Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 21, 2022 - Viva & Barnes

01:56:22

Al Roker Hospitalized! CBS Fake News Contiunues... And Trudeau Lying Again? Viva Mondays!

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Back in Ottawa, there have been a lot of questions in the House of Commons about the issue of alleged Chinese interference in the 2019 election, and there have been a number of answers from your ministers who were there.
	What's preventing your government from giving more information on who those 11 people are?
	Our government has always taken very seriously the responsibility of protecting Canadians, working with our security agencies to do everything we can to keep Canadians in our institutions.
	Safe against foreign interference.
	I have asked my officials to examine these media reports and give all possible answers, everything they can, to the parliamentary committee that's looking into this.
	But let me be clear.
	Let me be clear.
	receiving.
	Any money from China?
	China!
	Can we go break down the anatomy of a liar and the anatomy of a lie?
	Let's just start this again.
	Good morning, everyone.
	Nope.
	Good afternoon.
	Come on, play again.
	Back in Ottawa, there have been a lot...
	Oh, by the way, after all of that cockamamie evasive answer, does anyone remember what the question was?
	I remember what the question was.
	Why can't you name the 11 federal officials who are alleged to have taken money from China?
	That was the question.
	Sorry, I might be talking too loud.
	I can't get this audio louder.
	Can't go louder.
	What's preventing your government from giving more information on who those 11 people are?
	What's preventing your government from giving more information on who those 11 individuals are?
	The 11 individuals who...
	Even Canadian media, I had to report, might have had some Chinese influence.
	And I love the fact that the idea of Chinese influence on federal officials is shocking and offensive because it relates to Canadian security.
	But training Chinese soldiers for winter wartime conditions on Canadian soil is somehow okay until it gets discovered.
	And then they no longer do it.
	Why can't your administration give us more information on the 11 officials who are alleged to have taken money from China for the federal elections?
	Look at that.
	Look at that face.
	He's like, he's holding in his own verbal diarrhea.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Why are you asking me this again?
	You're not supposed to be asking me this.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Our government has always...
	We've taken very seriously the responsibility of protecting Canadians, working with our security agencies to do everything we can to keep Canadians and our institutions safe against foreign interference.
	That's why we were training Chinese soldiers on Canadian soil.
	I have asked my officials to examine...
	Who?
	Why can't you identify the 11?
	That was the question.
	These media reports.
	Oh, examine the media reports.
	Give all possible answers, everything they can, to the Parliamentary Committee.
	Wait for the lie.
	Wait for the lie.
	Right now.
	Let me be clear.
	Let me be clear is followed by a lie.
	Let me be clear.
	I do not have any information, nor have I been briefed.
	I don't have any information, nor have I been briefed.
	Plausible deniability.
	Oh, that's great.
	Why would you not have any more information?
	You're only the Prime Minister of Canada, you lying buffoon.
	On any federal candidates receiving any money from China.
	Haven't been briefed.
	You know what the beautiful thing about that is?
	Don't get briefed.
	Don't get briefed.
	And then you can always say, I have not been briefed.
	And I have no one.
	Oh, that's great.
	Close my eyes.
	Block my ears.
	And I wish you would put duct tape over his mouth.
	There's a study now coming out that shows that if you tape your lips shut when you sleep, it might force you to breathe through your nose and might be good for, I don't know, something or other.
	Science community, my wife told me.
	I have not been briefed.
	Let me be clear.
	I have not been briefed.
	Okay, that's good.
	You're supposed to be briefed.
	You're supposed to have answers.
	You're a liar.
	And I also just love the way Melanie Jolie, Justin Trudeau always likes to have the women standing behind him.
	It's the defining image of Justin Trudeau.
	At least it's not Chrystia Freeland anymore sitting there in the background doing whatever she does in the background.
	Liar.
	Liar, liar, pants on fire.
	And I can't wait for Justin Trudeau to testify for the emergency's inquiry.
	Emergencies Act Inquiry that is currently going on.
	First of all, before we do anything, good afternoon.
	Nice to see you.
	It's been, what, it's been 15 hours since we've seen each other?
	15 hours, and yes, there's stuff to talk about.
	It's like, what's it like?
	It's like gathering around a campfire with friends, and there's always something to talk about.
	And not like talk about gossip and make fun of people.
	No.
	Substantive, meaningful news and law.
	We're going to get both.
	We're going to get both today.
	Okay, my favorite is when I started coming.
	I am sympathetic to people who may have behavioral disorders that cause them to do things to their own body that subsequently become publicly embarrassing.
	I think Justin Trudeau's got...
	Probably under a lot of stress.
	In as much as I loathe him, and I mean I loathe him politically, probably personally, because it's impossible that someone who is such a political demon could possibly be a good person in real life, but I don't know him in real life.
	But I imagine, nonetheless, that being where Justin Trudeau is is immensely stressful.
	I mean, you've got to walk around all day worried that people are going to discover your lies.
	Your scandal.
	Your treachery.
	That's got to be...
	Sleeping with a clean conscience, even if you can't sleep at night, is still a lot more soothing than what Justin Trudeau must live with.
	I know people think he thinks he's morally virtuous and yada yada and has no second thoughts about what he's doing.
	He's got to walk around all day figuring out, how do I cover my various scandals?
	How do I cover the fact that there are more pictures of me in blackface Then I can account for it.
	How can I cover for the fact that in 2000, I was accused of having groped a reporter, apologized to her, and I'm confident I didn't misbehave?
	How can he rest knowing that you have the WE Charity scandal, SNC-Lavalin, Aga Khan, a bunch of others?
	It's got to be a life of stress to live under the shroud of lies and corruption that is Justin Trudeau.
	So I still have a bit of sympathy for him.
	Oh my goodness, he cannot be voted out of office and shamed in the annals of history fast enough.
	Viva's rants on JT remind me of the Grinch when he says, hate, hate, hate, loathe entirely.
	I still feel bad for Justin Trudeau, but he has been the most destructive force for Canada in the history of Canada.
	Now we're going to get into it.
	But before we get into it, people, hold on one second.
	I didn't bring up the window.
	I got to bring up the window.
	Before we get into it, I made sure that I checked the box because I have a fear.
	I have a fear of God.
	Even if I don't believe in a capital G God, I have a fear of God.
	And I don't ever want people to think I'm immoral, deceitful.
	Concealing anything, covering from it, whatever.
	I made sure that that box that says this video contains a paid promotion is checked because this video contains a paid promotion and it's one that I have grown to like quite a bit.
	Hold on.
	I didn't share the screen yet.
	Oh, look at that.
	I got the same color underneath.
	Field of Greens, people.
	Field of Greens from Brickhouse Nutrition.
	You get it at the website fieldofgreens.com and it brings you over to Brickhouse Nutrition.
	It is...
	Powdered greens, desiccated greens, not an extract, not a supplement.
	Like beef, jerky, pulverized vegetables and fruits, all in one spoonful.
	Most people don't know you're supposed to have five to six servings of vegetables a day.
	Most people know they don't have five to six servings of vegetables per day.
	Some people don't have any vegetables, which I don't know how people live like that to each their own, but everyone should have fruits and vegetables in as much as possible.
	What is your way to do it?
	Get a spoonful, mix it in water, and you get, let me just read off the thing, a full serving of vegetables, a full serving of fruit, antioxidant power, and boosted immunity.
	It is a food, not a supplement, not an extract, which means that.
	Thus, it is USDA organic.
	And, hold on, my eyes are really getting bad these days.
	Holy crap.
	What did it say?
	Made in America.
	Made in America.
	That's what I'm looking for.
	One spoonful is a serving of fruits and vegetables, antioxidants, immune-boosting power.
	It's healthy stuff.
	And it's certainly better and a healthier habit than a Red Bull.
	Better, healthier habit than a soft drink.
	Even a diet.
	One of those things are toxic factories.
	It's good stuff.
	It actually tastes good.
	And I'm not just saying that to say that it tastes good.
	And, by the way, if you use the promo code HEALTH, Oh, there's an additional discount for Black Friday.
	Hold on a second.
	Let me actually make sure that I remember.
	Because it's Thanksgiving week.
	I almost forgot.
	Thanksgiving week, so there's an additional discount.
	Hold on.
	Let me make sure that I don't forget anything important.
	That's Black Friday.
	I don't believe.
	It's Black Friday.
	So if you're looking for something to get for someone you like, promo code HEALTH.
	And you'll get 15% off your first order.
	And I believe you'll get 10% off subscriptions if you so subscribe.
	But fieldofgreens.com.
	It's good stuff.
	I like it.
	I use it.
	I spent a half an hour on the phone with the doctor making sure that it's something I could get behind.
	He came on for a live interview promo on the channel.
	Fielded some questions.
	Vegetables?
	Like the stuff my food eats.
	Yes, I've tried that argument.
	You cannot get a daily serving of vegetables from a cow when you eat a steak, even though all that that cow ever eats is vegetables.
	That being said, I stand by my argument that vegetarians have no good grounds to be vegetarians because a cow can be nothing more than that which it eats.
	And if it only eats grass, when I eat the flesh of a cow, all that I am eating is the byproduct of grass.
	How can something turn into something else?
	It can't.
	It can't.
	Grass cannot become meat.
	Therefore, when I'm eating a cow, I am being a good vegetarian.
	Fieldofgreens.com people, thank you very much to the sponsor.
	It's a good product, and now you know.
	Pick it, lick it, roll it, flick it.
	That has to be a booger joke.
	Oh, and by the way, thank you for reminding me.
	Robert Gallagher.
	Superchats.
	Anybody who wants to support the channel, thank you very much.
	You don't have to, but if you choose to do it, I greatly appreciate it.
	YouTube takes 30% of all those Superchats.
	If you don't want to support YouTube, but you want to support the channel, we're simultaneously streaming on Rumble.
	The link to Rumble is pinned, so you can go there when we shut this down here in a few minutes.
	Rumble has a thing called Rumble Rants, like Super Chats.
	They take 20%.
	Better for the creator, better for the platform.
	To support a platform that actually supports free speech.
	What about Al?
	We're getting to Al.
	Don't worry about it.
	We're getting to Al.
	Oh, it's a weed joke.
	Well, hold on a second.
	That would explain why I don't get it.
	What was I just about to say?
	Rumble?
	Oh yes, that's right.
	No medical advice.
	No medical advice, people.
	When I cite anything, I'll cite a doctor so that I can cover my tushy.
	CMT.
	Or cover your arse, as we like to say.
	No medical advice.
	No legal advice.
	No election fornification advice.
	But we's going to talk about some stuff today.
	Lol.
	Viva got a sponsor.
	Now he can afford a haircut finally.
	Never.
	Never.
	I only sub for the hair.
	I need to update the stream app.
	I need to update my stream photo because the hair is way too short.
	Save the planet.
	Eat the farting cows.
	Meat is good.
	Period.
	I appreciate people.
	Okay, forget it.
	A discussion for another day.
	What do we want to start with?
	We got Al Roker.
	We got How Not to Lawyer, courtesy of Paul Champ from the Ottawa Emergencies Act Commission.
	We've got so much.
	Let's start with the video that I was going to start with, actually.
	Let's start with this.
	Oh, we're going to get to Kanye, by the way.
	Hold on.
	I got a lot of notes in the background.
	We're going to get to this guy, Jeremy Nollet, who's a Canadian politician, pushing the jibby-jab with impunity.
	It's beautiful.
	Oh, you know why it's not in my backdrop?
	Because I just tweeted it when I was walking the dog.
	Hold on.
	Twitter.
	Here we go.
	There are two rules, but really one rule of law.
	And it has an exception.
	If anybody has not seen what I humbly think is the best law movie ever, a civil action, John Travolta, Robert Duvall, and I forget who else is in it.
	The cardinal rule of law, or at the very least, litigation, cross-examination.
	The cardinal rule.
	It's a cliche.
	It's a meme.
	It's a kid knows it, and the kid will not know why they know it.
	Never ask a question to which you do not know the answer.
	Now, there is an exception in law and strategy here.
	You can ask a question when it doesn't matter what the answer is, because either answer is going to doom the person.
	You can ask that.
	There are very few situations in which that superseding rule trumps the original rule of not asking a question, To which you do not know the answer.
	Paul Champ is one of the lawyers at the Emergencies Act inquiry, which comes to an end this week.
	For those of you who have been following the channel, you know what the Emergencies Act inquiry is.
	Subsequent to Justin Trudeau's, in my humble opinion, abusive, unconstitutional, and in as much as it could be unlawful, unlawful invocation of the Emergencies Act, under the law, Within a certain period of time, there has to be an investigation, a commission, to investigate the circumstances surrounding the invocation of the Emergencies Act.
	We are now living through that inquiry.
	Now, the inquiry is not, despite what some people think it is, it's not a reaffirming of the government's decision, sort of like a uni-party.
	What's the opposite of bipartisan?
	A partisan.
	Oh, shit.
	That's going to be clipped.
	What's the opposite of bipartisan, people?
	Unlike the January 6th committee, this inquiry is in fact bipartisan.
	It's pluripartisan.
	There are many diverging interests, and they are conducting this inquiry in an actual adversarial sense.
	To investigate Justin Trudeau's invocation of the Emergencies Act, you have various parties.
	You have the government.
	Which is an interested party in that it wants to defend its decision to invoke the act.
	So everything they're going to adduce as evidence, all of their partisan framing is, we had no choice, it was necessary.
	You have the commission itself, and that's supposed to be the neutral element.
	Not pro-government, and not pro-protesters, not pro-anybody.
	They're there to get to the bottom of it.
	And so they ask questions in a neutral, objective fashion just to get the facts out.
	You then have the Coalition of Ottawa Citizens, partisan.
	They want to show how hard their lives were under the protest, that the government was justified in invoking the Emergencies Act because OPP, the Ontario Provincial Police, OPS, the Ottawa Police Services, incapable of resolving the occupation.
	And so it was necessary.
	You have the OPP.
	What their interest is, I'm not exactly certain, but they are interested parties in that they want to defend their own conduct.
	Same thing for the OPS.
	You have the convoy.
	And the convoy wants to show they're an interested party, partisan.
	They want to show that it was absolutely abusive to invoke the act.
	There was no emergency, no nothing, no violence, yet nothing.
	It was abusive constitutional overreach and should be sanctioned.
	In as much as this commission can sanction, which it can't, it can only issue conclusions, recommendations, etc.
	So it is a truly bipartisan or pluralist show.
	And it is a bit of a show.
	Who's down with OPP?
	Yeah, you know me.
	That's never going to get old, by the way.
	So Paul Champ is representing the members of the class action lawsuit, Zexy Lee, who's one of the parties as well.
	Paul Champ, I don't judge broadly individuals, period.
	No but.
	But he's got a bumper sticker on his computer that has been in plain sight for the better part of this commission that says, tax the rich.
	I just watched the documentary Eat the Rich on GameStop.
	We'll talk about that later today as well.
	I'm not judging the person, but I'm coming to conclusions.
	The lawyer representing Zexy Lee and the other petitioners to the class action that's seeking like $300 million in damages from this protest.
	Has a bumper sticker on his computer that he brought to court that he made visible for the cameras that says, tax the rich.
	I question his litigator skills.
	People can make fun of me all day long.
	I'm an eccentric, a wacko.
	I don't practice law anymore.
	I must have sucked.
	Okay.
	I am used to those baseless and ignorant critiques.
	I was good and I was damn good.
	I don't talk about it very much because I don't like talking about those types of things.
	I was known as a bulldog or a pit bull.
	I forget which.
	I do a lot of things badly.
	I do some things very well.
	Multitask, cross-examine, listen, detect lies, detect buffoonery.
	And I've got a good memory.
	I don't draft without making typos, but you grow to live with that.
	So setting all that aside.
	13 years of practice.
	I was good.
	So set those insults aside.
	I can tell you what the problem is here.
	We're going to listen to this once, and then we're going to flesh it out a little bit.
	This is Paul Champ.
	He's interviewing someone from the government police.
	I forget who they're interviewing.
	Oh, crap.
	I forgot that.
	You see?
	Weakness.
	But, Mr. Vino, let's just be clear that if someone's making a threat against a public official because they're trying to influence that public official.
	This is Paul Champ trying to justify the invocation of the Emergencies Act on the basis that threatening a political individual falls within Section 2C of the CSIS, the Canadian Security and Intelligence Services Act, which sets out the threshold or the criteria for invoking the Emergencies Act through cross-referencing.
	We'll get there.
	That inherently falls under 2C, does it not?
	Now, it may be that you don't view the threat as credible, but if it was a credible threat, it would inherently fall under 2C, would it not?
	I think that's why we took a lot of pain inside the service and working with partners to better understand how the IMVE phenomenon was...
	IMVE, ideologically motivated violent extremism, which has become the buzzword of the days.
	But by the way, just pay attention right now.
	The person who's answering doesn't want to make Paul Champ unhappy, and he's giving him the indication, it's not the answer you're going to want, so I'm not giving it to you, and I'm giving you a very lengthy roundabout answer, so move on, which Paul Champ does not.
	interacting with the CSIS Act.
	Ms. Khan walked us through earlier a description of how we go through the process of understanding this, which would be the sphere of CSIS responsibility, but He's not reading the witness right now.
	The witness does not want to give the answer that he needs to give to this question, and so he's giving a roundabout evasive answer.
	To indicate the answer is not going to be what you want.
	What I'm saying is that this is not black and white.
	It's dynamic.
	And this is why people talk to each other on an ongoing basis.
	Sir, please, I'd like to give you lots of...
	Normally, I'd like to give witnesses full-time to answer, but I only have a limited time.
	I'm just trying to get an answer because I believe I've asked it a few times here.
	You have asked it a few times and he's avoided the answer a few times.
	What might that tell you, Mr. Champ?
	If someone is threatening a public official because they want to influence that public official to take some policy choice, does that not inherently fall under 2C?
	Yes or no?
	Each case is look on a case-by-case basis.
	By the way, did you notice the witness's face?
	Look at how he goes like this, which also should be an answer.
	Yes or no?
	Look at his face.
	There.
	Each case is look on a case-by-case basis, and it would not be, you know, a default proposition.
	So if someone's threatening to kill a mayor or a premier because they want them to drop a public health measure, that does not necessarily fall under two Cs.
	Is that your testimony, sir?
	Yes, it is.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	You can't argue your way into the answer that you want.
	Let me just say it's section 2C CSIS.
	So this is...
	In order to justify the invocation of the Emergencies Act, which is the replacement to Canada's War Measures Act, there has to be a threat to national security, infrastructure, etc., etc.
	From what I understand, and this is probably learning material for any lawyer, Canadian or otherwise, because it's never been invoked before, the Emergencies Act, as the criteria for national security, threat, or whatever, it points back or cross-references.
	What is this called?
	The Canadian Security Intelligence Services Act.
	And it says, in this act, and we go down to, where was it?
	Here.
	Threats to security of Canada.
	Are we looking at the same thing?
	We are.
	Threats to security of Canada means, and we go down to C, to C. By the way, when you're a kid, to C is to C, to she.
	Activities within or relating to Canada directed toward or in support of the threat or use of act of serious violence against persons of Canada, persons or property of Canada for the purposes of achieving political terrorism.
	I mean, that's another word for terrorism.
	So, Paul Champ, in trying to compel this witness to give an answer that is not the truthful answer because it's just not the case, wants this witness to say, any threat...
	Against any public official, at any time, by definition, is Section 2C of the CSIS Act, and therefore, necessarily, by definition, intrinsically, inherently, fundamentally, triggers or justifies the invocation of the Emergencies Act, to which the guy said no.
	And if Paul Champ had been listening to this witness and listening to his body language, he would have known he was not going to get the answer that he thought he was going to get or that he wanted because it's not the right answer.
	Masterclass in how not to ask a question, how not to conduct a cross-examination.
	Don't ask a question if you don't know the answer unless it's one of those rare cases where either answer is going to damn you or damn the witness.
	And rule number two, when you're in a hole, stop digging.
	Or the Viva Fry variation.
	When you've stepped in dog do, stop running around the house.
	Dude stepped in dog crap and went nuts.
	And then he was jumping off the walls.
	He was getting poop in places where he's not even going to be able to clean it from.
	So that was the fun part of watching this morning.
	Rob A. in Rumble says, not the right question.
	Not the right question indeed.
	Yeah, so it's more the same.
	Now, the big issue or the big news of the week, apparently, apparently or allegedly, we'll see if it happens.
	Justin Trudeau to testify at emergencies.
	Justin Trudeau is supposed to testify this week.
	Let's see where the...
	Here we go, National Post.
	Justin Trudeau is supposed to testify this week.
	I've made a prediction that he won't because he's a coward.
	On Twitter, can't take it down.
	I might be wrong, but it'll be one of those things where I will be happy to be wrong.
	If Justin Trudeau testifies, I will be sipping on a cup of Field of Greens, watching that live, and reacting in real time.
	Justin Trudeau, to face the Emergencies Act inquiries, big question.
	Why did you do it?
	Well, it's very complicated.
	There was immediate threats of sexual assault as confirmed by pathological liar Mark Mendocino.
	There were bouncy castles.
	By the way, get your bouncy castles happen shirt at Viva Frye.
	I'll show you that in a second.
	When Trudeau and his ministers appear before the commission this week, they will have to explain why they felt their judgment was better.
	When?
	When?
	If?
	Justin Trudeau.
	We'll see, man.
	If he testifies, if he actually shows up, my goodness, it's going to be amazing.
	The inquiry itself is triggered automatically by language in the act.
	You all know that now because we get smarter together.
	Trudeau's cabinet set the terms of the inquiry by asking Justice Rouleau to look at issues around alleged foreign funding for the Freedom Convoy.
	That's funny.
	It's funny.
	Foreign funding for the Freedom Convoy.
	When there's alleged foreign funding of federal government elected officials.
	Am I wearing the confession through projection?
	Nope.
	A little confession through projection there, Justin Trudeau.
	You think your enemies are doing what you're doing because that's the framework through which you see the world.
	But in his opening statements, Rouleau made it clear he considered the inquiry's goal to be...
	Its focus will remain squarely on the decision of the federal government.
	Why did it declare an emergency?
	How did it use its powers?
	And were those actions appropriate?
	Rouleau said.
	Oh!
	I will, I will, I'll have a WWE climax.
	You know, that gif of the guy in his seat.
	If Rouleau asks Trudeau questions and gets mad at Trudeau for his pathologically evasive, disingenuous, dishonest answers.
	Oh!
	We'll watch it together in real time, people.
	But let's just see if there's a date on when Trudeau is supposed to testify.
	Threats to security of Canada.
	On February 14, Trudeau declared a public emergency, yada yada, an emergency that arises threats to the security of Canada.
	And then it goes here.
	The phrase threats to security of Canada has a specific definition, the same definition as in CSIS.
	And as Paul Champ, just...
	Sadly discovered.
	No, Paul Champ, it doesn't mean that every time someone threatens an elected official, you invoke the Emergencies Act, you buffoon.
	Respectfully submitted.
	Can't call people buffoons in courts.
	Buffoon is my conclusion from Acts of Buffoonery.
	When Trudeau and his cabinet colleagues appear before the commission next week.
	Next week?
	No, no, no, no, no.
	When is this from?
	This is not going on next week.
	No, this ends this week.
	This ends this week.
	Okay, well, I'll get clear on the tape.
	Okay.
	When was this article written?
	No, this week is supposed to be the last week.
	Oh, maybe it is next week.
	Oh, gosh, another week?
	No, this cannot go into December.
	Maybe it got an extra week because it was taking too long.
	When Trudeau takes the cabinets, yada, yada, yada, they will have to explain why they followed the judgment.
	Okay.
	Trudeau and several of his cabinets will swear an oath and face questions both from inquiry counsel and from lawyers representing provincial government.
	Oh my goodness.
	Okay.
	Well, anyways, the rest of it we know.
	CSIS advised that implementation of the Emergencies Act would likely galvanize the anti-government narratives within the convoy and further the radicalization of some towards violence, it said.
	Yep.
	And Trudeau knew that, and that's why he invoked it.
	Because he wanted that further radicalization, and he wanted that violence.
	He wanted that violence because in real time, invoking the act and lashing out in violence, it happens simultaneously, and in retrospect, for a disingenuous, dishonest government, it actually happens before the indication.
	Look at how violent that crowd was invoking the Emergencies Act was necessary.
	He wanted it, and he never got it.
	But for the grace of God.
	Okay, let's see what we got here.
	Did I get some super?
	So that's the latest on the Emergency Act inquiry for today.
	But I'll have to double check on the schedule because I thought it ended this week.
	Super chat.
	Al Roker in the hospital.
	Tommy from the Power Rangers past.
	Man, this week is rough already.
	Hoping you and yours are well, Viva.
	Power Rangers took his own life from what I read.
	It was not...
	We'll get to Al Roker.
	And it's nothing to do with Schadenfreude.
	It's to do with, at some point in time...
	It's immoral not to ask the questions because other people are going to suffer similar fates and they might be preventable or avoidable.
	Kangaroos, they're the solution.
	They don't fart.
	They also have exquisitely lean, healthy meat and they're pests in Australia.
	I've had kangaroo meat multiple times.
	It's actually very good.
	I would have spent less money on recycling and saved more if I knew the 2015 agreement would force expensive changes on large corporations that always fall under the consumer.
	Why didn't they warn us?
	I'm not exactly sure what we're talking about.
	But thank you.
	Let's go over to Rumble.
	Let's do this.
	Hold on.
	I'm going to get the Rumble link.
	Oh, there's a Rumble rant.
	I would put $5 on COVID excuse, says MedicDeb.
	Here, I'm going to give everybody the link again on YouTube.
	I can do it right through here.
	Okay, hold on.
	I just went live.
	Here.
	Let me put the link in here.
	Link again.
	Let's mosey on over to Rumble, people.
	Let's vote with our feet.
	Let's support with our dollar.
	And come to an end on Rumble and bring the party over to...
	End the party on YouTube.
	Brian Fox, former journalist, had Nazi flag at Convoy.
	Let me screen grab that and see if I can...
	Independently verify that.
	Okay, let's do it.
	Head on over to Rumble.
	We are ending on YouTube in 3, 2, 1. Ooh, yeah.
	Wait, not yet.
	1,500 people should be migrating to Rumble.
	Let's do this now.
	All right.
	I think we're alone now.
	There doesn't seem to be anyone around.
	Except everybody.
	Let's do this.
	Okay.
	We're on the Al Roker subject, so let's do it.
	Al Roker has been hospitalized with blood clots.
	Let me pull up the article.
	I don't have it yet.
	I have a tweet from Luke Radowski and Tim Poole here.
	Blood clots.
	It's not Schadenfreude and there is no but to this.
	I actually have nothing against Al Roker.
	I know that there will be people out there who will have something against Al Roker because...
	He comes on social media promoting a medical procedure, ostensibly for the purposes of encouraging others to do it.
	And some people will say, if you do that, A, expect it to be news if something bad happens to you that people might attribute to that decision.
	And B, you should not be promoting medical procedures for influence on other people.
	And we're going to get to the Canadian version of that in a second.
	For those who don't know, Today anchor, show anchor, Al Roker hospitalized for blood clots.
	Now, for those of you who are young, Al Roker used to be much heavier.
	I mean, I...
	Hold on.
	Let's just see if I can do this.
	Al Roker before and after.
	Al Roker used to be...
	There's no shaming.
	This is actually just...
	Actually fantastic.
	He used to be much heavier.
	Like unhealthy heavier.
	So it's conceivable.
	That this is a lingering consequence of unhealthy lifestyle before having lost massive amounts of weight.
	It's conceivable.
	What else is conceivable is that even if that's the case and then something foreign into one's body is triggering responses to predispositions, those are questions that people still need to ask and they're within their rights to ask.
	Oh, oh, he was overweight before and this is related to previous health issues.
	Okay.
	If that's the case and it's triggered potentially by current medical decisions, we're not really getting away from the problem.
	Oh, they were in remission and they had cancer previously, but some doctors say, well, some current behavior can trigger relapses of previous problems.
	That's still a problem that needs to be addressed, and certainly people are within their rights to ask.
	So Roker used to be much, much heavier.
	Al Roker is recovering after he was hospitalized last week for blood clots, the NBC Today show weather anchor said Friday.
	So many of you have been thoughtfully asking where I've been.
	Last week I was admitted to the hospital with a blood clot in my leg, which sent some clots into my lungs, Roker68 announced on Instagram.
	After some medical quackamole, I am so fortunate to be getting terrific medical care and on the way to recovery, he wrote.
	Thanks for all the well wishes and prayers and see you soon.
	Have a great weekend.
	Everyone should wish him well.
	Nobody should wish people ill.
	Even people you don't like.
	And now Roker is not a Justin Trudeau in terms of the levels of loathsomeness.
	Okay, let's see here.
	We love you.
	That's going to be about the size of the article.
	Roker was also off-air in 2020 after he went to successful surgery for prostate cancer.
	He went public with his prostate cancer, but there was another thing in here.
	It's not in this article, but it's in other articles.
	Al Roker, COVID.
	Because Al Roker had COVID in September.
	People Magazine.
	Al Roker has mild symptoms after testing positive for COVID.
	He feels well.
	Oh, we're going to read this, actually, because this might...
	Al Roker has tested positive for COVID-19.
	September 29, 2022.
	September, October, whatever.
	Oh, no.
	It's two months ago to the day.
	Yada, yada, yada.
	He's sitting out.
	He's sitting out of hurricane coverage due to the virus.
	Some people have been wondering during the storm, where's Al?
	Tested positive for COVID.
	Mild symptoms.
	Okay.
	Stand in.
	Fine.
	Let me just see if something else is in this article.
	Okay.
	So they don't make any mention of.
	Being vaccinated or boosted in this article.
	Um.
	So we don't know about recent boosted status.
	Let me see here.
	There has to be.
	They have to make reference to it.
	This was done.
	This was drafted before the issue.
	So, okay, some people have been wondering where he is.
	Let's just read through this quickly.
	He then joked, I can only imagine Steph can't yet again.
	Okay.
	At the time of publishing, Roker had not updated his social media.
	That he tested positive, but he did share a screen.
	Okay, fine.
	Roker is far from the first Today Show to test positive.
	Okay, that's great.
	Quarantined others.
	Yada yada.
	Savannah Guthrie tested positive in May.
	And Jeb Bush.
	Okay, so Jeb Bush Hager was also absent.
	So they're all getting COVID.
	Okay, there's no word when he'll be back on set.
	Okay.
	That in and of itself wouldn't be newsworthy.
	He got a clot and that's fine.
	It's not fine, but it's...
	Who knows?
	Some people are asking, hey, well, we've been told that blood clots were a potential side effect of something else, a certain jibby jab, and I don't need to go over the articles.
	Johnson& Johnson was polled at one point, or at least it was not recommended to women because of blood clots.
	It's a known potential side effect and one that occurs with undetermined levels of frequency.
	So when Al Roker is hospitalized, some might ask the question, but some might have the right to ask the question because he's been quite public about his vaccination status.
	Here we go.
	He's been quite public about it.
	This is Luke Rutkowski, who you may know from Tim Pool and other...
	There was something else.
	Hold on a second.
	Luke Rutkowski armed with a video camera.
	And a YouTube account.
	I pulled it out.
	We have another coincidence.
	How it started?
	Al Roker gets COVID-19 vaccine on live TV.
	How it's going?
	Today, Al Roker reveals he's in the hospital being treated for blood clots.
	We don't know.
	And the media immediately goes into, well, he had COVID, and COVID causes blood clot.
	Let's see this, because this is...
	Symptoms.
	COVID.
	This is from the flipping government.
	Who's this from?
	How do I click on this link?
	The CDC.
	Okay.
	Plot.
	Let's just go here.
	Symptoms of COVID.
	Why do I not see blood clots?
	There's studies that purport to show COVID.
	Can cause blood clots.
	We're not going to find it here.
	Well, there's also studies that show the jibby jab can cause the clots as well.
	Thank you.
	Yale Medicine.
	The link between Johnson& Johnson's COVID vaccine and blood clots, what you need to know.
	New data prompts the CDC to update their advice.
	We don't know what type of vaccine he had.
	All that we know is that he was public about getting vaccinated and now has suffered a blood clot.
	And you're not allowed to ask him the question.
	And the obvious explanation is that he recently had COVID.
	Blood clots come from COVID.
	Therefore, shut your mouth and don't look up.
	The ultimate irony and kick in the teeth, Is that I know there's disputes as to whether or not COVID causes myocarditis, pericarditis.
	There's arguments.
	There's studies that show that it does.
	There's studies that show that COVID causes blood clots.
	Well, if both potentially cause blood clots and the Jibby Jab, which also potentially causes blood clots, does not prevent transmission or contraction of the virus, which also causes blood clots, you have what we call multiplication of factors of risk here, people.
	You have...
	All right.
	If COVID potentially causes blood clots and myocarditis, okay.
	If the jibby jab also potentially causes clots and myocarditis, we don't know if it causes myocarditis yet because Pfizer and Moderna are only now doing those clinical trials, even though we were already told it's safe and effective, even though it's effective in that it doesn't prevent transmission.
	It's effective in that it does not prevent transmission, and it's safe in that we don't yet know if it causes myocarditis and on what skill.
	The jibby jab causes myocarditis potentially and clots, as does COVID.
	But the jibby jab doesn't prevent you from getting COVID.
	So you've effectively doubled your chances of very serious side effects.
	Unless there's a study out there that I have not yet seen that you are less likely to suffer blood clots and myocarditis if you contract COVID after having taken the jibby jab.
	If there's a study that pulls that mental gymnastics, I'd like to see it and I'd like to read it.
	Al Roker, bottom line.
	in the hospital for blood plots after having been public about his vaccination status and we're not allowed to ask him questions.
	Saving Canada podcast $20 Rumble rant on Rumble says, what legal percussions could you see if it was proven Trudeau deliberately colluded with the city of Ottawa and media to create the conditions for declaring the emergency act whistleblower perhaps?
	You won't like this answer.
	I do not see any.
	Legal repercussions.
	Maybe you can get another Ethics Act violation, which Justin Trudeau is already twice guilty of having violated.
	I don't see any criminal sanctions, any civil sanctions.
	There should be political sanctions, political repercussions, maybe a third ethics breach if it was proven that he violated whatever code of ethics doesn't apply to Justin Trudeau.
	By actively lying, actively colluding, and actively trying to cover up and conceal his lies.
	KGB2021 says, when it becomes a pandemic of the vaccinated, do we continue to make fun of them like they made fun of us?
	Can we watch Died Suddenly trailer together?
	I won't make fun of anybody.
	But if anybody thinks that was a $2 rumble rant, sorry, did I say that from KGB2021?
	I won't make fun of them.
	But for those who came out and actively promoted something that they...
	Whether or not they knew or thought it could, that could have caused problems for other people and they were pressuring other people with immunity to take this medical intervention, I might tell them to go to hell, depending on who they are.
	I might say, okay, we need to start learning from other people's mistakes.
	And I might also say, this is exactly why you shut your trap and you don't give people medical advice on the internet, any more than you give them legal advice on the internet.
	And you certainly don't give them medical advice when you are immune or...
	Have no potential of suffering any consequences from your bad medical advice.
	Do you know what the funny thing is?
	If I give legal advice over the internet and someone follows it and suffers consequences, I can get sued.
	Absolutely.
	And rightly so.
	Giving negligent legal advice based on incomplete information to individuals over the internet is reckless.
	It's negligent.
	It should be the same thing for telling people medical information, giving people medical advice online.
	Hey, you should really, everyone should go out and get jabbed and get boosted.
	Do it, yay, yay.
	Not knowing anybody's individual medical information and someone does it and goes out and suffers a consequence.
	Oh, I was just giving generalized blanket medical advice with immunity.
	No, they should be able to be sued.
	We'll get, and we're going to get to another example of that right after these.
	$3 rumble rant from Brent LH.
	I can't eat kangaroo meat.
	It meets me.
	I can't eat kangaroo meat.
	It makes me jumpy.
	I get that one.
	I'm not your buddy, guys.
	This was revealed during the hearing on your other stream.
	Oh, okay, fine.
	I got that.
	And MedicDeb says, I bet COVID is an excuse.
	But look, we got another example of people who love virtue.
	They love virtue more than they love ethics.
	They love virtue signaling, especially when it's absolutely consequence-free.
	Here we go.
	Let's see this dude.
	Jeremy Nollet.
	And so anybody who doesn't speak French, that's not...
	No lies!
	Oh, no lies!
	Yeah, right.
	Jeremy Nollet.
	Who's Jeremy Nollet?
	Chief of Staff to Alberta NDP New Democratic Party, official opposition leader Rachel Notley.
	You want to see some tweets of absolute stupidity, go look up some tweets from Rachel Notley, but you'll get a taste of it right now.
	That's who Jeremy Nollet is?
	He writes...
	Danielle Smith, the new Premier of Alberta, won't even go to a mic and urge people to get the COVID and flu vaccines.
	She's going to be the one to fix healthcare.
	This guy, who, unless I don't see it in his bio, is not a doctor, and even if he were a doctor, to get out there and blanket...
	Everyone should be urged to take the vaccine, which we now know, according to an actual doctor, has been qualified as a therapeutic.
	And that doctor I'm talking about, Kieran Moore of Ontario, she won't even go and urge people, blanket statements, willy-nilly to get a medical intervention.
	She's going to be the one to fix healthcare.
	Yeah, don't think so.
	Now, where's my reply going to be in this?
	We're in incognito.
	So my reply, I don't know how it works.
	It's going to be somewhere near the bottom.
	Does it go by chronologically November 20th?
	Maybe it does.
	It was last night.
	Here, hold on.
	Let's just see how far down it is.
	21 hours ago.
	Okay, so we should be getting to mine.
	Okay, that's funny.
	Come on, man.
	Where is it?
	Look for that avatar.
	God, it's funny watching these replies.
	Your wig, sir.
	Very nice.
	Gosh, the internet is funny and the internet is good.
	The internet is great.
	Hold on.
	How far down could I...
	I'm going to have to go to my Twitter feed.
	You know, it doesn't matter.
	I told this guy...
	Will you agree to be held personally liable, personally responsible for anybody who suffers a negative consequence as a result of your medical advice via the internet?
	Because if not, shut the hell up, Jeremy Notley.
	Shut the hell up.
	I'm sorry to swear.
	I'm sorry to get rude.
	I would actually say shut the F up, but that might be too much.
	Shut the hell up.
	If you're going to give people medical advice on the internet...
	And expect not to be held responsible for the consequences of that blanket medical advice coming from a non-medical professional.
	But they do it because it feels so good.
	Go get the jab.
	Has the lawyer that collapsed in Ottawa nearly two weeks ago come back yet?
	Have we gotten an explanation about that?
	Vaxxed to the max.
	Collapses in public court.
	Apparently it was supposed to be back a couple of days later.
	And from what I...
	I have seen has not been back yet.
	Don't ask.
	Al Roker?
	Look who got vaccinated.
	I presume he's been boosted however many times people have been boosted now.
	Blood clots?
	Don't ask.
	But everyone should go out there and get it done because I have immunity.
	Pharma companies' immunity.
	Government officials' immunity.
	I get to look virtuous, put people potentially at risk by giving them advice that I have no business giving them.
	But don't come to me if there's a problem.
	Oh, mamacita.
	P. Moyer says, you don't know how it works?
	Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
	Arthur C. Clarke.
	I love that.
	I love that expression, by the way.
	I have known it.
	That was a $2 rumble rant.
	Thank you very much.
	KGB 2021, another $2 rumble rant.
	Says, one more question.
	Are blood transfusions in hospitals going to become a problem in the future?
	Tainted blood from the vax.
	It's interesting.
	I've heard that.
	I mean, it's...
	I don't know.
	I mean, I...
	I have trouble conceiving of what the issues could be that would linger in the blood that could possibly affect somebody else.
	I would also imagine that blood transfusions...
	It's interesting.
	That'll be the next question I ask.
	Let me screen grab that.
	That'll be the next question I ask a doctor.
	Um.
	Big Lake says, it amazes me that anyone would blindly take directions off the internet.
	But the politicians have been blindly giving it.
	Just go get it.
	Imagine a one-size-fits-all.
	Your medical history doesn't even matter.
	And if your medical history does matter, well, we're just going to blame any adverse reaction on your medical history and not what might have been provoked of your medical history by a current intervention.
	You can't make those connections.
	And now, I do wish Al Roker the best.
	But I do know that there are people out there who are going to say, Al Roker had no business publicizing a medical intervention.
	And while I do feel bad for him, if there are other people out there who suffered consequences similar to his because of his advice, his pressure, that of other celebrities, politicians, influencers, I do wonder if at the end of the day when they close their eyes at night, if they feel any responsibility for that.
	I think I would and I might.
	And, you know, setting aside my stupid decisions, I am proud to say that I never supported any of this absolute, idiotic, inhumane discrimination against those who absolutely refused.
	And I protected their rights from the very beginning and as much as I ever could and will continue to do so.
	Now, on the subject of fake news, by the way.
	It's beautiful.
	Well, you know, we need the segue into this.
	CBS.
	Okay.
	Is this it?
	Look at this, guys.
	I made a meme.
	I'm not sure that I like the meme because I'll get to the meme in a second.
	CBS News PR.
	That stands for press release.
	CBS News press release.
	Says, this, by the way, we need a time on this.
	9.36 a.m.
	That's 9.36 in the morning.
	November 20th, that's yesterday.
	Let's put that into better perspective.
	That's Sunday morning, and pretty early Sunday morning.
	After pausing for much of the weekend to assess the security concerns, CBS News and Stations is resuming its activity on Twitter as we continue to monitor the situation.
	Oh, wow.
	After pausing for much of the weekend, you barely got half of the weekend in.
	Much of the weekend...
	When does the weekend start, people?
	Starts at 4 o 'clock Friday?
	5 o 'clock Friday?
	24 hours?
	5 o 'clock Saturday?
	36 hours?
	5 o 'clock Sunday morning?
	And how many hours are in a weekend?
	48?
	Well, no.
	If you go to 5 o 'clock Friday, then you have to go to Monday morning.
	Much of the weekend, you pathological liars, you dopamine-addicted Twitter freaks.
	You barely lasted half the weekend under pretextual security concerns before you were back on.
	CBS tried to put a little pressure on Elon Musk.
	Say, we're going to cease our activities on Twitter.
	And I'm like, amazing!
	Not only is Elon Musk doing his best to bring back free speech on Twitter, he's actually killing fake news on Twitter.
	Because you will recall, this is the same CBS that scrubbed their report.
	About how 30% of aid to Ukraine goes unaccounted for.
	This is the same CBS fake news propagandist liars that had to delete one of their own reports because it didn't meet journalistic standards.
	Because it might have said the quiet part out loud.
	It might have not been exactly what the regime wanted it to say.
	That 30%...
	Did I have that tweet?
	They had to delete news.
	By the way, this would be one of the good examples.
	Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
	Hey, CBS, why did you delete that report?
	And it will be one of two answers.
	It didn't meet our journalistic standards.
	Or we were told to delete it or pressured to delete it because it was damned embarrassing for the administration.
	Why are both of those answers damned if you do, damned if you don't, one way or the other?
	All right, you deleted it.
	If they got pressured by the administration to delete what was actually true information, it makes them Pravda-esque level propagandists for the government.
	Obvious answer on that one.
	Why'd you delete it?
	We got a call, and they said delete that shiit before people see it.
	Or their answer is, well, it got published by accident and it didn't meet our journalistic standards.
	Aha!
	All right, great, amazing.
	How did it not meet your journalistic standards?
	How did you publish something?
	How did you...
	Put together a documentary.
	How did it get past the levels of editing, scrutiny, editorial oversight?
	Makes it into a published documentary feature that you put on the internet and then you decide it doesn't meet journalistic standards.
	You're either incompetent on the one hand or corrupt on the other.
	So CBS, after taking much of the weekend off to assess security concerns, has come to the conclusion that it's safe to go back.
	It's safe to go back.
	Why?
	Well, now we know, by the way.
	Well, now we know because the day after they've assessed the security concerns and come back, oh, they're publishing Hunter Biden laptop stories.
	Hold on.
	We're going to watch this and we're going to react to this in real time.
	This is from CBS Mornings, CBS Heritage, who we're going to get to her as a journalist because some people like her.
	I neither like nor dislike.
	She may be a good journalist.
	You know what happens when you swim in a swamp?
	You get a staph infection.
	That works so well because when you swim in a fake news propaganda swamp, you get a staph infection.
	Staph as in like CBS staff?
	Okay.
	When is this from?
	23 hours later, after announcing that they were coming back to post on Twitter because they just could not stop.
	They needed that dopamine rush.
	They needed the clicks.
	They needed the revenue.
	They realized that by boycotting Twitter, they were doing nothing but cutting off their nose to spite their face.
	After assessing the security concerns, we feel good enough to come back onto Twitter.
	Just in time, because we've got a story.
	This is Catherine Herridge.
	CBS News has obtained data from a laptop purported to have belonged to Hunter Biden.
	The data came directly from the source, who said they provided it to the FBI under subpoena.
	CBS underscore...
	Herridge shares what was found during an independent forensic review.
	I swear to you, I saw this and I thought it was a two-year-old story.
	It's from today.
	Now, I had a funny joke.
	We'll see where my joke...
	Where's my joke?
	Where's...
	Why are my tweets...
	In incognito, they don't appear towards the top.
	I don't know how they determine the hierarchy because I made a funny.
	I said, was this tweet in your drafts for two years and you forgot to hit publish or you forgot to hit tweet?
	There we go.
	I'm going to go ahead and give CBS the benefit of the doubt and take for granted this is a two-year-old draft and they just forgot to hit tweet on.
	And we're going to have some people who are not going to get that that's a joke.
	The day after saying they're coming back because they're satisfied with security concerns, it's because they have a bombshell of a story to drop.
	Can you believe this, by the way?
	We're going to find out that the Hunter Biden laptop story was not Russian disinformation, but that it was actually real.
	Oh, yeah, most of us have already known that, Herridge, for the last two years.
	But listen, by the way, listen to the way they spin it to give it a veneer of news.
	So they can publish it as news.
	It's actually very interesting, very deceitful, if I dare say so myself.
	They have to have an excuse for how they're publishing what has been known for two years as news.
	And wait for the angle as to how they go about doing that.
	Let me get back to the video, and we're going to walk ourselves through this.
	And as Republicans take control of the House, Hunter Biden, the president's son, will be a target for investigations.
	So now, contextualizing it in something current, contextualizing a two-year-old's story, that's a revelation given current events.
	That means data from a laptop reported to belong to Biden could be crucial to the investigatory process.
	CBS News has obtained...
	It's data, not through a third party or political operative, but directly from the source who told...
	CBS News has obtained the data not from a third party, that being the actual guy from the computer store who handed it over to the FBI and to Rudy Giuliani.
	Not from a political operative, ostensibly Rudy Giuliani.
	It's news, by the way, because it's news to them.
	Because they got it.
	From someone else, not from the original two people who made it public two freaking years ago.
	Data, not through a third party or political operative, but directly from the source who told us they provided it to the FBI under subpoena.
	Hold on.
	Directly from the source.
	We'll see.
	Bottom line.
	Not from political operas.
	They got it from someone different.
	So it's new.
	It's news.
	Even though it's been out in the public for two years, suppressed by Twitter at the time, arguably but not arguably impacted the elections, was passed off as Russian disinformation by Joe Biden, none other than Joe Biden, by 50 members of the Intelligence Committee in a signed letter.
	Oh, but they got it now from somebody else.
	So let's run it as news.
	Independent forensic review to determine its authenticity.
	Senior investigative correspondent Catherine Herridge joins us now with what we've found.
	Catherine, I'm very interested.
	Good morning.
	You shouldn't be interested, dude on the left, because this has not been news for about two years.
	And people think Catherine Herridge is a good journalist and she was, what's the word?
	Held back.
	What's the word when you're, not shackled, but, you know, hands tied.
	She was blocked by CBS.
	Are we on CBS here?
	That's too bad.
	But then that has to be part of the story.
	Or maybe not her employers tying her hands, but maybe find an excuse to actually give credit where credit is due to the people who broke the story at the time, that being the New York Post.
	You can't pass this off as your news breaking stories.
	Tony, these House Republican investigations are coming, and that could be a challenge for the White House as we head into 2023.
	By the way, Tina Fey would be able to do an impeccable Katherine Herridge on SNL, if that hasn't already been done.
	In 2024, the laptop data we had analyzed showed no evidence it was faked or tampered with.
	We had analyzed.
	Digital forensic investigator Mark Lanterman was previously a member of a Secret Service Electronic Crimes Task Force.
	There was one thing that got my attention, and that was a voicemail.
	I said, I called and told him, I love you more than the whole world, pal.
	That voicemail, apparently from Joe Biden during his son Hunter's drug addiction, is one of many findings Lanterman used to authenticate what is believed to be Hunter Biden's laptop data.
	It's not believed to be anymore.
	It's confirmed to be.
	But can you imagine running this story now as though it's not known fact and as though it was not run a year and a half ago?
	You're confident based on your analysis this is Hunter Biden's data and that it's real?
	Yes.
	Things we all knew two years.
	Things we already knew for the last two years.
	Things we knew.
	This is not news.
	This is literally...
	Never paid.
	After 90 days, the store considered it abandoned.
	Then in December 2019, the FBI subpoenaed the store's owner.
	Can you imagine anybody who's watching this and saying, oh my goodness, how can this happen?
	Can you imagine that?
	There's probably a lot of people watching this and learning it for the first time.
	To turn over the computer and a portable drive of its data.
	Whatever happened to Hunter?
	During the 2020 election, versions were widely shared by Republican operatives, including Rudy Giuliani.
	This is their defense.
	We couldn't trust it at the time because it was released.
	It was revealed by operatives.
	I'm sorry, now that I'm listening to this for the second time, this is contradicted by your own state.
	It was released by the guy himself back in the day.
	Have the entire hard drive.
	But questions were raised about whether additional files were added to those versions.
	Oh, questions were raised?
	No.
	Allegations were thrown out into the ether.
	Lies were spewed.
	And by the way, I'd like to see if CBS was one of those liars at the time suggesting this was Russian disinformation.
	I suspect they were.
	Candidate Biden labeled the laptop controversy disinformation.
	What this he's accusing me of is a Russian plan.
	CBS News.
	That should be an impeachable offense.
	That should be something that gets someone booted from office.
	That was a bold-faced lie, unknown lie, and now it's a confirmed lie.
	Approached the lawyer for the computer repair shop owner to cut through the noise.
	We've always had...
	He's the original source that released it two years ago.
	One clean copy.
	And obtained a copy of what he says they provided the FBI under subpoena.
	We're going to stop here.
	That's the Weasel out.
	Now he provided it under subpoena recently.
	When he provided it two years ago, it wasn't under subpoena.
	When he provided it to Rudy Giuliani as his own insurance, it wasn't under subpoena.
	So the news is that now it was communicated under subpoena.
	So it's news to me.
	Do we want to keep watching that?
	One, let's keep watching that.
	Two, let's move on to something else.
	Let's keep watching it.
	Did I take it out?
	No, it's still there.
	It's...
	Is this the video?
	Here we go.
	Let's keep watching this just for a few more minutes.
	It's only...
	Yeah.
	A couple more minutes.
	Okay, here.
	Analysis.
	Were you paid by CBS or anyone else to analyze the data?
	No.
	No.
	I wouldn't want anyone to think that someone bought our opinion.
	Well, first of all, that's a bad excuse anyhow.
	I mean, you're going on CBS now and getting the best publicity you've ever gotten, so you did it for free for the publicity, which is kind of some form of compensation.
	Had you been paid by CBS, unless I had better reason to suspect your integrity as a professional, I probably wouldn't.
	I don't expect anybody to work for free.
	But regardless.
	We don't need a forensic expert to confirm the authenticity of the kid.
	It's old news, literally.
	Down the corner, it'll lead you to what we call our imaging room.
	Lanterman and his son, Sean, both digital forensic experts, recovered images of credit cards, a driver's license, social security number.
	Just the sheer volume of what we're...
	What other images?
	I want to know, but they don't ask that question.
	We're dealing with it would be difficult, if not impossible, to fabricate.
	And explained how files built up over years.
	It accumulated over time, which is consistent with normal, everyday use of a computer.
	There's some reporting about folders being added.
	We have read these.
	There's some reporting about folders.
	Some people have lied.
	Some people have thrown lies out into the ether in order to attenuate the severity of this story.
	Some people have lied to try to get away from this story.
	What do you have to say about those reports?
	These articles, we don't see that.
	So I believe that that's because we have a more pristine copy.
	The laptop and its contents have fueled Republican interest in Hunter Biden's business ventures.
	Hunter Biden.
	Can you imagine the framing of it?
	The laptop has fueled Republican interest in his business.
	It should fuel everyone's interest.
	It's not a partisan bias fault to say what the F was going on.
	The fact that it hasn't fueled the Democrats' interest should be the problem.
	Not that it's fueled Republicans' interest.
	This should fuel the interest of the Department of Defense, the Department of Justice.
	Say this May 2017 email outlining a proposed business deal with a Chinese energy firm is one reason why they have questions about whether President Biden benefited.
	We're prepared to subpoena Hunter Biden.
	We would certainly hope that he would want to come before the committee and clear his name.
	Two of Hunter Biden's former business...
	There's no clearing the name, even if he has reasonable answers to some of the questions, given what else was on that computer.
	Partners, including Tony Bobulinski, who received the email, told CBS News the 10 held by H for the big guy is shorthand for 10% held by Hunter for his father.
	After the email became public in 2020, the author of the email told the Wall Street Journal Joe Biden was not involved.
	How did that email become public in 2020, but not the rest of the laptop?
	Or how did some people report on that, but not the laptop?
	The author has not responded to CBS News' questions.
	Mr. Biden has consistently denied knowledge of his son's work or financially benefiting from it.
	I've never spoken to my son about his business.
	And also, I've never spoken to my son about his business.
	And the computer is Russian disinformation.
	Once a liar, always a liar.
	Chuck Grassley wrote this letter alleging bank records and financial data showed that Hunter Biden and the president's brother profited from a $5 million wire from a company connected to CEFC, the Chinese energy firm.
	They're going to look at every part of the Joe Biden administration.
	Doug High is a Republican strategist.
	A lot of this is also going to be aggressive on Hunter specifically.
	We're going to hear a lot about the laptop.
	Who profited?
	Was the law broken?
	Was it not broken?
	I'll save you some questions.
	I'll save you some answers.
	Yes, the law was broken.
	After two years of scrutiny, the laptop has not produced evidence President Biden directly benefited from his son's business deal.
	Directly benefited?
	What the heck does that mean?
	So is shareholding indirect or direct benefit?
	If there's dirt there, that will dirty him up.
	If not, those attacks can backfire.
	The White House declined to comment.
	Hunter Sawyer did not address our specific questions about the data or the CBS Forensic Review, but said there have been multiple attempts to hack, infect, distort, and peddle misinformation regarding Mr. Biden's devices and data.
	Throw more of those lies out there.
	What about those folders that were uploaded?
	Well, there are none.
	Oh, there have been attempts to hack Slack.
	And in no time did any individual, including the IT repair shop owner, Mr. McIsaac, have Mr. Biden's...
	That's an unfortunate misunderstanding of the law counsel for Hunter Biden and Chris Clark.
	Abandoned property.
	You abandon any expectation of privacy to that property.
	Not lost where you're looking for it.
	Abandoned.
	The lawyer also referred us to Hunter Biden's memoir where the president's son slammed the despicable opposition that purported to have a laptop belonging to him.
	It was his laptop.
	It was his laptop.
	I don't understand how they don't understand what the heck.
	Anyhow, it's phenomenal.
	It's now come to light.
	It's so undeniable that even CBS, after boycotting Twitter, had to come back just in time to publish that story.
	John McGarvey, $10 Rumble, says, Viva!
	Now it is an active investigation and they don't have to answer any questions from Congress.
	Well, isn't that convenient?
	And it's an active investigation after the midterms and as far as possible away from 2024.
	Suppressed during 2020 presidential elections and impacted the elections.
	Rediscovered the week after the midterms.
	As temporally distant from the upcoming 2024 election as humanly possible.
	How convenient.
	It's almost as though many people, it'll be too late for them to act based on this information, as it was in 2020, and they'll forget about it by the time it's the next time to act on it.
	It's almost like it's by design, deliberate on purpose, absolute strategy, well played.
	You diabolical snakes in the grass, well played.
	FairFroze55 says, much more believable if they said, we are professional.
	Our paid services to you are much as what we'd get charged any government entity, media, or private organization.
	Payment would not change results.
	Absolutely.
	$5 rumble rant from FairFrozen55.
	Anyhow, that's it.
	CBS, they can't stay off the platform because they need it.
	And I'll tell you one thing.
	Advertisers are going to see it.
	People cannot stay off Twitter right now, and rightfully so.
	It's a damn fun place to be.
	When you have the CEO of the big...
	If you had Zuckerberg actively interacting with people on Facebook, people would be more engaged, for good and for bad.
	I'd try to needle Zuckerberg to troll him a little bit.
	Having Elon Musk, the owner of Twitter, actively on the platform interacting with people, he brought back Trump.
	He brought back Project Veritas.
	He's bringing back, he brought back Kathy Griffin.
	I agree.
	Bring him back.
	Give them not second chances.
	They should start from scratch now.
	Treat them fairly.
	And in as much as possible, promote the freedom of speech that, you know, not absolute.
	Coming out and, you know, hurling ethnic stillers and threatening people.
	Protected speech in as much as possible.
	But having the CEO of the platform there.
	Actively interact.
	It's an interesting place right now.
	And advertisers will see it.
	Unless they're stupid.
	But if they're stupid, good.
	Cut off your nose to spite your face.
	Adidas, pull your ads from Twitter.
	Who are the other companies?
	Pull your ads!
	Guess what's going to happen?
	You're going to suffer economic consequences.
	Especially since you're pulling your ads probably from the most active audience who would buy your stuff.
	Or at least a more active demographic now that would actually buy your stuff.
	You're going to pull your ads.
	To placate the people who probably wouldn't buy your stuff in the first place and go advertise where?
	Television and radio?
	Enjoy it.
	Enjoy wasting your money.
	Okay.
	What do we have?
	What else?
	Marjorie Taylor Greene is back.
	I hadn't seen that.
	I had to start from...
	I had to start from sketch MFers delete my account.
	Okay.
	I don't know what that means.
	But, oh, hold on.
	And now you say MFers and it reminds me of the meme that I made.
	About CBS.
	And why I don't think I'm going to use this meme anymore because something about it makes me feel guilty.
	Let's see.
	Twitter here.
	Okay, that's the link for today.
	Oh, I'll get to that in a bit.
	Here we go.
	Okay, this is my meme.
	I'm not always great, but this is...
	The meme is called IOMF or IO this MF.
	And it's someone in a corner as they're being mocked by someone here.
	Now, I think...
	Let me see something here.
	IOMF meme.
	Here.
	That's definitely not the right...
	That's not the right meme.
	Let me see here.
	What are those things called?
	They're called mannequin.
	Okay.
	This.
	So I want to see pointing meme image flip.
	I think, I don't know the history of this, but I think it looks like a work of art.
	Here we go.
	Let's see this here.
	Okay.
	It's an object labeling an image macro meme format using a photo of artist Sheng Jing's sculpture, Bang.
	Showing a laughing mannequin pointing at a crying mannequin with a finger gun.
	In 2018, people started to use this image about one person calling another out for something or mocking them.
	Okay, interesting.
	I want to see this now.
	I want to see the origins of this work of art because I think there might be a meaningful spiritual element to that art in that it's showing the trauma of being mocked By someone who thinks it's funny to humiliate and disgrace somebody.
	It's a pretty darn poignant...
	Where's another angle of it?
	We need another angle.
	Cancel that.
	There has to be another angle because we need to see the art in the artist.
	Anyhow, so that's it.
	It might actually have a good message, that work of art, that should not be memefied, but that might just be me being...
	A sissy Canadian.
	But yeah, you imagine CBS, they think they're publishing the news today.
	IO, these losers think they're publishing news.
	They are the fake news.
	And really, they are the fake news.
	From deleting actual news to trying to boycott a platform because they want to make a point to coming back on their hands and knees so they can go sell more of their news.
	But to quote Charles Manson in Family Guy, if I haven't seen it, It's new to me.
	All right, what else do we got?
	There was something else.
	I just want to call out Mark Cuban for a second, and I want an answer.
	Mark Cuban tweets in response to a tweet that says, somehow I think Trump will manage.
	Manage is far different than succeed.
	I think he was rightfully removed.
	Your call to bring him back...
	But it's going to be fascinating to watch how you monetize the traffic.
	Maybe he sells more $8 checks, but it won't be near enough.
	Mark Cuban.
	Why was Donald Trump rightfully removed from Twitter?
	I just want to know.
	Did you read Twitter's justification as to why Donald Trump was permanently suspended?
	I'm sorry.
	I'm sorry.
	Permanently suspended.
	That's right.
	Also known as banned.
	Did you read the justification?
	If you didn't, here's a damned if you do, damned if you don't.
	Yet again, I don't know the answer.
	Maybe Mark Cuban did read the justification.
	Mark Cuban, did you read Twitter's justification for permanently banning Donald Trump?
	Yes or no?
	I don't know the answer.
	It's either no, in which case, if your answer is no, how can you say that you think he was rightly removed, rightfully removed?
	And if your answer is yes, how can you say that he was rightfully removed if you read that?
	Verbal diarrhea, mental gymnastics of a justification as to why Trump was removed based on two tweets, based on how they were received and interpreted by people on and off the platform.
	So Mark Cuban, I've got the question for you, but I doubt I'll ever get an answer because the answer cannot be a good one.
	But just wanted to get that off my chest.
	All right.
	Speaking of getting things off my chest.
	Okay, this will be an interesting one.
	We're going to watch this.
	People were asking me over the weekend, Viva, have you seen this?
	And I don't have notifications turned on on Twitter, so I don't see when I'm tagged.
	But every now and again, I go and Google Viva Fry Twitter and see what's going on.
	So I was tagged on this, and then someone sent it to me directly.
	And we're going to play the video, and then I'm going to explain my thought process and my understanding.
	So this has come out recently out of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.
	The college sent out a letter or a memo to all the doctors in Ontario suggesting to them, now so far they're not mandating it, they're just suggesting it, that any of their unvaccinated patients...
	That they should consider that they have a mental problem and that they should be put on psychiatric medication.
	So far, it's just a suggestion, but the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario should not be making these kinds of suggestions.
	This is extremely unethical, and this is a very, very slippery slope.
	If they're suggesting that people who wish to have bodily autonomy and don't want an experimental vaccine, that there may be something mentally wrong with them, that is a very, very dangerous slippery slope.
	Okay, so I hear this and I can identify that there's an element of interpretation in this.
	First thing first, I like to jump on things and I like to get outraged by that which is outrageous.
	This smells outrageous, but it smells a little too outrageous for my liking.
	So I need to see a copy of that memo or whatever it was, the email or leaked memo before reacting.
	Someone sent it to me.
	Let me see if I can find it.
	So I try to look around.
	It's not clear.
	And also, the internet is what it is, the proverbial memory hole of the interwebs.
	What was a website...
	The other day could be modified just as easily.
	And you'd have to go back to the Wayback Machine or whatever the time machine.
	And then even then, from what I understand, it's not necessarily the case that they're going to have all archived versions of the website.
	I need to see that before I can move on that and before I can get outraged by that.
	So I got a response.
	This is coming from Nadine Ness.
	The College of Physicians and Surgeons in Ontario is basically telling doctors to prescribe...
	And I'm doing this analysis with no judgment here.
	People can interpret this the way they want, and it can be a sincere interpretation, or it can be a disingenuous one, and I don't know.
	It can be an interpretation that I share, or one that I don't share, but that I still think is understandable or reasonable.
	They're telling them to prescribe drugs or refer patients to a psychiatrist if they don't want the vaccine.
	This is horrific.
	Yet another reason for lowered trust in our healthcare system.
	And we're going to read it.
	This, I presume, comes off the CPSO website.
	Let's see if I can zoom in on this.
	Let's go here.
	I'm going to read the top paragraph just so we can segue into it.
	While physicians are generally required to complete third-party medical reports for patients when requested, the circumstances of the pandemic support physicians declining to write notes.
	Or complete forms when the patient making the request does not have a medical condition that warrants an exemption.
	If you find yourself in this situation clearly and sensitively explained to your patient that you cannot provide them with a note or form along with the reason why.
	So, I think that looks like it's for exemptions.
	It is also important that physicians work with their patients to manage anxieties to the vaccine and not enable avoidance behavior.
	In cases of serious concern, responsible use of prescription medications and or referral to psychotherapy are available options.
	Overall, physicians have a responsibility to allow their patients to be properly informed about vaccines and not have those anxieties empowered by an exemption.
	So the first paragraph is talking about issuing exemptions.
	And then the second paragraph, just so you know, this is Orwellian regardless of the interpretation.
	It's important that physicians work with patients to manage anxieties related to the vaccine and not enable avoidance behavior.
	And it's psychotic.
	As though it's avoidance behavior to not want to expose yourself to uncertainties.
	Because we don't yet know about myocarditis because they haven't yet done those trials, but set that aside.
	In cases of serious concern, responsible use of prescription medications and or referral to psychotherapy are available options.
	I can understand what they are trying to get at.
	All right, someone comes in and says, look, I want to get the vaccine, but I'm so scared.
	I want to get it, but I have a morbid fear of needles.
	I just can't do it.
	Well, you know, some people say, I want to fly to Europe, but I can't get on a plane.
	All right, well, here's an antidepressant.
	It will dull your fear so you can do what you want despite your anxiety.
	That's how it's intended, I presume.
	It's to say somebody wants to get the jibby jab, but they have such irrational fears that they can't come over their irrational fears to do that which they want to do anyhow.
	Others might understandably interpret this to say, They're trying to get drug people up to get over their fears, which they qualify as avoidance behavior, but which are entirely legitimate concerns and qualify them as anxiety disorders or whatever and prescribe the medications to get them over that hump or refer them to psychotherapy.
	If we analogize this with a flight to Europe, someone always wanted to fly to Europe.
	But they just can't bring themselves to get on a plane.
	Claustrophobia, fear of death, et cetera, et cetera.
	I want to go, doctor.
	Help me go.
	Well, here's a, well, I don't know what the heck, a Valium.
	Take this.
	It'll take the edge off and you'll be able to do what you want to do.
	If someone comes to a doctor and says, doctor, I really want the jab.
	I know that I should take it, but I can't get over the fear that it might do something to me.
	Help me get over that.
	All right, well, here's a value.
	Go see a cognitive behavioral therapist.
	Get over your fear of needles, and you'll be able to do what you want to do despite your fears.
	Okay, I can see how people read this and say, anybody who doesn't want the vaccine, it's an anxiety.
	It's avoidance behavior.
	We will not empower it.
	We will not entertain it.
	And we will either politely suggest and responsibly use medications or refer them to psychotherapy.
	And from there, well, as we've seen in Canada now, we see what they want to do to those who they qualify as mentally ill.
	So I understand the interpretation.
	I think it's a bit of a radical interpretation that I would not give myself.
	But I would certainly say that reflexively treating what I think are reasonable fears as anxieties that warrant even the recommendation of potential psychotherapy is deeply, deeply troubling.
	That was it.
	That's my response to that.
	It might be too much to say what some are saying.
	It's an understandable deduction from what is being said, and it's scary.
	MedicWiz, a $10 rumble rant, says, have you seen this out?
	Now, I have to go screen grab it, but I can't get links, so I'm going to screen grab this.
	Oh, you know what I can do?
	I can copy it.
	Look at that.
	Yeah, I can copy that right there.
	What is it?
	Let me see here.
	Hold on.
	I'm going to go put it.
	What is it?
	It is...
	What's causing a 67% reduction in Australian birth rates?
	Yeah, that's it right here.
	Okay.
	I'm going to watch it afterwards.
	So this is from Malcolm Roberts.
	What's causing a 67% reduction in Australian birth rates on YouTube?
	36,000 views 12 hours ago.
	I now have it in the backdrop and I will watch it later, MedicWiz.
	Thank you very much.
	What do we got here?
	KGB2021 again with a $5 rumble round says, can we please watch Died Suddenly Together?
	It's on rumble.
	Jaws will be on the floor.
	Let me see what I'm going to do this because I don't, you know, there's fair use and I understand that but watching the whole movie while commenting, I'm going to see if I can reach out to the To the creators and see if we can do something collaborative so that it will not just be what I think would probably qualify as me milking the fruits of their hard labor.
	So I've screen grabbed that and let me see what we can do with that.
	Rhodey underscore Le underscore Sid says, Viva, now ask the College of Doctors, what is their policy on the use of antibiotics for infections?
	Should I blanket use them anyways?
	Hella there 25 says, I have a fear of psychotropic drugs.
	Now what?
	As do I, hella there 25. As do I. I once had a doctor when I was a kid because I had migraines.
	Suggest, recommend a prescription medication for migraines.
	And it was a very low dose of antidepressants.
	And I said, it may be scientifically ill-founded, but I'm not taking antidepressants to treat migraines regardless.
	I'd sooner live with the migraine.
	Okay, so that's the story coming out of Ontario.
	So now you all know.
	You know what it is, and you know what the wording was, and you can all come to your own conclusions accordingly.
	Yeah, let's just do this.
	The ADL is proving themselves to have supremely bad takes on everything.
	Hold on, why would I go?
	The tweet is unavailable.
	What in the what?
	The tweet's not unavailable.
	There you go.
	Shalom.
	Yay!
	One of the other many people that Elon has allowed back onto the platform, I don't think it was his first tweet back.
	I think his first tweet back was test, test.
	His second tweet back, or one of the follower tweets was shalom with a smiley face.
	Shalom, for those of you who do not know, is a Hebrew word for hello, goodbye, and peace.
	The Sanskrit, or maybe...
	Arabic variant is salam, which means basically the same thing.
	He comes back and tweets this.
	And then Peter Fox says, can you please just leave us alone?
	Now, I have to go to Peter's profile because I don't know.
	Freelance writer, table, T-meg.
	CNN opinion, which explains everything.
	Washington Post, which explains everything.
	Teen Vogue, which explains even more.
	Oh, remind me of what I'm pulling up right now.
	Board member at the ADL, which explains even more.
	Glow forward.
	Jewish star.
	Gay pride flag.
	Hashtag LGM.
	What does that stand for?
	Let's go, Michael.
	What does LGM stand for?
	Let's go Mets.
	Okay, wow.
	Would not have gotten that.
	Teen Vogue, remind me about this.
	Can you please just leave us alone?
	So, Peter Fox is talking for people, a group of people.
	And I don't know which group.
	I presume it might be, depending on the group, he'll conveniently take his pick.
	The ADL, I presume he's talking about Jewish people.
	To which I just said, who are you talking for?
	I don't care that Kanye comes back and says shalom.
	I don't even care if he meant it as a dig following up his Instagram post.
	I don't care if he meant it as a satire, as humor, as if to say, they can't get mad at me if I say shalom.
	That would make, that would be, can you please?
	I just simply said, who do you speak for, Peter?
	Do not speak for me because that doesn't bother me.
	That's not bothering me.
	And by the way, Peter.
	There's a block function for a reason.
	And unless Kanye specifically said shalom at that Peter Fox, he's not talking to you.
	He probably does not even know that you exist any more than he knows that I exist.
	And if that bothers you, you might be looking to be bothered.
	And you might be the problem.
	Not Kanye West for coming back and humorously saying shalom after I was just banned off social media for making Questionable?
	Maybe even offensive?
	I'll just say stupid comments.
	After he's back on, hey, what better way to come back and needle a little bit more at the reason for the banning or the suspension than coming back with Shalom?
	Funny stuff.
	And don't take life too seriously.
	You'll never make it out alive.
	But I want to just bring up Keen Vogue.
	Now that I remember this, by the way.
	You want to talk about something to be offended by?
	Anyone remember this?
	I mean, does anybody remember this?
	Why do I remember this?
	I wish this wasn't in my bank of memories.
	Let me just make sure that it's the right one.
	It looks like they've gotten into trouble twice about Teen Vogue's Guide to Anal Sex, Spawn's Backlash.
	This is from 2017.
	Teen Vogue's guide to anal sex spawns backlash.
	Now, you might think that we're overreacting.
	We're Puritans.
	I'll say we.
	I'm not me.
	You might think that I'm a Puritan.
	What do you have against anal sex?
	Teen Vogue, if I'm taking a guess here, is directed at teenagers.
	The market for Teen Vogue is teenagers.
	I wouldn't necessarily even care if they were promoting sex to teenagers.
	I would probably still have the same reflex.
	I won't swear.
	I won't swear.
	Pause your outrage over...
	Hold on.
	Which one is it?
	2017?
	Teen Vogue.
	Anal sex.
	Safety.
	How-to's, tips, and more.
	When it comes to your body, it's important that you have the facts.
	Being in the dark is not doing your sexual health or self-understanding any favors.
	With that sentiment in mind, we're here to lay out...
	We're here to lay it all out for you when it comes to anal sex.
	It's important to know what kinds...
	I haven't read this in so long.
	It's important that we talk about all kinds of sex because not everyone is having or wants to have penis in the vagina sex.
	If you do have penis in the vagina sex and are curious about something else or are finding that type of sex is not for you and you'd like to explore other options, it's helpful to know the facts.
	Even if you do learn more and decide anal sex is not a thing you'd like to try, it doesn't hurt to have the information.
	Oh, by the way, when it comes to certain types of sex, it actually can hurt to have certain types of information.
	I won't go into stories that I've read.
	Okay, I'm not doing it.
	I'm sorry.
	I won't go.
	You want to...
	Sorry.
	Here.
	The Guardian.
	I'm sorry, because I know that these articles exist and we should all.
	Rise in popularity of anal sex has led to health problems for women.
	Incontinence, bleeding, and STIs, sexually transmitted infections, are among consequences, say to surgeons, who want doctors to raise the topic with patients.
	That's as much as we're going to go into this.
	So, yeah.
	Peter Fox, always fighting for the little people.
	Works for...
	I'm reading.
	Bill Brown.
	Viva, this is so going to be clip and twisted on you.
	Now you all know more than you probably wanted to know earlier today.
	But, you know, always looking out for the little guys.
	Leave us alone.
	While I work or whatever his relationship is to Teen Vogue, an entity that promotes what doctors say is damaging sexual activity to teenagers.
	There's a word in the English language for that type of behavior, and it starts with groom and it ends with ing.
	Oh, no, sorry, I'm an idiot.
	It starts with groom and it ends with urs.
	Or the activity starts with groom.
	Adults teaching sexual activities and in teen vogue sense, teen vogue instance, anal sexual activities to teenagers.
	I'm not a Puritan.
	I'm just a reasonable human with an absolute ordinary sense of outrage.
	All right.
	Well, anyways, that's it.
	Yeah, but he's telling Kanye, leave us alone.
	Leave us alone.
	Don't say shalom.
	That's racist.
	That's anti-Semitic.
	You're making fun of a Hebrew word.
	You want to get outraged?
	Go to Mastodon, Peter.
	From what I understand, Mastodon, that alternative website to Twitter, that alternative website to Twitter, from what I understand, it's like the Reddit of Twitter.
	You got your mods?
	Everyone at the hall monitors are out, and they're looking for outrage, and there's no shortage of it.
	Kanye West, in the greatest act of anti-Semitism of modern times, has come back to Twitter and tweeted, Shalom.
	Won't someone think of the children that we're pitching anal sex on?
	Yep.
	Always thinking of the children.
	All right.
	One more.
	One more.
	Saving the best for last, by the way.
	I think we're saving the best for last.
	Let me make sure here.
	No, you know what?
	We're not going to say...
	We're going to end on the best last, and this is not the best.
	We just can't forget about the January 6th people.
	I won't forget about Brittany Griner.
	There's just much less that anybody can do or say when it comes to a foreign government imposing their own law on foreigners who come in and break national law, especially when people regard those...
	Leaders as authoritarian, genocidal tyrants, and yet choose to go to their country to bring the business that they conduct into that country, choose to break the law in an authoritarian dictatorship of a tyrannical, genocidal leader of a government, then get arrested, then get sentenced.
	Yep.
	It was absolutely unjust.
	I mean, it's inhumane what was done to Otto Warmbier in North Korea.
	You dance with the devil, the devil's going to step on your toes.
	And, you know, that's not to say play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
	People will say that.
	You go to North Korea, to a lawless, authoritarian regime, don't expect Western-standard-style justice.
	But then look at what's happening in Washington, and I'm not sure what's left of Western-standard-style justice.
	I won't forget about Brittany Griner, nine years for what she did.
	It's excessive.
	But the Ohio man who stole bourbon, coat rack during Capitol riot, gets three years in prison.
	You know, people tell him, don't forget?
	Don't forget about January 6th?
	No, don't forget about the inhumane treatment of the January 6th defendants.
	An Ohio man was sentenced to 36 months in prison on felony and misdemeanor charges stemming from his actions during the breach of the Capitol on January 6th, including theft of a coat rack.
	From the Capitol building, his and others' actions disrupted a joint session of the U.S. Congress convened to ascertain and count the electoral votes related to the presidential election.
	Dustin Byron, 38, he's going to lose three years of his prime years on this earth.
	Sentenced in District of Columbia.
	He was found guilty on April 14, 2022.
	He's probably served a lot of time in jail anyhow, so he might get out soon.
	Co-defended Robert Anthony.
	Yada, yada, yada, pleaded guilty on March 14 to misdemeanor charges of theft of government property and disorderly deceptive conduct, yada, yada, yada.
	He was sentenced on September 22 to 40 days in jail, followed by a year of supervised release.
	He must also pay a $1,000 fine and $2,000 restitution.
	According to the government's evidence, they went and flew.
	Okay, at approximately 2 p.m., they entered the restricted grounds.
	Thompson, wearing a bulletproof vest, unlawfully entered the building, then proceeded to the Senate Parliamentarian's office and stole a bottle of bourbon.
	Why does a parliamentarian have a bottle of bourbon in their office at Capitol Hill?
	No, don't ask the obvious questions.
	What are they, drinking on the job?
	Oh no, but it's a hard job.
	They've got to have their snifter of scotch after a hard day on Capitol Hill.
	Set aside why there's a bottle of bourbon in the office of a parliamentarian.
	He stole it.
	After being directed out of the building by U.S. Capitol Police, he re-entered, this time with Lyon.
	They stole a coat rack from the same parliamentarian's office.
	They're just, they're looting this guy's office.
	His bourbon, his coat rack, to jail for three years.
	What did Arnold Warmbier get for stealing a poster in North Korea?
	He got 13 years of hard labor.
	Ah, the justice system works in America.
	Three years for stealing a bottle of bourbon in a coat rack compared to 13 years for Warmbier for stealing a government.
	Paraphernalia.
	He sent a photo to Lyon of himself posing with the coat rack, as well as him yelling, woo!
	Additional yadda yadda yadda.
	Thompson later approached Lyon carrying the coat rack.
	At one point, Lyon sent a message to Thompson saying, we need to get the F out with this trophy.
	Yadda yadda yadda.
	Okay, fine.
	He was arrested following...
	Okay, let's hear it.
	He was arrested on January 25th, 2021.
	The jury found him guilty of one felony, obstruction of an official proceeding, and five misdemeanor offenses.
	The misdemeanor charges include theft of government property, entering, remaining in a restricted building, disorderly and disruptive conduct.
	Disrupting.
	Okay, fine.
	Following completion of his prison term, Thompson will be placed on three years supervised release.
	He must pay $2,000 restitution.
	I am making $95 each hour working online.
	Wow!
	That's the news from three years for stealing a coat rack bourbon and whatever other charges they could throw in there.
	But Brittany Greiner, unjust, mobilized the international negotiation forces.
	Oh, by the way, I almost forgot the punchline.
	And then meanwhile, what did the Molotov cocktail-throwing lawyers out of New York get?
	We talked about it yesterday.
	Steal a coat rack.
	Three years.
	Throw a Molotov cocktail.
	Molotov cocktail lawyers.
	Throw a Molotov cocktail.
	15 months.
	Throw a Molotov cocktail into a police car that was empty but for the grace of God because I don't think they knew the cop car was empty.
	Throw a Molotov cocktail.
	Into a cop car.
	15 months.
	Want to continue reading?
	No, I don't.
	Anyway, you can see it there.
	15 months.
	Steal a coat rack.
	36 months.
	There's a difference.
	Capital D in parentheses difference.
	Guy in the room 83 says, but Viva, she cried in the court.
	So did Guy Refit.
	He got seven years, I think, seven or nine years.
	It's hard not to get jaded and cynical, but on the subject of getting jaded and cynical, saving the best for last.
	For anybody who thought that the FDA was telling you that ivermectin was not a legitimate treatment, for anyone who thought that the, you know...
	That the FDA was behind ivermectin being pulled from the shelves, the horse paste.
	They never told you not to take it, according to the Epoch Times.
	They never told you not to take it.
	It was just a recommendation.
	FDA says telling people not to take ivermectin for COVID was just a recommendation.
	The U.S. Food and Drug Administration telling people to stop taking ivermectin.
	They didn't even call it ivermectin.
	I believe they called it the horse paste.
	We'll see if I can pull up their tweet.
	It was informal and just a recommendation, government lawyers argued during a recent hearing.
	The cited statements were not directives.
	I'm sorry, quote, the cited statements were not directives.
	They were not mandatory.
	They were recommendations.
	They said what parties should do.
	They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
	Yeah, because they said you're not a horse, if I recall correctly.
	They did not say you may not do it.
	They just pulled it from shelves.
	They just threatened doctors' licenses for prescribing it.
	Not the FDA.
	Those who were acting on the non-directives recommendations of the FDA.
	You see, none of us did it.
	Nobody told you to do it.
	You did it on your own.
	It was a recommendation.
	And those doctors who were having their licenses threatened for prescribing it, well, FDA didn't do that.
	That was the licensing body.
	And the licensing body says, well, we were just operating on the guidance by the FDA.
	It's the Spider-Man pointy fingers all around the house, or the we were just doing what we were told.
	They didn't say it's prohibited or unlawful.
	They didn't say the doctors may not prescribe ivermectin.
	Isaac Belfer, one of the lawyers, told the court during the November hearing in the federal court in Texas.
	They use informal language.
	That is true, he also said, adding that it's conversational, but not mandatory.
	The hearing was held in a case brought by three doctors who say the FDA illegally interfered with their ability to prescribe medicine to their patients when it issued statements on ivermectin, an antiparasitic that has shown positive results in some trials against coronavirus.
	Not in the trials that were funded by Sam Bankman, Fried, and FTX.
	Not in those trials.
	In other trials.
	I'm not wearing the politics ruins everything shirt, but you know where I'm going.
	Ivermectin is approved by the FDA, but not for COVID-19.
	What is it called?
	Off-label use, which is prevalent in the industry of medicine.
	Drugs are commonly used for non-approved purposes in the United States.
	The practice is known as off-label treatment.
	How far down are we going with this?
	Oh, this is a long article.
	I'll give it.
	I don't think we need to go through the whole thing.
	I'll flip it in the link.
	Liars.
	Just liars.
	Well, no, the FDA, by the way, yeah, sure there was a recommendation because they don't have the authority to ban doctors from prescribing it.
	All they do is issue recommendations that licensing bodies then act on to threaten the licenses of doctors who then go on to prescribe a medication that the FDA recommended, said not to use.
	You're not a horse.
	God damn it.
	You're not going to treat your patients like horses?
	How dare you?
	Hold on one second.
	Let me just...
	You're not a horse, tweet, FDA.
	We're going to leave it on this.
	This is the FDA making themselves a joke.
	A corrupt joke.
	You are not a horse.
	You are not a cow.
	Seriously, y 'all.
	We're American.
	We're from Middle America because we say y 'all.
	Seriously, y 'all, stop it.
	From the FDA.
	Dot gov.
	Thank you.
	.gov.
	Why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID?
	We've been...
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	The FDA has received multiple reports of patients who have required medical attention, including hospitalization, after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for livestock.
	Let me see something here.
	Let me see something here.
	Let me just see if we have the most effective ways to prevent spreading COVID.
	Getting the vaccine when it's available and following CDC guidelines.
	We never said not to.
	It was a recommendation.
	But we tweeted out, you're not a horse.
	You're not a cow.
	Seriously, y 'all, stop it.
	When they said stop it, it wasn't an order.
	It was a recommendation.
	That licensing bodies and orders of professionals were then acting on to threaten doctors who were prescribing it, to pull it from the shells, to criminalize medication, people, to criminalize the very practice of medicine.
	All right.
	We need to end the stream.
	Oh, you know we're going to end the stream on?
	Good.
	By the way, everybody should know I've got another channel.
	I've got Viva Clips where I put out clips from the live streams.
	I've got VivaFamily, which is where I put out stuff that is absolutely...
	I put now on VivaFamily what VivaFry used to be before I niched in on legal-turned-political analysis.
	We're going to end on a funny video.
	We pulled our kid's tooth with a meteorite.
	Yes.
	I'm going to give everyone the link.
	I would invite everyone to subscribe on VivaFamily if you want non-law...
	Political stuff.
	But Viva Clips.
	Share the link for Viva Clips around because I wouldn't mind getting to 100,000 subs on that just so I can have a second trophy because it's idolatry.
	And yes, I recognize that.
	What I was going to say...
	Ah, forget it.
	We're just going to leave on that.
	Viva Fry for merch.
	If anybody wants some merch, there's a new one out there.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	Viva Fry.
	You got to see it because it's made specially.
	For the convoy.
	Present screen.
	Chrome tab.
	Know the fro.
	Here we go, people.
	Bouncy castles happen.
	Yes.
	I like.
	It's Thanksgiving, so you can go pick up some merch if anybody wants to support the channel.
	I now have two bumper stickers on my car.
	I am officially that person.
	I've got my own merch bumper stickers on the car.
	Politics ruins everything, being one of them.
	What I was going to say is above and beyond that, forget that.
	We're going to end on a fun video because we pulled our kid...
	Don't start the video yet.
	We pulled our kid's second tooth.
	In our family, we have a long tradition of humorous tooth pulls.
	This one, brand new, hot off the press.
	I'll send the link there.
	Hot off the press.
	We tried to pull our kid's tooth with a meteorite.
	It didn't work all that well.
	But it's still kind of glorious.
	So, people, I say this not to give artificial hope or optimism.
	I genuinely feel that there is a massive turning of the tide.
	There's a spiritual turning of the tide of the zeitgeist out there.
	Things are looking bad in some respects, discouraging in other respects, and upsetting in a great many respects.
	But there seems to be something of a shift in this boat, this massive boat away from the iceberg, but maybe I'm just imagining it or wanting to believe it.
	But this week, if it's not this week, it's next week, the last week of the Emergencies Act Commission.
	We're going to see Justin Trudeau testify or not.
	But there's a shift in the zeitgeist that I feel that should be encouraging to everyone.
	But that is not to say to give up the fight, the peaceful, law-abiding fight.
	Go back to Twitter, everybody, and see the last two tweets from Donald Trump that got him banned from Twitter.
	Anybody still defending that needs to have their head examined.
	They should probably seek psychotherapy, jokes aside.
	Everything will be revealed at the end of the day.
	Three things cannot long be hidden.
	The sun, the moon, and the truth.
	And we are...
	One step away from the truth being revealed.
	That January 6th sham of a bipartisan committee, a partisan schlockfest is what that was.
	Go back and look at Trump's last two tweets and see for yourself.
	But we're...
	Things are changing.
	Don't give up hope.
	Don't get too cynical.
	And do not become the monster that you are battling.
	Conduct yourselves in a manner that would make your parents, children, and pets proud and you can do no wrong.
	And with that said, I'm going to go for a jog.
	I'm going to get some fresh air.
	Maybe go fishing this afternoon.
	But for you all, I leave you with Toothpull by Meteorites, starring Viva Frye and Son and Family.
	This is a meteorite.
	It is a, I think it's about eight pounds.
	This meteorite has traveled through the cosmos.
	It has.
	In space.
	In space.
	For 4.5...
	Billion years.
	Who knows?
	It's unclear.
	John McGarvey says go stack six golf balls.
	Okay.
	Be right back.
	Go.
	Have a good afternoon, people.
	Thank you for being here.
	You can see the thumbprints, they call them.
	Okay?
	As it breaks through the atmosphere, it gets hot and pieces break off.
	This has traveled through the infinite, endless cosmos.
	It has gone through the cosmos to end up tied to a dental floss to this child's tooth.
	Right here.
	Don't yawn.
	It's not having a start in your head.
	Okay, show the tooth.
	Just very carefully.
	The meteorite is going to pull a child's tooth.
	No, no.
	Where are you going?
	It's getting for me.
	Sit down.
	Sit down.
	Three, two, one.
	Oh, my God!
	The tooth didn't come out!
	It didn't come out.
	Hold on a second.
	That's a technical...
	Me too.
	I thought we lost a child when the child was going out the window.
	Let me just do this again.
	That's not supposed to happen.
	At least you're still in my tooth.
	You need stronger dental floss.
	No, what I need to do is stronger nostrils.
	Three, two, one!
	This tooth?
	This tooth.
	Get your hand in my mouth.
	Pull your lip down, please.
	Pull your lip down.
	I don't know what the finger is supposed to indicate.
	I don't know what this means.
	Are you recording?
	The meteorites come from space.
	I can't do it anymore.
	I can't do this anymore.
	Get your face over here.
	Four billion years.
	Hands up!
	Look at that!
	Is it going?
	It didn't work.
	Is it going?
	It didn't work.
	Okay, sit up.
	Don't move.
	Okay, sit up.
	First try.
	This meteor has traveled across the cosmos to call out this child.
	Is it out?
	No, it's not out.
	It landed in Campo del Cielo, Mexico.
	Only.
	It's destiny!
	They thought it's destiny was over!
	But it's destiny was not over.
	Three, two, one!
	It didn't work.
	It's out.
	It's out.
	It's not possible!
	The meteorite flies through space.
	That was so bad.
	Is the tooth out?
	No, whip it out.
	I don't want to see you smash that.
	It's out!
	The tooth is out!
	The tooth is out!

▲