Trump in Contempt - AGAIN! NY Senator Sued Under His Own Law! AND MORE! Viva Frei Live
|
Time
Text
Okay, there's a turtle right there on the path.
And I think it might be nesting.
Check this out.
Check this out.
Oh, it's definitely...
Let's see if I can get in there.
Maybe it's just taking a poop.
Oh my goodness.
Oh my goodness.
Oh my.
Did you just see that?
Yes.
Oh.
Yes, people.
Okay.
What we are witnessing is nature.
Let me just make sure that we are live across all platforms.
We just saw that together.
That was unexpected.
Oh my.
How many more?
Okay, we're gonna leave it now, but how many more does it have?
That was so cool.
That was so cool.
Now his mouth is open, he's like, yep, door into it.
He's getting ready to do it again.
Breathe, man, breathe.
In through the nose, out through the mouth.
And then you go.
We are definitely live across all platforms.
Apparently it can have anywhere between 2 and 30 because the internet gives very broad answers.
We're going to start off with nature and not stuff that makes us puke.
It dug a hole.
It's actually wild.
Okay, okay.
One more.
It's a red-eared turtle.
You know, some people might come across it and say, hey, I better help nature.
I'll put her back in the pond while she's laying her eggs.
Look at this.
Look at this.
Okay, watch this and we're going to stop.
Look at the glop coming up.
Oh my goodness.
She's pushing the glop that just came out of her vajayjay down into the hole.
And there's going to be one more egg coming up.
It's like, I keep telling my kids, if you leave the house, things happen.
Good things happen.
There you go.
Look at this.
Shaking that booty.
Look at this.
Look at this.
Oh my.
Goodness, people.
Unreal.
Okay.
And then she kicks it down and puts it down in the hole.
Look at that.
Bam.
All right.
I went back.
I biked back this afternoon to see if the turtle was still there.
I knew the turtle wasn't going to be there.
But that's amazing.
That's amazing.
Damn nature.
Yesterday, we have an alligator trying to catch our bowfin.
Today, we go to this...
Park, you know, in the area to go jogging and see a freaking turtle doing her turtle business.
It's amazing.
Whether or not it's placenta, my theory, my operating theory is that it might be something intended to keep the eggs hydrated or moist.
Moist, to quote Justin Trudeau.
Let me just see something here.
Hold on, I was just about to check something out in the...
Ah, forget it.
Good afternoon, everybody.
This is another thing.
Like, you know, I'm just sitting around.
I did a vlog earlier today.
I'm going to play some of that.
We're going to talk about it today.
I'm like, oh, maybe we don't do a live stream today.
I mean, what could have happened between last night and this afternoon?
Answer, everything.
For those of you who don't know me, Viva Frye, David Frye, former Montreal litigator, turned current Florida rumbler.
Live streams, short vlogs, office vlogs, talking about what's going on in the world.
It can make sense, but it can't.
It doesn't because the world's gone bad.
Oh, that's what I was going to do.
Check that I'm using the right mic.
Because if you can't hear...
Hold on one second.
Let me see here.
Settings.
Oh, yeah.
Microphone.
This is the one right here.
Nice.
We're on the right mic.
We're on everything.
The internet, for some reason, is giving me a little bit of issues lately.
So hopefully it's good.
Viva needs a haircut?
Nope, nope, nope.
I don't think so anytime soon.
By the way, we're having our Rumble Freedoms of Speech panel on May the 10th in Toronto.
I don't exactly know where the event is, but I'm sure if you go to the interwebs and look it up, you'll find it.
Speakers that are going to be there.
Don Trump Jr., Kimberly Guilfoyle, Ezra Levant.
Sheila Gunn-Reed, David Menzies, Glenn Greenwald, myself, and there's one more in there that I think I might be forgetting.
It's going to be phenomenal.
That's what I got on the week.
Wednesday, Dr. Chris Martinson during the day, and we've got a sidebar in the afternoon.
And that's it.
Now you know everything.
We're going to end on YouTube after we do the first segment, which is a vlog that I already did today about this New York State senator who's...
What is it called?
Turnabout?
Turnabout?
Or just outright hypocrisy?
This New York senator is now getting a taste of his own unconstitutional, politically motivated legislation.
We'll get there in a second, and then we're going to talk about the Trump...
Contempt ruling today from the totally not corrupt Judge Juan Marchand, whose daughter is totally not raking in millions of dollars off this prosecution, who's not representing Adam Schiff, who's also receiving tens of millions of dollars in donations from this very prosecution from Judge Juan Marchand.
He issued another contempt ruling today.
And to quote Adam Sandler from They're All Gonna Laugh at You and Goat Boy, it will blow your freaking mind.
It's just...
I mean, it's...
It would be comical if it were funny.
It's tragic.
It's corrupt to the core.
We'll get there.
And I'm going to try.
I'm not going to do it as well as Robert Gouveia, nor am I going to do it for as long as Robert Gouveia, because Robert Gouveia watching The Watchers, he's going live at 6 o 'clock, and he's going to go over the tweet stuff of the day, but I'm going to talk about it and run through some highlights from Inner City Press.
So that's what's going on.
Let me see something here.
We're on Rumble.
Whatever.
Everybody should...
Either become a member, which is not necessarily supportive.
You don't have to pay money to become a member at vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Viva Barnes Law.
But you could be a member and no financial commitment whatsoever, just an email address to be part of a 120,000 member community at Viva Barnes.
And if you want to support, that would be the ultimate flattery.
That would be the ultimate honor.
You get tons of exclusive content and all the good stuff.
So that's where we're at.
And I keep forgetting to, you know, talk about merch.
But if you want merch...
Hold on.
We got merch at vivafry.com.
This was our bestest.
But we've got the, you know, shirts.
All the other stuff.
Yada yada.
Okay.
Link to Viva Barnes Law.
Maureen is here.
Boom.
Bada bing.
Now the link to Rumble should be in the pinned comment.
But it's not.
Because I forgot to do it.
And link to Rumble here.
Bam.
Bada-bing.
And I'm going to go here.
No, no, no, no, no.
Like this.
And pin.
There we go.
All right.
Let's talk about the news of the day.
First of all, I'll play a few minutes, not even, two minutes from my vlog of the day because it's fantastic.
No.
Yes, I will.
I will.
Just a couple minutes if I can find it.
Karma is a biatch.
Just listen to this.
So, Kevin Parker, New York State Senator, a Democrat, is a raging hypocrite, a double standard, rules for thee, but not for me.
Who the fuck?
Sing it, brother.
Viva Frye, former Montreal litigator.
You already got all that.
I put up the vlog earlier today.
It's on Rumble, it's on YouTube, and it's on Twitter.
If you haven't heard the news, this guy, there's a New York Senator.
His name is Kevin Parker.
He was one of the senators who voted for the Adult Survivors Act, ASA, the Adult Survivors Act, which was a piece of legislation spearheaded by Hochul, Kathy Hochul, who, if you haven't, if you've forgotten, Hochul might be among the most anti-Trump governors, anti-Trump politicians out there.
This is a woman, Kathy Hochul, who...
She reveled in Trump being removed from the ballot in Colorado.
You know, praised the states for their attempts to remove him from the ballot.
Said that even though he was removed from the ballot and reinstated by virtue of a 9-0 ass spanking by the Supreme Court, she still, you know, congratulated the states for doing what they thought was within their constitutional powers to deny half of the country of their vote.
To disenfranchise half of the country.
The party that talks about...
It being racist to insist on voter ID because it disenfranchises African Americans as if they think that African Americans are somehow incapable of getting voter IDs or IDs, period.
The same party that rails against the Republicans for voter disenfranchisement tried to disenfranchise half of the country of their vote.
Okay, notwithstanding all of that, Kathy Hochul, the woman who, I don't know, she spearheaded this litigation, but she was certainly proud of it when it passed.
The Adult Survivors Act, the man, Kevin Parker, who voted in support of it, who praised it because it was amazing, he's now being sued under it.
Now, for those of you who don't remember what the Adult Survivor Act is, it was a piece of legislation that offered a one-year window of opportunity to file civil claims for what would otherwise be statutorily barred claims of sexual abuse or improper touching, all that stuff.
Because there's a statute of limitations beyond which you can't sue for certain things.
This offered a one-year window because sometimes there's pressure, there's fear, there's coercion, there's shame.
That makes it so that people don't file claims for sexual abuse and their time had lapsed.
And so this legislation was drafted and passed to allow people to have a one-year window of opportunity to file a claim that would have otherwise been statutorily barred.
Crazed is, you know, availing victims of sexual abuse of their rights to remedy.
And I remember, it's so wild because I remember watching the interviews at the time and they're like, this doesn't change the substance of the law.
They're still going to have to prove their claims.
It just opens a window for them to make their claims if they didn't make them in 25 plus years.
E.G. and Carol, I'm looking at you.
It doesn't change the burden of evidence.
It doesn't change what needs to be proven in order to succeed on your claim.
It just opens the door.
As if some things don't become patently impossible to prove after two and a half plus three decades at times.
So this guy, Kevin Parker, passed the legislation.
Looking at my dog because I think I smell something bad here.
He passed the legislation.
He voted for the legislation.
He took pride in the legislation.
Now he's being sued under the legislation by a woman who says that damn near 20 years ago, he raped her.
And we'll go over that lawsuit in a second.
And now he's saying it's unconstitutional.
Listen to this.
This is from Breitbart, but it was reported in the New York Post.
I'm trying to find the actual quote of him saying it's unconstitutional because thus far all I can find is the New York Post saying he said it's unconstitutional.
But the only quotes that they have from him are him saying, I'm still going to continue with my activism.
Democrat New York State Senator fights law permitting rape lawsuit against him.
After he voted for it.
That's an unclear title, Breitbart.
You might want to fix that.
New York State Senator Kevin Parker, Democrat from Brooklyn, who stands accused of raping a woman in 2004, claimed in court documents that the law supporting the lawsuit against him in the case was unconstitutional, despite the fact that he voted for it.
I'm going to put on pause here.
I'm going to put a pin in it.
And those of you who have been around the channel for long enough are going to know where I'm going with this right now.
Because it needs to be told, it needs to be repeated, and it needs to be documented so that nobody can say, This never happened.
You will all recall in 2020 when people were saying that was a fraudulent election.
The election was stolen.
And they were saying, shut your filthy mouths.
You're getting demonetized.
You're getting deplatformed.
You cannot attack the legitimacy of elections.
It was the most secure election in the world.
And if you think that hundreds of thousands of confined voters in Wisconsin voting by mail is a problem, well, you should have had a hand in changing the laws or opposing the laws that were being changed beforehand.
If you think that there was a problem with the signature verification in Georgia, well, you should have cried a little harder at the time because we never did that signature verification.
And if you say anything bad about that election, we will deplatform you, we will demonetize you, and we will demonize you.
Okay.
They then went out to put out an article explaining exactly how they stole the election, but they don't call it stealing, you see.
They called it fortifying.
Now, this is repetitive for many of you, but it needs to be done here and documented in real time.
Again.
Time article.
Get the F out of here.
Sorry.
Time article magazine, 2020.
A 35-minute read.
Hells to the bells?
No.
Molly Ball.
Hold on.
Molly Ball.
February 4th, 2021.
Let me just check something.
I'm fairly certain that Molly Ball has blocked me on Twitter.
Hold on one second.
Let me just see something here.
I'm going to do this in real time.
Just go ahead and read that title.
Molly Ball.
Journalists.
Wall Street.
No, she hasn't blocked me.
Okay, fine.
Good.
Maybe I'll reach out to her.
This is the article.
Molly Ball bragging about it.
A weird thing happened.
I'm not going to go over this.
There's only one passage.
You know which one I want.
It has a very contentious word in it.
Kabal.
Here, let's go here.
That's why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream, a well-funded cabal of powerful people ranging across industries and ideologies working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.
They were not rigging the election.
No, no, no.
I know, it sounds like they were, you dumbass.
You lowly pleb.
That's not rigging.
They were fortifying the election.
That's rigging, you MFing liars.
No, they weren't rigging the election.
They were just changing the rules to fortify it in their favor.
And they believe the public needs it.
All right.
So they admitted how they rigged and fortified the 2020 election by changing the rules and laws.
You go back to the Adult Survivor Act and you appreciate what they did.
They literally, I'll say it funny, they literally changed the law so that a batshit crazy geriatric lunatic could file a claim against Donald Trump.
The day it all started, you know, she's a Thanksgiving man.
She just came in there and said, thanks.
Here's your Thanksgiving turkey, Trump.
I'm suing you for alleged sexual abuse that allegedly occurred 30 years ago.
There's no evidence of it whatsoever.
My story makes absolutely no sense.
I'm a crazy woman to begin with.
A cat named Vagina T Fireball.
They say rape is sexy.
Bat shit crazy.
They changed the law so that this useful tool...
Through her politically motivated attorney, I forget her name, could sue Trump, get the politically prejudiced jury to find him liable of sexual abuse?
But that didn't go far enough.
Because the jury only found him liable for sexual abuse because something went in her and she didn't know what it was because it's 30 years ago.
How's anyone supposed to remember?
The jury did not find Trump liable for rape, but sexual abuse, because something went...
We don't believe her that he penetrated her with a pee-pee.
We think he might have put a little fifi in there, a finger.
Because that wasn't enough, under this law, that they literally created so that this bat-shit crazy lady could go after Trump.
They didn't get what they wanted, so they had that corrupt Judge Kaplan, in one of his rulings, say, yeah, well, you know...
It wasn't rape under the law, but colloquially speaking, it qualifies as rape.
So it's technically correct when people say that Trump raped E. Jean Carroll.
They didn't get what they wanted out of the law that they changed specifically to prosecute Trump.
So they had a corrupt judge on the bench basically change the jury finding, which specifically said, no, he did not rape her.
And he says, yeah, but they're doing it again.
And appreciate that they're doing it again.
They changed the laws for this particular lawsuit.
They are now weaponizing every aspect of the legal system to go after Trump.
We're going to get there in the contempt ruling.
So appreciate it.
It's like Alex Jones said when he was on the channel.
It's the same play over and over again.
And what's truly amazing is that it works because the collective memory apparently is not even four years and people don't remember what they admitted to having done in 2020.
Okay.
The New York Post.
On Sunday, cited recently filed court records where Parker denied the allegations leveled against him in the rape case, noting his claim that the Adult Survivors Act was unconstitutional.
Oh, well, it was constitutional for Trump when Hochul came out and said, we're happy with this law.
Constitutional for Trump, unconstitutional for me.
The act was modeled after the New York Child's Victims Act, which resulted in more than 9,000 lawsuits being filed in May of 2022.
According to the Post, quote, the now-expired act permitted victims to file civil lawsuits against their accused attackers within a certain window, even if the state's statute of limitations had run out on their claims.
And then we get into the claims.
Parker's accused.
In 2004, a woman says Olga Jean Baptiste claimed he raped her inside her apartment after they discussed relief efforts for Haiti that had endured flooding.
Per Breitbart News.
The claim was submitted just before time ran out.
The Post article said he added he boasted of supporting the law while denying the allegations.
He boasted of supporting the law while denying the allegations against him while claiming that the law itself was unconstitutional.
It's wild.
You know what that's called?
Sucking and blowing.
It's called flip-flopping.
It's called, what's the other expression for what that is?
Oh.
Let me see here.
In 2018, Parker, who was sponsoring a bill that would require potential gun owners to submit to social media background checks, told a Republican aide online to kill herself after she accused him of misusing a parking placard, according to Breitbart News.
Yeah, apparently this guy's not a particularly likable character.
And apparently he also was charged with punching a parking ticket-issuing guy in the face in 2000, I want to say, 8 or something a long time ago.
Punching him in the face for issuing him a $55 ticket.
So not an unsavory character, but now feeling the brunt of their weaponizing of the legal system.
They thought it would never come back to haunt them.
Wild.
But now, just because we're going to do it anyhow.
I pulled up the lawsuit.
No, that's Judge Engel.
Not Engel.
Here we go.
Here's the lawsuit.
We'll go through it very briefly.
Because this is a filed complaint that now he's contesting.
Never happened.
20 years old, the claims, by the way.
Just so everybody does not accuse me of hypocrisy, the point of this tirade, this rant right now, is not to assert the innocence of Kevin Parker.
He might be innocent, he might be guilty.
I'll reiterate what I've reiterated time and time again, although I was too shy to do it back when...
What's her face there?
Christine Blasey Ford was raising 30-plus-year-old allegations of being gang-trained by Brett Kavanaugh at a house party in 1978.
You know what the problem is with...
These allegations, unfortunately, true or not, I'll say true, if they're true, unfortunately, sometimes you wait long enough that there can be no justice without being a current injustice.
They might be true, but if someone cannot reasonably defend themselves, then there's an injustice.
Also, they might not be true, and then a person cannot reasonably defend themselves because the power lies in the accusation.
So I'm not saying that this guy's guilty.
I'm saying that there's a problem with these laws.
They don't mind the problems when they're directed at their ideological adversaries.
And all of a sudden they mind the problems when they're the victim of them.
Nature of the claim, this action is brought pursuant to New York, New York's Adults Survivors Act.
Pursuant to the ASA, plaintiff timely brings her cause of action within the retroactive revival window.
which removes the previously applicable statute of limitations.
Wow.
Pursued to the ASA, defendant is liable for the intentional acts which resulted in plaintiff being the victim of criminal sexual misconduct.
Serious psychological and physical and emotional harms suffered by the plaintiff.
Jurisdiction venue.
The party's plaintiff is an adult residing in Brooklyn, 31 years old.
At all times relevant to this, defendant Senator Kevin S. Parker is an individual and New York State Senator with his residence and principal place of business.
This dog.
Do you hear the dog here?
She's looking at me.
She's looking at me because she wants to eat.
Hey, Pudge!
Okay, get away from me.
So they say they went to Haiti.
They come back from the trip.
He asked to visit her in her apartment to pick up some photos.
Senator Park arrived in the apartment with her at a table in the living room after a few moments of visiting her, talking about the work in Haiti, taking the photo from her.
Plaintiff stood up and said goodbye when he put both of his hands on her wrists.
Plaintiff was frozen in fear and was unable to cry out.
Senator Parker then took plaintiff down the hallway to her apartment, to her bedroom, made a sexual comment, put her face down on the bed.
He vaginally raped plaintiff without her...
At no time either before or during the interaction with Senator Parker did plaintiff consent to any of Senator Parker's actions of a sexual alleged nature.
Are you all causes of action and we can go through this?
We don't need to.
My obvious questions, again, why on earth would this have taken so long to file, even with that statute of limitations being suspended for a year?
Is there any corroborating evidence?
Is this a case of Tara Reid making accusations against Joe Biden where you have Lisa Bloom, daughter of Gloria Allred, saying we all knew it was true and we did nothing at the time and you're not asking for money.
You just want your truth to be told and we believe you, but we gotta fight Trump.
Is it one of those cases?
Or is it a arguably like an MKUltra type psychopath like, what's her face?
Christine Blasey Ford.
I remember.
I need some caffeine.
I'm going to tell her, talking in that psychotic baby voice, talking about how she'll need caffeine after she tells her story, fabricating a 30-plus-year-old story of rape from Brett Kavanaugh, who has been FBI background checked year over year for decades.
Or is it one of those cases?
No evidence, total fabrication, totally implausible, and yet people believe her.
Is it like an E. Jean Carroll case?
Changing room of a Bergdorf.
Donald Trump enters in.
Nobody saw him.
There's no celebrity people going crazy that Trump came in there.
No service people saying, oh, Trump is in here.
He's a big spender.
We might want to get a clerk working with him.
No, none of that.
Just some crazy lady making something up that cannot be verified, that can actually be disproven based on what she was wearing, a dress that apparently didn't exist until later on.
So which one of it is it going to be?
Is it a Tara Reade or is it an E. Jean Carroll?
Or will it not matter?
Because I don't know what the politics of this guy are.
Oh, Lordy, Lordy.
Oh, Lordy.
Anyway, that's what's going on with Kevin Parker.
It's unconstitutional.
And the wildest thing is, if this guy's going to challenge the constitutionality of a law that he passed and succeed in it being declared unconstitutional, what then?
I presume Trump is challenging the constitutionality of this provision of law as well that E. Jean Carroll sued him on.
The process is the punishment.
They don't care what happens after this election year.
That law was changed specifically so that this orchestrated attack on Trump could be put into effect and carried out by the politically prejudiced New York judicial system.
Politically speaking, New York is the racially prejudiced...
Alabama, Mississippi of eras past.
And they justified their hatred to themselves because Trump is just that bad.
All right.
Do we have anything more on that?
I'll give everybody the link to that lawsuit, if anybody.
I hate these lawsuits because there's not a believe all women.
Don't believe anybody.
You practice law long enough.
I mean, you don't even have to practice that long to learn the lesson.
You don't believe anybody.
You don't even believe your own client.
Because the second you believe your own client and you stop verifying their story, you get your ass burnt.
That came out bad, but you know what I mean.
You get burnt.
So you don't trust anybody.
It's not a question of, oh, I trust you.
Okay, so I'll listen.
No.
And it's not even trust but verify.
It's verify.
So we'll see what comes out by way of evidence.
We'll see what corroborating evidence might exist to support Madame Baptiste's story against Kevin Parker.
The dude sounds like he's got a temper.
The dude sounds like he's got already a reputation of being something of an ass.
That being said, it took 20 years for this woman to bring suit.
And that is that.
All right, everybody.
Here's what we're going to do.
Get your buddies on over to Rumble.
Or locals?
I'll give you the link to locals.
Because we're going to get into the contempt ruling, and then we're going to get into inner-city press Matthew Russell-Lee.
Let's just actually take some chat before we leave Rumble here.
Viva, is there no law in New York covering election interference?
There is!
I'm sorry, Doc, Doc.
Dak, Dak.
Oh my god, my eyes are getting bad.
This is a funny question because...
They're going after Trump for election interference in that bogus Alvin Bragg prosecution.
Remember, the only way they managed to turn those misdemeanor bookkeeping charges into a felony was to allege that they were wrongfully concealing election interference.
So they have election interference.
I mean, first of all, there's federal election interference and there's state election interference.
So, oh, they got it.
And as far as I'm concerned, they're breaking it.
You want to talk about RICO election interference?
That's what's going on up in Fannie, up in Georgia.
That's what's going on up in Engeron, in New York.
That's what's going on with Kaplan, E. Jean Carroll.
That's what's going on with Juan Marchand, in this case.
So, yeah, they are guilty of what they accuse others of.
So that's it.
Okay, now I'll give everybody the link to Viva Barnes Law.
No, not to Viva Barnes, to Rumble.
It's going to get fun over there.
Okay, bam.
That's the link to Rumble.
And YouTube has had as much as they deserve of us.
So let me just see the number.
If I can be neurotic for one second.
Actually, while everyone trickles over, I'll bring this up.
I haven't watched this video yet, but it's Hakeem Jeffries, so I know it's going to be, you know, it'll be like watching stuff come out of a butt, but it won't be an egg.
It'll be like a turd.
This is a turd coming out of someone's mouth.
Okay.
Yeah, let's just see what we got here.
Haven't seen it yet!
This is Hakeem Jeffries.
He always says very intelligent things.
And I have no doubt he's going to use the word extreme MAGA Republicans or extremists or something along those lines.
Let's just see what it is.
The eyeball.
I forget what CBS knew.
The extreme MAGA Republicans.
Did he actually?
I'm sorry.
I swear to you, I have not watched this yet.
And I thought I was actually hallucinating.
So first three words, extreme MAGA Republicans.
The extreme MAGA Republicans have set in motion the erosion of reproductive freedom.
We're going to fight for it with everything that we've got at our disposal.
Sorry, fight for it with everything that we've got at our disposal?
Didn't Trump get impeached for saying fight like hell?
With everything we've got at our disposal?
That actually sounds like a threat, Hakeem Jeffries.
And you call the others the extreme MAGA Republicans.
If Roe v.
Wade can fall, anything can fall.
Social Security can fall.
Medicare can fall.
Voting rights can fall.
The people who say the Constitution is a living, breathing document that evolves, that evolves with the ages, are now complaining that things can fall.
I mean, imagine if things couldn't fall, well, you'd never have your Civil Rights Act.
Imagine if things couldn't fall, women would have never gotten the right to vote.
It's an amazing thing.
Things falling, not always a bad sign, sometimes a sign of evolution.
Also, just throwing this out there, when done by the Supreme Court of the United States of America, you have to be an insurrectionist not to accept the results of the highest court of the land.
Maybe.
And God help us all, but democracy itself can fall.
If Roe v.
Wade can fall.
I don't want to judge him.
He seems like a genuinely stupid human being.
They're useful idiots, liars, people with no conscience and no morals, but decent actors.
I was listening to John Kirby give another press conference today.
He makes me want to puke.
He exudes a pompous arrogance that's indescribable.
Hakeem Jeffries exudes a similar sort of pomposity.
Cringe might be a good word for it, but it's just extreme.
If Roe v.
Wade can fall, imagine what else can happen.
People who were denied the right to vote can get the right to vote.
People who were denied access to certain buildings and infrastructures and services can get that access.
But imagine what else can happen if things fall.
Eventually you get your buck decision.
The right of, you know, the mentally challenged not to be sterilized can fall as well.
So, you know what?
Make sure you have a robust argument, but all that to say is Hakeem Jeffries is an idiot.
Okay, so with that said, we're going to end on YouTube and come on over to Rumble is here.
And if you want to just skip the line and come over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, who got sneak peeks of the turtle birthing an egg?
Who got sneak peeks of the vlog today.
Come on over there.
But for now, commie tube, I bid you, I don't know how to say goodbye in Russian, but you know what I'm saying, comrades.
We go over to Rumble.
Okay.
Holy crap, people.
If you haven't seen the judgment, so the news of the day.
Judge Juan Marchand.
I don't know if it gets old because it's my job to be repetitive.
Being repetitive is my job.
It's my job to be.
Repetitive.
My job.
Hold on.
Let me see here.
My job to be...
Fat fingers.
My job to be repetitive.
Let's see if I can find this.
Yeah, right here.
Check this out.
Repetitiveness is my...
It's my job to be repetitive.
My job.
My job.
Repetitiveness is my job.
You're going to go out there and give the best performance of my life?
The best performance of my life?
Okay.
Look, repetition serves a purpose.
Judge Juan Marchand last week found Trump guilty of nine of the ten charges of contempt that were brought before him by the state, by the people.
And I'm going to go out on a limb also and say that...
The state is not representing the people in any aspect of this persecution.
They are representing their own corrupt asses.
Last week, the state brought 10 charges of contempt for Trump posting various links in four cases to a New York Post article talking about what a corrupt liar, perjurer, Michael Cohen was.
For another post, Truth Post, in which Trump refers to Michael Cohen, convicted perjurer, according to Arthur Engron, and notorious porn star, liar.
Stormy Daniels as sleazebags in retweeting a Michael Avenatti tweet.
There were two other posts on social media.
The judge found Trump in contempt of nine of the ten charges.
Fined him $1,000 per charge and said, if you keep this up, it's going to pain me to do it, but I might have to put you in jail.
You know, like the abusive spouse saying, look what you made me do.
Why'd you make me hit you?
This is what the judge said.
If you make me do it again, I'll put you in jail.
If you talk again.
Well, the judge had another one that he adjudicated upon today.
And I'm going to read to you what the charge was because you will just not believe it.
Oh, here it is right here.
Listen to this.
This is the charge.
He had four charges today.
The judge only found him in contempt of one.
Because, let's read this here.
As more fully explained in the Assistic District Attorney Conroy's affirmation of April 25, 2024, the people...
The corrupt administration alleged defendant violated the expanded order on four separate occasions as follows.
By virtue of statement defendant made to the media in the hallway, yada, yada, yada, after Kurt adjourned for the day, among other things, defendant stated, quote, and when are they going to look at all the lies that Cohen did in the last trial?
He got caught lying in the last trial.
So he got caught lying, pure lying, and when are they going to look into that?
They actually, oh, I'll give Judge Merchant that corrupt.
Corrupt judge whose daughter is making millions of dollars off this prosecution credit here.
He didn't find him guilty on this one because he said, you know, he's responding to some attacks from Michael Cohen.
I don't know if he actually said also, because it's true.
Arthur Engeron, in his ruling, referred to convicted perjurer Michael Cohen as a convicted perjurer.
So I guess, you know, truth is not even a defense when it comes to contempt.
The second one.
By virtue of an interview defendant gave on April 22nd.
To the Real America Voice, yada, yada, yada.
Listen to this.
He said, quote, I'm right here, people.
Oh, that's not working.
Quote, you know, the judge is rushing the trial like cray-cray, crazy.
Nobody's ever seen a thing like this.
The jury was picked so fast.
95% Democrats.
The area's mostly all Democrat.
You think of it as just a purely Democrat area.
It's very unfair, the situation.
That I can tell you.
The judge found him in contempt for this statement.
And listen to what the judge says about that statement.
Won't someone please think of the children?
Won't someone please think of the children?
In doing so, the defendant not only called into question the integrity and therefore the legitimacy of these proceedings, he's a freaking defendant to a bullshit political persecution.
He's not allowed calling into question the legitimacy of the proceedings?
What is he supposed to do?
Admit that they're valid?
I mean, understand what the judge is saying right here.
You can't question the legitimacy of these bullshit proceedings.
So what you must basically do is concede, acquiesce, convict yourself.
I'm going to start again, sorry.
In doing so, and I'll calm down, defendant, my children, they might think I'm having an aneurysm.
In doing so, defendant not only called into question the integrity and therefore the legitimacy of these proceedings, but again raised the specter of fear for the safety of the jurors and their loved ones.
What crack hallucination dream are you living in, Judge Juan Marchand?
Such concerns undoubtedly threaten to "interfere with the fair administration of justice and constitute a direct attack on the rule of law, capital R, capital L." Expanded gag order.
It remains this court's fundamental responsibility to protect the decency of the criminal process and to control the disruptive influences in the Let me just read to you again what he said, because it's such a load of horse crap.
You know...
The judge is rushing the trial like crazy.
Nobody's ever seen a thing go like this.
The jury was picked so fast.
95% Democrats.
The area is mostly all Democrat.
You think of it as just a purely Democrat area.
It's a very unfair situation.
That I can tell you.
All of that is 100% true.
The judge himself prided himself on how fast he was jury selecting.
He said, oh, it went by faster than I thought.
We can start the trial early.
Oh, it started, it went faster than I thought.
We can cut early today.
Purely Democrat area?
Do we need to, like, prove this?
It's like, you know, D.C. is a pretty Democrat area, yeah.
So is this particular district of New York.
Guilty!
But then let's get to the...
Hold on one second.
Let me just refresh.
I need another conclusion that I didn't highlight in this.
And I'm not sure that it's here.
Now, the dog is whining, by the way, because we ran out of dog food today.
And the missus has gone to get some dog food.
What did I just do here?
Holy crab apples.
I'm not, I didn't shut it down.
Okay, hold on.
Listen to what the judge says.
He reminds him again in the conclusion.
I've got the order right here.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Look at this.
Let's go all the way down here.
Just, you know, finds him guilty, sends him to a thousand bucks.
Hey, look at this.
Therefore.
Defendant is hereby put on notice that if appropriated and warranted, future violations of its lawful orders will be punishable by incarceration.
Put him in jail.
Put him in jail, Marshawn.
Do it.
I mean, it's not me that you're threatening, but do it.
See what that yields by way of political blowback.
See what that yields potentially by at what point in freaking time is the Supreme Court going to get involved in this?
At what point?
I mean, do they want...
People to be provoked into stupidity because of the acts of provocation by this out-of-control judge?
If warranted, we'll lock him up.
We'll lock him up for saying it's a Democrat area, he rushed to the jury, and this is a joke.
Lock him up.
Oh no, but they're not Putin.
They're not locking up Navalny for no reason.
They're locking up their political rivals for damn good reason.
He's calling out their corrupt bullshit in real time.
Ah.
Ah, okay, here we go.
Before we get into the...
Now, people are going to cut this out.
Pasha Moir, P. Moir says, Viva, goodbye in Russian is...
Dosvidanya!
Dosvidanya!
I like that.
Dosvidanya!
Hold on a second.
Hold on.
Dosvidanya!
Viva is a Russian asset.
By the way, my grandmother...
You see, we always said she was Russian or Ukrainian.
I forget which side her family came from, but it was...
I want to say...
I don't know.
They left...
Her side of the family left during the 1890s, the pogroms of the 1890s.
Do svidaniya!
And how do you say cheers?
Prost!
Although I don't like vodka, I prefer gin.
And I don't even like Eastern European gin.
I like Irish gin.
Or Scottish gin, I should say.
Terrible.
All right, what was I going to do here?
Oh, yeah, I was going to go to the second crumble rant.
And see what was going on here.
The second trouble rant.
I'm not your buddy.
I could not be more clear.
If you have sciatic nerve pain, do not drink cold water.
Well, I drink cold water.
Do you know what the number one vitamin at Walmart is for sciatic nerve pain?
I have no idea.
You won't believe how old she is.
Excuse me?
I ask people who are really fit.
What do they do for their workouts?
Do you mind if I ask you what you do?
Actually, not a lot.
I was going to go to the second.
Okay.
I'm sorry, that ad actually, that ad pulled me in for a brief second.
I'm not your buddy, guys.
This could not be more clear.
The left have crossed the Rubicon and are going all in.
Everyone must understand the consequences should these people win.
Look, my joke is...
So the crossing of the Rubicon is when Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon to go somewhere in ancient Rome that he wasn't supposed to go to.
And it was like a religious violation to have crossed the Rubicon.
The Democrats have crossed so many Rubicons.
It's not just that they've crossed them.
My spin on it is they've crossed the Rubicons and they've taken steaming aqua dumps each time.
They've entered the holy waters and they've taken a dump in it.
Because it's like, can you imagine, just as I said, the rubricons that we've lived through in real time, indicting a former president, convicting a former president.
Well, no, we've got to go back.
We've got to go back all the way to the beginning.
Impeaching a president for bullcrap reasons.
Impeaching a president a second time for bullcrap reasons.
Criminal prosecution of a former president.
Farah, not Farah, Nara.
RICO prosecution of a former president.
Removal of a candidate from the ballot.
Criminal prosecutions.
Locking up a former president.
Passing legislation to deny Secret Service the Disgrace Act of a convicted former federal officer.
They've crossed Rubicon after Rubicon and they squat down in the water and they take a steaming aqua dump in it.
It's wild.
I remember when Barnes, during our Sunday, she was like, even they're not politically suicidal enough to try to remove Trump from the ballot.
Gina, whatever the hell her name is, Griswold?
Jenna Griswold.
Is that her name?
Jenna Griswold said, hold my beer.
And then the other one, the Secretary of State out of Maine said, hold her beer, hold my beer.
And you got the one out of, I forget where else you're trying to do it.
So it's just wild.
And it's depraved.
All the while, while they do that, they accuse their political adversaries of undermining democracy.
So that's the ruling.
And now let's go to a little bit of inner-city press.
Hold on, let me just make sure.
I'm going to go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com where we've got two tips.
Let me see here.
We've got Devil Dog Mom.
Hold on, how do I do this?
Devil Dog Mom.
I have a special kinship to Hawaii.
I went there for my honeymoon with my wife, and it's like the most beautiful place on earth.
Minus the freaking...
I think we had two layovers on our way to L.A., and then we had to fly from L.A. to Hawaii.
Most beautiful place on Earth.
By the time I got there, I had the worst sinus infection of my life, so it took me seven days of the ten days of our honeymoon to get over the sinus infection.
Funny story, we went snorkeling for sea turtles and everything.
We got the snorkels, and my wife had her little tushy bubbling out of the water while we were snorkeling.
She got a sunburn.
Am I going to get in trouble for this?
It was so bad, it blistered on her butt.
I've never seen a sunburn that bad in my life.
Now, to answer your question, without the TMI that nobody asked for, the Supreme Court did find that forgiving the student debt under the legislation or the mechanism that he did it initially was unconstitutional.
And so he's trying a different mechanism, Biden, to forgive a portion of it under a different law.
I don't know the details right now.
I know that I can't phrase them right now.
I'd have to pull up the specific details.
But it was declared unconstitutional.
They're not having a second kick at the can in the exact same manner.
Biden is trying to find another legislative loophole to do it for a portion of the debts.
I think it's like $10,000.
And that's how they're bypassing what would otherwise have been a relatively clear Supreme Court ruling.
Someone came home with dog food.
So that's that.
And it's the same thing they're doing in Bruin.
Like, Bruin came down out of New York and was very clear about Second Amendment rights.
And they say, Second Amendment, be damned.
Don't be bringing that into our courtroom, said Judge Darke.
Darke or Darke?
It's Darke.
In the Dexter Taylor case, 55-year-old, doesn't matter that he's Black.
He's a 55-year-old Black man out of New York who, in my interview with him, said, these laws are intended to basically tell...
I won't use his exact terminology because I might get cancelled for it, but he said it was the legislation out of New York, the prohibitions were intended to tell uppity black men that you are under the state's protection and you are not allowed to take care of yourself or protect yourself.
And from what I understand, the prosecution saw our interview, didn't like it.
He would have been convicted anyhow.
He's now been convicted off to Rikers Island and they're going to appeal that decision and then maybe raise the Second Amendment arguments of law before the Court of Appeal.
But they don't care.
The Democrats will accuse Trump of, you know, desecrating the judicial authority, refusing to abide by Supreme Court rulings, overriding the Constitution.
They accuse him of doing it when they are the ones doing it in real time.
Concrete examples, student loan forgiveness, Bruin Second Amendment, in real time.
And they're trying to do it all.
Well, they're not trying to do it with Roe versus Wade, because Roe versus Wade didn't render any prohibition on abortion above and beyond saying, It goes to the states.
Let your states legislate whatever wacky abortion laws they want to legislate.
Okay, that was a long-winded answer.
Thank you very much for the tip.
Bill Brown says, they can't balance the budget, but they all become millionaires.
And Bill, you sent me a good one earlier today.
Hold on.
Let's see this here.
My wife says, am I live?
I am live.
Am I in trouble?
Bill Brown sent me a good meme earlier today.
I don't always get to respond to everything people send me, but this one's funny.
It says, I have a bumper sticker.
Let me make sure I'm looking at this here.
It says, I have a bumper sticker.
It says, honk if you think I'm sexy, then I wait at green lights until I feel better about myself.
All right.
So we've done that.
We've done everything now.
Then we've got P. Moyer says, since you mentioned Ukraine, goodbye is in the language is do pobochynia.
Do pobochynia.
All right.
Let's get to as much of the real-time tweeting.
So bottom line, by the way, I'm not going to go through the entire Matthew Russell Lee tweet thread of the day documenting the trial.
The bottom line of yet another day of this trial, we're up to what now, day 12?
I don't know how many witnesses we've gotten now of the prosecution, but Hope Hicks didn't turn out the way they wanted.
What do you want?
Hold on.
Look at this.
Look at this.
This is what I have to live with here.
This is what...
Yeah, there you go.
This is her right here.
I forget it.
Hold on a sec.
Get out.
Oi.
I mean, depending on who you listen to, you would either think that this prosecution is going smashingly well for the prosecution if you listen to the liars at MSNBC, or if you listen to people with half a brain and who are mildly honest.
And I like to think that I am entirely honest but have half a brain.
You would know that this entire prosecution is a load of crap.
They haven't been proving jack squat in this case.
Michael Cohen has been getting destroyed and he hasn't even testified yet.
Stormy Daniels.
I mean, the judge is going to have to modify the gag order because...
Okay, never mind.
Sorry.
It's going to stop there.
Not going to go good places.
So today, the witness on the stand, let me just bring up Inner City Press.
I don't know how he does it, but he deserves a Pulitzer Prize for this.
After they adjudicate on the contempt from today, they bring on...
Here we go.
Hold on, hold on, hold on.
Okay, they bring on...
What's the problem here?
Mr. Makani, please describe your education.
Okay, so Makani, Baruch College.
Okay, so Mr. Makani, please describe your education.
Makani.
Makani went to Baruch College?
Okay, Makani sounds like an Irish last name, Baruch College.
Does not sound like an Irish...
He hired by the Trump Organization in 1987 and now retired.
Okay, he signed a separation agreement.
Fine.
You're here under subpoena.
I'm going to go through this very quickly.
So he's...
I don't know if that means he's not cooperative with the prosecution.
Would rather not be there.
Have you spoken with him being Trump since last Friday?
No.
How are Trump Organization entities owned?
Okay, they talk about that.
Yada, yada, yada.
Did you supervise Deb Tarasov?
I'm not sure who that person is.
Did Trump Tower accounting team cover all entities, all except golf course and hotels?
Who enters information into the general ledger?
Just to illustrate what's going on in this case, we've talked about it many times.
They've turned a 34-count bullshit misdemeanor bookkeeping charge into a 34-count felony because they argue that every time a $35,000 retainer was paid to Michael Cohen, that's one felony, election interference hiding the true intent of the payment.
Every time they wrote in the ledger, legal fees.
Also, another felony.
Sign the check, felony.
File your tax, felony.
Anything related to each monthly payment, felony.
So, the question is, who enters the information into the general ledger?
Because each one of those entries is a felony.
The accounting staff.
Does the team also cover Mr. Trump's personal accounts?
Yes.
2017, they used Capital One as his main account?
Yes.
Okay, let's skip that.
Did the Trump organization ever cut a check if no invoice was submitted?
Never.
Who has the authority to approve invoices?
They give all the people.
They're Ivanka, Don Jr.
Then when it comes to payments, under $10,000, one signature required.
Over $10,000, two signatures required.
Okay.
Did you review the files on the thumb drive earlier today?
Yes.
Have you ever emailed with Michael Cohen?
Yes.
We asked to admit these exhibits.
There's objections to several of them.
All right.
Are you familiar with Michael Cohen?
Yes.
We both worked there.
I spoke with him by the coffee machine.
What was his position?
He was a lawyer.
Did he get reimbursed sometime in January 2017.
This guy...
They thought he was going to confirm all this.
He confirmed none of it.
This guy confirmed that Trump actually didn't instruct anything.
Okay, let's go down here.
Did you keep the files?
Whatever.
What is this bank statement?
It's the Essential Consultants First Bank.
Okay, here we go.
$130,000 to Keith M. Davidson Associates, PLC, $130,000.
Weisselberg's handwriting grossed out, then divided by 12. Okay.
Prosecutor, why $180,000?
Makani, the $130,000 to Michael Cohen, $50,000 to Red Finch.
What's the grossing up to cover the taxes?
So they say...
They're saying they were paying an amount to Michael Cohen so that he would have net basically after taxes.
So they're paying him more because they know a portion of that's going to have to go to taxes.
Why?
Because it was always supposed to be a retainer.
Or to everyone's understanding, it was a retainer paying Michael Cohen for fixing the problems that he made in the first place, fixing that which he broke.
$35,000 a month?
Yes, we'd wire each month starting February 1st, 2017, when Trump is already president.
Immunity might resolve this.
We'll see.
Did you take notes?
People's 36. I don't know what that is.
Those are my notes.
Bonus $50,000, $180,000, grossing it up to $180,000.
So it's $420,000 wire from Donald John Trump.
With the grossing up, was this an expensive reimbursement like others?
No.
Let me show you the exhibit.
Okay, objection, objection.
I love this.
I asked for an invoice.
A lot of people ask for money.
We need an invoice.
Michael wrote, remind me of the monthly amount.
I replied, $35,000.
He wrote, pursuant to the retainer agreement.
You can see here that this guy's testimony is that which Trump has been saying from the beginning.
This was a retainer to Michael Cohen for legal services.
There was no conspiracy to begin with.
Even if there was a conspiracy that this was a hushed money payment to Stormy Daniels, it's also not illegal.
But this guy's coming in and saying, yeah, this guy, look at this.
Pursued to the retainer agreement.
Pay me $35,000 a month.
I do work for you.
I do good work, Mr. Trump.
Michael Cohen strikes me as being that jackass guy from Happy Gilmore.
Hey, I did good.
Hey, Shooter?
Yeah, I found a liar and I paid her off to be quiet and I charged a lot of money to do it.
Isn't that amazing?
You posted this to legal expenses?
Yes, I did.
Code 51505.
Did the Trump Organization outside accounts have access to this?
Not directly, but through the reports.
Did Mr. Cohen invoice each month?
Yes.
And we paid it each month.
What do you think in this time...
What did you do in this time frame for checks?
All right, let's just...
I'm going to go over here.
Well, okay, is that it?
What happens?
This is where I get lost following this crap.
Not inner-city press being crap, but it's not possible to do this.
In a way that's...
It's not possible to do this in a way that makes sense so that people can follow.
So Gouveia does an amazing job bringing this to life.
I'll put together a short summary vlog.
Walkie-talkie.
Walkie-talkie or just city-talkie.
Was it consistent with the $180,000 you discussed with Weisselberg?
Yes.
No further questions.
Cross-examination.
Emile Bove, you rarely spoke to President Trump, did you?
I did not.
He never asked you to make these entries.
He did not.
And Mr. Weisselberg didn't tell you President Trump told him to do it.
No!
I mean, does he end it right there?
Here's Michael Cohen's signature book.
Does it say Fixer?
It does not.
Cohen was basically a vendor to President Trump, right?
Yes.
He said he had an outside firm.
Yes.
Bove, you don't know if Michael Cohen did legal work for Mr. Trump with regard to the summer Zervos.
I don't know what that is.
Things were in flux, yada, yada.
Okay, let's just go down here.
Let's talk about the handwritten notes.
Times two for taxes.
Alan was rattling off things that I had to write down.
Okay, I think we can probably stop it here.
We've gotten to the bottom line of all of this.
Trump's lawyer, Blanche, half hour ago we learned who the next witness was.
Okay, fine.
So that's what McConnell...
Had to show.
Absolutely nothing.
Like the guy from UHF.
Nothing!
Absolutely nothing!
You're so stupid!
McConnell comes out and says, this freaking guy, we all knew Michael Cohen was the lawyer.
We paid him his monthly retainer.
There was no instruction to do anything nefarious or even anything specific.
Bada bing, bada boom.
Nice prosecution witness, you morons.
Does it matter?
Probably not.
Just get my phone here.
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.
That's what came out of the day.
And I believe that that has been corroborated by bigger, smarter people than myself.
Bigger legal minds, smarter people than myself.
Oh, what else?
Gecko Cujo Music says, Amen.
Oh, King Ginger says, Govea starts in four minutes.
Don't worry.
I'm going to end maybe 6.05 on Rumble.
I'm going to take the after party to locals and go watch Robert Govea because he's going to do a kick-ass job.
Govea is working hard.
It's amazing.
I don't think people think you get up and talk to a camera.
Don't appreciate the work that goes into all of this.
Govea, he's got a system and he's meticulous and he's amazing.
Go check out Govea.
Go check out Inner City Press because it's obligatory.
But for those of you who don't have two hours to sit around listening to the reading of it, for those of you who can't read through it, I'll put out a short video summary like I did with the Hope Hicks testimony later tonight if my wife doesn't kill me.
Okay.
Okay, okay, okay.
What else do we have in the backdrop here?
I know I got some other stuff here.
Do I?
Well, hold on one second.
Well, hold on one second.
Let me go over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and see what we got over there.
Michael Avenatti said that weather balloon booed Stormy and Michael, the crook, Cohen, cooked up this plot to extort Trump.
That's what Rustang says.
Yeah, no, look, I talked about that now also.
I now understand why David Pecker signed the, or AMI signed the non-prosecution agreement with the state.
I now understand what Michael, look, it's like anybody who's ever had a bad lawyer.
Knows exactly how they work.
Law is like one of those, one of the rare practices where you make more money, the less efficient that you are.
And I once had, it was a very, very cynical thing that my, it wasn't my mentor, it was actually somebody else who said, you know, if you're going to settle a file, don't settle it too fast.
I was like, thank you for giving me specific advice that I will remember you for and that I will never absorb and implement myself.
If you're going to settle a file, Put 10 hours of work into it before you settle it.
And we got Bill Brown says, no worries, Viva.
I do not require apply.
I'm just hoping to send a smile.
Now, what we're going to do, by the way, I'm going to set up the Q&A on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
So tomorrow, I forget what I've got going on for tomorrow.
I've got something going on for tomorrow, but I'll be live tomorrow.
I just wanted to cover these two big stories because they're wild.
Let me see.
There was absolutely something else I'm totally forgetting.
To talk about...
Give me one second.
Give me one second to bring it up.
And we're going to end on this and then move on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com Okay, the Adult Survivors Act, the Turtles Making Babies.
Okay, the Judgment, we got that.
Ah, yes.
No, that's not it.
Ah, come on.
Achtung!
Yeah, this was it right here.
Okay.
I want proof of life of Commander.
The internet went crazy because Kristi Noem admitted in her book to shooting her dog when it was an ill-behaved dog.
Brian Taylor Cohen posts this video.
By the way, it's an amazing thing.
This is Commander, the dog that Kristi Noem threatened.
First of all, I disagree with that.
Maybe I say it from a self-preservation perspective because we had a very unfortunate dog growing up.
And we're not bad people.
We're not bad trainers.
I think you do get bad seeds of dogs that are just mentally, chemically unstable.
Doesn't matter.
This is Brian Taylor Cohen, no lie, who's running propaganda.
Oh, he's a contributor to MSNBC.
That must be new, and I didn't know that.
Okay, well, it's over.
Posting a two-second clip of what appears to be commander, but appears to be a young commander, licking his face.
Now, look at this.
Look at the police guys behind him.
Two seconds is all they could get with this dog without biting somebody.
That seems to be a shock caller, if I'm not mistaken, but I'm not certain.
And those guys in the back are like, get me the hell away from this dog, because he might rip your smug face off any second now.
People were going nuts on Kristi Noem for having shot her dog, and I appreciate...
When I said that she should just stop talking about it, I appreciate that country life is different than city life, and I do not...
I don't believe between the humane ways of putting a dog down that I would ever offer a shotgun to the head.
I just wouldn't do it.
I don't judge anybody who does it, country life being what it is.
I appreciate that.
I actually don't hold any negative feelings for people who did that.
The owner of our first dog did that to the father because the father of the dog was just too big to do anything with after time came.
Shotgun dug a hole and buried him.
But what I love is that people don't seem to understand.
I believe Commander has In all likelihood, been euthanized.
A German Shepherd that, well, I won't say attacks, but that bites Secret Service Asians 24 times.
Any dog that bites that many times is getting put down.
And I believe some state law might actually require it.
Until I see proof of life of commander, I'm going to assume that every Democrat Joe Biden Butt-licking sycophant out there doesn't understand that Commander is probably dead, as is that other dog, because they went through two dogs in the White House before they went to a cat.
And all that Brian Taylor Cohen could get was a two-second clip of that dog not mauling his face off.
So that's it.
I wanted to end with a good laugh.
Brian Taylor Cohen, it's wild.
He says, no lie with Brian Taylor Cohen.
You know you're getting lied to.
People's Democrat of the Congo Republic.
You know it's not a Democrat and you know it's not for the people.
I gotta go.
Love you all.
Have a great night.
Everyone says King Ginger 33. Go and enjoy the good night.
Bring all vicious dogs to liberal areas.
Don't put them down.
Better than tied to the roof.
Okay, let me see.
Some people are descended from barbarians.
It's cool.
That was Biden's fault.
Dog only bites assholes.
Jacob Castro, no, I disagree with that because I'm not an asshole.
We had that French bulldog, which was an inbred dog that was passed off as a locally bred dog.
It had a mental issue and it bit me.
And I know that I'm not a bad person.
All right, so what we're going to do now, everybody, we're going to end this on Rumble and we're going to go on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com for the after party.
We're going to do the supporters only Q&A, so get ready.
For that bing-bang-bong Q&A.
I was going to do a kayak livestream, but I think I'll hold that off for a little while here.
Lady on the right says, love you, thank you very much.
Okay, link to locals.
Boom.
And Viva kills minnows and some fish.
BZ Zuhai.
Yeah, but there's a number of...
I don't like fishing with live bait if I can avoid it.
And I don't mind fishing with live bait if we're fishing to eat dinner.
And I appreciate that some people think it's morally objectionable to use a worm or a minnow, even if they're specifically bred only for that because those minnows in that container at the gas station, that's what they're bred for, that's what they're going to die doing.
I appreciate that.
And I actually, you know, I prefer to fish with lures and not live bait.
I just say, like, if I'm going to put my dog down, I'm going to...
Hopefully he falls asleep.
Plus, for the preservation of the body, it's like there's a number of things.
Anyhow, it doesn't matter.
We don't need to get it.
Don't get inbred dogs, Viva.
This is from Thai Sites Arts.
I'm never getting a dog from a breeder ever again.
I think.
I'm only going to get rescues from now on.
Because I'm convinced that especially the inbreeding of specific dogs cause problems.
But I'm also just trying to defend myself.
Trump is a loser, says Stormy Fat Tits.
That's funny.
It's also about the fish you're fishing for, not dying from fully ingested live bait.
Okay, I don't know what that means.
Fauci is a P-O-S-A-O-Gib.
All right, we are ending on Rumble.
Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
And if you're not, I will see you tomorrow.
Go check out Govea Watching the Watchers.
And that is all.
Stay tuned for the vlog.
There will be one tonight.
Rumble, peace out.
Stay tuned for good stuff this week.
Locals, here I comes.
All right, peeps, what do we got here?
I did work on the Democrat.
This is from Encryptus.
I did work in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
It ended with the assassination of someone in the government.