All Episodes
Previous Next
May 7, 2024 - Viva & Barnes
01:24:31
Covid Censorship Class Action Against Google / YouTube AUTHORIZED! Trump, Stormy & MORE! Viva Frei
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'm Kayla Pollack.
As most of you know, I was severely vaccine injured by my booster shot taking Moderna in February 2022.
For the last two years, I've been trying to get my story out so that I can have a better life for myself by trying to crowdfund So that I can stay at home.
My biggest concern has been my nine-year-old son.
He was seven when this happened, and all they wanted to do was either put me in long-term care or offer me medical assistance in dying, which I was offered three times.
I won't lie, I considered it.
Many of you have already heard my story, and that's not what I'm here to talk about.
What I'm here to talk about today is something I need help with.
If you do feel compelled to donate, you can always go to my Gives and Go, which is located at opkayla.com, or you can go to my Gives and Go, which is always located at the bottom of the Canadian Independent article, which I hope to be able to connect to the bottom of this.
My biggest concern right now is that I cannot get a hold of my Member of Parliament.
I first contacted my Mayor.
He was a wonderful man.
I live in Bradford West Willenberry, which is actually connected to York Simcoe.
And he's a really nice guy and took my story very seriously.
He told me that he would call Carolyn Moroney's office and call Scott Davidson's office right away.
Hopefully that I could speak with both of them.
He told me that he was friends with both of them and this shouldn't be a problem.
Carolyn Maroney's office did call me back right away.
Her office staff was great.
Carolyn wasn't available at the time.
However, it seemed that Scott was the one I needed to get a hold of.
I have not been able to do that.
I've been able to get a hold of Dr. Drew easily.
I've been able to get a hold of Tammy Peterson easily.
I've been able to get a hold of Dr. Phil if I want to.
But I can't get a hold of my local MP.
My story's gone around the world.
And yet, I can't get a hold of my local MP.
We have a problem here.
A big, big problem.
I need your help.
In order for me to get even some help, I need to be able to reach out to my local MP, who is either ignoring me or not seeing my story somehow.
I'll pause it here for one second.
I have to make sure that we are live across platforms, which we are.
Can't get a hold of MP.
You know what the amazing thing is, by the way, I'll play this video out because I think it needs to be played in its entirety.
Google Kayla Pollack Moderna.
Google that, and if you're in Canada, see the search results that come up.
I'll let this play out.
You can do.
Instead of just liking this video, giving it a heart, or retweeting it, or re-exiting it, I don't know what you call it anymore, please do this one simple thing.
Hashtag or link Scott Davidson to this video.
His tag will be below.
And also, give your two cents worth about my condition.
Give your opinion about what should be done.
Give your opinion about how sick it is that the government isn't listening to me.
Don't be rude.
Don't be mean.
Just give your opinion.
Help me by sending him a few words.
But if we all start to take my video and we all start to send it to him, then maybe he will get the video and maybe he will understand that I'm trying to get a hold of him.
Email's not working.
Mail isn't working.
Going through his constituents isn't working.
Going through his friends isn't working.
I'm either being directly ignored on purpose or I'm falling through the cracks, which happens all the time.
There might be just too many people that are trying to get a hold of this particular rep or government officials for this particular reason.
This is Kayla Pollack.
She was on the channel.
We did an interview.
She explained everything in detail.
She's suing Moderna.
Google Kayla Pollack Moderna.
You'd think.
You'd think maybe some legacy media up in Canada would be interested in covering that story.
Go look at the results.
Put in news and see what happens.
This is bureaucracy by all means.
What I'm hoping we can do is tag him in that Canadian independent video.
The short and sweet 13-minute video that not only tells my story, but also very sweet and very easily gives my gives and go.
And it just wraps it up and gives you all the information that you need.
It shows the evidence from the doctors in the hospital proving that my vaccine injury was actually directly the result of.
Supported by these doctors and also there's an audio recording there from the neurologist before all the testing was done who says I believe it's my gut reaction that this is not going to be cancer.
It's going to be caused by the vaccine and I've seen many many people like you before.
So there are many others he's saying in this audio recording that I took at the hospital.
There's other audio recordings I am trying to get through with the Vaccine Injury Compensation Board.
That's been a nightmare.
They just keep halting me.
They don't have records of having filed.
It took them, what, it took them over a year and a half?
I'm not even sure what the latest status is on Dan Hartman.
Answers for Sean.
Sean Hartman, where they initially denied it.
You know, Sean Hartman doesn't wake up.
33 days after a certain jibby jab.
And, you know, the Vaccine Injury Support Program, the VISP up in Canada, says, we can't.
It's not related.
Be on your way.
18-year-old kids, this happens all the time.
They don't write back.
They don't call back within their 48-hour time frame that they give you.
It's just been absolute hell.
But what I need right now, I need to get a hold of this Member of Parliament.
So, like I said, if we can all just do our part.
And tag this member.
I will provide that below.
And if anyone who is being tagged in this video could also share and retweet this video along with doing this, that would be a big time bonus.
So if you can not only reach out to Scott, but also We share this video so that more people are seeing it, so that more people can do it.
Remember the Canadian independent video is also very important here.
So if you guys can do that for me, this will help us work together.
Remember, I'm here to help other vaccine-injured Canadians and other vaccine-injured people from around the world.
And so that people can see that this is a global problem and that we need to deal with it now.
We are in Canada.
We have high expectations for our country.
We are losing our country in front of our eyes.
Censorship with all of this stuff.
And it needs to stop.
I'm just one voice who chooses to be loud and chooses to come forward.
But I will do that for you guys.
I will keep coming out.
I will keep doing these things.
I just need help in return.
Getting my voice heard to the right people so that I can help more and get the help that I need in order to live a somewhat normal life.
Because right now, I'm losing my life.
Please help so that I can continue my mission.
Thank you so much.
Imagine in Canada, they didn't offer her care.
One of the doctors...
Actually suggested it was psychological.
Then the other doctor, if you listen to the recording and you see the Western Standard expose, said, you know, he's seen this.
He knows what this is.
The government then offered her death because they say, look, you're not going to get any better.
You're going to cost us a lot of money.
Have you thought about offing yourself?
And by the way, I don't really think twice about these things anymore.
I think YouTube is up to some...
Effing BS.
And I think it's quite clear.
The thought goes through your head.
Do I start off with this video?
I don't want YouTube demonetizing it.
Couldn't give a sweet bugger all about that.
Don't want YouTube giving me a strike.
YouTube, I did my re-education camp on your platform.
I know what the rules are.
Kayla is allowed sharing her personal story.
She's allowed sharing her own personal medical information.
She got...
She suffered the consequences she suffered from having gotten a Moderna booster after having gotten two Pfizer jabs.
When did the science ever say you can mix and match like you're taking shots at a bar in Vegas?
Who the hell knows?
They were moving at the speed of science.
The government says to her, have you thought about killing yourself?
I mean, you are now a recently developed quadriplegic.
You've got a son who is now, you know, his life, I don't know if it's the entirety has been upended.
And is now dedicated to taking care of mum.
Have you thought about killing yourself?
Can you imagine anything more?
It's straight out of a horror movie.
You don't need to watch Saw.
You don't need to watch The Hills Have Eyes.
Just go watch the story of the Canadian government.
Have you thought about killing yourself?
Oh, we don't call it killing.
We don't call it euthanasia.
That's also too offensive.
We call it maids.
Have you gotten yourself a maid, Kayla?
Oh, that's right.
It stands for medical assistance in dying.
And we're going after the paralyzed, the quadriplegics, the mentally ill.
I mean, the Nazis had this program and it was called Mercy Killings.
And they started off with the exact same targets.
You're going to cost us a lot of money.
You're not going to get the care you need because we've shipped off a few too many billions of dollars to Ukraine.
So it would be much cheaper for us and better for you if, you know, one little needle.
It's obscene.
And her story needs to be told.
I mean, look, the problem is there's too much of this tragedy going on in the world these days, and it's impossible to keep up with it.
And it's impossible to keep up with everybody's story.
Look at this, look at this.
Kayla Pollack, Moderna.
You would think that a woman who was rendered a quadriplegic by the Moderna jab, the company just posted some massive losses, you'd think that her suing the company for $45 million in Canada would be news?
What do we see here?
Okay, so now we're in all of the internet.
You got her tweet on Twitter.
You've got the Western Standard story.
You've got YouTube.
That's Dr. Drew.
You've got, she made it to Reddit.
Then you've got Bonanza Valley voice.
Moderna booster jab renders Canadian woman.
Okay.
You got Dr. Drew.
You got Kayla Pollack.
You got Odyssey.
Odyssey, whatever that is.
Dr. Drew.
GoFundMe.
Kayla Pollack.
Canadian woman.
Tammy A.A. or Tammy L. Substack.
Good pods.
Okay, that's what you get in the all.
You go to news, right?
Because Canadian news outlets should be interested in a story about a Canadian woman rendered a quadriplegic and suing Big Pharma for justice for $45 million as if all the money in the world could remedy this injustice.
Let's see what news is reporting on this in Canada.
Western Standard, Dr. Drew, Rare Foundation, TechARP, Todayville, and...
That seems to be it.
Oh, maybe I've done something wrong.
Maybe I didn't put in the right search terms.
CBC?
No.
How about, let's see, Radio?
We're going to have a French lesson today, by the way.
How about Radio Canada?
No.
How about Global?
Global News?
No.
Nothing.
And why would they cover it?
I mean, who subsidizes them?
Oh, that's right, the same government that might be directly or indirectly responsible for the damages that the woman is now claiming from Moderna?
Interesting.
Bond says, I feel so bad for her and all the others who were injured by those injections.
We are witnessing absolute capture, absolute corruption, and absolute...
Ignoring of the story.
Can you imagine CBC?
I mean, I just did that panel up in Ottawa, Canada Strong and Free, where we were talking about media.
You know, the media might not be flailing or failing if they actually covered news.
If you were not getting subsidized by the government and actually had to succeed on your own merits and compete for clicks and cover the news that people want to hear, maybe they would be covering the Caleb Pollack story.
But when you get subsidized, you turn into a big fat hog sucking at the government teat and you don't want to bite that hand.
You think you're going to be the big fat hog and you're going to bite the hand as it comes in to give you some raw meat or donuts?
Hell no.
Ignore it.
CBC, state-funded, $1.4 billion, ignoring it.
Radio Canada, state-funded, they're in there with CBC, $1.4 billion.
CTV News, Global News, National Post, Toronto Sun, Toronto Star, Montreal Gazette, nothing.
Silence crickets because you are all a bunch of corrupt hacks sucking at the government teeth and you will go down in history not just as failed enterprises but as failed human beings.
All right.
Her Give, Send, Go.
Let me get you the link to her Give, Send, Go so that everybody can...
If you can support...
And the problem is people are...
Everybody's struggling.
Let me see if I can get the Give, Send, Go here.
I know it's in here somewhere.
Hold on.
Give, Send, Go.
Kayla Pollack.
Right here.
Here's the link.
Let me imagine that.
$1.4 billion.
Why the hell would they cover it?
Hmm.
Okay.
Now, everybody, share the link out.
We're live and we're going to have a fun one today because we're going to cover some French.
We're going to go over a very interesting decision coming out of Quebec.
Whether or not it's going to have broader repercussions, I think it will because I think class action lawsuits are the way to go when dealing with the censorship.
I need to go back to some of my old YouTube chicanery videos and pick out the point because this was the solution I was proposing a while back.
That class action for damages from censorship is going to be the way to go after these companies, especially in jurisdictions that are not big tech friendly, or at the very least are more prone to protecting the rights of the lowly people.
But before we even get into that, I want to play something because I'm trying new stuff on the channel.
And I put out, it's a short one, and you'll tell me.
Now, I'm going to put out a poll, and you're going to tell me whether or not you like it.
You might have gotten the notification.
I probably shouldn't have published it quite so closely.
I'm going to go like this, and I'm going to bring it up so we can see it, and you're going to tell me.
I'm going to run a poll if you like this or not.
I say I'm going to run a poll anyhow, but then the question is going to be, even if you don't...
I think I'm still going to do it because I think I like this edit.
Check this out here.
Trump trial update.
The news of the day.
Judge Juan Marchand, who's totally not corrupt, whose daughter is totally not an executive at a PR firm that's representing Adam Schiff, Democrat political action committees, having worked with Kamala Harris' 2020 campaign, raising millions of dollars for the company and for the clients she represents because of this very prosecution.
That judge, Juan Marchand, just found Trump to be in contempt of court for the 10th...
Time today.
You will not believe the charge for which Judge Juan Marchand just found Trump.
Guilty of contempt of court.
I'll read it for you, because you won't believe it if I don't read it for you.
From the judgment, by virtue of an interview defendant gave on April 22, 2024, at approximately 6 o 'clock p.m. to a program called Just the News, No Noise, which is broadcast on a network called Real America's Voice.
Among other things, defendant stated, quote, You know, the judge is rushing this trial like crazy.
Nobody's ever seen a thing go like this.
The jury was picked so fast.
95% Democrat.
Was that too loud?
I noticed some people saying...
They are using...
I noticed people saying rest in peace, Mike.
So I will not play the whole thing.
I'll give you all the link.
Do you like that?
I put it in the poll.
It says, me likey?
Yes or no?
Link, bada bing, bada boom.
Okay, good.
Now we're done with that.
Go check it out.
Share it.
Because what's going on in that Trump trial is an absolute flipping outrage.
We'll cover the morning's worth of inner-city press tweets over on the Rumble side.
We're going to start on the YouTube side with the class-action lawsuit coming out of Canada.
But first, actually, Me Likey Dad.
Does everybody know the song by Lonely Island?
Me Likey Dad.
When your mom...
What's the song?
Oh, it's a song.
It's called Me Like You Dead.
It's a great song.
But before we get into anything, and because I am an idiot and forgot to do the sponsor yesterday, they're going to get a sponsor and a half because the links were in the pinned comment yesterday.
I forget what I got distracted by.
It's probably because I wasn't focusing, because I wasn't on a good, nutritious diet, or I hadn't had my energy drink.
Let me see here.
I got a text from my wife.
Now we need oil in the car, but...
More important than oil in the car is nutrition in your body.
What if I told you that you could replace your energy drinks with your multivitamins, coffee, etc., etc., with a supplemental intake in one product?
It's one product saving you money and making you feel incredible.
Organ meat, people.
And don't do it the way I do it.
If anybody's seen my video where I did the bison balls, don't do it like that.
You've likely heard the chatter about the benefits of beef organs, but until you've experienced bison organs...
You don't know anything about it.
And by the way, don't do it either like that liver guy.
Cook it if you're going to do it.
Or a supplement where you don't actually have to eat the organ meat.
Why bison?
Because it's the leanest, most nutritious, dense, cleanest meat source, revered for centuries for its unmatched makeup of minerals, vitamins, and protein.
Hormone-free, vaccine-free, grass-fed, and finished.
No GMOs, additives, or fillers.
It doesn't get cleaner or closer to the source than bison trifecta from the wellness company.
A revolution in nutritional science, the indigenous people knew how to harness the raw, untapped energy of bison organs, and now you can experience it for yourself.
pure ethically sourced bison in its most bio-available Freeze-dried in a convenient capsule, Bison Trifecta takes the magic of the heart, liver, and kidneys and combines them into a powerful blend that can help elevate your athletic performance, improve digestion, shift your mood, reduce inflammation, and all the other good stuff.
Take them as a daily capsule or crack them open and sprinkle them onto your meals or, you know, sneak into the kids' meals if you want to do it that way.
But do yourself a favor and make sure you find a way to add Bison Trifecta to your life.
Your body will thank you.
Go to TWC...
They've got a number of products.
They've got the Contagion Kit, the Spike Kit, and now they've got Bison Protein Supplement, and it's a great company.
And the link is in the description.
Booyah!
Oh, lordy, lordy.
Don't do it the way I did it, people.
I got bison balls.
Like, I mean, actual testicles.
Let me see, actually, while we're on the subject.
Hold on a second.
Google Viva Fry Bison Balls YouTube.
How to prepare...
And cook.
Don't do it this way.
Get the capsule.
It'll be much easier.
Watch this.
Switch to chrome.
You might want to vomit a little bit if you watch this.
And especially if you watch the entire thing.
But more important than that, look at this.
Turn the volume down here.
Look at this.
It's not often we get exotic foods that we actually haven't ever tasted before.
Tonight is one of those nights.
Look at this thing, by the way.
Big.
Admittedly, the packaging does not make it look...
Are we eating a foot?
We've had amourettes before.
Amourettes is like...
We've never had the amourette of...
A bison.
It is actually...
It's quite disgusting.
What is it?
This is the amourette...
I'll tell you in a second.
This is the amourette of a bison.
The guy that we buy meat from said that he had a bunch of bison balls lying around the freezer.
That's where I should have gotten suspicious.
Sir...
Meat dealer, why do you have leftover bison balls?
Nobody had purchased them.
And he said he would bring...
He said he would bring them over.
Okay, so anyways, that's a...
Don't do it that way, people.
TWC.health forward slash Viva and get bison ground up into a powder so you don't have to handle big, bloody bison balls.
All right, Link, if anybody wants to go watch that.
All right, now we're getting into the good stuff of the show, people.
And look, it's going to be a trip down memory lane for my...
Pour mon français, on va traduire une décision juridique qui provient de la Québec de Montréal.
We're going to translate in real time a decision coming out of Quebec.
Now, actually, I've got to give credit to the proposed class representative, Héloïse Bois.
I'm going to bring this all up here.
I'll share her Twitter handle afterwards as well because the news comes across my feed yesterday.
Viva, did you hear that a class action was authorized?
Against YouTube and Google for, this is ironic that we're covering it on YouTube, for COVID censorship.
And I'm like, holy crab apples, if that's true, that's very big news.
And I'm skeptical.
I'm reluctant.
You know, over the weekend, someone sends me a link and it says, hey, they're charging an exit tax of $25,000 on Canadians.
Like, okay, that sounds interesting.
I got to double check.
And lo and behold, not accurate.
This turned out to be true.
And we're going to go through the decision because it's all in French.
I shared it on our vivabarneslaw.locals.com community, and I said, look, if anybody has good OCR recognition and wants to translate this, I think it should be done as a service regardless in the legal community in Quebec.
It's a French province, and if you want to live there, that's it.
Those are the rules.
But there's no English version out yet, and so I translated the conclusion, but we're going to walk through it and just have a little fun because it's a good decision.
There is a proposed class action against Google and YouTube for COVID censorship.
And do we do the spoiler at the end?
Now, we'll go through this here.
Héloïse Bois.
Now, hold on one second.
I'm going to show her Twitter feed real quick so that we don't lose this Twitter.
I think her handle is Hélo.
Hélo.
Veux savoir.
Hélo veux savoir.
Here we go.
This is her handle.
And I'll show everybody.
So everybody can go follow her.
I think some of her stuff is in French.
Some of it's in English.
Hello veut savoir means hello wants to know.
Follows me.
I follow her.
We've been messaging and she's going to come on to talk about this sooner than later.
Ma question sur plein de sujets.
I question a lot of subjects.
Certain taboos.
Some taboos.
I question a lot of subjects.
Some are taboos.
Others less so.
Je veux croire qu 'on vivra notre futur dans un monde libre.
I want to believe that we're going to live our future in a free world.
So that's LRE's Veux Savoir.
Here's her Twitter handle.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Now, let's bring up the decision and let's walk through this because it's interesting.
It just takes one good judge.
Although I don't know what's going to happen on appeal.
This might go to appeal and it might get overturned.
And it's not any form of a success on the merits.
All that this lawsuit, all that this decision says, coming from the Superior Court, the judge is L 'Honorable Lukas Granojic.
All that this decision says is that the defendants, Google...
LLC, their motion to dismiss, to strike the class action fails.
It can move forward because there's a legitimate question to be had here.
So let's...
If anybody wants a French class today, you're going to get it.
And I'll try to do it fast so that it's not too boring.
It says, La demandresse souhaite exercer une action collective pour représenter le groupe suivant.
And I'll stop reading in French because you all know that I can speak.
Okay, fine.
The plaintiff wants to exercise or wants to file...
Wants to proceed with a class action.
Action Collective in Quebec, in Canada, is a class action to represent the following group.
Because bear in mind, in a class action, you have to have the group to be represented as the class.
And this says any person, physical or moral, so that would be individual or company, who used or visited YouTube since March 15, 2020, while they were a resident in Quebec.
Or had an establishment in Quebec.
So I would, in theory, fit that definition, even though I'm no longer there at the time I was.
And at the time, I think I was complaining about the My Sharona Cyrus censorship on the YouTubes.
Okay, hold on.
Bring it back here.
All right, and there we go.
Paragraph two.
She is looking for, essentially, compensatory damages and punitive damages.
For every person who, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, was censored, but also for all people who could not take cognizance of videos that were censored.
This is sort of like Joe Nierman Goodlogic's contestation of the gag order for Trump.
His argument for un-gagging Trump is not that it only violates Trump's First Amendment rights to speak.
It violates everyone else's First Amendment rights to hear Trump speak.
So when they censor a video from, let's just say, Kayla Pollack on YouTube, or they censor a Dan Hartman story on YouTube, which they did, or in my case, they censor a Francis Christian interview, which they did.
Told me it was medical.
They told me, hold on, let me rail here for a second.
YouTube told me that Dr. Francis Christian, an interview that I gave with him, Where he was talking to me from his own medical professional experience, YouTube told me that what Dr. Francis Christian said was medical misinformation.
So now, it's not just a question of preventing people from speaking, but it's also about preventing people from hearing what needs to be said.
There are people out there who may not know about Kayla Pollack's story because people are reluctant to post it on YouTube, the indirect censorship, or it was posted on YouTube, suppressed, censored, and people didn't get to hear it.
All right.
And then we get the context.
This is like, you're going to see this.
La défendresse exploite un médium social, un médium social appelé YouTube.
The plaintiff, she's a YouTuber.
She's got a, she shares videos, yada, yada, yada.
She has a YouTube channel called Hello Versavoir, and she alleges that she was censored.
She got censored for publishing videos on YouTube because it violated a YouTube rule which prohibited sharing information, medical disinformation, that contradicts that of the WHO.
In French, it's Organisation Mondiale de Santé, the WHO, the World Health Organization, regarding COVID.
And then she gives a few examples.
And I think we're going to skip through this pretty quickly because it's going to be pretty painful to go through this.
Not everybody wants the legal tests.
Though there's a funny anecdote here.
There was a Supreme Court justice named Biche.
I forget what her first name was now.
And they called her the Biche on the bench because she was a very powerful, opinionated woman.
Bish.
It's not bitch, but that was the joke.
The bitch on the bench.
They called it bish on the bench.
So here we go.
We're going through the criteria to be allowed to be authorized to file a class action lawsuit.
And it says, you know, according to the teachings of the Supreme Court, four conditions, the four conditions to allow for the authorization or the filing of a class action lawsuit, they have to be interpreted in a liberal, delicate, And generous fashion with the objective of facilitating and even promoting class action recourses.
Vehicle d 'accès à la justice, moyen d 'attendre, the procedural vehicle to attain justice in cases where it's not always that easy to obtain because there's small amounts, many people, etc., etc.
And it says here, paragraph 26. C 'est ainsi qu 'une seule question commune peut suffire à satisfaire l 'exigence.
It says, one common question can satisfy the criteria for filing class action lawsuit under the section of our code there.
If it permits to advance the debate or to favorise it, to allow for settling d'une manière non négligeable sans qu'on ne doive nécessairement d'y apporter une réponse.
If it can help resolve a question without necessarily bringing us a collective answer.
And the bottom line, look, we can go through this.
You've got all of these criteria for filing class action lawsuits.
You've got to have a common question.
You've got to have a definable class.
You've got to have the standard criteria for allowing class action lawsuits.
And then when we go here, we're going through all of the case law.
Very, very boring.
Imagine doing this for a living, people.
And you've got to go through this.
How far?
We're not even going to.
Paragraph 14, it says, The plaintiff is principally arguing that the control carried out by YouTube as relates to the COVID-19 pandemic constitutes an unlawful and deliberate attack on freedom of expression guaranteed by the Charter of Rights and Liberties in Canada.
That's pretty amazing.
You were censoring and violating our First Amendment rights, or we don't have First Amendment, but your charter rights, which binds corporations.
And let's just see here, paragraph 15, this is the argument from Google.
Google says we didn't violate any provision of the charter.
That Google has no obligation to provide a space to share videos, regardless of their content.
It's a private platform.
It applies its own rules.
And that the plaintiff can exercise her free speech rights in another manner.
And that she would not have suffered any meaningful consequence to justify the damages that she's claiming.
But basically, it's sort of like mutatis mutatis what they're arguing in the States.
We're a private company.
We can do whatever the hell we want.
So we don't have to respect your First Amendment rights under the Constitution because we're not a government entity, although the argument is being made now in a number of cases that When you do the government's bidding through hook or crook, coercion or inducement, then you become a state actor that might be bound by the Constitution.
In Canada, it's a little broader.
And incidentally, by the way, the reason why Kayla Pollack could sue Moderna in Canada, whereas people are having problems suing Pfizer and Moderna in the States, we didn't have a PrEP Act.
They didn't get immunity.
They got indemnity clauses in their contracts.
So there's a bit more of a window to sue pharma in Canada and people are using it.
And there's a bit more of a window to sue big tech in Canada.
And now...
Eloise is using it.
And I think we're going to skip the rest and just go down to the end here, because you go through all of these principles, and then you go through the suppression of videos on YouTube.
I mean, we know the story.
They were doing it.
They were suppressing content on YouTube for information that, in fact, turned out to be accurate information.
Three years ago, they said, no, this is medical disinformation.
Oh, you say masks don't work?
Oh, well, that's disinformation.
Oh, three years later, they say, yeah, we knew they weren't going to do very much.
So you go through the whole thing.
I'm not going to translate it.
What do we got here?
Let's see.
Oh, what's this?
Oh, gosh.
I'm seeing like sections of the code that I haven't seen in a long time.
Oh, look at this.
She's raising the argument that I was suggesting they raise.
The plaintiff is also invoking la loi sur la protection du consommateur.
Oh, geez.
What is it?
The Consumer Protection Act.
The CPA.
Now, the reason why some people don't fit into the Consumer Protection Act is if you use Google as a business, you're not a consumer, you're basically a business.
So she's invoking the Consumer Protection Act, which restricts and interdit la stipulation par laquelle un commerçant se dégage de ses conséquences de son fait personnel.
In the Consumer Protection Act, it says that a merchant cannot absolve themselves of the responsibility of their deliberate actions.
So you can't do something deliberately and then say in your contract, you won't hold me responsible for the deliberate conduct that I engage in.
Okay, we're going to go down here.
54.4.
Oh, this is when you sign a contract at a distance.
Is this about signing off on the terms and whether or not they can circumvent the terms?
Yada, yada, yada.
Scrolling all the way down.
Let's get to the group.
That there is a definable group.
So basically they're saying here, They're going to modify the group so that it corresponds to the allegations of the claim in the following manner.
Toute personne, any person, physical or moral, that's going to be an individual or a company, who used or visited YouTube since March 15, 2020 and saw their videos directly or indirectly on the pandemic censored or who wanted to take cognizance of videos that were censored could not do so, basically.
While they were residents in Quebec or had an establishment there.
And then let's get to the conclusion because it's good.
And then the adequate representation.
Can the plaintiff represent the group?
They can.
Conclusion.
And if you're in our locals community or you follow me on Twitter, you would have already seen this by now.
Si Google, this is fantastic.
Si Google gère et contrôle le contenu, se retrouvant sur son platform, YouTube.
If Google controls, manages and controls the content that is found on YouTube, And if it poses certain acts in that sense, it cannot deny all responsibility.
If it censors or impedes certain people from posting videos or censors or impedes other people from watching those videos, elle entrave ainsi la libre circulation des idées et s 'expose à devoir défendre ses façons de faire.
It is impeding on the free circulation and exchange of ideas and it exposes itself.
to defending how it goes about doing it.
Its decision might be well-founded and maybe it will not incur its responsibility.
We're here.
Mais la question se pose, but the question is nonetheless a legitimate question and it is manifest, it is patently obvious that the plaintiff possesses a simple possibility of success on the merits.
Enfin, toutes les autres questions relatives aux avis.
And then the other questions related to the notices, publications and the costs.
Yada, yada, yada.
All right, bam.
Pour ce motif, le tribunal, this is in the French version of, for these reasons, the court orders, accueille, grants, the plaintiff's claim, authorizes the exercise, or the authorizes the filing, let me say, authorizes the exercise of a class action in damages, compensatory and punitive, and an injunction, a prohibitive injunction in the District of Montreal.
And I presume that prohibitive injunction is, don't censor the videos anymore.
Attribute to the plaintiff Héloïse Bois the status of representative for the purposes of the class action, the envisioned, the proposed class action for and on behalf of the following people as described here, the group, and we went over that before, identifies the following principal questions of fact and law that will be dealt with collectively.
Oh, this is good.
Les règles de conflit de droit international privé, the rules of international conflict, the rules of resolution of international...
Les règles de conflit de droit international privé québécois.
The rules of international conflict of private Quebec law.
Must they be disregarded in whole or in part in virtue of section 33076 of the Civil Code of Quebec?
Let me go and refresh my memory.
3076 CCQ.
That law, 3076, the rules contained in this book apply subject to those rules of law in force in Quebec which are applicable by reason of their particular object.
That's section 3076 of the Civil Code.
Okay, that's one part.
I've lost where I was here.
Now I'm losing everything.
Okay, then question number B. The Quebec courts, do they have jurisdiction to hear this case?
With regards to sections of jurisdiction in the Civil Code, foreign law, le droit étranger, foreign law, must it be excluded and Quebec law applied in whole or in part in virtue of sections 3080 of the Civil Code?
So bottom line, are we excluding foreign law and applying Quebec law to this class action?
Advenant que les règles de YouTube sont applicables.
In the case that YouTube's rules are applicable, the following clauses...
Must these following clauses be annulled because they are abusive and contrary to public order?
Those permitting the defendant, Google, to control the content judged deemed reprehensible, problematic with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic, and those granting a limitation or an exoneration of responsibility of Google.
More questions.
The rules of YouTube and their application, do they violate in an unjustified manner freedom of expressions for any members of the group?
If that's the case, is it illegal and intentional?
That's item G. Is the conduct of Google or YouTube fault?
Is it a fault that incurs their responsibility?
The fault of the defendant, is it intentional?
Can the defendant exclude or limit its responsibility under the sections of our civil code, which exclude or limit liability, and the sections of the Consumer Protection Act?
Let's see here.
So section 272 of the Consumer Protection Act, does it allow for the authorization of punitive damages?
Given the fact that Google or YouTube allegedly might have violated the following sections of the Consumer Protection Act.
Holy crap, there's a lot of questions here.
What amount of compensatory damages is due to the members?
Depending on whether or not their content was censored or they were censored from viewing it, what is the quantum of punitive damages awarded to the members?
And then you can figure out here.
and identify as follows the question, conclusion, Okay, and then we're going into the damages to order the defendant to pay to every one of the members.
Yada, yada, yada.
$1,000 in damages, compensatory damages with interest.
$1,000 punitive damages with interest.
What do we got here?
$500 compensatory damages.
Oh, so then you want $1,000 for those who were censored and $500 for those who were denied the ability to see.
Punitive and compensatory.
And then you say...
Okay, so then authorize a collective payment.
Reconvene the parties within 30 days of final judgments to determine the modalities of repayments.
And that's it.
Le tout avec frais, all with interest, yada, yada, yada.
And that's it.
That's the decision.
Lukas Granozik.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say Lukas Granozik is a young judge.
Let me see if I can find this judge.
That's the decision, people.
I hope everyone...
Well, first of all, I hope we're all still here.
I can't see myself.
Okay.
I hope everyone enjoyed the lesson in French.
Lukas Granozik.
I'm saying this guy's going to be a young judge.
Lukas Granozik, Quebec judge.
Oh, he was appointed in 2014.
No?
Let's see here.
Grano.
The Honorable Lucas Granojic, a lawyer with Norton Rose.
Okay, so let me bring this out here.
Faskin Martineau was the attorneys for the defendant.
Faskin Martineau is a big law firm.
Norton Rose is a very, very well-known, very reputable law firm in Canada, and they do a lot of IP.
So, I mean, that's interesting that the judge with an experience in IP, for anybody who cares, would render that decision.
Bachelor of Science.
He had a Bachelor of Law in 1993.
So he's 15 years older than me.
Okay, so he's not that young.
And it looks like he was appointed, give or take, in 2014.
So he's been on the bench for darn near a decade.
Okay, that's cool.
And that's the decision.
Here's hoping that this judge doesn't suddenly lose his appointment.
No, they're appointed for life in Canada.
So he has to do something very, very bad to be removed from the bench, and oh my goodness, it doesn't ever happen.
So that's the good news coming out of Quebec, I guess.
A little silver lining.
And before we get into the...
I'm going to go to the chat here over on Rumble and see what's going on here.
If anything interesting...
Is there a...
Let's see here.
Stormy Fat Tits seems to be spamming.
Let me see here.
Yeah, that's going to be forever.
Sorry, guys.
I just saw that.
I'm not even double-checking to make sure that that person who was spamming, I have diarrhea, I have diarrhea, is a legit not-spammer.
All right.
That's that.
Now what we're going to do here, we're going to take the party on over to Rumble, and we're going to just cover a few things from...
Oh, my goodness.
Oh my goodness.
You're going to want to come over here.
Link to Rumble.
Link to Rumble.
Bada bing, bada boom.
If anybody wants to skip the line and come straight over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, link to Locals.
And that's it.
Tomorrow, by the way, before we leave off of YouTube, thank you to the sponsor, TWC.
I just gave a step on the website.
It's twc.health forward slash Viva.
Yeah, the promo code.
I forgot to say what the promo code is.
10?
What was it?
Jeez Louise, I forgot to tell you.
It's 10% off and free shipping.
So thank you to the sponsor before we head on over to YouTube.
Tomorrow, speaking of COVID and information and disinformation, Dr. Chris Martinson is coming on at 11. And then we've got a sidebar at 7. So it's going to be a double header and it might be a triple header because I think I might be making my way to the local studio for a bit with Dr. Drew.
Let me just see here that we got...
The confirmation Jeremy Carl is confirmed for 7 o 'clock tomorrow night.
So, 11, 7, and possibly something in between.
With that said, people, if you're not coming over to Rumble, I don't know what you're doing with the rest of the day, but we are ending on YouTube.
Thank the sponsor, link in the pinned comment, and let's take the party on over to the free speech platform, Rumble.
And you will not believe what we're going to start with.
Kathy Hochul, being an overt racist.
If that doesn't induce the...
However many people are left on YouTube to come on over to Rumble.
Nothing will.
Let me go over to the vivabarneslaw.locals.com chat, and we got some tips up in here.
Hold on.
Bill Brown said, I offered Viva tubby testicles when they were removed, but he never got back to me.
Bill, I know that you didn't do that, because if you had, I really would have thought about it.
DTQC says, can I be your assistant teacher for this French lesson?
DTQC, I know, is up in Montreal and is...
French-Canadian.
And we got LilyAmerica1 says, Enjoy your day, everyone.
I have to go to a medical appointment which is causing me severe anxiety.
If you could send prayers and good thoughts my way, I would really appreciate it.
There is energy in the world.
And so everybody out there, put out some positive energy for LilyAmerica.
I will not ask the questions because it's none of my business, but positive vibes out there.
And then we got Craig.
Hold on, look at this.
Allegedly, more people watch video of a fireplace than Don Lemon's livestream.
Although, admittedly, that's a tough act to follow.
And then there's a Zero Hedge article of apparently...
What's his name?
Don Lemon has not been doing all that well.
It's got to be tough.
I mean, it's got to be tough for a guy who's coming from CNN, got fired, has whatever personal controversy, then burns his bridge hard with Elon Musk and Twitter and is now living with the consequences of the poor decisions that he made.
Not in terms of the tough questions.
You can ask tough questions, but in terms of the manner in which he went about burning that bridge with Elon Musk.
All right, let's see.
So we're all good on Rumble.
Rumble is where all the deplorables hang out, says PolishDog989.
All right, people.
You won't believe this.
So this video comes across my feed this morning.
And I'm like, I refuse to believe it's a real video.
It's like, okay, it's out of context.
It's edited.
It's CGI.
AGI?
AI?
Whatever it is.
There was an amazing situation that just occurred where a disgruntled teacher...
I'll pull up the article, actually.
A disgruntled teacher...
Faked the voice of a principal with an AI-generated voice.
AI-generated voice, racist teacher.
Did you guys hear about this?
If you haven't heard about this, it's freaking wild.
Here, Baltimore teacher accused of using AI.
Good, be gone.
Baltimore teacher accused of using AI to create fake racist recording of principal.
Dejean Darien arrested over fake recording of principal complaining about students and faculty members.
This is a true story.
We talked about it on The Unusual Suspects.
You hear the audio and you're like, holy crap, that's indistinguishable.
And where right now it's being used to frame potentially people for racist statements that they didn't make.
Listen to this.
Are we looking at the same thing here?
Oh, we are.
Okay, good.
Listen to this.
We're like one day away from it being used to fake Vladimir Putin saying we're launching nukes and then Joe Biden who can't tell...
You know?
I seriously don't understand why I have to constantly put up with these dumbasses here every day.
Between these ungrateful black kids who can't test their way out of a paper bag or these teachers who don't get it, how hard is it to get these students to meet their grade level expectations?
Lawrence and Ravenel should have never been hired.
And don't let me get started on DJ.
I'm going to drag his black ass out of here one way or another.
I'm going to get something to stick.
It's scary.
I'm just so sick of the inadequacies of these people.
And if I have to get one more complaint from one more Jew in this community, I'm going to join the other side.
Kathy, I'm done.
See, where I knew, where I thought, I got so many jokes that I actually can't make.
Hold on one second.
How do I get out of here?
So that's the audio recording, by the way.
So it can be done.
And we're entering a realm where you just cannot trust anything you hear or even see.
And we're like, we are one bad, dangerous AI video of someone declaring something that they didn't declare before some demented old nincompoop or a war-whore, war-hungry military-industrial complex decides to act on it, even if they don't think it's real, away from World War III.
All right, so I see this video, and I say, holy crap, this has to be fake.
So I have to go find it.
Let me see if I can pull this up here.
A clip came across my neck.
This is it right here.
So this is the homework that I have to do.
I'm looking at this.
I was like, oh, okay.
I got to zoom in on the text behind her.
What does the text say?
Here, Milken Institute.
So I go put in Milken Institute Global Conference 2024.
There's a 17-minute video that Kathy Hochul herself published to her YouTube channel.
I listened to the full 17-minute video and I'm like, holy shit, she actually said it.
Listen to this.
No, no, this is New York.
We'd like to be first with all due respect to people from other states.
It's sort of our attitude.
We'll be the best.
We will be the first.
I'll shut my face.
And I want others to follow because right now we have, you know, young black kids growing up in the Bronx who don't even know what the word computer is.
They don't know.
They don't know these things.
And I want the world to open up to all of them because when you have their...
Diverse voices, innovating solutions through technology, then you're really addressing society's broader challenges.
I've created this governance board, this advisory committee.
Our CEO is Arvind Krishna, who is the CEO of IBM, very well-established legacy industry.
The co-chair is Tameka Barrett, who's the CEO of Girls Who Code.
Why did I do that?
Because I want all those young girls to know that there's a place for them in this emerging technology.
So this is how we make it more equitable.
Make AI equitable for all in the state of New York.
And I want other states to follow that.
That's just the larger framework.
Got it through the legislature.
Can't always do that very easily, but it's a huge commitment.
But that supercomputer is being built, and we're going to get it done.
Let me see.
What was the guy's name?
Girls Who Code.
Establish legacy industry.
The co-chair is Tameka Barrett for this advisory committee.
Our CEO is Arvind Krishna.
Arvind Krishna.
Hold on a second.
I'm just going to give you Arvind...
How would I spell that?
Arvind Krishna.
Okay.
So...
Arvind Krishna.
Let's just...
You know, we don't want to know who we're talking about.
So she's very proud.
She brought on Arvind Krishna.
Okay.
Okay, good for her.
She seems very righteous.
And who else did she have?
Tamika Barrett.
Hold on.
Let's just get Tamika.
Girls Who Code, right?
Tarika Barrett.
Here.
Oh, look at this.
So she's touting her successes.
Do we all understand exactly what the hell she's doing right here?
First of all, let's bring it back to the beginning of that video.
She literally says...
We have black kids who don't know what a computer is?
Don't know what the word computer is?
Hold on.
Let's play this again.
He's the CEO of IBM.
Very well established.
There are two people from other states.
It's sort of our attitude.
We will be the best.
We will be the first.
And I want others to follow.
We will be the best.
We will be the first.
But...
And then she says this about black kids in the Bronx.
Right now we have, you know...
Young black kids growing up in the Bronx who don't even know what the word computer is.
They don't know these things.
They don't know these things.
But I hired an Indian man and a black woman on my team because I am the white savior who looks down on these people that they need to be taken care of by me.
They don't know.
First of all, I'm taking this out now because I'm going to get myself good and enraged.
There is not one kid...
In New York State or in America, I would dare say.
Black, brown, white, and any shade in between.
There's not one freaking kid in America who doesn't know what the word computer means.
Unless they suffer from some sort of mental impairment.
And then in which case, it's got nothing to do with race.
Can you imagine her getting up there and saying...
We're first in New York.
We're first.
It's competitive.
I don't want to put anyone else on.
I don't want to judge anybody else with all due respect.
We're first.
We're the best.
And I think that we have black kids who don't know what the word computer is.
All right.
That's racist.
And the amazing thing is, if you get, like, a Klansman saying something like that about...
The black community.
Well, they would say that you're a racist and that's evidence of your racism.
That you look at the young black men and you look at people who you think don't even know what the word computer means.
You're a racist.
But when you're an uppity, white, rich politician who comes in and says it, well, then it's virtuous and then somehow it's not racist.
I mean, the racist nature of what someone's saying very rarely is going to be Context-driven.
It's going to be very rarely like, oh, if someone says something horribly offensive, it's only racist if he's wearing a white hat when he says it.
And it's not racist when it's just some white politician on stage touting her minority hires while condemning a generation of kids to a stereotype of stupidity to the point where they don't know what the word computer means.
That's how she looks at them and that's how she views them.
Holy hell.
So she said it.
And she's always just been an awful person to me.
And this is just more evidence to that effect.
But I put in Arvind Krishna, so I'm saving one.
And I put in Tarika Barrett.
I'm saving another.
I'm a good savior.
Oh my goodness.
Here's the tweet.
I do wonder if she's going to...
She disabled comments on the video.
I mean, surprise, surprise.
Who would have thought that?
Here we go.
It was the Milken...
The Milken...
Milken...
Institute Global Conference, and then I'll put in Hochul.
She published it.
Oh, it was a Milken member of the Global Fireside.
Hey, they're having a Fireside chat.
It's so organic, and she's saying this to...
Oh, well, that's funny, actually.
Why can't I find it now?
Milken Fireside Hochul 2024.
Yeah, there's no way it came down that quickly.
Here we go.
Here you go.
Presents.
The future of work.
I'm Jonathan Capehart, associate editor at the Washington Post and anchor of MSNBC.
Oh, this is the guy that cried overnight over January 6th.
Oh my goodness.
And comments are turned off.
Of course.
That's the guy that cried for January 6th when he was interviewing that police officer.
I'm trying to get through this without crying.
Anyhow, so Kathy Hochul is an abject, overt racist and it's just terrible.
And it's like the impunity with which she says it.
It's the thoughtlessness with which she says it.
Flags don't go off in your head before saying something so stupid.
It's not even a misphrased sentence.
Nothing's going off in that head except absolute stupidity.
Alrighty then.
Alright people, let's do this here.
We've got the rumble rant.
Finboy Slick says, I use the same terminology to make Viva Mulvaney.
I use the same technology to make Viva Mulvaney.
If you want details on how it works, I'll gladly...
Dude, don't give that information out.
That's terrible.
That's crazy.
You're going to start a war.
King of Biltong.
Good morning from Anton's Meat and Eat.
Free shipping for your Biltong using code Viva on www.biltongusa.com and www.antonusa.com.
If you're a carnivore, keto, or just want some high-protein snacks, try it.
You'll love it.
Biltong...
That's me.
You'll love it.
You will love it.
All right.
And now, people.
In what is left of the day that we're going to have together, let's get some inner-city press and see how the trial is going.
We'll do a real-time tweet review of the live tweeting coming from inner-city press.
They've got Stormy Daniels on the stand today, for those of you who don't know.
Yesterday, they had...
And we'll just go through.
We're going to read these because I don't know what happened today yet.
I haven't been able to keep up.
Okay, here we go.
Let's bring it on.
And let's read through and see where things are.
Hold on.
I'll make sure what's going on in VivaBarnesLaw.
Vocals.com.
Okay, we're hearing some gardening outside.
Okay, let's bring this up here.
Inner City Press.
And we'll go through this.
Oh, I can't imagine.
I don't know what he's doing.
He's not dictating, but he's doing this.
So the day starts.
Listen to...
Listen to what they have to decide.
All rise.
Clerk.
This is the people of the state of New York versus Donald Trump.
Justice Marchand.
Anything we need to discuss.
Trump lawyer.
We are informed that Stormy Daniels is the second witness today.
We oppose any details of sexual acts.
Alleged sexual acts.
Justice Marchand.
Other than just we had sex.
This is what's going on in court.
Prosecutor.
Your Honor, only limited details is to Karen McDougall, not Stormy Daniels.
The details are important.
The sex act, only certain details are unnecessary.
Prosecutor Suzanne Hoffinger.
We'll get into the conversation they had in the hotel and how the sexual act came about, how she felt about it.
We will not get into genitalia.
Trump's lawyer, Neschlis.
There is no need for this.
This is a case about books and records.
Bear in mind, people, whether or not they even had sex is absolutely irrelevant.
There's the allegation that they did, and the allegation that this payment was to pay it off.
They want to get into the sex, how she felt about it.
He didn't last long enough.
His peepee wasn't big enough.
This is disgusting.
This is not just election interference by way of lawfare.
This is character assassination in real time.
These jackasses were making jokes about Trump allegedly farting in the courtroom.
You think they're not going to make jokes about this?
This is out there.
They want this out there, and the judge is going to allow it only so they can try to humiliate Trump in any way that they can.
Oh, then Justice Marchand says, this woman has credibility issues, so details are important.
I will allow them?
That seems like the wrong conclusion.
Now, we're not going to go...
We want to get to Stormy.
We want to go through the first one here.
Oh, Franklin.
Okay, so we're looking down.
Look down until we're going to go to Stormy because we don't really care about the first...
Oh, here we go.
We got Daniels right here.
Oh, this is so beautiful.
This is new to me.
I feel like Charles Manson out of The Family Guy.
If I haven't seen it, it's new to me.
Prosecutor, the people call Stormy Daniels.
Please tell me about your family.
I was born in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Now I live in Florida with my partner.
My parents split up when I was four.
I was sent to a strict Christian school, paid for by my father, raised by my mother.
Hobbies?
Oh yeah, we know what her hobbies might have been.
4-H, Baton Rouge, Ballet, Co., etc.
A friend introduced me to dancing, exotic dancing, when I was in high school.
I was better than my other job.
It was better than my other job.
Shoveling manure.
There might be, you know, like Robert De Niro out of The Bronx Tale.
You might make more money doing something else, but there is something dignified about driving a bus.
Why did you move out?
My mother was neglectful, left me alone.
She wasn't even an addict.
Prosecutor.
Did you do nude modeling?
Yes, you have to have credentials or credits to be the star.
I went on to Pose to go on tour as a featured entertainer.
I was 21. Did you work in the adult film industry?
I work as clothed extra.
We're getting a little...
I mean, this is just interesting.
This is the type of questions I'd ask Stormy Daniels if we did an interview.
How does someone get into porn?
I mean, there's a...
Forget who did the stand-up comic.
I think it's Dennis Leary.
You've got to have a lot of dads missing a lot of dance recitals before you decide to perform sexual acts and make money that way.
Have you been in films and TV?
The 40-year-old virgin of the TV show with Courtney Cox and on a podcast, Beyond the Norm, Female Series, Killers, UFO, yada, yada, yada.
Prosecutor, 2009.
Did you explore running for Senate in Louisiana?
Yes.
There was a draft Stormy campaign.
To oppose David Vitter.
Okay, fine.
Let's take a turn back to Tahoe, 2006.
I was a golf course, Wicked sponsor, a hole-in-one course.
Yes, I'm aware that is funny.
Did you meet Donald Trump?
Oh, so hold on a second.
Did we miss something?
Okay.
He's anti-women.
Okay, fine.
So did you meet Donald Trump?
Yes.
On the course, Wicked's owner introduced me as a director.
Prosecutor, what did you know about Mr. Trump?
This is 2006.
I had seen The Celebrity Apprentice.
I remember his cameos and wrestling.
Big deal in Louisiana.
Then what?
He asked me about my films.
I saw him talk with another gentleman.
Okay.
Did you see Mr. Trump in the courtroom?
Yeah.
Can you identify him?
Yeah, yeah.
There he is in the blue suit.
Take this thumb drive.
People's 226th exhibit.
The golf room photo.
Stormy.
He's in the red hat.
And this photo?
That's him on the golf course.
What did you tell Mr. Trump's bodyguard when he said Mr. Trump would like to take you to dinner?
Daniel said, fuck no.
Did you give Keith Schiller your number?
Yes.
Did you discuss the invitation with anyone?
My media guy, Mike, I was supposed to go to the wicked dinner.
I wanted to avoid it, catfight and stuff.
He told me you should go.
It'll make a great story.
What could possibly go wrong?
Ha ha ha.
Story down is I texted with Keith and arranged to go to the Trump's hotel, Harrah's, and next Keith told me to go up to the penthouse.
Keith was at the door.
He said, you look nice.
What were your expectations?
Dinner.
I'm not sure how much of this I believe, but whatever.
What was he wearing?
Silk pajamas.
I asked him, did you steal Hugh Hefner's pajamas?
And he told me to change.
He did.
And he told me to change.
He did.
He came back in dress shirt and pants.
This hotel room was three times the size of my apartment.
What did you discuss?
I told him where I grew up.
Do I have siblings?
I do not.
Did I have a boyfriend?
No, at the time.
Did you tell him about your hard childhood?
Yes, objection stricken.
Did you tell him about your hard childhood?
Yes, objection.
Stricken.
Interesting.
Okay, sustained.
Finally an objection from the defense that gets maintained.
Stormy Daniels, so he asked about your adult film industry, whether you have unions, get residuals, usually people asking about sexy stuff.
Did he ask you if you'd been tested?
Yes, Wicked is a condom mandatory company.
I'm allergic to latex.
I asked him about wrestling because he knew Vince McMahon and he had a cameo, yada yada.
Ms. Daniels, could you slow down?
Okay.
We were supposed to get his head shaved if he lost, and I told him he wouldn't look good yet.
Okay, fine.
He said, don't worry, it's all scripted.
Did you ask about Melania?
I did.
He said, don't worry, we don't even sleep in the same room.
He kept cutting me off.
He'd ask a question, then not let me finish.
I told him, you're rude.
Weird.
I ended up spanking him.
I'm sorry.
This just got intense real quickly.
I ended up spanking him, and after that, he acted much better.
Is this a fucking joke?
I mean, this just went into the realm of E. Jean Carroll hallucination.
We're talking.
He said he's rude, and I spanked him.
He said I should be in The Apprentice.
I told him, everyone doesn't have much power.
You remind me of my daughter.
Blonde, beautiful to me.
It made sense.
Prosecutor, what did he say about The Apprentice, Stormy Daniels, that he could tell me?
The challenge.
He couldn't let me win, but at least not lose right at the beginning.
I wanted to direct some non-adult films.
They have big budgets and better catering.
Oh my goodness.
Did you call another friend?
Stormy Daniels?
Yes, a neighbor, Alana.
I had run into her and knew that she wouldn't believe where I was.
I called her and put her on speaker.
He said hello.
Why don't you come over and hang out with us?
She didn't call back.
Are they going to call her?
I'm curious to know if that story is corroborated.
Prosecutor, at some point, did you use the restroom?
Justice Marshall, let's take a break.
Okay, fine.
Typing fast if you'd like, you can support.
Matthew Russell Lee, PayPal, Venmo, all the rest.
They're back.
Prosecutor, did you need to use the bathroom?
Yes, I was instructed by Mr. Trump to go through the bedroom to the facilities.
It was a leather-looking toiletry bag on the counter.
What was in it?
I looked.
Old Spice.
Stormy Daniels, gold tweezers.
Gold tweezers are extra, extra fine.
Extra accurate.
When I came out, Mr. Trump was on the bed in his boxer shorts.
I was startled.
I was spanking him earlier, and now I'm startled that he's in his underwear.
I felt like the run spun in slow motion.
I don't know what that means.
Like, if you stand up too fast.
Oh, the room spun.
Okay.
I thought, oh my god, what did I misread to get here?
He was posing on the bed.
You just spanked him, allegedly.
Stormy?
Was that not part of the foreplay if you indeed alleged that you had an intercourse?
I spanked him on the butt, and then his pants were off?
I was shocked!
Okay, Dan, he stood up, not in a threatening manner.
He said, if you ever want to get out of that trailer park, objection, Merchant, sustained.
Move on.
What next?
I felt drugged.
Objection.
Overruled?
Sidebar?
At the defense table, Trump speaks with Bove, who again moves to far seat when Blanche returns.
Merchant, the objection is sustained.
You are not drugged, right?
There was a power imbalance.
Holy shit, is that dirty?
I would expect nothing less from a porn star possibly.
There was a power imbalance.
I'm sorry, yeah, that's not typically what people mean when they say, I felt drugged.
What they mean when I felt drugged is, he drugged me.
I felt drugged by the power exchange imbalance.
Did you have sex with him on the bed?
Missionary.
Objection sustained.
I was staring at the ceiling, wishing I was somewhere else.
Merchant sustained, I guess it was an objection.
Was he wearing a condom?
No.
He said, that was great.
We should get together again soon, honeybunch.
What did you say?
Nothing.
He didn't even give me a call.
He didn't even give me his cell number.
Did he express concern about his wife finding out?
No.
Did you tell people?
Very few.
I am ashamed I hadn't stopped it.
I didn't want people I was dating to find out.
Did you later remember some things?
Yes, in the book.
Objection?
Sustained?
Approach?
I remembered things later.
Did you see him again in Lake Tahoe?
Yes.
In a nightclub there, Keith had called me and said that Mr. Trump would be there.
It would be in public.
So I went.
I don't know what to believe.
Holy cow.
It does sound dirty.
It doesn't sound like something I would think Trump would do.
Oh my goodness.
I spanked him.
Came back.
He's in his underwear.
I felt weird.
I felt drugged based on the power imbalance.
I was wishing I was somewhere else.
I didn't want people finding out I had sex on the first date, although I'm a porn actress who has sex for a living.
Okay.
Did you tell anyone else?
Another Keith, my photographer.
Would Mr. Trump then call you?
Yes.
I would put him on speaker.
People heard him.
Did he know he was on speakerphone?
No.
Why did you continue to take his calls?
My publicist bragged.
My publicist was saying, I told you so.
Please just answer the questions.
Daniel says, I wanted to be on The Apprentice.
Prosecutor, did Mr. Trump give you the number of his assistant?
Yes, Rona.
I put her on.
Now former Stormy contact is shown.
Okay, that's her number.
Fine.
This is fun.
Hold on a second.
What is this Jerry Springer saying in the rumble chat?
Prosecutor, did you go to launch?
Did you go to the launch of Mr. Trump's vodka?
He's got vodka?
Stormy Daniels, yes, he introduced me to Karen McDougal.
Then he spent most of the time talking to my friend.
We lied.
We were flying out of LAX on a girls' trip.
Did you go to Trump Tower?
Yes.
I was dancing in a club, so I invited him.
It was a public place, so I felt safer.
Oh my goodness, objection sustained.
Okay.
And someone coached her.
It's so freaking obvious that she's been coached.
Because remember, it went from her denying that the relationships ever occurred to...
Potentially dishonestly saying they did occur, and now to framing it as they were quasi-nonconsensual.
And you tell me that she wasn't prepped by the same lawyers, probably, who prepped E. Jean Carroll?
I don't know that that's the case.
It's probably not the case, but prepped for a narrative of poor little victim.
Okay, we went to Trump Tower.
He said he was still working on getting me on The Apprentice.
He introduced me around.
Fine.
Did you see Mr. Trump in L.A.?
Yes, he invited me to his bungalow.
By then, my publicist was my boyfriend.
He drove me and waited outside.
That was common.
Mr. Trump was watching TV, a documentary about sharks.
He kept making sexual advances.
He touched my leg.
How did you respond?
Says the prosecutor.
I told him I was on my period.
Then there was no progress on getting on The Apprentice.
I stopped answering his calls, but he told me Jenna Jameson would be on.
I think Jenna Jameson is a...
Is she a porno actress or just an actress?
Hold on a second.
Jenna Jameson.
Yeah, she's a porno actress.
Okay, so now I gotta go clear up my frickin' search Google results.
Oh, God.
Okay, where am I?
Jenna Jameson is a porno actress, for those of you who didn't know.
Alright, did you move on?
How was your life, Daniels?
An awesome move to Texas.
Became a ranked equestrian.
Objection?
I'll allow it.
Who cares?
Let her...
Okay, never mind.
I can't make these jokes.
It's not my genre, but there's jokes about riding large animals in there.
I'll allow it.
Did you agree to be interviewed by InTouch?
Yes, someone had told, had sold my story.
Daniel says, Gina Rodriguez told me to take control and $15,000.
How long was the interview?
15, 20 minutes on the phone.
They never ran the story.
Did you know why?
No.
Judge, may we approach, says the prosecutor.
Yes.
Sidebar.
Speaking of sidebars, there's one tomorrow night at 7 o 'clock.
Did you have an encounter in a parking lot in Las Vegas?
That's a leading question.
But Stormy Daniels, a man approached me and told me to keep telling my story and told me not to keep telling my story about Trump.
Did you tell your partner he was having mental issues?
What the hell?
These are non-sequiturs.
Prosecutor, did you become aware your story was on thedirty.com?
Yes, I don't read that.
Oh, son of a gun.
Yes, I don't read that site.
It was taken down.
I'd been threatened.
What did Gina say?
Daniel says she asked if she could get Keith Davidson to take it down.
Keith Davidson is the questionable lawyer involved in all of this, represented McDougal, and I think he also had a very pivotal role to play in the attempted extortion of Hulk Hogan, according to Roger Stone, if I'm not mistaken, that Keith Davidson was the lawyer who tried to extort Hulk Hogan with the sex tape for the gawker, and we all know how that ended.
I saw that from a tweet from Roger Stone the other day.
I didn't know that, but I'm still new to this game.
Did Keith Davidson succeed?
Yes, it came down.
In 2015, once Trump was running for president, were you ever told you could sell your story for more?
Daniel says, yes, I was advised by a lawyer to have a press conference.
Prosecutor, do you remember the Access Hollywood tape coming out?
What's this relevant about?
Yes, Gina told me about it.
I wanted to get the story out because of the threat.
Did you find that Donald Trump and Michael Cohen wanted to buy your story?
Yes.
Daniel says, it would be good.
My husband wouldn't find out, but I'd have paperwork.
I didn't care about the $130,000.
The amount didn't matter to me.
We no longer lived in California, which is very expensive.
Prosecutor, were we presented an agreement?
Answer says, yes.
What is this?
Stormy Daniels says, Keith Davidson's email to Michael Cohen.
I wanted it done before the nomination.
Do you mean the election?
Yes, the election.
This was the side letter.
I was Peggy, and he was David Dennison.
Interesting.
I didn't hear about this.
Prosecutor, what is this list?
Stormy says, people who knew.
One is Keith, not Davidson.
Justice Michonne will break in two, yada yada.
Now, I think that might be where we're at.
We'll break to two, and that is where we're at.
Okay.
Very cool.
I'm going to share everybody's link with Inner City Press.
And so now we're caught up.
On the day, what did we learn?
I'm not sure that we learned very much, people.
Here.
Link to Inner City Press.
Lady on the right says, thank you, Viva, for working so hard for us.
Stop it.
Oh, yep.
No, no.
Look, I would be doing it one way or the other.
This way, I just get to make entertainment out of it.
It's fantastic.
All right, so we're caught up on the day with Stormy Daniels.
What did we learn?
She alleges that they had sex.
She alleges that she remained in contact with him for an extended period of time afterwards.
She alleges that she sold her story and that...
It wasn't about the money.
That's very bizarre.
$130,000?
Bullcrap.
That's going to mean something to everybody.
What could her net worth possibly be?
What's her name?
Stormy Daniels.
I don't trust these net worth things, but let's just see if...
I would be shocked if it's...
Yeah, she doesn't have...
It's not $50 million, so one website says $1 million.
But I would be shocked if she had a meaningful net worth, and I don't mean that judgmentally.
I mean that as in...
$130,000 is a lot of money to pretty much anybody.
For her to say it wasn't about the money, what was it about?
About getting...
She was selling her story.
It wasn't about the money, it was about getting her truth out?
Okay, I'm not sure where it's going from that.
But let's see, that's it.
So that's story, Daniels, thus far.
Of note, Hope Hicks did nothing for the prosecution, in fact, undermined the prosecution and destroyed, eviscerated Michael Cohen, who was not even on the stand.
Yesterday, Makani...
As far as I can tell, and maybe I'm off on my analysis, did nothing for the prosecution, and in fact only undermined the prosecution.
Trump never asked us or instructed us to do anything with this payment.
It was always for a legal retainer agreement with Michael Cohen.
Monthly payments for his legal services grossed up because Michael Cohen didn't want to be netted down based on taxes that he'd have to pay, and that was it.
And now we've got Stormy Daniels talking her story out.
She allegedly had sex with Donald Trump, was paid for the...
You know, that story not to be published.
Catch and kill, end of story.
Even if it happened, by the way, not a crime.
And then the question is going to be, what is the defense going to make?
Are they going to destroy her on cross-examination on that letter that she signed, which we've all seen?
Confirming that they did not have a relationship on five separate occasions spanning 15 years and that she confirmed that they didn't have a relationship, not because she was paid for it and not because it was an NDA, but because it never happened.
There was no sexual relationship.
Bada bing, bada boom.
And that's that.
Okay.
Let's see what's going on in the chat here.
Where is the letter she wrote that no affair occurred?
It says Nicoletta Turnbearer.
Hold on a second.
I know I tweeted it.
Let's go with Google.
Viva Fry Stormy Letter Tweets.
I know that I tweeted at least a couple of times.
Someone else.
Stormy Daniels.
Confirmation no affair.
My goodness.
It's interesting how it can become so hard.
To find something that you know exists.
This is terrible.
Hold on.
If anyone in Locals can get it, Stormy Daniels letter.
Images.
I mean, Trump tweeted it.
Here we go.
This is it right here.
Bada bing, bada boom on X. Who's posting it today?
Here we go.
Okay.
Let's bring this up.
This looks like it might be someone also tweeting this trial.
Okay, there we go.
This is it.
January.
So this is an old...
Wow, this tweet's five years old.
New Stormy Daniels to Jimmy Kimmel.
Jimmy Kimmel, did you sign this letter that was released today?
Stormy Daniels, doesn't look like my signature, does it?
Jimmy Kimmel, do you know where it came from?
Do you have any idea?
Stormy Daniels, I do not.
Oh, wow.
You know what I'm going to do right now?
So she lied about her signature.
She lied about the letter.
Now she's admitting that she signed the letter, but she's alleging that she signed it because of the NDA.
This is what the letter says.
Official statement of Stormy Downs.
Very official, by the way.
You need a little hologram.
I was going to make a porn joke there.
January 30, 2018.
To whom it may concern, over the past few weeks, I've been asked countless times to comment on reports of an alleged sexual relationship I had with Donald Trump many, many, many years ago.
The fact of the matter is that...
Each party to this alleged affair denied its existence in 2006.
Once.
2011.
Twice.
2016.
Three times.
2017.
Four times.
2018.
Five frickin' times.
I am not denying this affair because I was paid, quote, hush money, end quote, as has been reported in overseas-owned tabloids.
I am denying this affair because it never happened.
I will have no further comments on the matter.
Please feel free to check out my Instagram, at thestormydaniels.
I will not be checking out your Instagram, Stormy, out of safety.
An abundance of caution.
But what I am going to do, actually, right now...
Hold on a second.
Stormy Daniels.
Anyways, that's what's going on in the trial.
So we know the latest.
Gauvet is going to cover the day afterwards.
And we'll see what happens this afternoon.
All right, people.
Let me see.
I think I've covered everything that we had on the day.
I think Trump probably banged her.
But who cares?
Nothing was criminal, says Sergeant Hayes one.
Dude, maybe everyone is not as much of a germaphobe as me, but unprotected sex with a porn actress, when you know that it could take six months to a matter of years for symptoms of HIV to show up.
I mean, I appreciate that they get tested, or they say they get tested.
And that's HIV!
Unprotected sex with a porn actress who could have...
Herpes.
And this is not like a woman thing.
This is like a human thing.
Herpes, warts, gonorrhea, syphilis.
I mean, there's so many things that are so...
Oh, but they sure mean that they're clean.
Oh, God.
Oh, God, it makes me want to vomit.
I'm with you, Viva, says UltraChase513.
Oh, look, I won't...
It's not always a fun thing to be what some people might say clinically OCD or neurotic, but like, holy hell.
Oh, never mind.
I'll save that anecdote for when I'm on Joe Rogan.
If I'm ever on Joe Rogan.
All that to say, though, by the way, I grew up in the 80s.
I got nervous about sitting on toilet seats in public places.
Okay.
Stormy has a doctor on retainer, says Dackley.
Big freaking deal.
She has norovirus, says Paolo Grande.
Trump is a germaphobe.
He would never.
And not just that.
Anyhow, it doesn't matter.
Who knows?
And it's like...
I have no doubt that it's so effing stupid what this is is a smear campaign.
It's election interference in terms of strategy and it's character assassinations in terms of tactics.
That's what it is.
All right, peeps.
We're going to go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Stay tuned.
So tomorrow, Chris Martinson at 11. Jeremy Carl.
Not Jeremy Carl.
Oh, jeez.
Hold on.
It's not Jeremy Carl because that's Sargon of Akkad.
It is Jeremy Karl.
Well, there it is.
Jeremy Karl.
I'm getting confused.
Seven o 'clock tomorrow night, and I might be at the local studio with Dr. Drew in between.
We'll see how it works.
But come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
We're going to have our after party, and we'll see where it goes.
Rumble, thank you.
If you're not coming, hold on.
I'll give you the link one more time.
What else is there?
I'm schvitzing like a pig.
The AC does not seem to be working in the house.
Yeah, it's Carl Benjamin, not Jeremy Carl.
Thank you very much, UltraJase.
Link to locals.
Boom!
Eating vajayjay with norovirus gives you throat cancer.
Wasn't that Martin Sheen's Ultimate Flex or Kirk Douglas?
One of those had the Ultimate Flex.
I got throat cancer from too much oral sex on women.
That's what the children call a humble flex.
No, Trump is no angel, but he would not go that low.
I think it was between Cohen and Michael Avenatti was doing it.
Well, so Avenatti, by the way, got an apology from OAN.
This will be the last one, and then we're going to go.
Listen to this.
OAN retraction.
Cohen.
Twitter.
The Washie.
Well, yeah, here we go.
Take it from the Washie.
No, I want to get it on.
I want to get the tweet.
I don't want to see this.
The OAN had to retract a story.
That Michael Cohen had an affair with Stormy Daniels.
Listen to this.
I mean, Michael Cohen was putting it on blast and thinks it's the ultimate vindication that the convicted perjurer didn't have an affair with the porn star.
I don't know who this person is, but I just got it.
Today, OAN announced it's retracting a false story about my client, Michael Cohen.
Oh, I guess that's...
Michael Cohen's lawyer?
This is a total vindication for Mr. Cohen.
That, except for the fact that he's a convicted perjurer and stated as much, confirmed as much by Arthur Engeron.
And a warning, Mr. Cohen is telling the truth.
He's identified and labeled as a convicted perjurer by Judge Arthur Engeron.
And there will be legal consequences for those who lied about him.
See our full statement.
Oh, that's your full statement.
OAN agrees to legal settlement, retracts false article by Michael Cohen.
Today, One America News.
Publicly retracted a false article that OAN published about Michael Cohen, Donald Trump's former personal counsel.
The retraction came after OAN article falsely claimed Cohen was having an affair with an adult film actress, Stormy Daniels, and that Mr. Cohen was trying to extort Mr. Trump.
In its retraction, OAN said these statements were false.
It regrets the publication.
The retraction also says that in addition to Mr. Cohen, Michael Avenatti, Mrs. Daniels, former lawyer and OAN's ultimate source, also denied the truth of the statement, as did Mrs. Daniels.
Mr. Cohen was represented in this defamation matter by lead counsel Justin Nelson and Sussman.
Sussman Godfrey, LLP, who was retained after publication of the article.
Co-counsel is E. Dania Perry, her, of Perry Law PLLC, who separately represents Mr. Cohen in other matters.
Mr. Nelson commented on the retraction and settlement.
Today's retraction by OAN represents a victory for accountability.
The retraction is not about money.
It's about protecting the truth.
Ms. Perry also reacted to the retraction and settlement.
This result is a vindication from Michael Cohen.
He has faced severe consequences for telling the truth.
With this action, he has made clear that those who slander him will face their own consequences.
Do I need to pull up the decision from Arthur Angoran?
Let me see here.
Arthur Angoran, convicted perjurer.
Michael Cohen.
It's so...
He's telling the truth despite Arthur Angron having said he's a convicted perjurer in his decision.
All right, peeps.
Rumble.
Let's do it.
We're going to go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
If you're not coming, I will see you tomorrow and I'll see you on the interwebs, peeps.
Ending live stream now.
Thank you all for being here, locals.
Here it comes.
All right, locals, what's up?
Oh, my butt.
My butt and my leg muscles hurt.
Let's go up here.
I'm going to refresh and see if I've missed anything.
▲
Export Selection