aside that.
	Hunter Biden had a trial.
	Hunter Biden, probably the most politically favored or at least politically protected defendant, had a trial and was convicted.
	Kyle Rittenhouse had a trial as probably one of the more politically disfavored defendants and was acquitted.
	And so, yes, he was forced to use his gun to kill two human beings, one of whom was a pedophile and the other was a dirty criminal.
	Who were attacking him specifically to cause grievous bodily harm, thus forcing him to kill those people and only those people.
	One was convicted, one was acquitted.
	So kind of apples and oranges, or maybe like apples and steak.
	So congratulations, progressive brain, for not identifying patterns or, by consequence, distinctions.
	The best.
	And I think we're going to leave it on this.
	The best.
	Dan, the scumbag of all scumbag Goldman.
	First of all, before we even get into this, let's keep the audio off.
	Can we appreciate what Dan Goldman...
	Is Dan Goldman going for like an Eminem look?
	Look at what Dan Goldman looks like today, and look at what he looked like.
	It can't be more than six months ago?
	This is what happens when you sell your soul to the devil.
	First of all, he's got...
	Wild, druggie eyes.
	Like, that man looks like he's on something.
	And I'm going to make an Ozempic joke only because I will make a joke about a community note later on, but he doesn't look well compared to...
	Five, four, four to six months ago?
	Listen to what the scumbag of all scumbags, Dan Goldman, has to say about what he had to say back in the day.
	In July of 2023, just after that plea deal fell through, this is what you said.
	I want to watch.
	Do you think a pardon for his son would be a mistake?
	Yes, and I don't think there's any chance that President Biden is going to do that, unlike his predecessor, who pardoned all of his friends and anyone who had any access to him.
	And I think you see that in this case, where he kept on, and Merrick Garland kept on, a Trump-appointed U.S. attorney to investigate the president's son.
	If there is not an indication of the independence of the Department of Justice beyond that, I don't know what we could look for.
	What does that feel like, watching yourself back then, reassuring people that Biden was not going to issue a pardon for his son?
	Yeah, and I think that if that plea agreement and that plea deal had gone through, there would be no pardon.
	Just let's pause it right there.
	Set aside the fact that the plea deal had already fallen through, so this idiot liar can't even keep his lies in order.
	If the plea deal had gone through, there wouldn't have been a pardon?
	No shit, Sherlock.
	Holy crap.
	Hey, Dan, did you go to law school for that?
	If they had solidified the plea deal, for which there could no longer be a subsequent prosecution, then he wouldn't have been pardoned.
	No shit, you absolute moron.
	The only problem with your stupid theory?
	The plea deal had already fallen through when he said those things.
	That is to say, Dan Goldman.
	Yeah, and I think that if that plea agreement and that plea deal had gone through, there would be no pardon.
	That was a satisfactory outcome.
	It had already fallen through.
	What's that?
	What's that?
	Oh, shit.
	What? Sorry?
	Sorry? When you reacted, this was when the deal had fallen through.
	I would like to see the rest of that answer.
	They can't even keep track of their own lies.
	Had the plea deal...
	Not fallen through, there would have been no need for a pardon.
	Well, there you go.
	That's law 101 right there.
	Congratulations. You're an idiot.
	By the way, the deal had already fallen through, so what you said as to your justification for repeating the lie makes no sense.
	But by the way, if the pardon was only necessary because the plea deal had fallen through...
	Yeah, dude, I'm telling you, Maria 36, he looks like he's on drugs.
	Doesn't look good at all.
	If the plea deal was only necessary...
	Sorry, if the pardon was only necessary because the plea deal had fallen through, why the hell does the pardon cover a decade?
	All offenses, including but not limited to those which were charged and prosecuted.
	Oh, so you're telling me that because the plea deal fell through, well, now he needs the protection because the plea deal didn't fall through, so he gets a pardon for a decade?
	In perpetuity throughout the universe for any and all crimes he may or may not have committed, that he may or may not have been charged with a...
	Thanks, Dan.
	You know what would have happened if he had gotten a plea deal?
	He would have been pardoned anyhow for the same things, for the same decade, for the same...
	I don't know that there's been a more expansive pardon in the history of America.
	I can't pretend to have been following things to even know.
	Ten years, all of his activities at Burisma.
	Some people are saying this is the cover-up.
	To protect Joe Biden, to which I say, not really, because what's his face?
	Hunter can have his ass hauled before committee and be compelled to answer questions.
	And now he can't plead the fifth anymore because there's no risk of self-incrimination.
	But that won't stop him from pleading the fifth.
	That won't stop him from defying a congressional subpoena.
	And that won't stop anyone from not going after him the way they have not gone after everybody who's defied a congressional subpoena unless you happen to be a Capitol or Republican Trump supporter or in his orbit, Peter Navarro, Steve Bannon.
	So nothing's going to stop crackhead, former crackhead.
	Felonious firearm application, tax dodging because he's getting it from illegal activities, shady activities overseas.
	Nothing's going to stop him from defying a congressional subpoena because he knows he's never going to be prosecuted for it.
	Because go back to that letter, they don't prosecute their own unless they really, really have to for specific reasons, including cover-up.
	The bottom line, though, I'm sticking to my prediction.
	Biden's going to pardon himself and Trump before leaving office.
	He's in no rush to do that because, hypothetically, this is not a schadenfreude or a fear hiding a wish.
	There's no but to that.
	I do not wish this type of ill on people.
	Had Biden died before issuing that pardon, Kamala Harris comes into power.
	Kamala Harris, given the obvious animosity between her and Biden, the Harris's and the Biden's, probably, maybe, might not.
	Have pardoned Hunter Biden.
	So there was something of an existential time requirement on pardoning Hunter because if Joe dies and Kamala becomes 47, she doesn't necessarily pardon Hunter and he might never get that pardon.
	So he had to do that more urgently than he has to pardon himself.
	If he passes away, a self-pardon is more or less relevant.
	It includes everything, by the way.
	It includes everything.
	That is a federal crime.
	Does it include murder?
	Asks Don Darkstar86.
	Let's pull up the Gary Oldman meme.
	It includes everything that would be a federal crime that was maybe potentially committed in that decade.
	So Biden is not in as much of a time squeeze to pardon himself because there's only so many ways he leaves office before his term.
	And so he can pardon himself up to the last day, unless he passes away, in which case he doesn't need a pardon.
	Okay. So this is not as much of a protection of Biden yet as I see, because they can still haul Hunter before a congressional investigative committee.
	He can still, you know, unlawfully plead the fifth and then go after him for that.
	It'll take years and whatever.
	And by that time, Joe Biden is on borrowed time in any event.
	And that's it.
	They may or may not even prosecute Hunter Biden for defying a congressional subpoena.
	It's corruption through and through.
	But the issue is that you have to ask yourself, like...
	We throw the word around pardon.
	I don't think people actually take a moment to ask, what is the purpose of the pardon?
	Hold on.
	There's a good justification for the pardon.
	What is the purpose of a presidential pardon?
	There's a reason why they actually exist in the first place.
	And as we're going to get into...
	By the way, let me just make sure that I credit the person who's thought this was because it wasn't my original thought.
	Oh, cripe.
	How do I see?
	I just started following the person because I was listening to the Twitter space yesterday for the Jan Sixers and I started following this guy right after I heard this amazing insight.
	Let me just see if I can't find...
	Do the followings...
	Good, they go in order.
	Trennis J. Evans III.
	Let me scroll down my DMs here.
	So I started following this guy after I heard this insight as he was one of the speakers during a Twitter space yesterday for the January Sixers.
	Pardon all January Sixers.
	Trennis J. Evans III.
	Condemned USA.
	He said, you know, the pardon doesn't exist for innocent people.
	And it's an amazing thing.
	You always say, oh yeah, you pardon innocently convicted.
	No. If someone is innocent and wrongfully convicted, that's not what the pardon was for.
	If they're innocent and wrongly convicted, that's what the appropriately functioning justice system is for.
	Now, it could encompass that as well, because what it is supposed to cover, the pardon, is political injustices or alleviating the burden of a felony conviction in circumstances where it's An undue, unwarranted hardship.
	A pardon is an executive order granting clemency for conviction.
	It may be granted at any time after the commission of the crime.
	After the commission of the crime.
	Not after the wrongful conviction of an innocent person for a crime they never committed.
	I know it's Wikipedia, take it for what it's worth.
	Conversant persons may apply five or more years after their sentence has been completed.
	However, the President's pardon power is not restricted by temporal constraints except...
	That the crime must have been committed.
	Well, there's a gray zone around that.
	Pardon is an expression of the president's forgiveness and ordinarily is granted in recognition of the applicant's acceptance of responsibility for the crime and established good conduct for a significant period of time afterwards.
	It's to alleviate the burden of what a felony conviction carries for the rest of the life of the person.
	If they transgressed for a brief moment in time.
	That's what the pardon was for.
	It wasn't there to pardon innocent people who were wrongfully convicted.
	It doesn't signify innocence.
	Its practical effect is restoration of civil rights and statutory disabilities, firearm rights, occupational licensing, etc.
	So once you understand that the pardon is not there to get innocent people out of jail, although it could be used for that, you then say, well, what is it for?
	It's to forgive people who transgressed momentarily, and it's to forgive people who were unduly punished by a highly politicized system.
	In other words, the pardon exists for the Jan Sixers.
	All of them.
	And this is what we discussed yesterday during this call, during this Twitter space, which was hosted by Jake Lang, who's currently in jail, who Jake Lang committed, I guess what is by the...
	According to Horwell, what is it, Horwell?
	Definition. By the dictionary definition, Jake Lang, one of the January 6th political prisoners, as far as I'm concerned, committed acts of violence against the police.
	The question is, why?
	The question is, did he have a lawful excuse for that act of violence that he committed?
	Kyle Rittenhouse killed two people.
	You can't pretend he didn't.
	The question is, did he have a lawful excuse, a lawful defense to kill those two people?
	And he did.
	So the question is going to be, set aside the entrapment, set aside whether or not they were let in.
	Anybody who struck a police officer with a baseball bat, a baton, pepper spray, did they have what might otherwise be a lawful excuse to do it?
	If it turns out that the police were out there provoking with concussive grenades, rubber bullets, firing on the crowd, triggering response from the crowd, killing members of the crowd, Would you then say that some members of the Jan 6 violent convicted people were lawfully exercising violence against police violence?
	You can defend yourself against a policeman who's assaulting you.
	They don't have carte blanche to beat the shit out of you.
	So the question is this.
	Did Jake Lang, who was there and by his own testimony, so you can believe it or not, Who witnessed Roseanne Boyland get struck by police officers, trampled to death by the stampede and what the police caused by way of their aggressive, instigative, if that's a word, conduct.
	He swung back.
	Does he go to jail for 20 years?
	Even assuming it's not lawful self-defense, a man with no prior criminal record, as far as I understand.
	If he did have that moment of transgression where he just got so pissed off watching the boots of a weaponized government stomping literally on a woman to death, he transgressed.
	He struck back.
	That's what the pardon is for.
	It's not for the grannies who were let in and then wrongfully convicted, although it should apply to them as well.
	So that is the bottom line.
	The pardon is...
	In existence for the situation that is the January 6th.
	Whether it was lawful self-defense, whether it was a momentary transgression that should not by any means be used to ruin the rest of the lives of all of these patriots.
	That's what it's for.
	And I say, at this point, all of them, without exception, without trying to filter through who got a fair trial, who didn't, who committed access, none of them got a fair trial.
	None of them got fair treatment under the law.
	None of them got lawful disclosure under the law.
	None of them.
	And so you fucked up.
	That's it.
	You're going to have to eat it.
	And you're going to have to let the world know you screwed up.
	You don't not disclose video to defendants, get them convicted, force them to plea, and then say, oh, too bad.
	My bad.
	No harm, no foul.
	Wrong. All of them.
	And I'll tell you, watching Chris Pawlowski.
	A, become the warrior that, I think one of the more unsung warriors in this existential battle for the future of America, oddly enough, Canadian boy from Ontario, a key player in the future, I'd say not just of America, but of the world.
	His transformation over the years has been wonderful, organic, and above all else, right and righteous.
	Pavlosky puts out a tweet yesterday in response to the Hunter Biden pardon.
	After today, after pardoning from the party of so-called law and order, of so-called gun laws, a crackhead, drug addict, tax evading scoundrel lying on a firearm application.
	After that pardon, there's no excuse.
	There must be pardons for all political prisoners from January 6th immediately.
	See, the only thing he got wrong there is it can't be immediately.
	It'll be on day one.
	And day one, and do not let...
	I say the Trump administration off the hook.
	Day one, it must be done.
	That rhymes, so it must be true.
	Okay, let me go through before we head on over to Rumble.
	Viva, we're here for Ray Epps.
	Well, Jeff Overturf, come on over to Rumble for the Ray Epps part.
	Oh, we're going to talk about that.
	Okay, hold on.
	Let me give everybody the link on YouTube.
	Get your heinies on over.
	First of all, you're here because you want to hear somebody rant and rave about current events and hopefully shed a slight amount of novel insight.
	But yes, we're going to do Ray Epps over on the Rumble side.
	I see a couple of Commitube Super Chats.
	Viva Fry.
	I know Nebraska.
	Has state sex trafficking laws.
	When Hunter had his prostitutes fly across the country through Nebraska airspace, he can be charged in Nebraska.
	There is a slew of state charges they can go after Hunter for.
	Absolutely. I don't know what those are, but never.
	Biden said it himself.
	He's a Zionist, says SRD Visions.
	What I love...
	There's an expression.
	A zealot is someone who never changes their mind and refuses to change the subject.
	How anything in today's discussion could have to do with Zionism.
	God bless if you can figure it out, SRD Visions.
	But thank you for the super chat.
	Yeah, but nothing we've discussed today had anything to do with Zionism.
	Mrs. Viva Fry would have shaved his head like Santa.
	So yeah.
	And then we got SD Visions.
	Jared Kushner is responsible for Trump's cabinet.
	Well, okay, if that's where we're going with Zionism, but then if Jared Kushner is responsible for Trump's cabinet, then he's made a good choice with Kash Patel, with Jay Bhattacharya, with RFK Jr., with Tulsi Gabbard, and with Pete Hegseth.
	But I appreciate that.
	The Kushner and the Kushner favor, yada, yada, yada.
	Okay, that's it.
	No, no, hold on.
	We'll do actually the...
	Did I miss any of the Rumble Rants?
	I didn't set up the thing here.
	We got Rumble Rant that I can find.
	Crash Bandit.
	Wasn't Geraldo Rivera the same person who drew our troops locations on the ground on live TV in an active war zone?
	Who knew he was not all there?
	That's Crash Bandit.
	Thank you for that.
	We got Delisium.
	Keep in mind, Viva, that many of the more serious charges against Hunter Biden were left uncharged when the statute of limitations ran out without Biden's DOJ filing any charges.
	True. But if the statute of limitations had lapsed, you don't really need a pardon for that because you can't bring charges for those.
	But who the hell?
	I mean, the whole thing is corrupt from the beginning.
	It is.
	This is going to segue into the Ray Epps.
	The prosecution was the cover-up.
	And the pardon is just the cover-up.
	Dilly Jim says, hey, Viva, since Hunter Biden owed $1.4 million in back taxes, does the pardon mean it's essentially a gift from daddy?
	No, he paid back.
	I don't think he had any outstanding unpaid taxes.
	Who was it that...
	I think he paid that back.
	Hold on a second.
	Who financed...
	The computer has just greenmailed.
	Who financed Hunter's tax repayment?
	There was somebody connected.
	Here we go.
	Okay. I think this is it.
	At the risk of making a mistake in real time, I will correct myself if I do.
	Here's why Kevin Moore says he paid Hunter Biden's back taxes.
	No, that's what I remember this.
	Okay, Morris said getting back taxes straight is often part of recovery for his clients and that he was not trying to help Joe Biden politically, according to a full transcript of House testimony.
	In an interview with House lawmakers and investigators last week, this is January 2024, a year ago, entertainment lawyer Kevin Morris, Hunter Biden's financial benefactor, portrayed himself as someone who helped the younger Biden because he was moved by his struggles, not by a desire to help then-candidate Joe Biden win the presidency.
	Bullshit! On the oversight committee, they released the transcript.
	The transcript provides the most detailed descriptions to date of how Morris met Hunter, the more than $5 million in loans he gave him to cover expenses and pay his outstanding tax liabilities as well as Morris' purchases of Hunter Biden's art.
	It's fucking money laundering.
	And do you know what's going to happen, by the way?
	They mention it's a loan.
	If Hunter doesn't pay back that loan, then it becomes income.
	He's going to owe taxes on that income.
	I understand, by the way, a loan, you gotta repay it.
	If you don't repay it, it becomes income.
	And I think, at least under Canadian tax law, you have two years to repay a loan?
	Oh, and he was buying the artwork.
	Amazing. At least we know where...
	The loans were not made in the form of cash to Hunter, but were largely direct payments to third parties.
	They included payments to the IRS for back taxes, 2016 through 2019, rent on a house, legal fees, other attorney fees, payment to Hunter Biden's ex-wife, child support.
	Wow. Morris testified that the loans were made to help him maintain sobriety, yada, yada, yada.
	It's my custom and practice to get taxes straight.
	It's part of the recovery making amends.
	This is incredible.
	Morris said that he had purchased 13 of Hunter Biden's paintings to date for almost $1 million.
	Money laundering.
	He said that for those 11 paintings purchased last January, he paid...
	After last week's interview, Comer said Morris' tax support raises ethical and campaign finance concerns for President Joe Biden.
	And said Morris began paying Hunter Biden's taxes, quote, to insulate then-presidential candidate Joe Biden from political liability.
	Morris testified that $170,000 was paid while Joe Biden was a presidential candidate, the rest after the elder Biden was in office.
	So nice to have friends like that.
	Yep. Okay.
	Let's go over to Viva Barnes Law and see what's going on over there.
	And then we're going to move on over.
	Then we're moving.
	After this, we're moving on over to the dismissal being the cover-up and the tipped questions we have over in Locals.
	Bill Brown, in all seriousness, look how many self-proclaimed liberals are on medication for mental issues.
	I'd say all of them.
	Robin Sage.
	Never forget, this pardon is not to protect Hunter.
	It's to protect Joe, Obama, the Clintons, etc.
	But it doesn't...
	Okay, Robin Sage.
	No, this is the legit disagreement.
	It doesn't.
	Because now Hunter can be compelled to testify.
	And he can't plead the fifth.
	He might disobey the subpoena, but he could have disobeyed the subpoena without being pardoned.
	I think the issue might have been, at least Dan Bongino's theory, and he has sources.
	I just have hypothesizes.
	Is that Biden didn't want to go to jail and was threatening to disclose secrets if he didn't get a pardon.
	And you can't wait too long with an 81-year-old man because, as I keep saying, each Matlock could be his last.
	So it might have been to protect Joe Obama, the Clintons, if Hunter were going to talk, if he were not guaranteed he wouldn't go to jail.
	But it doesn't protect them all that much.
	There's other people who can spill the beans.
	And now Hunter Biden doesn't get to plead the fifth if they subpoena him for congressional whatever.
	Gantet says, Biden pardoning Hunter is a good thing for the country.
	Sunshine is the best disinfectant.
	All the people who are so stuck on the left because they bought the lies of the Democrats for years are finally starting to see the devil they've supported.
	Yeah, they'll put up with it because it would have been so much worse with Trump.
	Neurodivergence says David Hunter can still plead the fifth.
	They could theoretically bring state charges against him, so his right to plead the fifth remains intact.
	That's a damn good point.
	Hmm. I'm going to have to factor that in.
	Damn it, that's a good point.
	Makes me angry.
	I didn't think of that actually even before.
	It might have been a basic mistake.
	Alright, and now we are going over to Crumble.
	And vivabornslaw.locals.com.
	Let me make sure I don't screw this up.
	End here.
	Okay, come on over to Rumble.
	If you're not coming, I will see you tomorrow.
	Tomorrow, 4 o'clock, people.
	sure.
	If you were...
	Let me just make sure.
	Gotta make sure.
	I'm so flipping neurotic.
	It's almost debilitating.
	Where is it?
	The confirmation.
	What the heck is my problem?
	Wow, I'm like totally defective here.
	Hold on a second.
	Okay, I'm in my DMs.
	And it should be confirmed for...
	This doesn't make sense.
	Am I losing my mind?
	We're going to have a podcast.
	I'm going to be on with the Unusual Suspects.
	And... We're going to have a podcast.
	I'm so...
	Oh, for goodness sake.
	Thank you.
	I feel like I'm going crazy, but there's going to be a podcast tomorrow.
	Okay, come on over to Rumble.
	We're ending it on Commitube right now.
	Peace, peeps.
	Update stream.
	And we're good.
	Let me just go over to YouTube and end it officially in the live section here.
	Dashboard. Okay, let's go content.
	Live. I'm not going to be able to end it on YouTube, apparently.
	Oh my goodness.
	Okay, here.
	Okay, I can go like this.
	Now I can go into edit video.
	This is adding to levels of frustration.
	Can't seem to end the live stream today.
	That's right here.
	Okay, good.
	Now I can end it.
	Ending officially so they don't see that green blurred screen.
	Okay, good.
	The cover-up.
	When Barnes and I were talking about P. Diddy and about Eric Adams.
	And, you know, I forget with which one it was the case, but Barnes said, you know, it's not the first time it's come up either, but the prosecution is the cover-up.
	With P. Diddy, with Epstein, when the FBI goes in there and seizes the videos and they never see the light of day again, when they go in there and they seize the black book of clients of a sex trafficking ring for which there was a conviction for sex trafficking, but no conviction of clients.
	You realize that the investigation, the charges, are the cover-up.
	Eric Adams getting slapped with bogus campaign finance violations.
	Those charges are so weak, I question whether or not that's not part of the cover-up.
	With P. Diddy, same thing as Epstein.
	Go in there, raid, get your blackmail material, and charge P. Diddy, but not with the child stuff, although that might be coming, because that's part of the cover-up in terms of seizing the...
	Confidential blackmail extortion material that might make a whole slew of other people beyond some hip-hop stars look very, very bad.
	So, Ray Epps, you all know him.
	He's the totally not-fed agent.
	And I use the word very loosely here, agent, anyone affiliated with.
	He could be a confidential human source.
	He could be an asset.
	He could be an agent insofar as he answers to the FBI.
	Ray Epps...
	The man who said we need to go into the Capitol on January 5th.
	The man who went into the Capitol on January 6th.
	Who directed people into the Capitol on January 6th.
	Who orchestrated the breaching of the barricades on January 6th.
	Who took credit for orchestrating the breach of the barricades by texting his son or his nephew, I forget which, on January 6th.
	The man who was on the FBI's most wanted list in the immediate aftermath and then miraculously, magically plucked from that list.
	The man who was not charged for a damn thing for damn near three years.
	The man who became the hero of that unlawfully formed January 6th committee.
	The man who became the hero of the traitorous rhinos on the right and the traitor liberals on the left, the Jamie Ratskin calling him the poor schmuck who was turned into a scapegoat for the right.
	The man who was lionized and turned into the victim, not charged until two or three years later, and then when charged only with one lowly misdemeanor to which he pleaded and got probation, no jail time.
	The totally not a Fed asset then sued Fox News for defamation.
	Fox News and some commentators for defamation.
	Okay, we covered it at length, and that's as thorough as an introduction as you need.
	The lawsuit, in my view, was always doomed to fail.
	The problem is this.
	You have to check your own biases and your own confirmation bias and your own preconceived notions.
	I start off with the bias that Fox News, ever since their Dominion settlement, which was inexplicable, are players in the conspiracy.
	So I appreciate that's a bias.
	And so whatever Fox News is going to do, I'm going to say, oh.
	How do I interpret that into my foregone conclusion that Fox News is part of the conspiracy?
	I appreciate it.
	I can appreciate that that's a source of attack, and it might be even a source of undermining my thought process in this.
	I think Fox News is a player in money laundering in that ridiculous $787 million settlement with Dominion.
	And I think they are playing something with Ray Epps.
	The question is what?
	Ray Epps sues them for defamation.
	Remember, they settled with Dominion.
	For nearly a billion, for three quarters of a billion dollars, when Dominion was only suing for $1.2 billion.
	Again, I appreciate politics has changed, circumstances have changed, but when you settle, typically you don't settle so early on for virtually the entire amount claimed.
	So that is, to me, definitive evidence that Fox News is up to something that doesn't make sense, except it has to make sense and I don't have the details.
	Okay. With that said, they settle with Dominion, but then make a motion to dismiss against Ray Epps.
	Why wouldn't they settle with Ray Epps?
	Okay, interesting.
	For $787 million, they could have gotten off free with Ray Epps.
	Pay him a million bucks.
	Get the hell out.
	Go back to your trailer home and live your life with your Fed agent.
	What's it called?
	Pension. So they make a motion to dismiss.
	And they succeed on the motion to dismiss.
	And then my immediate reaction is to say, Finally, you know, a W, Ray Epps, that scumbag extraordinaire, who I firmly, genuinely, and sincerely believe is an FBI asset, a confidential human source.
	He's part of the insurrection, the fedsurrection.
	He orchestrated it by his own words.
	So I said, you know, the initial reaction is, oh, good, he finally got what he deserved.
	And then, you know, take a step back and say, hmm, he sued for defamation.
	He looks like the victim.
	After having gotten probation for one misdemeanor charge to which he pleaded.
	So he still gets to claim to be the victim of defamation.
	And now he gets to claim to be the victim of never having gotten his day in court.
	Because you'll recall, Sandman's case, Nicholas Sandman sued CNN for defamation, initially was tossed by the judge.
	The judge reviewed it and brought back on his own accord, by the way.
	It was very interesting.
	This is how Nate Brody and I met.
	The judge reviewed his own dismissal and brought back the claim for a certain portion of it.
	And Sandman settled, and we don't know what he settled for.
	Some people think a lot, and others like myself think not a lot.
	But even Sandman was allowed to pursue his claim for defamation.
	They're notoriously difficult to pursue, and I'm always shocked as to how many do get dismissed.
	Trump's claims for defamation got dismissed, although E. Jean Carroll's didn't.
	So where was I going with that?
	Yes, they're notoriously...
	He brought one, and I think it's an idiotic claim in the first place because calling him an agent or a federal agent or a conspirator is clearly a matter of speculation or opinion.
	It's not like anybody's calling him a rapist.
	We're going to get to that outright act of per se defamation in a second as relates to Pete Hegseth.
	So I thought the claim was stupid, but these claims, nonetheless, they're difficult to succeed upon, but they still go forward in some cases.
	Fox I'm operating on the basis that everything they're doing is scoundrelous.
	They bring a motion to dismiss, and it gets dismissed.
	How does that become a conspiracy theory?
	The judge, by the way.
	I was thinking about this.
	I'm in the park.
	I'm going for a jog today.
	I was like, oh, who was the judge that dismissed the case?
	It was Delaware.
	Delaware, if I'm not mistaken, Delaware court Elon Musk.
	It's a politicized court.
	Yeah, it's...
	Delaware judge rejects Musk's bid.
	So the Delaware courts, because you will recall that's the Delaware jurisdiction is where Elon Musk's bonus was basically denied by a judge.
	And then Elon Musk says, get the hell out of Delaware.
	So I believe my bias is that Delaware is a politicized, weaponized judicial system.
	So I'm thinking about the judge now who, let me see, my computer's freezing here.
	The judge dismisses the case.
	And I want to see who the judge is.
	Okay. And who's the judge?
	Let me see that we can see the same thing.
	Appointed by Joe Biden in January 2024.
	A young judge.
	I couldn't find much by way of meaningful court rulings or even decisions, court filings in which she's heavily involved.
	But she's a Biden judge.
	Dismisses the case.
	Okay. It's out.
	Failure to say the claim.
	You didn't allege or prove actual malice, but we're on a motion to dismiss here a Rule 12b, failure to state a claim.
	Dismissed. Oh, poor baby Ray Epps denied his day in court.
	He still gets to say, I sued Fox News for defamation, but I never got to have my day in court.
	And then I'm thinking, what would have happened if this proceeded?
	You know, one of the theories as to, you know, one of the steel man arguments for why Fox settled in Dominion was because they proceeded to Discovery and they got compromising information out of Discovery, they being Dominion.
	And that's what some people allege.
	That what they got in Discovery would have been so compromising, so prejudicial to Fox News that they had to settle no judge.
	They would have gotten their asses handed them in front of a judge.
	Because you discover things in Discovery, that's why it's called Discovery.
	Depositions, examinations, depending on your jurisdiction.
	What might they have found if this proceeded to Discovery with Ray Epps petitioning the court?
	This is like one of those cases where...
	Who was it that, you know, it happens often when they say, I'm going to sue you for defamation.
	Do it, mother effer!
	I'll discover in Discovery, and you might not be too happy with what is revealed in Discovery.
	It might be that Discovery shows the allegations were true, and truth is the ultimate defense to defamation.
	My operating theory now may be seeing conspiracies where they don't exist.
	Is that the judge, in dismissing the case, is participating in the cover-up because had this proceeded to discovery, we would have gotten to know where the hell Ray Epps gets his money from.
	Where the hell Ray Epps has been talking in the last four years.
	How the hell Ray Epps fell off the FBI's most wanted list.
	What has been his level of cooperation with the FBI?
	Because he might have been, hypothetically, a legitimate, true believer on January 5, and then the feds come in and say, we're going to lock you up for good.
	Unless you help us.
	I don't know what help Ray Epps could have offered the FBI.
	It's a very weak theory that he was a true believer to begin with and just doing what he thought was appropriate and then got flipped because they were threatening him with jail because he doesn't have much to offer after January 6th in terms of revealing what other wrongdoing people are doing.
	No. He was there to stir shit up.
	He was there as an agent provocateur in my humble belief.
	Sue me, Ray Epps.
	He was there as an agent provocateur.
	With ties to intelligence, with ties to the FBI, and he was there to do exactly what he did in fact do, and exactly what he did in fact take credit for.
	And that probably would have come out on any meaningful discovery that an active player would have wanted to conduct.
	You know, for Fox News, for settling for $787 million, why not carry on this case and depose Ray Epps, and then decide whether or not you want to make a motion to dismiss after discovery?
	So I think that that judge, a Joe Biden-appointed Delaware judge, is participating in the cover-up by dismissing this lawsuit so that Ray Epps is never subjected to discovery.
	Because recall, he was never subjected to any meaningful...
	He was never cross-examined during the January 6th.
	He was praised as a hero.
	He's never been subject to discovery in any meaningful way.
	And I firmly, sincerely, truly believe, with I believe all evidence as plain for the eye to see, that he is a federal agent, in that he's affiliated in some capacity with the FBI, is an asset, is a confidential human source, was there to do exactly what he did, exactly what he took credit for, and they weaponized it and they made political gold out of that fedsurrection.
	And then he gets slapped on the wrist with probation.
	He gets to file a lawsuit which goes nowhere, and now he gets to scuttle off to the mountains.
	Off whatever pension he's getting and claimed to be the victim not once but twice because he got defamed and then he got denied his day in court.
	See, justice is blind.
	Even Ray Epps, the Fed, didn't get his day in court.
	And that's what I think.
	What do you think, chat?
	If we shall go to the chat section and I shall bring up the crumble rants which have come in from Anton's Bill Tom.
	Looking for some healthy high-protein stocking stuffers this season?
	Get yours at BiltongUSA.com.
	We will ship it to your loved ones door-to-door.
	10% discount with code VIVA.
	Go to BiltongUSA.com.
	10% discount with VIVA10.
	It's freaking delicious, people.
	I'm not sponsored by them, except for these...
	I say except some might consider the Crumblefrance.
	To be what I call involuntary sponsorships.
	Like, dude, you want publicity?
	You want 4,000 people to see a message?
	Spend 10 bucks and I'll read it.
	But it's not an official sponsor of the channel.
	They just make damn good built-on.
	They stream Fridays and Sundays, 4 p.m.
	Eastern, 3 p.m.
	Central. Shit talking whilst cooking real food.
	Follow our channel.
	Eat at Anton's and join us in the cooking fun and chats.
	Thank you, Vivas is King.
	Quality deserves as much recognition and publicity as humanly possible.
	I had some not good beef jerky, which is different than biltong, as we were driving to Orlando because I was falling asleep and I needed to have some.
	It was just not good.
	And I was kicking myself for leaving the bag of biltong at our place.
	We got...
	Still not banned here.
	Says very few are genuine.
	Their apology and hopes to make anything better whatsoever.
	Like maybe three people.
	Everyone else is just re-offending.
	I'm sorry.
	FBI was always rogue, says liquor giant.
	Get Cash Patel in there.
	He'll fix it.
	Have I missed anything?
	No, I think we're good.
	And going over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	Hunter can still plead the fifth on state charges.
	There should be easy precedent to verify if and when that's been done before.
	Okay, we're good here.
	Alright, now, there was a little bit more in the backdrop that I had.
	Take this out.
	What was left?
	Oh! Okay, this is actually fantastic.
	First of all, I'm going to use my platform to put quality on blast and to put assholes on blast.
	Pierce Morgan, that coward little bastard, blocked me.
	And I don't care about the block.
	I love it, actually, because it shows such insecurity, such hypocrisy, such abject intellectual dishonesty.
	Like, people can block me, and I will totally understand it, but I will also make absolute fun of them for being a bunch of sissies.
	Little children.
	But when they block me, and then I see that later on, they've actually adopted my very thinking for which they blocked me in the first place.
	You're damn right!
	I'm going to put Pierce, not Pierce Broughton, Pierce Morgan on blast.
	This is the last interaction we had.
	Here, this is the last one that I noticed before he blocked me.
	Oh, I need to go get the full tweet.
	Hold on one second.
	It was, let me go get the entire tweet.
	I don't want to use that.
	That's a window that I've got to keep up there.
	Google Viva Frye as offensive.
	And we'll go tweet Piers Morgan.
	Okay, as offensive as you think it might be.
	Do I get my original tweet?
	Yeah, here we go.
	This is it.
	Okay. It wasn't even that bad.
	My God, what a flipping sissy.
	Here, this is it.
	Okay. I wrote to Piers.
	This is in respect of October 7. And he's talking about...
	As offensive as you think this...
	As offensive as this might be to you, it's not anti-Semitic.
	And that was in response to...
	You have to play Twitter.
	Catch up.
	Also, to dismiss the possibility that the greatest security breach in Israeli history that was apparently years in the making yet undetected by Israeli intelligence, that breached the most secure border in the world, that continued for hours uninterrupted by IDF, that occurred on the 50th anniversary of the Yom Kippur War, was a lee hop, let it happen on purpose or made it happen on purpose, proves that you are incapable of critical thought required to be required of a true journalist.
	Respectfully submitted.
	That was what I said to him.
	Where he just writes off people as anti-Semites for saying something.
	Then he replied to me before blocking me.
	If you think Israel was somehow in on the October 7 terror attacks, then you're either shockingly delusional conspiracy theorist or worse, you're deliberately promoting a disgusting, disgusting.
	I say.
	Then I have the other one here.
	Hold on.
	This is fun.
	Look at this.
	This is great.
	I love going back to this.
	Feel free to snip, clip, and share and put...
	Pierce on blast.
	He'll have the butt plug rabbi on and he'll have destiny on.
	But he blocks someone who he then steals the ideas from.
	I replied to him, I said, also, I didn't say in on.
	Let me minimize so I can see this.
	I didn't say in on.
	One thing is certain.
	Israeli intelligence failed at every step.
	It failed in identifying, preventing, and responding to the terror attack while literally providing briefcases of cash to Gaza since 2018, while being well aware of the fact that security had been compromised due to internal political strife of the Netanyahu government.
	The question now is whether the same intelligence that was at the watch of that failure Can somehow find the solution by leveling Gaza and killing tens of thousands of civilians in the process?
	These are legitimate questions that you cannot simply disregard by calling people names.
	Okay, I think that sounds pretty smart, pretty reasonable.
	Let me go back.
	I'm going to go forward.
	Do I lose it now?
	That's what he blocked me for.
	Then I go and I just see things like, oh yeah, that's what he had.
	Who did he have on here?
	How many civilians do you believe were killed?
	Because now he's giving the Israeli representatives a bit of a hard time.
	When they said, we don't know how many were killed.
	He's like, oh, it's disgusting and indefensible.
	What the hell are you doing, Netanyahu?
	This is Pierce Morgan, the same man who blocked me for what I just said as I read it to you a few seconds ago.
	The scenes from Rafa overnight are horrific.
	I've defended Israel's right to defend itself after October 7, but slaughtering so many innocent people as they cower in a refugee camp is indefensible.
	Stop it now, Netanyahu.
	This is Pierce Morgan, who I believe...
	I mean, they've all got their reasons, and their reasons can only be ratings and not intellectual honesty.
	And mine are quite inverted, maybe even to my detriment.
	I prefer only intellectual honesty and then just assume.
	That ratings, that the trust that comes with being not necessarily right, but intellectually honest, pays dividends in the long enough timeline.
	Hold on one second.
	The dog has apparently had enough.
	Anyhow, that's it for Pierce Morgan, I think.
	Now, let's see here.
	I gotta show you something really funny.
	Okay. Don't look quickly.
	Close your eyes, close your eyes, close your eyes.
	Okay, here.
	Now, this thing, I got to show you what this is because it's actually amazing.
	It's a Japanese assessment of eyes.
	Don't walk, don't walk, run, psychotic eyes, Japanese.
	Hold on.
	Yeah, sanpaku eyes.
	So look at this.
	It's so fantastic.
	Once you learn, it's just...
	I don't know what this is from, so I haven't done more than this.
	Sanpaku eyes, Japanese term meaning three whites.
	If the white of a person's eyes are visible, either below or above the colored portion, or iris, that person is said to have sanpaku eyes.
	And let's just see what we got here.
	So you got the top eyes.
	Looks like a beautiful woman.
	Stress in life somewhere.
	So everyone's got those eyes.
	Depth perception and peripheral vision is off.
	Accident prone.
	Much like...
	I have a...
	Like a brain of a woman!
	Yes, no, that was my joke.
	Okay, then we got this one.
	Also looks maybe a little meaner.
	A lot of pressure.
	Be aware of situation.
	These eyes want to unload.
	Okay, then we got this guy.
	Be very cautious.
	Extreme pressure.
	These eyes are hiding something.
	Then we got number four.
	Don't walk, run away.
	These eyes have psychotic tendencies.
	And then we've got these eyes.
	These eyes, the eyes of a psychopathic killer.
	These eyes want to gain power of you.
	It's actually unbelievable.
	I don't want to go down too many rabbit holes.
	Let me just remember this one here.
	Go to the chat, the bottom one, number five.
	Who do you think that looks like?
	Because I can tell you offhand exactly what I'm thinking about.
	I'm not going to tell you.
	Let me see here.
	I'm just going to go get to images.
	Here we go.
	It's actually amazing.
	I don't want to lose this.
	I want to see if the chat is going to have the same thought that I'm having here.
	Number five.
	Does anybody know who they can think that that looks like?
	Shifty Schiff, maybe.
	Hillary. Manson.
	Jenny Beans is the answer I was looking for.
	Not because it's the best answer.
	But because it's the right answer.
	Hold on.
	Manson. This.
	Look at those eyes.
	And look at the sanpaku eyes.
	That's the same thing.
	Now look at four.
	And you might have already seen it, so it's not going to be much of a surprise.
	Look at the four.
	Who does that look like?
	I saw that, and I didn't know that this came from an actual sanpaku assessment of the eyes.
	I thought it was just like the PDF sort of high contrast inversion of actual face.
	Look at those eyes.
	Keep looking.
	You tell me they're not identical.
	I'm not trying to be funny.
	You tell me that those eyes are not Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer's eyes.
	I'm not crazy, right?
	It's the same picture, to quote the meme.
	Yep, oh wow, yep.
	Rahm Emanuel, I have to check.
	I love the content creator was news outlets where you have to go to let the dog out.
	It's not fake.
	It's genuine.
	No, the dog just wanted to get out of the room.
	Oh, ship.
	He does look like a psycho.
	The Jews.
	Okay, buddy.
	Thanks. Well, first of all, I'm curious also because it's a Japanese eye assessment.
	So I'm curious as to why they have, you know, I don't know.
	Would you call them Caucasian?
	It's freaking Albert Bourla, people.
	It's Albert Bourla and it's Charles Manson.
	So... Okay.
	I mean, it's amazing.
	But also speaking of psychopaths, I just want to take a trip down memory lane before we go on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the rest of the show.
	I forget who put it out yesterday.
	When was your moment?
	I can luckily go back to my Twitter timeline and realize that in as much as maybe for a week or two I was making the best of a bad situation.
	I got wise pretty early.
	If it wasn't late March 2020, it was certainly April 2020, when they padlocked the outdoor dog run.
	But someone asked, when did you realize that COVID, just coming right back to the end of this, the pandemic, was a total scam?
	And I said, for me, it was when they locked the outdoor dog run.
	But if it didn't come for you, when the New York Times wrote this article, Are protests dangerous?
	What experts say may depend on who's protesting what.
	Public health experts decried the anti-lockdown protests as dangerous gatherings in a pandemic.
	Health experts seem less comfortable doing so now that the marches are against racism.
	If that win, what's that from?
	New York Times.
	Who is protesting what?
	I just want to win that article.
	Who's protesting?
	COVID. Are protests dangerous?
	October 2020.
	Can you believe that we have been lied to?
	Definitively, by the way.
	This is it.
	We're ending on this and then we're going to go on over to locals afterwards.
	Definitively lied to.
	Have you all gone through the 576 page final report?
	Of course you have.
	Fools, if you haven't done it, this is the final report.
	Coronavirus pandemic select subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic chairman Brad Weinstrup.
	After action review of the COVID-19 pandemic, lessons learned and a path forward.
	It's an amazing thing.
	We're going to read only the summary, then I'm going to go over some executive stuff.
	It has been my distinct pleasure.
	Five years ago, on December 1st, 2019, was what would eventually be the first confirmed case of COVID.
	COVID was novel.
	The brightest scientists and medical experts were learning on the job to determine how to treat the underlying conditions.
	Since February 2023, the subcommittee sought to produce a full action report to provide a roadmap of how we in Congress, the executive and private sector, may better prepare for and respond to future pandemics.
	Throughout this process, the select subcommittee sent more than 100 investigative letters, conducted, transcripts, yada, yada.
	Most of you know me.
	You know that I strive to work collegially with our fellow Americans to provide results for all of us.
	That is the same mentality I brought to my work as chairman of the sub-collectomy.
	During that time, yada, yada, yada.
	There's a bipartisan consensus among multiple issues.
	The possibility that COVID-19 emerged because of a laboratory or research-related accident is not a conspiracy theory.
	It makes me angry.
	It makes me really, really angry.
	Because we were called, and I'll lump myself together in there, but other people were earlier.
	We were called conspiracy theorists.
	I had videos demonetized, taken down.
	They weren't really taken down.
	Demonetized. Because it was conspiracy theory.
	You couldn't say it.
	It was racist.
	And we all knew that it wasn't racist, it wasn't a conspiracy theory, and we should have been allowed to talk about it.
	Now they say, oh yeah.
	It's not a conspiracy theory.
	EcoHealth Alliance, Dr. Peter Daszak, should never again receive U.S. taxpayer dollars.
	I remember people saying that as well.
	Scientific messaging must be clear and concise, backed by evidentiary support.
	Oh, you needed to conduct a committee hearing to determine that?
	It should come from trusted messengers, such as frontline doctors treating patients.
	Oh, so you mean like the people issuing directives to deny to the frontline doctors the treatment medications?
	By blocking them from pharmacy?
	That was not a good idea?
	Oh, you needed a two-year committee to determine that?
	Public health officials must work to regain America's trust.
	Americans want to be educated, not indoctrinated.
	Oh. Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo participated in medical malpractice and publicly covered up the total number of nursing home fatalities in New York.
	Hey, why not Gretchen Whitmer?
	Oh, is it because she might be a future presidential candidate that you don't want to stick her name in here?
	In addition to these notable bipartisan successes, the sub-collect committee...
	The select subcommittee developed extensive findings, some of which include the U.S. National Institute of Health funded gain of research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
	That was a conspiracy theory.
	The Chinese government agencies within the U.S. government and some members of the international scientific community sought to cover up facts concerning the origins of the pandemic.
	We were called conspiracy theorists for talking about that.
	Operation Warp Speed was a tremendous success and a model to build upon in the future.
	The vaccines which...
	Do you remember these mother effers calling anybody who said it wasn't a vaccine an anti-vaxxer?
	Fuck all of these people.
	I'm sorry.
	I'm sorry.
	People were called anti-vaxxers for asserting.
	That they were therapeutics and not vaccines.
	We were called conspiracy theorists for highlighting the fact that they changed the definition of vaccines to include what could only be described as a therapeutic.
	These people are the worst people on earth.
	They take two years of employing themselves to come, not just to the same conclusions to which people came, smarter people, years earlier, to state the flipping obvious.
	They saved millions.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	Rampant fraud, waste, and abuse played COVID-19 pandemic response.
	No shit, Sherlock.
	Pandemic-era school closure will have an enduring impact on generations of America's children, and these closures were enabled by groups meant to serve those children.
	Oh, so you participated in child abuse.
	Some of us were...
	Called assholes for saying that very same thing as I sat on a chair in the snow three years ago saying any parent who locks their kid down because of COVID or risk of contamination is a child abuser.
	The Constitution cannot be suspended in times of...
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Didn't we say there's no virus exception in the Constitution?
	Barnes and I have only been saying that for five freaking years.
	The prescription cannot be worse than the disease, such as strict and overly broad lockdowns that led to predictable anguish and avoidable consequences.
	Predictable? All of these people should go straight to hell.
	Anybody who had a rule in this should go straight to hell.
	After a long, healthy life, people.
	A long, healthy life filled with living their later years, hearing all of the bad things people are going to say about them.
	Chairman Select, yada, yada, yada.
	Okay, whatever.
	What does he say here?
	I have undertaken 12 years in Congress.
	This work will help the United States world predict the next pandemic, prepare, protect, and prevent.
	The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted a distrust in leadership.
	Trust is earned.
	Accountability, transparency, honesty, and integrity will regain this trust.
	A future pandemic requires a whole of America response managed by those without personal benefit or bias.
	We can always do better.
	And for the sake of future generations, we must.
	It can be done.
	Brad Weinstrup.
	Do you understand what we just looked at here?
	My goodness, I hope we've been looking at the same thing because I haven't been in my...
	The executive summary confirms absolutely everything that some of us have been saying from the beginning and that many of us have been saying for a while.
	It's enraging.
	It's absolutely enraging.
	Okay. Before you leave, people, if you're not coming over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, make sure that you're subscribed.
	Hit the thumbs up.
	There's 4,000 people watching it.
	4,500 and we only have 300 thumbs up.
	Unacceptable. One thumbs down?
	Who the hell did that?
	I'm just going to read the track.
	Crazy Eyes belong to most Kamala Harris voters.
	Vaccines always carry a casualty rate, says Buddy1205.
	Yeah. But also, vaccines typically are vaccines.
	Oh, now, just like, slip it in there.
	It's now called a therapeutic.
	How many times did I eat, take shit?
	Not eat shit.
	How many times did I take shit from family members, friends who called me all sorts of names?
	you.
	Okay. Listen to the thousands of doctors against the jabs.
	All right, let's go on over to Viva Barnes Law.
	If you're coming, if you're not, I will see you tomorrow.
	Link to Locals.
	Thank you all for being here.
	I hope you enjoyed the show.
	I hope I do good.
	I hope I give insight.
	I hope I convey, share knowledge and information with a little bit of humor so that you don't end up with hype.
	Hold on, hold on, hold on.
	Hold on.
	Alright, peeps.
	Because... Okay, we're going to do this in real time.
	This is a blood pressure device.
	Okay? I'm going to lower my pulse just to relax a little bit.
	We're going to do this in real time and see how it goes.
	Who's taking bets?
	Go into the chat and take bets.
	Okay. I am saying it's going to be...
	How do I feel today?
	I want to say it's going to be 127 over 83, pulse 67. Let me just write it down.
	127 over 83, pulse 67. Okay.
	Let me make sure that we can see it here.
	This is a fun game.
	I can do this all the time.
	Okay. Pushing it.
	Okay. It's working.
	I got to stop talking.
	you.
	Well, that is high.
	Well, son of a bitch!
	It's broken, guys.
	The machine's broken.
	It said 141 over 95, pulse 72. I'm going to have to do that again afterwards.
	I'm telling you, that has actually never happened before.
	If I had known that that was even a possibility, I would have never done that live.
	Oh, the thing was out.
	That's what happened, people.
	Okay, I'm going to...
	You should do it again, Boopsie says.
	I'll do it again in Locals.
	We're going to see.
	No, I don't believe it either.
	There's something wrong with that.
	If you want to see if it's accurate, you're going to have to come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
	It was a ploy the entire time, people.
	All right, come on over to Locals.
	Yeah, I don't believe that.
	I know my pulse was going to be high.
	Too much pressure.
	Yeah, right.
	The thing was out.
	Okay. Come on over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com.
	See if the number is accurate.
	We're going to do it one more time and then we're going to have our after party there.
	Thank you all for being here and I will see you all tomorrow.
	Hopefully. All right.
	Jokes aside, it's going to be a good Unusual Suspects tomorrow and it's going to be a good podcast tomorrow.
	So come on over to Locals right now.

▲