All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 26, 2023 - Viva & Barnes
01:21:33
Boxing Day Special! Jack Smith UNLAWFUL Appointment? Spacey on Tucker? AND MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Just a quick dip.
Cold water?
Well, whatever the lake is.
Doing a blend?
Probably not that bad.
It's about five degrees air temperature.
The water, though it looks like water, is ice.
All those rocks on the ice were from yesterday.
I forgot that coffee cup from yesterday.
Okay.
Grandma's not going to be happy.
Let's do this.
I don't think this is a good idea.
Let's help break the ice.
these pits.
It's going to be very satisfying to break the ice.
Okay, that's very cool.
Yeah, you're not going any further out of your mind.
Hands up.
Do it.
Aw, yeah.
It's a beautiful bathing suit there.
The one piece really is...
Watch out, don't slip.
It's also that the ice is very sharp.
Oh my god.
Ow.
This is much colder than Florida.
I'm waiting for the internet to catch up.
I'm wearing a sweater because it was so damn cold I still haven't gotten warmed up I'm wearing a sweater because I'm wearing a sweater because I'm wearing a sweater because I'm wearing a sweater.
Thankfully the audio is good, but the video frame rate is terrible.
Let me see if I...
The internet should catch up.
Just be sure your heart keeps beating.
My heart's still beating.
Viva la revolution!
There was a reason why I'm letting a long video play.
I was looking for a tweet that I know exists.
I did a polar punch.
Okay, yours is good.
Maren, take the camera, please.
You think you're going to do it?
I'm going to be outdone by my wife.
Let's get this party started.
Okay.
I didn't bring you a towel.
You're not taking mine.
Oh, you've got a bathrobe on.
The internet's not catching up, people.
And just so everybody knows, my kids had colds before I did this.
So if I get a cold, it has nothing to do with this.
Maybe when I stop playing multiple videos, it'll catch up.
Happy Boxing Day, people.
Tommy John underwear, they still haven't sponsored me.
Oh my goodness.
I'm just gonna go quick.
Just avoid, avoid looking at the genitalia.
It's very cold, the water.
I think this counts, right?
Like Joe Rogan would be proud of me?
Stay in for three minutes.
Control.
Probably could have.
Activation of your immune system and your brown fats.
Oh, yeah?
Because then you get out and you're forced to warm up.
So, like...
Yo, Rogan!
This is for you.
Get the brown fats going.
It sucks.
You're going to do it?
Is that enough?
My toes are going numb.
My fingers are going numb.
I didn't know it was a competition.
Nobody told me it was a competition.
Everything.
With your spouse is a competition in the best possible sense.
Everybody, now that I stopped playing that video, I'm seeing my two radars.
Note, now I'm down to one radars.
I'm going to be sneezing, I think.
Little bastard childrens have may have given me their cold.
This was to jumpstart my immune system.
To jumpstart the brown fat system.
Happy Boxing Day, people.
Let me go over to...
You feel maple syrup?
I did this two hours ago.
I'm still freezing.
I didn't take a warm shower afterwards because I think that's cheating.
I had hot turkey soup that we cooked from yesterday with some Tabasco sauce and three fried eggs in it and some cheese and a mushy, disgusting carrot.
Let me see here.
Viva, you're in great shape.
Do you work out only every day?
No, I jog every day obsessively.
Almost every day.
I've started doing push-ups and curls recently just because, I don't know, I feel lazy if I go for a jog and then don't do some muscular stuff.
But look, I'm not a scientist.
No medical advice, no legal advice.
I think a lot of the muscle residue is from having been a very athletic teenager.
And I don't know, I think there's like muscle memory.
That if I start doing push-ups, I'll build muscle very quickly.
I look the same as I used to be when I was 13 years old.
Wrestling beasts at Lower Canada College.
Wrestling, sports, rugby, football, and the like.
Okay!
Happy Boxing Day, people!
Let me make sure the mic is good.
I'm still in my mother-in-law's studio.
Viva, do you want to be remembered as a father?
A lawyer or a YouTuber?
Definitely not a lawyer.
Definitely not a YouTuber.
So definitely a father.
As I will be.
Just want to be remembered as a good father.
Push-ups will put a lot of muscle on most underrated exercises.
They're easy.
The only problem is I got a ganglion cyst in my wrist and I got carpal tunnel syndrome.
So if I do too many push-ups, but if I do too many curls, I wake up every night and my thumb and index fingers are...
Like, numb.
Like, non-existent.
I rub them, don't even feel them until the sensation comes back.
Oh, okay.
Now let me just make sure that we're live everywhere.
We should be live on...
We're live on Rumble.
Let's see if the video looks any better now.
Is that what I look like?
The audio...
Alright, so the video sucks, but the audio is decent.
Let me see if we're live on Rumble.
Not on Rumble.
On VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com And I am.
Okay, let me just make sure I'm going to put that on pause now.
I don't want to...
I don't want to overload the bandwidth.
We're in Canada.
This is like...
We're in Canada.
The internet...
I think there's one satellite out there.
Alright, so good morning, everybody.
It is morning.
For another seven minutes on the East Coast.
What I was going to say is Merry Christmas, Happy Boxing Day, whatever the hell it is.
Boxing Day is the biggest joke of a scam of a holiday ever.
It just whips people up into a frenzy who they think they're getting good deals and you're not getting good deals on anything that you can't otherwise get every day of the week with the advent of the internet.
It gives people an excuse to go out there and spend money that they shouldn't spend on crap that they don't need because they think they're getting a good deal on it and call me whatever.
Call me a cynic.
Nobody gets a good deal on anything on Boxing Day because of Boxing Day.
You can get all that same crap.
You can get all that same crap for just as good a price later on.
Viva phoning in from 1996.
Well, you see, I could change my...
I could go like this.
Stop cam.
I could do the pulsating avatar.
There's my logo.
All into...
Transmission in the basement during Commie Canada's revolution is going to be a revolution.
Forget it.
We're going to go...
See, look at that.
The second I put the video back on, I see the little radar go back to one thing.
Whatever.
Mascuzi's people.
At least the audio is good, and I'll probably cram out a vlog later today.
If anybody didn't see the vlog that I put out yesterday, after...
I didn't do a live stream yesterday because it was Christmas Day, and...
That's how you get divorced, is if you say, yeah, sorry, I can't come to the Christmas table.
I'm doing a live stream.
If you haven't seen yesterday's vlog...
I think it was good.
I think it asked some questions that I think I know the answers to.
Link to yesterday's vlog.
How has everyone's Christmas been and Boxing Day?
Oh my goodness.
So we're going from the studio.
We're going to be leaving here and I'm going to haul my gear with me and we're going to go, I don't know, travel around now, see some more family.
Christmas is an amazing time of year.
Thus far, it's been uneventful.
Everyone's been happy.
I had a discussion.
What's Boxing Day?
Come on.
Boxing Day is like a national holiday.
It's the day after Christmas when everything is allegedly on super discounted specials because everybody who got a crappy gift for Christmas goes and returns it and then they've got to sell those returned gifts so they sell them at a super discounted rate.
Um...
See, your gift never arrived, David.
I don't know if that's a small weenie joke.
I think it might be.
And yeah, so I didn't do a stream yesterday, but did a vlog yesterday.
Just my thought process and just looking into the very simple question of how the hell the flu disappeared during COVID.
And after all of the analysis, I've got more questions than answers.
But that was the link right there.
So check that out.
Then people during the stream on Sunday, which was the Christmas Eve special, were like, Viva, have you read the amicus brief for some...
I'll get the person who filed it.
In the Trump context, in the Trump Colorado decision there...
No, it's not the Trump Colorado.
What the hell am I talking about?
It's the D.C. Trump immunity claim.
Filing an amicus to the Supreme Court...
Stating that Jack Smith was never lawfully appointed.
That we call him special...
What do they call him?
Special agent?
I forget what the word is.
Oh, jeez.
What's the word for Jack Smith?
It'll come to me in a second.
It's like an attorney, special investigator, whatever.
When he's just a citizen that was handpicked...
We're going to do that on Rumble.
So for those of you who don't know, first of all, Merry Christmas, Happy Boxing Day.
It's not a holiday.
We'll be seeing each other before New Year's, but Happy New Year's.
Everyone get out there and freeze your nipples and your besties off by going into special counsel.
Thank you.
I'm blaming all of this on the brown fats that are being released in my brain right now because of the cold.
Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator turned Florida rumbler, were up in Canada for the holidays, crossed the border, stepped into the asylum, and there's a different political atmosphere in Canada.
It's indescribable, it's unmistakable, and it's undeniable.
So we're here, and not to say that I can't wait to go back to Florida, the sun came out for about five minutes.
So you wake up at eight o 'clock, it's blue, like blue darkness outside, overcast, cold, depressing in terms of seasonal environment.
Florida's just sunny every day.
The problem with a Florida sunny day every day is you feel like you have to go out and make the most of every day in here.
You feel like you want to sleep through the next six months.
Blue!
There was some overcasts.
It's beautiful in its beauty, but in its comfort, Florida's a little bit more comfortable.
But then you get to the summer where you have to leave the state to get out of the sweltering heat and blistering heat of the summer.
So, Viva Frye.
We start on YouTube Rumble.
Then we end on YouTube and we go exclusively to Rumble.
Then when we're done on Rumble, we go to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, have our after party there of our wonderful community.
Everybody should know, if you want to support vivabarneslaw.locals.com, it's $7 a month or a discounted $70 a year if you get the yearly package.
It's going up to $10 a month as of January or $100 a year at the discounted rate if you get the whole year.
If you lock it in now...
And you want to support the work that gets a coffee a month.
It is actually a coffee, by the way.
Starbucks is like $7 for one of those stupid dragon fruit refreshers.
American, by the way.
I'm talking American prices.
So for the cup of coffee a month, if you want to support the work that I do with Robert Barnes, vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
If you want to get grandfathered in at the $7 instead of, you know, put it off for two weeks and sign up next month, get in there now, do it.
If you are so inclined...
I think Ben Dover, I think that Jesus had to do with the $7 a cup of coffee.
When Gad Saad was down in Florida, he came down from Canada.
We go get a cup of coffee.
I've stopped doing the calculation now in terms of 30% more because it's American dollars versus Canadian.
Now that we're here, I'm like, 20 bucks?
That's like $14 US.
It's shocking.
The price of living, the cost of living is shockingly expensive everywhere for everyone.
And so that's it.
That was the pitch.
If you can't support, there's a ton of stuff on our Locals community that's for the non-supporting members.
It's a beautiful community.
Easiest way to support.
If you want to snip, clip, share, spread the word.
Too much coffee.
Not a good idea for you, Viva.
Dude, I got Red Bull.
I've regressed to Red Bull because I'm finding that sucralose is upsetting my stomach and sugar, bad.
At least I know how it makes me feel.
I need another cup of coffee.
I'm still so cold.
All right.
Before we go over to Rumble, this was the alternative, the video that I was going to start with.
We are governed by psychopaths.
It's not a question.
We are governed by psychopaths.
And the only people who would want to govern have to be psychopathic in nature.
Now, I know people are going to say, Viva, you ran for office.
Are you a psychopath?
I'm on mute every time I sniff.
I ran for office as a question of protest, knowing that I really wasn't going to get elected.
I have no interest in governing.
If I ever become prime minister or president, I can't become president.
If I ever become in a position to govern, I would reduce the size of the state apparatus immediately overnight.
It's...
I would not govern to govern.
I would govern to free the citizenry.
That would be my objective for governing.
That should be a good campaign logo.
I'm not governing.
I'm not running to govern.
I'm running to liberate.
So, we're governed by psychopaths.
And there's no bloody doubt about it.
Gaslighting, narcissist psychopaths.
Now, let me just bring up one...
Where is it?
Peter Sellers.
Oh, God.
I got some clips.
I got some clips and some insights.
But I wanted to start with Christopher Freeland.
Where the heck is the Christopher Freeland?
Oh, hold on one second.
Wishing us a Merry Christmas.
Do you remember when they told us that we had to celebrate Christmas differently, alone?
While they were literally taking flights to exotic islands.
And pissing off, pissing, just abandoning everybody.
Literally, we've got to celebrate Christmas differently, one of these liberal Ontario politicians said in a pre-recorded video that he posted to Twitter that he published when he was in St. Bart's Island.
Quebec politicians messed off and went to Caribbean for the holidays, while Canadians had to celebrate Christmas differently alone.
But this year...
They just rub it in your face.
What does she say here?
This is Christa Freeland.
Merry Christmas.
Joyeux Noël.
The people who have spent the better part of eight years destroying the country incrementally and systematically.
Look at them.
They're humans too.
Look at this.
They got a good life.
It's beautiful.
When they're not locking you down, they're cashing their government paychecks, riding their government horses.
Riding their high horses.
I mean, they don't even see the symbology in all of this.
But it doesn't stop at the provincial, national level.
It doesn't even stop at the government level.
Some people who have not ever been elected are trying to govern us like the subservient plebs that they think we are.
When did the...
Not NWO.
What's his name here?
When did that guy...
Where is he?
This guy.
When did the WHO get a mandate to govern me, my country, my citizens?
When?
The answer is a big, fat never.
These people are professional managers.
They are people who think they get to manage other people, they're better, and they get to make decisions for other people.
They know what's best for other people, and they want to manage a problem, even if it means creating a problem to manage the problem.
Look at this guy.
I don't think everybody should tweet that.
I think that picture of him at a gay bar was a doctored photo, so I don't think I've ever shared that, unless it's to question it.
But this freak weirdo, who the hell gave this guy permission to do anything, say anything, have any reach over me and my country?
Our food systems are harming the health of people and planet.
Food systems contribute to over 30% of greenhouse gas emissions and account for almost one-third of the global burden of disease.
Global burden of disease, for anybody who didn't understand what he said.
I'm going to break this down.
Section by section afterwards.
I'm just going to play it out so you can all revel in the insanity.
This man belongs in jail.
Look, if they can find crimes on Trump, they can find crimes on this guy.
I would like this guy to be nowhere near a position of power.
The devil on my shoulder says I'd like him in jail.
And the rational part of me is saying if they can manufacture crimes on Trump after a life in the spotlight in real estate, in entertainment industry, they can find something on this.
Absolute psychopath.
Let's just play this through here.
Transforming food systems is therefore essential by shifting towards healthier, diversified, and more plant-based diets.
If food systems delivered healthy diets for all, we could save 8 million lives per year.
WHO is committed to supporting countries to develop and implement policies to improve diets and fight climate change.
I'm therefore very pleased that over 130 countries have signed the COP28 UAE Declaration on Climate and Health.
Together, we can protect and promote the health of both people and planet.
I thank you.
Both people and planet.
Now, I'm going to try not to make fun of his accent because that's not the funny part of this, but if I just say his accent with my accent, it won't be, you know, accurate.
What the hell?
Food systems?
Understand what this guy just said at the end there.
We can help the health of people and the planet.
I need to break down the insanity of all of this.
Our food systems are harming the health of people and planet.
Our food systems are harming the health of people and planet.
Our food systems which feed people.
I don't even know what he means by food systems.
I'm going to Google this afterwards.
Food systems contribute to over 30% of greenhouse gas emissions and account for almost one-third of the global burden of disease.
Greenhouse gas emissions.
I know we talk about this over and over again, and I just, again, ask the obvious question.
What do plants eat?
What do trees consume?
What do algae and phytoplankton consume?
Carbon emissions.
They consume carbon and emit oxygen.
Where has it been definitively demonstrated that carbon emissions are the be-all and end-all of whatever climate crisis people think exists?
Considering that plants need to consume them and emit oxygen as a result, as a byproduct, when did we settle the science on carbon emissions being the be-all and end-all?
Even if we did.
Food systems contribute to 30% of gas.
Okay, I don't even know what that means.
Do we all appreciate that China and India, China, I believe, emits more greenhouse gases than the next three or four countries combined?
China and India are the biggest polluters, if we're going to use that word of carbon emissions.
They want to go after food systems before going after China and India.
Why?
I might suspect, because this guy, I forget what his name is, is probably beholden to China.
Just stating the obvious.
Food systems are causing global health crisis.
You know what we should do?
Reduce the population.
Transforming food systems is therefore essential by shifting towards healthier, diversified, and more plant-based diets.
Plant-based diets.
Okay, they want us to eat bugs or, you know, I guess not bugs because that's not plant-based, but maybe bugs are plant-based because you get them from plants.
Where has it been established that fields of wheat, grain, whatever, take up less land than beef or animals for the amount of people fed?
For the amount of nutrients obtained through?
I guess you could go with acre per person fed.
You'd have to go with nutrient-rich food.
In terms of nutrient per gram, that's what's important.
Who has ever established that a field of corn or a field of wheat...
It's more environmentally efficient than pastures for free-range cows.
I don't know.
If food systems delivered healthy diets for all, we could save 8 million lives per year.
You could save 8 million lives per year?
How many would you kill?
Do we know how many?
People were estimated to have starved to death or entered starvation because of the response to COVID.
So in order to save, I don't know, let's just give the benefit of the doubt.
In order to save tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands of old geezers, we just condemned hundreds of millions into a state of absolute poverty, into a state of starvation.
Bill Gates was saying, because of the COVID interruption, Or I should say the response to COVID, interruption to the supply chain, hundreds of millions of people risk starvation.
Oh, but we did it to save tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, maybe, let's just even say, low millions.
And now we've created a new problem that we've got to remedy.
It's an amazing thing.
Government is the only position where you fail upwards, where every time you screw up and cause a problem, you give yourself a raise to deal with the problem that you created in response to the other problem that you were unable to resolve.
The WHO is committed to supporting countries to develop and implement policies to improve diets and fight climate change.
I'm therefore very pleased that over 130 countries have signed the COP28 UAE Declaration on Climate and Health.
Together, we can protect and promote the health of both people and planet.
I thank you.
Both people and planet.
Let me just see here something.
COVID response starvation millions.
Let's just, let me just, the 2020, let me just see this.
Okay, fine.
The WHO, this is the same jackass organization.
That is telling us now, we know how to solve problems of health and climate, trust us.
The 2023 edition of the report reveals that between 691 and 783 million people faced hunger in 2022, with a mid-range of 735 million.
This represents an increase of 122 million people compared to 2019 before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Wrong!
Not before the COVID-19 pandemic, before the government's utterly incompetent, corrupt, dishonest response to the COVID pandemic.
The COVID pandemic, I'm putting it in quotes now, people.
I've come a long way on my black pill.
The COVID pandemic, some might think, was actually just a rebranding of the flu season.
And I cannot call them stupid, crazy, or even wrong for hypothesizing that.
The COVID pandemic did nothing on its own.
You're right.
It did result in the death of a great many elderly people who were kept in long-term healthcare facilities.
The average age of the average bona fide COVID victim was actually older than the average lifespan.
Go figure.
The COVID pandemic did very little to fuck up the world.
It was the government's response to it.
The COVID pandemic did not increase starvation by 125 million people.
The government's response to it, just shutting down economies, shutting down countries, shutting down travel, rebranding and.
Yep.
But the WHO, which now says, look, our response to the COVID pandemic put another 130 million people in.
In a position of starvation.
But trust us, if we can rework food systems, I still don't know what the hell that word means, we can save 8 million people a year.
It's accounting for criminals.
Oh, we'll save 8 million people.
It's like children.
Well, I made 8 bucks today.
Alright, but you sold a $2,000 necklace for 8 bucks to make 8 bucks.
Yeah, but I made 8 bucks.
Well, I saved 8 million people this year.
Alright, you killed 130 million.
Don't expect me to give you credit for that, you corrupt nincompoop.
And I want to play this from Jessica Rose.
I'm going to do two more things before we head on over to Rumble.
Because Jessica Rose, a scientist with a functioning frickin' brain.
She's been on the channel at least three times.
Come on over to Rumble, there's a link.
I want to play this clip from Jessica Rose, and then we're going to end on YouTube with a little bit of a laugh.
You think these people are crazy.
You think some of these movies which have depicted cataclysmic end-of-world stuff like Dr. Strangelove, you thought they were exaggerating.
You thought it was too cartoonish, too comedic to be true.
That guy, whatever his name is, what's his name?
What's the guy's name there, this stupid guy from the WHO?
They're even more comical in reality than Dr. Strangelove was as parody.
Where is Jessica Rose?
I have it here.
Ah, here, listen to this.
She's amazing.
Here, listen to this.
We're going to play this whole thing.
But like you're a free entity, you're a sovereign soul being whatever when you come into this world and nobody can restrict your movement.
It's in the best interest of us as a species, as a social, you know, a bunch of social beings to form small beings.
Herds, you know, like communities of 150, I hear, are ideal.
And to, you know, group together because we do have predators.
We mostly have predators within our own species now, but, you know, this is, that's the limiting factor.
Like, we should restrict our own movement out of self-preservation.
But nobody has the right to tell you that you cannot go somewhere because of some shit.
That's bullshit.
That's an absolute lie.
It's not a lie.
It's an aberration of natural justice.
It's an aberration of human freedom.
What kind of human gets to think that they get to tell you to stay in your house from 10 to 5 in the absence of, I don't know, cataclysmic war?
You know what kind of human?
A frickin' nutcase who thinks we need to tell you what to eat so that we think we can manage a crisis of our own making better.
Psychopaths.
There's no other way to put it.
There's a reason why good people like Jessica Rose have no interest in governing others.
There's a reason.
I consider myself a decent person.
A good person.
Get in there and slash the government.
Go!
You're free, government workers.
You're no longer dependent.
You're no longer captive.
Go!
Oh, but we don't know how to make our own money.
We don't know how to work in the private sector.
We've been getting paid by government taxpayer dollars.
That's our career.
Welcome to freedom.
Barsical.
And that's basically how our entire system is set up now.
And that's the fear with this movement toward the social credit score system with the CBDCs and stuff.
It's like...
They're going to make it so that you can't move.
It's like the segue into not having flights anymore.
It's just going to be like slowly moving the goalpost farther and farther so that you don't even really notice that it's happening and then all of a sudden you're a cow in a cage.
It's a digital Berlin wall.
I mean, that's what it is.
A digital Berlin wall.
Oh, what's that?
You donated to the wrong charity?
Well, your life is over.
What's that?
You attended the wrong protest?
Your life is over.
You're not getting on a plane.
We're not locking you in jail.
We're just putting you on a no-fly list.
We're not locking you in jail.
We're just debanking you.
We're just making it so that you can't exist in this world, but we're not doing anything to you.
And then, by the way, if and when you lash out and go do something stupid, well, then we're going to come down on not only you, but everyone in your group.
These savages can't deal with justice.
They can't deal with the systems.
Oh, taxation is not theft.
It's armed robbery.
So you got...
What's the guy's name, by the way?
What's the guy's name?
The weirdo from The Who.
Who are you?
Who is he?
Who?
Who?
Let me see if I can...
While we do that, let me just go see Food Systems WHO.
Here, let's just see this.
Food System Overview.
Let's see if this is it.
I can't read that.
What the hell is that?
That's the Washington system.
Food system overview.
Agricultural production.
Oh, here, let's see.
This is what the systems are.
What's the guy's name?
Not Klaus Schwab.
Dr. Tedros.
I think it's Dr. Tedros.
Let's see what the food systems are.
This is from Washington State University.
I don't think this is necessarily what the WHO is talking about.
You got your agricultural system, processing, distribution, marketing.
Human health and well-being environment.
No, that sounds like...
We need to...
We need to make sure you eat plants.
Where did I go that I saw...
It was at a Burger King at the airport where they had the Impossible Whopper.
I'm not eating that.
Oh my god.
Meat is amazing.
It's the most nutrient-rich food out there.
I don't want to be mean to vegans, but there's a reason why vegans have certain stereotypes in terms of looking the way they look and why meat eaters...
Go swimming in ice-cold Canadian water.
I'm joking.
But no, the food systems.
They're going to interfere with the food system.
And then when 300 million people starve, they're going to say, how did it happen under Stalin?
You know how it happened under Stalin?
And I'm truly appreciating it now.
How do you have the Holodomor, the Ukrainian famine?
How do you have...
Socialism, communism, Leninism, whatever you want to call it, resulting in the starvation of 50 million.
How do you have it?
You have the government take something over and utterly destroy it because they don't know what they're doing.
And what's the WHA?
They're trying to take over the network of infrastructure that has been built over hundreds of years that led to the international global supply chain.
Well, they know they can shut it down.
Why can't they control the whole thing?
And then, oh, look at...
Whoa, Jesus, this is a lot harder.
Who would have thunk that Dr. Tedros doesn't have the expertise of a farmer in Venison, Quebec?
Venison, Quebec, baby.
Who would have thunk?
Oh, well, what's this?
We saved 8 million people, but we killed 100 million.
So...
But they didn't die from starvation.
They died from crime because they're criminals.
They died from other stuff that...
Another problem that we have to go regulate.
And then soon enough...
It's going to be them living in bunkers and saying, well, we saved one million politicians.
Listen to this.
It's so bloody good, I have to go watch this movie again, and maybe even with the kid.
You thought Dr. Tedros sounded crazy?
We must make you eat plants for the good of the environment.
You may not understand it, stupid citizen, but we do.
Well, we might have to go live in bunkers for the next million years, but don't worry.
Government officials, you're going to get the sexy women down in the bunkers.
If anybody has not seen Dr. Strangelove, stop watching now and go watch Dr. Strangelove.
After this, we're going over to Rumble.
You mean people could actually stay down there for 100 years?
This is after they initiate a nuclear holocaust.
After the governments of the world let Sweden and Finland join NATO, trigger a World War III cataclysmic nuclear...
Nuclear devastation.
Well, Zuckerberg's got his Hawaiian island allegedly bunker.
He can take 12 women down there.
He's going to have to take young women because they're going to have to reach peak fertility at different stages of the reproduction of the world.
So he's going to have to get, like, you know, 12-year-old, 15-year-old, 18-year-old.
I mean, they've got to start legal, but he's got a plan for the future, right?
You've got to get, like, fertile young people.
So that when the time comes, Zuckerberg can repopulate the Earth and the government officials in their bunkers can repopulate the Earth.
Sorry, I'll stop interrupting.
Would not be difficult, my Fuhrer.
Nuclear reactors could...
I'm sorry, Mr. President.
Nuclear reactors could provide power almost indefinitely.
Let me pause this here.
The joke here is not a joke.
I never understood it.
The joke here is that this guy is a Nazi doctor.
Working with the American government to plan ahead for the nuclear holocaust that they're about to create.
Oh, I'm sorry, when I first saw this movie, I didn't realize it was based on reality.
Operation Paperclip, Nazi scientists, Nazi doctors, Nazi military officials fleeing, or not even fleeing, being acquired by Western interests for their knowledge.
I didn't realize that this was actual reality.
So the whole joke here is this guy's got his doppelganger.
He keeps doing Zeke Heil or Heil Hitler.
And it's true.
It's more based in reality than I ever understood.
And by the way, it's less absurd than the reality in which we currently live.
Greenhouses could maintain plant life.
Animals could be bred and slaughtered.
A quick survey would have to be made of all the available mine sites in the country.
But I would guess that a dwelling space for several hundred thousand of our people could easily be provided.
Well, I would hate to have to decide who stays up and who goes down.
Oh, don't worry.
Don't worry.
We have AI for that.
I mean, it's not a joke.
This is like AI before AI.
Oh, don't worry.
We'll do it neutrally.
We'll get people based on sexual productivity, age, intelligence.
That's it.
AI will determine who lives and who dies.
Who gets good food and who gets wheat.
And by the way, it's so damn good.
Oh, sexual fertility.
You mean...
We, the survivors who messed up and caused this problem, we get hot chicks?
Fringe benefits, baby!
Of course, it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition.
Actually, they would be prodigiously, eh?
There would be much time and little to do.
Okay, I'm not going to play too much of this.
It's one of the best scenes of all time.
It's one of the best movies of all time, and I've got to rewatch it now.
Here's the link to that scene, if anybody hasn't seen it.
Before we go, by the way, I realize I haven't gotten to the chat in YouTube.
I'm going to get to the chat and rumble as well, and then we're going to head over.
Let me see here.
Oh, I didn't push this button.
Okay, let's just see here.
Ah, cripe, I think I missed something on the rumble side.
Okay.
Be that as it may.
Let me just get to the chatter.
Von Braun is famously shown with his arm in a sling while serving with NASA.
So Sellers is also shown with a bad wing.
It's amazing.
It's amazing!
Like, you can't even appreciate how good it is.
It sounds like...
Okay, so now hold on one second.
I almost forgot to read the Super Chats here.
Pasha Moyer in the house with $5.14, which I think is a shout-out to 514 Area Code, being Montreal.
What's the word for Jack Smith?
But Viva, I thought this was a family show.
Wait until we get to the Jack Smith stuff on the other side of things.
Careful of all that carbon, if not trees needed.
Careful...
I'm not your buddy guy.
Careful for all that carbon.
It's not trees needed.
I think that's a...
Let me see here.
There was more carbon over 80,000 years ago.
Yeah, well, I guess the argument might be that 80,000 years ago, there was a mass extinction with 75 million.
I don't know what there was 80,000 years ago.
We were not yet in an ice age, but...
It's so stupid!
You would have these...
Mr. Dr. Tedros talking about how you have to save the dinosaurs.
In the event of a mass extinction.
I'm not your buddy guy says, you see the article on breathing and climate change?
Oh yeah, no, no, there's this.
Well, they're going after cow burps.
So the only next thing is to go after human burps.
You know, like, if you eat a diet that produces gas, they'll tax you.
So what they'll do is they'll say, no beef for you.
You'll get vegetables.
Yeah, sure, vegetables make everybody gaseous.
So we're going to tax you on your burps and your farts after we force you to eat plants which make you burp and fart more.
It's like, it would be absurd if it weren't so bloody absurd.
Vladstein says, so is Trudeau still licking the ball sack of China?
I believe the answer to that question would be yes.
Who was out there licking the boots of Justin Trudeau?
The people on Twitter still defending Justin Trudeau blows my freaking mind.
Okay, with that said, okay, that's my sister-in-law.
Let me get a copy of this.
One last time, people, we're going to go over to...
Rumble is the link right there.
We're going to go over to...
If you want to come over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, locals, come, join, be a member, non-supporting, be a supporting member if you so choose.
Otherwise, and regardless, if you're on YouTube and you're not coming over, shame on you.
How dare you?
Look at this thing right here.
This is beautiful.
Oh, and this other thing.
Just stuff everywhere.
My mother-in-law's studio.
Here, look at this.
Rose mailing everywhere.
Just boom, flowers.
There's another one.
Here.
Yeah, I'll take this one.
Nope, that's stuck to the table.
I'm going to leave that here.
Just everything, man.
Everything.
She could do a garage sale and raise a million dollars selling Rosemailing, her artwork.
Okay.
Did I get everything on the chat on the Rumble side?
Let me go to Locals, Rumble.
Okay, I think I got everything there.
All right, let's come on over to YouTube or Rumble.
And I'm going to do probably a standalone vlog breakdown of it.
For ease of sharing of the highlights.
Am I still in Quebec?
Hold on one second.
Mankind loses wisdom as they walk away from God.
I can understand that.
Am I still in Quebec?
I've returned to Quebec for the holidays.
Come back, everybody gets colds because whatever.
Travel stress and all that other crap.
Trying to jack up with a little swim.
What's up with the 140pp?
I blame Justin Trudeau.
It's Canadian internet.
We're up in the country and that's what it is.
Alright.
Come on over to Rumble and or Locals.
We're going to end on YouTube in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. Let me just put on mute while I sniffle.
Let the Coke jokes begin, but no, I have a little bit of a sniffle.
So, let me make sure that we're good here.
On Rumble.
Oh, there was one Rumble rant.
I don't know if I missed a bunch because I hadn't opened up the app yet.
I'm Not Your Buddy Guy says Super Chat Limited when I could type.
I wanted to type...
It's not like trees need it.
Looking at that video.
My goodness, the video's terrible.
I've been on one amplification of that 3A radar, so sorry about that, guys.
But it'll be good.
You'll appreciate my beautiful face when I get back to the non-Vaseline filter.
Okay.
Jack Smith.
Let me pull up one article.
We're going to go over the 1,000-foot overview.
Oh, no, no, no, sorry.
We're not going to go over an article.
We're going to go to a The Hill video.
Rumble, locals.
Let me see what's going on in locals here.
Okay, we're good on locals.
Has The Hill always been so bad?
I always thought The Hill was conservative.
I watch The Hill, and it feels like I'm watching a slightly more educated The View.
It's like a conservative The View.
But it's still garbage.
So I want to pick the brains of people who I think probably know more than me.
I know what I think.
I sometimes know that I think things without having the right or the knowledge to think them, but I still think them nonetheless.
So I go pick some brains and see where people get things right in my mind, where they get them wrong.
I wanted to hear what they had to say about Jack Smith, the amicus brief, alleging, arguing that Jack Smith lacked the authority in his appointment and therefore everything he's done is invalid from the get-go.
Then I stumbled on this.
Here, listen to this.
I mean, insurrection, insurrectionary activity to me, like, involves the seizing of arms, the, like, actual violence, revolution, that kind of thing.
Oh, you mean, like, as far as your very insightful understanding goes, insurrection actually involves the criminal legal definition of insurrection, not the Merriam-Webster's definition?
Okay, fine.
Listen to what his co-host says.
I don't know who she is.
Whereas Trump was using questionable legal maneuvers that, again, might reflect some underlying criminality.
It was a lawfare insurrection.
When the founding fathers included the Insurrection Clause Amendment, the 14th Amendment, to exclude from participation in government the very forces that just fought to secede from these United States of America, they also meant, mutandis mutandis, lawfare insurrection.
It is not the kind of thing the people who wrote...
The 14th Amendment had in mind an actual army that was mustered against the United States.
The people who wrote the 14th Amendment couldn't foresee Trump posting on social media talking about the folks that were at the Capitol on January 6th.
I think it's interesting to think of his leadership on that day, what he was directing people to do, what now.
We know he knew was happening on the day of January 6th and didn't want to call in the National Guard, was kind of cheering them on, encouraging them at the Capitol for many hours while this was happening.
Does that mean he was inciting an insurrection?
If he's the leader of it, if he inspired it, if he gave a speech there and then they marched onto the Capitol afterwards only to break in and try and steal those electoral votes.
I'm not sure.
I'm not a legal scholar.
I can see a case being made, though.
And I'm not sure what the makeup is and try and steal those electoral votes.
I'm not sure.
I'm not a legal scholar.
I can see a case being made, though.
I'm not sure.
I'm not a legal scholar.
But I can see a case being...
I'm not sure.
I'm not a doctor.
But, sir, I think you've got cancer.
I mean, you got a little pimple on your face.
I'm not sure that that's a malignant tumor or a pimple, but I think I could say you have cancer.
What kind of idiocy is this?
And I'll get to the kicker in 12 seconds.
And I'm not sure what the makeup is of a lot of these state supreme courts, but I can definitely see when it comes to 2024, Trump being off the ballot in a great number of states.
So tell me, chat, Has the Hill always been, like, to me it feels like the Hill is conservative-ish, and they're now trying to sinisterly, surreptitiously brainwash the right into believing the very same lies that the left has been promoting for years now.
Oh, I shut down the thing, and I want to go to say, you're entitled to have your own stupid opinion, but you're not entitled to have your own lying, untrue facts.
What did she say?
Oh, God!
Oh, my goodness, what did she say that Trump did?
That he didn't call in the National Guard!
I mean, that's a lie!
It's a lie, it's dishonest, and it's legally untenable to begin with.
Kash Patel, during the Colorado trial, said we discussed it.
He said they would call them in if needed.
In the days leading up to it, they never asked for it.
And then in explaining why that is, well, he explained the hierarchy of how it has to work to call in the National Guard.
The president can't just deploy the National Guard to any jurisdiction without that jurisdiction requesting it, lest that be deemed to be an actual military coup.
Imagine deploying the military.
When it hasn't been requested or required, they would frame that as a coup.
Don't deploy the National Guard.
And they frame that as a passive insurrection.
And this woman, I don't know what her name is, gets out there and says, he didn't call the National Guard.
Factually incorrect, legally backwards.
And she's out there now saying, well, because of all these facts that I've made up that I'm misrepresenting, you don't need to be a legal scholar to accurately represent and reflect the facts.
You just need to be honest.
And they're actually seemingly trying to sensitize the conservative side of the aisle that if and when this happens, well, it's not so bad because, you know, he didn't call in the National Guard.
He participated in an insurrection.
He said things that he didn't actually say to a crowd that was already there, ready to store some shit up because it had however many feds in it.
They didn't try to steal anything, says PudgeTV.
That's also true.
They weren't trying to steal the electoral votes.
They wanted them to be certified properly.
So I go to see them and I'm not going to...
Hold on, I'm going to sneeze again.
Oh boy, hold on.
It's coming.
It's not coming.
You know, you can't trust them on anything.
So they're talking about Jack Smith and whether or not the amicus brief, you know, they didn't get into any meaningful analysis of it.
And I can recognize right now, I cannot get into any meaningful analysis of the legal strength of the argument raised in the amicus brief.
It makes sense to me.
And I can say that even if I think it makes sense, and even if I'm inclined to say, okay, you might be right in law, the reality is such that it's like building a house, basically.
without a permit and that it said oh you built this entire house without a permit we're going to petition the city and have the house destroyed probably not i mean probably not what they might do is say okay well we'll retroactively issue you the permits or we'll issue the permits pay a fine or they'll say if it's the government yeah you you don't own that house anymore we'll we'll appropriate that house but nobody's going to destroy it undo all of the work which will have to be Jack Smith lawfully appointed as special counsel.
Or unlawfully appointed a special counsel.
There would have either been a special counsel, or they're going to say to the extent that it's criminal law, any attorney general could have done it in any other jurisdiction.
They're not going to throw out all of the work, the corrupt work that Jack Smith has done, just because in law maybe he wasn't lawfully appointed.
But before I even get too far ahead of myself.
So the analogy that I work with is...
Even if the house was built without the lawful permits, they're not going to raise the house to the ground and destroy all that work if their intention is to build the house anyhow.
So they'll find a way to say, okay, he's not appointed.
We're going to go through Congress.
Congress is going to approve a special counsel, ratify all of the conduct, or maybe review some of it.
That's what I think is going to happen.
But let me bring up what I highlighted.
Here we go.
Just the section that I highlighted, and then we're going to get into the link, which I have as well.
What federal statutes and the Constitution do not allow, however, is for the Attorney General to appoint a private citizen, which Jack Smith was, who was never confirmed by the Senate, as a substitute United States Attorney under the title Special Counsel.
This is what happened on November 18, 2022.
The appointment was unlawful, as are all the actions, the lawful actions that flowed from it.
Okay, now hold on one second.
That was my major highlight, but I'll bring up the actual amicus.
Hold on.
I have it in the backdrop here somewhere.
It's right here.
Okay, boom.
Shakalaka.
And...
Okay, so...
I cannot...
I cannot adjudicate...
Hold on.
Let me just do one thing here.
Don't want anybody seeing...
Me rubbing my nose on my mother-in-law's sweater.
Okay.
So let's see here.
On petition for a writ of certiorari.
Let me just bring out that thing here.
No, get rid of those is what I want to do.
Boom shakalaka.
Here we go.
On petition.
So now, brief of former Attorney General Edwin Meese III.
So this is one thing that's relevant here.
This is sort of like out of Canada, Brian Peckford taking a charter challenge to the federal court.
Brian Peckford being the last living signatory to the...
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
He's the last living signatory to it.
He negotiated it, drafted it, ratified it, was in government when it happened.
The presumption is that he knows what the intent was of the Charter of Rights and Freedom in Canada.
And the intent there was, you don't get to lock people down just because you claim that there's a public health emergency.
Especially if that public health emergency is just a bad influenza season rebranded.
So, in this particular case, you've got a former Attorney General.
I think he was Attorney General under Reagan.
We're going to see there.
And law professor, and probably a better law professor than Lawrence Tribe.
My goodness, must he feel vindicated?
Holy crap, I forgot about that.
Lawrence Tribe is the one who predicted, said that the legal theory to bar Trump from the ballot is a perfectly tenable legal theory.
And then the lower court in Colorado said no.
Michigan said no.
I want to say Minnesota said no.
I forget which other state said no.
And then four partisan hacks on the Supreme Court of Colorado said yes.
He must feel so vindicated.
Okay, so he's a law professor, and I'll say it sounds like he's a lot smarter than Lawrence Tribe, or at least he's not blinded by partisan politics just yet.
Supporting neither party.
Just the justice.
Just the law.
So let's scroll down here.
This is the question presented.
Whether private citizen Jack Smith...
I love it.
Don't call him special counsel.
Private citizen.
Schlock.
A schlock who I suspect they have blackmail material on.
Who himself might have partaken in a blackmail extortion scheme in Eastern Europe.
We'll talk about that in the New Year's as well.
Whether private citizen Jack Smith lacks authority to represent the United States, which jurisdictional requirement must exist at all stages of litigation, and which cannot be waived in filing his petition for a writ...
Oh, in filing...
Okay.
It's weird, but it's an ugly way of phrasing it.
That's the question.
In filing his writ of certiorari to this court.
Oh, that's right.
Jack Smith petitioned the Supreme Court.
So they're saying, look, he doesn't even have the authority to do this because he was never properly appointed in the first place.
A lot of table of authorities.
Let's just get to...
We're going to read the first few pages.
And then we're going to see where this goes.
Introduction and interests of Amici.
Amici's brief.
Amici Curie is a friend of the court.
They're not a party to the suit, but they are someone who thinks they have something legally relevant to add to the debate.
The court should reject Mr. Smith's request for a certiorari before a judgment for the simple reason that he lacks authority to ask for it.
Nor does he have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution.
Who would have it?
An attorney general for D.C.?
Those actions can only be taken by persons properly appointed as federal officers to properly created federal offices.
Neither Smith nor the position of special counsel under which he purportedly acts meet those criteria, and this is a serious problem for the American rule of law, whatever one may think of the defendant or the conduct at issue in the underlying prosecution.
The illegality addressed in this brief started November 18, 2022, when Merrick Garland Remember, Who's Merrick Garland, people?
Garland is a man who got denied his seat on the Supreme Court because the Republicans refused to hold confirmation hearings, saying that you can't appoint a Supreme Court.
And my goodness, the things Garland has done as Attorney General...
confirm that he was unfit and undeserving of the nomination and the seat to begin with.
Smith was appointed, quote, "to conduct the ongoing investigation into whether any person or entity, including the former President Donald Trump, violated law in connection with efforts to interfere with the lawful transfer power following the 2020 presidential election or the certification of the Electoral College vote held on or about January 6, 2022." Remember that insurrection that so wildly interfered with the Orderly administration of justice that the certification was delayed a whopping eight hours.
Okay.
I'm back.
Let's see what we got here.
Okay, keep going down.
Garland cited a statutory authority for his appointment.
Some Section 28 USC of the United States Code.
None of those statutes nor...
Now, this is where there's going to be an argument.
Like, I'm not any legal...
In any legal position to say whether or not the Section 28 U.S.C.
509-515 does or does not authorize it, I'd be curious to hear Legal Eagle's take on it.
I'm not saying that to be facetious.
And then I'd be curious to hear someone else's position who says Legal Eagle is wrong.
But none of those statutes, nor any other statutes or constitutional provisions, remotely authorize the appointment by the Attorney General of a private citizen to receive extraordinary criminal law enforcement power under the title of Special Counsel.
These are going to be the arguments that are fleshed out in the 32 pages that follow, or the 20 pages that follow.
Here, listen.
It makes total sense.
Again, I would pick Barnes' big brain on this.
How do federal...
Representatives get appointed.
Like, okay, you get appointed to positions of power.
Don't you go through a confirmation hearing?
Doesn't the, I think, Senate have to vote on it?
Listen to this.
So first, the Appointments Clause requires that all federal offices, quote, not otherwise provided for, end quote, in the Constitution, must be, quote, established by law, the Constitution.
Okay.
And there is no statute establishing the Office of Special Counsel in the DOJ.
We had this argument back in the day with Barnes.
They said, oh, Jack Smith is independent.
Well, he's not independent if the only reason he exists is because he was appointed by Biden's DOJ.
So he's not independent.
And then if he's not independent and he basically is an officer of Biden's DOJ, well, he's engaging in election interference for and on behalf of the person who appointed him.
Simple enough.
Here they're saying there's no statute.
To establish the Office of Special Counsel, the statutory provisions relied upon by the DOJ and lower courts for the appointment of special counsels over the past half century do not authorize the creation and appointment of special counsels at the level of United States Attorney General.
Very interesting.
I understand this question may or may not have arisen in this framing.
Oh, in Nixon, there it is.
And the United States v.
Nixon does not hold to the contrary because no question was ever raised in that case about the validity of the independent counsel's appointment.
That case concerned the relationship between the president and the DOJ as an institution, not between the president and any specific actor purportedly appointed by the DOJ.
I would listen to Dershowitz on this as well.
Second, even if one overlooks the absence of the statutory authority for the position, there is no statute specifically authorizing the Attorney General, rather than the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to appoint such a special counsel.
I mean, I know what I believe, I know what I don't have good cause to believe, or I lack the expertise to believe, but I know what makes bloody sense in all of this.
Is willy-nilly, behind closed doors, secretly appoint private citizens to positions of federal authority?
To go after former presidents without having Senate approval?
Under the appointments clause, inferior officers can be appointed by the department heads only if Congress so directs by statute, United Constitution, Article 2, and so directs specifically enough to overcome a clear statement presumption in favor of presidential appointments and senatorial confirmation.
I thought that's what you'd have to do.
You want to talk about rogue actors?
Seeking to cling to power by excluding from the ballot of the next election those who might take the vote.
Oh yeah, let's just appoint willy-nilly our own private hired guns to disqualify the person who's slated to beat us in the next election.
Wow!
I mean, Putin is laughing at this.
Brazil is laughing at this.
They're actually taking notes.
No such statute exists for the special counsel.
Third, the special counsel, if a valid officer, is a superior or principal rather than inferior officer, and thus cannot be appointed by any means other than presidential appointment and senatorial confirmation, regardless of what any statutes purport to say.
I've got my questions.
What do we have here?
Superior versus inferior officer, but I understand how that means.
I mean, I guess we're going to be carrying out state functions.
They've got to get approval by the government.
This is not just like...
It's literally like that guy there.
Was it Dick Durbin?
Who was the one talking about allowing illegal immigrants into the military?
This is like creating your own private lawfare.
Police force.
Prosecutors.
Hey.
What is it?
Private citizen Jack Smith, do you want some special powers?
Here, we'll appoint you and go after our political rivals to make sure that they can never get into power while we accuse them of being the ones who would never relinquish power if they ever got re-elected because they did relinquish power the last time they got elected.
I want to swear.
Forget it.
This is true as a matter of original meaning, and it is even true as a matter of case law.
Once one understands that neither Morrison, I don't know what these are, can plausibly be read to say that any person who is any fashion subordinate to another executive official other than the president is an inferior officer.
Such a reading of those decisions leads to the ludicrous result that there is only one non-inferior officer in every executive department.
I cannot pretend to understand that.
To be sure.
There are times when the appointment of a special counsel is appropriate, and statutes and the Constitution both provide ample means for such appointments by allowing the use of existing United States attorneys.
Existing United States attorneys, not willy-nilly hired-gun private citizens who we know are going to do our dirty work for us, maybe because we have dirty stuff on them.
Maybe.
I swear to you, I think Jack Smith is being blackmailed.
Or they have dirt on him like they have on all those other filthy, corrupt, perverted, morally degenerate, sexual deviant politicians.
Yes, I'm saying it.
Under the United States attorneys, any number of United States attorneys have performed with distinction the function of serving as special counsel.
For example, December 3rd, Patrick Fitzgerald, who was then the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, was lawfully appointed by the then-acting Attorney General to investigate the Valerie Plame leak affair, which arose in the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia.
District Court.
Okay, I remember that.
Mr. Fitzgerald was a Senate-confirmed officer of the United States, prosecuted and secured the conviction of Vice President Richard Cheney's Chief of Staff, Scooter Libby, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Other recent examples involve Senate-confirmed U.S. Attorney Rod Rosenstein, John Huber, John Durham.
All of these investigations and prosecutions of high-level wrongdoing were It's amazing.
There seems to be good precedent for this argument and no precedent for the other argument.
He can just appoint whoever the hell he wants, no Senate confirmation hearings, no oversight, hired goons.
What federal statutes in the Constitution do not allow, however, is for the Attorney General to appoint a private citizen who has never been confirmed by the Senate as a substitute United States Attorney under the title, quote, special counsel, end quote.
That is what happened on November 18, 2022.
The appointment was unlawful, as are all the legal actions that have flowed from it, including Citizen Smith's attempt.
It is myth.
It's so...
It's out of a movie.
Mr. Smith.
Citizen Smith, not Comrades.
We'll call him Comrade Smith next time.
Current attempts to obtain a ruling from this court.
Given the interest in the rule of law, the legal issue addressed in this brief is of particular importance to Amici.
The Honorable Edwin Meese, here we get into some credentials, served as the 75th Attorney General of the United States after having served as a councillor to the President and is now the Ronald Reagan Distinguished Fellow Emeritus.
At the Heritage Foundation.
During his tenure as Attorney General, the Department of Justice steadfastly defended proper limits on federal power.
For their part, Professor Calabresi and Lawson are scholars of the original public meaning of the Constitution.
Members of this court have cited their work in the past, so on and so forth.
Okay.
And then that's it.
So I'm not getting into the bulk of this.
It's going to be another, how many, 12, 20 pages.
Well, let's just go to the conclusion.
This is going to flesh out the legal theory behind the already elaborated legal theory with citations and all that other stuff and a nuanced discussion that I'll go through and maybe pin some highlights if there's any good ones like out of that dissenting decision from Colorado.
But let's just go down here.
Conclusion.
Not clothed in the authority of the federal government, Smith is a modern example of the naked emperor.
Improperly appointed, he has no more authority to represent the United States in this court than Bryce Harper, Taylor Swift, or Jeff Bezos.
Probably some bad examples because I think a lot of people...
I don't know who Bryce Harper is, but I know who Taylor Swift and Jeff Bezos is.
That fact is sufficient to sink Smith's petition, and the court should deny review.
We express no views on the merits.
Who's Bryce Harper?
Hold on a second.
Let's drive me a little crazy.
Is that Taylor Swift's boyfriend?
Bryce Harper.
Baseball player.
Okay.
Good for him.
And then what I'm going to do here is I'm just going to give everybody the link.
So, look, in as much as I can read the words and I can go through the authorities to distinguish Nixon versus this particular case, probably wouldn't understand very much until I had a bigger brain break it down in a way that even a Canadian can understand.
But it's quite fascinating.
Here's a link to the filing.
Okay, boom, there you go.
And you can all go read that by yourselves.
But we're not ending right there, by any means.
So that's it.
Okay, hypothetically, Jack Smith's filing is dismissed.
They're going to appoint.
I don't know how they do it.
They'll find a lawful way to do it.
They'll say, look, there's been so much work done for stability.
We need answers to these big legal questions.
Dismiss him.
Find someone to replace him.
I don't know, ratify some stuff.
There's no way.
There's no way in God's blue earth.
Hell or high water, they're not tossing all of these indictments on this particular ground.
What they might do is toss it on other grounds and then say, oh, and by the way, he was unlawfully appointed from the beginning.
Shame on you, you godforsaken criminals.
They might do that.
But there's not a chance in hell that all the work That they've done is going to just, you know, go down the drain because of a technicality that they might say at the end of the day, which...
That's it.
Okay, so hold on.
What I wanted to do right here, actually, was just Boxing Day Special.
Here, I just wanted to bring these up.
Kay Fleury is now a monthly supporter.
Kay Fleury, bienvenue.
Bienvenue aux fêtes.
Bienvenue aux parties.
Viva Frey.
Then we got Bolo BRL.
Don't forget Liskinoism, where Stalin propped up Lisenkoism.
Yeah, and his theory that communism could be applied to botany and crops.
More failure, less food, more corpses.
Yep, and then they blamed it.
They blamed it on others.
They blamed it on people who are allegedly...
They blamed it on anything.
Deny the numbers and then find another reason to blame it.
Or just outright just lie.
Say it's not happening.
Super chat limited what I could type.
I wanted to type.
It's not like trees needed.
Said I'm not your buddy guy.
Okay, now hold on because we got a couple of good things left before I get hauled out of here by my wife.
What was this one here?
Oh, I should have brought this up during the Trump discussion.
Going back to the insurrection by lawfare.
A lawfare insurrection.
He didn't call in the National Guard.
And I said, remember that time when everyone was screaming about how Trump was going to call in the military in order to remain in power?
And then those same people accused him of engaging in insurrection for not calling in the National Guard.
You can't logic with Democrats.
I stand by that.
Don't seem to have a notification.
Oh, I got another one there.
Here, that's the link to the tweet.
Let me see here.
And then someone was saying, oh, God, just because Trump, someone on Twitter, The DeSantis camp is really, really, they're getting very annoying on Twitter, and I don't know if they appreciate it.
And I say that being fully aware of the fact that there's a great many people on Twitter who are probably getting very annoyed with me.
Someone tweeted out, just because Trump has been falsely persecuted by the state doesn't mean I have to support him.
It's a too nuanced discussion for Twitter, but I would argue that, yeah, that's specifically why you have to support him.
Because if you do not, and then you try to politically profit from that partisan, unconstitutional persecution, you're almost as guilty as the people doing it in the first place.
Maybe even more guilty.
Because the people who are doing it are letting you know that you're scoundrels.
You're trying to conceal the fact that you're a scoundrel to politically profit off the acts of scoundrels while purporting to be...
To paint yourself as a lawful constitutionalist.
Yeah.
My argument is that everyone, even if you're a Democrat who doesn't like Trump, you have to support Trump, specifically because what the state is doing to him.
Because if you do not, you can say all you want.
Oh, I'm against it.
It's terrible.
It's an abuse of the process.
You can say that all you want.
But if you try to politically profit from it, what you are basically saying is, it's terrible, but...
If I can profit from it just a little bit, I'll tolerate it.
Some might even say that you're worse than the scoundrels in the first place, because at least the scoundrel lets you know that they're a scoundrel.
We're still at one bar.
This is great.
We got one more rumble around in there.
TZ Burton says, Merry Christmas, Viva.
My wife is a Vancouver BC gal.
Safe journey back to Florida.
I mostly watch the replay, and I think that's a shout-out to Salty Cracker.
Thank you very much.
I just forgot your name already here.
TZ Burton.
Yeah, BC's beautiful.
Anyways, we're going to have a fun time.
We're going to see the rest of the family before we go back.
We did the polar plunge, and so I think we should be good for the rest of the holiday.
Let's go to the chat here.
Actually, you know what?
Let's just do this for one second.
What I'll do here.
I'll bring this back up, add to stage, and we'll deal with the chat and just have some chat before we go over to Rumble.
There's one last thing you're going to want to see here.
Rhee, that would be a DeSantis move.
You are correct, sir.
That would be a DeSantis move, says Linda.
Yeah, no, I'm noticing with not so...
What are they called?
Not sorority?
What are the people who speak for you called in politics?
Ah, shite.
Surrogates.
That's what his sycophants are saying.
It's crazy.
It's terrible what they're doing to Trump.
But he's unfit to run for office because it's too much of a distraction because of all the lawfare that he's going through.
Okay, well, hey, thanks.
Hand it to the Democrats and think that they're going to stop at Trump.
Well, if it worked on Trump, it'll work on Vivek.
It'll work on DeSantis.
And if they don't try it on DeSantis or Haley, it's probably because that is a swamp pig that they want in place of power.
January Sixers have asked DeSantis for help.
DeSantis' office tells them they are on their own.
That's from I Hate Liberals and Rhinos.
Other than moral support, I'm not sure what DeSantis can do.
These are federal charges, and it's not like a state governor can do anything.
Could he pledge a pardon if he gets elected?
That would solidify some political goodwill.
If we're just speaking, if we're just talking out loud.
Bill Dozer says, have we heard any more about Rumble Studio?
They're working on it.
I gave them a list of 12 to 15 items that are obligatory fixes before it can even be reused.
Because, hold on.
Oh, it's coming.
Oh, it's coming.
Excuse me.
I gave them a list of 12 to 15 fixes that are mandatory fixes, so it's coming.
Carrie Lake will be Trump's VP.
I hate liberals and rhinos.
Yeah, I'm waiting for the story to be confirmed bogus that all of those DeSantis surrogates ran with.
Oh, MAGA are going to be freaking out now that Trump is talking about picking Haley.
Talking about picking Haley according to two anonymous sources familiar with the conversations as reported by NBC or CBS.
I forget which one.
Holy crap.
They become idiots all of a sudden.
They become idiots who believe fake news all of a sudden.
Well, now I'm going to believe NBC and their anonymous sources when it says something that I think I can use to, um, what's the word?
To dunk on Trump.
I just, Vivek, going to the other countries.
I don't know what that means.
Eric Trump for VP, cry harder campaign slogan, read the kung fu-dom.
That would be hilarious.
Holy cow.
That would be one way to ensure that...
Impeachment would not be a...
A third impeachment would not be a solution to anything.
No, no, no.
Tulsi Gabbard says Dean Tate.
I like Tulsi Gabbard.
So we got Sean Joe.
Now I understand why some of these comments are highlighted.
Who's a supporter.
Says Trump needs a DC insider as VP.
Someone who knows the swamp.
Robert Barnes?
Oh my goodness.
That would be funny.
Who said that's a fake news story?
Kata Futaba.
Kata Futaba.
Futaba says, if you have me on as a guest, I'll look and see who you are.
No promises.
This is not how I do things, but I'll screen grab and just see who you are.
Trump will not pick Haley per Bannon Lupec.
No shit.
The whole story was bullshit to begin with.
But they run with the bullshit.
And it's like, you can believe the fake news when they say, when they report on something that's contrary to narrative.
You can't believe them when they report something that's convenient to your narrative, but still convenient to their narrative.
Two anonymous sources familiar with the conversations.
I'm quoting from the article.
We went over it on Sunday.
Oh, yeah.
Lake is busy running for Senate.
Jim, 1979, 4. Well, she's got it.
I think that's a good move anyhow.
Okay.
Because I don't think I have very much longer until the wife comes down and the kids come in.
I wanted to bring this up.
Wait, about this one, this one, the video monster.
Jack Smith, Viva.
The amicus.
Okay, now.
We're going to end on this as we go over to our after party on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Let me give everybody the link there.
Link to locals.
And the question is, do I have coffee, yerba mate, or Red Bull?
The Yerba Mate has half the calories of a Red Bull, and I have two of them.
So what's the point?
It's got 60 milligrams of caffeine, which is not quite exactly enough for what I need.
Robert Barnes as VP would be good, good.
It says P1GL33T.
Vivek Ramaswamy should be Trump's impeachment poison pill, much like Kamala Harris is for Joe Biden.
Well, that's what I loved about Vivek's answer to the question from Ezra.
When he said, look, you're running in Trump's race.
You're a distant fourth, fifth, whatever.
Why are you doing it?
And he says, look, Vivek says, I don't think they're going to let Trump anywhere near the White House.
He's probably right.
The only question is the extent to which they go to to make sure that that doesn't happen.
And to the extent that that's what Vivek believes not to be blackpilled, I'm going to be the one truest to Trump's principles of the remaining GOP candidates if that ever happens.
I mean, that's how Vivek...
Blows by Nikki Haley, and I don't even believe that Nikki Haley has the support that the polls say she has.
I believe Nikki Haley is a swamp creature that even MSM now is rallying behind, and oh yeah, you get those polls that show she's surging in the polls.
Horse crap.
That's what Vivek's function is here.
He's the poison pill.
If they get rid of Trump, they've got to get rid of Vivek, they've got to get rid of RFK Jr., despite his lackluster answer to the Supreme Court question that he had on Charlie Kirk, but so on and so forth.
Vivek is the only real choice for Trump, says Kay Fleury, who's a new member to the community.
Now I see these, I see the highlighted, Sean Joe says Trump needs a DC insider, so I saw that one.
I'm going to scroll up and just stop at these.
K. Fleury, DeSantis is being a politician.
He should know by now we are sick of professional politicians.
It's so easy.
I scroll up and I can see the highlighted member comments.
There were some from before that I missed.
Let me just see if I can find those.
K. Fleury is a new member and I'm scrolling up.
Any highlighted red ones?
Here's one from PudgeTV.
Even if they had been on private property, they were let in by Capitol Police.
Nobody broke any laws by walking in around the Capitol, says PudgeTV.
And a judge at least said that with respect to one defendant from January 6. People ask for, where's the evidence that the election was stolen?
The intelligence officers and deep state colluding with Twitter and social media to censor the Hunter Biden laptop.
Sorry, end of discussion.
Where's the evidence that they let people in with open doors to the January 6th of the Capitol building?
A judge acquitted somebody on that very basis.
He said they were waving them in.
They opened the doors for him.
How can I convict him?
There's your evidence.
Anybody who says, where's the evidence?
It's there.
You just need to know where to look.
And you have to have your bloody eyes open.
Okay.
We're going to end on Rumble with this video to play us out.
And then you can come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com if you want to come around for the after party.
It's a good laugh.
I've uploaded this video to Newsflare.
See if they can license it because I think it's damn funny.
It was not a setup.
And I officially broke.
Well, I shouldn't spoil the surprise.
Come on over to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com And if you're not going to, I'll see you tomorrow.
Probably going to go live tomorrow.
At the very least, I'll do a video probably at some point today because I have an obsession.
We've all come to grips with that.
Even my wife.
She knows I have to do it.
I don't feel good if I don't do it.
So I'll probably end up doing it.
Link to Locals, but I'll be live tomorrow and throughout this holiday because I did not lug all of this crap up from Florida in a briefcase that gave me blisters hauling it through the airport for nothing.
All right.
All right.
Okay.
Okay.
Here.
Here we go.
Stop it.
And by the way, I have perfect form when it comes to axing.
Come on over to vivabarslaw.locals.com and I will see you there in two.
Enjoy.
A little known fact.
Splitwood.
Yep.
Then I'm a master axler here for this.
Oh, get up.
Ah!
Thank you.
Wait, did you do that again?
No, because I did it broken.
Did you ask?
Okay, now I gotta get Uncle Vincent an axe for Christmas.
Stop recording.
Look, before I leave, in fairness, that axe was going to break.
It's probably better that it broke with me than anybody else.
Someone else might have been killed.
They might have broken their arm.
But do appreciate, I split that piece with one shot.
It was a wet piece of wood, and I split it with one shot.
Boom!
Eat it, wood!
And then I broke the handle.
And it wasn't just that the little divot popped out.
I broke the wood.
That's how strong I am.
Did he ask?
Okay, now I've got to get Uncle Vincent an axe for Christmas.
Stop recording.
Alright, people.
That's it.
Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com and we're going to have our after party and then I'm going to go make a decision on the Red Bull Yerba Mate or a cup of coffee.
Everybody, peace out, peeps.
See you on Locals.
People, how are we doing here?
What does this stream look like?
It doesn't look any...
I'm looking at the video here.
It doesn't look...
Let me see here.
Has it been like this?
That's not so bad.
It's not so bad.
▲
Export Selection