All Episodes
Dec. 24, 2023 - Viva & Barnes
01:19:09
Christmas Eve Special! Trudeau Welcomes Satan! Cali Goes Commie Colorado! Vivek & MORE!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Are the Christmas trees loaded on trains?
Loaded.
Good.
Gingerbread cookies?
They've arrived at the port.
For those of you who don't know who this is, this Academy Award winning actor right here, Pablo Rodriguez, Canada's Minister of Heritage, who's in charge of usurping, nationalizing the internet.
I'll let this masterpiece, this...
Bulls-level piece of government propaganda play out.
In case you don't know where this is going, this is what our taxpayers are paying for.
Taxpayer dollars are paying for.
How about candy canes?
Also ready and boarded on planes.
Perfect!
So we're ready to...
Hey, boss!
Pablo, what are you doing?
You don't have to deliver the presents yourself.
Come on, leave that to Santa.
That's his mandate.
Your job is to make sure he's good too.
The kids are counting on you.
Who else wants to vomit?
We're ready.
You can proceed as planned.
Safe travels.
Santa's still white, so at least...
Santa is clear for travel in Canada and space.
So, Merry Christmas, Feliz Navidad, Happy Holidays, and stay...
Stay safe.
Stay safe.
The flip side to that is live in fear.
Alright, before we get going, is it two frames per second?
Oh, cripe.
Hmm.
I don't know what I look like on it if I go look to see what the frames per second are.
How bad is the internet?
It's not going to get much better than this.
It's like watching a slideshow.
Well, let me see.
Let me see.
Let me go watch and make sure we're live anyhow, and I'll see how this looks, because this is going to suck if the internet...
And I've got the extender on and everything, and let me play through an ad on Rumble.
It looks like we're live on Rumble.
Joyeux Noël.
Happy Green Christmas, says Mr. MP Stick.
It's not that bad.
I mean, I love a mushy-faced potato.
Let me hear what the audio is.
It's pretty bad.
Hold on.
Lower my gain down here.
Oh, I'm blurry.
We have two things to do here.
Either not do this, or do it only in an audio.
It's smooth for me, but maybe we'll keep it short and just wish everyone a Merry Christmas, but we'll go for a little bit.
We'll cover some stories.
And just have a chat.
This is going to end early anyhow because East Coast, it's 4 o 'clock.
I think people start sitting down for dinner around 5.30 and I've been told that's what we're going to do as well.
It's all blurry.
Let me start with this here.
We have a blurry, soft focus.
Okay, but is there a way that I can do?
Let me see.
I've got the extender.
Potato internet.
And there's no way of tethering off my phone.
You know what?
Hold on a second.
If I just do this, is this...
Oh, there we go.
At least we got a pulsating avatar.
Is this going to be happier for people if we do this and just have a pulsating avatar of Viva's face instead of a blurry potato face for Viva?
Try not being a boomer.
What do you want me to do?
I already ran for federal office.
There's nothing more I can do for the internet up in the middle of nowhere.
We're going to go with potato-faced Viva, but the question is this.
The question is this.
Let me take this thing out.
The internet is so slow.
No, we want to see you, Viva.
Oh, Natalie, stop it.
Hold up.
Okay.
If I play a video, was the video smooth?
Ish.
Because once we're looking at potato faces, faces that are all blurry and some that make you want to vomit, we'll start with the Trudeau part of this stream.
First of all, good evening.
Merry Christmas.
Holy crap, is this time of year stressful?
I know it's supposed to be fun, beautiful, and everything.
It's bloody stressful.
Travel is stressful.
Airports are stressful.
Then you come and you're living with people in closed, cramped quarters.
People are tired.
People are stressed.
Oh my goodness.
So if I'm going to add to some of that stress, I'll try to quell some of that stress.
If someone asks for a white pill, we need some optimism for the new year.
We'll get it.
We will get it.
And it's going to come from some unlikely places.
But before we even get there, stressful sloppy Joe economy.
You got Bidenomics out in the US.
You got Trudonomics up in Canada.
I was talking...
I was on Pantelis podcast yesterday.
We had our stressful tech issues there.
I was on with Pantelis, talking about the situation up in Canada.
We had a Christmas party yesterday where I got a Black Santa coffee mug.
It's classic.
By the way, check this out.
You won't be able to see it.
Those are rosy-cheeked little bunny slippers.
I have...
Taken my wife's slippers.
Okay, is the video quality going back up?
We're going to live with it.
Has the budget balanced itself yet, Maple Syrup1234123?
We're going to pull out another gem from Trudeau.
In fact, we're going to start with Trudeau.
We're going to talk about Trudeau, the mockery that he's made of Canada.
Remember when people were accusing Trump of being the tyrant that's never going to leave office?
He'll never relinquish his power?
Whoopsie doodle!
The people who accused him of that in the States are the ones now insisting on taking his name off of ballots because, you know, that's how much of a tyrant Trump was.
He'd never relinquish power.
He'd call in the National Guard.
He'd pull a military coup to stay in power.
No, he left.
No, he was...
Banned from social media.
Tyrants always get banned from social media.
Now, the powers that be, the ones that were calling Trump the dictator that would never relinquish power, are trying to remove his name from ballots.
Up in Canada, Justin Trudeau is like, you know, he did an interview on Global News and was actually asked a relatively hard question.
Paraphrasing the question.
People hate you, Justin Trudeau.
Everyone loathes you.
No one wants you in your position.
No one wants you leading the Liberal Party.
They want you out.
To which he said, what now?
Now, let me get the clip.
It's a thing of beauty.
Oh, by the way, before I even get there, Mr. Potato Face says, Merry Christmas.
Welcome to the stream.
If you don't know who I am, Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator.
Former Montreal, former litigator.
I guess I have to do a former for both.
Florida Rumbler.
But now I've crossed back into, call me Canada.
And it is cold.
It is dark.
It's four o 'clock.
And the sun has gone down.
I swear, the only color I see all day is blue.
I look out the window, I see blue.
I mean, I'm not joking.
I woke up this morning.
8.30 in the morning.
It's blue.
The sun's coming out.
It's like, it's trying to cast a little light, but it's blue.
Sun goes down at 3.50.
It's blue.
I went for a jog outdoors.
I got some fresh air.
Did some push-ups.
But I'm up here.
For the holidays, and it's fun seeing everybody again.
So we start on YouTube Rumble, and let me make sure we're good on vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Are we good on vivabarneslaw.locals.com?
We should be.
Let me make sure here.
Are we good here?
Now, Barnes is not coming.
Are we good here?
Barnes is with family, and I'm with family too, but...
Every now and again, even family needs a break from family.
So I'm up in my mother-in-law's studio.
As you can tell from...
One day we'll do a massive auction of my mother-in-law's work.
What are we allowed to say in Canada?
We must be very forgiving with Justin Trudeau.
And we must...
Compliment him even when insulting him.
Okay, so that's the thing.
We're going to end on YouTube.
Go over to Rumble.
Do a little after party on vivobarneslaw.locals.com.
Everyone's going to go have an amazing Christmas Eve dinner.
You know, if you've got kids, they're going to wake up early in the morning and want to get to the gifts.
And the gifts.
Oh, God.
And then eating candy canes and cake.
Okay, whatever.
Oh, that's right.
I had the typo in the title where I said Trudeau does Santa.
And I think I had a typo that said Satan, and I think it was a deliberate typo.
Okay, whatever.
Enough meandering, enough whatever.
Trudeau did an interview with Global News where he was sat down and he was asked a hard question.
Nobody likes you.
Can you leave, please?
Can you please get out of here?
We don't like you.
To which Trudeau, by the way, pathological narcissism?
It's their fault for not liking me.
I mean, that's basically what he says.
I'm not done with you yet.
I'm not done abusing you yet.
I'm not done destroying the country yet.
And if you don't like me, that's because you're dumb and you don't know better.
You don't appreciate all the progress we've made in the last eight years in which me, tyrant man, has been in power.
If you don't understand it, it's because you're stupid, not because I'm a failure.
Listen to this.
And I understand wanting to advance that agenda and that it's hard to let go of being in power once you're in.
But historically, Canadian prime ministers don't get elected four times in a row.
People are being very clear that they don't like you in these polls.
Listen, people are frustrated right now.
But on a personal level, I made a commitment in 2015 to a whole bunch of young people who came out to vote for the very, very first time.
Listen to this.
This is like when you...
And I'm not saying this to be glib, and I'm not saying this to demean.
The severity of abusive relationships.
I'm saying this to draw an actual analogy.
Listen, you're not leaving me yet.
This is what he's saying.
I'm not done with you yet.
But on a personal level, I made a commitment in 2015.
I'm not leaving you.
I made a commitment that I'm going to spend the rest of my life with you.
And if you think you're leaving me...
A whole bunch of young people who came out to vote for the very, very first time.
That we were going to be doing the right kinds of things to secure the promise of this country in a way that people were worried about.
And years later, even with everything we've done on the environment, on inclusion, on gender equality, on growing the economy, on reconciliation, those young people, eight years later, are having trouble paying their rent, worried about their future in ways that are just as tangible, if not more, because...
Of the global context we're in.
Can you fully appreciate what he's saying right now?
I've been in power for eight years.
We're in a dire, shitty situation right now after eight years, despite all the verbal diarrhea coming out of his mouth.
I'm going to play it again in a bit, but we're in a shitty state of affairs eight years after my dictatorship has begun.
But appreciate all the progress on diversity, inclusion.
And I'm not done with you yet.
Make a promise that I was going to make things better for them and then walk away after four years or even after eight years.
First of all, I haven't made things better for you.
I've made things worse for you.
And I'm not done with you yet.
I'm not going anywhere.
You're going to have to vote me out of office.
I said I'd be there to fight for them every single day.
Even if they don't want you there.
Listen, there'll be an election eventually in which people will get to make that choice.
But I am not giving up on them.
I'm not giving up on Canada.
I mean, this is like if you've been in an abusive relationship before, I'm not giving up on you.
We're not done yet.
I know you think you don't love me, but we're not done yet.
I'm not giving up on the progressive vision of progress that we've been fighting for every single day over the past years.
Write it down.
The progressive vision of progress.
I personally believe that U.S. Americans have trouble finding places on a map because they don't have maps.
And in my progressive view of progress, it's very progressive, and I'm a progressive progressionary of my progressive progress, which we've made a lot of progress over the last eight years, even though it's worse now than it was eight years ago.
But I'm not done with you yet.
What is the part where he said here?
Years later are having trouble paying the rent.
Even with everything we've done on the environment, on inclusion, on gender equality.
Inclusion and gender equality?
That's his pinnacle of success after eight years in office.
On growing the economy, on reconciliation.
Reconciliation, the same one where he skipped off and went vacationing on a Tofino beach in Vancouver, skipping National Truth and Reconciliation Day, the first federal holiday that his government created.
Those young people, eight years later, are having trouble paying their rent, worried about their future in ways that are just as tangible, if not more.
Because of the global context, it has nothing to do with me.
Eight years later, sorry folks, you're in a shitty state, and I'm not leaving you yet.
You're going to have to vote me out of office.
Oh my goodness.
And in that time, he did leave his wife for...
I didn't read that all the way through.
Yeah, that's Justin Trudeau.
He's not quite done yet destroying the country.
He's going to make you vote him out of office before he stops.
And even then, who knows?
What will be the national global crisis then that we'll have to, you know, potentially...
Oh, whatever.
Okay, hold on a second.
Oh, there's two super chats here.
Did I bring this one up?
Blurry Viva equals soft focus looks younger.
I don't know what I look like now, but thank you, KM.
Mr. Lucky Sod, I am.
20 pounds.
Long-time admirer of yourself and Mr. Barnes' work to enlighten the world.
Merry Christmas to both and yours.
Thank you very much, and Merry Christmas to you, Mr. Lucky Sod, I am.
Yes, we're going to have a...
I'm looking at the wind and I see like...
The lake is just frozen enough over that I can't actually go in the water for a polar plunge, which might be a blessing in disguise, but I do have an axe, and I might make some access on the shoreline.
We'll see.
That was a good clip from Trudeau.
It's so in-your-face.
They put out these stupid taxpayer-funded, taxpayer-dollar Christmas ads, and you're just like, it was his moment to shine.
He's wanted to be an actor his entire life.
Whoa!
Whoa!
Pablo, what are you doing?
So we're ready to...
Hey, boss!
Hey, boss!
Pablo, what are you doing?
You don't have to deliver the presents yourself.
Come on, leave that to Santa.
Look at that face.
That's his mandate.
That's his mandate.
And the sick, insidious...
Normalizing of the word mandate.
Now, I don't think I'd ever heard the word mandate.
We used to have it in law.
When you get a file, it's a mandate.
I'd never heard it in government, in administrative bureaucracies, to the degree that we have now grown accustomed to it.
That's your mandate.
Whoa, Pablo, what are you doing?
I've always wanted to be an actor, and this is my time to shine, and yours too, Pablo.
When we're not burning the country down, we're making nauseating...
Christmas videos that make even the most lover of Christmas hate Christmas.
Okay, so that's that.
Then there was another super chat that just came in here.
So I think that's it for Canada for the second.
I hate to do this, but Kurt or Uncivil Law needs a phone call.
He's in a dark place.
I'll have a look at that.
I'll have a look at that, Damocles of Syracuse.
Okay.
Let me make sure that that was it for Canada.
Oh no, that was not it for Canada.
It is it for Canada for the Trudeau side of things.
I'm going to pull up a clip of Ezra Levant interviewing Vivek Ramaswamy while they're on campaign.
I think he was in Iowa yesterday or the day before.
And they asked an amazing question.
And he got a very interesting answer.
Oh no, no, no.
We're not on gang.
I'm just pulling up the highlights.
You watch these things.
And you think you're going crazy.
Again, I am now entering the world where I don't believe anything I see, hear, or read, even when it's with my own eyes.
But let's just see what this is here from Canada Proud.
You know it's going to be good.
The number of companies and countries that are saying something's happening in Canada where it's better there, even though for Canadians, yeah.
Grocery bills suck.
Rent sucks.
Mortgage renegotiation.
Oh my God, how are we going to deal with it?
Like, these are real fears.
But we have built the base of things that are going to help so much in an uncertain world.
The number...
Okay, is this real?
Canada proud.
I'm not going to get to see any comments in it.
It's the amazing doublespeak.
I was elected eight years ago.
To make your lives better.
And yeah, some diversity, inclusion, gender equity, whatever.
And things are worse now, but it's because of Putin.
And I'm not going anywhere.
Rent is high.
Inflation is high.
It's outrageous.
I ordered a...
It was a good Subway.
Not at Subway, but I ordered a Sub.
$20 Canadian for lunch.
Just for a sandwich.
That's it.
Everything.
It's outrageous.
FJT, from your mouth to God's ears.
From brain-dead past-date dumbass to, well, I learned, Vivek.
Alright, so that's it.
That was just a little light-hearted stuff of what's going on in Canada.
Now, I'm going to probably do a standalone video because video quality is irritating me about the latest out of Trump.
And, you know, Colorado, California, and Jack Smith trying to expedite to the Supreme Court.
On the presidential immunity question.
So, very interesting stuff coming out of there.
So, I won't rehash the Colorado ruling, but now California is trying to jump on the bandwagon.
Their lieutenant general or attorney general, whatever, trying to press to keep Trump off the ballot.
Because, you know, Trump was the threat to democracy.
If he ever got in power, he'd never relinquish power.
And he got out of power, relinquished power, handed over, transitioned, got booted from social media.
Hallmark signs of tyrants.
And now in order to keep that tyrant from gaining power again and never relinquishing it again, they've got to get his name off the ballot and they've got to take his name off the ballot.
Colorado ruling came down.
You know what I think about that.
It's a load of steaming pile of poo-poo-poo.
California is going for it now as well.
Jack Smith.
Made that motion to expedite to the Supreme Court the question of Trump immunity to bypass the D.C. Court of Appeals.
And there's been a ruling on that.
It came down Friday night.
I was flying Friday.
I guess I missed it.
But I want to play this particular clip because they're telling you what they're doing in real time while they're accusing others of doing it themselves.
Remember, they accuse Trump of election interference, of trying to...
Interfere with the outcomes of elections.
They accused him of colluding with Russia.
All right, let's get to that breaking news, everybody.
We have got this.
It's from the Supreme Court, where special counsel Jack Smith's request to immediately settle Donald Trump's immunity claim in the election interference probe, it has been denied, essentially shuttling that which Jack Smith wanted, the fast track, if you will.
To decide presidential immunity.
Donald Trump, of course, has asked the Supreme Court to take this case up as well.
So there's a lot to get to right now because the interpretation of this could greatly sideline upcoming cases and potentially affect the 2024 election.
Can you believe that they're saying this out loud?
The proceedings that Jack Smith, the indictment that Jack Smith has initiated, could potentially interfere with the 2024 elections.
Not potentially, definitively.
Hold on one second, people.
Oh gosh, it's carbonated water.
Definitively.
And that's exactly, that has been the goal from the beginning.
I mean, it's becoming apparent now, I think, even to the most stubborn holdouts, Democrat holdouts.
Yeah, but hold on.
Let's wait for the answer here.
Listen to us now.
We have NBC News justice and intelligence correspondent Ken Delanian.
And back with us, former U.S. attorney and MSNBC legal analyst Barbara McQuaid.
Okay, let's go first to you, Barbara.
What's your interpretation of this?
How much does this set back Jack Smith?
Yeah, this is definitely a setback for Jack Smith, who had hoped to leapfrog the Court of Appeals and go straight to the Supreme Court.
Instead, he will have to first litigate this matter in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Now, in the meantime, since he filed this request with the Supreme Court, the D.C. Circuit has said they would hear the question, On an expedited basis.
They have set oral argument in the case for January 9th.
If they decide fairly quickly, then we could be back at the Supreme Court maybe within a month or so.
Maybe within a month or so.
That would bring us to back at the Supreme Court within a month or so.
That would be, whatever, December, January, February.
Oh, but they want to start this trial the day before Super Tuesday, but they're not the ones interfering with elections right now.
If that doesn't happen, well, my goodness, are they called caucuses?
The primaries might go on before we can have an adjudication on this.
What might happen then?
Or it could be that they take their time and we don't decide the case until June, in which case the trial will be delayed by that amount.
These are the expert legal commentators.
What are we on?
MSNBC?
These are MSNBC's expert legal commentators.
I swear to you, I don't have a degree in the States.
I don't have any experience in the States or in election law.
What is this other than stating the obvious?
Well, if they add delays, it's going to add delays, and those delays might slow down the process, which might not allow Jack Smith to cram through with this trial so he can get a conviction before November 2024.
That might have an impact on the 2024 elections.
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
But I think she says it even more clearly in a second.
Hold on here.
Either way you slice it is in some trouble now.
That doesn't mean it can't be tried before the election, but I think we're looking more at a summer trial instead of a spring trial.
Which potentially affects the election.
Look at this guy's face.
I don't like to judge books by their cover.
But if I would ever look at a man and say, someone's got some sexual deviant dirt on that man, this is his face.
And I know a lot of you out there who are saying, confession through projection, Viva must have been married to the same woman for how long now?
How long have I been married for?
15 years.
I've been dating my wife since 1999, people.
There's confession through projection, and then there's just outright observation of people with compromising material that can be the only explanation to justify, rationalize their conduct.
But this is, look at this.
Barbara, I mean, how long would a trial like this take?
Months!
I have assumed it would take about two months.
There are, you know, five different schemes here, each of which would probably take the government a week to try.
Two months?
Up in Canada, we've been trying to hammer a leech on mischief charges.
It's been two months.
Oh, my goodness.
The attorney general in New York on the fraud case.
What was it?
It was 12 weeks?
That's three months.
That's my problem.
Twelve weeks is three months on a bogus fraud case, which had already been predetermined, prejudged on a summary motion.
Oh yeah, it'll take two months.
Presidential immunity, constitutional questions, evidentiary questions.
Yeah, two months, two months.
We've got to get it done before the election, people, because we can't let the people themselves decide.
Give the defense a couple of weeks for their case, and then maybe a week for closing arguments and deliberations.
At the closest, eight weeks.
But you're right.
I mean, you know, the primaries will have been settled likely by June.
The conventions will be beginning in August.
And so this would have to occur kind of simultaneously with a lot of campaign activity.
It could interfere with the elections.
Hell, you know what they could do just to simplify everything?
Just default Trump again on the presidential immunity.
Just, I don't know, say he didn't comply with discovery obligations.
Default him.
Default him like they summary judgmented him in New York.
Default him like they defaulted...
Who did they just...
Oh, Giuliani.
Didn't comply with discovery obligations.
Well, it'll make the trial a lot easier.
He's already guilty.
Now we're just going to see how many years he goes to jail for.
They're telling you in real time what they're doing, what their objective is, and then they accuse the victims of their abuse of doing it.
It's classical...
Classical.
It's classic Darvo.
Confession through projection.
Accuse your enemies of doing what you are doing so as to create confusion, which is not a Saul Alinsky rules for radical.
It is a Joseph Goebbels Nazi propaganda technique.
So, by the way, the bottom line is, Jack Smith made the motion for expedited, go straight to the Supreme Court, bypass the D.C. Court of Appeals.
That in and of itself, and if you'd listened to Bourbon with Barnes, because he had analyzed it thoroughly multiple times, Barnes' opinion on this, and I have not heard anyone more intelligent than him, is that...
This was a mistake from Jack Smith.
He didn't appreciate how the scheduling would work.
It's not for D-Chess.
Jack Smith is not a smart man.
I am not a smart man.
Jack Smith, he's picked to do what he's doing because he's specifically not a smart man.
He's basically like a dumb dog that will do what you tell it to do.
So, Barnes' take on this is Jack's first mistake was...
Petitioning the Supreme Court to hear this on an expedited basis.
It was sort of a win-win for Trump.
Bypass the D.C. Court of Appeal.
I mean, you can assume the D.C. Court of Appeal is going to be so biased, you can predict the way they're going to rule.
Just go ahead and read the majority decision out of Colorado.
Understand the conclusion to which they want to come.
And then just draft backwards.
Does President Trump have presidential immunity?
Well, I mean, they'll accept Jack Smith's framing of the question.
Does President Trump have presidential immunity to break the law?
Well, that's not the legal question, now, is it?
The question is, does Trump have presidential immunity for official acts that he carries out as president?
Then the question's going to be, well, how do we determine what's an official act carried out as president versus a non-official act carried out by Trump as a person?
Hypothetically, you know, the most extreme example...
I don't want to take any too hyperbolic examples, but dealing drugs, he gets caught with a kilo of coke because he's selling it to Hunter Biden.
He would not be able to say presidential immunity for that.
It was not an official presidential function to sell Hunter Biden crack.
That being said, overseeing election, election integrity, I think is quite clearly what many would say is a presidential act, a presumptive presidential act.
Whereas some might say, you know, dealing crack is a presumptive non-presidential act.
Jack Smith frames this as, does he have presidential immunity to break the law?
That's not the question.
Does he have presidential immunity for presumptively presidential acts?
So anyways, some are saying Jack Smith screwed up in the first place by being compelled to pressure to go to the Supreme Court so they can get a ruling on this before March 4th so that they can have their trial before the primaries.
And now Trump is saying, look, it's a win-win.
Expedited to the Supreme Court, that's good for me.
But I don't think I'm going to let you do that, Jack.
And so Trump came in and opposed Jack Smith's motion to expedite and says, I don't want this to go super fast.
I want to hear what the Court of Appeal out of D.C. has to say.
I want to see how quackery they're going to get.
And so Trump came out and opposed it, said there's nothing singularly pressing to bypass the ordinary mechanisms, that being let the...
Appellate court adjudicate on this so the Supreme Court can get the benefit of the partisan hackery coming out of D.C., and then the Supreme Court will deal with it.
And if they don't deal with it before the 2024 election, you know what's going to deal with it?
The 2024 election.
So that's it.
But the clip, I mean, MSNBC, oh yeah, this is going to interfere.
This is going to impact the election.
It's been the plan from the get-go.
It's been the plan from day one.
They cannot have this go to a clean and fair election.
They've got to get him off the ballot on the pretext of these bogus charges for which he was already acquitted by the Senate in the second impeachment, if we're talking about the insurrection clause.
And that's it.
But my goodness, I mean, at some point, some people were saying, well, what if the Supreme Court doesn't take it up?
Well, for the time being, we no longer have to worry about that.
They're going to take it up.
They're going to say, we'll deal with this after the Court of Appeals deals with this.
Court of Appeal comes and says, Yeah, no.
Clear presidential immunity or not presidential immunity.
And we'll hear what they have to say and what their rationale is, and then the Supreme Court will deal with it.
First time in American history they've ever indicted a presidency.
You know, I was listening to Gouveia, Robert Gouveia, watching The Watchers.
I like to pick the brains of everybody.
And he's like, you know, bringing up some pretty clear examples.
Obama, extrajudicial assassination of American citizens abroad.
By drone strikes.
Is that a presidential act or is that a criminal act?
What's his face?
Bill Clinton bombing the aspirin factory.
Presumptively presidential act or criminal act?
What's his face there?
Weapons of mass destruction guy.
Lying about that.
Was he lying as president or was he lying as a criminal?
And the fact that none of them have ever been criminally charged for not just overt acts of criminality, but according to some, war crimes.
But Trump, for insurrection, for January 6th, even though he was acquitted on that, after being acquitted for those events, then gets civilly disqualified based on a civil determination of insurrection that never meant any criminal definition.
And then we go after we indict a president on hush money payments.
You remember when Hillary Clinton funded the Steele dossier, then lied about it, and then concealed the fact that they financed it?
Oh, no indictment there.
They got a little slap on the wrist penalty and an apology and then they move on.
But Trump gets indicted.
They've never done it before.
But Trump's the one who's the tyrant who's going to seize power and never relinquish it.
Oh my goodness.
I brought this up for some reason.
Oh, the Nikki Haley.
I don't want any of these.
I don't want any of these cookies.
Okay, we'll come back to this in a second.
What's going on in the chat here?
Let's see here.
Oh, we'll go to Rumble.
I haven't seen if there's any.
There's no Rumble rants, and that's fine.
Merry Christmas, Viva, says Pumpkin79.
Okay, well, the video seems to have gotten a little better.
Do we end on YouTube and come on over to Rumble?
Let's do this.
We're going to take the party over there.
And then we're going to end the party over there and come on over to Viva Barnes Law, where we'll have just a little Merry Christmas after thingy thing.
Here, link to Rumble.
And hopefully, I don't know what I'm going to do.
I mean, I set up, I lugged my mic back, my lighting, my floodlights, my computer, everything.
I'm going to use it, but the internet's not going to let me?
That's not going to be good.
Live here.
Let's go back to the...
War Witch Nikki Haley.
You know what?
We'll...
Okay, we're going to do one more.
Come on over to Rumble.
We're going to deal with my prediction here, by the way.
And it's going to involve a little bit of an attack on the DeSantis supporters, the DeSantis cheerleaders on social media.
The news has been floating around that Trump...
Hold on.
Stop screen.
That Trump has been contemplating picking Nikki Haley.
Is this going to be a video that we watch here?
Thank you.
Thank you.
Is that Donald Trump, three months ago, pretty much remained around the same in the mid-40s.
His support has remained rock solid.
But fast forward three months into December, we still have him around 44%, where Nikki Haley, on the other hand, has been served significantly.
So it'll be interesting to watch out in the next few weeks whether she will continue on this track and whether she will continue to close in on this gap.
I don't believe any of those stats.
So, allegedly, by the way, listen to this.
This is what people have been tweeting and replying to.
Oh, Trump is just as bad as he's ever been.
Now he's going to go with war pig Nikki Haley.
And the DeSantis camp is saying, look, this is your man.
He's deep state.
He doesn't care about anything.
He's establishment.
He's good.
How dare he?
If anyone who supported Trump, look what he's doing now.
Okay, so they tweeted this out.
And I'm telling you, my prediction is this story is a load of crap.
It's going to turn out to be bunk, and anyone who relied on it to take a dig at Trump is going to look a bit like a fool.
Former President Donald Trump has been asking allies and advisors for their thoughts about Nikki Haley as a presidential vice presidential candidate.
Two sources familiar with the conversations tell CBS, holy, can you believe this?
I mean, sources say Trump referred to the shithole countries.
Sources said Trump removed the busk of...
Martin Luther King from the White House.
Sources say Trump was on a quid pro quo phone conversation.
Two sources familiar with the conversations.
It's such a bloody fake news red herring.
And then the thing is this.
What did they overhear?
Hey guys, should I pick Nikki Haley?
Two sources overheard a conversation in which Trump was...
Contemplating picking Nikki Haley.
The story's bullcrap.
It's bullcrap as per their strategy all the time.
My wife, she's coming to see if I'm doing something.
It's bullcrap.
Two sources familiar with the conversations tell CBS News.
The feedback from the MAGA crowd regarding putting Haley on a ticket if the GOP wins was overwhelmingly negative.
According to these GOP sources, Politico first reported Trump allies are working to quash the possibility of a Haley-Nikki ticket.
First of all, if Haley is that popular, I might be accused of polling one of those, it's not true, but if it's true, here's why it's not so bad.
I don't think it's true, period.
And if it is true, I would not support it either, because I watched Nikki Haley on stage there.
If he went with Nikki Haley over, let's just say, Vivek Ramaswamy, I would say that's a kick in the proverbial teeth that his supporters do not deserve and will not appreciate.
The whole story is bullcrap, okay?
It's bullcrap.
It's fake news, and the people running with it are going to look stupid for having run with it afterwards.
That's my prediction.
I might be wrong, but I don't think I'm going to be.
But Trump, in an interview Friday with conservative talk show host Hugh Hewitt, blasted polls showing Haley was performing well as fake.
Yeah, that's exactly what you do if you're contemplating taking her on.
You say that she doesn't actually have the support that she has.
He also insists that he's not worried about Haley as a challenger.
Nor should he be.
Haley blah blah blah.
That's the article!
That's the article, people!
And who is running with it?
Who's running with it?
I'm not trying to make fun of anybody.
In particular, I'm just publicly saying what I said on Twitter.
John Cardillo comes out and says, ha ha ha, I told you suckers.
I really hope this happens so I can watch MAGA spin and cope.
They'll soon have to come to terms with the fact that there's nothing conservative or America first about their emperor god king.
Because he's retweeting the article breaking Trump asking allies about Nikki Haley.
According to two anonymous sources familiar with the conversations, my prediction this story will turn out to be total bunk and will reflect poorly on anyone who ran with it to attack Trump.
As we say in French, people, rien ne va plus.
No more bets.
That's my bet.
And I think it's really bad.
I don't know what the bloody deal is with the DeSantis camp.
I like DeSantis as the governor.
I find the online support...
The organic, the big names who you know are real people and not bought accounts.
It's cliched rubbish of support, juvenile talking points, and propaganda.
And then these other accounts, like whenever I see a juvenile insult, a outrageously stupid political insight, I go click on the bio, the profile, and it says hashtag Team DeSantis.
And I don't for the life of me understand what's going on.
Here was another one.
Here was another one.
Well, this was John Cardillo again.
I like people who don't lose elections to dementia patients.
That's great.
That's a play on what Trump said about McCain.
I like war heroes who don't get caught.
And Cardillo thinks he's got the zinger.
Oh, I like candidates who don't lose elections to dementia patients, referring to Trump losing to dementia patient Joe Biden.
There's two reasons why this is a self-own.
How do you feel about candidates who lose to someone who loses to a dementia patient?
That's going to be the obvious retort.
Because DeSantis is going to lose to Trump.
He's losing already.
He might even lose to Haley.
So how is it going to feel when someone says, I don't like candidates.
I like candidates not to lose to candidates who lose to dementia patients.
Point number one.
You're digging yourself a hole.
Point number two.
These DeSantis cheerleaders...
In promoting DeSantis and trying to take digs at Trump, they're legitimizing an illegitimate election.
That's what they're doing.
Oh, I don't like candidates who lose to dementia patients.
Or I like candidates who don't lose to dementia patients.
That was an illegitimate election in 2020.
I'm not saying it was fraudulent in the sense of vote-flipping Dominion, the ghost of Chavez, a kraken that never appeared.
It was an illegitimate election if for one reason and one reason only, the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story.
If that were the only thing that occurred, it would be an illegitimate election and you got the DeSantis camp in their quest to dunk on Trump basically legitimizing the 2020 election and saying it was totally kosher and if anybody has any problems with it, you're the problem.
If only for that, it would have been a fraudulent election.
It would have been fortified, interfered with.
Illegitimate.
Censorship.
Then you get government working through EIP with big tech to censor.
Then you get ballot harvesting in some states where ballot harvesting wasn't necessarily all that legal.
Then you get changing of the rules and regulations.
Then you get arguably unconstitutional broadening of confined peoples for the purposes of mail-in voting.
Then you get the failure and refusal to ever have a meaningful signature match.
The team DeSantis thinks it's an own on Trump to tell 70 million Americans, 80 million Americans, who believe that that election was illegitimate, that it was legitimate all along, and now we're ratifying that election?
What a...
It's a bold move, Cotton.
We'll see if it pays off.
It won't.
Spoiler alert.
There's the link to Rumble.
Let's get over there for a couple more stories before we end and then get on over to Locals and see how our community is doing there.
So everybody, sorry for the potato face, Viva.
Let me see here.
Oh, so I've heard this as well.
Read the friend of the court brief, the amicus brief.
Jack has no authority.
There's an argument going around that Jack was never lawfully appointed.
I'll tell you this, I don't know the merits of it.
I'm just going to say that if anybody thinks that what's going to happen now is the court's going to come in and say, Jack has been ultra-virus this entire time.
Everything is stricken.
I mean, even if it's true, and I don't know that it is or isn't, that outcome, I think, would never happen to begin with.
They'll find a way to either ratify, substitute, retroactively ratify through a new replacement.
They're not going to undo what's been done.
They're too far gone now.
And it's not going to be a resolution for anything to say, oh, well, Jack Smith was...
Unlawfully appointed, so everything he's done is scrapped and let's just go to 2024 elections accordingly.
They've crossed the Rubicon.
They're going to find a way to replace...
It won't happen.
That's my very superficial understanding of what the accusations are.
Even if he were unlawfully appointed and didn't have the authority, was acting ultra-virus, they're going to have to find a way to ratify everything he's done because they can't undo it.
And also, they're going to say there's no point in undoing it because the same questions are just going to come up sooner than later, so let's just answer them now for the sake of it.
Okay, so with that said, one last here thing, and we're going to end on YouTube.
YouTube, for those of you who are not coming over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, why am I not even giving you the link to Viva Barnes?
Here, link to Locals.
For everyone on YouTube who's not coming over to the free speech platform or our wonderful above-average community, Merry Christmas.
I feel like it's an act of defiance to say Merry Christmas.
Merry Christmas.
And the white pill in all of this, this too shall pass and 2024 is going to be a revolutionary year.
That's the white pill, the black pill, the dooms pill, the green pill, the optimism and the pessimism.
2024 is going to be a revolutionary year.
So that is it.
Come on over to...
Rumble or vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Ending now.
Thank you all on YouTube.
Peace.
And now we are back on Rumble.
And I can see when the three bars tell me that I've got a good connection, better connection.
Now I'm down to one potato face again.
Locals, let me see what's going on here.
Okay, so we got chat and we got Rumble Rats.
Merry Christmas, everyone, says Jesse Michael.
You forgot the Vivek and Ezra interview.
It's totally worth it.
Oh, no, I didn't!
Aura Benu?
We're doing that here.
I'm telling you this, it's amazing.
People can poop on Ezra and Rebel News for whatever the reason, and there's reason to criticize everybody, even me.
That interview was short, sweet, Ezra asked the good questions, and...
My goodness, did Vivek have some of the right answers.
Like, objectively good answers.
I'm not going to play the whole thing because you've got to go watch the entire thing yourself.
It's only 13, 14 minutes long.
I've got the one question and the one answer that we're going to have to highlight here.
And shout out to my man, Ezra Levant.
No, I'm joking.
That sounds like total cringe.
Ezra Levant went down to Iowa, got the interview, and it was amazing.
Let me do the rumble rants before I get too far behind now.
I think that they've caught up with the internet.
Arkansas crime attorney says we're still live on YouTube.
What?
No, I don't think we are, but if we are, I'm not taking any chances.
I don't think we are.
I think we're good now.
Arkansas crime attorney, Little Rock.
How you doing?
Merry Christmas, Little Rock.
What I love is I've got a bunch of members of our community that, you know, they have my cell number, text me pictures, wish me Merry Christmas.
I'm going to get to all of you after the stream.
Maybe a picture of my beautiful shoes, but...
Little Rock, I hope you're doing well.
We've all had one hell of a tumultuous three years, but some have had a more tumultuous three years than others.
Little Rock, good to see you again, and thank you for that.
Ginger Ninja, 1776.
He made my chess set, but I don't have it here because I'm not...
I miss Florida.
I miss Florida, but I love it here.
Do you miss Florida?
my kid misses Florida too Ginger Ninja says Merry Christmas Viva Chat and Viva Barnes Law Community Viva the amacrist brief by Reagan's Attorney General is incredible Jack Smith's appointment is illegal and illegitimate you and Robert I'm sure we talked about this at some point as well.
I know that Barnes talked about how the Jack Smith appointment was illogical on its face because he's either appointed by Biden, in which case...
He's acting at the behest of Biden, or he isn't, as he says, and he's independent, in which case he, you know, wasn't appointed by Biden.
But I'll have Gouveia on for sure.
I'll have Gouveia on.
I'm going to text him right now and say, hey, Gouveia, Rob, Merry Christmas.
I'm jealous of you being down in Arizona with the warm weather, and we're sitting up here pitch black, and I'm already vitamin D deficient after like two days here.
No, but I'll reach out to him for sure.
The Ross Rodriguez.
$50 Rumble, man.
Thank you very much.
Merry Christmas.
I love you and your family.
May God continue to bless you.
From your mouth, Roz Rodriguez, to God's ears.
It's that guilt that comes with things, and we have been exquisitely fortunate.
That said, everybody, you know, everybody's got stress and my goodness, does it sometimes peak around this time of year?
Arkansas Crime Attorney says, Merry Christmas.
Watching the whole family at my house.
So donations will be a little less than normal.
LOL.
My goodness, Arkansas.
Don't worry about it.
And Merry Christmas to all of you.
Merry Christmas.
Viva and based Barnes said Saturday.
Well, speaking of based, I think I've gone back to Mr. Potato Face again.
Okay, no, I think we're good now.
Speaking of based, I'm telling you this, I'm not, I'm sure as hell I'm not paid by any presidential candidate.
I don't even accept, like, accommodations.
I have nothing...
I started off skeptical of Vivek.
And I'll poke fun at him lightly when I think he makes mistakes.
The peeing with the mic on, my goodness.
People find that embarrassing?
I get up to the cottage where my mother-in-law...
I get up here.
The first thing I do is I get out and I pee outdoors.
I don't know if it's some sort of innate primordial...
I like Vivek, and my goodness, I'll just play one answer in particular.
And this is it.
Listen to this question, because it's the question I'd ask Vivek.
Vivek, I don't think you have a chance.
And I asked him when he was on my channel, I was like, you know, I don't think you have a chance.
Is this for a position in Trump's cabinet?
And his answer...
Was good then?
And it's even better now.
Listen to this.
And it's better now because I think he's making a point.
I don't think he's right that Trump's not going to get to the finish line.
I hope he's...
Whatever.
Listen to this.
You used the phrase America first, I heard in a little gaggle afterwards.
You talked about making America great.
Those are slogans that Donald Trump popularized in his first run.
Trump has had very positive things to say about you, especially your debate performance.
That said, Trump is way ahead in all the polls.
I mean, the polls might be inaccurate, but it suggests he's out front.
How do you run a primary where he is nominally, and on the ballot, he's your opponent, even though you seem to be carrying the fire, carrying the torch for his ideas?
Well, I do think they're his ideas.
I mean, George Washington, these are George Washington's ideas.
And it's up to each of us to carry the torch forward, to take that further than George Washington did in 1796 when he left office.
And so, yes, Donald Trump, I give my man's credit for a lot of his accomplishments in this country.
But I think I'm going to be able to take that America First agenda that began with George Washington, that continued through Ronald Reagan, through Donald Trump, now through me, taking that to the next level.
I think I have fresh legs.
I think I'm able to reach the next generation in a way that he's not.
And I don't mean to be cynical here, but let's also get very practical.
I don't think this system, that permanent state, is going to let him get anywhere near that White House.
And I think that that may sound dark, but you look at what's happening in Colorado or in California and other states.
I think anybody who thinks that it's just going to be a honky-dory, straightforward path that they even let Donald Trump get anywhere near that White House again, that existing establishment, I think that's a naive delusion.
Actually.
And so it's my job anyway to stand for this agenda, take our America first agenda to the next level.
I'll honor Donald Trump and his legacy.
But I think there are forces at work in the United States that have determined not to let him anywhere near.
And it's my responsibility to make sure that we have standard bearers who can take the America first agenda to the next level starting in 2024.
That's what I'm in this race to do.
And I think next year is going to be a complicated and turbulent year.
That's one hell of an answer.
It's deep.
It's insightful.
It's dark.
And I don't think it's one of those cases of a fear hiding a wish.
I don't think Vivek is hoping something bad happens to Trump so that he can be the Trump candidate of the remaining un-Trump candidates.
And I think when he said at the beginning, you know, they're not going to let him get near it and then attenuated it a little bit.
They're going to do everything they can to not let Trump get near that White House.
To keep him off the ballot.
They'll do everything they can to subvert democracy while simultaneously accusing Trump of being the one to subvert democracy.
And in that sense, yes, it's good to have Vivek there, not as a replacement, but as someone who is carrying the ideals of that which they don't want to seem to let to get back into the White House.
That was a really bad way of saying it.
That was a damn good answer.
And by the way, go show some love if you don't mind.
Here's the link to the tweet of Ezra Levant's interview.
Vivek is right in a sense.
They'll do everything they can.
Keep them off the ballot, indict, charge, try to jail.
And then, you know, it's whether or not they're going to go the next step and go JFK.
And it's a cornered animal is the most dangerous animal on earth.
And it's not Trump who's the cornered animal here.
It is the deep state that is the deep state, the administrative state, the forces that are burning the country to the ground to keep this guy out of office that are the dangerous animals here.
Dangerous, feral, rabid, and out of control.
Absolutely and utterly out of control.
Lord knows what they're going to do, but they're going to try everything, and they're doing it.
But it's good to have Vivek there, because between Vivek, who's left now?
if they Chris Christie useless useless entity that he is DeSantis who is drilling holes in his own ship and if it's not him I believe some of I genuinely believe some of his cheerleaders on social media are sabotaging him.
It would be the only way to explain how bad some of the messaging is.
And then war pig Nikki Haley.
You know, the one who wants to compel identity for using the internet.
And she didn't misspeak.
She took some flack from Vivek at the last debate.
She didn't misspeak.
Nikki Haley is as much uniparty, deep state, administrative state, Democrat to some extent.
She's more on the left than RFK Jr. in terms of some of the policy that she wants to implement.
Oh yeah, people need to feel safe on the internet, so we need mandatory IDs so that you can access the interwebs?
My goodness, how could that possibly go wrong?
So that's that.
It was one heck of an interview.
Let me see what's going on in the chat here.
Hold on a second.
Oh, that's Aurora.
So I got the link now.
She's worse than Hillary, FFS.
That means for frick's sake.
That's from Crazy Warlock.
She really is.
She really is, policy-wise, bad.
She's less toxic to the senses than Hillary.
But policy-wise, just as bad, if not worse.
More war.
Endless war.
Digital ID.
I wouldn't be surprised if she's going to back the...
What is it?
Digital Central Banking.
No.
Central Digital Banking Currency.
CDBC.
It's good for them.
Someone who's made her millions in defense contracting in a short period of time.
She's beholden to somebody.
And it sure as hell is not the American people.
Vivek, he's made his FU money.
And by the way, how much is Vivek worth?
I don't know if I'm going to be able to even look this up fast enough.
Vivek Ramaswamy.
I was blown away, by the way.
Holy crab apples.
Ramaswamy's campaign advisor and his net worth a billion?
Ramaswamy's campaign advisor said his net worth was worth more than a billion.
Forbes estimated it at $950 million.
I'm not attracted to that type of wealth, and there's no but to it.
He does have FU money in a way that Nikki Haley doesn't, but also he has that FU money in a way that might not mean that he's indebted to whomever he made that money off of.
I can't quite say the same for Nikki Haley.
And, you know, you got Elon Musk, who's got that FU money, and who has attracted a similar ire of politicians, European politicians, and all those other people who try to shut people up when they don't want to listen to what they have to say.
What else was it that I had on the backdrop before we head on over to...
Oh, yeah, well, speaking of RFK, here's another one, by the way.
Another good interview.
Charlie Kirk, man.
Dude is...
People get good at what they do.
And when what you do is know your stuff so that you can catch people in real time and you can know your stuff that you're actually a master of your stuff...
Yeah, that's called being good at what you do, and it comes from the 10,000 hours of practice, which Charlie Kirk has more.
When you engage in real-time debates with people, like the actual debates of sitting down, you talk, and I'll listen to you, and I'm going to get back to you, you need to know your stuff, and you need to be able to access that information very quickly.
He had on RFK Jr., and many of you know, I like RFK in demeanor.
I like his, not all of his policy, but I like the way he conducts thoughtful...
Interviews, long-format interviews, listens to what people have to say.
I've never seen them caught off-guard or caught flat-footed or caught with an atrocious answer the way I've seen right here.
And courtesy of and credit to Charlie Kirk.
But listen to this.
So one of the things as president, obviously, you get to appoint Supreme Court justices.
And the Supreme Court...
is more important than ever as a check and balance.
Which current or recent Supreme Court justice is closest to your ideas or what you would appoint?
Stop.
That's a long, bloody silence.
Let's just hear it.
More important than ever as a check and balance, which current or recent Supreme Court justice is closest to your ideas or what you would appoint?
14, 15, 16, 17, 18. 19?
20?
I couldn't answer that.
Seven seconds.
And the thing is this.
My projection of what's going on here, he didn't have an answer to it.
And he's embarrassed that he can't think of one offhand.
And then he's got to come up with a policy reason for which he doesn't want to answer the question because he lacked the factual understanding, the factual knowledge to make an answer.
So it's kind of interesting, but we'll play it out.
I would say, you know, I'm going to appoint judges who...
Platitudes.
Who reflect my values?
Give me a name.
What are those values?
Because President Trump has a list, to his credit, here are the 65 people.
I mean, would it be more like Kagan or more like Clarence Thomas?
Here's the problem.
I couldn't name a decision that I couldn't...
Other than the cases that I've covered in the last few years of vlogging, I don't know of many like central decisions that I could name.
Like Kagan had X opinion on.
I couldn't do it offhand.
I'm trying to think of one offhand.
I would be caught flat-footed, and it's got to be embarrassing.
I don't know.
I wouldn't answer that.
But respectfully, you're running for president.
The voters, that's a huge issue for voters.
Especially when it comes to Second Amendment rights, abortion.
Please continue.
I mean, I can tell you what my important...
I think I've found a new admiration for how to conduct interviews and the persona of an interviewee, interviewer.
Please continue.
I like that.
The issues for me are free market capitalism, strong environmental protection, strong liberties, human rights, civil rights.
Bodily autonomy.
All platitudes.
All general vagaries.
I hear that.
Trying to keep the relationship good.
So those are the issues.
I'm not going to tell you.
But who's your favorite Supreme Court justice ever?
The answer might be, I've never thought about that, Charlie.
I should have an answer for this.
I don't.
I'm going to look into it, and I'll come back to you with a list.
Just one that you would say that you think did a good job.
Earl Warren.
Okay.
So the Warren court that got rid of prayer in public schools.
Bam!
You know, I'm not going to like this.
I don't want to pick a particular...
You have to, because voters vote on the Supreme Court.
Well, yeah, but I'm telling you what I would look for.
Maybe...
Well, I'll stop here, because it's good.
I'll give everybody the link.
Maybe...
RFK knew from the beginning, like, no matter what he says, he's dealing with someone who's so smart.
He could pick Clarence Thomas, and even if he said Clarence Thomas, Charlie Kirk could find the worst decision that Clarence Thomas ever came up with and said, oh, so you support this?
He goes on later and says, look, I'm not going to name one because all you're going to do is pick a decision that they sucked with and hold it against me.
But the reality is, I just don't think RFK has even ever thought of it and was too embarrassed to say, I don't know, I've never even thought about that.
I haven't gotten there yet.
Which is why, ladies and gentlemen, If you don't know the answer to a question, it's almost just better to say, you know what?
Mea Koopa, I don't have a good answer for this.
I need to look into this and actually be able to answer it the next time someone asks.
Bam!
I mean, I couldn't name one case.
I could think of the Korematsu decision.
I could think of the Korematsu decision as bad Supreme Court decisions.
Jacobson.
I couldn't tell you who the justices were that came down with it.
I can't...
Good on Charlie Kirk.
It was great because he's giving him a real hard time being loving and sympathetic nonetheless while doing it.
I don't know how RFK is going to feel about Charlie Kirk after that interview, but he's only got himself to blame.
Yeah, that was funny.
Okay, let me see this here.
Charlie's a kid.
How old is Charlie?
I bet you Charlie's older than me.
Hold on a second.
Charlie Kirk age.
Oh, he is a kid.
He's 30 years old.
I mean, he looked young.
I just thought he was like one of those pimp-on-a-blimp young-looking guys who are actually quite old.
Anyway, I think I want to go catch up on some Charlie Kirk.
RFK is a Democrat.
Is a Democrat.
The real man.
Only...
Big Mama Obumba.
I can't read that, but thank you.
All right.
Earl Warren that resided over the Warren Commission who found Oswald as the lone shooter of his uncle's death?
See, I wish...
Damn, I mean, I'm going to learn something new every day.
That's from 2DZWilliams.
I knew the names are the same, but I'm going to go look at that.
That would be really funny.
I mean, is it the same Earl Warren?
I'm going to take your word for it.
Okay, what we're going to do...
We're going to have our exclusive locals after party.
I don't know why I'm seeing my own face in the wrong camera.
Have we been live here?
Holy crab apples.
Let me refresh.
Okay, good, good, good.
Okay, we've been live there.
The video's not that bad either.
Everybody, there's one more story in the backdrop.
Oh yeah, sorry, that's what I'm trying to do.
I was trying to get to the...
Sorry, getting distracted by my own distractedness.
I wanted to go to the Rumble Rants because there were a few more.
John's Goat.
Come on, Viva.
He was an American lawyer running for president.
John's Goat.
Yeah, look, I might be biased or have some bias to like JFK or RFK, sorry, because I think he would harbor resentment for the deep state that assassinated his uncle and father.
I could really also imagine a world in which...
If you're writing a John Clancy book where he's being compelled to run so that he can continue with the agenda of the deep state that assassinated his father and uncle, I like the fact that he listens to people, engages in long-format discussion.
I mean, how many of the presidential candidates engage in long-format discussion?
I mean, Joe Biden, hell or high water, would never do it.
Yeah, and Vivek does it.
I don't think, I mean, what's his name?
DeSantis did it with PBD and displayed that he's got a very lacking in a sense of humor.
And Nikki Haley, I don't know, and Chris Christie, I mean, he'll do long-form interviews just so he can talk about how Trump is bad and should be up here defending.
Okay, I came here to do this.
Now stop distracting me, people.
I wanted to say, I saw one person say why they, I stopped trusting Charlie Kirk during the 2022 Arizona election.
He correctly predicted Carrie Lake win, but then made the biggest mental gymnastics to defend the fraud, except calling it out as fraud.
I don't know of that, the real man, and so I cannot take a position on that.
And the other thing is this, you're never going to find someone who you're going to agree with with issues.
You're never going to find someone who hasn't made a mistake.
You're never going to find someone who's not a weak human who made a mistake and then Was reluctant to or refused to admit to it to preserve their own ego.
And I can't think of anybody who I listen to and admire, with the exception of Barnes, maybe.
I don't know that Barnes has ever been wrong that he would ever have to apologize for in the first place.
But everybody makes mistakes.
And everybody's human and then sometimes are reluctant to admit when they made a mistake because they don't want to give in and whatever.
And then they go through mental gymnastics to justify their mistake, their bad assessment, whatever.
So you don't have to agree with love 100% of what everybody's ever said.
But you can go by the broader, are they doing good?
Charlie Kirk is doing good.
As far as I know.
Ezra Levant is doing good.
Rebel News is doing good.
So there's that.
Charlie ignored the fraud, says Big Pete 44. But then, I don't know, maybe Charlie, Big Pete, first of all, Merry Christmas.
I'm not driving down through New York.
On the way, we flew.
I was going to drive.
God, I wasn't.
Anyhow, maybe some people are not convinced of the fraud.
Maybe some people are focusing on the fraud, as in the Dominion ghost of Hugo Chavez, bring out the Kraken fraud, and that didn't exist.
And so that's the problem, by the way, that people could say, well, there wasn't fraud because there wasn't vote flipping on Dominion machines, but there sure as hell was election interference.
So anyways, I don't know what his positions are on that thoroughly enough, but if I ever interviewed him, I would consult the interwebs and say, give me the biggest wrongs Charlie Kirk has ever done, and I'll ask him about it live.
Okay, so we got John's Goat.
Come on, Viva.
He's an American lawyer running for president.
Okay, Arkansas crime attorney.
It is Sotomayor coined the ignorant term undocumented immigrant.
I can now say that I've lived through that transition of language.
Illegal alien, illegal immigrant, undocumented immigrant.
Now what do they call them?
Transitory migrants or migratory transits?
I don't know what it is exactly.
Sad ones raging.
Okay, I got all that.
Real Man, Viva, you make mistakes, but unlike most, you correct them.
I've been watching you for years, and you are a good person.
Merry Christmas, The Real Man.
Thank you very much.
I know.
I'm trying to think of a situation where I made a mistake, and then I tried to rationalize the mistake.
Because you want to.
It's embarrassing to make mistakes.
The one off hand where I thought that that tweet from the Dr. Solnit was real and because she blocked me.
But no, I apologized thoroughly, publicly and even privately to her if she ever gets the DM.
So, the real man, thank you very much.
Okay, there was one more thing I think I had on the backdrop before we...
508.
Okay, we're doing good.
I'm not going to make people too late for Christmas.
Supreme Court won't fast track.
Supreme Court won't fast track.
Charlie Kirk.
Okay.
Y 'all, we're going to end on the white pill before we get over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
I'll go back to the chat a little bit.
I guess it's a white pill.
It's watching Viva molest a dog.
I will play the whole thing.
I have the permission of the owner to make that dog famous.
This is a three-quarter Chihuahua, one-quarter Chinese Crested.
Look at this dog.
I'm going to do a detailed breakdown of this dog.
You're going to need to come close.
Look at the finger.
It's a her.
It's a her.
One thing at a time.
The first thing is, from this side, the dog looks totally normal.
If you don't look at the tongue.
And then from this side, you're like, what?
Oh, you see the tongue?
What is the teeth?
The dog has teeth.
Can you imagine being this dog?
It's a beautiful dog.
Look at this.
Look at this sausage.
It's bald.
It has hair.
It's hairless.
It's like a soft...
It's beautiful.
Okay, that's the hair...
Okay, so I fell in love with that dog.
I think I may have...
I may have touched it in a way.
I know the owner, and they were totally cool with it.
It's gross.
Cheeky starboard.
Come on, it's...
If you felt it, it's like, the truth is, the skin felt like my grandmother's hands when she was later in life.
Like, super thin, super soft, like, sexual abuse, says Jesse.
No, Jesse Michael.
I kept my hands to non-private parts.
And then people, I posted it to both, you know, everywhere.
And on Rumble, I posted it to Viva Random and people were like, we have a very serious crowd on Rumble.
They're definitely...
You know, above average intelligence as well.
Much more critical.
Everyone's like, this is what breeding of dogs creates these monstrosities.
The tongue sticking out of its mouth could be a potential health problem.
The dog is nine years old.
The owners take very good care of it.
And it's actually like, it's a very agile, mobile dog.
I forgot this.
I have a kid sitting right now.
She's been here the whole time.
I totally forgot.
It's a very mobile dog.
It plays with other dogs.
Oh, now my missus has come.
Anyhow, I love that dog.
And I, yeah.
Marion, you want to come say hi?
Okay, they'll come afterwards.
Okay, everybody, what we're going to do now is 2,000 mules is worth considering.
That's Osutisoft.
Viva!
Oh, I got that one already.
Not all inbred dogs are sickly, said Scream.
This is true, by the way.
In fact, I found that some of the, you know, mutts.
Well, I guess there's a difference between being a mutt and being an inbred dog.
No, inbreeding typically, or overbreeding typically causes problems.
With Dobermans, their skull is very tight.
It causes brain pressure, which actually causes neurological disorders.
I'm convinced that's what happened with our Frenchie, Barney, which is why I vowed I'm going to do only rescues or mutts for the rest of my days because they've been behaviorally better than Barney.
Winston.
I mean, a blind dog.
A paralyzed dog is not going to bite you.
But for you, they're on a one-way track to the cosmos.
So, that's that.
A mutt is not an inbred.
This is true, says Trudeau is retarded.
I should have read that name.
No, a mutt, they tend to be the healthiest dogs.
They get the best attributes, not...
Inbred to breed in the most desirable attributes for humans.
And by the way, actually, before I forget, on Rumble, I listened to a podcast with Rogan and who was it about AI?
Aza Raskin and Tristan Harris.
And now I've got to see if Aza Raskin...
Aza Raskin...
Father?
Please tell me.
Aza Raskin is not related to that guy in government.
Okay, whatever.
It was Aza Raskin and Tristan Harris, episode 2076 on Joe Rogan about AI.
Terrifying and very interesting.
So, that's that.
The dog is fine.
The dog is totally happy.
What do we got here?
Big Mama Obomba says, yes, and he still won't admit that it's poison.
He's proud of his poison.
Who cares if he didn't mandate it?
That's my biggest public critique of Trump.
I know that that's what it's about, Big Mama Obama.
Trump is going to have to reverse on the pride that he takes in Operation Warp Speed.
And I've laid what I believe is the groundwork for him to do it.
I was having a discussion with somebody, and you realize the level of indoctrination for people who have been induced.
Brainwashed into taking one shot, two shot, one jab, two jab, three jabs.
And the more they do it, the more they have to convince themselves that there's nothing remotely bizarre about it.
It's always been this way.
Why wouldn't you get a booster every six months?
I'd get mine as soon as I'm eligible.
When you see that level of brainwashing in real time, and you see the way that if you try to confront people like this...
If you try to confront people like this, you'll notice there's an immediate defensive reaction of lashing out at the person who dares even question it.
Why would you do this?
Why wouldn't you?
What's wrong with you that you don't do it?
I've had that...
The bottom line is you can't hide these stats any longer.
The numbers are out.
And Trump is going to have to...
Find a way to address and not do a 180.
My blueprint, the groundwork for what he's gotta do, and he'll come out and say it.
What they've done with Operation Warp Speed was never what they intended to do with Operation Warp Speed.
It was not intended to replace therapeutics.
It was not intended to be a one-size-fits-all.
It was not intended to be for everyone of all ages.
It was intended to be targeting the most vulnerable demographics.
80 and up.
I'm joking, but old people, sick people.
It was never intended to be one-size-fits-all for six months and up.
And what Biden's administration did with Operation Warp Speed was never what the raison d 'etre, the initial purpose, was supposed to be.
A, they bastardized it.
They bastardized it to make a one-size-fits-all and go after everybody regardless of actual risk profile to COVID.
And they also lied about it.
Period.
Pfizer withheld information from me.
Fauci withheld information from me.
Because you know that they did.
Unless they didn't, in which case, they will be held to pay.
If Trump himself, not the members of his administration, which has to be held accountable for to some extent, if he knew that Pfizer was lying, concealing, misrepresenting, held to pay.
I doubt he did.
So he can say this was never how it was supposed to be.
They were never supposed to suppress therapeutics.
It was supposed to be a perfect...
Tandem parallel lines.
Young people who are not at risk, get your therapeutics.
Focus on alternative vitamin D, etc.
Zinc and whatever.
No medical advice.
For the old infirmed, that's what we had it for.
They misused it, and they also lied to me.
He's got to do it.
And he's got to do it at some point, because the biggest legitimate criticism is he's still proud of Operation Warp Speed, which many people believe is attributable to the deaths of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people.
And I don't think it's...
Entirely wrong to think that.
Okay, so that's it.
Everyone, Rumble, if you're not coming over to Locals, it's getting Christmas time.
We've got about 20 minutes left before I have to go and do this.
I'm going to go warm up with a nice dry martini.
The link to Locals is there.
Come on over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com, where I'm going to thank everyone here, thank everyone there.
If you're not coming over, Merry Christmas.
I'll be live between now and New Year's, so we'll see each other before then.
But Merry Christmas.
Tonight's the night.
Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, whatever.
I dare say everybody loves Christmas, except for the protesters who are desecrating the trees.
Everybody loves Christmas.
I even love Christmas in Canada.
You walk outside, it's cold, crisp air.
There's Christmas lights everywhere.
I'll take some Christmas light pictures to show everybody what it looks like out here.
The missus is coming.
She's coming to see hi.
But it's beautiful.
Merry Christmas.
The kids are going to wake up early.
Demand that you open the Christmas presents.
Be disappointed or they'll be happy.
Maybe you'll have kids who are going to be grateful for what they got.
But go out there and enjoy Christmas.
You want to say hi to Rumble before we head on over to locals?
Did you tell everyone about my suitcase not making it?
I didn't.
It's a good thing it didn't make it.
We get about, after we dump the dogs off at the kennel, we're like, we're missing a briefcase and we're not going back for it.
Marion, packed for everybody.
I even packed the Christmas stockings for the dogs.
What happens is, as you're a parent, and she packed for me, like, look, everyone in a marriage, we have our respective things.
I also packed all the presents.
The presents all made it.
Just my clothes.
That's all that didn't make it.
Where's the camera?
The camera's here.
She had to go buy a lot of underwear.
Underwear and bras.
Alright, I'm going to go over to locals, but everyone...
Merry Christmas.
So no clothes.
And it's a good thing because we got an SUV.
It's a Hyundai venue?
We didn't have enough room for our briefcases in that Hyundai venue.
So that's it.
That's not the end of the world.
Long, long, bless you in the family.
Bless everyone.
Thank you very much.
You know I love hearing that.
I like being called brother.
I like being told God bless you.
Even though I'm not a religious man, but some people might be second guessing that.
Okay, so we're going to end it on...
Rumble, and then we're going to have a brief party.
Maybe I'll get a drink for vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
Thank you all.
Merry Christmas, Rumble.
If you're not coming over, enjoy the day, and I will see locals in 3, 2, 1, now.
All righty, locals.
Let's see what's going on here.
Export Selection