All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 27, 2023 - Viva & Barnes
01:04:14
James O'Keefe DONE DIRTY! Trans Regressivism Canadian Fake News & MORE?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It activates the brown fat going.
It activates the brown fat, yeah.
It's like a controlled activation of your immune system and your brown fats.
Oh, yeah?
Because then you get out and you're forced to warm up.
Oh, I remember that.
Go Rogan!
This is for you.
Get the brown fats going.
It sucks.
You're going to do it.
Feels like it was just yesterday.
Well, I feel like having a bit of a how it started versus how it's going, that was yesterday.
Was that yesterday?
I'm going to be hitting the mute button.
I'm going to be hitting the mute button a lot today.
Look, I know what everybody's thinking, and if you're anything like my dad, you're going to be saying, Machaya, David.
Machaya, David.
You act stupid and now you got a cold.
The reality is...
I was already coming down with a cold before then.
The kids had colds, and when kids have colds, the parents are going to get them.
It's just a matter of time.
So it started off as a polar plunge.
Viva, living life, is now Viva, drinking chamomile tea out of a Golden Girls mug.
Alone.
Why alone?
Look, because it's Christmas, and I know that even family doesn't want to be stuck in the same room house as somebody who's snotting, coughing, sneezing, walking around.
Oh, I feel so bad.
Look at my eyes.
Look at my eyes.
Watery eyes.
Oh.
Viva's voice has gone up two octaves due to ball shrinkage, and it's gone now down two octaves due to...
The funniest thing is this.
When you get a cold, everybody's still a little bit crazy.
I want to make sure you don't have COVID.
Okay, it's great.
I don't have COVID.
That's great.
I just have another cold, which for my demographic is probably much riskier, you know, statistically than COVID.
No locals?
Hold on one second.
If there's no locals, there should be.
Let me, so hold on, hold on, hold on.
We should be live on locals.
Yeah, we're live on locals.
What are you saying?
Don't say that.
Yeah, we're live.
So I do the COVID test.
It's like, oh, jackpot!
I'm COVID free.
I don't have COVID.
I just have something else, which is probably, you know, as far as statistics go, much riskier for kids and middle-aged men.
Merry Christmas, everybody.
The other thing is this.
So I'm sitting here like a flipping zlub all day, lying on a couch.
Couldn't figure out how to work the TV where I am.
So I'm sitting there, pressing all sorts of buttons, trying to sleep, but I can't sleep.
And then I watch a couple of movies in another room where I figured out how the TV works.
Watched Hunger Games.
Very average.
I'm turning into a cranky old man.
And then I watched The Office Christmas Party with Jason Bateman, the woman from Friends.
What's her name?
I don't remember her name.
Decent.
Shouldn't have taken that plunge.
I was sick beforehand, and then I asked Mary, like, Mary, you know, it's good to jumpstart the immune system, right?
She's like, yeah, but you probably shouldn't do it if you're coming down with a cold.
Oh, so I sit here all day.
I don't think I've left the house today.
I've watched two movies.
I can't go to bed at 7.30.
I'm not going to sleep.
So I'm sitting there.
I get text messages all day.
I get a message.
James O 'Keefe got screwed.
Screwed by the courts.
So I was like, okay, well, I can't really do a vlog.
Nobody's going to want to hear this awful, raspy, disgusting voice.
So I was like, okay, I'll read the decision.
I'll do it tomorrow.
I'll invest in my future.
I watched two movies.
I'm going freaking stir-crazy here.
I'm alone.
It's like, quiet.
What am I going to do?
Go to bed at 7.30?
I can't watch another crappy movie.
So that's where I'm at.
It had nothing to do with the cold plunge.
I was already coming down with something.
And now this is where, like, depending on who you ask, they're going to say, you made the wrong decision.
Maybe had you not gone in the water, maybe the cold would have passed.
Maybe.
Maybe had I not gone in the cold water, the cold would have been 10 times worse.
I'll feel better tomorrow.
That cold plunge will stimulate the brown fats and the immune system.
And that's it.
We'll see.
So that's it.
The ice plunge killed the COVID.
Yeah, right.
Oh, man.
So that's it.
The parents were a massive crowd.
Nobody wants to be with some coughing, snurveling, whatever they call it, sniffling, miserable man.
In French Canadian, by the way, they call it a grip d 'homme.
It's a cold.
A man's cold.
I get a man's cold.
It's not really a grip d 'homme.
It's really like they use it as an insult to say, like, oh, you have a grip d 'homme.
You're a little baby of an adult.
I'm sitting there on the couch.
I'm like, Marion.
Scratch my head.
Play with my hair.
And then she's like, no, I'm leaving.
Not leaving, but leaving to go, you know, with the family.
Oh, let's see.
Disagree with the naysayers.
The cold plunge is good for you.
I swam with the polar bears.
Best I ever felt.
Yeah, I should not have gone possibly when I knew that I was coming down with the cold.
Oh, God, that was hot.
Now it's burning all the way down here.
Oh.
So I said, look, I'm going to do this anyhow because I was going to wait until tomorrow.
Who knows how I'll feel tomorrow?
Maybe I'll feel just as bad tomorrow or even worse.
So I'm going to get it done now because I want to cover the James O 'Keefe story.
A little house cleaning before we get going on some of the topics of the evening.
First of all, are we live everywhere?
Let me see here.
We are live on Rumble.
Wait, are we live on Rumble?
I hear the intro video.
Let me make sure we're live here.
Good.
We're live on Rumble.
We're live on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
And what was I going to say?
For those of you who don't know, Montreal, former Montreal litigator turned Florida rumbler.
We're going to end on YouTube 20, 30 minutes into this.
We're going to cover the stories that YouTube is going to like.
One of which involves COVID.
I'm not playing the video because they've confirmed...
Hold on one second.
When you don't hear anything, that's because I'm snorting.
I had a doctor who said...
You're not supposed to blow your nose, because when you blow your nose, you can get an ear infection.
You're supposed to snort.
I'm going to end on YouTube in about 20-30 minutes, go over to Rumble, and then go over to Locals afterwards for our afterparty.
But what I wanted to say...
I'm not going to play the video, because I'll just get demonetized again.
That video that I made, how COVID made the flu disappear, and I went down a rabbit hole.
And, you know, it was a good video.
Got 66,000 views before YouTube said...
That's a damn good video you have right there.
Maybe we should take it away from you.
66,000 views two and a half days after the video.
I'm just scrolling through my phone because you don't get notifications anymore.
When YouTube demonetizes, it's just like that.
Bam.
Gone.
If you rely on that, if that's a relevant, a significant portion of your revenue, disappears in a split second and they don't even have the courtesy to tell you.
Can you imagine of all of the algorithms that YouTube has?
They can't notify you by email when they unilaterally, after two days of monetization, demonetize a video?
That seems like it's a problem of design on purpose.
So they demonetize it.
Just like that.
Boom.
And then I asked for manual review.
And let me see here.
Let me see.
Is it going to be able to show us?
Ooh, look at that.
We can see it.
I asked for manual review.
What is this?
In incognito.
It's showing a tweet from February?
Wow, that's weird.
They confirmed it's demonetized after manual review.
And I said, hey guys, can you tell me what part of the video was confirmed as not suitable for advertisers after manual review?
Would you be able to pinpoint that?
I know you've got AI that can predict behaviors, predict likes, run, gather, decipher, tally information about you.
Could you tell me what portion of the video was deemed not?
Suitable for advertisers?
Yeah, let's just see here.
You won't get help on it because it's by design and not by accident.
Here we go.
What a joke to you.
Kindly, here you go, but it's done.
Confirmed.
They looked it over.
They did it very thoroughly.
The video's been confirmed by manual review is not suitable for most advertisers.
Imagine some dude sitting in a forest.
Maybe they thought it was, maybe it was the reference to the Blair Witch Project.
Scared them.
Maybe they thought it was a horror movie.
Maybe they thought some horrible act of violence was occurring in that video of me sitting on a log in the forest talking to the trees.
Oh, yes, potato head.
Ich bin sick.
Ich bin very sick here.
Stay golden, my friends.
So that's what's going on on YouTube.
It's more of the same.
So I said I'm going to go live tonight because, you know, I'll try to go live tomorrow.
Who knows what happens during the day?
And I really want to get to the Project Veritas story.
We're going to do the Project Veritas story over on Rumble.
And for those of you who don't know, this was Project Veritas objecting to the search or the seizure and search of cell phones belonging to James O 'Keefe and other, at the time, Project Veritas journalists as relates to Ashley Biden's stolen diary.
As it relates to Ashley Biden's stolen diary, and they contested the seizure, they contested the special master's mandate to review the documents, they contested the deemed waiver of privileged information, solicitor-client information on that cell phone, and they lost on all counts.
But there's a specific highlight from that decision which is going to blow your minds because it's becoming increasingly clear in as much as January 6th was a setup from the beginning.
That diary...
It was a setup from the very beginning.
It was a setup to frame, go after James O 'Keefe and other journalists.
Who stole it?
We're going to get there.
We're going to get there, Gin Bottle.
Who stole it?
And what did they plead to?
And what's their punishment going to be for what they get to do now in terms of suppressing actual journalism?
Remember what I said?
The election interference wasn't just the Hunter Biden laptop.
It was also the Ashley Biden diary.
Remember they told us that that was also Russian disinformation or fake.
It was a fake news story.
Okay.
That's what we're going to do.
But!
Before we get there, people, tonight's theme, above and beyond New York corruption, is going to be progressive regressivism.
From transgender people who seem to have the most regressive stereotypes of what it means to be a woman.
I've said this for a long time.
To sanctuary cities who are now finally realizing, oh shit, there's consequences to our actions.
Listen to this, by the way.
This is that new mayor.
Remember when they said you couldn't get worse than Lori Lightfoot?
You got worse than Lori Lightfoot, people.
Listen to this.
To meet this demand, we have reached a critical point in this mission that absent real significant intervention immediately, our local economies are not designed and built to respond to this type of crisis.
We are literally building a system as we go along.
I commend Mayor Johnston and Mayor...
I'd like to hear what the full context of that was, but can you understand what he's saying?
Our economies, our systems were not meant to cope with this crisis.
To respond, not designed and built.
Our local economies are not designed and built to respond to this type of crisis.
We are literally building a system as we go along.
I commend Mayor Johnston.
Here's the obvious statement, sir.
No shit, Sherlock.
Your system, your economies were not designed to deal with an influx of illegal immigrants?
Holy crap, call me shocked.
Whose was?
Which economies, which cities were designed to deal with this crisis?
Border cities?
Border states?
You know, like, you declare yourself a sanctuary city.
And then you got...
The problems that come with being a sanctuary city.
And then you realize, holy crap, the buck stops with my mouth and I don't have the check to write this.
What is it?
I don't have the cash.
I don't have the money to cash this check that I wrote.
You know what I mean.
I'm a little mixing up my analogies tonight.
We want to be a sanctuary city.
We want to be welcoming because it feels good for virtue signaling points on Twitter.
And we can't afford it.
And now we have a massive crisis.
Eric Adams out of New York has a massive crisis.
And holy shit, we realize that the chickens have come home to roost.
Our economies are not built for this.
Texas is.
Arizona is.
You know, those lowly border states, those lowly border towns, they're designed to deal with it because they have no choice.
Don't ship them over here.
This is it.
It's progressivism.
Exploitation of minorities, exploitation of immigrants, exploitation of victimhood, so that you can exploit it for the virtue-signaling social media credits and destroy your own town and city that you're supposed to be governing.
It's coming to a head now.
Oh yeah, no, no, but that's it.
And what did Mayor Adams say?
Yeah, we're a sanctuary city.
Don't come here.
You're not welcome here.
We can't pay for you.
We're kicking homeless people out of shelters to make room for you.
Oh, but by the way, and also, don't ship them to Martha's Vineyard.
That's human trafficking.
Texas, Arizona, shut your mouths.
Take them.
And you're designed to deal with this.
Not us.
Not the aristocrats up in blue states.
It's the lowly hoi polloi in red states.
Eric Adams is asking New York citizens to go down to protest in D.C. You can't make stuff up.
I don't know what he's asking them to protest with.
Your mouth...
Here it is.
Your mouth is writing checks it can't afford.
Thank you.
So that's it.
That's what's going on in towns that cannot deal with the problems they've created.
But then they'll figure out other ways.
Hey, maybe they'll pull an Olivia Chow out of Toronto.
Y 'all got any rooms in your house?
Now, I'm seeing one bar on the Internet.
I thought I was in civilization here.
Hold on a second.
Let me see here.
Play.
Okay, no, the Internet is good enough.
Oh, my goodness.
I don't want to refer to Democrats and progressives as parasites that literally destroy everything they touch.
I just can't think of another way of describing it.
Yeah, sanctuary cities.
Ice is not welcome here.
We're not even going to enforce federal law.
We can't deal with this shit.
Please leave.
Don't come here.
Go to Yuma.
Go to Rio Grande.
Well, that's the river.
So that's it.
I mean, it's Yuri Bezmorov.
Yuri Bezmorov was right.
It's nuts.
But it's progressivism.
Progress to the point of breaking.
Now, I've said something for a little while.
Moving on to our next topic.
I just wanted to highlight the stupidity of these people.
How did they go?
What's that guy's name?
What's the new mayor of Chicago's name?
Let me just see here.
Mayor of Chicago.
Yeah, Brandon Johnson.
let's go brandon um I do not need a night nurse.
My wife, whatever.
Brandon Johnson.
Let's go, Brandon.
They cannot but destroy that which they touch.
And then in the destruction, they give themselves more powers.
Pull an Olivia Chow.
Ask people to give up their rental units.
If you have an empty rental unit, give it to an illegal immigrant.
I mean, that's the first step towards nationalizing private property.
And they're not far off from that.
I don't know what they're doing in New York.
Guaranteed we're going to see that coming out of Chicago sooner than later.
I will not call him that.
What up, fam?
Black Brick Jonesy.
So that's what's coming out of Chicago.
Who would have thunk that you could actually get worse than Lori Lightfoot?
You get what you vote for, and then sometimes, unfortunately, other people get more than what they voted for.
So progressives are the most regressive people on Earth.
It's just the way it is.
Like when Trudeau came out with his video, it's like, I'm not relinquishing power.
I'm not giving up the progressive...
Progress that we progressives have progressed with recently.
This is when Trudeau said, in response to a global news question, people don't like you.
Would you just step down?
I didn't promise things four, eight years ago to give up on all the gender equity, diversity, and progress that progressives make.
Progressives are the most regressive people on earth.
Policy-wise, in the stereotypes that they expose, Here, let's see this here.
Let's see this here.
Holly of London.
There's a story to this as well.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
Here, this.
No, not that one.
It came from Libby Emmons.
Here we go.
Look at this.
Look at this.
I agree.
Whoever said, you know, there's no such thing as trans.
I'm just, we're using words in the colloquial sense so that we can identify what we're talking about.
Trans women, I don't even know which way it goes.
There's no such thing as trans.
I mean, once upon a time.
They used to go by transvestites or cross-dressers.
When I was a kid, I remember we had transvestites, we had cross-dressers, we had people who dressed up like the other sex, and even within families, we knew it.
It really wasn't even an issue.
Nobody really cared until they started making other people use ze, zur, he, she pronouns when they're quite clearly a she or a he.
This is a video that Libby Emmons posted.
Let me just see this here.
This man dresses as a woman and plays out a fantasy of being vulnerable, alone, and chased by a male predator.
I don't know where this comes from, but I'm going to get into this in a second.
Listen to this.
So, by the way, for those who are listening on podcasts...
Oh, jeez, I haven't put streams to podcasts in a while.
The text says, if trans women aren't women...
Why do I have to immediately do this anytime I'm out alone?
What the hell is he talking about, you might ask yourself.
When did it end?
All the enjoyment I'm sad again Don't tell my *Pewing* It's the most absurd thing on the planet that espouses the most regressive stereotypes on the planet.
First of all, is he saying that what it means to be a woman is to be a fearful person, to be afraid all the time, getting into your car?
Is that what he's saying?
If trans women aren't women, why do I have to do this immediately whenever I'm out?
So this man thinks that what it means to be a woman is to live in fear and be a frail, bumbling idiot when you get in your car.
Do you think Ronda Rousey is scared like that when she gets in her car?
You think a woman who's packing heat in her purse is afraid like that when she gets into a car?
And do you think there's not some men out there who are raging, neurotic, fearful types like myself who are like that?
But no, this trans male, this man, who thinks what it means to be a woman is to be a frail, babe in the woods, permanently afraid stereotype of a woman.
Oh, and that's progress.
That's progress.
RBRB0510 says, "'Cause you're wearing a woman costume." No, I'm not even sure that I would identify that person as being a man if I had seen him on the street.
No, but the idea that trans women, trans men are women, and what a man says it means to be a woman is to be a flailing, bumbling idiot.
Oh, pulling your sleeves over your hands.
Oh, I'm so scared when I get into my car.
Bullshit.
There's a lot of women out there who would kick some ass and who don't get into their cars like a five-year-old kid scared wetting their pants when they sleep.
But that's what progressivism means.
It's regression in the name of progress.
We've gone so far forward, we've done a full loop around where now a man says, this is what it means to be a woman, ma 'am.
You are scared.
You are helpless.
And when I'm going to be a woman, that's what I'm going to be, and you have to accept me as a woman, you weak, scared little thing.
Oh, but don't worry.
That's not the only one.
That's not the only one that we're going to deal with tonight.
Let me just go ahead and refresh and see how we're doing on YouTube.
Reload.
All right, we're good.
We're not done with the progressive regressivism.
Here we go.
Listen to this.
Give this man, give this man a raise.
So let's just get the context.
Hollywood actor, well, we're going to get that.
Tommy Dorfman, who identifies as a woman, has been exposed as the upset passenger arguing with these Delta employees after claiming they had purposely misgendered him.
Wait till you hear the audio.
And you might understand why someone got, not misgendered, And what about when an adult employee misgenders you intentionally?
You just misgendered me again.
Multiple times.
Both of you have.
Well, she did do it intentionally twice.
You said she and then you said he.
You're being condescending.
And if you want to continue, I have full authority escort you out the building right this moment if you want to play that game with me.
Yes, sir.
Would you like to continue three days before Christmas?
I really don't mind.
I'm good.
I'll just put this on.
And what about when an adult employee misgenders you intentionally?
I'm so sorry.
While he's talking, you're talking.
You just misgendered me again.
You just misgendered me.
I mean, there was a, um, hold on one second.
There was a video going around, and I couldn't tell if it was real or not, and I think it was, of like a socialist gathering of socialists and some, I don't know where it was.
And they were like, they were giving all of these pre-warnings, like pre-speeches.
Hi, I'm, um, I'd like to remind everyone, I know everybody's here to listen and talk, but I'm very triggered by background noise, so if you could all stop talking, that would be great.
She, him, whatever, they, there, whatever, they announce themselves, gender themselves.
And then talk about all of these micro-aggression triggers that trigger them.
Holy crap, you compare this to the book, The Battle of Pulelu, of the old stock?
Oh, you just misgendered me?
First of all, excuse me, hold on a second.
Let me get to that video again.
Misgendered me.
I want to hear this.
You're a Hollywood actor.
Here we go.
Listen, I want to hear the misgendering part.
Multiple times.
Both of you have.
It wasn't intentional, but if you want to take it personal, that's also...
Well, she did do it intentionally twice.
She did do it intentionally twice.
This man whose voice is deeper than me with a cold is talking about being deliberately misgendered.
And it's like, imagine just looking for crisis.
But hold on.
The question here, however, is who is the person in this video?
Okay, so hold on.
Here we go.
Tommy Dorfman.
Here.
This is the person, by the way.
I'm not sure if I would know.
I mean, look, I might err on the side of caution.
Oli London.
This is Tommy Dorfman, a Hollywood actor.
Am I off mute?
Yeah, a Hollywood actor who filmed himself abusing Delta Airlines staff.
The actor who is friends with Dylan Mulvaney.
They're people looking for a cause.
And only transitioned back in 2021.
Transitioned.
I don't know.
I would like to know what happened there.
Began berating multiple Delta staff members for getting his pronouns wrong.
After staff repeatedly tried to calm him down, he continues to berate them for misgender.
A calm staff says, you're being condescending.
And if you want to continue, I'll have Port Authority escort you out of the building.
Un...
There's a part of me that just feels genuinely bad for these people.
People who have had overt mental illness, reaffirmed, and basically professionals, health professionals, have been handcuffed from treating it.
I mean, something doesn't cease being a mental disorder just because you stop treating it as one.
And I know the argument.
Once upon a time, homosexuality was a mental disorder as well.
Mistakes have been made, and other times, they weren't mistakes.
Gender dysphoria has always been a mental disorder.
And I say that as someone who most people probably say suffers from OCD, ADHD, whatever you want to...
The question is, it's an amazing thing.
Don't stigmatize mental disorders, but don't call gender dysphoria a mental disorder.
This guy, who...
Not to be judgmental, sounds like a man.
And, you know, maybe it's a pat situation where you want to get them by their actual sex.
But what they are are actually faux victims looking for victimhood.
And, yeah, there's that.
Ah, what do we got here?
Kendrick Leist.
Given the weaponization of law by the government, I'm interested in you and Barnes' thoughts on automatically applying the English rule for all civil government-initiated cases.
I can tell you I don't know what that means.
So let me screen grab that and just look that up afterwards.
Oh, man.
I'd better sleep tonight.
I did not sleep well last night.
And I don't want to take sleeping aids.
I hate taking sleeping aids.
Also, by the way, I may have put a little bit of shivis in this.
So that's it.
Progressive regressimism.
A man knows what it means to be a woman, and it means to be weak, fragile, vulnerable, unable to defend yourself.
Once upon a time, that was called misogyny.
Don't misgender me.
Just ignore the fact that my voice is three tones deeper than Barry White.
Okay, we're going to end with one story here, and it's Brandon Strzok, and I want to bring this up for a reason here.
Brendan Strzok, who's been on the channel, the founder of Walkaway, he ran into trouble on January 6th.
He ran into trouble on January 6th.
He pleaded, he detailed his entire criminal ordeal when he came on the channel.
He also had a civil ordeal, for those of you who don't know.
He was sued under the KKK Act by various Capitol Police officers, civilly, by an activist organization with activist lawyers.
To call it a load of shit lawsuit is an understatement.
He had it dismissed just recently.
And he's been highlighting the fact that some of these plaintiffs, some of these alleged plaintiffs, who say that Brendan Strzok assaulted them, caused them pain and suffering, all sorts of civil damages, weren't even...
Within his vicinity, and some of them weren't even within the vicinity at large.
So this is what Brandon Strock wrote, and we'll play the video in a second.
This is Capitol Police Officer Byron Evans.
Officer Evans sued me under the KKK Act, alleging that I'd violated his civil rights.
It was all predicated on race, by the way, in case you didn't know.
And then I conspired with white supremacists to commit assault and battery against him on January 6. Follow this thread to see how Officer later admits he never came into any harmful or offensive contact with any protesters.
Seen here in this interview on CNN, Officer Evans described his experience of watching the January 6th riot on television from a secure location.
Brendan puts, I was not present on Capitol grounds during the riot that occurred on the west side of the building.
Officer Evans, along with several other black and brown police officers, because they had to go into the KKK Act, as if they were alleging that Brendan Strzok conspired with white nationalists to violate their civil rights as black and brown officers.
Did you ever think this might be a life or death situation for you?
I remember specifically thinking it when I was on the floor.
I remember thinking all that stuff like, Byron, this is the day.
All those times you've given thought on what you would do, you're doing it.
Four hours, Evans and the senators watched the riot on TV from a secured location.
I just remember the anger I felt when I saw those images.
Busting windows, climbing the walls and stuff like that.
It was an audible gasp in the room.
Wow, there was an audible gasp in the room.
Sir, Officer Evans, now do Black Lives Matter?
When they set up Chop and Chaz, no-go zones, firebomb police stations, courthouses.
Oh yeah, there was some violence there.
Whether or not it was actually provoked by the police or agent provocateur, I got my questions.
Link to Rumble.
Here we go, people.
Yeah, it was definitely a frivolous lawsuit.
Hold on, where were we?
Definitely a frivolous lawsuit.
Because they're all getting paid, you know.
Well, it was an activist lawsuit, and even in D.C., even in D.C., it got tossed.
So, good on Brandon Strzok.
Okay, everybody, head on over to Rumble.
Head on over.
Oh, why are my caps on here?
Head on over to Rumble.
Here's Rumble.
And also, come on over to Locals, because we're going to have a little...
It'll be a short afterparty there, because if you can't tell, I'm still sweating here.
Link.
Two locals.
Boom shakalaka.
We're going to go over the couple of other stories, and then we're going to go over the Project Veritas setup, because it was a setup.
All right, so we're ending on YouTube.
Come on over to Rumble or vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
And by the way, we might have a show this Sunday with Barnes.
It might be at a different time, but I think it looks like we might be having a show Sunday.
So stay tuned for that.
Ending on YouTube.
Come on over to Rumble.
The link is pinned.
Is it?
Yeah, the link is pinned.
And that's it.
And then we're going to end there.
And I'm going to go to bed and hopefully sleep.
Alright.
Hold on.
What did I do here?
Link.
End on YouTube.
See you on Locals and see you on Rumble.
321.
Oh, I love it when I have my raspy, sick man voice.
Hi.
I was going to do a little ASMR sneezing, coughing, and phlemming, but I figure I'll just hit mute.
Every time.
It'll be much easier.
Okay.
Let's see what we got here.
Just some interesting stuff.
Oh, well, no.
We'll do that later.
Well, a quick one.
A quick one.
The McCloskeys.
You remember?
Keep it up with the McCloskeys.
Oh, remember that?
Look at that.
They pleaded.
I forget what they pleaded to.
They're still trying to get their guns back.
The Court of Appeals said no, but I'm going to see what the Missouri Supreme Court has to say.
We exercised our Second Amendment's right, got prosecuted, pardoned by Governor Parsons after you pleaded.
But still don't have them back.
If I wasn't holding an evil assault weapon, you'd think I might have gotten them back by now.
Woke is as woked does, Mama always says.
Okay, we'll have a couple of fun stories afterwards.
Okay, let's talk about Project Veritas.
It's an all-out assault on democracy, journalism, freedom of speech.
For those of you who don't know, I hope I'm not going to get some of the details wrong here.
Hold on.
Project Veritas, back in the day, they were approached by someone out of Florida who said, we believe that we have Ashley Biden's diary, that we believe she left at a halfway house.
I think it was in Florida.
I'll go over some of the facts when we read through this.
Project Veritas apparently, allegedly, doesn't pay for information.
They say, bring it to us, let's see what it has to say.
This is the alleged fake diary, which they said was fake, so it couldn't have been stolen.
Then they said it's stolen, so it has to be real.
They say, bring it to us, we'll see what it says.
James O 'Keefe didn't feel comfortable publishing it, and didn't publish it.
Then they get raided by the FBI a short while later on the basis that they were involved in conspiring to steal property for allegedly paying the people to steal the property because allegedly they compensated them $20,000 for travel expenses.
They get raided.
Cell phones seized.
They go through their cell phone.
They go through their solicitor-client communications.
They go through everything.
They get a special master in there to see what's responsive to the warrant and what's not responsive.
And they contested the seizure and the warrant on First Amendment grounds.
What's the word I'm looking for now?
Journalistic privilege.
And they just lost.
And you won't believe it.
You won't believe.
How the courts can just get around whatever lawful restrictions there are protections in the first place?
How do you get around journalist privilege?
Allege that the source of the information no longer seeks to be confidential.
How do you get around solicitor-client privilege?
Allege that it's in carrying out of a criminal act, because you can't have solicitor-client privilege if you're conspiring to commit a crime.
It's outrageous.
And we're going to go through it.
Now hold on a second.
There was a rumble rant.
Finboy Slick, if you had done a Rogan-worthy cold plunge, the virus would have left intimidated by your manliness.
This and the lackluster bike pull-ups not living up to your unrealistic AI Viva standards.
Finboy Slick.
Excuse me.
Finboy Slick makes some borderline inappropriate Viva Fry AI.
So that's the overall context.
This is the decision that they just came down with.
Let me just open it up.
I think this is it right here.
Yeah, this is it.
Okay, good.
And I got my highlighted sections on my phone here.
So let me just go ahead and get that so I can...
Okay, here we go.
All right.
Annalisa Torres.
I mean, this is the problem.
And I say Annalisa Torres has historically been a good judge.
And the problem is, I can understand everything that she's detailed in this decision, and it's going to be, in my mind, a very hard decision to overturn.
Because she details how they're going to use the law to screw James O 'Keefe.
She describes it very well.
Okay, so we've got here.
In November 2021, Judge Cave issued three search warrants for electronic devices at the residence of James O 'Keefe, Spencer Meads, and Eric Cochran, all members of Project Veritas.
An undercover investigative journalism organization.
I don't know why she put it in quotes.
Judge K found probable cause of the devices contained evidence of federal crimes.
Oh, yeah.
Remember at the time they told you the diary was fake, so it couldn't have been a federal crime?
Okay, so I'm going to go here.
It's page three after that.
They said it was a fake diary, so it couldn't have been evidence of a crime.
They executed the warrants, seized a vast amount of information, And that's that.
Now, December 8th, court appointed a retired judge for the special master to overview the review and seizure of the materials.
Okay.
And the special master issued a report.
They said there was some privileged stuff, some confidential stuff, and some other stuff which is non-responsive.
Okay.
Okay, okay, okay, okay.
What was I?
Page three.
Here we go.
Page three.
Listen to this.
The government alleges, this is Project Veritas, that they stole additional items from the victim.
That's Ashley Biden.
And who stole them were the not-journalists from Project Veritas, the two people who have now pleaded to a very sweetheart deal.
The government alleges that the people who stole it stole items from the victim and gave it to Project Veritas' employee in Florida, who transported them to New York.
Project Veritas subsequently paid Harrison Coolinger, those are the two people, $20,000 each for the stolen property.
That, I'd like to see that piece of information.
That's a material fact that I'd like to know what they paid for.
Okay, so hold on a second.
Let's get this out here.
I'm just going to go to the...
My phone keeps timing out.
Okay.
Okay, let me go to page four.
Listen to this.
The procedural background.
Okay.
Here we go.
Listen to this.
State lines, people.
They're coming back.
These are the four charges.
Interstate transportation of stolen property Possession of stolen goods Aiding and abetting So these are all the crimes.
Do you imagine, like, if this is the new standard for journalists, it's gonna basically kill journalism?
I mean, they had the Pentagon Papers, which...
The Pentagon Papers...
Basically said, you know, like, you can publish, even if it's classified, so long as you don't partake in the stealing of it.
How do you bypass that now?
Just allege they stole it.
Allege that they partook in stealing it.
Oh, well, WikiLeaks, they partook in stealing it.
Well, not Tracy Banning.
Just allege that they partook in stealing it, and you bypass all other restrictions that might have otherwise applied to journalists.
Listen to this.
The court directed the special master to proceed in three stages.
1. Conduct an initial review to determine whether seized materials are responsive to the seven categories of documents specified in the warrants.
2. Send only the responsive material to the government's filter team to determine the information.
3. Review petitioners' objections to the filter team's decisions.
Okay, that's what they were supposed to do.
Now we go down to paragraph 5, the last line here.
Is this it?
For the 76 documents which petitioners claim are protected...
So they say...
James O 'Keefe says some of this stuff is solicitor-client, some of it is privileged confidential, other is not responsive.
And they detail this here.
For 76 documents which petitioners claim are not protected, are protected by the attorney-client privilege, the special master found that 24 are privileged, or partially privileged, that 40 are not privileged...
are not privileged, and that for the other 10, the privilege is vitiated by the crime fraud experience.
There you have it.
That's how you get around it.
And the problem is, it's a relatively well-detailed decision.
Oh man, oh man.
Petitioners do not explain how their proposed standard differs from the legal framework outlined by the circuit.
Petitioners contend that the special master invoked a weak relevancy standard and disclosed documents upon hypothetically finding relevance, indeed any imaginable relevance, of the information.
That's not what I wanted to highlight here.
It was this.
But this argument challenges the special master's application of the framework, not the framework itself.
So the law is the law.
And you're not going to have any protection under it.
Let me see with the third one here.
Third petition, and we're on page 10, just to read this here.
Petitioners contend that pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in Bartnicki v.
Wopper, Special Master could have only required the disclosure of documents that evidence its journalists' participation of the theft of information not already in the possession of the...
Okay, fine.
That's not what I want to...
Hold on a second.
Oh man, sorry.
Sorry.
Where was I going to go?
It's after paragraph 141.
Is it 141 or 143?
Oh, it's 143.
Here.
Here the government is investigating whether petitioners participated in the theft of the victim's journal and other items.
So all you have to say now is, okay, I understand you had this information that was given to you.
We're going to allege that you partook in the theft and we're going to scour your cell devices, your computers, and we're going to disregard any solicitor-client privilege.
On the basis that we're going to allege that you partook in the theft and screw you under the law with all...
Here, listen to this.
Okay, paragraph 12. It's actually, it's just fascinating how...
It's like Chief Wiggum.
When Marge says to him, you said the law was powerless to help me.
He says, yeah, I said it was powerless to help you, not hurt you.
It's just amazing here.
So Project Veritas argued confidentiality.
And they say, look, a journalist never gives up their sources.
You can't force us to.
And they say, yeah, true.
When the sources want to remain confidential.
Here, petitioners promise to keep the identities of Harrison Kurlander confidential.
But Harrison Kurlander pleaded guilty and revealed to the public that they were the ones who provided the victim's journal and additional items to Project Veritas.
Petitioners, therefore, are not protecting the identity of any source.
And I gotta tell you, it's ugly, but it's not...
They're not necessarily wrong.
They're going to say, okay, well, this is confidential information.
No, it's not.
They pleaded guilty already.
And by the way, what did they get?
I think, hold on, let me just see something here.
Harrison Kurlander, what did they get by way of, I think they got nothing by way of a plea deal.
So they're saying, yeah, there's nothing confidential here to protect because they pleaded guilty.
Oh, paragraph, page 19, we're skipping a little bit down here.
So they're going to appeal this.
I mean, I presume they're going to appeal this, but I...
The communication must itself be in furtherance of crime or fraud, and not only provide evidence of crime or fraud.
The court must find a purposeful nexus between attorney-client communication and the crime of fraud.
When a topic of an attorney's representation is found to be a crime or fraud, communications with the attorney as to the topic are necessarily in furtherance of illegal conduct.
I think they did the same thing with Trump.
I'm going to say everything you did with your lawyers was in furtherance of a crime, so none of it's privileged.
There is no rule of law anymore.
And it's not a question of a two-tiered system.
It's lawlessness.
Oh, lordy, lordy, lordy.
Let's just go to the end here because I think we're close to the end.
A lot of redactive conclusion.
Oh, the court overrules petitioners' objections and adopts the special master's recommendation.
And that's it.
They basically lost on everything.
Solicitor-client privilege.
Not privileged because in furtherance of a crime.
Journalistic confidentiality.
There's no confidentiality because the two individuals pleaded guilty.
Let me just see something here.
Plead.
Sentence.
What was their sentence?
Whoa, hold on a second.
Let me see something here.
Southern District of New York.
Florida residents plead guilty to conspiracy to commit interstate transportation of stolen property.
Please follow filing of criminal information alleging defendants stole the property belonging to immediate family member of then former government official.
Let's see the sentence here.
Do we get the sentence?
Okay.
Amy Harris of Palm Beach, Florida, and Kurlander of Jupiter, Florida, each pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit interstate transportation to stolen property, which carries a maximum five years in prison.
The maximum potential sentence in this case is prescribed by Congress and is provided here as the information only, purposes only, as any sentencing in the defense will be determined by the judge.
Under the terms of this plea, Harris and Kurlander each agreed to forfeit $20,000, and Kurlander agreed to cooperate with the government.
Okay, so hold on a second.
That's not giving us the answer.
They pleaded guilty.
Have they not been...
Did they...
Hold on a second.
Okay, three months ago.
Sentence.
There'll be sentence next month.
And when was this?
September, October.
So what was the sentence?
Six months.
Oh, here we go.
Prosecutors recommended a sentence of six months home confinement and three years.
Supervised release.
Yep.
That's a sweetheart deal.
That's a sweetheart deal.
This was a setup from the beginning.
Six months home confinement and they take down James O 'Keefe and arguably, maybe, I don't even know what the potential penalty is for James O 'Keefe, but it's relatively serious.
Let me refresh this here.
See if there's any questions in here about this.
It's...
Are we having problems with the live chat on Rumble?
I think we are.
Hold on a second.
Ah, da, da, da, da, da.
Dude, I think we might be having problems with chat.
Okay.
Oh yeah, here we go.
Yeah, the chat broke.
Okay, it's back now.
Alright, it's back.
Testing one, two, three, and I can see it.
Now let me go here.
So, oh, there's a bunch of...
Oh jeez, I hope that...
Finboy Slick, I hope he didn't mean to post multiple...
multiple...
Rumble rants here.
Finboy Slick says, The trans person has a bad case of my fake reality is based on my real feelings.
The first trans person...
Has a bad case of my fake realities based on that?
Okay.
And then we got Finboy.
Okay.
Well, the chat's back, so there's that.
So that's what's going on with Project Veritas.
I wish I could have done a standalone vlog.
Maybe I will tomorrow.
They got six months home confined.
Well, that's what's being recommended.
So they're not doing any jail time.
And they're going to take down Project Veritas.
They're going to appeal it, but I read that decision and...
In as much as I think it's just using the law as a charade to get to the desired end result, if I had to place a guess, I don't think it's getting overturned.
But maybe I'm wrong, and we'll see.
I'll live to be surprised.
Okay.
Now, hold on.
There's still more.
So that's Project Veritas.
Ah, what else do we have back here?
The Coots 4, by the way.
I said there was going to be some Canadian fake news going on here.
Mm-mm-mm.
CBC.
Has written a hit piece about the Coots Four.
You all know who the Coots Four are.
Oh, now they're called the Coots 13. They've rebranded.
I'm saying it tongue-in-cheek.
They, um...
Hold on a second.
The Coots Four, I've talked about them at length.
I'm in touch with one of them who's in jail.
They call me every now and again.
CBC just ran an article, and it's nothing but a hit piece.
February...
When is this from?
This is not the right one.
Ah, forget it.
They're drudging up on one of the spouses of one of the Coutts four, impaired driving from like decades ago.
This is what Canadian journalism is doing.
Chris Carbert is one of the Coutts four who's been in jail for a little...
There's Chris Lysak, and I forget the other names right now.
This is coming from Jason Levine, who's been doing some amazing journalism, journalizing on this.
Kutz Update, message from Chris Carbert.
Chris is very upset with the CBC News for the malinformation they printed about him.
Also, Chris would like to read the Hategate affair.
I've done the Hategate on this channel as well, and I actually had Kareem Assad on to talk about it.
Betty Carbert wrote, and I don't know if she's writing.
I think she's writing.
Yeah, she's writing for Chris.
Hello, everyone.
Hope you all had a good Christmases.
We played bingo in the gym and got some snacks from a percentage of the money that goes towards these events when they buy hobbies.
So it's a nice little bonus.
We, of course, had what we call a processed turkey dinner.
He's in jail, by the way.
This is what life is like.
We did actually get broccoli, which is a treat in here, and pumpkin pie with ice cream.
I may or may not have ate an extra piece of pumpkin pie from one of the guys in here.
I think probably slept 80% of the day away, so went by quick.
So I hear CBC is writing about my impaired driving charges as a young offender.
So yes, I did get too impaired.
As a teenager, I was a bit of a lost teenager.
And it goes on.
But can you imagine the CBC in an attempt to dig up dirt on these otherwise four individuals who have virtually no criminal record?
To try to demonize them and try to make sense of the charges against them.
Dig up impaired driving from decades ago.
And this is the CBC, state-funded.
I mean, it's a crown corporation who needs to do the hard lifting for Justin Trudeau so that they can maintain the charade of this weaponized prosecution, persecution of the Coutts Four who are accused of conspiracy to commit murder because, you know, they might have been...
Using hyperbolic language while having a beer with a young, attractive police officer.
It doesn't end.
I mean, I guess at some point in time it will end.
It's just...
Oh, man, oh, man.
So that's that.
But there's...
For the Coots Four, for whoever's paying attention to it, there's been a falling out of sorts between the four, or there's been issues, some drama.
They've all gone and done their own independent fundraising.
They are going to be in jail now on pretrial detainment, in remand now for going on two years without having had their trial yet.
Lives destroyed.
Lives stolen.
Kids growing up without parents.
They're political prisoners.
They are nothing but political prisoners.
Ah, Ken.
Okay, well that was my tweet about James O 'Keefe.
Let me see what's going on in the chat before we get to the...
Oh, the chat's broken again.
What did we say here?
Uncle Sixty says, I brought my son to...
I brought my son to Scared Straight program.
He liked the prison food.
It's like camp food, I guess.
Maybe he can like that stuff.
Another Christmas mist, says Kenzie Sixty Seven.
I'm testing, says Mud Cloud.
It's working.
Hold on, let me just snort.
Oh, lordy, lordy.
Okay, I'm gonna have to...
Take that call afterwards.
So that's what's going on with the Coots 4. Jason Livian, I think, is going live at 9 o 'clock tonight.
I'm going to be going to bed by 9 o 'clock tonight.
I'm going to go walk around the block and get some fresh air because Marion, my wife, says go get some fresh air.
It'll help you sleep.
Maybe take a Chlor-Triplon because whenever I get the slightest congestion, it immediately turns into a sinus infection.
Maybe something about a deviated septum.
All right.
Oh, and speaking of...
Speaking of...
Oh, my God.
It's like, I don't know how, I feel like I'm going crazy.
And you know, okay, let me bring this out here.
Story time.
Whenever I get a cold, I get depressed, I get a little, I get fatigued, tired.
And then I think like, okay, this is God punishing me.
Surely I've done something in the last year that I should not be proud of and that I deserve to have a little reminder, a little spank from God if such a God exists.
And so maybe a cold is God's way of reminding you.
You don't always live up to your own standards of yourself.
Like when you tell...
Hakeem Jeffries, do you ever shut the fuck up because this guy just keeps going on and on about MAGA extremists?
Maybe I succumb and maybe I don't live up to my own standards for myself.
I cannot help but fight with idiots on Twitter, especially ones who have doctor in their Twitter bio, and especially the doctors who have pronouns in their bio.
Listen to this.
So Vigilant Fox.
Worth a follow, says Dr. McCullough issues warning to clot shot pushers.
You are complicit in crimes against humanity.
Listen to this.
Any time a biopharmaceutical product remains on the market despite excess mortality and mounting evidence suggesting greater and greater deaths are accumulating with each and every day that the COVID-19 vaccines are left on the market, that does qualify.
As mass negligent homicide for all of those who are responsible for manufacturing the vaccines, distributing them, administering them, and then promoting them, each and every person that ever encouraged, pressured, coerced, or threatened reprisal for one of these COVID-19 vaccines.
Is complicit in a crime against humanity, and that crime is mass negligent homicide.
He might be wrong.
He might be wrong.
It might be hyperbolic.
It might be deliberately hyperbolic.
But we understand...
Anytime a biopharmaceutical...
We understand what he's saying.
And then I get this guy, David Gore...
Is this one?
David Gorsky.
David Gorsky.
Surgeon, scientist, promoting science-based medicine, editor, science-based medicine blog, he, him, also at MassDiv.com.
Oh my goodness.
Well he's got beautiful dogs so give him credit for that.
He writes: And fools like this wonder why I don't take McCullough in the least bit seriously.
I replied to that tweet, and I said, you do understand.
Like, I showed the article.
It says, from Canada, Globe and Mail.
There's excess deaths in Canada, and people don't know why.
In 2023.
Hold on here.
Hold on one second.
Excess death.
I showed it a few times already.
No, that's not it.
That's not it at all.
Hold on.
I showed it a few times.
More people are dying than expected.
Here.
Nobody knows why.
It's crazy.
More people than expected are dying.
And in Canada in 2023 for reasons that are not yet clear.
Oh, okay.
And then everyone's like, oh, and then the idiots who refuse to accept that maybe they have been participating to contributing to that excess death.
Oh, you don't know that it's the jab.
It could just be the fact that people were locked down and they missed doctor's appointments.
Stress.
Okay, so you killed them one way or the other.
And then, oh, but read the headline, you jackass.
It says we don't know why.
Yeah.
It's amazing how when you're not looking for something, you'll never find it.
What could possibly account for excess deaths?
Hmm.
What could possibly account for it?
Then I have to have a fight with another doctor.
Does this one have a...
Let me see if this one's got...
It's unbelievable.
These might not be doctors.
Internal medicine physician, assistant professor of medicine.
Okay, you got the trans flag.
My views are my own.
Star Wars, Darren.
He, him, as if I, as if I, as if I would have, hold up a second, as if I would have had any, any doubt of the he, him.
Thanks for clarifying that, Jonathan.
He writes, pretty sure he's referring to how it wasn't, oh, oh, oh, so we got into another one.
Then people say, they never said it would prevent infection.
And then I have to bring up Albert Brula's tweet.
Then they have to say, oh, that's, you're taking that out of context.
That was just the headline from the tweet.
Show the article.
Then I go show the actual article.
Where is it?
Hold on a second.
Then we get into disagreements about myocarditis.
It's like we can't even agree on truth.
And we're supposed to make progress.
Hold on.
I want to see where...
Hold on a second.
We can go back here.
Where was...
Oh, yeah.
Then they say...
You're just taking a screen grab of the tweet.
Go to the article.
Link us to the article, you lazy bastard.
You're just trying to mislead.
This was what Pfizer said in the link that was in their article.
Vaccine was 100% effective in preventing COVID-19 cases in South Africa where the B.1.351 lineage is prevalent.
There's no awakening from people, and I might very well be arguing with absolute robots on Twitter.
I might not be arguing with real people who are only bots out there to sow discord to destabilize society, and I can't say that I disagree with it.
I can't say that that's not something I believe anymore.
Oh, hold on a second.
We're going to end with one more thing here, and then I'm going to go over to Rumble.
I'm going to go to VivaBarnesLaw.locals.com, and I'm going to get some...
Advice on what I should do tonight.
To sleep well.
Okay.
We're ending where we started, people.
First of all, come on over to vivabardslaw.locals.com.
The link is here.
Oh, God.
Tomorrow, touch wood.
God willing, I'll be healthy and I won't sound like this.
I want to play two things before we leave.
One is an interview that I did with Ezra Levance.
And I just want to play one clip from it.
It's, um...
Ezra.
It's not just that they went from Nuremberg to violating Nuremberg.
They went from Nuremberg, no human experimentation, informed consent, to immunizing pharma and the doctors, and effectively the government, immunizing them from real-time human experimentation.
If you can pull the clip in post or pull the clip, Obama getting up there and admitting in real time, well, we've basically clinically trialed on billions of people.
That's an admission of real-time human experimentation.
And people want to try to shame...
Oh, play the clip.
Take a look at that clip right now.
Absolutely.
Take a look.
And yet, despite the fact that we've now...
Clinically tested.
Essentially clinically tested.
Billions of people.
The vaccine on billions of people worldwide.
Oh, that dramatic cause.
Around one in five Americans is still willing to put themselves at risk and put their families at risk rather than get vaccinated.
Oh, I can't say this.
People are dying.
People are dying.
Because of misinformation.
And we're killing them.
You got Obama admitting it, and people are going to try to shame me.
People will say, you can't make that comparison.
I say, first of all, I can.
My grandfather escaped Nazi Germany in 1936 to move to Argentina, went back to try to get some family members, and then ended up in, I believe it was Winnipeg, Canada.
I can make that analogy, and I'm not going to be shamed into it because I'm Jewish.
And I'm not going to be shamed into it regardless.
Non-Jews can make that analogy.
Jews can make that analogy.
And why?
Some are going to say, well, nobody's being lined up in trains and exterminated.
History doesn't repeat, but it rhymes, to quote Mark Twain.
And you want to talk about the adverse events or adverse reactions caused by this experimental whatever the hell you want to call it?
We're into the hundreds of thousands, if not the millions.
And so we can't even say that we're not even on the same scale in terms of numbers.
All right.
And that's it.
I'm going to have to give you all the links so you can go watch that yourselves.
Excuse me.
And show some love here.
Hold on.
Link to interview.
All right.
And then I said, excuse me, I got into the part where I remember how livid I was when my wife is going out of the house to go to work at 8 o 'clock at night or 9 o 'clock.
And she had to have her papers folded up with her so that she could have her papers to leave the house at night.
People are going to tell me I can't compare it to Nazi Germany?
Go to hell.
I can compare it to Nazi Germany because it wasn't there in terms of distance, but it damn well was in terms of direction.
And we might be nearing distance in terms of numbers as well, depending on what numbers we believe.
Now, we're going to end this where we started, with a brave person whose words should be listened to.
And while this plays out, I'm going to go over to Locals.
I'll see you all there.
Thank you for being here.
I'll try to go live tomorrow.
I'll see how I feel.
But I wanted to get to the Project Veritas story.
Maybe, excuse me, if I do nothing else tomorrow, maybe I'll just do a short video breaking down the Project Veritas.
But listen to this.
It's worth watching.
I was asked.
And before?
VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com I'll see you before New Year's, people.
But I'll see you soon.
Okay.
Head on over to Locals.
VivaBarnesLaw.Locals.com I was asked to stop tweeting about it.
I was asked to stop doing anything, saying anything about it on social media because I was offending others at the company.
I made sure I sent off another tweet that night after I received that email because like, no, and let's stop living in this lie.
And once again, oh, you're going to silence me and Sam.
She was told the same thing, you know, for this issue.
But then we're going to let everybody else talk about all these other things that are not even related to sports on our sports programming.
And I'm like, no, no, no, no, no.
If we're going to preach on ESPNW and all of these things, and I'm going to stand up for all these women, many of whom are afraid to do what Riley Gaines is doing, to do what I'm doing at a much lesser level than Riley, than you, right?
But just, no.
And so that, I actually said this to myself as I was sending a tweet, the first tweet.
About, you know, standing up and supporting you.
I said, I already had the lawsuit going.
You know, I mean, whatever.
I didn't know how it was going to end.
But I literally said, this is the hill I will die on.
100%.
Because it is facts.
This is not even my opinion about a vaccine mandate or whatever.
Like, these are facts.
This is science.
This is biology.
This is all of the things.
Come at me.
Tell me I'm wrong.
Tell me to stop supporting women.
Go ahead.
▲
Export Selection